HomeVideos

If you don't make it about the customer

Now Playing

If you don't make it about the customer

Transcript

1509 segments

0:00

What are you going to do for me? If I

0:02

can pick that up from the messaging,

0:04

then I'm probably willing to talk to

0:05

you. But if this whole message is about

0:06

what you do, nobody cares, man. Look,

0:08

Bootstrap founders that want to grow

0:10

really quickly oftent times have like

0:11

champagne taste and Bud Light budget.

0:13

>> Welcome to building in the age of AI.

0:15

This is a new series that I'm doing

0:17

where I'm sitting down with a founder or

0:18

an operator and we're comparing notes on

0:20

what it actually takes to build, market,

0:22

and run a business in the age of AI. Not

0:24

just a theory, but what is actually

0:26

working in the real world. Our first

0:28

guest is Wade Low. Weighs an

0:30

entrepreneur at heart. He's built and

0:31

exited two businesses, one a SAS, one a

0:34

marketplace, and these days he works as

0:36

a CRO, a chief revenue officer. So, he

0:38

goes into companies and owns the

0:40

revenue. It gets properly embedded with

0:42

a team reporting to him, basically a

0:43

co-founder on demand. And that lines up

0:46

almost too well with where I am right

0:47

now. I'm about to take my own product,

0:49

Olati, to market. And the hardest part

0:51

isn't building its attention. Olati has

0:54

to get noticed in a really noisy world

0:56

where everyone's sending the same emails

0:57

that are going into the same inboxes,

0:59

getting eyeballs, getting customers.

1:01

That's what I'm actually working on

1:03

right now. That's what Wade does for a

1:04

living. So, this isn't an interview.

1:06

This is two operators swapping notes on

1:08

the same problem. And we don't agree on

1:10

everything, which makes this even more

1:11

interesting. Let's get into it. Wade,

1:13

welcome to Building in the Age of AI.

1:14

Why don't we start off tell us who you

1:16

are and what do you do?

1:17

>> Oh, that's a great question. So, the

1:20

easiest way to describe it is I'm an

1:22

entrepreneur at heart. And to describe

1:24

what I do, I I don't I don't know what I

1:27

do at the moment. Like, I'm in So, I'm

1:28

doing I'm I'm owning revenue for a

1:31

couple different companies and doing

1:32

some consulting work uh for another, but

1:35

they're not my businesses. But I sold an

1:38

enterprise SAS business in 24 and then

1:40

took a bunch of time off. And now I'm

1:42

very much kind of trying to figure out

1:45

as I'm still working trying to figure

1:46

out exactly like okay what what does

1:48

this look like? What am I trying to do?

1:50

Where am I trying to go? How do I want

1:52

to add value? And I bounced around from

1:53

a a few different ideas but ultimately

1:55

right now like where I spend my time

1:57

during the day is I'm helping other

2:00

companies grow their revenue at a rapid

2:03

rate. I think that's that's where I'm

2:04

spending the bulk of my day right now.

2:06

>> Yeah. Yeah, I heard you say that you

2:07

jump into businesses and you get

2:09

integrated as if it was your business

2:11

and but you're acting as a consultant.

2:12

Is that right? But you are literally

2:14

acting as a consultant but is you treat

2:15

it like if it's your business.

2:16

>> Yeah, I think consult it's more

2:18

fractional than consultant because

2:19

consultant has very little

2:21

responsibility for the outcome where I

2:23

actually own the revenue for companies

2:26

and I have people directly reporting to

2:28

me and teams of people underneath me. So

2:29

I'm like I'm in I'm I'm operating inside

2:33

a b of a couple different businesses. Um

2:36

so and I have very specific outcomes and

2:39

milestones that I'm personally

2:41

responsible for. um and that and so I

2:45

but I think the reason that companies

2:46

are like that is because consultants

2:49

don't really they they can provide a lot

2:51

of good strategy but they don't have any

2:53

responsibility for the execution whereas

2:55

I I

2:56

>> they just give you advice or something

2:57

and then they walk away

2:58

>> and so I'll actually say I think we

3:00

should do this and then I'll actually go

3:02

execute against that and then I get to

3:04

determine whether my ideas were actually

3:06

useful or not.

3:07

>> So what would you say is your from your

3:08

perspective what is go to market? What

3:10

is a good go-to market strategy

3:12

>> right now? It depends on the business. I

3:14

mean the best gotom market, the easiest

3:17

go to market is when you have a

3:19

tremendous amount of demand and your

3:22

main problems are trying to orchestrate,

3:25

manage, process,

3:28

systematize

3:29

the demand that's hitting you, right? It

3:33

but that's not that's not typical. It's

3:35

not normal. It's great if you have it

3:37

because you can build a tremendous

3:38

amount of momentum extremely quickly.

3:40

But if that's not the case, then you got

3:43

to go get it. And that's where real go

3:46

to market is. You know, sometimes you

3:48

really do have really strong product

3:49

market fit or you've got a really good

3:52

founder, CEO, and personal brand

3:55

mechanism that's attracting a lot of

3:57

potential customers. But assuming that's

4:00

not the case, then how do you actually

4:02

build a a system and build a machine

4:05

that allows you to go get business? And

4:08

that's a very different type of motion.

4:11

>> Yeah. The outbound and and that's that's

4:13

exactly where I am now. I'm in a

4:14

position where I've got to get this uh

4:16

product uh Oli to market the the phone

4:18

system product and and the question is

4:20

do we do we focus on outbound or do we

4:23

focus on my personal brand or do we

4:25

focus on both? What is going to be the

4:26

best approach? And are we doing a should

4:28

we focus on accountbased management

4:29

sales? Should we do pure outbound and

4:31

and do a productled motion growth? So

4:34

all this all these questions are going

4:35

through my mind right now.

4:36

>> So how are you so how are you doing it?

4:37

How are you thinking about it?

4:38

>> The plan at the moment is keep working

4:40

on my personal brand to build an

4:42

audience of like-minded people. But the

4:44

idea is tech techminded founders, CEOs,

4:48

operators, business operators that uh

4:50

share my world view. That's essentially

4:53

who I'm after. And I'm building a

4:55

subscriber base on YouTube, uh, an email

4:58

list through my personal website, and

4:59

it's growing, slowly growing, but it's

5:01

so slow. I mean, I had one video on

5:04

YouTube that did better than the rest.

5:05

An outlier, you could say my usual

5:08

YouTube view videos are getting 300

5:10

views, and this one got 360,000 views,

5:12

but it was I thought when I got this,

5:15

this video hits the 360,000. I thought,

5:18

great, every single video I do from now

5:19

on will get 360,000. But that's

5:21

absolutely not the case. the next video

5:23

got yeah like 5,000 and oh actually the

5:26

next video got 10,000 and the following

5:28

one got to 5,000 but compared to my

5:31

usual videos which got 300 it's lifted

5:33

my baseline which is great and it's also

5:35

given me about 8,000 new subscribers

5:39

that single video did and in total now

5:41

I'm at 9,00

5:44

something subscribers and I've been

5:45

added for six months and the majority of

5:47

those subscribers came over the last

5:48

month so it's uh it's crazy how one

5:51

small thing can make a big impact

5:53

So that's my strategy at the moment.

5:54

>> Is it turning into business? Because the

5:56

only thing that matters in go to market

5:57

if the things that you're doing actually

5:59

turn into leads which turn into ops

6:00

which turn into deals which turn into

6:02

recurring or repeat business right so I

6:05

think especially on the personal brand

6:07

side I think people get wrapped around

6:09

the axle on vanity metrics but there's a

6:14

lot of people that have built personal

6:16

brand with a very small following but

6:18

they're but their following is very

6:20

engaged. Yeah, good point. It doesn't

6:22

matter how many people you have. It's

6:24

about how many people are buying that

6:25

you have.

6:26

>> Correct. Correct. So, is it so I guess

6:28

that's the question like how are you

6:29

measuring? Are you measuring by

6:30

subscribers or are you trying to measure

6:32

by what the actual results?

6:33

>> I'm so early into this that uh to be to

6:37

all to be honest and and all cards on

6:40

the table. We've just decided to rebrand

6:43

the product because it was called Wii U

6:45

before and now we're going to call it

6:46

Olati. Olati is a brand new brand. and

6:49

it doesn't even have a website yet. So,

6:51

I need to build a landing page. I need

6:52

to build the um a list and I'm going to

6:55

make it a essentially a invite only kind

6:58

of a um a weight list method kind of

7:01

thing. So, we're going to have I'm going

7:02

to be pushing people through to the

7:04

latatti website, but I've not started

7:07

marketing for latatti yet because we

7:08

have the product built and we're using

7:10

it with the with Circle Cloud. So,

7:12

through the Circle Cloud, we have a a

7:14

great distribution engine like you know,

7:15

I think we've spoken about it a few

7:16

times. We've got the telemarketing team.

7:18

We've got 25 people dialing out every

7:20

day, actually a bit more now, uh, trying

7:22

to book appointments with owners of

7:24

businesses, uh, small UK businesses. And

7:27

then we have a field sales team that are

7:28

going to see them face to face and and

7:30

sell them a phone system. And it works

7:32

really well for the Circle Cloud model

7:33

because we're signing them into longer

7:35

contracts. We give them more of a white

7:36

glove handheld really like hideouch

7:39

service, which is not really scalable

7:41

for a SAS. We can't really do it on a

7:42

SAS model that that is on a rolling

7:44

30-day contract. So we need to change

7:47

the distribution method for the SAS. So

7:49

the it has to be done on the person on

7:51

the on the online marketing side which

7:53

is going to be either organic content

7:55

through my personal brand and and within

7:57

the Olati brand once it's launched or it

7:59

will be paid ads and and and paid media.

8:02

So I want to try the the organic path as

8:04

much as possible before going on to paid

8:07

or we just scrap it all and we go

8:08

through what we know which is going to

8:10

be more of accountbased marketing uh

8:12

approach.

8:13

>> Yeah. I mean, what's the what's the

8:15

duration? It's there's 30-day contracts.

8:17

It's not a if it's SAS, it's it's not a

8:19

longer term contract.

8:20

>> Yeah, we're planning on doing 30 days uh

8:23

as a standard, but we're going to be

8:25

trying to push people to the annual.

8:26

That's the plan. Uh it's just looking at

8:28

what else is in the marketplace, the

8:30

comparables, if we go in and and require

8:32

a three-year contract, we're just not

8:34

going to be able to compete with with

8:35

other things that are out there. We

8:37

we're trying to differentiate in the way

8:38

that people ask me, what's the USB? What

8:41

makes you different to Microsoft Teams?

8:42

What is the USB? The USB is me. And it's

8:45

difficult to explain that, but it's

8:46

really it's it's my the way I've I've

8:49

crafted the product and the way that my

8:50

I I believe that people should be able

8:52

to communicate in a way that is is not

8:54

happening with the products out there

8:54

right now. There's so much friction.

8:56

There's so much uh noise and and uh in

8:58

terms of the products when you use a

9:00

communications product, it's it's

9:01

cumbersome. An example is Microsoft

9:03

Teams like we're talking about it now.

9:04

If you launch Microsoft Teams and then

9:06

you're going to try and call somebody,

9:07

you press the call and just you hear

9:08

this thing

9:10

b you know that thing that comes up on

9:12

Microsoft Teams, it's so annoying and it

9:14

just delays the process. And then you

9:15

got that cognitive function before you

9:17

even open Teams. Okay, I got to call

9:19

this person. Do I message them on Slack?

9:20

Do I call them on Teams? Do I uh send

9:22

them on WhatsApp? All this debt that

9:24

comes with uh the decision there. So

9:26

what we're trying to do is for a small

9:27

business, eliminate all that and just

9:29

give them a platform that they can

9:30

communicate internally and externally

9:32

really quickly and efficiently. Okay.

9:33

So, it's not going to take you 2 minutes

9:34

to dial when you press the when you when

9:36

you either type a number in because you

9:39

we've removed the dial pad. We just type

9:41

it with a keyboard. Or you can use our

9:43

voice command feature to make the to

9:44

initiate the call. It's instant. So, the

9:46

idea is it is super quick to initiate

9:48

the call. It's ringing straight away and

9:49

it gives you we've put a lot of

9:51

attention into the the the the

9:53

finetuning of the product. We've had

9:56

time to do that. We've been spending

9:57

we've spent the last four years building

9:58

this product way too long. But the I

10:01

guess the the the card we had up our

10:04

sleeves is that we've got Circle Cloud

10:05

in the background. So Circle Cloud, the

10:06

distribution engine that's already

10:08

working, that's already selling the

10:09

system and is funding this is is allowed

10:12

us to be able to to spend so much time

10:14

fine-tuning the product and get it to a

10:16

point that we we've designed it with

10:17

with you know a lot of attention to

10:19

detail and that's what I think we're

10:21

going to try and go to market with but

10:22

it's such an unknown.

10:24

>> Do so do you have customers outside of

10:26

CircleCloud? Like is anybody using it

10:28

outside of your own ecosystem yet?

10:31

>> No. No. So we we've only got four

10:33

customers of Circle Cloud using it

10:35

externally. Everybody else is using it

10:36

internally.

10:37

>> Right. So you have So you have four PE

10:39

but you do have four customers that are

10:41

using it externally.

10:42

>> Yeah, we have four customers that are

10:43

outside of us internally using it. They

10:46

are circle cloud customers. We just

10:47

moved them over to to Olati,

10:50

>> but they are using it in production for

10:51

their main business phone system. And we

10:53

are going to keep introducing new uh

10:56

customers which again is a great way to

10:57

fine-tune the product because we can

10:58

discovering small bugs and things that

11:01

we didn't realize at the time of

11:02

building it that the real world teaches

11:04

you which is when by correcting this now

11:06

when we do go to market with the SAS

11:08

it's it's going to be much more stable

11:10

and reliable because we're not going to

11:12

have those bugs that we've already

11:13

discovered by using it or introducing it

11:15

to our existing customer base. You'll

11:16

have but you'll find you'll find more

11:18

users or

11:19

>> oh of course I know

11:20

>> in that regard they'll they'll

11:21

definitely and they'll help you know

11:23

it'll help you if you're paying

11:24

attention because it'll help refine the

11:26

product. We did that. I had there was a

11:28

business called Sitefill that I was a

11:30

co-founder in um we then built a

11:33

technology platform to service that

11:35

business and then spun out the the

11:39

actual software as a standalone company

11:42

um and and had obviously a very

11:44

different business model. It was a SAS

11:46

business. That was the business that we

11:47

sold in 2024. But we started the same

11:50

way where we actually it started off by

11:52

servicing the existing company that we

11:55

had founded and then we spun it out as a

11:57

standalone company. That that software

11:59

business then grew and then we sold we

12:02

sold that. And what we found by going

12:04

through that like you're spinding is

12:06

that how we used how the the original

12:09

company used it internally was not

12:11

exactly aligned with how the market was

12:13

going to use it. But it was great to so

12:15

we had a good first use case and it got

12:17

us 80% of the way there and then by

12:20

going out to market and getting other

12:22

companies that were outside of the

12:24

ecosystem onto the platform. There was a

12:26

whole bunch of stuff that we just

12:26

weren't aware of um that we ended up

12:29

improving and refining and iterating and

12:32

and building out to to to make it be

12:34

able to suitable for the whole market

12:35

versus just for us. And you'll probably

12:37

go through the same thing.

12:39

>> That's super interesting. Is that the

12:41

because you you've been involved in a

12:42

SAS and also a marketplace. This is this

12:44

the one that you're talking about?

12:45

>> Yep. The market was the marketplace and

12:47

then we built a software for the for the

12:49

we built a a SAS platform that we pulled

12:51

out of we pulled out of that.

12:53

>> Got it. Got it. Got it. Well, let's see

12:55

how many pivots we have to make. That's

12:57

the that's the unknown.

12:59

>> Yeah. Well, and you won't know until you

13:00

get people in it and banging away on it,

13:02

right? It's the only way that's the only

13:04

way you're going to find out. And and

13:05

that's I mean the fact that you guys

13:06

have been doing it for four years though

13:08

and that that you're using it yourself

13:10

internally. You're gonna I mean you're

13:12

going to have a product that's viable

13:14

for the market. It's just like what

13:15

adjustments do you need to make to be

13:17

able to service different types of

13:18

customers?

13:19

>> Yeah, exactly. I read something about

13:21

you being focused and actually we when

13:23

we spoke last you mentioned this being

13:25

focused on I think what you call the

13:27

boring businesses. What do you mean by

13:29

that and and why is that your is that

13:31

your strategy? It wasn't a strategy,

13:33

man. Like I was talking to a a company

13:35

that I do work with yesterday and we

13:37

were just talking about fails on with

13:39

the sales team. I'm talking about

13:40

face-toface meetings and you need to go

13:41

out and have face to face meetings and

13:43

it's and they're talking about bringing

13:44

product with them to be able it's a

13:46

physical company so I'm bringing product

13:47

with them to go do to go do the meetings

13:49

and I was and I shared a story about

13:51

when I started my career. I was 21 years

13:54

old. This I'll get to your point though.

13:55

It'll take a minute. But I was 21 years

13:56

old and I was trying right out of

13:58

college and I was working for a plastics

14:00

packaging manufacturing company and I

14:03

was covering the southeast. So I had

14:04

five states and I didn't know dude I

14:06

didn't know what the I was doing,

14:07

right? I was just like went and trained

14:09

for like a couple months and I was

14:11

planted in a I was working remotely at

14:13

21. So that I've been doing for a long

14:15

time and I was on a plane every week and

14:16

I was at different cities and I had

14:18

customers. I was going to try to talk to

14:19

them or I had prospects I was trying to

14:20

go find. But we manufactured bottle

14:23

caps. So, and not like beverage caps,

14:26

like shampoo and nail polish, like all

14:28

the fancier type of bottle caps. Like

14:30

that's what the business did, right? So,

14:32

that was my first job. And that is a

14:34

boring business, you know.

14:36

>> You were on the road as an exec.

14:37

>> I was an a Yeah. At time we weren't

14:39

called AE. They were called a sales rep

14:41

or an account manager, right? Like AE

14:43

didn't even exist. That was late 90s.

14:46

And that's what I did. And I had and we

14:48

would have to I brought a tackle box

14:51

full of samples and caps that we could

14:53

show. So I had to show people when I was

14:54

sitting across from right like that is a

14:56

bor and that's a great way. It's a very

14:58

good company. It was very wellrun and

15:00

they're very professional. It's a great

15:01

training ground but that's a boring

15:04

business. And then I got into other

15:06

businesses that so I ended up what I

15:08

found is I think I have a unique skill

15:10

set to be able to help companies that

15:14

are it's really hard differentiate be

15:17

able to differentiate and sell because

15:19

if you can if you can sell and drive

15:21

revenue inside of businesses that are

15:23

not like cutting edge and first to

15:24

market but have been around for a long

15:26

time and have a lot of comp have a lot

15:28

of competition that is a very unique

15:30

skill set to have which I found and I

15:32

didn't do it on purpose. just kind of

15:33

how my career navigated. And then when I

15:36

was in the marketplace was around fuel

15:38

like fuel is a nonsexy business and a VP

15:42

of sales that was a was also a

15:44

marketplace for heavy construction

15:46

equipment like heavy equipment for

15:48

construction job sites like also not as

15:51

a very boring type of there's a lot

15:53

going on but it's not super sexy. But

15:55

what I found is if you can do well in

15:57

those environments then you can do well

15:59

in anybody. So, when I'm looking to hire

16:01

salespeople, I don't want people that

16:04

have been at companies that were really

16:07

well known and raised a bunch of money

16:09

and had a pole motion on them because

16:11

were they really selling or were they

16:13

just they're they had so much momentum

16:15

behind the brand that they're just

16:16

taking orders. Like that's not that's

16:18

not selling. Like that's order taking.

16:20

There's a very big difference between

16:21

selling and order taking. And so you

16:23

look for people that have been in

16:24

environments where there wasn't they

16:26

weren't the big brand. They couldn't

16:27

just call and say, "Hey, I'm with Amazon

16:30

and I'd like to take a meeting with

16:31

you." Be like, "Okay." Right? Like, "I'm

16:32

with AWS or I'm with Microsoft or I'm

16:35

with Deal or I'm with RAMP." Right? Like

16:38

just those are easy. That's easy to get

16:40

meeting set up when you're those when

16:42

you work for those brands. So, you're

16:43

looking for people that have been in, I

16:45

think, nonsexy type of environments that

16:47

have done well. Those are the people

16:49

actually know how to sell. Um, and you'd

16:51

want a bunch of them on your team. And

16:53

so anyway, so the point being is around

16:54

that that though I didn't intentionally

16:57

go down that path. It just happened to

16:58

be where I landed, but I stayed there.

17:00

But I but it's it's served me well

17:03

because it I think I' I think it's

17:06

really sharpened my skills. And there's

17:09

also not if you've been doing it for a

17:10

long time, there's just not it's not as

17:12

there's not as much highlevel

17:14

competition. You're not competing with

17:16

people out of Silicon Valley. No, just

17:18

not. And that's okay. Okay, there's

17:20

nothing wrong with with people in the

17:22

space, but that's a different type of

17:24

competitive landscape, right? Where this

17:27

is not that and it's very beneficial

17:30

because I think it's easy to be

17:32

recognized and demonstrate a different

17:35

level of professionalism that people

17:38

appreciate because they're not used to

17:39

getting it.

17:39

>> Yeah, we hire sales team, sales people

17:43

uh frequently. We have a revolving door

17:45

that we call it of telemarketers because

17:47

it's a really tough job to do. So they

17:49

come and they go, but in particular the

17:51

field sales guys, these are the real uh,

17:54

you know, the hunters. We we've had some

17:57

in the past that are just not hungry for

17:58

it. But the ones we have, they're on

18:00

commission only and they earn really

18:01

good money

18:02

>> and they're they're hungry for it.

18:03

They're driving around. Sometimes they

18:05

spend, I don't know, six hours in a day

18:08

driving from appointment to appointment

18:10

and then they spend two, three hours in

18:11

each meeting and they have really long

18:13

days, two, three meetings a day and

18:16

yeah, they they're hungry for it.

18:17

they're good sales people and it's

18:19

difficult to find a team of good sales

18:21

people. So when you go into a business

18:22

as a let's say fractional CRO

18:25

>> what do you do with a team in there? Do

18:27

you do you recommend to the CEO hey we

18:30

need to founders and CEOs we need to

18:31

replace your guys or do you train them

18:33

or do you do a bit of both?

18:34

>> It's a bit of both but oftentimes it's

18:37

like one of the companies I'm with right

18:39

now there's only one salesperson that

18:40

was there when I started.

18:42

>> How many did you how many were there

18:43

when you started?

18:44

>> I'm not going to get into the details

18:45

but there was a lot more than one. Um, I

18:48

mean only there's only one the team

18:50

still there's still a team there now,

18:51

but it's all different people. She's the

18:53

only one that made it through that

18:55

process and it wasn't because we fired a

18:59

lot of people. It's just that the

19:01

expectation and the standard gets set

19:04

and then when there's more visibility

19:06

into like, oh, there's performance

19:08

metrics and oh, we're going to actually

19:09

report on how things are going. Oh,

19:11

we're going to hold you accountable and

19:13

support, right? Right? It's not just

19:14

hold you accountable. It's it's hold you

19:16

accountable and train. Some people don't

19:18

want it, right? And it gets really

19:21

apparent very quickly if you're doing

19:23

well or not because there's a big gi

19:25

unlike any other department, there's a

19:26

big giant scoreboard and if if you and

19:30

if you're looking at the school and if

19:31

you make the scoreboard public so that

19:33

everybody sees it every day, the people

19:34

that are underperforming get very

19:36

uncomfortable, right? And and it's very

19:38

and they it's very apparent who's doing

19:40

well and who's not. And the ones that

19:42

are underperforming on an ongoing

19:44

regular basis and then don't want to do

19:45

the work to get coached up, they

19:48

typically just navigate their way out of

19:50

the business versus having to be told

19:52

that they need to be that they shouldn't

19:54

work here. They go find something else

19:56

to do. That's typically happens.

19:58

>> You raise the bar

19:59

>> and then it it's a natural selection

20:01

from that point, isn't it?

20:02

>> Correct. And you've got to be able it

20:04

can't just be raise the bar and then not

20:06

make any changes internally as well to

20:09

support them. There's got to be

20:10

training. There's got to be there's

20:12

there's there's a there's al it's it's

20:14

two-sided. There's the expectation and I

20:17

firmly believe this. I grew up in sales.

20:18

There is the expectation that the people

20:22

in the seats have to perform at a

20:24

certain level, but at the same time the

20:26

business also has to do what it needs to

20:28

do to be able to support because you

20:31

can't give somebody a quota that's

20:32

unobtainable and say, "Hey, you have to

20:34

hit this now." If the business isn't

20:36

doing what it needs to do to be able to

20:37

make sure that if the right person is in

20:39

the seat, they can't hit it, you know,

20:40

and that's where there's that's where

20:42

that's where sometimes I think younger

20:44

founders struggle a little bit that like

20:46

that because you can make them you can

20:48

make a model do whatever you want,

20:49

right? And so I just will the revenue I

20:51

want to see the revenue at this, you

20:53

know, move up to this level. It's like

20:54

okay, great. But how like what's the

20:56

business doing to make sure that that's

20:58

actually possible? Not just that you

21:00

want to see it that way.

21:02

>> It needs to be realistic. And when you

21:03

go into a business, do you transform or

21:06

introduce any new technology? How are

21:07

you using AI right now for your when

21:09

when you're in a business?

21:10

>> Uh, I mean, everybody's trying to figure

21:12

that out, dude. So, yes, using

21:14

technology. I mean, personally, like I

21:16

use cloud co-work. That's what I do

21:18

personally. And it's [clears throat]

21:19

connected into all my different It's

21:21

connected to my email. It's connected to

21:22

my calendar. It's connected. I've got

21:23

projects inside of co-work that are

21:25

associated with the different companies

21:26

that I do work with. doing some personal

21:28

side projects that I have going on that

21:29

are unrelated to anything like this,

21:31

more like passion projects. Um, so for

21:34

me, that's what I personally use is kind

21:36

of my orchestration layer to be able to

21:39

see what's going on and what's

21:40

happening. And then inside the

21:41

businesses depends like in one business

21:44

we use HubSpot and HubSpot rolled out uh

21:47

and some AI functionality and tooling

21:50

that as a beta that we were one of the

21:51

testers on. It's actually really good

21:53

and specifically for our SDR BDR team

21:55

and it's actually a really good tool.

21:56

like because I don't want to have to

21:57

build everything from scratch. Like it's

21:59

not super helpful. But then in other

22:00

instances, we're using a company called

22:02

um there's a company out there called

22:04

Growth Band that handles like email uh

22:07

email box warm-ups and the ability to be

22:09

able to send and using AI to be able to

22:11

write some messaging and it's you know

22:12

there's definitely you got to have human

22:14

in the loop on that because if you just

22:17

let the AI do the messaging right it's

22:19

not always really great but you can get

22:22

70% of the way there and then like on

22:24

another side it's instantly AI is a tool

22:27

that we use Apollo's obviously a tool

22:29

tool we use. We're doing some homegrown

22:32

build out of agents internally for

22:34

inbound to be able to process inbound

22:36

more effectively and do some lead

22:37

routing and scoring and messaging back

22:39

for like tier four leads. So, it depends

22:42

on the company and it depends on what

22:45

tech stack they already have or don't

22:47

have. And then it's how much of it do

22:49

you want to build and how much of it do

22:50

you want to buy. You know, I think it's

22:52

okay to build some things. I don't think

22:54

it's great if you're not a soft if

22:56

you're not if you don't have a team of

22:57

engineers. I don't think it's great to

22:59

be building 15 agents because

23:02

>> you got to manage them,

23:03

>> right?

23:03

>> Exactly. There's a bunch of new

23:05

companies that I'm seeing app popping

23:07

up. And I think it's a wave, a new wave

23:10

that's coming of the whole personal

23:11

assistant AI thing where you connect

23:13

your tools to it, be it Gmail or

23:16

whatever email you use, Slack or

23:18

whatever chat system you use, whatever

23:20

phone system you use, meeting nodes. it

23:22

essentially because it's got the

23:24

connection to all these tools, it knows

23:26

all the context of what you're doing at

23:28

work

23:28

>> and that's when it can really become

23:29

useful. The question is who's going to

23:31

crack this so it works properly. There's

23:33

so many companies that I'm seeing out

23:35

there that are starting to build this

23:36

and it's really the the one that cracks

23:38

this or it might not be a single

23:39

company. It might be just a joint I mean

23:41

it might be Claude that does this with

23:42

all the integrations that it's got but

23:44

it's having that context that's context

23:46

is key right now.

23:47

>> Yep. Yeah. Yeah. And the um and tools

23:49

for the sake of tools like what outcome?

23:51

At the end of the day, it's all about

23:52

outcomes. Like what outcome are we

23:54

getting? Is this making things better or

23:55

not, right? Are we getting better

23:57

outcomes? If the answer is no, then stop

23:58

doing it. Like I don't think you just

24:00

have to run full force into the AI wall

24:03

because everybody's doing it. I mean, be

24:04

selective about what you're trying to

24:06

do. And look, if you're not tech and

24:07

companies that I work with are not we're

24:09

not they're not super technical. So

24:11

that's a very different conversation

24:12

than if you go into like again like a

24:14

Silicon Valley company where you've got

24:16

teams of engineers. you're going to use

24:18

AI differently than teams that don't

24:19

have those resources. And so what's the

24:22

what's the best way to be able to do

24:24

that without overwhelming a very and I

24:26

work with bootstrap companies, right? So

24:27

you're always constrained by capital,

24:29

you're always constrained by resources,

24:30

you're always constrained by talent. So

24:32

if you just start to go in and start and

24:34

start throwing a bunch of stuff for

24:37

people to do that are already

24:39

constrained and there's no real strategy

24:41

and there's no real, you know, practical

24:43

use application or results that are

24:45

being driven, then stop doing it, right?

24:47

And then figure out like where do where

24:48

are you going to actually get good

24:49

results and have an impact versus just

24:52

trying to have everybody use it for the

24:54

sake of using it

24:55

>> and not throw a bunch of tools at it.

24:56

You mentioned talking about tools Apollo

24:58

earlier and in reality most businesses

25:01

have access to the same tools more or

25:03

less. So how do you how do you stand out

25:06

or get noticed or just uh get the

25:08

attention of people right now if

25:09

everybody's got the same tools in in

25:11

outbound in particular?

25:12

>> Is it the people? Is it literally the

25:14

people because people buy from people or

25:15

is there a way with a particular way of

25:17

doing email marketing or LinkedIn

25:19

approaches? Do you see like a something

25:21

that's working better than others? Some

25:23

approach

25:23

>> I do. So it has to be multi-pronged, but

25:27

phone calls are are definitely getting

25:29

the best the best result. I mean, send

25:31

the email, but you got to make the phone

25:32

calls. So you got and you see that I

25:33

mean, you've got a team of people that

25:34

make phone calls all day, right? That

25:36

that there is as much as people don't

25:38

want to do that, there is no way around

25:40

not doing it. If you rely exclusively on

25:42

digital, unless again, you've got that

25:43

inbound demand hitting, you've got so

25:45

much product market fit that the

25:46

market's pulling you, that's different.

25:49

But most companies don't have the luxury

25:50

of that. So you have to go get it. So

25:52

call is important. Um, the other thing

25:54

that's important about the, at least

25:55

what I found on the messaging on the

25:57

email side is that you have to very

26:00

clearly state

26:02

what problem it is that you're going to

26:04

solve for them and and do it concisely.

26:08

So, whatever their like one of the

26:09

companies I work with like risk

26:11

mitigation is the thing like we tested

26:13

some messaging, sending things out. The

26:14

ones that got the best response were

26:15

around risk mitigation. That's that's a

26:17

real situation that companies are trying

26:18

to deal with. So it's like okay so the

26:20

messaging is going to be around how we

26:21

help companies with risk mitigation

26:23

specifically on you know certain

26:25

projects that they're that they're

26:26

working on. Um but you got to find out

26:28

it can't just be blank first of all it

26:30

can't be blanketed just standardized

26:33

messaging and it certainly can't be

26:35

about you. It has to be about them

26:37

because if you're just describing what

26:38

you do nobody gives a like they

26:41

care about them. They don't care about

26:43

you right? Especially they don't know

26:45

you. So, if they're going to bother to

26:46

read something, it's got to say, "What

26:48

are you going to do for me?" And if I

26:51

can if I can pick that up from the

26:52

messaging, then I'm probably willing to

26:54

talk to you. But if this is just like,

26:55

"Hey, this is this whole message is

26:57

about what you do." Nobody cares. Nobody

26:59

gives a

27:00

>> Yeah. So, he's making it about outcomes

27:01

for them. There's a guy, I think he's

27:02

called Jordan Crawford. Have you heard

27:04

of him? He does like something he's got

27:06

a product called Blueprint GTM and and

27:08

he's got this whole approach about

27:10

sending cold emails, but they emails

27:13

people would pay to receive. There was a

27:15

one example that he gave of this

27:16

trucking business. I think it was a

27:18

trucking business or it was a uh a plant

27:20

hire business. That was right. And he he

27:22

got he he looked at uh different

27:25

permits, construction permits that have

27:26

been granted around the area where the

27:28

plant hire company was was uh was

27:30

renting out his equipment. And it sent

27:33

uh a bunch of emails to plant hire

27:34

companies in the area saying there's

27:36

this construction project that's being

27:37

uh that's coming live or it's just come

27:39

live based on the rates of your

27:41

equipment rental. This is an opportunity

27:42

of this much for you. and you know

27:44

here's here are the details of this lead

27:47

and if you want more of those let me

27:48

know something like that it's just

27:50

providing value straight away and then

27:51

you just want the reply saying yes give

27:53

me more and that's that's a great way in

27:55

>> yeah what's the name of that company

27:56

because I may call him later today

27:58

[laughter]

27:59

>> yeah so I think that the the key is on

28:02

the the what is it in for the for the

28:04

customer right

28:05

>> making it about them

28:06

>> it's always got to be about them I think

28:08

that gets lost a lot of times because

28:09

there's such a focus on growth growth

28:12

growth hit your numbers, hit your

28:14

targets, right? And so there's this

28:16

there's this natural pressure that sales

28:18

people feel that I have to close deals.

28:20

And so if I have to close deals, like it

28:23

creates this kind of energy about you

28:25

that is less about the customer, more

28:27

about you. And that's

28:29

>> desperation.

28:29

>> Yeah. It comes from the top, you know,

28:31

so

28:32

>> people can smell it. And and you work

28:33

with obviously coming from the top, you

28:35

work with directly with founders. And

28:37

you mentioned that you work with

28:38

bootstrap companies. So I'm assuming

28:39

it'll be founderled businesses and

28:41

businesses run by founders, right?

28:42

Typically, yes.

28:43

>> How do you find because I heard you say

28:45

once that the business takes on the

28:47

personality of the founder?

28:48

>> Yeah.

28:49

>> How how is it Have you got any examples

28:51

that you've ever seen a business either

28:53

become toxic or where where it's it's

28:56

basically taken on the personality of

28:57

the founder, but it's not gone well.

28:59

It's it's the opposite of what should

29:00

have happened.

29:01

>> Yeah. I won't get as I don't want to

29:03

throw people under the bus so I won't

29:04

get like super but so yes I've seen that

29:07

one environment in particular was just

29:09

very young founder and and didn't quite

29:12

know what he was doing yet but was very

29:14

intense and very um I think he just

29:18

believed that and it's not anybody I

29:20

work with now by the way but I think he

29:21

just believed that by force of will he

29:25

could make things happen and if he

29:26

wanted it to be so then it must be

29:29

possible to do like maybe but there It's

29:32

like it's the it's always the question

29:33

about how are you going to do that? It

29:35

was very intense and very passionate.

29:37

But that intensity and that passion, you

29:39

know, bled through to the entire

29:41

organization, but because there wasn't a

29:42

great plan around it create a lot of

29:44

panic, you know, because it's just like,

29:46

oh, this is what this is what the CEO

29:47

founder wants and this is what he's

29:49

going to push on and he's not going to

29:50

relent that this is where we're trying

29:51

to go. But there wasn't a good plan

29:53

around how we're going to get there. And

29:55

all that did was create a lot of anxiety

29:58

and work and pressure for people inside

30:00

the business without really a good plan.

30:03

And so it just created a pretty um

30:07

toxic, but it was it was just it wasn't

30:09

a real pleasant environment to be in

30:11

>> because people were stressed because

30:12

they don't know exactly how they're

30:13

going to be doing the the thing that

30:15

needs to be done according to the

30:16

founder when there's no plan. So I get I

30:18

understand that entirely. Yeah.

30:19

>> Yep. And so so the intensity level is

30:21

very high. So everybody's intensity

30:23

level was very high and passion level

30:24

was very high but it wasn't super

30:26

productive. So that would be one example

30:28

in particular.

30:29

>> And when you go in to a business what's

30:31

the first thing that you fix? You

30:32

mentioned earlier that you look at the

30:33

how and you look at the people is that

30:35

what what the first thing is is what is

30:37

the objective and how are you planning

30:38

on getting there?

30:39

>> It's two it's two things. It's what's

30:41

the model like do you have a model built

30:43

like and what assumptions are in the

30:45

model to be able to determine whether

30:46

like what's fine what's the goal where

30:48

you trying to go and then well so

30:50

there's the there's always the well

30:51

where are you trying to go ultimately

30:53

that's kind of always the first

30:54

conversation I have with people is

30:56

because if you don't know where you're

30:57

trying to go I can't help you that's

31:00

there's coaches out there who can help

31:02

you figure out what it is you want to do

31:04

and where you want to go but that's not

31:05

my job my job is you've already

31:08

determined where you want to go and now

31:09

let's figure figure out how to get

31:11

there. And then typically, you know,

31:13

I'll go back to that example I was just

31:15

using. If there's not a plan in place,

31:17

then it's just wishful thinking. So,

31:18

it's like, well, what's the plan? Like,

31:20

have we built a model to say, okay, this

31:22

is how much revenue we're going to do

31:24

this month, and this is how much we're

31:25

going to do the following month, and

31:26

this is what's the headcount associated

31:27

to that? And is there a marketing

31:28

budget? Are we going to lose money for a

31:30

little bit? Are we going to always try

31:31

to stay profitable? Like, and are we

31:32

trying to do inbound? Are we trying to

31:34

do outbound? And if we're going to

31:35

allocate capital to growth, what where

31:36

are we allocating that capital? Is it

31:38

going to be to people? Is it going to be

31:40

to tools? Is it going to be to both? Are

31:42

we trying to take one big bet and place

31:44

it in one place? Are we trying to take

31:45

like six small bets and place them and

31:47

see where that goes? So, so that's that

31:48

all has to ha doesn't have to, but I

31:51

think it's helpful to happen because

31:52

then at least if there's a plan, you can

31:54

talk to the rest of the team like here's

31:56

the plan and maybe it'll and and look

31:58

and if it doesn't work, we reserve the

32:00

right to adjust the plan, but this is

32:02

what we're going to try to do. So, let's

32:03

try to do that and if it's working,

32:05

we'll do more. And if it's not, we will

32:06

we will adjust the plan accordingly and

32:08

we will figure out some other avenues to

32:10

test. Right? And it's okay. I think it's

32:12

okay for people to hear that even from

32:14

the top. They I think sometimes

32:16

especially younger founders are scared

32:17

that if they don't have all the answers

32:19

to the questions that they're losing

32:20

credibility like nobody has all the

32:21

answers to the questions. So just be

32:23

honest about it.

32:24

>> Best to have a plan and change it than

32:25

not have a plan in the first place.

32:26

>> Correct. Or just think your plan is a

32:28

like having a target is not a plan.

32:30

Those are wildly different things. Like

32:33

that's great. It's a target. It's not a

32:35

plan. A plan is how you get to the

32:37

target. And then sometimes like that

32:39

target is not realistic. Or I was

32:42

talking last week like man bootstrap

32:45

founders that want to grow really

32:46

quickly oftentimes have like champagne

32:48

taste and Bud Light budget. Like what?

32:51

Like what do you I hear you. I know. I

32:53

would. Yeah. Of course you want to build

32:55

a you know billion dollar enterprise but

32:58

but you've got a budget that's not like

33:01

companies that do that at scale. They

33:02

raise a lot of money. They have a huge

33:03

balance sheet and then they burn cash. I

33:06

more I guess AI is changing the dynamic

33:07

a little bit on that for sure. There's

33:08

definitely companies that are scaling

33:10

super aggressively that did not are not

33:13

burning through all their cash which is

33:14

very much what it used to have to

33:16

happen. So it's interesting to see that

33:17

play out. But they've still most of them

33:18

have still raised, you know. So you have

33:21

to have like realistic expectations on

33:23

what your growth is going to look like

33:25

if you're not planning on raising

33:26

capital.

33:26

>> You said earlier that you work at um so

33:29

you look at the model, right? But you I

33:30

think you mentioned in a previous uh

33:32

conversation that you work with

33:34

companies of 5 million and above. Is

33:36

that right? 5 to 20 million or something

33:37

like that.

33:38

>> Well, five 5 to 50 in that range. That's

33:41

it.

33:41

>> And then you look at obviously

33:43

increasing their revenue and and

33:45

profitability. You mentioned the model

33:47

is one of the things you look at. How

33:48

many times would you say there's a

33:49

percentage of times that you've had to

33:51

change the model because a business

33:53

that's doing five million in turnover

33:54

and above it's got a they've got a sales

33:56

model. They've got a distribution model.

33:58

They're they're operating. Have you ever

34:00

had to change it?

34:02

>> Yeah, but they don't have but they may

34:04

not actually have a mo like an actual

34:06

model built with assumptions that can

34:08

make it predictable about what's coming.

34:10

Like a lot of times they can take they

34:11

can they have a conceptual model that's

34:14

working but it's not necessarily

34:16

predictable based off of specific

34:18

assumptions that they're trying to drive

34:19

towards.

34:20

>> Makes sense,

34:21

>> right? So when I say model, I mean like

34:23

an Excel spreadsheet with assumptions

34:25

that are built in that if you change the

34:27

assumption, it's going to cascade out

34:28

for the next 18 months like that. And

34:31

typically they don't have that because

34:32

they've gotten to where they are on the

34:34

back of the founder

34:36

>> just by doing what they've always done

34:37

and they're going to get they've always

34:38

what they've always got. that we started

34:40

to marketing and an example now is that

34:41

we've got a a commercial director who

34:43

has he's a king of spreadsheets and he

34:45

knows to the like a person sitting down

34:48

dialing out should make this many calls

34:50

in a day from this many calls we expect

34:52

this kind of contact rate from the

34:53

contact group we expect this many

34:54

appointments from this many appointments

34:55

how many will sell and this whole thing

34:58

trickles down and we know exactly what

35:00

the unit economics are of one single

35:02

person sitting down and that's the

35:03

amount of time they're sitting down for

35:04

and that's I guess what you mean by

35:06

model is having it all modeled out and

35:07

and detailed

35:08

>> correct and a lot of companies don't

35:10

have that, right? like is they don't

35:12

have that level of granularity and then

35:14

it's because the nice thing about that

35:16

is is be you can p it's easier to

35:19

predict like what's going to happen in

35:20

the future

35:21

>> especially if you see the some of the

35:23

assumptions starting to trend up or down

35:25

you can kind of you can figure out okay

35:26

what is that going to mean three months

35:28

from now where I think it gets

35:29

challenging one of the things I'm

35:31

challenged with right now with companies

35:32

is there's incremental changes which is

35:34

often time you can play around with the

35:36

model and find the changes to help grow

35:39

20% a year but then there's like step

35:42

changes and the step changes are less

35:44

about the model. It's like what are we

35:46

what are we going to do fundamentally

35:48

differently that could help the business

35:50

double like in a year and that's

35:52

typically not in the model like versus

35:54

just get a model place you understand

35:56

what's happening figure out where your

35:57

how your business operates but beyond

35:58

that it's like okay you can continuously

36:00

for the first you know 12 18 24 months

36:02

you can make pretty good improvements to

36:04

a business by really understanding

36:05

what's happening figure out what levers

36:06

to pull pull the levers get better

36:08

results but then to make like step

36:10

changes like oh we want to double okay

36:12

well that's a fundamentally different

36:14

like are Are we off are we doing a

36:16

different service offering? Are we

36:17

creating a whole new business unit? Are

36:20

we changing the value prop? Are we doing

36:22

category expansion where maybe we offer

36:24

this particular service now but in order

36:27

to be able to we need to offer also

36:29

another service that we can sell into

36:31

the existing customer or take build a

36:33

product you know like a SAS product and

36:35

take it out to market. It's a separate

36:36

company. Like those are step changes and

36:38

that's different and that really is up

36:40

to the found that's not that's a that's

36:42

not my job. That's a fact. Like if you

36:44

want to do that, you got to figure out

36:45

what the thing I can once you figure out

36:46

what that thing is, then fine. Let's go

36:48

execute against it. But I can't help you

36:49

figure out what a step change is for

36:51

your business. That's got to be

36:52

typically coming from the founder.

36:54

>> Makes sense. Well, look, wait, this is a

36:58

there's a section here that I've

37:00

introduced for the quickfire round that

37:02

we spoke about. And the idea is that

37:03

instead of doing me asking you questions

37:05

and you answering quickly, I thought

37:07

that we could do like a swap notes idea

37:08

where I ask you a question and we we you

37:10

answer quickly and I answer quickly and

37:11

then we go to the next question. Is that

37:13

uh

37:13

>> perfect idea?

37:14

>> Yeah. Yeah.

37:15

>> So the first one is an an AI tool that

37:17

you use every day.

37:18

>> Cloud code work.

37:19

>> Cloud code for me.

37:21

>> Is it cloud code? Okay. I don't code at

37:23

all and I'm very I'm just like almost

37:25

like anti because I'm just like

37:26

something I don't want to learn. But I I

37:30

should probably get into it. thing is I

37:31

don't code either. I've not written a

37:33

single line of code in my life. I've

37:34

tried but I just can't get the syntax

37:35

right. But uh the the clo code just

37:38

writes it for me which is great but yeah

37:39

it takes a bit of a there's a bit of

37:41

learning curve on there. Next one is one

37:43

thing that everyone says about AI that

37:45

you think is wrong

37:45

>> that it's going to replace it's going to

37:47

replace more jobs than it's going to

37:48

make.

37:49

>> Completely agree with that one. I was

37:50

going to say something on the lines of

37:51

AI coding. People think that they're

37:53

going to give their thinking away to AI

37:55

coding but I think you can still keep

37:56

your thinking but let AI write the code.

37:59

developers are attached to the identity

38:01

of writing code. So I think there's an

38:02

element of giving up your thinking. You

38:04

can still think and let AI do at a

38:07

higher level. You think at a higher

38:08

level and then AI will do the thinking

38:09

at a at a lower level. I think that's

38:12

that's a good way to put it.

38:12

>> Yeah, I would agree in that uh there is

38:15

always going to be a tremendous amount

38:16

of value for people who can think

38:17

critically that I don't think there may

38:20

be actually that gap may widen for

38:23

people to do because now they have tools

38:24

that just can allow them to be

38:26

incredibly productive. But if you just

38:28

let Ally do the thinking for you, you're

38:30

in I think you're in a world of hurt.

38:32

>> Yeah. Yeah. The next one, I think you've

38:34

already answered it before, but I'll ask

38:35

it anyway. Build it or buy it.

38:37

>> Buy it. [laughter]

38:39

>> For me, it's build it when I can because

38:41

I I love to own the whole stack,

38:43

especially if it's something that

38:44

customers the customers um end up using.

38:47

But I appreciate the point of buying it.

38:49

It just saves so much time. Um but I am

38:51

I am just one of those stubborn I like

38:53

to build it myself kind of people.

38:55

>> Sure. I mean I think there's a place for

38:56

I think some of it's personality but I

38:58

think some of it's dependent on the on

38:59

the like what the resources of the

39:00

business are because everything that you

39:02

build you have to maintain.

39:04

>> Correct. Exactly right.

39:05

>> Yeah. That so that's where it gets

39:06

tricky. Yeah. Because it's easy to build

39:08

it's harder to maintain and then if

39:10

you're building a lot of different

39:10

things and and they're touching each

39:12

other if you're not you know if you're

39:14

not technically inclined you can't and

39:16

you're and you're constrained that's a

39:18

that's a job in and of itself and you

39:20

may not have the resources internally

39:21

for it. And software is like perishable

39:24

goods. You have to it literally it goes

39:27

off. The software has to be kept up to

39:29

date. It has to be maintained otherwise

39:31

yeah you run into that problem. And the

39:32

next one is what is the last thing the

39:34

AI did for you that genuinely surprised

39:37

you?

39:37

>> That genuinely surprised me. I was doing

39:41

some due diligence on a private

39:44

placement deal that I had the

39:46

opportunity to participate in. And the

39:48

research that it was able to do that was

39:51

well beyond like what would have taken

39:52

me probably two weeks in regards to like

39:54

really doing the DD and the research and

39:57

finding things that were relevant to the

39:59

people that were involved. like it did

40:01

like it did a really really good job of

40:03

and and being very detail oriented and

40:06

very robust and finding information that

40:07

I don't know that I ever would have been

40:09

like would have ever found.

40:10

>> And was that with Claude or was it with

40:12

Pexity?

40:13

>> It was with Claude.

40:14

>> Yeah, it's pretty impressive for

40:15

research is really good and Plexity is

40:17

really really good for research as well.

40:18

For me it was a coffee machine that

40:20

broke. I'm not sure if you heard the

40:21

latest video that I put out on YouTube,

40:23

but I I tell the story there. Basically,

40:24

coffee machine, integrated coffee

40:25

machine I got at home broke and I I

40:28

couldn't take it away and take it to the

40:29

shop. I needed somebody to come to the

40:30

house

40:31

>> and I and it was broke for a month or so

40:32

before I got round to looking at it. And

40:34

it's just one of those things that you

40:35

know it's going to take you time calling

40:37

the manufacturer getting put on hold

40:38

pass around multiple departments and

40:40

just waiting and it's

40:41

>> so I I thought I just discovered

40:43

perplexity computer which is an AI agent

40:45

that it's like open claw but it's more a

40:48

clean version I guess where you know

40:49

it's not it's not it's more secure. So I

40:51

took a picture of the machine and the

40:53

model number was in there and I uploaded

40:55

the picture to the computer and I said

40:56

the machine's broken. This is the

40:57

problem. This is where I am. find me a

40:59

uh somebody to fix it and off you go.

41:02

And then suddenly I got an email, a

41:04

notification back on Plexity saying they

41:06

can come on Tuesday. This is what it's

41:07

going to cost. And I approved it.

41:09

Somebody called me. They came to the

41:10

house. I maybe spent 10 15 minutes if

41:12

that between Perplexity and the guy that

41:14

came to the house letting him in. But

41:16

yeah, the machine was fixed. It was

41:17

really like a an aha moment at the time

41:20

because uh I never used an agent

41:22

functionality before because I connected

41:23

my Gmail to it. So it's able to do all

41:25

that for me.

41:25

>> Nice. Yeah, it's a I mean it's

41:27

spectacular. What the efficiency and the

41:30

personal gains that that you can get

41:31

from from using it that where you just

41:33

where you get time back. You just get a

41:36

lot of time back.

41:37

>> Exactly. But what's one thing that you

41:38

wouldn't hand over to ever?

41:40

>> I don't know about ever. But right now

41:42

I'm not like I'm not connected to any my

41:44

financial data. Not from a business but

41:46

from a personal perspective like I'm

41:47

just not doing it. Not yet. I don't know

41:49

that that's will always be the case but

41:51

I'm I'm not comfortable with that yet.

41:53

>> Yeah. I think I agree with not handing

41:55

over and in particular with software

41:58

it's not handing over the keys uh

42:00

because you have to keep your

42:01

environment variables secure because

42:02

that again that has it could potentially

42:04

have financial repercussions but also

42:06

security implications.

42:07

>> So yeah, it's sensitive information and

42:09

that's a valid point. There's still not

42:12

I wouldn't hand it over to to one of the

42:13

big one of the big AI companies. Well,

42:15

I've got Cloud Co-work connected into

42:17

like all my different work emails, but I

42:19

won't connect it to my personal like I

42:21

just because there's a lot of person,

42:22

you know, I've got all my tax filings in

42:23

there. I've probably got my kids birth

42:25

certificate number like just stuff in

42:26

there that I'm just like

42:28

>> I don't know they need to have access.

42:29

>> Not quite yet. Yeah. Yeah. That's why

42:30

I'm surprised that all these companies

42:32

that I said earlier, this type of

42:33

company that's this delivering this

42:35

personal assistant product that requires

42:37

you to connect your company Slack, your

42:39

company email, your company drive, how

42:41

are they going to get around the the

42:44

friction? Because as a company owner, I

42:46

don't feel too comfortable giving away

42:48

all my company data to this company

42:51

that's probably a startup that is just

42:53

going to copy everything everything into

42:55

their database. That's scary.

42:58

>> Yeah,

42:58

>> that's something they're going to have

42:59

to overcome and I'm not sure exactly how

43:02

I would sell that.

43:03

>> I'm not technical enough to know like

43:04

how that gets handled on the back end,

43:07

but I definitely don't want to be on the

43:08

bleeding edge of that. I'll let other

43:11

people go first and they'll take the

43:13

they'll take the bullets and then as it

43:16

settles down and it gets more

43:17

standardized and I'm sure there'll be an

43:19

opportunity to step in and you don't

43:21

have to absorb as much risk.

43:22

>> Got one more um one or two more. What's

43:24

one piece of growth advice that uh it

43:27

refuses to die that just doesn't work

43:28

but it just keeps being pushed.

43:30

>> Mass email I think [laughter]

43:33

>> it's like in bulk like bulk anything. I

43:35

just think bulk anything is dead.

43:37

>> Yeah, it has to be custom. You can still

43:38

do it in bulk, right? Customize it,

43:40

right? Make it about them.

43:41

>> Be personalized and it has to be about

43:43

them. And it can't just be personal

43:44

like, "Oh, I saw that you're connected

43:46

to my friend on LinkedIn." Or, "Hey, I

43:48

saw that you, you know, you posted and

43:50

your dog's name's, you know, chick and

43:53

I've got a dog, too." Like, it's gota,

43:55

you know, it has to actually be fairly

43:58

it's got to be relevant and then it has

43:59

to be specific about how like how are

44:02

you gonna help?

44:03

>> Exactly. So, what would that what would

44:04

you say is that one piece of advice

44:06

you'd say for somebody building in the

44:07

AI era? Would it be that or would it be

44:08

something different?

44:09

>> I don't think I'm have a good answer for

44:10

that, dude. Because I'm seeing a lot of

44:12

people because look, man, I'm almost 50,

44:14

right? Yeah. And so, you know, I'm lucky

44:17

in regard where I've had some success in

44:18

my career. Um, but, you know, I still

44:21

need to work for a little bit and and

44:24

and

44:25

>> I'm seeing solo young founders build

44:28

like just build incredible things really

44:30

quickly and get off to a hot start. And

44:32

it's just like, man, I'm like I'm like

44:33

I'm sure that's possible for me, right?

44:35

But I'm also like 49. I don't know that

44:38

I want to go down that path necessarily.

44:40

So I don't have a great insight into

44:41

that. If you're still I mean I watch my

44:43

son, he's 12. He loves lovable and this

44:46

is because of me. Like he he loves he

44:48

building stuff. I was like dude that's

44:50

amazing. Um that you love to do that. So

44:52

I think the one advice would be just

44:54

find something you're interested in and

44:57

try to apply the ability to build

45:00

something with AI that's related to your

45:03

interests because I don't know where

45:05

else to go like I don't know what else

45:06

to where things are going to go. So try

45:08

to find some I think it's try to find

45:10

something you're really interested in

45:11

and then try to build something that's

45:13

related to that. You know I think that

45:15

goes a lot further than trying to like

45:17

I'm trying to look for a wedge in the

45:18

market and trying to find a way to make

45:20

a buck. So just just find just follow

45:22

your edge. I think the thing with AI,

45:23

you can follow your interest in so many

45:25

different places and actually do things

45:26

that are that maybe you couldn't do

45:27

before and try that to start and then

45:30

see where you go.

45:31

>> That advice is timeless. Do you know

45:33

follow your interests, do what you love.

45:35

Don't chase the money, chase your

45:36

interests. That's that's timeless.

45:38

>> Yeah, I think and do what you love, I

45:39

think, is sometimes gets is a little

45:41

tricky. I do think if you have some

45:43

interest, now's the time to you can

45:45

now's the time to follow them because

45:46

you can probably monetize it more so

45:48

than you ever could before. And I don't

45:50

mean doing it I don't so I don't mean to

45:52

make it about the money but you actually

45:54

can take interests and find niches and

45:57

ways to be able to make money related to

45:59

your interest which I don't think was

46:00

possible you know for a lot of people 5

46:02

10 20 years ago.

46:03

>> Yeah. Ultimately that's how you breed

46:05

happiness. You follow your interests

46:06

which means you're going to end up doing

46:08

something you probably will love doing.

46:09

So that's that's good point.

46:11

>> Yeah that's

46:12

>> so wait thank you for your time. What

46:14

would you say how how can people reach

46:16

out to you and get hold of you?

46:18

LinkedIn, that's probably the place. I'm

46:20

I've got some other socials, but I'm not

46:22

going back to age thing. I don't spend a

46:24

lot of time there. Uh, but LinkedIn, I'm

46:26

fairly, if not active, at least I'm on

46:28

it a lot just to kind of keep up with

46:29

what's going on.

46:30

>> Okay. I'll link your profile in the show

46:31

notes.

46:32

>> Cool, man. I appreciate you having me.

46:33

Great talking to you.

46:34

>> Thanks for your time. Thanks I do.

Interactive Summary

This video features a conversation between the host and entrepreneur Wade Low, a fractional Chief Revenue Officer, regarding the challenges and realities of building, marketing, and running a business in the AI era. They discuss go-to-market strategies, the importance of focusing on outcomes over vanity metrics, the value of 'boring' businesses, and how to effectively integrate AI tools into workflows without losing human focus. They also share a quick-fire round of insights on personal productivity, the future of coding, and the importance of aligning business ventures with personal interests.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts