Putin Exposes Ceasefire Trap, Outlines SMO Goals, Admits Alaska Concessions
1156 segments
All right, Alexander, let's talk about
the situation with Project Ukraine, with
uh with Russia, Putin's uh speech to the
United Russia party ahead of the uh
September parliament elections
>> and a far more interesting uh interview
from Putin right after the speech or or
maybe it was recorded before the speech
with uh Rosia Russian media. No,
>> where Putin said some some interesting
stuff uh some some shocking things
actually uh from from Putin during this
one interview. And uh and then we have
the the general situation on the front
line which even the uh the collective
west uh media is starting to admit that
Donbas is is all but lost. Uh you still
have uh drone strikes and uh and and a
missile strike into Vulgogra. you have
drone strikes continuing to to hit the
refineries in Russia, but you also have
Russia hitting military facilities and
uh and refineries and fuel fuel stations
inside of Ukraine as well. So anyway,
the general situation in in Russia with
uh the general military situation in
Ukraine, the situation in Russia, the
speeches from Putin, where do you want
to begin? A lot to get to. Well, I think
the first thing to say is that it's been
one of the busiest 72-hour stretches in
terms of the special military operation
that we have seen from Vladimir Putin. I
mean, there are moments we know when he
gets really deep into things and very
very heavily involved and you get one
thing after another, but this has been
one of the heaviest. So, firstly, he has
a two-day meeting with Lucas Shanka
who's the president of Bel.
which is of that as well.
>> And and he has that meeting in Valdai.
Um which is extremely interesting
because of course Valdai was the
location where he was supposed to be in
December when the Ukrainians launched
drone attacks um which were clearly
intended to kill him. So anyway, so he
meets Lucenko in Vai. Then he comes to
Moscow um on the same day because that's
a two-day meeting with Lucanka. comes to
Moscow, he addresses in the morning the
United Russia party in what is clearly
an election speech. Then in the evening
he has a meeting to discuss the fuel
situation um of which a large chunk of
it is made public and then as you
rightly say he gives this really
incredible interview with Pavl Zarubin
who is of course um not just any Russian
journalist he is the Kremlin's
authorized journalist and that's on
Rosia one and it's broadcast to the
Russian people and very interestingly It
contains several very shocking as you
rightly say and very sensitive things.
So shocking and so sensitive in fact
that whilst the Kremlin has provided a
Russian transcript of this interview, it
is it is got sections of the interview
deleted and there has been no English
translation of the interview provided.
that as you correctly say is the single
most re revealing do uh revealing set of
comments of all. It it is so extensive
that I like yourself I I suspect it was
recorded first before all of these other
various meetings took place. But it it
is nonetheless within the last couple of
hours because in it Putin gives a very
detailed
the most detailed account of the whole
situation on the front lines that I've
seen him give ever and um that clearly
is well up to date. So he can't have you
know he can't have done it very long
ago. So a a a an extremely intense
period of activity from Putin and the
reason for this is a number there's a
number of things. Firstly, he says very
clearly and he says this both to the
United Russia party and at the meeting
with the people who deal with the energy
situation and in Zarubin, the program
with Zarabin that there is a major
information campaign underway from the
West, not just Ukraine, but from the
West in order to try to destabilize the
situation in Russia. the internal
situation in Russia. So there's been the
attacks on the refineries, there's been
the attempts to create fuel shortages.
Above all, there's been a big campaign,
information campaign intended to create
the appearance of fuel shortages. And he
goes into great length to discuss all of
this. He says that in reality there is
as much fuel in Russia now as there was
roughly this time last year. There is no
overall shortage of fuel. But all of
this campaign, this information
campaign, which has clearly been very
coordinated and which has led to um
presumably there's been messages and all
sorts of things being circulated in
Russia itself that that has led to panic
buying in some places and this is
creating problems. Um he's now put
himself in charge of a committee
basically intended to sort this out. his
energy minister uh um Alexander Novak is
also directly involved. So he says
there's an information campaign to try
to create uncertainty and
destabilization
inside Russia. He he says that yes, of
course, we have these drone attacks and
they are a problem, but he says that,
you know, we're going to sort this out
soon. We got air defense systems coming.
And then he provides this incredibly
detailed disc discussion of what the
situation on the front lines is. And he
paints an absolutely disastrous
situation for Ukraine, which by the way
I believe is true. I I don't think that
this is propaganda. I think this is an
accurate description of the situation on
the front lines. And then there's the
part of this that we don't know which is
what he discussed with Luc Shanka. But
I'm assuming that we're going to get
military deployments in Belleris by the
Russian military and by the way they are
in a position to make those military
deployments. And then lastly and most
incredible of all he talks about the
diplomacy. He tells us that there was in
fact no real agreement made in
Anchorage. The Americans did make a
proposal. The Russians accepted it. The
Americans have now walked away from
their own proposal. He's still prepared
to have interactions with the Americans.
But clearly Anchorage, whatever it was
that Putin and Trump did agree on, and
they did agree on something despite what
everybody is now saying now, that's all
dead. It's been written off. That's in
the past. But the Russians have been
getting messages from someone. Perhaps
Lucenko brought them with him when he
met with Putin. Possibly the Europeans
have been communicating it. This is
might have come from President Coer of
the European Council who we know has
been in touch with the Russians perhaps
through other parties that the Russians
have been getting proposals
firstly to agree a ceasefire
um in the war in the sky and Putin
rejected that completely and then
alternatively
a ceasefire in part of the front lines
to limit the fighting to Donbass,
Zaporosia and Hersan regions, but to
have a ceasefire everyone else
everywhere else in Kharkov region,
Sunumi region, in the process region and
Putin said that this is an obvious
device to try to um enable the
Ukrainians who are suffering severe
manpower shortages to redeploy their
forces to to u hold the Russians back in
Donbass And in what Putin said was
Novorosia. And Putin again talks now
about Novorosia. He doesn't just talk
about Zaporosia and Hers region. As
every Baldi knows,
Novorosia,
the Russian province of Novorosia,
was a huge territory that includes
Adessa.
I believe that Adessa was the actual
capital of this region and he's talking
now about the Russians continuing
operations to liberate the whole of
Navarosia. So an extraordinary uh uh set
of meetings, discussions, speeches um
Putin trying to do various things at one
and the same time to to reassure and
stabilize the internal situation which
is where the only real threat comes to
provide us with an insight as to the
kind of negotiations that are taking
place. um to coordinate in some way with
Lucas Shanka and to give us an update
about the situation on the front lines.
As I said, an extraordinary performance
from Putin, if you will, and perhaps
just to say he's finally been listening
to these people who are have been
warning him that if he continued along
the line that he's been taking up to
now, he would lose the information war.
He's finally seems to have understood
that and decided that he has to take
action about it.
>> Yeah. Dealing with the the stabilization
of uh of the domestic on the domestic uh
front, the the drone strikes and and all
of that stuff. uh he didn't really give
a solution to that. How he's going to
deal with uh with the pressure that that
the West is placing on on Russia to try
and destabilize things to uh to try and
cause chaos. Uh the drone strikes
hitting refineries, the drone strikes
hitting civilian targets. He said he
actually used the word terrorism. So he
used that word as well. Um, I believe he
used that during his speech to uh to
United Russia, but he didn't really
provide any any solutions as to how he's
going to deal with that. I mean, he
talked about getting fuel to Crimea. He
talked about how the how things are not
critical. Um, it has caused problems,
the strikes into Russia, but but it's
not at a critical level. He talked about
Russia's reserves. We're hearing reports
about uh export bansu uh on fuel and
diesel,
but but he's not getting to the root
cause of it, is he? No, he he continues
to avoid it.
>> Um
>> well, can I can I can I say something? I
mean, he he didn't really he didn't
really I don't know. In my opinion, he
didn't really address what the root
cause is.
>> He just he just talked about, you know,
Russia taking a more of a defensive
position.
>> He he entirely took a defensive
position. He says that they're going to
ramp up air defense. And he seemed
fairly confident that the additional air
defense would be sufficient to deal with
the situation. He said this some time
ago, by the way. He said that if the uh
air defense forces had actually prepared
in advance for this um um then this
problem would never have arisen in the
first place because Ukrainian drones are
easy to shoot down. He said this about
two weeks ago actually. And um the
previous air defense chief had um
actually was actually sacked I think um
on the strength of that. I I I think
that Putin believes that this is going
to be sufficient to deal with the
problem and um the word in some quarters
and I difficult for me to to assess this
is that um over the last couple of days
the Ukrainians have launched lots of
drones but that the numbers that are
getting through are starting to dwindle.
So I I think that Putin is fairly
confident that he can get through this
and I think he's also very confident
that he can get through the problem with
the oil and fuel shortages which he puts
down overwhelmingly to panic buying. If
you're talking about taking aggressive
actions against the West, he didn't talk
about that and he didn't say this
because as far as he's concerned, the
problem is not a problem of actual real
damage done inside Russia. It is of an
information campaign and that's I think
what he feels he needs to counter.
>> Yeah. He's I think it's very clear that
he's going to to play defense on this
one.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yes.
>> I mean, I think that's his his position.
I don't think he's going to deviate from
that.
>> No, no,
>> no.
>> It was obvious.
>> He's he's telling what he's basically
telling people. Look, we've got this
under control. We got plenty of fuel. We
got plenty of oil. By the way, export
bans on diesel especially are very
common at this time of year
>> because the Russian uh um the Russian
economy uh especially the agricultural
part of the economy uses heavy large
amounts of diesel to bring in the
harvest. So export bans on diesel um
regularly take place um at this time of
year. I've seen this happen several
times before. Um issues with gasoline. I
think he puts that down mostly to panic
buying and he's going I think he's going
to try and say to people that this is
all about panic buying. Don't be scared
by it and we've got we got the situation
under control. We've got abundant energy
and fuel. We can we can deal with this.
Crimea and Hersan regions, which are
frontline regions,
are in a different position from what
you might call pre204
Russia. They they've had to absorb
attacks many times over the course of
this war. Crimea especially. Um for
Putin, what is particularly sensitive is
what goes on in pre204 Russia. uh where
I think and I've discussed this in
previous programs he's particularly
concerned to preserve the spirit of
normaly that exists there.
>> Yeah, he he did he did admit that
the drones are are are causing problems.
I mean he he he had to admit he would
have been he would have been extremely
unwise to have done otherwise.
>> I believe it's the first time he has
admitted this.
>> Yeah, I know. But it would have been
extremely unwise to have done otherwise.
Even if the amount was, you know, even
if the problem is most mostly panic
buying, the worst thing a m the worst
mistake um a political leader can make
when there is an apparent problem is to
deny that the problem exists even if the
problem has been massively exaggerated.
I I was I remember being told all this
by my aunt uh years ago when she was a
minister in the Greek government. I mean
the the thing you do the thing you must
do is first firstly admit that there is
a problem tell everybody that you're in
the process of getting a handle on it
and then when you do get a handle on it
when the situation with supplies for
example stabilizes then of course you
take credit for the fact that you have
got a handle on it but telling everybody
don't worry there's no nothing going on
the situation is under control is
extremely ly extremely uh foolish
behavior. Many Western politicians do
it. Um Putin is far too experienced to
make that mistake.
>> Yeah. Okay. Um Mhm. the uh
what I what I got from from his from his
statements is is that the there will be
no asymmetric or or or symmetric
response to to Ukraine or the West
launching missile strikes or drone
strikes into Russia even pre204 Russia.
I think the general
the the general message from Putin is
we're going to focus on Donbas
and on strikes hitting Moscow or
Petersburg or Crema or or anywhere else.
We're just going to play defense. I
think I think that's I don't want to
oversimplify it, but but that's the
general position that he took. He's
going to rem remain focused on the front
line and on Donbas
and everything else is just going to be
a more of a defensive posture.
>> I I think that is basically true.
>> Basically, I'm simplifying it. I want to
just be clear. I'm simplifying it. But
that that was a general message that he
put out there.
>> I I I don't think it is entirely true.
Um he spoke to the this is where the
election address to the United Russia
party was particularly interesting
because he said that Russia has been
Russia has been placed under
extraordinary pressure. There is clearly
an attempt to destabilize the situation
inside Russia. He made it very clear
that it is the west altogether that is
doing this and he did so in ways that
suggested to me that we are probably
going to see as asymmetric reactions.
Now he didn't talk about that because I
think a lot of this is going to be
covert and unfortunately that is the
problem because covert operations
like saying supplying more drones to
Iran. I'm just saying that that kind of
thing. Um it might actually have an
effect. It might actually cause hurt to
the west, but of course it isn't
something that anybody knows about
because by definition it is covert. So
he he may be in the process of doing
things, the Russians may be in the
process of doing things, but in a world
where information
manipulation and information control is
so important and so powerful. I'm not
sure that it makes much difference.
>> Look, I I think the West is going to to
go through this this uh this speech and
this interview of Putin, if they even
are listening to Putin anymore. But
they'll they if they go through this, I
think they'll they'll interpret it as as
Putin conceding that Russia can now be
hit. Even pre204, Russia can now be hit
with drones and and long-range missiles.
And I think they'll they'll look at it.
They'll interpret it as as as Putin u
moving away from what was a red line
that he defined in 2020
23 24 right before Trump took office.
So, so now that we're talking about
concession, this is how I think they
will interpret it because he may do
covert things and he may do other other
asymmetric things that that that are
that are in response to to the strikes
into Russia, but as you rightly said, um
I don't think it's going to register
with many of the leadership in the
collective west. Now,
>> I think I think these people are are not
receptive to those kind of messages. And
this is something maybe that Putin
doesn't understand. I he said a couple
of days ago that um if there are missile
strikes or drone strikes carried from
Europe carried out from European
territory then the Russians will conduct
counter strikes and the Europeans know
that and that's why they don't do it.
Well maybe but in all other respects
provided it looks as if the drones and
the missiles are coming from Ukraine.
Um,
whatever the Russians do and whatever
they might be communicating privately to
the Americans, and it's mostly the
Americans that we'll be talking to, I I
don't think the Americans are going to
pay much attention.
>> Yeah. Going on on on the theme of
concessions, an admission from Putin
that he did make concessions to Trump in
uh in Alaska, how do how do we read
that? Uh the most likely concession that
he made in my opinion was freezing
Zaparo and Herson.
>> That was probably the big concession
that that he made
>> that that that has been massively talked
about. It has never been confirmed. It's
not even confirmed by Yes. I It's it's
it's not being confirmed even by the
Americans. It's very very difficult to
get a sense of what exactly it was that
Putin and Trump agreed about agreed with
each other in Alaska. But the Russians
have always said that Witkoff came to
Moscow with a proposal. The Russians
decided to accept or rather I should
correct that Putin decided
to accept that proposal.
Doing so was difficult because it
required concessions from the Russian
side. This is something that Putin has
often said and Lavough has often said
and um the um other members of the
Russian leadership as I very well
remember were clearly not happy about
it. Um and we've never been told what
those concessions were. But the rumors,
the stories that have circulated at the
time is that it was for a freeze in
Zaporosian Hersong region a as the
Russians rather as the Ukrainians
withdrew from Donbas. [laughter] I I I
think we are now going beyond this
actually and this takes us back to what
Lavro has now been saying because
Lavough
is sort of suggesting
that um Anchorage all along was an
American trick that it was an act of
duplicity
that what the Americans were really
angling for was again a ceasefire.
on the existing conflict lines. So what
they were trying to do was to get Putin
to agree to this formula that Trump
presented with presented him with maybe
do some kind of deal or something and
then the Americans would have said well
we've now got this agreement the
Ukrainians will withdraw from Donbass
so let's have a ceasefire until that
happens and I I that's what Lavro seems
to be ending at. And it would make
complete sense given that we know that
the person who actually came up with the
proposal that Witkoff took with him to
Moscow was none other than General
Kellogg. [snorts]
So given that it was Kellogg's idea,
Kellogg who first proposed that the
Ukrainians withdraw from Donbass,
um I it starts to look as if it was
indeed some kind of a trap.
Well, we we do have reports,
>> very good reports which claim that
Whitov actually when when he was in
Moscow, he wrote on a piece of paper, I
believe he wrote three three and two in
that the the deal was uh Donets Lugans
Crea
>> and the two that the the two concessions
were Heron Zaparo.
>> Yeah.
>> The freeze. I mean, we have a lot of
reports which which which I I believe
are are accurate at this point because
it's it's reports from from uh from
Russian media, from uh from US media and
they all come to the same conclusion and
we've talked about this many times that
most likely that was the the scenario. I
believe even Lavro touched upon this. He
never stated anything in in in the
definite,
>> but I believe he did touch upon sort of
a phased out uh withdrawal of Ukraine
from the the constitutionally recognized
regions of Zapad and Jan, but it would
be it would be phased out. It wouldn't
be it would be a freeze and then Russia
would and then Ukraine would over time
um move out. But
>> whatever it was,
>> there's there's nothing definitive. We
don't have anything in writing and Putin
said as much and and and these are just
media reports and a couple of statements
from Russian officials and they dance
around the the subject.
>> Yeah.
>> But
the 32 model does look like that was
that was the proposal.
>> Well, yeah, but this is what this is
what I got to say. Whatever it was that
Putin and Trump agreed with each other,
and they did they did come to some kind
of agreement, notwithstanding what each
of them is now saying, whatever it was,
it's clearly very embarrassing to both
of them. It's embarrassing to Trump and
it's embarrassing to Putin because if it
was not, we would surely have by now
been told what it was. So that's that's
that's I think the one thing we can
definitely say probably there was there
was a proposal for a ceasefire in or a
freeze in Zaparosia in Hong regions and
probably
there was an agreement that the
Ukrainians would withdraw from Donbass
about that I think we can be fairly
confident
>> but whichever which but but as I said it
was something that neither side wants to
actually tell us exactly what it was
despite the fact that from what I can
tell the documentation is all over the
place. I mean there's lots of
documentation that sets it out and
obviously there's a stenographic record
of what the two of them discussed at the
meeting. It's all history now because
the Americans have said that there was
no deal in Anchorage and the Russians
are now saying that there was no deal in
Anchorage. Putin has just said there was
no deal in Anchorage. There was just a
discussion of possibilities. So
Anchorage is dead. Whatever it was that
each conceded to the other, it's now
history.
>> Well, I I I don't know about what the US
conceded, but I don't understand why
Putin would would say, and I quote, we
were asked to accept the compromise
formulated by the American negotiators.
We agreed. We agreed. That's that's his
words. His words.
>> Yes.
>> Why would I mean, why didn't he just
leave it at
>> there was no deal. There was no written
agreement in Anchorage. full stop ended
there. Why would he take it one step
further and say the US asked us for
compromises
and we agreed?
>> Well, the
>> why would you say that?
>> Well, there's nothing you really
strange.
>> Lav Lavough has been saying this for
months. I mean, all the way back to
November, he's been saying that this was
an American proposal. The Americans were
asked to implement the proposal. They
weren't able to. There was apparently
and this is this is we've had this all
from Lavough uh uh over many months that
Putin asked Trump at Anchorage right
this is this is what we've agreed with
each other can you guarantee that you
will be able to get Zalinski to act on
this and Trump allegedly told Putin I
was say allegedly I mean Lavrov says
this I'm I'm prepared to accept that
this is true And Trump told Putin, "Yes,
I can guarantee I will get Zalinski to
work to move forward with this." And of
course, it didn't happen. And then Trump
uh starts talking again about an
unconditional ceasefire on the existing
conflict lines. And then there's the
talk about the supply of atom missiles.
And then there's an angry call between
Putin and Trump in which Putin asks
Trump, "Why aren't you moving forward
with your own proposal?" And then Trump
proposes this summit meeting in Budapest
which doesn't happen. And then we get a
whole pointless exercise of what now
really looks like obfiscation with
Dimmitrif and Witgov coming up with 28
point proposals which lead nowhere as
well. So the the point about the
Russians accepting an American proposal
in Anchorage, we've known about that
since about September.
But I I still don't understand this
statement from Putin.
>> Okay. Um I'll I'll I'll leave it there.
Um what what a monumental gigantic waste
of time and what a failed strategy.
That's my opinion from coming from the
Kremlin. But anyway,
>> failed failed failed fail failed
strategy altogether by everybody. Um and
one which has just created distrust. If
if the American intention, which is what
Lavro is now saying, was to get a
ceasefire, then clearly it failed and
that might explain a lot of the
frustration and anger that that does
appear to exist around this in
Washington as well. and clearly a failed
strategy on the part of the Kremlin
because they continued to try to work
with um Trump
uh and thought they spent an enormous
amount of time in the spring and early
summer to try to move these things
forward and to secure some kind of a
deal with the Americans and that wasn't
going to happen either. So I it's it's
one of those situations and I think this
is where I come back to a point I've
made many many times. If you conduct
negotiations in this incredibly
unconventional way, if instead of having
proper diplomats and proper negotiating
sessions with proper negotiating teams,
if you rely on people like Dimmitrif and
Witoff to do all the work for you,
you're inevitably going to end up with
massive misunderstandings of the
position of the other side. Everything
is going to fall apart. a huge amount of
time is going to be wasted and all that
you're going to get is more mistrust and
a lot of embarrassment and that's I
think where we are.
>> But Putin knows this.
>> Oh, absolutely. Everything that you said
he knows this but he still went down the
the
>> Yeah, absolutely. I think he played he
played along He played along with Trump.
He played a wrong He played a roe Trump.
>> He did. Exactly. I mean he did it
because he wanted to see obviously he
thought he thought that there would be
some way forward but it was it never
happened. So but anyway it's just it's
history. Now the point is the point is
that on the issue of Donbass he never
made a concession. He he refused to make
any concessions and the Europeans and
the uh Ukrainians perhaps stupidly
wouldn't play along with what Trump
wanted which is obviously their folly.
The the good part was opening up
dialogue with the United States, was
getting a meeting with Trump in Alaska.
>> Yeah.
>> The bad part was that that Putin should
have should have forgotten the entire
thing the minute the drones started to
fly into
>> Valdai.
>> He should have forgotten about the
entire thing. The minute Trump started
to walk everything back, he should have
said, "You know what? We tried. We went
to Alaska. We had our meeting. We even
made concessions. We we we did our
absolute best.
>> Yeah.
>> But but there's no there's there's no
way moving forward with this
administration. They just sent drones
into my residence in Valdai.
>> It's over. But we went from April all
the way to to now and and Putin
continued to try and and appease Trump
over the past couple of months.
>> Yeah.
>> Which has led to to Lav is right. It has
given the United States and NATO and
Ukraine a a bit of time and space so
that they can organize the drone
campaign, but more importantly organize
the propaganda and media campaign that
goes along with the drones. And we're
seeing that now in full force. It's
article after article now about Putin
drowning and Putin's in trouble. And
there's going to be regime change and
Putin's going to lose Crema. And then
you have a soldier talking about how
he's going to march to the all the
stupidest things in the world.
>> But this is obviously organized without
a doubt. All of this is extremely
organized and coordinated. This is I
think Lavro's point is that
>> Putin by not cutting losses back when
the drones were hitting his home. He
provided a couple of more months for the
Trump administration and the media and
Zilinsky and the Europeans to to get
everything in order so so we can come to
this point where we are today. I I I
mean the drone offensive I think was
basically decided by Trump back in May
of last year to be honest. I remember
when the discussion took place that that
by the way was the moment when Putin
arguably should have called this thing
off. He should have said to Trump,
"Look, I mean, you want me to sit down
and negotiate with you and now I'm
reading in I think it was the New York
Times um that you have actually been
encouraging Zilinski to conduct drone
and missile strikes against my capital.
I mean, don't you understand that there
is a fundamental discordance between
these two approaches?" I mean, that that
was that was probably that that surely
was uh the mistake. I I I don't think
what has happened since Vald Dai has
made much difference there because if I
have to be honest there haven't been any
negotiations meaningful negotiations
anyway since Vald Dai the one thing that
has continued to happen is that the
Americans and the Russians do still
speak to each other and the Russians
the Russian media are still under
instructions not to criticize Donald
Trump and I think again I am I've
discussed this I think this is causing a
lot of stress amongst many people in
Russia itself. I think the partly the
strategy is you know prepare for the day
when the war is won, talk with the
Americans after that and at the same
time try to maintain some kind of
dialogue with the Americans in order in
the in the perhaps a fullon hope that
the Americans might act possibly as some
kind of restraint on these crazy people
in Europe who are indeed becoming very
crazy. By the way, there there's the the
Russians are still getting proposals
which are very interesting proposals in
themselves and Putin is apparently
rejecting them. So, ceasefire in the sky
which the Americans have been trying to
push since the spring of last year.
There's been endless proposals from the
Americans and from the Ukrainians for an
end to to drone and missile strikes by
each side on the other. Putin is having
none of that. He says the Americans the
well, he didn't say the Americans, but
the West knows perfectly well that our
strikes on Ukraine are multiple times
more powerful and affected than what the
Ukrainians are managing on us. So
there's not going to be a ceasefire
there and as I said this extraordinary
idea of a ceasefire on all the other
front lines and a focus instead leaving
the fighting in Donbass and Upper Roia
to continue. So you can see that there
is still all kinds of attempts being
made by all sorts of people probably
through multiple intermediaries quite
probably through uh global south
intermediaries as well just saying to
try to get the Russians to agree to a
temporary ceasefire in some form to take
the pressure off the Ukrainians and
Putin has rejecting everyone. Well, this
brings me to my next point. You actually
made my my point, my question to you.
You actually answered much of it. But
the reason that the the the collective
west and the Europeans on the
instruction of the US, there's no way
that the Europeans are actually making
this proposal without the US telling
them to go make this proposal. The
reason they come up with ideas like uh
like fighting being uh restricted only
to the four regions.
>> Yeah. or or or or let's let's uh let's
not have any any um um air strikes, no
more no more u like a no-fly zone is
basically what they're saying. That's
what they're proposing. Yeah.
>> The reason they come up with these
proposals is because they understand
that if they throw enough proposals at
Putin and if they approach it in
different various ways, eventually
they're thinking their thinking is that
eventually he'll bite on one of them
like he did in Alaska or like he did
with Minsk or like he did with 2022 and
remove your troops from from surrounding
Kiev or I mean this is their thinking.
I'm not saying this is correct and I'm
not saying that Putin is is is he's
rejecting these proposals, but their
their thinking is keep on pushing all of
these proposals on him.
>> Let's try different techniques. Let's
try Trump calling him. Let's try try
Trump uh flattering him. Let's try Trump
uh uh bashing him. Let's do all these
different things. Let's try Gosta. Let's
try Stub. Let's try Schwarter. Let's try
Merkel.
You know, I'm exaggerating a bit, but
eventually he'll agree to something. Oh,
no.
>> Because he always has in the past.
>> There's absolutely no doubt that that is
correct. I mean, he engaged the
Europeans, first the Europeans and then
the Americans. In years of negotiations,
he made concessions. He agreed to Minsk
one. He agreed to Minsk 2. He um agreed
to Istanbul, which many Russians also
saw by the way, as a big concession. Um
he agreed to um he agre agreed to do
whatever it was that he agreed in um
Istanbul, sorry, not in Anchorage. So of
course, you come you throw all of these
proposals at him. You do it from all
directions. You get Erdogan to do it.
You get Modi probably to do it. You
definitely get Lula to come up with
proposals. You talk to the Chinese as
well. You do everything like this to
keep this pressure on Putin. But what
Putin is basically saying in this
interview with Zarabin is that this is
in the past now. We made concessions.
We're not making any more concessions.
This strategy that the West is uh
engaging in, this diplomatic strategy is
going to fail. and the pressure they're
going to put on us is going to fail. And
you know, I made all of those uh
concessions to them in the past, but I'm
not going to be doing that again. And in
a sense, I mean, I think that's probably
true. I mean, Razarin made the point
that negotiations between the Americans
and the Russians and over the whole
issue of Ukraine have now come to
essentially a stop. So, he doesn't seem
to be in the mood to make any
concessions. But you're perfectly
correct. The fact that he's done it in
the past leads them to think that
perhaps he may.
>> I think there are people like Zarub and
like Lav like Medved who are telling
Putin in their own different ways
enough. You've made sure so many
concessions over the past 10 years.
>> Yes,
>> please no more.
>> There are the parts of the Kremlin which
are pressuring Putin. Come on, man. Just
make a deal and let's go back to the way
things were in 2010 or something. I'm
sure there are parts of the creme. I
don't know how much influence they have.
>> It's probably on the downward,
>> right? Their their influence.
>> Yeah.
>> But he definitely has that as well.
>> Putin Putin's character, his character
and his instinct, I I think is is
leaning is always leaning more towards
to his credit is always leaning more
towards uh diplomacy and talking. I
mean, at the end of the day, Putin is
without a doubt uh a moderate through
and through,
>> right? So, so I think his his his his
instinct, his character definitely is
not towards the hard line. He definitely
feels more comfortable
>> on the on the diplomacy uh front.
>> Well, one of the reasons he he does is
because he's very good at diplomacy. And
as as often happens with people who are
very good at something, they perhaps
over rely on it. Um he he is and this is
the thing always to remember about
Putin. He is a civilian. He does not
have a background in the military. A
military man in Putin's position might
take a different approach. He might play
diplomacy down and focus on war more.
But
>> he was an intel. He was an intel. But
but in intelligence as any everybody
who's been involved in it has often told
me does involve an awful lot of what
might be called diplomacy too. So I
think this is partly the background and
he's been a lawyer as well and lawyers I
should say what they are first and
foremost always is negotiators. Now let
let me just actually talk about this
because about um the pressures on Putin
to negotiate and not to negotiate
because a Russian journalist very
well-connected very well-informed
Russian journalist Marathulin has now
provided us an interesting insight. He
says that he was very uh he was informed
and knows for a fact that back in
February 2022 when the decision to
launch the special military operation
started
um the um economic block of the
government
silana for the finance ministry people
in the commerce ministries um and
Nabulina and no doubt of the um central
bank said you know hold on is this
really a good idea can't we come up with
a more soft approach can't we find
negotiations
to you know ease this thing do we really
have to start the special military
operation and even more interesting some
important regional governments in Russia
um said the same saying they were also
apparently
um opposed or had doubts about the SMO.
And I'm going to guess that these were
the regions in the Arctic and in Western
Siberia and the Eurals who were most
connected with the um oil and gas
industry.
And on that occasion uh Putin overrode
them and that was probably very
difficult. Now that was I think where
the real opposition came. Um I think
that it did not come so much from people
within what you might call the inner
core of the Kremlin, the um security
council, people of that kind. Now, since
February 2022,
the concerns of the economic block and
of these regional governments have
probably been moderated very
considerably. I think that there are
people who want to see a return to
normal and a return to what existed not
just before pre February 2022, but
probably to what existed before February
2014. In other words, a complete retreat
all the way back to the position Russia
took before u the Maidan events before
uh Crimea and all of that. But I think
that they are outside the Kremlin now. I
don't think that they wield much
influence. Um and I think that there are
still perhaps some forces within the oil
and gas industry that are giving Putin
that advice. But I think that their
influence has fallen very considerably.
The people who
are giving the advice in the Kremlin, I
think overwhelmingly they want him to
take a harder line. So it's Putin who is
the moderate, the negotiator,
the lawyer, the per the the the
diplomat, the person who talks to the
bricks leaders. It's Putin who
represents moderation in the Kremlin. I
don't think there's anyone else.
>> Uh Novarosia, his statement about
Novarosia.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah,
>> his statement he also made statements
about uh a buffer expanding the buffer
zone. Uh Sumi
>> Yeah.
>> Uh Kov
what I
[laughter]
>> is a town in Poland.
>> Yeah. I was you know you know what it's
it's it's the outro to my video and for
some reason it popped in my head where
on all my videos I have the outro that's
actually the the main square in in in
KCO in Poland. So anyway, a beautiful
square by the way.
>> Absolutely.
>> The uh Harov and he even brought up
Kursk. Just your final thoughts on on
those statements. They're going to pay
for Kursk, he said,
>> which is an interesting statement
because Kursk was a year half ago. Hold
on one sec. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Absolutely. Well, I think the
first thing to say is that he pre
presents an absolutely catastrophic
situation for Ukraine on the front
lines. And he says, and I'm sure he's
right about this, that this is partly
the urgency to try to get the Russians
to persuade the Russians to stop that um
despite all the narrative, all the media
propaganda, all the talk about Ukraine
winning back the initiative that the
reality is the exact diametric opposite
that the things are going from bad to
worse. He he seemed to suggest Liman 99%
under Russian control. Constantinfka 96%
under Russian control. The Russians
making big advances in all sorts of
other places. Let's let's talk about
Novarosia. I've already said this.
Novoria, if we're talking about the
Tarist region of Novoria, that
absolutely includes Adessa. That
includes all of R uh Ukraine's Black Sea
coast. I I have had the sense since the
autumn of last year that Putin has
basically been telling the military,
"Your ultimate objective is in fact
Adessa." So I I, you know, he he even
took them, I remember, to the tomb of
Peter the Great and Katherine the Great.
This is, you know, way back in the
autumn of last year. And he said, you
know, these are these are the people who
should inspire you. Peter played a big
role in defeating the west in Ukraine in
Pava and Katherine of course is the
founder of Adessa. So I you know I I
think that the signals there are very
very clear. He talks about Kusk. He
talks about revenge for Kusk.
Very interesting. And again
what does it mean? Well, I thought what
he said about the city of Sunumi was
very interesting. He said, "On the one
hand, we're still only talking about
buffer zones. Um, we're still um we've
got still got no political interest in
the city of Sunni, but ultimately it is
for the military to decide what they
should do." So in effect he's leaving
the decision or he says he's leaving the
decision to the soldiers to decide
whether to capture Sunumi or not. And
frankly that all but tells me that the
decision to capture Sunumi has been
made.
All right we will end the video there.
The duran.locals.com. We're on next
we're on Rumble. We're on Telegram. Go
to Durant shop. Pick up some merch. Also
check us out on Substack. Take care.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video features a discussion on a series of intense events involving Vladimir Putin, including his address to the United Russia party, a meeting with Lukashenko, and a candid interview with Russian media. The speakers analyze Putin's current defensive posture regarding domestic issues like drone attacks and fuel shortages, which he attributes to Western-driven information campaigns. They further discuss the defunct negotiations from the Anchorage summit and the reality of the front line situation in Ukraine, with Putin signaling potential further military objectives related to 'Novorossiya'.
Videos recently processed by our community