HomeVideos

Joe Rogan Experience #2474 - Dave Smith

Now Playing

Joe Rogan Experience #2474 - Dave Smith

Transcript

5218 segments

0:01

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

0:04

>> The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:06

>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

0:08

NIGHT. All day.

0:13

>> So Dave, you were telling me right

0:14

before the show that you are now

0:15

retiring because you got an impromptu

0:19

phone call and bet hundreds of millions

0:21

of dollars on oil prices going down.

0:24

Congratulations.

0:25

>> It was uh it was a good bet. It just

0:27

wasn't timed right. I thought you got it

0:30

in on time. I thought you got it in like

0:32

Yeah, I thought you got it in like five

0:34

minutes early.

0:36

>> I did not.

0:37

>> How is there not a massive investigation

0:39

into that right away? Didn't someone

0:41

make like $1.8 billion in like 5

0:44

minutes?

0:45

>> Yeah, there's uh there's a lot of those

0:47

like trades like that that should be

0:48

investigated that kind of never are.

0:50

>> Bro, how about what's his name? Lutnik.

0:54

>> Yeah, how about that one? He's so he's

0:57

the tariffs one

0:58

>> working for the administration and also

1:00

standing to gain huge if people can sue

1:03

over the the tariffs right

1:06

>> well explain the whole thing do you know

1:08

how to do you know the actual details of

1:10

it

1:10

>> no I don't really

1:11

>> essentially he was telling everybody

1:13

that you know don't sweat it the tariffs

1:16

are golden we're getting them through

1:18

there's going to be no problems is that

1:20

what it was but meanwhile he was

1:22

shorting the tariffs yeah so he was

1:24

personally shorting Let's find out what

1:25

that actually is so we don't get sued. I

1:27

bet he's quite ligious gentleman.

1:29

>> Yeah, he might be.

1:31

>> See if we can find it.

1:32

>> I got some I don't know what that means.

1:34

>> Like is it wild that people are on the

1:36

files visited the island and then they

1:38

still work. It was unbelievable. Like

1:40

some people had to resign from some

1:42

jobs.

1:42

>> Well, especially just him because he so

1:45

ju the way there's something about a

1:47

really confident liar like where they

1:50

just cuz I mean that that interview clip

1:52

where he's like let me tell you

1:53

something. I met Jeffrey Ebste that one

1:54

time. He had a massage table. He said

1:56

they were sex massage tables. I went

1:57

right back to my wife and I said,

1:58

"Honey, we are never hanging out with

2:00

Jeffrey Epstein again." And that is

2:02

that, you know, is that really his

2:04

quote?

2:04

>> Oh, dude. I mean, I've seen that. I

2:06

>> I don't know if it's verbatim, but that

2:08

is the exact spare.

2:09

>> Probably pretty verbatim. Let's Let's

2:11

listen to it.

2:11

>> Listen Listen to it. I'm very very close

2:14

to exactly what he said.

2:15

>> Okay, let me get this one again. What

2:16

was this one?

2:17

>> Lutnick Lutnik interview about Ebstein.

2:20

And he just sounds, I mean, so like

2:22

morally outraged about the idea.

2:24

>> There's so many people that they exist

2:26

in that world where you just pretend

2:28

that you're a different person. You

2:30

pretend you're one way. Yeah. You

2:32

pretend you think things differently.

2:34

>> It's uh I've been up close with people

2:37

like that. I said that was my takeaway

2:38

from debating Chris Cuomo was like I

2:40

just could It's a weird thing to see

2:42

someone just lie like that.

2:43

>> Here it is. Now, this is the one that

2:45

says he's the greatest black mailer

2:46

ever.

2:49

Which quote am I trying to find?

2:51

>> Yeah, try to explain it to him.

2:53

>> It was uh let me see the key words that

2:55

would

2:57

>> downplay his relationship with him. That

2:59

that might be it.

3:02

>> There was something on the other thing,

3:03

but I don't know what that

3:04

>> what does he do?

3:06

>> He's um what's he's a commerce

3:08

secretary.

3:09

>> Uh he was a he was always like a money

3:11

finance guy. He I think he used to work

3:12

for C uh CNBC if I'm correct. in this

3:15

administration. This like the wolves

3:18

have taken over the hen house.

3:20

>> Yeah. Yeah, they sure have.

3:22

This is this is what draining the swamp

3:24

looks like.

3:25

>> Under fire for Epstein ties, commerce

3:27

secretary Howard Lutnik defends visiting

3:29

his private island.

3:30

>> Yeah, but this is this isn't the clip.

3:32

The clip was from

3:34

>> Oh, at the top it says it says Lutnik

3:37

said in an interview last year he was

3:38

never in the room with Epstein other

3:40

than a 2005 visit to his apartment.

3:44

Okay, so that's probably it. He said,

3:47

you know, he met him once and like this

3:48

guy sucks.

3:49

>> He specifically says that he met him

3:51

that he saw he had a m a massage table

3:54

in his living room and he goes, "Hey,

3:56

Jeffrey, what do you you really like

3:57

massages?" And he claims that Jeffrey

3:59

went, "Yeah, and the right kind of

4:01

massages."

4:03

>> And that's when he decided he would

4:05

never talk to him again.

4:06

>> Nobody likes the right kind of massages.

4:09

Those are terrible. Imagine if those

4:11

were legal, just hand job massages.

4:13

There'd be like no relationships.

4:18

How many people are in terrible

4:20

relationships just cuz they need sex?

4:22

>> There's a lot of guys that be like, I'm

4:23

just going to hang out with the boys,

4:25

just get jerked off once on Wednesday

4:27

and I'm good.

4:28

>> Howard Lendy downplays relationship with

4:30

Epste during Senate testimony.

4:32

>> Testimony. I don't know.

4:33

>> Uh, is this it? Now, this is from this

4:35

is from recently. This is from this

4:37

year. I did find an article that kind I

4:39

don't even know what this website is

4:40

though. I don't know if

4:42

>> this old firm did not in fact profit

4:44

from the Supreme Supreme Court tariff

4:46

ruling.

4:47

>> It says that there was an article

4:48

claiming it and then that's why I was

4:50

trying to dig through this.

4:51

>> Oh, we better edit that out then.

4:54

>> I mean, it was reported though that they

4:56

did, but I don't know that what this

4:57

says.

4:59

>> Um,

5:00

says firm is run by his two sons. Elder

5:03

Lutnik announced the sale of the stake

5:04

in the firm and other investors Supreme

5:07

Court on Friday invalidated many of

5:09

Trump's tariffs. The president said why

5:12

okay caster did not consider the product

5:16

which has existed for years was humming

5:18

trade on Wall Street's Trump first term

5:22

tariff push but decided against it after

5:24

weighing the political sensitivities

5:26

according to a senior banker familiar

5:28

with this matter. Caner spokesman said

5:30

the salesman erroneously believed the

5:32

firm was likely to greenlight the

5:33

business. Okay, I'm missing this. I'm

5:36

I'm not exactly sure what they're saying

5:37

here.

5:38

>> There's a

5:38

>> this is just the legality of tariffs are

5:40

discussing that

5:41

>> an email that said that they're

5:42

representing 10 million. That's right. I

5:45

was trying to figure out

5:46

>> tariff refund rights

5:47

>> accuracy of all this and whatnot.

5:48

>> So what was the accusation? The

5:50

accusation was that he had shorted

5:52

tariffs while claiming that tariffs are

5:56

going to work. Yeah, the the accusation

5:58

was that he stood to make a lot of money

5:59

from tariffs being struck down.

6:02

>> Um

6:02

>> um why don't you put that into

6:03

perplexity, Jamie, and find out if

6:05

that's accurate and let it scour the

6:07

internet instead of us doing it.

6:09

>> God, I love AI.

6:10

>> Yeah, it is something.

6:12

>> I can't wait until it takes over

6:13

government.

6:14

>> It's going to be awesome.

6:15

>> It's after a while you're like, I don't

6:16

know if it could be much worse than what

6:18

humans are doing with government.

6:19

>> It's going to be better. It's not going

6:20

to be greedy. Well, as long as it

6:22

determines that human life is valuable,

6:25

I feel like is really the uh

6:27

>> humans. So, let's be honest. You know,

6:30

some homeless guys taking a [ __ ] on your

6:31

jaguar. Is that guy really valuable?

6:34

>> Yeah. But but to AI, we all might be

6:36

homeless guys taking

6:37

>> Did you see that? There was these San

6:38

Francisco tech guys and they got trapped

6:40

in their Whimo because a homeless guy

6:42

started attacking the Whimo and yelling

6:44

at them, "Why are you paying robots?"

6:47

>> No.

6:47

>> Yeah. Like you're a trader. You're

6:49

paying robots. You're paying the robots.

6:51

The homeless guy was upset about this.

6:53

>> The homeless guy was attacking the

6:55

Whimo. The tech guys were in the Whimo.

6:57

We were terrified for our life. We

6:58

feared our safety because they're

7:00

they're being attacked by a crazy person

7:02

who's saying you shouldn't be giving

7:03

money to robots.

7:04

>> That's an uncomfortable position to be

7:05

in.

7:06

>> I get all my information from the Tim

7:07

Dylan show, by the way. But they did.

7:09

>> It's not it's not the worst source of

7:11

information.

7:12

>> It's the best source. Him and that dude.

7:14

What's his name? Uh James Lee. He's our

7:17

other number one source of information.

7:19

Conspiracy theorist. There you go.

7:21

>> But uh another one uh a Whimo, a gal got

7:24

in and there's a [ __ ] homeless guy in

7:27

the trunk

7:28

>> because apparently the last person when

7:30

they left their Whimo, they opened the

7:32

trunk to get their luggage out and they

7:34

never closed it. So the homeless guy

7:37

hopped into their [ __ ] Whimo and

7:40

it was in the trunk. So she get she

7:42

orders a Whimo. She climbs in. There's a

7:44

homeless guy in the trunk and Whimo's

7:47

like, "That's unacceptable." Yeah. Oh,

7:48

you think? Oh, you think?

7:52

Okay. The main claim is that Caner

7:54

Fitzgerald, Howard Lutnick's former

7:56

firm, now chaired by his son, stood to

7:59

profit by buying tariff refund rights

8:01

that only became a became valuable if

8:04

Trump's tariffs were overturned, but the

8:06

firm insists it ultimately did not

8:08

execute those trades. what critics say

8:11

happened. Investigators and reporter

8:13

reporting notably by Wire described

8:15

Caner Fitzgerald exploring a business

8:17

where it would buy the rights to future

8:18

tariff refunds from importers for about

8:21

20 to 30 cents on the dollar. Internal

8:24

materials cited in those reports

8:25

suggested Caner had capacity to trade

8:28

several hundred million of these refund

8:29

rights and had already facilitated at

8:32

least one trade of around $10 million in

8:35

rights under the EPA tariffs. The idea

8:38

was that if courts later struck down the

8:40

tariffs, the government would have to

8:42

refund duties and Caner or its clients

8:45

would collect the full refund while the

8:47

original importers only kept a small

8:49

upfront payment.

8:51

So why is it seen as a conflict? Is it

8:53

true? So it just say that they executed

8:55

on one, right? Didn't it say that?

8:57

Scroll back up.

8:58

>> That was based off that email article.

9:00

It says internal material cited in those

9:02

reports suggested Caner had capacity to

9:04

trade and had already facilitated at

9:08

least one trade of around $10 million in

9:11

rights.

9:12

>> It's only 10 million. Let it go Dave.

9:14

>> That is small potatoes for what we're

9:16

talking about.

9:16

>> Yeah. For these kind of guys.

9:18

>> Uh what Canour and Leticide say. Caner

9:21

Fitzgerald has publicly stated that

9:23

while some salespeople explored, I like

9:26

that in quotes, brokering tariff refund

9:28

rates in 2025, the firm never executed

9:32

any transactions or taken any position

9:35

on tariff refund claims, calling

9:37

contrary reports false. Follow-up

9:40

recording has echoed that Caner

9:42

considered products tied to the Supreme

9:44

Court tariff ruling, but ultimately

9:46

backed off in part because of the

9:48

political optics. Duh. Yeah, [ __ ]

9:51

that's a big duh around Letic's

9:53

government job. Latest coverage is no

9:55

public evidence that Cantor actually

9:57

booked profits from this strategy,

10:00

though the investigations in Congress

10:02

are ongoing and focused on whether there

10:05

was any attempted or potential profiter.

10:10

Are you more interested in the ethics

10:11

conflicts of interest or the nuts and

10:13

bolts of how the secondary tariff refund

10:14

market works financially? No. So, it

10:17

seems like we don't really have

10:18

evidence.

10:18

>> Well, it'll be interesting. I mean, if

10:20

uh which is probably going to happen, um

10:22

but the Democrats take the House and the

10:25

Senate in the midterm elections this

10:26

year. I mean, they're going to be in

10:28

that'll just be the next two years of

10:30

politics will be investigations and

10:32

>> some Democrat lady just over to she just

10:34

took over the seat um in Trump's

10:38

neighborhood where Mara Lago is. So,

10:40

Democrat lady just won.

10:42

>> Yep. Yeah. Well, yeah. I mean, look,

10:44

they in his first term, they impeached

10:46

him twice for absolute [ __ ] So,

10:49

they'll go after him for anything, but I

10:52

have a feeling now there's probably a

10:54

lot more for them to investigate and

10:57

work on stuff like this and the meme

10:59

coin stuff and, you know, whatever

11:01

business deal. You know, I don't I I

11:03

don't have the details at the top of my

11:06

mind, but I do know that they said at

11:09

one point that Jared Kushner would not

11:10

be involved in this administration at

11:12

all because he does so much business

11:15

over there and it's just like so they

11:16

were like, "Oh, no, no, no, he won't."

11:18

But now he totally is. It's him and Whit

11:19

are like the lead

11:21

>> negotiators in this, too. So,

11:23

>> there's a lot of meat on the bone for

11:25

Democrats to make big political theater

11:27

out of for the next two years.

11:29

>> Is there anywhere that's not corrupt? I

11:31

mean, when we look at the insider

11:33

trading in Congress, when you look at

11:35

all these slimy deals that get made with

11:38

NOS's, you look at every it's like

11:41

everything's dirty. There's not one part

11:43

of government. You're like, right there,

11:45

they nailed it.

11:46

>> Yeah. Well, that is true.

11:47

>> Like maybe the post office.

11:49

>> That's I mean,

11:50

>> post office is pretty [ __ ] good,

11:52

dude.

11:53

>> Yeah. Compared to all the rest of it.

11:54

Sure.

11:54

>> You get a a letter moved across the

11:57

whole country for like what is it like

11:59

30 cents? How much is a stamp these

12:01

days?

12:01

>> That's true. If I mean I don't know if

12:03

you include the cost on the back end

12:05

like the taxes that pay for the whole

12:07

thing. Maybe it's a little more

12:08

expensive but relatively speaking. Yeah.

12:11

You can get you know something.

12:12

>> Not a bad organization. In terms of

12:14

government organizations, you never hear

12:16

except going postal. That used to be a

12:18

thing. Remember those days? Yes, I did.

12:20

>> There was a while like where so many

12:23

post officers went so crazy and started

12:25

shooting people that they started

12:26

calling it going postal but it never it

12:29

just went away. Yeah, young people, if

12:30

you're listening to this and you don't

12:31

know what we're talking about, in our

12:33

day, we didn't have school shootings,

12:34

okay? We had to do it the oldfashioned

12:36

way. You had to drive a postman crazy

12:38

until he went around shooting people.

12:39

And it happened several times to the

12:41

point that that became a thing like

12:43

these crazy postal workers.

12:45

>> There was a video game called Postal

12:48

>> where you run around shooting people. It

12:50

was in the I want to say the '9s.

12:52

>> Yeah, that would be about the time

12:53

period.

12:54

>> The first one came out 97.

12:56

>> Yeah. Yeah. And it was like highly

12:58

criticized. They were like, weren't they

12:59

like cartoon looking characters? Can you

13:01

see if you pull up a video of post?

13:04

>> It was like they're like South Park

13:06

looking characters just blasted people.

13:08

So, it felt like less if I remember

13:10

correctly. Or maybe that's the box.

13:13

>> I never played it.

13:14

>> Maybe I played it. I don't know. Oh,

13:16

this is

13:16

>> this is going postal. No,

13:18

>> pissing everywhere.

13:19

>> This looks way better than 1990s.

13:21

>> Oh, this was in the 90s for sure.

13:23

>> Is this the new postal?

13:24

>> Here's what it looked like.

13:26

>> That might have been a newer version

13:26

right there. Oh Jesus.

13:29

>> You just run around jacking people.

13:31

>> Yeah.

13:32

>> So it was like the first Grand Theft

13:33

Auto really

13:34

>> kind of. I mean Grand Theft Auto came

13:35

out around then too actually. It didn't

13:36

look like this then though.

13:38

>> But real weird though, right? That post

13:40

office workers were just killing a bunch

13:42

of people. That's what it looked like.

13:44

Like that. Okay. This is This is what it

13:47

looked like.

13:50

It didn't look like that other thing. It

13:53

was like uh it wasn't a first person

13:55

thing. It was like you're seeing it from

13:56

above and you're just running around

13:58

killing everybody.

13:58

>> I played a postal though that was the

14:00

first person like that.

14:00

>> Maybe they had more versions of it.

14:02

>> Also, I don't want to show because I

14:04

don't know what's going to be some bad

14:06

stuff on there.

14:06

>> Yeah, probably

14:07

>> nudity or anything.

14:08

>> Dude, video games really are like crack.

14:12

>> I loved your you had a rant about that

14:14

years ago about how like the problem is

14:15

that they're so much fun and you're not

14:17

accomplishing anything. So, the last

14:19

video game I got into was uh UFC 3, and

14:24

I loved that game. I just loved it. And

14:26

then me, like I think it was I got

14:28

married, my wife got pregnant, and I was

14:30

like, "All right, I got to get rid of

14:30

this. I just can't. I'm so I was at um

14:33

the the Dojo of Comedy. It was a club in

14:36

uh New Jersey." Great club. Um

14:38

>> they have a LA one, too.

14:39

>> Oh, do they? Okay.

14:40

>> Sam Tripley.

14:41

>> Uh Oh, yeah. Shout out to Sam. Yeah.

14:42

Yeah. So, uh, so I was at the one in in

14:45

Jersey and they have in the green room

14:47

they have UFC 3 and I was like, "Oh,

14:50

that's the game that I got really into."

14:52

So, I was there for a weekend and I mean

14:53

I just the whole time I was there just

14:55

in the green room playing this video

14:57

game and I was like it was like a

14:59

feeling almost like like a drug addict

15:02

who's around their drug of choice where

15:03

I was like I need to be away from that.

15:05

Like I will play this until I kill

15:07

myself. It's so much fun.

15:08

>> It's a problem. Robbie Lawler fighting,

15:11

you know, whoever and just

15:13

>> and they keep getting better.

15:14

>> Yeah, I know. Well, I didn't I stopped

15:16

at that, so I never even like learned

15:18

how to play the new ones. But

15:20

>> what number UFC game are they at now?

15:22

>> Five, I think.

15:23

>> Five.

15:25

>> The graphics keep getting better. The

15:27

movement keeps getting more natural.

15:29

>> Yeah.

15:29

>> And first person shooters, man. Oh my

15:31

god.

15:31

>> Who was so good now?

15:32

>> Was it Joe Joe Lozison, I want to say?

15:35

Was that was the guy 155 guy? Really

15:38

good grappler. Wasn't his thing? Like he

15:40

was obsessed with video games and then

15:41

he went, "I got to just do something

15:43

else instead of this." So he just did

15:44

jiu-jitsu and then just got like amazing

15:46

at jiu-jitsu. I swear I think that was

15:49

his story. I could be misremembering

15:51

this, but I swear I heard him talk about

15:52

this in an interview once and that they

15:54

was just like, I just played video games

15:56

all day, all night. And then eventually

15:57

I was like, I got to do something

15:58

productive with this. And so he just

16:00

started doing jiu-jitsu instead.

16:01

>> I wonder what he's up to these days. He

16:03

was a fun guy.

16:04

>> He was a fun fighter to watch.

16:05

>> Fun fun dude like in person, too. him

16:08

and his brother used to beat the [ __ ]

16:09

out of each other on the yard, like in

16:11

the front yard. They would have like

16:12

full-on MMA fights, like full power.

16:14

>> They just beat the piss out of each

16:16

other in the front yard. I was like,

16:17

"Boys,

16:20

>> save it." Like, "Save I whailing on each

16:22

other." It's crazy.

16:24

>> That's a young man's game.

16:25

>> They had like a bunch of guys hanging

16:26

around. It looked like it was a picnic

16:28

or something like that. They decided,

16:29

"Let's spice this picnic up. You and me

16:31

fight, motherfucker." And they would

16:32

fight like fight fight. But all across

16:34

this country, there are boys fighting in

16:37

their yard. And that was of the highest

16:40

level of yard fighting. I mean, that was

16:42

top 1%.

16:43

>> Oh, that was two two like legit MMA

16:46

professionals.

16:47

>> Yeah. Two legit MMA professionals are

16:49

mad at each other because they're in the

16:51

house with each other all the time. Shut

16:52

the [ __ ] You didn't [ __ ] do that.

16:54

You [ __ ] You were supposed to put

16:56

that [ __ ] away.

16:57

>> Yeah. Yeah. That was uh You ate my food.

17:01

>> Yeah. next.

17:02

>> They both ended up being real fun

17:04

fighters to watch, though.

17:05

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Joe was awesome. He was

17:07

a great fighter.

17:08

>> Yeah, he had a lot of fights in the UFC,

17:10

too.

17:11

>> Yep.

17:11

>> And I think it got to, you know,

17:14

um, how many years was he in? I go, God,

17:18

it's I want to say he was at least in

17:19

the UFC for like around a decade.

17:22

>> He was Yeah, he had a pretty long

17:23

career.

17:24

>> Yeah,

17:24

>> because he was fighting I mean, he

17:26

fought

17:28

I don't know. I mean, he fought like the

17:30

whole uh like I think when he started

17:32

was like BJ Penn era of lightweight and

17:34

then he fought into like Anthony Pettis

17:36

was the champion.

17:38

>> Pull up Lozison's Wikipedia, find out

17:40

when he retired.

17:41

>> Oh, his first fight was September 23rd,

17:44

2006 and I think it's his last fight was

17:46

2019.

17:47

>> Wow,

17:48

>> that's crazy. 2019.

17:52

Some of these guys just don't they just

17:54

don't want to stop. It's just too fun.

17:56

It's a very hard uh job to keep going

18:00

for a while.

18:01

>> Maybe the hardest.

18:02

>> Yeah.

18:03

>> You know, like on your body.

18:04

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah.

18:05

>> Other than football. There's a lot of

18:07

those guys in the NFL. They only last a

18:09

couple years.

18:10

>> Yeah, for sure. This episode is brought

18:11

to you by Into It Turboax. April 15th is

18:15

coming fast. There's been so many tax

18:17

law changes this year, which means

18:19

you're going to need an expert who has

18:21

your back. You're in luck. Turboax now

18:24

has in-person locations nationwide. Walk

18:28

into their tech enabled stores and meet

18:30

face tof face with a Turboax fullervice

18:33

expert who will get your best outcome.

18:37

Your expert works to get you every

18:39

dollar you deserve while updating you as

18:41

you go about your day. Head to

18:44

turboax.com

18:46

to find a store near you. No, I mean

18:48

that's a real tough one, but there's

18:50

nothing Well, I guess I guess like

18:53

professional football, there's a similar

18:54

aspect to where like you're not just I

18:57

mean, look, you can go to the hospital

18:58

from basketball, you know, you can get

19:01

hurt and get a bad injury, but the NFL

19:04

or the UFC, you kind of like, you know,

19:07

every time you go into it, like there's

19:09

a very reasonable chance you're leaving

19:11

here on a stretcher to go to the

19:12

hospital. But particularly with MMA,

19:16

it's the most unforgiving sport where

19:18

like you you're one mistake, one mistake

19:22

away from like, you know, like if LeBron

19:24

James misses a wide open layup, he runs

19:26

back on defense and tries to, you know,

19:28

get a block or something on the next

19:29

play. But in MMA, you could be

19:31

dominating, fighting a perfect fight,

19:33

make one mistake, and it's like, okay,

19:35

you're unconscious now. Maybe

19:39

perfect example.

19:40

>> Yep.

19:40

>> Camaro's way ahead in the fight. It's in

19:42

the fifth round. I think there's like 20

19:44

seconds to go or something crazy. And

19:46

Leon just plants one. A perfect head

19:49

kick. Yeah. And it was the per and John

19:51

Anick makes the perfect call, you know,

19:54

like something had been said about him

19:56

maybe deciding, you know, to quit. And

19:59

then John Anick says, "But that is not

20:01

the cloth from which he was cut."

20:02

>> Yeah.

20:03

>> Boom. Headkick knockout. It's like, come

20:05

on, man. Is this real?

20:06

>> One of the most amazing MMA championship

20:09

knockouts ever.

20:09

>> Oh, ever. Ever. And then just his his

20:12

post-fight speech, look at me now. Look

20:15

at me now.

20:17

>> And then comes back and wins the rubber

20:19

match.

20:19

>> Yeah.

20:20

>> Which was like it's an interesting

20:21

thing. Um how much you know like well

20:24

first off like getting knocked out cold

20:26

like that and you know better than me

20:27

but like that does a number to your body

20:29

like that's not you're not

20:31

>> psychologically.

20:32

>> Well psychologically and also I think

20:34

physically. Um, and then also just like

20:36

the confidence that that gave Leon

20:38

Edwards going into the next fight like

20:40

just changes everything now.

20:42

>> Um,

20:42

>> yeah,

20:44

>> Camaro had to be very careful cuz he

20:45

knew at any I mean he dodged most of the

20:49

big ones until the big one landed. Yep.

20:51

So in his head in that fight he had a

20:54

narrative and that narrative completely

20:56

changed with one headkick. So going into

20:57

the next fight the narrative is now if

21:00

you [ __ ] up you will be unconscious. You

21:02

can't get knocked unconscious again. and

21:03

he fought much more cautiously. Yeah. In

21:05

the second fight,

21:07

>> I remember seeing that with um I felt

21:09

like you could watch that when uh Dustin

21:11

Porier fought Conor McGregor the second

21:13

time like you know McGregor had knocked

21:15

him out years earlier

21:16

>> and you could kind of see you know like

21:19

you could see Dustin I'm not saying like

21:21

he was nervous or anything. He's like

21:22

one of the greatest fighters ever. But

21:24

you could kind of just see like he gets

21:26

in there and he starts and he takes a

21:27

couple shots from Connor and he's still

21:29

there, you know, and then he lands a

21:31

couple shots and you could see like in

21:32

that first round like his confidence

21:35

growing. Like you almost got to get that

21:37

out of your head that it's like, "Yeah,

21:38

yeah, yeah, that guy beat you there back

21:40

then, but you're a different guy now."

21:42

>> Well, with Connor, it's all about

21:44

weathering the initial storm. The

21:46

initial storm is crazy. He's so

21:47

explosive, so fast, so accurate. And

21:51

then another part about that second

21:53

fight was Dustin setting up those calf

21:56

kicks

21:57

>> specifically because both of those guys

21:59

fight southpaw. And when you both fight

22:01

southpaw, if you're a southpaw like

22:03

Dustin, a lot of times the calf kick's

22:05

not really available. Like you have to

22:07

you have to throw it with a switch or it

22:09

doesn't have the same sort of potential.

22:11

It's a slightly different potential when

22:13

you exchanging it in combinations. But

22:15

with Connor, it was wide open because

22:17

Connor has two things going on. one is

22:19

his southpaw. Also, he had just gotten

22:21

off the Floyd Mayweather fight. He's

22:23

very boxing heavy, not just, but a while

22:25

back, but he had really concentrated on

22:28

his striking with his hands. His his

22:30

hands were elite. So, because of that,

22:32

your stance is a little wider and you're

22:34

putting a little bit more weight on your

22:36

legs,

22:37

>> you know, and he always had a wide

22:38

stance anyway. He had that karate

22:40

stance. The craziest thing about that is

22:42

the calf kick really didn't become a big

22:44

deal

22:46

>> even until Connor was a superstar.

22:49

>> Like it was after that.

22:50

>> That's how recent it is.

22:52

>> Yeah. It's very strange that that was

22:53

almost like a thing that didn't get

22:54

figured out until so recently and then

22:57

just totally changed everything. Like at

22:59

this point you rare, not saying you

23:00

never see it, but you pretty rarely see

23:02

guys kick guys in the thigh anymore.

23:05

Well, no, but I mean like compared to

23:06

what it used to be, where it used to be

23:08

like that was that was what a leg kick

23:11

was for many years in MMA and now it's

23:14

I'd say like the majority of leg kicks

23:16

are are targeting the calf. Yeah. Like

23:18

you'll see almost like a thigh kick

23:19

almost just to switch it up a little

23:21

bit.

23:22

>> This guy's got really good at taking

23:23

those.

23:24

>> Yeah, he got really good at being

23:25

conditioned. And you know, we also saw a

23:27

few leg breaks,

23:28

>> right? We saw the Anderson Silva one. We

23:30

saw the Chris Weidman one. There's been

23:32

there's been a few leg breaks from guys

23:34

just full power leg kicking the the

23:37

thigh and then someone just lifts up

23:38

their knee a little bit and takes it on

23:40

the right where the shin bone meets the

23:42

kneecap is where they like to catch it.

23:45

And boy, I've seen way too many of

23:47

those. I've seen a bunch in person, but

23:49

because of the internet, I've seen

23:51

dozens and dozens of small promotions

23:54

where a guy throws that kick wrong

23:56

really hard and the guy checks it and

23:59

his [ __ ] foot just wraps around the

24:02

leg and you see it dangling there.

24:04

You're like, "Oh no." You recognize the

24:07

thing like that injury is so

24:10

recognizable. Like I've seen it so many

24:12

times now. I see it. I just go, "Oh,

24:14

it's going to wrap around the calf.

24:16

>> It's going to flop. He's going to fall

24:17

down.

24:18

>> I've seen it several times on internet

24:20

videos and in UFC fights. I've only once

24:22

seen a guy continue to talk [ __ ] about

24:24

the other guy after from the ground,

24:27

which is the craziest [ __ ] ever, dude.

24:29

Everyone else I've seen is like crying

24:31

in pain. And Connor's talking about your

24:33

wife's whatever DMs.

24:36

>> Jesus Christ.

24:36

>> Yeah. He asked me to come and sit down

24:38

with him and do a podcast.

24:41

>> He's an animal.

24:43

>> I mean, the dude's one of a kind. He's

24:45

one of a kind. He apparently made a post

24:47

on his uh Instagram saying he's back

24:50

>> and uh if it's true that would be

24:52

awesome. The idea is his uh suspension

24:56

for whatever he took before is up.

24:59

>> So

25:00

>> I remember

25:01

>> yay.

25:01

>> What was it? Something uh

25:03

>> was someone I think it was Douglas

25:04

Murray when he wrote that article about

25:06

me. He said

25:07

>> Mr. Confidence returns

25:10

to save fighting again. Call your

25:12

grandma. Nanny, we did it. Watch and pay

25:15

me. [ __ ] you. Pay me, you fat Irish

25:18

prick. You don't have my money. I put

25:20

your brain to sleep. Who's that? What's

25:22

that about? Who's he talking about? Uh C

25:25

is in the casinos after the Mac loves

25:27

you is all. I got love for you. It's an

25:31

all. It's an honor. It's light work.

25:34

It's easy for life and eternity. It's

25:37

McGregor. How drunk was he when he wrote

25:38

this?

25:41

I do this fight game. Easy peasy. The

25:43

sound of my shots off the head go bing

25:46

in green dot laser form.

25:49

Okay.

25:51

Well, I really hope he is actually back.

25:55

I hope it's true. It'd be fun to see him

25:58

back.

25:59

>> It'd be a lot of fun.

26:00

>> Greatest personality the sports ever

26:01

known. That's right. There's no one even

26:03

close.

26:04

>> I mean, he's the most dynamic

26:05

personality the sport's ever known. And

26:08

he was um for for a time there just such

26:12

an unbelievable fighter. I mean he was

26:14

like just it was incredible what he was

26:16

doing.

26:16

>> Danny Alvarez fight.

26:18

>> Oh yeah. I was there. I was there. Well,

26:20

thanks to you. Uh with really good

26:21

really good seats. Thanks to you. Uh but

26:23

that was that was one of the best that

26:25

might be the best fight I've ever been

26:26

to live cuz that whole card was just

26:28

stacked and that as the main event was

26:30

just unbelievable,

26:31

>> bro. He was in the matrix. He was in the

26:33

matrix. He was just in the zone. You

26:36

know, Dana said it best. He's like,

26:38

"That kid eats pressure." He goes, "He

26:41

eats it." Yeah. Like he thrives on

26:43

pressure. Pressure that makes other

26:44

people wilt, he like shines under that

26:47

pressure. and he had an amazing ability

26:49

even very early in his career which was

26:51

like kind of it it was really unique

26:53

like because even like on his first

26:54

fight ever if you watch his first fight

26:56

in the UFC um against uh like Brimage I

26:59

think the guy's name is

27:00

>> and he was a relatively unknown at the

27:03

time but dude the place is going nut he

27:06

already had made so much kind of like

27:08

street cred for himself and then the

27:10

Irish thing like the Irish were really

27:12

really into it but he from the very

27:13

first fight he would always create these

27:16

moments where it's Like, dude, this is

27:17

going to be the biggest spectacle that

27:19

you, my opponent, has ever been in in

27:21

their career. Like, I'm going to get you

27:23

mad with [ __ ] talking. I'm going to get

27:24

the fans so excited

27:26

>> because he's completely comfortable

27:27

there.

27:28

>> Like, I'm not sure if you're really

27:30

comfortable here, but I'm And so, it

27:31

would and even with with Aldo,

27:33

>> who had been the entire division.

27:35

>> He would literally when they started the

27:37

division, they started him as champion.

27:38

He didn't even win it. He came in

27:40

because they absolved the WC. So, he was

27:43

the entire featherweight division. had

27:45

just dominated everyone and he even

27:47

created such a moment that like like

27:50

Aldo was like uh

27:51

>> he was the boogeyman.

27:53

>> Yeah, dude. He was incredible. So, still

27:54

he's one of the greatest featherweights

27:56

of all time.

27:57

>> But he got him to the point where he was

27:58

like so furious that he was like I want

28:00

to take this [ __ ] guy's head off and

28:02

then Connor's just like relaxed. He's

28:04

like like he he didn't care about any of

28:06

the [ __ ] talking. He was just like,

28:07

"Yeah, we're having fun.

28:08

>> Let's play."

28:09

>> He lost his composure. Yeah. And he he

28:11

looked he looked very overwhelmed by the

28:13

moment. And oh, and by the way,

28:16

everyone from Ireland came to Vegas for

28:19

that fight. It was the nuttiest thing

28:20

I've ever seen in my [ __ ] life. The

28:23

entire Mandandalay Bay was overcome with

28:27

Irish people. I mean, overcome like you

28:30

couldn't move. There was nothing but

28:32

Irish people everywhere. And they were

28:34

singing. They were all singing together

28:36

in the halls of this gigantic casino

28:40

packed bump like they're waiting in line

28:42

for something. And they were just there

28:44

partying for Connor.

28:46

>> I remember I think it was when I want to

28:48

say it was when

28:48

>> Look at all these people.

28:49

>> Yeah, it was nuts, dude.

28:50

>> Bro, this is nuts, man. They're all

28:52

Irish people. Like, you got to realize

28:55

nobody had a following like him.

28:58

>> Like, this is actually Irish people for

29:00

the Floyd Mayweather fight. They were

29:02

still ride or die with him even for that

29:04

fight.

29:04

>> I I think it was when he fought Dennis

29:06

Siver, I want to say.

29:08

>> I think that was in Boston.

29:09

>> So, I went to I went with uh Lewis J.

29:11

Gomez, my good friend. hilarious

29:13

comedian. Um, and he, me and him went to

29:16

some Irish bar to watch, like we just

29:18

happened to be in Midtown Manhattan and

29:20

we were like, "Oh, the fights are coming

29:21

on." Oh, they're playing it at this bar.

29:23

You know, it was just like an Irish pub.

29:24

>> And dude, I mean, it wasn't even that

29:26

big of a bar. They must have I mean, it

29:28

was shouldertoshoulder

29:30

Irish people losing their [ __ ] minds.

29:34

Like it was the it was the most fun

29:35

environment to watch a fight in cuz

29:37

they're just I mean they're just like

29:39

but all that singing and chanting. It

29:41

seemed like everyone had an Irish flag

29:43

with them like

29:44

>> it was it was this in a in a little bar.

29:46

It was this

29:47

>> that's nuts, man. Look at that. That's

29:50

Mandalay Bay.

29:51

>> Wow.

29:52

>> Look at this.

29:53

>> Oh, that's MGM.

29:55

>> Well, they were everywhere. They were

29:57

probably at every [ __ ] casino there

29:58

was.

29:59

>> This is crazy.

30:04

imagine imagine if you you're from

30:07

Northern Ireland

30:11

>> and you like you still still remember

30:14

the troubles and you make your way to

30:17

the hotel just came to Vegas for a

30:18

little gambling you don't follow MMA you

30:21

had no [ __ ] idea what's this all

30:23

about

30:25

>> I have picked the wrong [ __ ] week for

30:27

me vacation

30:30

>> oh by the way I was going to say that uh

30:32

Douglas Murray's big knock on me when he

30:34

wrote his op-ed in the New York Post was

30:36

he goes he goes you know Dave goes on

30:37

Joe Rogan and he talks about foreign

30:39

policy like he's an expert but I bet he

30:40

wouldn't go in there and talk MMA with

30:42

him because then Joe would recognize

30:43

he's not an expert and I was like

30:45

>> we do that all the time that every so

30:49

>> I was like almost every time we hang out

30:51

we end up talking MMA and like it

30:54

probably is fair that yeah there'll be

30:55

moments where you'll correct me if I get

30:57

something wrong

30:58

>> so what

30:58

>> but if I get it right you don't go

31:00

you're not an expert dumb Imagine we

31:02

don't talk about MMA because you're not

31:04

an expert. That's so silly.

31:06

>> Well, I watch a lot of it. I have some

31:08

thoughts.

31:08

>> Why is he so silly? I love Douglas. I

31:11

really do. I've enjoyed talking to him.

31:12

I think he's a brilliant man. But I was

31:14

very disappointed with uh You've never

31:16

been very disappointed with that that

31:19

sort of strategy that you shouldn't be

31:21

talking about these things that are

31:22

factual. But even more disappointed with

31:24

that notion, the notion that like you

31:25

would never talk about MMA with me. Like

31:28

you think we would I first first of all

31:30

I don't think I argue about MMA with

31:33

anybody. I don't think anybody if

31:36

someone has a point about MMA I don't I

31:38

never argue. I might say you've

31:41

corrected me when I've gotten things

31:42

wrong. Yeah. Or I might say I dis like

31:44

somebody think some people think that c

31:46

a certain thing is going to happen and

31:47

I'm like oo I don't see that. I

31:49

disagree. That happens.

31:52

>> Sure. But

31:53

>> well, also like it's the whatever point

31:57

you're making is either a good point or

31:58

it's not a good point if it's like an

32:00

objective claim. You know what I mean?

32:02

So like if I if I say like uh you know

32:04

when when Vulcganowski fought Lopez, his

32:07

jab was crucial.

32:09

>> Okay, that's either correct or it's

32:10

incorrect. Like whether I'm an expert or

32:13

not, I'm not an expert on fighting.

32:15

>> Gez, you could watch the fight and that

32:16

would be correct.

32:17

>> Yes. Right. So it's I saw he hit a home

32:19

run. You're right. Yes, there you go.

32:22

That's crazy.

32:22

>> Well, I you know was a weird a weird

32:24

thing during that show was um because

32:27

it's a weird I don't know there's like

32:28

weird incentives in built into like all

32:31

>> incentives. Incentives are the right

32:33

word because there's a lot of people

32:34

that are saying things and you go why

32:36

are you saying that?

32:37

>> Yeah. Well, also from my perspective, I

32:40

was a little disappointed with it

32:41

because I kind of thought I was like,

32:42

"Oh, this could be like a really cool

32:44

thing." And and it had been literally,

32:46

which I don't think I'm saying anything

32:47

that is like betraying confidence here,

32:50

but the only thing that was ever said to

32:52

me, I remember you called me and you

32:53

were like, "What do you think about

32:54

doing this?" And I think I said yes

32:55

before you could finish answering the

32:57

question. Yes, absolutely. Let's do

32:58

that. Um, and then you told me that he

33:03

had said, "Hey, he really doesn't want

33:06

this to devolve into like a food fight.

33:08

He wants to make this like a good faith

33:09

thing." And I was like, "Oh,

33:11

>> awesome." And now I feel like he like

33:13

Trump Witoff negotiated me. Like he's

33:16

negot he was cuz then he came in and the

33:17

whole thing was about me. He didn't want

33:19

to talk about the issues at all. He just

33:20

want And so in a weird way I was like,

33:22

"Well, this sucks cuz I thought we could

33:23

have had a really cool thing." But then

33:25

there was this other part of me that was

33:26

like I mean he's really just handing

33:28

this to me. You know what I mean? Like

33:30

he kind of just like gave me the win in

33:34

in a thing that was a big show with a

33:36

like a you know a lot of people I knew

33:38

were going to watch it. I mean obviously

33:39

every time I do your show a lot of

33:40

people are going to watch it but that

33:41

was a particularly big one.

33:43

>> Yeah.

33:43

>> And so I was kind of almost like for the

33:45

first 45 minutes of it I was kind of

33:47

sitting there like oh I can't believe he

33:49

just he went this route. Well, if you

33:52

look at it objectively, there weren't a

33:55

lot of options, right? Yeah. It's very

33:57

difficult to argue the side that what

34:00

they're do doing like we were talking

34:02

about Gaza in particular.

34:04

>> Yeah. like like the arguing that that's

34:06

not horrific

34:08

and if you're a human being and you

34:10

recognize that there are human beings

34:13

that are subjected to that government

34:15

just like you're subjected to ICE you're

34:18

subjected to homeland security you're

34:20

subject you're subjected to the cops if

34:22

you're a civilian you have to listen to

34:25

these orders so if you're living in Gaza

34:27

and you're a child or you're a woman and

34:30

you live you're not Hamas okay and the

34:32

idea that you're responsible for oto

34:33

October 7th. Even if you're one of the

34:37

people that cheered in the street, boy,

34:39

don't you think you kind of have to

34:41

cheer in the street if everybody else is

34:42

cheering the street? If you're [ __ ]

34:44

in terror for your life and you have to

34:47

like keep your safety intact, like you

34:50

got to kind of go along with whatever

34:51

everybody else is doing. I'm not saying

34:53

it's that's good, but when you look at

34:56

how that place is leveled, I mean, the

35:01

most recent videos that I've seen were

35:03

still like a few months old. So, I don't

35:04

know if it stopped. Did they stop

35:06

bombing? I don't know what's going on.

35:07

>> No, they've slowed down a bit, but they

35:09

haven't stopped.

35:09

>> Okay. It there was nothing left, man.

35:12

And that represents people's homes. That

35:15

represents schools. That represents

35:17

hospitals. There's no way you can argue

35:20

that that's not horrific. Yeah.

35:22

>> So, he was stuck.

35:23

>> That's right. That's right. It's kind of

35:24

indefensible. And so, instead, you pivot

35:27

to arguing against this guy rather than

35:29

against the issue. Well, I think that um

35:32

you know, it's in I can't remember if

35:34

this was in the letter to America or

35:36

this was in his declaration of war

35:38

against America, but Osama bin Laden

35:40

literally said that uh civilians are

35:44

fair targets because you guys have

35:47

elections and you vote for these

35:49

politicians and they're the ones who

35:51

conduct these wars that that slaughter

35:53

innocent Muslims. So like just saying

35:55

it's the logic of Osama bin Laden to say

35:58

that civilians are responsible for what

36:00

and in Gaza like they don't even really

36:02

have a government. Hamas is not a

36:04

government. They don't have regular

36:05

elections. They had one election back in

36:07

' 05 or ' 06 or whatever it was which

36:09

Hamas did not even win uh majorities of.

36:13

They they won on pluralities. You know

36:15

what I mean? And so the idea that you're

36:18

holding these people responsible for

36:20

Hamas just doesn't make any sense. And

36:22

just on a very basic human level, you

36:24

just kind of go, and I'm not like an

36:26

egalitarian. I'm not saying all people

36:28

are equal or all cultures are equal or

36:30

anything like that, but on a very basic

36:32

human level, like those are real people,

36:34

too. And when a mother is like pulling

36:37

her six-year-old dead body out of the

36:40

rubble, that's the same exact experience

36:42

as if your wife was pulling your

36:45

six-year-old out of there. Like that

36:46

same thing is happening to her. And once

36:48

you even just admit that it does change

36:51

the calculation, it changes the

36:53

calculation to be like, okay, look, the

36:55

onus is on you to demonstrate that this

36:58

is absolutely necessary. Like there is

37:01

no other option than to do it this way.

37:03

And that makes defending most wars very

37:06

difficult. Not all of them, you know,

37:08

but most wars are very difficult to

37:11

defend if you just run it through that

37:13

filter of like, is there any other

37:14

option other than this? Have you

37:16

exhausted everything else? And then of

37:18

course in the case with Israel and

37:20

Palestine, you go, "Oh, you never even

37:21

tried to just give them their

37:22

independence. You've never tried to just

37:25

let them out from this occupation and

37:26

see if maybe that will improve things."

37:29

And the answer is no.

37:31

>> Crazy that the world didn't at one point

37:34

in time stand up and say, "There's a

37:36

simple solution here.

37:38

>> Like these people should have a state.

37:39

Like why do you get to control them, but

37:41

they're not Israeli? like they're

37:43

they're a kind of a country

37:46

>> but not really cuz they're attached to

37:48

you.

37:49

>> Yeah. It's people

37:50

>> Why don't you guys go buy another

37:52

country and give it to them and let them

37:54

have a country or

37:55

>> Yeah.

37:56

>> They don't like being attached on the

37:58

same small patch of dirt to people that

38:00

have a totally different ideology, I

38:02

guess.

38:02

>> Well, that's right. And that look, I

38:04

mean, it's just

38:05

>> But we are.

38:06

>> Yeah.

38:06

>> We have Canadians right there.

38:08

>> Yes. But Canadians, Canadians do get

38:10

citizenship in their own country. You

38:12

know,

38:12

>> they get citizenship here, too. Boy,

38:14

that's the last thing I looking for is

38:16

[ __ ] Canadians. They're like,

38:17

>> "Oh, yeah. Your visa's expired and don't

38:20

worry about it, buddy. Get on the

38:21

plane."

38:21

>> They'd probably have a much easier time.

38:23

Like, Canadians will go, "All right,

38:24

guess I got to go."

38:25

>> Well, yeah. Also, they can just ditch

38:28

the accent and pretend they're Americans

38:30

and everybody will buy it if I don't say

38:32

about wrong.

38:33

>> Yeah.

38:33

>> You, you know, they could just say,

38:34

"Aha, sorry. I don't have my license on

38:36

me."

38:37

>> Yeah, that's true. Yeah. Like, okay,

38:38

buddy, where you from? I live in Iowa.

38:41

Okay, sounds right.

38:42

>> That does check out.

38:42

>> Get out of here.

38:43

>> All right.

38:44

>> [ __ ] that does check out.

38:45

>> You see the [ __ ] that's going on in the

38:46

airports? So, are they using

38:48

>> They're using ICE now at the airports

38:51

because first of all, how many ICE

38:53

agents are there? Aren't they busy?

38:55

>> How do you have time to put them in all

38:56

the airports? How many [ __ ] airports?

38:57

>> It's in the low tens of thousands.

38:59

There's not that many of them,

39:00

>> right? So, like, how many airports are

39:01

there? There's a lot of airports. Okay.

39:04

So, you're putting ice in the airports.

39:06

Where are you getting all these ice

39:07

guys? Are you hiring new ice guys to

39:09

take the airport jobs? Like is this like

39:12

it takes seven weeks to train them? So,

39:14

do they have like a surplus of like a

39:16

ice factory where they're turnurning

39:18

them out and putting them out there?

39:19

>> I heard So, I didn't see any of them. I

39:21

flew out here the other day. Uh, and I

39:23

didn't see any of them, but then I did

39:24

see people saying that they were at the

39:26

the airport I flew out from later that

39:28

day.

39:28

>> Up to 150. That's not a lot. Immigration

39:31

and Customs Enforcement officers were

39:33

deployed at airports across the United

39:35

States on Monday. So I of course, you

39:38

know, you get on social media, somebody

39:40

sends you something and somebody sent me

39:42

something. I'm not sure if it was true,

39:43

but it was like, look at the difference

39:45

between the lines at the airport before

39:47

ICE was there and after ICE was there

39:50

and tell me that only 10 million illegal

39:52

aliens got in.

39:56

They're like, they're like, "What is the

39:58

real We were talking about this last

40:00

night, like what's the real number?

40:03

>> What is the real number of illegals in

40:05

the United States?"

40:06

>> We don't know.

40:06

>> You were saying something about Anne

40:07

Coulter.

40:08

>> Yeah. Well, she had um and this was from

40:10

a while ago. So, this was well, she had

40:13

she had in her book, Adios America, she

40:16

had I believe it was from Bayer Sterns.

40:18

I could be wrong. Double check now. It

40:20

was one one of the big finance companies

40:22

that they had put a thing where like

40:24

they put it between like 30 and 50

40:26

million um total in the country.

40:28

>> Jeez.

40:29

>> And 50 is wild.

40:31

>> Yeah. And this is before Joe Biden and

40:32

them now. I don't know. Maybe maybe they

40:34

got those numbers wrong.

40:35

>> This is before So what year was this

40:36

book?

40:37

>> Uh I want to say 2014 2015.

40:40

>> Oh my god. That's 10 years ago.

40:42

>> Yeah. Yeah. A lot of them a lot of them

40:44

have come in since then.

40:45

>> Well, at least 10 million they believe

40:47

came in through the Biden

40:48

administration. So over four years.

40:50

>> Well, I remember the numbers being like

40:52

during the Biden administration where

40:54

they'd be like it was something like

40:55

last month there were 700,000 border

40:59

apprehensions and you're like, well,

41:01

geez, then how many were just floating

41:03

and you'd see those big caravans coming

41:05

in and stuff. I mean, look, it's a huge

41:07

that that still is a a huge scandal. Um,

41:10

and as much as I uh have really been

41:13

really criticizing Trump and the Trump

41:14

administration since last summer, um,

41:18

you know, he he's done a good job in

41:20

securing the border. That is the one

41:22

thing that like you kind of got to give

41:23

him and he got that secured like right

41:24

away. But even

41:26

>> even if you think that it should be open

41:30

and those people should be able to

41:31

travel freely, they should. There's no

41:34

one's illegal on stolen land, that kind

41:36

of [ __ ] Mhm.

41:37

>> You know how much sex trafficking

41:38

happened during that time of children?

41:40

You know how many children were

41:41

trafficked that way? You know how many

41:43

children were dragged across the border

41:44

and sold to psychopaths?

41:47

>> Oh, yeah. Oh, it was horrible. I mean, I

41:49

saw um Oh, there's an with at least 15

41:52

>> at least 50 million illegals in the

41:55

country today. See my book Adios America

41:57

for the analysis from Pulitzer

41:59

Prizewinning reporters and numbers

42:00

crunchers from Bear Sto.

42:02

>> I was right. It was Bear Sto.

42:03

>> This is 2022 this post. Wow. The book is

42:06

even older though.

42:07

>> The book is like the book is from before

42:09

I I want to say 2015, but it's it's

42:11

around then. Is crazy.

42:14

>> Uh that's crazy.

42:16

>> Supposedly, this is the book that uh got

42:19

Donald Trump on the immigration issue.

42:22

Uh at least I've heard I've heard Anne

42:24

Coulter say that before. Maybe that's

42:25

right. Maybe that's not right. But um

42:28

but yeah, I mean look, it's like it's

42:30

also a particularly it's a it's a

42:32

profound

42:34

like act of of treachery for a

42:38

government to do that to its own country

42:42

>> like to to allow that and and really

42:44

facilitate that to happen against the

42:46

will of the domestic population. Like if

42:49

if you were to I I've tried to look this

42:50

up before. I was trying to figure this

42:52

out cuz I did a big immigration debate

42:53

last year um or maybe the year before

42:55

and I was trying you can't even get

42:57

numbers on what the polling on open

42:59

borders is cuz no one even asked the

43:01

question in polling because it's like

43:03

they ask like do you think immigration

43:04

policy should be less restrictive or

43:06

more restrictive cuz cuz the number of

43:09

people who support open it's like maybe

43:11

1% of the country supports that. It's as

43:13

unified an issue as anyone could have

43:15

that. No, you can't just have the border

43:17

wide open, right? And so to do that to

43:19

the American people against the like you

43:21

you drastically change the country in a

43:24

way that is not really it's not easy to

43:28

just undo. I mean as we've seen right

43:30

Donald Trump backed off of mass

43:31

deportations almost immediately um

43:34

because big business doesn't want it and

43:36

then because look like the level of

43:38

violence that you'd need to just

43:41

physically deport 50 million people is

43:44

going to be something that the American

43:45

people just aren't going to put up with.

43:46

I mean, you even see in in Minnesota and

43:48

and rightfully so. I completely

43:50

understand it that you see like, you

43:52

know, I saw one thing. I saw that Trump

43:54

had asked the ICE agents who were going

43:56

to the airports to not wear their masks

43:59

>> and I was like, is that even a that's

44:00

even a an option? Why would they be

44:03

masked in the airport?

44:04

>> Because they're ICE agents because they

44:06

get doxed.

44:06

>> Well, that's their concern. And look, I

44:08

understand that. That's a real concern.

44:09

>> I understand that concern organized, but

44:11

at the same time, you know, there is a

44:13

balancing act there. And you know, a lot

44:15

of people, like a lot of right-wingers,

44:16

will say, "Hey, look, if you're, you

44:18

know, if you came here illegally, then

44:19

that's a crime. You're here illegally.

44:21

That's the law." And hey, I get that

44:23

argument. But also, the supreme law of

44:25

the land is the Constitution of the

44:27

United States of America. And I've seen

44:29

a ton of videos where there were masked

44:31

ICE agents, not even identifying

44:33

themselves, going up to people telling

44:35

them that you have to answer my

44:37

questions. You don't have an option to

44:38

walk away, which is like not true. That

44:40

was my take on it is that you can't

44:42

accept people that are masked, that

44:45

don't have any paperwork, that don't

44:47

have a warrant on the streets in

44:49

militarized situations because if

44:52

they're using it for this, which you

44:54

agree to, that opens up the door for

44:57

them to use it because you won't take

44:58

your vaccine or because you did this or

45:01

did that or whatever the [ __ ] it is. If

45:03

a different person gets in power, maybe

45:05

they're going to use it for something

45:06

you don't support. It's just not

45:08

something you're supposed to accept.

45:09

>> That's right. You don't want to hear

45:10

something that someone told me that is

45:13

uh this is a very credible source that I

45:15

can't reveal what the source is

45:16

>> but they told me that there are people

45:19

in this country and not just a few but

45:22

many many that are affiliated with

45:25

terrorist organizations

45:27

directly affiliated but they've applied

45:30

for asylum and because they've applied

45:33

for asylum you can't deport them until

45:35

they go through the entire process. That

45:38

is wild.

45:39

>> That is wild. So, there's people that

45:41

are known at least terrorist

45:44

sympathizers. They're in communic direct

45:46

communication with terror terrorist

45:48

networks. They've done things with

45:50

terrorist networks and they've applied

45:53

for asylum. So, you have to go through

45:54

this long ass process through the legal

45:57

system and it's up to a judge whether or

46:00

not this person who may or may not be a

46:03

part of a [ __ ] sleeper cell gets to

46:06

stay in America.

46:08

Yeah,

46:08

>> suicidal empathy. That's what Gad Sad

46:11

calls it, you know, and I think he's

46:12

right.

46:13

>> I think he's got a fair point there with

46:15

suicidal empathy in terms of the idea of

46:18

like that we that we cannot say on some

46:23

level that it's like no, look, we have a

46:25

desire to preserve our society and we we

46:28

want to do what's bad and we don't have

46:29

to out of some feeling of guilt turn our

46:32

country into something worse than what

46:34

it otherwise would be. So, I think he's

46:35

got a point there. I think and look, I'm

46:38

not a big fan of Gad. He uh literally

46:40

just him and like Sam Harris and a few

46:43

others, they literally just trash me all

46:45

the time and refuse to engage on a

46:47

single thing I've said. So like it'll

46:49

just be doesn't engage with you. He

46:50

calls me Wikipedia Dave

46:53

>> on Twitter and it's a Well, look, I

46:55

>> I like the guy.

46:56

>> Look, I have a different relationship

46:57

with him than you do.

46:58

>> Well, that's true. And I'm a big critic

46:59

of Israel and he's a MSAD agent. So

47:01

there is that. That is part of

47:03

>> You think he is? He's admitted that he

47:05

worked for Assad

47:06

>> in the past.

47:07

>> Yes. Yeah. He's I guess he would say

47:08

he's not currently retired. Like I used

47:10

to

47:11

>> I used to work for Newport Crearyy. I

47:12

don't represent them anymore.

47:13

>> I think it's a little bit different with

47:15

the MSAD thing. But I also think that

47:18

the the big component that I think all

47:20

of those guys are are missing is that we

47:24

also create more enemies with our

47:26

foreign policy. And that's that's not to

47:29

say that like, you know, they always

47:32

kind of caricature my position on this.

47:34

Like I'm not saying Islam is all

47:35

peaceful and there are no problems in

47:37

the Islamic world or anything like that.

47:39

In fact, I don't think any religion has

47:41

truly always been peaceful. Um but you

47:46

know for guys like say like Sam Harris

47:49

um who these kind of like pretend

47:51

intellectuals who have spent he spent

47:53

his entire career talking about how

47:56

violent and irrational the Muslims are

47:58

and how you can't even draw a cartoon of

48:01

Muhammad or Muslims will want to do

48:03

violent stuff and like hey fair enough

48:05

that's [ __ ] and we should all say

48:06

like if you want to be over here in the

48:08

west our values are free speech and you

48:10

cannot kill people for cartoons but And

48:14

like none of them ever also go, "Hey,

48:18

you know, murdering an Ayatollah

48:21

might be dangerous during Ramadan."

48:24

>> Yeah. Like that is, you know, that is

48:26

not just a political figure to Shiite

48:28

Muslims. That is a So, at the same time,

48:31

it's like, okay, I'm fine with saying,

48:33

okay, you don't want to have suicidal

48:35

empathy. Um my uh my my buddy Keith

48:38

Knight, who's brilliant, uh works over

48:41

at the Libertarian Institute, he had I

48:42

forget what he said, but he he said

48:44

something like, "Okay, I don't want to

48:45

have suicidal empathy. Let's also not

48:47

have homicidal empathy, you know, and so

48:50

like maybe it also is like as we were

48:52

tying into that whole conversation with

48:54

No, I'm okay. Thanks." Um, with the

48:56

whole thing about the the kids and women

48:58

in Gaza, it's like it's also the fact

49:02

that if you just view slaughtering

49:06

Muslim children in the Middle East and

49:08

in Northern Africa as like just an

49:10

acceptable political price, you know,

49:13

that's just collateral damage. And

49:16

unfortunately, that happens when we

49:17

pursue this policy. You're going to deal

49:19

with more and more of that. And the

49:21

combination of both, Joe, like the

49:24

combination of having open borders,

49:26

having all these people get in and

49:28

continuing the war on terrorism and

49:29

slaughtering people in these numbers

49:31

must be the most insane combination

49:33

ever. The idea that you'd be like, we're

49:35

going to uh, you know, we're going to

49:36

just make an entire generation of of

49:39

Muslims hate us because so many of them

49:42

have seen what we've done to their

49:44

countries. And also, we'll welcome all

49:45

of them in with no checks and we can't

49:46

get rid of them when they come here.

49:47

Yeah, that is quite a combination. Yeah,

49:49

it's it's all nuts.

49:52

It's uh the Sam Harris thing. Um I

49:54

should clarify this because he's

49:56

apparently talked about me again

49:57

recently with on Bill Maher. We didn't

50:00

not talk because it was his idea. It was

50:04

me. I He wanted to do a podcast with me.

50:07

He wanted to do a co like a COVID, you

50:11

know, wrapup like to, you know, go over

50:15

everything that happened, all the

50:16

mistakes that were made and his

50:18

position, my position, cuz that's where

50:20

we kind of like separated. It was he was

50:22

very pro- vaccine.

50:24

Um, I said I won't do that until you

50:27

talk to Brett Weinstein.

50:29

>> That you need to talk to Brett. Like

50:32

Brett, you you disparaged him publicly.

50:36

I think you said things that weren't

50:38

correct. You called him a conspiracy

50:39

theorist and you said you wouldn't

50:41

platform him because it's dangerous. I

50:42

don't believe that's true. I I believe

50:45

the problem is that Sam was incorrect

50:48

about both the effectiveness and the

50:50

safety of the co vaccines. Brett was

50:52

correct. And the Brett didn't insult

50:56

Sam. Sam insulted Brett. I mean, Brett

50:58

said things about Sam since, but it was

51:00

it was Sam. And I said, "Look, you got

51:03

to talk to him first. you can't just

51:05

talk to me, you know, especially because

51:07

he's an actual evolutionary biologist.

51:09

Like he he understands these things.

51:12

>> He knows what he's talking about. He's

51:14

had multiple conversations with high

51:17

level vaccinologists and all these

51:19

different people that worked on the MR M

51:21

RNA vaccines. Like he was correct. We

51:24

all know that now. We know that all the

51:27

things that he was talking about,

51:29

whether it's masking doesn't work,

51:31

social distancing, the the lockown,

51:34

lockown, all the above. All the above.

51:37

He didn't want to talk to Brett. And I

51:39

said, "That doesn't make sense to me."

51:40

Like, you talk to everybody. You have

51:42

debates with Muslims on stage. That

51:45

doesn't make any sense. Like, why

51:46

wouldn't you talk to Brett? I don't

51:48

think he wanted to talk to Brett

51:50

>> because I don't I think he didn't want

51:51

to talk to Brett because Brett's right.

51:53

>> Yeah.

51:53

>> I think it's And I I think it's

51:54

indefensible. No, I completely agree. I

51:56

I mean, you know, I had a

51:58

>> By the way, I don't hate Sam. You know,

52:00

he could say all the crazy [ __ ] he

52:01

wants. He also said like, "I don't think

52:02

you should interview Gaddafi." Guess

52:04

what? I would if Gaddafi was alive. 100%

52:08

I would interview Gaddafi. Gaddafi. Do

52:10

you ever hear Russell Crowe talk about

52:11

Gaddafi?

52:12

>> I don't think so.

52:13

>> He did a clip that went viral that was

52:15

on this show where he talked about why

52:17

they wanted to get rid of Gaddafi,

52:19

>> right? And like while they talk talked

52:21

about how evil Gaddafi was and how he

52:23

subjugated his people, you can't see if

52:25

you could find that Russell Crow on

52:27

Gaddafi.

52:29

Um he wanted to create a United States

52:32

of Africa.

52:33

>> Yeah.

52:34

>> He wanted to get him on the gold

52:35

standard. He wanted to get him off the

52:36

US dollar. He like he had some very

52:39

dangerous ideas.

52:41

>> Now he also supported Palestinian

52:42

resistance.

52:43

>> Yeah, that was it.

52:49

There's no sound thing in there. Oh,

52:50

there it is.

52:52

Here it is.

52:55

>> We are taught, for example, to regard

52:57

Gaddafi in a certain way.

52:59

>> Okay. But if you look into what happened

53:02

in his country while he was the leader,

53:05

you look into the fact that every person

53:08

is given a house at a certain age.

53:11

You look at the fact that everybody's

53:13

education and health care is free. You

53:15

look at if somebody showed a particular

53:18

talent for something that required

53:20

further education overseas, all of the

53:23

costs that were paid for by the

53:24

government. Now, these are all things

53:27

put in place by the same country's

53:30

leader that we're told is evil and

53:34

corrupt.

53:35

>> Yeah.

53:36

>> So, it doesn't quite balance.

53:39

>> Well, there's also US government

53:42

interference. That's a that's a That is

53:46

one that we definitely monkeyed with. I

53:48

mean, he ran a foul of the United States

53:50

government. We are taught, for examp,

54:14

>> but laughing. And then that led to it,

54:17

Libya, at least for a while, becoming a

54:19

failed state. Oh, it still is.

54:21

>> It still is this whole time, man. It's

54:23

been a disaster.

54:24

>> This episode is brought to you by

54:25

Visible. Folks, there's one thing nobody

54:28

wants this season, and that's getting

54:30

catfished. And it's not just dating

54:32

profiles that are putting you at risk.

54:35

It's also big wireless carriers. You

54:38

know the type. Looks great at first,

54:39

promises a low price, but once you're

54:41

locked in, surprise fees and an

54:44

expensive bill that isn't what you were

54:46

expecting. Your night and shining armor

54:49

visible wireless. It's oneline wireless

54:53

with unlimited data and hotspot for just

54:56

$25 a month. Taxes and fees included.

55:00

Now that's a green flag. The best part,

55:03

Visible is all digital, so you can

55:05

switch as fast as you can swipe. Don't

55:08

fall for the trap of getting catfished

55:09

by wireless. Visit visible.com to learn

55:13

more and start loving your wireless

55:15

carrier. Terms apply. see visible.com

55:18

for plan features and network management

55:20

details. Um, and there's and you know

55:23

the thing is that they called that

55:24

Hillary's war. Uh, she really she was

55:26

the Secretary of State at the time under

55:28

Barack Obama, but she's really the one

55:30

who championed that. And I believe Obama

55:32

wrote in his book that he was 5050 and

55:35

that Hillary pushed him to that. He said

55:37

his big regret was that he didn't think

55:39

about what came next after Gaddafi

55:40

because somehow we haven't learned that

55:42

lesson yet. Like after Iraq, you'd never

55:45

thought of that. Um,

55:46

>> listen. But, thank God Trump's figured

55:48

it out.

55:48

>> Oh, yeah. That's the Yeah, Trump's

55:50

Trump's figured it out. We'll go in this

55:51

drastic new direction of getting the

55:54

seventh war that they want.

55:55

>> Don't be a [ __ ] Dave. Jesus Christ.

55:57

Did you see that one I don't know what

55:59

military expert was on television who

56:01

said something about we need to I'm a

56:03

fan of boots on the ground like Rome.

56:06

Like, hey [ __ ] Rome didn't have

56:08

nuclear weapons and drones.

56:10

>> Rome didn't have drones that hunt you.

56:13

Yeah.

56:13

>> Like, what we talking about? Boots on

56:14

the ground. Should we fight with swords?

56:16

Should we get everybody to fight with

56:17

swords? Is that what you're saying?

56:18

>> The [ __ ] are you saying?

56:19

>> Well, also like what

56:22

what even is the plan with boots on the

56:24

ground? Like what are you talking about

56:25

here? You're going to you're going to

56:27

take an island. It goes, okay, well then

56:29

you're going to be a target. You're

56:30

going to be target practice as long as

56:32

the Iranian regime is still standing.

56:33

And if you're talking about militarily

56:35

occupying the country like we did with

56:37

Iraq or Afghanistan or something like

56:38

that, this is a huge country with 92

56:41

million people. How many how many

56:43

soldiers you think you need to occupy

56:44

that country? At least at least half a

56:47

million. And probably you can't do it

56:49

with that. So what are you talking about

56:50

here? And so you're saying what are we

56:52

going to start a draft for the least

56:54

popular war going in in American

56:56

history? Cuz I don't think that's

56:58

happening.

56:59

>> Yeah, this is maybe

57:01

slightly more popular than Vietnam.

57:04

>> Uh going in it's less. I'm sure Vietnam

57:07

by the end was very very unpopular.

57:09

Well, Viet Vietnam going in didn't make

57:11

any sense, did it? There was, I guess,

57:13

the Gulf of Tonkan incident.

57:15

>> Most people in America were like, "Why

57:17

are we doing this? What's going on?

57:19

You're drafting people to go to Vietnam.

57:22

We're fighting communism in Vietnam."

57:25

>> Yeah.

57:25

>> What?

57:25

>> Well, they called uh what they called it

57:27

Vietnam syndrome that the American

57:29

people had, which is that we didn't want

57:31

to fight a war again after that. Was

57:33

that that's from their perspective,

57:35

that's a syndrome. Um and uh this is

57:38

it's really something. They think they

57:40

think by the way Ben Shapiro used this

57:41

same uh line called he said Trump

57:43

finally broke Iraq war syndrome because

57:46

they think see from Ben Shapiro's

57:49

perspective the illness is after you lie

57:53

the American people into a war and

57:55

slaughter a million people. The illness

57:57

isn't that that you might look at that

57:59

as the bad part, but the bad part is

58:01

that these these annoying Americans have

58:03

this tendency to not want to do that

58:05

again after that. Um, but he claims

58:08

Trump has broken Iraq war syndrome. Of

58:11

course, there's really no evidence with

58:13

support of the American people that that

58:15

has changed at all. And you know the

58:18

George HW Bush uh was said to have

58:21

defeated Vietnam war syndrome uh in

58:25

Panama and in Iraq because they were

58:27

relatively easy, you know, bloodless on

58:30

the American side or or very very

58:33

limited uh you know injuries and deaths.

58:36

Um and and they you know they weren't

58:39

like quagmires that went on forever or

58:40

whatever. But of course after the

58:44

Persian Gulf War in in '92, we went on

58:47

to be bombing Iraq for

58:51

ever since essentially, you know, I

58:52

mean, for 30 straight years after that,

58:54

we were still at war with that country.

58:56

>> You think for a million people being

58:57

dead.

58:58

>> Um, what is public support? Let's put

59:00

that into our sponsor perplexity. What

59:03

is current public support for the Iran

59:06

war in America? And first of all, how

59:09

will they know? No one's asked me.

59:11

>> You know what I'm saying? That's a fair

59:12

question. Like that's what I would say

59:13

about about uh polls. When was the last

59:15

time you answered a poll? When was the

59:16

last time anybody called you up and

59:18

said, "Dave Matt, first of all, when was

59:19

the last time you ever picked up the

59:20

phone if you didn't know who was

59:21

calling?" And then when you do answer,

59:23

when was the last time you said yes to a

59:25

poll?

59:25

>> I don't I don't even remember ever

59:27

getting calls.

59:27

>> It has to be the dumbest of dumb people

59:30

that answer those polls. So then you got

59:31

to realize out of those stupid [ __ ]

59:34

idiots,

59:35

even how many of them think the war is a

59:37

good idea?

59:40

It's even unpopular amongst them.

59:42

>> I mean, what does it say here? Most

59:44

recent national polls show Americans

59:46

overall oppose the current war with Iran

59:48

and think US military action has gone

59:50

too far. Um, a Quinnipac poll finds 54%

59:55

What is Quinnipac? Quinnipak poll finds

59:58

54% of US voters uh oppose US military

60:01

action against Iran and 39% support it.

60:06

I wonder how many of those 39% or

60:10

>> and

60:10

>> well not too much. We don't have the

60:12

numbers.

60:12

>> A poll reports about six and right. What

60:14

is the number of Jewish people in

60:15

America? 2% something like that.

60:19

>> Uh six and 10 adults say US military

60:21

action against Iran has gone too far.

60:23

Only about a quarter say it's been about

60:25

right. 25% poof. First of all, you know,

60:29

whenever you're talking about these kind

60:31

of things, it's like who again, who who

60:34

are we talking about? Who who was asked

60:38

finds Republicans largely support the

60:40

military action around 86% support.

60:43

Whoa. Yeah. There's

60:45

>> really cuz I talked to a lot of

60:47

Republicans who think it's a terrible

60:49

idea. While large majorities of

60:51

Democrats around 92% and independents

60:54

about 64% oppose it. 92%. Who are the

60:57

eight% of Democrats that are like,

60:59

"Let's [ __ ] go." You think maybe

61:01

they're Jew?

61:03

>> They work for CNN. They, you know,

61:05

whatever.

61:05

>> CNN thinks it's a good idea. No,

61:07

>> dude. CNN is running cover for Donald

61:11

Trump during this time.

61:12

>> For real?

61:13

>> Oh, yeah.

61:13

>> No way.

61:14

>> Yeah. They put up a poll the other day.

61:15

They had a graphic that said 100% of

61:17

MAGA supports the war in uh in Iran.

61:21

There's It's like after all these years

61:24

>> say he liked it or something like that.

61:25

Oh, but hold on a second.

61:27

>> Is that running cover or is that making

61:30

them look bad? Because most Americans

61:32

don't support the war and most

61:34

Democrats, 92% don't support the war.

61:37

So, if that's the case, wouldn't that

61:39

just make it look like these MAGA people

61:40

are a [ __ ] problem?

61:42

>> I I I guess.

61:43

>> Oh my god. MAGA GOP view of Trump. Can I

61:46

hear how he says it or would it be a

61:48

problem?

61:48

>> Among him talking, it's someone else

61:50

talking.

61:51

>> Okay, that seems bonkers. That seems

61:55

bonker. Approve 100%. How many people

61:57

did you ask? Two.

61:58

>> Two guys with MAGA hats on.

62:00

>> If you notice the way they say this,

62:01

right? So they don't just say GOP

62:03

voters. They say MAGA GOP voters. And so

62:06

what they're doing here is that they're

62:08

filtering who they consider to be MAGA.

62:11

And who they consider consider to be

62:12

MAGA are the people who still say they

62:14

support Donald Trump. But like 100% of

62:17

the people who don't support this war

62:19

stop supporting Donald Trump over it.

62:21

>> Right. But look at this little thing on

62:22

the bottom that they they don't show

62:23

you. 66% 31% split amongst non-MAGA,

62:29

>> right? And

62:30

>> but is that non-MAGA Republicans? Is

62:32

that what you're saying?

62:33

>> No, I think that's non-MAGA Americans, I

62:35

believe. Um,

62:36

>> how like the the whole MAGA thing, it's

62:38

like how did we're so fractioned as it

62:40

is? Yeah.

62:41

>> Like this whole idea of uh right versus

62:43

left as it is and now you've got a MAGA

62:45

section of the right.

62:46

>> It's all just ridiculous, dude. But it's

62:48

a way to describe it as anything other

62:50

than what it is, which is the most

62:51

unpopular war in American history going

62:53

into it. And for good reason. Look,

62:55

dude, he didn't even bother to like sell

62:56

us on a propaganda campaign about it. He

62:59

It was like the laziest like just lie

63:02

just lie us into it. Put on a [ __ ]

63:05

firm tinfoil hat right now. Let's Let's

63:08

get a double layer Reynolds wrap.

63:11

[ __ ] crease the edges, fold it down.

63:16

Why would he want to do this? Why would

63:18

he want to? Look, I am not denying that

63:23

the regime of Iran is a giant problem. I

63:26

am certainly not denying that if I was

63:28

Israel, I would not want them there.

63:30

They hate you. They're trying to get a

63:31

nuclear weapon. They're right there.

63:32

You're I get the Israel position. I

63:34

totally understand how they're so

63:38

just vehemently in defense of their

63:41

homeland. Like, they're surrounded by

63:43

people that hate them. They're the one

63:44

Jewish country. Everyone else is is a

63:47

Muslim. They all want a caliphate. They

63:48

all want to kill him. It's been going on

63:50

forever. They think it's in God's word

63:52

that they have it. It's all a lot of

63:54

craziness. I get it.

63:59

Why

64:00

now? Like why now? Like what does that

64:04

make any sense? Well, um, Trump himself

64:08

has said, which literally this would be

64:10

like considered an anti-Semitic

64:12

conspiracy theory if anyone else had

64:14

said it, but Donald Trump has openly

64:16

talked about many times, how the Adles

64:19

give him all this money and they come by

64:21

every day and all they have is another

64:23

demand on behalf of Israel. Um, Donald

64:26

Trump also very early in his political

64:28

career uh got in trouble with the Israel

64:32

lobby and then immediately pivoted to uh

64:35

blaming the to winning their favor back

64:37

over by saying he would tear up the

64:38

JCPOA, the Iran deal that Obama got us

64:41

into. And it looks to me,

64:45

you know, other speculation aside, who

64:47

knows exactly what control they have

64:49

over the guy, but it looks to me that

64:52

after Venezuela

64:54

and when there were these big uh street

64:56

protests and riots against the regime

64:58

and Iran there, that they convinced

65:00

Trump, and this is what Joe Kent, his

65:01

director of of uh counterterrorism, has

65:04

said too, that they essentially

65:06

convinced him that this would be the

65:09

time you could do it swiftly, surgically

65:12

remove the regime and the people would

65:14

rise up uh and and overthrow it. And

65:16

that this is what Donald Trump said when

65:18

he launched this war. He said, "This is

65:19

a regime change and I'm calling on the

65:21

great people of Iran to rise up." And

65:23

they did. They rose up uh by at least

65:26

the hundreds of thousands, they were out

65:28

in in Tyrron in defense of the regime

65:31

chanting Death to America. Because it

65:33

turns out when you kill 165 little

65:37

girls, that doesn't make a country go,

65:40

"We love you. Thank you for that.

65:42

>> Right. But before the bombing, there

65:43

were people in the streets that were

65:45

protesting and people were killed

65:47

because of that. A lot. That's the other

65:50

thing is that that regime is like they

65:52

they clamp down and they do it with

65:54

public figures. They killed a very

65:55

prominent wrestler from Iran is really

65:58

two of them. They killed one a few years

66:00

back. The UFC tried to step in and

66:03

somehow another stop it, but he was also

66:05

one that was accused of protesting

66:07

against the government.

66:08

>> Listen, I don't know this most recent

66:10

one. And I'm not saying this is true at

66:11

all. I don't trust any governments. But

66:13

he was they claimed he killed a few

66:16

cops. That's what the the Iranian regime

66:18

said he was being hung for. Now I don't

66:21

Yeah, the wrestler. He was he was

66:23

convicted of that, whatever that means

66:25

in a in a mull run court, you know. So

66:28

I'm not saying that's right at all. But

66:30

>> I will say this, right?

66:32

>> The Donald Trump when he when he

66:34

launched this war, and there's been a

66:35

whole lot of just false claims that have

66:37

been made. Um but he said specifically

66:39

that they killed 32,000 protesters. Um I

66:45

there has not been a shred of evidence

66:48

presented to back up this claim. Now I'm

66:51

not saying it's not true. I I'm not

66:53

putting it past this government that

66:55

they would do that. And they've

66:56

acknowledged that a lot of people have

66:58

died. I think they I think the last I

66:59

had seen was that I know they were

67:02

saying the the government of Iran is

67:04

before the Ayatollah was killed. They

67:06

were saying it was something like 3,000

67:08

uh people had died and then the CIA

67:11

>> But when you say died, does it mean they

67:12

killed the person?

67:13

>> That's unclear. That's that's not what

67:15

they're claiming. But then the CIA at

67:17

least there was a piece in the

67:18

Washington, excuse me, in the Wall

67:19

Street Journal where they had said and

67:21

this was like a week and a half into it

67:22

that they estimated like six and a half

67:24

thousand or something like that. But

67:26

this is a huge question, right? And and

67:28

it's not clear at all like were they

67:30

lining people up and just executing them

67:32

for the crime of protesting? They hung

67:34

the wrestler. But I'm saying the the

67:36

people who are have been killed here. Um

67:38

>> Iran protest death toll could top 30,000

67:42

according to local local health

67:44

officials. And this is from Time

67:46

magazine. Uh as many as 30,000 people

67:48

could have been killed in the streets of

67:50

Iran on January 8th and 9th alone. Two

67:53

senior officials of the country's

67:54

Ministry of Health told Time indicating

67:57

a dramatic surge in the death toll. So

67:59

many people were slaughtered by Iranian

68:00

security services that Thursday and

68:03

Friday it overwhelmed the state's

68:04

capacity to dispose of the dead. Stocks

68:07

of body bags were exhausted, the

68:09

official said in an 18wheel

68:12

semi-trailers replaced ambulances. Now

68:15

listen, all I'm saying here, man, is

68:17

that you got to be re I just seen this

68:19

movie play out a lot of times. You got

68:21

to be really careful about these

68:22

accusations that are made in the run-up

68:24

to a war. They're basically saying we

68:25

have a source who told us this.

68:27

>> What year was this? I mean, excuse me,

68:28

what date was this?

68:29

>> January 25th.

68:30

>> January 25th.

68:31

>> So, the protest started in late December

68:33

and then in in January. This is

68:35

>> Time was unable to independently verify

68:38

these figures.

68:39

>> That's right. Listen, the the claim

68:41

being made here, right, is that it look

68:43

in this they said in two days in two

68:46

days 30,000 people were were killed. If

68:48

that is true, that is up there with one

68:51

of the biggest massacres in human

68:52

history. The biggest massacres during

68:54

World War II were like around that the

68:57

number

68:57

>> it says as of Saturday US-based human

68:59

rights activist news agency had

69:02

confirmed 5,459 deaths and is

69:05

investigating 17,000 more.

69:08

>> Yes.

69:08

>> Um so that's at least close. So we're in

69:11

the neighborhood we're in the 20s just

69:13

if what they're investigating turns out

69:15

to be accurate if that's if that's the

69:17

case. But we're talking also here, Joe,

69:18

about like NE funded US-based NOS who

69:22

are really Iran hawks, you know, and so

69:25

and I'm just saying like look, the the

69:27

claim the claim here is that Iran, you

69:29

know, I I saw a bunch of the uh the

69:31

Zionists online when this was first

69:32

coming out back in January, they were

69:34

like, "Oh my god, they've already killed

69:37

half as many people as died in Gaza in

69:39

just a couple days." And you're like,

69:40

"Right, that's a pretty that's a hell of

69:43

a claim, right?" I mean like if you just

69:45

from following wars all these years if

69:47

you started carpet bombing Tyrron

69:50

>> Vietnam style carpet bombing Tyrron

69:52

after two days that's the type of death

69:55

toll you'd be looking at.

69:56

>> The thing is we don't they don't have

69:58

internet access to

69:59

>> well they shut down the internet during

70:00

that period. So but there were pictures

70:02

that came out. All I'm saying is that if

70:04

you had numbers like that you would

70:06

expect there to be some evidence that

70:08

you could point to. And there's like one

70:10

picture where they've pointed to like a

70:11

couple dozen body bags and been like,

70:13

"See, look at this." But look, I'm not

70:16

maybe it's true, maybe it's not. I'm

70:18

very skeptical of these claims when

70:19

they're made right before we launch a

70:21

war. But I think the the other point is

70:23

that the at least according there has

70:26

been some evidence of this, right? There

70:28

were police stations that were burned.

70:29

There were mosques that were were

70:31

attacked. These were not uh just

70:33

peaceful protests. I'm not saying they

70:35

don't have a right to violently rise up

70:36

and overthrow their government,

70:37

whatever. But all the the hawks in the

70:40

west were saying these people are trying

70:42

to overthrow their government.

70:43

>> Not only that, in the past our agencies,

70:47

our intelligence agencies have engaged

70:49

in nefarious practices where we have

70:53

conscripted certain people to go and

70:56

light things on fire and blow things up

70:58

and create these events to accelerate

71:02

>> front page of the Jerusalem Post. They

71:03

were bragging that there was MSAD within

71:05

the protests. Um, so now look, I don't

71:08

know, but also the thing is this, right?

71:10

If you are trying to overthrow a

71:12

government,

71:14

>> a government will kill you for doing

71:15

that. And that's true about every

71:17

government, including our own. Including

71:19

our own. If if armed uh protesters went

71:22

to try to overthrow Barack Obama's

71:24

government, he would kill those people

71:26

if they were actually a threat to do

71:27

that.

71:28

>> Ashley Babbot was murdered not January

71:30

6th.

71:30

>> And every single left-winger in the

71:32

country went, "Well, that's okay. It was

71:34

an insurrection." And by the way, every

71:36

single right-winger in this country when

71:37

this prey guy got killed were like,

71:40

"Well, he was interfering." Oh, I I saw

71:42

it. But by the way, the prey thing was

71:44

the most textbook example of a bad

71:46

shooting. There's just no defending it.

71:48

They had disarmed the guy. He's down.

71:50

There's six of them. They panic. They

71:52

put six bullets in a

71:53

>> Do you know what happened though? Do you

71:54

know Do you know the whole story of the

71:55

gun?

71:56

>> Uh the gun being removed?

71:58

>> Yeah. Do you know the whole story about

71:59

the gun?

71:59

>> No.

72:00

>> Okay. The gun is a Sig P320. A Sig P320

72:04

is notorious for accidental discharges,

72:07

right?

72:07

>> There is a video of the cop removing the

72:09

gun, walking off.

72:11

>> Yes, I saw that.

72:11

>> And the gun goes off.

72:13

>> Is that And that is that his gun for

72:15

sure? Cuz I thought that hadn't been

72:17

determined whether or not. I heard

72:18

people speculating about that.

72:19

>> I've watched the video multiple times

72:20

and I've watched other people's analysis

72:22

of it. Obviously, I'm no expert, but I

72:24

do know something about guns and that

72:27

gun in particular, it's been

72:28

demonstrated online that it will go off.

72:31

There's a cop inside of a precinct. He

72:34

bends over not touching his gun. Gun in

72:36

the holster and it goes off.

72:38

>> There's a guy there's a video of a guy

72:40

on a range and an a gun just goes off

72:43

and he goes, "Whose [ __ ] gun was

72:45

that?" And the range master goes, "Is

72:48

that a Sig?" And he goes, "Yeah." He

72:50

goes, "Get that [ __ ] gun off of my

72:52

range."

72:53

>> Wow.

72:54

>> Because it's a P320.

72:55

>> So Sig, by should be real clear. Sig

72:57

makes a bunch of guns that are awesome.

72:58

Like the P365 is like one of the best

73:01

carry guns in the world. There's a lot

73:02

of guns they make that don't have this

73:04

issue. But that particular gun that PR

73:06

had with one in the chamber is [ __ ]

73:08

knuckleheads walking around with one in

73:10

the chamber.

73:10

>> Absolutely. It's and and all for I'm

73:12

just saying the only point I'm making is

73:14

that it's clearly it was a [ __ ] I'm

73:16

not saying like they wanted to execute

73:18

the guy. I'm just saying like they had

73:20

the gun taken from him. They didn't

73:21

communicate that to each other. They

73:23

freaked out. They But literally all it

73:25

took was seeing one video 11 days

73:28

earlier where he kicked the back of a

73:29

cop car and for every right-winger to

73:32

go, "Yeah, whatever, dude. Got what you

73:33

deserve." So my all my point is about

73:35

this looking at this in the Iranian

73:37

regime.

73:38

>> It's just not clear like what are you

73:41

actually accusing them of? Are you

73:43

saying that somebody was trying to

73:45

overthrow the government and the

73:46

government mowed them down? Are you

73:48

saying that they lined up protesters and

73:50

shot them all in the back of the head

73:51

simply for voicing their opinion? Like

73:53

none of this is made clear, but when the

73:56

war drums are beating, no one even cares

73:58

to like ask these questions. It's just

73:59

like, yep, they killed their own people.

74:01

And then if you notice with this war,

74:02

much like with Venezuela, and almost

74:04

like with all of them, they just keep

74:06

giving you like they throw like 15

74:08

justifications

74:10

at it, you know, and you're like, wait,

74:11

which one is the reason we're fighting

74:13

this? Cuz I've I saw all of them like to

74:16

play the humanitarian card and go, we're

74:17

doing this to, you know, for these

74:18

oppressed people. We want them to rise

74:20

up. They've been living under this

74:21

brutal regime. And you're like, "Okay,

74:23

two things." Like, number one, that is

74:26

simply just not how US foreign policy

74:28

works. We don't fight wars on

74:30

humanitarian grounds. You know what I

74:32

mean? Like, we're partners with some of

74:34

the most brutal authoritarians in the

74:36

world. And we've and in the case of like

74:37

Israel, we've been funding their

74:39

destruction of Gaza for the last two and

74:41

a half years. Like, it's and and so like

74:44

that's not really what's motivating this

74:46

here. And then number two, Donald Trump

74:48

even just the other day said he'll be

74:50

partners with the new Ayatollah and run

74:53

the straight of Harmoose together. He's

74:55

backed off. Yeah, he's backed off of

74:57

regime change or the idea.

75:00

>> Are they even talking to him? Is someone

75:01

talking to him? Like who who is he

75:04

talking to?

75:05

>> Do they know who they're talking to? Cuz

75:07

it's not like they're meeting Donald

75:08

Trump said

75:09

>> some guys on the phone. I am free to

75:12

negotiate. Dude, he's he said Donald

75:15

Trump himself said the other day that um

75:18

that he goes, "Negotiate, we're

75:19

negotiating. Negotiations are going

75:21

great." And they go, "Who are you

75:22

negotiating with?" And he goes, "A

75:24

person we believe to be in charge."

75:27

And then they said, "So, is this the new

75:28

Supreme Leader?" And he said, "No, no,

75:30

no one's heard from that guy. We don't

75:32

know where he is.

75:32

>> Some hacker in his basement in

75:34

Bellarus." And

75:37

>> it's not.

75:37

>> He's talking with an Arabian accent and

75:40

he's got them convinced. Well, it's just

75:42

>> I have the authority to negotiate.

75:46

Uh let's be partners. Let's be wire 1

75:50

million Bitcoin to this address.

75:53

Well, everything I'm seeing publicly

75:55

reported today is that Iran is like,

75:59

"No, we're not in these negotiations.

76:01

We've made our terms clear." And their

76:03

terms, what they're asking for is

76:05

something that Donald Trump is not going

76:06

to be able to give them.

76:07

>> What's that? uh their uh their their

76:10

demands were uh that we we stop uh

76:14

attacking immediately like that part

76:16

they might get that we pay them uh

76:19

restitution for all the damage so far um

76:24

essentially that we leave the region I

76:25

mean they had a few other things there

76:27

that were just like

76:28

>> and they want they want him to open up a

76:29

Terry blacks in tan

76:32

that's

76:34

this one was really important to us if

76:36

one Terry Black's barbecue. We don't

76:38

have good barbecue here. Um it's it it

76:42

doesn't seem like if if he's not really

76:44

negotiating with this guy, if it's like

76:46

if that if that's not true and he's just

76:48

like putting this out there in the

76:50

public as like a negotiation ploy.

76:54

What a cluster [ __ ] Cuz you're you're

76:56

dealing with people that don't mind

76:57

dying.

76:58

>> They they they believe I mean these are

77:01

very religious people.

77:02

>> They're fanatical. They believe they're

77:04

going to go to heaven. They believe they

77:06

are martyrs and they're they're fighting

77:07

for Allah. This is this is the just and

77:10

holy war.

77:11

>> Well, they've also been attacked. They

77:13

Well, that's right. And they've been

77:14

preparing for this for a long time.

77:16

>> Um, you know, and they like there's, you

77:18

know, people make a lot out of um the

77:20

chance that the Iranians, you know, they

77:23

chant death to America. And

77:24

>> what do you got there, Jimmy?

77:25

>> Sorry.

77:29

And who's control of it? Will Iran still

77:31

be able to control the flow of oil? Uh,

77:33

>> be jointly controlled.

77:35

By who?

77:37

>> Maybe me. Maybe me.

77:39

>> Me and the Ayatollah. Whoever the

77:41

Ayatollah is, whoever the next Ayatollah

77:44

look, and it'll also be a form of a a

77:47

very serious form of a regime change.

77:50

Now, in all fairness, everybody's been

77:52

killed from the regime. There's

77:54

automatically a regime change. But we're

77:57

dealing with some people that I find to

78:00

be very reasonable, very solid. Uh the

78:04

people within know who they are. They're

78:06

very respected and maybe one of them

78:09

will be exactly what we're looking for.

78:12

Look at Venezuela. How well that's

78:13

working out.

78:15

>> I mean, dude, this is such a [ __ ]

78:17

mess. This is such a mess, dude. I mean,

78:19

this is just too ridiculous, dude. And

78:22

the, you know, the thing is that a lot

78:25

of people, you know, I've spent a long

78:26

time at this point being against this

78:29

war because this war has been

78:30

telegraphed since, you know, the the

78:32

Bush administration wanted to do this

78:33

[ __ ] And um, at least for like 15

78:37

years, I've been publicly opposing this

78:40

war. And one of the reasons why so many

78:43

of us oppose this, and it's a shitty way

78:45

to be vindicated, but is that look, Iran

78:49

is just not like any of the other

78:50

opponents in the global war on

78:52

terrorism. It's a it's a different beast

78:54

entirely. And you've seen this already

78:56

only 3 weeks in. We never dealt with any

78:58

of this with any of the other countries.

79:00

You know what I mean? We had what the

79:02

Pentagon calls escalation dominance in

79:04

all of those other wars, which is all

79:06

essentially like it it's just like

79:08

meaning like if you do this, we do this.

79:10

if you do that like we're prepared for

79:12

everything. It's kind of like escalation

79:13

dominance is a lot like uh you like in

79:15

jiu-jitsu where you see really highle

79:17

guys who basically put you in a position

79:19

where you can make one of two choices

79:20

and either way you know like okay you

79:22

can you can give me your back and I'll

79:24

choke you or you can push off me and

79:25

I'll arm bar you you know like whatever

79:27

option you have I'm going to get you. We

79:30

don't have that with Iran

79:31

>> and the Pentagon's been open about this

79:32

since at least 2007. Um and the the fact

79:36

is that as we're already seeing they can

79:38

target ships in the street of Hermoose.

79:40

They can target our assets, our bases,

79:42

our embassies in the region. They can

79:44

target our allies. And this is a big

79:46

problem. And so, like, it seems like

79:49

Donald Trump got into this thinking it

79:51

would be like Venezuela. It would be

79:53

quick and bloodless and easy and he

79:54

could claim victory. Now that it's not

79:57

gone that way, it seems like he's kind

80:00

of scrambling for what the what the

80:03

offramp is here. Yeah. Now, at least I

80:06

give Donald Trump, as angry as I am with

80:08

him, um like at least it is true that

80:11

he's looking for an offramp, it seems

80:13

like. And he did this with the 12-day

80:14

war, right? Like he he started the war,

80:17

he saw an off-ramp, and he and he took

80:19

he took it. The problem here really is

80:22

that this war changed the calculation

80:25

from the Iranian perspective. And that

80:27

much is clear so far. you know the after

80:30

911

80:32

all the countries in the Middle East in

80:33

North Africa all the ones essentially

80:35

they all waved the white flag all of

80:37

them Saddam Hussein welcomed UN

80:39

inspectors in he was trying to do

80:41

anything he could to not meet the fate

80:43

that he ultimately met Gaddafi

80:44

denuclearized got rid of chemical

80:46

weapons Bashar Assad got rid of all his

80:48

chemical weapon like they were all just

80:49

like we don't want it with you you know

80:52

and Iran was very much the same way they

80:55

they got into the JCPOA they allowed an

80:58

inspections regime in to come look at

80:59

their their nuclear facilities, all of

81:01

that. And even up to the 12-day war when

81:04

we we dropped the bunker buster, as in

81:07

Israel bombed a whole bunch of regime

81:08

targets, they still in their response

81:11

called ahead, made sure there'd be no US

81:14

uh uh troops there. They they hit the

81:16

side of a little base there, and then

81:18

they kind of went like they gave Trump

81:20

an off-ramp because they didn't want it,

81:22

you know? They didn't want to they don't

81:23

want to die like Moar Gaddafi. They

81:25

don't want to, you know, have their

81:26

country destroyed. So for

81:27

self-preservation reasons, they showed

81:29

restraint. The calculation this time

81:32

clearly already from the Iranians was

81:34

that we can't do that again. We we have

81:38

to give you a bloody nose and a black

81:40

eye. We have to make this cost as much

81:42

as possible for you. Otherwise, you guys

81:44

will just be back here in another 5

81:45

months doing it again. And they're

81:48

they're probably right about that.

81:50

They're probably right.

81:51

>> And so now we're in this situation where

81:53

we're already in a in a quagmire. It's

81:57

already like over a dozen Americans have

81:59

died. Some I think a couple hundred

82:01

wounded at this point. Israel isn't

82:03

given real numbers on what's going on

82:05

there, but there's some pretty

82:06

substantial damage and definitely some

82:08

Israelis have died and I'm sure

82:10

thousands of Iranians have have died at

82:12

this point. It's cost I mean Pete Hgs

82:15

has just asked for $200 billion. I don't

82:18

know if it'll get up to costing that

82:19

much, but this thing is certainly

82:20

already in the tens of billions if you

82:22

consider munition, military movements,

82:25

and and then just the damage to

82:26

embassies and bases and stuff like that.

82:29

I mean, this thing is already a

82:31

disaster. And so now it's not like

82:33

Venezuela where Donald Trump could just

82:35

stop and declare victory and and even

82:37

say like, "Look how great it's working

82:38

out." Now, is Venezuela really working

82:40

out that great? I I don't know. That's

82:42

kind you know, we took one guy away. The

82:43

regime's still in place. the people

82:45

haven't been liberated, but whatever. He

82:48

can claim that this now the problem here

82:50

is that, okay, number one, Donald

82:54

Trump's not really in a situation where

82:55

if he just quit right now, how is he

82:57

really going to say, look how wonderful

82:59

this is? It's like, I don't know, dude.

83:01

This cost a lot already and it doesn't

83:03

seem like there's any clear like what

83:05

did we get out of this? Well, the only

83:06

way it would work is if there was some

83:08

sort of a deal with whoever the [ __ ] is

83:10

going to be the new guy in charge and

83:12

they did come to some sort of an

83:14

agreement

83:15

>> and they did give them some compensation

83:17

for all the [ __ ] we blew up.

83:19

>> Yes. Well, that right.

83:20

>> So, they'll just print some more money

83:21

for that. Sure. And inflation. But look,

83:24

here's the thing is that it's not just

83:25

Donald Trump. There's two other

83:28

participants in this war um or two other

83:30

entities in this war. There's Iran and

83:33

there's Israel. Okay. Now, is Iran going

83:37

to accept that? Maybe. But look, just

83:39

like the 12-day war, look at the

83:40

position you're in now. We're relying on

83:43

the Mullers. You know what I mean? Like,

83:45

it's that that is not an ideal situation

83:47

to be in. And then the other factor is

83:48

that there's Israel who also gets a say

83:50

in this for some reason because we allow

83:53

them to. And Netanyahu just the other

83:56

day was very clear about this. This is a

83:58

regime change. And he even said it will

84:00

require ground forces. and he said he's

84:03

not sure who those ground forces will be

84:05

yet.

84:06

>> And so now this happened if you do you

84:09

remember the moment during the 12-day

84:11

war when it was the closest Trump ever

84:13

came to like flipping out on Israel and

84:15

he said they don't know what the [ __ ]

84:16

they're doing. It was but he said Israel

84:18

and Iran don't know what the [ __ ]

84:20

they're doing because Donald Trump so

84:22

after he drops the bunker busters

84:25

>> he goes that's it we're you know what I

84:28

mean? taking the off-ramp. And then he

84:30

said, "I want to work out a ceasefire

84:32

now." And then after he said that,

84:34

Israel just started lighting up regime

84:37

targets, just bombing the crap out of

84:39

them. And they weren't bombing nuclear

84:41

facilities. They were just bombing like

84:43

government buildings. And they've been

84:44

doing a bunch of that in this war as

84:46

well, bombing local police departments,

84:48

things like that, just creating chaos.

84:49

Cuz what they want is what they've been

84:53

getting in the rest of the war on

84:54

terrorism. They're they they are quite

84:56

happy with a Libya model or a Syria

84:59

model. They

85:00

>> don't want anyone that's organized as a

85:02

threat to Israel.

85:03

>> They don't it's it's all about Iran's

85:06

support for Hezbollah.

85:07

>> Yeah.

85:08

>> Is that they want southern Lebanon,

85:09

which they just uh Katz, their defense

85:11

minister, just announced that they're

85:12

going to occupy.

85:13

>> Yeah. That's crazy, right? They just

85:14

announced they're gonna be occupying

85:15

another country.

85:16

>> That's what it's about, man. And and

85:18

look, I mean, it's not again, this isn't

85:20

like a conspiracy theory. The guys all

85:23

tell you this in their own words.

85:24

Benjamin Netanyahu was asked point blank

85:26

a few months back what he thought of the

85:28

Greater Israel project. And he said it's

85:30

very near and dear to my heart. Like

85:32

this is the point of denying the

85:34

Palestinians a state for all these

85:36

years. You can't let the Palestinians

85:37

have a state because then how are you

85:38

going to take that all over someday?

85:40

That's all supposed to be part of

85:41

Israel. And the US ambassador, the US

85:45

ambassador, not the Israeli ambassador,

85:47

the US ambassador to Israel is on record

85:50

saying that God promised Iraq to

85:53

Benjamin Netanyahu and that God promised

85:57

Lebanon and Saudi Arabia and the West

85:59

Bank and parts of Syria and all of this

86:02

is greater Israel. That is it. By the

86:04

way, Sam Harris, where are you at on

86:07

that? Where where are the new atheists

86:10

when you could finally use them for

86:12

something? Hey, that's pretty crazy. Is

86:15

that how we do politics? We we work on

86:18

this this ridiculous religious

86:19

superstition that somehow the when God

86:22

said Israel in Genesis, he was referring

86:25

to the state that was created that they

86:27

named after that passage. This would

86:29

this would literally be on the level,

86:31

Joe, is if I named my son Jesus Christ

86:34

and then I told you you have to worship

86:35

my son.

86:36

>> Look, it's right there in your Bible.

86:37

Exactly. That you worship. No, you named

86:39

it after that, dude. That doesn't count.

86:41

>> I That's crazy. And they took the spot

86:43

where it was.

86:44

>> Yeah. I mean, like

86:45

>> they took over and they did it in a

86:47

horrific way. Like the numpka.

86:48

>> Yeah.

86:49

>> You You listen to some of those

86:50

soldiers, the translation of some of

86:52

those soldiers talking about what they

86:53

did and even laughing about what they

86:55

did.

86:55

>> Some of them even smiling

86:56

>> in 1948. That's

86:57

>> Yeah. Cuz it's not It wasn't in 1848.

86:59

You know what I mean? Like these guys

87:01

were alive. Maybe not so many of them

87:03

now, but like 20, 30 years ago, you

87:04

could put a video camera in front of one

87:06

of these guys and ask them to tell their

87:07

story,

87:08

>> right? It was 78 years ago. It wasn't

87:10

that long ago.

87:10

>> Yeah, that's right.

87:11

>> That's right. And so, you know, look, I

87:14

mean, the idea here that America after

87:19

just 25 years of catastrophic

87:23

failures, launching wars of choice, wars

87:26

of aggression, lying the American people

87:28

into it, just slaughtering millions of

87:30

people and like bankrupting this country

87:32

and really severely degrading the

87:34

country with these wars. The idea that

87:36

we would jump into another war of choice

87:39

for Israel is just too like th this is

87:44

too crazy, man. And especially when it's

87:47

the administration that that really

87:51

ran on and promised that we want to get

87:55

out of this out of this game of fighting

87:57

stupid wars in the Middle East.

87:58

>> Yeah, that was what we were all

88:00

supporting. Yeah,

88:00

>> that was the one thing that he was

88:02

saying that was so promising to so many

88:04

people that were independent that were

88:06

on the fence. They're like, "This guy

88:07

wants no wars." All right. Look, he

88:10

wants closing the border, which I think

88:11

is a great idea. He wants no wars. That

88:13

enough.

88:13

>> Let's go.

88:14

>> Well, especially um considering the fact

88:17

that well well like even if there are

88:19

some things about Donald Trump that

88:21

maybe you don't like uh but the other

88:23

guys are saying we want to keep fighting

88:26

forever wars and this guy is saying we

88:28

should stop doing that. That's enough to

88:30

go, "Well, then he's better than you on

88:31

net." And don't get me wrong, I mean, I

88:34

I endorse Donald Trump in 24. Um, you

88:38

know, people give me [ __ ] for that. Some

88:39

people like that, some people give me

88:40

[ __ ] for it. Um, but I I do I kind of

88:43

view it like this, like, and I really I

88:45

will say, maybe I'm a little biased here

88:46

because I love you, but I don't think

88:48

I'm being biased. I really think you

88:50

played a an enormous role in in kind of

88:54

like standing up to the

88:58

progressive democratic establishment and

89:01

their narrative over the last, you know,

89:03

decade or so. And it's really hard to

89:06

kind of overstate how crazy they were,

89:08

how much of a threat to this country

89:10

they were. And so for anybody who wants

89:12

to give [ __ ] to anyone who voted for

89:14

Donald Trump, it's like, "Hey man, the

89:16

alternative was the the party who

89:19

bragged about um first off insane woke

89:22

[ __ ] like poisoning the minds of

89:24

children in a really grotesque and

89:26

abusive way. They gave us open borders,

89:28

flooding the country uh with people.

89:31

They gave us all types of COVID tyranny

89:33

uh based on pseudocience. They gave us

89:35

the most reckless foreign policy uh in

89:38

American history, which was this proxy

89:40

war on Russia's border. And they were

89:42

running, they were pretending the

89:44

president wasn't scenile when he clearly

89:46

was. Then they in the fourth quarter

89:47

threw up a cackling [ __ ] who was not

89:50

democratically picked in any process.

89:52

And so, sorry, like it it does make

89:55

sense that a lot of people went, "Okay,

89:57

we're going to go back with with this

89:58

other guy." Yeah. Also, there was an

90:00

interesting dynamic happening in 24

90:03

where, okay, this wasn't, you know,

90:05

Donald Trump, they had actually tried to

90:07

throw him in in jail, maybe even tried

90:09

to murder him. We never really got any

90:11

answers on that one. Um, he now had

90:13

Bobby Kennedy with them. He now had

90:14

Tulsi Gabbard with him. He now had all,

90:17

you know what I mean? Even JD Vance,

90:18

like a lot of these people who were

90:19

supposedly much more

90:21

non-interventionist.

90:22

There was reason to hope that maybe it

90:24

wouldn't end up here. But anyway, I

90:27

guess my thing is that you played such a

90:29

huge role in this and I to a lesser

90:31

extent played a role in standing up

90:32

against a lot of that progressive

90:33

insanity over the last 10 years. And I

90:36

just feel like after 24, you know, this

90:39

coalition came together where Donald

90:41

Trump for the first time ever wins the

90:42

popular vote, wins every single swing

90:44

state, and really more remarkably won

90:47

the youth and the culture. Like Donald

90:49

Trump went from being like the cultural

90:52

pariah to being the guy like Jon Jones

90:54

is doing the the dance at the front. And

90:56

it was just it was and that whole

90:58

coalition has been destroyed over this

91:01

war. And now he's going to hand the

91:03

country right back over to these

91:04

Democrats who we've been fighting so

91:06

hard. All for what? All for a war that

91:08

Netanyahu wanted against a country that

91:10

dude, by the way, the justification for

91:12

the 12-day war was [ __ ] They

91:14

weren't trying to make nuclear weapons.

91:16

They were trying to negotiate. got out

91:17

of that unscathed.

91:20

But then all and and I want to you know

91:21

he said some nice things about me when

91:23

he was on here the other day with you.

91:24

So I will say some nice things about uh

91:26

Constantin Cassen who I despite our

91:28

disagreements I really like that guy a

91:30

lot but he is I could be wrong. I could

91:33

be missing someone. He's the only guy

91:35

I've seen who supported the 12-day war

91:38

but is really skeptical about this. And

91:41

I've seen so many people. It's

91:43

unbelievable dude. like they they just

91:45

so like the 12- day war comes for the

91:47

first 48 hours of it they're like dude

91:49

Israel's doing this on its own they want

91:52

for you to stay out of it then like the

91:55

third day they're like all right they do

91:57

need some help shooting down the

91:58

missiles that are coming back toward

92:00

them but whatever this is just defensive

92:01

you know what I mean like you don't have

92:02

to get invol then it's like the next day

92:04

like all right we don't we don't have

92:05

bunker busters so we do need you to drop

92:06

the bunker busters but then their whole

92:08

uh um like defense of the 12-day war was

92:11

like look no Americans died it didn't

92:13

cost us a lot. It didn't turn into this

92:15

disaster. And now we're at the okay,

92:18

well, fine. All of that happened, but

92:20

it's still a good thing. Constantin was

92:21

the one guy I saw who was like, "No, I

92:24

supported that one, but I am not getting

92:26

on board with this one." And I give him

92:28

a lot of credit for that. I give him a

92:30

lot of credit for that.

92:30

>> I like that guy a lot. I like him a lot.

92:32

I like Francis a lot, too. I think their

92:34

show Trigonometry is one of the best

92:37

shows. Agree with them or not agree with

92:38

them. They're always reasonable. They're

92:41

never ideologically driven. They have

92:43

opinions that you may or may not agree

92:44

with, but they're real clear about their

92:46

opinions and why they believe what they

92:47

believe.

92:48

>> Yep, that's right. And I I will say

92:49

>> and they're great guys.

92:50

>> Yeah. Genuinely good dudes.

92:51

>> Great guys.

92:52

>> I really liked uh you know I get in a

92:54

lot of uh like the [ __ ] show

92:57

>> like arguments. I find myself in them. I

92:59

probably should be better than them and

93:00

just not engage, but I I'm not and I'm

93:03

petty and [ __ ] show

93:04

>> like where it just becomes like an

93:05

insult thing or you know I debated Alex

93:07

Baron or just kind it's kind of

93:09

embarrassing in hindsight but like I

93:11

don't know. It gets me really angry when

93:12

the a guy's calling me a Holocaust

93:14

denier or something like that. I think

93:15

>> the phrasing was kind of silly. The way

93:18

he was saying it was silly and he was

93:19

just trying to play gotcha with you and

93:21

then you called him a [ __ ]

93:23

>> Yeah, it's not my finest moment.

93:24

>> You could tell he was really shaken by

93:26

that.

93:27

>> Well, that expected that.

93:28

>> I kind of have a thing where like look,

93:30

I'm really into this [ __ ] and I nerd out

93:31

on it and I'm obsessed with all of this

93:33

for whatever reason. It's just like my

93:34

calling in life. Um but I'm also standup

93:37

comic at heart, you know? And so like as

93:39

soon as someone goes like, "Oh, I want

93:41

to be vicious." You're like, "Oh, you

93:42

want to be vicious?" Cuz like I'm pretty

93:44

good at being vicious. So like I could

93:46

do that. And you're probably not used to

93:47

hearing this type of vicious [ __ ] that

93:49

like comics say to each other.

93:51

>> Um but one of the things that I really

93:53

appreciated about Francis and Constantin

93:55

was when I went to do their show, it was

93:57

just like

93:59

>> it was genuinely a good faith

94:00

conversation. They weren't trying they

94:02

weren't trying to like win the point or

94:04

or get a clip that they could go we

94:07

destroyed Dave. And then once they do

94:09

that, I'm like, "Okay, well then I'm not

94:10

trying to do that either, man. Like,

94:11

let's talk about this shit." That's

94:12

that's always what I'd rather do. Yeah.

94:14

>> Um, but

94:17

>> the thing that's I guess the thing

94:18

that's really interesting about this

94:19

moment is that because the kind of

94:22

corporate media propaganda apparatus has

94:24

been completely destroyed and because

94:27

the internet and social media and

94:29

podcasts are where people go now for

94:31

for, you know, conversations and debates

94:34

and news and all this stuff,

94:36

>> they're kind of like they're like

94:38

they're running without a propaganda

94:40

apparatus, you know, like Israel just

94:44

Israel in the last 2 and 1/2 years is

94:46

down like 50 points in the polls like in

94:49

terms of American approval like they've

94:52

just been this it's a drastic change

94:54

like I've never seen on any issue over

94:56

the last years

94:57

>> in our lifetimes where it's been an

94:59

issue that we are dealing with the

95:00

consequences of the relationship.

95:02

>> That's right.

95:02

>> There's never been a time in the past

95:03

where people were completely aware of oh

95:07

there's no other reason why we'd be

95:09

going into Iran. Like most people most

95:11

people don't think it wasn't for Israel

95:14

asking us to Netanyahu's consistent

95:16

visits to the White House. Mult

95:18

>> Oh, you can't even you can't even uh

95:20

pretend otherwise. I mean, people do.

95:23

>> Yes. Well, they try to, but people

95:24

>> Coleman Hughes just got into a debate

95:26

with Glenn Greenwald about it.

95:27

>> I saw that they did it. I have not had a

95:29

chance to watch it.

95:30

>> Somebody sent it to me and it was, you

95:32

know, I'm I'm being a good boy when it

95:34

comes to social media. It's been so good

95:36

for my brain.

95:37

>> Yeah.

95:37

>> It's kind of remarkable. So, uh, I got

95:40

just staying off, you mean?

95:41

>> Yeah. Yeah. My new phone, I'm not going

95:43

to put anything on it. I'm going to have

95:44

my old phone and leave it at home and

95:46

I'm not going to be able to look at it.

95:48

So, when I have to post things, I got to

95:50

post it on my other phone that's not

95:51

going to be with me. I'm not doing that

95:53

anymore because I just think

95:56

>> eventually ultimately it rots your

95:57

brain. But, you do get some cool debates

96:01

and some insight into what's going on.

96:03

And I don't know what Coleman's argument

96:06

was, but uh Glenn and Coleman were

96:09

arguing about Israel's influence on

96:10

this.

96:11

>> Well, I'll be very interested to watch

96:12

that. Um I do respect Coleman despite

96:15

disagreeing with him very adamantly on

96:17

this. Very smart guy. Very smart guy. No

96:19

question about it.

96:19

>> A very nice guy, too. And uh um and and

96:21

look I one of the things I really

96:23

respect about him is when I did his show

96:25

he literally starts it by going he goes

96:27

you know almost all these debates I see

96:29

you in like you're kind of debating

96:31

issues and then people just debate your

96:33

character and he goes I'm not doing that

96:35

at all. I want to talk about the issues

96:36

the whole time and I just genuinely

96:38

appreciate that agree with him or

96:40

disagree with him. He's a super

96:42

reasonable guy and a very nice guy. I

96:44

like him a lot. I like him a lot.

96:45

Whether I agree with him or disagree

96:47

with him, he's a wonderful person. I th

96:49

this agreed this this is what I will say

96:51

about um his position on this which I I

96:54

think is is kind of interesting. So,

96:56

number one, um, when I was on Pierce

97:00

Morgan with him right after Venezuela

97:03

happened and he was his position, I

97:07

don't want to mischaracterize it, but I

97:08

think this is pretty accurate, was he

97:10

was like, look, a lot of people are

97:11

comparing Venezuela to Iraq or Libya or

97:15

Syria, but like that is a different

97:17

region, a different culture, a different

97:19

religion, and so really what we should

97:21

be comparing this to is other

97:23

interventions in in Latin America in

97:25

South America. And I, you know, I didn't

97:28

completely agree with that. I was like,

97:29

actually, I think there are some lessons

97:31

you could learn from other wars that

97:33

we've been in that might apply here. But

97:34

I was like, okay, fair enough. Hey,

97:36

let's look at other interventions in

97:38

Central and South America because we've

97:39

got a long list of really disastrous

97:40

ones. Like if you want to look at

97:42

Guatemala or Nicaragua or, you know,

97:44

Cuba, Mexico, a whole bunch. Um, but

97:47

then when this war in Iran starts, I

97:51

don't see him going the equal opposite

97:54

of that, going, "Hey, now that we're at

97:56

war with Iran, we have to judge this by

97:58

Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya and

98:00

Syria." Because, you know what I'm

98:01

saying? Like, that would be the flip

98:02

side to the other position. And so, I

98:04

don't see that. The other thing is that

98:07

when he's arguing with me about uh

98:10

because I was arguing that, you know,

98:11

that is the Israel lobby and the Israeli

98:13

government were a huge part of why we

98:15

fought the war in Iraq, right?

98:17

>> And his big point that he stuck to a lot

98:18

of the hawks uh stick to this is that

98:21

Ariel Chiron was actually he who was the

98:23

sitting prime minister at the time, he

98:26

was actually against the war in Iraq.

98:28

Now, that's not exactly true. Um he he

98:31

wanted George W. Bush to invade Iran

98:33

first, not Iraq. And then when he got

98:36

assurances that Iran would be next, he

98:38

got on board. You could go look at

98:39

Chiron's speech. He gave a speech, I

98:41

think it was in August of 2002 to the

98:43

Knesset and it's all about how Iraq is

98:45

the biggest threat. They have weapons of

98:47

mass destruction, but the MSAD was

98:48

cranking out all types of BS

98:50

intelligence about the nuclear weapons

98:52

that he could detonate in 15 minutes or

98:54

whatever. It was all nonsense. But if

98:56

you're going to say that that is

98:58

evidence that Israel was not pushing us

99:01

into this because the sitting prime

99:02

minister at the time didn't like this

99:04

war, okay, but again then how does the

99:08

current sitting prime minister of Israel

99:10

feel about this war in Iran cuz he's

99:12

fighting it with us. And he said after

99:14

it started that this is the culmination

99:16

of his entire life's work. He has been

99:18

trying to lie our our government into

99:21

this war for my entire lifetime. coming

99:24

here. He he testified how many times he

99:28

testified with the cartoon of a bomb

99:29

>> at the UN cartoon a bomb cartoon with

99:33

percentages of the enriched uranium

99:35

>> and like a Daffy Duck bomb. Not like

99:37

like a the bomb that'll blow your beak

99:39

around to the other

99:41

>> and it was he was already up real high.

99:43

He was already up real high. No, dude.

99:45

He was on record saying that Iran was 3

99:47

to 5 years away from getting a nuclear

99:49

weapon in the '9s. He's I mean it's just

99:51

he's just been lying through his teeth.

99:53

And there is something look man there's

99:56

something really profoundly dishonorable

100:00

>> about trying to lie another country into

100:04

war. Like not even trying to sell the

100:06

war to your own people and have your own

100:07

military do it but because you can.

100:09

There it is.

100:10

>> Yeah. There we were up to 90%.

100:13

>> First stage. No, it was first stage we

100:15

were at. He was saying they've hit the

100:17

first stage.

100:18

>> Oh. Oh. Oh, excuse me. Okay. Yeah,

100:20

you're right. I guess this is we can't

100:21

we can't go any

100:22

>> mom.

100:24

>> It's just so ridiculous. And he knows he

100:26

knows he's lying.

100:27

>> He's like your friend that like you've

100:29

been friends with since high school and

100:30

every time you go out he gets you in a

100:31

fight.

100:32

>> Yeah.

100:32

>> Like dude, don't do this. Like those

100:34

guys over there are a [ __ ] problem.

100:36

Let's go over there and [ __ ] them up.

100:37

And like you know all your buddies are

100:39

like dude guy again.

100:41

>> Dude, I use that exact analogy when I

100:42

debated uh Josh Hammer did at uh

100:45

Princeton University and um or maybe it

100:47

was with the Charlie Kirk. It was one of

100:48

the times I debated him, but I used that

100:50

exact analogy. He was like, "Is Israel

100:51

an ally?" And I was like, "No." It's

100:53

like, "They're not a good friend. If

100:55

your friend's getting you in a bar fight

100:56

every night that stop hanging out with

100:58

that guy, bro." Tim Dylan did an ad for

101:01

Neurogum and Neuromints on his podcast

101:04

>> where he's like, "I have a friend, uh,

101:08

let's just call her Erica." And he does

101:10

this Erica Kirk ad. He doesn't say it's

101:15

Erica Kirk for Neurogum. Have you heard

101:18

of Jamie?

101:19

>> I don't think so.

101:20

>> Oh my god. Oh my god. It's so funny. Oh

101:23

my god. It's so It's so crazy. He's so

101:26

out of his I [ __ ] love him so much.

101:28

I'm so happy Tim Dylan's in the world.

101:31

>> He is the best.

101:32

>> He's the best. If you're not listening

101:33

to his podcast and you want a rational

101:35

but hilarious take on all the [ __ ]

101:38

madness that's going on with not just

101:39

his war but the Epstein Files, his

101:42

episode of the Epstein Files, I hardly

101:43

ever tweet about other people's

101:45

podcasts. But I I hardly ever tweet but

101:48

I posted it. I'm like this is one of the

101:50

best podcasts about anything ever. his

101:53

ability, Tim's ability to like rant

101:57

>> it like it like a hilarious rant that is

102:01

laced with excellent points, but it's

102:03

just hilarious the whole time and just

102:05

him going off is second to none.

102:07

>> And he's sober. He just puts on his

102:09

magic glasses.

102:10

>> It's him and Fuentes are the top two.

102:13

>> Oh, but he buries Fuentes. Fuentes is

102:15

really good. Fuentes has

102:17

>> him can do something different than

102:19

anybody else can do.

102:20

>> Yeah. Well, his ability to blend sarcasm

102:24

and just celebration of chaos.

102:28

>> Yeah, it's second to none.

102:29

>> Best ranter that's ever walked the face

102:31

of the planet.

102:32

>> I remember uh when I first met Tim in

102:34

New York back before he he moved out to

102:37

LA after that, but when I first met him

102:39

in New York and he was I think like he

102:41

was a green standup. I think he hadn't

102:44

been doing it for that long, but I

102:46

remember just like being on podcasts

102:47

with him and just being like, "Yo, this

102:50

dude is going to be a [ __ ]

102:53

superstar." Like it was just like his

102:55

his ranting like ability. Like he would

102:58

go off on things where you just find

103:00

yourself like like you almost have a

103:02

moment where you forget you're on the

103:03

show with him. Yeah.

103:04

>> You're like I'm just sitting here

103:05

watching that and then I'm like, "Oh

103:06

[ __ ] I'm here too. I better say

103:08

something." But like he's just

103:09

unbelievable.

103:11

>> Listen to this ad. Listen,

103:15

>> I don't know if I should tell this, but

103:16

it does show how effective neuromints

103:19

can be.

103:21

A friend of mine, let's call her Erica.

103:25

She

103:27

She's had a wild life, this woman. She

103:29

was in Romania. She had an orphanage.

103:33

She was on a reality show. She married

103:36

this famous guy. She was an intelligence

103:39

asset.

103:40

And I said to her, "How do you do this?"

103:43

And she says,"Tim,

103:45

it's neuros energy and focus." And I

103:48

said, "But how do you do it after the

103:51

guy, the husband and father of the kids,

103:53

gets murdered and you're out there doing

103:56

all kinds of stuff? You're doing

103:58

fundraisers and you're dancing around

104:00

with glitter pants. How does this

104:02

happen?" She goes, "I could lie to you,

104:05

but I'm telling you, it's Neuro's energy

104:07

and focus mix." I said, "Really?" She

104:09

goes, "Sure."

104:11

I said, "How are you running this

104:13

organization 7 hours after this guy got

104:16

popped?"

104:18

She goes, "A lot of people speculate,

104:20

but it's Neuro's energy and focus

104:23

mints." I go, "Really?"

104:26

She said, "Yeah, neuroenergy and focus

104:28

is powered by natural green tea,

104:29

caffeine, althenanine for calm, focus,

104:31

and vitamin B12 and B6 for

104:36

>> I mean, whatever they're paying him,

104:37

they should pay him more." Yeah, it's

104:39

not enough. No one can pay him enough.

104:41

He's the goat.

104:42

>> Well, that'll also just make you

104:43

remember that product forever.

104:45

>> Yeah. No, he's the greatest of all time.

104:48

>> It might be

104:49

>> I'm trying to figure out how to turn our

104:51

racetrack sign on all the way.

104:53

>> Is it broken?

104:55

>> God damn. We need a new one.

104:56

>> I'll get a hold of Bobby.

104:59

>> Uh he's the goat, dude. He's uh You mean

105:02

just Yeah. I had someone in the White

105:03

House come up to me and goes, "Is Tim

105:06

Dylan really gay?"

105:08

I go, "Yeah, he's really gay." Like, you

105:09

think he would fake that?

105:10

>> He goes, "How long have you known him?"

105:11

I go, "I've known him forever. He's

105:13

really gay."

105:14

>> Yeah. Well, he will he's a he's a real

105:16

good undercover, but every now and then

105:17

you see it come out.

105:18

>> Every now and then you see like uh like

105:20

I remember and this is back when he was

105:22

young and and he was broke at the time,

105:24

but Tim was always kind of a snob, even

105:26

when he was broke, like it was always

105:28

kind of and I went uh I forget what it

105:29

was, but uh I was like I was like, "Oh,

105:32

we could get food from this restaurant."

105:34

And he goes, "From there?" I go, "Yeah,

105:35

they got good food." And he goes, "You

105:37

think that's good food?" Like cuz he's

105:39

like a real like foodie or whatever. And

105:41

then it was just like, "Oh, I saw it for

105:42

a second there."

105:43

>> Well, he used to have money cuz he had

105:44

money when he was selling.

105:45

>> He had money in finance. Then he decided

105:47

to be

105:47

>> subprime mortgages and he was a part of

105:49

the housing crisis.

105:50

>> That's right.

105:51

>> And he was doing cocaine back then.

105:52

>> He he did topple the US economy for a

105:55

while, but then he got into comedy. He

105:58

more than made up for it. He's more than

106:00

made up for that.

106:00

>> This is where he belongs. Yeah,

106:02

>> he belongs in front of that screen with

106:05

the glasses on just going on these

106:07

insane rants.

106:08

>> Oh yeah,

106:08

>> he's so funny, man. His Epstein files

106:11

take [ __ ] genius, man.

106:13

>> That was great, dude. His thing about uh

106:14

Sam Harris having a a meditation app and

106:18

also supporting genocide.

106:20

It's like the most hilarious thing ever.

106:22

Like what human being does both of

106:24

those?

106:26

>> Such a great take on that.

106:27

>> Oh, he's so funny, man. Yeah, we're

106:30

lucky, dude. We're we're we're we're a

106:32

part of a really cool group of people

106:35

right now. You know, it's a very unusual

106:37

time that the mainstream has lost all of

106:41

its power of influence on people. It

106:43

still puts out information. It still

106:45

puts out shows, but they're

106:47

>> trying to look like you,

106:48

>> but they're fun. That was

106:51

>> that Jake Taber thing was so crazy. I

106:52

was like, what are you doing? Are you

106:54

doing a podcast now? Like, what are you

106:55

doing? It's it's such a perfect like

106:58

little microcosm though of like it's

106:59

almost painful. Like I'm like guys just

107:01

can you hire me? I mean like I I would

107:05

explain this to you wouldn't work either

107:08

because they're so trained. They're so

107:10

it's like

107:12

>> if you get a dog and that dog has been

107:16

maybe a Yeah. a cat might be a better

107:17

example. Like if you've never had a

107:18

litter box in the house and the cat's

107:20

been pissing all over the carpet.

107:21

>> Mhm.

107:22

>> You are always going to have that cat

107:23

piss on the carpet. That's what that guy

107:25

does. You're not going to fix him. If

107:27

your entire life you've been spitting

107:29

out nonsense from a teleprompter and now

107:32

all a sudden you have to be yourself,

107:33

you've been functioning in a world of

107:35

executives and producers where everybody

107:37

goes over every little thing you say and

107:39

do. You 100% read things you know aren't

107:43

true or at least partially true.

107:45

>> Mics for like everything.

107:47

>> Oh yeah. Yeah. Their their whole setup

107:48

is they're all trying to look like

107:50

podcasters.

107:52

>> No, wait a minute. They put mics out

107:54

like podcasters. That's crazy. Imagine

107:56

if they think that's all it takes.

107:58

>> But well, this is but but Joe, talk

107:59

about completely missing the point,

108:02

right? This just fundamentally missing

108:04

it is that they go they actually go,

108:06

"Okay,

108:07

>> so all of these people have left, you

108:09

know, watching cable news in in droves

108:12

and now they a lot of people listen to

108:14

podcasts. They'll listen to you or Theo

108:16

von or whoever it might be. And the a

108:19

huge reason, right, why people a huge

108:22

reason why you've been number one for so

108:24

long now is because however anyone feels

108:27

about you, you're authentic. And it's

108:29

very hard to deny that. You know, one

108:31

one of the biggest questions I get when

108:33

people like meet me if I do like meet

108:35

and greet after shows or something, it's

108:36

it's what's Joe Rogan like is a question

108:39

I get all the time because we're buddies

108:40

and I've been on the show a lot a lot of

108:42

times and you know people are love you.

108:44

And they'll go, "What's Joe Rogan like?"

108:45

And I always tell them the same thing. I

108:46

go, "You already know.

108:48

you're, you know, like you already know

108:50

who he is. He's that guy and then

108:52

offstage he's that guy. You know what I

108:54

mean? Like that's who he is. And people

108:56

like that. People like that. Whatever

108:57

you think about Theo, he's telling he's

108:59

authentic. He's being himself. That's

109:01

who he is. That's a That's why it works.

109:03

>> And because you guys in the corporate

109:05

media are all professional liars and

109:07

have lied to the American people about

109:09

the last 17 crises. You know, they don't

109:12

trust you anymore. And so then their

109:14

reaction to that is you go, "Well, what

109:16

if we pretended to be podcasters?"

109:18

You're like, "No, you dummy. That's the

109:20

whole thing. This is just proving

109:22

further how inauthentic you are that

109:24

you're [ __ ] meetings on this

109:27

podcast."

109:28

>> 100% they do, dude. They all This was to

109:32

me despite the fact that I, you know,

109:34

and people give me [ __ ] about voting for

109:36

Donald Trump and they could say I should

109:37

have known better and whatever. I was a

109:39

huge critic of him in his first term and

109:40

I'm a huge critic of him in his second

109:42

term. But the best thing about Donald

109:44

Trump winning in 24, and I did predict

109:46

this, right, I'm not always the best

109:47

with predictions. I'm pretty good on

109:48

issues, I think, but I'm not great at

109:50

predictions. They're tough. But the best

109:52

thing about Donald Trump winning was

109:54

that the corporate media finally

109:56

admitted it. They were they had been

109:58

pretending for so long. I remember we

110:00

used to joke about I remember coming on

110:01

like a few years ago and uh we would

110:03

joke about how Brian Stelter would

110:05

always whenever he talked about you he

110:08

would always kind of go like the fringe

110:10

Joe Rogan like as if he's the mainstream

110:13

and you're the fringe as if the numbers

110:15

aren't readily available to all of us

110:16

that we could be like your show has like

110:18

200,000 listening and his has 20

110:20

million. So, how is he the fringe and

110:22

you're the mainstream? But they would

110:24

pretend. Well, they maybe they believed

110:26

it, but that 24 the election, that's

110:28

when they all admitted it. And then the

110:30

talking point moved to

110:32

>> we need to find our own Joe Rogan. The

110:34

Democrats need to find a Joe Rogan or

110:36

whatever. Remember that was like, so

110:38

they kind of admitted that, oh, the

110:39

podcasts have become the new mainstream

110:42

and we are the fringe,

110:43

>> right? But the dumb part of that

110:45

statement was, you already had me, you

110:47

[ __ ] idiots. You just lost your mind.

110:49

I'm not right and I'm not left. Yeah, I

110:51

think both of them suck. And I think the

110:54

adherence to the ideologies that the

110:56

left supports or the right supports is

110:58

out of their [ __ ] You got to be out of

110:59

your [ __ ] mind. Whether it's these

111:02

crackpot Christian nationalists that

111:04

think that this whole war is a way to

111:05

get Jesus to return on a white horse. Do

111:08

you see those guys that were talking

111:09

Yeah. during the the readiness [ __ ]

111:12

meeting? That I think that's nuts, too.

111:14

I think the woke [ __ ] and all the the

111:17

chaos of the [ __ ] last four years of

111:19

having a completely open border and the

111:20

justifications of all these things,

111:22

that's nuts, too. I'm not on either

111:24

body, anyone's side. The Democrats

111:26

aren't ever going to get someone like me

111:28

because I'm not with either or. I'm not

111:30

with either or.

111:32

>> I'm with whoever [ __ ] makes sense and

111:34

no one makes sense until AI comes along.

111:36

I think they're going to do a really

111:37

good job. President Perplexity is going

111:39

to run this country fairly and balanced.

111:42

Man, I'm I'm willing to try it at this

111:44

point, dude.

111:44

>> I'm [ __ ] I'm dead serious, man. As

111:47

long as it doesn't like do something to

111:49

harm people. As long as like that's it.

111:52

It goal is just to manage society.

111:54

>> It's a big if that you got there. But

111:56

yes, if we can get that

111:59

but what you just said I think is really

112:01

well this is something that I'm

112:02

encouraged by is that I think what you

112:04

just said there I really do believe that

112:06

you speak for super majorities of the

112:09

American people. And that's why even

112:10

though Donald Trump has shattered his

112:12

coalition by lying us into this stupid

112:14

war on behalf of a foreign country,

112:17

>> that coalition is still ripe for someone

112:19

else to pick it up and run with it. And

112:22

that's kind of what I'm hoping. I hope

112:23

Thomas Massie runs for president. I

112:25

think, by the way, they're doing a big

112:26

money bomb for Thomas Massie on March

112:28

30th. And I think him winning

112:29

re-election in Congress is like the most

112:31

important political election in the

112:32

country right now because he's done

112:34

nothing wrong except actually stand up

112:36

for America first and for all the stuff

112:38

that Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard and

112:40

all these people ran on. and he's gotten

112:44

the the Israel lobby and the Adelins,

112:46

but I repeat myself, have been pouring

112:48

millions of dollars uh into his race to

112:50

try to unseat him for the crime of not

112:53

going along with the Epstein cover up

112:54

and not going along with another stupid

112:56

war and having some like fiscal sanity.

112:58

So, I hope I hope he wins. I

113:00

>> imagine those three negatives. Imagine

113:02

those being three negatives that people

113:04

are saying he's not MAGA.

113:06

>> Yeah. Well, then okay. What is MAGA

113:08

then?

113:08

>> Well, if that's like I don't know. Like

113:09

my position is always like if you're

113:11

saying if if not supporting covering up

113:14

the Epstein files or not supporting a

113:17

stupid war of choice, a war of

113:19

aggression on behalf of Israel means I'm

113:21

not MAGA, then okay, I'm not MAGA. I

113:24

don't I'm not attached to the the the

113:26

you know the phrase make America great

113:28

again. I don't care then. But that

113:30

phrase sucks. Here's the thing. Like

113:32

first of all, America is great. Make

113:35

America greater, I'm down. but make

113:38

America great again. And then it becomes

113:39

a movement of a bunch of [ __ ] dorks

113:41

because a lot of them are dorks. A lot

113:43

of them these really weird [ __ ]

113:46

uninteresting, unintelligent people that

113:48

have got something they cling to and and

113:51

there's a lot of people that are just

113:52

real genuine patriots and they're all

113:54

lumped into this one group and you got

113:56

to accept the dorks, too. [ __ ] that.

113:59

Like the concept of making America great

114:01

is a great idea. But as soon as you have

114:03

a [ __ ] team and you allow anybody to

114:05

join up,

114:07

>> you've you don't even have tryyouts for

114:09

your team. So you've got a bunch of

114:11

[ __ ] [ __ ] that are running around

114:13

spouting out opinions and you have to go

114:15

along with them because they're MAGA.

114:17

And then you've got bots online that are

114:19

probably from [ __ ] Indonesia or

114:21

Russia or wherever and they're

114:23

pretending they're MAGA and they're

114:25

saying crazy [ __ ] So that's a part of

114:26

MAGA, too. You've [ __ ] up by becoming

114:29

a part of a group.

114:31

>> Yeah.

114:31

>> Whether it's a Republican group, a

114:33

Democrat group, a MAGA group, a [ __ ]

114:36

woke group, whatever it is, you [ __ ]

114:39

up by being in a group.

114:40

>> Yeah. What is George Carlin said? People

114:42

are great as individuals. Yeah.

114:44

>> But when they get in a group, man,

114:45

they're the worst things in the world.

114:47

And that's why that's why it should be

114:48

about the like the issues. It should be

114:51

about your principles and what you

114:53

believe in. And you should be like,

114:55

look, like I've said uh many nice things

114:57

about Tulsi Gabbard over the years and I

114:59

was extremely critical of her over since

115:02

last summer into now cuz I think she's

115:04

lying us into a war which is the war

115:06

that she was always opposed to. The one

115:09

the one she sold no war with Iran

115:11

t-shirts. Um she like this was

115:14

>> how is she lying us into this war?

115:16

>> So la well

115:16

>> because that's a big statement.

115:17

>> Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Uh so and it's

115:20

it's true. So last summer, so Tulsi

115:23

Gabbard had given her the as the

115:25

director of national intelligence does

115:26

every year, they give their annual

115:28

threat assessment and she testified uh

115:30

before Congress about it and she it was

115:33

very clear in her annual threat

115:34

assessment that Iran was not attempting

115:37

to build nuclear weapons that they had

115:39

not yet made the political decision to

115:41

attempt to build nuclear weapons, let

115:43

alone like are actually going for it.

115:46

And um and she testified before Congress

115:49

saying the same thing. And then after

115:52

negoti while they were negotiating,

115:53

Israel sneak attacks them. Then she had

115:55

some post where she goes Iran could be

115:59

weeks or months away from nuclear

116:00

weapons, which is like was total

116:02

[ __ ] It made absolutely no sense.

116:04

>> Let me see what the post.

116:05

>> Sure. This is from if you could find it,

116:07

this is from last, it must have been

116:08

last June,

116:08

>> right? But is that a fact? So if they're

116:11

enriching uranium up to 60% and they

116:13

just have to enrich it further for the

116:16

ability to use it in nuclear weapons

116:18

that is a couple weeks away

116:20

>> now but not not before it would be to

116:22

build a bomb and to make it deliverable.

116:24

I think all the experts say at least a

116:25

couple years but the point aside from

116:27

that is that at the time this is over

116:30

now but at the time Iran was still

116:32

members of the JCPOA. They were still in

116:34

it. So like

116:35

>> what is that? the this is the Iran deal

116:37

that Obama uh got us into. Obama is

116:40

horrible on foreign policy, the butcher

116:43

of Libya and Syria and Yemen and he

116:46

surged in Afghanistan. But in Iran, he

116:49

made a deal with them and the deal but

116:51

it wasn't just with the US and Iran. It

116:53

also involved uh Russia and uh France

116:56

and and England and there were other

116:58

countries involved in it too. And the

116:59

the JCPOA said that uh Iran couldn't

117:02

enrich above I think it was 3 to 5% or

117:05

something like that and they were

117:06

staying in it and they it created a new

117:08

inspections regime which Iran so they

117:10

were having full inspections they

117:12

weren't enri but but the deal also said

117:14

that if America gets out of the deal

117:16

they can enrich up to higher. So when

117:18

America got out of the deal they started

117:20

enriching.

117:20

>> And when did America get out of the

117:21

deal?

117:22

>> Donald Trump to it up in his first term

117:25

I want to say 2017 or 2018. And then

117:27

they immediately started enriching.

117:28

>> No, they went up a little bit and then I

117:30

think there were a couple Israeli

117:31

attacks and then they went up to

117:32

enriching at 60%. But so the reason we

117:35

knew they were enriching up to 60%. Is

117:37

cuz they were still members of the JCPOA

117:39

with an inspections regime who was going

117:41

in there and saying they're enriching up

117:42

to 60%.

117:43

>> Right. But how much do you actually know

117:45

about enriching uranium and what it

117:47

takes to turn into a bomb?

117:48

>> Let's let's read what she says. New

117:50

intelligence confirm what POTUS has

117:52

stated numerous times. Iran's nuclear

117:54

facilities have been destroyed. Oh no, I

117:56

think this is after this is the right

117:57

one. Her tweet was before.

117:59

>> This is from June.

118:00

>> Yeah, this would have been just shortly

118:02

before this, but her tweet was before we

118:04

hit Fordo.

118:07

>> Yeah, this is June 25th. There's a

118:09

recent one though. Um Oh, edited June

118:12

25th.

118:13

>> Yeah, but it seems like it was still

118:15

edited the day it was posted. But can

118:17

you go to her page and because she

118:19

doesn't tweet a lot. She's not a psycho.

118:23

She's not one of those. If she tweets,

118:25

it's generally something important or

118:27

someone from our team is. So, is this

118:29

the Hold on. What above that

118:34

overwhelmingly elected by the Click on

118:36

that show more.

118:38

>> I think that's it.

118:40

>> Well, this is what she testified to

118:41

Congress this time. I I was referring to

118:44

a different one from But I also think

118:45

this is a a a lie. I mean, for her to

118:48

say that the president determines what

118:51

is an imminent threat or is not. No.

118:54

Either there is an imminent threat or

118:55

there is not one. That this is like

118:57

saying the president determines the

118:59

weather.

118:59

>> Right. Right. Right. But but you're

119:00

taking her words out of context. She's

119:02

saying something that's factually

119:04

correct. As our commander-in-chief, he

119:06

is responsible for determining what is

119:09

and is not an imminent threat. That is

119:11

true. And whether or not to take action

119:13

he deems necessary to protect the safety

119:15

and security of our troops, the American

119:16

people, and our country. That's just an

119:18

actual fact. Okay. Yes. Fair enough. But

119:20

when she testified before Congress, they

119:22

asked her like they asked her point

119:24

blank a bunch of times about this. And

119:26

then she goes, "That's not my job to

119:29

determine what's an imminent threat.

119:30

That's the job of the president. And if

119:32

he says it is, then it ends."

119:33

>> Okay. So look at this here. Initially,

119:35

she's contradicting Trump, saying that

119:37

Iran did not rebuild after the 2025

119:40

strikes. Contradicting Trump. So this is

119:43

also from Time magazine. So she's saying

119:46

that now what you're saying that she

119:48

said earlier was a lie is not a lie,

119:50

dude. Because that is actually his

119:52

>> Well, I wasn't referring to that.

119:54

>> I understand. But you did say that was a

119:56

lie. What she said was a lie.

119:57

>> Okay, fair enough. That was not a lie.

119:59

But it was but it is it's

120:01

>> actually correct. And if you're in a

120:04

position like she's in where you've got

120:05

that guy breathing down your neck and

120:07

you're forced to make a statement,

120:09

>> you've got to tread

120:11

very carefully on this tight rope that

120:13

you're walking.

120:14

>> Okay, fine. But let's just say

120:16

hypothetically that you know for a fact

120:18

that Iran did not pose an imminent

120:19

threat and then that's your answer when

120:21

you're asked if they did. Fine. It's not

120:24

a lie. But it is

120:27

>> very misleading to say the least.

120:30

>> How much Okay, hold on. Intel Chief

120:32

Gabbard declines to say if Iran posed an

120:35

imminent threat to the US. She declined

120:36

to say per on her own personally, but

120:39

she did.

120:40

>> This is the congressional test.

120:41

>> Yes. Yes. Yes. This is I think this is

120:42

what I was referring to here. And she

120:43

does at one point say that it's not her

120:45

job to make that determination, which I

120:47

do think is her entire job.

120:49

>> Um,

120:51

it's interesting. Look, maybe maybe I'm

120:53

being a little harsh by saying lying in

120:55

that example. And fair enough to your

120:56

point there. Like that technically is a

120:58

true statement. I do think it's very

120:59

misleading and I do think that she

121:02

really was the one who advocated against

121:04

this specific war for the reasons that

121:07

we're seeing unfold right now. And I do

121:09

think I I get your point. It's a very

121:10

tough tight rope to walk. options are

121:12

essentially, I think, to do what Joe

121:14

Kent did and resign or to stay on and

121:17

support the thing. I mean, I think it's

121:19

kind of hard to thread that needle,

121:21

>> right? Do you think that there is

121:23

>> any value in being one of the few

121:26

reasonable voices that has his ear?

121:29

Yeah, ultimately it is his

121:30

responsibility to determine what's an

121:32

imminent threat and what is not. Um, I

121:35

would imagine that she gets access to

121:38

most of the same classified information

121:40

that he does as the director of national

121:42

intelligence. I don't know though. I

121:44

don't know how it works.

121:45

>> But

121:47

what can she do other than try to be a

121:51

voice of reason if ultimately this guy

121:53

is going to do what he wants to do,

121:54

right? And he's going to do what also

121:56

what Israel wants to do clearly. Oh

121:58

yeah.

121:58

>> And he's talked about it, you know, and

122:00

also in his first term, I I'll never

122:02

forget this [ __ ] conversation that he

122:04

had with Steve Hilton cuz I think it was

122:06

one of the first times since I've seen a

122:08

president say, and Steve Hilton, by the

122:09

way, I've been friends with him for 12

122:12

or 13 years. Met him and his family in

122:14

Maui on the beach when my daughter's

122:16

really young and his kids really young,

122:18

they became friends. We've hung out

122:19

together, vacation together. He's a

122:21

sweetheart of a guy. I love that guy.

122:23

Um, and when he was interviewing Trump,

122:27

Trump said that there is a military

122:31

industrial complex and these guys want

122:32

to go to war.

122:33

>> Yep.

122:34

>> And we were like, "What? This is You're

122:37

just saying that? Like, you're just

122:39

saying that?" It's one of the many

122:41

reasons

122:42

um why a lot of people liked him cuz he

122:45

he would do things like that where he

122:46

would completely break protocol and

122:48

just, "Hey, let me know. Let let me let

122:50

me uh let you know rather let me inform

122:52

you. There's a bunch of people that want

122:54

to go to war and they're pushing me all

122:56

the time to go to war. That's what they

122:57

want.

122:58

>> It was so crazy, dude, because also even

123:00

when he coined the term, it was in his

123:02

farewell address to the nation. He was

123:03

literally like, "This is my last stop

123:05

and then I'm leaving." Trump was just in

123:06

the middle of his presidency and he

123:08

goes, "All of them want war. They all

123:09

want me to be in war all the time. If it

123:11

was up to them, we'd always be at war."

123:13

And I do, you know, now look, that was

123:16

crazy. I thought actually the one to me

123:17

that was even crazier was if you

123:19

remember when Bill O'Reilly was

123:21

interviewing him and he's talking about

123:23

Vladimir Putin and he goes, he's like,

123:25

oh well, you won't, you know, at the

123:26

time Donald Trump, which he had run on,

123:28

he was, he was saying, we should have

123:30

daunt with Russia. He goes like, why do

123:31

we, you know, we have all the nuclear

123:33

weapons. Yeah. He goes, he goes, Putin's

123:35

a killer. You want to have a date taunt

123:37

with a killer? And he goes, we got a lot

123:39

of killers, too. And then he goes, whoa,

123:41

whoa. What do you mean we got a lot of

123:42

killers, too? And he goes, "What was

123:44

Iraq? What was that? We got a lot of

123:46

killers on our side, too." And then Bill

123:47

O'Reilly's, "Well, I I mean, a a rack

123:49

was a mistake, but he goes, "Yeah, we

123:51

got a lot of killers, too." And I love

123:53

that, by the way. I mean, that was uh

123:56

>> that's breaking protocol.

123:58

>> Yes. Yes. Well, I think this is kind of

124:00

I think one of the main reasons why the

124:03

establishment revolted against Trump the

124:06

way they did. There's something very

124:07

scary to the powers that be about a guy

124:11

who like by his very nature like I don't

124:14

even think he's capable of not letting

124:17

things slip. You know what I mean? Like

124:19

he's he's just that's who he is. Um and

124:22

that you know was a big thing that

124:24

people really didn't like about him.

124:25

Very interesting to me is that so many

124:29

of the never Trumpers

124:32

have come to define his presidency. Like

124:35

if you if you remember back in in 2016,

124:38

the uh the the Warhawk kind of Israel

124:42

first Republican crowd, the neocons and

124:45

all them, they hated Donald Trump. Hated

124:48

him with a passion. Ben Shapiro uh was a

124:51

never Trumper. He said because of his

124:52

deeply held principles, he could never

124:54

support Donald Trump. Mark Levvin was a

124:57

never Trumper. All of National Review,

125:00

all of them. and now they are the

125:03

biggest Trump supporters ever as kind of

125:06

he's blown up the coalition that got him

125:08

elected. So, it's kind of interesting

125:10

that they all, you know,

125:13

you know, but again,

125:14

>> tell those guys to all stay off Twitter.

125:16

There's not one thing that they ever say

125:18

that makes them look better. They get in

125:20

these silly [ __ ] They just feel like

125:22

they're going to make some stupid

125:24

[ __ ] statement and then refute a

125:25

couple of people and don't understand

125:28

the crowd reaction when you've got

125:31

thousands of people tweeting against you

125:34

now. Thousands just attacking you,

125:36

destroying you, posting memes, posting

125:38

videos. You said this and you said that,

125:40

you piece of [ __ ]

125:41

>> It's amazing.

125:42

>> It's crazy.

125:43

>> I got to say I I do love that dynamic of

125:46

it. There's there's something that

125:48

>> that's why I stay off of it.

125:49

>> Yeah. Yeah. Well, that's you look,

125:50

there's problems with it, but there is

125:52

something about that dynamic now that

125:54

was just never true in the past where

125:55

it's like look, I'm not saying it's

125:57

perfect and obviously there's bots and

125:59

there's things like that. So, it's not

126:01

like a but

126:02

>> the people kind of get a voice in a way

126:04

that they never had before, right? And

126:05

there is something kind of cool about

126:07

that.

126:08

>> 100%. I love it. But it's not all the

126:11

people either. It's a lot of fake

126:13

people. There's a lot of like state

126:14

sponsored actors.

126:16

>> That's true. That's true. There's

126:17

manipulation, but there was always

126:18

manipulation in the old order. Also,

126:20

>> do you see this YouTube bot farm that

126:23

they just busted?

126:24

>> No,

126:24

>> they busted this this [ __ ] warehouse

126:27

had cell phones all rigged up for

126:30

YouTube views

126:32

>> where people would just they would just

126:34

hire a company and say, "Hey, you know,

126:37

part of the problem is not getting

126:38

enough views. I'd really like to blow

126:40

the [ __ ] up and get to number one." and

126:42

you hire them and they could get views.

126:45

>> Interesting.

126:46

>> Well, that's also I mean I guess if you

126:47

got advertisements that's legit fraud

126:49

>> 100%

126:50

>> that's like actual fraud 100%. And kind

126:53

of a weird loophole where I don't think

126:55

it's illegal.

126:56

>> Yeah, that's got to be a bot thing.

126:59

>> It's got to be some type of fraud though

127:00

if you're like if you're intentionally

127:02

doing that. Like maybe if you didn't

127:03

know,

127:04

>> right?

127:04

>> You could but

127:05

>> but listen, Twitter pays people X pays

127:08

people to post.

127:11

So you pay based on engagement, right?

127:13

That's how you get paid. So you farm out

127:16

engagement.

127:17

>> So like what percentage of what we're

127:20

interacting with is just horseshit?

127:22

Well, I got So um

127:24

>> I know this story just happened. A guy

127:26

got arrested plead guilty cuz he made I

127:29

think I think what happened? He made a

127:30

fake band to

127:32

>> Yeah. He had an AI generated song. He

127:34

got it played billions of times in an

127:37

effort to mimic the genuine streaming

127:39

activity of real consumers. Smith plead

127:41

guilty today. Conspirity to commit wire

127:43

fraud. Wire fraud.

127:44

>> Check this out, though. I heard a

127:46

similar story in Japan where

127:47

>> First of all, let me stop you right

127:48

there. Michael Smith generated thousands

127:50

of fake songs using artificial

127:52

intelligence. Hey, hey, hey, stop

127:54

talking [ __ ] about AI music cuz it's not

127:57

fake. Those are real songs.

127:59

>> Yeah.

127:59

>> Don't say fake songs. They They're real

128:02

songs and some of them are [ __ ]

128:04

bangers. Unfortunately,

128:07

>> some of them are really good.

128:08

>> You're going to like what I was going to

128:09

say then. A a guide was doing this in

128:11

Japan and it got viral and so he hired

128:15

people to be the band and now the band

128:18

is a real band.

128:20

>> Kind of popular.

128:21

>> So AI AI is creating jobs in this case.

128:24

>> Well, you know, so I

128:25

>> shift Brent rules though. You can never

128:27

create him in real life. He's the guy

128:29

who does the uh 50 Cent ones.

128:30

>> Oh yeah. Yeah. I've seen I've seen quite

128:32

a few. guy was, first of all, if that

128:34

guy was real, he'd have lungs like a

128:35

[ __ ] ultramarathon runner because the

128:37

flow. Like, how could you even have air

128:39

to say what you're saying?

128:40

>> Like, someone was saying that to me. She

128:42

was like, I think you couldn't do this.

128:44

And my argument was Eminem. I was like,

128:46

yeah, you could. You just have to be

128:48

wicked at it. Like Eminem. Like Eminem

128:50

in his prime, that [ __ ] could

128:52

spit in a way where you like, I can't

128:54

believe he's still talking.

128:55

>> Yeah, it was uh I I remember there were

128:57

a couple of his things where I was like,

128:59

I don't Can he actually do this? And

129:00

then I saw him do it live and not not

129:02

like I was there but saw it on YouTube

129:04

like where you're like, "Oh, he can

129:05

actually rap like that."

129:06

>> Recently,

129:07

>> I saw him recently. It was [ __ ]

129:08

great. He's still great. He's thin. He

129:10

looks good.

129:11

>> Yeah, he was killing it, man. He was

129:13

killing it. But those the speed in which

129:15

that he can rap made me go maybe AI is

129:18

not bullshitting. But, you know, 50 Cent

129:20

himself was like much more casual in his

129:23

delivery. Yes.

129:24

>> You know, and it was uh much slower. the

129:27

Shifty Brent AI version is like, damn,

129:31

that was a real person.

129:33

That'd be pretty great.

129:34

>> He would be the greatest artist. I got

129:35

there was a guy I can't remember his

129:37

name but just uh like the other day uh

129:39

some guy he works for Fox News and he

129:42

came out and had a whole post about me

129:44

and he goes uh um he goes Dave Smith's

129:46

account is clearly botted by foreign

129:49

like and I'm almost like when he said

129:51

that I was almost kind of like it was a

129:53

weird thing like I know I've never paid

129:55

for anything but like I don't know you

129:57

know what I mean like what someone else

129:59

might have done or something like that

130:00

but I asked him but I I so I replied to

130:02

him and I go wait what evidence do you

130:04

have of this and then he his post was

130:07

that he said because I had 900,000

130:11

followers on Twitter but I'm playing

130:13

Laugh Boston this weekend and he goes

130:15

that's a 300 seat venue so I play that

130:19

obviously sometimes too well I was like

130:20

first of all he doesn't understand you

130:22

just don't get comedy clubs dude like

130:24

this is not and first of all I'm doing

130:25

five shows there by the way come on out

130:27

this weekend

130:28

>> great club

130:29

>> great club one of my one of my favorite

130:31

weekends of last year

130:32

>> it's a [ __ ] great room

130:33

>> but I was like look Man, I I sold out

130:35

all the shows last year. Hoping to do

130:37

the same this year. But I go that is any

130:40

like I just know the industry of standup

130:42

comedy pretty well and I was like

130:43

anybody who you're saying would be

130:45

selling more than this. So what selling

130:46

out big theaters or selling out a

130:48

stadium or something like that? All the

130:49

people who do that have more followers

130:51

than me.

130:52

>> So like he's not even right about the

130:54

ratio of it or whatever.

130:55

>> He doesn't understand numbers.

130:57

>> But then I kind of like I I grilled him

130:59

on it a bit more cuz listen I'm kind of

131:01

like you. Like when you were talking

131:03

about suing CNN back in the day for

131:04

slandering you, like I'm never actually

131:06

gonna do it, but I don't mind saying it.

131:10

You know what I mean? So like I don't So

131:11

I tagged Fox News and I go, "Hey Fox

131:13

News, shouldn't you have some evidence

131:14

if you're going to make a claim like I'm

131:15

clearly botted by foreign influence or

131:18

whatever?"

131:18

>> Fox News actually said it.

131:20

>> The guy works for Fox News.

131:21

>> Was he on Fox News?

131:22

>> No, he's on Twitter.

131:24

>> Twitter, but he's like a a Fox News

131:26

contributor or something like that,

131:27

>> right? But I'm a UFC contributor. It

131:28

wouldn't be like the UFC. You know what

131:30

I'm saying? I guess that's true. So, I

131:32

don't know. Maybe it would just be him.

131:33

And either way, I'm not suing anyone.

131:34

But I did want him to just I go just

131:36

just admit you don't have any evidence

131:38

for this. Like, just retract that.

131:39

>> Well, here's the thing. I would agree

131:41

that your account is botted because

131:43

you're very controversial public figure.

131:45

So, of course, they're going to focus.

131:47

I'm sure my account is botted, too. I'm

131:49

sure Jaime's account is botted.

131:51

>> 100%. Right.

131:53

>> Show you the evidence.

131:55

>> I think Jamie might have bought himself.

131:56

>> We're all botted, man. the if you look

131:59

at you know we've brought up this up a

132:00

million times but there was an FBI

132:02

former FBI analyst who analyzed Twitter

132:05

before the purchase and it was his take

132:08

that as much as 80%

132:10

might be artificial now this is back

132:12

then this is before Elon purchased it I

132:15

think they've done they've taken some

132:17

steps to try to ensure one of the things

132:19

is you have to you could go to the

132:21

person's page you can see what country

132:23

they're posting from

132:24

>> Yes. I like that because there's a lot

132:26

of people that are like pro America and

132:27

you're like, "Hey, man, you're in

132:28

Pakistan." Yeah. Like what's going on

132:30

here? This is kind of kooky. So, there's

132:32

a lot of that going on.

132:33

>> I' I've had I've had uh uh before where

132:35

people go like, "Oh, Dave, you always

132:37

say Israel's trying to lie us into war,

132:39

but this is America. We decide what war

132:41

we're going to fight and then you click

132:42

it. Israel

132:44

in Israel talk.

132:45

>> At least we're getting steps to know

132:47

those." Listen, if it wasn't for Elon

132:49

Musk, we would be [ __ ] I've said this

132:52

before, I'll say it again. history will

132:54

go back and look at his purchasing

132:57

Twitter and it it has changed the course

133:01

of communication in this country for the

133:03

better. I know a lot of you thought, "Oh

133:06

my god, the racism is up and all this

133:08

stuff is up." That's people. That's the

133:11

internet. That is an accurate represent

133:13

representation of people. It's not good,

133:15

but it's also accurate. And the only way

133:18

that's going to change is if the other

133:20

voices are more compelling. And at least

133:22

now they have an opportunity to do that.

133:25

>> Yeah. Well, and you and you have to kind

133:27

of engage in this whether and I'm not

133:29

saying you have to be on Twitter or

133:30

something like that, but I'm just saying

133:31

like if you wanna,

133:33

you know, I would love very much to get

133:36

to a place where like you be like, "Hey,

133:38

let's all agree that we're not on board

133:40

with the bigotry stuff." And I mean this

133:42

like whether it's against white men or

133:44

whether it's against black men or

133:46

whether it's against Jews or whether

133:47

it's against Muslims or whatever. And I

133:48

see a whole lot of all of that. And I'd

133:50

love to move past that. I also would um

133:54

like like I I wish there was a way that

133:58

like Mark Leven and Tucker Carlson could

134:00

have like a cool conversation. You know

134:02

what I mean? And not like not like be

134:04

like but Well, look, it's

134:05

>> I wish Santa Claus and Jesus would come

134:07

meet me for dinner.

134:08

>> Well, look, both would be nice. This the

134:10

latter is more likely I think too at

134:12

this point. You know, I had a weird um

134:13

thing. I don't know if you saw this, but

134:16

uh Ben Shapiro uh had he made this video

134:20

about like about Pierce Morgan and and

134:23

like going at him over having me on on

134:26

the show. And he went and this whole

134:28

thing and so he he says to me or or he

134:31

said, you know, he insults me a few

134:32

times or whatever. And then he goes, uh

134:35

now I I can hear Dave Smith right now.

134:37

And his response to this is debate me,

134:39

bro. which fair enough, that kind of is

134:42

always my I only have one tool in my

134:44

toolkit. Like,

134:45

>> right,

134:45

>> come let's podcast about this. I don't

134:47

know. Like, this is what I do. I talk.

134:49

>> But I'm willing to do that.

134:50

>> He goes, "No." Uh because you're like,

134:52

"So, uh" he said, "Because I won't I

134:54

don't debate such intellectually

134:55

dishonest people or something like

134:57

that," which I thought was a weird

134:59

criticism of me. Like, you could say I'm

135:01

wrong, but I do believe the [ __ ] I say.

135:03

>> Yeah. I don't think you're in the I

135:05

don't think in any

135:07

demonstration of any I don't think

135:10

there's a single moment that I could

135:11

point to that I think that you've been

135:13

intellectually dishonest. I think that

135:15

is like factually incorrect.

135:17

>> Well, that's that is gaslighting. You

135:20

are very honest. You're a very honest

135:23

person.

135:23

>> Thank you. I try to be.

135:24

>> No, you are. It's one of the things I

135:26

love about you. You you're honest about

135:28

your fuckups. You're honest about your

135:30

what you were incorrect about and what

135:32

bothered you

135:33

>> about things that you've said. You're

135:35

you're very honest. So that's a silly

135:37

thing to say. That's total gaslighting.

135:39

>> Well, it's also Well, I look at it like

135:40

this and I don't you know, honestly,

135:43

like obviously if Ben Shapiro wanted to

135:44

debate, I would I would do it.

135:46

>> Everybody before

135:48

you go, dude, you can't say I'm beyond

135:50

the pale when you're known for debating

135:52

19year-olds who are confused about their

135:54

gender. You know what I'm saying?

135:56

Now, I don't know if you remember this

135:57

and this to me I I actually think is is

135:59

very interesting, but I don't know if

136:00

you remember this, but on this show when

136:02

Ben was on years ago, and this, you

136:04

know, years before October 7th or

136:06

anything like that, but he was saying

136:07

some he was talking about Israel and his

136:08

defense for Israel and you went uh you

136:11

go, "That's interesting. Would you ever

136:12

debate someone, you know, who's a critic

136:15

of Israel?" And just generically, not

136:17

about a specific person. And he goes,

136:18

"Absolutely. I'd be happy to do that."

136:20

And you know the thing about guys like

136:23

that is that particularly with Ben

136:24

Shapiro for the last two and a half

136:26

years his number one issue Israel has

136:29

been the number one topic of

136:30

conversation. And in that time Israel

136:33

support has been bleeding. I mean just

136:35

like to a level you couldn't have

136:37

imagined. You couldn't have imagined two

136:38

and a half years ago to go this will be

136:40

a pro Palestinian country. That was

136:42

unthinkable. And it's become that. And

136:44

forget me.

136:45

>> There's way better people than me. But

136:47

Ben Shapiro debated no one. He never

136:50

once had a conversation with a competent

136:53

critic of Israel and that listen, people

136:58

saw that. People noticed that. And so I

137:01

I kind of in a weird way feel like it's

137:03

like, "Hey dude, I don't care if you do

137:04

the debate with me or not. I wish I

137:06

don't think we ever can. I wish there

137:07

would be a world where we could have a

137:08

good faith conversation like a guy with

137:10

me and Ben Shapiro." But he refused to

137:12

do it with anyone anyway. So, while

137:15

you're smearing everybody who's a critic

137:16

of Israel, you're not willing to like

137:19

you. Listen, there are some people who

137:20

don't debate, but he branded himself as

137:22

the debate guy,

137:24

>> right? If you don't like Dave, sit down

137:25

with Scott Horton.

137:26

>> Sure. Absolutely. Scott Horton's way

137:28

smarter than me and knows way more [ __ ]

137:29

than me anyway. So, talk to him about

137:30

it, dude.

137:32

>> You're saying that this is the reason

137:33

why you won't do it. That sounds crazy

137:35

because wouldn't you want to debate

137:37

someone who's intellectually dishonest?

137:38

Because it would be so easy to refute

137:40

them with facts.

137:40

>> Exactly. So, come

137:41

>> It would be perfect. It's like dating.

137:43

It's like sparring a guy who knows fake

137:46

kung fu,

137:47

>> you know, he thinks he's got a death

137:48

touch and you're Dustin Porier. You're

137:49

like, "Oh, yeah, bro. Lace the gloves

137:51

up. Let's go."

137:52

>> Well, that was kind of my thing with

137:53

with the Douglas Murray thing, too,

137:54

where it was like at a certain point,

137:55

you're like, "Dude, you can't just say

137:57

you're an expert and I'm not an expert."

137:59

The demonstrate that then that if that's

138:01

the case, then it should be easy for you

138:03

to just shot me up in front of the world

138:06

right now. Some things that you had to

138:07

correct him on.

138:08

>> Yeah.

138:10

Yeah. He just got it wrong. And you

138:11

could see like the tremor in his eyes

138:13

like ah [ __ ] Like they don't want to

138:15

give up that ground because they're

138:16

playing a very different game. And the

138:17

game is not let's be intellectually

138:20

honest about what we think is going on

138:22

and what we think is good and bad about

138:24

what's going on versus I'm trying to

138:26

win. Yeah. And one of the ways I try to

138:28

win is by I can appeal to authority. You

138:32

you're not an expert.

138:34

>> You know, you're not a this. You're not

138:35

a professor. You don't you've never been

138:37

there. Yeah. That kind of [ __ ] That

138:39

that that is all like hack ass fake kung

138:43

fu moves.

138:45

>> You know you're gonna try on Francis and

138:46

Ganu. You know what I mean?

138:47

>> Yeah. Like Okay. So, good luck with

138:49

that.

138:49

>> You're saying you should not that I'm

138:50

comparing you to Francis. That's very

138:52

disrespectful to Francis.

138:55

>> Certainly not when it comes to fight.

138:56

You much rather fight me.

138:57

>> This Ronda Rousey card they got Francis

138:59

fighting Philip Lind. Philip Lind who's

139:02

a light heavyweight at in the UFC and

139:04

the UFC cut him and he's fighting the

139:06

scariest heavyweight who's ever walked

139:08

the face of the earth. I mean prime time

139:09

>> next to prime time Alistister Overim.

139:11

Prime time Alistister Overim when he was

139:13

Uber him I think is even scarier

139:15

>> I think because he was way skillful like

139:17

he was terrifying when he was on the

139:19

sauce.

139:20

>> Yes. But even

139:23

Francis was a thing where Francis almost

139:26

has a thing where it just seems like you

139:28

you have to fight a perfect against him

139:32

which Stipe Mio did his first fight.

139:34

Their first he took a lot of shots.

139:36

That's the thing about Stipe. Like Stipe

139:38

could take a shot

139:39

>> and you would see he would like jab him

139:41

and he'd be rocked, but he'd still get

139:42

the takedown and still and he exhausted.

139:44

>> Skill. He beat him with skill, strategy,

139:46

experience, everything. But in the

139:48

second one, DC said it best. He goes, "A

139:50

patient Francis is a [ __ ] terrifying

139:53

thing."

139:53

>> Dude, my favorite uh my favorite

139:55

commentary ever in a fight was uh when

139:57

when DC said it was just so hilarious to

139:59

me. It was so real. Like he just meant

140:01

it. Yeah,

140:02

>> it was when when Francis and Ganu fought

140:04

uh fought uh Gan

140:06

>> and he grappled a little bit in that

140:08

fight, which we had never seen him do

140:09

before, but there was one point where

140:11

there he was on the ground and he like

140:13

took his back or something like that.

140:15

Like he passed his guard or he took his

140:16

back or something like that and DC just

140:18

goes, "Oh my god, he's doing jiu-jitsu

140:21

now." Like it was like he was speaking

140:23

of a robot who just learned how to feel

140:25

feelings. He goes, "Oh my god, it's

140:26

learning. It's advancing." Like this is

140:29

so terrifying.

140:30

A guy that's that much of a destroyer

140:32

that learns how to take backs and

140:34

strangle people too and control you from

140:35

the back and blast you unconscious like

140:37

he did with that dude in the PFL in his

140:40

last fight. Took his back and just

140:41

blasted him into the nether world.

140:43

>> Yeah, that's that's scary.

140:44

>> He's the scariest guy that's ever fought

140:46

in the UFC. Like I said,

140:47

>> props to that dude for taking the fight.

140:49

>> Natural clean guy. I should say that

140:51

with a captain.

140:51

>> Fair enough. Fair enough.

140:52

>> You know, cuz we only got a couple

140:54

Alistar Overim fights where he was Uber

140:56

and the big one being Brock Lesnar.

140:58

>> That was the big one. And of course, the

141:00

other fight on that card that they

141:01

added, which is huge, is the Nate Diaz.

141:03

>> Well, here's here's my point.

141:04

>> If Nate Diaz is fighting, I just I'm

141:07

paying whatever you're charging, I'm

141:08

going to be wherever it is.

141:10

>> And it's Mike Perry who who bad

141:12

[ __ ] That's a great fight. But

141:14

my point is they also have Ro Bellis

141:16

Despain who's on the card who's a 6'7

141:20

Cuban taekwond do expert who's a

141:23

heavyweight, who's a knockout artist.

141:25

Like, why didn't they have him? He's

141:27

fighting Junior Doss Santos and Junior

141:29

Doss Santos is you know he's

141:31

>> it's he's had a he was an all-time great

141:33

but he had a long career and he's had

141:35

some bad knockouts

141:36

>> some wars too

141:37

>> bad wars the wars with Kane Velasquez

141:39

took years off his life

141:42

it was almost criminal that they didn't

141:43

stop uh both of those fights

141:45

>> well they were definitely horrible and

141:47

and terrible to watch but the point is

141:49

Roelis is huge he's a real heavyweight

141:52

he's a big giant knockout artist like

141:54

that would have been an interesting

141:55

fight versus Francis

141:56

big, super tall guy that's hard to hit.

141:59

>> Yeah.

141:59

>> And if it just is a striking fight, the

142:02

problem with Roell is he got he got

142:04

exposed in his last UFC fight on the

142:06

ground. He got beat up on his ground

142:08

game's not that good. Could have gotten

142:09

better, but on the feet that's a little

142:11

bit more interesting to me than

142:13

Philillip. Although Philip's a skillful

142:15

fighter, you know, he's just he's used

142:16

to fighting at light heavyweight. The

142:18

UFC cuts him and now all of a sudden

142:20

he's fighting against Francis. Yeah,

142:24

that's a little bit of a a mismatch, but

142:27

hey, I mean, you know, we've seen crazy

142:28

[ __ ] happen in MMA. Felipe, I think it's

142:31

pronounced Felipe. Felipe Lind, but he's

142:33

a good fighter. I It's not It's not a

142:35

bad fight in that sense. But it's like

142:38

>> you're going up against a guy with a

142:40

chip on his shoulder that they're paying

142:41

$20 million. He's the lineal I don't

142:43

know what they're paying him. I'm just

142:44

guessing. But he's the lineal

142:46

heavyweight champion of the world, the

142:48

real one. Like, if you really like plot

142:49

it out, no one beat him for the title.

142:52

That's a That's a crazy fight. It's like

142:55

that's how shallow the heavyweight

142:56

division out is outside of the UFC.

142:59

There's so few fights for you to get

143:02

Francis for. There's so few fights in

143:04

the UFC. I mean, the UFC's heavyweight

143:07

division is a a real mess.

143:10

>> It's very hard to find gigantic men who

143:12

are excellent fighters. I guess

143:14

>> there's a lot in Russia, okay? There's

143:16

there's guys that are fighting in other

143:17

countries that are really good that are

143:19

coming up. It's just like it's hard to

143:21

get him over here. This Josh Hoit, he's

143:23

a bad [ __ ] That's that wrestler

143:25

dude who's crazy who has these crazy

143:27

speeches after the fight. Puts on an

143:28

American flag bandana

143:30

>> and he said Brittney Grinder has a dick.

143:32

Like

143:33

Britney Grinder's a man. I forget what

143:35

he said, but he's just nuts. He's But

143:37

he's also like really smart about

143:39

marketing.

143:39

>> Who's the other guy? You you talked

143:41

about him several times, but he's the

143:42

the Olympic wrestler guy. Uh

143:44

>> oh, Gabe.

143:45

>> Gabe. Yeah, Gabe.

143:46

>> Gable. Gable. He's Yeah, he's not in

143:48

yet, though. He's not in I had him on

143:49

the podcast. He's not in the UFC yet.

143:52

When he's in the UFC, he's going to be a

143:55

[ __ ] problem. Olympic gold medalist,

143:58

elite wrestler, moves like a cat, 250

144:01

lbs, young, super dedicated, and just

144:05

recently learned striking and is [ __ ]

144:07

people up with his hands.

144:08

>> Yeah. And is picking it up quite

144:10

quickly.

144:10

>> And is a Jon Jones protege. So he's been

144:13

being mentored by the goat and absorbing

144:18

his mindset and help that guy's helping

144:21

him. He's investing his time into

144:24

training. If you're a young guy, you

144:25

know what a [ __ ] boost of confidence,

144:27

the greatest of all time says you're

144:29

going to be the man. You're going to be

144:31

the [ __ ] man. You just stick with

144:33

this plan and they're bringing him up

144:34

the right way. He fought in dirty

144:36

boxing. He fought some small MMA

144:38

organizations. He's just like building

144:40

up experience.

144:41

>> Yeah. And there's not there's never been

144:43

a lot of but there's not really right

144:47

now in the heavyweight landscape. There

144:50

isn't really like a Frank Mir or uh um

144:55

what's his name? Um Minotaur uh

144:58

>> Noggera where there used to be these

145:00

like guys who were like kind of known

145:01

for fighting off their back. You know

145:03

what I mean? Like most heavyweights

145:04

don't really like fighting off their

145:06

back. These even the guys who are really

145:07

good at jiu-jitsu. I also think just in

145:09

general fighting off your back is a lot

145:10

harder than it used to be.

145:12

>> Over Doom was the greatest.

145:13

>> Yes, that's a great examp.

145:15

Um, but there aren't really that many

145:17

guys like that. A lot of these guys, you

145:19

take them down,

145:20

>> they're in trouble.

145:21

>> They're in trouble.

145:21

>> Yeah. And when you got a guy like Gable,

145:23

guess what, [ __ ]

145:24

>> You're going to get taken down. And

145:26

there's not a [ __ ] thing you can do

145:28

about it. That is a next level.

145:31

>> I just saw the one one of his recent

145:32

fights where he uh he he's finishing a

145:35

double leg before he realized he knocked

145:37

the guy out. But it seemed like

145:38

>> he KO him with a left hook and he's so

145:41

fast that as the guy's collapsing on the

145:43

way down. He shoots a double, connects,

145:45

takes him to the ground while he's

145:46

unconscious. So before the guy has a

145:48

chance to drop, that's how fast he is.

145:51

He's already on him taking him down and

145:52

pounds him out while he's already

145:53

unconscious.

145:54

>> Yeah, that was scary.

145:57

>> That guy's a problem. He's a problem.

145:58

And that's an American heavyweight

146:00

[ __ ] We need one of those. We

146:02

need some American champions. We're

146:04

down.

146:04

>> Get him in the White House.

146:06

>> Yeah. I mean, are there any American

146:08

champions right now? Who are the

146:09

American champions? Um, McKenzie Durn is

146:13

the strawweight champion, so she's

146:15

technically an American, although his

146:17

her dad is a very famous Brazilian

146:20

legend.

146:21

>> Okay.

146:21

>> Yeah. Megaton Diaz is is her dad and she

146:24

was a jiu-jitsu Brazilian jiu-jitsu

146:26

champion, but she is American.

146:29

>> So, she's a champion. Other than that,

146:33

who

146:33

>> Sean Strickland's fighting for the

146:35

title? Kayla Harrison. That's right.

146:37

Kayla's. So, it's only women that are

146:40

the Americans.

146:42

>> Yeah. Look at that. Boy, you're gonna

146:44

see a lot of those dudes with those

146:45

beards.

146:46

>> They keep coming over here. You're going

146:48

to see a Oh, Joshua Van is an American.

146:50

That's right.

146:51

>> Um, you got to see a lot of those dudes.

146:53

That's a caveat though, the Joshua Van.

146:55

No disrespect for Joshua because I think

146:57

he's an awesome fighter, but he won that

146:58

fight. We got to have a rematch on that

147:00

one.

147:00

>> That was a freak injury. I mean, he fell

147:02

and dislocated his arm. It's a complete

147:05

freak injury. Um, and Pantosia still

147:08

hasn't fully recovered from that. So, it

147:10

was pretty bad. Whatever the [ __ ] They

147:11

said his shoulder dislocated and his

147:13

elbow.

147:14

>> Yeah, I remember hearing that afterward.

147:16

It looked like it was just his elbow.

147:18

>> Uhhuh. But they said the doctor had said

147:20

it was his shoulder. And so what it what

147:22

the thing about the elbow is um the

147:24

elbow is a less complicated joint,

147:26

right? And so when the elbow gets

147:28

dislocated, if someone just pulls on it,

147:31

it can pop back into place. So like

147:33

saying that there's as long they do know

147:35

what they're doing right because you

147:36

don't want to do it like Yuri Prohaska's

147:38

team did and rip his shoulder apart and

147:40

it needed surgery. You probably need

147:42

surgery anyway if it was dislocating

147:44

like that. It was probably loose. But

147:46

the point is that like his elbow might

147:48

have popped back into place by the time

147:49

they brought him backstage. And that's

147:51

when they realized his shoulder was

147:52

[ __ ] cuz his shoulder probably hurt

147:54

more even.

147:55

>> Right. Right.

147:57

>> That was unfortunate cuz that was a real

147:58

interesting fight. dislocate a lot, you

148:01

know, and you know, sometimes people

148:03

dislocate their shoulders and don't even

148:04

realize they do.

148:06

>> And I apparently, according to my the

148:09

this orthopedic surgeon that I went to

148:11

back in the day before I realized that

148:12

stem cells could fix it, uh this guy was

148:15

convincing me that I had to have

148:16

surgery. And one of the things he said,

148:17

"Do you know that your shoulder's been

148:19

dislocated?" And I said, "It has?" He

148:21

goes, "You didn't know?" I go, "No." He

148:23

goes, "How long how many times you hurt

148:24

your shoulder?" I go, "How much time you

148:26

got?"

148:27

just want to sit down and talk about how

148:28

many times I've been kamorid, how many

148:30

times I've been [ __ ] arm blocked, how

148:32

many times I've been caught in a

148:33

triangle, how many times, you know,

148:35

posting on the ground, I've jostled my

148:37

shoulder. The good news is there have

148:39

been no fracture or ligament injury.

148:41

That's great. Oh, that's Bahumpa said

148:43

that. So, from that, we have great

148:45

expectations for his return, but the

148:47

exact time frame is still unknown. Still

148:48

needs a lot of physiootherapy, start

148:50

moving his arm. Wow. Then he can go back

148:52

to light training and then hard

148:53

training. Bro, we got to get that guy

148:56

down to [ __ ] the CPI in, you know,

149:00

the the Cellular Performance Institute

149:02

that the UFC uses. Get that dude down to

149:04

Tijana.

149:05

>> I'm worried about I'm worried about the

149:07

new model for the UFC,

149:08

>> the Paramount model.

149:09

>> I'm worried about the Warren Iran and

149:11

the new UFC model. This is what keeps me

149:13

up at night.

149:13

>> I get it. So, what are you worried about

149:15

with the new UFC model?

149:16

>> Look, I I'm a I'm no genius. Um, but it

149:20

seems to me like I'm a hardcore fan of

149:22

the UFC, right? So, I was uh you know, I

149:26

order every pay-per-view, right?

149:27

Everyone, you know, I and and so every

149:30

any Saturday if I'm on the road in my

149:32

green room, we're watching the UFC. If

149:34

I'm not on the road, I'm either at home

149:35

watching it or I'm trying to go to the

149:36

event if it's in town,

149:38

>> right?

149:38

>> So, then uh it's like, okay, ESPN is is

149:42

over. Uh we're not doing that anymore.

149:45

So, then they're go we're switching to

149:46

Paramount. Now, I already had Paramount

149:47

cuz like my kids like some shows on

149:49

Paramount. Yep. So, now

149:51

>> Land Man.

149:52

>> Yeah. Oh, yeah. I I watch land great

149:53

show.

149:54

>> Um so you know so like I have Paramount

149:56

Plus I'm like oh okay well that's easy

149:58

enough and then I I'm I'm like so wait a

149:59

minute hold on so you tell me I just get

150:01

every one for free now I just don't have

150:04

to order pay-per-views anymore and

150:05

there's just something about that. Now

150:06

I'm not saying whether this is

150:09

Paramount's mistake or the UFC's mistake

150:10

or whatever. just like the the basics of

150:12

business to me. Go,

150:14

>> so you just had a a loyal customer who's

150:17

very happy to pay for every pay-per-view

150:20

and I'm just not now. Like this just on

150:23

some Now I understand it's cuz Paramount

150:24

gave them a whole bunch of money, but on

150:26

some level I go, number one, I go, "But

150:29

how is this good for business if the

150:31

customer no longer has to pay for a

150:33

thing that I was happily paying for?"

150:35

>> Let me correct you. Okay, sure. First of

150:37

all, Paramount,

150:40

the idea of doing this and investing $7

150:43

billion into the UFC over the next few

150:45

years,

150:46

>> the the positive that they're going to

150:48

get from that with loyal new customers

150:51

is massive. So, if you're

150:54

>> introducing it to a whole new audience,

150:56

>> if you're a loyal pay-per-view buyer,

150:58

>> if you spend what is it 70 bucks for a

151:01

pay-per-view,

151:01

>> I think something like that.

151:02

>> So, 70 bucks for this big time

151:04

pay-per-view card. Now you get it for

151:07

free. You just have to pay for Paramount

151:09

Plus every month for the year. You're

151:10

saving so much money. So the amount of

151:13

new people that are going to go, "Oh,

151:15

this is awesome. I don't have to pay for

151:17

pay-per-view anymore. I pay for

151:19

Paramount Plus and I get all these

151:21

awesome shows, too." Cuz Paramount Plus

151:23

has a ton of shows.

151:25

>> Great deal for the consumer.

151:26

>> You get roped in through that and then

151:28

you go looking around on Paramount Plus

151:30

and you stay a loyal subscriber. They

151:33

have all these years with this new

151:35

influx of viewers from the UFC deal to

151:38

build up more of a library, more shows.

151:40

It's huge for business. Okay, fair

151:42

enough.

151:42

>> They could take their app from where it

151:44

is now and take their streaming model

151:46

from where it is now and quadruple it

151:48

over the next x amount of years.

151:50

>> So they're Okay, so for them they're

151:51

bringing in the whole UFC audience.

151:53

>> And how many people would look at a

151:55

pay-per-view card and look, I would buy

151:57

every one of them. Even when I was

151:59

working for the UFC, I would go on ESPN

152:02

Plus and I would buy them. Even though I

152:04

was there, I was like, I want to be able

152:06

to watch it in the gym when I get home.

152:07

I'm going to buy it.

152:08

>> And so, you've got all these people that

152:12

were looking at those cards that were

152:14

like, this one, I don't know.

152:17

>> I don't know if that's worth 70 bucks.

152:18

If you're on a budget and you're looking

152:20

at this one, you're like, who's

152:21

fighting? Ah,

152:23

>> nah. I'm going to pass on this one. I'll

152:25

watch it, you know, in a couple weeks on

152:27

ESPN Plus because you could just wait a

152:29

few weeks. I don't know how long the

152:30

time frame is, but you can wait a few

152:32

weeks and you watch it.

152:33

>> This you don't have to do that anymore.

152:35

It's 10 bucks a month. What is Paramount

152:36

Plus a month? How much does it cost?

152:37

>> I think they upped it to maybe 12 or 13,

152:39

but I'm not

152:40

>> Let's find out so we're accurate. But

152:42

you're saving so much money. But also on

152:45

ESPN, they charged you something like

152:47

that, too. Like you had to pay an ESPN

152:50

fee and then you had to pay for each

152:52

individual pay-per-view. So, no, listen.

152:54

I'm saving a lot of money off this.

152:55

>> Okay. $ 13.99 a month or $139 a year for

153:00

the ad free premium plan which includes

153:02

Showtime. New and former subscribers can

153:05

currently get any monthly plan for $2.99

153:07

a month for the first two months.

153:09

>> It's not bad.

153:09

>> Oh, for So, for a new subscriber, you

153:11

could try it out for two months for

153:13

$2.99 a month and watch every UFC for

153:16

$2.99 a month for two months. It's

153:18

[ __ ] worth it. And then you're going

153:19

to get this huge influx of people that,

153:23

you know, if you're on a budget, you're

153:24

not going to subscribe to Paramount

153:26

Plus. You already got Netflix. Netflix

153:28

costs X amount of money. Maybe you got

153:30

HBO Max. That's X amount of money. Okay.

153:32

I can't afford Paramount, too. I don't

153:34

want to pay another 10 bucks a month or

153:35

$14 a month. Now, you just It's easy.

153:39

Like, no pay-per-views.

153:41

>> Yeah. They made they made a lot of wives

153:43

of hardcore fans happy. I'm sure for

153:45

that like I don't have to buy these

153:47

pay-per-views anymore. Yeah, they get

153:49

the Paramount shows and uh they don't

153:50

have to do that. All right, fair enough.

153:52

I guess it's just um

153:54

>> in some ways I guess and I don't really

153:55

have much of a mind for business, but in

153:57

some ways there's just a thing where

153:58

it's like we've always done it this way

154:01

now. We're doing it a whole new way.

154:03

>> Yeah. But it's been on streaming for the

154:04

last few years.

154:05

>> Yeah.

154:06

>> So, it's always been on an app anyway.

154:07

And then Paramount, you could get it on

154:10

Apple TV, you can get it on Android TV,

154:12

you can get it on all these different

154:13

things. It's like there's no reason to

154:15

not have it.

154:16

>> It's easy. It's just great for as a

154:18

business move for Paramount. It was a

154:20

smart [ __ ] move because you get this

154:23

built-in hardcore fan base. Now, have

154:25

some of the cards been lackluster? Yes.

154:28

But guess what? That has always been the

154:30

case. A matter of time. You watch Rose

154:34

Nama versus Carlo Esparza. There's been

154:37

some fights back in the day that just

154:38

weren't great.

154:39

>> And there's been cards that

154:42

>> even though they look good on paper, in

154:44

reality, they weren't so fun. Yeah, but

154:46

I also I'm I'm with you. Uh because I

154:49

remember you used to say this back in

154:50

the day all the time, but I I am like a

154:52

purist fan in in MMA in the sense that

154:54

like all of that is like I don't care

154:57

like like feel like oh it's boring.

154:59

You're like it's the most exciting sport

155:00

in the world on its worst day. Even in a

155:02

fight that's a bad fight because you if

155:04

you remember the uh um Frank Mir Crocop

155:07

is a good example of this where it was

155:09

just a boring fight the entire fight and

155:11

then there's a spectacular knockout at

155:12

the end of it. And even if that doesn't

155:14

end up happening, you're always watching

155:15

like that could happen at any moment. I

155:18

also uh I also am with you. I I believe

155:20

in like uh I don't believe in standups.

155:22

>> I don't think anyone should ever be

155:24

stood up. I don't think you should be

155:25

separated for stalemate or whatever.

155:27

It's like if someone puts you in that

155:28

position, then

155:29

>> yeah, you got to get up. If they're not

155:31

doing enough on the top, that's silly.

155:33

>> Sean Ali explains why piracy led to the

155:36

UFC's massive Paramount deal. Oh,

155:38

interesting.

155:38

>> There's a lot of people that'll pay for

155:40

it every week, but there's a lot of

155:41

people that won't. That makes sense.

155:43

They're streaming it illegally. That

155:45

makes sense. I knew there was a lot of

155:46

that because there were sites that you

155:48

could go to and people would openly talk

155:50

about it. You can go to it and just

155:52

watch the pay-per-view. It's a good

155:53

move, dude. It's a good move for for the

155:56

business. It's just like they just need

155:57

a few banger cards to make people forget

156:00

about the stale ones.

156:01

>> But that always that will happen. It's

156:03

inevitable.

156:04

>> You're going to have stale cards. I'm

156:06

concerned about the White House fight.

156:08

I'm concerned about it not just from a

156:10

security standpoint. I'm concerned about

156:11

it because it's outside. It's June and

156:14

it's in Washington DC. When you if it's

156:16

hot out and it could very well be like

156:18

what's the average temperature?

156:20

>> I looked this up the other day. Uh

156:21

average 67% humidity in last year or

156:24

2024 was 100° on June 14th.

156:27

>> Okay.

156:28

>> Okay.

156:28

>> That's tough.

156:29

>> Okay.

156:29

>> And I think it's supposed to be at noon

156:30

also.

156:31

>> Yeah, that's that's an issue.

156:32

>> Okay. Okay. Okay. That's a [ __ ] big

156:35

problem, dude. That's a big problem. You

156:37

are going to radically affect their

156:39

performance if you make people fight in

156:40

100 degree temperature with 67% humidity

156:44

outside.

156:45

>> You're also going to radically affect my

156:46

ability to do commentary. Okay?

156:49

My [ __ ] head doesn't have any hair.

156:51

The top of my head is going to be beat

156:53

red. I'm going to have to put some toxic

156:55

sunscreen on it. You're going to see me

156:57

with that white zinc powder that the

156:58

surfers use on their nose. It'll be all

157:00

over the I I'll make like fake hair with

157:02

like white zinc. Dude, my head's going

157:05

to get

157:06

80% chance of thunderstorms with highs

157:09

in the mid 80s.

157:09

>> Okay. Are they building a tent? Is this

157:12

outside outside or is it outside in a

157:14

tent? Are they going to have like fans

157:15

blowing cold air on us? You know how

157:17

much DC's going to complain? That

157:19

[ __ ] dude, he's going to be right

157:21

next to me. His shirt's going to be

157:23

soaked.

157:24

>> Yeah, that's a

157:25

>> You won't be able to tell with mine cuz

157:26

I always wear black anyway. But

157:28

everybody with a white shirt or a blue

157:30

shirt, if Anak has a light blue shirt

157:32

on, his pits are going to be [ __ ]

157:33

filled up with sweat. It's going to be

157:35

ridiculous.

157:36

>> That also like really legitimately

157:37

changes the actual fight itself.

157:40

>> 100%.

157:41

>> Isn't that like the rendering of it? I

157:43

think

157:43

>> Okay, so there I don't see any AC there,

157:45

bro. How you going to get AC on those

157:47

people? What is that going to be like?

157:49

That sounds [ __ ] insane to do that in

157:52

June just cuz that's a fun time to do

157:54

it. I mean, if I was Justin Gatechi or I

157:57

was Ilia Toporia, if I was Justin

157:59

Gatechi, I mean, first of all, he has to

158:01

take the fight. It's a historic fight.

158:02

It's at the White House. He's a He's a

158:05

true red-blooded American. He wants to

158:07

win the title at the White House.

158:09

>> Come on, you have to do it. But

158:11

>> he's 37 years old. He's had a long

158:14

career and he's fighting maybe the most

158:17

lethal guy he's ever faced. Yeah. the

158:20

the one guy out of all the guys he faced

158:22

that can shut the [ __ ] lights out

158:25

with one shot every time. His last three

158:28

fights is the craziest resume in the

158:31

history of the sport. Knocks out

158:33

Alexander Vulcganowski, knocks out Max

158:36

Holloway, knocks knocks out Charles

158:38

Olivera. Two at featherweight, one at

158:40

lightweight. All of them level. I I

158:43

wouldn't even say well I guess it's

158:46

debatable but certainly you could make

158:48

an argument the two best featherweights

158:49

of all time.

158:50

>> Yes.

158:51

>> And one of the greatest

158:52

>> one of the greatest lightweights of all

158:54

time. And by the way and I know MMA math

158:56

is never perfect but you look at what

158:58

Olivivera just did to Max Holloway who I

159:00

love is one of my favorite fighters of

159:01

all time. You look at what what Charles

159:03

Olivera just did to Max Holloway and

159:05

then you think about the way Ilia Tapora

159:07

handled him

159:09

>> flatlined him in the first round

159:10

>> and not what was to me almost as

159:14

impressive as the knockout was um

159:18

>> handling him on the ground. Yeah.

159:19

>> Pass his guard. He tried to take him

159:22

down. Think about the way he got one of

159:23

those body locks and tried to take him

159:24

down. Think about the way how helpless

159:26

Max Holloway was for that. How helpless

159:28

a whole bunch of guys we've seen are

159:29

when he gets his hands around you. And

159:31

Ilia Tapora, he tried to do that. He

159:32

ends up on top and passes his guard

159:34

right away. Also, he ate a really clean

159:37

elbow early in that fight and just was

159:39

like nothing. Like I mean,

159:41

>> shook it off like it was nothing. He's

159:43

he's a special talent. So, but then

159:46

again, when you are dealing with special

159:48

talents and great great fighters like

159:50

Justin, who this is probably his last

159:53

opportunity to fight for the title.

159:55

>> I want that under the perfect

159:56

conditions. I want that to be in an

159:58

arena where it's 72° and air

160:00

conditioned. I I don't want it to be

160:02

outside. I don't want there to be any

160:05

additional stress or distractions

160:07

because you're warming up at the White

160:08

House. Like, what do you have tents with

160:10

mats on them and these guys are going to

160:12

be slipping around in puddles of sweat

160:14

>> or shadow boxing in the situation room

160:16

before you come out?

160:17

>> Who's going to slip on sweat and blow

160:18

their ACL out? You know, I mean, have

160:21

you ever done striking on mats when a

160:23

bunch of dudes have been training like

160:25

in a class? It's so [ __ ] slippery,

160:28

man. It's If it's that hot, it's going

160:31

to Unless they have it these mats and

160:33

where they're getting set up in air

160:35

conditioned buildings somewhere. Unless

160:37

they have a facility.

160:38

>> Yeah, maybe they can do that.

160:39

>> I hope they think that through. I hope

160:41

they think that through. I hope they

160:42

prepare it. It's just I don't like I I

160:46

like the idea that it's like this big

160:49

celebration of the UFC that the

160:51

president loves the UFC so much he wants

160:53

to do it at the White House. But in

160:54

practice, I don't like it at all because

160:56

you've got two world titles. You know,

160:59

you've got the interim heavyweight world

161:01

title and then you've got this world

161:03

title with Justin and Ilia at 55. I

161:07

don't like it. I want those I want those

161:09

to be at the T-Mobile. I want those to

161:11

be at the Madison Square Garden Arena. I

161:13

want, you know, I want those to be

161:14

somewhere dope. The TD Garden in Boston.

161:17

Put it Put it in a [ __ ] real arena

161:19

where it's airond conditioned. Damn it.

161:21

These are amazing fights. I don't want

161:23

anybody fighting when it's 100° outside.

161:26

>> That's crazy.

161:27

>> Wouldn't and correct me if I'm wrong,

161:29

but also I would think it's you're going

161:30

to get sweaty so quick in weather like

161:33

that. And that is a big deal for like

161:35

grappling and stuff like that. I mean,

161:36

like that's a huge advantage if you're

161:39

trying to not get grappled by someone.

161:41

>> Here's another factor. These are people

161:43

that just were radically dehydrated 24

161:46

hours ago. And then you're asking them

161:48

to compete in a sauna. You're basically

161:51

asking them to fight in a sauna.

161:53

>> That is still so crazy to me that

161:55

there's not a way that we can just get

161:58

two guys who weigh 180 lbs to fight at

162:01

180 lb and instead instead we have to

162:04

have two guys who weigh 180 lb cut down

162:07

to 150 lb and then rehydrate up to 180

162:11

pounds to fight at 180 pounds

162:13

>> and weaken themselves like radically

162:15

weaken themselves. I see those guys the

162:17

day they weigh in. The worst ever that I

162:20

ever saw was Travis Lutter.

162:22

>> So Travis Anderson Silva, I remember

162:25

>> he missed weight, but I was backstage

162:27

for all of it. Right. So this was back

162:29

when the weigh-ins were the time of the

162:30

actual weigh-ins. It wasn't the

162:32

ceremonial weigh- in. Like now they give

162:34

them more time. You can weigh in in the

162:35

morning and then by the ceremonial

162:37

weigh-ins, which is usually 5:00 p.m.

162:38

Usually these guys have significantly

162:40

rehydrated. They do it slowly, but they

162:43

have a process to it. Uh, but Travis

162:45

missed weight and so I was backstage

162:47

while they gave him x amount of time to

162:49

make the weight and dude he couldn't

162:52

walk. He was shuffling. Shuffling like

162:55

he couldn't pick his legs up. His lips

162:57

were cracked. His face was draw. He

162:59

looked like he was going to die. He

163:01

looked like a guy who had been

163:02

shipwrecked, you know, and like lost at

163:04

sea and just drinking his own piss for a

163:07

week and they finally rescued him.

163:08

That's what it looked like.

163:10

>> Well, he was dying, I guess, right? I

163:12

mean, that is what you're looking at.

163:12

And then 24 hours later, he has to fight

163:15

the greatest middleweight of all time.

163:16

He has to fight Anderson [ __ ]

163:18

Silva in his prime.

163:20

>> And by did for that being the story did

163:24

remarkably well in the fight. I he got

163:26

viciously uh he was elbowed in the

163:29

triangle. Yeah. Yeah. It was hard.

163:30

>> That would not have happened if Travis

163:32

wasn't compromised. Travis was a real

163:34

problem back then. Yeah, he was the best

163:36

jiu-jitsu guys to ever compete in MMA

163:38

>> and he was stylistically kind of like

163:40

the best shot against Anderson Silva at

163:42

that time and cuz Anderson Silva just

163:44

looked untouchable and he got him down

163:46

and got him into good positions a few

163:48

times

163:48

>> even though he was [ __ ] from the

163:49

weight cut. But the thing was he never

163:52

made the weight. So even if he beat him,

163:54

he wouldn't have got the title. The

163:55

whole thing was [ __ ]

163:56

>> Yeah.

163:56

>> But it's like I've advocated for there's

163:59

a solution. One of them is multiple

164:00

weight classes that are additional to

164:03

what we have. have one at least every 10

164:05

lbs and it probably should be more. And

164:07

a lot of people push back against that,

164:08

but listen, 10 lb for an elite athlete

164:12

is a big [ __ ] deal. 20 lb is crazy.

164:15

So when you go like 85 to 205, that's

164:18

crazy. That's too much weight. It's too

164:21

much of a gap. You could have multiple

164:23

champions in between those weight

164:25

classes and it's just better for the

164:26

sport overall. You've got more

164:28

champions. You have more champion versus

164:30

champion matchups you can make. Well,

164:31

there's it also first of all, it's very

164:33

unhealthy and and dangerous, and that's

164:35

the biggest issue. But then it also

164:38

makes it a thing where it's like now

164:40

there's there's two factors. It's not

164:42

just who's the best fighter, it's also

164:45

who's the best at dehydrating

164:47

themselves, losing a ton of weight and

164:49

rehydrating themselves. And also, I

164:51

think like I've heard I've heard GSP say

164:53

before that like some people are just

164:55

naturally better at that. Some people

164:57

just fluctuate in weight more. people

164:58

can lose a lot of weight and then gain

165:00

it all back the other day. And he used

165:01

to always say, "I just can't do that."

165:03

Like, I'm not a guy who can do that. But

165:04

I think all of us, we just want to see

165:06

who the best fighter is. Exactly. We

165:07

don't care about who's the best at

165:09

dehydrating.

165:09

>> Anything that hampers your ability

165:12

should be removed from the equation,

165:14

especially if it's something like this.

165:15

But there's a solution. First of all,

165:17

there's a real silliness to the MMA

165:19

weight classes. And why I say silliness,

165:22

our names that we use have been owned by

165:26

boxing for more than a hundred years.

165:28

And the names that we use are for

165:30

different weight classes than boxing

165:32

uses.

165:32

>> That's dumb.

165:34

>> Yeah,

165:34

>> that is dumb as [ __ ] Like if you want

165:36

to have a 170 lb champion, fantastic.

165:39

But don't call it a welterweight because

165:41

welterweight is 147. It's been 147 for

165:45

over a hundred [ __ ] years. The fact

165:47

that you have a 147 champion and you

165:49

call that or 145 champion, you call that

165:51

a featherweight.

165:53

>> Featherweight is 126. That's what it's

165:55

been in boxing forever. Lightweight has

165:58

always been 135. That's what Julio Cesar

166:01

Chavez was the champ of 135.

166:04

>> 135. Lightweight is 155 in the UFC.

166:06

Like, come up with your own names. Why

166:09

do we still have these stupid names?

166:10

>> I never thought about that. It's a good

166:12

point. They attached these names to it

166:14

when they first started developing

166:15

weight classes because it used to just

166:17

be one weight class. Another one on

166:18

this. Why, and I think you've mentioned

166:20

this before. Why am I not getting the

166:23

leg reach?

166:24

>> They do that sometimes.

166:25

>> Do they? Yeah, they do.

166:26

>> I've seen like but on the regular tail

166:28

of the tape it'll still just be reach

166:30

where it's like but in this cuz that

166:32

actually for MMA that's such a huge

166:35

deal.

166:36

>> Sure.

166:36

>> Like it's such a hu cuz like if you're

166:38

Yeah. if you're in kicking range of me,

166:41

but you know what I mean? But you can't

166:42

touch me. Your jab doesn't matter as

166:44

much as in boxing, you know?

166:46

>> And some guys, they have really long

166:48

legs for their torso. And like my my

166:50

friend Larry, my friend Larry Jones from

166:52

my taekwondo days, he had this short

166:54

torso.

166:55

>> What is this?

166:56

>> Aldo's leg reaches longer than Stipe.

166:59

>> Whoa. That's crazy.

167:00

>> Is that right?

167:01

>> That's crazy. Stipe just has a way

167:02

longer torso. That's nuts.

167:04

>> That's crazy. Like the hips tip are the

167:06

same size.

167:06

>> Oh wow. That's crazy. Well, Aldo was

167:09

such a good kicker. It's probably part

167:11

of the reason why.

167:12

>> Um, my friend Larry had this short

167:14

torso, like really short to, but he was

167:16

like 6'3 and he was all legs and he was

167:18

this insane kicker. He was like a freak.

167:20

Like he was made in a lab. And when guys

167:22

would fight him, like you'd see guys in

167:24

tournaments fight him, they'd be like,

167:25

"What the [ __ ] am I going to do with

167:26

this?" Cuz his reach was so nuts and he

167:29

was so fast with his kicks and you

167:31

couldn't get anywhere close to him if

167:33

you were in his weight class and you

167:34

were normally built, right? He was built

167:36

like his torso was shorter than mine,

167:38

but his crazy long legs and long arms.

167:42

>> Yeah.

167:42

>> Like some people are just built certain

167:43

ways and for striking it's a giant

167:45

problem which is another thing that

167:47

makes Ilottopia so [ __ ] unbelievably

167:50

impressive. He's not tall at all.

167:52

>> Yeah.

167:52

>> You know, and he's just flatlining

167:55

people.

167:55

>> Oh, I mean Charles Olivera looked so

167:57

much bigger than him in that fight

167:59

>> and so much bigger than Max, too. Olive

168:01

is big. It's like, look, the sport's

168:04

fine. It's not It's not in trouble. The

168:07

sport's not in trouble. The heavyweight

168:08

division is in trouble. The heavyweight

168:10

division is kind of [ __ ] It's in a

168:11

weird situation. The Alex Pereira thing

168:14

is very interesting. Alex Pereira versus

168:16

Sir Gone is very, very, very interesting

168:18

cuz Sirill Gan is a problem. That guy's

168:21

a problem. He's super athletic. He's

168:24

really fast. He's super skillful with

168:26

his striking. His Muay Thai is

168:28

absolutely elite. and he does a lot of

168:30

things different than what a lot of

168:32

people do.

168:33

>> And has anyone because even Francis,

168:35

like I was saying before, grappled with

168:37

him a lot in that fight. Obviously, Jon

168:39

Jones took him down and choked him. But

168:41

has anyone really stood toe-to-toe and

168:43

beat him up?

168:44

>> No. No. No one's beat him up to toe.

168:46

Tied to Iasa went toe to toe with him

168:49

and tried to, but he got lit up.

168:51

>> Dude, serial gone is a problem.

168:53

>> Even in the little bit in the little bit

168:55

of Tom Aspenol, it looked like he's

168:57

tough. He's tough to fight like that,

168:59

man.

168:59

>> Not just tough, he was like getting off

169:01

on Aspenol and it didn't look good for

169:03

Aspenol. I mean, it's very unfortunate

169:05

that he got his eyes poked that I mean

169:07

that we really never got to see what

169:09

happens if he drags cereal deep deep

169:11

water. What the way Tom would adjusted

169:13

for the second round or third round,

169:14

>> which we've never really seen out of Tom

169:15

either. It was very interesting. We got

169:17

robbed of that, you know, but

169:19

>> we got robbed of that. And poor Tom,

169:20

he's had two [ __ ] eye surgeries and

169:22

then he felt like the UFC disrespected

169:24

him. The whole thing's a mess. Well, I

169:25

don't know about the UFC, but a lot of

169:27

fans did disrespect him. I saw that,

169:28

>> which is crazy. This is like, this is

169:30

really stupid.

169:31

>> We talked about this last night. It

169:33

should be one point, period. If you poke

169:35

somebody in the eyes, if you poke

169:36

someone in the eyes, one point.

169:37

>> Well, especially if the fingers go in

169:39

the eyes. If it's like a glancing thing

169:41

like that, maybe get a warning. But in a

169:44

nutshot, straight nutshot, one point.

169:47

The glancing thing, maybe a warning. I

169:50

think that could be up to the judge's

169:51

discretion upon view of the replay.

169:54

>> Yeah. Well, I the thing is that and we

169:56

were talking about this last night. If

169:58

you So, if you land a a nutshot and it's

170:02

it's accidental as it almost always is,

170:04

you know what I mean? You're trying to

170:05

throw an inside leg kick and it comes

170:06

up. Well, okay. Maybe not. I said almost

170:09

almost always. Uh, but so I just see

170:12

this all the time in MMA. It's the first

170:14

one. It was an accident. This guy gets

170:17

kicked in the nuts. He needs a few

170:18

minutes. Usually, they don't take the

170:20

full uh five or whatever they're

170:21

offered. And then you just go back. It's

170:23

like, look, even if it was an accident,

170:26

that's such an advantage to the guy who

170:29

who kicked him in the groin.

170:31

>> You hurt this guy and now he's got to

170:33

get back to it. And there's no So, like

170:35

it does seem like there almost has to be

170:37

some accounting for that. And there's I

170:40

think there's still it's still a very

170:41

young sport. I think there is still too

170:43

much referee discretion. Like there's

170:45

too much like there should be like an

170:46

official rule for what we do in this

170:48

situation. Not just

170:49

>> those kind of fouls. It's like doesn't

170:51

exist in basketball, right? If somebody

170:53

fouls somebody in basketball and

170:55

everybody sees it, that that's a foul.

170:57

Yes. Right. And the the crowd will go

170:59

nuts. Right. Usually. But it be like a

171:01

real one like throwing someone to the

171:03

ground.

171:04

>> I could show you examples. There are

171:05

some [ __ ] wild things that don't get

171:07

called for whatever.

171:08

>> Don't you think that's a little bit of

171:09

the the corrupt referees. I'm not saying

171:12

all of them, but that that is one thing

171:13

that's been 100% proven is that referees

171:16

do get paid off in order to influence

171:19

gambling lines.

171:19

>> Yeah. There was that one referee who uh

171:22

who confirmed that it was the um the um

171:26

she's Sacramento Kings versus the

171:27

Lakers, which was like a series that was

171:30

like notoriously like everyone was like,

171:32

"Yo, it was crazy. They didn't call any

171:35

of these fouls on the Lakers." And they

171:36

called all these fouls. And then a ref

171:38

came out and was like, "Oh yeah, yeah,

171:39

that's weird." And it does kind of make

171:41

sense. Um because it was the it was the

171:43

Shack and Kobe Lakers. You got to get

171:45

them in the finals, dude. It was big

171:47

money.

171:47

>> God, that's so gross. His defense

171:48

weirdly was like, "They didn't, no one

171:50

told us what to do, but you kind of know

171:53

what they want, so you sort of do it."

171:54

And then you keep kept going put on good

171:56

games and you keep getting the good

171:57

stuff.

171:58

>> Hang them.

172:00

>> Public hanging. [ __ ] you.

172:01

>> But we can deal We can deal with

172:03

Congress's insider trading. But

172:04

basketball must be a

172:06

>> bad judges. Hang them. Hang them all in

172:10

front of the kingdom.

172:11

>> All right, dude. Uh, anything else

172:13

before we wrap this up?

172:14

>> Uh, no. Thank you for letting a

172:16

non-expert talk MMA with you. I love I

172:18

love talking to non-experts,

172:21

>> dude. Thank you so much for everything

172:23

as always. Pleasure, brother. You're the

172:24

[ __ ] man. I love you.

172:25

>> You're the [ __ ] man, too. I love you,

172:26

too.

172:26

>> Uh we'll have fun tonight, right?

172:28

>> Uh I You coming? You leaving? Right.

172:31

>> A damn. Last night was fun, though.

172:32

>> That was a lot of fun. It was a lot of

172:33

fun. It was a good time.

172:34

>> All right. Bye, everybody.

Interactive Summary

The podcast covers a wide array of topics, beginning with financial controversies such as an alleged multi-million dollar bet on oil and claims against Howard Lutnick regarding tariff profits, while also questioning the integrity of public figures and government corruption, citing Jeffrey Epstein ties. The discussion touches on unusual Waymo incidents, the addictive nature of video games, and the intense physical demands and careers of MMA fighters, highlighting unique techniques like the calf kick and the impact of personalities like Conor McGregor. A significant portion critiques US foreign policy, detailing interventions in the Middle East and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and addressing concerns about US immigration, border security, and potential terrorist affiliations. The hosts express skepticism towards traditional media's authenticity compared to podcasts and debate the divisive nature of political labels. The conversation also delves into the UFC's new business model with Paramount+, concerns about holding a UFC fight at the White House due to environmental conditions, and issues with MMA weight classes and refereeing, concluding with a look at AI's role in music and potential fraud.

Suggested questions

14 ready-made prompts