Joe Rogan Experience #2474 - Dave Smith
5218 segments
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
>> The Joe Rogan Experience.
>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
NIGHT. All day.
>> So Dave, you were telling me right
before the show that you are now
retiring because you got an impromptu
phone call and bet hundreds of millions
of dollars on oil prices going down.
Congratulations.
>> It was uh it was a good bet. It just
wasn't timed right. I thought you got it
in on time. I thought you got it in like
Yeah, I thought you got it in like five
minutes early.
>> I did not.
>> How is there not a massive investigation
into that right away? Didn't someone
make like $1.8 billion in like 5
minutes?
>> Yeah, there's uh there's a lot of those
like trades like that that should be
investigated that kind of never are.
>> Bro, how about what's his name? Lutnik.
>> Yeah, how about that one? He's so he's
the tariffs one
>> working for the administration and also
standing to gain huge if people can sue
over the the tariffs right
>> well explain the whole thing do you know
how to do you know the actual details of
it
>> no I don't really
>> essentially he was telling everybody
that you know don't sweat it the tariffs
are golden we're getting them through
there's going to be no problems is that
what it was but meanwhile he was
shorting the tariffs yeah so he was
personally shorting Let's find out what
that actually is so we don't get sued. I
bet he's quite ligious gentleman.
>> Yeah, he might be.
>> See if we can find it.
>> I got some I don't know what that means.
>> Like is it wild that people are on the
files visited the island and then they
still work. It was unbelievable. Like
some people had to resign from some
jobs.
>> Well, especially just him because he so
ju the way there's something about a
really confident liar like where they
just cuz I mean that that interview clip
where he's like let me tell you
something. I met Jeffrey Ebste that one
time. He had a massage table. He said
they were sex massage tables. I went
right back to my wife and I said,
"Honey, we are never hanging out with
Jeffrey Epstein again." And that is
that, you know, is that really his
quote?
>> Oh, dude. I mean, I've seen that. I
>> I don't know if it's verbatim, but that
is the exact spare.
>> Probably pretty verbatim. Let's Let's
listen to it.
>> Listen Listen to it. I'm very very close
to exactly what he said.
>> Okay, let me get this one again. What
was this one?
>> Lutnick Lutnik interview about Ebstein.
And he just sounds, I mean, so like
morally outraged about the idea.
>> There's so many people that they exist
in that world where you just pretend
that you're a different person. You
pretend you're one way. Yeah. You
pretend you think things differently.
>> It's uh I've been up close with people
like that. I said that was my takeaway
from debating Chris Cuomo was like I
just could It's a weird thing to see
someone just lie like that.
>> Here it is. Now, this is the one that
says he's the greatest black mailer
ever.
Which quote am I trying to find?
>> Yeah, try to explain it to him.
>> It was uh let me see the key words that
would
>> downplay his relationship with him. That
that might be it.
>> There was something on the other thing,
but I don't know what that
>> what does he do?
>> He's um what's he's a commerce
secretary.
>> Uh he was a he was always like a money
finance guy. He I think he used to work
for C uh CNBC if I'm correct. in this
administration. This like the wolves
have taken over the hen house.
>> Yeah. Yeah, they sure have.
This is this is what draining the swamp
looks like.
>> Under fire for Epstein ties, commerce
secretary Howard Lutnik defends visiting
his private island.
>> Yeah, but this is this isn't the clip.
The clip was from
>> Oh, at the top it says it says Lutnik
said in an interview last year he was
never in the room with Epstein other
than a 2005 visit to his apartment.
Okay, so that's probably it. He said,
you know, he met him once and like this
guy sucks.
>> He specifically says that he met him
that he saw he had a m a massage table
in his living room and he goes, "Hey,
Jeffrey, what do you you really like
massages?" And he claims that Jeffrey
went, "Yeah, and the right kind of
massages."
>> And that's when he decided he would
never talk to him again.
>> Nobody likes the right kind of massages.
Those are terrible. Imagine if those
were legal, just hand job massages.
There'd be like no relationships.
How many people are in terrible
relationships just cuz they need sex?
>> There's a lot of guys that be like, I'm
just going to hang out with the boys,
just get jerked off once on Wednesday
and I'm good.
>> Howard Lendy downplays relationship with
Epste during Senate testimony.
>> Testimony. I don't know.
>> Uh, is this it? Now, this is from this
is from recently. This is from this
year. I did find an article that kind I
don't even know what this website is
though. I don't know if
>> this old firm did not in fact profit
from the Supreme Supreme Court tariff
ruling.
>> It says that there was an article
claiming it and then that's why I was
trying to dig through this.
>> Oh, we better edit that out then.
>> I mean, it was reported though that they
did, but I don't know that what this
says.
>> Um,
says firm is run by his two sons. Elder
Lutnik announced the sale of the stake
in the firm and other investors Supreme
Court on Friday invalidated many of
Trump's tariffs. The president said why
okay caster did not consider the product
which has existed for years was humming
trade on Wall Street's Trump first term
tariff push but decided against it after
weighing the political sensitivities
according to a senior banker familiar
with this matter. Caner spokesman said
the salesman erroneously believed the
firm was likely to greenlight the
business. Okay, I'm missing this. I'm
I'm not exactly sure what they're saying
here.
>> There's a
>> this is just the legality of tariffs are
discussing that
>> an email that said that they're
representing 10 million. That's right. I
was trying to figure out
>> tariff refund rights
>> accuracy of all this and whatnot.
>> So what was the accusation? The
accusation was that he had shorted
tariffs while claiming that tariffs are
going to work. Yeah, the the accusation
was that he stood to make a lot of money
from tariffs being struck down.
>> Um
>> um why don't you put that into
perplexity, Jamie, and find out if
that's accurate and let it scour the
internet instead of us doing it.
>> God, I love AI.
>> Yeah, it is something.
>> I can't wait until it takes over
government.
>> It's going to be awesome.
>> It's after a while you're like, I don't
know if it could be much worse than what
humans are doing with government.
>> It's going to be better. It's not going
to be greedy. Well, as long as it
determines that human life is valuable,
I feel like is really the uh
>> humans. So, let's be honest. You know,
some homeless guys taking a [ __ ] on your
jaguar. Is that guy really valuable?
>> Yeah. But but to AI, we all might be
homeless guys taking
>> Did you see that? There was these San
Francisco tech guys and they got trapped
in their Whimo because a homeless guy
started attacking the Whimo and yelling
at them, "Why are you paying robots?"
>> No.
>> Yeah. Like you're a trader. You're
paying robots. You're paying the robots.
The homeless guy was upset about this.
>> The homeless guy was attacking the
Whimo. The tech guys were in the Whimo.
We were terrified for our life. We
feared our safety because they're
they're being attacked by a crazy person
who's saying you shouldn't be giving
money to robots.
>> That's an uncomfortable position to be
in.
>> I get all my information from the Tim
Dylan show, by the way. But they did.
>> It's not it's not the worst source of
information.
>> It's the best source. Him and that dude.
What's his name? Uh James Lee. He's our
other number one source of information.
Conspiracy theorist. There you go.
>> But uh another one uh a Whimo, a gal got
in and there's a [ __ ] homeless guy in
the trunk
>> because apparently the last person when
they left their Whimo, they opened the
trunk to get their luggage out and they
never closed it. So the homeless guy
hopped into their [ __ ] Whimo and
it was in the trunk. So she get she
orders a Whimo. She climbs in. There's a
homeless guy in the trunk and Whimo's
like, "That's unacceptable." Yeah. Oh,
you think? Oh, you think?
Okay. The main claim is that Caner
Fitzgerald, Howard Lutnick's former
firm, now chaired by his son, stood to
profit by buying tariff refund rights
that only became a became valuable if
Trump's tariffs were overturned, but the
firm insists it ultimately did not
execute those trades. what critics say
happened. Investigators and reporter
reporting notably by Wire described
Caner Fitzgerald exploring a business
where it would buy the rights to future
tariff refunds from importers for about
20 to 30 cents on the dollar. Internal
materials cited in those reports
suggested Caner had capacity to trade
several hundred million of these refund
rights and had already facilitated at
least one trade of around $10 million in
rights under the EPA tariffs. The idea
was that if courts later struck down the
tariffs, the government would have to
refund duties and Caner or its clients
would collect the full refund while the
original importers only kept a small
upfront payment.
So why is it seen as a conflict? Is it
true? So it just say that they executed
on one, right? Didn't it say that?
Scroll back up.
>> That was based off that email article.
It says internal material cited in those
reports suggested Caner had capacity to
trade and had already facilitated at
least one trade of around $10 million in
rights.
>> It's only 10 million. Let it go Dave.
>> That is small potatoes for what we're
talking about.
>> Yeah. For these kind of guys.
>> Uh what Canour and Leticide say. Caner
Fitzgerald has publicly stated that
while some salespeople explored, I like
that in quotes, brokering tariff refund
rates in 2025, the firm never executed
any transactions or taken any position
on tariff refund claims, calling
contrary reports false. Follow-up
recording has echoed that Caner
considered products tied to the Supreme
Court tariff ruling, but ultimately
backed off in part because of the
political optics. Duh. Yeah, [ __ ]
that's a big duh around Letic's
government job. Latest coverage is no
public evidence that Cantor actually
booked profits from this strategy,
though the investigations in Congress
are ongoing and focused on whether there
was any attempted or potential profiter.
Are you more interested in the ethics
conflicts of interest or the nuts and
bolts of how the secondary tariff refund
market works financially? No. So, it
seems like we don't really have
evidence.
>> Well, it'll be interesting. I mean, if
uh which is probably going to happen, um
but the Democrats take the House and the
Senate in the midterm elections this
year. I mean, they're going to be in
that'll just be the next two years of
politics will be investigations and
>> some Democrat lady just over to she just
took over the seat um in Trump's
neighborhood where Mara Lago is. So,
Democrat lady just won.
>> Yep. Yeah. Well, yeah. I mean, look,
they in his first term, they impeached
him twice for absolute [ __ ] So,
they'll go after him for anything, but I
have a feeling now there's probably a
lot more for them to investigate and
work on stuff like this and the meme
coin stuff and, you know, whatever
business deal. You know, I don't I I
don't have the details at the top of my
mind, but I do know that they said at
one point that Jared Kushner would not
be involved in this administration at
all because he does so much business
over there and it's just like so they
were like, "Oh, no, no, no, he won't."
But now he totally is. It's him and Whit
are like the lead
>> negotiators in this, too. So,
>> there's a lot of meat on the bone for
Democrats to make big political theater
out of for the next two years.
>> Is there anywhere that's not corrupt? I
mean, when we look at the insider
trading in Congress, when you look at
all these slimy deals that get made with
NOS's, you look at every it's like
everything's dirty. There's not one part
of government. You're like, right there,
they nailed it.
>> Yeah. Well, that is true.
>> Like maybe the post office.
>> That's I mean,
>> post office is pretty [ __ ] good,
dude.
>> Yeah. Compared to all the rest of it.
Sure.
>> You get a a letter moved across the
whole country for like what is it like
30 cents? How much is a stamp these
days?
>> That's true. If I mean I don't know if
you include the cost on the back end
like the taxes that pay for the whole
thing. Maybe it's a little more
expensive but relatively speaking. Yeah.
You can get you know something.
>> Not a bad organization. In terms of
government organizations, you never hear
except going postal. That used to be a
thing. Remember those days? Yes, I did.
>> There was a while like where so many
post officers went so crazy and started
shooting people that they started
calling it going postal but it never it
just went away. Yeah, young people, if
you're listening to this and you don't
know what we're talking about, in our
day, we didn't have school shootings,
okay? We had to do it the oldfashioned
way. You had to drive a postman crazy
until he went around shooting people.
And it happened several times to the
point that that became a thing like
these crazy postal workers.
>> There was a video game called Postal
>> where you run around shooting people. It
was in the I want to say the '9s.
>> Yeah, that would be about the time
period.
>> The first one came out 97.
>> Yeah. Yeah. And it was like highly
criticized. They were like, weren't they
like cartoon looking characters? Can you
see if you pull up a video of post?
>> It was like they're like South Park
looking characters just blasted people.
So, it felt like less if I remember
correctly. Or maybe that's the box.
>> I never played it.
>> Maybe I played it. I don't know. Oh,
this is
>> this is going postal. No,
>> pissing everywhere.
>> This looks way better than 1990s.
>> Oh, this was in the 90s for sure.
>> Is this the new postal?
>> Here's what it looked like.
>> That might have been a newer version
right there. Oh Jesus.
>> You just run around jacking people.
>> Yeah.
>> So it was like the first Grand Theft
Auto really
>> kind of. I mean Grand Theft Auto came
out around then too actually. It didn't
look like this then though.
>> But real weird though, right? That post
office workers were just killing a bunch
of people. That's what it looked like.
Like that. Okay. This is This is what it
looked like.
It didn't look like that other thing. It
was like uh it wasn't a first person
thing. It was like you're seeing it from
above and you're just running around
killing everybody.
>> I played a postal though that was the
first person like that.
>> Maybe they had more versions of it.
>> Also, I don't want to show because I
don't know what's going to be some bad
stuff on there.
>> Yeah, probably
>> nudity or anything.
>> Dude, video games really are like crack.
>> I loved your you had a rant about that
years ago about how like the problem is
that they're so much fun and you're not
accomplishing anything. So, the last
video game I got into was uh UFC 3, and
I loved that game. I just loved it. And
then me, like I think it was I got
married, my wife got pregnant, and I was
like, "All right, I got to get rid of
this. I just can't. I'm so I was at um
the the Dojo of Comedy. It was a club in
uh New Jersey." Great club. Um
>> they have a LA one, too.
>> Oh, do they? Okay.
>> Sam Tripley.
>> Uh Oh, yeah. Shout out to Sam. Yeah.
Yeah. So, uh, so I was at the one in in
Jersey and they have in the green room
they have UFC 3 and I was like, "Oh,
that's the game that I got really into."
So, I was there for a weekend and I mean
I just the whole time I was there just
in the green room playing this video
game and I was like it was like a
feeling almost like like a drug addict
who's around their drug of choice where
I was like I need to be away from that.
Like I will play this until I kill
myself. It's so much fun.
>> It's a problem. Robbie Lawler fighting,
you know, whoever and just
>> and they keep getting better.
>> Yeah, I know. Well, I didn't I stopped
at that, so I never even like learned
how to play the new ones. But
>> what number UFC game are they at now?
>> Five, I think.
>> Five.
>> The graphics keep getting better. The
movement keeps getting more natural.
>> Yeah.
>> And first person shooters, man. Oh my
god.
>> Who was so good now?
>> Was it Joe Joe Lozison, I want to say?
Was that was the guy 155 guy? Really
good grappler. Wasn't his thing? Like he
was obsessed with video games and then
he went, "I got to just do something
else instead of this." So he just did
jiu-jitsu and then just got like amazing
at jiu-jitsu. I swear I think that was
his story. I could be misremembering
this, but I swear I heard him talk about
this in an interview once and that they
was just like, I just played video games
all day, all night. And then eventually
I was like, I got to do something
productive with this. And so he just
started doing jiu-jitsu instead.
>> I wonder what he's up to these days. He
was a fun guy.
>> He was a fun fighter to watch.
>> Fun fun dude like in person, too. him
and his brother used to beat the [ __ ]
out of each other on the yard, like in
the front yard. They would have like
full-on MMA fights, like full power.
>> They just beat the piss out of each
other in the front yard. I was like,
"Boys,
>> save it." Like, "Save I whailing on each
other." It's crazy.
>> That's a young man's game.
>> They had like a bunch of guys hanging
around. It looked like it was a picnic
or something like that. They decided,
"Let's spice this picnic up. You and me
fight, motherfucker." And they would
fight like fight fight. But all across
this country, there are boys fighting in
their yard. And that was of the highest
level of yard fighting. I mean, that was
top 1%.
>> Oh, that was two two like legit MMA
professionals.
>> Yeah. Two legit MMA professionals are
mad at each other because they're in the
house with each other all the time. Shut
the [ __ ] You didn't [ __ ] do that.
You [ __ ] You were supposed to put
that [ __ ] away.
>> Yeah. Yeah. That was uh You ate my food.
>> Yeah. next.
>> They both ended up being real fun
fighters to watch, though.
>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Joe was awesome. He was
a great fighter.
>> Yeah, he had a lot of fights in the UFC,
too.
>> Yep.
>> And I think it got to, you know,
um, how many years was he in? I go, God,
it's I want to say he was at least in
the UFC for like around a decade.
>> He was Yeah, he had a pretty long
career.
>> Yeah,
>> because he was fighting I mean, he
fought
I don't know. I mean, he fought like the
whole uh like I think when he started
was like BJ Penn era of lightweight and
then he fought into like Anthony Pettis
was the champion.
>> Pull up Lozison's Wikipedia, find out
when he retired.
>> Oh, his first fight was September 23rd,
2006 and I think it's his last fight was
2019.
>> Wow,
>> that's crazy. 2019.
Some of these guys just don't they just
don't want to stop. It's just too fun.
It's a very hard uh job to keep going
for a while.
>> Maybe the hardest.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, like on your body.
>> Oh, yeah. Yeah.
>> Other than football. There's a lot of
those guys in the NFL. They only last a
couple years.
>> Yeah, for sure. This episode is brought
to you by Into It Turboax. April 15th is
coming fast. There's been so many tax
law changes this year, which means
you're going to need an expert who has
your back. You're in luck. Turboax now
has in-person locations nationwide. Walk
into their tech enabled stores and meet
face tof face with a Turboax fullervice
expert who will get your best outcome.
Your expert works to get you every
dollar you deserve while updating you as
you go about your day. Head to
turboax.com
to find a store near you. No, I mean
that's a real tough one, but there's
nothing Well, I guess I guess like
professional football, there's a similar
aspect to where like you're not just I
mean, look, you can go to the hospital
from basketball, you know, you can get
hurt and get a bad injury, but the NFL
or the UFC, you kind of like, you know,
every time you go into it, like there's
a very reasonable chance you're leaving
here on a stretcher to go to the
hospital. But particularly with MMA,
it's the most unforgiving sport where
like you you're one mistake, one mistake
away from like, you know, like if LeBron
James misses a wide open layup, he runs
back on defense and tries to, you know,
get a block or something on the next
play. But in MMA, you could be
dominating, fighting a perfect fight,
make one mistake, and it's like, okay,
you're unconscious now. Maybe
perfect example.
>> Yep.
>> Camaro's way ahead in the fight. It's in
the fifth round. I think there's like 20
seconds to go or something crazy. And
Leon just plants one. A perfect head
kick. Yeah. And it was the per and John
Anick makes the perfect call, you know,
like something had been said about him
maybe deciding, you know, to quit. And
then John Anick says, "But that is not
the cloth from which he was cut."
>> Yeah.
>> Boom. Headkick knockout. It's like, come
on, man. Is this real?
>> One of the most amazing MMA championship
knockouts ever.
>> Oh, ever. Ever. And then just his his
post-fight speech, look at me now. Look
at me now.
>> And then comes back and wins the rubber
match.
>> Yeah.
>> Which was like it's an interesting
thing. Um how much you know like well
first off like getting knocked out cold
like that and you know better than me
but like that does a number to your body
like that's not you're not
>> psychologically.
>> Well psychologically and also I think
physically. Um, and then also just like
the confidence that that gave Leon
Edwards going into the next fight like
just changes everything now.
>> Um,
>> yeah,
>> Camaro had to be very careful cuz he
knew at any I mean he dodged most of the
big ones until the big one landed. Yep.
So in his head in that fight he had a
narrative and that narrative completely
changed with one headkick. So going into
the next fight the narrative is now if
you [ __ ] up you will be unconscious. You
can't get knocked unconscious again. and
he fought much more cautiously. Yeah. In
the second fight,
>> I remember seeing that with um I felt
like you could watch that when uh Dustin
Porier fought Conor McGregor the second
time like you know McGregor had knocked
him out years earlier
>> and you could kind of see you know like
you could see Dustin I'm not saying like
he was nervous or anything. He's like
one of the greatest fighters ever. But
you could kind of just see like he gets
in there and he starts and he takes a
couple shots from Connor and he's still
there, you know, and then he lands a
couple shots and you could see like in
that first round like his confidence
growing. Like you almost got to get that
out of your head that it's like, "Yeah,
yeah, yeah, that guy beat you there back
then, but you're a different guy now."
>> Well, with Connor, it's all about
weathering the initial storm. The
initial storm is crazy. He's so
explosive, so fast, so accurate. And
then another part about that second
fight was Dustin setting up those calf
kicks
>> specifically because both of those guys
fight southpaw. And when you both fight
southpaw, if you're a southpaw like
Dustin, a lot of times the calf kick's
not really available. Like you have to
you have to throw it with a switch or it
doesn't have the same sort of potential.
It's a slightly different potential when
you exchanging it in combinations. But
with Connor, it was wide open because
Connor has two things going on. one is
his southpaw. Also, he had just gotten
off the Floyd Mayweather fight. He's
very boxing heavy, not just, but a while
back, but he had really concentrated on
his striking with his hands. His his
hands were elite. So, because of that,
your stance is a little wider and you're
putting a little bit more weight on your
legs,
>> you know, and he always had a wide
stance anyway. He had that karate
stance. The craziest thing about that is
the calf kick really didn't become a big
deal
>> even until Connor was a superstar.
>> Like it was after that.
>> That's how recent it is.
>> Yeah. It's very strange that that was
almost like a thing that didn't get
figured out until so recently and then
just totally changed everything. Like at
this point you rare, not saying you
never see it, but you pretty rarely see
guys kick guys in the thigh anymore.
Well, no, but I mean like compared to
what it used to be, where it used to be
like that was that was what a leg kick
was for many years in MMA and now it's
I'd say like the majority of leg kicks
are are targeting the calf. Yeah. Like
you'll see almost like a thigh kick
almost just to switch it up a little
bit.
>> This guy's got really good at taking
those.
>> Yeah, he got really good at being
conditioned. And you know, we also saw a
few leg breaks,
>> right? We saw the Anderson Silva one. We
saw the Chris Weidman one. There's been
there's been a few leg breaks from guys
just full power leg kicking the the
thigh and then someone just lifts up
their knee a little bit and takes it on
the right where the shin bone meets the
kneecap is where they like to catch it.
And boy, I've seen way too many of
those. I've seen a bunch in person, but
because of the internet, I've seen
dozens and dozens of small promotions
where a guy throws that kick wrong
really hard and the guy checks it and
his [ __ ] foot just wraps around the
leg and you see it dangling there.
You're like, "Oh no." You recognize the
thing like that injury is so
recognizable. Like I've seen it so many
times now. I see it. I just go, "Oh,
it's going to wrap around the calf.
>> It's going to flop. He's going to fall
down.
>> I've seen it several times on internet
videos and in UFC fights. I've only once
seen a guy continue to talk [ __ ] about
the other guy after from the ground,
which is the craziest [ __ ] ever, dude.
Everyone else I've seen is like crying
in pain. And Connor's talking about your
wife's whatever DMs.
>> Jesus Christ.
>> Yeah. He asked me to come and sit down
with him and do a podcast.
>> He's an animal.
>> I mean, the dude's one of a kind. He's
one of a kind. He apparently made a post
on his uh Instagram saying he's back
>> and uh if it's true that would be
awesome. The idea is his uh suspension
for whatever he took before is up.
>> So
>> I remember
>> yay.
>> What was it? Something uh
>> was someone I think it was Douglas
Murray when he wrote that article about
me. He said
>> Mr. Confidence returns
to save fighting again. Call your
grandma. Nanny, we did it. Watch and pay
me. [ __ ] you. Pay me, you fat Irish
prick. You don't have my money. I put
your brain to sleep. Who's that? What's
that about? Who's he talking about? Uh C
is in the casinos after the Mac loves
you is all. I got love for you. It's an
all. It's an honor. It's light work.
It's easy for life and eternity. It's
McGregor. How drunk was he when he wrote
this?
I do this fight game. Easy peasy. The
sound of my shots off the head go bing
in green dot laser form.
Okay.
Well, I really hope he is actually back.
I hope it's true. It'd be fun to see him
back.
>> It'd be a lot of fun.
>> Greatest personality the sports ever
known. That's right. There's no one even
close.
>> I mean, he's the most dynamic
personality the sport's ever known. And
he was um for for a time there just such
an unbelievable fighter. I mean he was
like just it was incredible what he was
doing.
>> Danny Alvarez fight.
>> Oh yeah. I was there. I was there. Well,
thanks to you. Uh with really good
really good seats. Thanks to you. Uh but
that was that was one of the best that
might be the best fight I've ever been
to live cuz that whole card was just
stacked and that as the main event was
just unbelievable,
>> bro. He was in the matrix. He was in the
matrix. He was just in the zone. You
know, Dana said it best. He's like,
"That kid eats pressure." He goes, "He
eats it." Yeah. Like he thrives on
pressure. Pressure that makes other
people wilt, he like shines under that
pressure. and he had an amazing ability
even very early in his career which was
like kind of it it was really unique
like because even like on his first
fight ever if you watch his first fight
in the UFC um against uh like Brimage I
think the guy's name is
>> and he was a relatively unknown at the
time but dude the place is going nut he
already had made so much kind of like
street cred for himself and then the
Irish thing like the Irish were really
really into it but he from the very
first fight he would always create these
moments where it's Like, dude, this is
going to be the biggest spectacle that
you, my opponent, has ever been in in
their career. Like, I'm going to get you
mad with [ __ ] talking. I'm going to get
the fans so excited
>> because he's completely comfortable
there.
>> Like, I'm not sure if you're really
comfortable here, but I'm And so, it
would and even with with Aldo,
>> who had been the entire division.
>> He would literally when they started the
division, they started him as champion.
He didn't even win it. He came in
because they absolved the WC. So, he was
the entire featherweight division. had
just dominated everyone and he even
created such a moment that like like
Aldo was like uh
>> he was the boogeyman.
>> Yeah, dude. He was incredible. So, still
he's one of the greatest featherweights
of all time.
>> But he got him to the point where he was
like so furious that he was like I want
to take this [ __ ] guy's head off and
then Connor's just like relaxed. He's
like like he he didn't care about any of
the [ __ ] talking. He was just like,
"Yeah, we're having fun.
>> Let's play."
>> He lost his composure. Yeah. And he he
looked he looked very overwhelmed by the
moment. And oh, and by the way,
everyone from Ireland came to Vegas for
that fight. It was the nuttiest thing
I've ever seen in my [ __ ] life. The
entire Mandandalay Bay was overcome with
Irish people. I mean, overcome like you
couldn't move. There was nothing but
Irish people everywhere. And they were
singing. They were all singing together
in the halls of this gigantic casino
packed bump like they're waiting in line
for something. And they were just there
partying for Connor.
>> I remember I think it was when I want to
say it was when
>> Look at all these people.
>> Yeah, it was nuts, dude.
>> Bro, this is nuts, man. They're all
Irish people. Like, you got to realize
nobody had a following like him.
>> Like, this is actually Irish people for
the Floyd Mayweather fight. They were
still ride or die with him even for that
fight.
>> I I think it was when he fought Dennis
Siver, I want to say.
>> I think that was in Boston.
>> So, I went to I went with uh Lewis J.
Gomez, my good friend. hilarious
comedian. Um, and he, me and him went to
some Irish bar to watch, like we just
happened to be in Midtown Manhattan and
we were like, "Oh, the fights are coming
on." Oh, they're playing it at this bar.
You know, it was just like an Irish pub.
>> And dude, I mean, it wasn't even that
big of a bar. They must have I mean, it
was shouldertoshoulder
Irish people losing their [ __ ] minds.
Like it was the it was the most fun
environment to watch a fight in cuz
they're just I mean they're just like
but all that singing and chanting. It
seemed like everyone had an Irish flag
with them like
>> it was it was this in a in a little bar.
It was this
>> that's nuts, man. Look at that. That's
Mandalay Bay.
>> Wow.
>> Look at this.
>> Oh, that's MGM.
>> Well, they were everywhere. They were
probably at every [ __ ] casino there
was.
>> This is crazy.
imagine imagine if you you're from
Northern Ireland
>> and you like you still still remember
the troubles and you make your way to
the hotel just came to Vegas for a
little gambling you don't follow MMA you
had no [ __ ] idea what's this all
about
>> I have picked the wrong [ __ ] week for
me vacation
>> oh by the way I was going to say that uh
Douglas Murray's big knock on me when he
wrote his op-ed in the New York Post was
he goes he goes you know Dave goes on
Joe Rogan and he talks about foreign
policy like he's an expert but I bet he
wouldn't go in there and talk MMA with
him because then Joe would recognize
he's not an expert and I was like
>> we do that all the time that every so
>> I was like almost every time we hang out
we end up talking MMA and like it
probably is fair that yeah there'll be
moments where you'll correct me if I get
something wrong
>> so what
>> but if I get it right you don't go
you're not an expert dumb Imagine we
don't talk about MMA because you're not
an expert. That's so silly.
>> Well, I watch a lot of it. I have some
thoughts.
>> Why is he so silly? I love Douglas. I
really do. I've enjoyed talking to him.
I think he's a brilliant man. But I was
very disappointed with uh You've never
been very disappointed with that that
sort of strategy that you shouldn't be
talking about these things that are
factual. But even more disappointed with
that notion, the notion that like you
would never talk about MMA with me. Like
you think we would I first first of all
I don't think I argue about MMA with
anybody. I don't think anybody if
someone has a point about MMA I don't I
never argue. I might say you've
corrected me when I've gotten things
wrong. Yeah. Or I might say I dis like
somebody think some people think that c
a certain thing is going to happen and
I'm like oo I don't see that. I
disagree. That happens.
>> Sure. But
>> well, also like it's the whatever point
you're making is either a good point or
it's not a good point if it's like an
objective claim. You know what I mean?
So like if I if I say like uh you know
when when Vulcganowski fought Lopez, his
jab was crucial.
>> Okay, that's either correct or it's
incorrect. Like whether I'm an expert or
not, I'm not an expert on fighting.
>> Gez, you could watch the fight and that
would be correct.
>> Yes. Right. So it's I saw he hit a home
run. You're right. Yes, there you go.
That's crazy.
>> Well, I you know was a weird a weird
thing during that show was um because
it's a weird I don't know there's like
weird incentives in built into like all
>> incentives. Incentives are the right
word because there's a lot of people
that are saying things and you go why
are you saying that?
>> Yeah. Well, also from my perspective, I
was a little disappointed with it
because I kind of thought I was like,
"Oh, this could be like a really cool
thing." And and it had been literally,
which I don't think I'm saying anything
that is like betraying confidence here,
but the only thing that was ever said to
me, I remember you called me and you
were like, "What do you think about
doing this?" And I think I said yes
before you could finish answering the
question. Yes, absolutely. Let's do
that. Um, and then you told me that he
had said, "Hey, he really doesn't want
this to devolve into like a food fight.
He wants to make this like a good faith
thing." And I was like, "Oh,
>> awesome." And now I feel like he like
Trump Witoff negotiated me. Like he's
negot he was cuz then he came in and the
whole thing was about me. He didn't want
to talk about the issues at all. He just
want And so in a weird way I was like,
"Well, this sucks cuz I thought we could
have had a really cool thing." But then
there was this other part of me that was
like I mean he's really just handing
this to me. You know what I mean? Like
he kind of just like gave me the win in
in a thing that was a big show with a
like a you know a lot of people I knew
were going to watch it. I mean obviously
every time I do your show a lot of
people are going to watch it but that
was a particularly big one.
>> Yeah.
>> And so I was kind of almost like for the
first 45 minutes of it I was kind of
sitting there like oh I can't believe he
just he went this route. Well, if you
look at it objectively, there weren't a
lot of options, right? Yeah. It's very
difficult to argue the side that what
they're do doing like we were talking
about Gaza in particular.
>> Yeah. like like the arguing that that's
not horrific
and if you're a human being and you
recognize that there are human beings
that are subjected to that government
just like you're subjected to ICE you're
subjected to homeland security you're
subject you're subjected to the cops if
you're a civilian you have to listen to
these orders so if you're living in Gaza
and you're a child or you're a woman and
you live you're not Hamas okay and the
idea that you're responsible for oto
October 7th. Even if you're one of the
people that cheered in the street, boy,
don't you think you kind of have to
cheer in the street if everybody else is
cheering the street? If you're [ __ ]
in terror for your life and you have to
like keep your safety intact, like you
got to kind of go along with whatever
everybody else is doing. I'm not saying
it's that's good, but when you look at
how that place is leveled, I mean, the
most recent videos that I've seen were
still like a few months old. So, I don't
know if it stopped. Did they stop
bombing? I don't know what's going on.
>> No, they've slowed down a bit, but they
haven't stopped.
>> Okay. It there was nothing left, man.
And that represents people's homes. That
represents schools. That represents
hospitals. There's no way you can argue
that that's not horrific. Yeah.
>> So, he was stuck.
>> That's right. That's right. It's kind of
indefensible. And so, instead, you pivot
to arguing against this guy rather than
against the issue. Well, I think that um
you know, it's in I can't remember if
this was in the letter to America or
this was in his declaration of war
against America, but Osama bin Laden
literally said that uh civilians are
fair targets because you guys have
elections and you vote for these
politicians and they're the ones who
conduct these wars that that slaughter
innocent Muslims. So like just saying
it's the logic of Osama bin Laden to say
that civilians are responsible for what
and in Gaza like they don't even really
have a government. Hamas is not a
government. They don't have regular
elections. They had one election back in
' 05 or ' 06 or whatever it was which
Hamas did not even win uh majorities of.
They they won on pluralities. You know
what I mean? And so the idea that you're
holding these people responsible for
Hamas just doesn't make any sense. And
just on a very basic human level, you
just kind of go, and I'm not like an
egalitarian. I'm not saying all people
are equal or all cultures are equal or
anything like that, but on a very basic
human level, like those are real people,
too. And when a mother is like pulling
her six-year-old dead body out of the
rubble, that's the same exact experience
as if your wife was pulling your
six-year-old out of there. Like that
same thing is happening to her. And once
you even just admit that it does change
the calculation, it changes the
calculation to be like, okay, look, the
onus is on you to demonstrate that this
is absolutely necessary. Like there is
no other option than to do it this way.
And that makes defending most wars very
difficult. Not all of them, you know,
but most wars are very difficult to
defend if you just run it through that
filter of like, is there any other
option other than this? Have you
exhausted everything else? And then of
course in the case with Israel and
Palestine, you go, "Oh, you never even
tried to just give them their
independence. You've never tried to just
let them out from this occupation and
see if maybe that will improve things."
And the answer is no.
>> Crazy that the world didn't at one point
in time stand up and say, "There's a
simple solution here.
>> Like these people should have a state.
Like why do you get to control them, but
they're not Israeli? like they're
they're a kind of a country
>> but not really cuz they're attached to
you.
>> Yeah. It's people
>> Why don't you guys go buy another
country and give it to them and let them
have a country or
>> Yeah.
>> They don't like being attached on the
same small patch of dirt to people that
have a totally different ideology, I
guess.
>> Well, that's right. And that look, I
mean, it's just
>> But we are.
>> Yeah.
>> We have Canadians right there.
>> Yes. But Canadians, Canadians do get
citizenship in their own country. You
know,
>> they get citizenship here, too. Boy,
that's the last thing I looking for is
[ __ ] Canadians. They're like,
>> "Oh, yeah. Your visa's expired and don't
worry about it, buddy. Get on the
plane."
>> They'd probably have a much easier time.
Like, Canadians will go, "All right,
guess I got to go."
>> Well, yeah. Also, they can just ditch
the accent and pretend they're Americans
and everybody will buy it if I don't say
about wrong.
>> Yeah.
>> You, you know, they could just say,
"Aha, sorry. I don't have my license on
me."
>> Yeah, that's true. Yeah. Like, okay,
buddy, where you from? I live in Iowa.
Okay, sounds right.
>> That does check out.
>> Get out of here.
>> All right.
>> [ __ ] that does check out.
>> You see the [ __ ] that's going on in the
airports? So, are they using
>> They're using ICE now at the airports
because first of all, how many ICE
agents are there? Aren't they busy?
>> How do you have time to put them in all
the airports? How many [ __ ] airports?
>> It's in the low tens of thousands.
There's not that many of them,
>> right? So, like, how many airports are
there? There's a lot of airports. Okay.
So, you're putting ice in the airports.
Where are you getting all these ice
guys? Are you hiring new ice guys to
take the airport jobs? Like is this like
it takes seven weeks to train them? So,
do they have like a surplus of like a
ice factory where they're turnurning
them out and putting them out there?
>> I heard So, I didn't see any of them. I
flew out here the other day. Uh, and I
didn't see any of them, but then I did
see people saying that they were at the
the airport I flew out from later that
day.
>> Up to 150. That's not a lot. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement officers were
deployed at airports across the United
States on Monday. So I of course, you
know, you get on social media, somebody
sends you something and somebody sent me
something. I'm not sure if it was true,
but it was like, look at the difference
between the lines at the airport before
ICE was there and after ICE was there
and tell me that only 10 million illegal
aliens got in.
They're like, they're like, "What is the
real We were talking about this last
night, like what's the real number?
>> What is the real number of illegals in
the United States?"
>> We don't know.
>> You were saying something about Anne
Coulter.
>> Yeah. Well, she had um and this was from
a while ago. So, this was well, she had
she had in her book, Adios America, she
had I believe it was from Bayer Sterns.
I could be wrong. Double check now. It
was one one of the big finance companies
that they had put a thing where like
they put it between like 30 and 50
million um total in the country.
>> Jeez.
>> And 50 is wild.
>> Yeah. And this is before Joe Biden and
them now. I don't know. Maybe maybe they
got those numbers wrong.
>> This is before So what year was this
book?
>> Uh I want to say 2014 2015.
>> Oh my god. That's 10 years ago.
>> Yeah. Yeah. A lot of them a lot of them
have come in since then.
>> Well, at least 10 million they believe
came in through the Biden
administration. So over four years.
>> Well, I remember the numbers being like
during the Biden administration where
they'd be like it was something like
last month there were 700,000 border
apprehensions and you're like, well,
geez, then how many were just floating
and you'd see those big caravans coming
in and stuff. I mean, look, it's a huge
that that still is a a huge scandal. Um,
and as much as I uh have really been
really criticizing Trump and the Trump
administration since last summer, um,
you know, he he's done a good job in
securing the border. That is the one
thing that like you kind of got to give
him and he got that secured like right
away. But even
>> even if you think that it should be open
and those people should be able to
travel freely, they should. There's no
one's illegal on stolen land, that kind
of [ __ ] Mhm.
>> You know how much sex trafficking
happened during that time of children?
You know how many children were
trafficked that way? You know how many
children were dragged across the border
and sold to psychopaths?
>> Oh, yeah. Oh, it was horrible. I mean, I
saw um Oh, there's an with at least 15
>> at least 50 million illegals in the
country today. See my book Adios America
for the analysis from Pulitzer
Prizewinning reporters and numbers
crunchers from Bear Sto.
>> I was right. It was Bear Sto.
>> This is 2022 this post. Wow. The book is
even older though.
>> The book is like the book is from before
I I want to say 2015, but it's it's
around then. Is crazy.
>> Uh that's crazy.
>> Supposedly, this is the book that uh got
Donald Trump on the immigration issue.
Uh at least I've heard I've heard Anne
Coulter say that before. Maybe that's
right. Maybe that's not right. But um
but yeah, I mean look, it's like it's
also a particularly it's a it's a
profound
like act of of treachery for a
government to do that to its own country
>> like to to allow that and and really
facilitate that to happen against the
will of the domestic population. Like if
if you were to I I've tried to look this
up before. I was trying to figure this
out cuz I did a big immigration debate
last year um or maybe the year before
and I was trying you can't even get
numbers on what the polling on open
borders is cuz no one even asked the
question in polling because it's like
they ask like do you think immigration
policy should be less restrictive or
more restrictive cuz cuz the number of
people who support open it's like maybe
1% of the country supports that. It's as
unified an issue as anyone could have
that. No, you can't just have the border
wide open, right? And so to do that to
the American people against the like you
you drastically change the country in a
way that is not really it's not easy to
just undo. I mean as we've seen right
Donald Trump backed off of mass
deportations almost immediately um
because big business doesn't want it and
then because look like the level of
violence that you'd need to just
physically deport 50 million people is
going to be something that the American
people just aren't going to put up with.
I mean, you even see in in Minnesota and
and rightfully so. I completely
understand it that you see like, you
know, I saw one thing. I saw that Trump
had asked the ICE agents who were going
to the airports to not wear their masks
>> and I was like, is that even a that's
even a an option? Why would they be
masked in the airport?
>> Because they're ICE agents because they
get doxed.
>> Well, that's their concern. And look, I
understand that. That's a real concern.
>> I understand that concern organized, but
at the same time, you know, there is a
balancing act there. And you know, a lot
of people, like a lot of right-wingers,
will say, "Hey, look, if you're, you
know, if you came here illegally, then
that's a crime. You're here illegally.
That's the law." And hey, I get that
argument. But also, the supreme law of
the land is the Constitution of the
United States of America. And I've seen
a ton of videos where there were masked
ICE agents, not even identifying
themselves, going up to people telling
them that you have to answer my
questions. You don't have an option to
walk away, which is like not true. That
was my take on it is that you can't
accept people that are masked, that
don't have any paperwork, that don't
have a warrant on the streets in
militarized situations because if
they're using it for this, which you
agree to, that opens up the door for
them to use it because you won't take
your vaccine or because you did this or
did that or whatever the [ __ ] it is. If
a different person gets in power, maybe
they're going to use it for something
you don't support. It's just not
something you're supposed to accept.
>> That's right. You don't want to hear
something that someone told me that is
uh this is a very credible source that I
can't reveal what the source is
>> but they told me that there are people
in this country and not just a few but
many many that are affiliated with
terrorist organizations
directly affiliated but they've applied
for asylum and because they've applied
for asylum you can't deport them until
they go through the entire process. That
is wild.
>> That is wild. So, there's people that
are known at least terrorist
sympathizers. They're in communic direct
communication with terror terrorist
networks. They've done things with
terrorist networks and they've applied
for asylum. So, you have to go through
this long ass process through the legal
system and it's up to a judge whether or
not this person who may or may not be a
part of a [ __ ] sleeper cell gets to
stay in America.
Yeah,
>> suicidal empathy. That's what Gad Sad
calls it, you know, and I think he's
right.
>> I think he's got a fair point there with
suicidal empathy in terms of the idea of
like that we that we cannot say on some
level that it's like no, look, we have a
desire to preserve our society and we we
want to do what's bad and we don't have
to out of some feeling of guilt turn our
country into something worse than what
it otherwise would be. So, I think he's
got a point there. I think and look, I'm
not a big fan of Gad. He uh literally
just him and like Sam Harris and a few
others, they literally just trash me all
the time and refuse to engage on a
single thing I've said. So like it'll
just be doesn't engage with you. He
calls me Wikipedia Dave
>> on Twitter and it's a Well, look, I
>> I like the guy.
>> Look, I have a different relationship
with him than you do.
>> Well, that's true. And I'm a big critic
of Israel and he's a MSAD agent. So
there is that. That is part of
>> You think he is? He's admitted that he
worked for Assad
>> in the past.
>> Yes. Yeah. He's I guess he would say
he's not currently retired. Like I used
to
>> I used to work for Newport Crearyy. I
don't represent them anymore.
>> I think it's a little bit different with
the MSAD thing. But I also think that
the the big component that I think all
of those guys are are missing is that we
also create more enemies with our
foreign policy. And that's that's not to
say that like, you know, they always
kind of caricature my position on this.
Like I'm not saying Islam is all
peaceful and there are no problems in
the Islamic world or anything like that.
In fact, I don't think any religion has
truly always been peaceful. Um but you
know for guys like say like Sam Harris
um who these kind of like pretend
intellectuals who have spent he spent
his entire career talking about how
violent and irrational the Muslims are
and how you can't even draw a cartoon of
Muhammad or Muslims will want to do
violent stuff and like hey fair enough
that's [ __ ] and we should all say
like if you want to be over here in the
west our values are free speech and you
cannot kill people for cartoons but And
like none of them ever also go, "Hey,
you know, murdering an Ayatollah
might be dangerous during Ramadan."
>> Yeah. Like that is, you know, that is
not just a political figure to Shiite
Muslims. That is a So, at the same time,
it's like, okay, I'm fine with saying,
okay, you don't want to have suicidal
empathy. Um my uh my my buddy Keith
Knight, who's brilliant, uh works over
at the Libertarian Institute, he had I
forget what he said, but he he said
something like, "Okay, I don't want to
have suicidal empathy. Let's also not
have homicidal empathy, you know, and so
like maybe it also is like as we were
tying into that whole conversation with
No, I'm okay. Thanks." Um, with the
whole thing about the the kids and women
in Gaza, it's like it's also the fact
that if you just view slaughtering
Muslim children in the Middle East and
in Northern Africa as like just an
acceptable political price, you know,
that's just collateral damage. And
unfortunately, that happens when we
pursue this policy. You're going to deal
with more and more of that. And the
combination of both, Joe, like the
combination of having open borders,
having all these people get in and
continuing the war on terrorism and
slaughtering people in these numbers
must be the most insane combination
ever. The idea that you'd be like, we're
going to uh, you know, we're going to
just make an entire generation of of
Muslims hate us because so many of them
have seen what we've done to their
countries. And also, we'll welcome all
of them in with no checks and we can't
get rid of them when they come here.
Yeah, that is quite a combination. Yeah,
it's it's all nuts.
It's uh the Sam Harris thing. Um I
should clarify this because he's
apparently talked about me again
recently with on Bill Maher. We didn't
not talk because it was his idea. It was
me. I He wanted to do a podcast with me.
He wanted to do a co like a COVID, you
know, wrapup like to, you know, go over
everything that happened, all the
mistakes that were made and his
position, my position, cuz that's where
we kind of like separated. It was he was
very pro- vaccine.
Um, I said I won't do that until you
talk to Brett Weinstein.
>> That you need to talk to Brett. Like
Brett, you you disparaged him publicly.
I think you said things that weren't
correct. You called him a conspiracy
theorist and you said you wouldn't
platform him because it's dangerous. I
don't believe that's true. I I believe
the problem is that Sam was incorrect
about both the effectiveness and the
safety of the co vaccines. Brett was
correct. And the Brett didn't insult
Sam. Sam insulted Brett. I mean, Brett
said things about Sam since, but it was
it was Sam. And I said, "Look, you got
to talk to him first. you can't just
talk to me, you know, especially because
he's an actual evolutionary biologist.
Like he he understands these things.
>> He knows what he's talking about. He's
had multiple conversations with high
level vaccinologists and all these
different people that worked on the MR M
RNA vaccines. Like he was correct. We
all know that now. We know that all the
things that he was talking about,
whether it's masking doesn't work,
social distancing, the the lockown,
lockown, all the above. All the above.
He didn't want to talk to Brett. And I
said, "That doesn't make sense to me."
Like, you talk to everybody. You have
debates with Muslims on stage. That
doesn't make any sense. Like, why
wouldn't you talk to Brett? I don't
think he wanted to talk to Brett
>> because I don't I think he didn't want
to talk to Brett because Brett's right.
>> Yeah.
>> I think it's And I I think it's
indefensible. No, I completely agree. I
I mean, you know, I had a
>> By the way, I don't hate Sam. You know,
he could say all the crazy [ __ ] he
wants. He also said like, "I don't think
you should interview Gaddafi." Guess
what? I would if Gaddafi was alive. 100%
I would interview Gaddafi. Gaddafi. Do
you ever hear Russell Crowe talk about
Gaddafi?
>> I don't think so.
>> He did a clip that went viral that was
on this show where he talked about why
they wanted to get rid of Gaddafi,
>> right? And like while they talk talked
about how evil Gaddafi was and how he
subjugated his people, you can't see if
you could find that Russell Crow on
Gaddafi.
Um he wanted to create a United States
of Africa.
>> Yeah.
>> He wanted to get him on the gold
standard. He wanted to get him off the
US dollar. He like he had some very
dangerous ideas.
>> Now he also supported Palestinian
resistance.
>> Yeah, that was it.
There's no sound thing in there. Oh,
there it is.
Here it is.
>> We are taught, for example, to regard
Gaddafi in a certain way.
>> Okay. But if you look into what happened
in his country while he was the leader,
you look into the fact that every person
is given a house at a certain age.
You look at the fact that everybody's
education and health care is free. You
look at if somebody showed a particular
talent for something that required
further education overseas, all of the
costs that were paid for by the
government. Now, these are all things
put in place by the same country's
leader that we're told is evil and
corrupt.
>> Yeah.
>> So, it doesn't quite balance.
>> Well, there's also US government
interference. That's a that's a That is
one that we definitely monkeyed with. I
mean, he ran a foul of the United States
government. We are taught, for examp,
>> but laughing. And then that led to it,
Libya, at least for a while, becoming a
failed state. Oh, it still is.
>> It still is this whole time, man. It's
been a disaster.
>> This episode is brought to you by
Visible. Folks, there's one thing nobody
wants this season, and that's getting
catfished. And it's not just dating
profiles that are putting you at risk.
It's also big wireless carriers. You
know the type. Looks great at first,
promises a low price, but once you're
locked in, surprise fees and an
expensive bill that isn't what you were
expecting. Your night and shining armor
visible wireless. It's oneline wireless
with unlimited data and hotspot for just
$25 a month. Taxes and fees included.
Now that's a green flag. The best part,
Visible is all digital, so you can
switch as fast as you can swipe. Don't
fall for the trap of getting catfished
by wireless. Visit visible.com to learn
more and start loving your wireless
carrier. Terms apply. see visible.com
for plan features and network management
details. Um, and there's and you know
the thing is that they called that
Hillary's war. Uh, she really she was
the Secretary of State at the time under
Barack Obama, but she's really the one
who championed that. And I believe Obama
wrote in his book that he was 5050 and
that Hillary pushed him to that. He said
his big regret was that he didn't think
about what came next after Gaddafi
because somehow we haven't learned that
lesson yet. Like after Iraq, you'd never
thought of that. Um,
>> listen. But, thank God Trump's figured
it out.
>> Oh, yeah. That's the Yeah, Trump's
Trump's figured it out. We'll go in this
drastic new direction of getting the
seventh war that they want.
>> Don't be a [ __ ] Dave. Jesus Christ.
Did you see that one I don't know what
military expert was on television who
said something about we need to I'm a
fan of boots on the ground like Rome.
Like, hey [ __ ] Rome didn't have
nuclear weapons and drones.
>> Rome didn't have drones that hunt you.
Yeah.
>> Like, what we talking about? Boots on
the ground. Should we fight with swords?
Should we get everybody to fight with
swords? Is that what you're saying?
>> The [ __ ] are you saying?
>> Well, also like what
what even is the plan with boots on the
ground? Like what are you talking about
here? You're going to you're going to
take an island. It goes, okay, well then
you're going to be a target. You're
going to be target practice as long as
the Iranian regime is still standing.
And if you're talking about militarily
occupying the country like we did with
Iraq or Afghanistan or something like
that, this is a huge country with 92
million people. How many how many
soldiers you think you need to occupy
that country? At least at least half a
million. And probably you can't do it
with that. So what are you talking about
here? And so you're saying what are we
going to start a draft for the least
popular war going in in American
history? Cuz I don't think that's
happening.
>> Yeah, this is maybe
slightly more popular than Vietnam.
>> Uh going in it's less. I'm sure Vietnam
by the end was very very unpopular.
Well, Viet Vietnam going in didn't make
any sense, did it? There was, I guess,
the Gulf of Tonkan incident.
>> Most people in America were like, "Why
are we doing this? What's going on?
You're drafting people to go to Vietnam.
We're fighting communism in Vietnam."
>> Yeah.
>> What?
>> Well, they called uh what they called it
Vietnam syndrome that the American
people had, which is that we didn't want
to fight a war again after that. Was
that that's from their perspective,
that's a syndrome. Um and uh this is
it's really something. They think they
think by the way Ben Shapiro used this
same uh line called he said Trump
finally broke Iraq war syndrome because
they think see from Ben Shapiro's
perspective the illness is after you lie
the American people into a war and
slaughter a million people. The illness
isn't that that you might look at that
as the bad part, but the bad part is
that these these annoying Americans have
this tendency to not want to do that
again after that. Um, but he claims
Trump has broken Iraq war syndrome. Of
course, there's really no evidence with
support of the American people that that
has changed at all. And you know the
George HW Bush uh was said to have
defeated Vietnam war syndrome uh in
Panama and in Iraq because they were
relatively easy, you know, bloodless on
the American side or or very very
limited uh you know injuries and deaths.
Um and and they you know they weren't
like quagmires that went on forever or
whatever. But of course after the
Persian Gulf War in in '92, we went on
to be bombing Iraq for
ever since essentially, you know, I
mean, for 30 straight years after that,
we were still at war with that country.
>> You think for a million people being
dead.
>> Um, what is public support? Let's put
that into our sponsor perplexity. What
is current public support for the Iran
war in America? And first of all, how
will they know? No one's asked me.
>> You know what I'm saying? That's a fair
question. Like that's what I would say
about about uh polls. When was the last
time you answered a poll? When was the
last time anybody called you up and
said, "Dave Matt, first of all, when was
the last time you ever picked up the
phone if you didn't know who was
calling?" And then when you do answer,
when was the last time you said yes to a
poll?
>> I don't I don't even remember ever
getting calls.
>> It has to be the dumbest of dumb people
that answer those polls. So then you got
to realize out of those stupid [ __ ]
idiots,
even how many of them think the war is a
good idea?
It's even unpopular amongst them.
>> I mean, what does it say here? Most
recent national polls show Americans
overall oppose the current war with Iran
and think US military action has gone
too far. Um, a Quinnipac poll finds 54%
What is Quinnipac? Quinnipak poll finds
54% of US voters uh oppose US military
action against Iran and 39% support it.
I wonder how many of those 39% or
>> and
>> well not too much. We don't have the
numbers.
>> A poll reports about six and right. What
is the number of Jewish people in
America? 2% something like that.
>> Uh six and 10 adults say US military
action against Iran has gone too far.
Only about a quarter say it's been about
right. 25% poof. First of all, you know,
whenever you're talking about these kind
of things, it's like who again, who who
are we talking about? Who who was asked
finds Republicans largely support the
military action around 86% support.
Whoa. Yeah. There's
>> really cuz I talked to a lot of
Republicans who think it's a terrible
idea. While large majorities of
Democrats around 92% and independents
about 64% oppose it. 92%. Who are the
eight% of Democrats that are like,
"Let's [ __ ] go." You think maybe
they're Jew?
>> They work for CNN. They, you know,
whatever.
>> CNN thinks it's a good idea. No,
>> dude. CNN is running cover for Donald
Trump during this time.
>> For real?
>> Oh, yeah.
>> No way.
>> Yeah. They put up a poll the other day.
They had a graphic that said 100% of
MAGA supports the war in uh in Iran.
There's It's like after all these years
>> say he liked it or something like that.
Oh, but hold on a second.
>> Is that running cover or is that making
them look bad? Because most Americans
don't support the war and most
Democrats, 92% don't support the war.
So, if that's the case, wouldn't that
just make it look like these MAGA people
are a [ __ ] problem?
>> I I I guess.
>> Oh my god. MAGA GOP view of Trump. Can I
hear how he says it or would it be a
problem?
>> Among him talking, it's someone else
talking.
>> Okay, that seems bonkers. That seems
bonker. Approve 100%. How many people
did you ask? Two.
>> Two guys with MAGA hats on.
>> If you notice the way they say this,
right? So they don't just say GOP
voters. They say MAGA GOP voters. And so
what they're doing here is that they're
filtering who they consider to be MAGA.
And who they consider consider to be
MAGA are the people who still say they
support Donald Trump. But like 100% of
the people who don't support this war
stop supporting Donald Trump over it.
>> Right. But look at this little thing on
the bottom that they they don't show
you. 66% 31% split amongst non-MAGA,
>> right? And
>> but is that non-MAGA Republicans? Is
that what you're saying?
>> No, I think that's non-MAGA Americans, I
believe. Um,
>> how like the the whole MAGA thing, it's
like how did we're so fractioned as it
is? Yeah.
>> Like this whole idea of uh right versus
left as it is and now you've got a MAGA
section of the right.
>> It's all just ridiculous, dude. But it's
a way to describe it as anything other
than what it is, which is the most
unpopular war in American history going
into it. And for good reason. Look,
dude, he didn't even bother to like sell
us on a propaganda campaign about it. He
It was like the laziest like just lie
just lie us into it. Put on a [ __ ]
firm tinfoil hat right now. Let's Let's
get a double layer Reynolds wrap.
[ __ ] crease the edges, fold it down.
Why would he want to do this? Why would
he want to? Look, I am not denying that
the regime of Iran is a giant problem. I
am certainly not denying that if I was
Israel, I would not want them there.
They hate you. They're trying to get a
nuclear weapon. They're right there.
You're I get the Israel position. I
totally understand how they're so
just vehemently in defense of their
homeland. Like, they're surrounded by
people that hate them. They're the one
Jewish country. Everyone else is is a
Muslim. They all want a caliphate. They
all want to kill him. It's been going on
forever. They think it's in God's word
that they have it. It's all a lot of
craziness. I get it.
Why
now? Like why now? Like what does that
make any sense? Well, um, Trump himself
has said, which literally this would be
like considered an anti-Semitic
conspiracy theory if anyone else had
said it, but Donald Trump has openly
talked about many times, how the Adles
give him all this money and they come by
every day and all they have is another
demand on behalf of Israel. Um, Donald
Trump also very early in his political
career uh got in trouble with the Israel
lobby and then immediately pivoted to uh
blaming the to winning their favor back
over by saying he would tear up the
JCPOA, the Iran deal that Obama got us
into. And it looks to me,
you know, other speculation aside, who
knows exactly what control they have
over the guy, but it looks to me that
after Venezuela
and when there were these big uh street
protests and riots against the regime
and Iran there, that they convinced
Trump, and this is what Joe Kent, his
director of of uh counterterrorism, has
said too, that they essentially
convinced him that this would be the
time you could do it swiftly, surgically
remove the regime and the people would
rise up uh and and overthrow it. And
that this is what Donald Trump said when
he launched this war. He said, "This is
a regime change and I'm calling on the
great people of Iran to rise up." And
they did. They rose up uh by at least
the hundreds of thousands, they were out
in in Tyrron in defense of the regime
chanting Death to America. Because it
turns out when you kill 165 little
girls, that doesn't make a country go,
"We love you. Thank you for that.
>> Right. But before the bombing, there
were people in the streets that were
protesting and people were killed
because of that. A lot. That's the other
thing is that that regime is like they
they clamp down and they do it with
public figures. They killed a very
prominent wrestler from Iran is really
two of them. They killed one a few years
back. The UFC tried to step in and
somehow another stop it, but he was also
one that was accused of protesting
against the government.
>> Listen, I don't know this most recent
one. And I'm not saying this is true at
all. I don't trust any governments. But
he was they claimed he killed a few
cops. That's what the the Iranian regime
said he was being hung for. Now I don't
Yeah, the wrestler. He was he was
convicted of that, whatever that means
in a in a mull run court, you know. So
I'm not saying that's right at all. But
>> I will say this, right?
>> The Donald Trump when he when he
launched this war, and there's been a
whole lot of just false claims that have
been made. Um but he said specifically
that they killed 32,000 protesters. Um I
there has not been a shred of evidence
presented to back up this claim. Now I'm
not saying it's not true. I I'm not
putting it past this government that
they would do that. And they've
acknowledged that a lot of people have
died. I think they I think the last I
had seen was that I know they were
saying the the government of Iran is
before the Ayatollah was killed. They
were saying it was something like 3,000
uh people had died and then the CIA
>> But when you say died, does it mean they
killed the person?
>> That's unclear. That's that's not what
they're claiming. But then the CIA at
least there was a piece in the
Washington, excuse me, in the Wall
Street Journal where they had said and
this was like a week and a half into it
that they estimated like six and a half
thousand or something like that. But
this is a huge question, right? And and
it's not clear at all like were they
lining people up and just executing them
for the crime of protesting? They hung
the wrestler. But I'm saying the the
people who are have been killed here. Um
>> Iran protest death toll could top 30,000
according to local local health
officials. And this is from Time
magazine. Uh as many as 30,000 people
could have been killed in the streets of
Iran on January 8th and 9th alone. Two
senior officials of the country's
Ministry of Health told Time indicating
a dramatic surge in the death toll. So
many people were slaughtered by Iranian
security services that Thursday and
Friday it overwhelmed the state's
capacity to dispose of the dead. Stocks
of body bags were exhausted, the
official said in an 18wheel
semi-trailers replaced ambulances. Now
listen, all I'm saying here, man, is
that you got to be re I just seen this
movie play out a lot of times. You got
to be really careful about these
accusations that are made in the run-up
to a war. They're basically saying we
have a source who told us this.
>> What year was this? I mean, excuse me,
what date was this?
>> January 25th.
>> January 25th.
>> So, the protest started in late December
and then in in January. This is
>> Time was unable to independently verify
these figures.
>> That's right. Listen, the the claim
being made here, right, is that it look
in this they said in two days in two
days 30,000 people were were killed. If
that is true, that is up there with one
of the biggest massacres in human
history. The biggest massacres during
World War II were like around that the
number
>> it says as of Saturday US-based human
rights activist news agency had
confirmed 5,459 deaths and is
investigating 17,000 more.
>> Yes.
>> Um so that's at least close. So we're in
the neighborhood we're in the 20s just
if what they're investigating turns out
to be accurate if that's if that's the
case. But we're talking also here, Joe,
about like NE funded US-based NOS who
are really Iran hawks, you know, and so
and I'm just saying like look, the the
claim the claim here is that Iran, you
know, I I saw a bunch of the uh the
Zionists online when this was first
coming out back in January, they were
like, "Oh my god, they've already killed
half as many people as died in Gaza in
just a couple days." And you're like,
"Right, that's a pretty that's a hell of
a claim, right?" I mean like if you just
from following wars all these years if
you started carpet bombing Tyrron
>> Vietnam style carpet bombing Tyrron
after two days that's the type of death
toll you'd be looking at.
>> The thing is we don't they don't have
internet access to
>> well they shut down the internet during
that period. So but there were pictures
that came out. All I'm saying is that if
you had numbers like that you would
expect there to be some evidence that
you could point to. And there's like one
picture where they've pointed to like a
couple dozen body bags and been like,
"See, look at this." But look, I'm not
maybe it's true, maybe it's not. I'm
very skeptical of these claims when
they're made right before we launch a
war. But I think the the other point is
that the at least according there has
been some evidence of this, right? There
were police stations that were burned.
There were mosques that were were
attacked. These were not uh just
peaceful protests. I'm not saying they
don't have a right to violently rise up
and overthrow their government,
whatever. But all the the hawks in the
west were saying these people are trying
to overthrow their government.
>> Not only that, in the past our agencies,
our intelligence agencies have engaged
in nefarious practices where we have
conscripted certain people to go and
light things on fire and blow things up
and create these events to accelerate
>> front page of the Jerusalem Post. They
were bragging that there was MSAD within
the protests. Um, so now look, I don't
know, but also the thing is this, right?
If you are trying to overthrow a
government,
>> a government will kill you for doing
that. And that's true about every
government, including our own. Including
our own. If if armed uh protesters went
to try to overthrow Barack Obama's
government, he would kill those people
if they were actually a threat to do
that.
>> Ashley Babbot was murdered not January
6th.
>> And every single left-winger in the
country went, "Well, that's okay. It was
an insurrection." And by the way, every
single right-winger in this country when
this prey guy got killed were like,
"Well, he was interfering." Oh, I I saw
it. But by the way, the prey thing was
the most textbook example of a bad
shooting. There's just no defending it.
They had disarmed the guy. He's down.
There's six of them. They panic. They
put six bullets in a
>> Do you know what happened though? Do you
know Do you know the whole story of the
gun?
>> Uh the gun being removed?
>> Yeah. Do you know the whole story about
the gun?
>> No.
>> Okay. The gun is a Sig P320. A Sig P320
is notorious for accidental discharges,
right?
>> There is a video of the cop removing the
gun, walking off.
>> Yes, I saw that.
>> And the gun goes off.
>> Is that And that is that his gun for
sure? Cuz I thought that hadn't been
determined whether or not. I heard
people speculating about that.
>> I've watched the video multiple times
and I've watched other people's analysis
of it. Obviously, I'm no expert, but I
do know something about guns and that
gun in particular, it's been
demonstrated online that it will go off.
There's a cop inside of a precinct. He
bends over not touching his gun. Gun in
the holster and it goes off.
>> There's a guy there's a video of a guy
on a range and an a gun just goes off
and he goes, "Whose [ __ ] gun was
that?" And the range master goes, "Is
that a Sig?" And he goes, "Yeah." He
goes, "Get that [ __ ] gun off of my
range."
>> Wow.
>> Because it's a P320.
>> So Sig, by should be real clear. Sig
makes a bunch of guns that are awesome.
Like the P365 is like one of the best
carry guns in the world. There's a lot
of guns they make that don't have this
issue. But that particular gun that PR
had with one in the chamber is [ __ ]
knuckleheads walking around with one in
the chamber.
>> Absolutely. It's and and all for I'm
just saying the only point I'm making is
that it's clearly it was a [ __ ] I'm
not saying like they wanted to execute
the guy. I'm just saying like they had
the gun taken from him. They didn't
communicate that to each other. They
freaked out. They But literally all it
took was seeing one video 11 days
earlier where he kicked the back of a
cop car and for every right-winger to
go, "Yeah, whatever, dude. Got what you
deserve." So my all my point is about
this looking at this in the Iranian
regime.
>> It's just not clear like what are you
actually accusing them of? Are you
saying that somebody was trying to
overthrow the government and the
government mowed them down? Are you
saying that they lined up protesters and
shot them all in the back of the head
simply for voicing their opinion? Like
none of this is made clear, but when the
war drums are beating, no one even cares
to like ask these questions. It's just
like, yep, they killed their own people.
And then if you notice with this war,
much like with Venezuela, and almost
like with all of them, they just keep
giving you like they throw like 15
justifications
at it, you know, and you're like, wait,
which one is the reason we're fighting
this? Cuz I've I saw all of them like to
play the humanitarian card and go, we're
doing this to, you know, for these
oppressed people. We want them to rise
up. They've been living under this
brutal regime. And you're like, "Okay,
two things." Like, number one, that is
simply just not how US foreign policy
works. We don't fight wars on
humanitarian grounds. You know what I
mean? Like, we're partners with some of
the most brutal authoritarians in the
world. And we've and in the case of like
Israel, we've been funding their
destruction of Gaza for the last two and
a half years. Like, it's and and so like
that's not really what's motivating this
here. And then number two, Donald Trump
even just the other day said he'll be
partners with the new Ayatollah and run
the straight of Harmoose together. He's
backed off. Yeah, he's backed off of
regime change or the idea.
>> Are they even talking to him? Is someone
talking to him? Like who who is he
talking to?
>> Do they know who they're talking to? Cuz
it's not like they're meeting Donald
Trump said
>> some guys on the phone. I am free to
negotiate. Dude, he's he said Donald
Trump himself said the other day that um
that he goes, "Negotiate, we're
negotiating. Negotiations are going
great." And they go, "Who are you
negotiating with?" And he goes, "A
person we believe to be in charge."
And then they said, "So, is this the new
Supreme Leader?" And he said, "No, no,
no one's heard from that guy. We don't
know where he is.
>> Some hacker in his basement in
Bellarus." And
>> it's not.
>> He's talking with an Arabian accent and
he's got them convinced. Well, it's just
>> I have the authority to negotiate.
Uh let's be partners. Let's be wire 1
million Bitcoin to this address.
Well, everything I'm seeing publicly
reported today is that Iran is like,
"No, we're not in these negotiations.
We've made our terms clear." And their
terms, what they're asking for is
something that Donald Trump is not going
to be able to give them.
>> What's that? uh their uh their their
demands were uh that we we stop uh
attacking immediately like that part
they might get that we pay them uh
restitution for all the damage so far um
essentially that we leave the region I
mean they had a few other things there
that were just like
>> and they want they want him to open up a
Terry blacks in tan
that's
this one was really important to us if
one Terry Black's barbecue. We don't
have good barbecue here. Um it's it it
doesn't seem like if if he's not really
negotiating with this guy, if it's like
if that if that's not true and he's just
like putting this out there in the
public as like a negotiation ploy.
What a cluster [ __ ] Cuz you're you're
dealing with people that don't mind
dying.
>> They they they believe I mean these are
very religious people.
>> They're fanatical. They believe they're
going to go to heaven. They believe they
are martyrs and they're they're fighting
for Allah. This is this is the just and
holy war.
>> Well, they've also been attacked. They
Well, that's right. And they've been
preparing for this for a long time.
>> Um, you know, and they like there's, you
know, people make a lot out of um the
chance that the Iranians, you know, they
chant death to America. And
>> what do you got there, Jimmy?
>> Sorry.
And who's control of it? Will Iran still
be able to control the flow of oil? Uh,
>> be jointly controlled.
By who?
>> Maybe me. Maybe me.
>> Me and the Ayatollah. Whoever the
Ayatollah is, whoever the next Ayatollah
look, and it'll also be a form of a a
very serious form of a regime change.
Now, in all fairness, everybody's been
killed from the regime. There's
automatically a regime change. But we're
dealing with some people that I find to
be very reasonable, very solid. Uh the
people within know who they are. They're
very respected and maybe one of them
will be exactly what we're looking for.
Look at Venezuela. How well that's
working out.
>> I mean, dude, this is such a [ __ ]
mess. This is such a mess, dude. I mean,
this is just too ridiculous, dude. And
the, you know, the thing is that a lot
of people, you know, I've spent a long
time at this point being against this
war because this war has been
telegraphed since, you know, the the
Bush administration wanted to do this
[ __ ] And um, at least for like 15
years, I've been publicly opposing this
war. And one of the reasons why so many
of us oppose this, and it's a shitty way
to be vindicated, but is that look, Iran
is just not like any of the other
opponents in the global war on
terrorism. It's a it's a different beast
entirely. And you've seen this already
only 3 weeks in. We never dealt with any
of this with any of the other countries.
You know what I mean? We had what the
Pentagon calls escalation dominance in
all of those other wars, which is all
essentially like it it's just like
meaning like if you do this, we do this.
if you do that like we're prepared for
everything. It's kind of like escalation
dominance is a lot like uh you like in
jiu-jitsu where you see really highle
guys who basically put you in a position
where you can make one of two choices
and either way you know like okay you
can you can give me your back and I'll
choke you or you can push off me and
I'll arm bar you you know like whatever
option you have I'm going to get you. We
don't have that with Iran
>> and the Pentagon's been open about this
since at least 2007. Um and the the fact
is that as we're already seeing they can
target ships in the street of Hermoose.
They can target our assets, our bases,
our embassies in the region. They can
target our allies. And this is a big
problem. And so, like, it seems like
Donald Trump got into this thinking it
would be like Venezuela. It would be
quick and bloodless and easy and he
could claim victory. Now that it's not
gone that way, it seems like he's kind
of scrambling for what the what the
offramp is here. Yeah. Now, at least I
give Donald Trump, as angry as I am with
him, um like at least it is true that
he's looking for an offramp, it seems
like. And he did this with the 12-day
war, right? Like he he started the war,
he saw an off-ramp, and he and he took
he took it. The problem here really is
that this war changed the calculation
from the Iranian perspective. And that
much is clear so far. you know the after
911
all the countries in the Middle East in
North Africa all the ones essentially
they all waved the white flag all of
them Saddam Hussein welcomed UN
inspectors in he was trying to do
anything he could to not meet the fate
that he ultimately met Gaddafi
denuclearized got rid of chemical
weapons Bashar Assad got rid of all his
chemical weapon like they were all just
like we don't want it with you you know
and Iran was very much the same way they
they got into the JCPOA they allowed an
inspections regime in to come look at
their their nuclear facilities, all of
that. And even up to the 12-day war when
we we dropped the bunker buster, as in
Israel bombed a whole bunch of regime
targets, they still in their response
called ahead, made sure there'd be no US
uh uh troops there. They they hit the
side of a little base there, and then
they kind of went like they gave Trump
an off-ramp because they didn't want it,
you know? They didn't want to they don't
want to die like Moar Gaddafi. They
don't want to, you know, have their
country destroyed. So for
self-preservation reasons, they showed
restraint. The calculation this time
clearly already from the Iranians was
that we can't do that again. We we have
to give you a bloody nose and a black
eye. We have to make this cost as much
as possible for you. Otherwise, you guys
will just be back here in another 5
months doing it again. And they're
they're probably right about that.
They're probably right.
>> And so now we're in this situation where
we're already in a in a quagmire. It's
already like over a dozen Americans have
died. Some I think a couple hundred
wounded at this point. Israel isn't
given real numbers on what's going on
there, but there's some pretty
substantial damage and definitely some
Israelis have died and I'm sure
thousands of Iranians have have died at
this point. It's cost I mean Pete Hgs
has just asked for $200 billion. I don't
know if it'll get up to costing that
much, but this thing is certainly
already in the tens of billions if you
consider munition, military movements,
and and then just the damage to
embassies and bases and stuff like that.
I mean, this thing is already a
disaster. And so now it's not like
Venezuela where Donald Trump could just
stop and declare victory and and even
say like, "Look how great it's working
out." Now, is Venezuela really working
out that great? I I don't know. That's
kind you know, we took one guy away. The
regime's still in place. the people
haven't been liberated, but whatever. He
can claim that this now the problem here
is that, okay, number one, Donald
Trump's not really in a situation where
if he just quit right now, how is he
really going to say, look how wonderful
this is? It's like, I don't know, dude.
This cost a lot already and it doesn't
seem like there's any clear like what
did we get out of this? Well, the only
way it would work is if there was some
sort of a deal with whoever the [ __ ] is
going to be the new guy in charge and
they did come to some sort of an
agreement
>> and they did give them some compensation
for all the [ __ ] we blew up.
>> Yes. Well, that right.
>> So, they'll just print some more money
for that. Sure. And inflation. But look,
here's the thing is that it's not just
Donald Trump. There's two other
participants in this war um or two other
entities in this war. There's Iran and
there's Israel. Okay. Now, is Iran going
to accept that? Maybe. But look, just
like the 12-day war, look at the
position you're in now. We're relying on
the Mullers. You know what I mean? Like,
it's that that is not an ideal situation
to be in. And then the other factor is
that there's Israel who also gets a say
in this for some reason because we allow
them to. And Netanyahu just the other
day was very clear about this. This is a
regime change. And he even said it will
require ground forces. and he said he's
not sure who those ground forces will be
yet.
>> And so now this happened if you do you
remember the moment during the 12-day
war when it was the closest Trump ever
came to like flipping out on Israel and
he said they don't know what the [ __ ]
they're doing. It was but he said Israel
and Iran don't know what the [ __ ]
they're doing because Donald Trump so
after he drops the bunker busters
>> he goes that's it we're you know what I
mean? taking the off-ramp. And then he
said, "I want to work out a ceasefire
now." And then after he said that,
Israel just started lighting up regime
targets, just bombing the crap out of
them. And they weren't bombing nuclear
facilities. They were just bombing like
government buildings. And they've been
doing a bunch of that in this war as
well, bombing local police departments,
things like that, just creating chaos.
Cuz what they want is what they've been
getting in the rest of the war on
terrorism. They're they they are quite
happy with a Libya model or a Syria
model. They
>> don't want anyone that's organized as a
threat to Israel.
>> They don't it's it's all about Iran's
support for Hezbollah.
>> Yeah.
>> Is that they want southern Lebanon,
which they just uh Katz, their defense
minister, just announced that they're
going to occupy.
>> Yeah. That's crazy, right? They just
announced they're gonna be occupying
another country.
>> That's what it's about, man. And and
look, I mean, it's not again, this isn't
like a conspiracy theory. The guys all
tell you this in their own words.
Benjamin Netanyahu was asked point blank
a few months back what he thought of the
Greater Israel project. And he said it's
very near and dear to my heart. Like
this is the point of denying the
Palestinians a state for all these
years. You can't let the Palestinians
have a state because then how are you
going to take that all over someday?
That's all supposed to be part of
Israel. And the US ambassador, the US
ambassador, not the Israeli ambassador,
the US ambassador to Israel is on record
saying that God promised Iraq to
Benjamin Netanyahu and that God promised
Lebanon and Saudi Arabia and the West
Bank and parts of Syria and all of this
is greater Israel. That is it. By the
way, Sam Harris, where are you at on
that? Where where are the new atheists
when you could finally use them for
something? Hey, that's pretty crazy. Is
that how we do politics? We we work on
this this ridiculous religious
superstition that somehow the when God
said Israel in Genesis, he was referring
to the state that was created that they
named after that passage. This would
this would literally be on the level,
Joe, is if I named my son Jesus Christ
and then I told you you have to worship
my son.
>> Look, it's right there in your Bible.
Exactly. That you worship. No, you named
it after that, dude. That doesn't count.
>> I That's crazy. And they took the spot
where it was.
>> Yeah. I mean, like
>> they took over and they did it in a
horrific way. Like the numpka.
>> Yeah.
>> You You listen to some of those
soldiers, the translation of some of
those soldiers talking about what they
did and even laughing about what they
did.
>> Some of them even smiling
>> in 1948. That's
>> Yeah. Cuz it's not It wasn't in 1848.
You know what I mean? Like these guys
were alive. Maybe not so many of them
now, but like 20, 30 years ago, you
could put a video camera in front of one
of these guys and ask them to tell their
story,
>> right? It was 78 years ago. It wasn't
that long ago.
>> Yeah, that's right.
>> That's right. And so, you know, look, I
mean, the idea here that America after
just 25 years of catastrophic
failures, launching wars of choice, wars
of aggression, lying the American people
into it, just slaughtering millions of
people and like bankrupting this country
and really severely degrading the
country with these wars. The idea that
we would jump into another war of choice
for Israel is just too like th this is
too crazy, man. And especially when it's
the administration that that really
ran on and promised that we want to get
out of this out of this game of fighting
stupid wars in the Middle East.
>> Yeah, that was what we were all
supporting. Yeah,
>> that was the one thing that he was
saying that was so promising to so many
people that were independent that were
on the fence. They're like, "This guy
wants no wars." All right. Look, he
wants closing the border, which I think
is a great idea. He wants no wars. That
enough.
>> Let's go.
>> Well, especially um considering the fact
that well well like even if there are
some things about Donald Trump that
maybe you don't like uh but the other
guys are saying we want to keep fighting
forever wars and this guy is saying we
should stop doing that. That's enough to
go, "Well, then he's better than you on
net." And don't get me wrong, I mean, I
I endorse Donald Trump in 24. Um, you
know, people give me [ __ ] for that. Some
people like that, some people give me
[ __ ] for it. Um, but I I do I kind of
view it like this, like, and I really I
will say, maybe I'm a little biased here
because I love you, but I don't think
I'm being biased. I really think you
played a an enormous role in in kind of
like standing up to the
progressive democratic establishment and
their narrative over the last, you know,
decade or so. And it's really hard to
kind of overstate how crazy they were,
how much of a threat to this country
they were. And so for anybody who wants
to give [ __ ] to anyone who voted for
Donald Trump, it's like, "Hey man, the
alternative was the the party who
bragged about um first off insane woke
[ __ ] like poisoning the minds of
children in a really grotesque and
abusive way. They gave us open borders,
flooding the country uh with people.
They gave us all types of COVID tyranny
uh based on pseudocience. They gave us
the most reckless foreign policy uh in
American history, which was this proxy
war on Russia's border. And they were
running, they were pretending the
president wasn't scenile when he clearly
was. Then they in the fourth quarter
threw up a cackling [ __ ] who was not
democratically picked in any process.
And so, sorry, like it it does make
sense that a lot of people went, "Okay,
we're going to go back with with this
other guy." Yeah. Also, there was an
interesting dynamic happening in 24
where, okay, this wasn't, you know,
Donald Trump, they had actually tried to
throw him in in jail, maybe even tried
to murder him. We never really got any
answers on that one. Um, he now had
Bobby Kennedy with them. He now had
Tulsi Gabbard with him. He now had all,
you know what I mean? Even JD Vance,
like a lot of these people who were
supposedly much more
non-interventionist.
There was reason to hope that maybe it
wouldn't end up here. But anyway, I
guess my thing is that you played such a
huge role in this and I to a lesser
extent played a role in standing up
against a lot of that progressive
insanity over the last 10 years. And I
just feel like after 24, you know, this
coalition came together where Donald
Trump for the first time ever wins the
popular vote, wins every single swing
state, and really more remarkably won
the youth and the culture. Like Donald
Trump went from being like the cultural
pariah to being the guy like Jon Jones
is doing the the dance at the front. And
it was just it was and that whole
coalition has been destroyed over this
war. And now he's going to hand the
country right back over to these
Democrats who we've been fighting so
hard. All for what? All for a war that
Netanyahu wanted against a country that
dude, by the way, the justification for
the 12-day war was [ __ ] They
weren't trying to make nuclear weapons.
They were trying to negotiate. got out
of that unscathed.
But then all and and I want to you know
he said some nice things about me when
he was on here the other day with you.
So I will say some nice things about uh
Constantin Cassen who I despite our
disagreements I really like that guy a
lot but he is I could be wrong. I could
be missing someone. He's the only guy
I've seen who supported the 12-day war
but is really skeptical about this. And
I've seen so many people. It's
unbelievable dude. like they they just
so like the 12- day war comes for the
first 48 hours of it they're like dude
Israel's doing this on its own they want
for you to stay out of it then like the
third day they're like all right they do
need some help shooting down the
missiles that are coming back toward
them but whatever this is just defensive
you know what I mean like you don't have
to get invol then it's like the next day
like all right we don't we don't have
bunker busters so we do need you to drop
the bunker busters but then their whole
uh um like defense of the 12-day war was
like look no Americans died it didn't
cost us a lot. It didn't turn into this
disaster. And now we're at the okay,
well, fine. All of that happened, but
it's still a good thing. Constantin was
the one guy I saw who was like, "No, I
supported that one, but I am not getting
on board with this one." And I give him
a lot of credit for that. I give him a
lot of credit for that.
>> I like that guy a lot. I like him a lot.
I like Francis a lot, too. I think their
show Trigonometry is one of the best
shows. Agree with them or not agree with
them. They're always reasonable. They're
never ideologically driven. They have
opinions that you may or may not agree
with, but they're real clear about their
opinions and why they believe what they
believe.
>> Yep, that's right. And I I will say
>> and they're great guys.
>> Yeah. Genuinely good dudes.
>> Great guys.
>> I really liked uh you know I get in a
lot of uh like the [ __ ] show
>> like arguments. I find myself in them. I
probably should be better than them and
just not engage, but I I'm not and I'm
petty and [ __ ] show
>> like where it just becomes like an
insult thing or you know I debated Alex
Baron or just kind it's kind of
embarrassing in hindsight but like I
don't know. It gets me really angry when
the a guy's calling me a Holocaust
denier or something like that. I think
>> the phrasing was kind of silly. The way
he was saying it was silly and he was
just trying to play gotcha with you and
then you called him a [ __ ]
>> Yeah, it's not my finest moment.
>> You could tell he was really shaken by
that.
>> Well, that expected that.
>> I kind of have a thing where like look,
I'm really into this [ __ ] and I nerd out
on it and I'm obsessed with all of this
for whatever reason. It's just like my
calling in life. Um but I'm also standup
comic at heart, you know? And so like as
soon as someone goes like, "Oh, I want
to be vicious." You're like, "Oh, you
want to be vicious?" Cuz like I'm pretty
good at being vicious. So like I could
do that. And you're probably not used to
hearing this type of vicious [ __ ] that
like comics say to each other.
>> Um but one of the things that I really
appreciated about Francis and Constantin
was when I went to do their show, it was
just like
>> it was genuinely a good faith
conversation. They weren't trying they
weren't trying to like win the point or
or get a clip that they could go we
destroyed Dave. And then once they do
that, I'm like, "Okay, well then I'm not
trying to do that either, man. Like,
let's talk about this shit." That's
that's always what I'd rather do. Yeah.
>> Um, but
>> the thing that's I guess the thing
that's really interesting about this
moment is that because the kind of
corporate media propaganda apparatus has
been completely destroyed and because
the internet and social media and
podcasts are where people go now for
for, you know, conversations and debates
and news and all this stuff,
>> they're kind of like they're like
they're running without a propaganda
apparatus, you know, like Israel just
Israel in the last 2 and 1/2 years is
down like 50 points in the polls like in
terms of American approval like they've
just been this it's a drastic change
like I've never seen on any issue over
the last years
>> in our lifetimes where it's been an
issue that we are dealing with the
consequences of the relationship.
>> That's right.
>> There's never been a time in the past
where people were completely aware of oh
there's no other reason why we'd be
going into Iran. Like most people most
people don't think it wasn't for Israel
asking us to Netanyahu's consistent
visits to the White House. Mult
>> Oh, you can't even you can't even uh
pretend otherwise. I mean, people do.
>> Yes. Well, they try to, but people
>> Coleman Hughes just got into a debate
with Glenn Greenwald about it.
>> I saw that they did it. I have not had a
chance to watch it.
>> Somebody sent it to me and it was, you
know, I'm I'm being a good boy when it
comes to social media. It's been so good
for my brain.
>> Yeah.
>> It's kind of remarkable. So, uh, I got
just staying off, you mean?
>> Yeah. Yeah. My new phone, I'm not going
to put anything on it. I'm going to have
my old phone and leave it at home and
I'm not going to be able to look at it.
So, when I have to post things, I got to
post it on my other phone that's not
going to be with me. I'm not doing that
anymore because I just think
>> eventually ultimately it rots your
brain. But, you do get some cool debates
and some insight into what's going on.
And I don't know what Coleman's argument
was, but uh Glenn and Coleman were
arguing about Israel's influence on
this.
>> Well, I'll be very interested to watch
that. Um I do respect Coleman despite
disagreeing with him very adamantly on
this. Very smart guy. Very smart guy. No
question about it.
>> A very nice guy, too. And uh um and and
look I one of the things I really
respect about him is when I did his show
he literally starts it by going he goes
you know almost all these debates I see
you in like you're kind of debating
issues and then people just debate your
character and he goes I'm not doing that
at all. I want to talk about the issues
the whole time and I just genuinely
appreciate that agree with him or
disagree with him. He's a super
reasonable guy and a very nice guy. I
like him a lot. I like him a lot.
Whether I agree with him or disagree
with him, he's a wonderful person. I th
this agreed this this is what I will say
about um his position on this which I I
think is is kind of interesting. So,
number one, um, when I was on Pierce
Morgan with him right after Venezuela
happened and he was his position, I
don't want to mischaracterize it, but I
think this is pretty accurate, was he
was like, look, a lot of people are
comparing Venezuela to Iraq or Libya or
Syria, but like that is a different
region, a different culture, a different
religion, and so really what we should
be comparing this to is other
interventions in in Latin America in
South America. And I, you know, I didn't
completely agree with that. I was like,
actually, I think there are some lessons
you could learn from other wars that
we've been in that might apply here. But
I was like, okay, fair enough. Hey,
let's look at other interventions in
Central and South America because we've
got a long list of really disastrous
ones. Like if you want to look at
Guatemala or Nicaragua or, you know,
Cuba, Mexico, a whole bunch. Um, but
then when this war in Iran starts, I
don't see him going the equal opposite
of that, going, "Hey, now that we're at
war with Iran, we have to judge this by
Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya and
Syria." Because, you know what I'm
saying? Like, that would be the flip
side to the other position. And so, I
don't see that. The other thing is that
when he's arguing with me about uh
because I was arguing that, you know,
that is the Israel lobby and the Israeli
government were a huge part of why we
fought the war in Iraq, right?
>> And his big point that he stuck to a lot
of the hawks uh stick to this is that
Ariel Chiron was actually he who was the
sitting prime minister at the time, he
was actually against the war in Iraq.
Now, that's not exactly true. Um he he
wanted George W. Bush to invade Iran
first, not Iraq. And then when he got
assurances that Iran would be next, he
got on board. You could go look at
Chiron's speech. He gave a speech, I
think it was in August of 2002 to the
Knesset and it's all about how Iraq is
the biggest threat. They have weapons of
mass destruction, but the MSAD was
cranking out all types of BS
intelligence about the nuclear weapons
that he could detonate in 15 minutes or
whatever. It was all nonsense. But if
you're going to say that that is
evidence that Israel was not pushing us
into this because the sitting prime
minister at the time didn't like this
war, okay, but again then how does the
current sitting prime minister of Israel
feel about this war in Iran cuz he's
fighting it with us. And he said after
it started that this is the culmination
of his entire life's work. He has been
trying to lie our our government into
this war for my entire lifetime. coming
here. He he testified how many times he
testified with the cartoon of a bomb
>> at the UN cartoon a bomb cartoon with
percentages of the enriched uranium
>> and like a Daffy Duck bomb. Not like
like a the bomb that'll blow your beak
around to the other
>> and it was he was already up real high.
He was already up real high. No, dude.
He was on record saying that Iran was 3
to 5 years away from getting a nuclear
weapon in the '9s. He's I mean it's just
he's just been lying through his teeth.
And there is something look man there's
something really profoundly dishonorable
>> about trying to lie another country into
war. Like not even trying to sell the
war to your own people and have your own
military do it but because you can.
There it is.
>> Yeah. There we were up to 90%.
>> First stage. No, it was first stage we
were at. He was saying they've hit the
first stage.
>> Oh. Oh. Oh, excuse me. Okay. Yeah,
you're right. I guess this is we can't
we can't go any
>> mom.
>> It's just so ridiculous. And he knows he
knows he's lying.
>> He's like your friend that like you've
been friends with since high school and
every time you go out he gets you in a
fight.
>> Yeah.
>> Like dude, don't do this. Like those
guys over there are a [ __ ] problem.
Let's go over there and [ __ ] them up.
And like you know all your buddies are
like dude guy again.
>> Dude, I use that exact analogy when I
debated uh Josh Hammer did at uh
Princeton University and um or maybe it
was with the Charlie Kirk. It was one of
the times I debated him, but I used that
exact analogy. He was like, "Is Israel
an ally?" And I was like, "No." It's
like, "They're not a good friend. If
your friend's getting you in a bar fight
every night that stop hanging out with
that guy, bro." Tim Dylan did an ad for
Neurogum and Neuromints on his podcast
>> where he's like, "I have a friend, uh,
let's just call her Erica." And he does
this Erica Kirk ad. He doesn't say it's
Erica Kirk for Neurogum. Have you heard
of Jamie?
>> I don't think so.
>> Oh my god. Oh my god. It's so funny. Oh
my god. It's so It's so crazy. He's so
out of his I [ __ ] love him so much.
I'm so happy Tim Dylan's in the world.
>> He is the best.
>> He's the best. If you're not listening
to his podcast and you want a rational
but hilarious take on all the [ __ ]
madness that's going on with not just
his war but the Epstein Files, his
episode of the Epstein Files, I hardly
ever tweet about other people's
podcasts. But I I hardly ever tweet but
I posted it. I'm like this is one of the
best podcasts about anything ever. his
ability, Tim's ability to like rant
>> it like it like a hilarious rant that is
laced with excellent points, but it's
just hilarious the whole time and just
him going off is second to none.
>> And he's sober. He just puts on his
magic glasses.
>> It's him and Fuentes are the top two.
>> Oh, but he buries Fuentes. Fuentes is
really good. Fuentes has
>> him can do something different than
anybody else can do.
>> Yeah. Well, his ability to blend sarcasm
and just celebration of chaos.
>> Yeah, it's second to none.
>> Best ranter that's ever walked the face
of the planet.
>> I remember uh when I first met Tim in
New York back before he he moved out to
LA after that, but when I first met him
in New York and he was I think like he
was a green standup. I think he hadn't
been doing it for that long, but I
remember just like being on podcasts
with him and just being like, "Yo, this
dude is going to be a [ __ ]
superstar." Like it was just like his
his ranting like ability. Like he would
go off on things where you just find
yourself like like you almost have a
moment where you forget you're on the
show with him. Yeah.
>> You're like I'm just sitting here
watching that and then I'm like, "Oh
[ __ ] I'm here too. I better say
something." But like he's just
unbelievable.
>> Listen to this ad. Listen,
>> I don't know if I should tell this, but
it does show how effective neuromints
can be.
A friend of mine, let's call her Erica.
She
She's had a wild life, this woman. She
was in Romania. She had an orphanage.
She was on a reality show. She married
this famous guy. She was an intelligence
asset.
And I said to her, "How do you do this?"
And she says,"Tim,
it's neuros energy and focus." And I
said, "But how do you do it after the
guy, the husband and father of the kids,
gets murdered and you're out there doing
all kinds of stuff? You're doing
fundraisers and you're dancing around
with glitter pants. How does this
happen?" She goes, "I could lie to you,
but I'm telling you, it's Neuro's energy
and focus mix." I said, "Really?" She
goes, "Sure."
I said, "How are you running this
organization 7 hours after this guy got
popped?"
She goes, "A lot of people speculate,
but it's Neuro's energy and focus
mints." I go, "Really?"
She said, "Yeah, neuroenergy and focus
is powered by natural green tea,
caffeine, althenanine for calm, focus,
and vitamin B12 and B6 for
>> I mean, whatever they're paying him,
they should pay him more." Yeah, it's
not enough. No one can pay him enough.
He's the goat.
>> Well, that'll also just make you
remember that product forever.
>> Yeah. No, he's the greatest of all time.
>> It might be
>> I'm trying to figure out how to turn our
racetrack sign on all the way.
>> Is it broken?
>> God damn. We need a new one.
>> I'll get a hold of Bobby.
>> Uh he's the goat, dude. He's uh You mean
just Yeah. I had someone in the White
House come up to me and goes, "Is Tim
Dylan really gay?"
I go, "Yeah, he's really gay." Like, you
think he would fake that?
>> He goes, "How long have you known him?"
I go, "I've known him forever. He's
really gay."
>> Yeah. Well, he will he's a he's a real
good undercover, but every now and then
you see it come out.
>> Every now and then you see like uh like
I remember and this is back when he was
young and and he was broke at the time,
but Tim was always kind of a snob, even
when he was broke, like it was always
kind of and I went uh I forget what it
was, but uh I was like I was like, "Oh,
we could get food from this restaurant."
And he goes, "From there?" I go, "Yeah,
they got good food." And he goes, "You
think that's good food?" Like cuz he's
like a real like foodie or whatever. And
then it was just like, "Oh, I saw it for
a second there."
>> Well, he used to have money cuz he had
money when he was selling.
>> He had money in finance. Then he decided
to be
>> subprime mortgages and he was a part of
the housing crisis.
>> That's right.
>> And he was doing cocaine back then.
>> He he did topple the US economy for a
while, but then he got into comedy. He
more than made up for it. He's more than
made up for that.
>> This is where he belongs. Yeah,
>> he belongs in front of that screen with
the glasses on just going on these
insane rants.
>> Oh yeah,
>> he's so funny, man. His Epstein files
take [ __ ] genius, man.
>> That was great, dude. His thing about uh
Sam Harris having a a meditation app and
also supporting genocide.
It's like the most hilarious thing ever.
Like what human being does both of
those?
>> Such a great take on that.
>> Oh, he's so funny, man. Yeah, we're
lucky, dude. We're we're we're we're a
part of a really cool group of people
right now. You know, it's a very unusual
time that the mainstream has lost all of
its power of influence on people. It
still puts out information. It still
puts out shows, but they're
>> trying to look like you,
>> but they're fun. That was
>> that Jake Taber thing was so crazy. I
was like, what are you doing? Are you
doing a podcast now? Like, what are you
doing? It's it's such a perfect like
little microcosm though of like it's
almost painful. Like I'm like guys just
can you hire me? I mean like I I would
explain this to you wouldn't work either
because they're so trained. They're so
it's like
>> if you get a dog and that dog has been
maybe a Yeah. a cat might be a better
example. Like if you've never had a
litter box in the house and the cat's
been pissing all over the carpet.
>> Mhm.
>> You are always going to have that cat
piss on the carpet. That's what that guy
does. You're not going to fix him. If
your entire life you've been spitting
out nonsense from a teleprompter and now
all a sudden you have to be yourself,
you've been functioning in a world of
executives and producers where everybody
goes over every little thing you say and
do. You 100% read things you know aren't
true or at least partially true.
>> Mics for like everything.
>> Oh yeah. Yeah. Their their whole setup
is they're all trying to look like
podcasters.
>> No, wait a minute. They put mics out
like podcasters. That's crazy. Imagine
if they think that's all it takes.
>> But well, this is but but Joe, talk
about completely missing the point,
right? This just fundamentally missing
it is that they go they actually go,
"Okay,
>> so all of these people have left, you
know, watching cable news in in droves
and now they a lot of people listen to
podcasts. They'll listen to you or Theo
von or whoever it might be. And the a
huge reason, right, why people a huge
reason why you've been number one for so
long now is because however anyone feels
about you, you're authentic. And it's
very hard to deny that. You know, one
one of the biggest questions I get when
people like meet me if I do like meet
and greet after shows or something, it's
it's what's Joe Rogan like is a question
I get all the time because we're buddies
and I've been on the show a lot a lot of
times and you know people are love you.
And they'll go, "What's Joe Rogan like?"
And I always tell them the same thing. I
go, "You already know.
you're, you know, like you already know
who he is. He's that guy and then
offstage he's that guy. You know what I
mean? Like that's who he is. And people
like that. People like that. Whatever
you think about Theo, he's telling he's
authentic. He's being himself. That's
who he is. That's a That's why it works.
>> And because you guys in the corporate
media are all professional liars and
have lied to the American people about
the last 17 crises. You know, they don't
trust you anymore. And so then their
reaction to that is you go, "Well, what
if we pretended to be podcasters?"
You're like, "No, you dummy. That's the
whole thing. This is just proving
further how inauthentic you are that
you're [ __ ] meetings on this
podcast."
>> 100% they do, dude. They all This was to
me despite the fact that I, you know,
and people give me [ __ ] about voting for
Donald Trump and they could say I should
have known better and whatever. I was a
huge critic of him in his first term and
I'm a huge critic of him in his second
term. But the best thing about Donald
Trump winning in 24, and I did predict
this, right, I'm not always the best
with predictions. I'm pretty good on
issues, I think, but I'm not great at
predictions. They're tough. But the best
thing about Donald Trump winning was
that the corporate media finally
admitted it. They were they had been
pretending for so long. I remember we
used to joke about I remember coming on
like a few years ago and uh we would
joke about how Brian Stelter would
always whenever he talked about you he
would always kind of go like the fringe
Joe Rogan like as if he's the mainstream
and you're the fringe as if the numbers
aren't readily available to all of us
that we could be like your show has like
200,000 listening and his has 20
million. So, how is he the fringe and
you're the mainstream? But they would
pretend. Well, they maybe they believed
it, but that 24 the election, that's
when they all admitted it. And then the
talking point moved to
>> we need to find our own Joe Rogan. The
Democrats need to find a Joe Rogan or
whatever. Remember that was like, so
they kind of admitted that, oh, the
podcasts have become the new mainstream
and we are the fringe,
>> right? But the dumb part of that
statement was, you already had me, you
[ __ ] idiots. You just lost your mind.
I'm not right and I'm not left. Yeah, I
think both of them suck. And I think the
adherence to the ideologies that the
left supports or the right supports is
out of their [ __ ] You got to be out of
your [ __ ] mind. Whether it's these
crackpot Christian nationalists that
think that this whole war is a way to
get Jesus to return on a white horse. Do
you see those guys that were talking
Yeah. during the the readiness [ __ ]
meeting? That I think that's nuts, too.
I think the woke [ __ ] and all the the
chaos of the [ __ ] last four years of
having a completely open border and the
justifications of all these things,
that's nuts, too. I'm not on either
body, anyone's side. The Democrats
aren't ever going to get someone like me
because I'm not with either or. I'm not
with either or.
>> I'm with whoever [ __ ] makes sense and
no one makes sense until AI comes along.
I think they're going to do a really
good job. President Perplexity is going
to run this country fairly and balanced.
Man, I'm I'm willing to try it at this
point, dude.
>> I'm [ __ ] I'm dead serious, man. As
long as it doesn't like do something to
harm people. As long as like that's it.
It goal is just to manage society.
>> It's a big if that you got there. But
yes, if we can get that
but what you just said I think is really
well this is something that I'm
encouraged by is that I think what you
just said there I really do believe that
you speak for super majorities of the
American people. And that's why even
though Donald Trump has shattered his
coalition by lying us into this stupid
war on behalf of a foreign country,
>> that coalition is still ripe for someone
else to pick it up and run with it. And
that's kind of what I'm hoping. I hope
Thomas Massie runs for president. I
think, by the way, they're doing a big
money bomb for Thomas Massie on March
30th. And I think him winning
re-election in Congress is like the most
important political election in the
country right now because he's done
nothing wrong except actually stand up
for America first and for all the stuff
that Donald Trump and Tulsi Gabbard and
all these people ran on. and he's gotten
the the Israel lobby and the Adelins,
but I repeat myself, have been pouring
millions of dollars uh into his race to
try to unseat him for the crime of not
going along with the Epstein cover up
and not going along with another stupid
war and having some like fiscal sanity.
So, I hope I hope he wins. I
>> imagine those three negatives. Imagine
those being three negatives that people
are saying he's not MAGA.
>> Yeah. Well, then okay. What is MAGA
then?
>> Well, if that's like I don't know. Like
my position is always like if you're
saying if if not supporting covering up
the Epstein files or not supporting a
stupid war of choice, a war of
aggression on behalf of Israel means I'm
not MAGA, then okay, I'm not MAGA. I
don't I'm not attached to the the the
you know the phrase make America great
again. I don't care then. But that
phrase sucks. Here's the thing. Like
first of all, America is great. Make
America greater, I'm down. but make
America great again. And then it becomes
a movement of a bunch of [ __ ] dorks
because a lot of them are dorks. A lot
of them these really weird [ __ ]
uninteresting, unintelligent people that
have got something they cling to and and
there's a lot of people that are just
real genuine patriots and they're all
lumped into this one group and you got
to accept the dorks, too. [ __ ] that.
Like the concept of making America great
is a great idea. But as soon as you have
a [ __ ] team and you allow anybody to
join up,
>> you've you don't even have tryyouts for
your team. So you've got a bunch of
[ __ ] [ __ ] that are running around
spouting out opinions and you have to go
along with them because they're MAGA.
And then you've got bots online that are
probably from [ __ ] Indonesia or
Russia or wherever and they're
pretending they're MAGA and they're
saying crazy [ __ ] So that's a part of
MAGA, too. You've [ __ ] up by becoming
a part of a group.
>> Yeah.
>> Whether it's a Republican group, a
Democrat group, a MAGA group, a [ __ ]
woke group, whatever it is, you [ __ ]
up by being in a group.
>> Yeah. What is George Carlin said? People
are great as individuals. Yeah.
>> But when they get in a group, man,
they're the worst things in the world.
And that's why that's why it should be
about the like the issues. It should be
about your principles and what you
believe in. And you should be like,
look, like I've said uh many nice things
about Tulsi Gabbard over the years and I
was extremely critical of her over since
last summer into now cuz I think she's
lying us into a war which is the war
that she was always opposed to. The one
the one she sold no war with Iran
t-shirts. Um she like this was
>> how is she lying us into this war?
>> So la well
>> because that's a big statement.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Uh so and it's
it's true. So last summer, so Tulsi
Gabbard had given her the as the
director of national intelligence does
every year, they give their annual
threat assessment and she testified uh
before Congress about it and she it was
very clear in her annual threat
assessment that Iran was not attempting
to build nuclear weapons that they had
not yet made the political decision to
attempt to build nuclear weapons, let
alone like are actually going for it.
And um and she testified before Congress
saying the same thing. And then after
negoti while they were negotiating,
Israel sneak attacks them. Then she had
some post where she goes Iran could be
weeks or months away from nuclear
weapons, which is like was total
[ __ ] It made absolutely no sense.
>> Let me see what the post.
>> Sure. This is from if you could find it,
this is from last, it must have been
last June,
>> right? But is that a fact? So if they're
enriching uranium up to 60% and they
just have to enrich it further for the
ability to use it in nuclear weapons
that is a couple weeks away
>> now but not not before it would be to
build a bomb and to make it deliverable.
I think all the experts say at least a
couple years but the point aside from
that is that at the time this is over
now but at the time Iran was still
members of the JCPOA. They were still in
it. So like
>> what is that? the this is the Iran deal
that Obama uh got us into. Obama is
horrible on foreign policy, the butcher
of Libya and Syria and Yemen and he
surged in Afghanistan. But in Iran, he
made a deal with them and the deal but
it wasn't just with the US and Iran. It
also involved uh Russia and uh France
and and England and there were other
countries involved in it too. And the
the JCPOA said that uh Iran couldn't
enrich above I think it was 3 to 5% or
something like that and they were
staying in it and they it created a new
inspections regime which Iran so they
were having full inspections they
weren't enri but but the deal also said
that if America gets out of the deal
they can enrich up to higher. So when
America got out of the deal they started
enriching.
>> And when did America get out of the
deal?
>> Donald Trump to it up in his first term
I want to say 2017 or 2018. And then
they immediately started enriching.
>> No, they went up a little bit and then I
think there were a couple Israeli
attacks and then they went up to
enriching at 60%. But so the reason we
knew they were enriching up to 60%. Is
cuz they were still members of the JCPOA
with an inspections regime who was going
in there and saying they're enriching up
to 60%.
>> Right. But how much do you actually know
about enriching uranium and what it
takes to turn into a bomb?
>> Let's let's read what she says. New
intelligence confirm what POTUS has
stated numerous times. Iran's nuclear
facilities have been destroyed. Oh no, I
think this is after this is the right
one. Her tweet was before.
>> This is from June.
>> Yeah, this would have been just shortly
before this, but her tweet was before we
hit Fordo.
>> Yeah, this is June 25th. There's a
recent one though. Um Oh, edited June
25th.
>> Yeah, but it seems like it was still
edited the day it was posted. But can
you go to her page and because she
doesn't tweet a lot. She's not a psycho.
She's not one of those. If she tweets,
it's generally something important or
someone from our team is. So, is this
the Hold on. What above that
overwhelmingly elected by the Click on
that show more.
>> I think that's it.
>> Well, this is what she testified to
Congress this time. I I was referring to
a different one from But I also think
this is a a a lie. I mean, for her to
say that the president determines what
is an imminent threat or is not. No.
Either there is an imminent threat or
there is not one. That this is like
saying the president determines the
weather.
>> Right. Right. Right. But but you're
taking her words out of context. She's
saying something that's factually
correct. As our commander-in-chief, he
is responsible for determining what is
and is not an imminent threat. That is
true. And whether or not to take action
he deems necessary to protect the safety
and security of our troops, the American
people, and our country. That's just an
actual fact. Okay. Yes. Fair enough. But
when she testified before Congress, they
asked her like they asked her point
blank a bunch of times about this. And
then she goes, "That's not my job to
determine what's an imminent threat.
That's the job of the president. And if
he says it is, then it ends."
>> Okay. So look at this here. Initially,
she's contradicting Trump, saying that
Iran did not rebuild after the 2025
strikes. Contradicting Trump. So this is
also from Time magazine. So she's saying
that now what you're saying that she
said earlier was a lie is not a lie,
dude. Because that is actually his
>> Well, I wasn't referring to that.
>> I understand. But you did say that was a
lie. What she said was a lie.
>> Okay, fair enough. That was not a lie.
But it was but it is it's
>> actually correct. And if you're in a
position like she's in where you've got
that guy breathing down your neck and
you're forced to make a statement,
>> you've got to tread
very carefully on this tight rope that
you're walking.
>> Okay, fine. But let's just say
hypothetically that you know for a fact
that Iran did not pose an imminent
threat and then that's your answer when
you're asked if they did. Fine. It's not
a lie. But it is
>> very misleading to say the least.
>> How much Okay, hold on. Intel Chief
Gabbard declines to say if Iran posed an
imminent threat to the US. She declined
to say per on her own personally, but
she did.
>> This is the congressional test.
>> Yes. Yes. Yes. This is I think this is
what I was referring to here. And she
does at one point say that it's not her
job to make that determination, which I
do think is her entire job.
>> Um,
it's interesting. Look, maybe maybe I'm
being a little harsh by saying lying in
that example. And fair enough to your
point there. Like that technically is a
true statement. I do think it's very
misleading and I do think that she
really was the one who advocated against
this specific war for the reasons that
we're seeing unfold right now. And I do
think I I get your point. It's a very
tough tight rope to walk. options are
essentially, I think, to do what Joe
Kent did and resign or to stay on and
support the thing. I mean, I think it's
kind of hard to thread that needle,
>> right? Do you think that there is
>> any value in being one of the few
reasonable voices that has his ear?
Yeah, ultimately it is his
responsibility to determine what's an
imminent threat and what is not. Um, I
would imagine that she gets access to
most of the same classified information
that he does as the director of national
intelligence. I don't know though. I
don't know how it works.
>> But
what can she do other than try to be a
voice of reason if ultimately this guy
is going to do what he wants to do,
right? And he's going to do what also
what Israel wants to do clearly. Oh
yeah.
>> And he's talked about it, you know, and
also in his first term, I I'll never
forget this [ __ ] conversation that he
had with Steve Hilton cuz I think it was
one of the first times since I've seen a
president say, and Steve Hilton, by the
way, I've been friends with him for 12
or 13 years. Met him and his family in
Maui on the beach when my daughter's
really young and his kids really young,
they became friends. We've hung out
together, vacation together. He's a
sweetheart of a guy. I love that guy.
Um, and when he was interviewing Trump,
Trump said that there is a military
industrial complex and these guys want
to go to war.
>> Yep.
>> And we were like, "What? This is You're
just saying that? Like, you're just
saying that?" It's one of the many
reasons
um why a lot of people liked him cuz he
he would do things like that where he
would completely break protocol and
just, "Hey, let me know. Let let me let
me uh let you know rather let me inform
you. There's a bunch of people that want
to go to war and they're pushing me all
the time to go to war. That's what they
want.
>> It was so crazy, dude, because also even
when he coined the term, it was in his
farewell address to the nation. He was
literally like, "This is my last stop
and then I'm leaving." Trump was just in
the middle of his presidency and he
goes, "All of them want war. They all
want me to be in war all the time. If it
was up to them, we'd always be at war."
And I do, you know, now look, that was
crazy. I thought actually the one to me
that was even crazier was if you
remember when Bill O'Reilly was
interviewing him and he's talking about
Vladimir Putin and he goes, he's like,
oh well, you won't, you know, at the
time Donald Trump, which he had run on,
he was, he was saying, we should have
daunt with Russia. He goes like, why do
we, you know, we have all the nuclear
weapons. Yeah. He goes, he goes, Putin's
a killer. You want to have a date taunt
with a killer? And he goes, we got a lot
of killers, too. And then he goes, whoa,
whoa. What do you mean we got a lot of
killers, too? And he goes, "What was
Iraq? What was that? We got a lot of
killers on our side, too." And then Bill
O'Reilly's, "Well, I I mean, a a rack
was a mistake, but he goes, "Yeah, we
got a lot of killers, too." And I love
that, by the way. I mean, that was uh
>> that's breaking protocol.
>> Yes. Yes. Well, I think this is kind of
I think one of the main reasons why the
establishment revolted against Trump the
way they did. There's something very
scary to the powers that be about a guy
who like by his very nature like I don't
even think he's capable of not letting
things slip. You know what I mean? Like
he's he's just that's who he is. Um and
that you know was a big thing that
people really didn't like about him.
Very interesting to me is that so many
of the never Trumpers
have come to define his presidency. Like
if you if you remember back in in 2016,
the uh the the Warhawk kind of Israel
first Republican crowd, the neocons and
all them, they hated Donald Trump. Hated
him with a passion. Ben Shapiro uh was a
never Trumper. He said because of his
deeply held principles, he could never
support Donald Trump. Mark Levvin was a
never Trumper. All of National Review,
all of them. and now they are the
biggest Trump supporters ever as kind of
he's blown up the coalition that got him
elected. So, it's kind of interesting
that they all, you know,
you know, but again,
>> tell those guys to all stay off Twitter.
There's not one thing that they ever say
that makes them look better. They get in
these silly [ __ ] They just feel like
they're going to make some stupid
[ __ ] statement and then refute a
couple of people and don't understand
the crowd reaction when you've got
thousands of people tweeting against you
now. Thousands just attacking you,
destroying you, posting memes, posting
videos. You said this and you said that,
you piece of [ __ ]
>> It's amazing.
>> It's crazy.
>> I got to say I I do love that dynamic of
it. There's there's something that
>> that's why I stay off of it.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Well, that's you look,
there's problems with it, but there is
something about that dynamic now that
was just never true in the past where
it's like look, I'm not saying it's
perfect and obviously there's bots and
there's things like that. So, it's not
like a but
>> the people kind of get a voice in a way
that they never had before, right? And
there is something kind of cool about
that.
>> 100%. I love it. But it's not all the
people either. It's a lot of fake
people. There's a lot of like state
sponsored actors.
>> That's true. That's true. There's
manipulation, but there was always
manipulation in the old order. Also,
>> do you see this YouTube bot farm that
they just busted?
>> No,
>> they busted this this [ __ ] warehouse
had cell phones all rigged up for
YouTube views
>> where people would just they would just
hire a company and say, "Hey, you know,
part of the problem is not getting
enough views. I'd really like to blow
the [ __ ] up and get to number one." and
you hire them and they could get views.
>> Interesting.
>> Well, that's also I mean I guess if you
got advertisements that's legit fraud
>> 100%
>> that's like actual fraud 100%. And kind
of a weird loophole where I don't think
it's illegal.
>> Yeah, that's got to be a bot thing.
>> It's got to be some type of fraud though
if you're like if you're intentionally
doing that. Like maybe if you didn't
know,
>> right?
>> You could but
>> but listen, Twitter pays people X pays
people to post.
So you pay based on engagement, right?
That's how you get paid. So you farm out
engagement.
>> So like what percentage of what we're
interacting with is just horseshit?
Well, I got So um
>> I know this story just happened. A guy
got arrested plead guilty cuz he made I
think I think what happened? He made a
fake band to
>> Yeah. He had an AI generated song. He
got it played billions of times in an
effort to mimic the genuine streaming
activity of real consumers. Smith plead
guilty today. Conspirity to commit wire
fraud. Wire fraud.
>> Check this out, though. I heard a
similar story in Japan where
>> First of all, let me stop you right
there. Michael Smith generated thousands
of fake songs using artificial
intelligence. Hey, hey, hey, stop
talking [ __ ] about AI music cuz it's not
fake. Those are real songs.
>> Yeah.
>> Don't say fake songs. They They're real
songs and some of them are [ __ ]
bangers. Unfortunately,
>> some of them are really good.
>> You're going to like what I was going to
say then. A a guide was doing this in
Japan and it got viral and so he hired
people to be the band and now the band
is a real band.
>> Kind of popular.
>> So AI AI is creating jobs in this case.
>> Well, you know, so I
>> shift Brent rules though. You can never
create him in real life. He's the guy
who does the uh 50 Cent ones.
>> Oh yeah. Yeah. I've seen I've seen quite
a few. guy was, first of all, if that
guy was real, he'd have lungs like a
[ __ ] ultramarathon runner because the
flow. Like, how could you even have air
to say what you're saying?
>> Like, someone was saying that to me. She
was like, I think you couldn't do this.
And my argument was Eminem. I was like,
yeah, you could. You just have to be
wicked at it. Like Eminem. Like Eminem
in his prime, that [ __ ] could
spit in a way where you like, I can't
believe he's still talking.
>> Yeah, it was uh I I remember there were
a couple of his things where I was like,
I don't Can he actually do this? And
then I saw him do it live and not not
like I was there but saw it on YouTube
like where you're like, "Oh, he can
actually rap like that."
>> Recently,
>> I saw him recently. It was [ __ ]
great. He's still great. He's thin. He
looks good.
>> Yeah, he was killing it, man. He was
killing it. But those the speed in which
that he can rap made me go maybe AI is
not bullshitting. But, you know, 50 Cent
himself was like much more casual in his
delivery. Yes.
>> You know, and it was uh much slower. the
Shifty Brent AI version is like, damn,
that was a real person.
That'd be pretty great.
>> He would be the greatest artist. I got
there was a guy I can't remember his
name but just uh like the other day uh
some guy he works for Fox News and he
came out and had a whole post about me
and he goes uh um he goes Dave Smith's
account is clearly botted by foreign
like and I'm almost like when he said
that I was almost kind of like it was a
weird thing like I know I've never paid
for anything but like I don't know you
know what I mean like what someone else
might have done or something like that
but I asked him but I I so I replied to
him and I go wait what evidence do you
have of this and then he his post was
that he said because I had 900,000
followers on Twitter but I'm playing
Laugh Boston this weekend and he goes
that's a 300 seat venue so I play that
obviously sometimes too well I was like
first of all he doesn't understand you
just don't get comedy clubs dude like
this is not and first of all I'm doing
five shows there by the way come on out
this weekend
>> great club
>> great club one of my one of my favorite
weekends of last year
>> it's a [ __ ] great room
>> but I was like look Man, I I sold out
all the shows last year. Hoping to do
the same this year. But I go that is any
like I just know the industry of standup
comedy pretty well and I was like
anybody who you're saying would be
selling more than this. So what selling
out big theaters or selling out a
stadium or something like that? All the
people who do that have more followers
than me.
>> So like he's not even right about the
ratio of it or whatever.
>> He doesn't understand numbers.
>> But then I kind of like I I grilled him
on it a bit more cuz listen I'm kind of
like you. Like when you were talking
about suing CNN back in the day for
slandering you, like I'm never actually
gonna do it, but I don't mind saying it.
You know what I mean? So like I don't So
I tagged Fox News and I go, "Hey Fox
News, shouldn't you have some evidence
if you're going to make a claim like I'm
clearly botted by foreign influence or
whatever?"
>> Fox News actually said it.
>> The guy works for Fox News.
>> Was he on Fox News?
>> No, he's on Twitter.
>> Twitter, but he's like a a Fox News
contributor or something like that,
>> right? But I'm a UFC contributor. It
wouldn't be like the UFC. You know what
I'm saying? I guess that's true. So, I
don't know. Maybe it would just be him.
And either way, I'm not suing anyone.
But I did want him to just I go just
just admit you don't have any evidence
for this. Like, just retract that.
>> Well, here's the thing. I would agree
that your account is botted because
you're very controversial public figure.
So, of course, they're going to focus.
I'm sure my account is botted, too. I'm
sure Jaime's account is botted.
>> 100%. Right.
>> Show you the evidence.
>> I think Jamie might have bought himself.
>> We're all botted, man. the if you look
at you know we've brought up this up a
million times but there was an FBI
former FBI analyst who analyzed Twitter
before the purchase and it was his take
that as much as 80%
might be artificial now this is back
then this is before Elon purchased it I
think they've done they've taken some
steps to try to ensure one of the things
is you have to you could go to the
person's page you can see what country
they're posting from
>> Yes. I like that because there's a lot
of people that are like pro America and
you're like, "Hey, man, you're in
Pakistan." Yeah. Like what's going on
here? This is kind of kooky. So, there's
a lot of that going on.
>> I' I've had I've had uh uh before where
people go like, "Oh, Dave, you always
say Israel's trying to lie us into war,
but this is America. We decide what war
we're going to fight and then you click
it. Israel
in Israel talk.
>> At least we're getting steps to know
those." Listen, if it wasn't for Elon
Musk, we would be [ __ ] I've said this
before, I'll say it again. history will
go back and look at his purchasing
Twitter and it it has changed the course
of communication in this country for the
better. I know a lot of you thought, "Oh
my god, the racism is up and all this
stuff is up." That's people. That's the
internet. That is an accurate represent
representation of people. It's not good,
but it's also accurate. And the only way
that's going to change is if the other
voices are more compelling. And at least
now they have an opportunity to do that.
>> Yeah. Well, and you and you have to kind
of engage in this whether and I'm not
saying you have to be on Twitter or
something like that, but I'm just saying
like if you wanna,
you know, I would love very much to get
to a place where like you be like, "Hey,
let's all agree that we're not on board
with the bigotry stuff." And I mean this
like whether it's against white men or
whether it's against black men or
whether it's against Jews or whether
it's against Muslims or whatever. And I
see a whole lot of all of that. And I'd
love to move past that. I also would um
like like I I wish there was a way that
like Mark Leven and Tucker Carlson could
have like a cool conversation. You know
what I mean? And not like not like be
like but Well, look, it's
>> I wish Santa Claus and Jesus would come
meet me for dinner.
>> Well, look, both would be nice. This the
latter is more likely I think too at
this point. You know, I had a weird um
thing. I don't know if you saw this, but
uh Ben Shapiro uh had he made this video
about like about Pierce Morgan and and
like going at him over having me on on
the show. And he went and this whole
thing and so he he says to me or or he
said, you know, he insults me a few
times or whatever. And then he goes, uh
now I I can hear Dave Smith right now.
And his response to this is debate me,
bro. which fair enough, that kind of is
always my I only have one tool in my
toolkit. Like,
>> right,
>> come let's podcast about this. I don't
know. Like, this is what I do. I talk.
>> But I'm willing to do that.
>> He goes, "No." Uh because you're like,
"So, uh" he said, "Because I won't I
don't debate such intellectually
dishonest people or something like
that," which I thought was a weird
criticism of me. Like, you could say I'm
wrong, but I do believe the [ __ ] I say.
>> Yeah. I don't think you're in the I
don't think in any
demonstration of any I don't think
there's a single moment that I could
point to that I think that you've been
intellectually dishonest. I think that
is like factually incorrect.
>> Well, that's that is gaslighting. You
are very honest. You're a very honest
person.
>> Thank you. I try to be.
>> No, you are. It's one of the things I
love about you. You you're honest about
your fuckups. You're honest about your
what you were incorrect about and what
bothered you
>> about things that you've said. You're
you're very honest. So that's a silly
thing to say. That's total gaslighting.
>> Well, it's also Well, I look at it like
this and I don't you know, honestly,
like obviously if Ben Shapiro wanted to
debate, I would I would do it.
>> Everybody before
you go, dude, you can't say I'm beyond
the pale when you're known for debating
19year-olds who are confused about their
gender. You know what I'm saying?
Now, I don't know if you remember this
and this to me I I actually think is is
very interesting, but I don't know if
you remember this, but on this show when
Ben was on years ago, and this, you
know, years before October 7th or
anything like that, but he was saying
some he was talking about Israel and his
defense for Israel and you went uh you
go, "That's interesting. Would you ever
debate someone, you know, who's a critic
of Israel?" And just generically, not
about a specific person. And he goes,
"Absolutely. I'd be happy to do that."
And you know the thing about guys like
that is that particularly with Ben
Shapiro for the last two and a half
years his number one issue Israel has
been the number one topic of
conversation. And in that time Israel
support has been bleeding. I mean just
like to a level you couldn't have
imagined. You couldn't have imagined two
and a half years ago to go this will be
a pro Palestinian country. That was
unthinkable. And it's become that. And
forget me.
>> There's way better people than me. But
Ben Shapiro debated no one. He never
once had a conversation with a competent
critic of Israel and that listen, people
saw that. People noticed that. And so I
I kind of in a weird way feel like it's
like, "Hey dude, I don't care if you do
the debate with me or not. I wish I
don't think we ever can. I wish there
would be a world where we could have a
good faith conversation like a guy with
me and Ben Shapiro." But he refused to
do it with anyone anyway. So, while
you're smearing everybody who's a critic
of Israel, you're not willing to like
you. Listen, there are some people who
don't debate, but he branded himself as
the debate guy,
>> right? If you don't like Dave, sit down
with Scott Horton.
>> Sure. Absolutely. Scott Horton's way
smarter than me and knows way more [ __ ]
than me anyway. So, talk to him about
it, dude.
>> You're saying that this is the reason
why you won't do it. That sounds crazy
because wouldn't you want to debate
someone who's intellectually dishonest?
Because it would be so easy to refute
them with facts.
>> Exactly. So, come
>> It would be perfect. It's like dating.
It's like sparring a guy who knows fake
kung fu,
>> you know, he thinks he's got a death
touch and you're Dustin Porier. You're
like, "Oh, yeah, bro. Lace the gloves
up. Let's go."
>> Well, that was kind of my thing with
with the Douglas Murray thing, too,
where it was like at a certain point,
you're like, "Dude, you can't just say
you're an expert and I'm not an expert."
The demonstrate that then that if that's
the case, then it should be easy for you
to just shot me up in front of the world
right now. Some things that you had to
correct him on.
>> Yeah.
Yeah. He just got it wrong. And you
could see like the tremor in his eyes
like ah [ __ ] Like they don't want to
give up that ground because they're
playing a very different game. And the
game is not let's be intellectually
honest about what we think is going on
and what we think is good and bad about
what's going on versus I'm trying to
win. Yeah. And one of the ways I try to
win is by I can appeal to authority. You
you're not an expert.
>> You know, you're not a this. You're not
a professor. You don't you've never been
there. Yeah. That kind of [ __ ] That
that that is all like hack ass fake kung
fu moves.
>> You know you're gonna try on Francis and
Ganu. You know what I mean?
>> Yeah. Like Okay. So, good luck with
that.
>> You're saying you should not that I'm
comparing you to Francis. That's very
disrespectful to Francis.
>> Certainly not when it comes to fight.
You much rather fight me.
>> This Ronda Rousey card they got Francis
fighting Philip Lind. Philip Lind who's
a light heavyweight at in the UFC and
the UFC cut him and he's fighting the
scariest heavyweight who's ever walked
the face of the earth. I mean prime time
>> next to prime time Alistister Overim.
Prime time Alistister Overim when he was
Uber him I think is even scarier
>> I think because he was way skillful like
he was terrifying when he was on the
sauce.
>> Yes. But even
Francis was a thing where Francis almost
has a thing where it just seems like you
you have to fight a perfect against him
which Stipe Mio did his first fight.
Their first he took a lot of shots.
That's the thing about Stipe. Like Stipe
could take a shot
>> and you would see he would like jab him
and he'd be rocked, but he'd still get
the takedown and still and he exhausted.
>> Skill. He beat him with skill, strategy,
experience, everything. But in the
second one, DC said it best. He goes, "A
patient Francis is a [ __ ] terrifying
thing."
>> Dude, my favorite uh my favorite
commentary ever in a fight was uh when
when DC said it was just so hilarious to
me. It was so real. Like he just meant
it. Yeah,
>> it was when when Francis and Ganu fought
uh fought uh Gan
>> and he grappled a little bit in that
fight, which we had never seen him do
before, but there was one point where
there he was on the ground and he like
took his back or something like that.
Like he passed his guard or he took his
back or something like that and DC just
goes, "Oh my god, he's doing jiu-jitsu
now." Like it was like he was speaking
of a robot who just learned how to feel
feelings. He goes, "Oh my god, it's
learning. It's advancing." Like this is
so terrifying.
A guy that's that much of a destroyer
that learns how to take backs and
strangle people too and control you from
the back and blast you unconscious like
he did with that dude in the PFL in his
last fight. Took his back and just
blasted him into the nether world.
>> Yeah, that's that's scary.
>> He's the scariest guy that's ever fought
in the UFC. Like I said,
>> props to that dude for taking the fight.
>> Natural clean guy. I should say that
with a captain.
>> Fair enough. Fair enough.
>> You know, cuz we only got a couple
Alistar Overim fights where he was Uber
and the big one being Brock Lesnar.
>> That was the big one. And of course, the
other fight on that card that they
added, which is huge, is the Nate Diaz.
>> Well, here's here's my point.
>> If Nate Diaz is fighting, I just I'm
paying whatever you're charging, I'm
going to be wherever it is.
>> And it's Mike Perry who who bad
[ __ ] That's a great fight. But
my point is they also have Ro Bellis
Despain who's on the card who's a 6'7
Cuban taekwond do expert who's a
heavyweight, who's a knockout artist.
Like, why didn't they have him? He's
fighting Junior Doss Santos and Junior
Doss Santos is you know he's
>> it's he's had a he was an all-time great
but he had a long career and he's had
some bad knockouts
>> some wars too
>> bad wars the wars with Kane Velasquez
took years off his life
it was almost criminal that they didn't
stop uh both of those fights
>> well they were definitely horrible and
and terrible to watch but the point is
Roelis is huge he's a real heavyweight
he's a big giant knockout artist like
that would have been an interesting
fight versus Francis
big, super tall guy that's hard to hit.
>> Yeah.
>> And if it just is a striking fight, the
problem with Roell is he got he got
exposed in his last UFC fight on the
ground. He got beat up on his ground
game's not that good. Could have gotten
better, but on the feet that's a little
bit more interesting to me than
Philillip. Although Philip's a skillful
fighter, you know, he's just he's used
to fighting at light heavyweight. The
UFC cuts him and now all of a sudden
he's fighting against Francis. Yeah,
that's a little bit of a a mismatch, but
hey, I mean, you know, we've seen crazy
[ __ ] happen in MMA. Felipe, I think it's
pronounced Felipe. Felipe Lind, but he's
a good fighter. I It's not It's not a
bad fight in that sense. But it's like
>> you're going up against a guy with a
chip on his shoulder that they're paying
$20 million. He's the lineal I don't
know what they're paying him. I'm just
guessing. But he's the lineal
heavyweight champion of the world, the
real one. Like, if you really like plot
it out, no one beat him for the title.
That's a That's a crazy fight. It's like
that's how shallow the heavyweight
division out is outside of the UFC.
There's so few fights for you to get
Francis for. There's so few fights in
the UFC. I mean, the UFC's heavyweight
division is a a real mess.
>> It's very hard to find gigantic men who
are excellent fighters. I guess
>> there's a lot in Russia, okay? There's
there's guys that are fighting in other
countries that are really good that are
coming up. It's just like it's hard to
get him over here. This Josh Hoit, he's
a bad [ __ ] That's that wrestler
dude who's crazy who has these crazy
speeches after the fight. Puts on an
American flag bandana
>> and he said Brittney Grinder has a dick.
Like
Britney Grinder's a man. I forget what
he said, but he's just nuts. He's But
he's also like really smart about
marketing.
>> Who's the other guy? You you talked
about him several times, but he's the
the Olympic wrestler guy. Uh
>> oh, Gabe.
>> Gabe. Yeah, Gabe.
>> Gable. Gable. He's Yeah, he's not in
yet, though. He's not in I had him on
the podcast. He's not in the UFC yet.
When he's in the UFC, he's going to be a
[ __ ] problem. Olympic gold medalist,
elite wrestler, moves like a cat, 250
lbs, young, super dedicated, and just
recently learned striking and is [ __ ]
people up with his hands.
>> Yeah. And is picking it up quite
quickly.
>> And is a Jon Jones protege. So he's been
being mentored by the goat and absorbing
his mindset and help that guy's helping
him. He's investing his time into
training. If you're a young guy, you
know what a [ __ ] boost of confidence,
the greatest of all time says you're
going to be the man. You're going to be
the [ __ ] man. You just stick with
this plan and they're bringing him up
the right way. He fought in dirty
boxing. He fought some small MMA
organizations. He's just like building
up experience.
>> Yeah. And there's not there's never been
a lot of but there's not really right
now in the heavyweight landscape. There
isn't really like a Frank Mir or uh um
what's his name? Um Minotaur uh
>> Noggera where there used to be these
like guys who were like kind of known
for fighting off their back. You know
what I mean? Like most heavyweights
don't really like fighting off their
back. These even the guys who are really
good at jiu-jitsu. I also think just in
general fighting off your back is a lot
harder than it used to be.
>> Over Doom was the greatest.
>> Yes, that's a great examp.
Um, but there aren't really that many
guys like that. A lot of these guys, you
take them down,
>> they're in trouble.
>> They're in trouble.
>> Yeah. And when you got a guy like Gable,
guess what, [ __ ]
>> You're going to get taken down. And
there's not a [ __ ] thing you can do
about it. That is a next level.
>> I just saw the one one of his recent
fights where he uh he he's finishing a
double leg before he realized he knocked
the guy out. But it seemed like
>> he KO him with a left hook and he's so
fast that as the guy's collapsing on the
way down. He shoots a double, connects,
takes him to the ground while he's
unconscious. So before the guy has a
chance to drop, that's how fast he is.
He's already on him taking him down and
pounds him out while he's already
unconscious.
>> Yeah, that was scary.
>> That guy's a problem. He's a problem.
And that's an American heavyweight
[ __ ] We need one of those. We
need some American champions. We're
down.
>> Get him in the White House.
>> Yeah. I mean, are there any American
champions right now? Who are the
American champions? Um, McKenzie Durn is
the strawweight champion, so she's
technically an American, although his
her dad is a very famous Brazilian
legend.
>> Okay.
>> Yeah. Megaton Diaz is is her dad and she
was a jiu-jitsu Brazilian jiu-jitsu
champion, but she is American.
>> So, she's a champion. Other than that,
who
>> Sean Strickland's fighting for the
title? Kayla Harrison. That's right.
Kayla's. So, it's only women that are
the Americans.
>> Yeah. Look at that. Boy, you're gonna
see a lot of those dudes with those
beards.
>> They keep coming over here. You're going
to see a Oh, Joshua Van is an American.
That's right.
>> Um, you got to see a lot of those dudes.
That's a caveat though, the Joshua Van.
No disrespect for Joshua because I think
he's an awesome fighter, but he won that
fight. We got to have a rematch on that
one.
>> That was a freak injury. I mean, he fell
and dislocated his arm. It's a complete
freak injury. Um, and Pantosia still
hasn't fully recovered from that. So, it
was pretty bad. Whatever the [ __ ] They
said his shoulder dislocated and his
elbow.
>> Yeah, I remember hearing that afterward.
It looked like it was just his elbow.
>> Uhhuh. But they said the doctor had said
it was his shoulder. And so what it what
the thing about the elbow is um the
elbow is a less complicated joint,
right? And so when the elbow gets
dislocated, if someone just pulls on it,
it can pop back into place. So like
saying that there's as long they do know
what they're doing right because you
don't want to do it like Yuri Prohaska's
team did and rip his shoulder apart and
it needed surgery. You probably need
surgery anyway if it was dislocating
like that. It was probably loose. But
the point is that like his elbow might
have popped back into place by the time
they brought him backstage. And that's
when they realized his shoulder was
[ __ ] cuz his shoulder probably hurt
more even.
>> Right. Right.
>> That was unfortunate cuz that was a real
interesting fight. dislocate a lot, you
know, and you know, sometimes people
dislocate their shoulders and don't even
realize they do.
>> And I apparently, according to my the
this orthopedic surgeon that I went to
back in the day before I realized that
stem cells could fix it, uh this guy was
convincing me that I had to have
surgery. And one of the things he said,
"Do you know that your shoulder's been
dislocated?" And I said, "It has?" He
goes, "You didn't know?" I go, "No." He
goes, "How long how many times you hurt
your shoulder?" I go, "How much time you
got?"
just want to sit down and talk about how
many times I've been kamorid, how many
times I've been [ __ ] arm blocked, how
many times I've been caught in a
triangle, how many times, you know,
posting on the ground, I've jostled my
shoulder. The good news is there have
been no fracture or ligament injury.
That's great. Oh, that's Bahumpa said
that. So, from that, we have great
expectations for his return, but the
exact time frame is still unknown. Still
needs a lot of physiootherapy, start
moving his arm. Wow. Then he can go back
to light training and then hard
training. Bro, we got to get that guy
down to [ __ ] the CPI in, you know,
the the Cellular Performance Institute
that the UFC uses. Get that dude down to
Tijana.
>> I'm worried about I'm worried about the
new model for the UFC,
>> the Paramount model.
>> I'm worried about the Warren Iran and
the new UFC model. This is what keeps me
up at night.
>> I get it. So, what are you worried about
with the new UFC model?
>> Look, I I'm a I'm no genius. Um, but it
seems to me like I'm a hardcore fan of
the UFC, right? So, I was uh you know, I
order every pay-per-view, right?
Everyone, you know, I and and so every
any Saturday if I'm on the road in my
green room, we're watching the UFC. If
I'm not on the road, I'm either at home
watching it or I'm trying to go to the
event if it's in town,
>> right?
>> So, then uh it's like, okay, ESPN is is
over. Uh we're not doing that anymore.
So, then they're go we're switching to
Paramount. Now, I already had Paramount
cuz like my kids like some shows on
Paramount. Yep. So, now
>> Land Man.
>> Yeah. Oh, yeah. I I watch land great
show.
>> Um so you know so like I have Paramount
Plus I'm like oh okay well that's easy
enough and then I I'm I'm like so wait a
minute hold on so you tell me I just get
every one for free now I just don't have
to order pay-per-views anymore and
there's just something about that. Now
I'm not saying whether this is
Paramount's mistake or the UFC's mistake
or whatever. just like the the basics of
business to me. Go,
>> so you just had a a loyal customer who's
very happy to pay for every pay-per-view
and I'm just not now. Like this just on
some Now I understand it's cuz Paramount
gave them a whole bunch of money, but on
some level I go, number one, I go, "But
how is this good for business if the
customer no longer has to pay for a
thing that I was happily paying for?"
>> Let me correct you. Okay, sure. First of
all, Paramount,
the idea of doing this and investing $7
billion into the UFC over the next few
years,
>> the the positive that they're going to
get from that with loyal new customers
is massive. So, if you're
>> introducing it to a whole new audience,
>> if you're a loyal pay-per-view buyer,
>> if you spend what is it 70 bucks for a
pay-per-view,
>> I think something like that.
>> So, 70 bucks for this big time
pay-per-view card. Now you get it for
free. You just have to pay for Paramount
Plus every month for the year. You're
saving so much money. So the amount of
new people that are going to go, "Oh,
this is awesome. I don't have to pay for
pay-per-view anymore. I pay for
Paramount Plus and I get all these
awesome shows, too." Cuz Paramount Plus
has a ton of shows.
>> Great deal for the consumer.
>> You get roped in through that and then
you go looking around on Paramount Plus
and you stay a loyal subscriber. They
have all these years with this new
influx of viewers from the UFC deal to
build up more of a library, more shows.
It's huge for business. Okay, fair
enough.
>> They could take their app from where it
is now and take their streaming model
from where it is now and quadruple it
over the next x amount of years.
>> So they're Okay, so for them they're
bringing in the whole UFC audience.
>> And how many people would look at a
pay-per-view card and look, I would buy
every one of them. Even when I was
working for the UFC, I would go on ESPN
Plus and I would buy them. Even though I
was there, I was like, I want to be able
to watch it in the gym when I get home.
I'm going to buy it.
>> And so, you've got all these people that
were looking at those cards that were
like, this one, I don't know.
>> I don't know if that's worth 70 bucks.
If you're on a budget and you're looking
at this one, you're like, who's
fighting? Ah,
>> nah. I'm going to pass on this one. I'll
watch it, you know, in a couple weeks on
ESPN Plus because you could just wait a
few weeks. I don't know how long the
time frame is, but you can wait a few
weeks and you watch it.
>> This you don't have to do that anymore.
It's 10 bucks a month. What is Paramount
Plus a month? How much does it cost?
>> I think they upped it to maybe 12 or 13,
but I'm not
>> Let's find out so we're accurate. But
you're saving so much money. But also on
ESPN, they charged you something like
that, too. Like you had to pay an ESPN
fee and then you had to pay for each
individual pay-per-view. So, no, listen.
I'm saving a lot of money off this.
>> Okay. $ 13.99 a month or $139 a year for
the ad free premium plan which includes
Showtime. New and former subscribers can
currently get any monthly plan for $2.99
a month for the first two months.
>> It's not bad.
>> Oh, for So, for a new subscriber, you
could try it out for two months for
$2.99 a month and watch every UFC for
$2.99 a month for two months. It's
[ __ ] worth it. And then you're going
to get this huge influx of people that,
you know, if you're on a budget, you're
not going to subscribe to Paramount
Plus. You already got Netflix. Netflix
costs X amount of money. Maybe you got
HBO Max. That's X amount of money. Okay.
I can't afford Paramount, too. I don't
want to pay another 10 bucks a month or
$14 a month. Now, you just It's easy.
Like, no pay-per-views.
>> Yeah. They made they made a lot of wives
of hardcore fans happy. I'm sure for
that like I don't have to buy these
pay-per-views anymore. Yeah, they get
the Paramount shows and uh they don't
have to do that. All right, fair enough.
I guess it's just um
>> in some ways I guess and I don't really
have much of a mind for business, but in
some ways there's just a thing where
it's like we've always done it this way
now. We're doing it a whole new way.
>> Yeah. But it's been on streaming for the
last few years.
>> Yeah.
>> So, it's always been on an app anyway.
And then Paramount, you could get it on
Apple TV, you can get it on Android TV,
you can get it on all these different
things. It's like there's no reason to
not have it.
>> It's easy. It's just great for as a
business move for Paramount. It was a
smart [ __ ] move because you get this
built-in hardcore fan base. Now, have
some of the cards been lackluster? Yes.
But guess what? That has always been the
case. A matter of time. You watch Rose
Nama versus Carlo Esparza. There's been
some fights back in the day that just
weren't great.
>> And there's been cards that
>> even though they look good on paper, in
reality, they weren't so fun. Yeah, but
I also I'm I'm with you. Uh because I
remember you used to say this back in
the day all the time, but I I am like a
purist fan in in MMA in the sense that
like all of that is like I don't care
like like feel like oh it's boring.
You're like it's the most exciting sport
in the world on its worst day. Even in a
fight that's a bad fight because you if
you remember the uh um Frank Mir Crocop
is a good example of this where it was
just a boring fight the entire fight and
then there's a spectacular knockout at
the end of it. And even if that doesn't
end up happening, you're always watching
like that could happen at any moment. I
also uh I also am with you. I I believe
in like uh I don't believe in standups.
>> I don't think anyone should ever be
stood up. I don't think you should be
separated for stalemate or whatever.
It's like if someone puts you in that
position, then
>> yeah, you got to get up. If they're not
doing enough on the top, that's silly.
>> Sean Ali explains why piracy led to the
UFC's massive Paramount deal. Oh,
interesting.
>> There's a lot of people that'll pay for
it every week, but there's a lot of
people that won't. That makes sense.
They're streaming it illegally. That
makes sense. I knew there was a lot of
that because there were sites that you
could go to and people would openly talk
about it. You can go to it and just
watch the pay-per-view. It's a good
move, dude. It's a good move for for the
business. It's just like they just need
a few banger cards to make people forget
about the stale ones.
>> But that always that will happen. It's
inevitable.
>> You're going to have stale cards. I'm
concerned about the White House fight.
I'm concerned about it not just from a
security standpoint. I'm concerned about
it because it's outside. It's June and
it's in Washington DC. When you if it's
hot out and it could very well be like
what's the average temperature?
>> I looked this up the other day. Uh
average 67% humidity in last year or
2024 was 100° on June 14th.
>> Okay.
>> Okay.
>> That's tough.
>> Okay.
>> And I think it's supposed to be at noon
also.
>> Yeah, that's that's an issue.
>> Okay. Okay. Okay. That's a [ __ ] big
problem, dude. That's a big problem. You
are going to radically affect their
performance if you make people fight in
100 degree temperature with 67% humidity
outside.
>> You're also going to radically affect my
ability to do commentary. Okay?
My [ __ ] head doesn't have any hair.
The top of my head is going to be beat
red. I'm going to have to put some toxic
sunscreen on it. You're going to see me
with that white zinc powder that the
surfers use on their nose. It'll be all
over the I I'll make like fake hair with
like white zinc. Dude, my head's going
to get
80% chance of thunderstorms with highs
in the mid 80s.
>> Okay. Are they building a tent? Is this
outside outside or is it outside in a
tent? Are they going to have like fans
blowing cold air on us? You know how
much DC's going to complain? That
[ __ ] dude, he's going to be right
next to me. His shirt's going to be
soaked.
>> Yeah, that's a
>> You won't be able to tell with mine cuz
I always wear black anyway. But
everybody with a white shirt or a blue
shirt, if Anak has a light blue shirt
on, his pits are going to be [ __ ]
filled up with sweat. It's going to be
ridiculous.
>> That also like really legitimately
changes the actual fight itself.
>> 100%.
>> Isn't that like the rendering of it? I
think
>> Okay, so there I don't see any AC there,
bro. How you going to get AC on those
people? What is that going to be like?
That sounds [ __ ] insane to do that in
June just cuz that's a fun time to do
it. I mean, if I was Justin Gatechi or I
was Ilia Toporia, if I was Justin
Gatechi, I mean, first of all, he has to
take the fight. It's a historic fight.
It's at the White House. He's a He's a
true red-blooded American. He wants to
win the title at the White House.
>> Come on, you have to do it. But
>> he's 37 years old. He's had a long
career and he's fighting maybe the most
lethal guy he's ever faced. Yeah. the
the one guy out of all the guys he faced
that can shut the [ __ ] lights out
with one shot every time. His last three
fights is the craziest resume in the
history of the sport. Knocks out
Alexander Vulcganowski, knocks out Max
Holloway, knocks knocks out Charles
Olivera. Two at featherweight, one at
lightweight. All of them level. I I
wouldn't even say well I guess it's
debatable but certainly you could make
an argument the two best featherweights
of all time.
>> Yes.
>> And one of the greatest
>> one of the greatest lightweights of all
time. And by the way and I know MMA math
is never perfect but you look at what
Olivivera just did to Max Holloway who I
love is one of my favorite fighters of
all time. You look at what what Charles
Olivera just did to Max Holloway and
then you think about the way Ilia Tapora
handled him
>> flatlined him in the first round
>> and not what was to me almost as
impressive as the knockout was um
>> handling him on the ground. Yeah.
>> Pass his guard. He tried to take him
down. Think about the way he got one of
those body locks and tried to take him
down. Think about the way how helpless
Max Holloway was for that. How helpless
a whole bunch of guys we've seen are
when he gets his hands around you. And
Ilia Tapora, he tried to do that. He
ends up on top and passes his guard
right away. Also, he ate a really clean
elbow early in that fight and just was
like nothing. Like I mean,
>> shook it off like it was nothing. He's
he's a special talent. So, but then
again, when you are dealing with special
talents and great great fighters like
Justin, who this is probably his last
opportunity to fight for the title.
>> I want that under the perfect
conditions. I want that to be in an
arena where it's 72° and air
conditioned. I I don't want it to be
outside. I don't want there to be any
additional stress or distractions
because you're warming up at the White
House. Like, what do you have tents with
mats on them and these guys are going to
be slipping around in puddles of sweat
>> or shadow boxing in the situation room
before you come out?
>> Who's going to slip on sweat and blow
their ACL out? You know, I mean, have
you ever done striking on mats when a
bunch of dudes have been training like
in a class? It's so [ __ ] slippery,
man. It's If it's that hot, it's going
to Unless they have it these mats and
where they're getting set up in air
conditioned buildings somewhere. Unless
they have a facility.
>> Yeah, maybe they can do that.
>> I hope they think that through. I hope
they think that through. I hope they
prepare it. It's just I don't like I I
like the idea that it's like this big
celebration of the UFC that the
president loves the UFC so much he wants
to do it at the White House. But in
practice, I don't like it at all because
you've got two world titles. You know,
you've got the interim heavyweight world
title and then you've got this world
title with Justin and Ilia at 55. I
don't like it. I want those I want those
to be at the T-Mobile. I want those to
be at the Madison Square Garden Arena. I
want, you know, I want those to be
somewhere dope. The TD Garden in Boston.
Put it Put it in a [ __ ] real arena
where it's airond conditioned. Damn it.
These are amazing fights. I don't want
anybody fighting when it's 100° outside.
>> That's crazy.
>> Wouldn't and correct me if I'm wrong,
but also I would think it's you're going
to get sweaty so quick in weather like
that. And that is a big deal for like
grappling and stuff like that. I mean,
like that's a huge advantage if you're
trying to not get grappled by someone.
>> Here's another factor. These are people
that just were radically dehydrated 24
hours ago. And then you're asking them
to compete in a sauna. You're basically
asking them to fight in a sauna.
>> That is still so crazy to me that
there's not a way that we can just get
two guys who weigh 180 lbs to fight at
180 lb and instead instead we have to
have two guys who weigh 180 lb cut down
to 150 lb and then rehydrate up to 180
pounds to fight at 180 pounds
>> and weaken themselves like radically
weaken themselves. I see those guys the
day they weigh in. The worst ever that I
ever saw was Travis Lutter.
>> So Travis Anderson Silva, I remember
>> he missed weight, but I was backstage
for all of it. Right. So this was back
when the weigh-ins were the time of the
actual weigh-ins. It wasn't the
ceremonial weigh- in. Like now they give
them more time. You can weigh in in the
morning and then by the ceremonial
weigh-ins, which is usually 5:00 p.m.
Usually these guys have significantly
rehydrated. They do it slowly, but they
have a process to it. Uh, but Travis
missed weight and so I was backstage
while they gave him x amount of time to
make the weight and dude he couldn't
walk. He was shuffling. Shuffling like
he couldn't pick his legs up. His lips
were cracked. His face was draw. He
looked like he was going to die. He
looked like a guy who had been
shipwrecked, you know, and like lost at
sea and just drinking his own piss for a
week and they finally rescued him.
That's what it looked like.
>> Well, he was dying, I guess, right? I
mean, that is what you're looking at.
And then 24 hours later, he has to fight
the greatest middleweight of all time.
He has to fight Anderson [ __ ]
Silva in his prime.
>> And by did for that being the story did
remarkably well in the fight. I he got
viciously uh he was elbowed in the
triangle. Yeah. Yeah. It was hard.
>> That would not have happened if Travis
wasn't compromised. Travis was a real
problem back then. Yeah, he was the best
jiu-jitsu guys to ever compete in MMA
>> and he was stylistically kind of like
the best shot against Anderson Silva at
that time and cuz Anderson Silva just
looked untouchable and he got him down
and got him into good positions a few
times
>> even though he was [ __ ] from the
weight cut. But the thing was he never
made the weight. So even if he beat him,
he wouldn't have got the title. The
whole thing was [ __ ]
>> Yeah.
>> But it's like I've advocated for there's
a solution. One of them is multiple
weight classes that are additional to
what we have. have one at least every 10
lbs and it probably should be more. And
a lot of people push back against that,
but listen, 10 lb for an elite athlete
is a big [ __ ] deal. 20 lb is crazy.
So when you go like 85 to 205, that's
crazy. That's too much weight. It's too
much of a gap. You could have multiple
champions in between those weight
classes and it's just better for the
sport overall. You've got more
champions. You have more champion versus
champion matchups you can make. Well,
there's it also first of all, it's very
unhealthy and and dangerous, and that's
the biggest issue. But then it also
makes it a thing where it's like now
there's there's two factors. It's not
just who's the best fighter, it's also
who's the best at dehydrating
themselves, losing a ton of weight and
rehydrating themselves. And also, I
think like I've heard I've heard GSP say
before that like some people are just
naturally better at that. Some people
just fluctuate in weight more. people
can lose a lot of weight and then gain
it all back the other day. And he used
to always say, "I just can't do that."
Like, I'm not a guy who can do that. But
I think all of us, we just want to see
who the best fighter is. Exactly. We
don't care about who's the best at
dehydrating.
>> Anything that hampers your ability
should be removed from the equation,
especially if it's something like this.
But there's a solution. First of all,
there's a real silliness to the MMA
weight classes. And why I say silliness,
our names that we use have been owned by
boxing for more than a hundred years.
And the names that we use are for
different weight classes than boxing
uses.
>> That's dumb.
>> Yeah,
>> that is dumb as [ __ ] Like if you want
to have a 170 lb champion, fantastic.
But don't call it a welterweight because
welterweight is 147. It's been 147 for
over a hundred [ __ ] years. The fact
that you have a 147 champion and you
call that or 145 champion, you call that
a featherweight.
>> Featherweight is 126. That's what it's
been in boxing forever. Lightweight has
always been 135. That's what Julio Cesar
Chavez was the champ of 135.
>> 135. Lightweight is 155 in the UFC.
Like, come up with your own names. Why
do we still have these stupid names?
>> I never thought about that. It's a good
point. They attached these names to it
when they first started developing
weight classes because it used to just
be one weight class. Another one on
this. Why, and I think you've mentioned
this before. Why am I not getting the
leg reach?
>> They do that sometimes.
>> Do they? Yeah, they do.
>> I've seen like but on the regular tail
of the tape it'll still just be reach
where it's like but in this cuz that
actually for MMA that's such a huge
deal.
>> Sure.
>> Like it's such a hu cuz like if you're
Yeah. if you're in kicking range of me,
but you know what I mean? But you can't
touch me. Your jab doesn't matter as
much as in boxing, you know?
>> And some guys, they have really long
legs for their torso. And like my my
friend Larry, my friend Larry Jones from
my taekwondo days, he had this short
torso.
>> What is this?
>> Aldo's leg reaches longer than Stipe.
>> Whoa. That's crazy.
>> Is that right?
>> That's crazy. Stipe just has a way
longer torso. That's nuts.
>> That's crazy. Like the hips tip are the
same size.
>> Oh wow. That's crazy. Well, Aldo was
such a good kicker. It's probably part
of the reason why.
>> Um, my friend Larry had this short
torso, like really short to, but he was
like 6'3 and he was all legs and he was
this insane kicker. He was like a freak.
Like he was made in a lab. And when guys
would fight him, like you'd see guys in
tournaments fight him, they'd be like,
"What the [ __ ] am I going to do with
this?" Cuz his reach was so nuts and he
was so fast with his kicks and you
couldn't get anywhere close to him if
you were in his weight class and you
were normally built, right? He was built
like his torso was shorter than mine,
but his crazy long legs and long arms.
>> Yeah.
>> Like some people are just built certain
ways and for striking it's a giant
problem which is another thing that
makes Ilottopia so [ __ ] unbelievably
impressive. He's not tall at all.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, and he's just flatlining
people.
>> Oh, I mean Charles Olivera looked so
much bigger than him in that fight
>> and so much bigger than Max, too. Olive
is big. It's like, look, the sport's
fine. It's not It's not in trouble. The
sport's not in trouble. The heavyweight
division is in trouble. The heavyweight
division is kind of [ __ ] It's in a
weird situation. The Alex Pereira thing
is very interesting. Alex Pereira versus
Sir Gone is very, very, very interesting
cuz Sirill Gan is a problem. That guy's
a problem. He's super athletic. He's
really fast. He's super skillful with
his striking. His Muay Thai is
absolutely elite. and he does a lot of
things different than what a lot of
people do.
>> And has anyone because even Francis,
like I was saying before, grappled with
him a lot in that fight. Obviously, Jon
Jones took him down and choked him. But
has anyone really stood toe-to-toe and
beat him up?
>> No. No. No one's beat him up to toe.
Tied to Iasa went toe to toe with him
and tried to, but he got lit up.
>> Dude, serial gone is a problem.
>> Even in the little bit in the little bit
of Tom Aspenol, it looked like he's
tough. He's tough to fight like that,
man.
>> Not just tough, he was like getting off
on Aspenol and it didn't look good for
Aspenol. I mean, it's very unfortunate
that he got his eyes poked that I mean
that we really never got to see what
happens if he drags cereal deep deep
water. What the way Tom would adjusted
for the second round or third round,
>> which we've never really seen out of Tom
either. It was very interesting. We got
robbed of that, you know, but
>> we got robbed of that. And poor Tom,
he's had two [ __ ] eye surgeries and
then he felt like the UFC disrespected
him. The whole thing's a mess. Well, I
don't know about the UFC, but a lot of
fans did disrespect him. I saw that,
>> which is crazy. This is like, this is
really stupid.
>> We talked about this last night. It
should be one point, period. If you poke
somebody in the eyes, if you poke
someone in the eyes, one point.
>> Well, especially if the fingers go in
the eyes. If it's like a glancing thing
like that, maybe get a warning. But in a
nutshot, straight nutshot, one point.
The glancing thing, maybe a warning. I
think that could be up to the judge's
discretion upon view of the replay.
>> Yeah. Well, I the thing is that and we
were talking about this last night. If
you So, if you land a a nutshot and it's
it's accidental as it almost always is,
you know what I mean? You're trying to
throw an inside leg kick and it comes
up. Well, okay. Maybe not. I said almost
almost always. Uh, but so I just see
this all the time in MMA. It's the first
one. It was an accident. This guy gets
kicked in the nuts. He needs a few
minutes. Usually, they don't take the
full uh five or whatever they're
offered. And then you just go back. It's
like, look, even if it was an accident,
that's such an advantage to the guy who
who kicked him in the groin.
>> You hurt this guy and now he's got to
get back to it. And there's no So, like
it does seem like there almost has to be
some accounting for that. And there's I
think there's still it's still a very
young sport. I think there is still too
much referee discretion. Like there's
too much like there should be like an
official rule for what we do in this
situation. Not just
>> those kind of fouls. It's like doesn't
exist in basketball, right? If somebody
fouls somebody in basketball and
everybody sees it, that that's a foul.
Yes. Right. And the the crowd will go
nuts. Right. Usually. But it be like a
real one like throwing someone to the
ground.
>> I could show you examples. There are
some [ __ ] wild things that don't get
called for whatever.
>> Don't you think that's a little bit of
the the corrupt referees. I'm not saying
all of them, but that that is one thing
that's been 100% proven is that referees
do get paid off in order to influence
gambling lines.
>> Yeah. There was that one referee who uh
who confirmed that it was the um the um
she's Sacramento Kings versus the
Lakers, which was like a series that was
like notoriously like everyone was like,
"Yo, it was crazy. They didn't call any
of these fouls on the Lakers." And they
called all these fouls. And then a ref
came out and was like, "Oh yeah, yeah,
that's weird." And it does kind of make
sense. Um because it was the it was the
Shack and Kobe Lakers. You got to get
them in the finals, dude. It was big
money.
>> God, that's so gross. His defense
weirdly was like, "They didn't, no one
told us what to do, but you kind of know
what they want, so you sort of do it."
And then you keep kept going put on good
games and you keep getting the good
stuff.
>> Hang them.
>> Public hanging. [ __ ] you.
>> But we can deal We can deal with
Congress's insider trading. But
basketball must be a
>> bad judges. Hang them. Hang them all in
front of the kingdom.
>> All right, dude. Uh, anything else
before we wrap this up?
>> Uh, no. Thank you for letting a
non-expert talk MMA with you. I love I
love talking to non-experts,
>> dude. Thank you so much for everything
as always. Pleasure, brother. You're the
[ __ ] man. I love you.
>> You're the [ __ ] man, too. I love you,
too.
>> Uh we'll have fun tonight, right?
>> Uh I You coming? You leaving? Right.
>> A damn. Last night was fun, though.
>> That was a lot of fun. It was a lot of
fun. It was a good time.
>> All right. Bye, everybody.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The podcast covers a wide array of topics, beginning with financial controversies such as an alleged multi-million dollar bet on oil and claims against Howard Lutnick regarding tariff profits, while also questioning the integrity of public figures and government corruption, citing Jeffrey Epstein ties. The discussion touches on unusual Waymo incidents, the addictive nature of video games, and the intense physical demands and careers of MMA fighters, highlighting unique techniques like the calf kick and the impact of personalities like Conor McGregor. A significant portion critiques US foreign policy, detailing interventions in the Middle East and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and addressing concerns about US immigration, border security, and potential terrorist affiliations. The hosts express skepticism towards traditional media's authenticity compared to podcasts and debate the divisive nature of political labels. The conversation also delves into the UFC's new business model with Paramount+, concerns about holding a UFC fight at the White House due to environmental conditions, and issues with MMA weight classes and refereeing, concluding with a look at AI's role in music and potential fraud.
Videos recently processed by our community