HomeVideos

Joe Rogan Experience #2452 - Roger Avary

Now Playing

Joe Rogan Experience #2452 - Roger Avary

Transcript

5231 segments

0:01

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

0:03

>> The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:06

>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

0:08

NIGHT. All day.

0:12

>> Come on, Roger.

0:14

>> Yeah. [ __ ] it. [ __ ] it.

0:16

>> [ __ ] it. Go for it. [ __ ] it. We'll do IT

0:18

LIVE.

0:19

>> YEAH. DO IT LIVE.

0:20

>> THAT'S A CLASSIC.

0:21

>> YEAH. That's a classic. Look behind the

0:23

scenes. [laughter]

0:25

>> Do it live.

0:26

>> [ __ ] crazy crazy people telling you

0:28

the news. Yeah, that that's good. And

0:30

the the William Shatner one where uh you

0:34

know the um studio guy, you know, he

0:36

says uh Shatner is doing some ADR for uh

0:41

the cartoon, the Star Trek cartoon, and

0:44

he says uh you know, he uses the word

0:47

sabotage and he gets corrected by the by

0:51

the studio guys. He's like, "Uh, Bill,

0:53

it's pronounced sabotage. Please don't

0:56

correct me. It disgusts me. It sickens

0:59

me. And [laughter] you say sabotage. I

1:02

say sabotage.

1:05

I absolutely

1:08

love William Shatner.

1:09

>> My favorite ones are the or uh excuse

1:12

me. Uh [ __ ] I can't remember his name.

1:15

Um Rose Bud Orson Wells. Jesus Christ.

1:18

>> Orson Wells. What happened?

1:20

>> You started saying it.

1:20

>> I know. What happened? My brain just

1:22

[laughter] said nope. No access. When

1:24

Orson Wells was doing the Gallow Wine

1:26

commercials, remember those days? Like

1:28

>> Orson Wells wine

1:31

>> before it's time.

1:32

>> I know. And then he was like

1:33

>> everything was like a exhaustive sucking

1:36

of air to come in to see.

1:37

>> But then he was making fun of how shitty

1:40

the wine was in between takes like he

1:42

was angry.

1:43

>> Yeah. [laughter]

1:45

>> There is a CD that you can get. I can't

1:47

remember what it's called, but I have

1:48

them at home. And it's like all these

1:50

radio things like that where just when

1:52

celebrities, you know, lose it on uh

1:55

while doing voice over and ADR. It's

1:58

hilarious.

1:59

>> Orson Wells is a crazy story, right?

2:01

Because when he made that movie, when he

2:03

made Citizen Canain, which was about

2:05

William Randph Hurst. Yeah. William

2:07

Randph Hurst essentially shut down one

2:09

of the most talented guys alive at the

2:12

time, shut down his career.

2:13

>> Yeah. Because the movie was kind of an

2:15

insult about, you know, the whole thing

2:17

about Rosebud is that's the name of his

2:20

girlfriend's clitoris.

2:21

>> Oh, really?

2:22

>> That was his nickname for her clitoris.

2:24

And so Orson Wells was doing a kind of

2:27

very uh uh like uh like he was jabbing

2:33

at him in a very low-level way like

2:35

really. Yeah. Rose.

2:37

>> How did he know that that was the

2:38

nickname of his girlfriend's clitoris?

2:40

>> People in Hollywood [snorts] know these

2:41

things.

2:42

>> Oh boy. Word gets around. [laughter]

2:45

>> Word gets around.

2:46

>> I would keep that one just to her.

2:47

>> Yeah.

2:48

>> Who told

2:49

>> Yeah, [laughter]

2:50

>> that's crazy. But I mean, if you go back

2:52

to like War of Worlds and then Citizen

2:55

Kane, I mean, this guy was a dynamo. And

2:57

then they shut him down. Well, yeah. And

2:59

he was doing things that nobody else

3:00

would do. It's like he's like, "Oh, I

3:02

want the camera down here like on the

3:04

phone." Well, we can't get the camera

3:06

lens down that low. You like what you're

3:08

talking about is impossible to do. And

3:10

so he would just grab a like a pickaxe

3:12

and just start chopping away at the

3:14

studio concrete and dig a hole in the

3:16

ground so you could put the camera down

3:18

that low.

3:19

>> Oh, really?

3:19

>> Yeah. He would he was uh obsessed with

3:22

getting a a vision on screen that was

3:26

even today is so advanced. There's a

3:28

shot in the very beginning when uh young

3:31

Kane is like a little kid and he's out

3:33

there playing with Rose Bud. He's out

3:35

there playing with the sled in the snow

3:37

and the camera is on him and then it

3:39

kind of starts pulling back and it pulls

3:41

through a window and then we see his

3:43

parents and the uh the trust attorney

3:46

and the camera keeps backing up all the

3:48

way into the room. Well, to do that in a

3:51

studio and to have all that snow and

3:52

everything, you need so much light, but

3:54

you also need a lot of light inside the

3:56

uh because the exposure change.

3:59

It's like an amazing, incredible uh

4:03

dolly shot, a reverse tracking shot.

4:05

It's fantastic.

4:06

>> And what year did he do this too,

4:08

>> guy?

4:10

[laughter]

4:10

I don't know the exact year. Uh

4:12

>> citizen Kane has to be 40s, right?

4:14

>> Yeah. Yeah, probably. It's uh Yeah, it's

4:17

in the 19 late 40s, I would think.

4:20

[sighs]

4:20

>> Is that when it was Jamie?

4:22

>> Yeah. Tell us the

4:23

>> uh It should be Yeah. 41 is when it came

4:25

>> 41. Early early 40s. Early 40s.

4:28

>> Wow.

4:28

>> Yeah. Wow. Let me see that shot.

4:30

>> Time.

4:30

>> Can we find that?

4:31

>> Wartime. It's a wartime film.

4:32

>> What, Jamie?

4:33

>> I was I was looking for I was lost in

4:35

some other ones.

4:35

>> Wartime 40s, right?

4:37

>> Yeah.

4:39

Yeah. Yeah.

4:40

>> I didn't even think of that.

4:41

>> Yeah.

4:42

>> Oh my god.

4:42

>> A lot of stuff going on back then.

4:44

>> Probably hard to get people to go to the

4:45

movies back then.

4:46

>> No, it would be easy to go to the

4:48

movies. In fact, wartime and depression

4:51

and when things are bad,

4:52

>> that's usually the best time for

4:54

entertainment because people just want

4:56

to escape.

4:57

>> Well, that actually makes sense.

4:59

Be careful, Charles.

5:01

>> Pull your muffler around your neck,

5:03

Charles.

5:03

>> Kane, I think we shall have to tell him

5:05

now.

5:06

>> Yes.

5:07

>> I'll sign those papers now, Mr.

5:09

Thatcher.

5:10

>> You people seem to forget that I'm the

5:12

boy's father.

5:12

>> It's going to be done exactly the way

5:14

I've told Mr. Thatcher.

5:15

>> There ain't nothing wrong with Colorado.

5:17

I don't see why we can't raise our own

5:19

son just because we come into some

5:21

money. If I want, I can go to court. A

5:23

father has a right to. a border that

5:25

beats his bill and leaves worthless

5:27

stock behind. That property is just as

5:29

much my property as anybody's now that

5:31

it's valuable. And if Fred Graves had

5:33

any idea all this was going to happen,

5:35

he'd have made out those certificates in

5:36

both our names.

5:37

>> However, they were made out in Mrs.

5:38

Kane's name. So, in order to maintain

5:41

that background exposure of the little

5:42

kid in the window and the foreground,

5:45

what's what you're not knowing is how

5:47

much light they're using on the interior

5:49

part in order to create that balance

5:51

between the two

5:52

>> with the with the film stocks back then.

5:54

And the other thing is that table gets

5:56

flown in like they move that table into

5:58

the shot because it's in the way of the

6:00

camera move. Wow.

6:01

>> And so there's all sorts of like, you

6:02

know, mathematics going on in the

6:05

creation of this shot. And most people

6:07

would just, you know, be like, "Oh,

6:08

just, you know, shoot the kid outside

6:09

and then cut inside, you know, just do

6:11

it like that." But, you know, Wells was,

6:14

I mean, he was thinking on a complete

6:15

other level.

6:16

>> I just We've robbed We got robbed of so

6:19

many films if you really think about it,

6:20

what he could have made.

6:21

>> Yeah.

6:22

>> You know, yes and no. My favorite film

6:24

of his is Touch of Evil and there's this

6:27

amazing shot in with Charlton H where

6:29

he's playing a Mexican and he's got like

6:31

this like pencil thin uh you know

6:34

mustache this and like Chuck H as a

6:37

Mexican is fantastic and then

6:39

everybody's so sweaty in the movie and

6:41

it takes place in Mexico but it's shot

6:42

in Venice, California and so the whole

6:45

opening which is this setting of a bomb

6:47

in the trunk of a car and then yeah

6:50

here's the opening shot and you can tell

6:51

that it's actually downtown Venice

6:54

And this is supposed to be Mexico.

6:56

>> Yeah, this is supposed to be like a

6:57

border town in Mexico. I don't know if

6:59

it's Tijana or some other border town,

7:02

but it's he does this this [snorts]

7:05

amazing amazing single shot.

7:08

>> Wow.

7:09

>> And which back then this is really hard

7:11

to do. And this is kind of a um I mean

7:14

it's Charlton H essentially saying I uh

7:18

I believe in Orson Wells and his vision.

7:21

This is

7:21

>> That's downtown Venice. There's the

7:23

beach is just beyond that.

7:24

>> Ah, wow.

7:27

>> God, what year is

7:28

>> Actually, I'm sorry. The beach might be

7:29

behind us.

7:30

>> What year was this?

7:31

>> 58.

7:32

>> Yeah. 1958.

7:33

>> Wow.

7:36

>> It's an incredible shot. And And this is

7:40

incredibly difficult to do as well

7:41

because you've got a crane

7:42

>> and now you're following the people.

7:44

>> Now you're following the people. And

7:45

there's Charlton H with his mustache.

7:48

And we know as an audience that there's

7:50

a bomb in that car, but he doesn't know.

7:55

>> Wow.

7:55

>> And so, you know, he he's still, you

7:58

know, the just the fact that this is all

8:01

one shot is crazy. And for back then, I

8:03

mean, it's a big deal. Back then, the

8:05

camera that you're using isn't just some

8:07

little uh handy cam or something like

8:09

that now, you know, an iPhone. It's a

8:12

Mitchell BNCR, which is a, you know, it

8:14

takes four guys to move that camera.

8:15

It's made out of cast iron. You know,

8:17

it's a a giant camera with a blimp and

8:21

uh blimp.

8:21

>> A blimp is a a soundproofing device.

8:24

It's So, you have the camera and then

8:25

you've got to build a giant uh encasing

8:27

for the camera

8:28

>> because it makes so much noise. [snorts]

8:30

>> You don't want to hear that.

8:32

>> What did that look like?

8:33

>> Um I have one in my home. It's uh

8:35

>> Of course you [laughter] do.

8:38

>> Well, I that shot's incredible. I I

8:41

would have never I didn't know that film

8:42

existed. I bought I bought mine from

8:44

this commercial director named Charles

8:45

Whittenmeer and he had a massive

8:48

collection of stuff and then he

8:49

liquidated everything. He just kind of

8:51

cashed out of Los Angeles and he's he

8:53

had a warehouse full of stuff and so I

8:55

went in and he's like you know well

8:57

here's you can get this and you can get

8:58

this. I was like okay the Mitchell BNCR

9:00

and we went over to it and he's like you

9:02

know this Mitchell BNCR was used uh you

9:05

know to shoot uh the Godfather.

9:08

>> So that's what it looks like with the

9:09

big lid on it.

9:10

>> Yeah, that's actually Yeah, that's

9:11

basically the camera. That's That's the

9:13

camera. I also have some cameras.

9:15

>> The blimp is the thing on top of it.

9:16

>> Yeah, the blimp is Well, the whole thing

9:18

is actually the whole thing is a blimp.

9:20

I mean, well, there's there's a smaller

9:22

um area

9:24

>> with a blimp on it. The the big one like

9:26

the whole thing is a blimp. And when you

9:28

can actually open up all of these uh

9:30

these trap doors on it to reveal the

9:32

camera inside of it. And then the reels

9:34

that are in There you go. It's There's

9:36

an opened one, an opened up one.

9:39

>> Wow.

9:39

>> That one looks like it's holding an airy

9:41

on the inside. in area 100. One of the

9:43

things about old movies is they would

9:45

let a scene cook. You know, you had so

9:48

much time before people would talk and

9:51

you just let like the average daily life

9:54

sort of play out.

9:56

>> Yeah.

9:56

>> And it set the tone for the film and

9:59

they don't now it's like it's like built

10:02

for Netflix.

10:03

>> Well, yeah. Well, now you have a white

10:04

paper that Netflix gives you and that I

10:06

think uh was it Ben Affleck that was

10:08

talking about it. you know how you know

10:10

you got to have a beat in the beginning

10:11

and you've got to have this and this and

10:13

this and regular things. I mean there

10:16

was this book by Sid Field which was a

10:18

screenwriting book um that you know at

10:21

one hand it gave a kind of formula on

10:23

what a movie should be. you know, by

10:24

page seven, your inciting event should

10:26

happen, and by page 30, the first, you

10:29

know, he had everything mapped out by

10:31

page. And that eventually found its way

10:32

into the hands of studio executives, and

10:34

they were like, "Oh, now we know what a

10:36

screenplay is supposed to be structured

10:38

like, you know, in order to have proper

10:40

story arcs and structures and a

10:42

satisfying uh design." And uh and that's

10:47

just the next iteration is Netflix

10:49

giving you a white paper saying you have

10:51

to shoot with these cameras. You have to

10:53

uh process at these labs. You have to

10:56

have, you know, tech specs that are

10:58

within this range. And that's now

11:01

extending to story because they've

11:03

analytically looked at what audiences

11:05

are, you know, able to process now,

11:07

which is less and less probably because

11:09

of the COVID shot, you know, uh

11:11

[laughter] completely frying their

11:12

pineal glands. So they can no longer pay

11:16

attention to anything. And then on top

11:18

of that, the uh the mind control device

11:21

of uh cell phones. And um you know, with

11:26

all of that, they they're now like,

11:27

well, how do we maintain the audience?

11:29

And so you end up with white papers.

11:31

>> Don't you think it's options, too? It's

11:33

almost like if something is not really

11:35

fascinating within the first 20, 30

11:37

seconds, people just want to let's see

11:39

what else is on. They just want to keep

11:41

searching.

11:42

>> Well, there is that. I mean, there's

11:43

something magical about being in a movie

11:45

theater. You know, it's uh you know,

11:48

you're

11:49

>> you're you're in this congregation.

11:52

>> You know, Clinton always talks about how

11:54

you know, movies are my church. Well, it

11:56

is a congregation and you're having

11:59

you're sitting in the dark next to

12:01

someone you don't even know. They might

12:03

have completely different ideologies,

12:05

uh, you know, race, creed, color, like

12:08

everything is different about them. And

12:10

yet you're sitting in the dark next to

12:12

them having this ecstatic dream, this

12:14

waking dream, sitting like insects

12:17

looking at the flicker on the screen,

12:19

and you're sharing this kind of

12:20

experience that you're physically

12:22

trapped in. you like you you don't you

12:24

know you don't get up and leave the

12:25

theater and well you might if you have

12:27

to go to the bathroom or get some

12:28

popcorn or something but they'll even

12:30

bring that to you now you uh you having

12:32

this kind of ecstatic experience

12:35

absorbing the movie with someone you

12:37

don't know and you're sharing your

12:38

bodily electricity with them and I think

12:41

this kind of uh this is the magic that

12:44

they often talk about of movies it's not

12:46

necessarily the the movie itself on

12:49

screen it's the shared experience of

12:52

being next to people.

12:53

>> Yeah.

12:54

>> And that

12:56

there is a kind of unseen electricity

12:59

between people that unifies us. And I

13:03

think that there are dark forces in the

13:05

universe that are attempting to divide

13:07

people up

13:08

>> and to take that away to take away that

13:10

congregation. Do you really think that

13:12

that's on by design or you think that's

13:14

just a natural function of streaming and

13:16

televisions and phones and having access

13:19

to things instantaneously? I personally

13:22

think that streaming was by design to

13:24

eliminate residuals like

13:26

>> by design but isn't it just a function

13:28

technology emerging

13:29

>> you noticed that all of the executives

13:31

well yeah I mean part of it is

13:32

technology but technology gets pushed

13:34

and brought to the forefront for

13:35

specific reasons and

13:37

>> you know digital cinema hasn't been the

13:41

greatest thing for the creative process

13:43

and I think we see that in the works

13:45

that we're looking at I mean if you

13:46

watch stuff on Netflix and uh whatnot we

13:50

can see that it it doesn't have the same

13:54

power and impact. And also, you know,

13:57

when you were making a movie, when you

14:00

were making a film on film, it was like

14:04

every time you turn on the camera,

14:06

you're burning money. It's like every

14:08

single frame is like 4 cents or

14:10

whatever, whatever the calculation was.

14:13

And so, uh, that was actually an

14:15

expensive part of the process. And so,

14:17

you know, there was all this preparation

14:19

to get everything ready, like, oh, we

14:20

want to get all of the the props in

14:22

place, you know, right before we shoot

14:24

and the actors are in their trailer and

14:26

they're figuring out their what they're

14:28

going to do. And then you're on your way

14:30

to set and people are like, "Hey, I'll

14:31

see you in the moment." And what they

14:33

mean by that is when the cameras turn on

14:37

and you [snorts] actually hear that

14:38

happening, suddenly everything pops into

14:41

play and suddenly you're you're

14:43

performing in front of uh you know,

14:45

you're you're

14:47

what you're attempting to do is capture

14:48

lightning in a bottle and you don't even

14:50

know that you have it right away. You

14:52

ask your DP like, "Do we have it?" And

14:54

it's like, "Oh, well, there was a some

14:55

dust in the frame or a hair in the

14:57

frame. Let's get another one." and you

14:59

get another one and like then you hold

15:02

that all in the dark, all that film

15:04

because you can't expose it and you send

15:05

it off to the lab and then some

15:08

alchemist at the lab at the castle, you

15:10

know, puts it into a potion and he and

15:13

the next day what comes out are these

15:14

like little stained glass windows and

15:16

you watch it and you realize what you

15:18

caught. You're like, "We did it. We we

15:20

captured something." Okay, now

15:22

everything is different. you uh you

15:25

know, you show up on set and

15:27

everything's digital and you've got

15:28

producers and uh network executives and

15:33

broadcasters and everybody's there,

15:35

studio people in video village and they

15:38

set up like a little tent and

15:39

everybody's sitting there in their

15:41

Canadian goose uh jackets on high chairs

15:44

and they're looking at a big color

15:46

corrected monitor and there's a guy

15:47

doing color correction in a van and

15:49

they're basically watching an

15:51

approximation of what it's going to look

15:52

like in the the end and they're sitting

15:54

there. Okay, on my first film there was

15:56

none of that. I had to stand next to the

15:58

camera. We didn't even have videotap.

16:00

Stand next to the camera and look at the

16:02

actors and see did the actors do what I

16:03

wanted them to do. And now, you know,

16:07

they just turn on the camera and it's it

16:10

costs more money to stop the camera and

16:12

to restart it again. So, you just let it

16:13

roll and you're just like letting it go

16:16

and you're like, "Hey, you the director

16:18

now is like, hey, go back, start over

16:20

and smile this time." And then they redo

16:24

it and then the editor is now like

16:25

having to take those takes and separate

16:27

them in the uh in the editing room and

16:30

the actors are like suddenly the moment

16:32

is gone in in other words it's vanished.

16:35

It's uh

16:36

>> is there a way to do both? I mean is it

16:38

the medium of film?

16:39

>> I mean it seems like it's the but it's

16:42

the environment as well. You're

16:43

describing an environmental thing,

16:45

right? Video village executives.

16:47

>> Yeah. The the problem is now suddenly

16:49

you've got a chorus of people sitting

16:51

there who are like, "Oh yeah, you got

16:52

it. I saw he got it. Didn't he get it?

16:53

You got it." But you as the director

16:55

still have to run back and forth to the

16:56

camera and to the actors and everything

16:57

and you're like trying to uh keep it all

17:00

in place. And

17:01

>> look, it it's neither is worse than the

17:05

other,

17:05

>> right?

17:06

>> They are both paint, but one is

17:09

watercolor and one is oil paint. And

17:11

those are opposingly different. M

17:14

>> you know if you were a um an oil artist

17:17

during the uh British Renaissance of

17:21

watercolor paint where all of a sudden

17:23

watercolor came out and everybody wanted

17:24

watercolor.

17:25

>> Why would you try to make your you know

17:30

watercolor paint look like oil or vice

17:32

versa? They're just completely different

17:33

mediums. They're both paint but they're

17:36

different. And so digital has its its

17:38

advantages and its purposes. you can,

17:41

you know, because you can run like a

17:43

long mag of uh of video. I call it

17:47

video. Everybody calls it digital

17:49

cinema, but that was that was just to

17:51

push it through, you know, and and and

17:53

actually the technology is different,

17:55

you know, with film, light travels

17:58

through through the glass. It travels

18:00

through a gate. It exposes the silver

18:03

and the acetate and uh and and then and

18:07

you keep it all in the dark and send it

18:08

away. With video, the light travels

18:11

through the glass, it strikes the golden

18:14

sensor and then it bounces back into the

18:16

glass. And that's why video or digital

18:19

cinema is flatter by nature than than

18:22

most film because it and so to combat

18:24

this uh filmmakers have started to do

18:28

the exact opposite of what we used to

18:30

do. It used to be that you would go to

18:32

uh shoot something, you're on you're

18:34

outside, you're on set, I've got my

18:36

camera on Joe and I have the sun behind

18:38

me because I want all that light on you

18:40

for the most part. I'm overexaggerating

18:42

my point, but and the analogy would be

18:45

or the uh the saying would be that at

18:47

the end of the day, you go home and the

18:48

back of your neck is sunburned because

18:50

you've always had the light behind you.

18:52

Now, because the image is flatter, they

18:54

rotate the camera 180 degrees and they

18:56

shoot into the sun to get lens flare.

18:59

and lens flare gives you the the the

19:01

illusion of depth where there is none.

19:04

>> This episode is brought to you by Zip

19:06

Recruiter. The best way to learn

19:08

anything is to ask questions. Be

19:10

engaged, be curious, have a

19:12

conversation. Whether you want to know

19:14

more about a friend, start a new hobby

19:16

like surfing or figure out how your dad

19:18

makes the best steak. You're not going

19:20

to get any answers just sitting around.

19:22

When you're hiring, it's also important

19:24

to ask questions to make sure the

19:26

candidate is right for your role. That's

19:28

why you need Zip Recruiter. It can help

19:30

connect you with people who could be a

19:33

good fit. And today you can try it for

19:36

free at ziprecruiter.com/rogan.

19:40

Rated the number one hiring site based

19:42

on G2. Zip Recruiter has the features

19:45

you need to find the perfect match for

19:47

your role, like filters to show you

19:49

who's been active recently on the site.

19:51

And of course, and most importantly, you

19:54

can add screening questions to your job

19:56

post to make sure you're talking to

19:58

people with the right skill set. Ask key

20:00

questions and hire faster with Zip

20:03

Recruiter. Four out of five employers

20:05

who post on Zip Recruiter get a quality

20:07

candidate within the first day. Try it

20:10

for free at ziprecruiter.com/rogan.

20:14

That's ziprecruiter.com/rogan.

20:17

Meet your match on Ziprecruiter. I

20:20

always thought that like when you would

20:21

watch soap operas, I was like, why do

20:24

they look so weird and it's because they

20:26

were shooting them on video instead of

20:28

on film. Like when we were filming News

20:31

Radio, the sitcom, we were doing it on

20:33

film and they were like really adamant

20:36

about doing it on film. Like they really

20:37

wanted it to be on film and then there

20:39

was some process where you could make

20:41

video look like film and I was like this

20:43

is so interesting. It's like we're

20:45

design like when you take your photo

20:47

with your camera on your phone and you

20:48

use portrait mode. Yeah.

20:50

>> Which is you blur out the background, so

20:52

you're making it shittier.

20:53

>> You're doing an artificial

20:54

>> Yeah.

20:55

>> That's because uh we associate um you

20:58

know, we we associate the the faults of

21:02

of media as as film. Like people think

21:06

of like old movies as Gateweave and

21:09

sepiaone and Dustin Scratches and kind

21:12

of fast motion. Well, when those movies

21:15

were originally made, the motion was

21:16

corrected by the cranking of the

21:18

projector. And so it was natural motion.

21:22

The uh there was no sepia tone change.

21:24

There was no dust. It was originally and

21:27

and there was no gate weave because it

21:29

was a fixed image. The image the

21:31

celluloid hadn't yet shrunk or anything

21:33

like that. And so uh we now we have this

21:37

kind of filter nostalgic filter that we

21:40

associate with what an old movie looks

21:42

like. And so if you want to make

21:43

something look old, you start adding all

21:44

this crap to it. You're adding the

21:46

faults. And it's the faults of cinema

21:48

that actually make it really good. It's

21:49

not the perfection of cinema.

21:51

>> That's in my opinion

21:52

>> because you would never be able to sell

21:54

that if that cinema never existed. Like

21:56

if cinema never existed and video came

21:58

around and then it was normal video like

22:00

soap opera style and then someone came

22:02

along and said, "Hey, let's make it

22:04

blurry in the background and let's like

22:06

it's almost like we've become accustomed

22:09

to the faults and nostalgically we look

22:11

at them as if they're they're it's a

22:13

positive and and and it's also led by

22:15

you know everything is shot on iPhones

22:17

now and so that's becoming the cinematic

22:19

vernacular the grammar that uh people

22:22

are used to and they they now expect

22:24

that in a big movie and so suddenly ly

22:26

you see something like the latest James

22:29

Gun Superman or Gile Gilmo Del Toro's uh

22:33

Frankenstein and they've got these crazy

22:35

wide lenses where there's no distortion

22:37

and you know kind of infinite depth and

22:40

and they're shot in a in a very large

22:43

format but what they're replicating is

22:45

an iPhone,

22:46

>> right? And it just I I I watched both of

22:49

those movies and I thought, okay, both

22:52

of them are amazingly technically

22:55

competent and they're made by, you know,

22:58

like highly professional people, but you

23:00

know, it looks like iPhone footage, too.

23:03

>> I'm a huge Guo Del Toro fan. Um, I even

23:05

loved his book, The Strain. Like, it was

23:08

really, it was really good till about

23:09

like 3/4 of the way through and it

23:12

seemed like he just wanted to finish the

23:13

book. Yeah, probably

23:14

>> like a bunch of [ __ ] just sort of just

23:16

happens in the last quarter of the book

23:18

where I was like this is kind of

23:19

jarring.

23:19

>> It became dinner time

23:21

>> like put this aside.

23:24

>> It just seemed like [ __ ] [laughter] I

23:25

can't keep going with this book. It's

23:27

what it feel felt like. It felt rushed

23:29

just my my opin but I'm a huge fan of

23:31

that guy. I love Pan's Labyrinth. I love

23:33

a lot of his films but I didn't like

23:35

Frankenstein. I am, you know,

23:40

like I love Gilmo and I love his spirit

23:43

and I love his artistry. He is an

23:46

amazing artist. His he's a um uh just

23:50

literally as a as an artist, you know,

23:52

his his sketchbooks are beautiful and he

23:55

brings a great amount of passion uh to

23:57

his work. He he brings that kind of

23:59

Mexican uh passion to his work and I

24:03

adore his him as a as a person. But to

24:06

be perfectly honest, I'm not wild about

24:08

his movies that much. I you know I I

24:10

>> You didn't like Pans's Labyrinth.

24:12

I I liked parts of it, but as a whole, I

24:16

it just kind of

24:18

and I don't know what it is, you know,

24:21

about it, but uh I mean, Blade 2 is

24:23

probably my favorite film of his because

24:26

it's like the least of of Well,

24:28

actually, it's quite a bit of him, but

24:30

um it's just the most accessible for me.

24:33

I didn't know he did Blade 2. Which one

24:35

was that Patton Oswald was in where he

24:37

had the the whole bit about Wesley

24:40

Snipes and then they replaced him with a

24:42

cool cooler Wesley Snipes? [laughter]

24:44

>> I think that was three.

24:46

>> Yeah, it was probably Blade.

24:47

>> Blade three. I don't remember Blade 2. I

24:49

don't remember Blade 2. Blade one was

24:50

awesome though.

24:51

>> Yeah,

24:52

>> that's my favorite of all the comic book

24:54

vampire well comic book movies because I

24:57

I was just a giant fan of the Blade

24:59

comic book series. I also like his

25:01

Pacific Rim movie and I like parts of

25:03

like the moment in Frankenstein that I

25:05

think is for me the entire movie. Like I

25:08

could have like left the rest of it. So

25:10

much of it was just so melancholic and

25:15

you know it was just like I just

25:17

couldn't engage with it. And uh uh but

25:21

the part that I absolutely loved was at

25:22

the Miller's house where he's learning

25:25

language. Mhm.

25:26

>> To me, that was the movie when he's kind

25:29

of secretly learning how to speak and

25:31

how to be and learning morals. And to

25:36

me, the mo I could have watched an

25:37

entire movie about that sequence. And it

25:40

was also beautifully made that part.

25:43

Just the rest of it with

25:46

I could have done without.

25:47

>> It was just a little flat. I don't know.

25:48

>> And also, it's like why does it have

25:50

It's so freaking long. Like [laughter]

25:53

he could really like learn a lesson.

25:56

Well, I was going to say he could learn

25:57

a lesson from Ridley Scott who just

25:59

clips through things like he he takes,

26:01

you know, oh, there's a dialogue scene.

26:02

I'm just going to do the essentials and

26:04

just get out like it's a commercial.

26:05

This dialogue scene doesn't need to be

26:07

any longer than 30 seconds and he just

26:09

clips along

26:11

somehow. Yet, his movies are still like

26:12

two hours long.

26:14

>> Well, they're so involved. You know what

26:16

I really loved? Uh, Noserado. Did you

26:18

see the new

26:19

>> No. I haven't, you know,

26:23

I don't want to sound like a pnicity

26:25

guy, but I had to be in the right

26:26

>> I want you to be pnikity.

26:27

>> I had to be in [laughter] the right mood

26:29

to engage with that movie [snorts]

26:30

because um I like that guy's first

26:33

movie, The Vivich or The Witch.

26:36

>> Um I

26:36

>> I never saw that.

26:37

>> I

26:37

>> I heard it's great though.

26:39

>> I love that film. I think that's a great

26:40

movie. And he's like a production

26:41

designer.

26:42

>> He's doing a werewolf movie right now.

26:43

>> Yeah, of course he is. [laughter]

26:45

>> Of course he is.

26:45

>> I love a good werewolf. I did not like

26:47

his Moby Dickish uh lighthouse movie. Um

26:50

>> Oh, I didn't see that. That was the

26:52

William Defo

26:54

one. It was just uh just garish and kind

26:58

of I felt like lost its way halfway

27:00

through. And um but uh and then you know

27:05

this latest one, Nosperatu.

27:08

Look, I am a Verer Herzog nut and so I

27:13

like I adore Verer Herzog and I love his

27:16

noseratu. So for me to, you know, like

27:19

watch this guy's version of that.

27:23

>> Which one?

27:24

>> I have to be in the right mood. I have

27:25

to be in the right mood. I just wasn't

27:27

yet in the right mood to accept.

27:28

>> Which one is Werners? Who who plays

27:30

Nosado?

27:30

>> Oh, Claus the the incomparable

27:34

Klauskinsky. And uh I know I've seen it.

27:36

I mean the thing about Verer Herzog when

27:38

he made his noseratu what's you know uh

27:41

the Mnau movie which is the original

27:44

Noseratu the the very first one with Max

27:46

Shrek

27:48

>> uh that

27:48

>> I saw at the library when I was 10 years

27:51

old.

27:52

>> So the thing about Verer Herzog as a

27:54

filmmaker is that most filmmakers have

27:56

their forefathers that they can look

27:58

back to. they can you they have a

28:00

generation before them that they can

28:01

kind of imprint on and because of the

28:05

brutality and uh tragedy of World War II

28:10

uh he had none. There were no German

28:12

filmmakers that he could look to and so

28:14

he had to look to his grandfather

28:15

basically which was Mnau when he made it

28:18

and so his film is almost like haunted

28:20

by the by the original and then he bring

28:23

you know Ver Herzog grew up

28:25

>> not using a telephone until he was in

28:27

his teens. He'd never seen a telephone

28:29

before. He had grown up like in, you

28:31

know, upper Bavaria in in the mountains.

28:34

And, you know, so he he comes like his

28:37

film is almost displaced in time. It's

28:39

like skipped a generation. And he does

28:42

things like uh you know, he'll show two

28:45

actors in the most emotional part of the

28:47

movie when Mina and Jonathan Harker are

28:51

uh you know, at the beach and they're

28:52

basically saying goodbye. And normally

28:54

in a Hollywood film, they would cut to a

28:56

closeup so that we could see the tears.

28:58

You know, we would cut to that close-up.

29:00

But because his film is, you know,

29:03

because he's displaced in time, he stays

29:06

back. Like, he doesn't even bother

29:08

shooting a close-up. To him, it's more

29:10

melancholic to show them just isolated

29:12

as figures, you know, in in a in a wide

29:16

shot. And it truly is. And so, his film

29:19

is is super powerful that way. And then

29:21

you have Klaus Kinsky, you know, who is

29:24

uh, you know, like the madman actor of

29:27

of German cinema and who is uh uh, you

29:32

know, who who was like I mean there's a

29:34

documentary called My Best Fiend, which

29:37

um, uh, K which is about the

29:40

relationship you between Herzog and

29:42

Kinsky. And there's an amazing scene in

29:45

the beginning of that where uh he Verzog

29:49

visits the apartment that he rented in I

29:51

think it was in Berlin that uh you know

29:53

that where he was first becoming a

29:55

filmmaker and where he first met Klaus

29:57

Kinsky and he goes there and it's now

29:59

occupied by these two you know just very

30:01

conservative uh this German couple and

30:04

and he starts going through the house

30:05

and saying oh yes here this is where uh

30:10

Klouse you know went crazy and he

30:12

started smashing it and [ __ ] on the

30:14

walls and like you [laughter] know like

30:16

cuz he was an insane guy. He was like

30:18

his whole thing was about provocation.

30:20

And so he brings a kind of crazy

30:24

vampire. I mean it feels like a real

30:27

vampire.

30:28

>> I remember it now but I haven't seen it

30:30

forever. What year was that?

30:31

>> Uh you mean the Kinsky one?

30:32

>> Yes.

30:33

>> Uh I think it was in the 70s so I'm

30:34

thinking it was like 78 or 79. Maybe

30:37

even earlier.

30:37

>> I know I've seen all the Noseratos.

30:40

Um let me see. Give me a um

30:42

>> I will eventually see this new

30:44

>> I will eventually see this new one.

30:46

>> It's [ __ ] good, man. It's good.

30:48

>> The dude who plays the vampire, what's

30:50

his name?

30:51

>> Um

30:52

>> the guy who played uh the the clown and

30:54

it

30:54

>> Bill Scarsgard.

30:55

>> Oh, yeah. Bill Scars.

30:56

>> He's so good. Well,

30:58

>> he's so good.

31:02

>> So, is this the scene when he meets the

31:03

vampire?

31:04

>> I don't know. I just clicked on.

31:05

>> Yeah, this Oh, he cuts.

31:07

>> Well, this is Yeah, this is I mean

31:09

that's [snorts]

31:12

I mean, Kinsky brings just an amazing

31:15

>> The knife is old and could be

31:17

>> empathy.

31:20

>> It could give you blood poisoning.

31:22

>> Oh, this is the English version.

31:23

>> Please let me do it. It's the oldest

31:26

remedy in the world.

31:28

>> Oh, forget it. It's hardly worth

31:31

mentioning. Just a little cut.

31:44

You [sighs]

31:46

you know

31:49

it's only for the best.

31:53

[gasps]

31:55

>> The original [laughter]

31:57

in German is incredible.

32:04

>> That's so awesome. And that's probably

32:06

Kinsky like you know they're supposed to

32:08

cut and Kinsky just keeps going.

32:12

Yeah. I mean Bruno Gans. I think it's

32:14

Bruno Gans is probably terrified in real

32:17

life cuz he doesn't know Kinsky's crazy

32:19

enough where he'll bite him,

32:20

>> right?

32:21

>> And he's got those fake teeth.

32:23

>> Yeah.

32:31

>> Let's sit up for a while.

32:37

All right, show me a clip from the new

32:38

one. You You got to see the the new

32:41

Noserato.

32:42

>> I mean, I had never seen a vampire like

32:44

that. And And then I think Salem's Lot

32:46

was made after the TV movie was super

32:49

similar to it.

32:49

>> Yeah.

32:50

>> Um there's a a scene when he um meets

32:55

the guy at the castle.

32:57

I did see one scene from this online

33:00

with Lily Rose Depp kind of

33:02

>> this is it

33:02

>> reacting to something which was like

33:04

very compelling.

33:04

>> Go full screen to this. This is when he

33:06

makes it into the castle.

33:09

It's really dark man. He did a fantastic

33:12

job of like capturing the creepiness of

33:15

it and also the surreal aspect

33:18

of him being under the trance of this

33:21

vampire. You recognize that reality is

33:23

all [ __ ] up and skewed. Like time

33:26

passes very quickly. It doesn't make

33:28

sense. He's super confused as to what's

33:30

going on.

33:40

I mean, I have to say this movie feels

33:42

haunted as haunted by the Herzog version

33:46

as Herzog was haunted by the Mnau

33:48

version. As if it's a continuation. For

33:51

me, it would be

33:52

>> like I encourage anybody to like enjoy

33:54

all three of them, I guess.

33:56

>> Yeah. I wonder if he was haunted by that

33:57

or if I wonder if he was haunted by the

33:59

original. But this is uh with the use of

34:03

all

34:03

>> the little step frame

34:05

>> modern ability. Yeah.

34:07

>> But it's just the way they made the

34:08

castle and the way they made him is very

34:11

unique. There's so many aspects of it

34:13

that I thought were very unique. Even

34:15

the way the vampire feeds on people is

34:17

unique. This guy is a he's a very very

34:20

very good filmmaker. I just uh

34:24

>> You are late.

34:29

The midnight hour has passed

34:35

and my attendance

34:38

have wor

34:40

>> I don't know so much about the way he's

34:43

talking.

34:43

>> It's a It's weird but it grows on you.

34:46

It grows on you.

34:47

>> Well, I'm sure it has a like a haunting

34:49

quality over time.

34:50

>> Yeah. Like like this, the guy just

34:52

disappears and all of a sudden he's way

34:54

far away. There's a lot of that in this

34:56

movie. So the scene when they get him to

34:59

sign papers when he's get up to that

35:04

>> questions about the young

35:07

we yet keep close many superstitions

35:12

here that may seem backward

35:16

to a young man of your high learning.

35:23

>> Sure Prince Charles was like jacking off

35:25

to this film. [laughter] Oh,

35:27

>> before they made that painting.

35:28

>> Well, he he apparently he visits uh

35:31

Castle Dracula like every year.

35:34

>> Well, isn't he related to Vlad Tz?

35:37

>> Yeah, it doesn't surprise me. I mean,

35:38

he's he's German. He's of German

35:40

ancestry. So,

35:42

>> I think Prince Charles is related to the

35:45

original Vlad the Impaler.

35:47

>> That would go further ahead. So, they

35:50

>> would track with the whole baby eating

35:51

thing.

35:51

>> They give you a look at what he looks

35:53

like.

35:54

I think it cuts off probably.

36:01

This is going to cut it off.

36:06

They don't want to give away too much.

36:07

That was the other thing. Like you don't

36:09

really [music] get to get a look at them

36:10

for quite a while and when you do it's

36:13

horrifying.

36:14

>> Yeah. And the movie is made in washes of

36:17

darkness.

36:17

>> Mhm. It's very dark.

36:20

I mean, it's very much a candle lit

36:22

movie,

36:24

>> which I like because I don't like a film

36:26

where you're pretending that people are

36:28

in a candle lit, but it's really well

36:30

lit.

36:30

>> Well, and that's that's an example of

36:32

where video actually is is a better

36:35

medium to choose

36:37

>> because it it like digital loves

36:40

darkness

36:41

>> and it can do things in darkness that

36:43

film just doesn't have the capacity to

36:44

do, right?

36:45

>> And so, it's an excellent choice. When

36:46

we did Silent Hill, we made the choice

36:48

of whenever we're in the dark, we're

36:50

shooting on digital and whenever it's

36:53

during daylight, we're shooting on film.

36:54

>> Oh,

36:55

>> to create a kind of dissonance between

36:57

the two.

36:58

>> And so, um, and and that's largely

37:01

because digital loves dark. And this is

37:03

a great use of it. I'm warming up to it.

37:06

I like I've been waiting. I bought it

37:08

on, uh, on Blu-ray. I I have the movie.

37:11

I mean, I keep it. It's in that stack

37:14

and I've just been waiting to, you know,

37:15

for the right time to expose it. Expose

37:17

myself to it where I'm in the right

37:19

mood.

37:20

>> I loved it. I'm no film expert, but it's

37:22

my favorite vampire movie ever.

37:24

>> Well, that's uh that's that's actually

37:26

saying a lot. That's that's incredible.

37:28

>> I loved it.

37:28

>> That's incredible.

37:29

>> My a fun vampire movie is 30 Days of

37:32

Night.

37:33

>> Yeah, 30 Days of Night is great. Um

37:35

>> I love that one, too. It's not as good

37:37

as this. This is This is a better

37:39

>> I think I Am Legend is actually a pretty

37:41

good uh vampire movie. the uh uh the one

37:44

with Will Smith.

37:45

>> Well, they're I thought they were

37:45

zombies.

37:46

>> Well, they're kind of It's a contagion

37:48

film. Technically, they're not really

37:50

zombies, but they've been turned into

37:52

like vampire-like creatures. They're you

37:54

in that film. That's a really good one.

37:56

And then that one that uh uh what's his

37:59

name? Titiki Wakataka

38:02

that uh that Polynesian uh director who

38:05

did the Thor movie did. Uh god, what was

38:07

it called? the um uh

38:12

we are I can't remember the name of it,

38:15

but it's like a comedy version of uh uh

38:19

vampires like kind of all living in a

38:21

house and and sort of

38:22

>> How old is that?

38:23

>> This was made in sometime in the mid

38:26

2000s, I think.

38:28

>> H vampires living in a house.

38:30

>> What We Do in the Shadows.

38:31

>> Yeah. What We Do in the Shadows.

38:32

>> Did you see that?

38:33

>> Nope.

38:34

>> That is an incredible vampire movie.

38:37

It's kind It's kind of like a

38:38

mockumentary like where they're they're

38:42

>> but it's it takes all of the kind of

38:44

vampire mythology and it makes it really

38:46

really fun.

38:47

>> I've never even heard of this.

38:49

>> It's fantastic. This is his best film.

38:51

This is I'm sure the foundation of

38:52

everything he's done has been on what we

38:55

do for me. What we do in the shadows.

38:57

>> Huh. That's so crazy. I never even heard

38:59

of it.

39:00

>> Yeah. It it's it's wonderful.

39:02

>> Show me the trailer, Jamie.

39:07

We are granted protection for the

39:09

subjects in this film. Oh, it's like a

39:12

Blair Witch Project type deal.

39:15

>> It's been like this the whole time.

39:17

Deacon on dishes and it still hasn't

39:19

moved in 5 years. You're a cool guy, but

39:22

you're not pulling your weight in the

39:23

flat.

39:24

>> Oh, I'm glad to hear that I'm cool.

39:28

>> No, that's not the point, though. You're

39:29

missing

39:30

>> not a flat meeting about how cool you

39:32

are. When you get three vampires in a

39:36

[music] flat, obviously there's going to

39:38

be a lot of tension.

39:40

>> Viago was an 18th century dandy.

39:44

>> Look, a ghost coplav

39:47

is a bit of a pervert.

39:49

>> This is my torture chamber.

39:51

>> Deacons like the young [music] bad boy

39:53

of the group.

39:54

>> I'm supposed to pay rent, but I don't.

39:57

[music]

39:58

>> The trouble with being a vampire is you

40:01

have to be invited in.

40:05

You can walk in.

40:06

>> Will you invite us in?

40:07

>> We need some fresh. [laughter]

40:10

>> The whole movie is like that. It's

40:11

fantastic. Oh, that's funny.

40:14

>> Will you invite us in?

40:16

>> Just invite us in. The bouncer's like,

40:17

"No." [laughter]

40:19

And they can't do anything about it cuz

40:20

they're vampires.

40:21

>> Let the right one in.

40:23

>> Oh, okay. That is uh of all the modern

40:25

vampire movies, I mean, I haven't seen

40:27

the what's his name? Edgar's uh

40:29

>> the American version of it.

40:30

>> Um no, I hate the American version. The

40:32

American version is Let Them In is

40:35

terrible. [laughter]

40:37

>> It It like I had to wash my eyes

40:40

afterwards with another movie.

40:42

>> I [laughter] didn't mind it.

40:43

>> I I hated the uh but because I loved the

40:47

foreign version.

40:47

>> The who who which country was it from?

40:50

>> I think it's Sweden.

40:50

>> Sweden. It's really good.

40:52

>> It's it's an outstanding outstanding

40:54

film. And the book is fabulous as well.

40:56

It's a an amazing novel.

40:58

>> Yeah. I just love a good horror movie. a

41:00

well-made horror movie because it like

41:03

the suspension of disbelief is like

41:04

inherent to the enjoyment of the film

41:06

like you know like just show me show me

41:09

how the guy turns into a monster. Show

41:11

me.

41:11

>> Yeah. Make it make it so make it so. And

41:15

>> and also you can see you like I mean

41:19

they have been making Dracula movies

41:21

again and again and again. It seems like

41:23

every year there's another vampire movie

41:25

coming out or every couple years at

41:27

least. And you know there never seems to

41:30

be an exhausted the market never seems

41:33

to be exhausted right by it you know

41:35

it's uh zombie movies they they continue

41:37

making them you know it's like

41:39

>> that's the most overused genre is zombie

41:41

films zombie films zombie TV shows I

41:44

mean how many versions of the walking

41:46

dead are there's multiple

41:47

>> yeah and I I'm not a big fan of the I

41:49

like I mean

41:51

>> the beginning was great I think first

41:52

season

41:53

>> when it started but then I when I

41:54

realized oh it's just sadism And that I

41:58

mean I get the point after the first

41:59

season I realized oh the point is that

42:01

the walking dead are the living.

42:04

>> They're actually the walking dead. Yeah.

42:05

Because they've become emotionally

42:07

>> I didn't like it when it got into the

42:09

point where they were just it was just

42:11

murder porn.

42:12

>> Yeah. And and and that I mean I think I

42:16

even talked about this before that like

42:18

that's a real problem with television is

42:20

that they're just trying to get the

42:21

serotonin levels spiked by killing

42:24

someone that you care about. M

42:26

>> and you know real television you return

42:28

because you love the characters and you

42:30

want to return to it.

42:31

>> Well, sometimes it's done well. Like

42:33

Game of Thrones did a fantastic job of

42:35

doing that.

42:36

>> But even that kind of lost its way after

42:38

a while. I mean eight seasons. I'm I'm

42:41

rewatching it right now. We're actually

42:43

on season 3 right now. It's [ __ ]

42:45

great. I I kind of forgot how great it

42:48

was. But when you get to binge it and

42:50

you don't have to wait like like there

42:52

was years in between seasons it took so

42:55

long to produce.

42:55

>> Have you seen the Pen Dragon cycle the

42:59

um the rise of the Merlin?

43:02

>> No.

43:02

>> Okay. So these days like you almost

43:06

don't know where television where to

43:08

find television and that's because you

43:10

can find it anywhere like and no the

43:12

main uh the mainstay producers of it the

43:16

studios and everything they're no longer

43:17

reliable in producing quality television

43:20

and so suddenly uh we see stuff rising

43:24

you know out of places that is

43:25

completely unexpected and uh this was

43:28

produced by the daily wire of all of all

43:31

people. S and the CEO of the Daily Wire

43:34

directed it. Uh this guy Jeremy Boring.

43:37

Yeah, I hope I'm not mispronouncing his

43:39

name. His name is Boring. [laughter]

43:42

>> But um

43:43

>> and this is good.

43:44

>> Okay, this is to me this is better than

43:47

uh you know it's I have a very high

43:51

watermark for um uh for Arththeran

43:56

mythology. Like to me Excalibur is the

43:58

high watermark and this really went

44:01

there.

44:02

Like I had a chip on my shoulder when I

44:03

started watching this. I was like,

44:04

"Okay, this is very unlikely that I'm

44:07

going to enjoy this production." But

44:08

they did it for like a for a micro

44:11

budget effectively. They made something

44:13

that is absolutely kind of reinvents the

44:16

mythology and they do it like proper

44:18

television where you kind of love the

44:21

characters and they they weave an entire

44:24

reality and universe that is just

44:26

fantastic. And it's done for like, you

44:27

know, for very very little. you know,

44:30

they're spending billions making uh

44:32

these Lord of the Rings things and like

44:34

nobody cares. They're just awful to

44:36

watch. And in the meantime, these guys

44:40

just, you know, without anybody paying

44:42

attention cranked this out. And I've

44:46

only seen four episodes of it, but I am

44:49

like completely blown away by it.

44:51

>> That's so interesting. The Daily

44:54

I think that's part of the problem.

44:55

Well, that's because well, like we don't

44:57

hear about a lot of things and media is

45:00

like the least of it.

45:01

>> Well, certain [laughter] Right. Good

45:04

point. But certainly with the Daily

45:06

Wire, the problem is it's like

45:07

associated with this right-wing

45:09

production.

45:10

>> If you can get over that and like and

45:12

and put that behind you and then uh I

45:16

mean this is to me as good as classic

45:18

television. It's I my prejudice was

45:21

initially, oh, they're going to somehow

45:24

or another embed right-wing ideology in

45:27

this.

45:27

>> Well, everybody's embedding their own

45:29

ideology there. Whenever you make any

45:31

media, there's usually um you have

45:34

corporate propaganda and personal

45:36

propaganda. And you're you and usually

45:37

there was a balance between the two. You

45:39

know, if you're making

45:41

Midnight Express, for example, okay,

45:44

that movie was nothing like the book at

45:46

all

45:47

>> really. and not not even close to the

45:49

book and it it's a complete alternate

45:51

experience and you wonder why did that

45:53

movie why was that movie such a big

45:55

success? Why was that movie such a um

45:59

overwhelmingly like Oscars and

46:01

everything? Okay. I think it had a

46:04

little bit more to do with the politics

46:05

of what was going on with Turkey at that

46:07

time than anything else. And and and you

46:11

know um what's his name? Billy Hayes who

46:14

uh um you know experienced it, lived it,

46:16

spent the rest of his life basically

46:18

apologizing for the movie and uh you

46:21

know

46:22

>> because none of he wasn't like raped in

46:25

a Turkish prison and that's like that's

46:26

like a

46:28

>> that's like a joke that gets you know

46:30

you know in airplane they're making

46:31

jokes about it

46:32

>> and so yeah Billy Hayes he was the the

46:34

actual character or the person who lived

46:37

the experience and uh and so the movie

46:41

is a kind of propag propaganda element

46:43

and that's like all Hollywood does it.

46:46

You know, you kind of accept whenever

46:48

you're making a movie that you're being

46:50

used in a certain level to do something,

46:53

whether it's to, you know, on a very

46:55

basic level, whether it's just to like,

46:56

you know, mortify or scare audiences or,

46:59

you know, to to to do things. And we see

47:01

that more and more obviously in media as

47:04

the director, the personal propaganda

47:06

when you have something personal that

47:08

you want to get on screen has become

47:10

more and more diminished and you have a

47:12

you know sort of more corporate

47:14

propaganda kind of taking over. And I

47:16

think the the the most probably crass

47:19

example of that is DEI stuff uh you know

47:23

in movies and pushing

47:26

>> uh characters in situations that are

47:27

just completely out of whack. Did you

47:29

see the Star Trek that they tried to

47:32

make like that?

47:34

>> Okay, I'm like a big Star Trek guy. I

47:35

watch Star Trek every day in my house.

47:38

We watch like two or three episodes and

47:40

I'm not kidding. My wife [laughter] is

47:41

like a Treky. She is like crazy for Star

47:44

Trek and so she puts Star Trek on, you

47:46

know, like at around 5:00 Star Trek

47:49

comes on original. Well, uh, we cycle

47:52

through, we go chronologically from, uh,

47:55

you know, the original series through

47:58

the next generation and then DS9 and

48:01

then Voyager and then Enterprise and

48:03

then we look back to, uh, and sometimes,

48:06

you know, when you show an episode like

48:08

uh, in DS9 there's an episode called

48:10

Trials and Tribulations where all the

48:12

characters go into the past and they

48:14

kind of interact with Trouble with

48:16

Tribles and they kind of blend them into

48:18

the set and everything that's happening.

48:20

we'll then go back and watch Trouble

48:22

with Tribbles or, you know, uh same

48:24

thing with Wrath of Khan. We'll do this,

48:26

you know. So, we we'll uh we'll kind of

48:29

connect it all together. And so, uh but

48:32

every day there's at least two or three

48:34

episodes of Star Trek playing in my

48:35

house. It's like uh I usually have to

48:37

wrestle away the controller to say we're

48:39

watching a movie now.

48:40

>> [laughter]

48:40

>> So, and so uh and and my children were

48:44

like basically raised on Star Trek and

48:47

you know the sort of morals behind Star

48:49

Trek and you know uh you know and people

48:53

complain about oh you know I don't like

48:55

DS9 as much. It's not as dynamic. I hate

48:57

Beij and blah blah blah. Uh but I think

49:00

Captain Cisco is one of the most amazing

49:03

captains there is because he's also a

49:04

father and there's all these like

49:06

fatherson lessons that are going on

49:08

throughout it. It's like really

49:10

elaborate television. And by the way,

49:12

all that kind of DEI stuff is still in

49:15

it. It's still there. There, you know,

49:18

they're exploring all sorts of things in

49:19

Star Trek: The Next Generation, uh

49:21

Riker, who's like the uh uh the second

49:25

in command to Peard. In in that one,

49:29

there's an episode where he goes to a a

49:31

planet of neuters that are just, you

49:33

know, they have one gender and he falls

49:36

in love with one and they kind of waken

49:38

up out of their single gender thing and

49:40

realize, oh, I'm female. And that person

49:42

then gets taken and reprogrammed like

49:45

and and then there's an episode where

49:47

Cork is turned into a woman in order to

49:50

for some cockamame reason that they come

49:51

up with in the show and and and he kind

49:54

of likes it. he's like getting into it

49:56

like so it's not like they aren't

49:57

exploring gender and

49:59

>> they're not [clears throat] just beating

50:00

you over the head with it.

50:01

>> It's somehow integrated into good

50:04

storytelling. And I think something

50:05

happened at uh you know at the studios

50:08

where they fired all of the legacy

50:10

people and they hired on a bunch of new

50:13

people who just weren't as good at

50:16

storytelling and or as respectful of the

50:20

you know the the canon I guess you could

50:23

say is what it was. But you know those

50:27

uh seasons of Star Trek are which I

50:29

guess you could call the from the Gene

50:31

Rodenberry into the Rick Burman era and

50:35

I mean they had such amazing writers.

50:37

They had guys like Renee Shavaria and

50:39

Narin Shankar and uh and they had

50:42

technical adviserss and you know so if

50:44

you were just into the tech you could

50:46

really like you know and and and most of

50:48

our technology and most of our

50:50

aspirations have come from Star Trek.

50:52

You know, our telephones are basically,

50:55

you know, like triers and we're we're

50:58

all and you know, when we see it on Star

51:00

Trek, like, oh, we talk to the computer.

51:02

Well, I want to have that. And so,

51:04

somebody figures out a way to develop

51:06

that and to make it so. And now we have

51:07

that.

51:08

>> Didn't he actually say computer? Like he

51:10

would say computer and ask question.

51:12

>> Yeah. Well,

51:13

>> hey Siri. Hey Siri. Same thing.

51:16

>> Yeah. Wow.

51:17

>> And so it, you know, it it's a I mean, I

51:20

think it's a fantastic show. And then

51:22

this dweeb Alex Curtsman comes along and

51:25

just shits all over everything. Just

51:27

like craps all over it. And I mean, I

51:29

went in and met with the guy, you know,

51:32

I was like, "Hey, I will write for for

51:34

scale. I'll, you know, I'll I'll write

51:36

on your new show." I like I I just want

51:38

to be part of it

51:39

>> just as an opportunity to work on Star

51:41

Trek.

51:41

>> And he was and I basically found out he

51:43

didn't want anybody who had any kind of

51:44

fondness for the original show. M

51:46

>> he wanted to do something new and to

51:49

create something new. And boy has he

51:52

[ __ ] the bed like in a big way. And this

51:55

latest thing that he that they've made

51:57

this Starfleet Academy now it's still

51:59

ongoing. Maybe it writes itself at some

52:02

point. You know,

52:03

>> I think they canceled it.

52:04

>> Did they? Good.

52:05

>> The newest the newest they read The

52:08

Room. They read The Room. Finally.

52:10

>> Is it um if they they didn't they stop

52:13

the idea of a season two? That [ __ ]

52:15

Alex Curtsman, man. His company is

52:17

called uh Secret Hideout. I think he's

52:19

going to need a Secret Hideout after all

52:21

these like after destroying Star Trek

52:24

for like this latest generation.

52:25

>> Are we talking about the newest one? The

52:27

one with Tigaro? That's the newest.

52:29

>> Starfleet Academy.

52:30

>> Starfleet Academy is an abomination. Uh

52:34

>> I could not I could not get Yes. I could

52:36

not get through three episodes of of

52:38

Discovery. And I mean they're just like

52:40

it is just awful awful storytelling.

52:44

Well, it's also clunky dialogue and bad

52:47

acting.

52:47

>> It's just horrible. And they're they're

52:49

more interested in um in the corporate

52:53

corporate pol in the corporate

52:55

propaganda than they are with any kind

52:57

of personal propaganda,

52:58

>> right? It seems like that's the

53:00

imperative that it's like they get

53:02

across this

53:03

>> inclusive I

53:06

was terrible. It was it's was sad

53:08

actually. It was just depressing for me.

53:10

And so like when you know when

53:13

>> Seth what's his name did that show the

53:14

Orville and like that is like you know

53:16

the proper successor like they brought

53:18

back guys like James Conroy

53:21

the uh

53:22

>> but I don't know what the Orville is.

53:23

>> Uh it was kind of like a comedy version

53:26

Seth McFarland did but he hired all the

53:30

original people that they had fired from

53:32

Star Trek and basically used them to do

53:34

his show. And it actually feels a little

53:37

bit more like a like a continuation.

53:40

>> I I never heard of this either.

53:42

>> And it's on Hulu.

53:44

>> Yeah.

53:44

>> Yeah.

53:44

>> Is it It is a Star Trek or is it

53:47

>> No, it's not Star Trek. It's the

53:48

Orville. [laughter] So, they just ripped

53:50

off Star Trek. basically just ripped off

53:52

Star Trek and they they have a sort of

53:53

like tongue and cheek quality but they

53:55

they bring all the you know all the

53:57

writers from the original and

53:58

showrunners and uh you know people like

54:01

that and the original directors like um

54:04

you know like Jim Con god I'm like

54:06

blanking on his name Con I want to say

54:08

Conroy but it's I think it's ah

54:10

whatever. Um and uh so they bring

54:14

everybody back and it has a little bit

54:15

more of the same spirit. Another really

54:17

good Star Trekish thing is Galaxy Quest.

54:20

Something that got kind of buried and

54:22

with uh

54:24

>> Sigourney Weaver.

54:24

>> Sigourney Weaver.

54:25

>> Yeah, that was good.

54:26

>> Galaxy Quest is hilarious. If you love

54:29

the original series of Star Trek, Galaxy

54:31

Quest is amazing. Like it it's so

54:35

fantastic. It's

54:36

>> I I love Sigourney Weaver.

54:37

>> Yeah,

54:38

>> she's one of my all-time favorites. That

54:40

that's a good example of a movie that

54:42

was like a DEI movie that you never even

54:45

noticed it was Alien.

54:46

>> Like you have a female lead and you you

54:49

never think about it.

54:50

>> We didn't have like powerful women in

54:52

movies before. We've like had them

54:54

throughout history, right?

54:56

>> You know, uh the history of cinema is

54:58

built on uh you know and and by the way

55:01

a you know a complex woman character can

55:04

have faults,

55:05

>> right?

55:05

>> Like that's part of it is characters

55:08

have faults. characters have things

55:09

wrong with them. You know, they're not

55:11

always just, you know, like, you know,

55:14

I, you know,

55:15

>> dominant and noble.

55:17

>> Dominant and and like can do everything

55:19

immediately.

55:20

>> Exactly. Like the some of the Star Wars

55:22

ones went woke. There was a few of

55:24

those.

55:25

>> Well, yeah. I mean, you know, it's

55:26

funny. You had I think it was I think it

55:28

was here Ben Affleck was on and they

55:30

were talking about AI and how it always

55:32

goes to the middle and well, you know,

55:35

it always goes to the middle. It always

55:36

goes to the middle. And I was like, like

55:40

J.J. Abrams always goes to the middle.

55:42

And boy was that Star Wars. He did the

55:45

middle where he just basically took the

55:47

Luke Skywalker story and just

55:48

reinterpreted it with a strong strong

55:51

woman, you know, character. And I I just

55:53

thought it was bland and just tasteless

55:57

and just, you know, nothing new. He just

56:00

went to the middle. So you don't need AI

56:02

to go to the middle. This episode is

56:04

brought to you by Visible. Folks,

56:07

there's one thing nobody wants this

56:08

season, and that's getting catfished.

56:11

And it's not just dating profiles that

56:13

are putting you at risk. It's also big

56:16

wireless carriers. You know the type.

56:18

Looks great at first, promises a low

56:20

price, but once you're locked in,

56:22

surprise fees, and an expensive bill

56:25

that isn't what you were expecting. Your

56:27

night and shining armor. Visible

56:30

wireless. It's oneline wireless with

56:33

unlimited data and hotspot for just $25

56:36

a month. Taxes and fees included. Now

56:40

that's a green flag. The best part,

56:43

Visible is all digital, so you can

56:45

switch as fast as you can swipe. Don't

56:48

fall for the trap of getting catfish by

56:50

wireless. Visit visible.com to learn

56:52

more and start loving your wireless

56:55

carrier. Terms apply. See visible.com

56:58

for plan features and network management

57:00

details. No, no, you just need a

57:03

mandate. And the the thing about Alien 2

57:07

was like you didn't know who the hero

57:10

was.

57:10

>> Alien 2 or Alien You mean Aliens

57:12

>> as well? I mean Alien one. I didn't like

57:14

Aliens 2 as much. It was fun, but it was

57:18

like why are they so easy to kill now?

57:19

Why are they so obvious?

57:21

>> Well, they were, you know, space

57:22

marines. And Marines are tough. Marines

57:25

are badass. Marines can like and the

57:27

first they still overwhelm.

57:29

>> I know. But the first alien was clever.

57:31

He was hiding. He would sneak around. He

57:34

would jump. You didn't get to see much

57:36

of it. And that was also cool, too,

57:38

because it kind of captured you with the

57:40

suspense.

57:40

>> It's one of the best movies ever made.

57:42

And

57:43

>> and it's a 1979 movie, too, which is

57:45

crazy. People don't even know how old it

57:46

is.

57:46

>> Well, it's funny. I recently went back

57:48

and started watching all the Ridley

57:50

Scott movies I hadn't seen, you know,

57:52

like there's a ton of them that I just,

57:54

you know, kind of missed along the way.

57:56

And I started off with um uh God, what

58:01

was it? I um Oh, I started off with

58:03

Napoleon and like because I just missed

58:05

it when it came out. And I'm like, what?

58:08

What happened to Ridley Scott? It's And

58:11

I have not liked any of his recent alien

58:14

movies. I just think they're I'm

58:16

confused by them to be honest.

58:17

>> The Prometheus ones.

58:18

>> It's just like when you need a web

58:20

episode in order to understand what the

58:21

hell he's talking about in the movie.

58:23

You failed. And And they're just like

58:26

they're high. They're technically

58:28

technical marvels. Like nobody shoots

58:30

big canvas cinema like Ridley Scott.

58:33

Like no one shoots a helicopter crashing

58:36

like Ridley Scott shoots a helicopter

58:38

crashing. And uh and and you know, you

58:41

watch Napoleon and sure the battle

58:43

battle of Astrolitz amazing to watch.

58:46

You know, cannonballs going into the the

58:49

lake and the ice breaking and people

58:51

falling in the water. But the minute

58:54

anybody talks in that movie, it just

58:56

collapses on its own weight. It's just

58:58

like you just don't care. My wife was

59:01

like, "This is the worst date movie.

59:03

You're not going to sleep with me after

59:05

[laughter] this."

59:06

>> What's wrong with it?

59:07

>> I didn't see it. It's well Walken

59:10

Phoenix who and I think he made a choice

59:13

because I consider him to be an

59:14

excellent actor but in this movie I

59:17

think he made a choice to just play it

59:19

like you know contemporary

59:22

is doing sort of a British or French

59:25

accent like they're all kind of

59:26

pretending that they're in a in a period

59:28

piece but not walking in Phoenix he just

59:30

plays it like he just you know walked

59:32

off Hollywood Boulevard really and and

59:34

he and it and just like the battle scene

59:36

there's no passion in any of his

59:39

performance. It's kind of this weird

59:41

dead dead performance. And uh and so

59:45

>> he did it on purpose to betray like a

59:47

sociopath.

59:48

>> I think he came on he was like I am

59:50

going to do whatever I want to do the

59:52

way Napoleon would and I and and I'm not

59:55

and I'm not going to try I'm a Corsican

59:56

and I'm not I'm going to be an outsider

59:58

to all of these other people who were I

60:00

think there was an intellectual idea

60:01

behind what he did and it completely

60:03

failed. So, I'm like, "Okay, I adore

60:05

watching Ridley Scott do these big

60:07

scenes, but what a terrible movie." And,

60:10

[laughter]

60:11

you know, like failure. And then I So,

60:14

and so then after that, I'm like, "Okay,

60:16

let's let's watch something else." Well,

60:17

oh, he did Exodus. I've never seen that.

60:20

Gods and Kings with Christian Bale. Same

60:23

thing. It's like you start watching that

60:25

movie and there's some interesting

60:26

things in the film. He's got like

60:29

chariot battles and you know archers

60:31

shooting things and like you know

60:33

whenever he's doing that like Ridley

60:34

Scott's like oh this is my day on set

60:36

and he's got a cigar and 20 cameras you

60:38

know put cameras everywhere and he's

60:40

like shoot from every angle and he's

60:41

like a like a great general you know uh

60:44

uh shooting but the minute anybody talks

60:47

that movie falls apart and actually I

60:49

mean I don't know how to say this but

60:50

that movie almost did its best to turn

60:53

me on the Jews. Like I'm watching it and

60:55

I'm like this is like first of all is

60:59

anybody even Jewish making this? Like it

61:01

seems like nobody involved in it was was

61:04

Jewish and like they start like you know

61:07

>> how is that even possible?

61:08

>> Well Moses as a character when he's uh

61:11

an Egyptian when he's like the adopted

61:13

Egyptian brother. I'm like totally with

61:15

him for some reason. and he becomes

61:17

Moses after getting like hit in the head

61:18

with a rock and uh and all of a sudden

61:21

he's uh you know kind of he's like a

61:24

lunatic and like you're like everybody's

61:27

following him like he's like he's

61:30

distaste he's distasteful all of a

61:32

sudden and but every now and then they

61:34

would show a battle scene and it's like

61:35

okay I [sighs] can like Ridley Scott's

61:38

doing his thing again but like and you

61:40

know who's also really good in it is um

61:42

God I can't remember Joel Edertton who

61:44

plays Ramsy's It's really funny because

61:47

Joel Edertton is, you know, usually you

61:50

imagine Egyptians when they're cast as

61:52

being kind of tall and, you know, sort

61:54

of noble looking and everything. He's

61:56

kind of like this butch, like sort of

61:59

tough, you know, widebodied butch uh

62:02

Ramsay's like just kind of like a tough

62:04

Ramsey's. And every now and then his

62:05

Australian accent comes out. So he's

62:06

like, "Oh, he's like an Australian

62:09

Ramsey's." And John Touturo plays his

62:11

his father uh who you know a bald I'm

62:14

like is that John Turo? Like what a

62:16

crazy choice this is. And so there were

62:18

all sorts of like interesting things

62:20

going on in the movie. But again I was

62:23

like oh this is awful.

62:25

>> Is it impossible for you to watch a

62:28

movie without just becoming hyperritical

62:31

about all these different aspects like

62:32

how I would do it? What I don't like?

62:34

>> Yes and no. So, the next Ridley Scott

62:37

movie I watched, which I stayed away

62:39

from and with great apologies to Matt

62:42

Damon and Ben Affleck, was The Last

62:44

Duel. And I just kind of avoided it. I

62:47

was doing other things at the time. And

62:49

the poster looked awful and I was like,

62:51

I'm not going to go see that. And then I

62:54

uh I I I put it on after watching these

62:56

other two and I was like, okay, here we

62:58

go. Let's go again. And lo and behold,

63:02

one of the best films of the century in

63:04

my opinion. Absolutely. First of all,

63:07

those guys know how to write a script.

63:09

And I know that they wrote it with

63:10

Nicole Hoffen or whatever her name is.

63:13

>> And look at And look at Ben Affleck.

63:15

Like when I saw him blonde, I was like,

63:17

that's one of the reasons it kept me

63:18

away from it, but he's hilarious in the

63:20

movie. He's a genius in the film.

63:23

>> I never even heard about this.

63:25

>> I was gripped by this film. And this is

63:27

a great date movie. Like this, my wife

63:29

got turned on after this film,

63:30

[laughter]

63:31

believe it or not.

63:34

That's hilar. I don't know anything

63:35

about that.

63:36

>> And Adam Driver is magnificent and like

63:39

this relationship that these two guys

63:40

have and it's kind of a Rashimon story

63:42

meaning that uh like Akira Kurasawa's

63:45

Rashimon which was three stories that

63:47

are all sort of the same event told from

63:49

different perspectives. And so and Matt

63:51

Damon is like a revelation. And this

63:54

movie says so much about Hollywood. Like

63:55

when I watched this I was like okay I'm

63:57

Matt Damon and Quentyn is uh Adam Driver

64:00

for sure. Like Adam Driver totally knows

64:03

how to like you learn about Hollywood in

64:06

this film and I'm sure they're writing

64:07

it like knowing about Hollywood that the

64:09

way to really get along in court is to

64:12

join the orgies, you know, to be in the

64:13

orgy with everybody is like how you get

64:15

along. It's like uh uh we all [ __ ]

64:19

together and that's how we do it. But

64:20

Matt Damon, who by all accounts in this

64:23

is a great, you know, he's a fighter.

64:26

He's a great knight. He had he's true in

64:28

his heart, but he's just a like a pill

64:31

to hang out with and he doesn't go to

64:33

the orgies. And because of that, he's

64:34

just kind of marginalized. And the whole

64:37

movie plays off of this friendship that

64:39

just kind of goes ary where jealousy

64:41

comes into play and uh and and it's

64:44

ruinous to everything until they're

64:46

finally fighting in the very end. And

64:48

this is where Ridley Scott just does

64:50

what he does, which is he has this

64:54

insane fight between these two guys,

64:56

which like was just every blow was

64:59

painful to look at. And this to me was

65:02

the best Ridley Scott movie I've seen of

65:04

the century. I mean, I guess Blackhawk

65:06

Down. I also very much like Gladiator,

65:08

although Gladiator 2. I throw that in. I

65:11

never saw that.

65:11

>> Throw that in with Exodus Gods and

65:13

Monsters. It was actually boring to

65:15

watch. I loved Gladiator 1, though.

65:18

>> Gladiator 1 is magnificent. It had some

65:20

kind of secret sauce in it that was

65:23

fantastic. And Gladiator 2, it it just

65:25

kind of goes through the paces. It's

65:27

just kind of everybody shows up.

65:28

Speaking of showing up, when Sigourney

65:30

Weaver shows up in uh Exodus Gods and

65:33

Monsters, she's not even trying at all.

65:35

She knows that she's there for a

65:36

paycheck. Like, she just shows up and

65:38

she's just like does not put on an

65:41

accent of any kind. She just shows up

65:42

and just speaks the lines and I'm out of

65:44

here. I'm going into Morocco or whatever

65:47

into [laughter] into town. I'm going to

65:49

go party for a while.

65:51

>> You think she just thought it was a bad

65:52

film and just checked out?

65:54

>> I'm not sure what she was thinking, but

65:56

like she may have been thinking what uh

65:58

I mean, maybe she was trying, but I

66:00

don't It just didn't look like it. It

66:02

just looked like she was

66:04

>> Well, that's got to be a weird thing

66:06

when an actor makes a choice with a

66:08

character and it just doesn't work and

66:09

they don't realize it, but they're

66:10

committed to it. And the other Ridley

66:12

Scott movie that I just watched that I

66:14

hadn't seen. Again, I avoided it partly

66:16

because of the um uh the title of the

66:19

film and there just nothing excited. I

66:21

thought it was a comedy. In fact, I'd

66:23

been avoiding it. It was on my plex.

66:25

There it is. I I look at the thing, it

66:28

looks like a comedy. It's got um Javier

66:30

Bardam and Cameron Diaz and they're all

66:32

kind of Javier Bardam looking exactly

66:35

like Robert Downey Jr. like in it. Like

66:37

just kind of this crazy Robert Downey

66:38

Jr. his crazy phase, you know, with like

66:41

colorful glasses and everything. Robert

66:43

Downey Jr. with like a broken up nose or

66:45

whatever is going on with that nose. And

66:48

um okay, so I put on the counselor and

66:52

this So looking at that, I thought this

66:54

was a comedy. I thought, "Oh, it's going

66:55

to be a romantic comedy." This movie

66:58

after I saw it, I was like, I feel like

67:00

I've seen too much.

67:02

>> I feel like I know too much now about

67:04

the world. like it's it and and it and

67:08

it h and it's made like right before you

67:10

and I think this movie was kind of a

67:12

disaster for Ridley Scott and he uh you

67:15

know had to recover from it I probably

67:18

because of the the failure of it but

67:20

>> I never even heard of it. It's written

67:22

um by um uh oh my god um Corormick

67:25

McCarthy and so so it is dark dark dark

67:29

and it is a an analysis of how power

67:34

works in the modern world

67:36

>> which is basically a giant cartel. The

67:38

cartel runs everything and you cannot

67:41

escape the cartel and it is such a

67:45

specta I think that's such a spectacular

67:47

movie.

67:48

>> I loved it. I loved it. When did that

67:50

come out?

67:50

>> Like 2014, I think.

67:52

>> 2013.

67:53

>> 2013. Did you ever hear of it, Jamie?

67:55

>> I don't think so. I'm

67:57

>> There's too much content. Well, there's

67:58

too much content. And yet, really, Scott

68:00

and he's cranking out movies like every

68:02

year he's doing a movie. It's like just

68:04

knocking them back. Knocking them back.

68:05

He's constantly making films. And so,

68:08

that was why I hadn't uh and so finally

68:10

I was like, well, I got to catch up on

68:11

some Ridley Scott. and and Quinton had

68:14

been talking about uh Blackhawk Down and

68:16

how much he loved it and how he thought

68:17

it was the best film of the century and

68:20

you know he's largely correct that's not

68:23

a bad uh I could have done without the

68:27

UNICEF commercial at the very beginning

68:30

where it's just like you know a little

68:32

UNICEF commercial about people starving

68:34

in Africa and Somalia but uh the rest of

68:37

the movie is just insanely beautiful and

68:40

so I wanted to check out all the movies

68:41

I hadn't seen of is and and so that's

68:43

why I started researching them and

68:45

looking them up again and like the

68:46

counselor how did that fall through the

68:48

cracks and it gets terrible reviews like

68:50

people hated the film apparently and

68:53

>> what's the criticism

68:54

>> uh people like I think they they were

68:57

just like we don't believe it they just

68:59

don't believe that that's what the world

69:01

is like and you know I found the film to

69:03

be like uh

69:05

>> do you think that's just because of the

69:07

time period it was released I think it

69:08

was more innocent

69:09

>> I think Ridley Scott knows things that

69:12

and Cormick McCarthy know things about

69:14

the world that they put on film before

69:17

everything was known. Like I think if

69:20

that movie was released today, people

69:21

would be like, "Yeah,

69:23

>> that's what's happening today."

69:25

>> Yeah.

69:25

>> And so yeah. Oh yeah. Oh, they're

69:27

putting people in sulfuric acid into uh

69:29

milk into drums. What the [ __ ]

69:32

>> And shipping them around the world, you

69:34

know, as a joke, you know, like

69:36

>> that's in the film.

69:37

>> Yeah. There's also

69:38

>> Did you see the thing in the Epstein

69:39

files?

69:40

>> Oh, yeah. like I've seen files. In fact,

69:43

I can't believe that like everybody just

69:45

kind of like, "Oh, okay." And they're

69:46

moving on with their lives. Did you see

69:48

that guy at the Atlanta airport uh

69:50

flipping out the well-dressed black dude

69:53

who just freaks out at in the Atlanta uh

69:55

just like a couple of days ago on uh I

69:58

saw it on YouTube. No, I saw it on

70:00

Twitter or X. And uh this guy's just

70:04

freaking out in the Atlanta airport.

70:06

He's like, "Yeah, I read the Upstate

70:08

Files. It's like all of you, you're

70:09

going about your lives like nothing's

70:11

happening. Look at you're all zombies.

70:13

And he's right. It's like Invasion of

70:15

the Body Snatchers. Everybody is just

70:17

numb to everything. Like, dudes, we had

70:20

a global pandemic. Uh, aliens. Uh, you

70:24

know, all these like revelations. People

70:26

are, you know, eating babies. Uh,

70:30

>> here. This is a guy

70:34

AND ALL OF Y'ALL ARE ACTING NORMAL.

70:38

ALL.

70:41

>> And there's a longer version of that

70:43

where he's but he's basically like

70:44

you're all acting like nothing's

70:46

happening. Like what the [ __ ] You know,

70:48

you're all just pretending you're just

70:50

drones going on in your

70:52

>> waiting for a condensed version that

70:55

lays out all the facts. It's the people

70:58

that are like really interested in

70:59

reading all the emails.

71:00

>> I think the Luciferians uh cast a spell

71:03

on the world. And

71:05

>> for real?

71:05

>> Oh, absolutely. like, you know, it's

71:08

just like how vampires can't go into a

71:10

house unless they're invited. They tell

71:12

you, you know, what's going on ahead of

71:14

time. It's predictive programming. And

71:17

once you say it out loud and you put it

71:19

out there and make fun of it and do a

71:21

little skit, like they like Steven

71:22

Colbear did a little skit on his show

71:24

where, oh, here's a baby. I'm going to

71:26

take this baby and I'm going to give it

71:28

to Moolok. And he goes into like a

71:30

cloudy red uh, you know, furnace and

71:33

hands the baby over and, oh, the baby's

71:35

going to be fine. and they make a joke

71:36

about it and the audience laughs. Okay,

71:38

we're all now conditioned to it. We've

71:40

all seen it and by laughing at it, we

71:43

were complicit.

71:44

>> You think that that's a that's on

71:46

purpose that this is like some sort of a

71:47

grand design to get us to be

71:49

desensitized to the idea of demons

71:51

eating babies?

71:52

>> Yeah, for sure.

71:53

>> Really?

71:54

>> For sure.

71:55

>> And and by the way, nobody's doing

71:57

anything about it. We know what's

71:59

happening.

71:59

>> But that has to take like there has to

72:01

be a person or some group of people.

72:04

>> Yeah. like about about 8,500 people.

72:07

>> Yeah.

72:07

>> That are manipulating the Cobar show.

72:09

>> That are manipulating everything. It's

72:11

all an illusion.

72:12

>> Like reality as we know it is fake.

72:16

That's that's the revelation that that

72:19

guy is having. And he's looking around

72:21

and he's like it's like Invasion of the

72:23

Body Snatchers. Well, it's s See, I

72:26

don't The thing about the emails is one

72:29

of the things is it's just stuff written

72:32

down. And so that's sort of hard to

72:34

digest. Like what is this? Like what are

72:36

they saying? Like some of it is in code

72:38

like walking over beef jerky. Like

72:41

saying talking about jerky. Could you

72:43

walk beef jerky over to this person?

72:45

Like what does that mean?

72:45

>> For all this pizza they're talking

72:47

about. You never see any pizza.

72:48

>> Right.

72:50

>> I'm going to get I'm going to get some

72:52

gr soda. It's like with my cheese pizza.

72:58

Yeah. And like there's all this coded

72:59

language and everyone's like, you know,

73:01

oh that's uh you're just you just have

73:04

parola, you know, the uh you're just

73:06

seeing things where you want to see

73:07

them.

73:08

>> No, there's clearly a code. Well, that

73:09

was the thing about absolutely a

73:11

[clears throat] code. And in fact,

73:12

mundice vault de ergo. It's a long known

73:16

concept. And so in Latin, Mundis dei

73:20

means the world wants to be deceived.

73:23

Ergo.

73:25

Therefore, it is

73:27

>> we want to be deceived. We We don't want

73:30

to believe the horrors that are actually

73:33

behind the veil.

73:34

>> Well, I think with the Epstein files,

73:36

people are because of these emails that

73:38

have been released, people are just now

73:40

starting to be aware of the

73:43

bizarness of the code and some of the

73:47

thing like the facts like let's just

73:49

talk about the sulfuric acid. So, this

73:51

was like right after he was indicted in

73:55

200.

73:55

>> Yeah, I gotta get rid of some bodies.

73:58

>> Yeah. [laughter]

73:58

How much did

73:59

>> dissolve up some bodies?

74:00

>> What did it say he ordered? Like, let's

74:03

uh

74:06

>> like 8,000 gallons.

74:09

Maybe we can get our sponsor Perplexity

74:12

to process this and uh give us a

74:15

synopsis of what exactly happened, some

74:17

sort of a breakdown. Because one of the

74:20

things they're saying is like he was

74:22

indicted and then right after he's

74:25

indicted, he orders how many gallons?

74:29

>> Six 55 gallon containers full of

74:31

sulfuric acid.

74:32

>> Jesus Christ.

74:35

Jesus Christ. Um

74:40

>> what what

74:42

>> they're eating babies, man. Like that's

74:44

the

74:45

>> So that that you think is real. So

74:47

>> Well, yeah. Not only that, I think that

74:48

there's uh you know, sacrifices going on

74:51

every day in Los Angeles. I mean, you

74:53

know, allegedly like, you know, uh, uh,

74:57

highlevel,

74:59

uh, musicians, let's say, high level

75:01

female musician, uh, is like, you know,

75:04

killing chickens every day, doing

75:06

sacrifices, like, you know,

75:07

>> high level.

75:08

>> Well, I I don't want to say I don't want

75:10

to say names because I don't want to get

75:11

sued and I I don't want to be dead

75:13

either.

75:13

>> What does it rhyme like? Here's the

75:14

purchase order. I go I start looking at

75:16

the comments for some stuff. Not that

75:18

this is the best answer, but a quick

75:19

answer someone gives is that uh this

75:21

could be for like a reverse osmosis

75:24

water treatment system.

75:25

>> True. He is on an island. I mean,

75:27

there's enough there's enough uh push

75:29

back because Mundus vultip ergo

75:31

dissipator

75:32

>> you know we we but like the timing of

75:34

all of that like you know where are the

75:36

purchase orders for all of that sulfuric

75:38

acid before then? Oh no, I just want to

75:40

put sulfuric acid into my swimming pool.

75:41

Muriatic acid.

75:42

>> Well, that's the question. Was there

75:44

orders for sulfuric acid before this? if

75:47

they do have a water treatment plan.

75:48

Why? How does sulfuric acid play into

75:51

water treatment?

75:51

>> It says it here. It says it's commonly

75:53

used. This explains it. I don't [ __ ]

75:56

know.

75:56

>> Okay. It says R O plant reverse osmosis

76:01

seawater desalination facility. Sulfuric

76:03

acid is commonly used in the maintenance

76:05

of such facilities. Not everything you

76:07

don't understand adds up to the worst

76:08

possible thing. It could be

76:10

>> deception.

76:11

>> Look, maybe they're all eating pizza and

76:12

grape soda. How many who is that guy

76:14

that's

76:14

>> How many billionaires do you know that

76:16

you like sit down and eat lots of pizza

76:17

and grape soda and ice cream?

76:20

>> This is weird. Trial warrior.

76:22

>> I was just I just that's why I just go a

76:24

grain of salt. This is just a a

76:26

plausible answer. I don't know that it

76:27

is the answer. I could even be wrong.

76:29

>> Okay. So, does he have a desalination

76:32

plant on the island?

76:34

>> Oh, it's a reverse.

76:34

>> Oh, yeah. For sure. He is. He has a

76:36

>> He had everything. He had a dump and

76:39

like they had all sorts of stuff. So

76:41

that's tunnels and

76:43

>> so they were using that. So they're

76:44

taking sea water and converting it into

76:46

fresh water for what? For irrigation or

76:48

for drinking for all the above.

76:50

>> One similar email that he wrote to

76:51

someone said that like his around his

76:53

island is like Damascus. And I'm like

76:55

what the [ __ ] does that mean? He was

76:57

like it's you go explore buried [ __ ]

77:00

around my island or what I what else

77:02

could he mean by that?

77:03

>> Huh? What does that mean?

77:05

>> I don't know. I mean, that's they say a

77:08

lot of things and they're not really

77:09

coding it very much.

77:11

>> Well, the code it's glaringly obvious

77:14

when they say pizza and when they say

77:15

jerky. That's glaringly obvious. How do

77:18

you walk jerky?

77:19

>> Yeah.

77:19

>> You know what I'm saying?

77:20

>> And why do I need a chilled container

77:22

to, you know, a chilled bag or whatever

77:25

they say?

77:25

>> Jesus Christ.

77:26

>> You know, and and

77:27

>> so you think they're eating babies?

77:29

>> Oh, yeah. I absolutely believe that.

77:31

>> You should get together with Kurt

77:32

Matzer. You two [laughter] would go

77:34

crazy. I don't doubt it for a second.

77:37

>> I think and I think this dates back

77:39

like, you know, a long long time. Dates.

77:42

This is Moolok worship.

77:44

>> Oh, well, there was the other uh email

77:47

that said, "Thank you for the torture

77:48

video. I enjoyed the torture video."

77:51

>> Yeah.

77:52

>> And it's like people just they don't

77:56

>> they don't want to accept it. Like

77:57

people don't want to believe it. They

77:59

don't want to accept it.

78:00

>> Okay. Uh some commentary notes that a

78:03

remote island with water treatment and

78:04

energy systems could plausibly stockpile

78:07

such quantities for a one to two years

78:09

of operations. Although others argue

78:12

that using it directly for reverse

78:13

osmosis as stated in one social post is

78:16

technically questionable for membrane

78:18

health.

78:20

Hm.

78:22

Highly corrosive, strong mineral acid

78:24

that can severely burn skin, eyes,

78:25

dehydrate, and char organic material.

78:27

Which is why it features

78:29

>> in both legitimate industrial processes

78:32

and in darker hypotheticals

78:34

online.

78:35

>> Darker hypotheticals.

78:36

>> Darker hypotheticals is where I'm

78:38

leaning. When you get indicted for sex

78:40

trafficking and then you order six drums

78:44

of sulfuric acid right away, are you

78:46

really worried about your reverse

78:48

osmosis plant right after you get

78:49

indicted? I feel like you know you're

78:51

going to jail.

78:52

>> It looks like a duck and it quacks like

78:53

a duck. It's probably a duck.

78:55

>> It's probably a duck.

78:57

330 gallons of sulfuric acid.

79:01

>> It says this was the only documented

79:04

purchase order for it. I I came out here

79:06

last time and I talked about, you know,

79:07

the the pedto cult inside of the Cubric

79:10

film.

79:10

>> Yes, by the way, that went viral

79:12

>> and I got so much blowback from that.

79:14

You know, the online critics are like,

79:16

"No, no, there's nothing in there."

79:17

Mundus Vault SAP. They don't want to see

79:19

it. They don't want they don't want to

79:21

see those two guys walking away with

79:22

that girl in the end. They just like,

79:24

"No, no, it's it wasn't in the

79:26

Schnitzler novel and blah blah blah." I

79:28

mean, dude, look at that movie. It's

79:31

about a cult. Like, what are you talking

79:33

about? It's a secret cult. And in fact,

79:35

uh, Sydney Lamett's character even says

79:37

at one point, you know, uh, do you know

79:39

what these people do? I'm not going to

79:41

tell you what they do, but let me tell

79:42

you, if I told you what they do, they

79:43

would like scare the hell out of you.

79:45

>> I mean, like,

79:47

that's after he's been to the place and

79:50

seen everybody walking around at the in

79:52

the sex club. I mean, it's obviously

79:55

there's obviously more going on in that

79:57

movie, but people don't want to see it.

79:59

I like like I had what was it? New York

80:02

magazine or whatever went so far as to

80:04

like, you know, aggressively trying to

80:06

get me to debunk it and uh which is

80:10

fine, which is fine. It's just an

80:12

interpretation of a movie,

80:14

>> right? But that that interpretation

80:15

resonated. I mean, that clip went very

80:17

very viral,

80:18

>> especially now. It's like people are

80:19

like uh looking at it and they're like,

80:21

well, you know, he was obviously saying

80:23

something. Even if you extract that out

80:25

of the movie, he's obviously saying

80:27

something about people at high levels of

80:29

power. Well, there's always been weird

80:31

secret groups and rituals.

80:34

>> Yeah.

80:34

>> And it's one of the ways to ensure that

80:37

you're compromised. You'll stay.

80:39

>> It's a confidence operation. Yes. And so

80:41

what you do is you find somebody when

80:43

they're young and they're, you know,

80:45

less inhibited and and they, you know,

80:48

or uninhibited and you catch them doing

80:51

something that is illegal and maybe you

80:54

even provide the mechanism for that to

80:57

happen. And then once it's happened, you

81:01

uh you now have the the video proof or

81:03

the audio proof or whatever proof you

81:05

have. You've got proof of it and you

81:07

show it to them and you say, "Look, this

81:09

is uh what we have on you and uh and we

81:12

can ruin you at any minute, but you know

81:14

what we're going to do? We're going to

81:15

give you $20,000 a month or we're going

81:17

to give you $20 million a year, whatever

81:20

level that is instead, and you're going

81:22

to work for us." And uh and and what

81:25

else explains some of these people who

81:28

were so flipped out about like you know

81:30

about Trump like he's a he's a pot he's

81:34

a like there it's over the top. It's you

81:37

know what it's it's strange how people

81:40

are how people behave in uh um regarding

81:44

that it's

81:45

>> don't you think that's also just because

81:46

the Democratic party didn't want him to

81:49

get into power because he was a complete

81:51

outsider. I don't think there are

81:53

parties.

81:54

>> I don't think there there I think that's

81:56

all an illusion. Also, I think

81:57

everything that you think that it is is

82:00

an illusion.

82:01

>> It's all fake. I don't think that any

82:04

history before 1600 I think everything

82:07

has been uh falsified before the year

82:09

1600.

82:10

>> How so?

82:11

>> Well, um there's this guy Anatoli Fenco

82:15

who's a Russian mathematician and

82:17

historian and he wrote a book called The

82:20

New Chronology. It's actually a series

82:21

of books. It's like six volumes and I've

82:24

read them all and [laughter]

82:27

and and um and and also his addendum

82:30

book, the new chronology. He has an

82:32

addendum book about it and uh he

82:36

basically says that uh all of history

82:39

has been changed. About a thousand years

82:41

have been added to the timeline in order

82:44

to justify land claims. And those land

82:47

claims largely have to do with uh

82:50

Eurasian the Eurasian horde and the

82:52

elimination of the Eurasian horde by uh

82:55

collusion between uh you know the

82:57

Vatican, the uh Romanovs, the uh

83:02

>> So you mean like the Mongols and the

83:03

Huns? Yeah, there was a and if you look

83:05

on very very old maps, you see that

83:08

there used to be a country called

83:09

Tartaria that was uh that was in

83:12

existence and at a certain point they

83:16

wiped them out. And so his theory and

83:18

it's just a theory. It's just a posit.

83:20

But when you see how history is

83:22

constantly being rewritten in real time,

83:24

it's not so hard to believe. And then he

83:26

uses you know uh um astronomical uh

83:31

evidence and you know mathematically

83:33

kind of proves it and he basically says

83:35

that uh let's see if I can get this

83:37

right that um uh Rome and Greece and you

83:43

know those uh and Egypt were um actually

83:47

active till around 1600 and that Rome

83:49

actually fell around [snorts] 1600. kind

83:51

of imagine or more like late 1400s 1492

83:55

>> as opposed to what's the conventional

83:56

timeline

83:57

>> uh about a thousand years before and so

84:00

and so you know if you can wrap your

84:03

head around it the Salem witch trials

84:05

>> took place around the same time as the

84:07

Inquisition

84:08

>> Columbus was discovering America around

84:10

the time Rome fell and that uh all of

84:14

this was designed to justify and or to

84:17

uh erase this entire civilization from

84:20

history. And then there are people who

84:22

believe that there are a lot of

84:23

buildings that are still in existence

84:25

that uh that were this they uh they they

84:27

claim that uh Jesus Christ was I can't

84:30

remember um the emperor's name. It's

84:34

kind of a composite story. There's a

84:36

number of uh

84:37

>> so they think a thousand years are

84:39

missing from the timeline.

84:41

>> Yeah. Think about it. If you're a

84:42

Byzantine guy and you're like, "Hey, I

84:43

want to move to the country." and you

84:44

look over at uh France, let's say, and

84:47

Germany, and and you're like, "Yeah,

84:49

there's all these like indigenous

84:50

peoples there, and we want to wipe them

84:52

out." So, you hire, you know, a

84:54

mercenary. You hire a guy named

84:56

Charlemagne, and you get him to go in

84:58

there and kill all the chieftains in one

84:59

day. Like 5,000 chieftains were killed

85:03

in a single day, apparently, by

85:04

Charlemagne. And you completely wipe out

85:07

everything. And then you move in, you

85:08

become Jerome uh the Jerome the first

85:10

and you run Paris or you begin, you

85:13

know, France. And what it really is is

85:15

just land. It's and so you add time to

85:18

the timeline in order to justify that

85:20

land claim because what makes more sense

85:22

that history was cruising along like

85:25

this and then suddenly flatlined for a

85:26

thousand years and then picked up again?

85:29

Or does it make more sense that somebody

85:31

took that time that the dark ages and

85:35

kind of added added to the timeline.

85:39

>> So I'm I'm confused. So but isn't there

85:42

like documented history from multiple

85:46

cultures about that time period?

85:48

>> Yeah. But it's all like you know written

85:49

down by the Jesuits who were completely

85:50

in the control of uh you it's that

85:53

history history is easily changed and in

85:56

fact we see history being changed before

85:58

our eyes in real time and so the deep

86:00

past is is easy to change.

86:03

>> So we're not in 2026. No, we're like in

86:05

the 1700s.

86:08

[laughter]

86:08

>> Oh Jesus.

86:11

>> Oh my god.

86:12

>> Just a theory. It's just this guy Antony

86:14

Anton an anti

86:17

uh Fnco and uh and it's a very

86:21

interesting theory. And so I read that

86:23

and I kind of had a tent pole collapse.

86:25

I was like, well, holy crap.

86:26

>> Explain to me the flatness. Like what do

86:28

you mean by history goes up and then

86:31

flattens? Well, the progression the

86:32

progression of humanity through history

86:34

as we kind of are progressing as we go

86:36

and then all of a sudden there's this

86:37

flatline called the dark ages where

86:39

nothing happened.

86:40

>> Is there a conventional explanation for

86:42

this

86:43

>> flatline for a thousand years?

86:46

>> The the collapse of Rome and uh and

86:48

falling into barbaris the time of

86:50

barbarism.

86:52

>> That's not plausible.

86:54

>> Everything is plausible. It's plausible

86:56

that sulfuric acid is used for RO uh

87:00

reverse osmosis uh water cleaning and so

87:03

everything is possible.

87:05

>> The question is is it probable? And

87:07

>> well Jamie just pulled up that that was

87:09

the first time they had ever ordered

87:10

that.

87:11

>> Oh. Oh really?

87:12

>> Yeah.

87:12

>> Okay. So well there it is.

87:13

>> Yeah. [laughter]

87:14

>> That's not good.

87:15

>> Yeah. That's not good. I mean that's the

87:18

least of the things. The thing is we

87:19

become desensitized to stuff. I mean

87:21

look at everything that has happened in

87:23

the last six years. It it's like an

87:26

insane amount of stuff has happened and

87:27

everyone's just kind of like numb to it.

87:29

>> Well, they get and I think it literally

87:31

is that people's brains have been fried.

87:33

>> You think by co vaccines?

87:35

>> Yeah, for sure.

87:36

>> Well, there's some scientific evidence

87:38

that for some people at least it crossed

87:41

the bloodb brain barrier and had some

87:43

sort of a detrimental effect on their

87:45

cognitive function. mRNA is

87:47

reprogramming your your your system

87:50

and uh and we're I think look and we've

87:53

been looking at a giant die off of

87:54

people. People are collapsing left and

87:57

nothing is normal anymore. I mean that

88:00

guy at the airport who's flipping out.

88:02

That's what he's realizing. He's having

88:04

a sudden awakening and he's tweaking

88:06

over it. He's like and he he's looking

88:09

around and no one cares.

88:12

>> Everyone just wants to like, you know,

88:14

get through their day.

88:15

Everyone wants to just make their next

88:16

movie and maybe they'll let me make

88:18

their next movie and everybody wants to

88:20

just, you know, I just want to keep

88:21

going at my job and I just want to do my

88:22

thing and I just want to protect my

88:24

thing.

88:24

>> There's certainly a lot of that going

88:25

on.

88:26

>> The British only care about as long as I

88:27

have my daily pint at the end of the

88:29

day. That's all they care about. You

88:30

know, they'll in the meantime their

88:32

entire country is being overtaken and

88:34

overrun by like when else in history has

88:38

this happened and ended well. [laughter]

88:40

>> No. Well, it's so shocking how quickly

88:42

it's happening in England that you just

88:44

go, how do you bounce back from this?

88:46

Like, what is the remedy?

88:48

>> Yeah.

88:48

>> Because they're they're doing this mass

88:52

arrest thing with social media posts,

88:55

which is bizarre. It's bizarre to watch.

88:57

And then they eliminate jury trials for

89:00

anything other than like murder and

89:01

rape.

89:01

>> If you say anything, you're in jail. If

89:03

you post, if you repost anything, you're

89:05

just immediately sent to jail. Look at

89:07

what's going on in Canada right now, you

89:10

know, with

89:10

>> Carney.

89:11

>> I mean, like, I think that's insane

89:13

what's going on. And most Canadians are

89:15

just kind of vibing along with it.

89:16

Nobody wants to rock the boat. Nobody

89:18

wants to be racist. Nobody wants to be

89:20

uh you know, nobody wants to be

89:22

discriminatory in any kind of way.

89:24

Rightfully so, like, you know, you and

89:26

you want to believe that your leaders

89:28

are are taking care of you and they're

89:31

not. And it's over. We've lost. It's

89:35

over. I mean,

89:36

>> you think it's over here in America as

89:38

well?

89:39

>> Well, it got slowed down a little bit.

89:42

It got slow whether you like Trump or

89:44

not. And I'm not like a I don't really

89:46

like anybody, but it

89:48

>> that's a healthy perspective.

89:49

>> It definitely added a road bump

89:52

>> in the in in the actions of the cabal of

89:57

the Clintons and the Obamas and and

90:00

their the bankers that that control

90:01

them. And that's when you see the movie

90:04

uh the counselor that's what you realize

90:06

is that wow the cartels are the banks

90:11

and they are law enforcement and they

90:13

are the media and they are everything

90:15

and there is no fighting it

90:17

>> and there is no individually fighting it

90:19

like there's nothing any of us can do

90:22

>> that is

90:23

>> and I don't mean to be I mean the only

90:25

thing you can do is uh you know affect

90:29

what's happening around you locally

90:30

within the moment But don't you think

90:32

that more people are aware of what's

90:34

going on right now? There's more push

90:36

back than ever before and so there's a

90:38

possibility that it could be stopped.

90:40

>> Yeah. Look at that guy. Look at that guy

90:41

in the airport though. Nobody Everyone's

90:42

like he's crazy. Like yelling at a

90:45

[ __ ] airport. I would think he's

90:46

crazy, too. If I was there waiting for

90:49

my flight to go visit my parents and

90:50

there's some [ __ ] guy yelling out the

90:52

Epstein f. You're just living your life.

90:53

Like, yeah, what do you want me to do,

90:54

dude? I'm I'm headed to Florida right

90:57

now. Invasion of the Body Snatchers was

90:59

about McCarthyism and what was going on

91:00

at that time. And both

91:02

>> Really?

91:02

>> Oh, yeah. It was The original Invasion

91:04

of the Body Snatchers was all about

91:06

McCarthyism. And

91:08

>> I'm the I'm a fan of the Donald

91:09

Southerntherland one.

91:10

>> Well, and look at And look at how that

91:12

ends. That ends with you're walking

91:14

through the streets pretending to be,

91:18

>> you know, like you're you're just

91:19

pretending to not be an alien, hoping

91:21

that you can get by. And then, you know,

91:22

the minute you show any kind of emotion,

91:24

that's it. You're caught. And then

91:26

they're going to make you go to sleep.

91:28

And uh and so I mean

91:30

>> so that the original script was written

91:32

about McCarthy as well.

91:33

>> The original uh um the original film.

91:35

Yeah. The Kevin McCarthy uh movie.

91:38

>> Okay. So

91:39

>> and in the end, look how that movie

91:40

ends. That movie ends with him like that

91:42

guy in the airport on the street, you

91:44

know. They're, you know, they're it's

91:47

it's they're aliens. You basically, you

91:50

know, running through the street just in

91:51

traffic and people just keep driving.

91:54

I don't remember the original one. I

91:56

might not have even seen it,

91:58

>> but the Southerntherland one was

91:59

amazing. I never would have thought that

92:01

that's what it was about.

92:02

>> I mean, I we're experiencing a kind of

92:04

Bolevik revolution at the moment right

92:06

now. So,

92:08

>> in what way?

92:09

>> Well, there's a rise of bullsheism. You

92:12

know, it's like we see it we see it

92:13

occurring. And

92:15

>> how do you define bullsheism? Well, uh,

92:18

it's the

92:20

Bolsheviks were [laughter]

92:22

essentially a kind of, uh, uh, I mean,

92:25

it's it's it it's it's not correct to

92:28

say communism, but it's basically a a

92:30

kind of authoritarianism,

92:32

you know, in the guise of egalitarianism

92:35

and and helping the world that we're all

92:37

going to be equal and everything, but it

92:39

>> and they were socialism. Yeah. they were

92:42

murdering Christians and socialist and

92:44

you know we're very very close to that

92:46

now. We're very very we're on we're

92:49

standing on civilization is standing on

92:52

the precipice at the moment. And by the

92:54

way uh you know after this podcast comes

92:58

out, people are going to be like, "Oh,

92:59

Avery's crazy. Avery went to jail.

93:02

Avery's a you know a killer." They're

93:05

going to say all sorts of [ __ ] about me

93:06

to discredit anything that I say. And

93:08

that's fine. like I'm easy to discredit

93:11

and so it's not really my right to speak

93:14

up anymore about anything. And so

93:17

>> you're a human being. It's always your

93:18

right to speak up.

93:19

>> Well, it it is but uh

93:21

>> they can eat [ __ ]

93:22

>> As I look as I look around like

93:24

civilization is on the precipice and you

93:27

know mostly good people tend to not take

93:31

action against stuff

93:32

>> until they have to

93:34

>> until they have to. We were talking

93:35

about this yesterday actually um with

93:37

Cheryl Hines and I was saying I think we

93:39

were talking about this I was talking

93:41

about this recently where I was saying

93:42

that it's almost like we need something

93:44

like a 9/11 to wake us up like I would

93:47

never want that to happen but I do

93:50

remember that after 9/11 we were united

93:52

cuz we realized oh threats are real

93:55

danger is real like we we really do need

93:58

to be united as one group a community

94:01

and and recognize that that we are

94:04

brothers andist sisters in the streets

94:05

are not our problem. And

94:08

>> yeah, but we even know about 9/11 now

94:11

that like so much of it was like we

94:14

building 7 thermite like the evidence is

94:17

there for anyone to look at.

94:18

>> Nobody wants to look at

94:19

>> and nobody wants to look at it because

94:21

and that is

94:22

>> nobody wants to look into the conspiracy

94:24

like how did these guys get a hold of

94:26

these planes? How did they fly into the

94:28

building? Who why were the the dancing

94:31

Israelis watching it cheering it on? Why

94:33

did they get, you know, shipped out of

94:35

the country?

94:35

>> Yeah. And that guy who uh who owned the

94:38

building, who bought it, who took out it

94:39

like the insurance policy and then, you

94:42

know, had uh Elliot Spitzer kind of push

94:44

it through and force it through so that

94:46

he could receive his billions in

94:48

insurance claim

94:50

because they wanted to tear because they

94:52

wanted to tear down that building and it

94:53

would have been too expensive to do and

94:55

all the asbestous and everything. So,

94:56

hey, not to just destroy it.

94:58

>> It's like what was that building

94:59

housing? Like building seven? Building 7

95:02

was housing all sorts of it was like was

95:04

an IRS uh I mean

95:06

>> NSA.

95:07

>> Yeah, it was NSA and

95:08

>> what was in building 7? Let's find that

95:11

out so we don't just

95:13

>> I think but there was certainly some

95:15

intelligence and data that was being

95:17

collected in building the the the fact

95:20

that no one wants to admit that that

95:21

building fell like a controlled

95:23

demolition is really crazy. And again,

95:26

I'm not saying it's a controlled

95:27

demolition, but the fact that people

95:29

want to say no, it wasn't like a

95:32

controlled demolition. Like, when was

95:33

the last time you ever saw a [ __ ]

95:35

building collapse like that ever? Only

95:37

controlled demolitions. There's been

95:39

many buildings that have been very badly

95:41

damaged and lit on fire, but their frame

95:43

remains.

95:44

>> Reputable structural engineers have

95:45

basically also proven the towers could

95:47

not have fallen the way they fell

95:49

without uh explosives. Um, you know,

95:53

pre-planned explosives. Okay.

95:54

>> And the people on the scene, the the

95:56

rescuers on the scene, the people who

95:58

were there said, "Yeah, I heard

95:59

explosion." Boom, boom, boom, boom. And

96:01

they're describing the sounds of uh

96:03

controlled demolition.

96:04

>> US Secret Service floors 9 through 10.

96:07

CIA, the Department of Defense sharing

96:10

the 25th floor with the IRS and the

96:13

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

96:15

Like you put all that together, CIA,

96:16

Department of Defense, IRS, you know,

96:19

who thinks any of those people have your

96:22

[laughter]

96:23

>> like also if you wanted data,

96:26

>> you wanted to destroy data, like didn't

96:29

the part of the Pentagon that got hit,

96:31

wasn't and that was also a day after

96:33

Rumsfeld was saying that there was

96:34

trillions of dollars that were

96:35

unaccounted for.

96:36

>> Yeah.

96:37

>> Didn't the accounting part of the

96:39

Pentagon get hit by that air quotes?

96:42

>> Yeah. Yeah. That that plane that was

96:44

that plane that came in very

96:45

>> Jamie screen last

96:47

>> the building contained about 24,000

96:50

gallons of diesel fuel for generators

96:52

used by tenants like Solomon Brothers

96:53

and the emergency command center floors

96:56

46 through 47 and parts of the lower

96:58

level were mechanical spaces while files

97:01

from federal investigations

97:03

uh secret service cases were stored

97:05

there but lost in the collapse

97:07

>> and the SEC.

97:08

>> And the SEC whoopsies. And has the world

97:11

been the same since then?

97:13

>> The SEC like having that there too. Boy,

97:16

that's super convenient. Guys, we lost

97:18

the data. Let's just start from scratch.

97:21

>> There's no case anymore. Whatever they

97:23

were doing

97:24

>> and yet nobody wants to accept it.

97:26

Nobody. And nobody cares. Video of it.

97:28

That is like really shocking. I had this

97:30

real really dumb guy on the podcast once

97:33

that was uh a skeptic, a professional

97:36

skeptic, and he was really angry with me

97:38

for saying that it looked like a

97:40

controlled demolition. You you know,

97:41

you're

97:42

>> you're promoting a dangerous conspiracy

97:45

theory. I'm like, "No, I'm saying it

97:47

looks like you're saying it doesn't look

97:49

like a control. Let's watch it." I'm

97:50

like, "Let's watch it. Let's it falls."

97:52

>> Conspiracy theorists have had a pretty

97:54

good run lately.

97:54

>> Let's watch it. Let's watch building 7

97:57

collapse because it's kind of kooky.

97:59

Now, one thing that people do point out

98:00

that is true is that the center, like

98:03

there was a a small structure at the top

98:06

of the roof, building 7, that collapses

98:08

first, and it does it like I think a

98:11

minute before the actual building.

98:13

>> These are skirt built. These are skirt

98:14

buildings. And what that means is that's

98:15

actually the most structurally sound

98:18

part of the building. The rest of the

98:19

movie is a facade that's hanging off of

98:20

the inner building.

98:22

>> Yeah. The that's the the most sound part

98:24

of the building. is built over a con

98:26

Edison substation requiring large

98:28

transfer trusses on lower floor floors

98:30

to support the tower above creating long

98:32

span floors vulnerable to thermal

98:34

expansion. Long unsupported floor beams

98:38

and girders up to 50 ft connected to

98:40

critical in critical interior columns

98:43

like column 79 with sheer studs that

98:45

failed under fire induced lateral loads

98:49

rather than just gravity.

98:50

>> It was the automanual flip-flop. The

98:52

exterior tube frame provided stiffness,

98:55

but the open interior layout lacked

98:58

redundancy to prevent fire induced

99:00

progressive collapse with connections

99:02

not designed for horizontal thermal

99:04

forces.

99:08

Okay, that's a cute way of saying that's

99:11

why it fell at freef fall speed and

99:13

looks like a controlled demolition. Cuz

99:15

if that was my building, I would say,

99:16

give me my [ __ ] money back. You made

99:18

this [ __ ] ass building. This building

99:20

got lit on fire and just collapsed on

99:22

itself. Let's watch it collapse because

99:25

the way it collapses is so kooky because

99:27

it really does it at freef fall speed or

99:30

close to it. It's strange. Like there's

99:34

never been a building that looks that

99:36

intact that falls like that. It's weird,

99:40

man. I mean, it's [ __ ] weird. Anybody

99:42

that says it's not weird, look, this is

99:44

how it happened.

99:46

It's weird. Now, the planes hitting

99:50

tower one and tower two.

99:52

>> Okay, that makes more sense to me. Does

99:55

it? Yeah. Does it? Yeah, because it fell

99:57

from the top down like it looks normal.

100:00

It doesn't collapse into its base. Tower

100:03

7 collapses into its base. The way to

100:05

>> How about the testimony of people saying

100:07

they heard multiple pop pop explosions?

100:09

Is that just girder snapping?

100:11

>> It could be. Yeah. I mean, you got to

100:13

think you have immense immense amounts

100:15

of weight and it is collapsing. So, if

100:18

it does collapse the way it looks, it's

100:20

collapsing from the top down. It's not

100:22

going to be silent. You're going to hear

100:23

tremendous explosions. When concrete

100:25

hits the slabs below it, it's going to

100:27

sound like explosions. Also, you have

100:29

the fog of war, right? So, you have

100:31

these people that are involved in

100:32

extremely traumatic situation and their

100:35

memory is very [ __ ] Like, your memor

100:38

is [ __ ] when you experience something

100:39

like this. You remember things funny.

100:41

You have confirmation bias. There's a

100:44

lot of weird stuff that happens. So,

100:45

this is the this is the explanation that

100:47

a piece of the plane falls down and hits

100:50

that building.

100:51

>> Big tower on top.

100:52

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'm sorry. A piece of

100:53

the uh building I meant to say. Sorry.

100:56

So, that that piece of the building

100:58

falls down and not a plane obviously the

101:01

hits the building next to it, tower 7.

101:03

And that gash

101:04

>> is all it took to take that building

101:06

down. That's super suspect. And I do

101:09

know that there was a fire inside the

101:10

building. I'm sure. I'm sure there was.

101:13

But the way it fell was crazy. That see

101:17

tower one and tower two. It's like I

101:19

don't know what happens when a jet flies

101:20

into a a building like that. Neither do

101:22

you. And also you got to deal with

101:25

corrupt construction companies, cutting

101:27

corners, not doing things up to code.

101:29

Perhaps. Perhaps I'll give you that.

101:32

I'll be super charitable. But with

101:34

building seven, I'm like, come on, man.

101:36

That's weird. That one's [ __ ] weird.

101:39

because it doesn't fall like one and

101:41

two. One and two fall from where the

101:45

impact was, the deterioration of the

101:47

structure, the weight of what's above

101:48

the impact. It falls down on it and you

101:51

see a progressive collapse from the top

101:53

to the bottom. Tower 7 is nuts. Tower 7

101:57

just drops. Just drops all at once. Free

102:02

sp free freef fall speed into its base.

102:05

That's weird.

102:06

>> Yeah. Anybody that doesn't think that's

102:08

weird is being naive.

102:09

>> Yeah,

102:10

>> that's never happened before to a

102:11

building that hasn't been a controlled

102:13

demolition. Again, not saying it it's a

102:16

controlled demolition. Maybe it's

102:17

accurate that these enormous drums of

102:20

diesel are creating this fire

102:22

unprecedented load on the structure of

102:24

the building.

102:25

>> But see, even that with everything else

102:28

that occurred, with all the tangental

102:29

stuff that's occurred, you're still

102:33

like giving the benefit of the doubt.

102:34

will have suspension. But I'm saying

102:36

right now, I was trying to finish that

102:38

fire is not on every floor uniformly. So

102:42

why is it collapsing uniformly from the

102:44

top down into the base? Why doesn't the

102:47

base where you have this incredible fire

102:49

load, why doesn't that weaken and it

102:51

fall over sideways because it no longer

102:54

has structure anymore? Why is it every

102:56

floor has the same amount of damage and

103:00

it gives in at the exact same time? That

103:02

kind of doesn't make sense because the

103:04

fire is not uniform throughout the

103:05

building. It's not like the the building

103:07

is one gigantic flame ball and then it

103:11

all gives out at the same time. But even

103:13

then, I would think it would tip over.

103:15

It would fall to the side. Falling into

103:18

its base. That seems to indicate some

103:21

sort of a control. Like it was done

103:25

uniformly. They time it. When you watch

103:27

like in Vegas when they blow up a

103:29

casino, it's like

103:31

and then it does that.

103:33

>> Let's watch watch an actual controlled

103:35

demolition.

103:38

>> So when you watch an actual controlled

103:39

demolition, it looks just like that. It

103:41

looks just like that. And then I don't

103:44

know. I mean the testimony of your eyes

103:46

are telling you the truth,

103:48

>> but your brain, you know, will come up

103:51

with all sorts of stuff because Mundus

103:54

Vault Deep.

103:55

>> Well, I'm not allowing it to with Tower

103:58

7. I've always maintained a a pretty

104:00

open mind with that, but also I lean

104:03

towards shenanigans in that one because

104:07

that one just seems [ __ ] The Tower

104:10

one and Tower Two maybe. Maybe Tower 7.

104:13

Come on.

104:14

>> Yeah.

104:15

>> Tower. Nobody looks. And if they're if

104:17

they're telling you that Tower 7 seems

104:19

normal, that seems they seem so

104:21

gaslighty. Everybody that says that

104:23

seems like they're gaslighting.

104:26

>> So, here we go. Hit it.

104:29

Okay. This one's they're setting up for

104:31

a controlled demolition. So, they're

104:32

showing you how. That's kind of a shitty

104:34

one.

104:35

>> There's other ones that have done a

104:36

better job with, but it's the same kind

104:37

of thing.

104:38

>> It's still falling into onto itself.

104:40

>> Yes. It's falling into itself the same

104:42

way Tower 7 did. That's

104:43

>> See that movie? That building has a

104:45

different shape.

104:46

>> That has a a skirt building. It's got a

104:48

center structure in there.

104:49

>> Yeah. It's a different kind of

104:50

structure. It has a different look to

104:51

it. Let's watch that one. Okay. There.

104:53

Like there. Come on. That looks exactly

104:57

like tower 7. When you watch that, back

105:00

that up again a little bit, please.

105:02

Watch that from the top. From the

105:03

beginning. Just a little bit before

105:05

right before it drops. So, watch.

105:07

They're looking. They're watching. We're

105:08

going to watch the building drop. There

105:10

it is. That [ __ ] goes right down like

105:12

tower. Like from there, come on. That's

105:15

exactly like a control demolition. And

105:18

even the way it looks as it's going down

105:20

looks exactly like tower.

105:22

>> You know, we were talking about

105:23

predictive programming and how movies

105:26

and like spells can predict stuff in

105:28

advance and uh you know kind of prepare

105:32

you for the future of what's coming. You

105:35

know in 1999 a movie came out which was

105:38

effectively a manifesto and that movie

105:41

was called Fight Club and uh in what's

105:44

the end of that movie? The end of that

105:46

movie is the collapsing of the buildings

105:48

which are the financial system you know

105:50

of the future so that they can create a

105:52

new future. Who produced that movie?

105:55

Arnon Milshan. Who is Arnon Milshan? And

105:58

they got a commercial director to do it.

106:00

Fincher and like he's an excellent

106:02

director and I think it's a excellently

106:05

beautifully made film but who is Arnon

106:06

Milchon? Well, you know he himself has

106:10

said I am a MSAD agent and he he said

106:14

that out loud like that's not me saying

106:16

that. That's him saying that. And

106:18

Fincher said oh yeah my last movie uh

106:21

that was made by an arms dealer. Well

106:23

that's him. That's Arnon Milshan. And so

106:26

you know and what's another Arnon

106:28

Milshan movie? uh the Medusa touch with

106:31

uh um George C. Scott and I think Lee

106:33

Rimik. And in that movie, what happens?

106:35

An airplane crashes into a building. And

106:38

you could probably pull that one up,

106:39

too. An airplane crashes into a

106:41

building. This guy's obsessed with

106:42

airplanes crashing into buildings and

106:44

buildings collapsing in movies. And so

106:47

what's likely, you know, is he has he

106:50

been reading uh these scenario plans

106:52

that uh defense departments make and

106:55

that are maybe, you know, uh uh MSAD uh

107:00

you know, plans that are made. I've

107:01

worked for the DoD through John Millius

107:04

and we wrote scenarios. They gathered

107:06

together a bunch of Hollywood writers

107:08

into a you know into a uh what is it

107:10

like like a conference room like a it

107:12

was like more like a ballroom but like a

107:14

small one and gathered a bunch of us

107:16

together around a table and said let's

107:17

come up with ways on how to attack Los

107:19

Angeles and we all wrote scenarios on

107:22

how to attack LA and now they just use

107:24

AI to do all that but so you know has he

107:28

just been like reading these does he

107:30

have access to them and so he just puts

107:32

them into his movies? Well, that movie

107:34

was made in 1999, and what happened

107:36

right after that movie got released?

107:38

Those buildings came down. 9/11 came

107:40

down. And so, is it predictive

107:42

programming where you're showing the

107:44

world what's to come and that makes it

107:46

almost somewhat acceptable to do?

107:49

>> Whoa.

107:49

>> Or is it just coincidence?

107:52

>> And most and most people out there will

107:53

say, "Oh, no, it's just coincidence.

107:55

It's coincidence. He just happens to be

107:56

I mean, that's what's what he has said.

107:58

I don't know if he is or not MSAD, but

108:01

that's what he said. So,

108:03

>> well, that's the thing about the major

108:05

term conspiracy theorist. It's it's

108:07

slapped on things and it immediately

108:09

sort of diffuses any real questioning

108:12

of, oh my god, are things this bad? Is

108:14

there this much? But as time goes on and

108:18

you're confronted with more and more

108:19

information. And I think we're in the

108:21

beginning stages of reckoning with these

108:24

files that were just released where so

108:26

many people like, I haven't really read

108:28

much of it. I've only read the things

108:30

that are really outrageous that my

108:32

friends have sent me because I'm just

108:34

trying to maintain my sanity.

108:35

>> Well, that's just it. Most people want

108:37

to maintain sanity. You just like I just

108:39

want to get through the day, you know? I

108:41

just want to like You're busy. Yeah.

108:42

Well, and it's even more than busy. I

108:44

want to be happy, right?

108:45

>> I want to raise my children in a in a

108:48

world that is, you know, a peaceful

108:50

world and uh where people respect each

108:52

other and where we can like you can make

108:55

something out of yourself, you know,

108:57

through hard work and through merit. You

108:59

know, it's like that's the world I want

109:01

to live in. And more and more it feels

109:03

like we're not in that world.

109:05

>> Did you see that thing that was just

109:07

released today? I think it's the AI

109:10

company Anthropic. I think that's the

109:12

company. So, one of its engineers

109:14

resigned and essentially said that

109:17

humanity is doomed. Yeah.

109:19

>> And he's going to move to the UK and

109:22

just write poetry and just wait it out.

109:25

>> Hasn't that guy seen Threads?

109:27

[laughter] Like the UK is like one of

109:30

the most dangerous places to be. That's

109:31

where he's going to wait it out. Like

109:33

that's uh

109:34

>> Well, he probably has his

109:35

>> Well, when he says UK, does he mean like

109:36

where

109:37

>> I'm not sure. Maybe he means like the

109:38

Scottish Highlands.

109:40

>> Maybe he's going to hide.

109:41

>> Yeah.

109:41

>> And go into some small town and [ __ ]

109:44

just hang out at a pub.

109:45

>> Yeah. They're going to populate that

109:46

town with uh [laughter] suddenly 800 uh

109:51

war capable men from uh you know,

109:54

another country are going to move in and

109:56

they're going to move into the local

109:57

some place that the the West has

109:59

conveniently been bombing and creating

110:01

refugees on.

110:02

>> Yeah. Creating angry people.

110:03

>> Yeah.

110:04

>> Yeah. And who have a

110:05

>> God, you don't want to think that it's

110:06

all planned out like that. But

110:09

>> of course you don't like uh you know

110:11

>> that was a bit of the exposure of US

110:12

aid, you know. So uh I like many people

110:15

thought US aid was about aid. I thought

110:18

it was like a beautiful philanthropic

110:20

program where the United States donates

110:22

money to all these poor countries.

110:23

That's how they get food. Like I had

110:25

Bono on the show and he's like, "I've

110:27

heard that 30,000 people have already

110:29

starved to death because of this. 30

110:31

million people are going to die." And

110:33

I'm like, "Okay, but do you know how

110:35

much corruption was involved with this?

110:37

Do you know that it's not aid? It's the

110:40

Agency for International Development."

110:42

And mostly what they were doing was

110:43

regime change [ __ ] And Mike Benz laid

110:46

it out and he said US aid was for

110:49

tasks that were too dirty for the CIA.

110:52

>> Yeah.

110:52

>> Which is crazy. So, like if they've been

110:54

engineering this long game and

110:57

engineering the collapse of legitimate

111:00

governments all throughout the world,

111:02

bombing places, creating refugees, and

111:05

then having these not just open border

111:08

policies, but inviting and helping

111:11

people get into countries and then

111:13

giving them money once they get there.

111:15

>> Yeah.

111:16

>> Like so many people do not want to admit

111:18

that that was really going on despite

111:21

all the evidence. That's another like

111:23

it's designed to destroy whatever

111:26

confidence you have in law enforcement,

111:29

in civilization, in the electoral

111:32

process.

111:33

>> Yeah. What's the answer? Okay. So, given

111:34

a choice between uh totalitarianism

111:38

or cannibalism, you know, which would

111:40

you prefer?

111:41

>> Right. Right. You take cannibalism

111:43

because you don't want to be eaten.

111:44

>> Yeah.

111:46

>> No, I mean you take totality

111:47

totalitarianism because you don't want

111:48

to be eaten. Like I would rather not be

111:50

in the movie The Road, but I feel like

111:52

we're turn I feel like we're

111:54

increasingly in the movie Children of

111:56

Men. And I mean that's that movie was a

112:00

pretty accurate futurist uh um example

112:03

of where we're heading

112:05

>> with collapsing birth rates and

112:08

>> uh at least portions of civilization

112:10

looking at extinction

112:11

>> and uh

112:12

>> I mean they're experiencing that

112:14

totalitarian South Korea, Japan. Yeah.

112:16

>> What is Can you find that guy's

112:18

manifesto or excuse me

112:19

>> Coron is a genius for making that film.

112:21

I just want to say

112:22

>> Children of Men. Yeah. Fantastic movie.

112:24

>> Um so today is my last day at Anthropic.

112:27

I resigned. Here's the letter I shared

112:29

with my colleagues explaining my

112:31

decision. That's a lot to read. What is

112:34

the synopsis? Just ask perplexity what

112:36

the synopsis of what this guy um said.

112:39

>> Okay. Chararma who built defenses

112:42

against AI assisted bioteterrorism and

112:44

push for transparency on model risks at

112:46

the San Francisco AI firm announced his

112:49

resignation on Monday. He described

112:51

struggles to let values guide actions

112:53

amid mounting pressures planning to

112:55

return to the UK for a poetry degree and

112:58

stepped back from the spotlight. His

113:00

exit follows other safety team

113:01

departures amid Anthropic's launch of

113:04

Claude Opus 4.6 six in a massive $20

113:06

billion funding round at $350

113:10

$350 billion valuation fueling debates

113:13

on balancing safety with commercial

113:15

speed.

113:17

>> Okay. What but what is he saying

113:19

specifically is the issue.

113:23

>> Let's click on that. Let's [ __ ] it.

113:25

Let's click on his

113:25

>> AI started talking to him and scared the

113:27

be Jesus out of him.

113:28

>> The safe holes. if he's part of the the

113:31

guiding of the wait, Damn it, lost the

113:35

word.

113:36

>> Yeah. Um

113:38

>> bioweapon. I mean, look, this guy's

113:40

built something and uh all of a sudden

113:43

he's realizing all the players that are

113:45

funding it are likely, you know, scary

113:49

scary people.

113:51

>> Yeah. Scary people who are

113:52

>> who are all in the same club, you know,

113:54

drinking baby blood and together.

113:57

>> What's oal again? [ __ ] Money. Mikonium,

114:01

which is like uh it's a thing.

114:03

>> Baby poop. Yeah. Um that's in the files.

114:05

>> What comes next? I do not know. I think

114:07

fondly of this famous Zen quote, "Not

114:10

knowing is most intimate." What my

114:13

intention is to create a space to set

114:15

aside the structures that have held me

114:17

these past years and see what might

114:20

emerge in their absence. He's already

114:21

working on his poetry right here. I feel

114:24

called to writing that addresses and

114:26

engages fully with the place we find

114:28

ourselves and that place that places

114:32

poetic truth alongside scientific truth

114:35

as equally valid ways of knowing.

114:37

>> Yeah, it was written for him by AI.

114:38

[laughter]

114:39

>> Elon said something very bizarre

114:41

recently. He was talking about the speed

114:43

of light that the speed of light cannot

114:45

be you can't bypass or exceed the speed

114:48

of light

114:49

>> if you believe Einstein. Yeah. He said

114:50

unless we live in a simulation

114:52

>> or unless Einstein was wrong.

114:54

>> Right?

114:55

>> I mean a lot of astrophysics is based on

114:57

a false premise that uh P equals P prime

115:02

and that the sun is like uh designed a

115:04

certain way and it's completely wrong

115:05

and everything that we know about the

115:07

stars and how we view the nature of the

115:09

universe is fundamentally incorrect.

115:12

>> How is it wrong? uh it's it's based on

115:15

this idea of this stability of Kelvin

115:19

temperatures in the sun and uh which is

115:22

this P equals P prime uh thing and the

115:26

guy who invented like CAT scan machines

115:29

there's sort of a vin diagram

115:31

overlapping of uh of you know this

115:34

photographic technique and astrophysics

115:36

and what he realized is holy cow

115:39

that is not true and therefore so much

115:42

of everything that we know about how we

115:44

view the cosmos is incorrect. And so,

115:49

um, and much

115:50

>> now, how'd they find out that it was

115:51

incorrect?

115:52

>> Well, he he's a mathematician. He

115:54

figured it out. I would have to look up

115:55

his name and everything.

115:57

>> And what is incorrect about it? Do you

115:58

remember that?

115:59

>> Uh, well, it's it's at the beginning of

116:02

astrophysics, there is this formula, and

116:05

if that formula is wrong, then the

116:07

preceding calculations are also wrong or

116:10

at least off. Mhm.

116:11

>> And so the idea is that, you know, what

116:14

we view is is really just a it's kind of

116:18

a cartoon that's painted for us using

116:21

all these formulas and and using radio

116:24

telescopes. And so, you know, it's

116:28

things are not as they seem.

116:29

>> Well, they've already they already have

116:31

issues with the findings from the James

116:33

Webb telescope.

116:34

>> Oh, yeah. Well, that's probably part of

116:36

it. Yeah. You know, I have to say like I

116:39

mean I'm a provocator and so I'm always

116:42

interested in uh um finding that which

116:47

upsets people's you know concepts of

116:50

things and that's partly because I'm a

116:51

screenwriter and I'm looking for these

116:54

kind of conflicts and interesting ideas

116:56

and stuff like that. So take what I'm

116:58

about to say with a grain of salt. But

117:00

uh the big one, the biggest conspiracy

117:03

theory that freaks everybody out is flat

117:06

earth. Now I don't know what the earth

117:09

is, but experientially through the

117:12

testimony of the eyes, it is flat. And

117:15

there is very little chance that I will

117:18

ever in my life or most of us will ever

117:21

in our life experience anything other

117:23

than what is effectively a flat earth.

117:26

And uh you and and you know the way uh

117:30

laser sighting across large bodies of

117:32

water or navigation nap maps for air air

117:36

travel, you know, for for pilots is

117:38

always the presumption of a flat earth.

117:41

>> It's always in the uh pilot manuals and

117:44

on and on maps.

117:45

>> How?

117:46

>> Well, if you're flying a jet at low

117:48

altitude, you're not making corrections

117:50

for curvature even though you're going

117:52

fast enough where you should be. And so

117:55

what's actually happening there? Well,

117:57

um, and so the the idea is, look, I

118:01

don't know what the world is or what the

118:02

realm that we're in is, but

118:05

experientially from my perspective in

118:08

life, it is nothing but a it's a flat

118:11

earth.

118:11

>> But what about travel routes? Like what

118:13

about when they fly over Antarctica?

118:15

What if they

118:16

>> That's Well, they don't fly away,

118:17

>> but you can watch the sun [laughter]

118:19

rise and fall as

118:20

>> they don't even they don't even fly from

118:22

Cape Town to Buenosares.

118:23

>> There's a procession of the equinox.

118:26

>> They travel up into into the other

118:28

hemisphere and like land in London or

118:30

something and then travel back down

118:32

whenever you're doing a a flight across

118:33

the Atlantic. And so like uh when you

118:37

look at it on a flat Earth map,

118:40

>> those satellite photographs of Earth

118:41

from space.

118:42

>> Those are all cartoons.

118:43

>> What are you talking about? I'm saying

118:45

that uh even the NASA the guys who

118:47

actually do those composits those are

118:49

composite imagery of uh listen I'm not I

118:53

am not saying that

118:54

>> but it seems like you're saying that the

118:56

earth is possibly flat

118:57

>> I'm saying experientially

118:59

>> right

119:01

from your daily

119:01

>> that's a scale issue though

119:03

>> correct

119:03

>> we're a tiny little thing on an enormous

119:06

thing

119:06

>> correct

119:07

>> but you know snipers have to calculate

119:09

for the curvature of the earth when they

119:11

shoot

119:12

>> only only the curvature of the landscape

119:14

that they're on.

119:15

>> Right. Why do you think the landscape

119:16

curves?

119:17

>> The landscape doesn't curve. The It is a

119:20

mountainous and

119:21

>> uneven. No. On flat planes, you have to

119:24

do the same thing if you're making a

119:25

long shot over a flat area like if you

119:28

had to shoot.

119:29

>> Well, then why then why don't pilots

119:31

make adjustments?

119:32

>> I'm not a pilot. I don't know. But but I

119:34

do know that when you look at the film

119:37

from the space station, presume a flat

119:38

Earth. When you look at the film from

119:40

the space station, you see an earth

119:42

that's not just round but spinning.

119:45

>> I see I what I actually this the the

119:48

space station, you know, the not uh the

119:51

International Space Station is actually

119:53

not high enough to see curvature and

119:55

what you're seeing is uh lens, you know,

119:57

the lens distortion

119:59

>> and

119:59

>> it's not high enough to see curvature

120:01

when you look out into the horizon. And

120:03

it's actually even like it's it's very

120:05

very close to the

120:06

>> let's look at footage from the space

120:08

station of Earth. So when you see

120:11

satellite images that are taken of the

120:14

Earth, you think they're lying? You

120:15

think there's this grand conspiracy to

120:17

piece all these pictures together and

120:18

turn it into a circle instead of

120:20

>> I'm saying is that's the fundamental

120:23

uh conspiracy theory that unravels

120:26

everyone. And

120:27

>> well, it doesn't make any sense because

120:29

everything that we see in the cosmos

120:31

that's a planetary body is round,

120:33

including stars.

120:35

>> So, it's all round except for small

120:37

moons. Everything is round. And that

120:39

that's because

120:40

>> I'm not even I'm not even certain

120:42

certain

120:43

>> that space exists.

120:44

>> That well that the moon is anything more

120:47

than a plasma.

120:48

>> A plasma?

120:49

>> Yeah.

120:50

>> What does that mean?

120:51

>> That it's a that it's a plasma effect, a

120:54

lenticular effect of some kind. So that

120:56

it's not a real thing, but it affects

120:58

the tides. It is something that we have

121:01

landed at the very least. We've landed

121:03

probes on.

121:04

>> We don't know that itffects. People

121:06

theorize this is

121:07

>> that it affects the tides

121:08

>> footage from the space station.

121:11

>> This is live footage from the space

121:13

station.

121:13

>> And I'm saying that and I'm saying

121:15

that's lens curvature and that what

121:16

you're actually seeing.

121:17

>> Why do you think that's lens curvatur?

121:19

>> What you're seeing is horizon.

121:20

>> So what you're talking about is like

121:22

>> if I'm trying to provoke you, that's

121:23

what I'm saying,

121:24

>> right? But let's not do that. right now

121:26

because I don't want you to be

121:27

completely [ __ ] insane cuz this is a

121:29

round body just like the moon, just like

121:32

Mars, just like Jupiter, just like

121:34

Uranus appears on that appears to be a

121:37

but in your practical life experience.

121:39

You have to accept a certain amount of

121:41

faith is what I'm getting at at any

121:44

moment.

121:44

>> But they understand the procession of

121:46

the equinox.

121:48

>> Okay. Do you know that the procession of

121:50

the Ignosis is how they measure the the

121:52

sky over a period of 26,000 years?

121:55

>> I see right there a little uh stitching

121:58

like right there.

121:59

>> I So this will just keep going straight

122:01

forever.

122:02

>> Do you see that line? Do you see that

122:03

line right there? What is that?

122:05

>> What is that line?

122:06

>> Yeah. What is that line? Well, that

122:08

looks like uh stitching to me. It looks

122:10

like they've stitched together and it

122:11

crosses over there through that mountain

122:12

range right there.

122:13

>> That is weird. Whatever that is. So for

122:15

your by your very example, I'm just

122:18

saying that you have to have a certain

122:19

amount of faith in that. And on the

122:20

surface, Mundus vault decap.

122:22

>> Okay. Okay. Okay. You you're freaking me

122:24

out. Go back go back to [laughter] that

122:26

Jamie. So what is the explan? Go back a

122:28

little bit.

122:29

>> Yeah. What is the explanation of that

122:30

line right there? I don't know.

122:31

>> Right. But how weird is that? That is

122:33

weird that there's this line,

122:35

>> right? Because that in itself is a

122:36

composite image, a cartoon that has been

122:39

put together for you to look at this

122:41

this apparent live imagery.

122:44

>> So

122:45

And

122:46

>> is this multiple images that are

122:48

supposedly pieced together? Is that what

122:51

they're

122:51

>> I'm saying that things fall into like

122:53

the way perspective works is that things

122:56

appear to fall into the horizon, but now

122:58

you use a what is that camera? Is it a

123:01

P200 camera that where you can actually

123:04

zoom in and lift things out of the

123:05

horizon that have appeared to fall into

123:07

the horizon? This live video, this live

123:09

video feed from the International Space

123:11

Station has

123:11

>> has been interrupted because of because

123:13

you're watching too much

123:14

>> due to either a [laughter] change in the

123:16

onboard camera configuration or a loss

123:18

of signal with the communications

123:19

network. The video return when a

123:21

connection is reestablished. So, this is

123:23

during the live feed.

123:24

>> This isn't from NASA's YouTube channel.

123:26

It's just down right now.

123:27

>> It's just down right now. Okay. So,

123:30

you're you're saying that this is like a

123:31

fisheye effect of a lens.

123:33

>> Yeah. I'm saying that potentially. I'm

123:35

saying that and and that we can even see

123:36

that whenever they're up there shooting

123:39

with uh cameras outside, you're like,

123:41

"Oh, there's the there's the there's the

123:44

curvature." And then every now and then

123:45

the camera turns and the and it inverts

123:47

for a moment, then it goes back down.

123:48

>> I've never seen that.

123:50

>> I watch a lot of NASA stuff. And listen,

123:53

I'm not saying that we're not living on

123:54

a globe or at least an oblate spheroid

123:57

as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, but have

123:59

you ever noticed how spasticated that

124:01

guy gets whenever you throw out the word

124:04

flat earth? He flips out like the way

124:06

Robert Dairo flips out on uh on like

124:09

irrationally he flips out.

124:11

>> He flips out when you say that men can't

124:13

be women, which is very weird.

124:16

>> Yeah.

124:16

>> And that they should be able to compete

124:17

in women's sports

124:19

>> which is very weird. like a man for a

124:21

man of science. That's bonkers.

124:22

>> Or that they should be able to go to

124:24

jail and that a sex offender

124:26

>> [ __ ] insane. Not just that, but

124:28

rapists who put in jail women and then

124:32

they have to pay for their electrolysis

124:34

and breast augmentation, which is okay.

124:37

>> At what point in time do you say that

124:39

this is some sort of a bizarre agenda

124:41

that you're trying to get us to accept

124:43

something that doesn't make any [ __ ]

124:45

sense? So much so that you're willing to

124:48

house male prisoners and with females

124:51

because they say they're a male with an

124:52

intact penis and then even if they get

124:55

like female prisoners pregnant or rape

124:57

them. We're all just trying to construct

125:00

what reality is and it tends to be a a

125:04

consensus of what it is. But you know

125:06

there are fringes that on the ends that

125:09

don't believe with what the consensus

125:11

says. Are they wrong? But do you know

125:13

how many people would have to be

125:15

involved to promagate this idea that

125:17

there's a a flat earth and you got to

125:20

cover up that thing and pretend it's

125:22

round? And what what's the motivation of

125:24

covering up the fact that the earth is

125:25

flat? It's an I mean, if we're really

125:28

fundamentally getting down to it, it's

125:29

about God and it's about what is this

125:32

realm that we're in and are we part of

125:34

creation and uh you know,

125:37

>> but why would it be more likely every

125:41

culture throughout recorded history

125:44

draws us in this kind of flat earthish

125:48

environment with a dome, a firmament

125:50

that uh covers it up until like when uh

125:53

the 1930s or

125:55

>> when they start making telescopes

125:56

>> when they well and

125:58

>> right I mean so this is a grand

126:00

conspiracy like Galileo was wrong,

126:02

Capernicus was wrong, all these people

126:04

recorded history is wrong and I mean the

126:08

other the other option is that we are

126:09

just specks of nothing floating around

126:12

[snorts] in an endless vast nothing that

126:15

goes on forever and that you are

126:17

completely insignificant that you are

126:19

not God's perfect creation which I think

126:22

you are. Well, that doesn't they're not

126:24

mutually exclusive. You know, just

126:26

because we are in this vast cosmos

126:29

that's almost impossible for mammal

126:32

minds to to grasp the magnitude of it

126:35

doesn't mean that God's not real.

126:37

>> It's exclusive to people who who believe

126:39

the Bible word for word. I'm not saying

126:42

I do necessarily. I I am uh uh I would

126:46

be considered apostate, you know, by

126:48

most uh um by most people. I've been

126:51

reading the Bible a lot. And one of the

126:53

problems that I find is it's clearly got

126:56

the hand of man on it.

126:57

>> Well, it's been edited. Yes, it's been

126:59

edited. You know, the King James or who

127:00

was King James? He wrote Bible. He wrote

127:02

books on demon on demons as well. And

127:05

so, uh, who was

127:06

>> Well, even the Old Testament,

127:08

>> the Old Testament has the hand of man on

127:09

it. Not just that, but it's also been

127:11

translated so many different times. Like

127:13

ancient Hebrew, the letters double as

127:16

numbers. There's no numbers in ancient

127:17

Hebrew. words have numerical value to

127:20

them

127:21

>> and you know imagine translating such a

127:23

complex language where like the letter

127:26

the word God and the word love they have

127:28

the same numerical value I believe I

127:31

read here's another thing I've read that

127:33

I don't know if it's true so let me find

127:34

out if that's true put that into

127:36

perplexity

127:37

>> there's a lot of weird stuff in the

127:39

Bible in gen in Genesis when the book

127:42

the Nephilim come down and they find

127:45

women comly and so they like okay What's

127:48

actually going on there? These angels or

127:51

Nephilim are are coming down and they're

127:54

taking women from men and having sex

127:57

with them and then creating uh you know

128:00

hybrid offspring.

128:02

>> When representative uh Anna Paulina Luna

128:04

was here, she told me about the book of

128:06

Enoch. She like, "You have to read that.

128:07

Have you ever read it?" I go, "No." So I

128:09

read it.

128:10

>> Holy.

128:10

>> Have you seen the Carpenter Son? The

128:12

Nicholas Cage movie?

128:13

>> No.

128:14

>> Incredible. I What did I just have you

128:17

look up though before I lose my train of

128:18

thought?

128:18

>> The King James Bible thing.

128:22

>> What?

128:22

>> That's what I was trying to ask

128:23

specifically. Which part did you ask

128:24

about?

128:24

>> No, what I what I asked you was u

128:27

ancient Hebrew. So the letters also

128:29

dropped those numbers. That's what that

128:31

movie pi is all about.

128:33

>> And that the word love and the word God

128:35

have the same numerical value. I'm very

128:38

>> very certain that that's true, but I

128:40

want to really double check.

128:41

>> Numerology exists around us everywhere.

128:44

and you know everything you it seems to

128:46

have a kind of and that's what the

128:49

Areronowski film Pi was kind of all

128:50

about is that

128:52

>> that was a great movie.

128:52

>> Yeah, it's a very there was also

128:54

>> he's a very interesting film.

128:55

>> A really fascinating statement by this

128:57

uh mathematician we talked about it on a

128:59

recent podcast was that how strange is

129:03

it that we find out that the universe is

129:07

made out of math and that it's encoded

129:10

in the universe itself. So a tool that

129:13

we used that human beings created to

129:17

measure the universe. It turns out that

129:19

that that tool is how the universe is

129:22

actually encoded.

129:23

>> Well, this gets back to what Elon is

129:25

saying about the world being a

129:26

simulation.

129:27

>> You I mean what is a simulation? A

129:29

simulation.

129:30

>> So it says no in ancient Hebrew whatever

129:33

that word is gatria. Uh no direct name

129:36

of God shares the exact same numerical

129:38

value as the word for love. So what is

129:41

the basis of that rumor? Uh sacred name

129:45

equals 26. A name for God equals 86.

129:50

>> Okay. Is there a a word for God?

129:53

>> Elohim.

129:54

>> Is that have the same?

129:56

>> It's a name,

129:57

>> right? What is the value of click on

130:01

that below that below that where it says

130:03

what is the gemantric? What was that

130:05

word?

130:06

>> I had to look it up. It's

130:07

>> gimatria. Yeah.

130:09

>> Primary Jewish mysticis. Oh, Cabala.

130:11

>> Yeah.

130:12

>> Religious studies to find hidden

130:13

spiritual meanings in sacred texts.

130:15

Okay.

130:16

>> It is fascinating though that there's

130:18

numerical value in words. Like you

130:20

there's no way you're going to get that

130:21

when you translate it to Latin. Uh so

130:23

that has a Greek

130:25

>> that has a value of 86. And what is

130:27

love's value?

130:30

>> What is the value? What is the ancient

130:32

Hebrew word for love?

130:35

What is the ancient Hebrew word for

130:38

love?

130:42

>> That's that what you mean by love is

130:45

going to be very

130:46

>> you have to say. Do you mean like love

130:47

between two people?

130:48

>> Okay. What is the geantri that doggy in

130:51

the window like a child?

130:52

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's a good point.

130:53

That's a good point.

130:54

>> Probably different words for it.

130:55

>> Definitely. So what is that? Click on

130:58

that. What's the geantria value of

130:59

avala? Right there. Right there. Yeah,

131:04

click on that.

131:08

It's 13. So that's a different number,

131:10

too. Interesting.

131:13

>> 13 twice equals 26. The value of Yahweh.

131:17

>> Yeah.

131:18

>> Huh. This movie, The Carpenter Son, is

131:21

all about the infancy of Jesus. that I

131:23

think is written by Matthew and it's

131:26

part of these uh um I mean

131:31

I may have this wrong but uh Coptic

131:34

texts and it is like

131:38

>> Cage is so good in this movie

131:40

>> but so twice 13 equals 26 the value of

131:44

Yahweh implying love mirrors or

131:47

completes God God's essence okay so

131:51

that's where that comes from

131:52

>> I was going to ask where it came from,

131:53

>> right? That's where it comes from. So

131:55

God is love. So love twice is coming

131:58

from God.

131:59

>> Um so here's a here's a question. What

132:02

happened the so the go

132:05

>> I understand I understand. Go to ask a

132:07

followup.

132:08

>> Um so the how was the numerical value of

132:14

ancient Hebrew language

132:17

lost when they translated it to Latin

132:20

>> to Greek? But to Greek first, right?

132:23

>> How is the numerical value of ancient

132:27

Hebrew words?

132:30

>> Numerical value of ancient Hebrew words

132:34

lost when they translated it to Greek

132:38

because it seems like if the it's not

132:40

just context like what is your word for

132:43

that? Like the word meant a different

132:45

thing to them.

132:47

you know numerical values of ancient

132:49

Hebrew words calculated via geratria

132:53

uh where letters double as numbers was

132:56

not preserved in Greek translations.

132:59

Um Hebrew letters inherently carry fixed

133:02

numerical values enabling word sums. Um

133:07

Greek letters have their own values. Uh

133:10

equivalents rarely match Hebrew sums

133:12

exactly. So you're going to lose it.

133:14

Like you know when you read like um

133:17

Russian translations of English or

133:19

English to Russian it gets like super

133:20

screwy

133:21

>> for sure. For sure.

133:22

>> Is this for sure like real

133:23

>> ancient Spanish

133:26

incredibly difficult

133:27

>> even all

133:29

>> all words mean another number that all

133:31

have some sort of secret meaning.

133:33

>> Runic writing from the Nordics is the

133:36

same thing and there is a striking

133:37

resemblance between many of the runes

133:39

with uh Hebrew. And so these ideas and

133:43

these glyphs and symbols that Odin first

133:46

saw while hanging upside down from the

133:48

tree and learned uh language and how to

133:51

speak are somewhat universal across the

133:54

planet.

133:54

>> We'll get to that for a second, but

133:55

let's find out what Jaime's saying.

133:58

primarily used in Jewish mysticism and

134:01

religious studies to find hidden

134:02

spiritual meanings in sacred texts like

134:04

Torah by assigning numerical values to

134:07

Hebrew letters and words, revealing

134:09

connections between concepts and

134:10

exploring the universe's underlying

134:12

structure. What's interesting is like

134:14

it's an older language, but doesn't that

134:16

seem like a more complex language? A

134:18

language that combines nu numerical

134:21

value with words like that. Like if you

134:24

said something to me, uh it's not just

134:27

implied by your tone or by the context

134:30

of what you're saying that I understand

134:32

what it means to you, but it's it's in

134:35

the numerical value of the words. That

134:37

seems like a better way to communicate

134:40

>> than just nouns and verbs and adverbs

134:42

like

134:42

>> rather than bifurcating

134:45

>> numbers and letters together. Like

134:46

sounds like a way better move. I mean,

134:48

doesn't it? It seems like if you can

134:50

understand that and if you grew up with

134:52

that that seems like that would be a

134:55

much richer and deeper way of

134:57

communicating. Isaac Azimoff wrote a

134:58

book called Is Azimoff on numbers which

135:01

is fantastic which talks about this and

135:03

he talks about Kalahari Bushmen who have

135:05

no concept of the number zero and how

135:08

they process and understand concepts

135:11

like you know uh when no one is around

135:14

uh you know if the village is empty and

135:16

things like that. And so uh you just

135:19

different people are just trying to

135:21

figure out how to articulate everything.

135:23

And you know, computer programming is a

135:26

language that utilizes numbers.

135:28

>> It's weird when there's like certain

135:30

languages that don't have a word for

135:32

something, so people really grasp they

135:35

have a hard time grasping what the [ __ ]

135:37

you're trying to say.

135:38

>> Like what's the translation for this?

135:40

Like what? We don't have a word for

135:41

that.

135:42

>> We don't we don't understand the concept

135:43

of empathy. Well, well, there's certain

135:46

um cultures that are like um uh tribal

135:50

cultures that can't understand the

135:52

concept of maintenance.

135:54

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

135:54

>> They don't have it. I've heard that.

135:55

I've heard that.

135:56

>> Yeah. Which is weird. Like you think

135:57

about it like Oh, right.

135:59

>> Why would they need maintenance? Why

136:00

would they need maintenance?

136:01

>> If you live a subsistence lifestyle, you

136:02

live off the land, you don't need

136:04

maintenance.

136:04

>> And then suddenly you're thrust into the

136:06

21st century and the Chinese are

136:09

building highways for you and and the

136:11

highways collapse.

136:12

>> Yeah. and the highways has collapsed

136:13

because no one's maintaining it,

136:15

>> right? Yeah, it's interesting.

136:17

>> But it's a it's interesting

136:19

>> pulling people out of the stone age and

136:21

dropping them into or maybe the iron age

136:24

or and dropping them suddenly into

136:27

>> to take this back to this idea that

136:28

we're missing a thousand years. So if we

136:31

really are missing this one for there's

136:32

two things I want to get I want to get

136:33

to that and I added a thousand years

136:35

added a thousand years. I really want to

136:37

get to that and uh well the I meant by

136:40

uh missing like they don't they don't

136:42

exist in the real world right

136:43

>> I want to get to that and I want to get

136:44

to is there a conventional explanation

136:46

for that stitching why that image like

136:49

what is the mainstream

136:51

>> I got to dig up what that what we were

136:53

even looking at I don't I don't it was

136:55

not the NASA channel we were looking at

136:56

I don't you know I can dig down that

136:58

rabbit hole

136:58

>> where were we looking at

136:59

>> I don't I've tried to pick up a video of

137:01

the live

137:02

>> you know the globe imagery that

137:03

>> hold on a second so that image might not

137:06

have been an official image that might

137:07

have been something that someone

137:08

created.

137:09

>> I'm not saying that. No. Well, let me

137:10

retract so I words aren't taken out of

137:13

context. I'm just saying it was it

137:14

seemed like a live video. It was live on

137:17

YouTube.

137:18

>> Oh, but it could have been AI.

137:21

>> Who? Yeah. I have to go back to look at

137:22

the I'm working fast over here.

137:24

>> No, I get it, dog. I get it.

137:26

>> That's why [laughter]

137:27

Jamie, you do the job of 15 dudes. So, I

137:30

I appreciate

137:30

>> I found a video from 11 years ago on

137:32

Vimeo that is from SpaceX. So, it's not

137:35

NASA, it's someone else. And it's like

137:37

it's a up and down of the rocket. You

137:40

can argue all day that it's got

137:41

curvature. It doesn't have curvature.

137:42

>> When you see a rocket launch, what does

137:43

it do? It goes kind of sideways across

137:45

the sky. And so, like we've now seen

137:49

that, you know, pretty regularly. And

137:51

that's because they're really not going

137:52

above the troposphere, which

137:54

>> well, I watched this. I watched the

137:55

SpaceX launch live. I was there. It went

137:58

straight up in the air

137:59

>> and then it curves and it travels

138:01

sideways across the sky until it meets

138:02

the horizon

138:03

>> to a certain orbit and then it traveled

138:05

and dropped off in Australia 35 minutes

138:07

later. I went to

138:10

>> No, I watched the entire thing from the

138:14

command center. I watched it from like

138:15

24 different cameras.

138:17

>> Mhm.

138:17

>> But how high did it go? Did it go above

138:19

the troposphere?

138:20

[sighs]

138:21

>> Not likely. Like this is not

138:23

>> the troposphere. Is that this is like

138:25

>> what how many miles is that up? This is

138:27

low Earth orbit where

138:28

>> Right. But at low Earth orbit, Jesus

138:31

Christ, that looks like a globe, huh?

138:33

>> But watch as the camera rotates. Just

138:35

>> This is also an edited video. I don't

138:36

want to get stuck in this.

138:37

>> Right. Right. Like this.

138:40

>> As Elon would say, uh, it it's real

138:42

because it looks fake. Or when it looks

138:44

fake, that's when you know it's real.

138:46

>> Say that about Bigfoot then, [ __ ]

138:47

[laughter]

138:49

>> Because Bigfoot looks fake as [ __ ] And

138:51

it's definitely not real.

138:53

>> Uh, you know what's real? That Turkish

138:55

sharpshooter. That dude was like a G up

138:57

in the corner. Um, press play. See what

139:00

this is supposed to be.

139:01

>> It cuts.

139:01

>> It cuts. Okay.

139:03

>> Oh, I see. I see.

139:04

>> Yes.

139:04

>> So, it cuts a bunch of different.

139:06

>> So, now you can actually see an

139:07

inversion occurring on the on the um

139:10

horizon right there.

139:11

>> A small piece of it.

139:12

>> Correct. But the lens distortion on the

139:14

side of the frame is causing the um the

139:16

horizon there

139:17

>> to go the opposite way

139:18

>> to to invert. And that's because of lens

139:20

distortion.

139:21

>> I see what you're saying. if it was

139:22

>> and the fact of the matter is even at

139:24

the height that even at the height that

139:25

these are orbiting at and I'm not saying

139:27

like presuming presuming a globular uh

139:31

planet uh and even the word planet plane

139:35

it's like a plane at you know or the

139:38

horizon is horizontal like uh you know

139:42

even presuming that the height that

139:44

they're at right now you would still

139:46

only see you know a circular

139:50

uh um you see the limit of your vision

139:53

which which has a

139:54

>> because it's so massive.

139:54

>> Yeah. Which is because it's so massive.

139:56

You're still high enough. You're still

139:58

not high enough to truly see curvature.

140:01

>> If we are in a simulation and if

140:03

consciousness it affects the reality of

140:06

things and they are only real if we are

140:08

experiencing them. That's when things

140:10

get really squirly.

140:12

>> The testimony of your eyes like I know

140:14

that I am here right now. Not just the

140:16

testimony of your eyes, but your

140:18

consciousness interacting with reality

140:20

is what creates it.

140:22

>> Correct? I mean,

140:23

>> that's that's where things get super.

140:25

>> How do you know gravity exists for

140:27

example?

140:27

>> Well, gravity is not clearly defined.

140:29

Correct. Correct. Gravity numbers.

140:31

>> Gravity is a concept and it's a non

140:34

truly nonprovable concept because you

140:36

can prove the exact same thing through

140:37

density and buoyancy. you know, the

140:40

density and buoyancy, you know, make a

140:42

lot of sense. How come the oceans uh,

140:44

you know,

140:46

react the way they do and don't, you

140:48

know, it's it's uh uh it's not

140:52

necessarily provable, but it's

140:53

believable. You you come to a certain

140:55

point where you're like, okay, faith

140:56

takes over at this point. My faith in

141:00

that in gravity, my faith in the globe,

141:03

uh, because that's what's been told to

141:05

me since I was a baby. uh at a certain

141:08

point that just takes over and you not

141:10

just that and you accept that as a

141:11

fundamental piece of what reality is

141:13

because we want to believe we understand

141:15

the universe. What I'm saying is we

141:18

don't understand jack [ __ ] about the

141:20

universe. We don't know anything and all

141:23

we do is we believe what they tell us

141:26

and they is just the the cumulative

141:29

understanding of how things are. But in

141:31

ancient times they had a different

141:33

understanding of things and that was how

141:35

it was back then. And so because they

141:38

had no other way to describe,

141:39

>> right? But even then the reality is just

141:42

built things based on where the sun was

141:45

going to be during the solar equinox.

141:47

They also were aware of the procession

141:49

of the equinoxes which is the wobble of

141:52

Earth's orbit. So Earth spinning around

141:55

doesn't spin perfectly. There is a

141:57

26,000year wobble and you could predict

142:00

it by the night sky.

142:01

>> Somehow Polaris remains centered in the

142:05

sky and all stars rotate around it.

142:07

That's extraordinary. If we're traveling

142:09

>> What do you mean? So during the

142:11

procession of the equinoxes over a

142:12

26,000 year cycle, Polaris remains it

142:16

has remained spot and supposedly that's

142:18

cuz that's where we're flying towards as

142:20

a as a solar system as we travel through

142:22

the galaxy in this

142:25

equinoxes this wobble over a 26,000year

142:28

period. It will move in the sky. Well,

142:30

the the point of Polaris uh will always

142:34

remain uh where it is directly

142:36

>> the point but our perspective of it will

142:38

will vary depending upon where we are in

142:40

this 26,000 year cycle.

142:42

>> It undergoes a kind of uh penumbra of

142:46

sort a kind of motion of sorts that

142:48

changes a figure 8 time it changes. Look

142:51

at it says right here do the 26,000year

142:55

axial procession cycle the north star

142:57

changes over millennia. While Polaris is

143:00

the current north star, other stars have

143:03

held this position including Thuban 3000

143:06

BC and future stars will include Arai,

143:10

Alderain, Al Aldurin, Aldderman, and

143:13

Vega. So, it's not the same star. It's

143:16

just what is dependent upon where we are

143:19

in the procession of the equinoxes.

143:22

That's why.

143:23

>> Well, there there is.

143:24

>> It's not not that the Earth is flat.

143:25

>> I know it's true because it's on Google.

143:26

>> But it's not just that. We know where

143:28

they've they've been able to accurately

143:30

predict the motion of the procession of

143:32

the equinoxes based on the

143:33

constellations which are clearly mapped

143:35

out. So we understand this wobble and

143:38

this wobble may be responsible for

143:40

cycles of earth's earth's climate, how

143:43

things change and and be dependent upon

143:46

where the equator sits and where these

143:49

poles sit and how it wiggles around.

143:51

Remember when we were younger the sun

143:52

was kind of yellow and orange and now

143:54

it's just like white like reality is

143:57

changing. I mean things change.

143:59

>> The sun looks exactly the same to me.

144:01

>> Does you think the sun is the same? To

144:02

me it's

144:03

>> I think pollution has affected it

144:05

somewhat. Especially if you live in LA.

144:07

>> Well, there used to be more pollution

144:08

and so maybe that's an excuse of why uh

144:10

the sun would be more yellow, but I've

144:12

lived all over the world.

144:13

>> Did you see Epstein talking about

144:14

gravity?

144:14

>> Oh boy.

144:15

>> Oh, here we go.

144:17

>> With it. It's not It's very I'll just

144:20

say

144:20

>> what does he have to say?

144:21

>> It's fine. It's only 45 seconds. Try to

144:23

>> just let it go.

144:25

So, someone's pushing the ball because I

144:28

know I am confident that the only thing

144:31

that gets something to move is with a

144:33

force that pushes. So, there's a force

144:34

that's pushing the ball down. In fact,

144:39

>> he never he called it gravity. He

144:42

measured how fast it was pulled. but

144:48

never was able to explain why it

144:50

happened. How is it? What is gravity?

144:53

It's this. Everybody says, "Well, why

144:55

did the ball fall to the ground?"

144:56

Because gravity took it. But what's

144:57

gravity? That's as Fineman would say,

145:00

that's the name of the thing. We have no

145:02

idea what it is.

145:04

>> That's the end of that clip.

145:05

>> Before it's just density and buoyancy.

145:07

>> He was really into this topic

145:09

apparently.

145:09

>> Apparently, he knew a lot about it.

145:11

>> You know who you should have on is Eric

145:13

Dubet. Do you know who this guy is?

145:14

>> Oh, he's a flat earth guy. Yeah, he's

145:16

the flat earth guy and he's written a

145:17

book called Aundred Proofs. And in order

145:20

to prove something, you also have to

145:21

prove things wrong.

145:22

>> You went down some rabbit holes, Roger.

145:24

>> I look I'm a screenwriter and so I'm

145:26

always looking for things like this to

145:28

write stuff about. And so it's uh

145:30

>> so in order to prove I take it

145:32

>> in order to prove what?

145:33

>> Whenever you have a proof, you also have

145:35

to disprove. And so, you know, he he

145:37

wrote a book called 100 Proofs about uh

145:40

you know, [snorts] the the the nature

145:43

of, you know, the the earth and how it

145:46

is and has explanations for many of the

145:49

things you're you're talking about.

145:51

>> Hasn't he debated people that actually

145:53

understand

145:55

>> how you can prove that the earth is

145:56

round?

145:57

>> He does it very calmly and it infuriates

145:59

people,

146:00

>> right? But I don't think he's done well.

146:02

>> It's very enjoyable to watch cuz it's

146:04

really funny. But to people that are

146:05

actual cosmologists, he's not performed

146:07

well in these.

146:08

>> Well, the cosmologists will uh say

146:12

things that still need to be if you're

146:14

making statements, they still need to be

146:16

you still need to disprove the other uh

146:19

you know the other proofs like

146:21

>> right but there's plenty of people that

146:22

have disproven that the earth is flat.

146:26

I'm all I'm saying with simple

146:28

experiments the the Joe Rogan experience

146:31

throughout life you are really like when

146:33

you go up into an airplane I do not see

146:35

the curvature of the earth.

146:37

>> Well you can't because of perspective

146:38

because you're so tiny.

146:39

>> Correct. Because we're so tiny. So all

146:41

I'm saying is that through experience

146:44

that the testimony of your eyes you will

146:46

never experience a globular earth. You

146:49

can't you but you do experience a

146:51

certain effect of a a earth that's a

146:54

globe if you go to the other side of the

146:57

earth and it's dark out when it's sunny

146:59

in California.

147:01

>> They've made models of how that could

147:03

work on the

147:04

>> dorks have dorks have made models

147:06

>> but it doesn't line in with our

147:08

understanding of cosmology. It doesn't

147:10

line in with our understanding of our

147:11

orbit around the sun.

147:12

>> That's assuming you believe that we

147:13

orbit around the sun. And I know listen

147:15

I'm not saying that we don't orbit

147:16

around the sun. I'm saying we don't live

147:18

on a globular earth. But the numbers

147:19

match but the numbers match.

147:22

>> If you do assume that they're correct

147:24

that we orbit around the sun their

147:26

calculations

147:28

if they make the calculations on their

147:30

flat earth model as well then you still

147:32

have to prove that wrong.

147:34

>> But isa doing that is MIT like of of all

147:38

people to believe the ones who are

147:40

digitally stitching [ __ ] and saying

147:44

>> that's a that's a government agency. You

147:46

went so deep with this. Boy,

147:48

>> I No, all I'm saying is my experience.

147:52

>> You know, when I get on the plane later

147:54

today and I'm flying back and I look out

147:57

outside, I'm going to see a flat, you

147:59

know, a flat uh horizon, a horizontal

148:03

horizon before me. And and and when I

148:07

land and uh and you know, it's

148:10

everything else is faith-based.

148:13

>> Well,

148:13

>> that's all I'm saying. It's not though.

148:15

It's it's science-based. It's based on

148:18

data. It's based on our understanding.

148:20

>> The word science means observation.

148:22

>> It means testimony.

148:24

>> I'm talking about the the measurements

148:27

>> data.

148:27

>> The data is so far removed one from my

148:30

ability to understand, but from ability

148:33

to understand

148:33

>> the the circumference of the earth,

148:35

right? You can understand the numbers

148:37

and the numbers line up exactly with how

148:40

much time it would take for the earth to

148:41

go around in a day.

148:43

>> Sure. And uh in what other

148:47

>> experiment can you show me where water

148:49

clings to a spinning ball? Like that's

148:51

kind of the the classic flatearther

148:54

uh thing that they'll ask you like,

148:56

"Well, show me any other [ __ ] ball

148:59

that's 24,000 miles wide."

149:01

>> And the answer to that is gravity. And

149:03

what he's talking about in that uh clip

149:06

that you just showed is gravity is just

149:07

sort of this idea that we came up with

149:09

to justify that. But there's clearly a

149:11

force

149:12

>> that does that, right?

149:13

>> That's density.

149:14

>> Just density.

149:15

>> There's Yeah, density.

149:17

>> Well, then how come these two things

149:18

will fall at the same time if I drop

149:19

them when this is far heavier?

149:22

>> How come?

149:23

>> I do not have an answer for that.

149:24

>> Right. But gravity does, right?

149:27

>> Gravity is like he said, it's just a

149:29

measurement. It's a measurement of how

149:30

things fall,

149:31

>> right? And so that measure and and the

149:34

word that they invented, gravity, is

149:36

just a an explanation for how objects

149:40

are are pulled downward,

149:41

>> right? But those objects come if it was

149:43

just density, wouldn't a heavier object

149:47

drop faster?

149:49

>> Well, when a

149:50

>> there's two balls, there's a bowling

149:52

ball and feathers dropping in a vacuum

149:53

and they're falling at the exact same

149:55

time.

149:56

>> How weird. Vacuum, no density. They both

149:59

fall at the same time because of gravity

150:00

or whatever the force we call gravity

150:02

is. But there is some sort of a force

150:05

that we call gravity that could be

150:06

measured in a vacuum.

150:08

>> Look how excited they all are.

150:09

>> Yeah. Brian Cox would be pissed if he

150:11

was here right now. He'd be [ __ ]

150:12

>> Oh, no. He'd be I'm not Listen, I'm not

150:14

say All I'm saying is that my experience

150:16

in the world,

150:17

>> of course, but your experience is based

150:19

on perspective of being a tiny little

150:21

thing on an enormous thing.

150:22

>> Correct.

150:23

>> Yeah,

150:23

>> that is correct.

150:24

>> Yeah,

150:24

>> that is correct. a few YouTube channels

150:26

that have broken down all of those flat

150:28

earth ideas together. Go watch those and

150:30

>> I tried years ago and I gave up.

150:33

>> It's it is absolutely a rabbit hole. But

150:36

what's interesting about it is that if

150:39

if you extract like the uh the the the

150:45

faith that you have in these kind of

150:47

ideas

150:49

and you supplement it with the faith of

150:53

you know these other ideas

150:55

they're exchangeable. They're only

150:57

exchangeable if you don't understand the

150:59

data and if you don't understand what's

151:01

actually been measured or if you don't

151:02

understand the path of satellites or if

151:04

you don't understand how many different

151:06

people would have had to lie about this

151:07

[ __ ] and not achieve the same

151:10

observational results that all these

151:13

different space agencies have that the

151:14

idea that they're all in collusion that

151:16

Japan and India and even countries that

151:19

hate each other they're all in collusion

151:22

on this this lie that the earth is

151:24

round. Well,

151:25

>> it seems much more likely that there's a

151:27

bunch of people with schizophrenia that

151:28

think that the earth is flat and they

151:30

make these YouTube videos where they're

151:31

very compelling because they're

151:33

articulate and they use great words and

151:34

they say it all in a nice way without

151:36

being challenged by real facts along the

151:38

way by someone who actually has studied

151:41

this their whole life.

151:42

>> Right. I still saw digital stitching on

151:45

your example.

151:46

>> Yeah, it wasn't my example. [laughter]

151:47

It was some [ __ ] Jamie randomly pulled

151:49

offline. That was weird though. And

151:52

that's perfect for this world that we

151:54

live in to to have sort of a glitch like

151:55

that.

151:56

>> That's kind of what I'm getting at is

151:57

there's so much out there is so much out

152:00

there that it it just re it falls to

152:03

faith. And also what does it really

152:05

matter? That's kind of what what I'm

152:07

getting at ultimately is what does all

152:10

of that really matter? What does it

152:11

matter to anybody that there's a cabal

152:13

of 8,000 plus uh people who are secretly

152:17

controlling the world and doing

152:19

occultism and drinking baby blood? What

152:21

does it really matter as long as you can

152:24

just have your daily pint?

152:25

>> This is a very different subject now.

152:26

We've we've shifted. We've you've moved

152:28

away from the concept of the earth being

152:30

flat and it's a giant lie that's

152:32

promoted by an a huge group of people

152:35

that aren't even connected in any way,

152:37

shape, or form to evil people that are

152:40

involved in cultlike rituals, which has,

152:42

by the way, always existed. And this is

152:45

why it's so it's very difficult for

152:47

people to imagine today that some of the

152:49

things that you're hearing from the

152:50

Epstein files like the potential that

152:51

they were eating children

152:53

>> or killing children or that they use

152:55

that sulfuric acid to to boil bodies. We

152:58

don't want to believe in evil that is

153:01

that deep. But in my opinion, if you can

153:04

find out that evil is real, right? Evil

153:07

most certainly is real. There's evil

153:09

acts that we have documented all

153:11

throughout the world. There's evil that

153:12

the cartel does. I just watched a video

153:14

where the cartel chopped this guy's head

153:16

off and put it on a drone and flew it

153:18

over to where the other cartel was.

153:21

>> Thought that was funny. They probably

153:22

thought it was funny.

153:23

>> Having a good time. Um, that's clearly

153:26

evil. There's plenty of demons.

153:28

>> Do you believe in demons?

153:30

>> I believe in the concept of demons.

153:32

>> I mean, demons have don't materialize

153:34

before us necessarily. They rest upon

153:37

the shoulders of men and whisper into

153:38

their ears. Then people do evil things.

153:41

>> Believe. This is what I believe. I

153:42

believe that if I was a demon or if

153:45

there if demons were real, they would

153:47

get people to do things which are

153:49

verifiably true that they have done.

153:53

I if I if you were if you were a demonic

153:56

idea and you got into Oenheimer's head

154:00

or uh Patton's head or anybody's and you

154:03

wanted them to do something horrific to

154:05

a bunch of innocent people it it and you

154:08

could say this is because we're at war

154:10

so we're going to drop a nuclear bomb on

154:12

Hiroshima. Like that's a demonic act.

154:15

It's a demonic act of eliminating

154:18

hundreds of thousands or a 100 thousand

154:20

plus people off the face of the earth

154:22

who did nothing. They're just citizens

154:24

that are unfortunately involved in a

154:27

country that is in a conflict with some

154:29

people that they don't even know and

154:30

then they just got vaporized like that.

154:32

That seems demonic. You've just expired.

154:36

>> But there are people who would argue

154:38

there are people who would argue that

154:39

the war would have continued. I've heard

154:40

this argument before. I've heard that

154:41

argument too. that the war would have

154:42

continued and so many more would have

154:44

died.

154:44

>> Well, if I was a demon, I would want to

154:46

prop propagate that idea. I would want

154:48

you to think that you have to do it.

154:50

>> And so like is is evil justification of

154:54

things?

154:56

Um certainly if if you wanted to find a

155:02

way where a demon like just like assume

155:05

that demons are real. How would demons

155:09

best be able to enact demonic things on

155:14

on earth? Would they do it by saying,

155:17

"I'm a demon and you know this is this

155:20

is what you should do and this is this

155:21

is horrible and evil." Or would you

155:24

creep into someone's head and find

155:26

justifications for doing a demonic

155:28

thing?

155:30

Like there's a lot of things like

155:31

>> you would creep well you would creep

155:33

into someone's head and you would you

155:35

know you would boil the frog slowly.

155:37

Like let's imagine this is the AIDS

155:39

crisis and you know that act is killing

155:42

people but you also but you also know

155:45

that you're making an insane amount of

155:48

profit off of killing people with act

155:52

and you have already established a

155:53

narrative and and Fouchi said this

155:55

publicly that the reason why they only

155:57

prescribe act is act is the only thing

155:59

that is both safe and effective. He

156:02

literally used the same language that he

156:04

used during he's been doing this for a

156:05

long time. Yes. If I wanted if I was a

156:08

demon, I'd want to get in that guy's

156:10

head and I'd want to get him to keep

156:12

doing it and say, "Look how much money

156:13

they're making. You got to keep this

156:15

money. You got to There's a way to

156:16

justify this. You're the purveyor of

156:18

information. You are the gatekeeper of

156:20

the truth. You just find a way to dance

156:23

around these numbers. You do not know

156:25

what you are talking about. This is not

156:28

gain of function." I mean, think just

156:30

what he did there. that was evil. By by

156:33

taking a virus, funding it, even though

156:36

it was illegal to fund it in the United

156:38

States, by doing it through Ecoalth

156:39

Alliance and then, you know, farming it

156:42

out to them, they do it at the Wuhan

156:43

lab. And you are in fact doing gain of

156:47

function research on a virus designed

156:49

for human beings to make it more deadly

156:52

and more contagious. That's demonic.

156:55

There's you're not you don't have a

156:56

cure. There was a researcher in Canada

156:59

at the Manitoba level four lab uh Dr.

157:02

Qui, I think is how you pronounce her

157:04

name. And she was the one who solved

157:06

Ebola. Like she had come up with the the

157:09

vaccine for Ebola, which is manufactured

157:11

by a California company that is

157:13

basically a Chinese company. And like a

157:18

rock star, she had made a like it was

157:21

like a hit. She had a hit, a huge hit.

157:24

And just like a rockstar, everybody's

157:26

asking you what comes next, what comes

157:28

next? And so she started actively

157:31

working working really really hard at uh

157:35

at coming up with that next thing. And

157:38

you know like most people you don't want

157:39

to stand in line. And these level four

157:42

labs you know they have to uh whenever

157:44

you move your research from one lab to

157:46

another uh you have to go through all

157:48

sorts of stuff in order to do that

157:49

because it's all patented. All of these

157:52

microbes and viruses and Ebola strains

157:56

and whatnot it's all patented. And so,

157:58

for example, there was this one kid who

158:00

was uh working at the lab in uh Canada

158:04

and he was moving, I think, to the one

158:06

in Atlanta. And so, he was crossing the

158:09

border and he was he didn't want to

158:10

like, you know, have to reproduce all of

158:12

his work and so he just put it into a

158:13

thermos inside of a thing and tried to

158:15

cross the border and he got caught.

158:17

Well, she got caught in 2019

158:20

uh by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police

158:23

basically moving stuff to from Canada

158:26

via Air Canada freight from uh Manitoba

158:29

from Winnipeg, this is the Winnipeg uh

158:32

lab to Wuhan and she they were moving

158:35

everything and I tracked where those uh

158:38

where where because I was writing a

158:39

screenplay about it and uh I so I

158:41

tracked like where did that come from?

158:43

Well, it's like the the cutter or maybe

158:45

it was Abu Dhabi, I can't remember. The

158:47

lab there and then that went through in

158:49

order to get around it got sent to the

158:51

one in Amsterdam and that got sent to

158:52

her and she was able to do all this

158:54

stuff and she was basically just

158:56

shipping, you know, everything. Ha and

158:59

all these patented things to Wuhan, you

159:02

know, in order to uh to do it. and uh

159:05

the Royal Canadian Mounted Police

159:06

basically, you know, stopped it and she

159:09

got like walked out of the laboratory

159:11

and everything because they were like,

159:12

"Is there a misappropriation of money

159:14

going on here? Like, what are all these

159:16

flights that are occurring?" And they

159:18

redacted who her financer was and we

159:22

still don't know who her financer was,

159:23

but it's one of three people. And it's

159:25

the people you probably can guess, you

159:27

know, these uh people who have an

159:30

interest in uh in in this. and uh and

159:35

and but her thing was just ambition. It

159:38

was just like anybody. She was just

159:40

wanting to have that next hit and she

159:42

would do anything to, you know, to to do

159:45

it to to repeat what she did with Ebola.

159:48

>> So she was helping to engineer viruses.

159:51

>> Yeah. They were engineering stuff and

159:53

then she would ship them via Air Canada

159:55

freight from Winnipeg to directly to

159:58

Wuhan on air literally on Air Canada

160:00

flights. So you're flying on Air Canada

160:02

to Wuhan and down below in cargo there's

160:05

all this like you know

160:06

>> some [ __ ] that leprosy and yeah some

160:08

horrible strain of something something

160:11

that's patented and then they're just

160:13

shipping it over to and you know none of

160:15

this has come out like some uh papers in

160:18

Canada you know like the Winnipeg Free

160:20

Press or something was trying to cover

160:23

it but you know it just gets kind of

160:24

buried. That was one of the weird things

160:26

that I had also seen that I don't know

160:28

if it's true in the Epstein files that

160:30

there was talk about engineering a

160:34

pandemic.

160:35

>> Yeah. Yeah.

160:36

>> Was it did you

160:37

>> Yeah, I read that too. I read that too

160:39

that they were like actively working on

160:41

it like you know running models and

160:44

figuring it out and you know well if we

160:46

do this then this will happen and you

160:48

know they were pretty successful at

160:49

that.

160:50

>> But why would Epstein be involved if

160:51

he's a financeier? He was involved in

160:53

everything.

160:54

>> He was involved in everything. It was

160:56

like amazing the energy that that guy

160:58

had. Who has the energy to be like doing

161:01

all this stuff like all over the world

161:03

and like, "Oh, in Nigeria we're doing

161:05

this and in Yemen we're doing this and

161:07

here we're doing that and at the same

161:09

time trafficking all these girls and you

161:12

know and young children and like

161:15

all this stuff,

161:17

>> right? It says the energy to do that."

161:18

It says, "No credible evidence in the

161:20

recently released Epstein files links

161:22

Jeffrey Epste or his associates to

161:24

engineering the CO 19 pandemic. Claims

161:26

stem from a misinterpreted

161:29

2017 email referencing routine pandemic

161:32

preparedness discussions, not a plot."

161:36

So what was the claim? The original

161:38

claim go down.

161:39

>> I didn't ask it about psy

161:41

you you just asked it about engineering

161:43

a pandemic. So what is the pandemic

161:45

claims? Scroll up a little so I can read

161:46

that.

161:47

>> That's all. Scroll down a little. There

161:48

it goes. So 2017 email originally from

161:52

2015 discussions to Bill widely assumed

161:54

to be Gates

161:57

forwarded to Ebstein proposed

161:59

recommendations and technical

162:01

specifications for pandemic modeling of

162:04

various strains.

162:06

It focused on healthc care data

162:08

simulations for preparedness and

162:10

neurochnology not creating or

162:12

engineering a virus. Gates Foundation

162:15

later ran public event 2001 and 2019 a

162:19

standard exercise with John Hopkins and

162:22

WHO predating COVID reports. That whole

162:26

public event 2001 is [ __ ] weird.

162:30

Event 2001 is weird.

162:33

Uh context and debunking pandemic

162:36

simulations are common public health

162:38

tools for th like those for SARS or flu.

162:41

Right. But why is Jeffrey Epstein

162:44

involved in these discussions?

162:46

>> He's involved in everything. He's

162:47

involved in gravity.

162:48

>> But how [ __ ] weird is that? How weird

162:51

a pandem

162:53

>> a pandemic was reportedly mentioned in

162:55

the Epste

162:58

before the world.

163:00

>> Well, this is what my friend Eddie

163:01

>> and creating the illusion. In the

163:02

meantime, Galileain Maxwell is uh

163:05

running the Reddit forum on world news.

163:07

Like she's literally shaping the world

163:09

news Reddit forum Reddit forum time.

163:12

Yeah,

163:12

>> she was running the world news forum on

163:14

Reddit.

163:15

>> Yeah, she was and it all went dark the

163:16

minute she got picked up. Her uh her

163:18

person, but she was like the the main

163:21

contributor did thousands of uh posts

163:24

like all day long posting world news

163:26

shaping our perception of things.

163:29

>> One email was a subject preparing for

163:31

pandemics was sent by a person whose

163:34

name was redacted.

163:36

By the way, the um did you see that?

163:38

>> Why would they redact the person who

163:40

sent that?

163:41

>> Yeah, good point.

163:41

>> That's not a victim. You're supposed to

163:43

redact.

163:44

>> I think they just they did like

163:45

supposedly they just did massive

163:47

redacting. But

163:48

>> sometimes you can see like oh the name

163:50

is short it's probably Bill and then the

163:53

one that comes after that if it's a

163:54

little longer it might be Clinton and if

163:56

it's a little shorter it might be Gates.

163:58

You know like you could but again that's

164:01

just you know

164:03

it's like there's no found. It's like

164:06

plausible deniability until until they

164:08

release all these names. Did you notice

164:09

that um uh Jeffrey Epstein's Fortnite

164:13

account

164:14

>> suddenly became active in uh Tel Aviv

164:17

and that somebody is playing under his

164:19

right after his supposed death,

164:21

>> right?

164:22

>> Suddenly he's playing Fortnite again.

164:23

[laughter]

164:24

>> Yeah. He doesn't even have the decency

164:26

to make a new account.

164:27

>> Yeah. Well, he wants to keep all of his

164:28

like, you know, his stats. wants to keep

164:31

all that stuff and he's safe in uh you

164:35

know in another country.

164:36

>> So do you think they just like did

164:38

that's another thing. There was another

164:39

Reddit thread about some guy who said

164:42

that he was a guard.

164:44

>> It was a 4chan thread.

164:45

>> Was it 4chan?

164:46

>> Yeah.

164:46

>> So it was a 4chan thread where this guy

164:48

said that he was a guard at the facility

164:51

and he posted this before Epstein was

164:54

killed.

164:54

>> He was a guard. They uncovered using

164:56

whatever way they do it, but using phone

164:58

records or whatever from 4chan, they

165:00

discovered he was a guard and that he

165:01

was like a legit guy. He got caught

165:03

basically talking about it that they

165:05

snuck they they use a decoy body. There

165:08

was an unscheduled uh ambulance arrival

165:12

that night. They never logged in and

165:14

you're always supposed to log in.

165:16

There's footage of like, you know,

165:17

orange uh people in orange moving

165:20

through the facility on the um you know,

165:23

just glimpses of it on

165:24

alive somewhere.

165:27

>> It's

165:28

>> It's not possible.

165:29

>> It's not impossible. It's probable.

165:33

>> Also, didn't

165:34

>> It's a probability. I mean,

165:36

>> whatever.

165:37

>> It's more than a possibility.

165:38

>> The guy who did the autopsy, did

165:39

anything happen to him?

165:42

The guy who

165:43

>> he committed suicide.

165:45

>> Yeah, let's find that out. [laughter]

165:46

That would be [ __ ] crazy because that

165:49

happened to the guy who did the autopsy

165:51

on Andrew Breitbart. Didn't he wind up

165:53

dying shortly after that?

165:55

>> Like Andrew Breitbart. Yes. And who was

165:57

the guy who said the

165:57

>> podesta alarming amount of people commit

165:59

suicide?

166:00

>> Alarming

166:01

>> who are you know doing this stuff who or

166:03

die of something to do so. Yeah.

166:05

Suddenly they do it. I came in jail who

166:08

committed suicide and they didn't commit

166:09

suicide. They got killed by their s.

166:11

Nobody bothered checking in on that.

166:13

>> Yeah, that makes sense. Um the guy who

166:16

did the autopsy for Jeffrey Epstein, did

166:19

anything happen to him? Uh I mean it was

166:22

a woman

166:22

>> a woman

166:23

>> chief New York chief medical examiner

166:25

Dr. Barbara Samson and she just resigned

166:28

uh like a couple like a year ago.

166:29

>> Okay. So nothing happened to her. You're

166:31

talking about evil. You know who the

166:33

devil was in The Exorcist?

166:34

>> Who?

166:36

>> Uh well they say it's like pizuzu and

166:39

we're presented with an actual devil.

166:41

But when you actually watch the movie,

166:43

there's kind of evidence that uh and and

166:46

people have talked about this that uh

166:48

you know there's evidence within the

166:50

film that uh it's it's it's more than

166:55

just demonic possession that the demonic

166:58

possession comes from someplace. And by

166:59

the way, Jeffrey Epstein was uh doing

167:01

also funding research in uh how trauma

167:06

uh affects like clairvoyance and

167:09

telepathy and things like that. how

167:10

you're able to invoke those out of uh

167:14

traumatic out of trauma. And in The

167:17

Exorcist, there's uh you know, you have

167:20

uh Reagan, who's uh Linda Blair, and uh

167:23

there's that party scene. And you

167:25

remember in The Exorcist, they're making

167:26

a movie within the movie. You know,

167:28

they're they're actually shooting a

167:30

movie. the the character of the mother

167:32

is uh um she's acting in a film inside

167:36

of the movie and there's a director in

167:38

that film and they have a big party

167:40

scene after it and the director uh you

167:43

know he's he's basically yelling at the

167:47

the butler her her house man you know

167:51

calling him a Nazi and stuff like that

167:52

and he's I bet you went bowling with

167:55

gerbles and things like that well for a

167:58

while he vanishes from the party and we

168:02

later see like Reagan afterwards like

168:03

completely flipped out like laying in

168:05

bed and then after that she comes and

168:07

then he's leaving the party and he turns

168:10

to the mother and he's like I have to

168:13

tell you something. I have to tell you

168:15

something.

168:18

[ __ ] it. And he leaves. And so and then

168:22

after that Reagan comes down and she

168:25

looks to the astronaut guy and says,

168:26

"You're going to die up there." And then

168:28

she pisses on the floor and everybody's

168:30

like, "Shit." And from that moment on

168:33

there's all this like uh highly

168:35

sexualized devil speaking through her

168:37

with a British accent and the guy the

168:39

director is a British guy. And so the

168:42

implication and then he is for some

168:44

reason left with Reagan and then gets

168:46

thrown out of the uh the balcony and his

168:48

head is twisted all the way around and

168:50

he's he dies as a character. Um, so the

168:53

implication is that the director is the

168:55

one who has raped Reagan and thus

168:58

invoking this demonic presence into her.

169:02

And it turns out that

169:03

>> I I thought it was a some totem that

169:06

they found and it was possessed

169:08

>> there. There all of that stuff is there.

169:10

The Ouija board is there and everything.

169:12

But it turns out that William Peter

169:13

Blatty uh actually made a movie called

169:18

um John Goldfrap Your Life is blah blah

169:21

blah. I can't remember the exact title

169:22

of the film and he made that movie with

169:24

Shirley Mlan and the director of the

169:27

film is this guy Jaye Thompson, British

169:29

director who looks exactly like the uh

169:32

the actor in that. And so the idea is

169:36

that uh Reagan's mother is Shirley Mlan

169:40

and uh Reagan is her daughter Sasha and

169:44

the British director is Jay Lee

169:46

Thompson. And when you start looking at

169:48

his movies, they're a little strange.

169:49

You know, there's like, you know, he

169:50

directed the original Cape Fear and

169:53

which has a kind of strange pedophilic

169:56

thing going on in it.

169:58

>> So does the second one

169:59

>> and Yeah. Yeah. They Yeah, they all do.

170:01

And then uh you especially they they

170:03

amplify it.

170:04

>> Yeah. With Julia, Robert Jane.

170:06

>> He did this movie Kite with Bronson and

170:08

that all has kind of like a weird

170:10

pedophilic thing. did this movie the

170:11

reincarnation of Peter Proud where Peter

170:14

Proud dies and then uh or rather uh

170:18

Peter Proud remembers his reincarnation.

170:21

He remembers his iteration of his other

170:23

self who was murdered and then he hunts

170:25

down the woman who maybe did it and then

170:28

starts sleeping with her daughter which

170:30

is basically sleeping with his daughter

170:33

because he's reincarnated. So this guy

170:35

as a filmmaker has done all and so the

170:36

the question and and so William Peter

170:39

Blatty worked on that film with Shirley

170:41

Mlan and shortly thereafter wrote the

170:44

book The Exorcist and Sasha in her you

170:47

know uh autobiography even mentions uh

170:51

you know go the person on the cover of

170:52

the book looked a lot like me and

170:54

everybody's saying oh it's just a

170:55

coincidence and uh you know well I never

170:58

walked down the stairs on all fours and

171:01

I never vomited uh you know pea soup or

171:03

whatever. that none of that ever

171:05

happened to me. But there's a pretty

171:07

dark implication behind the whole film.

171:09

And I brought it up with William

171:10

Freriedkin. Hey, is this meant to be

171:13

Jaye Thompson? Did this like is this a

171:17

way to talk about that that actually

171:18

happened, you know, in real life? He

171:20

said, I cannot talk about that, but I'm

171:22

not saying you're wrong.

171:24

>> Whoa.

171:24

>> And uh and and so, you know, and there's

171:28

actually a moment where uh Reagan is

171:31

talking to her mother and she's like,

171:32

"Well, do you like him? Do you like him

171:33

like you like daddy? And so there's this

171:35

idea that he's been coming over and

171:37

they've been having this affair. And

171:39

then all of a sudden she says to her

171:41

daughter, and it kind of jumped out at

171:43

me when I rewatched it. Uh she says to

171:45

her daughter, "Well, uh I like pizza,

171:48

but I wouldn't marry one." And I was

171:51

like, "Oh my god, there's like a pizza

171:52

reference like in the middle of this in

171:54

the middle of everything that's

171:55

happening."

171:56

>> How long is that? That'sola, but

171:59

>> Ben Swan brought up during the whole

172:01

Pizzagate thing that got him fired.

172:03

>> But how long has the term pizza been

172:06

used?

172:06

>> Well, it jumped out at me and The

172:09

Exorcist is in the early 70s and uh and

172:12

so what is it 1971 and that movie that

172:16

he did with Shirley Mlan who is

172:18

effectively that's the movie that

172:19

they're shooting inside of the movie.

172:21

And so this was a way for Peter

172:23

Benshley, I mean not Peter Benley,

172:24

William Peter Blatty to uh to kind of

172:28

transcode all of that. And the astronaut

172:32

in the film, Shirley Mlan, talks about

172:34

the the I can't remember if it was her

172:36

husband or boyfriend that she remarried

172:38

who was an astronaut. And in her

172:40

autobiography, she talks about he how he

172:42

was cloned. He came back from space and

172:45

a different person that he was cloned.

172:47

And she kind of everybody kind of

172:48

laughed it off like, "Oh, it was just

172:50

kind of a joke that I wrote into my

172:51

autobiography."

172:53

But it's kind of weird.

172:55

>> Real weird.

172:56

>> Yeah, it's really strange. So, people

172:59

speak through movies and they they hide

173:02

information in in films. And so, I think

173:05

that

173:06

>> some more than others, right?

173:07

>> Yeah. William Peter Blatty kind of who

173:08

was doing all sorts of uh Ouija stuff

173:11

with uh Sherna Mlan who was really into

173:14

that kind of thing back in the you the

173:16

late 60s and early 70s and uh you know

173:22

he he sits down to write his book and

173:24

what's he writing about? Well, he's

173:25

writing that movie is about Shirley

173:26

Mlan, her daughter, her her daughter

173:29

Sash Sasha,

173:31

um Sachi, I'm sorry, Sachi and uh um you

173:35

know the astronaut and you know it's all

173:38

and Jaye Thompson who basically he

173:41

eviscerates within the film but in a way

173:44

that nobody really connects it. It all

173:46

happens off camera,

173:49

>> but but the implication is is that she

173:51

was raped by that director and from and

173:53

from that moment on has a kind of, you

173:57

know, she's speaking with a British

173:59

accent as the devil. It's his voice

174:02

actually that's coming out of her. She's

174:04

talking about, you know, being raped by

174:07

a crucifix.

174:08

>> That actor that's his voice. Is that

174:09

what you're saying?

174:10

>> Yeah, that's what I'm saying. It's like

174:11

the the voice of Ed of I think his name

174:13

is McGawan and he was uh he died like

174:17

shortly after the film was made also

174:20

shortly after The Exorcist was made.

174:22

>> Well, we know that people have encoded

174:24

very bizarre things like Cubrick was

174:26

famous for it.

174:27

>> Yeah. Well, that's Cubrick. Everybody

174:29

does it. I do it. Everybody does it. I

174:31

mean motion pictures are a kind of magic

174:34

spell and you know when you write you're

174:39

hearing I I hear voices and they come

174:41

through me and they land on the page and

174:43

I don't know where they come from but it

174:46

is it is a kind of

174:48

>> uh in invite to possession and that

174:52

these things come into you and that you

174:54

put it on the page and then you make

174:56

this movie and everybody like I said

174:58

sits in a theater in the dark watching a

175:00

flicker

175:01

of this thing and it's telling you both

175:02

our myths and traditions but it's also

175:05

predictive programming everybody and so

175:09

>> Jesus dude

175:10

>> have you seen [laughter]

175:14

>> have I seen what

175:15

>> well actually I I was thinking about

175:16

like that uh where the Daily Wire uh

175:20

thing but I you know media comes from a

175:22

lot of different places now uh we you

175:24

know we you don't know where you're

175:26

going to find your uh your next

175:28

entertainment and there's this show that

175:31

uh I really like that show Rome. Did Did

175:33

you see Rome?

175:34

>> No, I never saw it.

175:34

>> Okay. I loved Rome. It was uh

175:36

>> I watched the first episode and I

175:38

thought it was flat. I love it because

175:40

it told the story of ancient Rome

175:42

through, you know, uh through

175:45

Shakespeare and through history and

175:47

through uh Plato and you know all these

175:50

uh kind of um ideas of ancient Rome or

175:54

Socrates and all these ideas of ancient

175:57

Rome and it then it told a very ground

175:59

level story from the perspective of like

176:02

handmaidadens and centurions and still

176:04

has Mark Anthony and Cleopatra and

176:05

everything going on in it but it tells a

176:07

very you know soap opera-like drama

176:10

through it. And so there was this other

176:11

show and it had been out like three

176:14

seasons when I started watching it. And

176:16

it did the exact same thing. Nobody had

176:19

ever like nobody was talking about it.

176:21

Nobody had ever heard about it. Most

176:22

people didn't even know about it. It's

176:24

The Chosen. Do you know this show?

176:26

>> What was that?

176:27

>> It does the exact same thing, but it

176:28

does it with the Gospels. And it's all

176:30

about Christ. And it's like a low-budget

176:34

uh or it was lowbudget crowdfunded story

176:38

of Jesus and it just basically like Rome

176:41

tells this historical tale and about

176:44

Jesus and okay so I'm watching I've seen

176:48

every movie about Jesus ever made. I've

176:52

seen King of Kings of both versions.

176:54

I've seen you know uh the Zepharelli

176:56

film. I've seen Last Temptation of

176:58

Christ. I've seen uh The Passion of the

177:00

Christ. I've seen all of them. I've seen

177:02

the Jeremy Systo uh Jesus

177:06

movie. I've seen everything. I've worked

177:08

with Paul Verhovven on his Jesus uh film

177:11

that was unproduced. And so like I've

177:14

had a lot of experience in it and I

177:16

never really got it to be perfectly

177:18

honest. I never really understood the

177:20

story. This show I started watching it.

177:23

I was like, "Okay, I've got a chip on my

177:24

shoulder. Let's see." And it's really

177:26

cheap. It's like rocks are made out of

177:28

styrofoam. they can't afford a uh you

177:31

know um a house and so they just use

177:34

blankets and a gourd hanging and so it's

177:36

like it's really really inexpensive and

177:38

the the script is even a little bit

177:40

contemporary and which almost becomes

177:42

like a joke as you're watching it. It's

177:44

kind of funny but lo and behold I'm

177:46

watching it and there came a moment by

177:49

about episode three where it was like

177:50

ding I get it like Jesus is kind of punk

177:54

rock. He's he's basically saying there

177:57

are no rules to anything like you know

178:01

you can commit miracles on the Sabbath.

178:03

You like there are no rules. Anybody is

178:06

led. All you need to be is wanting of

178:07

salvation. And it was like a third eye

178:10

opened up to me. And this show is

178:12

fantastic and it breaks all the rules.

178:14

It's outside of the Pharisees of

178:17

Hollywood. you know, they uh um one guy,

178:20

this guy Dallas Jenkins, who's

178:22

absolutely my favorite uh modern

178:25

filmmaker right now. I think this guy's

178:27

brilliant. He's directed every single

178:29

episode of this show and they've got

178:31

like seven seasons out and you can watch

178:33

it for free. It's

178:34

>> on what?

178:35

>> On anything. Like if you have an Apple

178:37

TV, you can just look up their the

178:39

chosen app and boop, up comes the uh the

178:42

chosen app and

178:43

>> so it's an app thing. or you can watch

178:45

it on YouTube or you can watch it I

178:47

think Netflix event I think it was

178:48

Netflix eventually bought it and now

178:50

they're showing it basically you can see

178:52

it anywhere they give it away the way

178:53

the Gideonss give away the Bible and um

178:57

and you know it it I thought it was

179:00

fantastic and then season 2 came around

179:01

and suddenly they had all this money and

179:03

they're doing all these like uh you know

179:05

they've got this ancient Judea set with

179:07

cobblestone streets and you know like

179:09

this detailed set and Roman colonades

179:12

and stuff like that and I I was like,

179:14

"Wow, like they really got a big

179:16

budget." And then I looked it up and I

179:16

was like, "Oh, no. They're using the

179:18

Mormons have all these standing sets for

179:20

their biblical productions in Utah and

179:23

they're incredible. These sets are

179:24

unbelievable. If I had known, it's like

179:26

Chinacha in Utah. It's uh it's it's

179:29

absolutely fantastic." And um and the

179:32

characters are like they only have money

179:34

for like three Romans costumes probably.

179:38

And so they're kind of like making do

179:40

with what they have, but they've got

179:41

this guy playing the legot there who is

179:44

hilarious. He's an in the first season.

179:47

He is absolutely hilarious. And the show

179:49

is great. And then like proper

179:51

television, you're watching it and

179:53

you're starting to love these characters

179:54

and you're starting to like it's and

179:56

it's you know what it is the bread and

179:59

butter of Hollywood is revenge and

180:01

wrath.

180:02

>> Like that's what makes that's the the

180:04

fuel that that pushes most Hollywood

180:06

movies. It is much more difficult and

180:09

and requires much more maturity to make

180:12

a movie about forgiveness. And this kid,

180:14

Dallas Jenkins, I call him a kid, but

180:16

he's not a kid. That's an insult. He's

180:18

uh he's super great. He um uh he is

180:22

making every single episode is

180:25

effectively because it's the gospels

180:27

about forgiveness. And he has done this

180:30

magnificent unbelievable achievement.

180:32

And the show is huge now. They've got

180:34

like seven seasons. They've built a

180:36

studio, you know, like outside of Dallas

180:38

Fort Worth on a Salvation Army property

180:40

that they've built, you know,

180:42

soundstages and everything.

180:43

[clears throat] And it is um I think and

180:46

and like and that's like you can get it

180:49

anywhere. You can watch it anywhere. And

180:51

they're making programming that should

180:53

have been on HBO. It should have been

180:54

produced by HBO the way Rome was. And

180:58

instead, it's just it's coming out of

180:59

the ether. And it's almost like with the

181:02

inattention given to you know uh most

181:07

modern

181:09

or or rather the the way that people are

181:12

making things that they're focused on

181:14

wrath and revenge like this other thing

181:19

like the Pen Dragon cycle and the chosen

181:21

have kind of risen out of out of the

181:24

vacuum that those other that the studios

181:26

have and broadcasters have kind of

181:28

created because they're not no longer

181:30

are making that kind of product at least

181:32

not as much. And so I I think this is

181:35

actually one of the most exciting times

181:37

in in media and and television. Yeah, I

181:40

definitely think it's a very unusual

181:42

time where the normal people that are

181:45

producing things don't have

181:48

a complete monopoly on what people see

181:51

and that many of the times these

181:53

alternative things have gotten much

181:54

larger than the mainstream things. I am

181:57

I find it like almost impossible to get

181:59

a movie going. Like I'm uh you know I'm

182:01

like an independent filmmaker. I go out

182:03

there and I usually I work on a script

182:05

and then I figure out the budgets and I

182:06

figure out and I go out and I hit the

182:09

pavement and it's like really [snorts]

182:10

hard part probably because I'm a

182:11

flatearther kid. I am not a flatearther.

182:14

[laughter] I just like to provoke people

182:16

but um uh you know I go out there and I

182:19

try to get the stuff made and it's like

182:22

almost impossible. And then I built a

182:24

technology company over the last year

182:27

and uh basically making AI movies and

182:31

all of a sudden boom like that money

182:33

gets thrown at it and all of a sudden

182:35

just by attaching the word AI and that

182:37

it's a technology- based company all of

182:40

a sudden investors you know came in and

182:43

we're in production on three films now

182:45

>> AI right now

182:46

>> three I know that's the crazy thing is

182:48

that it was so easy for me to get that

182:50

going and so difficult for me to get a

182:52

traditional movie going through the

182:53

traditional route like going to you know

182:55

A24 blah blah blah trying to like you

182:57

know hit the pavement oh I have to go to

183:00

Europe to gather together financing and

183:02

everything like that no just put AI in

183:03

front of it and all of a sudden you're

183:05

in production on three features and

183:07

we're making a Christmas movie that a

183:09

family Christmas movie that'll be in

183:11

theaters this uh this holiday season.

183:13

We're making a faith-based film for next

183:15

Easter and then we're making a kind of

183:17

big romantic war epic and like as

183:21

classical movies and we have like a

183:22

proprietary stack of technology that we

183:24

use for our process and I partnered with

183:27

this company Massive Studios AI and uh

183:32

formed my company which is General

183:33

Cinema Dynamics and I'm based here in

183:36

Texas now and uh or my company is and

183:40

I'm slowly transitioning

183:42

>> nice And it's like it's actually kind of

183:46

I think you know so many people are

183:48

against AI like Gilmo and you know love

183:51

him but he's like [ __ ] AI [ __ ] AI but

183:53

all it is is visual effects

183:55

>> and I have experience like with that

183:56

Beowolf movie doing it and what used to

183:58

be a million dollars a minute is now

184:00

$5,000 a minute and so to do it really

184:03

really well like it looks

184:06

kind of amazing actually. And so I think

184:09

for independent cinema and for the

184:10

future of film and television

184:12

production, these are super exciting

184:15

times.

184:15

>> All right, Roger, we just burned through

184:17

3 hours plus.

184:18

>> Really? Oh my god.

184:19

>> Yeah, it's already 4:00 this share with

184:21

you. All right, so what I pulled up is

184:23

this.

184:24

>> This is NASA, right? This is propain.

184:27

So this is a FAR TV. They're pulling in

184:29

multiple feeds. There's three different

184:30

boxes at the bottom. As you can see,

184:31

this one here in the middle says

184:32

offline. So, as I showed you also, I

184:35

pulled up the NASA feed, which is this

184:37

says it's offline. When that is offline,

184:41

this channel adds a 3D model showing

184:44

where the satellite currently is so that

184:46

you can still follow along.

184:48

>> 30 minutes ago, it wasn't offline and it

184:49

was showing a different feed. And I wish

184:50

I could have showed to you then, but I

184:52

didn't interrupt. So,

184:54

>> got it.

184:54

>> There is a flat earth YouTube or Reddit

184:56

account asking this exact thing.

184:59

[clears throat] What is that? And the

185:00

people on the flat earth Reddit gave me

185:03

the answer.

185:04

>> Yeah, those the crazies the crazies have

185:07

come out to uh

185:10

>> Okay,

185:11

>> so there you go. So that was what that

185:12

was.

185:13

>> Well, I'm glad we put that to

185:15

>> So it just says the video description

185:16

switch to a simulation with the ISS

185:18

above the Earth when the connection is

185:19

lost, aka off.

185:20

>> I was going to point that out because

185:21

you can see the stars in there and you

185:23

can't norally see the stars while you

185:24

can see the Earth. I'm glad we can be

185:26

comforted by at least one thing that is

185:28

secure and stable in our understanding

185:31

of reality.

185:32

>> Roger, that was very fun though. Thank

185:33

you very much. Let's do this. Pleasure.

185:36

It was a good time.

185:36

>> Really super pleasure.

185:37

>> Thank you, brother. Appreciate you very

185:38

much. All right. Bye, everybody.

185:45

[music]

185:48

[laughter]

Interactive Summary

This podcast episode covers a wide range of topics, starting with anecdotes from classic Hollywood, including William Shatner's ADR and Orson Welles' Gallow Wine commercials. The discussion then delves into the evolution of filmmaking, contrasting traditional film techniques with modern digital cinema, and how changes in production (like Netflix's guidelines) impact storytelling and the cinematic experience. Various filmmakers such as Orson Welles, Guillermo Del Toro, Ridley Scott, and Werner Herzog have their works critically analyzed, with specific praise for 'The Last Duel' and 'The Counselor.' A significant portion of the conversation shifts to conspiracy theories, exploring the Epstein files (particularly the sulfuric acid order), 9/11 theories concerning WTC Building 7, the 'New Chronology' theory about falsified history, and the Flat Earth theory, presented as a thought-provoking perspective rather than a firm belief. The speakers also touch upon the concept of predictive programming in movies, the nature of evil, and the impact of technology (like AI in film) and political agendas (like DEI in Star Trek) on contemporary media. The rise of independent and faith-based productions, such as 'The Orville' and 'The Chosen,' is highlighted as a counter-narrative to mainstream content.

Suggested questions

11 ready-made prompts