HomeVideos

RFK Jr. Goes Feral in Combative CNN Interview. Kara Swisher: “He Seemed Insane” | Pivot

Now Playing

RFK Jr. Goes Feral in Combative CNN Interview. Kara Swisher: “He Seemed Insane” | Pivot

Transcript

1901 segments

0:00

His brand is measles, raw milk, and

0:02

rabid raccoons.

0:03

>> No, you forgot exploding diarrhea.

0:11

>> Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York

0:13

Magazine and the Fox Media Podcast

0:14

Network. I'm Cara Swisser

0:16

>> and I'm Scott Galloway. Do you think

0:17

people were tuning in today hoping to

0:18

get someone else? [laughter]

0:20

>> No, it's not. [ __ ] I thought he was

0:23

gone.

0:23

>> I know. You thought it was Scott free

0:25

August, but he wanted to stay an extra

0:26

day. You did.

0:27

>> That's what happened here.

0:28

>> Yeah. Did you catch Dana Bash's

0:30

interview with RFK Jr. on Sunday? I

0:32

mean, let's listen to an exchange about

0:35

childhood vaccines and autism in which

0:38

he sounded like a rapid raccoon.

0:40

>> Are you also trying to find out how it

0:42

interacts with people's DNA, what's

0:45

predisposed to uh to to have an autistic

0:48

child? Are you doing both? Yeah, but but

0:52

Dana, you probably don't understand this

0:54

because you're not a scientist, but

0:55

genes don't cause

0:57

>> genes don't cause epidemiral

1:04

environmental. That's what I'm asking.

1:05

Are you studying the environmental

1:07

>> looking at all the different

1:08

environmental exposures? But your

1:10

statement, you have been fooled. Your

1:13

statement that this has been studied is

1:16

not true.

1:16

>> He was lying there. It was full of

1:18

errors. He was crazy. He was also

1:20

aggressive physically. I thought I

1:21

thought Dana handled it beautifully. He

1:23

seemed insane. Um thoughts?

1:26

>> If Fox News can can literally pollute,

1:30

litter,

1:32

defecate all over the cabinet, then my

1:35

attitude is okay, let's go to cable

1:37

news. We get to know them. We get to see

1:38

their intellect. I thought that in the

1:43

last week

1:45

uh Caitlyn Collins, Dana Bash, and

1:48

Margaret Brennan demonstrated a skill. I

1:51

think a lot about this. I do not have

1:53

this skill. I I really don't. And people

1:56

don't realize what an incredible skill

1:57

it is. And that is in a impromptu ad,

2:03

you know, sort of ad hoc, audible, click

2:06

on your feet way to push back in a

2:09

forceful yet dignified way. I mean,

2:13

these these three women, they put on a

2:16

master class because

2:17

>> I would agree.

2:19

>> And I'll come back to his comments. I

2:20

mean, no surprise, he's full of

2:22

conspiracy theory, has absolutely no

2:25

scientific background. But the thing

2:27

that struck me was just how adept at the

2:32

applone. You know, people are [ __ ]

2:33

posting that cable news doesn't matter

2:35

anymore. Some of the most talented

2:37

people in media are still in those

2:39

seats.

2:39

>> Yeah, this is important. This was an

2:41

important interview.

2:41

>> The way that Dana was able to forcefully

2:44

push back but not be disrespectful. And

2:46

also what Margaret was able to do with

2:49

that village idiot that said uh the the

2:52

accusations against against uh

2:54

>> Max Miller. Max Miller shouldn't be

2:57

fodder for media. It's like, oh, [ __ ]

2:59

The media talks about every elected

3:01

official,

3:02

>> correct?

3:02

>> That has accusations like this. I mean,

3:05

that was just such weak sauce. And she

3:07

was able to say just very quietly and

3:09

elegantly or softly and elegant, well,

3:11

actually, we cover these stories from

3:12

both political parties all the time,

3:14

>> right? They just did Graham Platiner.

3:16

>> But I thought Dana was outstanding. And

3:18

the and the moment that stuck out to me,

3:20

and I'll turn it back to you, was when

3:22

he raised his fingers for finger quotes

3:25

and then said the experts. I was like,

3:28

well, okay, who are we supposed to

3:31

trust? Of course, we trust experts.

3:33

Expert means you have certification,

3:36

you've done the diligence, you have the

3:37

domain expertise, and perhaps you've

3:38

devoted your life to not only trying to,

3:42

okay, it's arrogant to say they have the

3:44

right answers, but they have the least

3:46

wrong answers of anyone because they

3:47

devoted their life to understand the

3:49

[ __ ] And the thing about quote unquote

3:50

scientists that doesn't get enough play

3:53

in peer-reviewed research, if a younger

3:55

academic comes along and challenges your

3:58

views and is right, academics celebrate

4:01

it. They're like, "That's great. we've

4:02

made this better. They don't double down

4:05

and say, "No, my my now incorrect

4:08

information is the right way." And so,

4:11

let me ask the question I would have is

4:13

who's he going to put in between these

4:14

air quotes then that we're supposed to

4:16

listen to? Some housewife who got a

4:18

following on TikTok? Of course, we

4:21

listen to experts. That's the whole

4:22

[ __ ] point.

4:23

>> Yeah, I would I I thought this was

4:25

really a critical interview. Now,

4:26

interestingly, he's obviously running

4:28

for president. He just posted a picture

4:29

of him sailing except he's like a like

4:31

speaking of Teu JFK. Uh he he was he's

4:35

trying he's running for office. Let's

4:36

just be clear.

4:37

>> He is. Um with let me just tell you

4:40

Cheryl Hines is no Jackie Kennedy.

4:42

>> You mean the marvelous Mrs. Measles?

4:44

>> Yeah. Right.

4:47

>> I love that. Um yeah, this guy is like

4:50

his brand is measles and raw milk and

4:53

rabid raccoons.

4:54

>> No, you forgot exploding diarrhea.

4:56

>> Exploding diarrhea. Yeah. and she was

4:58

trying to get answers out of him, but he

4:59

was he was blaming everything on the

5:01

Biden administration. I don't know how

5:02

you could blame exploding diarrhea on

5:04

the Biden. He took no responsibility for

5:06

the measles outbreak, which is

5:07

unprecedented if you see the charts.

5:09

It's like like thousands now versus like

5:12

three, a small amount of measles. Um

5:16

it's he took no responsibility. He was

5:18

screaming. He seemed insane. And he was

5:22

fiscal. I I I was sort of like Dana He

5:25

was leaning into her. He's so

5:27

aggressive. He's he's he's a dangerous

5:31

person, I think, in a lot of ways and

5:33

very uh volatile clearly, you know, his

5:36

his history of drug use is like on

5:38

display, like has never gotten help for

5:40

it in the way he needs. Um, and it's

5:43

just it was a really disturbing

5:45

interview, but I thought Dan handled

5:46

well. I thought Margaret with this is

5:47

Mike Turner who was the person um and by

5:50

the way speaking of someone who really

5:51

failed on his video was Max Miller

5:53

himself where he said do you think if I

5:55

was hitting her I'd have made her she'd

5:57

have made me dinner. Yes, actually

5:59

that's like the classic uh abused wife

6:02

uh syndrome. Um he he looks terrible.

6:04

his father-in-law, Bernie Marino, who is

6:07

a senator, um, finally slapped back as a

6:10

as a father and a grandfather uh to him

6:13

and called him psychologically ill

6:15

essentially. Uh, he had apparently been

6:17

threatened because he there's rumors he

6:19

is gay. Um, but Max Miller actually

6:21

explicit seemed implicitly threatened

6:24

him really with outing him. I think

6:26

that's what he was doing. I mean, the

6:28

whole thing is so sorted and grotesque,

6:30

but they think they're going to flip

6:31

that seat, that Max Miller seed, and he

6:33

is he is, you know, he had had previous

6:35

relationship with Stephanie Gisham, um,

6:38

who has talked about him being abusive,

6:40

this guy, and then they, you know, they,

6:42

of course, they're going to start to

6:43

surface all his various drunken abuse

6:46

stuff that he it has, uh, there was

6:48

pictures of him in college. Um, this is

6:50

a two troubled people, RFK Jr. And then

6:54

um you know I just think a lot of these

6:56

interviews and Caitlyn of course last

6:57

week have been you're right dignified

7:00

answer the question please answer the

7:01

question here are the facts and they've

7:03

done a great job.

7:04

>> I I think there are certain red lines I

7:06

think the left needs to come up with an

7:08

aspirational vision of masculinity

7:10

otherwise that void will be filled by

7:12

really

7:12

>> by dominance and misogyny from the

7:14

right.

7:15

>> Yeah.

7:15

>> And one of those things I think is is a

7:18

move to protection. The whole point of

7:20

of massing a certain amount of strength

7:22

and power is so she can protect others.

7:23

That's the whole shooting mass. That is

7:25

the ends. And when someone insults your

7:28

wife's looks, you don't support them for

7:30

president, Senator Ted Cruz. That's a

7:32

red line. That's it. That you're out.

7:34

That it does. You don't need to be a

7:36

senator. You need to be a husband. And

7:38

if if there is anything anything

7:41

resemble I do believe in due process. I

7:44

do think in our society we have a

7:46

tendency that the accusation is the

7:47

conviction. I do think innocent until

7:50

proven guilty. But on certain

7:52

accusations,

7:53

>> there's a lot of troubling patterns

7:55

here.

7:55

>> When there's a ton of corroborating

7:57

evidence in a fact pattern, when the

8:00

daughter of your daughter,

8:02

there's evidence that this individual

8:05

broke a 2-year-old's collarbone.

8:09

You don't wait and focus group test this

8:11

and get worried about being outed for

8:13

having an account where you were

8:14

soliciting, possibly soliciting for gay

8:16

sex. That's it. You use the whole point

8:19

of amassing that power. Even if you have

8:21

to spend it all, even if you lose the

8:22

power, even if you get voted out as the

8:24

whole point of amassing that power is to

8:27

protect the people close to you.

