HomeVideos

Why Axon's CEO won't build lethal drones

Now Playing

Why Axon's CEO won't build lethal drones

Transcript

760 segments

0:00

From putting together his first Taser in

0:01

his garage in 1993 to today having a

0:05

drone business that is growing triple

0:06

digits and these drones are helping to

0:08

protect people at large events. That is

0:10

the story of founder and CEO of Axon

0:13

Enterprise Rick Smith, who I caught up

0:16

with in my new episode of Power Players.

0:22

Rick, good to see you. It's been a

0:23

while, man.

0:24

>> It is awesome to be back on. Thanks.

0:26

>> The last time I talked to you was a

0:27

couple years ago and I know this is a

0:30

wildly different business compared to

0:32

when we talked last time. But for those

0:33

not familiar with your story, tell it to

0:36

us because you founded this company in

0:38

1993.

0:40

You took a lot of big bold bets many

0:42

years ago. Like why did you found this

0:44

company and and how did you get going?

0:46

>> So uh I got started in this space. I had

0:48

two friends who were shot and killed.

0:49

They weren't like particularly close

0:52

friends, but it was more just like guys

0:53

in my social circle. America's more

0:56

dangerous than many of us realize. Like

0:57

gun violence is a big problem. And the

1:00

thing that struck me is this is a

1:01

technology problem. If we had Captain

1:03

Kirk's phaser, who would choose to shoot

1:05

bullets at people anymore?

1:07

And so I started a journey of

1:08

discovering the Taser. It actually been

1:10

invented before I was born in the late

1:12

1960s. The inventor was the chief

1:15

scientist on the Apollo moon landing

1:16

program in the 1960s. I mean this is

1:18

like a Marvel movie, right? So I called

1:20

this guy up when I'm 23. Like hey,

1:22

whatever happened to the Taser? The

1:23

first place I ever saw a Taser was in a

1:25

Jean-Claude Van Damme movie, Time Cop,

1:27

in the mid-80s. Um next thing I know

1:29

we're starting in his garage in Tucson.

1:31

Seven years of miserable failure,

1:33

bankrupting my parents and their best

1:35

friends that were funding this thing.

1:36

Then we turned the corner, took off, was

1:39

wildly successful. So successful that we

1:42

got hit with a raft of lawsuits and

1:44

crazy controversy cuz we came out of

1:46

nowhere. And this idea of using

1:48

electricity to incapacitate people

1:51

it turns out that that's kind of scary

1:53

to a lot of folks. It's that's why we

1:54

invented the body camera business. Was

1:56

like, all right, people are worried like

1:57

are police abusing people with the

1:58

Taser? What does it actually do to

2:00

people? Let's just record it. And we

2:02

made a big bet in uh about 2008, not

2:05

only on body cameras, but also on the

2:06

cloud, cuz we realized the only way we

2:09

could scale body cameras is if every

2:11

20-man police department didn't have to

2:13

set up their own video servers. And in

2:15

the moment we did that, it was a pretty

2:17

crazy bet. I mean,

2:19

our stock was down for about 5 years. I

2:21

took a a company this weapon company

2:23

making electric weapons, was converting

2:25

to a software company. So, investors

2:27

thought we'd lost our mind. They're

2:28

like, "When in history has a weapon

2:30

company become a software company?" Our

2:32

customers didn't want to wear cameras.

2:33

They thought the cloud was illegal for

2:35

them to put data in something they

2:37

didn't fully understand. And luckily, we

2:38

just stuck with it cuz it's just you

2:40

know, sometimes you just got to believe.

2:41

Like, our customers need to be able to

2:43

show the world what they do, so we're

2:46

not imagining what happens in these

2:48

terrible policing incidents. And then

2:49

Ferguson, Missouri happened, and the

2:50

rest is history. That's when the

2:51

business just really took off.

2:53

>> When you found out that you want to go

2:55

all in on a product called a Taser in

2:59

your early 20s, like how did you develop

3:01

that first prototype?

3:02

>> It was crazy. I had no idea like what I

3:06

was doing. And in some ways, that's a

3:07

gift as a young entrepreneur, cuz you

3:09

don't know what you're not supposed to

3:10

do. And so again, I discovered this

3:12

inventor lived in Tucson.

3:14

I was This is before the internet. So, I

3:16

was at the ASU law library looking

3:18

through patents. And I'm like, "Holy

3:20

smokes, this guy's address is like 90

3:22

minutes from here." So, I dialed 411.

3:24

And for some of your viewers who may not

3:26

know what that is, before Google, that's

3:27

how you got a phone number. And uh he

3:29

answered the phone, and I basically just

3:32

went down to visit him. He was 73, and

3:34

he was pretty frustrated. He'd been at

3:36

it already for 20 years. He'd got He

3:37

basically started two companies. They

3:39

both went bankrupt.

3:40

And here I am this bright-eyed,

3:41

bushy-tailed 23-year-old. I'm like,

3:43

"Hey, man. Like, let's give it another

3:44

shot."

3:46

And he basically said, "Okay, we'll tell

3:47

you what. If you pay me some patent

3:49

royalties, and we we cut a deal, I'll I

3:51

will help you make the first Taser

3:54

in my garage and then once once you sort

3:56

of get up and running, I'm going to go

3:58

back to retirement. And so that's what

3:59

it was. I I borrowed my my parents had a

4:01

trailer they used to take the dog shows

4:03

on the weekend, so I lived in that in a

4:05

trailer park in Tucson. Every morning

4:07

I'd show up, knock on Jack's, you know,

4:09

door. All right, let's go. And we built

4:11

the first Taser in his garage. Like, I'm

4:13

pretty convinced this guy could have

4:14

built a nuclear weapon if we had some

4:16

uranium. Like, it was crazy. We're

4:18

building with parts from Ace Hardware.

4:20

Uh uh uh uh you know, [laughter] taking

4:21

things like bicycle tire valves and

4:23

cranking them into welding them into the

4:25

metal casings to make propulsion

4:26

systems. Uh and we made our first

4:29

prototype in exactly 30 days.

4:31

Uh I remember that. Uh and then the US

4:34

government we made the first prototype

4:35

to send to the federal government so

4:37

they could give us a ruling on whether

4:38

or not it was a firearm, which was the

4:40

biggest risk to the business.

4:42

Uh and they responded in 2 weeks. So, 45

4:44

days from the founding we'd built our

4:46

first prototype and gotten government

4:47

approval.

4:49

Uh and and now I look at, you know, now

4:50

I've got like 6,000 employees.

4:53

Doing that would take a team of 50

4:54

people several years. Like, that's the

4:56

startup startup magic, right? You just

4:59

do crazy things cuz you don't know any

5:00

better.

5:01

>> And of course they're not made from Ace

5:02

Hardware materials anymore.

5:04

>> [laughter]

5:05

>> They're not made from Ace Hardware,

5:06

that's true.

5:07

>> [clears throat]

5:07

>> It's true. But I do miss making stuff

5:09

from Ace.

5:09

>> So what do you So you have this Taser

5:11

device? I mean, what do you go up to

5:12

local police precincts and say, um

5:15

Mr. and Mrs. Cop, please put away your

5:16

gun and uh buy my Taser thing. Here's

5:18

how it works. How do you demonstrate

5:20

>> That was pretty much it. So, we launched

5:22

as a consumer product and failed cuz

5:25

consumers were skeptical. They're like,

5:26

hey, and we launched it in the Sharper

5:28

Image. If you remember the Sharper Image

5:30

catalog, it had cool little Tasers.

5:34

And shockingly consumers were like,

5:35

okay, this isn't real. This has got to

5:37

be some kind of gimmick. Uh then we had

5:39

a second product launch that was a a car

5:42

security thing. We were just struggling

5:43

to figure out a product that would pay

5:45

the light bill. And then it on the verge

5:47

of failure we pivoted into policing and

5:49

and we basically dialed in the product

5:52

and we had no money to launch it. So, it

5:54

literally was exactly what you said. We

5:56

hired a former Marine in a Winnebago who

5:58

went cross-country knocking on doors at

5:59

police departments, like, "Hey, let me

6:01

show you the new Taser." And in the

6:03

early '90s, a Taser was used on Rodney

6:05

King in Los Angeles and it failed twice.

6:08

That was before I started this company,

6:09

that was the old Taser. And they went to

6:11

their batons and obviously the rest is

6:12

history. So, the Taser had a horrible

6:15

name in policing. Nobody believed it

6:16

worked. And so, when we would show up at

6:18

police departments, we gave this guy a

6:20

couple of $100 bills and the pitch was

6:23

like, "All right, if you don't believe

6:24

the Taser works, here's 100 bucks. Who

6:26

wants to try it?" And then literally,

6:28

we'd hook them up. Nobody got the 100

6:30

bucks, they would fall down. Like, word

6:32

spread like wildfire. One thing about

6:34

the police community, they all talk to

6:36

each other. There's all these

6:37

communiques they share back and forth.

6:39

And suddenly,

6:41

you know, within 12 months, we were cash

6:43

flow positive. 18 months from the launch

6:46

of the M-26, we went public on the

6:48

Nasdaq. It a massive $10 million

6:52

money raise. That was our IPO. Raised 10

6:54

million.

6:55

>> And now you're a $40 billion market cap.

6:57

>> Yeah, we've come a ways. Yeah.

6:59

>> How

7:00

tell us, you know, explain to us a

7:02

little bit from an entrepreneurial

7:03

standpoint, how do you

7:06

how did you scale up the business? I

7:08

mean, cuz it's not like you could just

7:10

sit give someone a

7:12

former Marine a $100 bills and go to

7:14

every police department. Like, how did

7:15

you get the business where it needed to

7:17

be in those early days?

7:19

>> Well, it really was that. It was like I

7:21

was out personally

7:23

leading instructor courses.

7:26

What we learned is in policing, the

7:28

first thing you got to do is you've got

7:29

to have an instructor's class so that

7:30

they know how to use the equipment and

7:32

and that there's a certification

7:34

process. They will not take anything out

7:36

on the street without certification.

7:38

All right. So, me and this Marine, he

7:39

happened to be the former chief

7:41

instructor of hand-to-hand combat for

7:42

the US Marine Corps. So, he knew about

7:44

developing lesson plans. And when you're

7:46

small, you just figure it out, right?

7:47

So, we developed it together.

7:49

Uh and then

7:51

three of us would go out and we would

7:53

offer these courses. Now, the buzz began

7:56

with him going cross-country in this

7:57

Winnebago, knocking on doors. And then

8:00

as the buzz picked up, agencies were

8:01

offering to host classes. Uh and we give

8:04

classes away for free cuz we also

8:06

discovered in policing

8:08

if the class is free, some cops will

8:10

show up just because it like it helps,

8:13

you know, with their resume to get more

8:14

certifications. And most in companies

8:17

charge for certification. So, this is

8:19

like another a freebie for any

8:21

instructor to get another certification

8:23

on their resume.

8:24

And it was just it was the grunt work uh

8:26

that that got us going. There was

8:28

absolutely zero magic. You know, there's

8:30

that old like there's no silver bullets,

8:31

only lead bullets.

8:33

We just you scratch and claw and fight

8:35

your way to survival.

8:36

And then then once it took off, you

8:38

know, then you start hiring people

8:40

following scaling, uh you know, with

8:41

sales people. And And it turns out uh a

8:44

lot of instructors in law enforcement

8:46

will

8:48

uh basically work as consultants to

8:51

train at other agencies. They typically

8:53

can't work for a company while they're

8:55

doing work at their own agency. That

8:57

would be a conflict of interest. But

8:59

like a Seattle PD officer can be an

9:02

instructor and go train at other

9:04

departments. In fact, that's standard in

9:05

the industry. Most police departments do

9:07

not want to be trained by a sales guy.

9:09

They would rather be trained by somebody

9:11

they know, "Okay, you're a professional

9:12

cop. You're paid to train me, but you

9:14

don't make any money if I buy or not.

9:16

You know, you it I can trust that you're

9:18

going to like give me the real scoop on

9:20

this."

9:20

>> Was there a moment that you could point

9:22

to that you knew

9:24

this company was going to be big?

9:26

>> When Sacramento police

9:28

bought Tasers for every officer, that

9:31

was that was a a crazy moment cuz like,

9:34

man, the capital of California. And that

9:36

was about 3 months before our IPO.

9:39

Uh say that was probably the moment.

9:41

Maybe the one right before that was the

9:43

first time I ever saw a cop carrying a

9:44

Taser out in the wild. It was in the

9:46

Salt Lake City Airport. Uh when I

9:49

just looked over and oh my god, that

9:50

guy's wearing the thing I make. Like,

9:53

holy holy cow. Like, this is working.

9:56

>> Rick, I've never seen one of those

9:57

before. Could you show Could you show it

9:58

again real quick? That that is that is

10:01

wild. And it just recharges?

10:03

>> Yep. It's got a a rechargeable battery.

10:06

And then this is the magazine. You put

10:07

10 rounds in it. This one's unloaded so

10:09

I don't, you know,

10:10

play with a live weapon while I'm on on

10:12

an interview. But yeah, it it's it's

10:15

what we've basically learned

10:17

is if we're going to be successful, we

10:19

never talk about taking a cop's gun

10:21

away.

10:22

You know, that would be

10:24

just unacceptable in America. There's so

10:26

many guns out there. But this is a new

10:28

kind of gun, right? This is a gun that

10:30

doesn't kill people, but it gives you

10:32

the job of incapacitating them,

10:34

which is what you want. Like, when

10:35

police use lethal force, they don't use

10:38

it because it's lethal. They use it

10:39

because it's reliable.

10:41

That Our problem is we're not as

10:42

reliable as a gun yet.

10:45

Now, we're getting very close. In fact,

10:47

we have When you mention like, "What do

10:48

we not do yet?"

10:50

Today,

10:52

our biggest limitation is we have this

10:54

Achilles' heel. This may or may not get

10:56

through heavy clothing. If you're

10:57

wearing a down jacket,

11:00

we may or may not be able to get through

11:01

it. So, I'm spending a fair amount of my

11:03

time in the labs with our engineers

11:06

working on a new cartridge system

11:08

that is designed to penetrate through

11:10

heavy clothing, which, believe it or

11:12

not, that's actually pretty easy. Here's

11:14

the hard part.

11:15

The same cartridge, if you're wearing a

11:17

parka, we got to make it through. But if

11:19

you're naked and we fire it at you, we

11:21

got to make sure it doesn't end up down

11:23

in your intestines causing a serious

11:24

injury. So, we needed to penetrate

11:26

through clothing and then stop as soon

11:28

as it punches through the skin. And we

11:30

got some very clever designs.

11:31

>> I mean, like I I like that's why love

11:33

doing this podcast. Like I can he

11:34

actually hear stories like this and go

11:36

holy This Well, I love to hear

11:38

that and you're still

11:40

in the labs like helping to

11:42

drive product innovation.

11:43

>> Yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah, in fact, I we

11:46

launched we call this new cartridge the

11:48

Apollo cartridge because we talk about

11:50

our moonshot mission. We we tend to be a

11:51

bit thematic and and like try to get

11:53

people focused. Like we're not we're not

11:56

here to make a business. We're on a

11:57

mission to make the bullet obsolete. And

11:59

when you think of things that way, it

12:01

pushes you to take more risk. Uh and

12:03

ultimately that's good for the business.

12:04

Like good risks. Like don't just sit on

12:06

your butt and and make the next Taser

12:08

slightly better than the last one. We're

12:09

going to go from two shots to 10. And

12:11

we're going to solve this clothing

12:12

issue. Anyways, we launched the we

12:15

announced the Apollo cartridge a year

12:16

ago. And to be honest, it it was failing

12:18

in testing. We weren't getting through

12:20

clothing well enough. So, we had to hit

12:21

the pause button. And so, yeah, I

12:23

parachute back in with the engineers.

12:25

That's That's the fun of the business.

12:26

Like, "Okay, guys, it's crisis mode.

12:28

This is like Apollo 13 now. Like, we've

12:30

spent $10 million on automation

12:33

equipment. The line is ready to go, but

12:35

the design ain't working. What are we

12:37

going to do? Like, I I don't want to

12:38

claim victory yet, but we're close. I

12:40

think we've got some design mods that

12:42

are testing very well."

12:43

>> Is it You think this year?

12:46

>> Uh yeah, we I think by next winter we'll

12:48

have it.

12:48

>> Wow.

12:49

>> And then when we do, this weapon will

12:51

actually outperform a 9 mm bullet. And

12:54

by that, I mean from the time you pull

12:55

that trigger till the time he's on the

12:57

ground and can't move, this will be

12:59

faster than shooting him with a bullet

13:00

and waiting for him to bleed out.

13:02

>> That is

13:02

>> And that's going to be a game changer.

13:04

>> That is a game changer. Then then does

13:05

that Is that the first step in making

13:07

the bullet obsolete?

13:08

>> Well, you know, the first step was

13:10

getting the neuromuscular effect dialed

13:12

in. Then it was getting them enough

13:14

shots so we're competitive with a gun,

13:16

right? Like, police don't carry a

13:18

derringer pistol with two shots cuz it's

13:19

hard to hit people.

13:21

Now it's getting through clothing and

13:23

just getting that last mile of

13:24

reliability. And then I'll tell you the

13:26

next thing beyond that is going to be

13:28

how do we make it so an officer doesn't

13:30

have to put their own life at risk? So,

13:33

today as I stand here right now, if

13:35

somebody enters a school with a gun or a

13:37

hospital or, you know, God forbid, you

13:39

know, where people go and do these mass

13:41

shooting events, the only way you can

13:43

stop them today is you send in more

13:45

people with more guns and they have a

13:46

gunfight. Like, this hasn't changed

13:48

since the Wild West. Now, I can make

13:51

this much, much more effective, but a

13:53

cop's never going to take this, no

13:54

matter how effective it is to a

13:55

gunfight. And my answer to that is

13:57

simple, don't get in a gunfight. Send in

13:59

a drone or a ground robot,

14:02

and we can remotely incapacitate people.

14:04

That's the next step of this.

14:06

Uh is how do we make it so we don't have

14:07

to put anybody at risk, we can

14:09

immediately send in a device,

14:12

probably an aerial drone, and stop

14:14

somebody. And if think about this way,

14:16

you like if it's your kid's school,

14:18

yeah, you want to stop that shooter, but

14:20

a shootout now with multiple officers

14:22

firing high-powered weapons, like

14:24

that's extremely dangerous. Far more

14:26

safe we could fly in a drone and take

14:28

that guy down using AI targeting, so

14:31

it's going to be more accurate than a

14:32

person. If you miss and you accidentally

14:33

hit somebody, you're not killing

14:35

anybody, you know, with the with stray

14:36

bullets.

14:37

>> This is a I want to tell you this, this

14:39

is a scary time in this country with

14:40

these these mass shootings at these very

14:42

large

14:43

um well-populated

14:45

uh events.

14:46

Two questions. One, what do you think

14:48

about what we're seeing here with this?

14:50

And then number two, like what what have

14:52

you seen budget-wise from departments,

14:54

police departments across the country?

14:55

As you get more of these events, are

14:57

they saying to you, Rick, I've got I've

14:58

found more money for you uh and your

15:00

team because you can help prevent things

15:03

like this?

15:04

>> Yeah. So, here's what's interesting.

15:06

When we start talking about putting

15:07

drones and robots, I actually don't

15:09

think it's going to be funded by the

15:11

police

15:12

because ultimately where it's going to

15:15

come from are the businesses that have

15:17

to protect their people. So, I had the

15:18

pleasure meeting Fred Smith, the uh the

15:21

founder of FedEx.

15:22

>> Yeah.

15:22

>> Oh, man, what an entrepreneur. Did you

15:24

ever interview him by the

15:25

>> I've I briefly talked to him, but not

15:28

interviewed him. But, holy cow. I mean,

15:30

American icon right there.

15:32

>> Yeah. Incredible. And we showed him

15:34

where we're going with Taser-capable

15:36

drones.

15:38

And he said, "This is one of the most

15:40

amazing things I've ever seen. I want to

15:42

put them in all of our stores." Now, of

15:44

course, he's now passed away and that

15:46

was more philosophical. So, you know,

15:48

since we're talking about investments,

15:49

so we should take that as an order. But,

15:51

the point was this.

15:53

FedEx had a shooting occur in one of

15:55

their stores. Remember back before

15:57

people would go to schools, they would

15:59

go to the post office. We used to call

16:00

it going postal.

16:01

>> Yep.

16:01

>> Uh you know, in the vernacular of for

16:03

people going out and and and going on a

16:05

shooting spree. Um so, I think what will

16:08

actually happen is businesses will be

16:10

like, "Hey, we want to protect our

16:11

employees." And businesses are

16:13

hyper-rational, right? When you put an

16:16

armed guard at a business,

16:18

your risk people are looking at that

16:19

going, "I hope to God they never have to

16:21

fire a bullet cuz if we're shooting

16:22

people within our business, that's an

16:24

extremely high liability event." But, a

16:26

business that could deploy a drone with

16:29

a non-lethal weapon, safer for

16:31

everybody. But, where it gets really

16:32

interesting is

16:34

they'll say things like, "Well,

16:36

and and and Fred actually in our

16:37

conversation had said this as well. He's

16:38

like, "Hey, I'd love to have these in

16:39

our stores, but I don't know that I want

16:41

my employees operating a Taser drone."

16:44

And I said, "Great. Actually, I think

16:47

society would prefer that that's

16:49

operated by

16:51

a sworn law enforcement officer anyway."

16:53

But, one advantage about the company

16:54

that was Taser is now Axon,

16:57

we happen to have built the largest

16:59

system of connected sensors

17:02

in the world for government. We have

17:03

over a million body cameras. We're the

17:05

market leader in drones as first

17:06

responder, in-car cameras. We have a

17:08

system called Fusus where we can take we

17:11

can fuse all of your CCTV cameras.

17:14

And you as a FedEx or as any other

17:16

business could hit the button and share

17:18

those to the police.

17:20

So, now in a crisis if somebody shows up

17:22

with a gun, right you you don't have to

17:24

operate that drone. You hit a button and

17:25

we can immediately share it to police

17:27

operation center and it'll be operated

17:29

by a professional. So, I think that's

17:31

that 5 to 10 years out, but I think that

17:33

is the game changer where it's not going

17:35

to make sense to show up anywhere with a

17:36

gun anymore because you'll be detected

17:38

and stopped by small autonomous robotic

17:41

systems operated by police, but paid for

17:44

by the private sector.

17:45

>> Well, this brings up I think the

17:46

evolution in your business. Now, this

17:47

drone business you acquired it what uh

17:50

it's called a different name 18 months

17:51

ago. Uh it has been growing if if I'm

17:53

right triple digits. Within that growth

17:56

rate who is who is buying these drones?

18:00

And I was very intrigued by maybe one

18:02

group that is buying it. And these

18:04

companies that are making data centers.

18:05

And I see the uproar with people like

18:07

oh, don't put a data center in my

18:08

backyard. I would imagine if you were

18:10

building a data center, you want

18:12

protection of that really large asset

18:14

right now.

18:15

>> 100%. So, we actually made three

18:18

acquisitions in this space. One, we

18:20

bought a small tactical drone company

18:22

called Skydio. They make drones for

18:24

special forces and for SWAT teams. So,

18:26

you haven't heard much about that yet,

18:28

but stay tuned. The second is a company

18:30

called Dedrone. That is counter-drone

18:33

detection. And so, basically you install

18:35

sensors and that's the business that's

18:37

growing at I don't know like north of

18:39

500% and that's where you can track

18:41

drones and then we can integrate with a

18:43

bunch of different sensors and with

18:45

different types of interceptors to be

18:47

able to either jam a drone, hack into

18:50

the drone,

18:51

or like we have partners in Ukraine

18:53

where we're actively building

18:55

integrations if you need to fly a small

18:57

interceptor drone up to take that drone

18:58

down. And then we have a third area

19:01

which we've done through a partnership

19:03

with Skydio which is the leading

19:04

American drone maker. Skydio is our

19:08

partner for outdoor long-range drones.

19:10

So, if I take a step back, the way I

19:12

look at it is like our job is to figure

19:14

out how to help our customers solve

19:16

these really interesting public safety

19:18

challenges, and drones are probably the

19:20

biggest safety challenge in the world

19:22

right now. And if we can't build the

19:24

best system, we'll go find a partner and

19:25

and connect them in. And what we deliver

19:27

is the connected uh sort of connect dome

19:30

of all these devices.

19:31

>> So, the

19:32

these drones, the drones you have now,

19:34

you said they're Taser powered. So,

19:36

they fly down and tip they would

19:38

actually taze someone on the ground or

19:41

and then second area like do do you

19:42

Okay, no, like what do they do exactly?

19:44

>> Yeah. So, that does not exist yet.

19:47

>> Okay.

19:47

>> The drone that is capable of stopping

19:49

somebody

19:50

is in the future. The drones today uh

19:53

will effectively fly over a scene, and

19:55

they will give you an immediate

19:56

awareness of what's happening, which is

19:58

a big advantage, but they right now they

20:00

can see, they can observe, they can

20:02

communicate, you can fly them down and

20:04

distract people, which often works where

20:06

they holy crap, there's a drone here. It

20:08

will interrupt the the things that

20:09

they're doing. Uh but we do not yet have

20:12

the ability to

20:13

put an effect on somebody. Uh but that

20:17

is something we're actively in R&D.

20:19

>> How far do you want to push this drone

20:21

business? And by that I mean

20:23

uh do you envision the day uh at some

20:26

point and when you're still leading the

20:27

company that this is

20:28

shooting some form of round at someone

20:30

like a tech drone and like you're

20:32

selling these to the Department of War.

20:34

>> Yeah, yeah. We will not make

20:35

intentionally lethal drones. Like and by

20:38

the way, the world

20:40

I thought wars were over. I wrote a book

20:43

uh before the pandemic called The End of

20:45

Killing, where I predicted that we are

20:47

at the end of modern wars. I was wrong

20:50

catastrophically. War is back. And

20:52

democracies need tools to win. So, I'm

20:54

not saying we don't need lethal drones,

20:56

we do, but that's not something we're

20:58

ever going to make. Where we view our

21:01

purpose in this world is how do we take

21:02

situations where historically the

21:05

solution might be to kill somebody and

21:07

find a way to not kill them. So, we're

21:09

be focused on drones that don't kill,

21:11

but they can stop people without killing

21:14

them. So, we're very focused on the

21:15

non-lethal portions of this. And we'll

21:17

let Anderol and others do deal with the

21:19

lethal drones.

21:20

>> Rick, lastly, before I let you go,

21:22

you're founder of a company 1993. You've

21:24

changed how

21:26

police do their job, how many people do

21:29

their job, and how

21:31

just people stay safe in this country.

21:33

Um

21:34

what do you think your legacy would be?

21:37

>> Um I think

21:40

if this

21:42

Let me take the if out.

21:43

We are going to make the bullet

21:45

obsolete. At the end of my career, we're

21:47

going to look back and remember, "Gosh,

21:48

you remember we used to shoot bullets at

21:49

people here in America?" Like, that's

21:51

that's crazy. We will have brought the

21:53

phaser to life. But, there's one other

21:55

piece to this. We started with the

21:57

Taser, then we got into body cameras,

21:59

and now we have this huge neural network

22:01

with millions of cameras and sensors,

22:03

and where AI is at the core of our

22:05

business now, because you can imagine,

22:07

there's not enough people to watch all

22:08

those cameras. So, we can use it to like

22:10

help a police officer write their

22:11

reports, translate languages to all the

22:13

different people they deal with. So, AI

22:15

is now transforming the next leg of

22:17

growth for us. And so, as I look at what

22:21

when I the big picture, we want to build

22:24

the future as envisioned by Gene

22:25

Roddenberry, the the creator of Star

22:27

Trek, right? Like there, that phasers,

22:30

they communicators, like technology sort

22:33

of uplifted civilization. That's what

22:35

we're trying to do. Unfortunately, when

22:37

you make technology for police, the

22:39

media tends to immediately run to the

22:41

George Orwell story of, "Oh, this is

22:43

going to be used to oppress people, to

22:45

kill people, to take away their

22:46

freedoms." So, we're really conscious of

22:48

like, "Hey, how do we build the

22:50

technology infrastructure for the world

22:52

we want to raise our kids in and leave

22:54

our leave to our kids?" Like, that

22:55

supports democracy, where we make it

22:57

very hard. Like, everyone needs Taser

22:59

devices,

23:00

it's got a log that records every time

23:01

it's used. We built cameras to watch how

23:04

you use it, right? So, we think a lot

23:05

about It's not just our job to make tech

23:07

and throw it out there. How do we make

23:09

it in a way we're proud of that And uh

23:11

by the way, for our investors, that's

23:13

how you build a long-term business. You

23:14

got to think like, what could go wrong

23:17

and how do we prevent it from going

23:18

wrong? How do we take more

23:19

responsibility so that our products are

23:21

durable and they're going to be here in

23:22

50 years and that we don't, you know,

23:25

step on a landmine because, you know,

23:27

people were out there abusing our our

23:29

tech.

23:30

>> From one product in 1993 found uh by

23:34

someone

23:35

um looking through a at the library

23:37

through a patent log um to almost a $40

23:39

billion market cap. Hell of a success

23:40

story. Rick, good to see you again. Uh

23:42

let me know when you're in New New York

23:43

City again.

23:44

>> Thanks. Yeah, and uh stay tuned the next

23:46

couple years. I think we are going to do

23:49

more impactful products in the next 5

23:51

years than we've done in all of our

23:52

history to now.

23:53

>> Well, you keep me posted. You're always

23:54

welcome on and uh we'll talk to you

23:56

soon. Take care.

Interactive Summary

Rick Smith, founder and CEO of Axon Enterprise, discusses his company's evolution from building the first Taser in a garage in 1993 to becoming a leader in public safety technology, including body cameras, software, and drone systems. Smith emphasizes his mission to make the bullet obsolete, relying on non-lethal technology and AI to protect citizens and officers while minimizing the risks associated with traditional policing and gun violence.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts