HomeVideos

The best AI investments aren't AI stocks

Now Playing

The best AI investments aren't AI stocks

Transcript

917 segments

0:02

Well, hello and welcome back. [music] I

0:04

am Kenny Pulcari and this is Trader Talk

0:06

at Yahoo Finance. Today I'm joined by

0:08

Stephanie Gild who's the CIO at Robin

0:10

Hood and many of you know Ryan Payne who

0:13

is the president of Pay Capital

0:15

Management and also the host of the pain

0:18

pain points of wealth. His points off

0:20

the tongue, Kenny.

0:20

>> Yeah, right off the tongue. Anyway,

0:22

thank you very much for joining me

0:24

today. Really appreciate it. There is a

0:25

lot going on, right? We're in the middle

0:27

of this earning season. This is a a big

0:29

week for not only earnings but for the

0:32

Fed, for markets, for the economy, uh

0:34

because we're going to get hit, you

0:35

know, broadside by a bunch of different

0:37

things. So, let's talk first about kind

0:39

of where you think we're at and then uh

0:41

where you think we're at.

0:42

>> Great. I think we're in a time period

0:44

where expectations have caught up to

0:48

some of the numbers like if you look at

0:50

the over the last quarter earnings

0:52

growth expectations increased by 50% you

0:55

know across the board for the S&P 500

0:57

>> when estimates grow by that fast in a

1:00

quarter and I know it was coming out of

1:02

a you know a conflict that was seemingly

1:03

over but now seems to be coming back and

1:05

forth

1:05

>> seemingly not over

1:06

>> um that we're you know there I think

1:08

that's where you kind of get some like

1:10

concerns like our our expectations too

1:13

high and I think that's what you're kind

1:14

of seeing from day to day in the market.

1:16

>> Well, and I think we've seen that over

1:18

the last couple of last couple of weeks.

1:20

Certainly expectations in the growth se

1:23

in the tech sector were obviously are

1:24

clearly too high. At least that's kind

1:26

of the sense that we got from the market

1:28

action.

1:29

>> Yeah. No, I think what you're seeing is

1:30

not it's not like money is coming out of

1:32

the market. It's just rotating, right?

1:33

And that's what's interesting because

1:34

yeah, I run pretty broadly diversified

1:36

portfolios and I mean if you look at the

1:38

last month, you've got obviously energy

1:39

stocks are crushing it. Um unless you've

1:41

been living for today.

1:42

>> Except for today. But [laughter] yeah,

1:43

but you know or this week.

1:45

>> This week, right? You pick the day

1:46

really. It's like it's up $10, down $10

1:48

in oil. Um you know, financials

1:50

obviously have been crushing it. I mean,

1:52

they just blew it out at the beginning

1:53

of earnings season. Healthcare stocks,

1:55

industrial stocks, right? Material

1:58

stocks. There you go.

2:00

>> So, it's really been a great rotation,

2:02

which, you know, I love. I mean, it's

2:03

healthy to see that you're seeing money

2:05

flow to other parts of the world. And I

2:06

think that's a key point, right? When I

2:08

talk to clients, people start to get

2:10

nervous. You know, they're nervous about

2:12

market reaction. They see tech under

2:13

pressure. I go, "Listen, this is not

2:15

liquidation." Liquidation would be if

2:17

you saw them selling everything and

2:19

throwing the kitchen sink out the

2:20

window. That would be liquidation.

2:22

That's not what's happening at all. In

2:23

fact, to your point, uh, we're seeing

2:25

this, we're seeing money move from these

2:28

kind of high growth sexy names, and

2:29

we're probably stretching overvalued

2:31

>> into more conservative kind of long-term

2:33

might be boring. Consumer staples.

2:35

There's nothing exciting about consumer

2:37

staples yet. Um it's a place where where

2:40

investors want to put some money.

2:41

>> But I think we're also so we also manage

2:43

a diversified portfolio single names um

2:46

Robin Hood strategies

2:47

>> and um we we also like I think the one

2:51

thing that we we kind of underlying

2:53

foundation is that there's a there's a

2:56

physical nature to what has been growing

2:59

and that like you you can't grow AI

3:01

without more power. You can't grow AI

3:03

without more construction. and you pick

3:05

it without materials. And so I think

3:06

like sometimes the market forgets that

3:08

and then it comes back to it. Forgets

3:09

that and comes back to it.

3:10

>> Well, I think there's a, you know, it's

3:12

funny when you talk about the AI and the

3:14

data centers and all the kind of the

3:16

angst that builds up around data

3:18

centers, right? About what they're doing

3:20

to the economy, what they're doing to

3:21

the climate, what they're doing to

3:23

towns. And I think it's very interesting

3:24

because I'm not sure that I would be on

3:27

the side that if a data center is

3:30

welldesigned and it's in an area of town

3:32

that you know like out in the middle of

3:33

the country where they're making them

3:35

right where they're not disturbing

3:36

anything, you're not taking farmland

3:37

away, you're not chopping down trees,

3:39

just kind of the land, right? Uh I don't

3:41

see what the big deal is because if

3:43

they're contained, right, the water is

3:45

contained that keeps them cool and all

3:46

that stuff and it's not drawing on on

3:49

those resources. Um, and somehow they

3:51

can manage the electricity draw.

3:54

>> Yeah.

3:54

>> Uh, I I think they'd be a benefit to

3:57

communities because it'd bring revenues

3:58

in.

4:00

>> Yeah. 100%. Yeah. Well, I think also,

4:02

right, it's more probably politicized,

4:04

practical that what you're hearing that

4:06

these data centers are going to be bad,

4:07

per se,

4:08

>> right?

4:08

>> And I know the argument of like, okay,

4:10

increases a lot of jobs at first because

4:12

you got to build these things and then

4:13

where those jobs go later. But also like

4:15

what I wonder about is you have this

4:17

disproportionate amount of capital being

4:18

spent on AI data centers and last time I

4:21

looked you have all these other

4:22

inefficiencies in the economy like we

4:24

need more housing right

4:25

>> so you know maybe some of that

4:26

construction uh you know employment

4:28

should be going towards building houses

4:30

because we have like what is it like 2

4:32

three million houses short you can

4:33

correct me if I'm wrong um you know in

4:35

this country right now so I just feel

4:37

like there is a little bit of a

4:38

misappropriation of capital we look this

4:40

in retrospect it seems a little bit like

4:42

too much capital may be flowing the same

4:43

place

4:44

>> well it may But AI, it is the theme,

4:46

right? We're in the middle of this

4:48

fourth industrial revolution that's

4:50

happening. And so I think like

4:51

everything it gets caught up.

4:53

>> Yeah. I mean, I think the data like you

4:54

could end up seeing that there ends up

4:56

being like housing growth and stuff like

4:57

that around the data centers because it

4:59

creates employment. Then you have like

5:00

because I think there's people living I

5:02

mean I don't know if this is true, but

5:04

living in like trailers and stuff like

5:06

that nearby the data centers to help

5:07

build them. So I think you could end up

5:09

having a

5:10

>> communities

5:10

>> communities built around them. But the

5:13

old I do think like the environmental

5:15

thing is something we have to be

5:17

>> the demand for power because our our

5:19

grid is very old.

5:20

>> I wrote a piece about that and I'm like

5:22

there's our infrastructure is old.

5:23

>> Well and that but that's true right

5:25

everyone kind of accepts that which is

5:26

why it's interesting because you know

5:28

Elon Musk if he has his way he's going

5:29

to put him in space right so this then

5:32

this whole conversation goes away right

5:33

if that happens. Yeah. And I I was I

5:36

don't remember who I was talking to

5:37

recently, so it may not be that helpful,

5:39

but I think there we already have some

5:40

stuff in space that is like actually I

5:42

was talking to a venture capitalist

5:45

stuff.

5:45

>> Yes, there are still there are already

5:47

some things in space that are working

5:49

and I but I of course then I start

5:51

thinking like who's going up there to

5:53

fix it. Um,

5:54

>> it feels like the long long game at this

5:56

point,

5:58

but I feel like, you know, data centers

5:59

in space, we're probably a little bit

6:01

further away than

6:02

>> I think that's one of the things about

6:03

this market right now is that like the

6:06

the hope and the kind of coolness of

6:09

what could be in the future is still

6:11

quite long duration. And then when you

6:13

come into an environment where

6:15

>> oil prices are higher, inflation is

6:17

definitely a risk, you're seeing it not

6:19

just in oil prices, like then you start

6:21

to realize the impact of long duration

6:23

investments and the relationship to

6:25

interest rates and I think that some of

6:26

that is coming through now.

6:27

>> All right, so let's get right to it

6:28

because it is a big tech week, right?

6:30

We're going to get four of the biggies,

6:32

Meta, Apple, Amazon, and Microsoft. Um,

6:35

and the first one out of the gate, I

6:37

believe, is Microsoft. So they're going

6:38

to be the first one to react to kind of

6:40

what we've heard from Apple last week.

6:42

the, you know, the the the ramp up in

6:45

capex spending and all that stuff that

6:47

Microsoft is going to is going to come

6:49

out and they're going to have to talk

6:50

about their cloud and Azure and all that

6:53

stuff. I I don't think they're going to

6:54

disappoint at all. In fact, I think

6:56

Microsoft I think Microsoft was one of

6:58

the names that got thrown out the window

7:00

like baby with the batwater. It was down

7:02

30 some odd percent.

7:04

>> Yes.

7:04

>> And I don't like I think it's a huge

7:06

buying opportunity.

7:08

I mean, I think there will be another

7:10

rotation into the Magnificent 7 in

7:11

general. Um, and I think like, let's

7:13

face it, I don't think Google actually

7:14

disappointed. I mean, the revenue is up

7:16

24% year-over-year, right?

7:18

>> So, it's just like when is Wall Street

7:20

going to get over the fact that capital

7:22

expenditure is just going to continue to

7:24

go higher. Um, and I think right now,

7:26

you know, that's maybe a short-term

7:28

issue because it's been there the whole

7:30

time. Um, but I just think it's coming

7:31

to roost this summer, but at some point

7:33

they might be like, "Hey, I'm happy with

7:34

this continued revenue growth that

7:36

you're seeing." And I think Microsoft

7:37

might be the only one of the Mag 7 or

7:39

the hyperscalers or hyper spenders,

7:41

whatever you want to call them, right?

7:42

Um that may still have free cash flow.

7:44

>> Well, so I guess we're going to find out

7:45

on Wednesday right now. Look, it traded

7:47

all the way down to 350. I think now

7:48

it's trading above 400 again. So it has

7:50

rallied some back. And I actually, you

7:52

know, listen, to be fair, I own

7:54

Microsoft. The firm owns Microsoft. And

7:56

you know, I would I would be buying it

7:58

on the dip. Like I said, I thought it

8:00

was a huge buying opportunity, but we'll

8:02

see because the next three or four days

8:05

are going to be very key to where this

8:07

market goes.

8:08

>> Yeah. I mean, obviously Microsoft got

8:10

caught up in the whole software, you

8:11

know, issue, right? Um and also their

8:14

their own models like they, you know,

8:16

they kind of failed at that um you know,

8:19

their LLM. So, you know, there

8:30

>> I don't use it.

8:31

>> I like it. It's sufficient for what I

8:32

do. I don't think I need to like, you

8:34

know,

8:35

>> you use the other one. You use cloud or

8:36

GPT?

8:37

>> I use Gemini because it's free. It's one

8:38

of my Google. Yeah. So, I can't actually

8:40

hear it, but I think it's sufficient

8:41

enough for, you know, a financial guy

8:43

like me. I don't think I need the most

8:44

sophisticated models, but

8:46

>> I Well, so we Yeah. I don't know. I this

8:49

is might be where I

8:51

>> disagree. [laughter]

8:53

>> No, I think I mean

8:54

>> feel afraid to disagree.

8:56

>> I truthfully like I I do see a

8:58

difference when I want to talk to data

9:00

with claude versus like using another

9:02

>> element. Yeah, I'm just a simpler

9:04

simpler data that could explain. Um but

9:08

I think there's I do think Microsoft

9:10

like the expectations have been low so

9:12

they could easily you know beat this

9:15

time around and and kind of surprise on

9:17

the upside. You are starting to see more

9:18

software companies do better in the last

9:20

like couple of weeks on and off more so

9:22

than the SAS apocalypse time.

9:24

>> Um but I I also wonder like what is

9:28

their growth

9:29

>> well but I but you see that's true

9:31

because coming into this earning season

9:33

I think the bar was set high. A lot of

9:34

us talked about that stocks were priced

9:36

to perfection. And so, you know, Goldman

9:39

Sachs and UBS came out last week and

9:40

talked about just looking at their prime

9:42

brokerage business, they can kind of see

9:44

where the flows are going and how all

9:45

these hedge funds were bailing on large

9:47

tech. It wasn't the big wasn't the

9:49

places like Fidelity or Wellington or

9:51

Capital Research that were bailing. It

9:52

was the hedge funds that were bailing.

9:54

And that makes then that makes sense

9:55

because they're more short-term oriented

9:57

than a long-term asset manager. But I

10:00

think for I mean I do think free cash

10:01

like I don't think it's a bad thing if

10:02

the market starts caring about free cash

10:04

flow. No, I don't think so.

10:05

>> I don't think we should be like, "Oh,

10:06

that's like" But I think it's it's

10:08

something

10:09

>> about profitability, [laughter]

10:10

>> but I I actually think it's like a good

10:12

idea to think about free cash flow and

10:14

not forget about that because

10:16

>> the bet is that longer term they will be

10:18

positive free cash flow. And if that

10:20

feels further in the future or interest

10:23

rates are higher and thus like it costs

10:25

more, you know, that that the current

10:27

value of that is lower, then that's when

10:30

it starts to matter. And I I did a whole

10:32

deep dive on this um actually looking at

10:35

owners free cash flow which takes out

10:37

stockbased compensation and it shows you

10:39

that some of these mag seven haven't

10:41

been positive free cash flow even before

10:43

the huge capback spending

10:44

>> and then you want to add on their like

10:46

their markettomarket gains right because

10:47

like I think this happened with Google

10:50

like yeah I own some space so that

10:52

actually was part of my profit

10:53

>> uh this past quarter so

10:55

>> yeah there is a lot of skew in there I

10:57

totally agree with that but Google's one

10:59

who just announced that they had

11:00

negative free cash flow this quarter,

11:02

right? Because of their huge AI on

11:04

Tesla,

11:05

>> well, but Tesla's had it.

11:07

>> They've never had Tesla's earnings.

11:10

>> Amazon has never had it either. So,

11:12

>> right. Um, but I think that although

11:14

Google on the top line, they crushed it.

11:16

But then after you do all that capex

11:18

spending, they realize, okay, now

11:19

they're getting negative, which I think

11:20

was part of the reason I they hit the

11:22

sell button. Yeah.

11:23

>> But, uh, we've seen that sell the news

11:26

reaction

11:28

>> really since earning season has started.

11:29

Not even just in tech and kind of a lot

11:31

of names,

11:32

>> you know, but part of that too is this

11:33

whole rebound trade is what they're

11:35

talking about. So if you're a hedge

11:36

fund, you were playing the game of okay,

11:38

we're putting SpaceX into a lot of major

11:40

indices. So now they have to sell some

11:42

of the magnificent seven because they're

11:43

just cowboy weight. In fact, I think

11:46

Millennium Millennium made like $4

11:48

billion on that trade.

11:49

>> So of course the institutions made

11:51

money, retail investors didn't. Story of

11:52

Wall Street. Um, so yeah, I think that's

11:55

also part of this kind of summer swoon

11:57

is the fact that you've had this big

11:58

rebalancing where a lot of money had to

12:00

go into SpaceX, right, and come out of

12:02

some of these other big names.

12:03

>> Well, so let's just talk about that for

12:05

a minute because SpaceX

12:06

>> is trading where 110 I think it was tra

12:09

might be up today, but I think it was I

12:11

think on Friday it closed around 110.

12:12

>> Sounds about right.

12:13

>> Which is down from traded as high as two

12:15

and a quarter I think right afterwards.

12:17

>> And you know come August 4th they're

12:19

going to announce their earnings in

12:20

August 6th. then there's going to be up

12:22

to 900 million shares that are going to

12:25

be eligible to come to the market. Maybe

12:27

they don't all don't, right? Maybe they

12:28

all do,

12:29

>> right?

12:29

>> Um, which I think has also been putting

12:31

pressure on SpaceX. I wouldn't be

12:32

surprised if we saw SpaceX go into the

12:34

80s before it bottoms out.

12:36

>> Yeah, I totally agree. I I think

12:37

>> I think anywhere below 100, I don't own

12:39

it yet. I want to own it, but below 100

12:41

is when I'd start to

12:42

>> I wouldn't touch that that stock, but 10

12:44

foot pole, can he? I mean, really think

12:46

about it's like is it you can probably

12:48

say more correctly than me. It's like 80

12:49

times sales. Yes.

12:51

>> Okay. The S&P is at three times sales

12:53

and that's historically high. Uh I mean

12:56

this company is a mature company. It's

12:57

been around since 2002.

13:00

I think all the good news that we can

13:01

imagine that this company's going to

13:03

have the next couple years already

13:04

priced in the stock.

13:05

>> I mean there is a lot of good news

13:07

priced in the stock. I I I sort of see

13:09

like I I think of SpaceX in the same way

13:11

as you think of Tesla.

13:13

>> Yeah. And obviously SpaceX has some good

13:15

like their their satellite stuff is

13:18

very, you know, cash flow uh rich, but

13:21

>> to me investing in either of those

13:23

companies has always been a lifestyle

13:24

decision more than I

13:26

>> Well, I never I never bought Tesla. I

13:29

don't own a Tesla. I never bought Tesla.

13:30

I I had that same sense. But I think

13:33

SpaceX is a little bit different, which

13:35

is why at some point I'd like to jump

13:36

in. I'm not going to it's not going to

13:38

it's not going to consume the portfolio

13:39

by any stretch, but I'd like to get I'd

13:41

like to be exposed. I think

13:43

>> I mean I believe in the space theme.

13:46

>> Yeah.

13:46

>> You know, for the like I believe in it

13:48

for the long term. I I but I wouldn't

13:50

put all of my space theme money into

13:53

space.

13:54

>> All right. So, let's talk about Apple

13:55

and Amazon. What's because those come

13:56

out on Thursday. So, talk about concerns

14:00

andor what you're looking for.

14:02

>> Well, I think with Apple what's

14:04

surprising is it's the best Magnificent

14:05

7 stock this year. It's up over 20%

14:07

>> trading at all time highs, isn't it?

14:10

>> Staple name.

14:12

>> I think it is. I think it's a value

14:13

stock. I think you're correct about

14:14

that. And I think it's trading like a

14:16

growth stock. It trades at like 40 times

14:17

forward earnings. So, momentum keep

14:19

pushing the stock. But this is another

14:21

stock where I'm kind of like, why would

14:22

you pay? I mean, traditionally, it trade

14:24

like 15 times forward earnings

14:25

>> where there's not that much innovation.

14:27

The iPhone doesn't look that much

14:29

different today than it did last couple

14:30

years.

14:31

>> We know China has some great phones

14:33

we'll never see which have caught up

14:34

with the technology. the margins like I

14:37

just think about the cost of memory and

14:39

how that's impacting them and I know

14:40

they're raising prices to cover that but

14:42

what like they're also trying to get the

14:44

government to allow them to buy the

14:45

Chinese memory makers because

14:47

>> the stock market doesn't care it just

14:49

keeps going higher right

14:50

>> which is remarkable

14:51

>> because I guess cash flow [laughter]

14:54

>> I can't justify

14:55

>> but I and I agree I would I own Apple

14:57

the firm owns Apple but but I'm not

14:59

going to chase Apple up here you know

15:00

it's all high on buy more but I'm not

15:03

I'm certainly not chasing it

15:04

>> totally agree What about Amazon? What do

15:06

you think about Amazon?

15:08

>> I've always struggled with Amazon

15:09

because they're it's hard to say like

15:11

what is Amazon? They do a lot of

15:13

different things, right? Like they have

15:14

a consumer retail business now. They're

15:16

going to have their own shipping

15:17

business. Now that they like the Yeah. I

15:21

mean, they've got so many different

15:22

things. And I'm like, as soon as I say

15:23

like, oh, I don't I don't want to invest

15:25

in this company. Someone can give you me

15:27

an argument about something like they're

15:29

like, well, how many boxes do you get a

15:32

day from Amazon? you know, and I'm like,

15:33

"Yeah, okay." But I just

15:37

>> but I think like personally I've really

15:39

struggled with wanting to to wanting to

15:42

to invest in this company because one

15:44

like their their free cash flow has been

15:46

pretty negative,

15:47

>> especially when you take stockbased

15:48

compensation out of it. Um they do have

15:50

investments in, you know, some of the

15:52

private companies that have lifted their

15:54

um you know, lifted them, but and then

15:56

also like just when you Amazon Web

15:59

Services, like is that going to grow or

16:01

not going to grow in that? I don't I

16:03

It's just hard for me to It's like

16:04

investing in an old GE where GE did like

16:06

a million did a million things.

16:08

>> It's hard to measure it for me.

16:10

>> I I know, but I don't know. I I think

16:12

Amazon tends to be kind of a core

16:14

holding for a lot of people.

16:15

>> Oh, and it's I mean it's huge in the

16:17

S&P. So, of course, like even if you own

16:19

a little bit of it, you're underweight

16:20

like right you know you're Yeah.

16:23

>> No, I agree with that because I think

16:24

the the other component to that is

16:26

because it's such a big part of the S&P

16:27

500 and I think there is still a lot of

16:29

retail money out there. We always talk

16:31

about money market funds at like $7.8

16:33

trillion. Invariably, if that money

16:34

comes in the market, a lot's going to go

16:36

into the S&P 500, which is going to be a

16:37

bid under all these magnificent seven

16:40

stocks.

16:40

>> So, you can almost be like, you almost

16:42

don't have to discern to some extent

16:43

because of that capitalization weighted.

16:45

>> You know, the way the S&P is structured,

16:48

it's like it's going to go there anyway.

16:49

So, I think when you get a re-rotation

16:51

of these stocks, you know, Amazon's

16:52

going to benefit, you know, Alphabet's

16:54

going to benefit, Meta's going to

16:56

benefit, Microsoft's Microsoft's going

16:57

to benefit, they're all going to

16:58

benefit. It's just going to be a

17:00

natural, you know, because retail money

17:02

is just going to go to the S&P.

17:03

>> Yeah. And I I think, you know, you you

17:05

said this, it made me think about it.

17:08

The S&P is up was up 8 and a half%.

17:12

>> Right.

17:12

>> The eagle weighted S&P is up 11 and a

17:15

half%. It's really outperforming the the

17:17

market weighted S&P, which I think

17:20

speaks to your whole rotation idea that

17:22

money's not leaving the market. might be

17:24

leaving the tech high growth tech names

17:27

because that's what that's what's really

17:28

driving the market weight S&P right but

17:31

it's clearly moving into other sectors

17:33

which I use as a as an argument um when

17:36

I'm talking to clients about you know

17:38

that are getting nervous I go okay take

17:39

a look at what's happening here

17:41

>> I think the around February of last year

17:44

I I said there's more to life than the

17:46

mag seven and I I have I have really

17:49

like believed that because there's also

17:51

like

17:52

>> I had this theme also of investing in

17:54

the receivers of the capex versus the

17:56

spenders of the capex which is

17:57

essentially saying the same thing in a

17:59

lot of ways and I think

18:01

>> I have this kind of like overarching

18:03

view that like

18:04

>> comp now this is not trying to be

18:07

political but companies themselves have

18:09

probably not paid enough in tax their

18:11

fair share of taxes right like and

18:13

obviously that's been to make us more

18:14

globally competitive and this is almost

18:16

the way of like the largest companies

18:18

like

18:19

>> paying their taxes but they're doing it

18:21

in building out infrastructure and

18:23

building out like

18:24

>> building out like the future for us and

18:27

I think

18:27

>> creating opportunity,

18:28

>> right? But that's why I'm like that's

18:29

what you don't like you invest where the

18:31

money is going and not where it's and

18:33

that's one of the reasons why but ex

18:35

Apple that's Apple has not been part of

18:36

that

18:37

>> where they're not the hyper spenders or

18:38

hyperscalers, right? Hope they don't go

18:39

bankrupt doing it, right? That's the

18:40

thing we really hope. But no, no, I

18:42

think it's a really good point, but I

18:43

also think it's kind of like we don't

18:45

really know when the spending is going

18:46

to turn off on this this whole and Yeah.

18:49

>> Every quarter I get nervous about them

18:50

saying we're good on spending this

18:52

quarter.

18:52

>> Yeah. Okay. So, that's the question. Is

18:54

the AI trade dead in your mind?

18:56

Certainly not. For me, it isn't.

18:58

>> No, not at all.

18:59

>> Not at all.

19:00

>> I don't think it's dead, but I think

19:01

there's a lot of risk there where I can

19:02

just say, "Hey, I can buy the banks

19:04

here, which trade for like a 40%

19:05

discount to the S&P. We know the economy

19:08

is starting to pick up. loan growth is

19:10

going up. Capital markets are opening

19:11

up. I'm getting like a two, three%

19:13

dividend. So, I think there's a lot of

19:15

places you can put your money in the

19:16

market that aren't predicated on AI. And

19:18

I think it's important because if I look

19:19

at most portfolios, they're so dependent

19:22

on that AI trade, whether you're just

19:24

owning the hyperspenders directly, you

19:26

own semiconductor stocks, you own, you

19:28

know, some of the like the nuclear plays

19:30

that are going to, you know, they're

19:31

going to basically electrify these um AI

19:34

data centers. And I think having

19:36

positions in your portfolio that if the

19:39

AI trade does not if if all the spending

19:41

doesn't come to fruition, you're safe, I

19:43

think is a really important starting

19:45

portfolio. We started doing that in our

19:46

portfolios. We started doing like

19:47

>> and it doesn't agree. I feel like go

19:49

ahead.

19:49

>> No, go ahead. No, no, I was going to say

19:50

somebody [laughter] was on somebody was

19:52

on TV this morning. I don't know if it

19:53

was on Maria or on Vanney saying that

19:56

you can't really get away from AI

19:58

because every industry is now impacted

20:01

by AI, right? So when you think you're

20:03

not getting involved in AI, in fact when

20:04

you buy JP Morgan, you're buying their

20:07

exposure to AI.

20:08

>> Totally. I mean every right I think

20:10

that's a great

20:10

>> when you buy the banks, when you buy the

20:12

industrials, when you buy right

20:13

>> and that's why I'm started saying like

20:14

um we started moving away from the semis

20:17

right in June and and to other things

20:19

that we think will benefit from AI and

20:21

that's why we started buying like a

20:23

Shopify a Visa. I actually think like

20:25

this whole kind of like infra financial

20:28

infrastructure with stable coin is an

20:29

interesting part of the AI right

20:31

>> growth of AI.

20:32

>> Well, look what's happened to

20:33

Caterpillar this year. Caterpillar,

20:36

it's a great company. Sure,

20:38

>> there was nothing really sexy about it.

20:39

It was up 80% or something because it

20:42

was drawn into the AI ecosystem, right?

20:46

the turbines, not only the the

20:48

construction equipment, but now the

20:50

turbines that they that they manufacture

20:52

that are used in the AI trade. And they

20:55

Caterpillar has been

20:56

>> massively. It's wild. Yeah. But I also

20:58

think there's other stories there,

21:00

right? You have we just talked about you

21:01

need to upgrade the grid, right? That's

21:03

real. We're doing this reshoring.

21:05

>> That's why I was like with Cleveland

21:07

Cliff finally like

21:08

>> that's an old school name.

21:12

cuz I was like they only futuristic

21:14

>> the only maker of grain oriented

21:16

electrical steel.

21:17

>> Well, no, it's a great point. Then you

21:19

have defense budgets going up around the

21:21

world as well. So when I think about

21:22

like mining stocks, you think about like

21:24

owning the emerging markets, all these

21:26

places are commodity based. So I think I

21:27

don't think all these trades are

21:28

actually that dependent on just AI. And

21:31

like let's face like J&J is up like 50%

21:33

plus over the last 12 months. That's not

21:35

dependent on artificial intelligence.

21:36

>> No, that's not. No, you're right.

21:37

Healthare has been a solid place to

21:39

>> healthare is a great Yeah. So I think

21:40

there's a lot of names you can put your

21:42

money into that's not predicated on

21:43

that.

21:44

>> All right. So we're going to run out of

21:45

time here pretty soon but I want to get

21:46

your kind of view on going into August

21:49

which tends to be kind of the doldrums

21:51

of the summer. A lot of people are off

21:53

Europe is on vacation, right? So things

21:55

quiet down. There's no Fed meeting in uh

21:59

we didn't pick we didn't pick up on it

22:00

but I'm assuming you think there's no

22:02

rate hike on Wednesday.

22:04

>> Yeah. Still it's a nothing for now.

22:06

>> Right. Okay, there's certainly nothing

22:08

in August because there's no meeting.

22:09

Doesn't mean he couldn't if there's a

22:11

reason to, but typically there won't be

22:13

anything in August. So, what what should

22:15

you be looking for? What should

22:16

investors be thinking about as we move

22:18

into August and then into the fall,

22:19

which tends to be sometimes a volatile

22:22

>> September tends to be the worst month of

22:24

the year.

22:25

>> That's good to know. I'm writing that

22:26

down. [laughter]

22:27

>> Not not always obviously investment

22:29

diary

22:30

>> if you go back over the last like you

22:32

know many years like September.

22:34

>> That's right. um because people ignore

22:36

what happens and then they come back to

22:37

their books and they're like they make

22:38

the changes they need to make. Um I

22:41

think you do need to watch inflation

22:43

what's happening in um in the Middle

22:45

East. I think those are two you know

22:48

swinging things and could be combined.

22:50

Yeah. Um I think Jackson Hole will be

22:54

interesting because is are will some of

22:56

the results of these group meetings that

22:59

you know task force that's right um you

23:01

know will that come out and say actually

23:03

we're not worried about inflation we're

23:05

more worried about deflation and then

23:07

they end up cutting rates which the

23:08

market may have an interesting reaction

23:11

to if they're seeing like near-term

23:13

inflation numbers

23:14

>> higher. Do you think Kevin Wer gonna

23:16

have a press conference on Wednesday?

23:18

[snorts]

23:19

>> I don't know. He I think he's still in

23:22

like trying to figure out what he should

23:23

do.

23:24

>> I hope he does not have a press

23:26

conference.

23:26

>> I think he's going to have one though.

23:27

>> I don't think he's going to have one.

23:29

>> I think he is.

23:30

>> If I was a Fed chair, I would have one.

23:32

>> But he like he had like he like the last

23:34

one he just said.

23:35

>> He's going to say very little, but he's

23:37

going to say

23:38

you you won't remember this.

23:41

>> When I came into his business, Alan

23:42

Greenspan was Fed chair. And Alan

23:44

Greenspin used to Allan, you would

23:46

remember, right? Alan Greenspin came

23:48

out. He'd say, "This is what the Fed

23:50

decision is." He'd make the

23:51

announcement. He'd close the book and

23:52

he'd walk away. He didn't take

23:54

questions. He didn't sit there and hold

23:56

your hand. He didn't ask you if you're

23:57

okay. He didn't ask you, you know, "Take

23:59

a Xanax and calm down." Nothing.

24:02

>> And I thought the markets did fine now.

24:04

The markets are different today.

24:05

>> They were more volatile in the the

24:07

market.

24:07

>> Yes. But there was the technology wasn't

24:09

around. So, they weren't as they didn't

24:12

>> it wasn't as quick as

24:13

>> Actually, they're very volatile now,

24:14

too, because of the speed of

24:16

information.

24:16

>> Correct.

24:17

and the technology allows it to be more

24:18

volatile. Anyway, before we run out of

24:20

time, what do you think about August?

24:22

>> I think cash is trash. I think you've

24:23

seen sentiment get very, very negative

24:25

in the last week because oil prices

24:27

skyrocket. And usually when you have

24:29

negative retail sentiment, that's a good

24:30

time to buy. Also, I think we're

24:32

probably at the higher range for oil

24:34

prices are. Yeah. And if you think about

24:36

if oil prices start to come down, it

24:37

disproportionately benefits the foreign

24:39

markets. So, I'm very bullish on the

24:41

global economy.

24:42

>> But that's assuming this ore is over. I

24:44

don't even think even if it's not over,

24:46

I could still see prices going back down

24:48

into the 70s.

24:49

>> What if it has, right?

24:50

>> It could. It could, but I'm gonna say if

24:53

I was going to be a betting man.

24:54

>> I mean, we thought it was over a month

24:56

ago. Everything was signaled and live

24:57

and suddenly it was.

24:58

>> I I don't I think it's I think it's

24:59

going to go on a long time, frankly. But

25:01

I but I do think you'll see prices come

25:02

back to the 70s. I mean, you're you're

25:04

clearly seeing oil come out in different

25:05

ways. Like Saudi Arabia's got their

25:06

pipeline get into the Red Sea as long as

25:08

the Houthies don't

25:09

>> block it. That's like another red. But I

25:11

think there's going to be a lot of

25:12

creative ways to get oil, you know, out

25:14

of the Middle East and it's not going to

25:16

do that.

25:16

>> I do think one of the things that saved

25:17

us was the fact that China stopped

25:19

importing oil and if they end up needing

25:22

like to come back out into the market, I

25:24

I don't know. I just think there was

25:26

like that really helped us and that

25:28

we'll see if they

25:29

>> Yeah. But it's kind of remarkable. We

25:30

haven't been over $100 a barrel, you

25:32

know, since the conflict started. So I I

25:35

think that speaks to there is more oil

25:36

getting to the market than that they say

25:38

that 20% that comes through the

25:40

straight. And I do think we're at the

25:41

higher end, but I think I think at some

25:43

point here you land in the 70s even if

25:44

the conflict continues. Um, and I think

25:47

that's the historical average last 20

25:49

years like $73 a barrel is oil prices.

25:52

>> The issue was there's not a lack of

25:53

supply of oil. Let's be honest, the

25:55

world is a wash in oil.

25:57

>> It is. Yes. But also, you have to worry

25:59

about energy security now, right? If I'm

26:01

Japan, I'm not going to want to get all

26:03

my oil. You're going to start to reroute

26:06

it. So, I think there's going to be a

26:07

premium on oil prices that we didn't

26:09

have before. So I think 70s are a normal

26:11

place and also like keep energy stocks

26:13

in your portfolios ahead. You haven't

26:14

been there.

26:15

>> I do agree with that. We've kept it

26:16

there.

26:16

>> Robin Hood agrees with me. So you know

26:18

must be right.

26:19

>> I was so hoping you didn't agree with

26:21

[laughter] them.

26:22

>> That's the only thing I agree with this.

26:25

>> Anyway, listen. I appreciate the time. A

26:27

half an hour goes by way too fast. I'

26:29

I'd like to grab this group together

26:31

again maybe toward the end of the year

26:33

just to see how all this played out and

26:34

kind of where we where we ended up

26:36

versus where we thought we ended up.

26:37

Just real quick, where do you think the

26:38

Do you have an S&P target?

26:40

>> Yeah, I actually had where it is around

26:43

here. So, and I've just been kind of

26:44

like watching it go sideways and I'm

26:46

like, do I go up or

26:48

>> No, I was in the 7576 range. Yeah.

26:50

>> You know, I think I think u uh

26:53

>> there there are numbers as high as

26:54

8,000. I think that's a little

26:56

aggressive.

26:56

>> I was at 7,500 and I was Yeah,

26:59

>> 8500. I think it's going to melt up. I

27:00

think there's just Yeah, I do. I do.

27:03

>> We're definitely coming back. We are

27:05

definitely coming back.

27:06

>> You know what? If I'm right, you guys

27:07

can take me out the scissors.

27:08

>> I'd be happy to take you out to dinner

27:10

if you're right. And if you're wrong,

27:11

you're taking [laughter] you're taking

27:12

us out to dinner if you're wrong.

27:14

>> Anyway, done. Done and done. Thank you

27:17

very much for joining us. Until next

27:19

time, take good care.

Interactive Summary

In this episode of Trader Talk, host Kenny Polcari discusses the current market landscape with Stephanie Guild (CIO at Robinhood) and Ryan Payne (President of Payne Capital Management). The panel analyzes the ongoing earnings season, the rotation of capital out of high-growth tech stocks into more diversified sectors, and the impact of AI infrastructure spending. They also examine specific stocks like Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and SpaceX, while debating the long-term outlook for the S&P 500 and the role of energy and commodity markets in a balanced portfolio.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts