HomeVideos

Trump's First Week: Inauguration Recap, Executive Actions, TikTok, Stargate + Sacks is Back!

Now Playing

Trump's First Week: Inauguration Recap, Executive Actions, TikTok, Stargate + Sacks is Back!

Transcript

3264 segments

0:00

so we had a dinner where me and freeberg

0:02

and J Cal were invited to have dinner

0:04

with the folks from and their and their

0:06

other top podcast off the Record dinner

0:08

let's talk all about it there was an

0:10

interesting moment which even Friedberg

0:12

had to recognize which was we went

0:14

around and said hey what what podcast

0:15

you listening to which ones are your

0:16

favorites we went out in the room and I

0:19

gotta tell you you know what your

0:20

podcaster favorite podcast is bingo

0:23

Allin podcast well the funniest thing is

0:25

my wife thinks I'm bullshitting all the

0:27

time I say this is a mine too pretty

0:29

reasonably success F and well she

0:30

doesn't believe it she thinks we're all

0:32

why do you think I waited to

0:34

make my world podcast premiere for Allin

0:36

all the ankle biters called and I said

0:38

no I'm just going to wait I'm wait to

0:40

the bestie's

0:42

call can we just say it Nick you got to

0:44

it up when podcast called you're like

0:47

nope can't do it waiting sry I'm waiting

0:49

for the real deal I don't need

0:54

JV let your winners

0:56

ride Rainman David

1:02

and instead we open source it to the

1:03

fans and they've just gone crazy with it

1:05

love queen

1:09

of all right everybody welcome back to

1:11

the number one business finance

1:13

technology science podcast in the world

1:16

this is the place where we call balls

1:19

and Strikes where we tell the truth

1:21

where there is zero

1:23

censorship every week we tell you about

1:27

the truth behind the most important

1:29

stories we point out who the heroes are

1:31

and who the villains are who are the

1:34

delightful ones and who are the disra

1:36

with me again on this week's program the

1:40

cackling chairman dictator my guy mouth

1:44

poly Hoppa how you doing how was your

1:46

Victory La how was your Victory really

1:48

really really fun you look like you were

1:51

in your Afterglow and I have to say that

1:55

was looking pretty good uh we have some

1:57

pictures don't worry we're going to go

1:58

through behind the scenes

2:00

Armani came through for Amore the amort

2:04

collection from Armani coming this fall

2:06

by the way I mean Armani Couture is like

2:08

firing on all cylinders the the other

2:10

the other one which you'll see is a

2:12

great picture of this incredible jacket

2:14

Louisa beia two shout outs Armani and

2:17

Louisa bear you know I was just thinking

2:19

that Armani really has been making it

2:21

happen now that we've talked about that

2:22

we'll talk about my wardrobe when the

2:24

time comes just get through the rest of

2:25

the interest all right all right and of

2:28

course here is your Sultan of

2:32

science David Friedberg Move Along J

2:35

let's go let's go had a wonderful he's

2:38

very bitter today he's got a lot of

2:40

anger he is the Barista of bitterness

2:42

today he's serving up bitterness all day

2:45

long and he had a great time at the um

2:47

maybe he's a little upset about the Lex

2:49

fredman triangle we're in right now I

2:51

think that could be part of it and we

2:53

have a special guest

2:55

here Thomas leant is the co-founder of

2:59

kou management they got a 50 Billy under

3:03

management uh public private yada yada

3:07

before that he worked at creative artist

3:09

Agency for seven years after he he went

3:11

to college so he does have the college

3:13

degree he signed Captain

3:16

America which is freeberg favorite

3:18

avenger Chris evris Evans Chris EV and

3:21

um Hasa client by the way yes and you're

3:25

still in touch with him I am not you're

3:28

not but I watched with Wonder at uh what

3:31

he's achieved after I left being his

3:34

agent it's been incredible great career

3:36

now now behind you we see this

3:38

incredible uh you're missing the one

3:41

you're missing the one part which is

3:42

that Thomas was one of the highest rated

3:44

speakers that we had at the all in

3:46

Summit yeah that's true actually he did

3:48

really great last year really crushed it

3:49

crushed it crushed it of course and I

3:51

think I'm I'm in the seventh best de

3:53

position and and hoping potentially

3:55

after the podcast to at least move up by

3:57

one okay so there you go let's see what

3:59

happens here now what what's this view

4:01

behind you this is uh Los Angel

4:03

definitely put you ahead of jcal Thomas

4:05

so you're wow you're up a spot my God he

4:08

really is serving up the bitterness

4:10

today

4:11

yeah so mad he's soad you know why you

4:14

know why he's mad I'll tell you why

4:17

because

4:19

okay this is for the audience Jason is

4:22

complaining all week in the group chat

4:24

that he has influenza A he's sending

4:27

pictures of him getting IVs and so

4:29

freeberg the

4:30

conscientious guy and co-founder of the

4:33

Pod that he is says I will moderate and

4:36

then he invests his time okay he's got

4:40

he's got a lot of things going on he's

4:41

got do three kids plus one on he's

4:44

running a company strawberries he

4:47

prepares and then you wake up after a

4:50

dose of Tamiflu and decide no I'm ready

4:52

to moderate of course and you can't just

4:55

do that because it's not nice all right

4:57

put hey Madame producer can you come on

5:00

the horn for a second here are we really

5:02

gonna do this yes we are we're gonna do

5:04

it we're doing it Madam this is so

5:06

stupid so

5:08

stupidy did I tell you to get freeberg

5:12

involved no no I did it myself okay you

5:15

went rogue can I say why you can go

5:18

Rogue I'm fine I said hey Jason how are

5:20

you feeling you said horrible I have the

5:22

flu I'm getting an IV tomorrow morning

5:24

to me that was like oh okay there's like

5:26

a 50% chance he misses the show so I

5:29

reached sh to freeberg I said hey

5:30

Jason's really sick with the flu maybe

5:32

you should just prepare yourself to

5:34

moderate tomorrow okay now when did I

5:37

find out about this when did I I think

5:39

that was a smart decision but you sir

5:40

are a small bitter man and so what you

5:43

did was you wanted to just yeah you

5:45

wanted to blow up free Brook's

5:46

preparation I found out about this this

5:48

morning I found out about this like an

5:49

hour ago how are you feeling I feel 80%

5:54

of a normal jcal which is 110% of any

5:57

other moderator I me get yourself Andrew

5:58

rorin I'm sorry he's genu flecting at

6:01

Davos to a bunch of

6:03

mids well we're going to get lexon so

6:06

we're going to get Lex oh that would be

6:08

great hello I am Lex fredman welcome to

6:12

the number one podcast in the world

6:15

today on the program we have Thomas

6:17

lefon investor in such great companies

6:20

as all right listen enough Shenanigans

6:22

we had so much fun we tore DC apart

6:25

let's start with actually just Thomas

6:27

did you watch any of it on TV did you

6:30

think about going it was really like um

6:33

there was so many tech people in

6:35

Washington this weekend I saw the live

6:37

stream I talked to saaks last night to

6:39

get get the download and you know my

6:42

takeaway just from watching especially

6:44

the executive orders was you know

6:46

democracy in action democracy

6:49

self-correct yeah and dictatorships

6:51

double down and to watch in real time a

6:54

country of our scale and a democracy you

6:57

know decide to make a change

6:59

I think that's why we've been great for

7:02

you know 250 plus years and will remain

7:04

great so it was fun to watch I'm really

7:07

curious to see what your takeaway was

7:09

okay well let's just we'll just go

7:11

behind the scenes first of all it's hard

7:13

to see that this was me dressed up for

7:15

Sax's ball I really brought the Heat

7:17

this is by the way Luca rubac is the

7:19

tailor here it's hard to see is blue Co

7:24

so this is what I'm saying I think the

7:26

picture is very hard to see but it's a

7:27

very refined green pap gley

7:31

o subtle hard to bring it out now I will

7:35

say this was the most popular shirt over

7:37

the entire weekend this is just a simple

7:39

Bion tuxedo shirt it was 200 versions of

7:43

it I felt bad when I saw because

7:45

normally I don't like to wear things

7:46

that other people are wearing correct

7:48

yeah what did Michael salor think of

7:50

this when you saw Michael salor at the

7:51

um at the you know I met I met Michael

7:54

CFO wonderfully nice guy so this is us

7:57

at the this is us at the crypto ball I

7:59

went for white tuxedo on the first night

8:01

I've never had three tuxedos before but

8:04

David looked David looked really great I

8:05

really love and saaks had this

8:08

incredible tux which was more crypto

8:10

themed it sort of looked like the

8:12

opening scene from The Matrix so there

8:14

was like this cool print you can see my

8:16

green in there a little bit Thomas in

8:17

this okay yeah yeah got it there's sky

8:21

and new money Sunny the president of

8:23

grock suep madra

8:26

x.com here the besties here the besties

8:29

I was

8:29

let's be honest guys even in all your

8:31

bitterness freeberg you felt the love at

8:33

this moment when we were all back

8:35

together did you not well minutes before

8:38

this when the three of us took a a video

8:39

a photo it was great yeah yeah okay

8:42

great so bit let you moderate you can

8:46

moderate if you want if you're that BR

8:48

you're doing a great job j keep we're 18

8:51

minutes into this and we're doing

8:52

fashion still Vin Sky Diego berkin the

8:55

co-founder of cloud kitchens so handsome

8:58

that

9:00

this was the crypto ball yeah this was

9:02

the crypto ball this was like this was

9:04

Sox's event it was

9:05

incredible it was a large number of

9:09

people there I was shocked at the number

9:11

of people at the crypto oh it was it was

9:13

huge hug here's a little poker after

9:16

behind the scenes with

9:18

pink TK Travis Clinic the co-founder the

9:22

founder of uber oh look that's on we got

9:24

to see who who's got the biggest stack

9:26

look it's the founder of uber next to

9:28

the third investor Uber uh and the

9:31

founder of cloud kitchens next to the

9:34

investor in Cloud kit Peter Teal's house

9:36

this is Katie Han and Kyle

9:38

Sani my wife and's wife amore amore this

9:43

is at Peter's house Peter had this Peter

9:44

te had this person going around taking

9:47

pictures this not good lighting for

9:49

you there better oh this was great also

9:53

Peter Teal's house yeah that was great I

9:56

have to say shth putting aside Jason

9:59

likes being a republican here's a here's

10:01

a here's a dinner that we had there's

10:03

Lex fredman Julius Janikowski who's the

10:06

former chairman of the FCC little known

10:08

the uh former uh former roommate of

10:11

Obama by the way following this dinner

10:13

all those streets were blocked off and

10:15

there was no way to get around you see

10:17

it there look you see the it was like 10

10:20

degrees Fen so we walk out yes it's

10:22

terrible it was like you were going to

10:24

die after two seconds out there it was C

10:28

start walking to try get our car and

10:31

after walking for like half a mile we're

10:33

like dude there's no way out of this

10:34

downtown area and Vinnie was shaking

10:36

he's like I'm going to die I'm going to

10:37

die I'm gonna die he turns around he

10:38

goes running back to the restaurant

10:40

jumps in and basically like huddles down

10:44

in the restaurant and then after about

10:45

10 minutes there's no way out he's like

10:47

you know it's sort of like you're in a

10:48

military zone he's like I'm gonna go for

10:50

it he runs out jumps on a scooter and he

10:52

disappeared into the distance and I

10:53

swore I would never see Vinnie again I'm

10:55

like that's it I think it's very smart

10:57

that Lex wears the same outfit the black

11:00

suit with the white shirt with the black

11:01

tie I really like the the consistency of

11:03

it actually it looks really he this is

11:05

it was incredible he was getting stopped

11:07

here here's every two minutes it was

11:10

unbelievable here's the jacket this is

11:12

Louisa beia and then here's the box from

11:14

Armani thank you unboxing whoa wah wa

11:18

wewa oh look there's a little side boob

11:21

there with that I didn't notice

11:23

that that's uh this is I'm wearing Tom

11:26

Ford shout out Tom Ford shout out

11:29

perfect mail for oh here's a huge shout

11:32

out to two guys that I had really wanted

11:34

to meet in person I finally got the

11:35

chance to meet this is at zuck's party

11:37

this is Brendan Carr who's the incoming

11:39

chairman of the FCC actually this

11:41

picture was taken right after he had

11:44

gotten confirmed so this was his first

11:47

day as the chairman and then this is a

11:49

guy who I've been following for a couple

11:50

of years Jared isman who is now going to

11:53

run NASA he's the founder and CEO of

11:55

shift for payments but both of these

11:58

guys are pretty epic you should should

11:59

follow them on Twitter he did a space

12:01

walk the first civilian Space Walk he

12:02

did he's he's he's really really Bron

12:05

was really nice I met him at Peter's uh

12:07

event and he told me he's a big fan of

12:09

the Pod he listens to show every amazing

12:10

I mean by the way if you want to see

12:12

like some really amazing tweets he had

12:14

some real bangers he's a very smart guy

12:17

he's um I've had Brendan on this week St

12:21

a couple times he's the guy who

12:23

fought for Starling that's right over

12:28

wasting five

12:30

$20,000 per home to install Broadband I

12:34

mean this guy's a hero uh and and he did

12:36

that when he was in office under Biden

12:38

and all that crazy corruption and grift

12:41

this is a picture of Mike Johnson and

12:43

his wife it this is a crazy story so

12:46

there was a G7 Summit in Italy and Mike

12:50

and his wife had was seated beside my

12:52

father-in-law Nat's dad at a dinner they

12:55

got to know each other he as a proud

12:58

grandpa showed Mike and his wife

13:00

pictures of natad and myself and our

13:02

kids and how we actually met in this

13:04

moment was his wife was like oh my God I

13:07

recognize you you're Sergio's son-in-law

13:09

you're Sergio's daughter it's amazing

13:12

and then we had a cool conversation so

13:14

that was cool and then this is Bill py

13:16

who is nominated to run fhfa which for

13:20

folks that know will be in control of

13:22

the conservatorship of Fanny May and

13:25

Freddy Mack and really great guy also a

13:28

co-investor with with me in Mr

13:30

Beast

13:32

not oh you're an investor in Mr Beast

13:34

there you go this is Mr I did the series

13:36

a this is the first time I think you've

13:38

said the here's this thing so this is

13:40

where jcal is at his Peak go ahead just

13:43

play I don't even know what this is go

13:45

what what is that what did you order all

13:47

right um I've given it some

13:49

thought and I'm going to order the

13:52

$95 do

13:54

Soul the $95 D soul

14:00

your tips included in I

14:04

mean we were just having such a great

14:07

time uh tearing it up I did order the

14:10

$95 do this is a oh sorry oh that's

14:13

that's me and Bobby Kennedy but this is

14:14

a this is walking into the capital for

14:17

the inauguration oh wow so you basically

14:19

you have to get off all these buses were

14:21

taking us in because of the security and

14:24

then you walk underneath and underground

14:26

to get into the and this is Bobby and

14:29

the guy right there c means another

14:31

great American make America healthy

14:33

again all right here's a couple of my

14:34

picks this is um me with somebody who's

14:38

going to be in the administration I'm

14:39

not big on politics but um telsey gabard

14:42

is Gab she's so strong she went she came

14:45

to our party this is the picture of our

14:47

party she is incredible well she came up

14:49

to me and she you know you can always

14:51

tell who a real fan is and she up I just

14:54

want to tell you J C I am a huge fan of

14:56

the Pod I love what you do I love the

14:59

you know balance should bring to the

14:59

program she really liked new details

15:01

about the podcast and so I wanted to get

15:04

a picture with her so as a joke I said

15:06

to her do you want to take a selfie I

15:09

said I'm okay with the selfie she goes I

15:10

was going to ask I was like no I'm

15:11

preemptively asking we took it together

15:14

funar she I think she's gonna be great I

15:16

like her a lot she's such a star oh well

15:20

yeah this is hello I am Lex Freedman

15:23

today with love and peace in my heart I

15:26

am interviewing dictator ID Amin who has

15:29

eaten half of his enemies we will share

15:31

love kindness and a fatty liver

15:36

enjoy so yeah that was us just tearing

15:38

it up after the YouTube party where we

15:40

hung out with Sundar and Neil from

15:44

YouTube they've been very good to us and

15:46

then here's one more I guess one more

15:48

and golfer Bryson dambo oh there's me

15:51

and the uh Presidente uh Twitter and

15:55

yeah this is the podcast crew at the

15:57

Free Press party okay let's talk about

15:59

key takeaways Chamas what is your big

16:02

takeaway from the weekend I think my

16:04

biggest takeaway is

16:07

that if you look in the

16:09

past there was a very tight coordination

16:13

I guess I would say between Private

16:17

Industry and the private sector and the

16:18

public sector meaning the president and

16:22

then people who were in charge of

16:25

managing huge vast swats of resources in

16:28

America and somewhere along the way that

16:31

became either unfashionable and uncool

16:35

particularly under

16:37

Democrats and what I saw was a very

16:41

broad-based

16:43

Embrace of business people because I

16:46

think that the president understands how

16:48

important it is to make sure that

16:50

economically America is just firing on

16:52

all cylinders the one thing to remember

16:54

like for example in the inauguration I

16:56

know that you saw the picture and it was

16:58

basically like

16:59

meta Google Apple Amazon Tesla kind of

17:03

CEOs Etc Founders Arno was there mukash

17:07

Amani was there so it's just business

17:09

people from the entire world were there

17:12

and so I think what it says is America's

17:15

G to basically turn a totally new page

17:17

we're not going to ostracize people

17:19

we're not going to play favorites that's

17:21

the other thing you know Elon was there

17:23

right at the beginning but if you saw

17:25

all the CEOs of the you know major

17:28

companies were there it's not like he

17:29

excluded Zuck because of his past issues

17:31

or anything or Sam Alman or Sam Alman

17:35

that was the biggest more notable one

17:37

yeah to exclude yeah that that the

17:40

president doesn't play favorites that

17:42

this is like Team America kind of thing

17:45

and it was a projection of tremendous

17:46

power to the rest of the world this is

17:48

what America is about I loved every

17:50

minute of it and I think that this is

17:53

exactly how the American government

17:55

should be working which is hand inand

17:56

with Private Industry to basically set

17:59

the pace for the rest of the world Thom

18:01

did you have a takeway after the weekend

18:04

I did I'm curious what you guys thought

18:06

but to me what was notable from Scott

18:09

Besson the new treasury secretary he was

18:12

asked in one of the exchanges about the

18:15

green Energy race with China and he

18:18

reframed the debate I thought incredibly

18:20

well where he said we're not in a green

18:22

Energy race with China we're in an

18:23

energy race with China that's right

18:26

right and he made the point that China

18:27

is adding 100 coal plants it's adding

18:30

nuclear and to me it was kind of just

18:33

137 gwatt Hydro facility which is

18:37

exactly unbelievable and it was such a

18:39

good framing of the debate because I

18:41

think chamath to your point it's about

18:43

reframing the right issues right and I

18:46

think that just that little piece of

18:47

dialogue to me is exemplified you know

18:50

and was a really important takeaway and

18:52

I think more of what we'll see over the

18:54

next coming year freeberg did you have a

18:55

takeaway coming out of this there was

18:57

just so much it was so impressive to be

18:59

there I definitely Echo the sentiment

19:01

about seeing the strength of America

19:04

represented between the entrepreneurial

19:07

engine that has driven this country for

19:09

250 years and the government that's

19:12

meant to serve the people working

19:14

together to try and take America forward

19:16

it was just really inspiring um the one

19:19

thing that was the biggest kind of

19:21

observation for me which was a bit of a

19:22

disappointment unfortunately is I feel

19:25

like Doge and cost cutting

19:29

is going to be a lot harder to realize

19:31

than folks assume uh nearly everyone I

19:34

met with who works in government or is

19:37

entering

19:38

government had this if not disdain for

19:42

Doge a concern that it doesn't really

19:46

align interests with the political

19:48

objectives of politicians that they need

19:51

to get more stuff for their constituents

19:53

in order to get reelected and that

19:54

they're not going to vote programs away

19:56

they're not going to vote themselves out

19:57

of a job which is effectively what they

19:59

would do if they cut programs in fact I

20:01

was watching Brook

20:03

Roland's secretary a confirmation

20:05

hearing this morning and Mitchell

20:08

Connell was given the opportunity to ask

20:10

her questions you know what his question

20:12

was he said in the last farm bill I was

20:15

able to get $60 million to build an a

20:17

research lab at the University Kentucky

20:19

and it hasn't started being built yet

20:21

it's been four years what are you going

20:22

to do about that this is literally the

20:25

intention of so many of these

20:27

conversations if you sit and watch and

20:28

then I watched a similar conversation

20:30

with a senator from Minnesota who you

20:33

know I I won't get into all the the

20:34

statements but every single conversation

20:37

you hear and we even talked with Ted

20:39

Cruz about this is all about great by

20:41

the way I love Ted Cruz it's all about

20:44

excellent It's all about what can I get

20:46

for my constituents how do I get more

20:48

jobs and how do I get more money and

20:51

ultimately that incentive is what gets

20:53

people elected and I don't think it's

20:55

going to change and so that was the

20:57

biggest kind of shock for me I thought

20:59

that there was a moment of the

21:00

importance of cost cutting the

21:01

importance of deficit reduction the

21:02

importance of debt reduction and I was

21:05

just a little saddened to kind of see

21:07

that that there's no stop in the train

21:10

so that was my takeaway it's a little

21:11

bit bitter I hope I'm wrong I really do

21:13

hope doge is effective and I really do

21:15

hope that policy makers start to

21:17

recognize the importance by the way R

21:19

Doo has a new book coming out we'll talk

21:21

more about his book once it's released

21:23

publicly but it speaks very clearly to

21:25

the challenge the United States is now

21:27

facing with respect to spending so I

21:29

know I've talked about this I know we

21:30

all felt like there was a big reprieve

21:31

with this election but for me it was a

21:33

little bit Bittersweet can I I say a

21:34

little bit on that first topic that I I

21:37

just want to double down on that because

21:39

one of the things that some folks said

21:42

and I guess it makes sense now that you

21:43

think about it but when you look at the

21:45

confirmation hearings there are certain

21:46

folks For Whom the resource allocation

21:49

is relatively modest inside of America

21:52

they tend to just do much better in

21:54

general and if you saw Marco Rubio's

21:56

confirmation process there was you know

21:58

it was like 99 to zero right and to your

22:02

point what what they say is that folks

22:04

that actually allocate the internal

22:06

spending in the United States gets a lot

22:09

more scrutiny because there's all of

22:11

this horse trading because they want

22:13

some of this money to get allocated into

22:15

their specific area it is going to be a

22:19

very complicated thing the the one thing

22:20

though that changed I don't know if you

22:22

saw but Doge was meant to be outside the

22:26

offices of the government and it wasn't

22:29

actually a government department and

22:32

it'll be interesting to understand when

22:34

it's explained but in the 11th Hour the

22:36

EO that established Doge established it

22:39

actually as a governmental agency yeah

22:41

we're going to get into that uh in just

22:42

a moment and um you know to build on

22:44

your point there Dave Senator Sanders uh

22:48

had a tweet today Nick I just sent it to

22:49

you already the discussion of like who

22:51

should take the brunt of these Cuts is

22:54

starting to happen and he's pointing out

22:57

you know as he should and you know hey

22:59

what's going to happen with the VA and

23:00

you're you're putting a freeze on hiring

23:02

people we have to make sure our vets are

23:04

taken care of we have a shortage of

23:05

doctors a short of of nurses but we do

23:08

have people you know responding to him

23:10

saying hey how are we going to pay for

23:11

all this so even if it's going to be

23:13

hard to do it's going to take courage

23:15

because you're going to be faced with

23:17

situations like this where does anybody

23:20

want to see va's budget cut and these

23:22

veterans who are coming back they should

23:24

get all the services in the world and

23:26

these hard discussions are now happening

23:28

and it's not taboo so the Overton

23:30

Windows wide open now to discuss even

23:33

the budget of the VA and where is the

23:34

money going to come from so I think

23:36

we're actually going to make progress on

23:38

it the this was like a sacred cow and

23:40

now we're we're talking about it uh to

23:42

the to Bernie Sanders point I don't know

23:44

if you saw there was a note on there

23:45

Nick community notes pointed out that

23:49

Trump put that none of the cuts should

23:51

impact vets and so I thought that was um

23:54

a good use of community notes there the

23:56

one comment I'll say about burn Bernie

23:58

Sanders is when Russ vote who is the

24:01

nominee to run om went through his

24:04

confirmation

24:07

yesterday Sanders asked a similar

24:09

question around Medicare and Medicaid

24:11

and what was interesting is Russ tried

24:13

to actually answer the question and give

24:16

the details around where they can be

24:19

waste Fraud and Abuse Sanders really

24:21

didn't want to hear it he just wanted a

24:22

sound bite so I think these confirmation

24:26

processes are

24:29

performative they're hugely performative

24:32

yes I do think that and this applies I

24:34

think to both sides Democrats as well

24:36

when when they are eventually in power I

24:39

think that when you're given a very

24:41

clear mandate as a president I think you

24:43

should be able to get to pick your

24:45

team because it's clear that the

24:47

American people have voted an agenda

24:49

it's not like he hid that agenda and so

24:51

the people that then want to implement

24:53

that agenda should be put on the field

24:55

it seems like the point of these should

24:56

be if somebody could get compromised or

24:59

there was something really gnarly in

25:00

their background like but otherwise yeah

25:03

let people build their team and then

25:04

they have to own their results tell us

25:06

about your feelings and takeaways about

25:09

the weekend well you know it's obviously

25:10

mixed I was a never Trumper and uh now

25:13

I'm rooting for him wholeheartedly to do

25:15

great

25:16

work hon you kind of like him come on

25:19

you do kind of like anybody who met

25:22

anybody who interacted with Trump before

25:25

you go your diet tribe just say it just

25:26

say you like him there are aspects I

25:29

like about the platform I like probably

25:30

80% of the platform and I will tell you

25:33

today that 20% I don't like I'm always

25:34

gonna call balls and Strikes but you you

25:37

kind of like him just say you kind of

25:38

like him you do like him I like 80% of

25:41

his platform this time around him him as

25:43

a person you know I there's things I

25:45

really don't like and I'll talk about

25:47

them today but anyway let's put inside

25:49

the the personal thing doesn't matter

25:51

what matters is what he does for the

25:52

American people and like you I know you

25:54

can't say it yet but they're deep down

25:56

inside you like Jak to be there you had

26:00

I have to say I had a lot of

26:03

fun Republicans are fun I will say

26:07

Republicans are fun fashion was off the

26:09

hook off the hook lot of great fashion

26:11

and it was great America beautiful again

26:13

my gosh I mean listen I no more jogging

26:16

pants and and white get rid of it

26:18

Burn It To The Ground B what I'll say my

26:21

takeaway was you know as somebody who

26:24

had concerns and you know I'm just I'm

26:25

not going to make the show about me but

26:27

the

26:28

important thing for me is who is Trump

26:32

going to lead with this time around is

26:35

it going to be the people from the sort

26:36

of 1.0 movement or the 2.0 movement

26:39

there was not a 1.0 person couldn't be

26:42

be couldn't be found couldn't be found

26:44

and so to like on the margin one or two

26:47

and and they were not the focus and who

26:51

you put in the front row speaks volumes

26:54

who do you put in the front row Sundar

26:58

Elon Zuck Lauren Sanchez he's got his

27:01

priorities straight here Lauren Sanchez

27:04

the priorities were very clear as to

27:07

what's important for this Administration

27:10

and I'm fully behind all of his

27:12

priorities both of those priorities all

27:15

those priorities seem incredibly

27:17

important to me you're such troll I mean

27:20

I don't want to troll too much but

27:22

that's the big takeaway for me and if

27:23

that is you know indicative of where he

27:27

wants to go with this which is business

27:29

first we're proud of our leaders we're

27:31

proud of innovation I think he's

27:33

sticking to it did you see him on at

27:35

Davos today he did a a I mean this guy's

27:38

got you know just crazy energy who mle

27:41

Trump zoomed into Davos and just dunked

27:45

on them for 45 minutes he did yes and he

27:50

just destroyed everybody at their dying

27:54

conference in their irrelevance as they

27:56

genuflected begging him to

27:59

come next year did you see the photo of

28:02

the half empty conference room to yes

28:04

you know most of the events were were

28:07

just empty chairs crazy it's it's

28:09

irrelevant I mean these people are

28:11

irrelevant now Thomas you guys remember

28:13

when Davos used to be a really big deal

28:15

is it debt I think it's worse trth I

28:17

think it's a counter indicator now it is

28:20

and there was a good conversation

28:20

yesterday greme Allison who spoke at our

28:23

Summit was on this panel and they

28:26

basically said we lost they won do like

28:29

our group here at davo is lost it's over

28:31

yeah and they're no longer to your point

28:34

on the right side of History they said

28:36

we had a point of view on the future we

28:38

believe we were going in the right

28:39

direction and everyone told us in this

28:42

last couple months that we were wrong

28:44

the gentleman by the way that spoke

28:45

after Grant was was also very good this

28:48

is incredible this is the greatest

28:50

comeback in political history of a

28:52

politician and then therefore he thinks

28:54

he can do anything we need to also

28:57

factor in not only who won which is

28:59

Trump but who's lost which is to say us

29:02

and then he has a whole the guy has a

29:03

whole long monologue on why they lost

29:06

and what they lost which I think is

29:08

pretty relevant that that you know kind

29:11

of elite if you will has been replaced

29:13

with a populist vote and a populist

29:15

leader all right let's get to our docket

29:18

today and just want to give a special

29:21

shout out we did our Inauguration live

29:23

stream and it was awesome and fun

29:26

special thanks to air call Abra and hyms

29:31

Thomas if you've ever got an issue with

29:34

weight or you know other issues that men

29:37

have you can go to hymns and use the

29:39

code Allin to get something hs.com Allin

29:42

I want you to write that down Thomas

29:43

okay in case you have have any any

29:45

issues uh that's what makes you think I

29:46

haven't already I well it's anything's

29:49

possible like I mean maybe we could talk

29:51

I mean are you on the chws or the pills

29:53

which one anyway we'll talk about it

29:55

offline but that's a full head of hair

29:57

it is a really incredible head of hair

29:59

thank you all natural baby it's great

30:01

it's great do you put what product do

30:03

you put in it yeah you put sea salt or

30:05

you got pomas what are you doing

30:07

allinone allinone PR shampoo plus

30:10

conditioner one bottle easy no but you

30:12

don't you don't use any product

30:14

afterwards none Jesus do you blow

30:17

yourself or do you have it

30:18

blown a question both but in this case

30:21

it's you know like Cuba Gooding and

30:23

Jerry Maguire I air dry baby oh air dry

30:27

gotta so when you're dry driving to that

30:28

Santa Monica office you just put the top

30:30

down on whatever convertible living that

30:33

full lifestyle okay yeah this is where I

30:35

I do have to admit unfortunately after

30:37

the after you appeared on the summit I

30:39

had all these women they were like oh my

30:41

God Thomas lefont is so good-looking and

30:44

I was like no he's not because I'm very

30:45

competitive in Zero Sum when other men

30:47

around me get but you were the Smash Hit

30:50

and then I figured out it must be the

30:52

hair and also the glasses I think the

30:54

glasses were a huge hit it looked very

30:55

Clark ksh are they are they real glasses

30:57

or you wear the clear ones to get the

30:59

extra intelligence points only time I've

31:01

ever been stopped in the street in my

31:03

life in the

31:04

Presidio a very nice lady tapped me in

31:07

the shoulder and said I loved your

31:09

all-in talk that's never happened before

31:11

so that says more about all-in than me

31:13

but the reach is

31:15

increasing it's a little bit by shout

31:17

out to Akash Singh who joined us on the

31:19

um live oh yes Akash was hilarious thank

31:22

you AOS filling in our Dei Department we

31:27

lost Cham and they sent AOS so he did

31:30

great get him back to gessos absolutely

31:32

yeah there's a moderator slot open so

31:34

he's going to be absolutely if you know

31:37

anybody who knows science all right in

31:39

our first topic president Trump smashed

31:41

the record for day one executive orders

31:44

26 in all beating the prior record of

31:47

nine by Uncle Joe Biden and no other

31:51

president signed more than one EO in day

31:54

one since the Federal Register started

31:56

tracking this in 19 1937 let's go

31:59

through them if you want to comment on

32:01

one we'll stop and pause or we can just

32:02

run through them gentlemen Doge

32:04

officially was established and uh people

32:07

are making note of the Doge SWAT team

32:10

Doge will assign an agency head to each

32:13

Federal agency the agency head will

32:15

build a four-person team this will

32:17

include an engineer an HR specialist and

32:20

an attorney it was separately announced

32:22

that v um was leaving Doge to run for

32:26

governor of Ohio fascinating interesting

32:28

I don't know if anybody's got a take

32:29

there they suspended the Tik Tock ban

32:32

for 75 days there's a lot more to get

32:36

into this so we're going to break that

32:37

down a little later TI to yeah okay

32:39

we'll go right to that in a minute the

32:41

January 6 pardons they pardon, 1500

32:44

January 6 participants including some

32:47

that savagely beat cops very

32:49

controversial we'll get back to that in

32:51

a moment ending Birthright citizenship

32:53

this is a controversial one that is

32:55

being fought legally those born in the

32:58

US to illegal immigrants would no longer

33:00

be considered citizens if this holds up

33:02

the birthright

33:04

citizenship is codified in the 14th

33:06

Amendment and 22 state attorney generals

33:09

have already sued over this executive

33:12

order so it might be a performative one

33:14

energy unleashing American Energy we're

33:16

going to dump into that one jump into

33:17

that one for sure and then federal

33:19

employees a hiring freeze and a full

33:23

return to office and the hiring fee

33:25

doesn't apply to military immigration

33:27

enforcement or Public Safety and then a

33:29

regulatory freeze on regulations

33:31

gentlemen where do we want to start Jan

33:33

6 Tik Tock Doge TI Thomas you're our

33:36

guest where do you want to start I'm

33:37

happy to chat about Tik Tok okay as we

33:40

mentioned earlier Trump extended Tik

33:42

tok's grace period by 75 days Trump said

33:45

he wants to get a deal done he also said

33:47

at a press conference that he'd like the

33:49

US to own 50% of Tik Tok and that it

33:51

could be a trillion dollar

33:53

asset that's unique and interesting he

33:58

was also positive about the idea of Elon

34:00

possibly buying it or maybe Larry

34:03

Ellison or anybody so he wants to make a

34:06

deal what are your thoughts Thomas on

34:10

what should happen with Tik Tok and what

34:12

will happen I don't know what will

34:14

happen but I do think it'd be

34:16

interesting um to share you guys we were

34:19

in we are investors in Tik Tok okay we

34:22

invested back it was obviously just a

34:24

Chinese company and investing in China

34:26

was very different back then but what

34:28

resonated to me when I met the founder

34:31

and he just had a very simple idea which

34:34

is his view was if I have a piece of

34:36

content and it's a great piece of

34:38

content how can I have it be shared and

34:40

his view was that if you share it on

34:42

Instagram the only way people see it as

34:43

if you had you know a lot of followers

34:46

and so he just had a really simple idea

34:48

and he said what if I take every piece

34:50

of content that's uploaded into the

34:52

system and I show it to at least one

34:54

other user so no matter what that

34:56

content is at least one person will see

34:59

it even if you have no followers and

35:01

then based on whether that person views

35:04

it or how long I might show it to

35:05

another user and then a third and a

35:08

fourth and it was such a revolutionary

35:10

idea and it really resonated with me at

35:12

the time and it just goes to show how

35:14

we're in an idea business and when you

35:16

have a truly revolutionary idea it can

35:18

get really big and so the the whole

35:20

Genesis of Tik Tok came from that really

35:22

simple concept of your content will be

35:25

shown and if people like it it'll be

35:27

shown to a lot of people so obviously I

35:30

mean if you look at Tik Tok in the US we

35:32

can just kind of very back of the

35:34

envelope look at the math right so if we

35:38

look at daus mother blue or meta as we

35:42

love to know the Facebook hat roughly

35:44

right has about 200 million

35:47

daus in the active users for folks who

35:50

don't know the terminology yeah correct

35:53

right so if you look at Facebook blit

35:55

Instagram you'll see it's about 200

35:56

million daus

35:58

and you can look at the time spent

36:00

what's interesting about Tik tok's time

36:02

spent is the daus are about half of

36:04

combined meta in insta so we get about

36:07

100 million daus in the US but the time

36:10

spent on the platform is the equivalent

36:13

of Facebook plus Instagram so obviously

36:17

um incredible not just scale in terms of

36:20

daus but also on time spent so if we

36:23

think about okay well what what would

36:25

that mean the business is worth so if we

36:27

look at meta today the market cap is

36:29

roughly 1 and a half

36:31

trillion I think internet investors

36:34

generally assume that roughly half the

36:36

market cap is

36:37

us so if we take the one and a half

36:40

trillion maybe that's 750 billion right

36:43

now we know that the time spent is

36:45

equivalent but the daus are half so

36:47

maybe we cut the 750 in half right that

36:50

would tell you that the max value would

36:52

po you know if you monetize the way meta

36:54

does and ranted the way zck does might

36:57

be 3 75 billion for the US asset alone I

37:01

think from that point you know you kind

37:03

of start to apply a couple discounts

37:05

right one is if that's my kind of

37:08

long-term value what kind of return

37:11

would an investor want potentially to

37:12

get to that 375 you know is it 50% so

37:16

maybe you cut that by

37:17

50% and then I think the devil would be

37:19

in the details what are exactly are you

37:21

getting are you just getting users are

37:23

you getting the algorithm are you

37:24

getting data right so maybe you also so

37:27

want to apply kind of a more kind of

37:29

severe discount to that but I think you

37:31

put it all together you know is 100

37:35

billion a reasonable

37:37

scenario you know I think the math

37:39

proves it and then could it be a

37:41

trillion dollar asset the way Trump has

37:44

mentioned I mean in a world where

37:46

Facebook's one and a half right and the

37:49

penetration of Tik Tok in the US is 50%

37:51

of what meta is I don't think it's

37:54

unrealistic so let's see what happens I

37:57

don't have any particular Insight on

37:59

what will happen but what I do know is

38:01

that it's an incredibly valuable

38:02

franchise so let me ask you the the

38:05

obvious question people are looking at

38:09

this and saying wait you're going to

38:11

take 50% of your shares and in this case

38:14

we actually have somebody here who has

38:15

shares so are you comfortable with the

38:17

government seizing 50% of your shares I

38:19

guess is one way to frame

38:21

it well I don't know I mean first of all

38:24

there's there's kind of no deals so it's

38:25

a little bit hard I can tell you that he

38:28

proposed so if in that scenario would

38:30

you yeah we never attributed much value

38:33

to the you know the Tik Tok us asset in

38:36

the sense of our our analysis was always

38:39

based on the value of the Chinese

38:40

business specifically because it's just

38:43

hard to know what the you know the Tik

38:46

Tok asset ex China would be worth right

38:48

is it worth zero because it's so

38:50

compromised regulatorily is it worth a

38:52

lot more it's just very very difficult

38:55

to know so we always took a very kind of

38:58

conservative view of really looking at

39:00

kind of the Chinese and you know some of

39:02

the other assets as the core value of B

39:04

Dan the holding

39:06

company ultimately what Tik Tok happens

39:09

I mean it's the classic when you try and

39:11

sell a company what's the value where it

39:12

depends is there one bidder or five

39:14

biders right is the government the only

39:17

uh bidder for that asset in that case it

39:19

kind of will indicate a value of x or

39:22

are there other companies that

39:23

potentially could be an acceptable

39:25

bidder to both sides

39:28

well the Trump deal though is he's

39:29

saying the government the United States

39:31

government the citizens of America would

39:32

get half of the company so that would be

39:35

the equivalent of you get shares the US

39:37

company yeah so what do you think of

39:39

this proposal because this seems like

39:44

unique in all the world so if in order

39:47

to have it spin out and maintain half

39:49

your shares would you be willing to give

39:51

all of us the government the citizens of

39:53

the United States half your shares well

39:55

I mean if you think about it what what

39:56

what did we

39:59

we learn that it might just get shut

40:01

down and be worth zero right so in one

40:04

sense anything that's greater than zero

40:07

by definition is kind of better right I

40:10

think

40:10

ultimately it will kind of come down to

40:13

does the government want to be the only

40:15

bidder for the asset or would the

40:16

comfortable would the government be

40:18

comfortable with either Elon owning it

40:20

and merging into to X or Microsoft

40:22

owning it or you know what

40:27

let me ask you a question can you just

40:29

tell the audience a little bit about

40:31

because you guys have been involved as

40:32

investors in China for a long time I

40:35

would love for you to share behind the

40:37

scenes what has gone on with respect to

40:41

being an investor in China in technology

40:44

over the last couple of years what has

40:46

changed and why and what goes on today

40:49

you guys made a fantastic investment in

40:51

by dance which is the parent company of

40:53

Tik Tok you've made other incredible

40:55

investments in China are you still

40:57

investing in China if not walk us

40:59

through what happened and why I think if

41:02

you look Dave at most of our virtually

41:05

all of our investments in China were

41:07

Chinese companies catering to the

41:09

Chinese market right right and there was

41:11

a massive trend of a very significant

41:15

economy that was adopting technology

41:17

right and so we can think about whether

41:19

that' be

41:20

smartphones companies like you know

41:23

Huawei whether it was companies like

41:25

Matan that were doing food deliver or 10

41:28

cent that were doing gaming and so you

41:31

know all our approach was basically

41:33

based on these companies and by the way

41:35

a lot of them were public which is what

41:37

people don't remember shath you may

41:39

remember but 10cent at one point was a

41:41

public company listed in Hong Kong the

41:43

market cap was 200 million yeah I do

41:46

remember so wow what was interesting

41:48

about it Dave is a lot of that played

41:50

out by do was an early IPO right so a

41:53

lot of that trend of Chinese companies

41:56

catering to the Chinese market really

41:58

kind of played out across public and

42:00

private markets for over 20 years y I

42:03

think to me what's significantly changed

42:06

over the past five

42:08

years is technology really became a

42:11

matter of National Security and I don't

42:14

think that when we were early investors

42:16

in Matan right that we necessarily

42:19

viewed that as a national security

42:21

threat as an example right and I think

42:24

as you know companies got bigger

42:27

as AI kind of came to be it became

42:29

pretty obvious that there were National

42:31

Security implications and you know our

42:34

view as investors is we don't set the

42:36

rules of the road we rely on government

42:37

and Regulators to do so it was pretty

42:39

clear I think to obvious that the

42:41

regulatory regimes were changing in both

42:43

countries and so for us as investors you

42:46

know we were just well we're just going

42:47

to follow what what the rules are and

42:49

what the governments are so my only kind

42:52

of regret through this whole thing is

42:54

and I don't know any you know if you

42:56

guys had kind some exposure to this but

42:58

the quality of the entrepreneurs that

43:00

came out of that era was

43:04

unbelievable strong cohort yeah

43:06

absolutely when you think about the the

43:07

founder of Matan Wanga and just how

43:10

brilliant he was and what he's done with

43:12

that franchise and not just doing food

43:14

delivery but also the software operating

43:16

system for restaurants right is truly

43:19

incredible Pony ma from 10cent right it

43:23

it was such an incredible group of

43:24

entrepreneurs they were a lot of fun to

43:26

be around they were excited and

43:28

passionate about bringing technology to

43:30

their

43:31

country and you know I and is it

43:34

over yeah hard to know I mean if you

43:37

look at the capital markets I mean you

43:39

can see we've not seen a tremendous

43:41

amount of innovation right or or new

43:42

companies kind of coming out so I think

43:45

the key question is you know is it a

43:47

pendulum and you know does the Chinese

43:49

regulatory regime kind of move one way

43:51

and then it kind of moves another way or

43:54

is it kind of fixed in this state is it

43:56

your Reed is it correct to say that the

44:01

CCP wanted to stop this extraordinary

44:04

wealth creation by a subset of

44:06

individuals in the country that this was

44:08

kind of becoming too much of a

44:11

capitalist enterprising system and

44:13

challenge some of the foundations of the

44:15

CCP is that what was going on and why

44:17

this all got throttled back I mean is

44:20

there or is there something something

44:21

else some other kind of you know

44:24

security I don't really know Dave

44:25

because as an investor it's you know

44:27

it's not a regulatory regime that you

44:29

have any interaction with right you're

44:31

really talking to the entrepreneurs and

44:33

you're kind of reflecting off of their

44:34

energy and their business ideas right so

44:37

we would meet businesses and we would

44:39

meet Founders and if if the idea was

44:41

kind of interesting to us we would kind

44:43

of fund it right so it's a black box in

44:45

some ways you know in terms of a market

44:47

to invest in you only have a limited

44:49

amount of

44:50

information and after Jack I mean you

44:53

got to think after Jack ma kind of

44:55

disappeared for a couple years if you're

44:57

an entrepreneur and you want to like the

45:00

message was sent the message was sent

45:02

message received and then you start

45:04

thinking about chamama you know what

45:06

Trump just did anding just did you put

45:09

those two things together Trump put all

45:11

of our top guys Top Dogs on stage here

45:14

they are it's the exact opposite of

45:16

China the message is very clear and it's

45:18

what Thomas said like technology is a

45:21

national security imperative and so

45:23

we're going to embrace these guys we're

45:25

not going to play favorites we're not

45:27

going to pick one and not the other

45:28

we're not going to have Summits and have

45:30

you know the founder of an entire

45:32

category not be invited that's just it's

45:35

honestly it's patently stupid and

45:37

immature and that's what the Biden

45:39

Administration did picked favorites yeah

45:42

and that is dumb based on the

45:44

implication and importance of technology

45:46

I just want to go back to the Tik Tok

45:47

thing I want to make three points one is

45:50

from the past I'll give you my sense of

45:53

the Tik Tok thing and I'm going to make

45:54

a prediction for the future

45:57

in

45:58

1984 the way that lvmh began was through

46:02

a deal that Bernard Arno

46:05

architected there was a business owned

46:08

by the French cotton King Marcel busac

46:12

and inside of that Empire was Christian

46:15

Dior long story short his Empire was

46:17

crumbling and Arno did a deal where he

46:22

bought that dying business essentially

46:24

from the French government for one Frank

46:28

fast forward now 40 Years of very hard

46:31

work and tremendous execution that's a

46:33

$350 billion public company now imagine

46:37

back then in

46:39

1984 if the French government actually

46:42

had done a deal where they said we'll

46:44

sell it to you for 50% of whatever you

46:45

build take it for a dollar but we're

46:47

going to own 50% of The Upside and you

46:50

know they would have an extra $175

46:53

billion

46:54

today I think that that's very important

46:57

in terms of what is possible today I

47:01

like Thomas's math I believe it I do

47:03

think it's about hundred billion asset

47:06

but at the end of the day the president

47:08

was very clear that it is completely and

47:11

entirely worthless without his permit

47:14

and he wants to own 50% of this asset

47:16

now if you're a buyer of something

47:19

you're not going to pay1 billion do if

47:21

you control whether it can exist or not

47:24

you're basically going to pay today's

47:26

equivalent of Frank which would be

47:28

$1 now I'm not saying that it is going

47:31

to be a dollar but if the United States

47:33

Treasury wants to hold 50% of an asset

47:37

that could be worth a 100 billion or 500

47:39

billion or you know maybe a

47:41

trillion it would make sense for the

47:44

United States Treasury and the United

47:45

States people to own that at effectively

47:48

zero so I think that the incentive is

47:51

there and I think he has essentially

47:52

said that he is going to do the best

47:55

deal in his interests which is the

47:57

United States

47:58

interests which I suspect means a price

48:01

that is as low as possible approaching

48:05

$1 and ultimately won't this be the

48:08

Chinese government's decision because

48:10

they could always say you know what let

48:12

it die maybe but my my point is it may

48:14

not be a dollar maybe it could be 25

48:16

billion maybe it could be 10 billion but

48:17

my point is I find it very hard to see

48:20

how it gets to the actual value that it

48:22

is today so then I think let me just

48:25

make a prediction for the future future

48:27

there's a question that this raises

48:29

which is does it make sense for the

48:32

American

48:33

government to be a little bit smarter

48:36

going forward about how it allocates

48:38

incentives and resources the American

48:40

government is still the largest single

48:42

land owner in America we give

48:45

concessions to private companies to

48:47

drill to build

48:49

things and it just turns out that if you

48:52

apply this example more broadly wouldn't

48:55

it make sense where when you create

48:56

incredible economic incentives and

48:58

upside for private investors and

49:01

investment for some portion of that gain

49:03

to go back to the American people is

49:05

that a bad thing I don't think so for

49:07

example if you said we're going to

49:09

accelerate permitting for all these data

49:12

centers we're going to make any form of

49:14

energy which was the opposite of what

49:15

the Biden EO said on his way out the

49:17

door he had all these conditions but if

49:20

the president president Trump's CEO on

49:22

data centers says any kind of energy but

49:24

we want to own a 5% Royal

49:27

and we allow you to put it on federal

49:29

lands or 10% or

49:31

15% would it really change the

49:33

underwriting that Blackstone and all

49:34

these other companies will do I don't

49:36

think so would it enrich America I think

49:39

so would it make it easier for people to

49:42

feel like they're participating in all

49:43

of these incredible gains I also think

49:46

so so my prediction is that this becomes

49:50

more of a template for the future it'll

49:52

be less about permitting it'll be more

49:55

about creating incentives allocating

49:57

those incentives for a share of The

49:59

Upside and I think that there is a

50:02

really strong economic argument for

50:05

America to do that you know trath to

50:07

build on that people don't remember but

50:09

Tesla got $465 million from the

50:12

Department of energy that was called the

50:14

atvm program which was the advanced

50:16

technology Vehicles manufacturing that

50:19

was a very Visionary program at the time

50:21

Visionary but it but it took no equity

50:24

but it didn't take equity and that was

50:26

dumb so dumb they should have gotten

50:30

some portion of equity some portion of a

50:32

loan Tesla did so well thanks to Elon

50:35

and the team hard work they paid it back

50:37

early they paid it back early that's how

50:40

well they did if they had owned 10% of

50:42

Tesla but 10% yeah I think the president

50:45

has has has sniffed this out by the way

50:47

this but and and you may not think that

50:49

these are related but when he said that

50:51

he's considering eliminating federal

50:53

income tax and funding this thing from

50:55

tariffs and he just had a press

50:57

conference today where he's inviting

51:00

every single company to come and make

51:01

things in the United States because he

51:02

will create economic incentives to make

51:04

it here cheaper but if you make it

51:06

abroad and bring it in here he's going

51:08

to charge money and a tariff all of this

51:11

are part and parcel of I think this

51:13

broader economic realization and unlike

51:16

20089 and 10 when we were allocating

51:19

money or 2020 and 21 and 22 where we

51:22

were just sending money out the door

51:25

with frankly no consequence and no

51:28

accounting this time around I think he's

51:30

got some incredibly sharp business

51:32

people this is by the way the upside of

51:34

having folks that have actually been

51:36

successful in the real world working

51:38

inside of government is they're going to

51:40

help them get to this realization and I

51:42

think it's a really good one I don't

51:43

think Tim Tim Walter my only push back

51:45

to you chamoff on that would be I just

51:48

think it's a dangerous game for the

51:50

government to start picking winners you

51:53

know I wouldn't for example if it owns

51:55

50% of a Tik Tok does does a

51:58

disadvantage a meta as an example right

52:00

and I do wonder is the value capturing

52:02

mechanism for the government taxes

52:04

essentially right so the the the way you

52:07

capture the the right the portion of the

52:09

value creation of these companies is

52:11

through a tax system and I do think we

52:13

just have to be careful of the

52:15

government all of a sudden picking

52:16

different companies to win you know I do

52:19

think having a good set of incentives a

52:20

Level Playing Field let the competitive

52:23

dynamics of different companies fight

52:24

each other and then capture the value

52:26

through taxes I think you're right and I

52:28

think that that part is absolutely

52:31

fundamental but I think there is a way

52:33

to architect this for example you have

52:36

these rfps that by Design have to be

52:39

published in the open source and

52:41

available for anybody to bid on my only

52:43

point is just to say that when there is

52:45

an ultimate winner why not have a small

52:48

stake in the upside look at the amount

52:50

of money that the doe gives in Grants

52:53

I'll give you an example you know one of

52:55

these companies that I helped start a

52:56

few years ago to make Advanced Battery

52:58

materials we got a $150 million Grant

53:01

I'm very appreciative of that Grant but

53:03

if they also asked for five or 10% of

53:05

the equity I would have still said yes

53:07

of course you would have yeah it's a

53:08

great deal and why not give a little

53:10

upside to the taxpayers I agree with

53:11

that by the way a parallel to that would

53:13

be Spectrum right if you think about

53:15

Wireless right kind of got built the

53:18

government auctioned off spectrum and

53:20

then allowed public you know private

53:21

companies to kind of come and bid on it

53:23

and you know so there there's a lot of

53:25

different interesting mechanisms you can

53:27

bring to that yeah freeberg which would

53:29

you like to go to next well I'll just

53:32

wrap on the Tik Tok

53:34

sure I do worry a lot about the predent

53:39

being set here with respect to foreign

53:42

government actions on us companies in

53:45

their in their local countries imagine

53:48

the CCP tells Tesla they have to sell

53:52

their Chinese operations and give 50% of

53:54

the Chinese operations to

53:56

the Chinese government because of their

53:59

concerns about security where Tesla is

54:01

now able to track Chinese citizens

54:03

driving around and where they are and

54:05

you can see very quickly how this whole

54:07

kind of overall I think presentation of

54:11

the security risk that we face with Tik

54:14

Tok and therefore we will shut it down

54:15

or own it creates I think a counter that

54:19

could really hurt American companies you

54:21

could see this going to Google to Apple

54:24

to Tesla even food manufacturing

54:26

companies that have operations overseas

54:29

where local governments say hey we need

54:30

to for local security purposes we need

54:33

to take ownership of your business I

54:35

think one of the things that's really

54:36

benefited Americans in global trade is

54:39

our ability to sell and Export our

54:41

technology our goods and our services

54:43

around the

54:44

world through open trade and I do think

54:47

that we've used this kind of Tik Tock

54:49

security thing to say this is a

54:50

rationale for us doing this as a one-off

54:53

but it also opens up a lot of other

54:54

people to say this is a oneoff and so

54:56

I'm just generally very wary about this

54:57

whole Tik Tok situation opening up a can

55:00

of worms you're 100% right and by the

55:02

way the ccp's done it already they did

55:04

it to Apple and if you follow what

55:07

happened when they introduced iCloud I

55:09

don't know if you remember gcbd

55:12

gcbd is the Chinese

55:15

state-owned data company the cloud

55:17

provider there and they just told Apple

55:20

we get all the data and they just had to

55:23

roll over and all citizens in China who

55:25

use an iPhone in order to use an iPhone

55:27

in China your data is owned by the

55:29

government period full stop and apple

55:32

had no choice but to do that so you want

55:34

to if you want to play in a certain

55:35

Market you got to play by the rules the

55:37

thing the thing to keep in mind here is

55:39

I hear all of these kind of like

55:40

theoretical qualms about how it's unfair

55:43

but this stuff happens all the time and

55:45

it's just that we don't benefit from it

55:47

so Jason brought up an excellent example

55:49

with Tesla the other example just to

55:51

remind you guys is during the pandemic

55:53

the Federal Reserve stepped in and

55:54

started buying commercial corporate

55:57

bonds they own a ton of like Ford bonds

55:59

so that these things wouldn't default

56:01

there's all kinds of action all the time

56:04

where the federal government is involved

56:06

in private companies my point is if

56:08

you're going to be involved have some

56:11

Legacy ownership on the back end of it

56:13

so that in case this stuff really works

56:15

that it's

56:17

broadly value creating for more

56:19

Americans I think it would create a way

56:23

to deescalate this Sensation that a

56:26

people are winning and everybody else is

56:28

just kind of staying still we should

56:30

talk about Stargate and the AI project

56:32

because I do think it tees off on one of

56:35

the Jan 6 though okay but it does tee

56:38

off of one of the other kind of

56:40

key things that I heard a lot about in

56:42

DC and I know Thomas is passionate about

56:44

like I am which is energy electricity

56:47

capacity buildout in the United States

56:49

because it's critical and like building

56:51

AI infrastructure means that we need to

56:52

build energy infrastructure all right

56:55

and so anyway yeah we'll go we'll go

56:57

right to that after we wrap up these um

56:59

we wrap up these executive orders and I

57:01

too wanted to talk about January 6th uh

57:03

just to give people the update here JD

57:06

Vance had said that the people who

57:07

committed violence on January 6 quote

57:09

obviously shouldn't be

57:11

pardoned and this's a parade of people

57:15

who are on the Republican side who are

57:18

coming out against how president Trump

57:20

handled this I think you you all know

57:22

where I would fall on the side of it

57:24

what are your thoughts on this where do

57:25

you where you fall on it you know I come

57:27

from a family of cops and I feel like

57:29

he's betrayed the blue on this one and

57:32

you know if there are people who I think

57:34

he should have taken his time with this

57:35

it is possible that some people had

57:37

sentences that were too long uh the

57:40

justice

57:41

system you know is imperfect in our

57:43

country and the pardon power is there I

57:45

think specifically to do a very granular

57:49

job of looking at each case right and so

57:52

I think we have to look at pardon power

57:53

generally after what we saw the Biden

57:55

family do and now we see Trump doing

57:57

this so I think the the pardon power is

58:00

not being used as it's intended it's

58:03

being used politically Now by both

58:05

parties so I'm trying to call balls and

58:07

Strikes here but you know as somebody

58:08

who's in law enforcement a family that's

58:10

in law enforcement and My Chosen career

58:12

was to be a cop and an FBI agent and you

58:16

know just looking at it it's just

58:17

heartbreaking to see people beat cops

58:19

and then be Trea as Heroes treated as

58:22

Heroes and some of these people are very

58:23

dark people you know the the the

58:25

oathkeepers and some of these people are

58:26

extremely violent and they're coming out

58:28

now after this has all been said and

58:30

saying that they're going to double down

58:32

they're going to buy more guns and that

58:33

they're going to get their retribution

58:35

and so I think you have to be really

58:37

careful with violent people that you

58:39

give them you know this coronation and

58:41

that they were Justified because they'll

58:44

go do more violent things and so I

58:47

understand he made this promise to

58:48

people I think he should have been very

58:51

granular in doing this I totally

58:53

understand there could be people who got

58:54

sentences that were too long and I would

58:57

would have liked to seen him do this

58:58

thoughtfully this was not done

58:59

thoughtfully I have a certain amount of

59:02

Goodwill towards the new president and

59:03

this has lowered it I knew that this

59:06

would be really important to you so I

59:08

took a few minutes to try to collect my

59:10

thoughts I've been kind of walking

59:13

myself through it since

59:16

yesterday this is not an explanation

59:18

other than to you Jason my friend about

59:22

how I think we got here okay so I just

59:24

wanted to take a few minutes to EXP

59:26

explain that to you I think that before

59:28

you can look at January 6 I think you

59:30

got to go back to what happened

59:34

during the covid lockdowns and what we

59:38

started to see in a bunch of these

59:41

liberal cities talking about BLM riots

59:44

the BLM riots the antifa riots what

59:46

happened in San Francisco Los Angeles

59:50

Seattle

59:51

Portland the lawlessness that you see in

59:54

places like New York the decarceration

59:57

movement and I think that what started

59:59

to happen

60:01

was a

60:04

sensation that

60:07

for the same weight there were different

60:10

measures

60:12

so for example if you start to look at

60:15

some of the deportations that are

60:16

happening now it's really quite shocking

60:20

I sent Nick a clip of them Nick you can

60:22

just maybe show the first few seconds

60:24

but you are talking about some

60:26

incredibly incredibly violent offenders

60:28

that were just walking randomly down the

60:30

street I'm not going back to Haiti one

60:32

of those threats is this illegal alien

60:34

from Haiti I says he's a gang member

60:37

with 17 criminal convictions in recent

60:40

years you feel me yo Biden forever bro

60:44

thank Obama for everything that he did

60:46

for me bro there's more after this but

60:47

there was like a rapist that they picked

60:49

up in Boston there's a person that was

60:51

charged with

60:53

assault so there was this sensation

60:55

Jason that was building up for a long

60:57

time that all of a sudden the law was

60:59

being applied in very odd ways where

61:02

depending on what you did you would get

61:05

adjudicated in totally different ways

61:08

based on your political affiliation or

61:10

your leaning or based on the desire of a

61:13

district prosecutor to go after one

61:15

thing or another let me just pause so

61:17

that's that's sort of like the thing

61:19

that was sort of building and cascading

61:22

I do agree with you that I think January

61:23

6 is kind of like a stain I I think

61:25

there's nothing to be proud of there but

61:28

I think what we found out since January

61:30

6th is somewhat important I think the

61:33

first thing we found out was that there

61:34

was a bunch of these folks whose

61:36

convictions were very speculative I

61:39

think the Supreme Court already ruled

61:40

that in June of last year it was like a

61:42

63 vote that said at least 350 of these

61:45

convictions should probably just be

61:47

thrown out so there was one body that

61:49

was that then there was a whole bunch of

61:52

them where to your point you took a

61:53

misdemeanor you trumped it up to a

61:56

felony you had all kinds of you know

61:58

things where procedural motions were

62:01

denied for the defense approved for

62:03

prosecution and you had sentences that

62:06

didn't match the crime and then you have

62:08

a president who frankly was the subject

62:10

of lawfare himself so I think that what

62:13

would have been better was a more

62:15

methodical approach to this I agree with

62:16

you but I do think that What's Happening

62:19

Here is essentially a moment where we

62:22

can close this entire chapter and we can

62:24

get back to a focus on observing the law

62:28

and adjudicating it equally for

62:30

everybody and I think that that's

62:32

probably the best way that we can all

62:34

deal with this because I think that

62:35

there was a bunch of Pardons that were

62:37

100% obvious and then there was a bunch

62:41

that were just you know had to be done

62:42

because the court was perverted in how

62:46

they dealt with some of these folks then

62:48

there was a small number and I don't

62:50

know the exact number to be fair Jason

62:52

where these folks did some really bad

62:54

stuff now it's also mixed with this

62:56

thing where there was a bunch of

62:57

informants then there was a bunch of

62:59

folks that were the informance stuff

63:01

have to wait for that to come out

63:03

because that's in conspiracy cor for now

63:06

my point is I just went and I collected

63:07

that as a way to try to explain to you

63:09

how I appreciate you understanding my

63:11

passion on it and and want to how we got

63:13

here I think it's sort of like I'm well

63:15

aware of it yeah I think we got to put a

63:17

pin in this and

63:18

say both sides should now have enough

63:22

experience to say we're going to apply

63:24

the law equally to everybody forward

63:26

from this moment out let's just go

63:27

forward and not look back I think that's

63:29

the best thing that we can all do let's

63:31

hope I'll just leave you with this the

63:33

the proud boy leader

63:35

Enrique Terio this is his quote on

63:38

getting out I'm happy the president's

63:40

focusing not on retribution and focusing

63:42

on success but I will tell you that I'm

63:44

not going to play by those rules they

63:46

need to pay for what they did these are

63:48

some seriously bad ombre the proud boys

63:51

and the oathkeepers and so don't be

63:53

surprised if they do something worse I

63:55

want to talk about the citizenship thing

63:57

and I just want to just provide a little

64:00

color for people I'm sure that there's a

64:03

lot of folks that are listening who have

64:05

people that work for them that you know

64:08

maybe the birthright thing if you came

64:10

here illegally and had a child you get

64:12

to be a citizen just to be clear this is

64:14

going to the Supreme Court and just to

64:16

put a little bit of color on it in the

64:17

14th Amendment there's this very

64:19

important part that says Birthright

64:21

citizenship is is applied to people who

64:23

are subject to the jurisdiction of

64:24

America

64:26

and for a long time that phrase was not

64:30

really considered in how the Supreme

64:33

Court administered the 14th Amendment I

64:36

think what this EO did and the lawsuits

64:38

that happened almost instantaneously as

64:41

a result will now send this back to the

64:43

Supreme Court very quickly yeah and

64:45

people will opine on what that means so

64:48

if it means nothing it means that if you

64:51

are here however you're here and you

64:53

have a child they're going to be a

64:54

citizen of America

64:57

if that

64:58

qualifier is now part of the

65:01

administration and the interpretation of

65:02

the 14th Amendment I think what

65:05

president Trump has written is what will

65:06

happen which is if you are here

65:09

illegally it doesn't apply if you are

65:11

here under a Visa that necessarily means

65:14

you're still subject to the jurisdiction

65:16

of somebody else it may not apply but I

65:18

think the Supreme Court is going to get

65:19

to decide this in pretty short order

65:21

okay a couple more issues I want to get

65:23

to on the docket sorry let me just make

65:25

a quick comment on the um oh sure Dave

65:27

go ahead the uh January 6 I I'm I just

65:31

generally don't like this power of

65:34

Pardon agreed we saw what Biden

65:37

did he gave I mean how many thousands

65:39

Nick you could pull the number up but

65:41

000 8,000

65:44

Pardons and I feel like the original

65:47

intention of the power of Pardon which

65:50

is in the

65:51

Constitution was meant to kind of

65:54

protect the the civility in the Union at

65:58

times of you know we need to kind of

66:00

come back together and realign ourselves

66:03

and it has been so far abused beyond

66:06

that original intention it's almost like

66:10

feels like an extraordinary Injustice it

66:12

almost gives the president the ability

66:14

to rewrite the law that many of the kind

66:17

of actions from the executive branch can

66:20

simply supersede the actions of the

66:21

judicial branch which is really meant to

66:23

protect and execute the law of the

66:25

nation and I think it's gone too far it

66:29

feels like there's a necessary amendment

66:32

to address this that these presidents

66:34

can come out and preemptively pardon

66:36

people for things that might be found in

66:37

the future because they're close with

66:39

them it has nothing to do with the

66:41

original intention if you go back to the

66:44

arguments for the pardon being in the

66:47

Constitution you can see that Alexander

66:49

Hamilton wrote deeply about it in

66:51

Federalist Paper number 74 and in that

66:54

paper he talked a lot about and

66:56

emphasized that the justice system which

66:58

is designed to be fair May occasionally

67:00

result in overly harsh or unjust

67:02

outcomes and the pardon allows for acts

67:05

of Mercy to correct these situations

67:08

there a lot of these sorts of actions

67:09

that we saw happen with with Biden do

67:12

not fit the bill for that

67:14

definition I will tell you there's a

67:16

quote from Federalist Paper 74 from

67:18

Hamilton it goes as follows in seasons

67:20

of insurrection or Rebellion there are

67:23

often critical moments when a well-timed

67:25

offer of Pardon to the insurgents or

67:27

Rebels May restore the Tranquility of

67:30

the Commonwealth so to counter my point

67:34

Hamilton's argument is that when the

67:36

nation is divided the act of the pardon

67:39

may actually help bring the nation back

67:41

together as may have been the case with

67:43

respect to the January 6th but it may

67:45

not necessarily be about or Justice or

67:48

Nixon and it may not necessarily be

67:49

about justice but is much more about

67:51

restoring Tranquility of the union and

67:53

allowing the nation to move forward even

67:55

even though it may not seem just it may

67:57

be the right thing for the nation so I'm

67:59

not trying to defend the action or

68:01

defend the pardon I really don't like

68:02

the act of pardoning as a kind of tool

68:05

that's being used in aund different ways

68:07

and it certainly seems like it requires

68:09

change so yeah and just um programming

68:11

note here research note 6,500 people of

68:14

those

68:15

8,000 seem to be convicted of marijuana

68:18

possession uh possession or they were

68:22

paron then then then the law should have

68:24

been changed and the courts should have

68:26

overturned all of those convictions it

68:28

does not necessarily need to fall and it

68:29

shouldn't fall on the executive branch

68:31

to take that action the courts need to

68:33

do their job and the legislators need to

68:35

do their job I don't disagree but I

68:38

think there is some compassion in the

68:40

Parton concept for how long do they have

68:44

to wait for that yeah how long do you

68:45

have to wait for that you know and then

68:47

like the people who were you know

68:49

convicted of selling dime bags or having

68:51

an ounce of weed on them were black and

68:52

brown and then all my white friends who

68:55

started

68:56

weed companies are now taking them

68:57

public in Canada so shout out trau all

69:00

right let's keep moving here I think we

69:02

we we've we did some good job here on

69:03

the reconciliation on the Pod where do

69:05

we want to go next Stargate project

69:07

Stargate Stargate starg Stargate

69:09

Stargate and energy yeah Stargate

69:12

energy so here we go and I'm gonna go to

69:16

to Our Guest here Thomas Thomas anything

69:18

on January six are controversial topics

69:20

like smoking weed but you want to jump

69:22

in on there no okay great sure L your LP

69:25

just

69:26

breathed hey you're coming on the all-in

69:29

podcast when is LPs they they're going

69:31

to be so happy but then when when they

69:33

hear the j6 they're just going to be

69:34

clenched waiting

69:36

for to end oh wait hold on my mic went

69:39

out oh never mind I missed it okay all

69:42

right it was well said honestly I don't

69:44

have anything to add you guys you guys

69:45

summed it anything on Lauren Sanchez's

69:48

uh outfit okay let's continue another

69:50

big story from week one we are literally

69:55

not even three or four days into this

69:58

it's going to be a crazy four years

70:00

according to open ai's press release the

70:03

Stargate project is a new company which

70:05

intends to invest 500 billion over the

70:08

next four years building new AI

70:11

infrastructure for open AI in the United

70:13

States freeberg we got to find out

70:14

what's going on here with the Stargate

70:16

movie and TV series if they got IP

70:18

permission to do this SoftBank and open

70:21

AI are the question I mean I'm just

70:24

thinking out loud and we have to talk

70:25

about where this ranks on your list of

70:28

great sci-fi and top 40 top 40 sci-fi

70:32

okay right up there with the Star Trek

70:35

original series and the Next Generation

70:38

SoftBank and openi are the lead partners

70:39

with Oracle and mjx also participating

70:42

Oracle Nvidia and openai will build and

70:44

operate the infrastructure Microsoft is

70:46

sort of involved although we'll see

70:48

about that Mas yoshian was at the

70:50

announcement he's going to be the

70:52

chairman however Gavin Baker and Elon

70:55

both called cap on X saying they don't

70:58

actually have the money Gavin did some

70:59

back of the envelope math and of course

71:02

as always Sam and Elon have been spicy

71:05

in the replies Sam is hurt Elon is

71:08

dunking it's it's just their

71:10

relationship is so

71:12

fluid Microsoft CEO Satia nadela jumped

71:15

into my thread with Elon saying he was

71:18

good for the 80 Bill and then he was

71:21

ready to build other products and

71:24

services and that was what was important

71:26

what do you think here Thomas is this uh

71:28

are you an investor in open AI I guess

71:30

let's get that out there or in xai just

71:33

so we know where you're coming from here

71:34

if you're talking your book but uh I am

71:37

an investor in open Ai and uh okay so

71:40

there's three points I want to make here

71:42

go Point number one going back to the

71:45

origins of the of this podcast and you

71:47

know sitting watching both Public Market

71:49

investors and Venture investors you know

71:52

one notable difference is you know I

71:54

think Venture invest ERS tend to be very

71:56

tribal so if you're in One Tribe You Are

71:59

by definition not in another and you

72:02

know I think there's a lot of kind of

72:03

domain specific reasons for that you

72:05

know for me as my legacy as a public

72:07

market investor I'm very comfortable

72:09

being both you know Pro open Ai and pro

72:12

Tesla and Pro X and so I just kind of

72:15

caveat that kind of you know as a first

72:17

point my second point is can we do a

72:20

slight detour on masa for one minute and

72:23

I'm curious to get your guys's opinion

72:25

but yeah is Mas the goat because when I

72:28

started in the growth business I met

72:29

with Yuri Milner and he said Thomas you

72:32

get in the Hall of Fame if you can have

72:33

one deal that gives you a billion dollar

72:35

return I.E you know whatever you invest

72:37

plus what you take out is a billion

72:39

dollars or more and he actually kept a

72:41

Tracker in his mind of who had made

72:43

those deals and what share he had and

72:45

Etc so let's go to masa for one minute

72:48

Masa is the hundred billion dollar Club

72:51

yeah okay and not only that he's

72:53

actually done it twice he did the first

72:55

time with SoftBank and Alibaba which at

72:58

its peak was a $200 billion win and I

73:00

think he ultimately netted like 80 plus

73:02

billion out of it so that's one he did

73:05

it again with arm that he bought for 30

73:08

and now is sitting on a gain of 100 I

73:11

think 35 billion and he could have done

73:14

it a third time with Nvidia if he hadn't

73:17

sold I mean guys there's nobody like him

73:20

there's no incredible you're 100% right

73:24

you got to give the man flowers he is so

73:26

I'll tell you what chath I am never

73:28

betting against Masa ever because you

73:31

got to give the man credit for what he's

73:33

done and so now let's go to kind of open

73:37

AI you guys mentioned we we do own some

73:39

open AI I am bullish on open AI which I

73:41

guess is now a uh

73:43

counter Against the Grain kind of view

73:46

but guys my point of view on open eye

73:48

and the reason I'm so bullish is really

73:50

kind of chat GPT and I do think when

73:52

open a gets you know we do conf it does

73:55

have different businesses right it's got

73:56

the model business it has the API

73:58

business and then it has the chat GPT

74:00

business right and if you look at the

74:02

downloads maybe Nick bring up the charts

74:04

but it is really interesting to watch

74:07

the market share of Chad GPT versus

74:09

Google uh Gemini and grock this is both

74:13

in the US and international it really is

74:17

a dominant kind of franchise right it is

74:19

maintaining 80% plus market share you

74:22

know J Cal if this was right sharing

74:24

right would say wow this this company is

74:27

the winner right so to me I think the

74:30

the quality of the chat GPT franchise

74:32

right I think they disclosed 300 million

74:35

weekly actives over a million Enterprise

74:38

users it has become a core part of my

74:41

own

74:43

workflow you know I have it on my phone

74:45

I have it on my desktop I use it all the

74:48

time I can't even quantify the value

74:50

that it brings it's so important for

74:52

what it does for me so

74:55

and I do think that it just keeps

74:56

getting smarter every query that I ask

74:59

uh it learns more about me it learns

75:01

more about our system so I do think the

75:03

chat GPT franchise inside of open AI is

75:07

one of the great most successful fastest

75:10

growing kind of stories so that's kind

75:13

of the underpinning of my kind of open

75:14

AI thesis you know on Stargate

75:18

specifically look I think the real

75:20

question to me isn't whether they have

75:22

the 500 billion right because we know

75:24

that the 500 billion could come from

75:26

Equity it could come from Masa if you

75:28

look at Gavin's tweet by the way he does

75:30

caveat it right saying that assumes that

75:33

Masa doesn't want to sell arm and soft

75:35

bank right so I'm not sure just Le up

75:38

and use debt correct so you have debt I

75:40

I think to me the real question guys is

75:43

do we ultimately believe that you can

75:45

get an Roi on that 500 billion because

75:49

if you can there will be people that

75:51

will want to fund it

75:53

right you can do data center by data

75:56

center you can do it actually at the GPU

75:58

level right so the financing is there to

76:01

me the the 500 billion doesn't scare me

76:04

from an absolute number I think the

76:06

question we you know really have to ask

76:07

ourselves is do we believe that the

76:09

market is big enough that the

76:10

opportunity is big enough that investors

76:13

can get a return on the 500 billion I

76:16

think I think you so to me that's the

76:17

real question I think you framed it

76:19

perfectly and since you bring up ride

76:20

sharing and the 80% there I you know I

76:23

really think that's an important thing

76:25

to to take a moment to um to settle on

76:29

because in that case you didn't have

76:32

Uber being challenged by Google

76:36

Microsoft and Elon Musk you know at the

76:39

same time in a digital product as

76:42

opposed to a real world product and so

76:44

you know when I use gemini or xai and

76:46

chat GPT and I use them all daily and

76:48

Claud the difference the difference

76:51

between the products right now is really

76:53

narrow and

76:55

I think you know if the equivalent would

76:58

be somebody who had a 100 million cars

77:00

on the road already competing against

77:03

Uber which you know doesn't exist or

77:06

didn't exist at the time so that that I

77:08

think is the the way I look at this as a

77:11

slightly different type of race I do

77:12

believe the chat GPT franchise has some

77:14

is worth something but I think

77:16

Enterprise folks when I talk to them

77:19

want the open source product most of all

77:21

so anyway I think it's still anybody's

77:23

um I think it's anybody's game right now

77:26

and I don't know how you get a return on

77:28

500 billion invested in this that that's

77:30

the other thing and I don't know if

77:32

that's the real number free BR what do

77:33

you

77:35

think I don't know yeah this is out here

77:39

in some crazy I think guys the way these

77:42

things happen right is you don't you

77:44

don't fund it all Equity UPF front right

77:46

I think these things get funded Facility

77:48

by facility data center by data center

77:50

across four years right and to Chamas

77:53

point it's not just equity it's you know

77:55

sight level debt and Etc right it's a

77:57

complex capital structure to these

77:59

things but look we live also in a world

78:02

right where I was just kind of looking

78:03

at this chart the kind of cloud capex

78:06

chart right and we know that in total

78:09

2025 capex for the top five players in

78:13

the US is going to be 312 billion right

78:16

so that's this year that's in one year

78:19

so we can also kind of frame this and

78:21

saying hey does that number make any

78:22

sense versus what others are spending um

78:25

it's at least kind of in the order of

78:26

magnitude right when you think about

78:28

it's over four years by the way another

78:31

really interesting kind of coral are on

78:32

this point is the US internet companies

78:36

spend 20x what the Chinese companies

78:38

spend on

78:39

capex really interesting as we think

78:41

about our competitiveness right uh Dave

78:44

to your point it's not just power it's

78:45

also kind of

78:47

compute I mean pretty powerful that

78:50

you're spending 20x what your competitor

78:52

is on these kind of Advanced

78:53

Technologies Jam how do you how do you

78:55

how do you look at this I think that

78:57

value and money are correlated in some

79:01

Industries like real estate or heavy

79:03

industry but I don't think that it's

79:06

very correlated in

79:07

Tech and I tried to say this in my tweet

79:09

I don't know Nick can you find this

79:11

tweet where I was just talking

79:13

about the Deep seek model so what did we

79:16

see last week we saw a model that got

79:18

released by the Chinese under by the way

79:20

a totally you know open source MIT

79:23

license that you can run on a laptop and

79:27

it turned out to be as good as open ai's

79:29

01 model so a couple of versions old but

79:31

the point is that this model cost

79:34

millions of

79:35

dollars and was able to compete with a

79:38

model that took billions of dollars to

79:41

train so my take away from that was that

79:44

these costs are falling really

79:46

precipitously so that's sort of my one

79:49

observation is spending more money

79:51

doesn't necessarily get you further

79:53

along if the goal is progress and I

79:56

think that that's very true in what

79:58

we're learning about AI because we're

79:59

learning as we go along so then I think

80:02

it just brings up this question of what

80:04

is the point of saying all these

80:06

grandiose numbers and this is where if

80:09

you look at a different industry like if

80:10

you if an oil company came into the oval

80:13

and said they were about to spend 500

80:16

billion you kind of know that it's real

80:20

because you know what these things cost

80:22

and you know what the entire

80:23

infrastructure will be and you know

80:26

so we know we know what goes on yeah so

80:28

the deeper the oil is in the ground and

80:30

the harder the rock is that you got a

80:31

break through to get there the more you

80:33

have to spend so those numbers become

80:35

very grounded in reality if you were a

80:38

rocket company and you wanted to build a

80:39

rocket and send it to Mars you can also

80:42

be very detailed in what the costs are

80:43

and you can assume some amount of

80:45

reductions of scale if somebody said

80:47

you'd have to spend 500 billion the

80:49

thing is that when in this world it

80:52

seems that there are these advances that

80:54

are are happening that allow you to do

80:55

things cheaper and cheaper almost

80:57

overnight by spending 1 1,000th of what

81:00

you spent even 6 months ago I think the

81:03

spending money part to be honest is more

81:04

of a gimmick than it is a technical

81:06

commitment so I guess if they want to

81:08

spend the money go ahead but it doesn't

81:10

actually tie to whether they're going to

81:12

be able to make custom vaccines whether

81:14

they're going to cure cancer so I kind

81:16

of thought that these things were just

81:18

joint and so my takeaway was entirely

81:21

different it was not a commentary on

81:23

mosa or Larry or Sam I think all of

81:27

those three companies are frankly very

81:29

good it was more a comment

81:32

that you have to be very careful to

81:35

protect the president's Legacy if I were

81:38

them to make sure that the things that

81:39

get announced are actually further down

81:42

the technical spectrum and are actually

81:44

going to be real because if they achieve

81:46

these things but it costs you a billion

81:50

dollars and you only hire 50 people

81:53

there's going to be a little bit of gone

81:54

the face and so that was sort of my own

81:56

takeaway I think that the things were

81:58

decoupled it just seemed more marketing

82:01

and Sizzle and kind of hastily put

82:03

together it was definitely yeah put

82:06

together mean yeah you got that sense

82:08

but I think it would be great if if open

82:09

AI Builds an another incredible model

82:11

whatever comes after 03 04 05 but it's

82:14

not clear that you have to spend 500

82:16

billion to do it you know I think people

82:19

are playing to what Trump likes which is

82:21

a big number and which is his influence

82:24

on growing the number so there was

82:26

specific details where Masa said you

82:28

know you I I told you 100 billion you

82:32

challenged me to get two I came back

82:34

with five right and so this is the sort

82:36

of trump ethos is hey we're going to

82:38

swing for the fences in a way you know

82:40

you could be critical of it and be like

82:42

well Trump's a BS artist or whatever or

82:45

if you're from Silicon Valley you could

82:46

say Hey listen he's moonshot it he's

82:47

going to just shoot for the stars and

82:50

get the moon so if these guys wind up

82:52

spending 50 billion or 100 billion and

82:54

more competitive more power to the

82:56

question I had was you know was did

82:59

Elon have any insight that this was

83:02

happening probably not from from the

83:04

reaction on I bet he did you know I

83:07

think you're I have no Insight either

83:09

but I do think if you were going to be

83:12

critical of trump that he was putting

83:14

his thumb on the scale for any one

83:16

company or individual this shows that

83:18

he's not it's an open platform the the

83:21

Trump Administration is an open platform

83:23

highest bidder gets to come to the White

83:25

House whoever spends the most whoever

83:27

buys the most military you know buys the

83:31

most ammunitions from us you're going to

83:32

get your time in the white house it's uh

83:35

this is a capitalist country this the

83:37

greatest one in the world equal

83:38

opportunity anybody one of the obvious

83:41

the obvious consequence of this data

83:44

center and Chip infrastructure effort

83:48

which is obviously going to happen with

83:49

or without government involvement is an

83:52

increase in electricity demand Thomas I

83:54

know you've got some slides do you want

83:56

to pull those up and and show them

83:59

because I think they're something I've

84:01

talked a lot about on the show which is

84:03

the difference in uh electricity

84:06

production capacity in the US versus

84:08

China historically and then

84:10

prospectively going forward ultimately

84:13

as I've talked about in the past right

84:15

the us today is paying roughly you know

84:18

call it one and a half to 3x the price

84:20

per kilowatt hour for electricity in the

84:22

United States over what China's paying

84:24

we

84:25

have I believe half of the electricity

84:29

production capacity of China they're

84:30

adding more the cost to add is is on10th

84:33

of what our cost to add is call it

84:35

1/10th to 1 half our cost to add per new

84:38

gwatt of production capacity everything

84:40

is in the wrong direction and ultimately

84:42

if Ai and automation are the critical

84:46

factors for economic growth going

84:47

forward and electricity is the critical

84:50

input to that we are hugely

84:52

disadvantaged and aren't going to catch

84:53

up it seem like you've pulled this

84:55

analysis together which kind of

84:56

indicates the same if you think it makes

84:58

sense to walk through this now yeah yeah

85:01

I'd be happy to I mean Dave you're 100%

85:03

right if you think of the GPU as the

85:05

atomic unit of the future right and and

85:09

the key competitive advantage and and

85:11

the key kind of uh ingredient you can't

85:15

power a GPU without a Data Center and

85:18

you can't use a data center without

85:20

power so I do think at the end of the

85:23

day it really comes down to the grid and

85:24

it comes down to power so I think that's

85:27

kind of constraint number one I other

85:31

you know the other thing Dave that I

85:32

think is really important is in an

85:34

inflationary era you do not want to

85:36

increase or have this industry be

85:39

perceived to be increasing electricity

85:41

prices for the consumer right so somehow

85:44

we need to add capacity we need to make

85:46

it so the consumer kind of doesn't go uh

85:50

Bonkers by having their bills go higher

85:53

and um we can Nick run through a couple

85:55

of the slides but the data shows exactly

85:57

kind of your point Dave right which is

86:00

we basically did not invest for a very

86:02

long period of time right in our grid

86:05

and China did and if you keep going we

86:08

can kind of run through these a couple

86:09

of times but that wasn't always the case

86:13

you know during kind of like the postor

86:16

War II boom era during the information

86:19

age you know we did invest and we did a

86:22

lot of it and then suddenly in 2000 we

86:25

just kind of stopped and this is

86:26

globalization you're saying is why we

86:28

stopped exactly right we start to of

86:32

that that we didn't have factories we

86:34

didn't have factories so we didn't need

86:35

as much power what's the reason we

86:37

didn't invest or we didn't need to I

86:39

think we just outsourced a lot of our

86:41

hardcore manufacturing you know indust

86:44

the USD industrial correct that's no

86:47

equals no need for additional

86:49

electricity now the new factories are

86:51

h100 factories we need back or AI

86:54

factories right and um and by the way

86:58

the way to think about it is almost like

87:00

a subscription business on a net ad

87:01

basis right yeah so this this makes it

87:04

even more Stark right because this is

87:06

kind of net additions and it just kind

87:10

of speaks for itself right and just just

87:11

read the numbers out so the audience

87:13

that's listening can can get a sense

87:14

here yeah I mean you can see I mean

87:17

since 1985 right the Delta roughly

87:20

between China and the US is what's the

87:24

quick math like it's almost 7x right in

87:27

2000 the US and China were both roughly

87:29

a th000 ter hours today the US is

87:32

1600watt hours and China is 9,000 tatt

87:35

hours yeah and this is just an

87:38

extraordinary ramp up relative to

87:41

correct on AI side the there was a Biden

87:45

EO last week I spoke about this on

87:47

Tucker because it happened the day I

87:49

went on Tucker but the EO basically said

87:52

we will allow

87:54

the

87:55

permitting of power plants on federal

87:58

lands to power these AI data centers

88:01

which started off like a very

88:02

intelligent EO but right in the second

88:05

paragraph started to talk about Dei and

88:07

all this other stuff and how you have to

88:09

have a certain percentage of it from

88:11

certain sources but just today it looked

88:13

like President Trump overturned it and

88:14

now it's full steam ahead if you have it

88:17

permitted then it's all about just get

88:19

the power however you need the power

88:20

which I think is the smart decision back

88:22

to your earlier Point like we are we are

88:24

in a race here in your analysis Thomas

88:26

can we do this without nuclear no can we

88:28

catch up without nuclear okay in fact we

88:30

can't and uranium I think you can speak

88:33

to that

88:35

better one of the really interesting

88:37

parts I mean you can see by the way

88:40

just the the

88:42

percentage of nuclear it kind of needs

88:46

to go

88:47

higher I don't know if you guys have

88:49

been following this stock in the public

88:50

market guys called Constellation Energy

88:52

oh yeah it's a really interesting

88:56

idea what's interesting of what Amazon

88:59

and Microsoft is they're actually

89:01

signing deals directly with these

89:04

companies right to do what's called back

89:06

behindth meter right types of deals so

89:09

they have Direct Energy access to your

89:12

point shth on the Biden

89:14

administration at the end of last year a

89:17

deal got

89:18

announced publicly announced that

89:20

federal agencies were also Contracting

89:23

directly now with ceg to power some of

89:27

their um facilities and even though the

89:29

in total the number was small we took it

89:33

and I think the market took it as a

89:34

clear indication right that the

89:37

government even under Biden was

89:39

acknowledging that nuclear is the best

89:42

path forward so you know we expect and

89:46

we think just the trend generally

89:48

towards nuclear energy is going to

89:49

continue it's been proven in China it's

89:51

been proven in Europe I think it will

89:53

show

89:54

to be a key part of the AI kind of arms

89:57

RS you know over the next 10 20 years

90:01

yeah this is to me kind of the story in

90:03

one slide right which is if you look at

90:05

basically the nuclear capacity in the US

90:08

it's basically been flat

90:10

for 25 plus years right ridiculous 90s

90:15

yeah right and so when Scott Besson was

90:17

asked are we in a in a you know Green

90:20

energy arms race with China he was

90:24

thinking about chart number on the right

90:27

right which basically shows how much

90:29

nuclear China has added right over that

90:32

time period and so I think it's it's

90:35

pretty clear what the answer is I think

90:37

China is leading the way in that measure

90:39

and I think we need to follow yeah well

90:42

and I think what's really important to

90:45

note is over that same period of time

90:47

Thomas we're in a different era on

90:49

nuclear than we were when we had Three

90:52

Mile Island and you know prior to that

90:54

Chernobyl we have new uh Gen 4

90:58

technologies that are meltdown proof

91:01

that have a totally different

91:03

architecture where there isn't a setup

91:05

where you have runaway heat and

91:07

ultimately a collapse of the uh the

91:09

reactor and a release of radioactive

91:12

material which is what happened at

91:14

Chernobyl these new systems which we

91:16

highlighted on the show a couple of

91:17

months ago like the pebble bed reactor

91:19

that's been in production making

91:21

electricity in China are incredible new

91:23

te technology architectures and they're

91:25

here and they're running and China's

91:28

rolling out dozens or hundreds of these

91:30

and the United States is rolling out

91:32

zero and that needs to change and I

91:34

think we only have a couple of months to

91:37

get the engine stood up that will allow

91:40

us to make the material that will allow

91:42

us to make the production technology

91:44

needed to actually deploy these stations

91:47

to try and have a shot at catching up

91:48

and if we don't we're going to be hugely

91:50

disadvantaged on an energy cost basis

91:51

we're going to be hugely disadvantaged

91:53

on an ability to actually deploy AI

91:55

technology competitively that's Key by

91:57

the way you also can look at France

91:59

right my my home country uh not known as

92:02

a technology leader but 70% of its

92:05

energy of its electricity comes from

92:07

nuclear but France held the line right

92:09

when Europe tried to really deprecate

92:11

its use of nuclear Germany did but

92:12

France held the line yeah it's too

92:14

important jamat you know it's 70% plus

92:17

so I I think it's there's examples it's

92:19

doable and I think now with AI it's a

92:21

matter of National Security National

92:23

Security

92:26

and that du tail into Fabs right which

92:30

is obviously another key component which

92:32

is a short term for Semiconductor

92:34

manufacturing facilities

92:36

right which is another in my opinion

92:39

keyst strategic area that we need to to

92:41

ramp up in the US the thing that I

92:43

noticed about that chart is the trend

92:45

line I mean look at how fast they're

92:48

building these and this is where you

92:49

know I don't know what government

92:51

incentive we need to create or what tape

92:54

has to be moved here but if we can't

92:57

build you know multif family housing in

92:59

some states like this nuclear is g to

93:02

really need to we're going to have to

93:05

figure out a way to change that trend

93:08

line freeberg yeah I mean what what

93:10

would it take to to build these nuclear

93:13

power plants at an accelerated rate I

93:15

will tell you that there is a lot of

93:16

capital and I we mentioned this last

93:18

time a lot of intellectual capital in

93:20

the United States that's eager hungry

93:22

and ready to get moving on buildout

93:24

the only thing that's challenged and the

93:26

only thing that's holding it back is

93:28

regulatory challenges regulatory

93:30

roadblocks and if those get removed

93:33

through emergency action I I view this

93:35

to be more of a national security threat

93:37

frankly than the Border I think we need

93:39

to get energy increased in this country

93:41

in an accelerated way for the United

93:43

States to even be in a position to be

93:46

able to challenge China with respect to

93:48

manufacturing and AI in the decades

93:51

ahead and the United States needs to

93:53

consider this an emergency emergency

93:55

declarations may be needed to drop the

93:57

regulatory road blocks that are keeping

93:59

the proliferation of electricity

94:02

production in the United States at Bay I

94:04

think it's time for that sort of action

94:06

so I think that's the only thing that's

94:07

getting in the way so we have the tech

94:10

we have the physics we have the will we

94:12

have the talent we have a blocker and

94:14

the blocker is regulation and that

94:16

regulatory blocker needs to have

94:19

leadership in

94:20

government to remove it am I summarizing

94:24

correctly here that's right and look you

94:25

have an energy Zar that I think is very

94:27

aligned with that intention in in Doug

94:29

beram obviously we have this big AI arms

94:32

race that's underway we have an

94:34

Automation and Manufacturing demand

94:36

which will massively increase energy

94:37

demand in this

94:38

country and we have I think a

94:41

deregulatory Administration the the

94:43

stars are aligned and I think that this

94:45

is a moment where this could happen sh

94:47

or Thomas what's the downside to

94:51

removing the regulation and going for it

94:54

and building this extra capacity can can

94:56

we Define any possible downside yeah the

94:59

downside is the the amount of time it

95:01

takes to adequately build these things

95:04

properly the thing that China has had as

95:06

it's as Thomas's chart shows is Decades

95:09

of practice in building things safely

95:11

and quickly we can build things but we

95:14

haven't had the practice to build them

95:16

either safely or quickly because we

95:18

haven't built any so that's a

95:20

complicated thing to just that's a valid

95:22

concern

95:24

if there is any resistance resistance to

95:26

this Thomas what would be on the top of

95:29

that list just theoretically how could

95:31

anybody want to block this what would be

95:33

the

95:34

resistance one other element guys I

95:36

think you know that we are blocking the

95:38

ability of China to get access to the

95:40

latest gpus right and the whole point is

95:42

we don't want them to use to develop

95:44

systems that could be used against us

95:47

but if China if one day China had 10xr

95:49

power capacity it won't even matter

95:52

right because they'll just have so many

95:54

more whether they're not quite the same

95:56

Advanced gpus or not they'll just have

95:58

so many more of them their industrial AI

96:01

capacity will be so much larger that

96:03

even if we have the best h100s and the

96:06

latest technology that Jensen and others

96:08

can provide it won't matter so in order

96:11

to make our strategy effective we need

96:13

to be able to to build this power

96:16

base I think it's a very astute Point

96:19

hey um chth I don't know if you've been

96:22

watching Netflix but I am a shareholder

96:25

and I am delighted I don't know what's

96:26

going on over there but they seem to

96:28

getting be getting their subs right and

96:30

that disra of a fight seems to have

96:32

somehow driven the stock price up and

96:35

there's some strategy that's working

96:36

over there maybe you could just um Riff

96:39

on it for a moment I have the opposite

96:41

take

96:43

okay yeah I mean it's obviously a very

96:45

good

96:46

company I think it's been incredibly

96:50

performant but I think it has like a

96:52

little bit of a dark commentary

96:54

on American society and productivity so

96:59

I asked Nick to just put up these three

97:01

charts I'll show you the first one so

97:02

this is the Netflix stock price from

97:06

2010 to 2020 and it's only gotten up

97:09

since 20124 okay

97:11

okay the only reason I did it at 2020

97:14

was because the the other data I went to

97:16

the CDC and I said well show me the

97:18

percentage of people Americans taking

97:20

ssris over that same period for

97:23

depression depression anxiety Etc and

97:26

what you see that it's also gone up and

97:28

then the last chart I went to the US

97:30

Bureau of Labor Statistics and I said

97:32

what has happened to the labor

97:33

participation rate over the same

97:35

period so I'm not blaming Netflix but I

97:40

think that this is a bit of a commentary

97:41

on sort of what's

97:43

happening in

97:45

society it's a little bit of a leading

97:48

indicator where as the company does

97:51

better and better the reality is that

97:53

that company wins by being a sync for

97:56

people's time it's where you go to

97:59

Netflix and chill it's a phrase that

98:01

that we all understand but the the the

98:04

dark underbelly of it is that there's

98:06

just a lot of people that are a little

98:07

bit more dejected there's a lot of

98:09

people that just opt out and and just

98:12

don't decide to work I think you could

98:15

graph the fertility rate and it's gone

98:17

down ratably as well so it's it's all of

98:20

this

98:21

soup that is about people living in a

98:24

life that that unfortunately just

98:26

doesn't

98:28

exist so I mean it's a well-run business

98:31

and I wish them all the best at some

98:33

level but at some other level I think

98:34

it's a commentary that as this company

98:37

does better and better there are more

98:38

and more people that are that are living

98:40

a shell of what their life could be so

98:43

cause and correlation uh aside obviously

98:46

correlated these is not causal you know

98:48

yes Netflix is not causing depression

98:50

but it's just a it's just a thing and

98:52

there's other things that obviously you

98:54

can put on this plate

98:56

sure but that was my reaction is I I

98:58

just think that the

99:00

more time

99:02

people are sort of detaching and and

99:06

plugging

99:07

out the more that you're going to see

99:10

these companies that provide ways of

99:12

distracting yourself do well I'm not

99:14

sure that Society benefits what do you

99:17

think Thomas opio for the masses or just

99:19

the golden error of

99:21

television what I'm curious chath is you

99:23

know how much of it is a substitutive

99:25

effect right away from kind of

99:28

traditional

99:30

media right I mean I've kind of looked

99:32

at it different ways that at least the

99:35

way it's measured you know time spent

99:37

watching television has not really

99:39

increased over 20

99:41

years to me it's more a reflection of I

99:45

could overlay the stock chart of you

99:46

know Fox and Comcast and you know CBS

99:50

and just have all of those have imploded

99:53

I think people have been kind of

99:54

substituting right away I I think the

99:58

the question then that you have to ask

100:00

is is there a reason that maybe the

100:01

Netflix product is fundamentally more

100:03

unsafe or detrimental to someone's

100:05

Health than the prior broadcast well you

100:09

know the one thing that I would say is

100:11

and this is not a Netflix commentary but

100:13

a general commentary which is online

100:15

products versus linear products have the

100:18

power and the benefit of this

100:21

algorithmic targeting and

100:23

personalization and I think that what

100:25

Netflix has successfully figured out and

100:27

a bunch of other products have

100:29

successfully figured out is that you can

100:31

hypertune to what people think they

100:34

want but what people think they want is

100:37

not necessarily what they need I think

100:39

when you had linear television you kind

100:41

of had to take what was given you didn't

100:43

love cheers but you watched cheers you

100:45

didn't love saying elsewhere but you

100:48

watched

100:49

it now it's that you can go into a place

100:52

where the thing

100:54

really feeds you and it gives you a very

100:56

visceral feedback loop and you can stay

100:59

there binge watching something for an

101:01

entire weekend and what didn't I think

101:03

the question is what didn't you do yes

101:06

necessarily didn't work out necessarily

101:08

didn't eat well didn't spend time with

101:11

friends and by the way I'm not saying

101:13

that I don't do it I've done it as well

101:15

like our group chat one of the

101:16

interesting things when Jason like he

101:19

he's very good about television and

101:20

stuff he says this series is amazing our

101:22

other friend Goldberg does the same

101:24

thing it's hard for me to not start to

101:27

start it and then not end it it's

101:29

addicting yeah but I have to really

101:31

check myself because then for those two

101:34

days I'll be tempted to not leave my

101:37

bedroom my my kids are like where's my

101:39

father and so I I I think it's it

101:42

happens to all of us yeah it's just a

101:44

thing that again I'm not trying to pick

101:46

on Netflix I'm just trying to say

101:48

societally I think we want people that

101:50

are vigorous and engaged in the real

101:52

world

101:53

and you know there needs to be a balance

101:57

yeah I uh wholeheartedly agree and I

102:00

think you have to schedule these things

102:01

you have to make it a permanent part of

102:03

your life playing poker on a certain

102:05

night of the week doing certain things

102:07

on the weekend with your kids having

102:08

certain rituals you know the the the

102:11

real damage to our kids is not that the

102:13

screens are damaging them it's that it's

102:14

replacing time I think which you you

102:16

were alluding to there Thomas this this

102:18

anxious generation as Jonathan hate and

102:20

we we had a great interview with him

102:22

myself and B in the Allin interview

102:24

series that is what's happening kids are

102:27

substituting whether it's Tik Tok or

102:29

Netflix or YouTube time for time with

102:32

their friends time doing physical

102:34

activities so you really just have to

102:36

limit the screen time so that those

102:37

other things in the boredom can emerge

102:39

and we will be having a talk in the

102:41

coming years about

102:44

dopamine it is something that these

102:47

algorithms have gotten really good at

102:49

doing which is firing your dopamine

102:51

every time you swipe that Tik Tok every

102:53

time you get to the Cliffhanger in a

102:55

series or you know Mr Beast video not

102:57

singling anybody out he's just a master

102:59

of it as well they're just all really

103:01

good at giving you that hook that

103:03

amazing moment uh and music musicians

103:06

are doing this now too with the hooks

103:07

and then the hooks go on Tik Tock the

103:10

dopamine addiction when you get burnt

103:11

out late at night getting those dopamine

103:14

hits the next day you feel depressed

103:16

then you go to a doctor and the doctor

103:18

said oh you have uh you know depression

103:20

so here's your Wellbutrin or here's what

103:21

whatever the I don't know what the the

103:24

the the things are of the moment I'll

103:26

just tell you what I focus on and what I

103:28

focus on with my family sleep hygiene

103:32

diet exercise

103:35

meditation do these four things and you

103:37

will reverse these Trends you don't need

103:39

it and listen I don't want to tell you

103:40

what to do medication's hard for kids

103:42

but I get the first three you know what

103:45

try it get the and listen I'm not

103:46

talking about book here app it has for

103:50

kids when I was growing up I grew up bud

103:53

my father would make us sit there at

103:55

9:00 every night and my sisters and I

103:59

would have to say this Buddhist prayer

104:01

and then he would make us close our eyes

104:03

for 15 minutes and he said meditate and

104:05

I was like I don't know what meditation

104:06

is but I was forced to just keep my eyes

104:08

shut and I would just Daydream but I I

104:11

suspect that there was like some

104:13

reasonably grounding value in that so I

104:15

get what you're saying I just have such

104:17

a negative connotation from it I've

104:19

never been able to come back to it

104:20

because of that experience but I would

104:21

just Daydream and by the way what I

104:23

dreamed of was getting out of that house

104:25

I was like I got to be you got a vision

104:28

Vision came to you I I got to manifest

104:30

some success here because this sucks Hey

104:31

Thomas thanks for coming on the show

104:32

great first appearance here as zesti

104:34

would' love to have you back unless the

104:37

king returns at some point you're the

104:39

best you should come back and you should

104:42

also come back to the all in Summit come

104:45

back for both and I know we still have

104:47

some some great topics like hotan and

104:49

others that I want to get to someday so

104:52

well that's actually when you come back

104:53

which we will do at some point in the

104:55

next few months I would love for us to

104:56

double click into hwk T so what for

104:58

folks that are listening wait what we

105:00

were going back and forth Hawken is the

105:02

CEO of broadcom and the reason when he

105:05

when Thomas brought this up hey guys

105:07

let's double click into

105:09

broadcom and the CEO the reason why I

105:12

was excited is that it is the only

105:14

trillion dollar company that nobody

105:16

talks about everybody knows Nvidia

105:19

everybody knows Amazon meta but broadcom

105:22

is a 1 one two trillion doll business

105:25

and it started basically through a whole

105:28

series of rollups anyways we'll double

105:30

click into this with you because I think

105:31

it's this is not the broadcom we're all

105:34

thinking of from the Telecom era is it

105:36

it is yeah Henry Samui yeah

105:39

correct I will leave you guys with a

105:41

with a

105:42

teaser to tease the next episode when we

105:45

talk about it and I'll tell you the

105:46

story that when Hawk bought broadcom

105:50

jcal to your point broadcom is the priv

105:53

of Orange County founded by Henry

105:54

Nicholas and Henry Samui kind of Legends

105:57

and semiconductors a legendary name so

105:59

it meant a lot to them that the combined

106:01

company aago was buying broadcom keep

106:04

the name broadcom and so Hawk being who

106:07

he is you know got a little bit of a

106:08

price discount to name the company

106:10

broadcom to him that was a great deal

106:12

that's who Hawk is he's a great

106:14

businessman but what is the ticker of

106:16

this particular company avgo and so I

106:19

said hawk why is the ticker still avgo

106:22

and you know what he said to me turn to

106:23

me said Thomas they forgot to negotiate

106:26

for the ticker

106:28

oh never forget the ticker interesting I

106:32

mean when when he started it was what

106:34

was the market capup 3.5 billion chath

106:37

it was an Not only was it an orphan

106:39

because it was it was a spin out of HP

106:43

it was a spin out of a spin out of HP it

106:46

was a double orphan 300X look at this

106:51

yeah is Last 5 Years the market Cap's

106:55

grown by 8X nvidia's grown by 20x but

106:59

you know Intel over the last five years

107:01

is what down

107:03

70% so you know I think there's a big

107:06

Divergence Thomas do you think this is a

107:08

function

107:09

of well I don't know if it's

107:11

directionally investing in the right

107:13

things or is it about like making

107:15

long-term Investments and thinking down

107:17

the road I mean obvious the compounding

107:19

Advantage he's an m&a Master this this

107:21

is less about there was a product that

107:24

won and more of a portfolio approach and

107:26

portfolio construction but did he buy

107:27

did he buy well ahead of the the curve

107:29

did he buy Over the Horizon Thomas like

107:32

that where Intel really missed I think

107:34

Intel really missed it's a complete

107:36

abdication of corporate governance at

107:38

the board level and the co level hey

107:41

guys breaking news story coming across

107:42

my feet I don't know if you can pull

107:44

this up Nick but there's a video

107:45

trending on the internet apparently an

107:47

executive order has just gone across the

107:49

president's desk and it was delivered by

107:52

none other than a gentlem David Sachs I

107:56

now there's a name I haven't heard in a

107:57

long time EO we're going to be forming a

108:00

internal working group to make uh crypto

108:02

to make America the world capital and

108:03

crypto under your

108:05

leadership which is really going up

108:07

right

108:09

absolutely here we go

108:12

whoa look at

108:16

this what he's using a Sharpie there to

108:18

sign these executive orders oh sax gets

108:21

to keep the pen there it is an executive

108:24

order I love how he holds them up it's

108:26

so great I wonder if s gets to keep that

108:29

they might not be excited but we're

108:30

going to make a lot of money for the

108:32

country thank you sir and so is

108:37

David oh you're reaction

108:40

jaman I think this is

108:42

great so we're going to make crypto

108:44

great again I'll be a little bit more

108:46

specific so I think that there are a

108:47

handful of ideas that if we can

108:50

Implement them

108:51

correctly are really

108:54

revolutionary I think that it's good to

108:56

have a stockpile of crypto I have less

108:59

of an opinion on that I think a set of

109:03

stable coin rails that makes payments

109:07

instantaneous and

109:09

Costless is an enormous acceleration to

109:13

GDP it would cut

109:17

fraud and I think that David's going to

109:19

go and figure that out and he's you're

109:21

talking about stable coins specifically

109:23

stable coins I mean I I talked about

109:24

this at the beginning of the year as my

109:26

sort of one of my predictions but I do

109:29

think that the United States stable coin

109:31

rails will be hugely disruptive and

109:34

value added he's going to have help from

109:37

the head of the SEC and the head of

109:38

Treasury to do it I just think it's

109:40

great I think saaks is already off to a

109:42

a hugely fast start the entire country

109:45

knows that we need to win the AI race

109:50

the the numbers are the numbers you put

109:51

up a chart like that Thomas

109:53

there's only one way for us to win and

109:55

that's to build more nuclear power

109:56

plants and so I think he's just got to

109:59

hammer this through and let's see who

110:01

tries to stop it I don't know if AOC or

110:03

Elizabeth Warren Pocahontas Bernie

110:05

Sanders who wants to jump in front of

110:06

this Trump train right now but I think

110:08

you get slaughtered if only there was

110:11

somebody who could comment on this

110:12

executive order that's what I need you

110:15

know chamath if I had the bat phone if I

110:17

could call somebody who call phone a

110:19

friend who would you call I don't know

110:22

you know I had my Saxy poo was always on

110:24

speed dial we used to hang in between

110:26

we'd have these great battles here on

110:28

the Pod then we go play chess together

110:30

we go have some drinks at the battery

110:32

but you know that was a different era

110:34

and you know I don't got my boy anymore

110:37

he's busy oh do we got right everybody

110:41

thanks for tuning in to the Allin

110:42

podcast I'm your host Jason calanis we

110:44

will see you next time bye sorry what

110:49

there he is there he is he's back back

110:52

to reclaim his seat it's yours home we

110:55

miss you buddy you look so handsome

110:57

going to cry 61 days not my bestie we

111:01

miss you were you just in the Oval

111:03

Office I was just in the Oval Office

111:06

first time in the Oval Office let me ask

111:08

you a

111:09

question was that your first time in the

111:11

oval well technically it was my second

111:15

but how was it sucks how's it been so

111:17

far it's pretty incredible yeah it's

111:19

really been pretty incredible well tell

111:22

us what are The Vibes and what's it like

111:24

to go in to the Oval Office and to have

111:29

that executive order sign TI us tell us

111:31

what the moment was like and then tell

111:33

us what's in the executive order well we

111:35

actually we did three executive orders

111:36

today so we did one on crypto one on AI

111:40

and then one on pcast which is the

111:42

president's Council of advisers for

111:44

Science and Technology the one on crypto

111:46

I guess we can start there the main

111:48

thing it does is it forms an internal

111:51

working group with the goal of making

111:53

the US the world leader in crypto so

111:56

it's not one specific action it's

111:57

basically authorizing and creating a

112:00

working group with the goal of achieving

112:03

that objective right and the members of

112:06

this working group are going to be

112:07

there's me there's the head of the SEC

112:10

the Secretary of the Treasury and all

112:12

the agencies and departments that have

112:14

an interest in crypto so we formed this

112:16

working group I'm actually chairing it

112:18

or I will be and again the goal here is

112:22

to to

112:24

identify and make

112:26

recommendations that the Departments

112:28

would then take back and they could

112:29

execute and just again with the goal of

112:31

making America the world capital of

112:34

cryptos the president of set of Davos

112:35

today and then the other two sex yeah so

112:38

that's crypto next one's AI so the the

112:41

number one thing that that EO does is

112:43

resend the the Biden EO which we talked

112:46

about on this podcast I don't know how

112:47

many episodes ago but remember it was

112:50

this 100 page monstrosity of burns some

112:53

regulation and the president had

112:55

promised on the campaign Trail to repeal

112:57

that and he did so it got rescinded

113:00

actually there was a master EO on Monday

113:03

that contained dozens of Biden era EOS

113:06

that got M rescinded this one provided a

113:09

little B more detail on it basically

113:10

said that that EO was UN necessarily

113:13

burdensome it said that we want to be

113:15

the world leader in AI in fact it uses

113:18

the word dominate you want we want to

113:20

basically have Global dominance in AI

113:23

and similar to what we're doing on the

113:24

crypto side it directs the creation of a

113:27

AI action plan and that study will be

113:30

led by three people the National

113:32

Security adviser who is Mike Waltz the

113:35

director of the office of Science and

113:36

Technology policy who will be Michael

113:40

ctios as soon as he Senate confirmed and

113:42

then the third person is me so the three

113:43

of us are going to work together on this

113:45

AI action plan and the idea is to figure

113:47

out what is it that the industry

113:49

actually needs to make us number one

113:51

globally in AI

113:52

so it's putting a little bit more

113:54

substance behind like what this what

113:56

this R ro means and the last one is to

113:59

build a science Council I don't know if

114:01

everybody's familiar with that so maybe

114:03

you could just describe what that is

114:04

generally for the audience well pcast

114:06

has been around for a long time I mean I

114:08

think it's you know been around for

114:10

decades and the the goal of pcast is to

114:12

assemble a group of top Science and

114:15

Technology Minds to provide the

114:16

president with advice so this was

114:19

already announced but

114:20

basically me and Michael ctios who I

114:23

mentioned before is g to be the director

114:24

of ostp we're going to be co-chairing

114:26

that and this is an EO that provides the

114:29

authorizing language to set that up and

114:31

then it provides some direction around

114:33

what pcast is going to do I think some

114:35

of the language that freeberg may like

114:37

is just it talks about the the need to

114:40

return to kind of truth-telling in

114:43

science and kind of getting away from

114:45

from woke science the AI order discusses

114:48

this as well we don't want AI models to

114:50

be ideologically biased an agenda I

114:53

don't know if it uses the word woke AI

114:55

but that's basically what it's talking

114:56

about we want AI models to be as

114:58

politically unbiased as possible well if

114:59

you need a recommendation for somebody

115:01

for the council I know somebody who is

115:03

extremely well versed on science he's

115:05

got a broad array of science knowledge

115:08

here here yeah I have an idea then we

115:11

could have two besties in the in and

115:13

around the White House hey well you know

115:15

thanks for including us in in so many

115:17

aspects of the weekend and the audience

115:19

really wants to know what are the chance

115:22

an we we get uh Sachs back on the Pod

115:25

now and again in 2025 um and we do

115:29

appreciate the sacrifice you're making

115:31

we're doing it right now but the

115:32

audience uh is you know not going to

115:34

just accept this little drop in here

115:36

they want to know what's the long-term

115:37

plan for David Sachs in the Pod and

115:40

what's happened like with media overall

115:42

in the administration now that

115:43

confirmation hearings are underway Sachs

115:45

and closing out does that mean folks are

115:47

going to be able to get back on social

115:49

and things that they were kind of

115:51

restricted by over the last couple of

115:53

weeks sure but I I think that you know

115:56

if you're working for the White House

115:57

there kind of needs to be a reason for

115:59

you to be out there because you don't

116:00

want to be making news that you're not

116:02

supposed to so in the case here today

116:05

the president signed these executive

116:07

orders on crypto and

116:09

Ai and they want me explaining them so

116:12

it makes sense for me to go out there

116:14

I've got a appearance on Fox Business in

116:17

about an hour to talk about the EOS as

116:19

well so that might come out before this

116:22

pod comes out but you guys are the first

116:23

ones I'm actually talking to but so

116:25

there's a reason for me to come out and

116:27

do it and I think that there probably

116:30

will need to be a good reason for me to

116:32

come on the Pod but I'm going to try and

116:33

come on the Pod every chance I get all

116:36

right well this is our appeal to djt to

116:38

let you come on and just chew the fat

116:41

and and and maybe there's some upside to

116:43

it for him do you miss being on the Pod

116:44

sex oh yeah sure of course we miss you

116:48

so

116:50

much look I'll be back back don't worry

116:53

some point are you a little emotional

116:56

right now SX what are your favorite

116:59

memories from the inauguration weekend

117:02

well the inauguration ceremony itself

117:04

was really pretty spectacular you were

117:06

there in the capital jamat yeah it's

117:09

funny Jack and I kind of took our seats

117:10

and there were aunda like kind of in the

117:12

back in the peanut gallery and I thought

117:14

that's where I was going to be sitting

117:15

and then somebody comes up to me and

117:17

says uh Mr saxs we have a seat for you

117:19

up up front and so they put me on the

117:22

you were with the big boys yeah it was

117:24

like the Secretary of State the

117:25

Secretary of Treasury and then me you

117:27

know and then we were just we were

117:29

behind the the Trump family you may not

117:31

have seen me because those Trump kids

117:32

are pretty tall but um that whole family

117:36

is very tall so I kind of disappeared a

117:39

little bit but in any event they put me

117:41

on the deas which was really pretty

117:42

crazy I wasn't wow I didn't realize that

117:44

yeah it was a huge honor there was a

117:47

shot where David and Jacqueline were in

117:49

the front they looked amazing and they

117:51

were kind of looking around H for where

117:54

to sit and I was like this can't be

117:56

right because there he must have had

117:57

like a name so it's good that it all got

117:59

sorted out but what was the vantage

118:01

point from your side basically you're

118:03

looking out yeah I mean I was looking

118:05

out and you know I could see the faces

118:08

of the Democrats as the president came

118:11

out you know President Biden and KLA

118:13

Harris they didn't look too happy no I I

118:16

wish they had a fixed camera on them the

118:18

whole time I wanted to see their

118:19

reaction shot side I've seen some of the

118:21

reaction shots you know hey just just I

118:25

mean that was really unique to have uh I

118:27

I mean I thought that that speech was

118:28

really incredible because well first of

118:31

all it was completely consistent with

118:33

everything the president had said during

118:35

the

118:36

campaign and so you really felt like he

118:40

he has a mandate here because this is

118:42

everything he said during the campaign

118:44

it remind me a lot of there's that

118:45

famous quote by by Abraham Lincoln that

118:47

public sentiment is everything with it

118:49

you can accomplish anything without it

118:51

you do anything and it really felt like

118:54

that inauguration speech was full of

118:56

substance but it was substance that the

118:58

president had delivered on the campaign

118:59

Trail and so when he won this Victory

119:04

where he only won the presidency he won

119:06

the popular vote he won seven out of

119:08

seven swing states he won the house he

119:10

won the Senate it really feels like he

119:12

has a mandate and I think he reiterated

119:14

that mandate in his speech and then of

119:17

course just the the cherry on top is

119:19

just that you know the losers just to

119:22

sit there and and listen to it well

119:24

kudos to them for coming out and keeping

119:26

the tradition yeah well yeah and when

119:30

he's talking about the corrupt

119:31

establishment that tried to put him in

119:32

prison through this law fair I mean he's

119:34

talking about some of those people who

119:35

were sitting behind him I just thought

119:37

it was remarkable a remarkable moment

119:39

that was a crazy visual do you want to

119:41

take us back sacks on how you because

119:42

you haven't talked about this publicly

119:44

but how did you end up I guess getting

119:46

the offer for the role deciding to take

119:48

the role anything you want to share

119:49

anecdotally on on the the path to get

119:52

here I don't know that there's that much

119:53

to report you know I was helping with

119:56

the transition I got offered the the

119:58

role and decided to do it so I mean look

120:00

it's not something I was expecting or

120:02

planning as you guys know I didn't even

120:04

know there was going to be such a role

120:05

but when they they decided to create it

120:07

and they offered it to me and so I

120:09

decided to do it you know just one thing

120:11

I should clarify just to make clear is

120:13

there's still some things I can't do yet

120:14

in the role because there's a whole

120:16

government ethics process that you have

120:18

to go through and I'm in I'm in the

120:20

midst of that process so we've signed

120:21

these it's given

120:23

me certain responsibilities and

120:25

authorized me to do certain things and

120:27

that process is going to begin as soon

120:29

as I complete this um I guess you call

120:31

it onboarding so just to be clear about

120:34

that there's things I can do there's

120:36

things I can't do I can kind of be in

120:37

listing mode I can't be necessarily

120:40

shaping policy yet so that's all going

120:42

to be worked through over the next

120:43

couple weeks all right sax I got to ask

120:46

first time in the

120:48

oval what's going through your mind yeah

120:51

great question my was on a swivel you

120:53

know one of those moments you're like

120:54

you can't really believe that you're

120:55

you're there it does feel a little bit

120:58

like you're on a movie set I mean it's

120:59

so famous obviously to be in that it

121:02

bigger in person or is it smaller in

121:03

person how what is it I thought it

121:05

seemed about the right size I know

121:06

that's that one of the things people say

121:08

about it is that it's smaller than you

121:10

expect I didn't feel like it was smaller

121:11

but it also didn't feel bigger it felt

121:13

felt like you know the Oval Office that

121:15

you've always seen the other people who

121:16

are in there who've been in there the

121:17

staffers who've been in there a 100 or a

121:19

thousand times it's obviously it wears

121:21

off and it's like just where they do

121:23

their work but yeah I've got to admit

121:24

the first time you go in there you're

121:26

pretty pretty a struck there was a post

121:29

that JD Vance now the vice president had

121:32

where he actually do you guys see this

121:34

Mike Johnson I saw the video Mike John

121:36

pretty crazy walking in and he's in

121:38

shock because he had never been in there

121:40

I guess you know I guess he became a

121:41

senator a few years ago and uh we've had

121:44

a Democrat president so he never

121:46

had and he said that he was honored and

121:49

humbled to be there I mean that's the

121:50

way I felt as well those comments by the

121:55

Vice President resonated with me I think

121:57

probably every American would feel this

121:59

way the first time you're in the Oval

122:00

Office it is pretty incredible you want

122:02

me to repeat the words that the

122:04

president said about you there's nobody

122:06

like this guy they said how did you get

122:09

David saaks how did you do that he's

122:11

doing it for the country more than

122:12

anything else we appreciate it David

122:15

thank you very much he's been he's been

122:17

really nice to me it's really incredible

122:18

he's been just incredible to me and he

122:21

he gave me the the pen from the from the

122:24

signing uh which is pretty cool can we

122:26

see the pen can we see the pen the brand

122:28

of the pen well it's not brand it

122:30

basically it says the White House on one

122:31

side and it's got his signature on

122:34

another and so look I wasn't expecting

122:37

trophy Cas is it like a Sharpie what is

122:39

it is it a Sharpie it is it is a Sharpie

122:42

you you you've seen him s sign right

122:44

yeah so it's what you know I assume it's

122:46

what what he likes but so he gave me the

122:48

pen which is pretty incredible have you

122:50

guys seen that there's all these ASMR

122:51

vide videos of the president's signing

122:53

where you can just hear

122:56

theen the pen on the paper it

122:59

makes exactly there's like all these

123:01

ASMR of that well freeberg wants to know

123:04

if you could

123:05

assign his new Tesla he wants you to

123:08

sign it with that pen he wants you to

123:09

autograph it so when you get back to the

123:11

valley you can you can start doing

123:13

autographs with that all around all

123:15

around no I think uh I think only the

123:17

presents allowed to use this pen only

123:19

the presents allowed to use okay well

123:20

put it in put it put it we're safe okay

123:22

don't lose the pen you got to put it in

123:23

a glass box or something and uh sax

123:26

there's thousands of commenters who are

123:29

just begging for you to come back do you

123:30

have a message to your Legions of

123:34

commenters well I I thank them and I'm

123:37

back right now I know maybe it's not

123:39

enough but soak it in it would help if

123:41

you guys could just do a better job on

123:42

the Pod so they weren't complaining all

123:44

the time we do the best we can without

123:46

you all right get back to work get back

123:49

to work go come on this taxpayer you're

123:51

on the tax clock here go go back to work

123:53

here and save America make America great

123:56

again listen we wish you great success

123:58

we miss you greatly and uh we thank you

124:01

for the service to the country we wish

124:03

you uh all all all the best as you go um

124:07

handle two of the most important issues

124:09

for our country Ai and help advise our

124:12

president on cryptocurrency as well love

124:15

you suxy and

124:16

pcast yes of course NP as well boys love

124:19

you very very much David love you

124:21

hopefully see you on Tuesday yes Thomas

124:24

thanks for coming in and for the opp

124:27

Thomas thank you very much you great

124:29

podast you Thomas love you

124:33

boys let your winners

124:36

ride

124:40

Rainman and instead we open sourced it

124:42

to the fans and they've just gone crazy

124:44

with it love you queen of

124:50

[Music]

124:54

besties

124:55

are that's my dog taking

125:01

driveway oh man

125:03

myit we should all just get a room and

125:05

just have one big huge orgy cuz they're

125:07

all useless it's like this like sexual

125:09

tension that they just need to release

125:11

[Music]

125:14

somehow

125:16

be we need to get merch our

125:22

[Music]

125:27

I'm going all in

Interactive Summary

Loading summary...