8:28

>> I agree.

8:29

>> And

8:31

these aren't men. These aren't

8:33

>> Yeah. These aren't men. That's

8:35

>> these are these are you pro the whole

8:38

point of power is so you can protect

8:41

your wife and your granddaughter and

8:43

your daughter. And the fact that he

8:45

waited this long

8:46

>> to say anything, it's like Jesus Christ,

8:49

dude.

8:50

>> What What's the point of all this?

8:52

>> This is Senator Marino. I know. The

8:54

whole thing is really gross. And

8:55

actually, it's very on brand for these

8:58

people. Aggressive dunking, angry. Um,

9:02

uh, I don't know if you know this.

9:03

Someone You got You got dunked on by

9:05

Spencer P.

9:06

>> Oh my gosh, you sent that to me. That

9:08

made my weekend.

9:09

>> Oh my gosh.

9:10

>> Should we read the tweet? Hold on.

9:11

>> Yes, let's read the tweet. Scott

9:13

Galloway is a perfect example of perhaps

9:16

the most pernitious people in society.

9:19

So first off,

9:20

>> he doesn't know perish.

9:20

>> What's the overunder on? He actually

9:22

understands the word pernicious.

9:23

>> I don't think he

9:24

>> Anyways, the stupid smart person

9:27

educated beyond his intelligence, smart

9:29

enough vocabulary to justify his ego and

9:31

smuggness, but too stupid to understand

9:33

basic realities of communist smart

9:35

people.

9:36

>> Okay, this is what stupid stupid people

9:39

do trying to use AI. Yeah,

9:41

>> this was so clearly written by AI.

9:43

>> Why did he pick you out? We wasn't your

9:45

Bill Maher thing.

9:46

>> I I I don't I literally have no idea. I

9:49

don't

9:49

>> you were very supportive of Fouchy and

9:52

cuz you just slightly laughed at him.

9:54

Bill Maher joke. They were like giving

9:55

you a hard time. But it was like I I

9:58

think it was must have been Bill Maher.

10:00

He must have seen you, right?

10:02

>> Or the M Dani doxing thing. Maybe the M

10:04

Donnie do.

10:05

>> But why would he go out?

10:07

>> Would he like the M Dami doxing thing? I

10:09

don't I

10:10

>> I I don't know what prompted him. I was

10:12

like,

10:12

>> "All I can say is, and the reason I read

10:14

>> call him a [ __ ] many times when he was

10:15

running, that is fair."

10:17

>> As FDR said, please judge me by my

10:20

critics. Spencer, if you're out there,

10:23

please continue to [ __ ] boast me. I I I

10:26

I

10:27

there are a few people.

10:28

>> Who's next? George Santos. What What in

10:31

the [ __ ] This is like

10:35

I'm not [clears throat] on Twitter, so I

10:36

don't care what people say about me now.

10:38

>> I know. I know. But so I don't Yeah, but

10:40

I didn't I was trying to figure out I'm

10:41

like when did who decided let's go after

10:44

Scott now?

10:45

>> I don't know. Anyways, but look, he lost

10:48

to a socialist and an incompetent.

10:51

>> Yeah.

10:51

>> You know, I think he's fading into the

10:54

distance and he's desperately clinging

10:56

to some form of relevance

10:58

of him running for mayor. And I guess

10:59

that's over. He must not have many

11:01

choices. He's going to pick some fights.

11:03

Anyway, Spencer, you're a Pratt.

11:07

That's a British term for idiot. Anyway,

11:09

it made me laugh my ass off when I saw

11:11

it.

11:11

>> Yeah, I you notice you were the first

11:13

person to forward it to me.

11:15

>> Well, I was like, what? I was Someone

11:17

said it to me. I was like, who? Like, it

11:20

was such a like why is he bothering

11:22

Scott? I mean, there's so many more

11:23

worthy people to bother Scott, you know,

11:25

on the regular. But this was weird.

11:27

Anyway, congratulations. We've got to

11:29

dig into Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft

11:31

added a combined 1.5 trillion in value

11:34

following Q2 earnings. Of note, Amazon

11:36

sales totaled over 80 billion uh up from

11:40

13% a year earlier and Meta's profit was

11:43

down 14% from the previous year as a

11:45

company's capex forecast for the year

11:46

increased to $130

11:49

billion. We're recording ahead of

11:51

SpaceX's earnings on Tuesday. Speaking

11:53

of SpaceX, Tesla executives reportedly

11:55

been told to prepare to separate the

11:57

company's China business ahead of a

11:59

potential merger with SpaceX, which I

12:01

predicted here. Elon dismissed the

12:03

report as fake news, which means it's

12:04

true. Um, so talk a little bit about any

12:07

predictions on SpaceX earnings and

12:08

you're going to be on vacation. So, give

12:10

us a guess of what the stock prices when

12:12

you return. So, let's start with

12:13

Alphabet, Amazon, and Microsoft.

12:16

These companies are just incredibly

12:17

well-run and continue to I mean that the

12:22

I as someone who loves earnings reports

12:24

and I read these things and I'm just

12:25

sort of like uh consistently blown away.

12:28

Uh Amazon AWS sales jumped 37%. That's

12:32

it fastest growth since 2021 blowing

12:34

past the 31% consensus. Total revenue

12:37

crossed 200 billion for the first time

12:39

in a single quarter. Net income get this

12:41

car surge 245%.

12:44

>> Yeah. Now most of that or some a lot of

12:46

that is from these firms have become now

12:48

tracking stocks for

12:50

>> for um their investments or for some for

12:52

AI because 53 billion of uh of that was

12:56

from anthropic investment game.

12:58

>> Jasse raised capex guys

13:00

>> investment game so couldn't could not be

13:02

possibly not real eventually but go

13:04

ahead.

13:04

>> Well not recurring or it's Alibaba right

13:07

>> not structural unless they continue to

13:08

be great VCs to get it. They would argue

13:10

we're going to continue to have access

13:12

to these types of investments, but

13:13

they're not VCs. This isn't a businesses

13:15

they're in. So, the market typically

13:16

discounts these types of one-time gains.

13:19

Jasse raised capex guidance to 220

13:21

billion. Uh, look, and their stock was

13:24

up, Amazon stock was up dramatically.

13:26

Meta revenue reached 60 billion, up 28%.

13:31

Uh, their e their EPS missed estimates

13:34

by 14%. My guess is because they keep

13:37

increasing capex as they're announced.

13:38

He's doubling. He is making a bet.

13:40

>> Yeah, they're fully in this AI uh

13:43

capital war. Um he confirmed the Meta is

13:46

fielding buyout offers for its compute,

13:48

hinting at an eventual cloud business

13:49

and infrastructure business. I think

13:51

this is a really big story and that is

13:53

everyone's moving from the front end to

13:55

providing infrastructure. I wonder if

13:57

it's flipping. Analysts called the AI

13:59

monetization answers vague even as

14:01

capback guidance rose and shares tumbled

14:03

as much as 11%. So this really was a

14:05

tale of two cities. Microsoft revenue

14:08

hit 90 billion up 18%.

14:11

>> Incredible.

14:12

>> While EPS was a beat uh uh Azure passed

14:16

100 billion in annual revenue growing

14:18

43%.

14:19

Co-pilot seats doubled sequentially to

14:23

over 30 million up from 20 million. The

14:25

thing that's interesting there is that I

14:28

work or an investor in a company called

14:29

section that helps companies upskill

14:30

their AI and the general consensus among

14:33

companies is that co-pilot is probably

14:35

the weakest of the AI products and yet

14:38

what people don't realize is when you

14:40

have a recurring revenue relationship

14:41

and salespeople and someone saying you

14:43

know what

14:43

>> enhance a feature yeah

14:44

>> you may not we may not have the best

14:46

frontier model but guess what

14:48

>> useful

14:49

>> uh you have a recurring revenue

14:50

relationship with us it integrates into

14:52

your workflow and also we're very

14:55

security-minded. Do you really want to

14:56

take a chance on this new AI? It's not

14:58

the best model. It's the

15:00

>> That's what they do with everything.

15:01

That was explorer. That was that's

15:03

Microsoft, right? That's their That's

15:04

Microsoft. It's good. It's good enough.

15:06

You know, good enough was always the

15:07

Microsoft thing. And they they are

15:09

actually I'm finding I use Alphabet

15:12

search for a lot of AI answers like

15:15

>> their capex guidance dropped uh a bit.

15:18

Their commercial backlog climbed 84% to

15:21

680 billion. The only the only thing

15:23

here but this again speaks to how smart

15:25

they are investing in the growth areas

15:27

of technology. Their legacy products are

15:30

eroding is Windows devices fell 7% and

15:33

Xbox content dropped 10%.

15:34

>> Really trouble. We should get into that

15:36

when you come back that

15:37

>> but these companies imagine imagine if

15:39

you're a cable company and you had uh so

15:42

their legacy products are struggling

15:44

with the same thing that most media

15:45

companies legacy products but the thing

15:47

is Warner Brothers Discovery or or or

15:51

you know named the company Paramount

15:53

they also don't have Tik Tok or

15:56

Instagram reels these companies early

15:59

recognize that some of their legacy

16:01

assets are declining and where they're

16:02

so brilliant is they take that cash flow

16:04

and they invest really adeptly adeptly

16:07

in the future. I mean, these companies,

16:09

it's just crazy how well. And then

16:12

finally, Apple revenue hit 109 billion,

16:15

up 16% with iPhone sales climbing 22% to

16:20

54 billion.

16:21

>> Apple got dinged a little bit because

16:23

some of the earnings were tariff

16:25

related, right?

16:26

>> Well, they're about to get two bill a $2

16:27

billion re refund check on tariffs that

16:30

consumers have already paid for. So,

16:32

what do they pay for the two bill? I

16:33

mean that that thing is just so

16:35

inefficient and so stupid. Services

16:37

revenues was a miss uh which I think

16:40

took the stock down and Cook warned

16:42

memory driven supply constraints uh will

16:45

worsen through the holiday quarter. His

16:47

final call is CEO and by the way the guy

16:49

deserves to take just the biggest of all

16:51

victory lapse. Uh EPS beat estimates

16:55

um uh 11 cents of that came from a

16:58

onetime tariff refund. shares dropped

17:00

roughly 7%

17:02

>> because the tariff thing they were

17:03

>> and guidance

17:05

>> that seemed to disturb they were

17:06

>> but the stock has had the stock has just

17:08

been an unbelievable consistent

17:10

>> performer

17:11

>> I have to say of all the companies al

17:13

someone [music] asked me who's going to

17:14

win in the air thing I'd go I'm not sure

17:16

number the other one but it's Alphabet

17:18

>> so this quarter just validated again

17:19

Google was never dead revenue hit 120

17:22

billion up 24%

17:24

beating the consensus 117 billion

17:28

um the business. Everyone assumed AI

17:30

chatbots would gut specifically search

17:32

grew 17%. Right. So the the notion that

17:37

the the bare case on Google that chat

17:39

GPT and perplexity would eat search. It

17:41

just isn't showing up in the numbers.

17:43

>> It's not. Yeah.

17:44

>> Cloud is now the real story. Not search.

17:46

>> Let me say they scrambled. They were

17:47

behind and they scrambled to

17:50

>> they figured it out. Well, yeah,

17:51

>> Google Cloud revenue climbed 82% to 25

17:54

billion with operating income at to grow

17:58

to grow a business 82 billion while or

18:00

I'm sorry 82% while maintaining 33%

18:03

operating I mean that's just that's

18:05

staggering.

18:06

So it's a cloud business that's going

18:08

from an all surround to profitable at

18:11

scale which is hard to do. Cloud backlog

18:13

grew to 514 billion.

18:16

So

18:17

>> Sundar Pachai, he's the next Tim Cook. I

18:19

think

18:20

>> the the overhang is capex and that is

18:22

the stock sank sank in extended trading

18:25

as Alphabet raised their capex guidance

18:27

to 200 billion from the prior 180

18:29

billion and quarterly free cash flow

18:32

went negative at 5.9 because 45 billion

18:34

in capex outpaced operating cash flow.

18:37

This is the same tension we're seeing

18:39

across most of big tech with the

18:41

exception of Apple and that is okay we

18:44

get that AI works but will AI pay in the

18:46

capex you're allocating will we see the

18:49

type of return you're expecting but

18:51

Alphabet these earnings cleanest

18:53

illustration of a great quarter stock

18:56

punished anyway because the results were

18:58

were I mean I saw the results as just

19:00

being strong on any segment. Yeah. The

19:02

the one tech company suffering for too

19:05

much spending and too much debt is

19:07

Oracle. Continues to to

19:09

>> stock cut in half the last 12 months.

19:10

>> Keep going. Yeah. They're the ones

19:12

people don't people trust Google to turn

19:13

to be able to keep Well, not that

19:15

Oracle's other business, their their

19:17

legacy business is hurting, but people

19:19

are questioning their spending and their

19:20

debt is close to junk, which is

19:22

interesting. And a lot of debt. A lot of

19:24

debt. Larry, sure you want to buy buy uh

19:27

buy Warner. Anyway, uh SpaceX very

19:29

quickly,

19:30

>> they have their first uh

19:31

>> earnings on Tuesday.

19:32

>> Earnings on Tuesday. So, it'll file its

19:36

first earnings report. It's going to be

19:37

really interesting. It'll um also the

19:40

more interesting thing than probably the

19:42

earnings will be that it'll be it'll uh

19:45

unlock the largest insider share sale in

19:47

market history. Now, often times when

19:49

people are scared of of a of of shares

19:52

being um unlocked for sale, the com the

19:55

markets have already anticipated that.

19:58

But the company reports um aftermarket

20:00

close on the 4th. And the report

20:03

triggers a lockup release letting

20:05

insiders sell, get this, uh 912 million

20:08

shares. And get this, the options

20:10

markets are pricing a 15% swing in

20:12

either direction after results. And

20:15

roughly 219 million shares are sold

20:17

short, raising the odd of the squeeze if

20:19

if if results of be if there's a beat.

20:22

>> It's sticking right now, but it's down.

20:24

It's down in one month. It's down 30 31%

20:27

essentially 6 months 31 year to date.

20:29

>> Yeah, it's it's been cut in half since

20:31

its intraday peak of 225 and it's 20%

20:34

below its IPO listing price of $135. So,

20:37

it's technically a broken IPO. And this

20:41

is despite the fact that underwriters

20:42

typically set first quarter targets low

20:44

during the road show to guarantee an

20:45

early beat. When whenever I've been on a

20:47

board where we take a company public, we

20:49

basically book we basically lock the

20:53

first quarter earnings call that it'll

20:54

be a beat.

20:55

>> So prediction. Give me a prediction for

20:57

SP. Will Tesla be folded in?

20:59

>> Well, you said it. This is your

21:00

prediction. You said that you think

21:02

Tesla will be folded in that he's

21:03

planning to put all of it under one

21:04

roof.

21:05

>> Yeah. And that's why Tesla's shares are

21:07

holding like above 300. I I think it'd

21:10

crash if that wasn't a possibility.

21:11

Okay, SpaceX prices at 110 right now

21:13

when you return from your Sojour.

21:16

>> Uh so as much as I like to ship both

21:18

SpaceX, if I were to make a bet, it

21:20

would be that there'll be a significant

21:22

pop because of all the short selling and

21:25

the anything but bad news will result in

21:29

a short squeeze that sends the stock up

21:30

temporarily, but it'll be a sugar high

21:32

and the stock will resume its downward

21:34

march. But on earnings, if unless

21:37

earning unless there's a surprise to the

21:39

downside, which there shouldn't be on

21:41

the first earnings call, any any glimmer

21:44

of like, oh, maybe there's some, you

21:46

know, this is a great company. Any

21:48

buying is like a bunch of people trying

21:50

to get through a crowded door cuz so

21:51

many people are short of the stock. So,

21:53

if if I have to predict on after hours

21:57

after hours, a bit of a short squeezing

21:59

up and then it it quickly resumes its

22:00

downward march.

22:01

>> We'll see. And also Elon's behavior so

22:03

far. He's had a pretty bad couple of

22:05

weeks. And maybe if Gwen Shotwell is the

22:07

one talking, maybe if he shuts up that

22:09

would work. And there's like he's he's

22:10

really posting a lot of crazy [ __ ] right

22:13

now. Like like do you have anything else

22:15

to do but post crazy [ __ ] I mean it's

22:18

not Spencer Prep, but still. All right,

22:20

let's go on a quick break. When we come

22:22

back, AI hacks and cyber chaos.

22:26

>> This is advertiser content from Harvey

22:28

AI. We have a choice over who we work

22:30

with and who we don't. specifically who

22:32

we allow to advertise and who we don't.

22:33

And for those of you who watch my

22:34

content, I am not an AI catastrophist.

22:36

I'm an AI optimist. I think it's going

22:38

to create more jobs [music] than it

22:40

destroys. And I think our job as

22:42

professionals is to figure out how to

22:44

leverage these these tools. AI more than

22:47

almost anything I do in terms of what I

22:48

could point to for real economic

22:50

leverage and savings is [music] 100% in

22:53

the legal fields. Harvey is the AI

22:55

designed specifically for legal work,

22:57

trusted by leading law firms and

22:58

enterprise legal teams. All right. So,

23:01

now I'm looking at their demo. It plugs

23:05

into tools that lawyers already work

23:07

with. Lexus, Nexus, Microsoft, and this

23:10

is a key, and I do this internally with

23:11

my LLMs. With permissions, it lets you

23:15

look at the firm's own files and

23:18

databases.

23:20

So, here it's answering a question,

23:22

reads the complaint, pulls the relevant

23:24

terms, checks the web, weighs the

23:26

evidence, and drafts a [music] response.

23:28

But it also can do this in a shared

23:30

workspace between the firm and the

23:32

client. [music]

23:33

So they both have visibility into the

23:35

work being done and can both add value

23:36

to it. I I think this space is clearly

23:41

sort of handinand glove for AI, right?

23:43

So there's no doubt about it. This I

23:45

think is uh it's going to be super

23:48

helpful not only for law firms

23:50

themselves but internally for general

23:52

counsels at companies. Harvey is AI

23:55

tailored for law. You can learn more at

23:58

harvey.ai. [music]

24:03

>> Scott, we're back. It's being called

24:05

cyber security's Jurassic Park moment,

24:07

which is kind of frightening and not the

24:09

good part of the movie. Anthropic says

24:11

that its models hacked into three

24:12

outside companies during testing. The

24:14

news comes just days after open egg

24:16

revealed one of its AI agents escaped a

24:18

test environment and hacked a startup he

24:20

hugging face. The hacks are increasing

24:22

pressure on the White House to address

24:23

AI security. Trump signed an executive

24:25

order in June asking AI companies to

24:27

voluntarily submit their most powerful

24:29

models for government testing before

24:30

releasing them publicly, but there's

24:32

still no real AI regulation from the

24:34

administration or Congress. What a

24:36

surprise. This cyber chaos era is

24:38

really, I think, problematic and and

24:41

dangerous given the lack of AI

24:43

regulation. And speaking of cyber

24:45

attacks, something that Nicole Pearl

24:46

Rothro told me in a recent interview,

24:48

what was going to happen, federal

24:49

authorities are warning critical US

24:51

infrastructure could be at risk after

24:53

seven states reported cyber attacks on

24:55

water and wastewater system, which is

24:56

precisely what he predicted. The warning

24:58

comes after US officials say Iran was

25:00

likely behind the coordinated cyber

25:02

attack on water systems in Minnesota.

25:03

Trump is blaming Minnesota Governor Tim

25:06

Walls for that, saying Iran has bigger

25:08

problems than worrying about Minnesota.

25:09

I don't even know what he's talking

25:11

about. um talk a little bit about this

25:13

because they really these things are

25:14

jumping out of sandboxes because that's

25:16

their job to jump out of sandboxes,

25:18

right? If you're going to be a hacker,

25:19

if you tell it to hack, it'll hack. Um I

25:22

think a lot of people are really under

25:25

under reporting this story, these these

25:27

attacks. Cuz with AI, you really can.

25:29

It's not just Iran. It could be just

25:31

anyone. It could be it could be Spencer

25:33

Pratt attacking Minnesota, you know,

25:35

with these tools.

25:36

>> You use the correct term. This is more

25:38

Jurassic Park than Terminator or Skynet

25:40

because someone left the gate open and

25:43

>> but they purposely did, right? No, they

25:46

didn't. They got out. They jumped out.

25:48

>> But someone someone in my understanding

25:50

is gave the the AI directions on how to

25:54

go get this. It just they were shocked

25:56

by how creative and ambitious it was.

25:58

>> Right. Right. Right.

25:59

>> And so it's more I think this is a story

26:01

of competence, not sentience.

26:04

>> Okay.

26:05

>> This is why we need regulation. If you

26:07

were to if you were to have AI

26:10

um basically say the moment you perceive

26:13

an existential threat, launch our our

26:16

birds, our missiles, you have to have a

26:18

person somewhere in there or you have to

26:20

have an AI that says okay any kind of

26:23

existential threat to humanity that

26:24

results in the harming of anybody or

26:26

economic harm or doing anything illegal

26:29

needs to send up red flags that notify a

26:31

regulatory body, the the executives.

26:34

So what I don't get is I I think this is

26:37

super interesting that these things

26:40

might it's like

26:43

the thing I thought of and this is a

26:44

weird analogy but there were there were

26:46

Japanese

26:48

soldiers

26:49

in the hills of the Philippines 20 years

26:52

after the war ended who used to come

26:54

down and terrorize the villages and

26:57

shoot at perceived enemies because they

26:59

had orders. They were sent in the hills

27:01

towards the end of the war and they were

27:03

they said go into the hills we have to

27:04

withdraw because we're getting beaten

27:07

but terrorize the [ __ ] village and

27:09

Americans and the enemy. And 20 years

27:11

later these individuals who were part of

27:14

the Imperial Army, they were still

27:17

following their orders and they actually

27:20

I thought this was such an interesting

27:21

story. In one case they had to find the

27:24

commanding officer. This is like I think

27:26

in the 50s or 60s

27:28

to and then transport the commanding

27:31

officer to the hill where they think

27:32

these guy was hanging out and start

27:35

yelling I'm you know major or general

27:38

Takashidto

27:40

come down you are relieved of your duty

27:44

and that was the analogy I thought these

27:46

AIs are taking their orders very

27:49

seriously

27:50

but someone did give it the order and

27:53

where I go is the same place And that is

27:56

you wouldn't sell if this this if this

27:58

technology according to the the leaders

28:00

of these firms is more powerful than

28:02

nuclear bombs. Well, you wouldn't let

28:04

Oenheimer sell these bombs into Proctor

28:06

and Gamble.

28:07

>> Right. No, I agree.

28:08

>> So, we need we need a thick layer of of

28:13

friction and let me use the R word,

28:16

regulation. That doesn't mean And by the

28:18

way, folks, good regulation is good for

28:21

industries. It they know what rules

28:23

they're playing by. It it it shields

28:25

them from frivolous lawsuits. I think I

28:28

think we're getting to the point with

28:29

these guys where they're actually pretty

28:30

sincere in saying, "Let's figure out a

28:33

way that we don't just ruin it for all

28:36

of us and let's figure out again 60-day

28:40

waiting period on any new product to

28:42

battle test the [ __ ] out of it. Give it

28:44

start asking it." Hey, is there any way

28:46

you can figure out a supervirus and see

28:48

what happens [laughter]

28:49

>> exactly? I mean, one of the things that

28:52

um that's gain of function testing is a

28:55

little bit disturbing actually. Um one

28:58

of the things that strikes me every time

29:00

because I've interviewed dozens of

29:01

people who who exactly explain what

29:03

could happen like they're like this

29:06

could happen, this could happen. This

29:07

could every time that one of these

29:08

stories breaks, these companies are

29:10

shocked. It jumped. And I'm always like,

29:12

what do you It's like your your kid like

29:15

your kid is a troublemaker and you're

29:17

shocked. Like it's sort of like me

29:19

saying I'm shocked that that Saul found

29:21

the Starbursts hidden in my drawer. Like

29:24

I just am not shocked. I know he will.

29:26

He's a very inventive kid. Um it just is

29:29

he wants the Starburst, right? It just

29:31

it's that to me is the like and it since

29:33

they're shocked, why don't we just make

29:34

the rules for them? Like since we're not

29:36

shocked that this is what happens and

29:38

you know the fact that I mean the Trump

29:40

administration has been one big giveaway

29:42

to the AI industry in a way that's now

29:44

veering on dangerous as far as I'm

29:46

concerned.

29:46

>> I'm curious. So you speak to more, and

29:49

I'm going to use air quotes, experts as

29:51

in actual experts.

29:53

>> Yes. Experts who know what they're

29:55

talking about guys.

29:58

>> And you know how I feel. I I tend to

29:59

think some of this catastrophizing as a

30:01

fundraising strategy, but what what have

30:04

the people you've talked to about this

30:06

this this hugging bear jumping the lab,

30:10

what do they think about what have they

30:12

said about it? Is this the threat that

30:14

people are worried about? They feel as

30:16

if they they are not correctly

30:18

anticipating the problems. It's sort of

30:20

like, okay, if you put a knife on the

30:23

steering wheel, maybe if there's an

30:24

accident, someone's going to be knifed.

30:26

>> Knife on a steering wheel. That's good.

30:28

>> One of the jobs I was going to do if I

30:30

worked for the government, if I had

30:31

gotten in, but I'm gay. Um was

30:33

anticipatory stuff. S I know. SA um was

30:38

anticipation of stuff like this. like

30:40

really true anticipation like okay

30:43

here's the you know I love remember the

30:45

movie Three Days of the Condor that's

30:46

what he did that's

30:47

>> oh my god Robert Redford and the most

30:49

beautiful one of the most beautiful

30:50

women of the 20th century who am I

30:52

talking about

30:52

>> Fay Dunaway

30:54

>> spectacular

30:56

>> yeah that's a fantastic [ __ ] movie

30:58

what amazing movie

30:59

>> Chinatown the three musketeers beautiful

31:02

woman I am so dating myself right did I

31:04

tell you about the time I had a high

31:06

ball at the polo lounge with Angie

31:08

Dickson I used to party with these Cool

31:10

cats and Kuba. [laughter]

31:12

>> Yeah. Lee uh Lee Grant.

31:14

>> I've met Johnny Carson.

31:15

>> Lee Grant. I'm trying to think of people

31:17

in that era. Beautiful women that um

31:20

Yes. I mean

31:21

>> Margaret

31:23

the best. Okay. We're not aging

31:24

ourselves. Let's let's move forward in

31:27

age.

31:27

>> Ann Margaret is hot hot. Go watch Ann

31:30

Margaret dance in any way and you she's

31:33

as relevant today as she ever was. Um,

31:37

but this is the anticipation and it has

31:40

to be

31:41

>> when I was eight.

31:42

>> Yeah. Her and Barbara Eden.

31:44

>> Yeah. Yes. Master Jeie, go to your

31:47

bottle. It's a I have come so far. I

31:50

have come so far.

31:52

>> If you had Genie, you would put her in

31:53

her bottle. I know that.

31:56

>> I go. Anyways, we're not going to talk

31:58

about it. I think Barbara Eden. Did I

31:59

tell you I sat next to Barbara Eden on a

32:01

flight to New York when I was a first

32:02

year analyst at Morgan Stanley?

32:04

>> She's still beautiful. gorgeous and

32:06

super nice, too.

32:07

>> Yeah, she's lovely. She's lovely.

32:09

Anyway, we're getting off. This is

32:11

dangerous and could kill us. Okay, so

32:13

guys, we need some and

32:15

>> escaped the bottle and is killing Larry

32:17

>> Hag [laughter]

32:18

stuck a shank in his neck.

32:20

>> Larry

32:21

shank anyway guys, we need it's not

32:24

coming from this. And the danger is

32:26

we'll have overregulation if something

32:28

terrible. That is what it will happen.

32:30

That is exact like we we have time to do

32:32

it in the right way now and you need to

32:35

stop. Okay. Now I'm going to get to

32:37

another story. Elon Musk is diving into

32:38

politics despite recently telling the

32:40

economist he got too involved before.

32:42

Now he's authorizing his super PAC to

32:43

spend between 100 and 200 120 million to

32:47

help GOP in the midterms. He's already

32:49

spent a lot. Elon pack has reportedly

32:51

plan on spending on house races in

32:53

states including California, Wisconsin,

32:55

and Washington. It's also targeting key

32:57

Senate races in Alaska, Iowa, Maine,

33:00

Michigan, and Ohio. Troy Jackson, the

33:02

Democratic Senate candidate who's

33:03

running against Susan Collins in Maine,

33:05

uh, released an ad about Elon spending.

33:07

He usually talks about him being a

33:09

logger and being a man of the people,

33:10

but let's listen to this ad that he put

33:13

out this weekend.

33:14

>> And here's why he's spending $100

33:15

million across these states. because he

33:17

wants to have people that are totally

33:20

beholden to him and Donald Trump making

33:23

sure that we're getting tax cuts for

33:25

billionaires on the back of our health

33:26

care system, on the back of our

33:28

hospitals. That's what Elon Musk wants.

33:30

He doesn't care about us. Really doesn't

33:32

care about Susan. He cares about him.

33:34

So, I would say and to you, Elon, Maine

33:38

and really the whole United States

33:40

doesn't want your dirty money in our

33:42

politics. You know, you don't get to buy

33:45

the government that you want. This is

33:47

about all of us coming together and

33:49

fighting for the government that we

33:51

deserve and you're not in it.

33:52

>> Ah, you're not in it. Oh, I love

33:54

[clears throat] dirty politics. Um, Elon

33:56

Lost in Wisconsin who spent 25 million

33:59

there. I think this is very effective ad

34:00

and he also sounds like he's about to go

34:02

fell a tree at any moment.

34:04

>> The silver lining here is that it

34:06

appears that money is showing a a lesser

34:10

and lesser return on on electoral

34:13

politics and some of these packs. I

34:15

wonder if at some point if attaching

34:18

Musk money to a candidate begins to hurt

34:20

them like I don't know if you've seen

34:21

what going it's what's going on if I

34:23

were a candidate distinct of your values

34:25

I wouldn't take money from Apac right

34:26

now I think it has become such a toxic

34:29

brand Apac what do you

34:30

>> and billionaires have to

34:32

>> whether you agree with them or not

34:34

>> but I wonder if at some point I mean the

34:37

example I keep going back to Tomsty who

34:40

I thought was a reasonable candidate Tom

34:42

is not a bad person I don't care what

34:44

you think

34:44

>> I liked him My son liked him.

34:45

>> Yeah. I don't care what you think about

34:46

his politics. He's a He's a I think I

34:49

think it's hard to argue he's not a good

34:51

man with his heart in the right place,

34:53

cares about the environment, understands

34:55

business. He spent a quarter of a

34:56

billion dollars and he came in third

34:57

place. Um, and you know, it ended up

35:00

he'd hired influencers and they think

35:02

that that's some sort of controversy.

35:03

I'm like, welcome to politics.

35:05

>> That was stupid.

35:06

>> Yeah.

35:07

>> But I would I think I'm wondering how

35:09

how many of them with money are doing

35:10

the same thing. Anyways, it's Citizens

35:12

United. So broken record here. Okay. If

35:17

the problem isn't that people well the

35:20

problem is that people can spend money

35:22

on politics. The problem is we have so

35:23

much income inequality and so much

35:25

concentration of wealth which equates to

35:28

power in a capitalist society. Are we

35:29

comfortable?

35:31

He he could spend 15 billion and it

35:34

wouldn't mean anything to him. Are we

35:36

that comfortable? I mean we have our

35:37

billionaires. you have, you know, George

35:39

Soros or whoever on the left, but at

35:42

some point when you have someone who

35:45

could say if they get emotional or

35:46

pissed off or really high one night and

35:48

think, you know what, I think I'm going

35:49

to spend $10 billion,

35:52

are we comfortable with that? I'm not as

35:55

freaked out about this. The Economist

35:56

did a great article on this and it said

35:58

that money and politics is having less

36:00

impact than reported, which I think is

36:03

really interesting. What are your

36:05

thoughts?

36:05

>> It could be. I I I think it is. I'm just

36:07

curious what you think. I'm going to

36:08

[clears throat] let Scott talk more this

36:09

episode because I think this is actually

36:11

right. And is this an effective ad to

36:13

attack Elon? I think it is. I think it

36:15

worked in Wisconsin. I think the people

36:17

Wisconsin are not unlike the people of

36:19

Maine. I don't think they like it. He

36:21

also sort of just dismisses Susan. He

36:23

doesn't really care about Susan. She's

36:25

hardly matters here. He's just buying

36:26

his way into our government. And the two

36:29

things that I thought were effective

36:30

here were doesn't want your dirty money

36:33

in our politics, which I love. I thought

36:35

that was beautifully said. And then this

36:38

is about the government we deserve and

36:39

you're not in it. There was a little bit

36:41

of you're not from here, are you fella?

36:44

Like that kind of thing. Like I thought

36:46

it was quite effective in this state. I

36:48

think it probably is.

36:49

>> If you rob a bank, there's typically

36:52

within the money or there's a a a bomb

36:56

that goes off and sprays you with

36:58

indelible ink. I think these people are

37:01

trying to put a bomb of indelible ink

37:04

around certain types of money.

37:06

>> Yeah. And do you think it's effective?

37:07

This this particular message, Troy,

37:10

>> look what's happening with Apac in the

37:12

Michigan Democratic Senate primary. The

37:14

attack line against God, I'm I'm

37:16

blanking on her name.

37:18

>> Haley, the attack line is you've taken

37:20

Apac money.

37:21

>> Yeah. Yeah. It's been

37:22

>> I wonder if it's about to become you've

37:23

taken Musk money.

37:25

>> And that's what they're trying to do

37:26

here. They're trying to they're trying

37:28

to they're trying to nest inside of this

37:31

money from him

37:32

>> with a a a paintball bomb. And I

37:35

actually don't have to be, you know,

37:38

Alex votes in Michigan. I I know he

37:40

mentioned it to me. He's like, "What the

37:42

heck? Why is all this Apac money here?"

37:44

Um, and I have to say, you know, you

37:47

know, it's interesting because some

37:48

money works. Like Louie really liked

37:50

Tom. I don't know how I don't know

37:51

either of them voted but he is certainly

37:53

not averse to Aliade and Alex is more

37:56

conservative I would say than Louisie.

37:58

Louis is like DSA essentially. Um but um

38:02

uh but Louie was attracted to Tom Styer.

38:04

>> That's because it's your egg, right?

38:06

>> No, [laughter]

38:07

>> I still understand Tom Styer but that's

38:10

I mean I liked Tommy Styer but I don't

38:11

know I didn't like any of the choices in

38:13

California but but I'm saying it

38:15

depends. I think I would assume Louie

38:17

found out about Tom Styer from these

38:19

paid influencers. I I don't know. But

38:21

it's the a

38:22

>> I don't think you're giving him enough

38:23

credit. Maybe he just did the work on

38:25

his own.

38:26

>> He he did, but in in Michigan, a lot of

38:30

young people like my son do not like

38:32

this. And they're, you know, I know

38:35

they're trying to say they're

38:35

anti-Semitic for doing that. I just

38:37

don't think they like the like get your

38:39

money out of our politics. I think

38:41

that's the stronger thing. And in

38:43

Michigan, it happens to be Apac. In

38:45

other places, it's other in in Maine,

38:47

it's Elon Money. Well, again, another

38:49

woman who did just an amazing job and

38:51

was forcefully yet dignified was I

38:53

believe she's the editor of The

38:54

Economist. I'm

38:55

>> blanking Zany.

38:58

>> So impressive.

38:58

>> Yeah.

38:59

>> But she highlighted I thought the I

39:01

thought the the the puncturing moment,

39:04

the pop that that really like showed you

39:06

how just ridiculous it is. He's all over

39:09

British politics. Like I our new our our

39:13

new kind of export biggest export from

39:16

the US is political divisiveness. we've

39:18

decided to export that into other

39:19

countries. And she asked him and I

39:21

thought that she's like, "When's the

39:23

last time you were in England?"

39:24

>> years ago.

39:25

>> And he's like, "Oh, a few years ago."

39:27

And she's like, "You know what the [ __ ]

39:28

is going on here?" When people asked me

39:30

about the UK, I was caved with, "I don't

39:33

live in England. I live in Marleone. I'm

39:35

in such a bubble."

39:36

>> But I I think she was making the point

39:38

that it's not like covered with with

39:40

immigrants killing people. If you would

39:42

believe Elon Musk, you would think that

39:45

England has been taken over by Muslim

39:47

rape gangs. And he doesn't know what the

39:49

[ __ ] he's talking about. And anyways, my

39:52

my point is

39:55

he's the last person to be talking as if

39:58

he has his finger on the pulse of what's

40:00

actually happening in England. And also,

40:03

it's one thing to be pouring money into

40:05

Michigan as a US citizen. It's another

40:08

to be exporting political divisiveness

40:11

to another country.

40:12

>> I agree.

40:13

>> That's just like I I don't I don't you

40:16

know I I it's like quite frankly boss

40:18

it's none of your [ __ ] business.

40:20

>> Get your dirty money out of our pocket.

40:22

>> And I wonder I wonder well actually

40:24

England has much stronger campaign

40:25

finance laws. And also you know not that

40:28

it's helping. I think I'm on my fourth

40:29

prime minister since moving there four

40:31

years ago. I'm like who is it now? I'm

40:33

like I'm literally It's like when my dad

40:36

used to show when my dad after he left

40:39

my mom would show up with my new mommy.

40:41

I wouldn't get attached cuz there'd be

40:43

someone another lovely lady the next

40:44

week in the living room drinking

40:46

Lancer's wine with my dad.

40:47

>> Lancers but you're really going back

40:49

Scott. Anyway, Elon Money doesn't work.

40:52

Nice job, Troy. Um all right, let's go

40:54

on a quick break. We come back. Oh, my

40:56

favorite story. Scott,

40:59

>> Trump administration turns on each other

41:02

over the reflection.

41:03

>> By the way, there was controversy over

41:05

whether they could use the term master

41:06

even back then and whether she could

41:09

show her naval. And spoiler alert, Larry

41:12

Hagman had a reputation for being

41:14

exceptionally difficult on set because

41:17

he had creative differences. I love

41:19

that. It's like when the Go-Os broke up

41:22

over creative differences. I'm like,

41:23

that is so ridiculous.

41:25

>> Oh yeah, Larry Hangman. He although

41:27

honestly he became amazing in Dallas.

41:31

Come on, J.R. Huing. What an amazing

41:33

role. He that was turned from hero to

41:35

like total villain. Anyway,

41:37

>> hottest woman in the world. What was

41:38

that girl? Oh my god. Victoria

41:40

Principal. Another hot.

41:41

>> Oh my god. Okay. All right. We're all

41:43

went out with Lance Renel. Wide receiver

41:45

from the last

41:47

who got a misdemeanor public as you're

41:50

leaving. But reflecting pool, Carol was

41:52

right again.

41:53

>> I would have loved to seen those two go

41:54

at it. She was so hot.

41:56

>> And we'll be back.

41:57

>> So hot.

41:58

>> Goodbye.

42:01

>> Support for the show comes from

42:02

Cororeweave. AI isn't just a new tool.

42:04

It encompasses so much more. It's

42:06

spurring a revolution across all

42:08

industries and reshaping itself to

42:09

become a big part of our future

42:11

together. Coreweave is at the center,

42:13

powering some of the biggest names in

42:14

AI. As the essential cloud for AI,

42:17

Corewave provides an AI platform that

42:19

combines next generation infrastructure,

42:20

intelligent tools, and expert support.

42:22

It's powering the world's most complex

42:24

AI workloads faster and more

42:25

efficiently. From medical research and

42:27

diagnosis to education, from complex

42:29

visual effects from movies to

42:30

breakthroughs in science and technology.

42:32

If it's AI, Cororeweave is uniquely

42:34

ready to power with purpose-built

42:35

[music] tech, the big ideas, the wild

42:37

visions, and what-ifs and why nots.

42:40

Corweave is working to build what's

42:42

never been built before. [music]

42:43

Cororeweave is the essential cloud for

42:45

AI. Ready for anything, ready for AI. To

42:47

learn more about how Coree powers the

42:49

world's best AI, go to

42:50

corweave.com/refor

42:52

anything.

42:54

Support for the show comes from Framer.

42:56

If your team wants a website that looks

42:57

and feels handcrafted, [music] but is

42:59

still fast to ship, Framer is built for

43:01

that. You design on a visual canvas with

43:04

responsive layouts, hosting, and a CMS

43:06

built in, so the work is production

43:07

ready from day one. Agents work

43:09

alongside you to draft pages and polish

43:11

sections. Then [music] you review and

43:13

publish what goes live. Framer is the

43:15

prosite builder for creators, teams, and

43:17

businesses that want a professional site

43:19

and care enough to get every detail

43:20

[music] right. Agents solve the gap

43:22

between AI generated ideas and

43:24

production ready website work. And the

43:25

agent works in the same [music] place

43:27

where the real site is designed,

43:28

managed, reviewed, and published. That

43:30

means it lands on the canvas, [music]

43:32

stays editable, and can be published

43:34

when the team is ready. Learn how you

43:36

can get more out of your site from a

43:37

framer specialist or get started

43:39

building for free [music] today at

43:40

framer.com/pivot

43:42

for 30% off a framer pro annual plan.

43:45

That's framer.com/pivot

43:47

for [music] 30% off. framer.com/pivot.

43:51

Rules and restrictions may apply.

43:54

Scott, we're back with more news. The

43:56

Trump administration is now feuding with

43:57

itself over the Lincoln Memorial

43:59

Reflecting Pool. My favorite story of

44:00

the year. US Attorney Janine Piro is in

44:03

the hot seat after dropping the

44:04

vandalism case against former Olympian.

44:07

Uh she also called out the damage as a

44:09

result of a botched installation. She

44:11

had to tell the truth when it came to

44:12

court. As it turns out, this didn't sit

44:15

well with Trump who said he disagrees

44:17

100% with Janine Piro and noting that

44:19

there may have been a contractor

44:21

difficulty, but major damage was caused

44:23

by vandals of which there is zero proof.

44:25

And Interior Secretary Doug Bergam, who

44:27

is like the definition of a suckup, is

44:30

trying to stay in Trump's good graces,

44:32

saying he gave the US attorney expert

44:34

and eyewitness testimony to the damage

44:35

done by vandals and the vandals. Um,

44:38

what he this is crazy. This is Janine

44:41

was like, I'm not getting disbarred for

44:43

this ninkham poop. And um, and speaking

44:46

of push back, Marjorie Taylor Green

44:47

posted a photo over the weekend

44:48

alongside Tucker Carlson and Thomas

44:50

Massie and a few others writing, the

44:52

movement has begun. So, the anti-Trump

44:55

the anti- the anti- anti-ant

44:58

anti-Trumpers. I don't know. Whatever.

45:00

Anyway, I told you this reflecting pool

45:02

was gonna is indicative of other things.

45:05

>> Yeah, it's just such a distraction. I

45:06

wonder if if it's planned for them, but

45:08

Jannine Piro did her research and she

45:11

found that essentially every lawyer, I

45:14

mean, literally every lawyer that gets

45:16

near, whether it's Rudy Giuliani,

45:18

whether it's Michael Khan, any lawyer

45:20

that gets near uh Trump ends up getting

45:23

disbarred.

45:24

>> Yeah.

45:24

>> I mean, it's striking if you look at

45:27

like eight of the 10 last lawyers that

45:30

that were representing,

45:32

>> they get they end up getting disbarred

45:33

or fined or

45:34

>> trouble. Alina Alena Haba they all

45:38

>> and there's no loyalty there. There's no

45:40

You want to talk about in Vietnam they

45:43

used to take I think the the second you

45:46

know lieutenant or whatever it was the

45:47

platoon leader marks off your helmet

45:49

because that the Vietkong was given

45:51

strict instructions. This is the person

45:53

you take out first.

45:54

>> Yeah. Do you think she'll refile given

45:56

all the push back? I don't see she can

45:58

because the judge the judge in this case

46:00

said you better be very careful young

46:01

lady or old lady drunk old lady. Um they

46:05

uh she the judge was very explicit that

46:08

you will be in trouble if you keep going

46:11

because this is really bad and but then

46:13

you know the fact that Bergam or the

46:15

others they just when are they going to

46:16

give that I just I have no idea. This

46:18

guy had a relatively okay reputation but

46:22

him and Bessant to me are the real

46:24

shockers in terms of like how much of a

46:26

suckup they can compete being in this

46:29

situation. I think the guy who's

46:30

actually taken the biggest reputation

46:32

hit is Todd Blanch. Well, people people

46:35

who knew him at what is it the Southern

46:37

District really had a lot of respect for

46:39

him some is an outstanding lawyer and a

46:41

person of integrity.

46:42

>> Said that what happened to you?

46:43

>> I think Janine Pero is like you know I I

46:46

don't want to be disbarred. This guy's

46:48

going to be out in two and a quarter

46:49

years or whatever. Um you know I think I

46:52

think her own lawyers have said to her

46:56

be really careful here. This is there's

46:58

no evidence here.

46:59

>> You think she'll try to refile anyway?

47:01

>> I don't know. But the the sad part of

47:03

this is that the more time old king,

47:05

>> the more time we spend talking about a

47:07

reflecting pool, good or bad, the less

47:08

time we spend talking about bombs,

47:10

inflation, and exploding diarrhea.

47:12

>> I agree with you, Scott. But as I said,

47:14

this is indicative of shoddy work,

47:17

lying, cult. It's it's it's a little

47:20

it's much more important in terms of

47:22

what these people are doing. this is how

47:24

far they'll go to protect an adult old

47:28

man's ego which is which I think is and

47:31

it links to Iran like saying oh no we

47:34

better not do this or the stuff he was

47:37

posting all weekend was crazy like

47:40

they're willing to let crazy person who

47:42

has like I just think this is exactly a

47:45

distillation that's why I think it's

47:47

important because one it's incompetent

47:49

management they couldn't fix the

47:51

reflecting pool and then they did made

47:53

worse. Two, they then tried to blame an

47:56

American citizen, you know, of something

47:58

he didn't do. Like these weird

48:00

prosecutions are also this what what

48:03

they did to Renee Good, what they did to

48:04

everybody else, what they're doing to

48:06

immigrants. It's like they just jail

48:08

people and just to please him. And so

48:10

that's why it's important. It it's it's

48:12

it's it's a bigger trend of saying,

48:15

"Yes, sir. We think this is amazing."

48:17

And let me tell you, Doug Bergman, the

48:19

shame of this will not outlive you and I

48:21

will be around to remember it for all of

48:23

us. Same thing with Bessence. And you're

48:25

right, Todd Blanch. You're all like Liz

48:28

Cheney is the one who said this is long

48:30

after this guy is gone, the dishonor on

48:32

you will remain. And Janine Piro decided

48:35

to get out before

48:36

>> Anthony Scaramucci, I mean, he

48:38

summarized it correctly when he tries to

48:40

the the flame the By the way, I saw the

48:43

Odyssey this weekend. the

48:45

>> the flame, the sirens call of power and

48:48

proximity to the president. Everyone

48:49

believes they're going to be the one

48:52

that can navigate it and serve the

48:53

country while not being guilty. They

48:57

they all hear the siren call and they

48:59

think that they cannot be immune to it.

49:02

He is political Chernobyl who has gone

49:04

on to great things from his first

49:06

administration. Yeah, buddy.

49:08

>> And in in the latest episode of Where

49:10

Are They Now, I just want to go over

49:11

where Trump's lawyers are now. Roy Cohen

49:15

was disbarred. You know, he's dead now.

49:17

Michael Cohen disbarred, pleaded guilty

49:20

to tax campaign and false statements

49:23

crimes. Rudy Giuliani disbarred in New

49:26

York and DC, $150 million in defamation

49:29

damages. Alina Haba sanctioned $1

49:31

million for frivolous litigation. Boris

49:34

Epstein pending a criminal charges in

49:37

fake electoral case. John Eastman

49:40

disbarred in California and subpoenaed

49:41

in DC. Arizona criminal case pending.

49:44

Kenneth Chzbro disparard in New York

49:48

Wisconsin case pending. I I mean

49:50

literally it's second lieutenant in

49:51

Vietnam to be a lawyer for this guy.

49:53

>> Listen, the old man's losing it, guys.

49:55

You better get on the Janine Piro

49:57

Express out of town, you know, and you

49:59

know, Green and Tucker Carlson and

50:01

Massie are going to take advants,

50:05

as long as they're done correctly, um

50:08

it's done, guys. It's done. You better

50:11

get off this [ __ ] train. If if Judge

50:13

Winebox is getting off, you need to exit

50:16

as fast as possible.

50:17

>> Yeah. Kenneth Kenneth Cheesebro, am I

50:20

saying his name? Chesbro. Cheese Bro, I

50:22

think it is.

50:22

>> Um, he was the attorney who was

50:25

basically the architect of the fake

50:27

elections narrative. By the way, he was

50:29

just disbarred in the state of New York.

50:32

I mean, wake up, folks. He's Chernobyl.

50:35

You stick around this guy long enough,

50:36

you're getting leukemia.

50:38

>> Anyway, uh, one more quick break. will

50:40

be back for wins and fails and then

50:42

Scott departs the scene.

50:44

>> Support for the show comes from Better

50:45

Help. You've heard me say before how

50:47

useful talk therapy can be when working

50:49

through a hard problem and that Better

50:50

Help has been a great option for a lot

50:52

of people. But at the end of the day,

50:54

the best way to know if BetterHelp is a

50:55

good fit for you is to check it out

50:57

yourself. More than 6 million people

50:59

have used BetterHelp globally. The

51:01

consistent feedback from real users

51:03

makes it easy to see why many people

51:05

continue to choose the platform.

51:06

BetterHelp reports on average live

51:08

therapy sessions rating of 4.9 out of

51:11

five based on over 1.7 million client

51:14

session reviews. BetterHelp therapists

51:16

have at least 3 years and 1,000 hours of

51:18

hands-on experience. They also hold all

51:21

required education, training, and

51:22

certifications across a range of mental

51:24

health specialties. And they make it

51:26

easy to get started. You just have to

51:28

answer a few questions, then get matched

51:30

with a therapist based on your needs.

51:32

And you can switch therapists at any

51:34

time if it's not the right fit. See the

51:36

reviews, see what stands out, and see if

51:38

BetterHelp is right for you. Visit

51:41

betterhelp.com/pivot.

51:43

That's betterhp.com/pivot.

51:47

Support for the show comes from Vanta.

51:49

What's the one thing in business that's

51:50

spreading as fast as AI? It's not

51:52

inflated egos or vicious backstabbing or

51:54

delusions of grandeur among CEOs.

51:56

Frankly, that stayed pretty constant for

51:58

years. It's AI risk. Every new tool your

52:01

team signs up for, every vendor that

52:02

turns on AI features, every new

52:04

integration, each one is an opportunity

52:06

for something to go wrong. And most

52:08

security programs weren't built for AI's

52:09

[music] pacer growth. Enter Vanta. Vanta

52:12

is the number one agentic trust platform

52:14

used by over 16,000 fastmoving companies

52:17

including Ramp Cursor and Harvey to

52:19

ensure they're always audit ready. And

52:21

now Vanta is helping companies including

52:23

yours watch for the risks that show up

52:25

between [music] audits across your

52:26

vendors, your AI tools, and your whole

52:28

environment. How the Vanta agent works

52:31

like a 24/7 GRC engineer in the

52:33

background finding issues, drafting

52:35

fixes for you, and cutting vendor

52:36

assessment time by up to 50%. Whether

52:38

you're a fast growing startup or a

52:40

global enterprise, Vanta is here to help

52:42

you automate your security and

52:43

compliance and earn improved [music]

52:45

trust. Get started today at

52:46

vanta.com/pivot.

52:48

That's venta.com/pivot.

52:53

>> Okay, Scott, let's hear some wins and

52:55

fails. Why don't I go first and very

52:57

quickly? Okay, my win is um Columbia

53:00

University School of Journalism, which I

53:02

went to and as an alumni, hired uh

53:04

Sharon Alonscy and Scott P as

53:07

journalists and residents this year and

53:08

I couldn't be more happy. I I never go

53:11

when they asked me to speak, but now

53:12

>> God, you're so white.

53:13

>> I am white, but I love

53:15

>> I think that's the whitest thing we've

53:16

ever said on this podcast and we've said

53:17

some pretty translucent things.

53:18

>> In any case, I'm very happy they did

53:20

that. Congratulations. They're all Let

53:22

me tell you, I've been in touch with a

53:23

lot of these people. They're all working

53:24

on some really great things. The New

53:26

York Post got it wrong about Bill Owens

53:28

this week, but they're all kind of cool

53:29

things and a little bit invigorated like

53:31

you know and I was with Don Lemon on

53:32

Leml this week and he's invigorated. I

53:35

was on um Aston H. Hearnden's show uh

53:38

America actually which I loved and I got

53:40

to say invigorated. All these people

53:42

feel invigorated. So it's not always a

53:44

bad thing. It's bad for 60 minutes but

53:45

it's really good for you and your souls.

53:47

You'll have a great time in out here in

53:49

the wilderness. might fail is there's a

53:51

story in the New York Times about um

53:54

Paul Weiss the the law firm and the the

53:57

downfall of how they acquies to Trump

54:00

largely because of a single partner who

54:02

seems like an [ __ ] um is and sort of

54:05

the ruining of another guy who had been

54:07

a you know a beacon of civil rights um

54:10

proono work etc uh is really devastating

54:13

just how quickly speaking of people

54:15

giving in and being you know ruined by

54:17

the Trump people Um this this was a

54:20

really sad story. These are the people

54:21

that should defend us. This was a firm

54:23

that was well known for defending people

54:26

like people who marginalized people all

54:28

manner of things. Just very a very

54:30

legendary firm who which just

54:32

essentially took the money and and

54:35

started treating like behaving in a way

54:37

that was so grabby. You're so rich you

54:39

lawyers. It's really it was a grotesque.

54:41

I recommend you read it. It's a long

54:42

read. Um, and it was just it was really

54:46

um it was really upsetting to read, I

54:49

have to say. Um, and I'll just say one

54:51

more thing. FIFA President Giani

54:53

Infantino has scrapped his proposal to

54:55

sell stakes in the World Cup after

54:56

backlash. And he there looks like he may

54:58

be in trouble. There's many more

55:00

reports. I think several people who

55:01

don't usually speak out has said it's he

55:03

should leave. Um, but we know someone

55:05

who predicted this. Let's hear a clip

55:07

from last week. My prediction is that

55:09

this ridiculous notion that

55:12

uh one of the most corrupt organizations

55:14

is going to get financing from a crime

55:17

family, the Trump family, to take FIFA

55:19

private and or turn it into a public

55:22

company.

55:24

This won't happen.

55:25

>> There you go, Scott. All right. All

55:28

yours.

55:29

>> You stole some of my thunder. Like I

55:31

have I could position one as a fail, but

55:34

I'll position both as a win. um these

55:39

global athletic

55:41

oversightes, whether it's the IOC, uh

55:44

FIFA,

55:46

or even I would argue the NC2A that was

55:48

comfortable with white guys in their 50s

55:50

making millions of dollars and claiming

55:51

that the non-white people on the

55:54

hardwood were not allowed to make money

55:55

because of the purity of the sport.

55:58

Yeah, there's just so much these

55:59

organizations benefit so much from the

56:01

goodwill and the fact especially the

56:04

international organizations operate in

56:05

this netherland. John Infantino is so

56:09

corrupt. FIFA is so corrupt

56:12

and the fact that it really does it's

56:15

just this sport really does bring people

56:18

together and at some point they're just

56:21

going to do you know how many people

56:23

really talented

56:26

um I mean take a guy who's lost an ele

56:29

take a guy like Mitt Romney

56:31

>> damn Mitt Romney would be good

56:32

>> find just an amazing person whose

56:36

integrity is unimpeachable

56:38

>> Scott Galloway Right.

56:39

>> Uh I I think I'm I'm I

56:41

>> You're impeachable. Yeah,

56:43

>> I'm impeachable according at least

56:44

according to Twitter this weekend. I've

56:46

heard

56:46

>> both of us are impeachable.

56:48

>> But my point is find somebody. There are

56:50

so many people who have incredible

56:53

integrity, character, understand

56:54

sponsorships, understand business, who

56:57

absolutely adore this game and would

57:00

take this job for a dollar and bring

57:03

real and say, "Okay, what's the job not

57:05

only of the tournament, but how do we

57:07

get more young people playing sports?

57:09

How do we uh raise the v visibility of

57:13

emerging nations? How do we bring people

57:14

together in between the World Cups and

57:17

make nations feel better about one

57:18

another? How do we just have how do I

57:21

just write in my final act a love letter

57:25

to the sport? Instead, we have these

57:28

corrupt individuals that see it as a

57:30

corpus for their own enrichment.

57:32

>> Yeah, he should just leave and go hang

57:33

out with rich people. That's my view. I

57:36

am really pleased that the public and

57:39

their love of the game just threw up all

57:41

over this guy and his idea to get the

57:43

Kushners to finance taking it private

57:46

and trying to figure out a way to

57:47

monetize what is what is the UN that's

57:50

actually working and that is football.

57:53

It's actually bringing people together.

57:54

>> You're right. This was a great

57:55

prediction. So, is he out out? Do you

57:57

think he's out? You did say you thought

57:58

he wouldn't last. these governing bodies

58:01

are so they have

58:04

like what court oversees it and so it's

58:08

it's difficult and in addition these

58:10

guys these guys grease everybody and pay

58:12

them off. They have friends everywhere

58:14

because they they give money in the form

58:17

of quote unquote development revenues to

58:19

I mean they have they're not dumb. They

58:22

they've they've greased a lot of palms.

58:24

They're

58:24

>> I think your first prediction is

58:25

correct. I think he's

58:27

>> Oh, really? Uh, I hope so. Again, it's

58:30

the same problem we have with Trump. We

58:32

need ideas and a vision for for FIFA,

58:35

not just [ __ ] posting the incumbent.

58:37

>> Yep. That's a fair point that we need.

58:39

>> Let's find Let's find someone

58:40

unimpeachable who would raise their hand

58:42

and say, "You know what? I I would I

58:45

would like to do this." Like,

58:46

>> Cuban,

58:47

>> I think he'd be great. I think I've I've

58:50

always been a fan of Tony Blair. He

58:52

evokes a gag reflection.

58:53

>> A lot of hanging on him. Cuban.

58:55

>> Yeah, fair enough. that there's got to

58:57

be somebody out there that people just

58:58

have a ton of goodwill around who loves

59:00

the game and says

59:02

>> what I'm going to bring to the game is

59:03

the following. I'm going to bring

59:04

goodwill and unimpeachable integrity.

59:07

I'm going to be I'm going to be [ __ ]

59:09

Mormon. I'm going to be literally I'm

59:11

thinking about Mitt Romney again. I I I

59:14

may get it wrong, but I will never

59:17

deceive you or enrich myself.

59:19

>> I'd still take Scott Galloway anyway.

59:22

Scott, that's a really good one. Do you

59:23

have any other

59:23

>> I don't know enough about the game. Can

59:25

I can I ask you one question? I'm gonna

59:27

prompt you. Are you seeing all the I'm

59:29

so sad you said not a word about it, but

59:30

wicker all the the the the story of uh

59:34

the basket that [ __ ] a woman. Have you

59:36

noticed this going all over the

59:38

internet? I'm surprised you haven't

59:39

because there was all these penis jokes

59:41

about Wicker.

59:42

>> Jesus Christ, I feel so out of it. I I

59:44

didn't find out that that that failed

59:46

mayoral candidates were [ __ ] posting me

59:48

until you forwarded. When when I I'm I'm

59:50

not exaggerating. When I go into August,

59:53

I try to put my phone away. I try not to

59:55

go on social media. I try not to read

59:57

the news because I find by the time I

59:59

get to August, I'm a nervous wreck. All

60:01

right. When you come back, I want wicker

60:03

jokes. And there's one that say, "I

60:04

wonder if JD Vance is going to see

60:06

Wicker." Um, there's a lot of very funny

60:10

funny jokes. The Wicker trailers called

60:13

uh someone called the Wicker trailer

60:15

Porninocio. And all I can say is I

60:17

guarantee you that was the original name

60:19

of the script and film. Anyway, looks

60:20

great.

60:21

>> I didn't see that. Yeah, I haven't seen

60:22

that. I did see the Odyssey, though.

60:24

>> And

60:25

>> in a word,

60:27

>> epic.

60:27

>> Epic.

60:28

>> Absolutely epic.

60:30

>> And I I just The thing that really

60:33

struck me about it was I think it could

60:36

have been I really respect

60:39

filmmakers and directors and studios

60:41

that greenlight something that has so

60:43

much downside risk cuz it's like a scene

60:45

with a cyclops. It could have so easily

60:49

been cheesy, CGI, and you believe

60:53

there's a Cyclops.

60:54

>> You do. Yeah.

60:55

>> And every scene that you'd heard about,

60:58

there was just a certain grit and

61:00

rawness. I thought the performances were

61:01

outstanding across the board. I want to

61:04

go to an island where I get high and

61:05

[ __ ] a hot model and forget how to get

61:07

home. I'm like, what a shocker. I love

61:10

like I've forgotten how to get home so I

61:12

have to hang out with Charlie Cerrone

61:14

and get high every day. But I've

61:15

forgotten how to get back to my wife. I

61:18

mean

61:18

>> you you'd still be on that island.

61:20

>> Oh my god. You would never island. You

61:23

would be like

61:23

>> Charlies I'm coming.

61:24

>> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. [ __ ] hilarious. The

61:28

guy he's literally do in aa doing X

61:31

[ __ ] the hottest woman and he's

61:33

forgotten how to get home to Liverpool

61:34

in his life.

61:36

>> Yeah. Anyways,

61:38

>> very nice. [snorts] Very nice. I'm glad

61:40

you All right, we have to move on.

61:42

>> My win.

61:43

>> Yeah.

61:44

>> Uh the outstanding

61:46

uh journalism and forceful yet dignified

61:50

uh performance this weekend of Dana

61:52

Bash, uh Margaret Brennan and last week

61:56

uh uh Caitlyn Collins. I just think

61:58

these I think these individuals define

62:01

the term professional.

62:03

>> Yep. Caitlyn will be here to replace

62:05

you.

62:06

>> There you go. That's Talk about an

62:07

upgrade. Mhm.

62:08

>> But I I the clips I saw this weekend. I

62:11

used to watch Meet the Press and Face

62:13

the Nation, the whole show. Now I'm part

62:14

of the Pepsi generation. I just watched

62:16

the clips. I thought I admire that they

62:20

are so calm and just right on the spot.

62:23

Push back thoughtfully. You actually do

62:26

this quite well.

62:27

>> Thank you.

62:27

>> And uh Jess Tarlo does this quite well.

62:30

>> Yeah, she does.

62:31

>> But I was so impressed.

62:32

>> What do we all have in common, Scott?

62:34

Just

62:35

>> Well, the future is female. care. The

62:37

future [laughter] is female.

62:38

>> I needed you to say that before you

62:40

>> The future is female. No, we're

62:42

>> Yeah. No, we're

62:43

>> That's a good win. That's a perfect

62:44

>> We're replaceable. We're just here We're

62:46

just here to build data centers and then

62:48

we're totally then we have no use.

62:50

>> No use. No use. Although lesbian

62:52

mechanics can do it anyway. And

62:54

construction workers. Anyways, my my win

62:58

is my wins, multiple wins are throwing

63:00

up on uh Johnny Anfontino and his

63:03

ridiculous monetization of the world's,

63:06

you know, the the beautiful game. I

63:09

thought the Odyssey was spectacular and

63:12

I went into it with high expectations

63:14

cuz Christopher Nolan is my favorite

63:16

director.

63:17

>> There you go. Oh my goodness. As you

63:19

say, there you go, Scott.

63:21

>> There you go.

63:22

>> Anyway, I'm glad you liked it. Very

63:24

positive. Anyway, we want to hear from

63:25

you. Send us your questions about

63:26

business, tech, or whatever's on your

63:28

mind. Go to nymag.com/pivot to submit a

63:30

question for the show or call 8551

63:32

Pivot. And elsewhere in the Karen Scott

63:34

universe this week and on with Cara

63:36

Swisser. I'm speaking with Rosie

63:38

O'Donnell. She's staging her onewoman

63:39

show in New York right now. And then

63:41

she's headed to LA to guest host Jimmy

63:42

Kimmel later this month. Let's listen to

63:44

her explain how she plans to deal with

63:46

Trump. I plan on doing what Jimmy Kimmel

63:50

has done so beautifully, which is giving

63:52

it to him in a comedic, honest, truthful

63:55

way. And I will do that as as big as I

63:58

can. Now, the song that I sang in my

64:00

show, if he only had a brain, I wanted

64:03

to do that on Kimmel, but they just told

64:05

me I can't.

64:06

>> Oh,

64:06

>> that they couldn't get permission for

64:08

the parody because it's political

64:10

content. And I was like, "Well, that is

64:13

absurd to me because we used to do

64:15

parodies every day on my show."

64:17

>> Wait, I don't understand.

64:18

>> Well, I've been told I'm not allowed to

64:20

do that now. I don't know. It's not a

64:22

bit of it here.

64:23

>> Yes. His approval rate is 30. His

64:26

diaper's always dirty. I think the guy's

64:29

insane.

64:31

[laughter]

64:35

>> You're so happy.

64:36

>> She's It was really good. Go watch her

64:37

show. It's terrific. Um, and Scott, as I

64:40

said, this is our last show together

64:42

before Scotfree August gets underway.

64:44

The saddest time of the year for me,

64:46

obviously.

64:46

>> Yeah, it's tough. I know.

64:48

>> You might be wondering about your

64:49

whereabouts over the next month. So,

64:50

we're getting ahead of things by

64:51

releasing a proof of life photo right

64:54

now.

64:54

>> Oh my gosh.

64:55

>> I am Elaine Chow.

64:58

>> You are of course our friend

65:00

>> and the late Mitch McConnell. The late

65:02

possibly late Mitch McConnell.

65:04

[laughter]

65:04

>> There's a lot of good We shouldn't

65:06

laugh.

65:06

>> Social media does have its redeeming

65:08

power. social. We shouldn't laugh, but

65:09

and yet we will. Okay, that is the show.

65:12

Thanks for listening to Pivot. Make sure

65:13

to like and subscribe to our YouTube

65:15

channel. I'll be back on Friday with

65:17

special guest co-host Hillary Clinton.

65:20

Scott, enjoy your time away. I miss you

65:22

every year. And please call me whenever

65:25

you need to and just pop in. Just just

65:27

text me at all. And I I'm excited for

65:30

you to return.

65:30

>> I need you to keep me on for informed on

65:32

how much people hate me across social

65:34

media.

65:34

>> I know, but that Spencer Pratt thing was

65:36

ridiculous. And so, you know, everyone

65:38

on Twitter, go [ __ ] yourselves. Scott

65:41

rocks.

65:42

>> Everyone on Twitter, there you go. All

65:43

right. All right. Enough of that.

Interactive Summary

In this episode of the Pivot podcast, hosts Cara Swisher and Scott Galloway discuss a range of topics, including a recent, contentious interview with RFK Jr., the impressive performance of cable news anchors in handling aggressive interviewees, and the ongoing tech earnings season involving Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Meta. They also touch upon cybersecurity risks associated with AI, Elon Musk's political spending, and political figures feuding over the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. The episode concludes with a segment on personal wins and fails, expressing optimism about the future of tech regulation and professional journalism.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts