HomeVideos

Essentials: How to Access Your Creativity | Rick Rubin

Now Playing

Essentials: How to Access Your Creativity | Rick Rubin

Transcript

806 segments

0:00

Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials,

0:01

[music] where we revisit past episodes

0:04

for the most potent and actionable

0:06

science-based tools for mental health,

0:08

physical health, and performance.

0:11

I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor

0:13

of neurobiology and opthalmology at

0:15

Stamford School of Medicine. And now for

0:17

my discussion with Rick Rubin. Great to

0:20

have you here today, Rick.

0:21

>> Thank you for having me. It's a

0:22

pleasure. Of all the topics in science

0:25

and in particular in neuroscience, I

0:27

confess that creativity is the most

0:30

difficult one to capture. As I went into

0:33

your book, the example that you give,

0:35

this idea that ideas and creativity are

0:38

a little bit like a cloud. If you look

0:40

at it at one moment, you might think

0:42

that it looks like one thing, but then

0:45

you look at it a moment later, it could

0:46

be quite a bit different. And if you

0:47

look at an hour later, it very well

0:49

could be gone. How did that come to you?

0:51

And how does it serve you in trying to I

0:55

don't want to say extract but trying to

0:56

access creativity.

0:57

>> I think the best way to think about it

0:59

is like a dream. It's like if you think

1:01

about your dreams they don't necessarily

1:04

make sense.

1:06

When you wake up you'll you might

1:07

remember part but not the whole thing.

1:09

Then if you start writing them down

1:11

they'll come back and they may not make

1:14

sense to you. You know maybe someday in

1:16

the future you'll be able to look back

1:18

and understand what they mean and maybe

1:20

not. And that's sort of how this the art

1:24

making uh process works is like we're

1:27

making things and we're looking for a

1:29

feeling in ourselves. It could be a

1:32

feeling of excitement or enthusiasm, a

1:34

feeling of interest, a feeling of

1:36

curiosity. I want to know more. It's not

1:38

an intellectual process. It's a

1:40

different thing. I think language is

1:42

insufficient to

1:45

to drill down on creativity. It's more

1:48

um it's closer to magic than it is uh

1:52

science.

1:53

>> Do you think kids are more are just by

1:55

definition and by design more creative

1:56

than adults?

1:58

>> Yes. Kids are they're open and they

2:01

[clears throat] have no baggage. They

2:03

don't have any belief system. They don't

2:05

know how things are supposed to work.

2:06

They just see what is. Most of us select

2:10

from

2:12

an endless number of data points

2:14

available to us to well as a as a

2:18

species to make sure that we don't die

2:21

and to procreate and to feed ourselves

2:24

are probably the primary functions

2:26

first. And then we learn things about

2:29

what's right and what's wrong. and we

2:30

learn things about uh how to do certain

2:33

things [clears throat]

2:35

or we're inspired by someone who makes

2:38

something we love and we want to do it

2:40

the way they do it. And all of those

2:42

things undermine the purity of the

2:45

creative process. They can be um tools

2:49

to

2:51

build your skill set to be able to do it

2:53

yourself. Like if you're a a singer, you

2:56

might imitate a singer you really like

2:58

for a while to get good at it and then

3:01

eventually come to find your own voice.

3:03

But if you're 3 years old or 5 year

3:06

years old and you try singing, you're

3:08

not singing like anyone else. You're

3:09

you're singing with your own your own

3:11

voice. And when you make something,

3:13

you're making it based on not knowing.

3:16

And I I think I had the advantage early

3:18

in my career of starting making music

3:21

without any experience, which was

3:23

helpful because I didn't know what rules

3:25

I was breaking. I was doing things that

3:28

other people wouldn't do. When something

3:31

feels creatively right, let's say in the

3:34

studio or maybe even you're listening to

3:36

something that somebody sent you, and

3:37

again, this could be about writing or

3:39

comedy or, you know, science or

3:40

podcasting for that matter. How do you

3:43

say keep going that way when they might

3:46

not even recognize that they did it? And

3:48

I'm guessing a lot of times they don't.

3:50

>> I I'll try to be in a in a setting where

3:54

as we're talking about it, we can engage

3:57

with it in that moment. Let's say I was

3:59

producing your new record and you played

4:01

me something and I had some thoughts

4:02

about it. It wouldn't be so helpful for

4:05

me to tell you what those were. it'd be

4:07

better for us to wait till we're in a

4:08

place where we could try things and see

4:11

where it goes. I wouldn't rely on

4:14

language to do it. It would be more of a

4:17

making a suggestion is something that's

4:18

actionable. We try it and then we have

4:21

more data. It's that simple. So much of,

4:24

you know, when we go to school, it's to

4:26

get us to

4:28

follow the rules. And in art, it's

4:31

different because the the rules are

4:33

there as a scaffolding to be um chipped

4:38

away as need be. Sometimes they're

4:40

helpful, sometimes they're not.

4:42

Understanding how you feel in the face

4:46

of other voices without second-guessing

4:49

yourself is probably the single most

4:52

important

4:54

um thing to practice as an artist or

4:58

skill set to develop as an artist is to

5:02

know how you feel and own your feelings.

5:05

If I'm undermining my taste for some

5:09

commercial idea or uh it it defeats the

5:13

whole purpose of doing this. This is not

5:15

that's not what this process is about.

5:17

This process is

5:20

I'm doing me and I'm showing you who I

5:23

am and you can like it or not. But

5:25

either way, this is still how I see it.

5:27

>> In your book, you describe again when

5:29

you're thinking about the creative

5:31

process as a cloud. For me again, it

5:34

serves as such a powerful anchor. And

5:36

then I think about the the biology, the

5:38

neurobiology of like strategy formation

5:42

or strategy implementation. And then

5:46

almost by sheer luck or miraculously, I

5:50

turn a few pages later into the book and

5:53

there's a description of how animals

5:55

that are trying to accomplish something.

5:58

eat, mate, find water, the requirements

6:02

of living. It requires a narrow visual

6:04

focus. This is something my lab is kind

6:06

of obsessed with and I've been obsessed

6:07

with. And in that more narrow visual

6:09

focus, we know that the the playbook

6:13

becomes more narrow. Now, at some point,

6:16

in order to come up with a new creative

6:19

idea, that means broadening vision is

6:21

essential in some way or broadening

6:23

thinking. Well, it could either be a

6:25

broadening or a narrowing, but it's

6:27

changing the aperture from the standard

6:31

to present something new that maybe you

6:36

already knew but didn't know you knew

6:38

it. It's not unlike what a comedian

6:40

does. You know, comedian makes you

6:41

laugh. Usually what they're saying, it's

6:43

outrageous, but you know that it's

6:46

right. You know, just no one says it

6:48

that way or no one has said it that way

6:49

before. But it's always the truth in it

6:52

that makes it funny. Recognizing

6:55

something that seems really obvious once

6:59

you see it, but seems like nobody else

7:03

sees it or no one else points it out.

7:05

>> So do you think nowadays the fact that

7:07

one can create something and quote

7:09

unquote release it quickly? I can put

7:11

something out onto Twitter or Instagram

7:14

now and I will get immediate feedback

7:16

which is external feedback of course but

7:18

then I can iterate on the basis of that

7:20

feedback. Do you think that's

7:22

problematic for the larger opportunity

7:25

for creativity?

7:25

>> I don't think it's wrong or right. It's

7:27

just it's more information that you can

7:29

use or not use and use it in a useful

7:32

way and you know you can make something

7:34

and put it out and people can not like

7:36

it and you're like they still don't get

7:38

it here. I'm going to I got to go

7:39

harder. There could be different stories

7:41

that happen at the same time where

7:42

you're making something and you have an

7:45

idea of what it is and then other people

7:49

engage with it and they have a different

7:51

idea of what it is and they like it for

7:53

a different reason than you did or

7:54

dislike it for a reason different than

7:56

the reason you like it. We can't control

7:59

any of those things. The only part of it

8:02

that we can control is how we relate to

8:05

the thing that we make. And any external

8:10

information that undermines the clarity

8:13

of that connection

8:16

is probably bad for the art is my is my

8:19

guess. All I've ever tried to make was

8:21

something I like or something that I

8:23

felt like was missing as a fan that I

8:26

wanted and I nobody was making it. So I

8:30

I'll make it. When I listen to an album

8:32

or a song, I mean, I have to assume that

8:35

there at some point it becomes

8:39

not strategy development or creativity,

8:42

but strategy implementation. Like songs

8:44

are going to come in this order. And

8:45

like at what point does one decide,

8:49

okay, like now's the time to get into

8:51

that more narrow focus of of effort.

8:55

Like we've got it, let's run with this.

8:57

because there is a component of the

8:59

creative process that involves packaging

9:00

and finishing and is that part less

9:02

satisfying to you or is it just all part

9:04

of the same larger arc?

9:06

>> It's all part of the same It's It's

9:07

nice. There's a good feeling. There's

9:09

usually a good feeling when something is

9:11

done. It's a commitment because up until

9:14

the time that you say it's done, you can

9:15

keep experimenting and changing it. You

9:17

know, if you if you think, well, maybe

9:19

tomorrow I can make it better, then it's

9:21

not finished. and you keep thinking that

9:23

for a long time, you can do that forever

9:25

and never never put out anything.

9:27

Getting to the point where you're ready

9:29

to sign off is a good feeling. One of

9:32

the things I talk about in the book is

9:33

um because it is a difficult thing to do

9:36

because it's fun to play and it's fun to

9:38

maybe it's not the best it could be yet,

9:40

you know, um

9:43

to use whatever the next project is

9:46

going to be as motivation to finish the

9:51

one you're working on. Now,

9:52

>> I'm very interested in, you know, your

9:55

process when it comes to going from

9:57

project to project and and you know,

9:58

you're going to be doing work with

9:59

somebody. Do you have a process for

10:02

removing the functions of the day and

10:05

the what you were doing last week and

10:07

what's going on and how do you clear the

10:09

static? What are some of the operational

10:12

steps that you think might be more um

10:15

generalizable to regardless of where

10:18

some somebody in you know um Africa is

10:21

listening to this?

10:22

>> I would say when I'm when I engage in a

10:24

particular project whatever it is I I

10:27

dedicate

10:30

all of myself for that period of time,

10:32

whatever it is, whether it be 20 minutes

10:35

or whether it be 5 hours, whatever it

10:37

is, total focus and no outside

10:41

distraction whatsoever.

10:44

And when I leave that process, I do my

10:47

best not to think about it when I'm away

10:49

from it. I don't bring any materials

10:51

with me. I don't leave the studio with

10:54

works in progress and spend time

10:56

listening to them during the day or

10:58

looking for ideas. I I stay as far away

11:01

from it when I'm not directly engaging

11:04

in it as possible. And in the best of

11:08

situations, I have something else to

11:10

totally engage myself in in between. So

11:13

instead of working on project A for 5

11:17

hours and then leaving and doing

11:18

nothing, I'm hoping to engage in a

11:22

project B or B, C, and D with all of

11:25

myself before going back to project A

11:27

again.

11:28

>> Even though you're disengaged,

11:30

do you believe that your subconscious is

11:32

working it through?

11:33

>> I believe so. I believe so. And I think

11:36

in general to stew over a problem is not

11:40

the way to solve a problem.

11:42

think to hold

11:44

the problems lightly. And when I say a

11:47

problem, you know, when we're when we're

11:49

starting a project, there's a question

11:51

mark at the beginning of every project.

11:52

I I I'm always anxious when I start a

11:54

new project because I have no idea

11:57

what's going to happen. I never know.

11:59

There's always a sense of anxiety

12:00

because I know whatever's going to

12:03

happen is completely out of my control.

12:05

Something either interesting or not will

12:07

appear and then we're going to follow

12:09

that wherever it goes. And until

12:13

something appears for us to follow,

12:16

I have a lot of anxiety. Even though I

12:19

know, even though it has never not come,

12:21

you know, it has come every time, but

12:22

there's something about it cuz I also

12:24

feel like there might be expectation on

12:26

me that I'm going to make it happen. And

12:29

I know that's not happening. That's not

12:31

how it works.

12:32

>> So what I keep coming back to is that

12:33

I'm imagining in my mind have two ends

12:36

of the continuum. one that is about

12:37

fairly narrow focus training training

12:40

strategy implementation cultivating

12:42

craft building craft and then the other

12:43

side is this the cloud and so we're

12:46

taking this cloud and we're we're

12:47

deciding what things are

12:49

>> yes we go through our lives

12:52

doing this all day with everything we

12:56

see if it's something we don't know and

12:58

something we're not familiar with first

13:01

thing is is

13:02

this doesn't make sense then what we do

13:05

is without thinking, we create a story

13:09

that explains what just happened

13:12

a hypothetical. Oh, maybe he's running

13:15

cuz his dog ran away and he's chasing

13:17

his dog. Maybe that's why he's running.

13:19

And as soon as we have that thought of

13:22

what it might be, we relax because now

13:25

it's not just a guy running, and this is

13:27

weird, but it's a guy running. Oh, he's

13:29

probably running after his dog. And now

13:33

we register that story that we just made

13:37

up without even knowing we were making

13:40

it up as what happened. And then later

13:42

in the day if someone says, "Yeah, do

13:44

you see that guy running out of box?"

13:45

Like, "Yeah, he was chasing his dog. I

13:47

saw that." And you you won't even

13:49

realize that it was the maybe

13:51

hypothetical story that was the first

13:54

possible explanation that allowed you to

13:57

continue walking. Our whole lives are

14:00

reacting to things, making up a story of

14:03

what we think may have happened without

14:05

realizing that's what we're doing, and

14:07

then living the rest of our lives as if

14:10

that thing that we made up really

14:11

happened. And we never know. That leads

14:15

us to we can't know much. Do you know

14:18

what I'm saying? Our resolution is so

14:20

low on everything. We're grasping at

14:24

straws. We have no idea. We have no

14:27

idea. And there's great power in knowing

14:29

that because if you think you know

14:31

what's going on,

14:34

chances are you're being deceived.

14:38

Not because somebody's deceiving you,

14:40

but because they're telling you what

14:41

they see and they don't know.

14:43

>> It's all Do you know what I'm saying?

14:45

It's all made up. Everything that we

14:47

everything we know is made up. Maybe

14:50

maybe it's true. It's This brings us to

14:52

pro wrestling. It's it's it's the reason

14:55

that pro wrestling is closer to reality

14:58

than anything else we can watch or any

15:01

other content. It's we know it's made

15:04

up.

15:06

We know that it's a performance.

15:09

It's storytelling.

15:12

And

15:14

that's how everything is. Except we

15:16

think wrestling's fake and the world is

15:18

real. Wrestling's real and the world's

15:21

fake. I do want to ask you about

15:23

wrestling. So, I have questions

15:25

specifically about wrestling, but it's

15:26

really about process.

15:27

>> Yeah.

15:28

>> What is the deal with your relationship

15:31

to wrestling?

15:32

>> Uh, I think it it maintains that kind of

15:34

playfulness. Anything is possible. We

15:38

expect the unexpected all the time in

15:40

wrestling. And it's a way to have a kind

15:43

of a feeling of

15:46

the energy of a sport

15:49

with with no competition. It's everyone

15:52

is working together to put on the best

15:54

show they can. So, it's more like a

15:56

ballet than it is like a sporting event.

15:59

>> I actually think uh the way you describe

16:01

um wrestling as you know it's the energy

16:04

of the sport. It's not the whether or

16:07

not it's this move or that move or who

16:09

wins or who loses. It's the energy and

16:12

I'm guessing it's the energy that it

16:14

creates in you

16:15

>> as an observer. Yes. It's the energy it

16:18

creates in me and the reality that it's

16:22

honest in what it is in a world where

16:27

seemingly nothing is honest at what it

16:29

is. In some ways, it's comforting and

16:32

there's still this mystery of like, wow,

16:33

I wonder if that's true or not because

16:35

we never really know. Someone gets hurt.

16:37

Did they really break their back or are

16:39

they just going on vacation? We don't

16:41

know. We'll never know. It's

16:43

fascinating. When you wake up in the

16:45

morning, um, are your thoughts

16:48

immediately structured or do you enjoy

16:49

the kind of clearing of the clouds?

16:51

>> It's a it's a slow process for me to

16:53

wake up and I like that. I like

16:57

not engaging too much too soon.

17:00

>> Does it [clears throat] become more

17:00

structured as the day goes on? Does your

17:02

thinking become um more structured

17:04

around projects and plans? I try to um

17:07

deal with things that need dealing with

17:09

after that and in preparation for going

17:13

to work and then when I go to work it's

17:15

more like this free thing where I'm

17:18

again hoping something good comes uh

17:21

welcoming something good paying

17:23

attention and maybe trying to will it to

17:26

happen but knowing I don't have the

17:28

ability to make it happen I can just be

17:31

present for it and be ready if it does

17:33

arrive. Obviously deadlines are relevant

17:37

time of day, right? There's only so many

17:39

hours in the day where one can stay in

17:41

the groove or this like readiness to

17:43

receive. Have you ever found yourself in

17:46

that mode where you're kind of grinding

17:48

like ah like here we are like okay I'm

17:50

not coming home for dinner tonight. It's

17:51

the next we're going to push. We're like

17:54

put on the coffee pot kind of thing.

17:56

>> A lot a lot in the over the course of my

17:59

life a lot not as much now. And one of

18:02

the things that I discovered through

18:05

working on the book was we're not

18:07

required to treat the different phases

18:09

of work in the same way. Whereas before

18:12

I did before everything was in this

18:15

state of play. Everything had an a wide

18:20

openen time schedule. It happens when it

18:23

happens. If it takes 2 years or 3 years,

18:25

it doesn't matter. It's not about that.

18:27

It's only about this thing has to be

18:29

great. And what I came to realize in

18:31

working on the book is that there there

18:33

are different phases. And the first

18:35

phase is this seed collecting phase

18:37

which is kind of an ongoing part of life

18:40

in general. I do that always whether I'm

18:43

whether I'm working on something or not.

18:44

I'm always in the seed collecting phase

18:46

and there's no deadline or uh anything

18:49

that interests me that I think I want to

18:51

learn more about or has potential to be

18:53

something anything I hear something

18:56

think hm [clears throat] I'd like to

18:58

read more about that or I wonder if I

19:00

wonder if there's a movie about that is

19:01

there a movie about that if not maybe

19:03

there's a movie to be made you know like

19:05

again I want this is something I want in

19:07

my life let's see if it exists if it

19:10

doesn't exist then maybe that's

19:11

something interesting to pursue um but I

19:14

know that the desire is there because I

19:15

have it. So in the seed phase, there's

19:18

no deadlines. It's just a wide open

19:20

part. And then the next phase is called

19:23

the experimentation phase where you

19:25

where you start experimenting to see

19:27

what the seeds want to do. You're

19:30

involved, but you're not really

19:32

dictating the action. You're you're

19:35

setting the stage for something to

19:36

happen, but it's not about you yet. It'd

19:40

be like the equivalent of you'd plant

19:42

the seed, you would water it, you'd make

19:45

sure it was in the sun, and you'd wait.

19:48

Um, so you're involved, but you can't

19:51

make it grow, you know, and then when it

19:54

sprouts and it grows and or if it turns

19:56

into a plant, then you can look at the

19:59

plants like, okay, how does this plant,

20:02

what's the potential of this plant? And

20:04

then you and then that the third phase

20:06

is the crafting phase where it's like

20:08

okay I have this plant maybe I'm going

20:10

to trim it or maybe I'm gonna uh combine

20:14

it with these other plants to make some

20:16

something else with it. Now it's like

20:18

material that you have and then finally

20:20

is the the completion or or finishing

20:23

phase which is the final edit getting to

20:28

the version of it the version of it

20:30

that's the one that you can share with

20:31

the world if if that's something you're

20:32

going to do. And I've come to realize

20:35

that by the time you're going into the

20:38

completion phase, you can have a

20:40

deadline and it won't hurt the project.

20:44

In fact, it might help the project. And

20:46

I didn't know that before. So, I've

20:48

worked on projects that have gone longer

20:49

than they necessarily needed to and

20:52

maybe not in the best interest of the

20:54

project because I didn't know that. I

20:56

didn't understand that that the timing

20:58

of that because I because I am so aware

21:02

of the necessity in the experimental

21:07

phase to not have a deadline

21:10

that I assumed that that held through

21:13

the whole project. It's not a clear

21:16

phase one finishes and then you start

21:18

phase two, phase two finishes and then

21:19

you start phase three. You move back and

21:22

forth between them. I'm collecting seeds

21:23

all the time. I'm always in phase one.

21:26

And then probably to some degree there's

21:28

always some version of experimentation

21:30

going on. Maybe not now, but if

21:32

something's on a list of things I want

21:34

to look at, hopefully I'll get get to

21:36

the list and give them some

21:38

experimentation and see what they can

21:40

turn into. And then if they do turn into

21:43

something, then they get to the crafting

21:45

phase where it's more, okay, now I have

21:47

this thing. What do what do I know about

21:50

this kind of thing? What can I match

21:52

this with? What can I use this for? How

21:54

can I be involved as a craftsman? By the

21:58

end of the crafting phase or deep into

22:00

the crafting phase,

22:03

you can start seeing the end. You know,

22:05

you can start seeing an end. And then

22:07

you can even dictate an end. But I

22:09

recommend if you do, just dictate it for

22:11

you, not for anyone else. Because if

22:13

something comes up where you learn if if

22:16

you uh [clears throat]

22:18

set a deadline, a public deadline, and

22:22

then a new discovery happens along the

22:24

way and you realize, oh, this could

22:25

actually be much better than I thought,

22:27

but I need more time. It's harder to do

22:29

that if you set the deadline.

22:31

>> The chapter on self-doubt was really

22:33

interesting to me. I'll read the first

22:35

sentence of it um which is that

22:37

self-doubt lives in all of us

22:39

>> and while we may wish it was gone, it is

22:41

there to serve us. Uh and it goes on to

22:44

describe how to um dance with

22:46

self-doubt. As one gets better at their

22:48

craft, you can imagine self-doubt goes

22:50

down. I think that's the perception of a

22:52

lot of people, right? You get better

22:54

what you're doing. Self-confidence goes

22:55

up, self-doubt goes down. But I think

22:58

you and I both know a number of people

22:59

who are successful enough to know that

23:01

often times there's a mirror image to

23:03

that where people feel pressure because

23:05

they did it once, now they got to do it

23:07

again.

23:07

>> Self-doubt is a it's like a um

23:12

it's a check on yourself. It can either

23:14

be really helpful or it can undermine

23:17

you. So, it's something we all have and

23:20

if we let it undermine us, then we don't

23:22

make anything and that's not good. But

23:24

when used as a a balancing tool in our

23:28

lives, it serves a great function. I

23:31

think the the phrases in the book, you

23:33

can doubt your way to a great work, you

23:34

know, to a masterpiece.

23:36

>> Have you ever encountered music that

23:38

really works well live but just does not

23:40

work in a recording? You don't have to

23:42

name names.

23:43

>> Yeah, I don't think so. I feel like

23:44

maybe there are some artists who are

23:47

great live who've never captured it well

23:49

on record. The Grateful Dead's a good

23:51

example of a band where I feel like

23:53

their albums are not their strong point,

23:56

but they're, if you hear live

23:57

recordings, they're really interesting

23:59

and really different from each other.

24:01

And that's kind of part of what makes

24:02

the Grateful Dead interesting is their

24:05

unpredictability. They're looking for

24:07

something

24:08

>> and sometimes they find it

24:10

>> and if you're there when they find it,

24:12

it feels exciting. It's not just

24:14

following a script. It's like something

24:16

is really happening. It's a it's a real

24:18

moment. Something that I aim for in the

24:21

studio

24:23

is to create real moments that when you

24:26

hear them, they don't necessarily sound

24:29

perfect. They sound like something that

24:32

really happened and in that moment

24:34

something happened and it's a special

24:36

moment. It's it's really what it's how

24:39

jazz works as well. The way you describe

24:43

um experiences going by in time and or

24:46

or things emerging in time and the

24:48

creative process being a way of

24:50

capturing those moments was beautifully

24:52

captured in the in the analogy you gave

24:54

about a kind of a con a conveyor belt

24:57

going by. I'll just read it to be beware

24:59

of the assumption that the way you work

25:01

is the best way simply because it's the

25:03

way you've done it before. Maybe you

25:05

could elaborate on this a little bit. I

25:07

mean, we want to have, you know,

25:09

mechanisms and routines we can trust.

25:12

>> Yeah.

25:12

>> But this is a, I think, an important

25:15

warning.

25:16

>> Yeah. When something works,

25:19

it's easy to be fooled into believing

25:24

that's the way to do it or that's the

25:27

right way. It's just a way and it's just

25:30

a way that happened to work that time.

25:32

This plays into when you get advice from

25:36

people who have more experience than

25:38

you. The advice that they're giving you

25:41

is not based on your life or your

25:44

experience. It's based on their life and

25:45

their experience that have very

25:47

different data points than yours.

25:50

So

25:52

maybe they're giving you good advice,

25:54

but maybe they're giving you good advice

25:55

for them and not giving you good advice

25:58

for you. I think it's hard enough to

26:00

even figure out what's right for

26:01

ourselves and if we do somehow crack the

26:05

code of what's right for us,

26:08

be happy we have it and then still know

26:11

I wonder if that's the only way. Maybe

26:13

there's an even better way that we're

26:15

not considering.

26:16

>> I forget the exact title of the chapter,

26:18

but um there's a chapter about being on

26:21

the lookout for clues.

26:23

>> Yeah.

26:24

>> Do you think there are clues in in every

26:26

everywhere? Yes, I think there are clues

26:28

everywhere for if we pay attention,

26:31

we'll hear a phrase, it'll trigger a a

26:34

thought, we'll see something unexpected.

26:38

Um, in the if someone recommends

26:42

something to you, maybe it's a

26:44

coincidence. If three people recommend

26:47

the same thing to you, maybe it's not. I

26:49

do believe the universe is on the side

26:53

of creativity

26:55

and the universe is supporting

26:59

things to happen and they can happen

27:01

through you or they could happen through

27:03

someone else. So if you're paying

27:07

attention maybe it'll happen through

27:08

you. The belief part of it is a huge

27:11

part of the conversation

27:13

about everything. You know what we

27:15

believe has power. If we believe we can

27:18

make something great, the chances of us

27:20

making something great are better than

27:23

if we don't believe we can. So, uh I I

27:27

would say any ability to harness your

27:30

belief on your behalf is a really

27:33

healthy thing to do. One thing that you

27:36

make very clear is that while our own

27:39

abilities may come into question from

27:41

time to time,

27:43

you absolutely believe that the elements

27:47

from which to create are out there.

27:49

>> Absolutely. All all the elements are all

27:52

are are here. Everything is here. We get

27:55

to pick and choose. We get to the

27:57

conveyor belts going by with little

27:59

gifts. First, we have to notice there's

28:01

a conveyor belt. Then we notice the

28:04

gifts and then that's the starting

28:06

point. And then we may even feel uh

28:11

uh empowered enough to grab one of the

28:13

gifts and open it up and see what's

28:14

inside. And then maybe that's the start

28:17

of something really beautiful.

28:18

Everything that I make or have made has

28:22

always been based on something that I

28:25

see or hear that

28:29

allows me to see something that I didn't

28:31

see before. So, I was going to ask you

28:33

whether or not it's important to be

28:35

happy in order to create, but certainly

28:38

a lot of people that were unhappy were

28:39

still able to create. But the more I

28:42

listen to you, it seems that it's really

28:45

about an ability to pay attention.

28:47

>> Yes.

28:48

>> So, if I'm unhappy or if I'm happy may

28:51

not be as relevant as whether or not I'm

28:54

able to stay undistracted.

28:56

>> Yes. I would say being able to stay

28:59

present in the work is probably the most

29:03

most important part of it and how you

29:06

feel

29:08

is less of an issue unless how you feel

29:11

gets in the way of you feeling how the

29:14

work makes you feel.

29:15

>> I do want to ask you about one other

29:16

aspect of process which is meditation.

29:20

How would you define meditation? Well,

29:22

there's different there are different

29:24

types of meditation. Usually, we either

29:28

are

29:29

engaging in a mantra which would be a

29:32

version of a almost like a creating a

29:36

trance for ourselves.

29:38

Not unlike listening [clears throat] to

29:40

something when we go to sleep that would

29:41

distract our conscious mind from

29:46

participating. we would be overriding

29:50

our uh the the talking mind with just a

29:54

sound that we're generating or a word or

29:57

a phrase series of phrases or it could

29:59

be focused on the breath. But the

30:01

purpose of being focused on the breath

30:04

is to not

30:07

hear the self-t talk that we normally

30:10

have. It's a singlepointed

30:13

focus exercise in those that I

30:15

described. The other version is an

30:17

awareness meditation where you're

30:20

closing your eyes and you're being with

30:23

whatever is. There's no story. There's

30:26

no this means this. None of those

30:29

things. Just like an inventory almost of

30:32

everything that comes up when it comes

30:34

up. And you do that for a period of

30:36

time. But in in all of those cases in in

30:39

the example of doing the awareness

30:41

meditation or doing a mantra meditation

30:44

or focusing on the breath in none of

30:46

them am I thinking and none of them am I

30:50

concentrating on

30:53

I I'm I'm being aware of the of sense

30:57

perceptions

30:59

in the awareness one

31:02

or in the other meditations I'm doing a

31:05

practice this so that I'm not aware of

31:08

thinking about anything else. And

31:10

there's also something called the um the

31:14

surgical series from the Monroe

31:15

Institute which

31:19

I used when I had a surgery. You listen

31:22

to this recording and

31:25

it both [clears throat] allows your body

31:27

to heal much faster and removes some of

31:30

the trauma that goes on when you know

31:32

getting cut open. It's traumatic. But

31:34

just through listening to certain

31:36

things, you can um can have a really

31:39

powerful effect, heal much faster. I

31:41

remember I was about to be put under for

31:45

a surgery and my eyes were closed and I

31:48

wasn't communicating with anyone there

31:49

because I was going inside and um and my

31:54

wife was with me and they came in and

31:56

they said, "Oh, um so they already gave

31:58

Rick Rick the sedative because he's

32:00

ready to wheel in." She's like, "I

32:01

didn't give him anything." He's like,

32:02

"But look at his numbers." just like,

32:04

"Yeah, [laughter]

32:06

>> I love it. I love that you're so willing

32:08

to share what you do and your process."

32:11

And I just want to thank you for being

32:13

such an incredible portal and also for

32:15

being an amazing friend.

32:17

>> Thank you. I love you. I'm so happy to

32:19

be here with you. And anytime I get to

32:20

see you, it's a good day.

32:22

>> Likewise.

Interactive Summary

In this discussion, renowned producer Rick Rubin shares his philosophy on creativity, viewing it not as a linear, intellectual process, but as an intuitive, dream-like engagement with the world. He emphasizes the importance of staying present, maintaining curiosity, and protecting the creative process from outside pressures or rigid deadlines. Rubin also covers practical aspects like the phases of a project, the role of meditation in managing awareness, and why cultivating a childlike perspective is essential for genuine artistic expression.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts