Repair Work Causes 100 Year Old New York Carpark To Collapse | 2023 Ann Street Disaster
352 segments
So, just before we get started with this
week's video, I'm really happy to
announce that I have these root cause
analysis cards up for sale on my Band
Camp, as well as a new cassette tape of
some of my new music up for sale. I
really hope you check it out. And
without any further ado, let's get on to
this week's video. Repair works are a
vital part of building maintenance. Be
it the odd bit of rewiring, plumbing,
updating, reflooring, or pointing, etc.
This is much more prevalent in older
buildings. As like everything in the
world, age takes its toll. And to stay
fresh for the future, you need to keep
on maintaining your usefulness in order
to save off the bulldozers. The
importance of knowing the area you're
going to work on is also very important
because a small job can turn into an
absolute nightmare when you open up an
unexpected rat's nest or some bodgege
previous fix. This kind of is the case
back in 2023 when a very old building
was undergoing some repair works where
the workers assumed one thing that ended
up with this as the aftermath. Today
we're looking at the 2023 New York City
parking garage collapse. My name is John
and welcome to Play Difficult. This
video wouldn't have been possible if it
wasn't for my YouTube Patreon and Kofi
members. If you want early access to the
channel's videos, then you can from just
one pound per month. And as always, the
links are in the pin comment below.
Also, whilst you're there, check out
some of my other bits like the music I
make and random bits and pieces I sell
on reverb. Again, the links will be down
below
[Music]
background. So, this car park video is
different to the ones more recently.
on my channel of unexpected self
deconstruction in that the structure was
not fairly new. Instead it was the best
part of a century old when it decided it
didn't like being a car park anymore.
Thus our story begins in the year 23.
Not 2023
but 1923. This is an street Manhattan
New York. And in 1923, a building
standing on this plot of land around
number 57 is just a year away from being
condemned. In early 1925, a demolition
permit and alteration certificate was
issued. This would pave the way for the
building in our video. A certification
of occupancy would be issued in January
1926, stating a garage for more than
five autos. The building used cinder
concrete slabs reinforced with welded
wire fabric. These were supported on
concrete encased steel beams and girders
which were also supported on internal
concrete encased steel columns and
perimeter unreinforced loadbearing walls
and peers. Some of the brick perimeter
walls were constructed with the garage
in 1925. However, some others were
reused from older buildings that had
been on the site's pre-new build. And
just so you know, the foundations for
the building were spread footings. Over
the years, the building would receive
various modifications to increase its
car loading capacity. In 1957, the roof
was modified to add more parking with a
stipulation for passenger type vehicles
only. Being a parking garage in a
massively congested city like New York,
it would not be much of a surprise that
it saw a lot of use over the years.
Hundreds of tons of vehicles each day
would show on the building structure
with noticeable cracks, reinforcement
rusting, loose brick work, and
deteriorating concrete being a not
uncommon sight for motorists as their
family cars were parked. In 2003, and 6
years later, the city department of
buildings issued to the car park's owner
violations regarding poor maintenance
and illegal modifications. It was found
the building had experienced structural
damage during these notices. It was not
new, however, as over its operating
life, it had racked up multiple concerns
with staircases being cracked, spooling
concrete, and exposed steel beams. But
even though falling apart, a car park
had quite a few regular customers. One
such was New York City Sheriff's Office,
who regularly park some vehicles on
site. In 2010, repair works was
submitted to the Department of Buildings
and the work to add new supporting beams
was undertaken. 11 years later, a new
rule came into effect in New York City.
This would require parking structures to
have regular department of building
inspections. The building's owners used
the consultants on retainer Experian
design group to undertake a survey of
the car park in May 2022 in preparation
for the city rules for submitting a
report by the 31st of December 2023.
The 3D survey used by EDG found some
issues which would require fixing. Most
notably cracking on pier E3 directly
beneath a thirdf flooror gerder. The
company came back 4 weeks later for a
second 3D scan. During this, they
identified Pier E3 again as needing work
and identified it as a masonry column
encasement instead of what it actually
was, which was a solid brick loadbearing
pier. The difference would change the
way any repair work would be undertaken.
As it was just an enc casement, the load
of the floor above it would have been
taken by a steel column which the bricks
were encasing. On top of that, EDG did
not identify the cracking brick works
condition as unsafe.
Instead, the pier was a solid brick
arrangement. I know I'm repeating myself
here a bit, but the difference is that
if you remove the bricks from the solid
brick pier, then you are removing the
thing holding the weight above you. On
the 21st of March and 22nd of March
2023, EDG workers tasked with doing
another survey to assist in drawing up
repair plans discovered further damage
to Pier E3, and that was that some
cracked bricks had been removed prior to
their visit. In April, the garage repair
drawings were issued. There it was set
out that the brick work would have to be
removed and rebuilt. No instructions for
shoring up the floor and roof materials
being held up by the pier had been set
out. Which leads us onto the disaster
and repair works are set to deal with
the cracking brick work at Pier E3.
The disaster. It is the 18th of April
2023 and car park employees begin
removing damaged brick and mortar from
the upper section of pier E3 on level
two. As each brick that was being
chiseled out and removed, it began
loading up more stress on the pier's
remaining brick work.
This work did not have the required
permit from the city, but I suppose the
managers of the car park didn't think
it'd be too much of a problem due to
still thinking it was an enc casement
rather than the actual thing holding the
floor up. The removal of the damaged
brick showed no steel support behind.
Photographs were taken and sent to EDG.
This was at around 10 3 in the
afternoon. EDG project manager Vivec Sha
instructed the workers to replace the
bricks which is all good and all
although no warning of urgency or danger
of the building was communicated to the
workers. Also, the lack of information
about the danger meant no attempt at
shoring was made on site. The workers
did not place any new bricks on the
pier, but they were very quickly running
out of time. Meanwhile, at 4 minutes
4:00 p.m., a car park member of staff in
a vehicle on the roof backed into a
drive aisle and drove past pier E3 and
into the vehicle lift. At around the
same time, the garage partially
collapsed on the northeastern and
southeastern quadrants of the building.
The second floor crashed into the first,
bringing down the structure above it.
Cars plunged into the wreckage as the
building let out a deafening crash,
interrupting the hustle and bustle of
the New York landscape. Soon enough,
multiple 911 calls came flooding in and
the first responders arrived on scene.
The adjoining buildings were evacuated
and in total, the collapse would end up
causing quite a widespread error of
effect. Subway services nearby had to be
operated at lower speeds. Nearby Pace
University classes were cancelled and
multiple areas had to be shut off due to
structural fears for the remaining parts
of the building, including its
streetside facade.
The building operated on a valley
parking service which limited the
numbers of people inside at the time of
the collapse. However, seven workers
were injured requiring minor medical
treatment. The collapse would take one
victim though, garage manager,
59year-old Willis Moore. His body would
be pulled from the wreckage the day
after the collapse. It was estimated
that 40 cars were in the building at the
time of the disaster, which would
require removal by crane and an
estimated insurance cost for the
vehicles alone, coming to $1.5 million.
Demolition of the structure would begin
on the 20th of April, but not before
investigators would descend upon the
site for evidence gathering. This took
place using LAR scans and 360°
photography to build up a state of the
car park post collapse. Interestingly,
the investigating would be jobbed out to
a third party company instead of by the
city itself.
The company was L Consulting Structural
Engineers, which leads us onto our next
section of the video,
the investigation. So fairly soon after
the April 2023 collapse, LER was held on
retainer. They began by looking over the
photographs taken during initial first
responders work and started digging into
the building's history. As demolition
began, drones and cameras were employed
to gather evidence of the structure as
parts were removed. Important sections
were marked as evidence for fire
inspection and laboratory testing later
on. This in conjunction with witness
testimony and reviewing the surveys
undertaken by EDC gave investigators a
pretty good sense of the cause of the
collapse. Clearly the start of the
disaster was at Pier E3
as that was the epicenter of the
self-granded part of the building. This
was the exact location that the masonry
was being ripped out for replacement
works. It was discovered that Pier E3
was actually a repurposed chimney from a
previous party wall and it was not well
built for the task it was meant to do.
As stated by Le, the pier was not well
integrated to the party wall, leaving it
poorly braced against buckling, unable
to effectively distribute concentrated
loads from the floor girders into the
surrounding wall and more highly
stressed than a pier that is well
integrated to the surrounding wall. The
building was very troubled throughout
its life with a total of reported 64
building code violations between 1976
and 2023 alone. It was deteriorating at
such a rate that multiple areas were at
a fraction of the strength that they
were meant to be, such as rusted away
steel work and severely cracked brick
peers. But what was the collapse
sequence? Well, the repair works on
column E3 severely weakened the support
for the third floor girder. At around
the same time, it was at its weakest,
i.e. with many bricks removed, a vehicle
was driven on the roof above Pier 3.
Around the same time, this was just
about the right amount of extra weight
to set off the collapse. It crushed the
remaining bricks and mortar in pier E3.
This made the third floor girder to drop
a few inches, in turn, creating a void
on the pier at the third floor. The void
left only supports on the party wall to
hold up the upper story of pier E3. Soon
enough, this connection at the party
wall failed, thus bringing down the roof
girder into the third floor and down and
down and so on. Pier E3 was likely not
even built to codes of its day next to
the party wall and not built into it,
which when added to the neglect that the
building went through meant that it was
a ticking time bomb as noted by LER in
their report. During its 98-y year
lifespan, Pier E3 suffered long-term
progressive deterioration, likely caused
by a combination of natural aging and
long-term exposure to moisture and
potentially aggravated by the elevated
stresses due to the above described
design and construction deficiencies.
And this deterioration resulted in
severe cracking in the pier. The straw
that broke the camel's back was though
the improper survey that incorrectly
identified the pier as having steel
inside. Again for the LER report,
EDG failed to require shoring and
probing to verify the apparent
assumption that Pier E3 consisted of
nonstructural brick encasement of a
structural steel column. The collapse
was a real eye openener for the state of
many buildings in New York City. In the
aftermath, 61 parking garages would be
deemed to be immediately hazardous.
Understandably, the collapse would
generate multiple lawsuits against the
building's owners, which are still
underway, although I reckon they will be
successful as the LER report was
released only in April 2025,
which was rather damning as we've seen
during this video. So, that's my video
on the An Street car park collapse. It's
going to be three on my scale, and this
is what I've got for my root cause
analysis card. Do you agree? Let me know
in the comments below.
This is a pl production. All videos on
the channel creative comation shell like
licensed pl videos produced by me John
in the currently quite warm corner of
southern London UK. And all I have to
say is thank you very much for watching
and Mr. Music. Can you play out please?
[Music]
[Applause]
[Music]
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video examines the 2023 collapse of an aging parking garage in New York City. Built in 1926, the structure suffered from decades of neglect, poor maintenance, and structural deterioration. The collapse was triggered by faulty repair work on a load-bearing pier (Pier E3) that had been incorrectly identified by consultants as a non-structural masonry encasement for a steel column. When workers began removing bricks, they weakened the support holding up the upper floors. Coupled with the weight of vehicles on the roof, this caused a progressive structural failure that resulted in the death of the garage manager and extensive legal and regulatory consequences for the city.
Videos recently processed by our community