If you don't make it about the customer
1509 segments
What are you going to do for me? If I
can pick that up from the messaging,
then I'm probably willing to talk to
you. But if this whole message is about
what you do, nobody cares, man. Look,
Bootstrap founders that want to grow
really quickly oftent times have like
champagne taste and Bud Light budget.
>> Welcome to building in the age of AI.
This is a new series that I'm doing
where I'm sitting down with a founder or
an operator and we're comparing notes on
what it actually takes to build, market,
and run a business in the age of AI. Not
just a theory, but what is actually
working in the real world. Our first
guest is Wade Low. Weighs an
entrepreneur at heart. He's built and
exited two businesses, one a SAS, one a
marketplace, and these days he works as
a CRO, a chief revenue officer. So, he
goes into companies and owns the
revenue. It gets properly embedded with
a team reporting to him, basically a
co-founder on demand. And that lines up
almost too well with where I am right
now. I'm about to take my own product,
Olati, to market. And the hardest part
isn't building its attention. Olati has
to get noticed in a really noisy world
where everyone's sending the same emails
that are going into the same inboxes,
getting eyeballs, getting customers.
That's what I'm actually working on
right now. That's what Wade does for a
living. So, this isn't an interview.
This is two operators swapping notes on
the same problem. And we don't agree on
everything, which makes this even more
interesting. Let's get into it. Wade,
welcome to Building in the Age of AI.
Why don't we start off tell us who you
are and what do you do?
>> Oh, that's a great question. So, the
easiest way to describe it is I'm an
entrepreneur at heart. And to describe
what I do, I I don't I don't know what I
do at the moment. Like, I'm in So, I'm
doing I'm I'm owning revenue for a
couple different companies and doing
some consulting work uh for another, but
they're not my businesses. But I sold an
enterprise SAS business in 24 and then
took a bunch of time off. And now I'm
very much kind of trying to figure out
as I'm still working trying to figure
out exactly like okay what what does
this look like? What am I trying to do?
Where am I trying to go? How do I want
to add value? And I bounced around from
a a few different ideas but ultimately
right now like where I spend my time
during the day is I'm helping other
companies grow their revenue at a rapid
rate. I think that's that's where I'm
spending the bulk of my day right now.
>> Yeah. Yeah, I heard you say that you
jump into businesses and you get
integrated as if it was your business
and but you're acting as a consultant.
Is that right? But you are literally
acting as a consultant but is you treat
it like if it's your business.
>> Yeah, I think consult it's more
fractional than consultant because
consultant has very little
responsibility for the outcome where I
actually own the revenue for companies
and I have people directly reporting to
me and teams of people underneath me. So
I'm like I'm in I'm I'm operating inside
a b of a couple different businesses. Um
so and I have very specific outcomes and
milestones that I'm personally
responsible for. um and that and so I
but I think the reason that companies
are like that is because consultants
don't really they they can provide a lot
of good strategy but they don't have any
responsibility for the execution whereas
I I
>> they just give you advice or something
and then they walk away
>> and so I'll actually say I think we
should do this and then I'll actually go
execute against that and then I get to
determine whether my ideas were actually
useful or not.
>> So what would you say is your from your
perspective what is go to market? What
is a good go-to market strategy
>> right now? It depends on the business. I
mean the best gotom market, the easiest
go to market is when you have a
tremendous amount of demand and your
main problems are trying to orchestrate,
manage, process,
systematize
the demand that's hitting you, right? It
but that's not that's not typical. It's
not normal. It's great if you have it
because you can build a tremendous
amount of momentum extremely quickly.
But if that's not the case, then you got
to go get it. And that's where real go
to market is. You know, sometimes you
really do have really strong product
market fit or you've got a really good
founder, CEO, and personal brand
mechanism that's attracting a lot of
potential customers. But assuming that's
not the case, then how do you actually
build a a system and build a machine
that allows you to go get business? And
that's a very different type of motion.
>> Yeah. The outbound and and that's that's
exactly where I am now. I'm in a
position where I've got to get this uh
product uh Oli to market the the phone
system product and and the question is
do we do we focus on outbound or do we
focus on my personal brand or do we
focus on both? What is going to be the
best approach? And are we doing a should
we focus on accountbased management
sales? Should we do pure outbound and
and do a productled motion growth? So
all this all these questions are going
through my mind right now.
>> So how are you so how are you doing it?
How are you thinking about it?
>> The plan at the moment is keep working
on my personal brand to build an
audience of like-minded people. But the
idea is tech techminded founders, CEOs,
operators, business operators that uh
share my world view. That's essentially
who I'm after. And I'm building a
subscriber base on YouTube, uh, an email
list through my personal website, and
it's growing, slowly growing, but it's
so slow. I mean, I had one video on
YouTube that did better than the rest.
An outlier, you could say my usual
YouTube view videos are getting 300
views, and this one got 360,000 views,
but it was I thought when I got this,
this video hits the 360,000. I thought,
great, every single video I do from now
on will get 360,000. But that's
absolutely not the case. the next video
got yeah like 5,000 and oh actually the
next video got 10,000 and the following
one got to 5,000 but compared to my
usual videos which got 300 it's lifted
my baseline which is great and it's also
given me about 8,000 new subscribers
that single video did and in total now
I'm at 9,00
something subscribers and I've been
added for six months and the majority of
those subscribers came over the last
month so it's uh it's crazy how one
small thing can make a big impact
So that's my strategy at the moment.
>> Is it turning into business? Because the
only thing that matters in go to market
if the things that you're doing actually
turn into leads which turn into ops
which turn into deals which turn into
recurring or repeat business right so I
think especially on the personal brand
side I think people get wrapped around
the axle on vanity metrics but there's a
lot of people that have built personal
brand with a very small following but
they're but their following is very
engaged. Yeah, good point. It doesn't
matter how many people you have. It's
about how many people are buying that
you have.
>> Correct. Correct. So, is it so I guess
that's the question like how are you
measuring? Are you measuring by
subscribers or are you trying to measure
by what the actual results?
>> I'm so early into this that uh to be to
all to be honest and and all cards on
the table. We've just decided to rebrand
the product because it was called Wii U
before and now we're going to call it
Olati. Olati is a brand new brand. and
it doesn't even have a website yet. So,
I need to build a landing page. I need
to build the um a list and I'm going to
make it a essentially a invite only kind
of a um a weight list method kind of
thing. So, we're going to have I'm going
to be pushing people through to the
latatti website, but I've not started
marketing for latatti yet because we
have the product built and we're using
it with the with Circle Cloud. So,
through the Circle Cloud, we have a a
great distribution engine like you know,
I think we've spoken about it a few
times. We've got the telemarketing team.
We've got 25 people dialing out every
day, actually a bit more now, uh, trying
to book appointments with owners of
businesses, uh, small UK businesses. And
then we have a field sales team that are
going to see them face to face and and
sell them a phone system. And it works
really well for the Circle Cloud model
because we're signing them into longer
contracts. We give them more of a white
glove handheld really like hideouch
service, which is not really scalable
for a SAS. We can't really do it on a
SAS model that that is on a rolling
30-day contract. So we need to change
the distribution method for the SAS. So
the it has to be done on the person on
the on the online marketing side which
is going to be either organic content
through my personal brand and and within
the Olati brand once it's launched or it
will be paid ads and and and paid media.
So I want to try the the organic path as
much as possible before going on to paid
or we just scrap it all and we go
through what we know which is going to
be more of accountbased marketing uh
approach.
>> Yeah. I mean, what's the what's the
duration? It's there's 30-day contracts.
It's not a if it's SAS, it's it's not a
longer term contract.
>> Yeah, we're planning on doing 30 days uh
as a standard, but we're going to be
trying to push people to the annual.
That's the plan. Uh it's just looking at
what else is in the marketplace, the
comparables, if we go in and and require
a three-year contract, we're just not
going to be able to compete with with
other things that are out there. We
we're trying to differentiate in the way
that people ask me, what's the USB? What
makes you different to Microsoft Teams?
What is the USB? The USB is me. And it's
difficult to explain that, but it's
really it's it's my the way I've I've
crafted the product and the way that my
I I believe that people should be able
to communicate in a way that is is not
happening with the products out there
right now. There's so much friction.
There's so much uh noise and and uh in
terms of the products when you use a
communications product, it's it's
cumbersome. An example is Microsoft
Teams like we're talking about it now.
If you launch Microsoft Teams and then
you're going to try and call somebody,
you press the call and just you hear
this thing
b you know that thing that comes up on
Microsoft Teams, it's so annoying and it
just delays the process. And then you
got that cognitive function before you
even open Teams. Okay, I got to call
this person. Do I message them on Slack?
Do I call them on Teams? Do I uh send
them on WhatsApp? All this debt that
comes with uh the decision there. So
what we're trying to do is for a small
business, eliminate all that and just
give them a platform that they can
communicate internally and externally
really quickly and efficiently. Okay.
So, it's not going to take you 2 minutes
to dial when you press the when you when
you either type a number in because you
we've removed the dial pad. We just type
it with a keyboard. Or you can use our
voice command feature to make the to
initiate the call. It's instant. So, the
idea is it is super quick to initiate
the call. It's ringing straight away and
it gives you we've put a lot of
attention into the the the the
finetuning of the product. We've had
time to do that. We've been spending
we've spent the last four years building
this product way too long. But the I
guess the the the card we had up our
sleeves is that we've got Circle Cloud
in the background. So Circle Cloud, the
distribution engine that's already
working, that's already selling the
system and is funding this is is allowed
us to be able to to spend so much time
fine-tuning the product and get it to a
point that we we've designed it with
with you know a lot of attention to
detail and that's what I think we're
going to try and go to market with but
it's such an unknown.
>> Do so do you have customers outside of
CircleCloud? Like is anybody using it
outside of your own ecosystem yet?
>> No. No. So we we've only got four
customers of Circle Cloud using it
externally. Everybody else is using it
internally.
>> Right. So you have So you have four PE
but you do have four customers that are
using it externally.
>> Yeah, we have four customers that are
outside of us internally using it. They
are circle cloud customers. We just
moved them over to to Olati,
>> but they are using it in production for
their main business phone system. And we
are going to keep introducing new uh
customers which again is a great way to
fine-tune the product because we can
discovering small bugs and things that
we didn't realize at the time of
building it that the real world teaches
you which is when by correcting this now
when we do go to market with the SAS
it's it's going to be much more stable
and reliable because we're not going to
have those bugs that we've already
discovered by using it or introducing it
to our existing customer base. You'll
have but you'll find you'll find more
users or
>> oh of course I know
>> in that regard they'll they'll
definitely and they'll help you know
it'll help you if you're paying
attention because it'll help refine the
product. We did that. I had there was a
business called Sitefill that I was a
co-founder in um we then built a
technology platform to service that
business and then spun out the the
actual software as a standalone company
um and and had obviously a very
different business model. It was a SAS
business. That was the business that we
sold in 2024. But we started the same
way where we actually it started off by
servicing the existing company that we
had founded and then we spun it out as a
standalone company. That that software
business then grew and then we sold we
sold that. And what we found by going
through that like you're spinding is
that how we used how the the original
company used it internally was not
exactly aligned with how the market was
going to use it. But it was great to so
we had a good first use case and it got
us 80% of the way there and then by
going out to market and getting other
companies that were outside of the
ecosystem onto the platform. There was a
whole bunch of stuff that we just
weren't aware of um that we ended up
improving and refining and iterating and
and building out to to to make it be
able to suitable for the whole market
versus just for us. And you'll probably
go through the same thing.
>> That's super interesting. Is that the
because you you've been involved in a
SAS and also a marketplace. This is this
the one that you're talking about?
>> Yep. The market was the marketplace and
then we built a software for the for the
we built a a SAS platform that we pulled
out of we pulled out of that.
>> Got it. Got it. Got it. Well, let's see
how many pivots we have to make. That's
the that's the unknown.
>> Yeah. Well, and you won't know until you
get people in it and banging away on it,
right? It's the only way that's the only
way you're going to find out. And and
that's I mean the fact that you guys
have been doing it for four years though
and that that you're using it yourself
internally. You're gonna I mean you're
going to have a product that's viable
for the market. It's just like what
adjustments do you need to make to be
able to service different types of
customers?
>> Yeah, exactly. I read something about
you being focused and actually we when
we spoke last you mentioned this being
focused on I think what you call the
boring businesses. What do you mean by
that and and why is that your is that
your strategy? It wasn't a strategy,
man. Like I was talking to a a company
that I do work with yesterday and we
were just talking about fails on with
the sales team. I'm talking about
face-toface meetings and you need to go
out and have face to face meetings and
it's and they're talking about bringing
product with them to be able it's a
physical company so I'm bringing product
with them to go do to go do the meetings
and I was and I shared a story about
when I started my career. I was 21 years
old. This I'll get to your point though.
It'll take a minute. But I was 21 years
old and I was trying right out of
college and I was working for a plastics
packaging manufacturing company and I
was covering the southeast. So I had
five states and I didn't know dude I
didn't know what the I was doing,
right? I was just like went and trained
for like a couple months and I was
planted in a I was working remotely at
21. So that I've been doing for a long
time and I was on a plane every week and
I was at different cities and I had
customers. I was going to try to talk to
them or I had prospects I was trying to
go find. But we manufactured bottle
caps. So, and not like beverage caps,
like shampoo and nail polish, like all
the fancier type of bottle caps. Like
that's what the business did, right? So,
that was my first job. And that is a
boring business, you know.
>> You were on the road as an exec.
>> I was an a Yeah. At time we weren't
called AE. They were called a sales rep
or an account manager, right? Like AE
didn't even exist. That was late 90s.
And that's what I did. And I had and we
would have to I brought a tackle box
full of samples and caps that we could
show. So I had to show people when I was
sitting across from right like that is a
bor and that's a great way. It's a very
good company. It was very wellrun and
they're very professional. It's a great
training ground but that's a boring
business. And then I got into other
businesses that so I ended up what I
found is I think I have a unique skill
set to be able to help companies that
are it's really hard differentiate be
able to differentiate and sell because
if you can if you can sell and drive
revenue inside of businesses that are
not like cutting edge and first to
market but have been around for a long
time and have a lot of comp have a lot
of competition that is a very unique
skill set to have which I found and I
didn't do it on purpose. just kind of
how my career navigated. And then when I
was in the marketplace was around fuel
like fuel is a nonsexy business and a VP
of sales that was a was also a
marketplace for heavy construction
equipment like heavy equipment for
construction job sites like also not as
a very boring type of there's a lot
going on but it's not super sexy. But
what I found is if you can do well in
those environments then you can do well
in anybody. So, when I'm looking to hire
salespeople, I don't want people that
have been at companies that were really
well known and raised a bunch of money
and had a pole motion on them because
were they really selling or were they
just they're they had so much momentum
behind the brand that they're just
taking orders. Like that's not that's
not selling. Like that's order taking.
There's a very big difference between
selling and order taking. And so you
look for people that have been in
environments where there wasn't they
weren't the big brand. They couldn't
just call and say, "Hey, I'm with Amazon
and I'd like to take a meeting with
you." Be like, "Okay." Right? Like, "I'm
with AWS or I'm with Microsoft or I'm
with Deal or I'm with RAMP." Right? Like
just those are easy. That's easy to get
meeting set up when you're those when
you work for those brands. So, you're
looking for people that have been in, I
think, nonsexy type of environments that
have done well. Those are the people
actually know how to sell. Um, and you'd
want a bunch of them on your team. And
so anyway, so the point being is around
that that though I didn't intentionally
go down that path. It just happened to
be where I landed, but I stayed there.
But I but it's it's served me well
because it I think I' I think it's
really sharpened my skills. And there's
also not if you've been doing it for a
long time, there's just not it's not as
there's not as much highlevel
competition. You're not competing with
people out of Silicon Valley. No, just
not. And that's okay. Okay, there's
nothing wrong with with people in the
space, but that's a different type of
competitive landscape, right? Where this
is not that and it's very beneficial
because I think it's easy to be
recognized and demonstrate a different
level of professionalism that people
appreciate because they're not used to
getting it.
>> Yeah, we hire sales team, sales people
uh frequently. We have a revolving door
that we call it of telemarketers because
it's a really tough job to do. So they
come and they go, but in particular the
field sales guys, these are the real uh,
you know, the hunters. We we've had some
in the past that are just not hungry for
it. But the ones we have, they're on
commission only and they earn really
good money
>> and they're they're hungry for it.
They're driving around. Sometimes they
spend, I don't know, six hours in a day
driving from appointment to appointment
and then they spend two, three hours in
each meeting and they have really long
days, two, three meetings a day and
yeah, they they're hungry for it.
they're good sales people and it's
difficult to find a team of good sales
people. So when you go into a business
as a let's say fractional CRO
>> what do you do with a team in there? Do
you do you recommend to the CEO hey we
need to founders and CEOs we need to
replace your guys or do you train them
or do you do a bit of both?
>> It's a bit of both but oftentimes it's
like one of the companies I'm with right
now there's only one salesperson that
was there when I started.
>> How many did you how many were there
when you started?
>> I'm not going to get into the details
but there was a lot more than one. Um, I
mean only there's only one the team
still there's still a team there now,
but it's all different people. She's the
only one that made it through that
process and it wasn't because we fired a
lot of people. It's just that the
expectation and the standard gets set
and then when there's more visibility
into like, oh, there's performance
metrics and oh, we're going to actually
report on how things are going. Oh,
we're going to hold you accountable and
support, right? Right? It's not just
hold you accountable. It's it's hold you
accountable and train. Some people don't
want it, right? And it gets really
apparent very quickly if you're doing
well or not because there's a big gi
unlike any other department, there's a
big giant scoreboard and if if you and
if you're looking at the school and if
you make the scoreboard public so that
everybody sees it every day, the people
that are underperforming get very
uncomfortable, right? And and it's very
and they it's very apparent who's doing
well and who's not. And the ones that
are underperforming on an ongoing
regular basis and then don't want to do
the work to get coached up, they
typically just navigate their way out of
the business versus having to be told
that they need to be that they shouldn't
work here. They go find something else
to do. That's typically happens.
>> You raise the bar
>> and then it it's a natural selection
from that point, isn't it?
>> Correct. And you've got to be able it
can't just be raise the bar and then not
make any changes internally as well to
support them. There's got to be
training. There's got to be there's
there's there's a there's al it's it's
two-sided. There's the expectation and I
firmly believe this. I grew up in sales.
There is the expectation that the people
in the seats have to perform at a
certain level, but at the same time the
business also has to do what it needs to
do to be able to support because you
can't give somebody a quota that's
unobtainable and say, "Hey, you have to
hit this now." If the business isn't
doing what it needs to do to be able to
make sure that if the right person is in
the seat, they can't hit it, you know,
and that's where there's that's where
that's where sometimes I think younger
founders struggle a little bit that like
that because you can make them you can
make a model do whatever you want,
right? And so I just will the revenue I
want to see the revenue at this, you
know, move up to this level. It's like
okay, great. But how like what's the
business doing to make sure that that's
actually possible? Not just that you
want to see it that way.
>> It needs to be realistic. And when you
go into a business, do you transform or
introduce any new technology? How are
you using AI right now for your when
when you're in a business?
>> Uh, I mean, everybody's trying to figure
that out, dude. So, yes, using
technology. I mean, personally, like I
use cloud co-work. That's what I do
personally. And it's [clears throat]
connected into all my different It's
connected to my email. It's connected to
my calendar. It's connected. I've got
projects inside of co-work that are
associated with the different companies
that I do work with. doing some personal
side projects that I have going on that
are unrelated to anything like this,
more like passion projects. Um, so for
me, that's what I personally use is kind
of my orchestration layer to be able to
see what's going on and what's
happening. And then inside the
businesses depends like in one business
we use HubSpot and HubSpot rolled out uh
and some AI functionality and tooling
that as a beta that we were one of the
testers on. It's actually really good
and specifically for our SDR BDR team
and it's actually a really good tool.
like because I don't want to have to
build everything from scratch. Like it's
not super helpful. But then in other
instances, we're using a company called
um there's a company out there called
Growth Band that handles like email uh
email box warm-ups and the ability to be
able to send and using AI to be able to
write some messaging and it's you know
there's definitely you got to have human
in the loop on that because if you just
let the AI do the messaging right it's
not always really great but you can get
70% of the way there and then like on
another side it's instantly AI is a tool
that we use Apollo's obviously a tool
tool we use. We're doing some homegrown
build out of agents internally for
inbound to be able to process inbound
more effectively and do some lead
routing and scoring and messaging back
for like tier four leads. So, it depends
on the company and it depends on what
tech stack they already have or don't
have. And then it's how much of it do
you want to build and how much of it do
you want to buy. You know, I think it's
okay to build some things. I don't think
it's great if you're not a soft if
you're not if you don't have a team of
engineers. I don't think it's great to
be building 15 agents because
>> you got to manage them,
>> right?
>> Exactly. There's a bunch of new
companies that I'm seeing app popping
up. And I think it's a wave, a new wave
that's coming of the whole personal
assistant AI thing where you connect
your tools to it, be it Gmail or
whatever email you use, Slack or
whatever chat system you use, whatever
phone system you use, meeting nodes. it
essentially because it's got the
connection to all these tools, it knows
all the context of what you're doing at
work
>> and that's when it can really become
useful. The question is who's going to
crack this so it works properly. There's
so many companies that I'm seeing out
there that are starting to build this
and it's really the the one that cracks
this or it might not be a single
company. It might be just a joint I mean
it might be Claude that does this with
all the integrations that it's got but
it's having that context that's context
is key right now.
>> Yep. Yeah. Yeah. And the um and tools
for the sake of tools like what outcome?
At the end of the day, it's all about
outcomes. Like what outcome are we
getting? Is this making things better or
not, right? Are we getting better
outcomes? If the answer is no, then stop
doing it. Like I don't think you just
have to run full force into the AI wall
because everybody's doing it. I mean, be
selective about what you're trying to
do. And look, if you're not tech and
companies that I work with are not we're
not they're not super technical. So
that's a very different conversation
than if you go into like again like a
Silicon Valley company where you've got
teams of engineers. you're going to use
AI differently than teams that don't
have those resources. And so what's the
what's the best way to be able to do
that without overwhelming a very and I
work with bootstrap companies, right? So
you're always constrained by capital,
you're always constrained by resources,
you're always constrained by talent. So
if you just start to go in and start and
start throwing a bunch of stuff for
people to do that are already
constrained and there's no real strategy
and there's no real, you know, practical
use application or results that are
being driven, then stop doing it, right?
And then figure out like where do where
are you going to actually get good
results and have an impact versus just
trying to have everybody use it for the
sake of using it
>> and not throw a bunch of tools at it.
You mentioned talking about tools Apollo
earlier and in reality most businesses
have access to the same tools more or
less. So how do you how do you stand out
or get noticed or just uh get the
attention of people right now if
everybody's got the same tools in in
outbound in particular?
>> Is it the people? Is it literally the
people because people buy from people or
is there a way with a particular way of
doing email marketing or LinkedIn
approaches? Do you see like a something
that's working better than others? Some
approach
>> I do. So it has to be multi-pronged, but
phone calls are are definitely getting
the best the best result. I mean, send
the email, but you got to make the phone
calls. So you got and you see that I
mean, you've got a team of people that
make phone calls all day, right? That
that there is as much as people don't
want to do that, there is no way around
not doing it. If you rely exclusively on
digital, unless again, you've got that
inbound demand hitting, you've got so
much product market fit that the
market's pulling you, that's different.
But most companies don't have the luxury
of that. So you have to go get it. So
call is important. Um, the other thing
that's important about the, at least
what I found on the messaging on the
email side is that you have to very
clearly state
what problem it is that you're going to
solve for them and and do it concisely.
So, whatever their like one of the
companies I work with like risk
mitigation is the thing like we tested
some messaging, sending things out. The
ones that got the best response were
around risk mitigation. That's that's a
real situation that companies are trying
to deal with. So it's like okay so the
messaging is going to be around how we
help companies with risk mitigation
specifically on you know certain
projects that they're that they're
working on. Um but you got to find out
it can't just be blank first of all it
can't be blanketed just standardized
messaging and it certainly can't be
about you. It has to be about them
because if you're just describing what
you do nobody gives a like they
care about them. They don't care about
you right? Especially they don't know
you. So, if they're going to bother to
read something, it's got to say, "What
are you going to do for me?" And if I
can if I can pick that up from the
messaging, then I'm probably willing to
talk to you. But if this is just like,
"Hey, this is this whole message is
about what you do." Nobody cares. Nobody
gives a
>> Yeah. So, he's making it about outcomes
for them. There's a guy, I think he's
called Jordan Crawford. Have you heard
of him? He does like something he's got
a product called Blueprint GTM and and
he's got this whole approach about
sending cold emails, but they emails
people would pay to receive. There was a
one example that he gave of this
trucking business. I think it was a
trucking business or it was a uh a plant
hire business. That was right. And he he
got he he looked at uh different
permits, construction permits that have
been granted around the area where the
plant hire company was was uh was
renting out his equipment. And it sent
uh a bunch of emails to plant hire
companies in the area saying there's
this construction project that's being
uh that's coming live or it's just come
live based on the rates of your
equipment rental. This is an opportunity
of this much for you. and you know
here's here are the details of this lead
and if you want more of those let me
know something like that it's just
providing value straight away and then
you just want the reply saying yes give
me more and that's that's a great way in
>> yeah what's the name of that company
because I may call him later today
[laughter]
>> yeah so I think that the the key is on
the the what is it in for the for the
customer right
>> making it about them
>> it's always got to be about them I think
that gets lost a lot of times because
there's such a focus on growth growth
growth hit your numbers, hit your
targets, right? And so there's this
there's this natural pressure that sales
people feel that I have to close deals.
And so if I have to close deals, like it
creates this kind of energy about you
that is less about the customer, more
about you. And that's
>> desperation.
>> Yeah. It comes from the top, you know,
so
>> people can smell it. And and you work
with obviously coming from the top, you
work with directly with founders. And
you mentioned that you work with
bootstrap companies. So I'm assuming
it'll be founderled businesses and
businesses run by founders, right?
Typically, yes.
>> How do you find because I heard you say
once that the business takes on the
personality of the founder?
>> Yeah.
>> How how is it Have you got any examples
that you've ever seen a business either
become toxic or where where it's it's
basically taken on the personality of
the founder, but it's not gone well.
It's it's the opposite of what should
have happened.
>> Yeah. I won't get as I don't want to
throw people under the bus so I won't
get like super but so yes I've seen that
one environment in particular was just
very young founder and and didn't quite
know what he was doing yet but was very
intense and very um I think he just
believed that and it's not anybody I
work with now by the way but I think he
just believed that by force of will he
could make things happen and if he
wanted it to be so then it must be
possible to do like maybe but there It's
like it's the it's always the question
about how are you going to do that? It
was very intense and very passionate.
But that intensity and that passion, you
know, bled through to the entire
organization, but because there wasn't a
great plan around it create a lot of
panic, you know, because it's just like,
oh, this is what this is what the CEO
founder wants and this is what he's
going to push on and he's not going to
relent that this is where we're trying
to go. But there wasn't a good plan
around how we're going to get there. And
all that did was create a lot of anxiety
and work and pressure for people inside
the business without really a good plan.
And so it just created a pretty um
toxic, but it was it was just it wasn't
a real pleasant environment to be in
>> because people were stressed because
they don't know exactly how they're
going to be doing the the thing that
needs to be done according to the
founder when there's no plan. So I get I
understand that entirely. Yeah.
>> Yep. And so so the intensity level is
very high. So everybody's intensity
level was very high and passion level
was very high but it wasn't super
productive. So that would be one example
in particular.
>> And when you go in to a business what's
the first thing that you fix? You
mentioned earlier that you look at the
how and you look at the people is that
what what the first thing is is what is
the objective and how are you planning
on getting there?
>> It's two it's two things. It's what's
the model like do you have a model built
like and what assumptions are in the
model to be able to determine whether
like what's fine what's the goal where
you trying to go and then well so
there's the there's always the well
where are you trying to go ultimately
that's kind of always the first
conversation I have with people is
because if you don't know where you're
trying to go I can't help you that's
there's coaches out there who can help
you figure out what it is you want to do
and where you want to go but that's not
my job my job is you've already
determined where you want to go and now
let's figure figure out how to get
there. And then typically, you know,
I'll go back to that example I was just
using. If there's not a plan in place,
then it's just wishful thinking. So,
it's like, well, what's the plan? Like,
have we built a model to say, okay, this
is how much revenue we're going to do
this month, and this is how much we're
going to do the following month, and
this is what's the headcount associated
to that? And is there a marketing
budget? Are we going to lose money for a
little bit? Are we going to always try
to stay profitable? Like, and are we
trying to do inbound? Are we trying to
do outbound? And if we're going to
allocate capital to growth, what where
are we allocating that capital? Is it
going to be to people? Is it going to be
to tools? Is it going to be to both? Are
we trying to take one big bet and place
it in one place? Are we trying to take
like six small bets and place them and
see where that goes? So, so that's that
all has to ha doesn't have to, but I
think it's helpful to happen because
then at least if there's a plan, you can
talk to the rest of the team like here's
the plan and maybe it'll and and look
and if it doesn't work, we reserve the
right to adjust the plan, but this is
what we're going to try to do. So, let's
try to do that and if it's working,
we'll do more. And if it's not, we will
we will adjust the plan accordingly and
we will figure out some other avenues to
test. Right? And it's okay. I think it's
okay for people to hear that even from
the top. They I think sometimes
especially younger founders are scared
that if they don't have all the answers
to the questions that they're losing
credibility like nobody has all the
answers to the questions. So just be
honest about it.
>> Best to have a plan and change it than
not have a plan in the first place.
>> Correct. Or just think your plan is a
like having a target is not a plan.
Those are wildly different things. Like
that's great. It's a target. It's not a
plan. A plan is how you get to the
target. And then sometimes like that
target is not realistic. Or I was
talking last week like man bootstrap
founders that want to grow really
quickly oftentimes have like champagne
taste and Bud Light budget. Like what?
Like what do you I hear you. I know. I
would. Yeah. Of course you want to build
a you know billion dollar enterprise but
but you've got a budget that's not like
companies that do that at scale. They
raise a lot of money. They have a huge
balance sheet and then they burn cash. I
more I guess AI is changing the dynamic
a little bit on that for sure. There's
definitely companies that are scaling
super aggressively that did not are not
burning through all their cash which is
very much what it used to have to
happen. So it's interesting to see that
play out. But they've still most of them
have still raised, you know. So you have
to have like realistic expectations on
what your growth is going to look like
if you're not planning on raising
capital.
>> You said earlier that you work at um so
you look at the model, right? But you I
think you mentioned in a previous uh
conversation that you work with
companies of 5 million and above. Is
that right? 5 to 20 million or something
like that.
>> Well, five 5 to 50 in that range. That's
it.
>> And then you look at obviously
increasing their revenue and and
profitability. You mentioned the model
is one of the things you look at. How
many times would you say there's a
percentage of times that you've had to
change the model because a business
that's doing five million in turnover
and above it's got a they've got a sales
model. They've got a distribution model.
They're they're operating. Have you ever
had to change it?
>> Yeah, but they don't have but they may
not actually have a mo like an actual
model built with assumptions that can
make it predictable about what's coming.
Like a lot of times they can take they
can they have a conceptual model that's
working but it's not necessarily
predictable based off of specific
assumptions that they're trying to drive
towards.
>> Makes sense,
>> right? So when I say model, I mean like
an Excel spreadsheet with assumptions
that are built in that if you change the
assumption, it's going to cascade out
for the next 18 months like that. And
typically they don't have that because
they've gotten to where they are on the
back of the founder
>> just by doing what they've always done
and they're going to get they've always
what they've always got. that we started
to marketing and an example now is that
we've got a a commercial director who
has he's a king of spreadsheets and he
knows to the like a person sitting down
dialing out should make this many calls
in a day from this many calls we expect
this kind of contact rate from the
contact group we expect this many
appointments from this many appointments
how many will sell and this whole thing
trickles down and we know exactly what
the unit economics are of one single
person sitting down and that's the
amount of time they're sitting down for
and that's I guess what you mean by
model is having it all modeled out and
and detailed
>> correct and a lot of companies don't
have that, right? like is they don't
have that level of granularity and then
it's because the nice thing about that
is is be you can p it's easier to
predict like what's going to happen in
the future
>> especially if you see the some of the
assumptions starting to trend up or down
you can kind of you can figure out okay
what is that going to mean three months
from now where I think it gets
challenging one of the things I'm
challenged with right now with companies
is there's incremental changes which is
often time you can play around with the
model and find the changes to help grow
20% a year but then there's like step
changes and the step changes are less
about the model. It's like what are we
what are we going to do fundamentally
differently that could help the business
double like in a year and that's
typically not in the model like versus
just get a model place you understand
what's happening figure out where your
how your business operates but beyond
that it's like okay you can continuously
for the first you know 12 18 24 months
you can make pretty good improvements to
a business by really understanding
what's happening figure out what levers
to pull pull the levers get better
results but then to make like step
changes like oh we want to double okay
well that's a fundamentally different
like are Are we off are we doing a
different service offering? Are we
creating a whole new business unit? Are
we changing the value prop? Are we doing
category expansion where maybe we offer
this particular service now but in order
to be able to we need to offer also
another service that we can sell into
the existing customer or take build a
product you know like a SAS product and
take it out to market. It's a separate
company. Like those are step changes and
that's different and that really is up
to the found that's not that's a that's
not my job. That's a fact. Like if you
want to do that, you got to figure out
what the thing I can once you figure out
what that thing is, then fine. Let's go
execute against it. But I can't help you
figure out what a step change is for
your business. That's got to be
typically coming from the founder.
>> Makes sense. Well, look, wait, this is a
there's a section here that I've
introduced for the quickfire round that
we spoke about. And the idea is that
instead of doing me asking you questions
and you answering quickly, I thought
that we could do like a swap notes idea
where I ask you a question and we we you
answer quickly and I answer quickly and
then we go to the next question. Is that
uh
>> perfect idea?
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> So the first one is an an AI tool that
you use every day.
>> Cloud code work.
>> Cloud code for me.
>> Is it cloud code? Okay. I don't code at
all and I'm very I'm just like almost
like anti because I'm just like
something I don't want to learn. But I I
should probably get into it. thing is I
don't code either. I've not written a
single line of code in my life. I've
tried but I just can't get the syntax
right. But uh the the clo code just
writes it for me which is great but yeah
it takes a bit of a there's a bit of
learning curve on there. Next one is one
thing that everyone says about AI that
you think is wrong
>> that it's going to replace it's going to
replace more jobs than it's going to
make.
>> Completely agree with that one. I was
going to say something on the lines of
AI coding. People think that they're
going to give their thinking away to AI
coding but I think you can still keep
your thinking but let AI write the code.
developers are attached to the identity
of writing code. So I think there's an
element of giving up your thinking. You
can still think and let AI do at a
higher level. You think at a higher
level and then AI will do the thinking
at a at a lower level. I think that's
that's a good way to put it.
>> Yeah, I would agree in that uh there is
always going to be a tremendous amount
of value for people who can think
critically that I don't think there may
be actually that gap may widen for
people to do because now they have tools
that just can allow them to be
incredibly productive. But if you just
let Ally do the thinking for you, you're
in I think you're in a world of hurt.
>> Yeah. Yeah. The next one, I think you've
already answered it before, but I'll ask
it anyway. Build it or buy it.
>> Buy it. [laughter]
>> For me, it's build it when I can because
I I love to own the whole stack,
especially if it's something that
customers the customers um end up using.
But I appreciate the point of buying it.
It just saves so much time. Um but I am
I am just one of those stubborn I like
to build it myself kind of people.
>> Sure. I mean I think there's a place for
I think some of it's personality but I
think some of it's dependent on the on
the like what the resources of the
business are because everything that you
build you have to maintain.
>> Correct. Exactly right.
>> Yeah. That so that's where it gets
tricky. Yeah. Because it's easy to build
it's harder to maintain and then if
you're building a lot of different
things and and they're touching each
other if you're not you know if you're
not technically inclined you can't and
you're and you're constrained that's a
that's a job in and of itself and you
may not have the resources internally
for it. And software is like perishable
goods. You have to it literally it goes
off. The software has to be kept up to
date. It has to be maintained otherwise
yeah you run into that problem. And the
next one is what is the last thing the
AI did for you that genuinely surprised
you?
>> That genuinely surprised me. I was doing
some due diligence on a private
placement deal that I had the
opportunity to participate in. And the
research that it was able to do that was
well beyond like what would have taken
me probably two weeks in regards to like
really doing the DD and the research and
finding things that were relevant to the
people that were involved. like it did
like it did a really really good job of
and and being very detail oriented and
very robust and finding information that
I don't know that I ever would have been
like would have ever found.
>> And was that with Claude or was it with
Pexity?
>> It was with Claude.
>> Yeah, it's pretty impressive for
research is really good and Plexity is
really really good for research as well.
For me it was a coffee machine that
broke. I'm not sure if you heard the
latest video that I put out on YouTube,
but I I tell the story there. Basically,
coffee machine, integrated coffee
machine I got at home broke and I I
couldn't take it away and take it to the
shop. I needed somebody to come to the
house
>> and I and it was broke for a month or so
before I got round to looking at it. And
it's just one of those things that you
know it's going to take you time calling
the manufacturer getting put on hold
pass around multiple departments and
just waiting and it's
>> so I I thought I just discovered
perplexity computer which is an AI agent
that it's like open claw but it's more a
clean version I guess where you know
it's not it's not it's more secure. So I
took a picture of the machine and the
model number was in there and I uploaded
the picture to the computer and I said
the machine's broken. This is the
problem. This is where I am. find me a
uh somebody to fix it and off you go.
And then suddenly I got an email, a
notification back on Plexity saying they
can come on Tuesday. This is what it's
going to cost. And I approved it.
Somebody called me. They came to the
house. I maybe spent 10 15 minutes if
that between Perplexity and the guy that
came to the house letting him in. But
yeah, the machine was fixed. It was
really like a an aha moment at the time
because uh I never used an agent
functionality before because I connected
my Gmail to it. So it's able to do all
that for me.
>> Nice. Yeah, it's a I mean it's
spectacular. What the efficiency and the
personal gains that that you can get
from from using it that where you just
where you get time back. You just get a
lot of time back.
>> Exactly. But what's one thing that you
wouldn't hand over to ever?
>> I don't know about ever. But right now
I'm not like I'm not connected to any my
financial data. Not from a business but
from a personal perspective like I'm
just not doing it. Not yet. I don't know
that that's will always be the case but
I'm I'm not comfortable with that yet.
>> Yeah. I think I agree with not handing
over and in particular with software
it's not handing over the keys uh
because you have to keep your
environment variables secure because
that again that has it could potentially
have financial repercussions but also
security implications.
>> So yeah, it's sensitive information and
that's a valid point. There's still not
I wouldn't hand it over to to one of the
big one of the big AI companies. Well,
I've got Cloud Co-work connected into
like all my different work emails, but I
won't connect it to my personal like I
just because there's a lot of person,
you know, I've got all my tax filings in
there. I've probably got my kids birth
certificate number like just stuff in
there that I'm just like
>> I don't know they need to have access.
>> Not quite yet. Yeah. Yeah. That's why
I'm surprised that all these companies
that I said earlier, this type of
company that's this delivering this
personal assistant product that requires
you to connect your company Slack, your
company email, your company drive, how
are they going to get around the the
friction? Because as a company owner, I
don't feel too comfortable giving away
all my company data to this company
that's probably a startup that is just
going to copy everything everything into
their database. That's scary.
>> Yeah,
>> that's something they're going to have
to overcome and I'm not sure exactly how
I would sell that.
>> I'm not technical enough to know like
how that gets handled on the back end,
but I definitely don't want to be on the
bleeding edge of that. I'll let other
people go first and they'll take the
they'll take the bullets and then as it
settles down and it gets more
standardized and I'm sure there'll be an
opportunity to step in and you don't
have to absorb as much risk.
>> Got one more um one or two more. What's
one piece of growth advice that uh it
refuses to die that just doesn't work
but it just keeps being pushed.
>> Mass email I think [laughter]
>> it's like in bulk like bulk anything. I
just think bulk anything is dead.
>> Yeah, it has to be custom. You can still
do it in bulk, right? Customize it,
right? Make it about them.
>> Be personalized and it has to be about
them. And it can't just be personal
like, "Oh, I saw that you're connected
to my friend on LinkedIn." Or, "Hey, I
saw that you, you know, you posted and
your dog's name's, you know, chick and
I've got a dog, too." Like, it's gota,
you know, it has to actually be fairly
it's got to be relevant and then it has
to be specific about how like how are
you gonna help?
>> Exactly. So, what would that what would
you say is that one piece of advice
you'd say for somebody building in the
AI era? Would it be that or would it be
something different?
>> I don't think I'm have a good answer for
that, dude. Because I'm seeing a lot of
people because look, man, I'm almost 50,
right? Yeah. And so, you know, I'm lucky
in regard where I've had some success in
my career. Um, but, you know, I still
need to work for a little bit and and
and
>> I'm seeing solo young founders build
like just build incredible things really
quickly and get off to a hot start. And
it's just like, man, I'm like I'm like
I'm sure that's possible for me, right?
But I'm also like 49. I don't know that
I want to go down that path necessarily.
So I don't have a great insight into
that. If you're still I mean I watch my
son, he's 12. He loves lovable and this
is because of me. Like he he loves he
building stuff. I was like dude that's
amazing. Um that you love to do that. So
I think the one advice would be just
find something you're interested in and
try to apply the ability to build
something with AI that's related to your
interests because I don't know where
else to go like I don't know what else
to where things are going to go. So try
to find some I think it's try to find
something you're really interested in
and then try to build something that's
related to that. You know I think that
goes a lot further than trying to like
I'm trying to look for a wedge in the
market and trying to find a way to make
a buck. So just just find just follow
your edge. I think the thing with AI,
you can follow your interest in so many
different places and actually do things
that are that maybe you couldn't do
before and try that to start and then
see where you go.
>> That advice is timeless. Do you know
follow your interests, do what you love.
Don't chase the money, chase your
interests. That's that's timeless.
>> Yeah, I think and do what you love, I
think, is sometimes gets is a little
tricky. I do think if you have some
interest, now's the time to you can
now's the time to follow them because
you can probably monetize it more so
than you ever could before. And I don't
mean doing it I don't so I don't mean to
make it about the money but you actually
can take interests and find niches and
ways to be able to make money related to
your interest which I don't think was
possible you know for a lot of people 5
10 20 years ago.
>> Yeah. Ultimately that's how you breed
happiness. You follow your interests
which means you're going to end up doing
something you probably will love doing.
So that's that's good point.
>> Yeah that's
>> so wait thank you for your time. What
would you say how how can people reach
out to you and get hold of you?
LinkedIn, that's probably the place. I'm
I've got some other socials, but I'm not
going back to age thing. I don't spend a
lot of time there. Uh, but LinkedIn, I'm
fairly, if not active, at least I'm on
it a lot just to kind of keep up with
what's going on.
>> Okay. I'll link your profile in the show
notes.
>> Cool, man. I appreciate you having me.
Great talking to you.
>> Thanks for your time. Thanks I do.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video features a conversation between the host and entrepreneur Wade Low, a fractional Chief Revenue Officer, regarding the challenges and realities of building, marketing, and running a business in the AI era. They discuss go-to-market strategies, the importance of focusing on outcomes over vanity metrics, the value of 'boring' businesses, and how to effectively integrate AI tools into workflows without losing human focus. They also share a quick-fire round of insights on personal productivity, the future of coding, and the importance of aligning business ventures with personal interests.
Videos recently processed by our community