HomeVideos

M5 MacBook Air vs MacBook Neo - Is Cheaper Really BETTER?

Now Playing

M5 MacBook Air vs MacBook Neo - Is Cheaper Really BETTER?

Transcript

288 segments

0:00

$600 versus $1,100. That is a lot of

0:03

money, and if you need a new laptop, you

0:05

might just be deciding between these two

0:07

and wondering if the Air is worth almost

0:09

double the price compared to the Neo,

0:12

especially in this economy. So, I used

0:14

both of them side by side, and it turns

0:16

out the answer was really not what I was

0:19

expecting. Let me explain. So, starting

0:21

with the physical differences, they have

0:23

roughly the same 13-in footprint,

0:26

design, and also incredible build

0:28

quality. But, I think the Air just feels

0:30

a little bit better to me personally.

0:33

It's just slightly thinner, you know,

0:34

the edges and curves are a bit sharper,

0:37

uh including those screen bezels.

0:39

They're a lot slimmer versus the Neo. Uh

0:41

a lot of people also hate the notch on

0:42

the Air, but it didn't really bother me

0:44

personally. I also ended up very

0:46

slightly preferring the keyboard on the

0:48

Air. It has a backlight versus the Neo,

0:51

which does not, and the keys just seem a

0:53

little bit more, I guess, crispy and

0:56

more clicky than the Neo. Same with the

0:57

trackpad. Um swiping with my finger felt

1:00

pretty much the exact same, but the Air

1:03

has Force Touch technology versus

1:05

Multi-Touch on the Neo. And Force Touch

1:07

just, I guess, feels and sounds more

1:10

premium when I was clicking the

1:12

trackpad. The speakers are also

1:13

noticeably better on the Air. They're a

1:15

little less tinny. Vocals in particular

1:18

sound a little clearer, and listening to

1:20

music or watching movies was overall

1:23

much more enjoyable. Also, the Neo does

1:25

not have Touch ID. I guess Apple just

1:28

cut it out to save on costs, which is a

1:29

shame, because I personally like Touch

1:33

ID. It just makes it so much easier to

1:35

log into my macOS user account, and of

1:37

course, use my password manager. Uh I

1:40

think most password managers these days

1:42

have some kind of Touch ID

1:44

functionality. Um so, it's just super

1:46

easy to just log straight into a

1:48

website. Don't need to enter your

1:49

password. Touch ID button, boom, it's

1:52

all done. Now, you can technically get

1:54

Touch ID capability on the Neo, uh but

1:57

only when you choose the upgraded 512 GB

2:00

SSD version, which is of course more

2:03

expensive. Now, in terms of ports, fun

2:05

fact, the Neo is the first ever Apple

2:07

silicon MacBook to come without

2:10

Thunderbolt ports. The M5 Air, of

2:12

course, has Thunderbolt 4, and they are

2:14

significantly faster than the USB 3 and

2:17

USB 2 ports on the Neo. Now, how much

2:20

this actually mattered though really

2:22

depended on what I was using the ports

2:25

for. Like, I just use a cheap standard

2:27

external SSD most of the time, and I

2:30

don't really use a Thunderbolt hub,

2:31

either. So, I found that the Neo was

2:34

perfectly fine. But, I did run into a

2:36

lot of issues when using an external

2:39

monitor. The Neo supports one external

2:41

display at up to 4K at 60 Hz, but

2:44

anything above that is kind of where the

2:46

Neo's limitations start to show. For 5K

2:49

monitors like the Apple Studio Display,

2:51

the Neo still technically worked, but it

2:53

was capped at a lower 4K resolution. 4K

2:58

ultrawide monitors, well, the image was

3:00

fuzzy and stretched out because the

3:02

resolution on some ultrawide monitors is

3:04

just slightly more than 4K, and the Neo

3:08

cannot support it. For those who use

3:10

dual monitor setups, they are just

3:12

completely unsupported on the Neo. It

3:14

just cannot do it. The M5 Air, on the

3:16

other hand, supported every single one

3:19

of these scenarios. Now, speaking of

3:21

monitors, if you don't already have a

3:23

monitor arm,

3:24

you should definitely get one like this

3:26

one here because I love being able to

3:28

easily adjust my monitor, either making

3:31

it higher or closer, especially because

3:33

I'm taller than average. So, the stands

3:35

that some monitors come with just don't

3:37

go high enough. The other problem is

3:39

that most monitor arms either sag over

3:42

time or wobble every time I bump my

3:44

desk. And that is where Whoa and Nuo's

3:47

Flow Lift Pro monitor arm comes in. And

3:49

big thanks to Whoa and Nuo for

3:52

supporting my channel and sponsoring

3:54

this section of the video. Now, the

3:56

Flowlift Pro uses something called Mecha

3:58

Spring, a mechanical spring system built

4:01

for long-term stability. So, unlike most

4:03

monitor arms that use those gas springs,

4:06

uh there's no sag or readjusting it

4:08

every few weeks, either. Now, the other

4:09

thing I really like is the yellow

4:12

indicator ring on the arm. Now, they

4:14

call it Precision View. Um instead of

4:16

guessing how much tension to dial in for

4:18

your monitor's weight, you can actually

4:20

just turn the screw until the yellow

4:22

ring lines up. It supports 13 to 32-in

4:26

monitors up to 19.8 lb. It also tilts,

4:29

swivels, and rotates in pretty much

4:31

every direction. And the click-and-lock

4:33

VESA mount means you can attach your

4:35

monitor in seconds. So, if you want to

4:37

clean up and make your desk set up more

4:39

ergonomic, check out the Flowlift Pro

4:42

using the link in the description, and

4:44

use code HN Creator to get it for around

4:47

20 bucks. But, apart from that, let's

4:49

get back to the video. Okay, moving on

4:51

to the screen, it was noticeably larger

4:53

on the M5 MacBook Air. And this was

4:55

probably the only difference I actually

4:57

noticed. Now, it doesn't translate into

4:59

that much like practical everyday use,

5:03

uh but I could squeeze in an extra line

5:05

or two of text or Excel rows. I just

5:08

think the Neo's screen is just a little

5:11

too cramped, even though they

5:12

technically have a very similar physical

5:15

footprint. Everything else was so

5:16

similar that I wouldn't be able to tell

5:19

them apart in a blind test. You know,

5:21

they both have the same brightness

5:22

levels, colors look very similar,

5:25

although the M5 does have a slightly

5:28

better color gamut. But again, it's only

5:30

something I noticed when they were

5:32

literally, you know, both side by side

5:34

with me with the brightness settings

5:36

perfectly matched. For the webcam, which

5:38

is something I use every day, I didn't

5:40

have any complaints about the Neo. And

5:43

overall video quality is comparable to

5:45

the M5 Air. The microphone on the M5 is

5:49

better and it has center stage so it can

5:51

track me if I move around but I usually

5:53

just sit still anyway. Now for most

5:55

people comparing these two MacBooks, the

5:57

M5 Air having double the SSD capacity

6:00

versus the Neo is going to be a big

6:02

deal. Now I have said many times before

6:05

on this channel that 256 GB SSDs

6:09

are enough but you do have to compromise

6:12

by constantly deleting stuff and storing

6:15

a lot on the cloud or on an external

6:17

SSD, etc. Now bear in mind only 206 GB

6:22

of the 256 GB are actually available

6:26

once the macOS operating system and

6:28

other system files are taken into

6:30

consideration. I find that a 512 GB SSD

6:34

just gives me so much more breathing

6:36

room and actually allows me to ditch the

6:38

SSD in a lot of cases which is really

6:41

nice. And it does make a big difference

6:44

during my everyday use. Now the RAM is

6:46

also doubled on the M5 Air to 16 GB

6:49

versus just 8 GB on the Neo.

6:52

Did this affect performance for me?

6:54

Well, there are two very different

6:55

comparisons to be made [music] when it

6:57

comes to performance. Everything that I

6:59

do falls into one of two categories. You

7:01

know, your standard everyday stuff and

7:04

more demanding stuff. I spend most of my

7:06

time on my laptop doing relatively

7:08

mundane things like web browsing,

7:10

emails, watching YouTube videos, etc.

7:14

And when I was comparing the difference

7:15

in performance between the two in that

7:17

basic stuff, it was very, very similar.

7:21

Although I did notice very slightly

7:23

snappier performance on the Air once I

7:26

started to load up multiple apps plus

7:28

having probably 20 to 30 browser tabs

7:31

open at the same time and all of that

7:33

obviously started to put a bit of

7:34

pressure on the RAM. The faster SSD and

7:37

memory bandwidth on the M5 Air certainly

7:40

helped here.

7:41

But sometimes you just need more RAM,

7:44

right? And when I had a lot of stuff

7:46

open and was constantly, you know,

7:48

multitasking through it all, switching

7:50

between apps, all that kind of stuff, uh

7:52

it can start to add up. But, that being

7:55

said, it wasn't something that would

7:57

make me want to buy the Air over the

7:59

Neo. It was relatively minor unless I

8:02

had both of them side by side and I was

8:04

like comparing everything. For the more

8:06

demanding stuff, like editing photos or

8:08

videos, etc., uh the M5 Air was the

8:11

clear winner every time, you know,

8:13

significantly outperforming the Neo. I'm

8:15

not going to bore you with a bunch of

8:17

graphs or synthetic benchmarks. I'm sure

8:19

you've seen all of that stuff already.

8:21

But this has always been a weird kind of

8:24

gray area for the MacBook Air, right?

8:26

Like it's a very capable machine and can

8:28

do these more demanding things, but if

8:31

you're frequently doing those things,

8:33

you probably wouldn't buy an Air in the

8:35

first place, right? And you would

8:36

instead get a MacBook Pro or something.

8:39

Even then, the Neo can still do all the

8:41

stuff that the M5 Air can do. It just

8:44

does it slower and less efficiently. So,

8:47

if you're the type of person who rarely

8:48

or, you know, never does those things,

8:51

there's really no major difference. For

8:53

battery life, the M5 Air is

8:55

significantly better than the Neo. I

8:57

would consistently get probably 12 to 15

9:00

hours of normal use versus roughly 8 to

9:02

10 hours on the Neo. But battery life

9:05

for me is very dependent on how mobile I

9:08

am with the laptop, right? Like these

9:10

days, I'm almost always around some kind

9:12

of power source, so I find that battery

9:14

life is less relevant. But, when I was a

9:17

student or when I traveled a lot for

9:19

work, it was very important. Not so much

9:23

being able to get like 12 hours straight

9:25

on a full charge, but for those

9:27

situations where maybe I forgot to

9:30

charge the night before or I had to rush

9:32

out of the office or the lecture hall or

9:34

whatever and only had, you know, 40%

9:37

left for the rest of the day. So, after

9:39

using both of these MacBooks side by

9:41

side for the last few months, for me,

9:43

the M5 MacBook Air was the clear winner.

9:46

Now, don't get me wrong, I love the Neo,

9:48

the value is just unbeatable, and I

9:50

would actually choose it if my budget

9:53

was limited or the Air's improvements

9:55

weren't relevant to me. [music] The Neo

9:57

has incredible build quality, it's got a

9:59

fair amount of features, you know, it's

10:01

going to be capable enough for most

10:03

people's everyday use, and the price is

10:05

honestly just too good to be true. But,

10:08

even though the Air is almost twice as

10:10

expensive, and, you know, not

10:12

necessarily twice as good, uh I'm

10:14

thinking about all of those little

10:16

moments during the day where I

10:17

constantly appreciate the features of

10:19

the Air that the Neo just doesn't have,

10:22

like the slightly bigger screen, better

10:24

speakers, Touch ID, so I'm not, you

10:26

know, manually typing my password 30

10:29

times a day. If I do need to do

10:31

something demanding on my MacBook, it's

10:33

super fast on the Air, plus better

10:35

battery life, trackpad, port speed,

10:38

external monitor support, double the RAM

10:40

and SSD size, etc. And these are all

10:43

things that I will take advantage of

10:44

every single day, and, you know, every

10:47

day for the next 5 to 10 years. Is that

10:49

worth the extra cost? For me, yes, it

10:52

is. But, honestly, you really can't go

10:55

wrong with either one. You know, Apple

10:57

has really hit a home run with these two

10:58

this year. Now, if you are interested in

11:00

watching more videos on this topic,

11:03

YouTube thinks that you will find this

11:04

video interesting. So, give it a click

11:06

and a watch, and let me know how you go.

Interactive Summary

This video provides a comparative review of the MacBook Air and the MacBook Neo, highlighting that while the Neo offers exceptional value, the Air provides a more premium experience through features like a slightly larger screen, better speakers, Touch ID, faster port speeds, better external monitor support, and higher RAM and SSD capacity. The presenter concludes that while the Neo is perfectly adequate for everyday tasks, the extra cost for the Air is justified by the cumulative benefits of its superior features over the long term.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts