Joe Rogan Experience #2452 - Roger Avary
5231 segments
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
>> The Joe Rogan Experience.
>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
NIGHT. All day.
>> Come on, Roger.
>> Yeah. [ __ ] it. [ __ ] it.
>> [ __ ] it. Go for it. [ __ ] it. We'll do IT
LIVE.
>> YEAH. DO IT LIVE.
>> THAT'S A CLASSIC.
>> YEAH. That's a classic. Look behind the
scenes. [laughter]
>> Do it live.
>> [ __ ] crazy crazy people telling you
the news. Yeah, that that's good. And
the the William Shatner one where uh you
know the um studio guy, you know, he
says uh Shatner is doing some ADR for uh
the cartoon, the Star Trek cartoon, and
he says uh you know, he uses the word
sabotage and he gets corrected by the by
the studio guys. He's like, "Uh, Bill,
it's pronounced sabotage. Please don't
correct me. It disgusts me. It sickens
me. And [laughter] you say sabotage. I
say sabotage.
I absolutely
love William Shatner.
>> My favorite ones are the or uh excuse
me. Uh [ __ ] I can't remember his name.
Um Rose Bud Orson Wells. Jesus Christ.
>> Orson Wells. What happened?
>> You started saying it.
>> I know. What happened? My brain just
[laughter] said nope. No access. When
Orson Wells was doing the Gallow Wine
commercials, remember those days? Like
>> Orson Wells wine
>> before it's time.
>> I know. And then he was like
>> everything was like a exhaustive sucking
of air to come in to see.
>> But then he was making fun of how shitty
the wine was in between takes like he
was angry.
>> Yeah. [laughter]
>> There is a CD that you can get. I can't
remember what it's called, but I have
them at home. And it's like all these
radio things like that where just when
celebrities, you know, lose it on uh
while doing voice over and ADR. It's
hilarious.
>> Orson Wells is a crazy story, right?
Because when he made that movie, when he
made Citizen Canain, which was about
William Randph Hurst. Yeah. William
Randph Hurst essentially shut down one
of the most talented guys alive at the
time, shut down his career.
>> Yeah. Because the movie was kind of an
insult about, you know, the whole thing
about Rosebud is that's the name of his
girlfriend's clitoris.
>> Oh, really?
>> That was his nickname for her clitoris.
And so Orson Wells was doing a kind of
very uh uh like uh like he was jabbing
at him in a very low-level way like
really. Yeah. Rose.
>> How did he know that that was the
nickname of his girlfriend's clitoris?
>> People in Hollywood [snorts] know these
things.
>> Oh boy. Word gets around. [laughter]
>> Word gets around.
>> I would keep that one just to her.
>> Yeah.
>> Who told
>> Yeah, [laughter]
>> that's crazy. But I mean, if you go back
to like War of Worlds and then Citizen
Kane, I mean, this guy was a dynamo. And
then they shut him down. Well, yeah. And
he was doing things that nobody else
would do. It's like he's like, "Oh, I
want the camera down here like on the
phone." Well, we can't get the camera
lens down that low. You like what you're
talking about is impossible to do. And
so he would just grab a like a pickaxe
and just start chopping away at the
studio concrete and dig a hole in the
ground so you could put the camera down
that low.
>> Oh, really?
>> Yeah. He would he was uh obsessed with
getting a a vision on screen that was
even today is so advanced. There's a
shot in the very beginning when uh young
Kane is like a little kid and he's out
there playing with Rose Bud. He's out
there playing with the sled in the snow
and the camera is on him and then it
kind of starts pulling back and it pulls
through a window and then we see his
parents and the uh the trust attorney
and the camera keeps backing up all the
way into the room. Well, to do that in a
studio and to have all that snow and
everything, you need so much light, but
you also need a lot of light inside the
uh because the exposure change.
It's like an amazing, incredible uh
dolly shot, a reverse tracking shot.
It's fantastic.
>> And what year did he do this too,
>> guy?
[laughter]
I don't know the exact year. Uh
>> citizen Kane has to be 40s, right?
>> Yeah. Yeah, probably. It's uh Yeah, it's
in the 19 late 40s, I would think.
[sighs]
>> Is that when it was Jamie?
>> Yeah. Tell us the
>> uh It should be Yeah. 41 is when it came
>> 41. Early early 40s. Early 40s.
>> Wow.
>> Yeah. Wow. Let me see that shot.
>> Time.
>> Can we find that?
>> Wartime. It's a wartime film.
>> What, Jamie?
>> I was I was looking for I was lost in
some other ones.
>> Wartime 40s, right?
>> Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah.
>> I didn't even think of that.
>> Yeah.
>> Oh my god.
>> A lot of stuff going on back then.
>> Probably hard to get people to go to the
movies back then.
>> No, it would be easy to go to the
movies. In fact, wartime and depression
and when things are bad,
>> that's usually the best time for
entertainment because people just want
to escape.
>> Well, that actually makes sense.
Be careful, Charles.
>> Pull your muffler around your neck,
Charles.
>> Kane, I think we shall have to tell him
now.
>> Yes.
>> I'll sign those papers now, Mr.
Thatcher.
>> You people seem to forget that I'm the
boy's father.
>> It's going to be done exactly the way
I've told Mr. Thatcher.
>> There ain't nothing wrong with Colorado.
I don't see why we can't raise our own
son just because we come into some
money. If I want, I can go to court. A
father has a right to. a border that
beats his bill and leaves worthless
stock behind. That property is just as
much my property as anybody's now that
it's valuable. And if Fred Graves had
any idea all this was going to happen,
he'd have made out those certificates in
both our names.
>> However, they were made out in Mrs.
Kane's name. So, in order to maintain
that background exposure of the little
kid in the window and the foreground,
what's what you're not knowing is how
much light they're using on the interior
part in order to create that balance
between the two
>> with the with the film stocks back then.
And the other thing is that table gets
flown in like they move that table into
the shot because it's in the way of the
camera move. Wow.
>> And so there's all sorts of like, you
know, mathematics going on in the
creation of this shot. And most people
would just, you know, be like, "Oh,
just, you know, shoot the kid outside
and then cut inside, you know, just do
it like that." But, you know, Wells was,
I mean, he was thinking on a complete
other level.
>> I just We've robbed We got robbed of so
many films if you really think about it,
what he could have made.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, yes and no. My favorite film
of his is Touch of Evil and there's this
amazing shot in with Charlton H where
he's playing a Mexican and he's got like
this like pencil thin uh you know
mustache this and like Chuck H as a
Mexican is fantastic and then
everybody's so sweaty in the movie and
it takes place in Mexico but it's shot
in Venice, California and so the whole
opening which is this setting of a bomb
in the trunk of a car and then yeah
here's the opening shot and you can tell
that it's actually downtown Venice
And this is supposed to be Mexico.
>> Yeah, this is supposed to be like a
border town in Mexico. I don't know if
it's Tijana or some other border town,
but it's he does this this [snorts]
amazing amazing single shot.
>> Wow.
>> And which back then this is really hard
to do. And this is kind of a um I mean
it's Charlton H essentially saying I uh
I believe in Orson Wells and his vision.
This is
>> That's downtown Venice. There's the
beach is just beyond that.
>> Ah, wow.
>> God, what year is
>> Actually, I'm sorry. The beach might be
behind us.
>> What year was this?
>> 58.
>> Yeah. 1958.
>> Wow.
>> It's an incredible shot. And And this is
incredibly difficult to do as well
because you've got a crane
>> and now you're following the people.
>> Now you're following the people. And
there's Charlton H with his mustache.
And we know as an audience that there's
a bomb in that car, but he doesn't know.
>> Wow.
>> And so, you know, he he's still, you
know, the just the fact that this is all
one shot is crazy. And for back then, I
mean, it's a big deal. Back then, the
camera that you're using isn't just some
little uh handy cam or something like
that now, you know, an iPhone. It's a
Mitchell BNCR, which is a, you know, it
takes four guys to move that camera.
It's made out of cast iron. You know,
it's a a giant camera with a blimp and
uh blimp.
>> A blimp is a a soundproofing device.
It's So, you have the camera and then
you've got to build a giant uh encasing
for the camera
>> because it makes so much noise. [snorts]
>> You don't want to hear that.
>> What did that look like?
>> Um I have one in my home. It's uh
>> Of course you [laughter] do.
>> Well, I that shot's incredible. I I
would have never I didn't know that film
existed. I bought I bought mine from
this commercial director named Charles
Whittenmeer and he had a massive
collection of stuff and then he
liquidated everything. He just kind of
cashed out of Los Angeles and he's he
had a warehouse full of stuff and so I
went in and he's like you know well
here's you can get this and you can get
this. I was like okay the Mitchell BNCR
and we went over to it and he's like you
know this Mitchell BNCR was used uh you
know to shoot uh the Godfather.
>> So that's what it looks like with the
big lid on it.
>> Yeah, that's actually Yeah, that's
basically the camera. That's That's the
camera. I also have some cameras.
>> The blimp is the thing on top of it.
>> Yeah, the blimp is Well, the whole thing
is actually the whole thing is a blimp.
I mean, well, there's there's a smaller
um area
>> with a blimp on it. The the big one like
the whole thing is a blimp. And when you
can actually open up all of these uh
these trap doors on it to reveal the
camera inside of it. And then the reels
that are in There you go. It's There's
an opened one, an opened up one.
>> Wow.
>> That one looks like it's holding an airy
on the inside. in area 100. One of the
things about old movies is they would
let a scene cook. You know, you had so
much time before people would talk and
you just let like the average daily life
sort of play out.
>> Yeah.
>> And it set the tone for the film and
they don't now it's like it's like built
for Netflix.
>> Well, yeah. Well, now you have a white
paper that Netflix gives you and that I
think uh was it Ben Affleck that was
talking about it. you know how you know
you got to have a beat in the beginning
and you've got to have this and this and
this and regular things. I mean there
was this book by Sid Field which was a
screenwriting book um that you know at
one hand it gave a kind of formula on
what a movie should be. you know, by
page seven, your inciting event should
happen, and by page 30, the first, you
know, he had everything mapped out by
page. And that eventually found its way
into the hands of studio executives, and
they were like, "Oh, now we know what a
screenplay is supposed to be structured
like, you know, in order to have proper
story arcs and structures and a
satisfying uh design." And uh and that's
just the next iteration is Netflix
giving you a white paper saying you have
to shoot with these cameras. You have to
uh process at these labs. You have to
have, you know, tech specs that are
within this range. And that's now
extending to story because they've
analytically looked at what audiences
are, you know, able to process now,
which is less and less probably because
of the COVID shot, you know, uh
[laughter] completely frying their
pineal glands. So they can no longer pay
attention to anything. And then on top
of that, the uh the mind control device
of uh cell phones. And um you know, with
all of that, they they're now like,
well, how do we maintain the audience?
And so you end up with white papers.
>> Don't you think it's options, too? It's
almost like if something is not really
fascinating within the first 20, 30
seconds, people just want to let's see
what else is on. They just want to keep
searching.
>> Well, there is that. I mean, there's
something magical about being in a movie
theater. You know, it's uh you know,
you're
>> you're you're in this congregation.
>> You know, Clinton always talks about how
you know, movies are my church. Well, it
is a congregation and you're having
you're sitting in the dark next to
someone you don't even know. They might
have completely different ideologies,
uh, you know, race, creed, color, like
everything is different about them. And
yet you're sitting in the dark next to
them having this ecstatic dream, this
waking dream, sitting like insects
looking at the flicker on the screen,
and you're sharing this kind of
experience that you're physically
trapped in. you like you you don't you
know you don't get up and leave the
theater and well you might if you have
to go to the bathroom or get some
popcorn or something but they'll even
bring that to you now you uh you having
this kind of ecstatic experience
absorbing the movie with someone you
don't know and you're sharing your
bodily electricity with them and I think
this kind of uh this is the magic that
they often talk about of movies it's not
necessarily the the movie itself on
screen it's the shared experience of
being next to people.
>> Yeah.
>> And that
there is a kind of unseen electricity
between people that unifies us. And I
think that there are dark forces in the
universe that are attempting to divide
people up
>> and to take that away to take away that
congregation. Do you really think that
that's on by design or you think that's
just a natural function of streaming and
televisions and phones and having access
to things instantaneously? I personally
think that streaming was by design to
eliminate residuals like
>> by design but isn't it just a function
technology emerging
>> you noticed that all of the executives
well yeah I mean part of it is
technology but technology gets pushed
and brought to the forefront for
specific reasons and
>> you know digital cinema hasn't been the
greatest thing for the creative process
and I think we see that in the works
that we're looking at I mean if you
watch stuff on Netflix and uh whatnot we
can see that it it doesn't have the same
power and impact. And also, you know,
when you were making a movie, when you
were making a film on film, it was like
every time you turn on the camera,
you're burning money. It's like every
single frame is like 4 cents or
whatever, whatever the calculation was.
And so, uh, that was actually an
expensive part of the process. And so,
you know, there was all this preparation
to get everything ready, like, oh, we
want to get all of the the props in
place, you know, right before we shoot
and the actors are in their trailer and
they're figuring out their what they're
going to do. And then you're on your way
to set and people are like, "Hey, I'll
see you in the moment." And what they
mean by that is when the cameras turn on
and you [snorts] actually hear that
happening, suddenly everything pops into
play and suddenly you're you're
performing in front of uh you know,
you're you're
what you're attempting to do is capture
lightning in a bottle and you don't even
know that you have it right away. You
ask your DP like, "Do we have it?" And
it's like, "Oh, well, there was a some
dust in the frame or a hair in the
frame. Let's get another one." and you
get another one and like then you hold
that all in the dark, all that film
because you can't expose it and you send
it off to the lab and then some
alchemist at the lab at the castle, you
know, puts it into a potion and he and
the next day what comes out are these
like little stained glass windows and
you watch it and you realize what you
caught. You're like, "We did it. We we
captured something." Okay, now
everything is different. you uh you
know, you show up on set and
everything's digital and you've got
producers and uh network executives and
broadcasters and everybody's there,
studio people in video village and they
set up like a little tent and
everybody's sitting there in their
Canadian goose uh jackets on high chairs
and they're looking at a big color
corrected monitor and there's a guy
doing color correction in a van and
they're basically watching an
approximation of what it's going to look
like in the the end and they're sitting
there. Okay, on my first film there was
none of that. I had to stand next to the
camera. We didn't even have videotap.
Stand next to the camera and look at the
actors and see did the actors do what I
wanted them to do. And now, you know,
they just turn on the camera and it's it
costs more money to stop the camera and
to restart it again. So, you just let it
roll and you're just like letting it go
and you're like, "Hey, you the director
now is like, hey, go back, start over
and smile this time." And then they redo
it and then the editor is now like
having to take those takes and separate
them in the uh in the editing room and
the actors are like suddenly the moment
is gone in in other words it's vanished.
It's uh
>> is there a way to do both? I mean is it
the medium of film?
>> I mean it seems like it's the but it's
the environment as well. You're
describing an environmental thing,
right? Video village executives.
>> Yeah. The the problem is now suddenly
you've got a chorus of people sitting
there who are like, "Oh yeah, you got
it. I saw he got it. Didn't he get it?
You got it." But you as the director
still have to run back and forth to the
camera and to the actors and everything
and you're like trying to uh keep it all
in place. And
>> look, it it's neither is worse than the
other,
>> right?
>> They are both paint, but one is
watercolor and one is oil paint. And
those are opposingly different. M
>> you know if you were a um an oil artist
during the uh British Renaissance of
watercolor paint where all of a sudden
watercolor came out and everybody wanted
watercolor.
>> Why would you try to make your you know
watercolor paint look like oil or vice
versa? They're just completely different
mediums. They're both paint but they're
different. And so digital has its its
advantages and its purposes. you can,
you know, because you can run like a
long mag of uh of video. I call it
video. Everybody calls it digital
cinema, but that was that was just to
push it through, you know, and and and
actually the technology is different,
you know, with film, light travels
through through the glass. It travels
through a gate. It exposes the silver
and the acetate and uh and and then and
you keep it all in the dark and send it
away. With video, the light travels
through the glass, it strikes the golden
sensor and then it bounces back into the
glass. And that's why video or digital
cinema is flatter by nature than than
most film because it and so to combat
this uh filmmakers have started to do
the exact opposite of what we used to
do. It used to be that you would go to
uh shoot something, you're on you're
outside, you're on set, I've got my
camera on Joe and I have the sun behind
me because I want all that light on you
for the most part. I'm overexaggerating
my point, but and the analogy would be
or the uh the saying would be that at
the end of the day, you go home and the
back of your neck is sunburned because
you've always had the light behind you.
Now, because the image is flatter, they
rotate the camera 180 degrees and they
shoot into the sun to get lens flare.
and lens flare gives you the the the
illusion of depth where there is none.
>> This episode is brought to you by Zip
Recruiter. The best way to learn
anything is to ask questions. Be
engaged, be curious, have a
conversation. Whether you want to know
more about a friend, start a new hobby
like surfing or figure out how your dad
makes the best steak. You're not going
to get any answers just sitting around.
When you're hiring, it's also important
to ask questions to make sure the
candidate is right for your role. That's
why you need Zip Recruiter. It can help
connect you with people who could be a
good fit. And today you can try it for
free at ziprecruiter.com/rogan.
Rated the number one hiring site based
on G2. Zip Recruiter has the features
you need to find the perfect match for
your role, like filters to show you
who's been active recently on the site.
And of course, and most importantly, you
can add screening questions to your job
post to make sure you're talking to
people with the right skill set. Ask key
questions and hire faster with Zip
Recruiter. Four out of five employers
who post on Zip Recruiter get a quality
candidate within the first day. Try it
for free at ziprecruiter.com/rogan.
That's ziprecruiter.com/rogan.
Meet your match on Ziprecruiter. I
always thought that like when you would
watch soap operas, I was like, why do
they look so weird and it's because they
were shooting them on video instead of
on film. Like when we were filming News
Radio, the sitcom, we were doing it on
film and they were like really adamant
about doing it on film. Like they really
wanted it to be on film and then there
was some process where you could make
video look like film and I was like this
is so interesting. It's like we're
design like when you take your photo
with your camera on your phone and you
use portrait mode. Yeah.
>> Which is you blur out the background, so
you're making it shittier.
>> You're doing an artificial
>> Yeah.
>> That's because uh we associate um you
know, we we associate the the faults of
of media as as film. Like people think
of like old movies as Gateweave and
sepiaone and Dustin Scratches and kind
of fast motion. Well, when those movies
were originally made, the motion was
corrected by the cranking of the
projector. And so it was natural motion.
The uh there was no sepia tone change.
There was no dust. It was originally and
and there was no gate weave because it
was a fixed image. The image the
celluloid hadn't yet shrunk or anything
like that. And so uh we now we have this
kind of filter nostalgic filter that we
associate with what an old movie looks
like. And so if you want to make
something look old, you start adding all
this crap to it. You're adding the
faults. And it's the faults of cinema
that actually make it really good. It's
not the perfection of cinema.
>> That's in my opinion
>> because you would never be able to sell
that if that cinema never existed. Like
if cinema never existed and video came
around and then it was normal video like
soap opera style and then someone came
along and said, "Hey, let's make it
blurry in the background and let's like
it's almost like we've become accustomed
to the faults and nostalgically we look
at them as if they're they're it's a
positive and and and it's also led by
you know everything is shot on iPhones
now and so that's becoming the cinematic
vernacular the grammar that uh people
are used to and they they now expect
that in a big movie and so suddenly ly
you see something like the latest James
Gun Superman or Gile Gilmo Del Toro's uh
Frankenstein and they've got these crazy
wide lenses where there's no distortion
and you know kind of infinite depth and
and they're shot in a in a very large
format but what they're replicating is
an iPhone,
>> right? And it just I I I watched both of
those movies and I thought, okay, both
of them are amazingly technically
competent and they're made by, you know,
like highly professional people, but you
know, it looks like iPhone footage, too.
>> I'm a huge Guo Del Toro fan. Um, I even
loved his book, The Strain. Like, it was
really, it was really good till about
like 3/4 of the way through and it
seemed like he just wanted to finish the
book. Yeah, probably
>> like a bunch of [ __ ] just sort of just
happens in the last quarter of the book
where I was like this is kind of
jarring.
>> It became dinner time
>> like put this aside.
>> It just seemed like [ __ ] [laughter] I
can't keep going with this book. It's
what it feel felt like. It felt rushed
just my my opin but I'm a huge fan of
that guy. I love Pan's Labyrinth. I love
a lot of his films but I didn't like
Frankenstein. I am, you know,
like I love Gilmo and I love his spirit
and I love his artistry. He is an
amazing artist. His he's a um uh just
literally as a as an artist, you know,
his his sketchbooks are beautiful and he
brings a great amount of passion uh to
his work. He he brings that kind of
Mexican uh passion to his work and I
adore his him as a as a person. But to
be perfectly honest, I'm not wild about
his movies that much. I you know I I
>> You didn't like Pans's Labyrinth.
I I liked parts of it, but as a whole, I
it just kind of
and I don't know what it is, you know,
about it, but uh I mean, Blade 2 is
probably my favorite film of his because
it's like the least of of Well,
actually, it's quite a bit of him, but
um it's just the most accessible for me.
I didn't know he did Blade 2. Which one
was that Patton Oswald was in where he
had the the whole bit about Wesley
Snipes and then they replaced him with a
cool cooler Wesley Snipes? [laughter]
>> I think that was three.
>> Yeah, it was probably Blade.
>> Blade three. I don't remember Blade 2. I
don't remember Blade 2. Blade one was
awesome though.
>> Yeah,
>> that's my favorite of all the comic book
vampire well comic book movies because I
I was just a giant fan of the Blade
comic book series. I also like his
Pacific Rim movie and I like parts of
like the moment in Frankenstein that I
think is for me the entire movie. Like I
could have like left the rest of it. So
much of it was just so melancholic and
you know it was just like I just
couldn't engage with it. And uh uh but
the part that I absolutely loved was at
the Miller's house where he's learning
language. Mhm.
>> To me, that was the movie when he's kind
of secretly learning how to speak and
how to be and learning morals. And to
me, the mo I could have watched an
entire movie about that sequence. And it
was also beautifully made that part.
Just the rest of it with
I could have done without.
>> It was just a little flat. I don't know.
>> And also, it's like why does it have
It's so freaking long. Like [laughter]
he could really like learn a lesson.
Well, I was going to say he could learn
a lesson from Ridley Scott who just
clips through things like he he takes,
you know, oh, there's a dialogue scene.
I'm just going to do the essentials and
just get out like it's a commercial.
This dialogue scene doesn't need to be
any longer than 30 seconds and he just
clips along
somehow. Yet, his movies are still like
two hours long.
>> Well, they're so involved. You know what
I really loved? Uh, Noserado. Did you
see the new
>> No. I haven't, you know,
I don't want to sound like a pnicity
guy, but I had to be in the right
>> I want you to be pnikity.
>> I had to be in [laughter] the right mood
to engage with that movie [snorts]
because um I like that guy's first
movie, The Vivich or The Witch.
>> Um I
>> I never saw that.
>> I
>> I heard it's great though.
>> I love that film. I think that's a great
movie. And he's like a production
designer.
>> He's doing a werewolf movie right now.
>> Yeah, of course he is. [laughter]
>> Of course he is.
>> I love a good werewolf. I did not like
his Moby Dickish uh lighthouse movie. Um
>> Oh, I didn't see that. That was the
William Defo
one. It was just uh just garish and kind
of I felt like lost its way halfway
through. And um but uh and then you know
this latest one, Nosperatu.
Look, I am a Verer Herzog nut and so I
like I adore Verer Herzog and I love his
noseratu. So for me to, you know, like
watch this guy's version of that.
>> Which one?
>> I have to be in the right mood. I have
to be in the right mood. I just wasn't
yet in the right mood to accept.
>> Which one is Werners? Who who plays
Nosado?
>> Oh, Claus the the incomparable
Klauskinsky. And uh I know I've seen it.
I mean the thing about Verer Herzog when
he made his noseratu what's you know uh
the Mnau movie which is the original
Noseratu the the very first one with Max
Shrek
>> uh that
>> I saw at the library when I was 10 years
old.
>> So the thing about Verer Herzog as a
filmmaker is that most filmmakers have
their forefathers that they can look
back to. they can you they have a
generation before them that they can
kind of imprint on and because of the
brutality and uh tragedy of World War II
uh he had none. There were no German
filmmakers that he could look to and so
he had to look to his grandfather
basically which was Mnau when he made it
and so his film is almost like haunted
by the by the original and then he bring
you know Ver Herzog grew up
>> not using a telephone until he was in
his teens. He'd never seen a telephone
before. He had grown up like in, you
know, upper Bavaria in in the mountains.
And, you know, so he he comes like his
film is almost displaced in time. It's
like skipped a generation. And he does
things like uh you know, he'll show two
actors in the most emotional part of the
movie when Mina and Jonathan Harker are
uh you know, at the beach and they're
basically saying goodbye. And normally
in a Hollywood film, they would cut to a
closeup so that we could see the tears.
You know, we would cut to that close-up.
But because his film is, you know,
because he's displaced in time, he stays
back. Like, he doesn't even bother
shooting a close-up. To him, it's more
melancholic to show them just isolated
as figures, you know, in in a in a wide
shot. And it truly is. And so, his film
is is super powerful that way. And then
you have Klaus Kinsky, you know, who is
uh, you know, like the madman actor of
of German cinema and who is uh uh, you
know, who who was like I mean there's a
documentary called My Best Fiend, which
um, uh, K which is about the
relationship you between Herzog and
Kinsky. And there's an amazing scene in
the beginning of that where uh he Verzog
visits the apartment that he rented in I
think it was in Berlin that uh you know
that where he was first becoming a
filmmaker and where he first met Klaus
Kinsky and he goes there and it's now
occupied by these two you know just very
conservative uh this German couple and
and he starts going through the house
and saying oh yes here this is where uh
Klouse you know went crazy and he
started smashing it and [ __ ] on the
walls and like you [laughter] know like
cuz he was an insane guy. He was like
his whole thing was about provocation.
And so he brings a kind of crazy
vampire. I mean it feels like a real
vampire.
>> I remember it now but I haven't seen it
forever. What year was that?
>> Uh you mean the Kinsky one?
>> Yes.
>> Uh I think it was in the 70s so I'm
thinking it was like 78 or 79. Maybe
even earlier.
>> I know I've seen all the Noseratos.
Um let me see. Give me a um
>> I will eventually see this new
>> I will eventually see this new one.
>> It's [ __ ] good, man. It's good.
>> The dude who plays the vampire, what's
his name?
>> Um
>> the guy who played uh the the clown and
it
>> Bill Scarsgard.
>> Oh, yeah. Bill Scars.
>> He's so good. Well,
>> he's so good.
>> So, is this the scene when he meets the
vampire?
>> I don't know. I just clicked on.
>> Yeah, this Oh, he cuts.
>> Well, this is Yeah, this is I mean
that's [snorts]
I mean, Kinsky brings just an amazing
>> The knife is old and could be
>> empathy.
>> It could give you blood poisoning.
>> Oh, this is the English version.
>> Please let me do it. It's the oldest
remedy in the world.
>> Oh, forget it. It's hardly worth
mentioning. Just a little cut.
You [sighs]
you know
it's only for the best.
[gasps]
>> The original [laughter]
in German is incredible.
>> That's so awesome. And that's probably
Kinsky like you know they're supposed to
cut and Kinsky just keeps going.
Yeah. I mean Bruno Gans. I think it's
Bruno Gans is probably terrified in real
life cuz he doesn't know Kinsky's crazy
enough where he'll bite him,
>> right?
>> And he's got those fake teeth.
>> Yeah.
>> Let's sit up for a while.
All right, show me a clip from the new
one. You You got to see the the new
Noserato.
>> I mean, I had never seen a vampire like
that. And And then I think Salem's Lot
was made after the TV movie was super
similar to it.
>> Yeah.
>> Um there's a a scene when he um meets
the guy at the castle.
I did see one scene from this online
with Lily Rose Depp kind of
>> this is it
>> reacting to something which was like
very compelling.
>> Go full screen to this. This is when he
makes it into the castle.
It's really dark man. He did a fantastic
job of like capturing the creepiness of
it and also the surreal aspect
of him being under the trance of this
vampire. You recognize that reality is
all [ __ ] up and skewed. Like time
passes very quickly. It doesn't make
sense. He's super confused as to what's
going on.
I mean, I have to say this movie feels
haunted as haunted by the Herzog version
as Herzog was haunted by the Mnau
version. As if it's a continuation. For
me, it would be
>> like I encourage anybody to like enjoy
all three of them, I guess.
>> Yeah. I wonder if he was haunted by that
or if I wonder if he was haunted by the
original. But this is uh with the use of
all
>> the little step frame
>> modern ability. Yeah.
>> But it's just the way they made the
castle and the way they made him is very
unique. There's so many aspects of it
that I thought were very unique. Even
the way the vampire feeds on people is
unique. This guy is a he's a very very
very good filmmaker. I just uh
>> You are late.
The midnight hour has passed
and my attendance
have wor
>> I don't know so much about the way he's
talking.
>> It's a It's weird but it grows on you.
It grows on you.
>> Well, I'm sure it has a like a haunting
quality over time.
>> Yeah. Like like this, the guy just
disappears and all of a sudden he's way
far away. There's a lot of that in this
movie. So the scene when they get him to
sign papers when he's get up to that
>> questions about the young
we yet keep close many superstitions
here that may seem backward
to a young man of your high learning.
>> Sure Prince Charles was like jacking off
to this film. [laughter] Oh,
>> before they made that painting.
>> Well, he he apparently he visits uh
Castle Dracula like every year.
>> Well, isn't he related to Vlad Tz?
>> Yeah, it doesn't surprise me. I mean,
he's he's German. He's of German
ancestry. So,
>> I think Prince Charles is related to the
original Vlad the Impaler.
>> That would go further ahead. So, they
>> would track with the whole baby eating
thing.
>> They give you a look at what he looks
like.
I think it cuts off probably.
This is going to cut it off.
They don't want to give away too much.
That was the other thing. Like you don't
really [music] get to get a look at them
for quite a while and when you do it's
horrifying.
>> Yeah. And the movie is made in washes of
darkness.
>> Mhm. It's very dark.
I mean, it's very much a candle lit
movie,
>> which I like because I don't like a film
where you're pretending that people are
in a candle lit, but it's really well
lit.
>> Well, and that's that's an example of
where video actually is is a better
medium to choose
>> because it it like digital loves
darkness
>> and it can do things in darkness that
film just doesn't have the capacity to
do, right?
>> And so, it's an excellent choice. When
we did Silent Hill, we made the choice
of whenever we're in the dark, we're
shooting on digital and whenever it's
during daylight, we're shooting on film.
>> Oh,
>> to create a kind of dissonance between
the two.
>> And so, um, and and that's largely
because digital loves dark. And this is
a great use of it. I'm warming up to it.
I like I've been waiting. I bought it
on, uh, on Blu-ray. I I have the movie.
I mean, I keep it. It's in that stack
and I've just been waiting to, you know,
for the right time to expose it. Expose
myself to it where I'm in the right
mood.
>> I loved it. I'm no film expert, but it's
my favorite vampire movie ever.
>> Well, that's uh that's that's actually
saying a lot. That's that's incredible.
>> I loved it.
>> That's incredible.
>> My a fun vampire movie is 30 Days of
Night.
>> Yeah, 30 Days of Night is great. Um
>> I love that one, too. It's not as good
as this. This is This is a better
>> I think I Am Legend is actually a pretty
good uh vampire movie. the uh uh the one
with Will Smith.
>> Well, they're I thought they were
zombies.
>> Well, they're kind of It's a contagion
film. Technically, they're not really
zombies, but they've been turned into
like vampire-like creatures. They're you
in that film. That's a really good one.
And then that one that uh uh what's his
name? Titiki Wakataka
that uh that Polynesian uh director who
did the Thor movie did. Uh god, what was
it called? the um uh
we are I can't remember the name of it,
but it's like a comedy version of uh uh
vampires like kind of all living in a
house and and sort of
>> How old is that?
>> This was made in sometime in the mid
2000s, I think.
>> H vampires living in a house.
>> What We Do in the Shadows.
>> Yeah. What We Do in the Shadows.
>> Did you see that?
>> Nope.
>> That is an incredible vampire movie.
It's kind It's kind of like a
mockumentary like where they're they're
>> but it's it takes all of the kind of
vampire mythology and it makes it really
really fun.
>> I've never even heard of this.
>> It's fantastic. This is his best film.
This is I'm sure the foundation of
everything he's done has been on what we
do for me. What we do in the shadows.
>> Huh. That's so crazy. I never even heard
of it.
>> Yeah. It it's it's wonderful.
>> Show me the trailer, Jamie.
We are granted protection for the
subjects in this film. Oh, it's like a
Blair Witch Project type deal.
>> It's been like this the whole time.
Deacon on dishes and it still hasn't
moved in 5 years. You're a cool guy, but
you're not pulling your weight in the
flat.
>> Oh, I'm glad to hear that I'm cool.
>> No, that's not the point, though. You're
missing
>> not a flat meeting about how cool you
are. When you get three vampires in a
[music] flat, obviously there's going to
be a lot of tension.
>> Viago was an 18th century dandy.
>> Look, a ghost coplav
is a bit of a pervert.
>> This is my torture chamber.
>> Deacons like the young [music] bad boy
of the group.
>> I'm supposed to pay rent, but I don't.
[music]
>> The trouble with being a vampire is you
have to be invited in.
You can walk in.
>> Will you invite us in?
>> We need some fresh. [laughter]
>> The whole movie is like that. It's
fantastic. Oh, that's funny.
>> Will you invite us in?
>> Just invite us in. The bouncer's like,
"No." [laughter]
And they can't do anything about it cuz
they're vampires.
>> Let the right one in.
>> Oh, okay. That is uh of all the modern
vampire movies, I mean, I haven't seen
the what's his name? Edgar's uh
>> the American version of it.
>> Um no, I hate the American version. The
American version is Let Them In is
terrible. [laughter]
>> It It like I had to wash my eyes
afterwards with another movie.
>> I [laughter] didn't mind it.
>> I I hated the uh but because I loved the
foreign version.
>> The who who which country was it from?
>> I think it's Sweden.
>> Sweden. It's really good.
>> It's it's an outstanding outstanding
film. And the book is fabulous as well.
It's a an amazing novel.
>> Yeah. I just love a good horror movie. a
well-made horror movie because it like
the suspension of disbelief is like
inherent to the enjoyment of the film
like you know like just show me show me
how the guy turns into a monster. Show
me.
>> Yeah. Make it make it so make it so. And
>> and also you can see you like I mean
they have been making Dracula movies
again and again and again. It seems like
every year there's another vampire movie
coming out or every couple years at
least. And you know there never seems to
be an exhausted the market never seems
to be exhausted right by it you know
it's uh zombie movies they they continue
making them you know it's like
>> that's the most overused genre is zombie
films zombie films zombie TV shows I
mean how many versions of the walking
dead are there's multiple
>> yeah and I I'm not a big fan of the I
like I mean
>> the beginning was great I think first
season
>> when it started but then I when I
realized oh it's just sadism And that I
mean I get the point after the first
season I realized oh the point is that
the walking dead are the living.
>> They're actually the walking dead. Yeah.
Because they've become emotionally
>> I didn't like it when it got into the
point where they were just it was just
murder porn.
>> Yeah. And and and that I mean I think I
even talked about this before that like
that's a real problem with television is
that they're just trying to get the
serotonin levels spiked by killing
someone that you care about. M
>> and you know real television you return
because you love the characters and you
want to return to it.
>> Well, sometimes it's done well. Like
Game of Thrones did a fantastic job of
doing that.
>> But even that kind of lost its way after
a while. I mean eight seasons. I'm I'm
rewatching it right now. We're actually
on season 3 right now. It's [ __ ]
great. I I kind of forgot how great it
was. But when you get to binge it and
you don't have to wait like like there
was years in between seasons it took so
long to produce.
>> Have you seen the Pen Dragon cycle the
um the rise of the Merlin?
>> No.
>> Okay. So these days like you almost
don't know where television where to
find television and that's because you
can find it anywhere like and no the
main uh the mainstay producers of it the
studios and everything they're no longer
reliable in producing quality television
and so suddenly uh we see stuff rising
you know out of places that is
completely unexpected and uh this was
produced by the daily wire of all of all
people. S and the CEO of the Daily Wire
directed it. Uh this guy Jeremy Boring.
Yeah, I hope I'm not mispronouncing his
name. His name is Boring. [laughter]
>> But um
>> and this is good.
>> Okay, this is to me this is better than
uh you know it's I have a very high
watermark for um uh for Arththeran
mythology. Like to me Excalibur is the
high watermark and this really went
there.
Like I had a chip on my shoulder when I
started watching this. I was like,
"Okay, this is very unlikely that I'm
going to enjoy this production." But
they did it for like a for a micro
budget effectively. They made something
that is absolutely kind of reinvents the
mythology and they do it like proper
television where you kind of love the
characters and they they weave an entire
reality and universe that is just
fantastic. And it's done for like, you
know, for very very little. you know,
they're spending billions making uh
these Lord of the Rings things and like
nobody cares. They're just awful to
watch. And in the meantime, these guys
just, you know, without anybody paying
attention cranked this out. And I've
only seen four episodes of it, but I am
like completely blown away by it.
>> That's so interesting. The Daily
I think that's part of the problem.
Well, that's because well, like we don't
hear about a lot of things and media is
like the least of it.
>> Well, certain [laughter] Right. Good
point. But certainly with the Daily
Wire, the problem is it's like
associated with this right-wing
production.
>> If you can get over that and like and
and put that behind you and then uh I
mean this is to me as good as classic
television. It's I my prejudice was
initially, oh, they're going to somehow
or another embed right-wing ideology in
this.
>> Well, everybody's embedding their own
ideology there. Whenever you make any
media, there's usually um you have
corporate propaganda and personal
propaganda. And you're you and usually
there was a balance between the two. You
know, if you're making
Midnight Express, for example, okay,
that movie was nothing like the book at
all
>> really. and not not even close to the
book and it it's a complete alternate
experience and you wonder why did that
movie why was that movie such a big
success? Why was that movie such a um
overwhelmingly like Oscars and
everything? Okay. I think it had a
little bit more to do with the politics
of what was going on with Turkey at that
time than anything else. And and and you
know um what's his name? Billy Hayes who
uh um you know experienced it, lived it,
spent the rest of his life basically
apologizing for the movie and uh you
know
>> because none of he wasn't like raped in
a Turkish prison and that's like that's
like a
>> that's like a joke that gets you know
you know in airplane they're making
jokes about it
>> and so yeah Billy Hayes he was the the
actual character or the person who lived
the experience and uh and so the movie
is a kind of propag propaganda element
and that's like all Hollywood does it.
You know, you kind of accept whenever
you're making a movie that you're being
used in a certain level to do something,
whether it's to, you know, on a very
basic level, whether it's just to like,
you know, mortify or scare audiences or,
you know, to to to do things. And we see
that more and more obviously in media as
the director, the personal propaganda
when you have something personal that
you want to get on screen has become
more and more diminished and you have a
you know sort of more corporate
propaganda kind of taking over. And I
think the the the most probably crass
example of that is DEI stuff uh you know
in movies and pushing
>> uh characters in situations that are
just completely out of whack. Did you
see the Star Trek that they tried to
make like that?
>> Okay, I'm like a big Star Trek guy. I
watch Star Trek every day in my house.
We watch like two or three episodes and
I'm not kidding. My wife [laughter] is
like a Treky. She is like crazy for Star
Trek and so she puts Star Trek on, you
know, like at around 5:00 Star Trek
comes on original. Well, uh, we cycle
through, we go chronologically from, uh,
you know, the original series through
the next generation and then DS9 and
then Voyager and then Enterprise and
then we look back to, uh, and sometimes,
you know, when you show an episode like
uh, in DS9 there's an episode called
Trials and Tribulations where all the
characters go into the past and they
kind of interact with Trouble with
Tribles and they kind of blend them into
the set and everything that's happening.
we'll then go back and watch Trouble
with Tribbles or, you know, uh same
thing with Wrath of Khan. We'll do this,
you know. So, we we'll uh we'll kind of
connect it all together. And so, uh but
every day there's at least two or three
episodes of Star Trek playing in my
house. It's like uh I usually have to
wrestle away the controller to say we're
watching a movie now.
>> [laughter]
>> So, and so uh and and my children were
like basically raised on Star Trek and
you know the sort of morals behind Star
Trek and you know uh you know and people
complain about oh you know I don't like
DS9 as much. It's not as dynamic. I hate
Beij and blah blah blah. Uh but I think
Captain Cisco is one of the most amazing
captains there is because he's also a
father and there's all these like
fatherson lessons that are going on
throughout it. It's like really
elaborate television. And by the way,
all that kind of DEI stuff is still in
it. It's still there. There, you know,
they're exploring all sorts of things in
Star Trek: The Next Generation, uh
Riker, who's like the uh uh the second
in command to Peard. In in that one,
there's an episode where he goes to a a
planet of neuters that are just, you
know, they have one gender and he falls
in love with one and they kind of waken
up out of their single gender thing and
realize, oh, I'm female. And that person
then gets taken and reprogrammed like
and and then there's an episode where
Cork is turned into a woman in order to
for some cockamame reason that they come
up with in the show and and and he kind
of likes it. he's like getting into it
like so it's not like they aren't
exploring gender and
>> they're not [clears throat] just beating
you over the head with it.
>> It's somehow integrated into good
storytelling. And I think something
happened at uh you know at the studios
where they fired all of the legacy
people and they hired on a bunch of new
people who just weren't as good at
storytelling and or as respectful of the
you know the the canon I guess you could
say is what it was. But you know those
uh seasons of Star Trek are which I
guess you could call the from the Gene
Rodenberry into the Rick Burman era and
I mean they had such amazing writers.
They had guys like Renee Shavaria and
Narin Shankar and uh and they had
technical adviserss and you know so if
you were just into the tech you could
really like you know and and and most of
our technology and most of our
aspirations have come from Star Trek.
You know, our telephones are basically,
you know, like triers and we're we're
all and you know, when we see it on Star
Trek, like, oh, we talk to the computer.
Well, I want to have that. And so,
somebody figures out a way to develop
that and to make it so. And now we have
that.
>> Didn't he actually say computer? Like he
would say computer and ask question.
>> Yeah. Well,
>> hey Siri. Hey Siri. Same thing.
>> Yeah. Wow.
>> And so it, you know, it it's a I mean, I
think it's a fantastic show. And then
this dweeb Alex Curtsman comes along and
just shits all over everything. Just
like craps all over it. And I mean, I
went in and met with the guy, you know,
I was like, "Hey, I will write for for
scale. I'll, you know, I'll I'll write
on your new show." I like I I just want
to be part of it
>> just as an opportunity to work on Star
Trek.
>> And he was and I basically found out he
didn't want anybody who had any kind of
fondness for the original show. M
>> he wanted to do something new and to
create something new. And boy has he
[ __ ] the bed like in a big way. And this
latest thing that he that they've made
this Starfleet Academy now it's still
ongoing. Maybe it writes itself at some
point. You know,
>> I think they canceled it.
>> Did they? Good.
>> The newest the newest they read The
Room. They read The Room. Finally.
>> Is it um if they they didn't they stop
the idea of a season two? That [ __ ]
Alex Curtsman, man. His company is
called uh Secret Hideout. I think he's
going to need a Secret Hideout after all
these like after destroying Star Trek
for like this latest generation.
>> Are we talking about the newest one? The
one with Tigaro? That's the newest.
>> Starfleet Academy.
>> Starfleet Academy is an abomination. Uh
>> I could not I could not get Yes. I could
not get through three episodes of of
Discovery. And I mean they're just like
it is just awful awful storytelling.
Well, it's also clunky dialogue and bad
acting.
>> It's just horrible. And they're they're
more interested in um in the corporate
corporate pol in the corporate
propaganda than they are with any kind
of personal propaganda,
>> right? It seems like that's the
imperative that it's like they get
across this
>> inclusive I
was terrible. It was it's was sad
actually. It was just depressing for me.
And so like when you know when
>> Seth what's his name did that show the
Orville and like that is like you know
the proper successor like they brought
back guys like James Conroy
the uh
>> but I don't know what the Orville is.
>> Uh it was kind of like a comedy version
Seth McFarland did but he hired all the
original people that they had fired from
Star Trek and basically used them to do
his show. And it actually feels a little
bit more like a like a continuation.
>> I I never heard of this either.
>> And it's on Hulu.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Is it It is a Star Trek or is it
>> No, it's not Star Trek. It's the
Orville. [laughter] So, they just ripped
off Star Trek. basically just ripped off
Star Trek and they they have a sort of
like tongue and cheek quality but they
they bring all the you know all the
writers from the original and
showrunners and uh you know people like
that and the original directors like um
you know like Jim Con god I'm like
blanking on his name Con I want to say
Conroy but it's I think it's ah
whatever. Um and uh so they bring
everybody back and it has a little bit
more of the same spirit. Another really
good Star Trekish thing is Galaxy Quest.
Something that got kind of buried and
with uh
>> Sigourney Weaver.
>> Sigourney Weaver.
>> Yeah, that was good.
>> Galaxy Quest is hilarious. If you love
the original series of Star Trek, Galaxy
Quest is amazing. Like it it's so
fantastic. It's
>> I I love Sigourney Weaver.
>> Yeah,
>> she's one of my all-time favorites. That
that's a good example of a movie that
was like a DEI movie that you never even
noticed it was Alien.
>> Like you have a female lead and you you
never think about it.
>> We didn't have like powerful women in
movies before. We've like had them
throughout history, right?
>> You know, uh the history of cinema is
built on uh you know and and by the way
a you know a complex woman character can
have faults,
>> right?
>> Like that's part of it is characters
have faults. characters have things
wrong with them. You know, they're not
always just, you know, like, you know,
I, you know,
>> dominant and noble.
>> Dominant and and like can do everything
immediately.
>> Exactly. Like the some of the Star Wars
ones went woke. There was a few of
those.
>> Well, yeah. I mean, you know, it's
funny. You had I think it was I think it
was here Ben Affleck was on and they
were talking about AI and how it always
goes to the middle and well, you know,
it always goes to the middle. It always
goes to the middle. And I was like, like
J.J. Abrams always goes to the middle.
And boy was that Star Wars. He did the
middle where he just basically took the
Luke Skywalker story and just
reinterpreted it with a strong strong
woman, you know, character. And I I just
thought it was bland and just tasteless
and just, you know, nothing new. He just
went to the middle. So you don't need AI
to go to the middle. This episode is
brought to you by Visible. Folks,
there's one thing nobody wants this
season, and that's getting catfished.
And it's not just dating profiles that
are putting you at risk. It's also big
wireless carriers. You know the type.
Looks great at first, promises a low
price, but once you're locked in,
surprise fees, and an expensive bill
that isn't what you were expecting. Your
night and shining armor. Visible
wireless. It's oneline wireless with
unlimited data and hotspot for just $25
a month. Taxes and fees included. Now
that's a green flag. The best part,
Visible is all digital, so you can
switch as fast as you can swipe. Don't
fall for the trap of getting catfish by
wireless. Visit visible.com to learn
more and start loving your wireless
carrier. Terms apply. See visible.com
for plan features and network management
details. No, no, you just need a
mandate. And the the thing about Alien 2
was like you didn't know who the hero
was.
>> Alien 2 or Alien You mean Aliens
>> as well? I mean Alien one. I didn't like
Aliens 2 as much. It was fun, but it was
like why are they so easy to kill now?
Why are they so obvious?
>> Well, they were, you know, space
marines. And Marines are tough. Marines
are badass. Marines can like and the
first they still overwhelm.
>> I know. But the first alien was clever.
He was hiding. He would sneak around. He
would jump. You didn't get to see much
of it. And that was also cool, too,
because it kind of captured you with the
suspense.
>> It's one of the best movies ever made.
And
>> and it's a 1979 movie, too, which is
crazy. People don't even know how old it
is.
>> Well, it's funny. I recently went back
and started watching all the Ridley
Scott movies I hadn't seen, you know,
like there's a ton of them that I just,
you know, kind of missed along the way.
And I started off with um uh God, what
was it? I um Oh, I started off with
Napoleon and like because I just missed
it when it came out. And I'm like, what?
What happened to Ridley Scott? It's And
I have not liked any of his recent alien
movies. I just think they're I'm
confused by them to be honest.
>> The Prometheus ones.
>> It's just like when you need a web
episode in order to understand what the
hell he's talking about in the movie.
You failed. And And they're just like
they're high. They're technically
technical marvels. Like nobody shoots
big canvas cinema like Ridley Scott.
Like no one shoots a helicopter crashing
like Ridley Scott shoots a helicopter
crashing. And uh and and you know, you
watch Napoleon and sure the battle
battle of Astrolitz amazing to watch.
You know, cannonballs going into the the
lake and the ice breaking and people
falling in the water. But the minute
anybody talks in that movie, it just
collapses on its own weight. It's just
like you just don't care. My wife was
like, "This is the worst date movie.
You're not going to sleep with me after
[laughter] this."
>> What's wrong with it?
>> I didn't see it. It's well Walken
Phoenix who and I think he made a choice
because I consider him to be an
excellent actor but in this movie I
think he made a choice to just play it
like you know contemporary
is doing sort of a British or French
accent like they're all kind of
pretending that they're in a in a period
piece but not walking in Phoenix he just
plays it like he just you know walked
off Hollywood Boulevard really and and
he and it and just like the battle scene
there's no passion in any of his
performance. It's kind of this weird
dead dead performance. And uh and so
>> he did it on purpose to betray like a
sociopath.
>> I think he came on he was like I am
going to do whatever I want to do the
way Napoleon would and I and and I'm not
and I'm not going to try I'm a Corsican
and I'm not I'm going to be an outsider
to all of these other people who were I
think there was an intellectual idea
behind what he did and it completely
failed. So, I'm like, "Okay, I adore
watching Ridley Scott do these big
scenes, but what a terrible movie." And,
[laughter]
you know, like failure. And then I So,
and so then after that, I'm like, "Okay,
let's let's watch something else." Well,
oh, he did Exodus. I've never seen that.
Gods and Kings with Christian Bale. Same
thing. It's like you start watching that
movie and there's some interesting
things in the film. He's got like
chariot battles and you know archers
shooting things and like you know
whenever he's doing that like Ridley
Scott's like oh this is my day on set
and he's got a cigar and 20 cameras you
know put cameras everywhere and he's
like shoot from every angle and he's
like a like a great general you know uh
uh shooting but the minute anybody talks
that movie falls apart and actually I
mean I don't know how to say this but
that movie almost did its best to turn
me on the Jews. Like I'm watching it and
I'm like this is like first of all is
anybody even Jewish making this? Like it
seems like nobody involved in it was was
Jewish and like they start like you know
>> how is that even possible?
>> Well Moses as a character when he's uh
an Egyptian when he's like the adopted
Egyptian brother. I'm like totally with
him for some reason. and he becomes
Moses after getting like hit in the head
with a rock and uh and all of a sudden
he's uh you know kind of he's like a
lunatic and like you're like everybody's
following him like he's like he's
distaste he's distasteful all of a
sudden and but every now and then they
would show a battle scene and it's like
okay I [sighs] can like Ridley Scott's
doing his thing again but like and you
know who's also really good in it is um
God I can't remember Joel Edertton who
plays Ramsy's It's really funny because
Joel Edertton is, you know, usually you
imagine Egyptians when they're cast as
being kind of tall and, you know, sort
of noble looking and everything. He's
kind of like this butch, like sort of
tough, you know, widebodied butch uh
Ramsay's like just kind of like a tough
Ramsey's. And every now and then his
Australian accent comes out. So he's
like, "Oh, he's like an Australian
Ramsey's." And John Touturo plays his
his father uh who you know a bald I'm
like is that John Turo? Like what a
crazy choice this is. And so there were
all sorts of like interesting things
going on in the movie. But again I was
like oh this is awful.
>> Is it impossible for you to watch a
movie without just becoming hyperritical
about all these different aspects like
how I would do it? What I don't like?
>> Yes and no. So, the next Ridley Scott
movie I watched, which I stayed away
from and with great apologies to Matt
Damon and Ben Affleck, was The Last
Duel. And I just kind of avoided it. I
was doing other things at the time. And
the poster looked awful and I was like,
I'm not going to go see that. And then I
uh I I I put it on after watching these
other two and I was like, okay, here we
go. Let's go again. And lo and behold,
one of the best films of the century in
my opinion. Absolutely. First of all,
those guys know how to write a script.
And I know that they wrote it with
Nicole Hoffen or whatever her name is.
>> And look at And look at Ben Affleck.
Like when I saw him blonde, I was like,
that's one of the reasons it kept me
away from it, but he's hilarious in the
movie. He's a genius in the film.
>> I never even heard about this.
>> I was gripped by this film. And this is
a great date movie. Like this, my wife
got turned on after this film,
[laughter]
believe it or not.
That's hilar. I don't know anything
about that.
>> And Adam Driver is magnificent and like
this relationship that these two guys
have and it's kind of a Rashimon story
meaning that uh like Akira Kurasawa's
Rashimon which was three stories that
are all sort of the same event told from
different perspectives. And so and Matt
Damon is like a revelation. And this
movie says so much about Hollywood. Like
when I watched this I was like okay I'm
Matt Damon and Quentyn is uh Adam Driver
for sure. Like Adam Driver totally knows
how to like you learn about Hollywood in
this film and I'm sure they're writing
it like knowing about Hollywood that the
way to really get along in court is to
join the orgies, you know, to be in the
orgy with everybody is like how you get
along. It's like uh uh we all [ __ ]
together and that's how we do it. But
Matt Damon, who by all accounts in this
is a great, you know, he's a fighter.
He's a great knight. He had he's true in
his heart, but he's just a like a pill
to hang out with and he doesn't go to
the orgies. And because of that, he's
just kind of marginalized. And the whole
movie plays off of this friendship that
just kind of goes ary where jealousy
comes into play and uh and and it's
ruinous to everything until they're
finally fighting in the very end. And
this is where Ridley Scott just does
what he does, which is he has this
insane fight between these two guys,
which like was just every blow was
painful to look at. And this to me was
the best Ridley Scott movie I've seen of
the century. I mean, I guess Blackhawk
Down. I also very much like Gladiator,
although Gladiator 2. I throw that in. I
never saw that.
>> Throw that in with Exodus Gods and
Monsters. It was actually boring to
watch. I loved Gladiator 1, though.
>> Gladiator 1 is magnificent. It had some
kind of secret sauce in it that was
fantastic. And Gladiator 2, it it just
kind of goes through the paces. It's
just kind of everybody shows up.
Speaking of showing up, when Sigourney
Weaver shows up in uh Exodus Gods and
Monsters, she's not even trying at all.
She knows that she's there for a
paycheck. Like, she just shows up and
she's just like does not put on an
accent of any kind. She just shows up
and just speaks the lines and I'm out of
here. I'm going into Morocco or whatever
into [laughter] into town. I'm going to
go party for a while.
>> You think she just thought it was a bad
film and just checked out?
>> I'm not sure what she was thinking, but
like she may have been thinking what uh
I mean, maybe she was trying, but I
don't It just didn't look like it. It
just looked like she was
>> Well, that's got to be a weird thing
when an actor makes a choice with a
character and it just doesn't work and
they don't realize it, but they're
committed to it. And the other Ridley
Scott movie that I just watched that I
hadn't seen. Again, I avoided it partly
because of the um uh the title of the
film and there just nothing excited. I
thought it was a comedy. In fact, I'd
been avoiding it. It was on my plex.
There it is. I I look at the thing, it
looks like a comedy. It's got um Javier
Bardam and Cameron Diaz and they're all
kind of Javier Bardam looking exactly
like Robert Downey Jr. like in it. Like
just kind of this crazy Robert Downey
Jr. his crazy phase, you know, with like
colorful glasses and everything. Robert
Downey Jr. with like a broken up nose or
whatever is going on with that nose. And
um okay, so I put on the counselor and
this So looking at that, I thought this
was a comedy. I thought, "Oh, it's going
to be a romantic comedy." This movie
after I saw it, I was like, I feel like
I've seen too much.
>> I feel like I know too much now about
the world. like it's it and and it and
it h and it's made like right before you
and I think this movie was kind of a
disaster for Ridley Scott and he uh you
know had to recover from it I probably
because of the the failure of it but
>> I never even heard of it. It's written
um by um uh oh my god um Corormick
McCarthy and so so it is dark dark dark
and it is a an analysis of how power
works in the modern world
>> which is basically a giant cartel. The
cartel runs everything and you cannot
escape the cartel and it is such a
specta I think that's such a spectacular
movie.
>> I loved it. I loved it. When did that
come out?
>> Like 2014, I think.
>> 2013.
>> 2013. Did you ever hear of it, Jamie?
>> I don't think so. I'm
>> There's too much content. Well, there's
too much content. And yet, really, Scott
and he's cranking out movies like every
year he's doing a movie. It's like just
knocking them back. Knocking them back.
He's constantly making films. And so,
that was why I hadn't uh and so finally
I was like, well, I got to catch up on
some Ridley Scott. and and Quinton had
been talking about uh Blackhawk Down and
how much he loved it and how he thought
it was the best film of the century and
you know he's largely correct that's not
a bad uh I could have done without the
UNICEF commercial at the very beginning
where it's just like you know a little
UNICEF commercial about people starving
in Africa and Somalia but uh the rest of
the movie is just insanely beautiful and
so I wanted to check out all the movies
I hadn't seen of is and and so that's
why I started researching them and
looking them up again and like the
counselor how did that fall through the
cracks and it gets terrible reviews like
people hated the film apparently and
>> what's the criticism
>> uh people like I think they they were
just like we don't believe it they just
don't believe that that's what the world
is like and you know I found the film to
be like uh
>> do you think that's just because of the
time period it was released I think it
was more innocent
>> I think Ridley Scott knows things that
and Cormick McCarthy know things about
the world that they put on film before
everything was known. Like I think if
that movie was released today, people
would be like, "Yeah,
>> that's what's happening today."
>> Yeah.
>> And so yeah. Oh yeah. Oh, they're
putting people in sulfuric acid into uh
milk into drums. What the [ __ ]
>> And shipping them around the world, you
know, as a joke, you know, like
>> that's in the film.
>> Yeah. There's also
>> Did you see the thing in the Epstein
files?
>> Oh, yeah. like I've seen files. In fact,
I can't believe that like everybody just
kind of like, "Oh, okay." And they're
moving on with their lives. Did you see
that guy at the Atlanta airport uh
flipping out the well-dressed black dude
who just freaks out at in the Atlanta uh
just like a couple of days ago on uh I
saw it on YouTube. No, I saw it on
Twitter or X. And uh this guy's just
freaking out in the Atlanta airport.
He's like, "Yeah, I read the Upstate
Files. It's like all of you, you're
going about your lives like nothing's
happening. Look at you're all zombies.
And he's right. It's like Invasion of
the Body Snatchers. Everybody is just
numb to everything. Like, dudes, we had
a global pandemic. Uh, aliens. Uh, you
know, all these like revelations. People
are, you know, eating babies. Uh,
>> here. This is a guy
AND ALL OF Y'ALL ARE ACTING NORMAL.
ALL.
>> And there's a longer version of that
where he's but he's basically like
you're all acting like nothing's
happening. Like what the [ __ ] You know,
you're all just pretending you're just
drones going on in your
>> waiting for a condensed version that
lays out all the facts. It's the people
that are like really interested in
reading all the emails.
>> I think the Luciferians uh cast a spell
on the world. And
>> for real?
>> Oh, absolutely. like, you know, it's
just like how vampires can't go into a
house unless they're invited. They tell
you, you know, what's going on ahead of
time. It's predictive programming. And
once you say it out loud and you put it
out there and make fun of it and do a
little skit, like they like Steven
Colbear did a little skit on his show
where, oh, here's a baby. I'm going to
take this baby and I'm going to give it
to Moolok. And he goes into like a
cloudy red uh, you know, furnace and
hands the baby over and, oh, the baby's
going to be fine. and they make a joke
about it and the audience laughs. Okay,
we're all now conditioned to it. We've
all seen it and by laughing at it, we
were complicit.
>> You think that that's a that's on
purpose that this is like some sort of a
grand design to get us to be
desensitized to the idea of demons
eating babies?
>> Yeah, for sure.
>> Really?
>> For sure.
>> And and by the way, nobody's doing
anything about it. We know what's
happening.
>> But that has to take like there has to
be a person or some group of people.
>> Yeah. like about about 8,500 people.
>> Yeah.
>> That are manipulating the Cobar show.
>> That are manipulating everything. It's
all an illusion.
>> Like reality as we know it is fake.
That's that's the revelation that that
guy is having. And he's looking around
and he's like it's like Invasion of the
Body Snatchers. Well, it's s See, I
don't The thing about the emails is one
of the things is it's just stuff written
down. And so that's sort of hard to
digest. Like what is this? Like what are
they saying? Like some of it is in code
like walking over beef jerky. Like
saying talking about jerky. Could you
walk beef jerky over to this person?
Like what does that mean?
>> For all this pizza they're talking
about. You never see any pizza.
>> Right.
>> I'm going to get I'm going to get some
gr soda. It's like with my cheese pizza.
Yeah. And like there's all this coded
language and everyone's like, you know,
oh that's uh you're just you just have
parola, you know, the uh you're just
seeing things where you want to see
them.
>> No, there's clearly a code. Well, that
was the thing about absolutely a
[clears throat] code. And in fact,
mundice vault de ergo. It's a long known
concept. And so in Latin, Mundis dei
means the world wants to be deceived.
Ergo.
Therefore, it is
>> we want to be deceived. We We don't want
to believe the horrors that are actually
behind the veil.
>> Well, I think with the Epstein files,
people are because of these emails that
have been released, people are just now
starting to be aware of the
bizarness of the code and some of the
thing like the facts like let's just
talk about the sulfuric acid. So, this
was like right after he was indicted in
200.
>> Yeah, I gotta get rid of some bodies.
>> Yeah. [laughter]
How much did
>> dissolve up some bodies?
>> What did it say he ordered? Like, let's
uh
>> like 8,000 gallons.
Maybe we can get our sponsor Perplexity
to process this and uh give us a
synopsis of what exactly happened, some
sort of a breakdown. Because one of the
things they're saying is like he was
indicted and then right after he's
indicted, he orders how many gallons?
>> Six 55 gallon containers full of
sulfuric acid.
>> Jesus Christ.
Jesus Christ. Um
>> what what
>> they're eating babies, man. Like that's
the
>> So that that you think is real. So
>> Well, yeah. Not only that, I think that
there's uh you know, sacrifices going on
every day in Los Angeles. I mean, you
know, allegedly like, you know, uh, uh,
highlevel,
uh, musicians, let's say, high level
female musician, uh, is like, you know,
killing chickens every day, doing
sacrifices, like, you know,
>> high level.
>> Well, I I don't want to say I don't want
to say names because I don't want to get
sued and I I don't want to be dead
either.
>> What does it rhyme like? Here's the
purchase order. I go I start looking at
the comments for some stuff. Not that
this is the best answer, but a quick
answer someone gives is that uh this
could be for like a reverse osmosis
water treatment system.
>> True. He is on an island. I mean,
there's enough there's enough uh push
back because Mundus vultip ergo
dissipator
>> you know we we but like the timing of
all of that like you know where are the
purchase orders for all of that sulfuric
acid before then? Oh no, I just want to
put sulfuric acid into my swimming pool.
Muriatic acid.
>> Well, that's the question. Was there
orders for sulfuric acid before this? if
they do have a water treatment plan.
Why? How does sulfuric acid play into
water treatment?
>> It says it here. It says it's commonly
used. This explains it. I don't [ __ ]
know.
>> Okay. It says R O plant reverse osmosis
seawater desalination facility. Sulfuric
acid is commonly used in the maintenance
of such facilities. Not everything you
don't understand adds up to the worst
possible thing. It could be
>> deception.
>> Look, maybe they're all eating pizza and
grape soda. How many who is that guy
that's
>> How many billionaires do you know that
you like sit down and eat lots of pizza
and grape soda and ice cream?
>> This is weird. Trial warrior.
>> I was just I just that's why I just go a
grain of salt. This is just a a
plausible answer. I don't know that it
is the answer. I could even be wrong.
>> Okay. So, does he have a desalination
plant on the island?
>> Oh, it's a reverse.
>> Oh, yeah. For sure. He is. He has a
>> He had everything. He had a dump and
like they had all sorts of stuff. So
that's tunnels and
>> so they were using that. So they're
taking sea water and converting it into
fresh water for what? For irrigation or
for drinking for all the above.
>> One similar email that he wrote to
someone said that like his around his
island is like Damascus. And I'm like
what the [ __ ] does that mean? He was
like it's you go explore buried [ __ ]
around my island or what I what else
could he mean by that?
>> Huh? What does that mean?
>> I don't know. I mean, that's they say a
lot of things and they're not really
coding it very much.
>> Well, the code it's glaringly obvious
when they say pizza and when they say
jerky. That's glaringly obvious. How do
you walk jerky?
>> Yeah.
>> You know what I'm saying?
>> And why do I need a chilled container
to, you know, a chilled bag or whatever
they say?
>> Jesus Christ.
>> You know, and and
>> so you think they're eating babies?
>> Oh, yeah. I absolutely believe that.
>> You should get together with Kurt
Matzer. You two [laughter] would go
crazy. I don't doubt it for a second.
>> I think and I think this dates back
like, you know, a long long time. Dates.
This is Moolok worship.
>> Oh, well, there was the other uh email
that said, "Thank you for the torture
video. I enjoyed the torture video."
>> Yeah.
>> And it's like people just they don't
>> they don't want to accept it. Like
people don't want to believe it. They
don't want to accept it.
>> Okay. Uh some commentary notes that a
remote island with water treatment and
energy systems could plausibly stockpile
such quantities for a one to two years
of operations. Although others argue
that using it directly for reverse
osmosis as stated in one social post is
technically questionable for membrane
health.
Hm.
Highly corrosive, strong mineral acid
that can severely burn skin, eyes,
dehydrate, and char organic material.
Which is why it features
>> in both legitimate industrial processes
and in darker hypotheticals
online.
>> Darker hypotheticals.
>> Darker hypotheticals is where I'm
leaning. When you get indicted for sex
trafficking and then you order six drums
of sulfuric acid right away, are you
really worried about your reverse
osmosis plant right after you get
indicted? I feel like you know you're
going to jail.
>> It looks like a duck and it quacks like
a duck. It's probably a duck.
>> It's probably a duck.
330 gallons of sulfuric acid.
>> It says this was the only documented
purchase order for it. I I came out here
last time and I talked about, you know,
the the pedto cult inside of the Cubric
film.
>> Yes, by the way, that went viral
>> and I got so much blowback from that.
You know, the online critics are like,
"No, no, there's nothing in there."
Mundus Vault SAP. They don't want to see
it. They don't want they don't want to
see those two guys walking away with
that girl in the end. They just like,
"No, no, it's it wasn't in the
Schnitzler novel and blah blah blah." I
mean, dude, look at that movie. It's
about a cult. Like, what are you talking
about? It's a secret cult. And in fact,
uh, Sydney Lamett's character even says
at one point, you know, uh, do you know
what these people do? I'm not going to
tell you what they do, but let me tell
you, if I told you what they do, they
would like scare the hell out of you.
>> I mean, like,
that's after he's been to the place and
seen everybody walking around at the in
the sex club. I mean, it's obviously
there's obviously more going on in that
movie, but people don't want to see it.
I like like I had what was it? New York
magazine or whatever went so far as to
like, you know, aggressively trying to
get me to debunk it and uh which is
fine, which is fine. It's just an
interpretation of a movie,
>> right? But that that interpretation
resonated. I mean, that clip went very
very viral,
>> especially now. It's like people are
like uh looking at it and they're like,
well, you know, he was obviously saying
something. Even if you extract that out
of the movie, he's obviously saying
something about people at high levels of
power. Well, there's always been weird
secret groups and rituals.
>> Yeah.
>> And it's one of the ways to ensure that
you're compromised. You'll stay.
>> It's a confidence operation. Yes. And so
what you do is you find somebody when
they're young and they're, you know,
less inhibited and and they, you know,
or uninhibited and you catch them doing
something that is illegal and maybe you
even provide the mechanism for that to
happen. And then once it's happened, you
uh you now have the the video proof or
the audio proof or whatever proof you
have. You've got proof of it and you
show it to them and you say, "Look, this
is uh what we have on you and uh and we
can ruin you at any minute, but you know
what we're going to do? We're going to
give you $20,000 a month or we're going
to give you $20 million a year, whatever
level that is instead, and you're going
to work for us." And uh and and what
else explains some of these people who
were so flipped out about like you know
about Trump like he's a he's a pot he's
a like there it's over the top. It's you
know what it's it's strange how people
are how people behave in uh um regarding
that it's
>> don't you think that's also just because
the Democratic party didn't want him to
get into power because he was a complete
outsider. I don't think there are
parties.
>> I don't think there there I think that's
all an illusion. Also, I think
everything that you think that it is is
an illusion.
>> It's all fake. I don't think that any
history before 1600 I think everything
has been uh falsified before the year
1600.
>> How so?
>> Well, um there's this guy Anatoli Fenco
who's a Russian mathematician and
historian and he wrote a book called The
New Chronology. It's actually a series
of books. It's like six volumes and I've
read them all and [laughter]
and and um and and also his addendum
book, the new chronology. He has an
addendum book about it and uh he
basically says that uh all of history
has been changed. About a thousand years
have been added to the timeline in order
to justify land claims. And those land
claims largely have to do with uh
Eurasian the Eurasian horde and the
elimination of the Eurasian horde by uh
collusion between uh you know the
Vatican, the uh Romanovs, the uh
>> So you mean like the Mongols and the
Huns? Yeah, there was a and if you look
on very very old maps, you see that
there used to be a country called
Tartaria that was uh that was in
existence and at a certain point they
wiped them out. And so his theory and
it's just a theory. It's just a posit.
But when you see how history is
constantly being rewritten in real time,
it's not so hard to believe. And then he
uses you know uh um astronomical uh
evidence and you know mathematically
kind of proves it and he basically says
that uh let's see if I can get this
right that um uh Rome and Greece and you
know those uh and Egypt were um actually
active till around 1600 and that Rome
actually fell around [snorts] 1600. kind
of imagine or more like late 1400s 1492
>> as opposed to what's the conventional
timeline
>> uh about a thousand years before and so
and so you know if you can wrap your
head around it the Salem witch trials
>> took place around the same time as the
Inquisition
>> Columbus was discovering America around
the time Rome fell and that uh all of
this was designed to justify and or to
uh erase this entire civilization from
history. And then there are people who
believe that there are a lot of
buildings that are still in existence
that uh that were this they uh they they
claim that uh Jesus Christ was I can't
remember um the emperor's name. It's
kind of a composite story. There's a
number of uh
>> so they think a thousand years are
missing from the timeline.
>> Yeah. Think about it. If you're a
Byzantine guy and you're like, "Hey, I
want to move to the country." and you
look over at uh France, let's say, and
Germany, and and you're like, "Yeah,
there's all these like indigenous
peoples there, and we want to wipe them
out." So, you hire, you know, a
mercenary. You hire a guy named
Charlemagne, and you get him to go in
there and kill all the chieftains in one
day. Like 5,000 chieftains were killed
in a single day, apparently, by
Charlemagne. And you completely wipe out
everything. And then you move in, you
become Jerome uh the Jerome the first
and you run Paris or you begin, you
know, France. And what it really is is
just land. It's and so you add time to
the timeline in order to justify that
land claim because what makes more sense
that history was cruising along like
this and then suddenly flatlined for a
thousand years and then picked up again?
Or does it make more sense that somebody
took that time that the dark ages and
kind of added added to the timeline.
>> So I'm I'm confused. So but isn't there
like documented history from multiple
cultures about that time period?
>> Yeah. But it's all like you know written
down by the Jesuits who were completely
in the control of uh you it's that
history history is easily changed and in
fact we see history being changed before
our eyes in real time and so the deep
past is is easy to change.
>> So we're not in 2026. No, we're like in
the 1700s.
[laughter]
>> Oh Jesus.
>> Oh my god.
>> Just a theory. It's just this guy Antony
Anton an anti
uh Fnco and uh and it's a very
interesting theory. And so I read that
and I kind of had a tent pole collapse.
I was like, well, holy crap.
>> Explain to me the flatness. Like what do
you mean by history goes up and then
flattens? Well, the progression the
progression of humanity through history
as we kind of are progressing as we go
and then all of a sudden there's this
flatline called the dark ages where
nothing happened.
>> Is there a conventional explanation for
this
>> flatline for a thousand years?
>> The the collapse of Rome and uh and
falling into barbaris the time of
barbarism.
>> That's not plausible.
>> Everything is plausible. It's plausible
that sulfuric acid is used for RO uh
reverse osmosis uh water cleaning and so
everything is possible.
>> The question is is it probable? And
>> well Jamie just pulled up that that was
the first time they had ever ordered
that.
>> Oh. Oh really?
>> Yeah.
>> Okay. So well there it is.
>> Yeah. [laughter]
>> That's not good.
>> Yeah. That's not good. I mean that's the
least of the things. The thing is we
become desensitized to stuff. I mean
look at everything that has happened in
the last six years. It it's like an
insane amount of stuff has happened and
everyone's just kind of like numb to it.
>> Well, they get and I think it literally
is that people's brains have been fried.
>> You think by co vaccines?
>> Yeah, for sure.
>> Well, there's some scientific evidence
that for some people at least it crossed
the bloodb brain barrier and had some
sort of a detrimental effect on their
cognitive function. mRNA is
reprogramming your your your system
and uh and we're I think look and we've
been looking at a giant die off of
people. People are collapsing left and
nothing is normal anymore. I mean that
guy at the airport who's flipping out.
That's what he's realizing. He's having
a sudden awakening and he's tweaking
over it. He's like and he he's looking
around and no one cares.
>> Everyone just wants to like, you know,
get through their day.
Everyone wants to just make their next
movie and maybe they'll let me make
their next movie and everybody wants to
just, you know, I just want to keep
going at my job and I just want to do my
thing and I just want to protect my
thing.
>> There's certainly a lot of that going
on.
>> The British only care about as long as I
have my daily pint at the end of the
day. That's all they care about. You
know, they'll in the meantime their
entire country is being overtaken and
overrun by like when else in history has
this happened and ended well. [laughter]
>> No. Well, it's so shocking how quickly
it's happening in England that you just
go, how do you bounce back from this?
Like, what is the remedy?
>> Yeah.
>> Because they're they're doing this mass
arrest thing with social media posts,
which is bizarre. It's bizarre to watch.
And then they eliminate jury trials for
anything other than like murder and
rape.
>> If you say anything, you're in jail. If
you post, if you repost anything, you're
just immediately sent to jail. Look at
what's going on in Canada right now, you
know, with
>> Carney.
>> I mean, like, I think that's insane
what's going on. And most Canadians are
just kind of vibing along with it.
Nobody wants to rock the boat. Nobody
wants to be racist. Nobody wants to be
uh you know, nobody wants to be
discriminatory in any kind of way.
Rightfully so, like, you know, you and
you want to believe that your leaders
are are taking care of you and they're
not. And it's over. We've lost. It's
over. I mean,
>> you think it's over here in America as
well?
>> Well, it got slowed down a little bit.
It got slow whether you like Trump or
not. And I'm not like a I don't really
like anybody, but it
>> that's a healthy perspective.
>> It definitely added a road bump
>> in the in in the actions of the cabal of
the Clintons and the Obamas and and
their the bankers that that control
them. And that's when you see the movie
uh the counselor that's what you realize
is that wow the cartels are the banks
and they are law enforcement and they
are the media and they are everything
and there is no fighting it
>> and there is no individually fighting it
like there's nothing any of us can do
>> that is
>> and I don't mean to be I mean the only
thing you can do is uh you know affect
what's happening around you locally
within the moment But don't you think
that more people are aware of what's
going on right now? There's more push
back than ever before and so there's a
possibility that it could be stopped.
>> Yeah. Look at that guy. Look at that guy
in the airport though. Nobody Everyone's
like he's crazy. Like yelling at a
[ __ ] airport. I would think he's
crazy, too. If I was there waiting for
my flight to go visit my parents and
there's some [ __ ] guy yelling out the
Epstein f. You're just living your life.
Like, yeah, what do you want me to do,
dude? I'm I'm headed to Florida right
now. Invasion of the Body Snatchers was
about McCarthyism and what was going on
at that time. And both
>> Really?
>> Oh, yeah. It was The original Invasion
of the Body Snatchers was all about
McCarthyism. And
>> I'm the I'm a fan of the Donald
Southerntherland one.
>> Well, and look at And look at how that
ends. That ends with you're walking
through the streets pretending to be,
>> you know, like you're you're just
pretending to not be an alien, hoping
that you can get by. And then, you know,
the minute you show any kind of emotion,
that's it. You're caught. And then
they're going to make you go to sleep.
And uh and so I mean
>> so that the original script was written
about McCarthy as well.
>> The original uh um the original film.
Yeah. The Kevin McCarthy uh movie.
>> Okay. So
>> and in the end, look how that movie
ends. That movie ends with him like that
guy in the airport on the street, you
know. They're, you know, they're it's
it's they're aliens. You basically, you
know, running through the street just in
traffic and people just keep driving.
I don't remember the original one. I
might not have even seen it,
>> but the Southerntherland one was
amazing. I never would have thought that
that's what it was about.
>> I mean, I we're experiencing a kind of
Bolevik revolution at the moment right
now. So,
>> in what way?
>> Well, there's a rise of bullsheism. You
know, it's like we see it we see it
occurring. And
>> how do you define bullsheism? Well, uh,
it's the
Bolsheviks were [laughter]
essentially a kind of, uh, uh, I mean,
it's it's it it's it's not correct to
say communism, but it's basically a a
kind of authoritarianism,
you know, in the guise of egalitarianism
and and helping the world that we're all
going to be equal and everything, but it
>> and they were socialism. Yeah. they were
murdering Christians and socialist and
you know we're very very close to that
now. We're very very we're on we're
standing on civilization is standing on
the precipice at the moment. And by the
way uh you know after this podcast comes
out, people are going to be like, "Oh,
Avery's crazy. Avery went to jail.
Avery's a you know a killer." They're
going to say all sorts of [ __ ] about me
to discredit anything that I say. And
that's fine. like I'm easy to discredit
and so it's not really my right to speak
up anymore about anything. And so
>> you're a human being. It's always your
right to speak up.
>> Well, it it is but uh
>> they can eat [ __ ]
>> As I look as I look around like
civilization is on the precipice and you
know mostly good people tend to not take
action against stuff
>> until they have to
>> until they have to. We were talking
about this yesterday actually um with
Cheryl Hines and I was saying I think we
were talking about this I was talking
about this recently where I was saying
that it's almost like we need something
like a 9/11 to wake us up like I would
never want that to happen but I do
remember that after 9/11 we were united
cuz we realized oh threats are real
danger is real like we we really do need
to be united as one group a community
and and recognize that that we are
brothers andist sisters in the streets
are not our problem. And
>> yeah, but we even know about 9/11 now
that like so much of it was like we
building 7 thermite like the evidence is
there for anyone to look at.
>> Nobody wants to look at
>> and nobody wants to look at it because
and that is
>> nobody wants to look into the conspiracy
like how did these guys get a hold of
these planes? How did they fly into the
building? Who why were the the dancing
Israelis watching it cheering it on? Why
did they get, you know, shipped out of
the country?
>> Yeah. And that guy who uh who owned the
building, who bought it, who took out it
like the insurance policy and then, you
know, had uh Elliot Spitzer kind of push
it through and force it through so that
he could receive his billions in
insurance claim
because they wanted to tear because they
wanted to tear down that building and it
would have been too expensive to do and
all the asbestous and everything. So,
hey, not to just destroy it.
>> It's like what was that building
housing? Like building seven? Building 7
was housing all sorts of it was like was
an IRS uh I mean
>> NSA.
>> Yeah, it was NSA and
>> what was in building 7? Let's find that
out so we don't just
>> I think but there was certainly some
intelligence and data that was being
collected in building the the the fact
that no one wants to admit that that
building fell like a controlled
demolition is really crazy. And again,
I'm not saying it's a controlled
demolition, but the fact that people
want to say no, it wasn't like a
controlled demolition. Like, when was
the last time you ever saw a [ __ ]
building collapse like that ever? Only
controlled demolitions. There's been
many buildings that have been very badly
damaged and lit on fire, but their frame
remains.
>> Reputable structural engineers have
basically also proven the towers could
not have fallen the way they fell
without uh explosives. Um, you know,
pre-planned explosives. Okay.
>> And the people on the scene, the the
rescuers on the scene, the people who
were there said, "Yeah, I heard
explosion." Boom, boom, boom, boom. And
they're describing the sounds of uh
controlled demolition.
>> US Secret Service floors 9 through 10.
CIA, the Department of Defense sharing
the 25th floor with the IRS and the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Like you put all that together, CIA,
Department of Defense, IRS, you know,
who thinks any of those people have your
[laughter]
>> like also if you wanted data,
>> you wanted to destroy data, like didn't
the part of the Pentagon that got hit,
wasn't and that was also a day after
Rumsfeld was saying that there was
trillions of dollars that were
unaccounted for.
>> Yeah.
>> Didn't the accounting part of the
Pentagon get hit by that air quotes?
>> Yeah. Yeah. That that plane that was
that plane that came in very
>> Jamie screen last
>> the building contained about 24,000
gallons of diesel fuel for generators
used by tenants like Solomon Brothers
and the emergency command center floors
46 through 47 and parts of the lower
level were mechanical spaces while files
from federal investigations
uh secret service cases were stored
there but lost in the collapse
>> and the SEC.
>> And the SEC whoopsies. And has the world
been the same since then?
>> The SEC like having that there too. Boy,
that's super convenient. Guys, we lost
the data. Let's just start from scratch.
>> There's no case anymore. Whatever they
were doing
>> and yet nobody wants to accept it.
Nobody. And nobody cares. Video of it.
That is like really shocking. I had this
real really dumb guy on the podcast once
that was uh a skeptic, a professional
skeptic, and he was really angry with me
for saying that it looked like a
controlled demolition. You you know,
you're
>> you're promoting a dangerous conspiracy
theory. I'm like, "No, I'm saying it
looks like you're saying it doesn't look
like a control. Let's watch it." I'm
like, "Let's watch it. Let's it falls."
>> Conspiracy theorists have had a pretty
good run lately.
>> Let's watch it. Let's watch building 7
collapse because it's kind of kooky.
Now, one thing that people do point out
that is true is that the center, like
there was a a small structure at the top
of the roof, building 7, that collapses
first, and it does it like I think a
minute before the actual building.
>> These are skirt built. These are skirt
buildings. And what that means is that's
actually the most structurally sound
part of the building. The rest of the
movie is a facade that's hanging off of
the inner building.
>> Yeah. The that's the the most sound part
of the building. is built over a con
Edison substation requiring large
transfer trusses on lower floor floors
to support the tower above creating long
span floors vulnerable to thermal
expansion. Long unsupported floor beams
and girders up to 50 ft connected to
critical in critical interior columns
like column 79 with sheer studs that
failed under fire induced lateral loads
rather than just gravity.
>> It was the automanual flip-flop. The
exterior tube frame provided stiffness,
but the open interior layout lacked
redundancy to prevent fire induced
progressive collapse with connections
not designed for horizontal thermal
forces.
Okay, that's a cute way of saying that's
why it fell at freef fall speed and
looks like a controlled demolition. Cuz
if that was my building, I would say,
give me my [ __ ] money back. You made
this [ __ ] ass building. This building
got lit on fire and just collapsed on
itself. Let's watch it collapse because
the way it collapses is so kooky because
it really does it at freef fall speed or
close to it. It's strange. Like there's
never been a building that looks that
intact that falls like that. It's weird,
man. I mean, it's [ __ ] weird. Anybody
that says it's not weird, look, this is
how it happened.
It's weird. Now, the planes hitting
tower one and tower two.
>> Okay, that makes more sense to me. Does
it? Yeah. Does it? Yeah, because it fell
from the top down like it looks normal.
It doesn't collapse into its base. Tower
7 collapses into its base. The way to
>> How about the testimony of people saying
they heard multiple pop pop explosions?
Is that just girder snapping?
>> It could be. Yeah. I mean, you got to
think you have immense immense amounts
of weight and it is collapsing. So, if
it does collapse the way it looks, it's
collapsing from the top down. It's not
going to be silent. You're going to hear
tremendous explosions. When concrete
hits the slabs below it, it's going to
sound like explosions. Also, you have
the fog of war, right? So, you have
these people that are involved in
extremely traumatic situation and their
memory is very [ __ ] Like, your memor
is [ __ ] when you experience something
like this. You remember things funny.
You have confirmation bias. There's a
lot of weird stuff that happens. So,
this is the this is the explanation that
a piece of the plane falls down and hits
that building.
>> Big tower on top.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'm sorry. A piece of
the uh building I meant to say. Sorry.
So, that that piece of the building
falls down and not a plane obviously the
hits the building next to it, tower 7.
And that gash
>> is all it took to take that building
down. That's super suspect. And I do
know that there was a fire inside the
building. I'm sure. I'm sure there was.
But the way it fell was crazy. That see
tower one and tower two. It's like I
don't know what happens when a jet flies
into a a building like that. Neither do
you. And also you got to deal with
corrupt construction companies, cutting
corners, not doing things up to code.
Perhaps. Perhaps I'll give you that.
I'll be super charitable. But with
building seven, I'm like, come on, man.
That's weird. That one's [ __ ] weird.
because it doesn't fall like one and
two. One and two fall from where the
impact was, the deterioration of the
structure, the weight of what's above
the impact. It falls down on it and you
see a progressive collapse from the top
to the bottom. Tower 7 is nuts. Tower 7
just drops. Just drops all at once. Free
sp free freef fall speed into its base.
That's weird.
>> Yeah. Anybody that doesn't think that's
weird is being naive.
>> Yeah,
>> that's never happened before to a
building that hasn't been a controlled
demolition. Again, not saying it it's a
controlled demolition. Maybe it's
accurate that these enormous drums of
diesel are creating this fire
unprecedented load on the structure of
the building.
>> But see, even that with everything else
that occurred, with all the tangental
stuff that's occurred, you're still
like giving the benefit of the doubt.
will have suspension. But I'm saying
right now, I was trying to finish that
fire is not on every floor uniformly. So
why is it collapsing uniformly from the
top down into the base? Why doesn't the
base where you have this incredible fire
load, why doesn't that weaken and it
fall over sideways because it no longer
has structure anymore? Why is it every
floor has the same amount of damage and
it gives in at the exact same time? That
kind of doesn't make sense because the
fire is not uniform throughout the
building. It's not like the the building
is one gigantic flame ball and then it
all gives out at the same time. But even
then, I would think it would tip over.
It would fall to the side. Falling into
its base. That seems to indicate some
sort of a control. Like it was done
uniformly. They time it. When you watch
like in Vegas when they blow up a
casino, it's like
and then it does that.
>> Let's watch watch an actual controlled
demolition.
>> So when you watch an actual controlled
demolition, it looks just like that. It
looks just like that. And then I don't
know. I mean the testimony of your eyes
are telling you the truth,
>> but your brain, you know, will come up
with all sorts of stuff because Mundus
Vault Deep.
>> Well, I'm not allowing it to with Tower
7. I've always maintained a a pretty
open mind with that, but also I lean
towards shenanigans in that one because
that one just seems [ __ ] The Tower
one and Tower Two maybe. Maybe Tower 7.
Come on.
>> Yeah.
>> Tower. Nobody looks. And if they're if
they're telling you that Tower 7 seems
normal, that seems they seem so
gaslighty. Everybody that says that
seems like they're gaslighting.
>> So, here we go. Hit it.
Okay. This one's they're setting up for
a controlled demolition. So, they're
showing you how. That's kind of a shitty
one.
>> There's other ones that have done a
better job with, but it's the same kind
of thing.
>> It's still falling into onto itself.
>> Yes. It's falling into itself the same
way Tower 7 did. That's
>> See that movie? That building has a
different shape.
>> That has a a skirt building. It's got a
center structure in there.
>> Yeah. It's a different kind of
structure. It has a different look to
it. Let's watch that one. Okay. There.
Like there. Come on. That looks exactly
like tower 7. When you watch that, back
that up again a little bit, please.
Watch that from the top. From the
beginning. Just a little bit before
right before it drops. So, watch.
They're looking. They're watching. We're
going to watch the building drop. There
it is. That [ __ ] goes right down like
tower. Like from there, come on. That's
exactly like a control demolition. And
even the way it looks as it's going down
looks exactly like tower.
>> You know, we were talking about
predictive programming and how movies
and like spells can predict stuff in
advance and uh you know kind of prepare
you for the future of what's coming. You
know in 1999 a movie came out which was
effectively a manifesto and that movie
was called Fight Club and uh in what's
the end of that movie? The end of that
movie is the collapsing of the buildings
which are the financial system you know
of the future so that they can create a
new future. Who produced that movie?
Arnon Milshan. Who is Arnon Milshan? And
they got a commercial director to do it.
Fincher and like he's an excellent
director and I think it's a excellently
beautifully made film but who is Arnon
Milchon? Well, you know he himself has
said I am a MSAD agent and he he said
that out loud like that's not me saying
that. That's him saying that. And
Fincher said oh yeah my last movie uh
that was made by an arms dealer. Well
that's him. That's Arnon Milshan. And so
you know and what's another Arnon
Milshan movie? uh the Medusa touch with
uh um George C. Scott and I think Lee
Rimik. And in that movie, what happens?
An airplane crashes into a building. And
you could probably pull that one up,
too. An airplane crashes into a
building. This guy's obsessed with
airplanes crashing into buildings and
buildings collapsing in movies. And so
what's likely, you know, is he has he
been reading uh these scenario plans
that uh defense departments make and
that are maybe, you know, uh uh MSAD uh
you know, plans that are made. I've
worked for the DoD through John Millius
and we wrote scenarios. They gathered
together a bunch of Hollywood writers
into a you know into a uh what is it
like like a conference room like a it
was like more like a ballroom but like a
small one and gathered a bunch of us
together around a table and said let's
come up with ways on how to attack Los
Angeles and we all wrote scenarios on
how to attack LA and now they just use
AI to do all that but so you know has he
just been like reading these does he
have access to them and so he just puts
them into his movies? Well, that movie
was made in 1999, and what happened
right after that movie got released?
Those buildings came down. 9/11 came
down. And so, is it predictive
programming where you're showing the
world what's to come and that makes it
almost somewhat acceptable to do?
>> Whoa.
>> Or is it just coincidence?
>> And most and most people out there will
say, "Oh, no, it's just coincidence.
It's coincidence. He just happens to be
I mean, that's what's what he has said.
I don't know if he is or not MSAD, but
that's what he said. So,
>> well, that's the thing about the major
term conspiracy theorist. It's it's
slapped on things and it immediately
sort of diffuses any real questioning
of, oh my god, are things this bad? Is
there this much? But as time goes on and
you're confronted with more and more
information. And I think we're in the
beginning stages of reckoning with these
files that were just released where so
many people like, I haven't really read
much of it. I've only read the things
that are really outrageous that my
friends have sent me because I'm just
trying to maintain my sanity.
>> Well, that's just it. Most people want
to maintain sanity. You just like I just
want to get through the day, you know? I
just want to like You're busy. Yeah.
Well, and it's even more than busy. I
want to be happy, right?
>> I want to raise my children in a in a
world that is, you know, a peaceful
world and uh where people respect each
other and where we can like you can make
something out of yourself, you know,
through hard work and through merit. You
know, it's like that's the world I want
to live in. And more and more it feels
like we're not in that world.
>> Did you see that thing that was just
released today? I think it's the AI
company Anthropic. I think that's the
company. So, one of its engineers
resigned and essentially said that
humanity is doomed. Yeah.
>> And he's going to move to the UK and
just write poetry and just wait it out.
>> Hasn't that guy seen Threads?
[laughter] Like the UK is like one of
the most dangerous places to be. That's
where he's going to wait it out. Like
that's uh
>> Well, he probably has his
>> Well, when he says UK, does he mean like
where
>> I'm not sure. Maybe he means like the
Scottish Highlands.
>> Maybe he's going to hide.
>> Yeah.
>> And go into some small town and [ __ ]
just hang out at a pub.
>> Yeah. They're going to populate that
town with uh [laughter] suddenly 800 uh
war capable men from uh you know,
another country are going to move in and
they're going to move into the local
some place that the the West has
conveniently been bombing and creating
refugees on.
>> Yeah. Creating angry people.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. And who have a
>> God, you don't want to think that it's
all planned out like that. But
>> of course you don't like uh you know
>> that was a bit of the exposure of US
aid, you know. So uh I like many people
thought US aid was about aid. I thought
it was like a beautiful philanthropic
program where the United States donates
money to all these poor countries.
That's how they get food. Like I had
Bono on the show and he's like, "I've
heard that 30,000 people have already
starved to death because of this. 30
million people are going to die." And
I'm like, "Okay, but do you know how
much corruption was involved with this?
Do you know that it's not aid? It's the
Agency for International Development."
And mostly what they were doing was
regime change [ __ ] And Mike Benz laid
it out and he said US aid was for
tasks that were too dirty for the CIA.
>> Yeah.
>> Which is crazy. So, like if they've been
engineering this long game and
engineering the collapse of legitimate
governments all throughout the world,
bombing places, creating refugees, and
then having these not just open border
policies, but inviting and helping
people get into countries and then
giving them money once they get there.
>> Yeah.
>> Like so many people do not want to admit
that that was really going on despite
all the evidence. That's another like
it's designed to destroy whatever
confidence you have in law enforcement,
in civilization, in the electoral
process.
>> Yeah. What's the answer? Okay. So, given
a choice between uh totalitarianism
or cannibalism, you know, which would
you prefer?
>> Right. Right. You take cannibalism
because you don't want to be eaten.
>> Yeah.
>> No, I mean you take totality
totalitarianism because you don't want
to be eaten. Like I would rather not be
in the movie The Road, but I feel like
we're turn I feel like we're
increasingly in the movie Children of
Men. And I mean that's that movie was a
pretty accurate futurist uh um example
of where we're heading
>> with collapsing birth rates and
>> uh at least portions of civilization
looking at extinction
>> and uh
>> I mean they're experiencing that
totalitarian South Korea, Japan. Yeah.
>> What is Can you find that guy's
manifesto or excuse me
>> Coron is a genius for making that film.
I just want to say
>> Children of Men. Yeah. Fantastic movie.
>> Um so today is my last day at Anthropic.
I resigned. Here's the letter I shared
with my colleagues explaining my
decision. That's a lot to read. What is
the synopsis? Just ask perplexity what
the synopsis of what this guy um said.
>> Okay. Chararma who built defenses
against AI assisted bioteterrorism and
push for transparency on model risks at
the San Francisco AI firm announced his
resignation on Monday. He described
struggles to let values guide actions
amid mounting pressures planning to
return to the UK for a poetry degree and
stepped back from the spotlight. His
exit follows other safety team
departures amid Anthropic's launch of
Claude Opus 4.6 six in a massive $20
billion funding round at $350
$350 billion valuation fueling debates
on balancing safety with commercial
speed.
>> Okay. What but what is he saying
specifically is the issue.
>> Let's click on that. Let's [ __ ] it.
Let's click on his
>> AI started talking to him and scared the
be Jesus out of him.
>> The safe holes. if he's part of the the
guiding of the wait, Damn it, lost the
word.
>> Yeah. Um
>> bioweapon. I mean, look, this guy's
built something and uh all of a sudden
he's realizing all the players that are
funding it are likely, you know, scary
scary people.
>> Yeah. Scary people who are
>> who are all in the same club, you know,
drinking baby blood and together.
>> What's oal again? [ __ ] Money. Mikonium,
which is like uh it's a thing.
>> Baby poop. Yeah. Um that's in the files.
>> What comes next? I do not know. I think
fondly of this famous Zen quote, "Not
knowing is most intimate." What my
intention is to create a space to set
aside the structures that have held me
these past years and see what might
emerge in their absence. He's already
working on his poetry right here. I feel
called to writing that addresses and
engages fully with the place we find
ourselves and that place that places
poetic truth alongside scientific truth
as equally valid ways of knowing.
>> Yeah, it was written for him by AI.
[laughter]
>> Elon said something very bizarre
recently. He was talking about the speed
of light that the speed of light cannot
be you can't bypass or exceed the speed
of light
>> if you believe Einstein. Yeah. He said
unless we live in a simulation
>> or unless Einstein was wrong.
>> Right?
>> I mean a lot of astrophysics is based on
a false premise that uh P equals P prime
and that the sun is like uh designed a
certain way and it's completely wrong
and everything that we know about the
stars and how we view the nature of the
universe is fundamentally incorrect.
>> How is it wrong? uh it's it's based on
this idea of this stability of Kelvin
temperatures in the sun and uh which is
this P equals P prime uh thing and the
guy who invented like CAT scan machines
there's sort of a vin diagram
overlapping of uh of you know this
photographic technique and astrophysics
and what he realized is holy cow
that is not true and therefore so much
of everything that we know about how we
view the cosmos is incorrect. And so,
um, and much
>> now, how'd they find out that it was
incorrect?
>> Well, he he's a mathematician. He
figured it out. I would have to look up
his name and everything.
>> And what is incorrect about it? Do you
remember that?
>> Uh, well, it's it's at the beginning of
astrophysics, there is this formula, and
if that formula is wrong, then the
preceding calculations are also wrong or
at least off. Mhm.
>> And so the idea is that, you know, what
we view is is really just a it's kind of
a cartoon that's painted for us using
all these formulas and and using radio
telescopes. And so, you know, it's
things are not as they seem.
>> Well, they've already they already have
issues with the findings from the James
Webb telescope.
>> Oh, yeah. Well, that's probably part of
it. Yeah. You know, I have to say like I
mean I'm a provocator and so I'm always
interested in uh um finding that which
upsets people's you know concepts of
things and that's partly because I'm a
screenwriter and I'm looking for these
kind of conflicts and interesting ideas
and stuff like that. So take what I'm
about to say with a grain of salt. But
uh the big one, the biggest conspiracy
theory that freaks everybody out is flat
earth. Now I don't know what the earth
is, but experientially through the
testimony of the eyes, it is flat. And
there is very little chance that I will
ever in my life or most of us will ever
in our life experience anything other
than what is effectively a flat earth.
And uh you and and you know the way uh
laser sighting across large bodies of
water or navigation nap maps for air air
travel, you know, for for pilots is
always the presumption of a flat earth.
>> It's always in the uh pilot manuals and
on and on maps.
>> How?
>> Well, if you're flying a jet at low
altitude, you're not making corrections
for curvature even though you're going
fast enough where you should be. And so
what's actually happening there? Well,
um, and so the the idea is, look, I
don't know what the world is or what the
realm that we're in is, but
experientially from my perspective in
life, it is nothing but a it's a flat
earth.
>> But what about travel routes? Like what
about when they fly over Antarctica?
What if they
>> That's Well, they don't fly away,
>> but you can watch the sun [laughter]
rise and fall as
>> they don't even they don't even fly from
Cape Town to Buenosares.
>> There's a procession of the equinox.
>> They travel up into into the other
hemisphere and like land in London or
something and then travel back down
whenever you're doing a a flight across
the Atlantic. And so like uh when you
look at it on a flat Earth map,
>> those satellite photographs of Earth
from space.
>> Those are all cartoons.
>> What are you talking about? I'm saying
that uh even the NASA the guys who
actually do those composits those are
composite imagery of uh listen I'm not I
am not saying that
>> but it seems like you're saying that the
earth is possibly flat
>> I'm saying experientially
>> right
from your daily
>> that's a scale issue though
>> correct
>> we're a tiny little thing on an enormous
thing
>> correct
>> but you know snipers have to calculate
for the curvature of the earth when they
shoot
>> only only the curvature of the landscape
that they're on.
>> Right. Why do you think the landscape
curves?
>> The landscape doesn't curve. The It is a
mountainous and
>> uneven. No. On flat planes, you have to
do the same thing if you're making a
long shot over a flat area like if you
had to shoot.
>> Well, then why then why don't pilots
make adjustments?
>> I'm not a pilot. I don't know. But but I
do know that when you look at the film
from the space station, presume a flat
Earth. When you look at the film from
the space station, you see an earth
that's not just round but spinning.
>> I see I what I actually this the the
space station, you know, the not uh the
International Space Station is actually
not high enough to see curvature and
what you're seeing is uh lens, you know,
the lens distortion
>> and
>> it's not high enough to see curvature
when you look out into the horizon. And
it's actually even like it's it's very
very close to the
>> let's look at footage from the space
station of Earth. So when you see
satellite images that are taken of the
Earth, you think they're lying? You
think there's this grand conspiracy to
piece all these pictures together and
turn it into a circle instead of
>> I'm saying is that's the fundamental
uh conspiracy theory that unravels
everyone. And
>> well, it doesn't make any sense because
everything that we see in the cosmos
that's a planetary body is round,
including stars.
>> So, it's all round except for small
moons. Everything is round. And that
that's because
>> I'm not even I'm not even certain
certain
>> that space exists.
>> That well that the moon is anything more
than a plasma.
>> A plasma?
>> Yeah.
>> What does that mean?
>> That it's a that it's a plasma effect, a
lenticular effect of some kind. So that
it's not a real thing, but it affects
the tides. It is something that we have
landed at the very least. We've landed
probes on.
>> We don't know that itffects. People
theorize this is
>> that it affects the tides
>> footage from the space station.
>> This is live footage from the space
station.
>> And I'm saying that and I'm saying
that's lens curvature and that what
you're actually seeing.
>> Why do you think that's lens curvatur?
>> What you're seeing is horizon.
>> So what you're talking about is like
>> if I'm trying to provoke you, that's
what I'm saying,
>> right? But let's not do that. right now
because I don't want you to be
completely [ __ ] insane cuz this is a
round body just like the moon, just like
Mars, just like Jupiter, just like
Uranus appears on that appears to be a
but in your practical life experience.
You have to accept a certain amount of
faith is what I'm getting at at any
moment.
>> But they understand the procession of
the equinox.
>> Okay. Do you know that the procession of
the Ignosis is how they measure the the
sky over a period of 26,000 years?
>> I see right there a little uh stitching
like right there.
>> I So this will just keep going straight
forever.
>> Do you see that line? Do you see that
line right there? What is that?
>> What is that line?
>> Yeah. What is that line? Well, that
looks like uh stitching to me. It looks
like they've stitched together and it
crosses over there through that mountain
range right there.
>> That is weird. Whatever that is. So for
your by your very example, I'm just
saying that you have to have a certain
amount of faith in that. And on the
surface, Mundus vault decap.
>> Okay. Okay. Okay. You you're freaking me
out. Go back go back to [laughter] that
Jamie. So what is the explan? Go back a
little bit.
>> Yeah. What is the explanation of that
line right there? I don't know.
>> Right. But how weird is that? That is
weird that there's this line,
>> right? Because that in itself is a
composite image, a cartoon that has been
put together for you to look at this
this apparent live imagery.
>> So
And
>> is this multiple images that are
supposedly pieced together? Is that what
they're
>> I'm saying that things fall into like
the way perspective works is that things
appear to fall into the horizon, but now
you use a what is that camera? Is it a
P200 camera that where you can actually
zoom in and lift things out of the
horizon that have appeared to fall into
the horizon? This live video, this live
video feed from the International Space
Station has
>> has been interrupted because of because
you're watching too much
>> due to either a [laughter] change in the
onboard camera configuration or a loss
of signal with the communications
network. The video return when a
connection is reestablished. So, this is
during the live feed.
>> This isn't from NASA's YouTube channel.
It's just down right now.
>> It's just down right now. Okay. So,
you're you're saying that this is like a
fisheye effect of a lens.
>> Yeah. I'm saying that potentially. I'm
saying that and and that we can even see
that whenever they're up there shooting
with uh cameras outside, you're like,
"Oh, there's the there's the there's the
curvature." And then every now and then
the camera turns and the and it inverts
for a moment, then it goes back down.
>> I've never seen that.
>> I watch a lot of NASA stuff. And listen,
I'm not saying that we're not living on
a globe or at least an oblate spheroid
as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, but have
you ever noticed how spasticated that
guy gets whenever you throw out the word
flat earth? He flips out like the way
Robert Dairo flips out on uh on like
irrationally he flips out.
>> He flips out when you say that men can't
be women, which is very weird.
>> Yeah.
>> And that they should be able to compete
in women's sports
>> which is very weird. like a man for a
man of science. That's bonkers.
>> Or that they should be able to go to
jail and that a sex offender
>> [ __ ] insane. Not just that, but
rapists who put in jail women and then
they have to pay for their electrolysis
and breast augmentation, which is okay.
>> At what point in time do you say that
this is some sort of a bizarre agenda
that you're trying to get us to accept
something that doesn't make any [ __ ]
sense? So much so that you're willing to
house male prisoners and with females
because they say they're a male with an
intact penis and then even if they get
like female prisoners pregnant or rape
them. We're all just trying to construct
what reality is and it tends to be a a
consensus of what it is. But you know
there are fringes that on the ends that
don't believe with what the consensus
says. Are they wrong? But do you know
how many people would have to be
involved to promagate this idea that
there's a a flat earth and you got to
cover up that thing and pretend it's
round? And what what's the motivation of
covering up the fact that the earth is
flat? It's an I mean, if we're really
fundamentally getting down to it, it's
about God and it's about what is this
realm that we're in and are we part of
creation and uh you know,
>> but why would it be more likely every
culture throughout recorded history
draws us in this kind of flat earthish
environment with a dome, a firmament
that uh covers it up until like when uh
the 1930s or
>> when they start making telescopes
>> when they well and
>> right I mean so this is a grand
conspiracy like Galileo was wrong,
Capernicus was wrong, all these people
recorded history is wrong and I mean the
other the other option is that we are
just specks of nothing floating around
[snorts] in an endless vast nothing that
goes on forever and that you are
completely insignificant that you are
not God's perfect creation which I think
you are. Well, that doesn't they're not
mutually exclusive. You know, just
because we are in this vast cosmos
that's almost impossible for mammal
minds to to grasp the magnitude of it
doesn't mean that God's not real.
>> It's exclusive to people who who believe
the Bible word for word. I'm not saying
I do necessarily. I I am uh uh I would
be considered apostate, you know, by
most uh um by most people. I've been
reading the Bible a lot. And one of the
problems that I find is it's clearly got
the hand of man on it.
>> Well, it's been edited. Yes, it's been
edited. You know, the King James or who
was King James? He wrote Bible. He wrote
books on demon on demons as well. And
so, uh, who was
>> Well, even the Old Testament,
>> the Old Testament has the hand of man on
it. Not just that, but it's also been
translated so many different times. Like
ancient Hebrew, the letters double as
numbers. There's no numbers in ancient
Hebrew. words have numerical value to
them
>> and you know imagine translating such a
complex language where like the letter
the word God and the word love they have
the same numerical value I believe I
read here's another thing I've read that
I don't know if it's true so let me find
out if that's true put that into
perplexity
>> there's a lot of weird stuff in the
Bible in gen in Genesis when the book
the Nephilim come down and they find
women comly and so they like okay What's
actually going on there? These angels or
Nephilim are are coming down and they're
taking women from men and having sex
with them and then creating uh you know
hybrid offspring.
>> When representative uh Anna Paulina Luna
was here, she told me about the book of
Enoch. She like, "You have to read that.
Have you ever read it?" I go, "No." So I
read it.
>> Holy.
>> Have you seen the Carpenter Son? The
Nicholas Cage movie?
>> No.
>> Incredible. I What did I just have you
look up though before I lose my train of
thought?
>> The King James Bible thing.
>> What?
>> That's what I was trying to ask
specifically. Which part did you ask
about?
>> No, what I what I asked you was u
ancient Hebrew. So the letters also
dropped those numbers. That's what that
movie pi is all about.
>> And that the word love and the word God
have the same numerical value. I'm very
>> very certain that that's true, but I
want to really double check.
>> Numerology exists around us everywhere.
and you know everything you it seems to
have a kind of and that's what the
Areronowski film Pi was kind of all
about is that
>> that was a great movie.
>> Yeah, it's a very there was also
>> he's a very interesting film.
>> A really fascinating statement by this
uh mathematician we talked about it on a
recent podcast was that how strange is
it that we find out that the universe is
made out of math and that it's encoded
in the universe itself. So a tool that
we used that human beings created to
measure the universe. It turns out that
that that tool is how the universe is
actually encoded.
>> Well, this gets back to what Elon is
saying about the world being a
simulation.
>> You I mean what is a simulation? A
simulation.
>> So it says no in ancient Hebrew whatever
that word is gatria. Uh no direct name
of God shares the exact same numerical
value as the word for love. So what is
the basis of that rumor? Uh sacred name
equals 26. A name for God equals 86.
>> Okay. Is there a a word for God?
>> Elohim.
>> Is that have the same?
>> It's a name,
>> right? What is the value of click on
that below that below that where it says
what is the gemantric? What was that
word?
>> I had to look it up. It's
>> gimatria. Yeah.
>> Primary Jewish mysticis. Oh, Cabala.
>> Yeah.
>> Religious studies to find hidden
spiritual meanings in sacred texts.
Okay.
>> It is fascinating though that there's
numerical value in words. Like you
there's no way you're going to get that
when you translate it to Latin. Uh so
that has a Greek
>> that has a value of 86. And what is
love's value?
>> What is the value? What is the ancient
Hebrew word for love?
What is the ancient Hebrew word for
love?
>> That's that what you mean by love is
going to be very
>> you have to say. Do you mean like love
between two people?
>> Okay. What is the geantri that doggy in
the window like a child?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's a good point.
That's a good point.
>> Probably different words for it.
>> Definitely. So what is that? Click on
that. What's the geantria value of
avala? Right there. Right there. Yeah,
click on that.
It's 13. So that's a different number,
too. Interesting.
>> 13 twice equals 26. The value of Yahweh.
>> Yeah.
>> Huh. This movie, The Carpenter Son, is
all about the infancy of Jesus. that I
think is written by Matthew and it's
part of these uh um I mean
I may have this wrong but uh Coptic
texts and it is like
>> Cage is so good in this movie
>> but so twice 13 equals 26 the value of
Yahweh implying love mirrors or
completes God God's essence okay so
that's where that comes from
>> I was going to ask where it came from,
>> right? That's where it comes from. So
God is love. So love twice is coming
from God.
>> Um so here's a here's a question. What
happened the so the go
>> I understand I understand. Go to ask a
followup.
>> Um so the how was the numerical value of
ancient Hebrew language
lost when they translated it to Latin
>> to Greek? But to Greek first, right?
>> How is the numerical value of ancient
Hebrew words?
>> Numerical value of ancient Hebrew words
lost when they translated it to Greek
because it seems like if the it's not
just context like what is your word for
that? Like the word meant a different
thing to them.
you know numerical values of ancient
Hebrew words calculated via geratria
uh where letters double as numbers was
not preserved in Greek translations.
Um Hebrew letters inherently carry fixed
numerical values enabling word sums. Um
Greek letters have their own values. Uh
equivalents rarely match Hebrew sums
exactly. So you're going to lose it.
Like you know when you read like um
Russian translations of English or
English to Russian it gets like super
screwy
>> for sure. For sure.
>> Is this for sure like real
>> ancient Spanish
incredibly difficult
>> even all
>> all words mean another number that all
have some sort of secret meaning.
>> Runic writing from the Nordics is the
same thing and there is a striking
resemblance between many of the runes
with uh Hebrew. And so these ideas and
these glyphs and symbols that Odin first
saw while hanging upside down from the
tree and learned uh language and how to
speak are somewhat universal across the
planet.
>> We'll get to that for a second, but
let's find out what Jaime's saying.
primarily used in Jewish mysticism and
religious studies to find hidden
spiritual meanings in sacred texts like
Torah by assigning numerical values to
Hebrew letters and words, revealing
connections between concepts and
exploring the universe's underlying
structure. What's interesting is like
it's an older language, but doesn't that
seem like a more complex language? A
language that combines nu numerical
value with words like that. Like if you
said something to me, uh it's not just
implied by your tone or by the context
of what you're saying that I understand
what it means to you, but it's it's in
the numerical value of the words. That
seems like a better way to communicate
>> than just nouns and verbs and adverbs
like
>> rather than bifurcating
>> numbers and letters together. Like
sounds like a way better move. I mean,
doesn't it? It seems like if you can
understand that and if you grew up with
that that seems like that would be a
much richer and deeper way of
communicating. Isaac Azimoff wrote a
book called Is Azimoff on numbers which
is fantastic which talks about this and
he talks about Kalahari Bushmen who have
no concept of the number zero and how
they process and understand concepts
like you know uh when no one is around
uh you know if the village is empty and
things like that. And so uh you just
different people are just trying to
figure out how to articulate everything.
And you know, computer programming is a
language that utilizes numbers.
>> It's weird when there's like certain
languages that don't have a word for
something, so people really grasp they
have a hard time grasping what the [ __ ]
you're trying to say.
>> Like what's the translation for this?
Like what? We don't have a word for
that.
>> We don't we don't understand the concept
of empathy. Well, well, there's certain
um cultures that are like um uh tribal
cultures that can't understand the
concept of maintenance.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
>> They don't have it. I've heard that.
I've heard that.
>> Yeah. Which is weird. Like you think
about it like Oh, right.
>> Why would they need maintenance? Why
would they need maintenance?
>> If you live a subsistence lifestyle, you
live off the land, you don't need
maintenance.
>> And then suddenly you're thrust into the
21st century and the Chinese are
building highways for you and and the
highways collapse.
>> Yeah. and the highways has collapsed
because no one's maintaining it,
>> right? Yeah, it's interesting.
>> But it's a it's interesting
>> pulling people out of the stone age and
dropping them into or maybe the iron age
or and dropping them suddenly into
>> to take this back to this idea that
we're missing a thousand years. So if we
really are missing this one for there's
two things I want to get I want to get
to that and I added a thousand years
added a thousand years. I really want to
get to that and uh well the I meant by
uh missing like they don't they don't
exist in the real world right
>> I want to get to that and I want to get
to is there a conventional explanation
for that stitching why that image like
what is the mainstream
>> I got to dig up what that what we were
even looking at I don't I don't it was
not the NASA channel we were looking at
I don't you know I can dig down that
rabbit hole
>> where were we looking at
>> I don't I've tried to pick up a video of
the live
>> you know the globe imagery that
>> hold on a second so that image might not
have been an official image that might
have been something that someone
created.
>> I'm not saying that. No. Well, let me
retract so I words aren't taken out of
context. I'm just saying it was it
seemed like a live video. It was live on
YouTube.
>> Oh, but it could have been AI.
>> Who? Yeah. I have to go back to look at
the I'm working fast over here.
>> No, I get it, dog. I get it.
>> That's why [laughter]
Jamie, you do the job of 15 dudes. So, I
I appreciate
>> I found a video from 11 years ago on
Vimeo that is from SpaceX. So, it's not
NASA, it's someone else. And it's like
it's a up and down of the rocket. You
can argue all day that it's got
curvature. It doesn't have curvature.
>> When you see a rocket launch, what does
it do? It goes kind of sideways across
the sky. And so, like we've now seen
that, you know, pretty regularly. And
that's because they're really not going
above the troposphere, which
>> well, I watched this. I watched the
SpaceX launch live. I was there. It went
straight up in the air
>> and then it curves and it travels
sideways across the sky until it meets
the horizon
>> to a certain orbit and then it traveled
and dropped off in Australia 35 minutes
later. I went to
>> No, I watched the entire thing from the
command center. I watched it from like
24 different cameras.
>> Mhm.
>> But how high did it go? Did it go above
the troposphere?
[sighs]
>> Not likely. Like this is not
>> the troposphere. Is that this is like
>> what how many miles is that up? This is
low Earth orbit where
>> Right. But at low Earth orbit, Jesus
Christ, that looks like a globe, huh?
>> But watch as the camera rotates. Just
>> This is also an edited video. I don't
want to get stuck in this.
>> Right. Right. Like this.
>> As Elon would say, uh, it it's real
because it looks fake. Or when it looks
fake, that's when you know it's real.
>> Say that about Bigfoot then, [ __ ]
[laughter]
>> Because Bigfoot looks fake as [ __ ] And
it's definitely not real.
>> Uh, you know what's real? That Turkish
sharpshooter. That dude was like a G up
in the corner. Um, press play. See what
this is supposed to be.
>> It cuts.
>> It cuts. Okay.
>> Oh, I see. I see.
>> Yes.
>> So, it cuts a bunch of different.
>> So, now you can actually see an
inversion occurring on the on the um
horizon right there.
>> A small piece of it.
>> Correct. But the lens distortion on the
side of the frame is causing the um the
horizon there
>> to go the opposite way
>> to to invert. And that's because of lens
distortion.
>> I see what you're saying. if it was
>> and the fact of the matter is even at
the height that even at the height that
these are orbiting at and I'm not saying
like presuming presuming a globular uh
planet uh and even the word planet plane
it's like a plane at you know or the
horizon is horizontal like uh you know
even presuming that the height that
they're at right now you would still
only see you know a circular
uh um you see the limit of your vision
which which has a
>> because it's so massive.
>> Yeah. Which is because it's so massive.
You're still high enough. You're still
not high enough to truly see curvature.
>> If we are in a simulation and if
consciousness it affects the reality of
things and they are only real if we are
experiencing them. That's when things
get really squirly.
>> The testimony of your eyes like I know
that I am here right now. Not just the
testimony of your eyes, but your
consciousness interacting with reality
is what creates it.
>> Correct? I mean,
>> that's that's where things get super.
>> How do you know gravity exists for
example?
>> Well, gravity is not clearly defined.
Correct. Correct. Gravity numbers.
>> Gravity is a concept and it's a non
truly nonprovable concept because you
can prove the exact same thing through
density and buoyancy. you know, the
density and buoyancy, you know, make a
lot of sense. How come the oceans uh,
you know,
react the way they do and don't, you
know, it's it's uh uh it's not
necessarily provable, but it's
believable. You you come to a certain
point where you're like, okay, faith
takes over at this point. My faith in
that in gravity, my faith in the globe,
uh, because that's what's been told to
me since I was a baby. uh at a certain
point that just takes over and you not
just that and you accept that as a
fundamental piece of what reality is
because we want to believe we understand
the universe. What I'm saying is we
don't understand jack [ __ ] about the
universe. We don't know anything and all
we do is we believe what they tell us
and they is just the the cumulative
understanding of how things are. But in
ancient times they had a different
understanding of things and that was how
it was back then. And so because they
had no other way to describe,
>> right? But even then the reality is just
built things based on where the sun was
going to be during the solar equinox.
They also were aware of the procession
of the equinoxes which is the wobble of
Earth's orbit. So Earth spinning around
doesn't spin perfectly. There is a
26,000year wobble and you could predict
it by the night sky.
>> Somehow Polaris remains centered in the
sky and all stars rotate around it.
That's extraordinary. If we're traveling
>> What do you mean? So during the
procession of the equinoxes over a
26,000 year cycle, Polaris remains it
has remained spot and supposedly that's
cuz that's where we're flying towards as
a as a solar system as we travel through
the galaxy in this
equinoxes this wobble over a 26,000year
period. It will move in the sky. Well,
the the point of Polaris uh will always
remain uh where it is directly
>> the point but our perspective of it will
will vary depending upon where we are in
this 26,000 year cycle.
>> It undergoes a kind of uh penumbra of
sort a kind of motion of sorts that
changes a figure 8 time it changes. Look
at it says right here do the 26,000year
axial procession cycle the north star
changes over millennia. While Polaris is
the current north star, other stars have
held this position including Thuban 3000
BC and future stars will include Arai,
Alderain, Al Aldurin, Aldderman, and
Vega. So, it's not the same star. It's
just what is dependent upon where we are
in the procession of the equinoxes.
That's why.
>> Well, there there is.
>> It's not not that the Earth is flat.
>> I know it's true because it's on Google.
>> But it's not just that. We know where
they've they've been able to accurately
predict the motion of the procession of
the equinoxes based on the
constellations which are clearly mapped
out. So we understand this wobble and
this wobble may be responsible for
cycles of earth's earth's climate, how
things change and and be dependent upon
where the equator sits and where these
poles sit and how it wiggles around.
Remember when we were younger the sun
was kind of yellow and orange and now
it's just like white like reality is
changing. I mean things change.
>> The sun looks exactly the same to me.
>> Does you think the sun is the same? To
me it's
>> I think pollution has affected it
somewhat. Especially if you live in LA.
>> Well, there used to be more pollution
and so maybe that's an excuse of why uh
the sun would be more yellow, but I've
lived all over the world.
>> Did you see Epstein talking about
gravity?
>> Oh boy.
>> Oh, here we go.
>> With it. It's not It's very I'll just
say
>> what does he have to say?
>> It's fine. It's only 45 seconds. Try to
>> just let it go.
So, someone's pushing the ball because I
know I am confident that the only thing
that gets something to move is with a
force that pushes. So, there's a force
that's pushing the ball down. In fact,
>> he never he called it gravity. He
measured how fast it was pulled. but
never was able to explain why it
happened. How is it? What is gravity?
It's this. Everybody says, "Well, why
did the ball fall to the ground?"
Because gravity took it. But what's
gravity? That's as Fineman would say,
that's the name of the thing. We have no
idea what it is.
>> That's the end of that clip.
>> Before it's just density and buoyancy.
>> He was really into this topic
apparently.
>> Apparently, he knew a lot about it.
>> You know who you should have on is Eric
Dubet. Do you know who this guy is?
>> Oh, he's a flat earth guy. Yeah, he's
the flat earth guy and he's written a
book called Aundred Proofs. And in order
to prove something, you also have to
prove things wrong.
>> You went down some rabbit holes, Roger.
>> I look I'm a screenwriter and so I'm
always looking for things like this to
write stuff about. And so it's uh
>> so in order to prove I take it
>> in order to prove what?
>> Whenever you have a proof, you also have
to disprove. And so, you know, he he
wrote a book called 100 Proofs about uh
you know, [snorts] the the the nature
of, you know, the the earth and how it
is and has explanations for many of the
things you're you're talking about.
>> Hasn't he debated people that actually
understand
>> how you can prove that the earth is
round?
>> He does it very calmly and it infuriates
people,
>> right? But I don't think he's done well.
>> It's very enjoyable to watch cuz it's
really funny. But to people that are
actual cosmologists, he's not performed
well in these.
>> Well, the cosmologists will uh say
things that still need to be if you're
making statements, they still need to be
you still need to disprove the other uh
you know the other proofs like
>> right but there's plenty of people that
have disproven that the earth is flat.
I'm all I'm saying with simple
experiments the the Joe Rogan experience
throughout life you are really like when
you go up into an airplane I do not see
the curvature of the earth.
>> Well you can't because of perspective
because you're so tiny.
>> Correct. Because we're so tiny. So all
I'm saying is that through experience
that the testimony of your eyes you will
never experience a globular earth. You
can't you but you do experience a
certain effect of a a earth that's a
globe if you go to the other side of the
earth and it's dark out when it's sunny
in California.
>> They've made models of how that could
work on the
>> dorks have dorks have made models
>> but it doesn't line in with our
understanding of cosmology. It doesn't
line in with our understanding of our
orbit around the sun.
>> That's assuming you believe that we
orbit around the sun. And I know listen
I'm not saying that we don't orbit
around the sun. I'm saying we don't live
on a globular earth. But the numbers
match but the numbers match.
>> If you do assume that they're correct
that we orbit around the sun their
calculations
if they make the calculations on their
flat earth model as well then you still
have to prove that wrong.
>> But isa doing that is MIT like of of all
people to believe the ones who are
digitally stitching [ __ ] and saying
>> that's a that's a government agency. You
went so deep with this. Boy,
>> I No, all I'm saying is my experience.
>> You know, when I get on the plane later
today and I'm flying back and I look out
outside, I'm going to see a flat, you
know, a flat uh horizon, a horizontal
horizon before me. And and and when I
land and uh and you know, it's
everything else is faith-based.
>> Well,
>> that's all I'm saying. It's not though.
It's it's science-based. It's based on
data. It's based on our understanding.
>> The word science means observation.
>> It means testimony.
>> I'm talking about the the measurements
>> data.
>> The data is so far removed one from my
ability to understand, but from ability
to understand
>> the the circumference of the earth,
right? You can understand the numbers
and the numbers line up exactly with how
much time it would take for the earth to
go around in a day.
>> Sure. And uh in what other
>> experiment can you show me where water
clings to a spinning ball? Like that's
kind of the the classic flatearther
uh thing that they'll ask you like,
"Well, show me any other [ __ ] ball
that's 24,000 miles wide."
>> And the answer to that is gravity. And
what he's talking about in that uh clip
that you just showed is gravity is just
sort of this idea that we came up with
to justify that. But there's clearly a
force
>> that does that, right?
>> That's density.
>> Just density.
>> There's Yeah, density.
>> Well, then how come these two things
will fall at the same time if I drop
them when this is far heavier?
>> How come?
>> I do not have an answer for that.
>> Right. But gravity does, right?
>> Gravity is like he said, it's just a
measurement. It's a measurement of how
things fall,
>> right? And so that measure and and the
word that they invented, gravity, is
just a an explanation for how objects
are are pulled downward,
>> right? But those objects come if it was
just density, wouldn't a heavier object
drop faster?
>> Well, when a
>> there's two balls, there's a bowling
ball and feathers dropping in a vacuum
and they're falling at the exact same
time.
>> How weird. Vacuum, no density. They both
fall at the same time because of gravity
or whatever the force we call gravity
is. But there is some sort of a force
that we call gravity that could be
measured in a vacuum.
>> Look how excited they all are.
>> Yeah. Brian Cox would be pissed if he
was here right now. He'd be [ __ ]
>> Oh, no. He'd be I'm not Listen, I'm not
say All I'm saying is that my experience
in the world,
>> of course, but your experience is based
on perspective of being a tiny little
thing on an enormous thing.
>> Correct.
>> Yeah,
>> that is correct.
>> Yeah,
>> that is correct. a few YouTube channels
that have broken down all of those flat
earth ideas together. Go watch those and
>> I tried years ago and I gave up.
>> It's it is absolutely a rabbit hole. But
what's interesting about it is that if
if you extract like the uh the the the
faith that you have in these kind of
ideas
and you supplement it with the faith of
you know these other ideas
they're exchangeable. They're only
exchangeable if you don't understand the
data and if you don't understand what's
actually been measured or if you don't
understand the path of satellites or if
you don't understand how many different
people would have had to lie about this
[ __ ] and not achieve the same
observational results that all these
different space agencies have that the
idea that they're all in collusion that
Japan and India and even countries that
hate each other they're all in collusion
on this this lie that the earth is
round. Well,
>> it seems much more likely that there's a
bunch of people with schizophrenia that
think that the earth is flat and they
make these YouTube videos where they're
very compelling because they're
articulate and they use great words and
they say it all in a nice way without
being challenged by real facts along the
way by someone who actually has studied
this their whole life.
>> Right. I still saw digital stitching on
your example.
>> Yeah, it wasn't my example. [laughter]
It was some [ __ ] Jamie randomly pulled
offline. That was weird though. And
that's perfect for this world that we
live in to to have sort of a glitch like
that.
>> That's kind of what I'm getting at is
there's so much out there is so much out
there that it it just re it falls to
faith. And also what does it really
matter? That's kind of what what I'm
getting at ultimately is what does all
of that really matter? What does it
matter to anybody that there's a cabal
of 8,000 plus uh people who are secretly
controlling the world and doing
occultism and drinking baby blood? What
does it really matter as long as you can
just have your daily pint?
>> This is a very different subject now.
We've we've shifted. We've you've moved
away from the concept of the earth being
flat and it's a giant lie that's
promoted by an a huge group of people
that aren't even connected in any way,
shape, or form to evil people that are
involved in cultlike rituals, which has,
by the way, always existed. And this is
why it's so it's very difficult for
people to imagine today that some of the
things that you're hearing from the
Epstein files like the potential that
they were eating children
>> or killing children or that they use
that sulfuric acid to to boil bodies. We
don't want to believe in evil that is
that deep. But in my opinion, if you can
find out that evil is real, right? Evil
most certainly is real. There's evil
acts that we have documented all
throughout the world. There's evil that
the cartel does. I just watched a video
where the cartel chopped this guy's head
off and put it on a drone and flew it
over to where the other cartel was.
>> Thought that was funny. They probably
thought it was funny.
>> Having a good time. Um, that's clearly
evil. There's plenty of demons.
>> Do you believe in demons?
>> I believe in the concept of demons.
>> I mean, demons have don't materialize
before us necessarily. They rest upon
the shoulders of men and whisper into
their ears. Then people do evil things.
>> Believe. This is what I believe. I
believe that if I was a demon or if
there if demons were real, they would
get people to do things which are
verifiably true that they have done.
I if I if you were if you were a demonic
idea and you got into Oenheimer's head
or uh Patton's head or anybody's and you
wanted them to do something horrific to
a bunch of innocent people it it and you
could say this is because we're at war
so we're going to drop a nuclear bomb on
Hiroshima. Like that's a demonic act.
It's a demonic act of eliminating
hundreds of thousands or a 100 thousand
plus people off the face of the earth
who did nothing. They're just citizens
that are unfortunately involved in a
country that is in a conflict with some
people that they don't even know and
then they just got vaporized like that.
That seems demonic. You've just expired.
>> But there are people who would argue
there are people who would argue that
the war would have continued. I've heard
this argument before. I've heard that
argument too. that the war would have
continued and so many more would have
died.
>> Well, if I was a demon, I would want to
prop propagate that idea. I would want
you to think that you have to do it.
>> And so like is is evil justification of
things?
Um certainly if if you wanted to find a
way where a demon like just like assume
that demons are real. How would demons
best be able to enact demonic things on
on earth? Would they do it by saying,
"I'm a demon and you know this is this
is what you should do and this is this
is horrible and evil." Or would you
creep into someone's head and find
justifications for doing a demonic
thing?
Like there's a lot of things like
>> you would creep well you would creep
into someone's head and you would you
know you would boil the frog slowly.
Like let's imagine this is the AIDS
crisis and you know that act is killing
people but you also but you also know
that you're making an insane amount of
profit off of killing people with act
and you have already established a
narrative and and Fouchi said this
publicly that the reason why they only
prescribe act is act is the only thing
that is both safe and effective. He
literally used the same language that he
used during he's been doing this for a
long time. Yes. If I wanted if I was a
demon, I'd want to get in that guy's
head and I'd want to get him to keep
doing it and say, "Look how much money
they're making. You got to keep this
money. You got to There's a way to
justify this. You're the purveyor of
information. You are the gatekeeper of
the truth. You just find a way to dance
around these numbers. You do not know
what you are talking about. This is not
gain of function." I mean, think just
what he did there. that was evil. By by
taking a virus, funding it, even though
it was illegal to fund it in the United
States, by doing it through Ecoalth
Alliance and then, you know, farming it
out to them, they do it at the Wuhan
lab. And you are in fact doing gain of
function research on a virus designed
for human beings to make it more deadly
and more contagious. That's demonic.
There's you're not you don't have a
cure. There was a researcher in Canada
at the Manitoba level four lab uh Dr.
Qui, I think is how you pronounce her
name. And she was the one who solved
Ebola. Like she had come up with the the
vaccine for Ebola, which is manufactured
by a California company that is
basically a Chinese company. And like a
rock star, she had made a like it was
like a hit. She had a hit, a huge hit.
And just like a rockstar, everybody's
asking you what comes next, what comes
next? And so she started actively
working working really really hard at uh
at coming up with that next thing. And
you know like most people you don't want
to stand in line. And these level four
labs you know they have to uh whenever
you move your research from one lab to
another uh you have to go through all
sorts of stuff in order to do that
because it's all patented. All of these
microbes and viruses and Ebola strains
and whatnot it's all patented. And so,
for example, there was this one kid who
was uh working at the lab in uh Canada
and he was moving, I think, to the one
in Atlanta. And so, he was crossing the
border and he was he didn't want to
like, you know, have to reproduce all of
his work and so he just put it into a
thermos inside of a thing and tried to
cross the border and he got caught.
Well, she got caught in 2019
uh by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
basically moving stuff to from Canada
via Air Canada freight from uh Manitoba
from Winnipeg, this is the Winnipeg uh
lab to Wuhan and she they were moving
everything and I tracked where those uh
where where because I was writing a
screenplay about it and uh I so I
tracked like where did that come from?
Well, it's like the the cutter or maybe
it was Abu Dhabi, I can't remember. The
lab there and then that went through in
order to get around it got sent to the
one in Amsterdam and that got sent to
her and she was able to do all this
stuff and she was basically just
shipping, you know, everything. Ha and
all these patented things to Wuhan, you
know, in order to uh to do it. and uh
the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
basically, you know, stopped it and she
got like walked out of the laboratory
and everything because they were like,
"Is there a misappropriation of money
going on here? Like, what are all these
flights that are occurring?" And they
redacted who her financer was and we
still don't know who her financer was,
but it's one of three people. And it's
the people you probably can guess, you
know, these uh people who have an
interest in uh in in this. and uh and
and but her thing was just ambition. It
was just like anybody. She was just
wanting to have that next hit and she
would do anything to, you know, to to do
it to to repeat what she did with Ebola.
>> So she was helping to engineer viruses.
>> Yeah. They were engineering stuff and
then she would ship them via Air Canada
freight from Winnipeg to directly to
Wuhan on air literally on Air Canada
flights. So you're flying on Air Canada
to Wuhan and down below in cargo there's
all this like you know
>> some [ __ ] that leprosy and yeah some
horrible strain of something something
that's patented and then they're just
shipping it over to and you know none of
this has come out like some uh papers in
Canada you know like the Winnipeg Free
Press or something was trying to cover
it but you know it just gets kind of
buried. That was one of the weird things
that I had also seen that I don't know
if it's true in the Epstein files that
there was talk about engineering a
pandemic.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Was it did you
>> Yeah, I read that too. I read that too
that they were like actively working on
it like you know running models and
figuring it out and you know well if we
do this then this will happen and you
know they were pretty successful at
that.
>> But why would Epstein be involved if
he's a financeier? He was involved in
everything.
>> He was involved in everything. It was
like amazing the energy that that guy
had. Who has the energy to be like doing
all this stuff like all over the world
and like, "Oh, in Nigeria we're doing
this and in Yemen we're doing this and
here we're doing that and at the same
time trafficking all these girls and you
know and young children and like
all this stuff,
>> right? It says the energy to do that."
It says, "No credible evidence in the
recently released Epstein files links
Jeffrey Epste or his associates to
engineering the CO 19 pandemic. Claims
stem from a misinterpreted
2017 email referencing routine pandemic
preparedness discussions, not a plot."
So what was the claim? The original
claim go down.
>> I didn't ask it about psy
you you just asked it about engineering
a pandemic. So what is the pandemic
claims? Scroll up a little so I can read
that.
>> That's all. Scroll down a little. There
it goes. So 2017 email originally from
2015 discussions to Bill widely assumed
to be Gates
forwarded to Ebstein proposed
recommendations and technical
specifications for pandemic modeling of
various strains.
It focused on healthc care data
simulations for preparedness and
neurochnology not creating or
engineering a virus. Gates Foundation
later ran public event 2001 and 2019 a
standard exercise with John Hopkins and
WHO predating COVID reports. That whole
public event 2001 is [ __ ] weird.
Event 2001 is weird.
Uh context and debunking pandemic
simulations are common public health
tools for th like those for SARS or flu.
Right. But why is Jeffrey Epstein
involved in these discussions?
>> He's involved in everything. He's
involved in gravity.
>> But how [ __ ] weird is that? How weird
a pandem
>> a pandemic was reportedly mentioned in
the Epste
before the world.
>> Well, this is what my friend Eddie
>> and creating the illusion. In the
meantime, Galileain Maxwell is uh
running the Reddit forum on world news.
Like she's literally shaping the world
news Reddit forum Reddit forum time.
Yeah,
>> she was running the world news forum on
Reddit.
>> Yeah, she was and it all went dark the
minute she got picked up. Her uh her
person, but she was like the the main
contributor did thousands of uh posts
like all day long posting world news
shaping our perception of things.
>> One email was a subject preparing for
pandemics was sent by a person whose
name was redacted.
By the way, the um did you see that?
>> Why would they redact the person who
sent that?
>> Yeah, good point.
>> That's not a victim. You're supposed to
redact.
>> I think they just they did like
supposedly they just did massive
redacting. But
>> sometimes you can see like oh the name
is short it's probably Bill and then the
one that comes after that if it's a
little longer it might be Clinton and if
it's a little shorter it might be Gates.
You know like you could but again that's
just you know
it's like there's no found. It's like
plausible deniability until until they
release all these names. Did you notice
that um uh Jeffrey Epstein's Fortnite
account
>> suddenly became active in uh Tel Aviv
and that somebody is playing under his
right after his supposed death,
>> right?
>> Suddenly he's playing Fortnite again.
[laughter]
>> Yeah. He doesn't even have the decency
to make a new account.
>> Yeah. Well, he wants to keep all of his
like, you know, his stats. wants to keep
all that stuff and he's safe in uh you
know in another country.
>> So do you think they just like did
that's another thing. There was another
Reddit thread about some guy who said
that he was a guard.
>> It was a 4chan thread.
>> Was it 4chan?
>> Yeah.
>> So it was a 4chan thread where this guy
said that he was a guard at the facility
and he posted this before Epstein was
killed.
>> He was a guard. They uncovered using
whatever way they do it, but using phone
records or whatever from 4chan, they
discovered he was a guard and that he
was like a legit guy. He got caught
basically talking about it that they
snuck they they use a decoy body. There
was an unscheduled uh ambulance arrival
that night. They never logged in and
you're always supposed to log in.
There's footage of like, you know,
orange uh people in orange moving
through the facility on the um you know,
just glimpses of it on
alive somewhere.
>> It's
>> It's not possible.
>> It's not impossible. It's probable.
>> Also, didn't
>> It's a probability. I mean,
>> whatever.
>> It's more than a possibility.
>> The guy who did the autopsy, did
anything happen to him?
The guy who
>> he committed suicide.
>> Yeah, let's find that out. [laughter]
That would be [ __ ] crazy because that
happened to the guy who did the autopsy
on Andrew Breitbart. Didn't he wind up
dying shortly after that?
>> Like Andrew Breitbart. Yes. And who was
the guy who said the
>> podesta alarming amount of people commit
suicide?
>> Alarming
>> who are you know doing this stuff who or
die of something to do so. Yeah.
Suddenly they do it. I came in jail who
committed suicide and they didn't commit
suicide. They got killed by their s.
Nobody bothered checking in on that.
>> Yeah, that makes sense. Um the guy who
did the autopsy for Jeffrey Epstein, did
anything happen to him? Uh I mean it was
a woman
>> a woman
>> chief New York chief medical examiner
Dr. Barbara Samson and she just resigned
uh like a couple like a year ago.
>> Okay. So nothing happened to her. You're
talking about evil. You know who the
devil was in The Exorcist?
>> Who?
>> Uh well they say it's like pizuzu and
we're presented with an actual devil.
But when you actually watch the movie,
there's kind of evidence that uh and and
people have talked about this that uh
you know there's evidence within the
film that uh it's it's it's more than
just demonic possession that the demonic
possession comes from someplace. And by
the way, Jeffrey Epstein was uh doing
also funding research in uh how trauma
uh affects like clairvoyance and
telepathy and things like that. how
you're able to invoke those out of uh
traumatic out of trauma. And in The
Exorcist, there's uh you know, you have
uh Reagan, who's uh Linda Blair, and uh
there's that party scene. And you
remember in The Exorcist, they're making
a movie within the movie. You know,
they're they're actually shooting a
movie. the the character of the mother
is uh um she's acting in a film inside
of the movie and there's a director in
that film and they have a big party
scene after it and the director uh you
know he's he's basically yelling at the
the butler her her house man you know
calling him a Nazi and stuff like that
and he's I bet you went bowling with
gerbles and things like that well for a
while he vanishes from the party and we
later see like Reagan afterwards like
completely flipped out like laying in
bed and then after that she comes and
then he's leaving the party and he turns
to the mother and he's like I have to
tell you something. I have to tell you
something.
[ __ ] it. And he leaves. And so and then
after that Reagan comes down and she
looks to the astronaut guy and says,
"You're going to die up there." And then
she pisses on the floor and everybody's
like, "Shit." And from that moment on
there's all this like uh highly
sexualized devil speaking through her
with a British accent and the guy the
director is a British guy. And so the
implication and then he is for some
reason left with Reagan and then gets
thrown out of the uh the balcony and his
head is twisted all the way around and
he's he dies as a character. Um, so the
implication is that the director is the
one who has raped Reagan and thus
invoking this demonic presence into her.
And it turns out that
>> I I thought it was a some totem that
they found and it was possessed
>> there. There all of that stuff is there.
The Ouija board is there and everything.
But it turns out that William Peter
Blatty uh actually made a movie called
um John Goldfrap Your Life is blah blah
blah. I can't remember the exact title
of the film and he made that movie with
Shirley Mlan and the director of the
film is this guy Jaye Thompson, British
director who looks exactly like the uh
the actor in that. And so the idea is
that uh Reagan's mother is Shirley Mlan
and uh Reagan is her daughter Sasha and
the British director is Jay Lee
Thompson. And when you start looking at
his movies, they're a little strange.
You know, there's like, you know, he
directed the original Cape Fear and
which has a kind of strange pedophilic
thing going on in it.
>> So does the second one
>> and Yeah. Yeah. They Yeah, they all do.
And then uh you especially they they
amplify it.
>> Yeah. With Julia, Robert Jane.
>> He did this movie Kite with Bronson and
that all has kind of like a weird
pedophilic thing. did this movie the
reincarnation of Peter Proud where Peter
Proud dies and then uh or rather uh
Peter Proud remembers his reincarnation.
He remembers his iteration of his other
self who was murdered and then he hunts
down the woman who maybe did it and then
starts sleeping with her daughter which
is basically sleeping with his daughter
because he's reincarnated. So this guy
as a filmmaker has done all and so the
the question and and so William Peter
Blatty worked on that film with Shirley
Mlan and shortly thereafter wrote the
book The Exorcist and Sasha in her you
know uh autobiography even mentions uh
you know go the person on the cover of
the book looked a lot like me and
everybody's saying oh it's just a
coincidence and uh you know well I never
walked down the stairs on all fours and
I never vomited uh you know pea soup or
whatever. that none of that ever
happened to me. But there's a pretty
dark implication behind the whole film.
And I brought it up with William
Freriedkin. Hey, is this meant to be
Jaye Thompson? Did this like is this a
way to talk about that that actually
happened, you know, in real life? He
said, I cannot talk about that, but I'm
not saying you're wrong.
>> Whoa.
>> And uh and and so, you know, and there's
actually a moment where uh Reagan is
talking to her mother and she's like,
"Well, do you like him? Do you like him
like you like daddy? And so there's this
idea that he's been coming over and
they've been having this affair. And
then all of a sudden she says to her
daughter, and it kind of jumped out at
me when I rewatched it. Uh she says to
her daughter, "Well, uh I like pizza,
but I wouldn't marry one." And I was
like, "Oh my god, there's like a pizza
reference like in the middle of this in
the middle of everything that's
happening."
>> How long is that? That'sola, but
>> Ben Swan brought up during the whole
Pizzagate thing that got him fired.
>> But how long has the term pizza been
used?
>> Well, it jumped out at me and The
Exorcist is in the early 70s and uh and
so what is it 1971 and that movie that
he did with Shirley Mlan who is
effectively that's the movie that
they're shooting inside of the movie.
And so this was a way for Peter
Benshley, I mean not Peter Benley,
William Peter Blatty to uh to kind of
transcode all of that. And the astronaut
in the film, Shirley Mlan, talks about
the the I can't remember if it was her
husband or boyfriend that she remarried
who was an astronaut. And in her
autobiography, she talks about he how he
was cloned. He came back from space and
a different person that he was cloned.
And she kind of everybody kind of
laughed it off like, "Oh, it was just
kind of a joke that I wrote into my
autobiography."
But it's kind of weird.
>> Real weird.
>> Yeah, it's really strange. So, people
speak through movies and they they hide
information in in films. And so, I think
that
>> some more than others, right?
>> Yeah. William Peter Blatty kind of who
was doing all sorts of uh Ouija stuff
with uh Sherna Mlan who was really into
that kind of thing back in the you the
late 60s and early 70s and uh you know
he he sits down to write his book and
what's he writing about? Well, he's
writing that movie is about Shirley
Mlan, her daughter, her her daughter
Sash Sasha,
um Sachi, I'm sorry, Sachi and uh um you
know the astronaut and you know it's all
and Jaye Thompson who basically he
eviscerates within the film but in a way
that nobody really connects it. It all
happens off camera,
>> but but the implication is is that she
was raped by that director and from and
from that moment on has a kind of, you
know, she's speaking with a British
accent as the devil. It's his voice
actually that's coming out of her. She's
talking about, you know, being raped by
a crucifix.
>> That actor that's his voice. Is that
what you're saying?
>> Yeah, that's what I'm saying. It's like
the the voice of Ed of I think his name
is McGawan and he was uh he died like
shortly after the film was made also
shortly after The Exorcist was made.
>> Well, we know that people have encoded
very bizarre things like Cubrick was
famous for it.
>> Yeah. Well, that's Cubrick. Everybody
does it. I do it. Everybody does it. I
mean motion pictures are a kind of magic
spell and you know when you write you're
hearing I I hear voices and they come
through me and they land on the page and
I don't know where they come from but it
is it is a kind of
>> uh in invite to possession and that
these things come into you and that you
put it on the page and then you make
this movie and everybody like I said
sits in a theater in the dark watching a
flicker
of this thing and it's telling you both
our myths and traditions but it's also
predictive programming everybody and so
>> Jesus dude
>> have you seen [laughter]
>> have I seen what
>> well actually I I was thinking about
like that uh where the Daily Wire uh
thing but I you know media comes from a
lot of different places now uh we you
know we you don't know where you're
going to find your uh your next
entertainment and there's this show that
uh I really like that show Rome. Did Did
you see Rome?
>> No, I never saw it.
>> Okay. I loved Rome. It was uh
>> I watched the first episode and I
thought it was flat. I love it because
it told the story of ancient Rome
through, you know, uh through
Shakespeare and through history and
through uh Plato and you know all these
uh kind of um ideas of ancient Rome or
Socrates and all these ideas of ancient
Rome and it then it told a very ground
level story from the perspective of like
handmaidadens and centurions and still
has Mark Anthony and Cleopatra and
everything going on in it but it tells a
very you know soap opera-like drama
through it. And so there was this other
show and it had been out like three
seasons when I started watching it. And
it did the exact same thing. Nobody had
ever like nobody was talking about it.
Nobody had ever heard about it. Most
people didn't even know about it. It's
The Chosen. Do you know this show?
>> What was that?
>> It does the exact same thing, but it
does it with the Gospels. And it's all
about Christ. And it's like a low-budget
uh or it was lowbudget crowdfunded story
of Jesus and it just basically like Rome
tells this historical tale and about
Jesus and okay so I'm watching I've seen
every movie about Jesus ever made. I've
seen King of Kings of both versions.
I've seen you know uh the Zepharelli
film. I've seen Last Temptation of
Christ. I've seen uh The Passion of the
Christ. I've seen all of them. I've seen
the Jeremy Systo uh Jesus
movie. I've seen everything. I've worked
with Paul Verhovven on his Jesus uh film
that was unproduced. And so like I've
had a lot of experience in it and I
never really got it to be perfectly
honest. I never really understood the
story. This show I started watching it.
I was like, "Okay, I've got a chip on my
shoulder. Let's see." And it's really
cheap. It's like rocks are made out of
styrofoam. they can't afford a uh you
know um a house and so they just use
blankets and a gourd hanging and so it's
like it's really really inexpensive and
the the script is even a little bit
contemporary and which almost becomes
like a joke as you're watching it. It's
kind of funny but lo and behold I'm
watching it and there came a moment by
about episode three where it was like
ding I get it like Jesus is kind of punk
rock. He's he's basically saying there
are no rules to anything like you know
you can commit miracles on the Sabbath.
You like there are no rules. Anybody is
led. All you need to be is wanting of
salvation. And it was like a third eye
opened up to me. And this show is
fantastic and it breaks all the rules.
It's outside of the Pharisees of
Hollywood. you know, they uh um one guy,
this guy Dallas Jenkins, who's
absolutely my favorite uh modern
filmmaker right now. I think this guy's
brilliant. He's directed every single
episode of this show and they've got
like seven seasons out and you can watch
it for free. It's
>> on what?
>> On anything. Like if you have an Apple
TV, you can just look up their the
chosen app and boop, up comes the uh the
chosen app and
>> so it's an app thing. or you can watch
it on YouTube or you can watch it I
think Netflix event I think it was
Netflix eventually bought it and now
they're showing it basically you can see
it anywhere they give it away the way
the Gideonss give away the Bible and um
and you know it it I thought it was
fantastic and then season 2 came around
and suddenly they had all this money and
they're doing all these like uh you know
they've got this ancient Judea set with
cobblestone streets and you know like
this detailed set and Roman colonades
and stuff like that and I I was like,
"Wow, like they really got a big
budget." And then I looked it up and I
was like, "Oh, no. They're using the
Mormons have all these standing sets for
their biblical productions in Utah and
they're incredible. These sets are
unbelievable. If I had known, it's like
Chinacha in Utah. It's uh it's it's
absolutely fantastic." And um and the
characters are like they only have money
for like three Romans costumes probably.
And so they're kind of like making do
with what they have, but they've got
this guy playing the legot there who is
hilarious. He's an in the first season.
He is absolutely hilarious. And the show
is great. And then like proper
television, you're watching it and
you're starting to love these characters
and you're starting to like it's and
it's you know what it is the bread and
butter of Hollywood is revenge and
wrath.
>> Like that's what makes that's the the
fuel that that pushes most Hollywood
movies. It is much more difficult and
and requires much more maturity to make
a movie about forgiveness. And this kid,
Dallas Jenkins, I call him a kid, but
he's not a kid. That's an insult. He's
uh he's super great. He um uh he is
making every single episode is
effectively because it's the gospels
about forgiveness. And he has done this
magnificent unbelievable achievement.
And the show is huge now. They've got
like seven seasons. They've built a
studio, you know, like outside of Dallas
Fort Worth on a Salvation Army property
that they've built, you know,
soundstages and everything.
[clears throat] And it is um I think and
and like and that's like you can get it
anywhere. You can watch it anywhere. And
they're making programming that should
have been on HBO. It should have been
produced by HBO the way Rome was. And
instead, it's just it's coming out of
the ether. And it's almost like with the
inattention given to you know uh most
modern
or or rather the the way that people are
making things that they're focused on
wrath and revenge like this other thing
like the Pen Dragon cycle and the chosen
have kind of risen out of out of the
vacuum that those other that the studios
have and broadcasters have kind of
created because they're not no longer
are making that kind of product at least
not as much. And so I I think this is
actually one of the most exciting times
in in media and and television. Yeah, I
definitely think it's a very unusual
time where the normal people that are
producing things don't have
a complete monopoly on what people see
and that many of the times these
alternative things have gotten much
larger than the mainstream things. I am
I find it like almost impossible to get
a movie going. Like I'm uh you know I'm
like an independent filmmaker. I go out
there and I usually I work on a script
and then I figure out the budgets and I
figure out and I go out and I hit the
pavement and it's like really [snorts]
hard part probably because I'm a
flatearther kid. I am not a flatearther.
[laughter] I just like to provoke people
but um uh you know I go out there and I
try to get the stuff made and it's like
almost impossible. And then I built a
technology company over the last year
and uh basically making AI movies and
all of a sudden boom like that money
gets thrown at it and all of a sudden
just by attaching the word AI and that
it's a technology- based company all of
a sudden investors you know came in and
we're in production on three films now
>> AI right now
>> three I know that's the crazy thing is
that it was so easy for me to get that
going and so difficult for me to get a
traditional movie going through the
traditional route like going to you know
A24 blah blah blah trying to like you
know hit the pavement oh I have to go to
Europe to gather together financing and
everything like that no just put AI in
front of it and all of a sudden you're
in production on three features and
we're making a Christmas movie that a
family Christmas movie that'll be in
theaters this uh this holiday season.
We're making a faith-based film for next
Easter and then we're making a kind of
big romantic war epic and like as
classical movies and we have like a
proprietary stack of technology that we
use for our process and I partnered with
this company Massive Studios AI and uh
formed my company which is General
Cinema Dynamics and I'm based here in
Texas now and uh or my company is and
I'm slowly transitioning
>> nice And it's like it's actually kind of
I think you know so many people are
against AI like Gilmo and you know love
him but he's like [ __ ] AI [ __ ] AI but
all it is is visual effects
>> and I have experience like with that
Beowolf movie doing it and what used to
be a million dollars a minute is now
$5,000 a minute and so to do it really
really well like it looks
kind of amazing actually. And so I think
for independent cinema and for the
future of film and television
production, these are super exciting
times.
>> All right, Roger, we just burned through
3 hours plus.
>> Really? Oh my god.
>> Yeah, it's already 4:00 this share with
you. All right, so what I pulled up is
this.
>> This is NASA, right? This is propain.
So this is a FAR TV. They're pulling in
multiple feeds. There's three different
boxes at the bottom. As you can see,
this one here in the middle says
offline. So, as I showed you also, I
pulled up the NASA feed, which is this
says it's offline. When that is offline,
this channel adds a 3D model showing
where the satellite currently is so that
you can still follow along.
>> 30 minutes ago, it wasn't offline and it
was showing a different feed. And I wish
I could have showed to you then, but I
didn't interrupt. So,
>> got it.
>> There is a flat earth YouTube or Reddit
account asking this exact thing.
[clears throat] What is that? And the
people on the flat earth Reddit gave me
the answer.
>> Yeah, those the crazies the crazies have
come out to uh
>> Okay,
>> so there you go. So that was what that
was.
>> Well, I'm glad we put that to
>> So it just says the video description
switch to a simulation with the ISS
above the Earth when the connection is
lost, aka off.
>> I was going to point that out because
you can see the stars in there and you
can't norally see the stars while you
can see the Earth. I'm glad we can be
comforted by at least one thing that is
secure and stable in our understanding
of reality.
>> Roger, that was very fun though. Thank
you very much. Let's do this. Pleasure.
It was a good time.
>> Really super pleasure.
>> Thank you, brother. Appreciate you very
much. All right. Bye, everybody.
[music]
[laughter]
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This podcast episode covers a wide range of topics, starting with anecdotes from classic Hollywood, including William Shatner's ADR and Orson Welles' Gallow Wine commercials. The discussion then delves into the evolution of filmmaking, contrasting traditional film techniques with modern digital cinema, and how changes in production (like Netflix's guidelines) impact storytelling and the cinematic experience. Various filmmakers such as Orson Welles, Guillermo Del Toro, Ridley Scott, and Werner Herzog have their works critically analyzed, with specific praise for 'The Last Duel' and 'The Counselor.' A significant portion of the conversation shifts to conspiracy theories, exploring the Epstein files (particularly the sulfuric acid order), 9/11 theories concerning WTC Building 7, the 'New Chronology' theory about falsified history, and the Flat Earth theory, presented as a thought-provoking perspective rather than a firm belief. The speakers also touch upon the concept of predictive programming in movies, the nature of evil, and the impact of technology (like AI in film) and political agendas (like DEI in Star Trek) on contemporary media. The rise of independent and faith-based productions, such as 'The Orville' and 'The Chosen,' is highlighted as a counter-narrative to mainstream content.
Videos recently processed by our community