Why Axon's CEO won't build lethal drones
760 segments
From putting together his first Taser in
his garage in 1993 to today having a
drone business that is growing triple
digits and these drones are helping to
protect people at large events. That is
the story of founder and CEO of Axon
Enterprise Rick Smith, who I caught up
with in my new episode of Power Players.
Rick, good to see you. It's been a
while, man.
>> It is awesome to be back on. Thanks.
>> The last time I talked to you was a
couple years ago and I know this is a
wildly different business compared to
when we talked last time. But for those
not familiar with your story, tell it to
us because you founded this company in
1993.
You took a lot of big bold bets many
years ago. Like why did you found this
company and and how did you get going?
>> So uh I got started in this space. I had
two friends who were shot and killed.
They weren't like particularly close
friends, but it was more just like guys
in my social circle. America's more
dangerous than many of us realize. Like
gun violence is a big problem. And the
thing that struck me is this is a
technology problem. If we had Captain
Kirk's phaser, who would choose to shoot
bullets at people anymore?
And so I started a journey of
discovering the Taser. It actually been
invented before I was born in the late
1960s. The inventor was the chief
scientist on the Apollo moon landing
program in the 1960s. I mean this is
like a Marvel movie, right? So I called
this guy up when I'm 23. Like hey,
whatever happened to the Taser? The
first place I ever saw a Taser was in a
Jean-Claude Van Damme movie, Time Cop,
in the mid-80s. Um next thing I know
we're starting in his garage in Tucson.
Seven years of miserable failure,
bankrupting my parents and their best
friends that were funding this thing.
Then we turned the corner, took off, was
wildly successful. So successful that we
got hit with a raft of lawsuits and
crazy controversy cuz we came out of
nowhere. And this idea of using
electricity to incapacitate people
it turns out that that's kind of scary
to a lot of folks. It's that's why we
invented the body camera business. Was
like, all right, people are worried like
are police abusing people with the
Taser? What does it actually do to
people? Let's just record it. And we
made a big bet in uh about 2008, not
only on body cameras, but also on the
cloud, cuz we realized the only way we
could scale body cameras is if every
20-man police department didn't have to
set up their own video servers. And in
the moment we did that, it was a pretty
crazy bet. I mean,
our stock was down for about 5 years. I
took a a company this weapon company
making electric weapons, was converting
to a software company. So, investors
thought we'd lost our mind. They're
like, "When in history has a weapon
company become a software company?" Our
customers didn't want to wear cameras.
They thought the cloud was illegal for
them to put data in something they
didn't fully understand. And luckily, we
just stuck with it cuz it's just you
know, sometimes you just got to believe.
Like, our customers need to be able to
show the world what they do, so we're
not imagining what happens in these
terrible policing incidents. And then
Ferguson, Missouri happened, and the
rest is history. That's when the
business just really took off.
>> When you found out that you want to go
all in on a product called a Taser in
your early 20s, like how did you develop
that first prototype?
>> It was crazy. I had no idea like what I
was doing. And in some ways, that's a
gift as a young entrepreneur, cuz you
don't know what you're not supposed to
do. And so again, I discovered this
inventor lived in Tucson.
I was This is before the internet. So, I
was at the ASU law library looking
through patents. And I'm like, "Holy
smokes, this guy's address is like 90
minutes from here." So, I dialed 411.
And for some of your viewers who may not
know what that is, before Google, that's
how you got a phone number. And uh he
answered the phone, and I basically just
went down to visit him. He was 73, and
he was pretty frustrated. He'd been at
it already for 20 years. He'd got He
basically started two companies. They
both went bankrupt.
And here I am this bright-eyed,
bushy-tailed 23-year-old. I'm like,
"Hey, man. Like, let's give it another
shot."
And he basically said, "Okay, we'll tell
you what. If you pay me some patent
royalties, and we we cut a deal, I'll I
will help you make the first Taser
in my garage and then once once you sort
of get up and running, I'm going to go
back to retirement. And so that's what
it was. I I borrowed my my parents had a
trailer they used to take the dog shows
on the weekend, so I lived in that in a
trailer park in Tucson. Every morning
I'd show up, knock on Jack's, you know,
door. All right, let's go. And we built
the first Taser in his garage. Like, I'm
pretty convinced this guy could have
built a nuclear weapon if we had some
uranium. Like, it was crazy. We're
building with parts from Ace Hardware.
Uh uh uh uh you know, [laughter] taking
things like bicycle tire valves and
cranking them into welding them into the
metal casings to make propulsion
systems. Uh and we made our first
prototype in exactly 30 days.
Uh I remember that. Uh and then the US
government we made the first prototype
to send to the federal government so
they could give us a ruling on whether
or not it was a firearm, which was the
biggest risk to the business.
Uh and they responded in 2 weeks. So, 45
days from the founding we'd built our
first prototype and gotten government
approval.
Uh and and now I look at, you know, now
I've got like 6,000 employees.
Doing that would take a team of 50
people several years. Like, that's the
startup startup magic, right? You just
do crazy things cuz you don't know any
better.
>> And of course they're not made from Ace
Hardware materials anymore.
>> [laughter]
>> They're not made from Ace Hardware,
that's true.
>> [clears throat]
>> It's true. But I do miss making stuff
from Ace.
>> So what do you So you have this Taser
device? I mean, what do you go up to
local police precincts and say, um
Mr. and Mrs. Cop, please put away your
gun and uh buy my Taser thing. Here's
how it works. How do you demonstrate
>> That was pretty much it. So, we launched
as a consumer product and failed cuz
consumers were skeptical. They're like,
hey, and we launched it in the Sharper
Image. If you remember the Sharper Image
catalog, it had cool little Tasers.
And shockingly consumers were like,
okay, this isn't real. This has got to
be some kind of gimmick. Uh then we had
a second product launch that was a a car
security thing. We were just struggling
to figure out a product that would pay
the light bill. And then it on the verge
of failure we pivoted into policing and
and we basically dialed in the product
and we had no money to launch it. So, it
literally was exactly what you said. We
hired a former Marine in a Winnebago who
went cross-country knocking on doors at
police departments, like, "Hey, let me
show you the new Taser." And in the
early '90s, a Taser was used on Rodney
King in Los Angeles and it failed twice.
That was before I started this company,
that was the old Taser. And they went to
their batons and obviously the rest is
history. So, the Taser had a horrible
name in policing. Nobody believed it
worked. And so, when we would show up at
police departments, we gave this guy a
couple of $100 bills and the pitch was
like, "All right, if you don't believe
the Taser works, here's 100 bucks. Who
wants to try it?" And then literally,
we'd hook them up. Nobody got the 100
bucks, they would fall down. Like, word
spread like wildfire. One thing about
the police community, they all talk to
each other. There's all these
communiques they share back and forth.
And suddenly,
you know, within 12 months, we were cash
flow positive. 18 months from the launch
of the M-26, we went public on the
Nasdaq. It a massive $10 million
money raise. That was our IPO. Raised 10
million.
>> And now you're a $40 billion market cap.
>> Yeah, we've come a ways. Yeah.
>> How
tell us, you know, explain to us a
little bit from an entrepreneurial
standpoint, how do you
how did you scale up the business? I
mean, cuz it's not like you could just
sit give someone a
former Marine a $100 bills and go to
every police department. Like, how did
you get the business where it needed to
be in those early days?
>> Well, it really was that. It was like I
was out personally
leading instructor courses.
What we learned is in policing, the
first thing you got to do is you've got
to have an instructor's class so that
they know how to use the equipment and
and that there's a certification
process. They will not take anything out
on the street without certification.
All right. So, me and this Marine, he
happened to be the former chief
instructor of hand-to-hand combat for
the US Marine Corps. So, he knew about
developing lesson plans. And when you're
small, you just figure it out, right?
So, we developed it together.
Uh and then
three of us would go out and we would
offer these courses. Now, the buzz began
with him going cross-country in this
Winnebago, knocking on doors. And then
as the buzz picked up, agencies were
offering to host classes. Uh and we give
classes away for free cuz we also
discovered in policing
if the class is free, some cops will
show up just because it like it helps,
you know, with their resume to get more
certifications. And most in companies
charge for certification. So, this is
like another a freebie for any
instructor to get another certification
on their resume.
And it was just it was the grunt work uh
that that got us going. There was
absolutely zero magic. You know, there's
that old like there's no silver bullets,
only lead bullets.
We just you scratch and claw and fight
your way to survival.
And then then once it took off, you
know, then you start hiring people
following scaling, uh you know, with
sales people. And And it turns out uh a
lot of instructors in law enforcement
will
uh basically work as consultants to
train at other agencies. They typically
can't work for a company while they're
doing work at their own agency. That
would be a conflict of interest. But
like a Seattle PD officer can be an
instructor and go train at other
departments. In fact, that's standard in
the industry. Most police departments do
not want to be trained by a sales guy.
They would rather be trained by somebody
they know, "Okay, you're a professional
cop. You're paid to train me, but you
don't make any money if I buy or not.
You know, you it I can trust that you're
going to like give me the real scoop on
this."
>> Was there a moment that you could point
to that you knew
this company was going to be big?
>> When Sacramento police
bought Tasers for every officer, that
was that was a a crazy moment cuz like,
man, the capital of California. And that
was about 3 months before our IPO.
Uh say that was probably the moment.
Maybe the one right before that was the
first time I ever saw a cop carrying a
Taser out in the wild. It was in the
Salt Lake City Airport. Uh when I
just looked over and oh my god, that
guy's wearing the thing I make. Like,
holy holy cow. Like, this is working.
>> Rick, I've never seen one of those
before. Could you show Could you show it
again real quick? That that is that is
wild. And it just recharges?
>> Yep. It's got a a rechargeable battery.
And then this is the magazine. You put
10 rounds in it. This one's unloaded so
I don't, you know,
play with a live weapon while I'm on on
an interview. But yeah, it it's it's
what we've basically learned
is if we're going to be successful, we
never talk about taking a cop's gun
away.
You know, that would be
just unacceptable in America. There's so
many guns out there. But this is a new
kind of gun, right? This is a gun that
doesn't kill people, but it gives you
the job of incapacitating them,
which is what you want. Like, when
police use lethal force, they don't use
it because it's lethal. They use it
because it's reliable.
That Our problem is we're not as
reliable as a gun yet.
Now, we're getting very close. In fact,
we have When you mention like, "What do
we not do yet?"
Today,
our biggest limitation is we have this
Achilles' heel. This may or may not get
through heavy clothing. If you're
wearing a down jacket,
we may or may not be able to get through
it. So, I'm spending a fair amount of my
time in the labs with our engineers
working on a new cartridge system
that is designed to penetrate through
heavy clothing, which, believe it or
not, that's actually pretty easy. Here's
the hard part.
The same cartridge, if you're wearing a
parka, we got to make it through. But if
you're naked and we fire it at you, we
got to make sure it doesn't end up down
in your intestines causing a serious
injury. So, we needed to penetrate
through clothing and then stop as soon
as it punches through the skin. And we
got some very clever designs.
>> I mean, like I I like that's why love
doing this podcast. Like I can he
actually hear stories like this and go
holy This Well, I love to hear
that and you're still
in the labs like helping to
drive product innovation.
>> Yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah, in fact, I we
launched we call this new cartridge the
Apollo cartridge because we talk about
our moonshot mission. We we tend to be a
bit thematic and and like try to get
people focused. Like we're not we're not
here to make a business. We're on a
mission to make the bullet obsolete. And
when you think of things that way, it
pushes you to take more risk. Uh and
ultimately that's good for the business.
Like good risks. Like don't just sit on
your butt and and make the next Taser
slightly better than the last one. We're
going to go from two shots to 10. And
we're going to solve this clothing
issue. Anyways, we launched the we
announced the Apollo cartridge a year
ago. And to be honest, it it was failing
in testing. We weren't getting through
clothing well enough. So, we had to hit
the pause button. And so, yeah, I
parachute back in with the engineers.
That's That's the fun of the business.
Like, "Okay, guys, it's crisis mode.
This is like Apollo 13 now. Like, we've
spent $10 million on automation
equipment. The line is ready to go, but
the design ain't working. What are we
going to do? Like, I I don't want to
claim victory yet, but we're close. I
think we've got some design mods that
are testing very well."
>> Is it You think this year?
>> Uh yeah, we I think by next winter we'll
have it.
>> Wow.
>> And then when we do, this weapon will
actually outperform a 9 mm bullet. And
by that, I mean from the time you pull
that trigger till the time he's on the
ground and can't move, this will be
faster than shooting him with a bullet
and waiting for him to bleed out.
>> That is
>> And that's going to be a game changer.
>> That is a game changer. Then then does
that Is that the first step in making
the bullet obsolete?
>> Well, you know, the first step was
getting the neuromuscular effect dialed
in. Then it was getting them enough
shots so we're competitive with a gun,
right? Like, police don't carry a
derringer pistol with two shots cuz it's
hard to hit people.
Now it's getting through clothing and
just getting that last mile of
reliability. And then I'll tell you the
next thing beyond that is going to be
how do we make it so an officer doesn't
have to put their own life at risk? So,
today as I stand here right now, if
somebody enters a school with a gun or a
hospital or, you know, God forbid, you
know, where people go and do these mass
shooting events, the only way you can
stop them today is you send in more
people with more guns and they have a
gunfight. Like, this hasn't changed
since the Wild West. Now, I can make
this much, much more effective, but a
cop's never going to take this, no
matter how effective it is to a
gunfight. And my answer to that is
simple, don't get in a gunfight. Send in
a drone or a ground robot,
and we can remotely incapacitate people.
That's the next step of this.
Uh is how do we make it so we don't have
to put anybody at risk, we can
immediately send in a device,
probably an aerial drone, and stop
somebody. And if think about this way,
you like if it's your kid's school,
yeah, you want to stop that shooter, but
a shootout now with multiple officers
firing high-powered weapons, like
that's extremely dangerous. Far more
safe we could fly in a drone and take
that guy down using AI targeting, so
it's going to be more accurate than a
person. If you miss and you accidentally
hit somebody, you're not killing
anybody, you know, with the with stray
bullets.
>> This is a I want to tell you this, this
is a scary time in this country with
these these mass shootings at these very
large
um well-populated
uh events.
Two questions. One, what do you think
about what we're seeing here with this?
And then number two, like what what have
you seen budget-wise from departments,
police departments across the country?
As you get more of these events, are
they saying to you, Rick, I've got I've
found more money for you uh and your
team because you can help prevent things
like this?
>> Yeah. So, here's what's interesting.
When we start talking about putting
drones and robots, I actually don't
think it's going to be funded by the
police
because ultimately where it's going to
come from are the businesses that have
to protect their people. So, I had the
pleasure meeting Fred Smith, the uh the
founder of FedEx.
>> Yeah.
>> Oh, man, what an entrepreneur. Did you
ever interview him by the
>> I've I briefly talked to him, but not
interviewed him. But, holy cow. I mean,
American icon right there.
>> Yeah. Incredible. And we showed him
where we're going with Taser-capable
drones.
And he said, "This is one of the most
amazing things I've ever seen. I want to
put them in all of our stores." Now, of
course, he's now passed away and that
was more philosophical. So, you know,
since we're talking about investments,
so we should take that as an order. But,
the point was this.
FedEx had a shooting occur in one of
their stores. Remember back before
people would go to schools, they would
go to the post office. We used to call
it going postal.
>> Yep.
>> Uh you know, in the vernacular of for
people going out and and and going on a
shooting spree. Um so, I think what will
actually happen is businesses will be
like, "Hey, we want to protect our
employees." And businesses are
hyper-rational, right? When you put an
armed guard at a business,
your risk people are looking at that
going, "I hope to God they never have to
fire a bullet cuz if we're shooting
people within our business, that's an
extremely high liability event." But, a
business that could deploy a drone with
a non-lethal weapon, safer for
everybody. But, where it gets really
interesting is
they'll say things like, "Well,
and and and Fred actually in our
conversation had said this as well. He's
like, "Hey, I'd love to have these in
our stores, but I don't know that I want
my employees operating a Taser drone."
And I said, "Great. Actually, I think
society would prefer that that's
operated by
a sworn law enforcement officer anyway."
But, one advantage about the company
that was Taser is now Axon,
we happen to have built the largest
system of connected sensors
in the world for government. We have
over a million body cameras. We're the
market leader in drones as first
responder, in-car cameras. We have a
system called Fusus where we can take we
can fuse all of your CCTV cameras.
And you as a FedEx or as any other
business could hit the button and share
those to the police.
So, now in a crisis if somebody shows up
with a gun, right you you don't have to
operate that drone. You hit a button and
we can immediately share it to police
operation center and it'll be operated
by a professional. So, I think that's
that 5 to 10 years out, but I think that
is the game changer where it's not going
to make sense to show up anywhere with a
gun anymore because you'll be detected
and stopped by small autonomous robotic
systems operated by police, but paid for
by the private sector.
>> Well, this brings up I think the
evolution in your business. Now, this
drone business you acquired it what uh
it's called a different name 18 months
ago. Uh it has been growing if if I'm
right triple digits. Within that growth
rate who is who is buying these drones?
And I was very intrigued by maybe one
group that is buying it. And these
companies that are making data centers.
And I see the uproar with people like
oh, don't put a data center in my
backyard. I would imagine if you were
building a data center, you want
protection of that really large asset
right now.
>> 100%. So, we actually made three
acquisitions in this space. One, we
bought a small tactical drone company
called Skydio. They make drones for
special forces and for SWAT teams. So,
you haven't heard much about that yet,
but stay tuned. The second is a company
called Dedrone. That is counter-drone
detection. And so, basically you install
sensors and that's the business that's
growing at I don't know like north of
500% and that's where you can track
drones and then we can integrate with a
bunch of different sensors and with
different types of interceptors to be
able to either jam a drone, hack into
the drone,
or like we have partners in Ukraine
where we're actively building
integrations if you need to fly a small
interceptor drone up to take that drone
down. And then we have a third area
which we've done through a partnership
with Skydio which is the leading
American drone maker. Skydio is our
partner for outdoor long-range drones.
So, if I take a step back, the way I
look at it is like our job is to figure
out how to help our customers solve
these really interesting public safety
challenges, and drones are probably the
biggest safety challenge in the world
right now. And if we can't build the
best system, we'll go find a partner and
and connect them in. And what we deliver
is the connected uh sort of connect dome
of all these devices.
>> So, the
these drones, the drones you have now,
you said they're Taser powered. So,
they fly down and tip they would
actually taze someone on the ground or
and then second area like do do you
Okay, no, like what do they do exactly?
>> Yeah. So, that does not exist yet.
>> Okay.
>> The drone that is capable of stopping
somebody
is in the future. The drones today uh
will effectively fly over a scene, and
they will give you an immediate
awareness of what's happening, which is
a big advantage, but they right now they
can see, they can observe, they can
communicate, you can fly them down and
distract people, which often works where
they holy crap, there's a drone here. It
will interrupt the the things that
they're doing. Uh but we do not yet have
the ability to
put an effect on somebody. Uh but that
is something we're actively in R&D.
>> How far do you want to push this drone
business? And by that I mean
uh do you envision the day uh at some
point and when you're still leading the
company that this is
shooting some form of round at someone
like a tech drone and like you're
selling these to the Department of War.
>> Yeah, yeah. We will not make
intentionally lethal drones. Like and by
the way, the world
I thought wars were over. I wrote a book
uh before the pandemic called The End of
Killing, where I predicted that we are
at the end of modern wars. I was wrong
catastrophically. War is back. And
democracies need tools to win. So, I'm
not saying we don't need lethal drones,
we do, but that's not something we're
ever going to make. Where we view our
purpose in this world is how do we take
situations where historically the
solution might be to kill somebody and
find a way to not kill them. So, we're
be focused on drones that don't kill,
but they can stop people without killing
them. So, we're very focused on the
non-lethal portions of this. And we'll
let Anderol and others do deal with the
lethal drones.
>> Rick, lastly, before I let you go,
you're founder of a company 1993. You've
changed how
police do their job, how many people do
their job, and how
just people stay safe in this country.
Um
what do you think your legacy would be?
>> Um I think
if this
Let me take the if out.
We are going to make the bullet
obsolete. At the end of my career, we're
going to look back and remember, "Gosh,
you remember we used to shoot bullets at
people here in America?" Like, that's
that's crazy. We will have brought the
phaser to life. But, there's one other
piece to this. We started with the
Taser, then we got into body cameras,
and now we have this huge neural network
with millions of cameras and sensors,
and where AI is at the core of our
business now, because you can imagine,
there's not enough people to watch all
those cameras. So, we can use it to like
help a police officer write their
reports, translate languages to all the
different people they deal with. So, AI
is now transforming the next leg of
growth for us. And so, as I look at what
when I the big picture, we want to build
the future as envisioned by Gene
Roddenberry, the the creator of Star
Trek, right? Like there, that phasers,
they communicators, like technology sort
of uplifted civilization. That's what
we're trying to do. Unfortunately, when
you make technology for police, the
media tends to immediately run to the
George Orwell story of, "Oh, this is
going to be used to oppress people, to
kill people, to take away their
freedoms." So, we're really conscious of
like, "Hey, how do we build the
technology infrastructure for the world
we want to raise our kids in and leave
our leave to our kids?" Like, that
supports democracy, where we make it
very hard. Like, everyone needs Taser
devices,
it's got a log that records every time
it's used. We built cameras to watch how
you use it, right? So, we think a lot
about It's not just our job to make tech
and throw it out there. How do we make
it in a way we're proud of that And uh
by the way, for our investors, that's
how you build a long-term business. You
got to think like, what could go wrong
and how do we prevent it from going
wrong? How do we take more
responsibility so that our products are
durable and they're going to be here in
50 years and that we don't, you know,
step on a landmine because, you know,
people were out there abusing our our
tech.
>> From one product in 1993 found uh by
someone
um looking through a at the library
through a patent log um to almost a $40
billion market cap. Hell of a success
story. Rick, good to see you again. Uh
let me know when you're in New New York
City again.
>> Thanks. Yeah, and uh stay tuned the next
couple years. I think we are going to do
more impactful products in the next 5
years than we've done in all of our
history to now.
>> Well, you keep me posted. You're always
welcome on and uh we'll talk to you
soon. Take care.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
Rick Smith, founder and CEO of Axon Enterprise, discusses his company's evolution from building the first Taser in a garage in 1993 to becoming a leader in public safety technology, including body cameras, software, and drone systems. Smith emphasizes his mission to make the bullet obsolete, relying on non-lethal technology and AI to protect citizens and officers while minimizing the risks associated with traditional policing and gun violence.
Videos recently processed by our community