HomeVideos

From Bold Idea to Global Legacy: 25 Years of MIT OpenCourseWare Live Webcast

Now Playing

From Bold Idea to Global Legacy: 25 Years of MIT OpenCourseWare Live Webcast

Transcript

6682 segments

0:10

for you

0:12

a little bit. I don't know.

0:16

>> Okay.

0:16

>> Actually, too much uh improvements.

0:21

>> Might not be.

0:22

>> Forget it.

0:24

>> But does this work? Uh

0:26

>> yes,

0:27

>> it does.

0:30

Can I just make a quick announcement?

0:36

>> Good morning. Good morning.

0:39

Good morning everybody. Thank you so

0:41

much for coming to celebrate Open

0:44

Corser's 25th anniversary with us. For

0:46

folks in the room, please take a moment

0:48

to silence your phones. Please

0:51

appreciate that. And your laptops or any

0:54

device. We appreciate that. Thank you so

0:57

much.

1:04

Good morning.

1:07

>> Um, my name is Dimmitri Bert Simas. I'm

1:09

the vice provos for open learning. I

1:12

have been at MIT 41 years and uh, as

1:16

many of you, I love this institution.

1:19

Dear colleagues, friends,

1:27

dear colleagues, friends, members of the

1:30

MIT community and the world. I'm certain

1:32

there are people who came um I know

1:34

actually some people came all the way

1:35

from many far places. 25 years ago at a

1:39

time when most universities were asking

1:41

how do we monetize online content? MIT

1:44

asked a fundamentally different

1:46

question. How do we give it away? That

1:49

question, bold, counterintuitive, and

1:53

unmistakenly MIT, changed the world.

1:58

President Charles Vest Chuck, uh, as

2:02

he's known, saw what others could not.

2:05

He declared that MIT would freely share

2:09

its knowledge with anyone, anywhere, an

2:12

act of breathtaking institutional

2:15

generosity.

2:16

Jack understood what that knowledge

2:19

unlike material resources grows when you

2:23

share it.

2:25

Hal Abson was the intellectual architect

2:28

who saw that openness was not a threat

2:31

to academic academic excellence but its

2:33

greatest amplifier. His advocacy laid

2:37

the found the philosophical and pra p

2:39

practical foundations for everything we

2:42

celebrate today. Dig Yu who is in the

2:45

audience had the original idea I'm told

2:48

he also turned vision into reality with

2:51

extraordinary operational skill and

2:53

quieted quiet determination he built the

2:56

infrastructure and teams that transform

2:58

an audacious idea into a living platform

3:02

to all three on behalf of this community

3:07

and the millions you have touched thank

3:09

you

3:11

500 million learners ers from villages

3:14

in Sapharan Africa, from bustling cities

3:17

in South Asia, from small towns in Latin

3:20

America and Eastern Europe have come to

3:23

MIT's virtual doors and found them wide

3:26

open. Six millions more on our YouTube

3:30

channel alone.

3:32

But let me make it more personal.

3:34

Several of my own PhD students have told

3:37

me the same story. They grew up far from

3:41

Cambridge.

3:42

They had talent, drive, and curiosity.

3:46

But what they lacked was access. And

3:49

then they found OCW, a lecture on

3:52

optimization, a problem set that opened

3:55

a door they did not know existed.

3:58

OCW did not just teach them, it found

4:02

them. It reached across oceans and said,

4:06

"You belong here." And now they are here

4:10

contributing to MIT and to the world.

4:15

And yet we are just beginning.

4:18

Artificial intelligence, adaptive

4:20

learning, immersive digital experiences.

4:23

These tools gives us the ability to do

4:27

what Chuck, Hal, and Dick dreamed of at

4:30

a scale and depth they could scarcely

4:33

have imagined.

4:36

We will move from open access to open

4:38

impact. I aspire ensuring not just that

4:42

knowledge is available but it transforms

4:44

lives. If OCW prove one thing, it is

4:48

this. When MIT opens its doors, the

4:51

world walks in.

4:55

25 years ago, MIT made a bet on

4:57

openness, on generosity, on the belief

5:00

that knowledge is a public good. That

5:03

bet has paid off 500 millions times

5:06

over. To President V's memory, to Hal,

5:09

to Dick, and to everyone who made OCW

5:11

possible, you gave the world a gift that

5:14

keeps giving. Now it is our turn to

5:17

carry it forward with the same courage,

5:20

the same conviction, and the same

5:22

unmistakable MIT spirit. you will see

5:26

today that the future of open learning

5:29

is bright and it belongs to all of us.

5:32

Thank you.

5:39

I would like to invite um my colleague

5:42

and friend Kurt Newman who heads OCW.

5:49

>> Thanks Dmitri and thank you to everyone

5:51

for joining us on this wonderful

5:53

celebration day. Um, while some of the

5:56

numbers that Dmitri has just shared with

5:57

you, reaching 500 million learners for

6:00

instance, that just tells part of the

6:02

story, the true measure of this work

6:05

lives in the experiences of the learners

6:07

and the educators around the world and

6:10

their stories of curiosity sparked,

6:13

resilience strengthened, and

6:14

opportunities unlocked.

6:17

We hear from learners around the globe

6:18

who've used open courseware in deeply

6:21

personal ways. For some, it begins with

6:23

curiosity. For others, it's really a

6:26

tool for navigating challenging times.

6:29

And for many others, it provides a

6:31

flexible, self-directed path for

6:33

upskilling and for growth. Take for

6:36

example a learner named Thomas from

6:40

Chile who first discovered open

6:41

courseware. When he was 17 years old, he

6:44

explored a course principles of

6:46

pharmarmacology to advance his

6:48

after-school scientific project of

6:50

extracting and studying medicinal

6:52

properties of plants and then shared

6:55

what he learned with the members of his

6:57

16person science group. His story

7:01

reflects the power of access to meet

7:03

learners where they are and what they're

7:04

interested in. He told us speaking in

7:08

Spanish, "Thanks to the pharmarmacology

7:10

course, I can collect and synthesize the

7:12

information we need to learn to prepare

7:15

the medicines for our project.

7:18

Take advantage of MIT's free digital

7:20

technologies and tools." He says, "Keep

7:23

an open mind as to how the knowledge can

7:26

be applied."

7:29

And this is also where the the

7:31

distinction an important distinction

7:32

between simply free and truly open

7:35

knowledge becomes so important. Free

7:38

access is powerful and absolutely

7:41

necessary. But openness goes further. It

7:44

invites participation. It allows

7:46

learners and educators not just to

7:48

consume knowledge but to adapt it, to

7:50

share it, and make it meaningful in

7:53

their own communities and their

7:55

contexts.

7:56

We see that in the ways educators around

7:58

the world are using these materials,

8:00

enriching their teaching, experimenting

8:02

with new approaches, and building a more

8:04

connected and collaborative global

8:06

learning community. We're grateful to

8:09

know that this brave leap into open

8:11

education that MIT took 25 years ago has

8:14

been in the words of our colleague James

8:16

Gapagosclan

8:18

of educational technology and learning

8:20

resources and distance learning at

8:21

College of the Canyons. He says not just

8:24

pathbreaking it's been path making for

8:28

other institutions to follow

8:31

and we see this in the broader momentum

8:33

of open education as a movement through

8:36

the dedication and leadership of our

8:38

colleagues like James the rise of open

8:40

textbooks for instance just one form of

8:43

open educational resources has already

8:45

saved students in the United States and

8:48

Canada hundreds of millions of dollars

8:50

while also improving their learning

8:52

outcomes. comes.

8:55

So with this, I'd like to invite my

8:57

colleague Dmitri back up to

9:01

introduce our very special guest.

9:11

As we celebrate 25 years of MIT Open

9:14

Courseware, we also recognize the

9:16

leadership that continues to carry this

9:18

mission forward. It is my honor to

9:20

introduce MIT's president, Sally

9:23

Kornflum.

9:24

President Kornflum. Sally led has led

9:28

with clarity and conviction championing

9:31

MIT core values of excellence, openness,

9:34

freedom of expression, and institutional

9:36

independence, especially important in

9:39

these trying times. She has also

9:42

articulated with remarkable clarity

9:44

MIT's mission to advance knowledge to

9:46

serve the nation and the world grounded

9:50

in merit, access and open educational

9:52

opportunity. These are the very

9:54

principles that have saved MI have

9:56

shaped MIT open courseware which is part

9:59

of MIT open learning from the beginning

10:03

and that continue to guide the future of

10:05

open education at MIT. Please join me in

10:08

welcoming Profess uh President Klu.

10:19

Thanks so much Demetus and Kurt. Uh and

10:22

good morning to everyone here. Uh and a

10:24

special greeting to the faculty and

10:26

staff who organized today's symposium

10:28

and to all the faculty, educators,

10:31

learners who share their experiences and

10:34

insights today. So, uh, 25 years ago

10:37

when OCW sprang to life, I lived 600

10:40

miles away. So, I can't say I was at MIT

10:42

for 40 years. Um, but even over that

10:45

distance, we heard the reverberations

10:48

right away and for a long time

10:50

thereafter. It was an incredibly brave,

10:54

selfless, and bold thing for MIT to have

10:56

done. So generous and so generative both

11:00

at the same time. Now more than two

11:03

decades later, this MIT spirit and

11:07

values that inspired OCW, the boldness,

11:10

the instinct for service, and the desire

11:13

for impact that were really central to

11:15

OCW is what drew me here to MIT. So it's

11:19

a wonderful honor to join you for this

11:21

milestone. And although I wasn't

11:24

actually here at the time, in some ways

11:26

I feel that I was because MI OCW's

11:29

founding story is woven deeply into sort

11:32

of the mythology and ethos of MIT. In

11:36

2001, the whole world of higher

11:39

education was talking about digital

11:41

learning. Actually, the world of higher

11:43

education, more accurately, was

11:44

fretting. Um, no one knew what to do.

11:48

And then the institute made a big bet

11:50

with the full weight of its reputation.

11:54

With the announcement of MIT Open

11:56

Courseware, it committed to a 10-year

11:58

initiative to do something no university

12:00

of MIT stature had ever dared to open

12:04

the doors without requiring a key. The

12:07

idea was to share lecture notes, problem

12:09

sets, syllabi, exams, and video lectures

12:12

from thousands of courses. a public

12:15

website covering the MIT curriculum.

12:18

Now, at the time, the prevailing wisdom

12:21

in higher education was to protect the

12:23

brand, to be cautious. Actually, I still

12:25

hear that about lots of things,

12:27

protecting the brand.

12:29

But leaders like Chuck Vest, Dick Yu,

12:32

Chagaru, Miaawa, and Hal Abson along

12:34

with all of MIT's at the time, 950

12:37

faculty members saw it very differently.

12:40

They believe that the brand of MIT

12:43

wasn't something to be hoarded. It was

12:45

something to be shared. At its core,

12:48

open courseware is a bold digital

12:51

manifestation of MIT's fundamental

12:54

mission to advance knowledge, to educate

12:57

students, and to serve the nation and

12:59

the world. By its very existence, it

13:03

asserts that the MIT experience should

13:05

not be defined by the walls of our

13:08

classrooms, but by the reach of our

13:10

ideas. Today, this risky experiment has

13:14

evolved into a global cornerstone of

13:17

educational equity. Open courseware has

13:20

cemented MIT's leadership in open

13:22

knowledge and access to education. We

13:25

have proven, as Demetra said, when you

13:28

share excellence, you don't actually

13:30

diminish its value, you multiply its

13:33

impact. As Curtain and Demetrius both

13:35

noted, the numbers are striking. More

13:37

than 500 million people have learned

13:39

from MIT's materials thanks to open

13:42

courseware. In fact, you know, I was in

13:43

meeting with some first year students

13:45

earlier this year, and I asked a student

13:48

how she wound up at MIT. She was in a

13:50

sort of underprivileged area. She hadn't

13:52

had access to any AP courses. She had

13:55

taken five MIT classes before even

13:57

applying to MIT. And I think that this

14:00

is the kind of story that we hear over

14:03

and over again um when we talk to

14:05

students who are here at MIT and we talk

14:08

to others elsewhere who were touched by

14:10

uh the influence of these courses. For

14:13

perspective, 500 million is the

14:16

population more than the population of

14:18

uh US and Mexico. Um, but the true

14:21

legacy isn't in the metrics. It's in the

14:24

landscape of education that has been

14:27

fundamentally reshaped. OCW didn't just

14:30

open MIT's doors. It kicked off a global

14:33

movement. It inspired universities

14:36

across the world to launch their own

14:38

open course initiatives, expanding the

14:40

open education movement far beyond what

14:43

anyone could have imagined in 2001.

14:46

Today, OCW is cited in national

14:49

education strategies, in by nonprofit

14:53

initiatives, by international

14:54

development programs. Proof that

14:56

openness can scale when you lead with

14:59

vision and with courage. It's actually

15:02

embodied in things like the teacher in

15:03

rural Appalachia using OCW to refine

15:06

their physics curriculum. It's in the

15:08

high school in Virginia who used OCW, as

15:11

I mentioned before, to stand in for AP

15:13

coursework not being offered at the

15:16

school and a student who found yes, she

15:18

could do the work. She could go to

15:20

college. And it's in the lifelong

15:22

learners living anywhere in the world

15:25

who through OCW found the spark to

15:27

improve their own knowledge and to

15:29

change their communities for the better.

15:32

That includes learners like uh Sujud

15:35

Aluma from Sudan. Sjude discovered OCW

15:38

when she was struggling with her

15:39

university's programming courses. She

15:41

went on to complete more than 20 OCW

15:44

courses, strengthening her skills and

15:47

ultimately discovering a passion for

15:49

data science. Today, she uses that

15:51

knowledge and passion to tackle real

15:54

world challenges, including responding

15:56

to devastating floods in her own

15:58

country. Her story is a reminder of how

16:01

open knowledge can transform not only

16:04

individual learners but their whole

16:06

communities. As you'll hear from

16:08

panelists today, open courseware has

16:10

broadened MIT's impact to every corner

16:14

of the globe. It has democratized the

16:16

school the the tools of discovery and

16:18

given millions of people the power to

16:21

change their lives. We feel its impact

16:24

here on campus as well. What we often

16:26

don't emphasize enough is that OCW isn't

16:30

doesn't just share MIT's teaching, it

16:33

improved MIT's teaching. Faculty came to

16:36

see their teaching in a new light. They

16:38

were able to collaborate across

16:40

departments and they embraced digital

16:42

tools that have shaped how we educate

16:45

our own students. In fact, OCW laid the

16:48

groundwork for every digital learning

16:50

advance that follows. MITx, MIT Open

16:53

Learning, MicroMasters, and now MIT

16:56

Learn. Each new platform stands on the

16:59

shoulders of this original brave idea.

17:02

With MIT Learn, our new online platform,

17:06

people have access to even more online

17:08

courses and resources from across the

17:11

institute, so they can learn with and

17:13

from MIT.

17:15

In short, the world is different because

17:18

of a bold idea that started here. And

17:20

I'll note that much of this progress was

17:23

made possible by the contributions of

17:26

thousands of supporters, including early

17:28

funders, the Huelet Foundation, the

17:30

Melon Foundation, Abinio, as well as

17:32

newer foundations like Arcadia. We're

17:35

deeply grateful for all that they do to

17:37

support MIT learning. Needless to say,

17:41

OCW would be an empty vessel without the

17:43

extraordinary intellectual contributions

17:45

of our faculty sustained over many

17:48

years. So again I do want to thank the

17:50

faculty. I want to thank the devoted OCW

17:52

staff and team past and present whose

17:55

perseverance, creativity and excellence

17:58

have powered this for a quarter century.

18:00

Their work in curating, organizing,

18:02

digitizing, maintaining thousands of

18:04

courses is a remarkable collective act

18:07

of s service to the world and this is

18:10

the legacy being celebrated today. We

18:12

know that the work of equitable access

18:15

is unfinished. Barriers to highquality

18:18

learning still exist, whether

18:20

linguistic, economic, geographic, or

18:23

technological. MIT remains committed to

18:26

lowering those barriers, expanding

18:28

reach, and really ensuring that

18:31

knowledge is not a privilege, but a

18:34

public good. As we look ahead, let's

18:37

continue to imagine boldly. Let's keep

18:40

asking what knowledge we can share, what

18:42

tools we can invent, and whose lives we

18:45

can help change next. As AI accelerates

18:48

the way we create, personalize, and

18:51

deliver knowledge, this mission becomes

18:53

even more vital. The world needs

18:55

trusted, rigorous, openly accessible

18:58

knowledge. And I believe MIT will

19:00

continue to lead in this era of

19:02

learning. So, thank you all for being

19:04

part of the journey. Um, I look forward

19:07

to seeing what exciting futures uh you

19:09

all will continue to build and to help

19:12

enable it in any way possible. So, thank

19:14

you

19:36

video.

19:51

>> There's this consistent vision.

19:54

MIT has asked itself in the words of TS

19:58

Elliott, do I dear disturb the universe?

20:03

And the consistent thing about MIT is

20:06

MIT has been willing to say yes.

20:16

Thank you all for u joining us here

20:18

today. As president of MIT, I've come to

20:22

expect top level innovative and

20:25

intellectually entrepreneurial ideas

20:28

from the MIT community.

20:30

>> Today, the word democratize seems very

20:32

cliched.

20:34

>> We invented that with knowledge and I

20:36

think it's a profound thing.

20:39

>> We went into this expecting that

20:41

something creative and cutting edge and

20:43

challenging would emerge, something that

20:45

would be consistent with MIT's mission.

20:49

But I must admit that open courseware is

20:52

not exactly what I had expected.

20:58

>> This idea started in 1999 2000 and

21:02

people would say there's this thing

21:05

called the internet. What is MIT going

21:08

to do about it?

21:10

>> It was sort of a feeding frenzy on the

21:14

possibilities of profiting from

21:17

knowledge.

21:20

The prevailing idea then was this is a

21:23

gold mine for universities to publish

21:26

their stuff and market it.

21:32

Part of the response was to create this

21:35

educational technology council.

21:39

The proposal on the table was that MIT

21:42

could enter into the space by offering

21:47

small modules packaged as a maybe at

21:51

that time a CD or some medium like that

21:54

whether it could go beyond that. We we

21:56

weren't sure

21:58

and the financial model conclusion was

22:01

it wouldn't work unless we do it at some

22:03

scale and at the end of the day it's

22:06

really not the pot of gold at the end of

22:08

the rainbow.

22:11

The question was what can we do that

22:15

really reflects MIT's values of

22:17

leadership of impact of excellence.

22:21

>> The key person really was Dick Yu. He's

22:25

the one who really had the initial idea.

22:28

>> I know exactly where I was. I was at

22:30

home. What I was doing, my wife

22:31

remembered where it was.

22:34

>> He was getting some food out of his

22:36

refrigerator, thinking about all of

22:38

this, and suddenly occurred to him

22:40

saying, "Why don't we just give it

22:44

away?"

22:47

>> I've heard it different ways.

22:48

>> Hal told us the story, and I don't know

22:50

if it's the right story.

22:51

>> I I was on an exercise bike at home.

22:54

I think I was on exasp

23:14

came about that we would give it away.

23:17

We won't make a dime but we would get

23:20

impact.

23:23

Open Courseware is a web-based program

23:26

that will provide free access to primary

23:29

materials for virtually every course at

23:32

MIT.

23:34

>> I remember hearing about open courseware

23:38

when it first got announced and we're

23:41

like, "Yes, this is so right. This is so

23:44

much what MIT is about."

23:47

>> It literally almost took my breath away.

23:49

I thought it was stunning.

23:51

No one was open licensing content at

23:56

that point in time, let alone full

23:57

courses. It was breakthrough thinking in

24:01

a lot of

24:05

a pretty long time of gee making sure

24:07

there's real real support from the

24:10

faculty and a lot of hearing, you know,

24:13

both enthusiasm and just a lot of

24:16

skepticism.

24:18

If students can go get this stuff on the

24:20

web, why do they need to come get a

24:22

university education?

24:25

>> People said, "Oh my god, you're giving

24:27

your crown jewels away." And many said,

24:30

"No, we're not because what is our crown

24:33

jewel is thinking. It's reasoning. It's

24:36

creating new knowledge. The knowledge

24:38

itself should be made available." I

24:41

mean, the sheer wisdom of that is pretty

24:43

incredible. Actually,

24:45

>> we have institutions like MIT and they

24:49

can only serve a limited population. But

24:52

if you can take the things that are

24:54

fundamental to how a faculty member here

24:57

teaches, many, many, many other students

25:00

can be affected.

25:04

The first time ever that my intro to

25:09

development class was put on OCW. I

25:12

think that very first year I taught more

25:15

student than I had ever taught before.

25:18

We taught this course on advanced

25:20

graduate level deep learning. In just 2

25:23

months, hundreds of thousands of people

25:25

engaged with the content online. The

25:28

fact that something that we worked so

25:30

hard to build can spread so far beyond

25:32

these institutions doors I think is

25:34

amazing.

25:37

>> We were able to grow in terms of courses

25:42

very steadily but it was one course at a

25:45

time, one faculty member at a time.

25:48

Growth though in terms of users was

25:52

exponential.

25:54

The OCW YouTube channel with its 6

25:57

million subscribers is the most

25:59

subscribed YouTube channel from any.edu

26:03

out there. So, an indication of just the

26:05

the kind of global hunger for knowledge.

26:33

It's about empowering people to actually

26:37

use this technology to improve their

26:40

lives and improve the world.

26:45

I first came upon OCW when I was about

26:48

14 years old.

26:51

I'm originally from Ukraine and when the

26:53

war started and I was trying to find an

26:56

opportunity to learn more beyond high

26:59

school's curriculum.

27:04

I think I started with calculus one. My

27:07

English wasn't that good back in the

27:11

day, but I was trying to grasp what the

27:14

professor was drawing on the board.

27:16

>> And that is just one over 101.

27:20

>> Then as I learned English more, I became

27:24

a big user of the platform.

27:28

>> I remember my first interaction with

27:30

this. I was looking up something on

27:33

YouTube and then I see results of an AI

27:35

class in MIT and I remember asking

27:37

myself which MIT is this? This can't be

27:40

the MIT. Why would they give this out

27:42

for free?

27:45

>> OCW became this stepping stone

27:49

and right now I'm a first year student

27:52

here and I'm deeply grateful for that.

27:58

If you can inform someone and give them

28:00

that knowledge and help them make better

28:04

decisions as people, multiply that fact

28:07

a thousand times and you know you're

28:09

building a better world. In my opinion,

28:12

>> it's not only us putting out stuff that

28:14

other people can use for free. It's to

28:16

encourage other people to improve and

28:19

build on it.

28:23

One of the cool things about using MIT's

28:25

OCW is being able to go in there and use

28:29

what works or using it as a starting

28:32

point and then adding a bunch of

28:34

examples. Somebody gets more, the other

28:36

person has to get less. So, we could use

28:38

them in a way that actually makes sense

28:40

to the things my students need to know.

28:43

Me and a few other students, we got this

28:46

idea that we can translate OCW materials

28:51

into first Ukrainian and then maybe

28:53

other languages.

28:55

They were really welcoming for us to

28:58

translate their materials.

29:00

>> It's always good to ask how could it

29:02

fail. For most of the courses we've

29:04

done, it's caption translation, but also

29:07

there is one specific course where we

29:09

translated audio and you can turn on the

29:12

toggle and professor Kvisher will speak

29:15

Ukrainian.

29:18

>> It maintains her natural pace, her tone,

29:22

and it's really fascinating.

29:26

Our

29:28

most popular courses tend to be in

29:30

calculus and physics and learning to

29:33

program.

29:34

>> Let's look at what this code's supposed

29:35

to do.

29:36

>> But a vitally important part of the

29:39

education in MIT is the integration of

29:41

other disciplines across the social

29:43

sciences, humanities, and the arts.

29:46

People might not realize that there's a

29:49

pretty vibrant set of physical education

29:52

experiences reflected on open

29:54

courseware, such as videos about scuba

29:57

diving and archery.

30:06

President Fest's vision was always that

30:09

open courseware would be a permanent

30:12

part of MIT and for that to happen we

30:16

had to make sure that it delivered real

30:19

value to MIT.

30:23

One of the way in which we're using the

30:25

open courseware material is as part of

30:27

flip classroom. students who listen to

30:29

the video at home and when they come to

30:32

class my students do case studies. So

30:36

open courseware material is used as very

30:39

very very very rich textbook in a way.

30:43

I work with many PhD students and every

30:46

year two or three of my students would

30:49

not be at MIT if it wasn't for OCW.

30:53

They learned maybe linear algebra,

30:55

quantum mechanics and so forth,

30:57

increasing their aspirations to proceed

30:59

further in science and technology. So in

31:01

addition to helping people, it also

31:03

helped MIT because it definitely

31:05

attracted people that would ordinarily

31:07

not be here.

31:12

It's a face that launched a thousand

31:14

ships. A lot of later online efforts

31:17

look back to open courseware and say

31:19

that was the model.

31:21

Open courseware was a big part of my

31:24

thinking of like well you know what if

31:25

MIT could stand on this principle that

31:27

certain things should just be free and

31:29

available to the world I want to stand

31:31

for that same principle. So there's a

31:33

direct through line from what MIT did

31:36

with open courseware to the existence of

31:37

Khan Academy.

31:39

This is also maybe my origin story with

31:41

open education because when I was going

31:44

to start going to college, you know, in

31:45

my early 20s, I, you know, six years not

31:49

thinking about math at all. Like I

31:50

didn't remember anything. I didn't

31:51

remember how to add fractions. And so I

31:54

actually very heavily used things like

31:56

Khan Academy to kind of get me back up

31:58

to speed. And for someone who was kind

32:00

of taking this not straightforward path,

32:03

it was vital.

32:05

UCW was a pioneer

32:09

in making educational resources

32:11

available to the public. The whole open

32:13

education resources movement has led to

32:17

thousands of open textbooks and many

32:20

many open courses that are available on

32:23

the web.

32:24

>> I've been teaching with almost

32:27

exclusively open education resources for

32:29

like 10 years now.

32:31

It's really made me think about some

32:33

things differently because, you know,

32:35

education is a human right. Everybody

32:38

has a right to learn, not just people

32:40

who can afford to pay for it.

32:57

If we democratize education, we will

33:01

have those future geniuses who can push

33:04

society forward.

33:07

>> I envision the future where we combine

33:10

multimodel data in a more global way in

33:14

languages that are not only English but

33:16

multiple others

33:18

>> is what we call speed. Having a trusted

33:20

source like open coursework is critical

33:24

for the future and we at MIT are

33:28

committed to maintain that.

33:31

Courage is not when you do something

33:33

because you know it's going to work.

33:36

Courage is when you do something because

33:38

you're doing it because it's right. Um

33:40

and you know there are risks. I mean

33:42

there's something very profound about

33:44

our ability as an institution

33:46

collectively to take the risk when we

33:49

make these forays.

33:51

If we ever say we won't do something

33:53

because it's too risky,

33:56

that's not the MIT brand and in fact

33:57

it'll take us away from the very thing

33:59

that brought us to where we are.

34:02

>> Think's next for open courseware and

34:04

open education. What is the next 10

34:05

years hold? the next 10 years for open

34:10

courseware is going to be an adventure.

34:13

I certainly don't know exactly where

34:15

this will lead just as we didn't really

34:17

know 10 years ago where it would lead.

34:20

But it's incumbent on all of us to think

34:22

hard about it. And it's incumbent on OCW

34:26

to listen a lot to its users around the

34:29

world for clues to where we could most

34:31

productively go because it's impacted

34:34

the lives of a huge number of people in

34:37

ways that you couldn't possibly have

34:38

envisioned.

35:11

Thank you.

35:15

I thought I might tear up a little bit.

35:18

Um, that's a world premiere of that

35:20

video. Uh,

35:23

congratulations to the whole team that

35:25

helped make this happen. Uh, so I'd like

35:28

to invite uh the panelists for uh for

35:31

this panel with uh three current MIT

35:34

faculty to follow up on that as we're as

35:37

we're coming up and getting started. Um

35:40

just wanted to say um there are so many

35:43

people that have helped build this

35:45

movement and you know unfortunately we

35:49

couldn't uh we couldn't get all their

35:51

voices included. Um so I just want to

35:54

give another sort of collective big

35:56

heartfelt thank you and round of

35:58

applause for everyone who's contributed

36:00

to make the open education movement

36:02

possible.

36:05

you know who you are.

36:08

So,

36:10

OCW at MIT exists because the MIT

36:14

faculty have been willing to share their

36:16

teaching freely and openly with the

36:18

world. And so, I'm so glad to now be in

36:21

conversation with three of these faculty

36:24

to share their their perspectives more

36:26

in the moment. I'd like to start with

36:28

Annabelle, senior lecturer in electrical

36:31

engineering, computer science and a

36:32

digital learning scientist in open

36:34

learning's delta team. Delta stands for

36:36

disciplinary experts in learning

36:38

technology and applications where she

36:40

focuses on introductory computer science

36:42

education. She teaches and develops

36:45

MIT's foundational programming courses

36:47

working to make rigorous computer

36:49

science accessible to beginners. Um, we

36:53

currently have three OCW courses by

36:56

Anna. She's also featured in a recent

36:58

pot radio video podcast episode where

37:00

rubber duck ducks play a really good

37:02

supporting role.

37:05

Um,

37:07

Professor John Gruber is forward

37:09

professor of economics and chair of the

37:11

economics department here at MIT, former

37:13

director of the healthc care program of

37:15

the National Bureau of Economic

37:17

Research, and a former president of the

37:19

American Society of Health Economists

37:21

and the Eastern Economics Association,

37:23

published more than 200 research

37:24

articles, edited seven research volumes,

37:27

and has written three books, including

37:29

Public Finance and Public Policy, a

37:30

leading undergraduate text in its

37:32

seventh edition. In 2006, he received

37:35

the American Society of Health Economist

37:37

inaugural medal for the best economist,

37:40

health economist in the nation aged

37:42

under 40. During the 1997 98 academic

37:46

year, Dr. Gruber was deputy assistant

37:48

secretary for economic policy, the

37:50

Treasury Department, key architect of

37:52

Massachusetts ambitious health reform

37:54

effort, and served on the health

37:55

connector board, the main implementing

37:57

body for that effort. and in 2009 to

38:00

2010 served as technical consultant in

38:02

the Obama administration worked with the

38:05

administration and congress to help

38:06

craft the patient protection and

38:07

affordable care act

38:10

on OCW. John's m introduction to

38:12

microeconomics course is the most

38:14

visited non- stem subject that we've got

38:17

and a brand new version of his public

38:19

policy and public finance course is

38:20

getting lots of attention. He's also a

38:22

recent guest on the Chalk Radio video

38:24

podcast and uh you should check out the

38:26

bonus content where he responds to some

38:29

YouTube comments. It's quite a treat. Uh

38:32

Christopher Capzola is the Elting E.

38:34

Morrison professor of history from 2022

38:37

to 25. He also served as senior

38:39

associate dean for open learning in that

38:42

role overseeing open education offerings

38:44

including open courseware MITx as well

38:47

as several other programs. He continues

38:50

to facilitate conversations about

38:51

generative AI in teaching and learning

38:53

at MIT and advocate for open,

38:55

affordable, and equitable post-secary

38:57

learning in US higher ed. For over 20

39:00

years, he's taught US history at MIT and

39:02

is the author of two books on US

39:04

political history. Chris was also an

39:06

early OCW participant starting with

39:08

three courses in our big 500 courses

39:10

launch back in 2003. So I'd like to

39:13

start um with a with a reflection on the

39:17

range of reasons that people have for

39:19

participating in open coursework. I'd

39:21

like to hear from you if I may

39:23

professionally and personally why you

39:26

choose to do so. So start with you Anna.

39:28

You know your introductory programming

39:30

courses are collectively I think our

39:32

most popular topic in the last few

39:34

years. What's motivated you to to share

39:37

this stuff with the world on OCW and to

39:39

keep doing so?

39:40

>> Uh thanks. Uh so both personally and

39:44

professionally there I guess two

39:46

reasons. So OCW I think came out when I

39:49

was in high school and I probably

39:51

started using it in undergrad. Uh there

39:54

were, you know, probably physics and

39:56

calculus courses and a couple of CS

39:58

courses originally and I just used them

40:00

as resources to help augment my learning

40:03

uh with the assignments that were

40:05

available for free and the exams that

40:07

were available for free and I would

40:09

just, you know, use them to just help me

40:11

study. And it is absolutely wild to

40:15

think that 15 years later, I would then

40:17

put my own courses that uh I was

40:20

teaching at MIT on OCW. And it was it's

40:23

just I was reflecting on that yesterday

40:25

and it it was just wild to think about

40:28

just that, you know, going from a user

40:30

to uh someone who's just now making

40:32

these um you know uh materials. It's

40:36

just it's been great to have this

40:37

opportunity. I just like again I have no

40:39

words for that. Um and so that's my

40:42

personal reason. Professionally I think

40:45

I I've been thinking a lot about the way

40:47

students learn and they learn best by

40:50

repetition. Um, and so, you know,

40:53

repeated exposure to concepts is very

40:55

important for students to learn the

40:57

materials. And so I feel like if I put

41:01

my materials out there, it gives

41:02

students an opportunity to see the same

41:04

material they might be learning in their

41:06

own classrooms in a completely different

41:08

light from a completely different

41:09

perspective. You know, me, um, you know,

41:12

is different than their current teacher.

41:13

And so I think, um, that it it helps

41:16

them retain the material a lot a lot

41:20

better. and it kind of, you know, it's

41:22

it's a reinforcement learning uh outside

41:24

of their own classrooms. And so, in a

41:27

sense, I feel like it's rewarding

41:29

students who put in the effort to um to,

41:34

you know, who have to put in the effort

41:35

to learn, who have students who have

41:37

this intrinsic motivation to just go out

41:39

there and uh actually understand the

41:41

material as opposed to just, you know,

41:43

pass the class. So, those are my two

41:45

reasons. Personal, I used it, now I get

41:47

to contribute. Second, it's just

41:50

pedagogically a a good thing to do.

41:53

>> Wonderful. Thank you. Yeah. Um I have

41:55

all kinds of follow-up questions I'd

41:56

love to ask, but we're running a little

41:58

bit behind time, so going to keep

42:00

rolling. Um so to you, John, now you've

42:04

also been a long-term participant. In

42:06

fact, uh we've done several versions

42:08

each of your intro to microeconomics and

42:10

and public policy and finance courses.

42:12

And you were also one of the first

42:14

participants back in 2003. I wonder if

42:17

you could cast your mind back to that

42:20

early moment when you were first invited

42:22

to participate in this thing that we

42:24

didn't know what it would turn into.

42:26

What what motivated you to to take the

42:28

leap?

42:30

>> You made it incredibly easy. I mean,

42:32

look, we're getting a lot of praise, but

42:34

like what's it involve? I got to put a

42:35

mic on when I lecture. I got to upload

42:38

my problem sets and notes, and you come

42:39

back to me and say, "It's done. Look at

42:41

it." I'm like, "Okay, that's great." I

42:43

mean, what's not to like? You just made

42:45

it unbel you. The resources MIT put in

42:48

to making this easy for our incredibly

42:51

busy faculty are the differencemaker. If

42:53

MIT had come to me and said look we want

42:55

you to go record a whole bunch of

42:57

separate lectures. I would have said no.

42:59

Uh basically we are busy busy people and

43:02

you have taken the resources to make it

43:04

easy. And uh the benefit to me all comes

43:08

from something that no one under 45 or

43:12

under 50 will understand which is there

43:14

used to be a time before phones when you

43:16

talk to people on planes. You won't

43:18

remember this. And every single time I

43:21

sat down next to someone and said I

43:22

taught economics, they'd say to me,

43:24

"God, that's the worst course I ever

43:25

took." And I thought, "How can this be?"

43:27

I mean, I said I'm not your favorite,

43:29

but it can't be your worst. I thought

43:30

it's just taught badly. often it's

43:32

taught in high schools by the gym

43:33

teacher or the history teacher. They

43:34

don't know what they're talking and so

43:36

to me the benefit is to be able to get

43:39

the world to understand economics uh in

43:41

in in much better and and improve their

43:44

lives in that way. Wonderful. Thank you.

43:46

Um, Chris, um, I'm especially curious,

43:50

you know, having published on OCW, then

43:53

you took the leap to like join the

43:56

family and work with us very closely for

43:58

a number of years kind of what what drew

44:01

you in to just be that much more

44:03

involved in this in this open courseware

44:05

work.

44:06

>> Yeah. No, it's been uh it was a great

44:08

adventure and part of it is, you know, I

44:11

blame Sanjay Sarma for um, you know, for

44:13

coming up with the idea. Um, but I think

44:15

the real answer is I'm going to start

44:17

actually with with a with an equation.

44:19

And that equation is 4 + 10 equals 16.

44:24

Right? So Anna is sitting here saying

44:27

like, what's going on over in the

44:28

humanities?

44:29

>> God, we let this guy in OCW. I'm not

44:31

sure we want to teach it our students.

44:32

>> So those those are UN sustainable

44:35

development goals. Four is education. 10

44:38

is reducing inequality. And 16 is just

44:41

in democratic institutions. Right? And

44:43

so I just fundamentally believe that 4

44:45

plus 10 equals 16. And I believe that if

44:48

that MIT through open courseware um and

44:51

all of our open education initiatives,

44:53

right, um has committed, right, to

44:56

solving that problem, right? And I just

44:58

wanted to kind of roll up my sleeves and

45:00

be part of it. And I had the chance to

45:02

work with 175 amazing staff members who

45:05

make that happen every day.

45:07

>> Thank you. Yeah, we're grateful that you

45:09

made that Jeep. That

45:10

>> four plus 10 equals 16. I'm going to

45:12

remember that. Thank you. Yeah. Um I

45:15

want to turn a little bit more attention

45:17

to the the stories of impact that you've

45:19

heard. Um John, you you uh referred to,

45:23

you know, the people you sat next to an

45:24

airplane who didn't necessarily have a

45:26

good experience. Um is there a story of

45:28

positive impact that you've heard from,

45:31

you know, things that you've shared

45:32

yourself or more broadly in open

45:34

education that that really stands out

45:36

for you?

45:37

>> Yeah, I started I'm I'm arrogant enough

45:39

that I keep a little folder of all the

45:40

nice emails I get. I started to go

45:42

through them and rather than just

45:43

reading a particular one, I just thought

45:45

I would reflect on the incredible

45:47

diversity of countries and uh people

45:51

that I hear from who say, you know, I

45:55

never thought I could take a class of

45:57

this quality. I never thought I could

45:59

learn so much about economics. Thank you

46:01

so much for setting me on this

46:02

educational path or for educating me.

46:05

And I guess personally I love

46:08

particularly the ones that say now I'm

46:09

going to go study economics. You know

46:11

that's what I wanted. And I love in

46:13

particular the messages I I get which

46:15

are you know I didn't really know about

46:17

economics. I attack your I took your

46:18

class. I'm going to go major economics.

46:19

I'm going to go further in economics.

46:21

And that is uh just incredibly

46:23

gratifying.

46:24

>> Wonderful. Thank you. How about you

46:26

Anna? Anything stand out?

46:27

>> Uh I have not been recognized on an

46:29

airplane yet. That's very growth mindset

46:32

but it's coming.

46:32

>> Yeah I know. growth mindset of me. Um,

46:35

again, I I don't have any specific

46:37

story, but like uh John here, I think

46:40

it's just there's um like an incredible

46:44

reach that OCW has. So, I've also been

46:46

contacted by, you know, students who

46:48

have taken the courses and there are

46:50

eight-year-olds who have taken the

46:52

courses. There are 80 year olds who have

46:54

taken the courses. There are students

46:56

who are blind who have taken these

46:57

courses and successfully gone through

46:59

it. Um there are people who you know go

47:01

through power outages every single day

47:04

and they have successfully gone through

47:06

the course and it's just like this

47:07

motivation to just you know their love

47:10

of learning that just kind of pushes

47:12

them on to just continue and you know

47:15

complete these courses and also

47:17

educators have taken the courses and

47:19

have gone on and you know taken some of

47:20

the things that we implement in our

47:22

classrooms and implemented in their own

47:24

like in um Nigeria especially they've uh

47:27

taken a lot of things that we've done

47:29

and just kind of implemented in their

47:30

own. So yeah, just a huge reach and love

47:34

of learning.

47:35

>> Yeah,

47:35

>> amazing to see.

47:36

>> Yeah, I'll I'll lift up that investments

47:38

that we make to make sure that our

47:40

content is accessible in all of the

47:42

different manifestations, you know,

47:44

really glad to hear that. Chris, any

47:46

particular impact stories for you? you

47:48

know there I mean there are so many but

47:50

I think uh it's worth putting a a thumb

47:54

on the scale for the people who take uh

47:56

OCW materials and do things with them

47:59

that we didn't imagine either in our own

48:02

classrooms or at open learning right who

48:05

and um and that that's the fundamental

48:07

sort of um motivation I think behind

48:10

open courseware and and why it's openly

48:12

licensed allows for reusing remixing um

48:15

and sort of making allowing people to do

48:17

creative things with it. And of course

48:19

uh some of the that most creative stuff

48:21

happens when people need to solve their

48:24

own educational challenges, right? And

48:26

we heard from Sophia from Ukraine and in

48:28

the video and there have been many other

48:30

learners who are displaced, refugees,

48:32

etc. Um who have like who have not let

48:35

that displace or or deter their

48:37

educational mission and that's been

48:39

super inspiring over the last few years.

48:41

>> Good. Thank you. Um, next question I'd

48:44

like to ask has to do with how

48:48

wonderful it's been to discover OCW's

48:51

reach across the whole lifelong learning

48:53

spectrum. You know, there was an idea, I

48:54

think originally, that it would mostly

48:56

be used by other educators in school

48:58

settings. And, you know, well over half

49:01

of our reach and impact has nothing to

49:03

do with people who are officially in

49:05

school. And each of you teaches a topic

49:07

that feels like especially sort of

49:10

resonant with sort of broad citizen

49:14

awareness at at this moment, you know.

49:17

Um what perspective might you have about

49:20

what OCW and open education more broadly

49:22

can do to support people's lifelong

49:25

engagement in in this field that you are

49:28

very deeply connected to? And Chris, I'd

49:29

like to start with you. This being a a

49:32

moment when so much history is being

49:33

made. Yes, more. Yes, more of it every

49:37

day. Um uh and

49:41

>> I think, you know, I'm going to answer

49:42

that question not just um thinking about

49:45

American history, although I'll get back

49:47

to that, but I think in many ways all of

49:50

these big concepts that we talk about

49:52

right now around lifelong learning, um

49:55

around workforce development, all of

49:57

those imagine people who are going to

50:00

school forever, right? people who will

50:03

who they may get a degree or not but

50:05

they will never graduate right they will

50:07

always be learners and if you trace that

50:10

back to its intellectual roots I think

50:14

you get back to 2001 um and the launch

50:17

of open courseware right because you

50:19

can't be a lifelong learner unless

50:20

there's lifelong learning materials out

50:22

there right um and I think that in order

50:25

to kind of empower those those those

50:27

learners um OCW and all of MIT's

50:30

initiatives play a real role in

50:32

Good. Thank you, John. How about how

50:35

about you? So much attention is put on

50:37

this thing that we call the economy and

50:40

its intersections with people's lives.

50:42

What do you what do you hope for there?

50:44

>> Look, I think another moment while I was

50:46

making history where where we're we're

50:48

struggling with democracy as a world

50:52

right now and there is a fundamental

50:54

link between being well educated and

50:56

supporting democracy. uh the the bedrock

50:58

of authoritarian leaders is they try to

51:00

cut down education. They try to limit

51:03

people's ability to understand what's

51:04

going on in the world. And the

51:07

fundamental resource we can provide to

51:09

fight that is free online education so

51:11

that people around the world can be

51:13

informed about what's really going on

51:15

about how to program a computer about

51:17

what's going on in history about how

51:18

economies work so that they can

51:20

understand that they should support free

51:22

and democratic societies uh to make the

51:26

best decisions and to support people in

51:28

the best way. And I just can't think of

51:31

a better way than what y'all have done

51:34

in making this kind of resource

51:36

available freely to people so that all

51:38

over the world where their leaders may

51:39

be trying to stop them from getting the

51:41

education they deserve and need, they're

51:42

meeting this human human goal of getting

51:45

that education.

51:48

and Anna um learning the program has

51:50

been for the past bunch of years an

51:53

incredible sort of gateway into you know

51:56

better jobs and so forth and so much

51:59

change a foot with what's happening with

52:00

AI. How do you think about this?

52:03

>> Uh so I'm not super worried about Gen AI

52:07

taking over our uh jobs. I'm super

52:10

excited about it because wait, not

52:12

because I don't want the jobs because it

52:14

will evolve as things always do. So, I

52:17

think uh okay, if I wore a hoodie, I'd

52:19

put that on right now because like the

52:21

thing about computer science is you

52:23

think about just hackers supposed to

52:24

like write code really quickly and, you

52:27

know, come up with, you know, come up

52:28

with it quickly and just like type type.

52:30

Um, but it's not about that. And I think

52:33

that's been a barrier for a lot of

52:35

people to get into computer science and

52:37

and programming because that is the

52:39

misconception. Even now I think that's

52:41

the misconception. But with Genai coming

52:43

on board, that part of doing the actual

52:46

coding is now going to be outsourced

52:48

most of the time to Genai. So I

52:50

personally think that now the computer

52:52

science education is going to go into

52:54

the bookend parts of programming

52:58

computer science which is the creative

53:00

part of coming up with the solution and

53:02

you don't need a typy type for that. You

53:04

just need a pen and pencil and

53:06

creativity. Um and then the other part

53:09

is the uh the testing. So you get code

53:12

back. How do you know if it's right or

53:14

not? And you'd have to do that whether

53:15

you did it yourself or whether the AI

53:17

wrote it for you. you can't really trust

53:19

yourself or the AI. So, both of those

53:21

pieces are a lot more creative than just

53:23

typy typy type code. Um, so I think it's

53:27

going to make programming a lot more

53:28

accessible to people um who, you know,

53:32

it's no longer like this hacker, you

53:34

know, this hacker thing. It's now just

53:36

going to be thinking up with uh coming

53:38

up with solutions to problems and then

53:40

figuring out, you know, well, what are

53:43

some tests that I need to run? what are

53:45

some possible, you know, ways that I can

53:47

break this code or things like that. So,

53:49

>> yeah.

53:49

>> So, we'll keep learning about that.

53:50

>> Keep learning about it and Yeah. Yeah.

53:53

>> Good. All right. Um, like to wrap up

53:55

with just an open question briefly. Um,

53:59

what's a hope that you have for the

54:01

future of this work? You know, we're

54:04

celebrating the 25 years today and also

54:06

projecting forward into the future. Um,

54:08

Anna, anything you'd like to start with

54:10

there?

54:10

>> Um, yeah. So I hope that uh OCW

54:14

continues to be offered exactly as is no

54:17

strings attached. I think uh learners

54:19

know what they're getting into whenever

54:22

you know when they see OCW. It's been

54:23

the same for 25 years and there's no you

54:27

know you know no hidden fees you know

54:30

nothing like that. It's a very

54:31

incredibly simple model for what

54:34

learners get out of it. Right? So you

54:36

have useful content and a glimpse into

54:40

MIT courses. That's it. And I think I

54:44

hope I hope it stays that way because

54:46

it's very simple and it works well.

54:48

>> Thank you, John.

54:50

>> Um I hope that we can find a more

54:55

effective hybrid of online learning and

54:57

inerson learning to provide lowerc cost

54:59

educational opportunities. I I think OCW

55:01

has been incredible. It must be continue

55:03

to be offered. At the same time, I feel

55:06

like the labor market is not yet

55:08

recognizing the credentialism of open

55:10

courseware because they still want some

55:12

of that real college feel. And I I'm

55:14

hoping that uh we can figure out a way,

55:17

you know, Esther in the video talked

55:19

about flip classrooms. We can figure out

55:21

a way to effectively partner with what

55:22

we're doing with in-person instruction

55:25

to provide a lowerc cost educational

55:27

alternative. I wish MIT be offered to 10

55:30

times as many people. It it can't

55:32

physically. it can online. Can we create

55:35

in ways that we can take the MIT OCO

55:37

material, pair it with some in-person

55:40

learning that sort of labor market

55:41

values and that people seem to want and

55:43

produce much less expensive education

55:46

for the masses.

55:47

>> Hear that?

55:48

>> All right, Chris. So, um, you know,

55:52

everybody all morning has been talking

55:53

about how big open courseware is and how

55:57

big it got and how fast. Um and my hope

56:00

actually is that MIT open courseware is

56:03

something small right a small part of a

56:06

much bigger open ecosystem right and

56:09

here it's worth thinking about MIT's

56:11

role in the development and adoption of

56:14

open software through the MIT license

56:16

and other mechanisms the role of MIT

56:18

community members in creating and

56:20

sustaining the creative commons um and

56:22

other tools for creatively sharing uh

56:24

work uh the leadership of the MIT

56:26

faculty and libraries in MIT's open

56:28

access policy, ongoing efforts to

56:31

challenge uh the market actions of large

56:33

for-profit publishers that disort

56:35

distort scholarly uh priorities. Uh

56:38

initiatives toward open science um

56:40

codified in federal legislation um in

56:43

the previous administration that enabled

56:45

the rapid broad dissemination of

56:46

publicly funded knowledge. Um and more

56:49

broadly uh both at our campus and and

56:51

beyond uh an open culture of sharing,

56:54

giving and openness um to make uh MIT

56:57

into the kind of institution that builds

57:00

bridges and not walls.

57:01

>> Yeah. If I may, sounds like you're

57:04

advocating let's keep losing market

57:06

share in the open space. Yeah,

57:08

>> indeed. What a Indeed. Let's do it.

57:10

>> All right. Thank you. Well, please uh

57:13

join me in thanking our panelists here.

57:20

We're we're we're running just a little

57:23

bit behind schedule. We now pretty much

57:25

caught up. Um I'm hoping that at the end

57:27

of our many of our panels will have an

57:29

opportunity for a little bit of Q&A at

57:31

the audience. Didn't quite land here.

57:34

our next, you know, our next session

57:36

will start at 15 past the hour and we

57:39

got to turn things around, bring up our

57:41

next panelists. Um, so that next

57:43

session, learning without limits, how

57:45

OCW opens opportunity for curious minds

57:48

worldwide. Again, we'll begin uh in

57:51

about 12 minutes from now. Please stay

57:54

tuned for this panel with learners and

57:56

educators.

58:10

I did not

58:29

go. the next

58:50

day.

58:55

Heat. Heat.

59:13

I got

59:34

water.

59:38

Okay.

59:49

All right.

60:29

Yeah.

60:42

Yeah.

60:56

Yeah.

60:58

Yeah.

61:08

Yeah.

61:31

that

61:41

number

61:44

That's probably

62:14

I can hear you as well, Victor.

62:16

>> Hi. It's so great to meet you.

62:49

Ah,

62:51

hey.

63:31

Heat. Heat.

67:36

Heat. Heat.

68:48

Heat. Heat.

70:21

Heat. Heat.

70:45

Heat. Heat.

71:07

Heat. Heat.

71:56

Come here.

72:16

Hey

72:25

Monday.

72:36

I can get a hug.

72:50

We should get going. You guys

73:26

Thank you.

73:54

Come on.

74:08

Yeah.

74:34

Thank you.

75:04

I

75:52

What did I get from there?

76:03

May I ask you to take my seat please so

76:07

we can get started.

76:43

All right, we're gonna get our next

76:45

session started

76:48

if we can get everybody seated again.

76:51

And uh hello to our online participants

76:54

as well. Sarah, my colleague Sarah

76:57

Hansen, I'll hand it off to you to get

76:58

us rolling. Thank you.

77:00

>> Thank you so much and thank you to all

77:02

of you.

77:04

>> I am I think it's just not on.

77:06

>> Yay. Welcome back everybody. Thank you

77:09

for joining our very special session on

77:12

learning without limits. It's wonderful

77:15

to see everyone in person and everyone

77:18

online. As we mark the 25th anniversary

77:21

of Open Courseware, we're not just

77:23

celebrating the breadth of knowledge

77:24

that's been shared, but we're also

77:26

celebrating the impact that it's had on

77:30

people around the world. And we're lucky

77:31

to be sitting next to some educators and

77:34

learners today. My name is Sarah Hansen.

77:38

I'm the assistant director for open

77:40

education innovation at MIT Open

77:42

Learning. and much of my work focuses on

77:45

the experiences of educators and

77:47

learners. So I really couldn't be more

77:49

pleased than to be moderating this this

77:52

panel today. Our session brings together

77:55

learners and educators whose stories

77:57

show the power of curiosity and access.

78:00

And I'm really excited for you to hear

78:02

directly from them. And bonus for you

78:05

today at the end if there's time you'll

78:08

have an opportunity to ask them

78:10

questions too. So, I'd like to introduce

78:13

the panelists. Um, we'll start right

78:16

here. Hinata Yamahara is a high school

78:19

student, a high school senior from

78:21

Georgia whose discovery of OCW opened

78:24

the door to his passion for urban

78:26

planning and helped him explore far

78:29

beyond what a typical high school

78:31

curriculum can offer.

78:34

>> Yeah,

78:36

I know. Please. Yes.

78:40

Dr. Victor Odum Muiwa joins us online.

78:44

We actually worked together, Victor, a

78:46

few years ago, so it's lovely to see

78:47

you. Um, he is an associate professor of

78:51

computer science at the University of

78:53

Logos, a leader in responsible AI

78:55

research and a former MIT empowering the

78:58

teachers fellow who has used OCW to

79:01

strengthen teaching, research, and

79:03

innovation capacity across Africa.

79:07

Dr. Yeah, please.

79:11

You're in the presence of greatness. You

79:13

should appreciate it.

79:15

>> Thank you. Thank you.

79:17

>> Good afternoon, everyone. Good day,

79:18

everyone. Thank you.

79:20

>> So wonderful to see you, Victor. Dr.

79:22

Elizabeth Syler

79:24

>> is a professor in the business

79:26

administration and economics department

79:28

at Worcester State University. You saw

79:30

her in the video. She advocates for open

79:33

educational resources like OCW and uses

79:36

them almost exclusively in her teaching.

79:45

And finally, Andrea Henchel is a

79:48

superstar. She's a PhD candidate in

79:50

aeronautics here at MIT. She's also a

79:53

veteran of the Air Force. And I know and

79:57

uh she's used OCW to adjust back into

80:00

academia. So, I'm really excited for you

80:02

to hear her story. So, let's give her a

80:05

round of applause, too.

80:10

Let's start at the beginning. I'm

80:12

curious, what inspired you to learn or

80:14

to teach with open courseware?

80:17

Was it curiosity, a specific need, or

80:20

may maybe even an unexpected discovery?

80:23

Um, and Hinata, I'd like for you to

80:25

start us off.

80:27

>> Sure. Yeah. So, um, is my mic working?

80:30

Uh I started off uh with open open

80:33

courseware um really unexpectedly. I was

80:35

just browsing the web for different uh

80:37

like I guess research just getting data

80:39

on a topic I wasn't really familiar with

80:41

but I wanted to learn more about. So I

80:44

was on a train from um Tokus Narita

80:47

airport if you guys have ever been

80:48

there. It's really far from the city and

80:50

you go through nothing to get into the

80:52

city. And in those like quote unquote

80:54

nothing areas they're building these new

80:56

towns and I was really curious to what

80:57

those were. And then while I was

80:59

researching that on the train, I was

81:01

really jet-lagged so I didn't get to

81:02

read it until I got to the hotel. But it

81:05

was MIT's open courseware course and I

81:08

was reading that. I knew nothing. So I

81:10

had to do a bunch of research as I was

81:12

reading the articles and listening to

81:14

lectures and stuff like that. But I got

81:16

to know a lot more and then I just kept

81:18

on being curious and then you know I was

81:20

on a trip to Japan but I just ended up

81:22

staying in my hotel room reading about a

81:24

bunch of other things.

81:26

I kind of wasted my parents' money, but

81:28

yeah, it was really nice. Um, I got to

81:30

pursue my uh I guess like passion in uh

81:34

urban planning. After that, uh I

81:36

continued to study it throughout my high

81:37

school years and uh open course where I

81:40

supported my time through that. It's

81:42

free. Um I thought they were going to

81:43

ask me for money. They never ended up

81:45

doing that. So that was a big part of

81:47

me. Yeah. As a broke high school

81:49

student, I can't really afford any extra

81:51

money to pursue my passion. So yeah,

81:53

that's where I got started with Open

81:54

Courseware. Nice.

81:55

>> Wonderful. And I'm seeing a pattern. So,

81:58

>> Professor Gruber talked about talking

82:00

about OCW on an airplane. You're talking

82:02

about trains. So,

82:05

>> Dimmitri, this might be an avenue we

82:07

need to explore in the future. Uh,

82:10

Victor, how about you? Can you share how

82:12

you first discovered OCW?

82:15

>> Yeah, thank you. Uh so my first

82:17

experience with OCW was based on my

82:21

application for the fellowship at MIT

82:24

which is the MIT ET program and so I had

82:28

to look at uh similar courses to the

82:31

courses I teach back home and so that

82:33

was my first experience with OCW and

82:36

when I actually came into MIT for the

82:38

fellowship uh I discover more resources

82:41

and then I got glued to it because I

82:45

could see a lot of content and more

82:47

interestingly the design of this content

82:49

made it more interesting to me and uh

82:52

that was the starting point. Thank you.

82:55

>> Thank you

82:57

Elizabeth.

82:59

So about 10 years ago, I was going to

83:01

teach a new class in teach a class for

83:03

the first time in negotiation. And as

83:06

you do, I looked at what commercial what

83:08

commercial textbooks were out at the

83:10

time and picked one and was and taught

83:13

from it. And you know, it was okay.

83:16

Actually, it sucked. Um, sorry, I'm not

83:19

going to tell you what it was. And also

83:21

at the same time um my our librarians I

83:25

think this was part of a state statewide

83:27

thing in Massachusetts but the

83:28

librarians at Worester State were really

83:30

promoting this thing called open

83:32

education resources and I had most of us

83:34

had never heard of this and you know

83:36

what there were these lists of like you

83:38

could go to these websites and look for

83:39

stuff and I was like yeah sure there's

83:41

going to be something at MIT about

83:43

negotiation and guess what there was

83:46

>> and so I found a course by that Mary row

83:49

I think you're the onbuds asked lots of

83:51

nods. I Yeah. Uh the ombbudsman been

83:54

here for many years, possibly decades,

83:57

uh taught a class for the graduate

83:59

business school here for um in 2001. So

84:02

her OCW materials are basically a stack

84:04

of paper, right? Paper. Yes. And it was

84:09

a treasure chest. It was amazing. It was

84:10

I didn't only get things that I could

84:12

use for my students for free instead of

84:14

having them try to

84:17

try to go online to pay $8 to buy

84:20

something from another school in

84:21

Cambridge. And um

84:25

yeah uh

84:27

I'm really sorry about that.

84:32

But also I learned so much about

84:33

negotiation because things that I did

84:37

not learn any place else because of she

84:39

was teaching from her experience with

84:42

literally thousands of people in

84:43

conflict and solving them

84:46

>> and um yeah it was amazing. So

84:48

>> thank you. Yes,

84:49

>> thank you for sharing that.

84:50

>> Andrea, I'd invite you to also share

84:52

your story.

84:55

>> Thank you so much. If I can say quickly,

84:57

thank you Sarah for moderating and I

85:00

could not be more grateful to be able to

85:02

celebrate 25 years of open courseware

85:05

with this incredible group. Um my

85:07

journey started

85:09

um pretty much by necessity. Um so I was

85:12

lucky enough my first assignment in the

85:14

military was actually to come to MIT and

85:17

earn a master's degree in the department

85:19

of aeronautics and astronautics. Um but

85:22

my first semester here was a little bit

85:24

rough. I got a B and a C in my classes,

85:27

which at MIT that's that's not very

85:30

good. And actually for my program as

85:33

well, I ended up being put on academic

85:35

probation, which meant the military was

85:38

concerned about my performance and

85:39

considering uh having me withdraw from

85:42

the program. Luckily, I had a great

85:45

active mentor who said, "I think the

85:49

issue is that you don't have the linear

85:51

algebra background that you need for

85:53

these courses." And he asked me if I had

85:55

heard of open courseware. And he pointed

85:58

me towards uh Professor Gil String's

86:01

linear algebra course. And I've I've

86:03

heard that he may be there in person. Is

86:06

that true?

86:09

Fantastic. Professor String, thank you

86:11

so much.

86:13

I I took two of his courses um between

86:17

the fall and spring semester and ended

86:21

up uh in the spring semester getting an

86:24

A and a B. And literally ever since then

86:27

uh because of open courseware I've

86:29

gotten all A's in my academic programs

86:32

since then I just I can't imagine where

86:35

else I would have had such an incredible

86:38

tool. Um, so again, Professor String,

86:42

uh, the open courseware team, you guys

86:45

saved my master's degree, so thank you

86:48

so much for that.

86:53

>> Thank you.

86:55

Open courseware often becomes a

86:57

meaningful part of learners and

87:00

educators lives. And I'd like to ask

87:02

each of you to reflect on how open

87:05

courseware has helped you grow

87:07

personally, professionally,

87:09

how it might have helped you meet a

87:11

goal. I think that our audience would

87:14

love to hear those stories. Hinata,

87:17

would you like to start us off?

87:19

>> Sure. Um, well, as you probably know,

87:22

I'm 18. Um, I've been having the

87:24

privilege to travel a lot. And when my

87:26

parents bring me to these cities that

87:28

I've never heard of, I often used to

87:31

look at them as like, oh, they're just

87:32

old cities. They're not really that

87:33

important. Or they're, you know, on the

87:35

opposite side. They're really new. They

87:37

feel really artificial. There's no life

87:38

to it. I don't really care. So now after

87:42

open courseware, I started to appreciate

87:44

like how they actually planned out these

87:46

new cities or these old cities. how

87:49

they, you know, let's say there was a

87:50

river running through the city and then,

87:51

oh, they use that river to put business

87:54

around it to get people around that

87:55

river. Those little things translate to

87:59

looking at a bunch of cities and

88:01

everywhere I travel at a really

88:03

different lens. I feel like that has

88:05

really grown me as a traveler. Um, and I

88:07

think I'm getting my parents money worth

88:09

money's worth as well. So, I think

88:11

they'll really appreciate that. But

88:12

yeah.

88:12

>> Wow, that's neat. So OCW is shaping

88:15

literally shaping how you see the world,

88:17

how you read the world.

88:18

>> Exly. Very different. Yeah.

88:20

>> Andrea, can you tell us about your

88:22

story? And you know, you you are looking

88:24

at the world from the perspective of

88:26

aeronautics. So I'm really curious what

88:28

perspective

88:29

>> OCW is helping you to have.

88:33

>> Open courseware has

88:36

opened uh no pun intended, but opened

88:40

you so many different avenues for me.

88:43

But I think the most salient one, the

88:45

most memorable one for me was as I was

88:48

transitioning out of the military. Uh I

88:50

knew I wanted to continue to serve and

88:54

just in a different capacity. I wanted

88:55

to serve as as an engineer and

88:58

researcher and I'd been out of the

89:01

classroom for a decade by this point. So

89:04

I knew I needed to refresh my academic

89:07

skills. I looked online for open

89:10

programs and ke kept coming back to open

89:13

courseware. It wasn't even deliberate. I

89:15

wasn't targeting open courseware. It was

89:17

just the courses that I wanted to take

89:19

were available on open courseware. And

89:21

that's actually what made me decide that

89:24

MIT it was MIT robust. I wanted to come

89:27

back to MIT for my PhD because of this

89:31

attitude of educational philanthropy. I

89:34

didn't want to go any place else. I

89:36

wanted to come to MIT.

89:38

Um I knew I needed to prove that I could

89:42

still hack it academically to get

89:44

accepted here. Um I wanted to get a

89:46

second masters in computer science to do

89:48

that. But I didn't have an undergraduate

89:50

degree in computer science. So I used

89:52

open courseware to computer

89:54

architecture, networks, programming and

89:56

C algorithms

89:59

and

90:01

it absolutely 100% set me up for

90:03

success. I went to Auburn University. I

90:06

scored so high on the baseline test

90:09

architecture. The professor told me I

90:11

didn't need to attend classes. I did

90:14

anyway. Uh and I was able to complete

90:17

that program in months including thesis

90:21

when it's scheduled for 21. And once I

90:24

sent those transcripts to MIT, I was

90:28

accepted to the PhD program here. And

90:30

again, MIT's open course enabled all of

90:33

that. All the professors that offer

90:35

their materials, the staff, the

90:37

administration, all of you enabled me to

90:39

do that. You enabled me to start this

90:41

new career to continue to serve as an

90:44

engineering researcher.

90:46

>> I feel so proud to be part of the team

90:49

that enabled you to do that because I

90:52

feel like you're making such a

90:53

difference in the world. And if I can be

90:55

even like an atomsized piece of that um

90:59

just feel very lucky.

91:02

>> Victor, I am

91:04

>> Victor, I am so curious how open

91:07

courseware has shaped your teaching in

91:09

the past. I've been able to talk with

91:10

you about your dedication to education.

91:13

Um could you tell the audience a little

91:16

bit about that?

91:18

>> Yeah, thank you. Uh so uh I remember

91:21

when I came to MIT that was in 2013 that

91:24

should about 13 years ago uh and one of

91:27

the professors managing the fellowship

91:29

program told me you have to go to take

91:32

6005 and check out what it's all about

91:34

that was elements of software

91:36

construction and so I was interested in

91:38

raising very solid worldass software

91:41

engineers. So that was my goal and when

91:44

I look at the course I saw that that was

91:47

well structured and designed course. Uh

91:52

it was very very interesting. So even

91:54

for me as a professor I had to learn a

91:56

lot of things. Yeah. And I had to even

91:58

sit down to in class apart from using

92:00

OCW to even sit down in class and see

92:02

how it's been taken live as well. And so

92:05

that was a really turning point because

92:08

it made me to see how the um MIT

92:12

students have been prepared for the

92:14

future and uh how the world content and

92:18

the whole evaluations everything design

92:21

how they design and so I learned a lot

92:24

and I applied the same approach back

92:26

home and sincerely I've got a lot of

92:29

positive feedbacks people getting jobs

92:31

in the global companies after taking the

92:33

course design when I came back to

92:35

Nigeria based on that course uh people

92:38

getting jobs at Google Microsoft because

92:42

of the content and the structure of the

92:46

course. So I I actually followed it and

92:48

redesign my own course back up. It was

92:50

really a very good experience and uh I

92:52

love the way the um the recitations

92:57

I design and also I mean things around

93:00

the assignment and very interesting not

93:02

only software construction I also use

93:05

this another course which is human

93:07

interface design user interface design

93:09

or postgraduate was also very

93:10

interesting so one of the things I found

93:12

there was at times when you use

93:14

textbooks you don't get everything you

93:17

want because uh this the flow flow in

93:19

the books may not be good enough for you

93:21

to actually help you to learn. But I see

93:24

that the way the courses are designed I

93:27

mean they are not following textbook per

93:29

se but the designing a way how do we

93:31

communicate knowledge to people and get

93:33

them to understand it from beginning to

93:35

the end. So I see that holistic design

93:38

that changes the way people learn and

93:40

make sure when somebody come to a

93:41

classroom as a novice or you follow the

93:44

material because it's based on a MIT

93:45

curriculum really and you come in as a

93:47

novice then you come out of the class at

93:49

the end of the semester you come out as

93:51

a as a mini expert. So I think that is

93:54

very interesting design and that has

93:56

actually also helped me also in

93:59

designing my courses back home. Thank

94:00

you.

94:02

>> Thank you.

94:03

It's one of the things I love about open

94:05

courseware is that we share not only the

94:08

content but the how the teaching happens

94:11

and that seems to have been important in

94:13

your journey.

94:15

>> So thank you for sharing that Elizabeth.

94:17

How about you?

94:18

>> Yeah. Um so I'm going to say this in

94:21

maybe two sentences but to be clear this

94:24

is a very longterm nonlinear process.

94:29

untethering my classes, untethering my

94:31

teaching from a textbook because

94:34

teaching, you know, because teaching a

94:36

textbook is just how we've always done

94:38

it has made me question so many other

94:41

things about how we've always done it.

94:44

So many other assumptions and I'm going

94:46

to leave you all to find your own

94:47

examples for that because I think you

94:49

probably can.

94:51

>> Yeah. Thank you.

94:52

>> So this sort of leads into my next

94:54

question which maybe we'll start with

94:56

you then and that's about barriers. So

94:59

one of the most powerful aspects of open

95:02

knowledge is how it can remove barriers.

95:05

So my question would you like to see

95:06

>> I don't remember what my I don't

95:07

remember what I said for this. Okay. Oh

95:10

right. Okay.

95:11

>> Let me let me ask the question.

95:13

>> My notes are in. Yeah.

95:15

>> Um can you share a moment when OCW

95:18

helped you overcome a challenge whether

95:20

academic, financial, personal or

95:23

something related to access?

95:24

>> Sure. Um one challenge that I think just

95:28

just two challenges really fast. One is

95:31

the uh public discourse around higher

95:34

education and to be clear I work for a

95:36

public institution right so we are

95:38

supposed to be serving the entire public

95:42

um but the public discourse around

95:43

higher education and it's been I don't

95:45

know 20 years about just oh go to

95:47

college and get a better job

95:49

>> that's it which is not the function of

95:52

public higher education historically and

95:54

not what I believe or not only what I

95:56

believe so just the fact that OCW exists

95:59

thank you keep keep doing this. Okay.

96:02

The other one and the other one is

96:03

really small for my student for my

96:05

classes because um are really micro not

96:09

small

96:11

is that um it's probably not a stretch

96:12

to say most MIT students are good at

96:15

school. Yeah. Um my students maybe do

96:18

not come in a lot of them do not come in

96:20

thinking they are good at school. A lot

96:21

of my students have came in with people

96:22

telling them that they are not good at

96:24

school that they are bad at many many

96:25

things. And um

96:29

so when I teach this class in particular

96:31

and I tell them look these materials

96:33

came from a graduate class at MIT and

96:37

yes you guys can do this too and I mean

96:39

I have to scaffold I have to you know

96:41

give them other support which is normal

96:42

because they're 18. Um they're like

96:46

what? Sorry.

96:51

>> How many consulting firms have you

96:52

worked at? None. Okay. Um

96:55

>> not yet.

96:55

>> Not yet. Not yet. Well, that's it. Not

96:57

yet. Right.

96:59

But they're like, "What? I can What? I

97:01

can do this?" Yeah. Of course you can.

97:03

>> Yes. Yes. You can do a whole lot more

97:05

than you think you can. You can do more

97:06

than people have told you you can.

97:08

>> Yes.

97:09

>> So, yeah.

97:10

>> Thank you.

97:10

>> Yeah. That's huge.

97:12

>> Um, I love the idea that open courseware

97:16

is a yes, you can.

97:17

>> Yeah.

97:17

>> I love that.

97:18

>> We might have to put that on some swag.

97:20

That's good.

97:22

>> Andrea, how about you? What barriers has

97:24

open courseware removed for you?

97:28

>> Gosh. So, and not just for me, for so

97:30

many of the people I mentor as well. So,

97:32

I talked about, you know, having these

97:35

um asynchronous

97:37

uh courses and materials available meant

97:39

that I could get the material that I

97:42

wanted on the timeline that I wanted

97:44

anywhere. So, anytime, anywhere, 100%

97:47

free as Hinata highlighted. And it was

97:51

important not just for my journey, but

97:53

now that I'm getting to mentor other

97:55

veterans, service members,

97:57

underrepresented, non-traditional

97:59

applicants, you know, getting to tell

98:01

them, hey, it's okay if you work strange

98:05

hours or you travel a lot or, you know,

98:09

money is tight. you can take worldclass

98:12

courses to prepare for whatever is next

98:17

for you, whether you're going straight

98:18

into the workforce or or whether you're

98:20

going into an academic program. Um, and

98:23

it's because of open courseware.

98:26

And

98:28

you know, it it also means something to

98:30

the people who are applying to these

98:32

selective academic programs to put on

98:35

their application that they're preparing

98:37

using open courseware courses. people

98:40

recognize open courseware for how high

98:42

quality it is and what it means to be an

98:45

independent learner taking those

98:46

courses. And so a lot of the people that

98:49

I've I've had the opportunity to mentor

98:51

have been accepted to these very

98:53

selective programs having used open

98:56

courseware to help get themselves there.

98:59

And if I can jump on what Elizabeth said

99:01

as well also that attitude of hey this

99:04

is from MIT the number one engineering

99:06

school in the world. you've taken this

99:09

course from this number one engineering

99:11

school in the world. Yes, you can you

99:14

can learn at that level. You can be at

99:18

institutions like this. So removing

99:21

mental barrier I think is is also

99:24

critical.

99:26

>> Thank you Victor. Has OCW helped remove

99:30

any barriers for you or your students?

99:34

>> Yeah, thank you. Like I said earlier, uh

99:38

the first thing is that it's made my

99:40

students even including myself to kind

99:43

of learn from the best professors. Even

99:46

though you're not having physical

99:47

contact with them, but from the

99:48

materials you created, you're having

99:50

learning from the best of the best.

99:52

Yeah, that's the first thing. So you are

99:54

getting exposed to knowledge that um

99:59

that MIT students are having. uh and so

100:02

that alone changed the understanding of

100:06

the students and secondly what it did

100:09

was also to make them to understand uh

100:11

the global market when you see the

100:13

content that's preparing student for

100:14

global market and you are using the it

100:17

makes to understand you're not just

100:19

trying to get ready for the market in

100:22

your country but you're getting ready

100:23

for the market a global market so this

100:25

barriers of entering the global market

100:27

was removed because when they go through

100:29

the content it makes them really ready

100:31

for a global market. So that was one of

100:33

the biggest barriers it's remote and

100:35

making them to see the kind of

100:36

difficulty that uh the best university

100:39

in engineering like mentioned by the

100:42

kind of difficulty the kind of problems

100:44

they give to their students. So when you

100:45

do that your confidence level goes up

100:47

and then you become more confident that

100:49

if they can do that and you are doing it

100:51

here then that means you are fine that

100:53

means you can compete anywhere in the

100:54

world. So confidence level increased and

100:57

also they get ready for global market.

100:58

Thank you. That's so um interesting that

101:01

the common theme that we've heard so far

101:04

um is lifting the confidence barrier

101:07

that it's a confidence enabler. That's

101:09

so interesting. Um we might circle back

101:12

to Hinata after we fix our technical

101:15

problems, but um I'd like to move us on

101:17

to the next question

101:20

and this is unexpected impacts and

101:23

surprises. So OCW has a way of

101:26

surprising us. I know it surprised me

101:28

when I saw the the job opening online

101:33

11 years ago. I was like, "This can't be

101:36

real. Like, OCW can't be real. Like, we

101:39

can't be like giving this away for

101:41

free." So, the very premise of it

101:43

surprised me. And I'd love to hear from

101:46

each of you how OCW has created surprise

101:51

connections,

101:53

a new way of thinking. However you want

101:55

to take this, I'd love to hear. Um,

101:58

Hinatada, are you are you too freshly

102:00

backed? Do you need a second to settle

102:02

in?

102:02

>> I mean, um, okay,

102:04

>> I'll answer your first question like

102:05

Okay.

102:06

>> So, we were talking about barriers to

102:09

entry, right? So, uh, my high school, I

102:11

go to a really good high school, um, in

102:13

John's Creek, Georgia. It's one of most

102:15

affluent suburbs in Georgia. So um we

102:18

have a lot of programs in med and

102:20

business and you know everything you can

102:22

imagine except for really niche topics

102:24

like urban planning and I was really

102:26

passionate in urban planning but I

102:28

couldn't pursue it in all my years of

102:29

high school. I took all these AP classes

102:32

and dual enrollment class I can't find

102:34

one that's like actually good about

102:35

urban planning and so through open

102:38

courseware I think like the barrier to

102:40

entry to you know more niche topics more

102:43

specialized topics that is also a lot

102:46

easier to enter now so I think that's

102:48

how and could you repeat your second

102:49

question for me again

102:50

>> sure it's a really fun one so in what

102:53

ways has OCW surprised you

102:56

>> well um aside from me being the only

102:58

high schooler in this room I think in

103:00

the

103:00

MIT, Harvard. Yeah. Um it's really

103:03

surprising like um I've I've been able

103:06

to talk to these so many uh accomplished

103:08

people and I've been able to learn from

103:10

so many of them

103:11

>> and I feel like the connections I've

103:13

gained just through these past two days

103:14

is really really really important and I

103:16

want to continue that as well. So

103:18

through open courseware yeah just want

103:19

to keep on learning and then also just

103:21

keep on growing my network and then

103:23

hopefully I'll be able to keep growing

103:24

as a person myself too.

103:26

>> Yeah,

103:26

>> maybe I'll be at MIT or Harvard. Yeah,

103:28

>> I'm sure you will be. Yes, hopefully.

103:31

>> So, I'm hearing all sorts of things

103:32

about connections and access and

103:36

confidence. These are really

103:39

>> getting at the heart of why we do what

103:41

we do. Elizabeth, any surprises for you?

103:44

>> Huge surprise. Um,

103:48

through my getting involved with OCW,

103:51

Sarah and I developed a friendship for

103:53

the last like we were actual friends in

103:55

real life.

103:56

>> Yeah.

103:57

>> Huh. Yeah. That was a really nice

103:59

>> It's pretty It's a really wonderful

104:01

surprise.

104:01

>> Yeah, open education is a great

104:03

connector.

104:04

>> Um,

104:05

our collaborations and engagement senior

104:08

manager Shira Seagull is in the audience

104:10

and she can attest to the power of

104:12

connecting people across institutions

104:14

through open education.

104:17

>> Victor, any surprises?

104:22

>> Oh, well, I will say I can't say

104:24

surprises really.

104:26

So what I can just say is like uh the

104:30

opportunities it bring to people.

104:32

>> Yeah.

104:32

>> Uh I remember I have one undergrad

104:35

students that wanted to do his postgrad

104:38

at MIT. Okay.

104:39

>> And so because he knew he was interested

104:42

in doing his postgrad at MIT, he started

104:44

using OCW to prepare. So that he came

104:46

out as a very very brilliant student,

104:49

one of the best students during that

104:50

session. But because he already followed

104:53

the OCW, the MIT materials, he was

104:56

already getting set for the MIT

104:58

environment. So easily got his admission

105:00

to MIT and was able to cope well during

105:02

his masters program. So I see this as

105:05

giving knowledge to everybody wherever

105:07

you are in the world and helping you to

105:10

have access.

105:11

>> Yeah.

105:12

>> Yeah. To access. So I think it's not a

105:14

surprise but it's I say it's a very good

105:16

opportunity and I see as a very good

105:18

contribution to the world. Yeah. Thank

105:20

you.

105:20

>> Very true. Thank you,

105:23

Andrea. Any surprises for you?

105:28

>> You know, sir, I have to echo what you

105:30

said earlier. The fact that such a

105:34

program exists is incredible.

105:37

>> Um, it shouldn't surprise me any anymore

105:40

given all the wonderful things that open

105:41

courseware does. But, you know, seeing

105:44

uh, you know, Hinata

105:47

kind of the the spec specificity of some

105:50

of the courses on there, the uniqueness

105:52

of some of the courses on there

105:53

continues to impress me. And I love uh

105:56

there's so many stories. You know, we're

105:58

a small sample of the people who were

106:00

impacted by open courseware. So, getting

106:02

to hear those those little snippets,

106:04

those little stories of of uh the real

106:06

world impact of the program is always

106:09

amazing.

106:10

um being up myself and I saw that Hinata

106:14

was working on his pilot's license,

106:15

which is fantastic. I'm I'm very biased,

106:18

you know, being a pilot. I'm always

106:19

excited to see other people learning to

106:21

fly. Uh I was reading his bio, I

106:24

thought, "Huh, I I wonder." And I

106:27

searched for pilot training on Open

106:29

Courseware and sure enough, I found uh

106:32

Philantina's

106:33

ground school course on Open Courseware.

106:36

So on open courseware you can take

106:39

private pilot ground school train from

106:41

two not just instructor pilots but they

106:44

are also PhDs from MIT

106:47

>> and that is an incredible thing I think

106:50

uh anybody training to be a to take that

106:53

course uh if for another reason than

106:55

just bragging that that's where you took

106:58

you know grad school was at MIT from

107:00

those incredible instructors.

107:02

>> Yeah, I recommend it. Um, I was I took

107:04

my uh private pilot written two days ago

107:06

before getting on the plane and uh MIT

107:10

helped me pass it. Yeah. So, I'm one.

107:14

>> Congratulations.

107:15

>> Fantastic.

107:18

>> We'll have to fly together someday.

107:20

>> Cool.

107:23

>> Oh gosh. When I was flying here last

107:26

night, the pilot had to reboot the plane

107:29

and he said, "Just a second while we

107:32

control altdelete

107:35

and I feel like I should take this

107:38

course so I have a better understanding

107:40

of what that means for my safety."

107:43

>> It's fine. I made it.

107:44

>> Okay.

107:45

>> Um, let's think about the future.

107:47

>> Yeah. I'd love to hear from each of you

107:51

what open education should look like in

107:53

the future.

107:55

>> Okay. Well, I could I have a really I in

107:57

the interest of time I am because we

107:58

were supposed to finish five minutes

107:59

ago, right? Yeah.

108:03

>> Oh, we have 45 minutes.

108:04

>> Woohoo. Never mind. Oh, we have an hour.

108:06

Oh my gosh, I'm so excited. Um what?

108:09

Like a professor wanting to talk more?

108:11

What? Um two things. One is that um

108:16

again it go it kind of goes with being

108:17

at school or being good at school or

108:19

being not good at school and teaching

108:20

everybody right because I teach the

108:22

whole range of the world comes through

108:24

my classes which is one of the reasons

108:26

that I absolutely love my job. Um

108:29

but

108:31

sometimes

108:32

taking what one professor has done and

108:36

then trying to use it again is a lot of

108:39

work, right? and also

108:43

taking what one professor has done for

108:46

excuse me for a web particular audience

108:47

um I was really influenced by Maad talk

108:51

here at I can't remember the name of the

108:53

department that does your teacher

108:54

training stuff uh that Sarah invited me

108:58

to see on Zoom um well during lockdown

109:00

and um one thing I've learned from

109:02

learning about equitable teaching is

109:04

that really making things finding ways

109:07

for students to connect these things

109:08

they may never have heard of or thought

109:10

about to their lives, to their values,

109:12

to their communities, to their goals is

109:13

really important.

109:15

>> Um, and a lot of times they don't even

109:17

know how to do that. You know, they

109:19

don't even they they can't see. And I

109:21

mean, I can I can, you know, tell them

109:23

examples from my, you know, white middle

109:25

class life. Yay. But um

109:29

to have you know to have examples of to

109:32

have ways to show to ask them the

109:33

questions to way be to ask them the

109:35

questions about how this go how they

109:37

could use these things to have examples

109:40

you know um so that they can figure out

109:45

ways to better learn this right and then

109:49

to go out and make the world a better

109:50

place because when I ask my students

109:52

that their eyes like so how are you

109:53

going to make the world a better place

109:54

and their eyes get really big they're

109:56

like what? That's why I'm in school. I

109:58

mean, yeah, that's why you're in school.

110:00

>> Yeah.

110:01

>> Whether you know it or not. And the

110:03

other thing is just to um keep leading

110:06

with courage. You may not quite be

110:08

aware, but that has a huge effect on the

110:11

rest of us to see that.

110:12

>> I think something you're saying speaks

110:14

to something I've always believed, and

110:16

that's that people power open.

110:18

>> You can give access to the materials,

110:20

but it's the people using them and the

110:22

people teaching with them that really

110:24

>> power them. So we need to continue to

110:26

support those people and to learn from

110:28

them.

110:30

>> Victor,

110:31

open education, what should it look like

110:33

in the future?

110:36

>> Well,

110:38

we're in the age of AI and uh so it

110:42

means that things have to evolve. The

110:45

content alone may not be enough. Uh why

110:49

you said a very important thing that is

110:50

more about people using it to teach and

110:53

people using it to learn. So I think

110:56

also we need to begin to see the

110:57

integration of hair into open education.

110:59

I don't know how to put it but in such a

111:01

way that can be that kind of uh

111:05

personalized effect coming up. I don't

111:07

know. Yeah. But those are the things I'm

111:09

thinking about because that will make it

111:10

more interesting because content alone

111:12

is not enough today. Yeah. So you will

111:15

begin to see people not paying attention

111:17

to just content. they they want to pay

111:20

attention to what guides them and help

111:22

them to uh understand the content better

111:26

and more so to understand the content

111:27

they need to get uh they need to use. So

111:30

>> in open education design you have to be

111:32

looking at how we bring in AI and still

111:34

ensure as we making content available at

111:38

the same time we are making sure that

111:40

the experience is getting personalized

111:43

and enhanced. So I think that is what we

111:45

should begin to look at the experience

111:48

the learning experience in using open uh

111:51

education open res open open education

111:53

resources. So how can he help us to

111:56

enhance that experience and so doesn't

111:58

go doesn't mean only content sharing but

112:00

it goes beyond that and then we can also

112:03

learn more from the learners. Yeah

112:04

that's my those are my thoughts for now.

112:06

Yeah, thank you for sharing that and

112:08

come back for the 3:15 session where

112:10

Dimmitri is going to talk about the

112:12

future of open learning and he's already

112:14

and our team is already thinking about

112:16

some of the things you've just

112:17

mentioned. So the future is NAS. Okay,

112:21

Andrea, what should the future look

112:23

like?

112:25

Yeah, I'm I'm going to hop on what uh

112:28

Elizabeth said earlier about, you know,

112:31

considering how we've always done things

112:33

and and how we should do things going

112:36

forward and what Victor said about

112:38

incorporating AI into, you know, how do

112:43

we present the information or

112:47

um you know, what tools are created to

112:48

help people learn. So, we've I I'm sure

112:51

Victor's way more experienced in this

112:53

area than I am, but there's been

112:54

research that shows, you know,

112:57

>> certain uses of generative AI tools can

113:00

actually inhibit learning and

113:01

information retention because they don't

113:03

allow students to kind of struggle with

113:07

the the learning process. And there's

113:09

there's

113:10

>> um growth in a certain amount of

113:12

struggle, but you don't want them to get

113:14

to the point that now they're

113:16

discouraged. You you want that

113:17

confidence. you want them to know, yes,

113:19

they can succeed at this level of

113:22

programming. So, I think there's going

113:24

to be a lot of uh development there. It

113:28

sounds like uh I'm excited for the 315

113:30

to hear what you guys are already doing

113:33

>> in that vein. And then um I'd also be

113:36

interested in in seeing uh you know

113:39

we've got a a lot of learners who

113:43

are across the spectrum in terms of

113:46

demographics and that's any demographics

113:48

it's age you know it's so cool to see

113:50

Hanada here and talk about using open

113:52

courseware as a high school student I'd

113:54

love to see you know open courseware

113:56

incorporated at pretty much any level of

113:58

learning from you know I I don't think

114:01

it's

114:02

a stretch to say that you know

114:04

elementary school students can learn

114:07

from some of these courses and I don't

114:09

think it's any stretch to say that you

114:11

know people who've been doing research

114:12

for decades can learn from these courses

114:15

as well. So both the way that we present

114:17

information and the demograph

114:20

demographic of people that are using it

114:21

is kind of what I'm hoping to see.

114:24

>> Thank you

114:25

Hannada. In some ways, you are our

114:28

future and so I'm curious what future

114:31

you want to step into and how open

114:33

education will be a part of it.

114:35

>> Yeah. No pressure though.

114:36

>> Yeah.

114:38

>> It's a lot of Yeah. But

114:40

>> um for the future, well, uh me

114:42

personally, my goal is to become like a

114:44

pilot, but also being able to do more

114:47

than just being a pilot, right? Um I

114:50

have a lot of different passions. I'm a

114:51

naturally curious guy. So, um, well,

114:54

being able to pursue all of my passions

114:57

like urban planning and stuff like that

114:58

on my off time. Um, so because being a

115:02

pilot, I'm going to be everywhere. I'm

115:04

not going to be able to commit to, you

115:05

know, going to school for 2 years, four

115:07

years and continuing my education. So,

115:10

maybe opening up access um or keep

115:12

opening up access to everybody like that

115:15

um would be a great future for open

115:17

courseware. and yeah being able to use

115:19

that to you know tickle my curiosity you

115:22

know keep on pursuing what I like and

115:24

yeah like that's a good future.

115:26

>> Great. So we have a few minutes if

115:29

anyone would like to ask a question to

115:31

the educators or learners that are

115:33

sharing their time. I will repeat your

115:35

questions so they can hear it through my

115:37

mic. Um yes.

115:42

>> Oh we have a mic coming. One moment.

115:53

>> Here it comes.

115:57

>> Thank you. Uh this has been an

115:58

interesting talk. Uh and speaking to the

116:01

issue of obstacles that have been

116:03

overcome and continue to be overcome. Uh

116:06

open courseware has done a lot to breach

116:08

the obstacles of economics and

116:11

geography. But we are in a world that is

116:14

increasingly being siloed. And I see a

116:17

lot of open courseware and education in

116:20

general going to people who already

116:21

recognize and respect education. And

116:24

there's another group that rejects

116:27

education as being partisan, which

116:30

education is not. And I'm wondering what

116:32

is being done and can be done to reach

116:35

to people with either ideological

116:38

differences to help them understand how

116:41

useful and important education is or who

116:43

don't have mentors or other people to

116:45

encourage them and therefore don't even

116:47

know to look for the resources we have.

116:51

>> So I can share one example. Uh we

116:55

created a podcast uh a special season of

116:58

the Chuck radio podcast which focused

117:02

solely on learner voices

117:05

and the two hosts one was from Memphis

117:07

Tennessee and one was from Kala Uganda.

117:10

They talked openly about how learning

117:13

out in the open was not necessarily safe

117:15

for them in their communities

117:18

and learners hearing from them saying

117:21

that is way more powerful than anyone

117:24

from our institution trying to say that.

117:26

So I think one strategic thing we can do

117:28

is to continue to put the spotlight on

117:31

the actual users of open courseware and

117:34

open learning to share their stories in

117:36

their own words to touch people all over

117:38

the world in all sorts of different

117:40

circumstances.

117:48

Anything else?

117:53

Yes.

117:56

If you were to change one thing

118:00

for OCW, what would that be?

118:09

>> It's a hard question, but um

118:11

>> that's why I'm a professor,

118:14

>> right? You're right.

118:16

>> Yeah.

118:21

>> I don't know. It's pretty good how it

118:22

is. I like it. I don't have an answer

118:24

for you.

118:30

>> I don't have an answer for that because

118:32

I'm really my exposure with it is really

118:34

limited, right? Like my one class has

118:37

been fantastic,

118:39

but nothing to nothing new to add to

118:42

that. Yeah.

118:43

>> Okay. Andrea or or Victor,

118:46

what would you change about open

118:48

courseware to improve it?

118:51

I already know what Victor is going to

118:52

say.

118:54

>> Go ahead.

118:57

>> Uh, so for me, uh, it's more about it's

119:01

not about the content. It's more about

119:04

making the navigation easy

119:06

>> for people to be able to easily discover

119:11

what they what they are looking for.

119:13

>> Yeah. I mean not just for um people in

119:16

the university but I mean anybody that

119:18

jumps on the platform should be able to

119:20

easily find something that relates to us

119:22

or query. So I think is more about how

119:26

do we facilitate that interaction with

119:29

the system for you to know that there

119:31

are resources there are treasures here.

119:33

So because if you don't know there are

119:34

treasures here you won't go there.

119:35

>> Yeah.

119:36

>> Uh so how do we make sure people can

119:38

understand and search and know that

119:40

there are treasures they can get from

119:41

that platform. So I think that is one.

119:44

The second will be like going forward

119:50

uh how do we ensure that the content are

119:53

created in such a way that we have a

119:55

consideration for different demography

119:59

and also different geography. Uh so

120:02

apart from just we recorded video or we

120:05

put the materials we are looking at uh

120:09

the the the models or people have access

120:12

all over the world. So how do we ensure

120:13

that the majority

120:16

can actually follow the content anywhere

120:18

they're coming from.

120:19

>> It's not an easy uh it's not an easy one

120:22

to do. There's a lot of work to do it

120:25

but I think if we want more adoption we

120:27

need to be thinking beyond we just

120:29

record or put it there but to begin to

120:31

look at where the demography and the

120:33

geography of access and how do we make

120:35

it more relevant to them. Yeah.

120:38

>> Thank you.

120:39

>> Thank you.

120:43

>> It's kind of a copout to say I just want

120:45

more.

120:47

It's

120:49

as as wide of a breadth of topics as are

120:54

available in open courseware. There's

120:56

constantly new issues popping up, new

121:01

discussions in just within STEM, you

121:05

know, Victor's Victor's field of AI. I I

121:09

swear every day there's a new critical

121:12

paper that fundamentally changes, you

121:14

know, how we're looking at training

121:16

models, uh how we're looking at

121:18

evaluating them, how we're looking at

121:20

creating certificates of guarantees,

121:24

and uh I I know that's extremely

121:27

challenging. There's there's time

121:28

investment, there's resource investment,

121:30

things like that. Um uh to kind of uh

121:34

again jump on on Victor's what Victor

121:37

said, I think a lot of the tools that

121:39

are uh coming up in terms of AI are

121:42

going to make the accessibility easier.

121:45

So meeting people with where they're at

121:47

in terms of how they learn um what

121:51

languages they they speak or you know if

121:55

they're uh sign language uh users. Um,

122:00

so it'll be really amazing to see, you

122:04

know, that development again. I think at

122:06

3:15 we're probably going to um see a

122:09

lot of what that that looks like and I'm

122:10

excited to see that.

122:13

>> Thank you. I think we have time for one

122:15

more. TJ, hi.

122:16

>> Okay, great. I'll make it an easy one.

122:18

So uh this question this is this panel

122:22

has shown an example of how people are

122:25

using finding value in MIT open

122:27

courseware without needing the value of

122:30

the credential right it's going to lead

122:32

to something you have plans but you you

122:35

find great intrinsic value in the

122:37

content so a two-part question one for

122:40

Hatada and Andreas how do you plan to

122:42

communicate with future employer or or

122:45

or educational institution the value

122:48

that you receive from these that's a big

122:50

challenge that somebody mentioned

122:51

earlier is how do we communicate

122:52

industry hasn't really adapted fully to

122:54

recognizing all types of learning right

122:57

they're still waiting for that degree or

122:59

that credential and the second question

123:01

is this a problem this may be for

123:03

everybody is this credentiing problem

123:05

and communication of this value to

123:08

employers and others is that something

123:10

that that MIT open courseware MIT itself

123:13

needs to solve or should somebody else

123:14

be working on that I just who should be

123:16

solving for that problem and and what

123:18

should we be doing with it?

123:19

>> Yeah, I think I have a good answer for

123:21

that. Um, I was doing college

123:22

applications cuz I'm a high school

123:24

senior. I'm sure if you have kids or,

123:25

you know, if you know anyone that's

123:26

applying to colleges, they probably

123:27

struggle with the same thing. But, um, I

123:30

took all these, you know, MIT open

123:32

courseware courses. I worked really

123:33

hard, but I didn't put it on my

123:35

application. And you might ask why,

123:37

like, you know, it's MIT, like you

123:39

probably should put down an app. But the

123:41

reason why I didn't is because I think

123:43

all my other achievements will speak for

123:44

that value that MIT has given me. I

123:46

don't have to necessarily cite that I

123:47

did MIT courses.

123:49

>> So like you know for the private pilot

123:50

written I was talking about earlier,

123:51

right? I took these MIT courses but the

123:54

proof that or I guess the value the

123:57

credentials are my results on that test.

123:59

It's not if I took it or not. It's like

124:03

you don't you don't credit the baseball

124:05

bat that you use to hit the home run.

124:07

You hit the home run. So it doesn't

124:08

matter. Does that make sense? Yeah.

124:12

>> Yeah. That's a great analogy.

124:14

>> Thank you.

124:17

Yeah, I think Hinata hits on a kind of a

124:20

key point. It's not that you took the

124:22

course, it's what en it enabled you to

124:24

do. So, there has to be some litmus test

124:28

of, you know, what your capabilities

124:31

are. And I think that's kind of

124:33

universal. Just because you have a

124:36

degree from someplace doesn't mean

124:38

necessarily

124:40

um that you have the same capabilities

124:42

as somebody getting the same degree from

124:44

someplace else or somebody who just you

124:47

know did extra work in class or outside

124:51

of class. So I think it's asking a lot

124:55

personally of open courseware to be able

124:59

to do such a I think a very narrow

125:03

assessment of ability to apply knowledge

125:06

because I think it's going to be so

125:09

job specific um so area specific so role

125:12

specific so I think it's I think it's

125:15

going to have to kind of be left up to

125:18

you know the people evaluating the

125:20

individual's capility for that specific

125:23

role.

125:24

Um, but I agree with Hanata very much

125:27

that there has to be a measure of

125:30

outcome, not just the fact that you

125:32

check the box and you take the court.

125:35

>> Interesting. Um, so the second part of

125:38

TJ's question, Dimmitri, I'm wondering

125:41

if you would like to speak to that to

125:43

how we're thinking about MIT's role in

125:46

workforce credentiing

125:49

and and open learning.

125:52

We'll have an opportunity to talk at

125:54

later at 3:15. But um as you perhaps

125:58

know MIT had um led the effort with uh

126:02

digital credentials

126:04

which uh in fact um has led uh few

126:08

months ago to an actual digital

126:10

credential. They they studied u the

126:13

group that worked on that studied the

126:16

the principles together with our

126:18

engineering team. they have developed

126:21

um an actual digital credential that is

126:24

now in use um in the MIT PL in the learn

126:28

MIT platform. We plan to continue um you

126:33

know the the development of this not as

126:36

concepts uh but rather we are investing

126:39

in the effort and um my hope is that

126:43

this will be further enhanced. Uh it's

126:46

still ongoing. I think the the jury is

126:49

not yet uh but we are definitely have um

126:53

included in our thinking the development

126:56

of credentials um within open learning.

127:00

Uh it is part of our strategy.

127:02

>> Thank you.

127:04

>> Example I have one right here.

127:05

>> Oh Brandon has an example.

127:07

>> So so this is the credential that

127:08

Demetri was just talking about that I'm

127:10

carrying with me on my phone

127:13

>> from Annabelle's course.

127:15

>> Wow. Thank you.

127:17

this wonderful. I would like to thank

127:19

all of the panelists for joining us. Um,

127:22

I learned a lot from you. I hope all of

127:24

you learned a lot. Thank you for

127:25

participating in the conversation. I

127:28

think it captures everything that is

127:30

foundational to open courseware,

127:32

curiosity, impact, and people powering

127:35

open. So, thank you, and I hope to see

127:39

you more as the day unfolds.

127:46

Thank you. And uh we will reconvene at

127:50

uh 1 pm Eastern time with a uh with a

127:53

session about the other opens beyond

127:57

open education. Uh really looking

127:59

forward to that session.

128:23

Heat.

128:52

Heat. Heat.

129:15

Heat. Heat.

130:05

Heat. Heat.

130:55

Heat. Heat. N.

133:42

Heat. Hey, Heat.

134:29

Heat. Hey, heat. Hey, heat.

134:59

down.

135:13

Heat.

135:49

Heat. Heat.

136:11

Heat

136:34

up here.

136:38

Heat. Heat.

136:54

Heat. Heat. N.

137:15

Heat. Heat.

137:40

Heat. Heat. N.

138:06

Hey.

138:20

Heat. Heat.

139:05

Heat

139:23

up

139:34

Heat. Heat.

139:55

Heat. Hey. Hey. Hey.

140:21

Heat.

140:35

Heat.

141:19

Heat. Heat.

141:42

Heat

141:54

up

142:10

here. Heat. Heat.

145:06

Down.

145:14

Down.

145:18

Heat. Heat.

145:39

Heat.

145:57

Heat.

146:03

Heat. Heat.

146:23

Heat.

146:45

Hey. Hey. Hey.

146:52

Oh,

147:14

hey.

148:13

Heat. Heat.

150:01

Everything.

150:31

Heat. Hey, Heat.

151:13

Hey everybody.

151:36

Heat. Hey, Heat.

152:46

Heat. Heat.

153:33

Heat. Heat.

154:47

Hey. Hey. Hey. Heat. Heat. N.

155:11

Heat. Heat.

156:01

Heat. Heat.

157:12

Heat. Heat.

157:35

Hey,

157:42

hey,

157:47

hey. Heat. Heat.

159:28

Heat.

159:44

Heat.

160:07

I want you.

160:19

Heat.

160:44

Heat.

162:12

Heat.

162:30

Heat.

162:36

Heat. Heat.

162:56

Heat.

163:11

Heat.

163:43

Heat. Heat.

164:04

Heat. Heat.

164:33

Oh,

164:51

hey. Heat. Heat.

166:10

Heat. Heat.

166:31

Heat. Heat.

168:28

Heat. Heat.

169:04

Hey,

169:19

hey, hey.

169:40

Heat. Heat.

169:48

Heat. Heat.

170:19

Heat. Heat. N.

171:09

Heat.

171:26

Heat.

171:32

Heat. Heat.

171:55

Heat. Heat. N.

172:05

Heat. Heat. N.

172:15

Heat

172:34

down.

172:40

Heat. Heat. N.

173:05

Heat. Hey, Heat.

173:40

Heat. Heat.

174:03

Heat. Heat.

174:53

Hey.

175:51

Heat.

177:08

Heat

177:21

up

177:33

here.

177:35

Heat. Heat.

177:56

heat.

178:25

Hey

178:51

Hey, hey, hey.

179:32

In any particular order?

179:34

>> No particular order.

179:53

Yeah, it's a nice

179:55

>> It's really cool.

180:17

Are we rolling?

180:19

>> We're rolling. Okay.

180:22

>> Well, good afternoon. Welcome back from

180:24

lunch. Uh, I'm thrilled to have you here

180:27

for our next session. Um, knowledge

180:30

without walls, MIT's ethos of open. This

180:34

session brings together leaders from

180:36

across the institute to explore a core

180:38

part of MIT's identity, the belief that

180:41

knowledge should be shared widely,

180:42

freely, and responsibly for the benefit

180:44

of all. The open education movement is

180:48

frankly inseparable from these other

180:50

threads of open knowledge manifest here.

180:53

We are braided together and stronger

180:55

together when we collaborate across open

180:58

access, open publishing, open science.

181:01

And so we'll hear this afternoon from

181:03

several of these key leaders how this

181:06

ethos of open is evolving and where we

181:09

might go from here. I'd like to

181:11

introduce Amy Brand is a leader in

181:14

scholarly publishing, open access and

181:16

knowledge dissemination. She's the

181:18

director of the MIT Press which is one

181:20

of the largest university presses in the

181:22

world and an important figure in open

181:24

access publishing. The MIT Press is well

181:27

known for its publications in emerging

181:29

fields of scholarship and its p

181:31

pioneering use of technology.

181:34

Chris Borg is the director of libraries

181:37

at MIT and a national advocate for

181:39

equitable access to knowledge. She's the

181:42

founding director of the center for

181:44

research on equitable and open

181:45

scholarship here at MIT.

181:48

Rebecca Saxs is the John W. Jarve Jarva

181:51

>> Jary

181:52

>> Jarvy professor of cognitive

181:54

neuroscience and the associate dean of

181:56

science at MIT. She's the assoc she is

181:59

an associate investigator at the

182:01

McGovern Institute and her work has

182:03

advanced transparency and openness in

182:06

scientific research.

182:09

So thank you for joining me here. Um

182:11

let's dive right in. um like to start

182:13

with a question about the way that

182:16

values drive this work and MIT's

182:20

leadership and open knowledge seems to

182:22

be driven from deeply held values around

182:25

openness in teaching, publishing and

182:27

collaboration. So Amy, what motivates

182:31

your commitment to openness and the work

182:33

you do at the press?

182:34

>> Um well, first of all, I just want to

182:36

say thank you. It's an honor to be part

182:38

of this wonderful celebration of 25

182:40

years of open courseware. Um I well I

182:44

first came to MIT in the mid80s not to

182:47

date myself as a as a grad student and

182:49

always experienced this place as you

182:52

know very open-minded open doors you

182:56

know people who don't stand on ceremony.

182:58

Um and that's part of what I've loved

183:00

about it and has kept me coming back you

183:02

know most recently to this as role as

183:04

director of the press. uh and you know

183:07

we have always kind of embodied those

183:10

open values. We did our first open

183:13

access book back in 1995

183:16

um and that work has continued to grow

183:18

and our first open journal um in in

183:21

2000. But you know to answer your

183:23

question more directly it's just you

183:25

know it's really a belief that to serve

183:28

as a publisher our authors our readers

183:32

you know we want to provide the deepest

183:34

impact of their work the widest possible

183:36

audience and and open models are the way

183:38

to do that.

183:40

>> Thank you. Thank you Chris. Libraries

183:43

are such a longunning champion for open

183:47

open and equitable access. what uh what

183:51

drives your work here?

183:52

>> Yeah, and I'll echo what Amy said. It's

183:54

it's just a privilege to be here and to

183:56

be part of this celebration. So, thank

183:58

you for inviting us. But um you know, I

184:01

was initially drawn to a career in

184:03

libraries

184:04

because libraries are sort of the

184:06

perfect example of public community

184:10

infrastructure, right? Like it's this

184:12

public space and service that's open to

184:15

anyone in the community. It's like whole

184:18

point is to open up equitable access to

184:21

information, to books, to tools, to

184:23

people. Um, you know, and that's just

184:26

that's uh very appealing to me and is

184:28

part of what drew me into um libraries.

184:31

But I'll also say that I mean access to

184:34

education, public education, qu high

184:37

quality public education, access to

184:40

books, access eventually access to

184:42

databases and online journals made a

184:46

huge difference in my life and my career

184:48

path. And so I'm motivated to make sure

184:50

that that is available to others as

184:53

well. And so the work we do in in the

184:56

libraries, you know, sort of fits that

184:58

for me. um you know to be able to do

185:01

that at a place like MIT we're talking

185:03

about values literally open is written

185:05

into our value statement um and I will

185:09

quote we champion the open sharing of

185:12

information and ideas like to work at a

185:14

place that actually states that as

185:16

clearly as that is I think for me a real

185:20

privilege. Um, it also carries some

185:23

responsibility I think to do it as well

185:25

and as broadly as we can to make what we

185:27

do here available to the world.

185:32

>> Thank you.

185:32

>> Yeah,

185:34

just a follow from there.

185:35

>> Yeah, Rebecca, you know, across kind of

185:38

the whole research enterprise, certainly

185:40

in your field of neuroscience, but well

185:42

beyond that, um, what's what's driving

185:45

your your commitment to open? Yeah, I

185:48

think and I'll just start again saying

185:50

thank you so much for having me.

185:52

>> Um, and I strongly share the sense that

185:55

you started with that this is about

185:56

values. So for me thinking about what it

185:59

is to be a scientist, why I'm a

186:01

scientist. Um, the core of that is a set

186:04

of ideals of what it what science is,

186:06

right? Science is um the freedom we have

186:09

to make true discoveries and to turn

186:12

them into useful knowledge. And I think

186:15

this core definition of science um

186:20

requires openness. Right? So what do we

186:23

mean by true? Right? That's a there's a

186:25

long philosophy of science trying to

186:26

figure out what is truth. And a current

186:29

view is that one of the things about

186:31

truth is standing up to scrutiny. Right?

186:33

Being open to scrutiny from as many

186:35

perspectives as possible. And so to

186:38

constitute a true discovery means to be

186:40

open to the most rigorous scrutiny you

186:43

can be. So openness is core to that. And

186:47

then similarly when we say we want to

186:48

make useful discoveries, we want the

186:50

things that we discover to have lives

186:52

beyond the moment of discovery. Whether

186:54

that's in cumulative reuse and expanding

186:58

the next part of the conversation,

186:59

opening new questions, or whether it's

187:01

in the sense of applications in

187:02

engineering and technology or in policy

187:05

and society, all of those forms of use

187:09

require that somebody be able to have

187:10

access to your discovery, right? If

187:13

you're keeping it private, then it can't

187:14

be used for any of those purposes. So it

187:16

feels to me that the openness of the

187:19

work that we do is just a fundamental

187:22

core backbone of what it would mean to

187:24

be a scientist and live up to our

187:26

ideals.

187:27

>> Wonderful. Thank you. Yeah. Um I think

187:30

those are really powerful perspectives

187:32

and it's it's great to know, you know,

187:35

the sort of intrinsic deep roots of this

187:37

work help keep us motivated and aligned

187:40

on all this. Um, I'm curious

187:44

how

187:46

living these values, you know, sometimes

187:49

can say shift or change or transform the

187:52

work that we're doing. Um, you know, new

187:55

new things that it might open up,

187:56

whether it's around, you know, different

187:58

forms of access or, you know, other

188:02

other ways to provide this sort of

188:03

transparency. um and in the work you're

188:07

doing, what um what changes have you

188:10

witnessed in trying to do this work?

188:12

Chris, you want to start us off with

188:14

that?

188:15

>> Yeah, I mean, one of the things that's

188:16

changed about how we do this work at the

188:19

MIT libraries is um how do I say this

188:23

delicately? present company accepted. uh

188:26

learning that many faculty who are

188:29

brilliant in their own fields un

188:31

undoubtedly and brilliant in many ways

188:34

actually don't have a very deep

188:35

understanding of how scholarly

188:37

publishing works right and many of their

188:42

perspectives on many of them think that

188:44

the the closed system of scholarly

188:46

publishing is not the right system but

188:49

they have uh solutions that are more

188:51

based on anecdotes and assumptions than

188:54

on rigorous examination of um behavior

188:58

and incentives. Um so one of the things

189:00

that changed here for us is that we did

189:02

launch this center for research in

189:04

equitable and open scholarship so that

189:06

we could meet the challenges of um sort

189:10

of reinventing scholarly sharing um

189:14

based on actual data and actual

189:16

information about what motivates people,

189:18

what are the economics of this. Um, so

189:21

we launched that um in 2019 and continue

189:24

to work on trying to bring in research

189:26

funding to really answer some of the

189:28

nutty the the really hard questions.

189:31

>> Good. Um

189:35

Oops. Um Amy, anything comes to mind for

189:38

you there? Yeah, I was thinking as I was

189:43

watching the the wonderful documentary

189:45

earlier um about the way in which open

189:48

courseware has had an impact so far

189:51

beyond MIT and and certainly in terms of

189:54

the the learners that it's reached but

189:56

but also in terms of the way it's

189:59

impacted what other universities do and

190:01

how they and and that that really has

190:04

been I think you know in the last

190:06

several years for us coming up with

190:09

replicable able sustainable open models

190:12

that we sort of trial at MIT press. We

190:14

do a lot of experimentation, a lot of

190:16

innovation and then you know see go out

190:19

into the watch go out into the world you

190:22

know and and get picked up elsewhere. So

190:24

um you know we we innovated a a model

190:28

for open monograph publishing um with

190:31

support of a very generous funer and um

190:34

have not only been able to publish all

190:36

of our books open access as a result but

190:38

we see others and so I I think you know

190:41

it's it's that value of openness and

190:45

also being at a place like MIT is is

190:47

about having kind of leadership here

190:49

that goes beyond just what we do you

190:51

know at the press.

190:53

talk about other examples, but

190:55

>> yeah, we'll come back. Um, how about for

190:57

you, Rebecca? What's uh what's been

191:00

helping support and drive the progress

191:02

and the changes that you're seeing here

191:04

in in open science?

191:06

>> Yeah. Well, so connected to all of

191:09

these, there's so many things you could

191:11

say because the landscape is changing so

191:13

much so fast. Um in terms of thinking

191:16

about how scientists share the process

191:19

of their knowledge um the the means for

191:23

sharing the options for how you might

191:25

share your science have you know

191:28

exploded over the time I've been faculty

191:30

at MIT for nearly 20 years and in those

191:32

20 years the ways in which scientists

191:34

could communicate their science have

191:37

exploded. So you know it's now possible

191:39

to fully film protocols and share them

191:41

as video protocols. It's possible to

191:43

share enormous data sets, all of which

191:45

are hosted online. It's, you know,

191:47

possible to share them in much more

191:49

well-managed, you know, with better

191:51

metadata so they can be reused better.

191:53

It's possible to think of what you're

191:54

doing as contributing to the um text

191:57

analysis in addition to the readers of

191:59

that work. So just you know and

192:02

protocols can be shared in implementable

192:03

forms for any work that's being done

192:05

computationally. there's GitHub and

192:07

hugging face just like an incredible

192:10

explosion of tools for sharing the parts

192:12

of our scientific work. Um and so that

192:16

creates a huge number of opportunities

192:19

um and some I know we'll come to

192:20

challenges in terms of uh teaching these

192:24

pract instantiating the practices

192:25

teaching the practices making sure our

192:27

students are at the cutting edge of all

192:29

of these practices um incentivizing them

192:32

through policies and recognition. Um so

192:35

so yeah I think in both in my own lab

192:38

and then in our department there have

192:40

been a huge number of new tools created

192:43

actually many of them have already gone

192:45

through the full cycle of being created

192:47

and adopted and then died and obsolete

192:50

became obsolete you know there's a very

192:52

fast turn right now I think in tools

192:54

available for ways of communicating

192:57

science um more openly though often then

193:01

you have to figure out are they open in

193:02

the ways that you wanted them to be. Um

193:05

so this has created many opportunities

193:07

and I'll just say briefly that the one

193:09

opportunity that connects to everything

193:11

we're saying here is um I've started

193:14

teaching a core class to the graduate

193:16

students in our department. Um which is

193:18

the whole point of the class is on how

193:20

to use contemporary tools to make

193:23

science more true and useful through

193:25

making it more rigorous and transparent.

193:27

Right? So all tied up in using these

193:29

tools for openness. um teaching a class

193:32

like that. It's the class that I have on

193:34

Open Courseware. And when I was invited

193:36

to put it on Open Courseware, I

193:37

hesitated at the time because I changed

193:39

that class every year because the tools

193:41

are different every year. I can't this

193:43

year teach last year's tools. Some of

193:45

them have been completely superseded.

193:47

Some of them, you know, are already

193:49

obsolete. So, it's a it's a huge

193:52

opportunity to stay up to date to make

193:53

sure my students are staying up to date.

193:56

um and also kind of overwhelming to

193:57

realize that I'm reconstructing this

193:59

curriculum every year to meet the the

194:02

changes. Um and just to highlight what

194:04

Amy said, yesterday I taught scientific

194:06

publishing in this class and we had

194:08

visit us the editor of a diamond open

194:10

access journal hosted by MIT Press who

194:12

was talking about how diamond open

194:14

access models are changing right now as

194:16

opposed to when I started this class

194:18

four years ago.

194:20

>> Yeah. Yeah. The name of that course is

194:22

tools for robust science. You'll find

194:23

that on open courseware. Um and uh we

194:26

should follow up on updating that

194:28

version here pretty soon. Yeah. Yeah.

194:30

Um, one of the great things about

194:32

getting these different perspectives and

194:33

braiding them together, as I talked

194:35

about at the beginning, is seeing the

194:37

themes emerge. And I'm I'm hearing maybe

194:39

a couple of themes here already about

194:42

like how do we communicate to our

194:45

broader sort of communities, you know,

194:48

what are these values and why do it and

194:50

also maybe sharing some of the best

194:53

practices around methods and tools and

194:55

just as kind of an open question, you

194:57

know, around those sort of themes, you

195:00

know, what what are what are you seeing

195:02

what are we seeing collectively around

195:04

how we message this build support and

195:07

how, you how to think about sharing sort

195:09

of tools, expertise. Anyone care to jump

195:11

in on those?

195:14

>> Um, it was interesting that you

195:16

commented on, you know, your students

195:18

who had developed new solutions that

195:20

sort of went through the whole life

195:21

cycle. I mean, we, you know, we've

195:23

certainly been there at the MIT Press,

195:25

too. Um,

195:28

you know, I but I continue to see sort

195:30

of a very robust, like Rebecca, creative

195:33

space around open infrastructure and

195:35

open tools. Um, and I'm seeing a lot

195:39

more kind of crossun university

195:40

partnerships in those areas. Um, but you

195:44

know, it's just yeah, often these are

195:47

grant funded projects. So that's that's

195:49

definitely an issue. Um, and I mean it's

195:52

I don't know many people that that teach

195:54

the kind of course that you teach, but

195:55

that's terrific.

195:57

Yeah, I was going to say maybe the same

195:59

thing if we're heading into

196:00

communication challenges is I think um

196:04

there's a robust core of people who are

196:07

activated and passionate and

196:08

knowledgeable and really see this as

196:10

central to their work and the challenge

196:13

has been expanding these practices to

196:16

become the default or the standard.

196:18

Right? I I am finding it frustrating

196:20

teaching this class for the fourth or

196:22

fifth time to that many of my students

196:25

are still encountering this material for

196:26

the first time from me and and of course

196:28

they're new students. They're not the

196:30

same students as four years ago. But but

196:32

I I I sort of hoped my whole course

196:36

would be obsolete within seven years.

196:37

You know that the the whole question of

196:39

open science would come to just be

196:42

science and I could move on to teaching

196:44

something else. Um, and so and to that's

196:47

not happening as much and as fast as I

196:49

would want it to. And that feels to me

196:51

like the challenge is not knowledge

196:55

creation or innovation or tool

196:57

development. All of that is happening

196:58

incredibly powerfully with people for

197:01

whom that is their core passion. What I

197:04

see as the major challenge is

197:07

disseminating all of those tools until

197:09

they're default for people for whom it

197:10

is not their passion. so that they're

197:12

using it without thinking about it the

197:14

way that they're currently using the

197:16

terribly broken old systems right now.

197:18

>> Yeah. So, if I can build off that, I

197:20

mean, I think Rebecca's always right,

197:23

but she's right on this, too. Um, you

197:26

know, there is a core of of people who

197:29

are incredibly passionate and work on,

197:31

you know, create classes and work on

197:33

infrastructure and so forth. Uh one of

197:35

the things that we found in a couple of

197:37

different research projects that we've

197:39

done through Creos is that actually

197:42

support for open science practices is

197:44

generally high. If you ask people their

197:46

attitudes about it people's faculty

197:49

everyone says yeah sure I think sharing

197:51

data is really a good idea sharing code

197:53

great sharing my research openly I

197:56

believe in that. Then you look at

197:58

behavior and it lags far behind that,

198:01

right? And so that the challenge is

198:03

getting people to act on their beliefs

198:05

because you I think what what happens is

198:08

when the rubber hits the road, is that

198:10

that how that expression goes? Is that

198:12

the right? Okay. Um you know, people are

198:15

making choices, scholars are making

198:17

choices um to uh I'll I'll stick with

198:21

journal articles. they're making choices

198:23

to publish their journal article in the

198:25

venue that they think will give them the

198:26

most prestige, right? And will help

198:28

their career the most or will help their

198:30

um co-authors, you know, more junior

198:32

co-authors careers. Um so getting that

198:36

behavioral change has been a sticking

198:39

point because the incentives I think are

198:41

are misaligned for many faculty to turn

198:44

that into a positive. I we are also

198:48

seeing some movement among early career

198:50

scholars who really are committed to

198:53

behaving differently and to truly

198:55

sharing their stuff openly and um the

198:58

MIT's graduate student council recently

199:01

passed a resolution on scientific

199:04

publishing um where among other things

199:06

they said uh what did they say? I had

199:09

the note somewhere. Anyway, it was all

199:11

in support of of open scholarship and

199:14

specifically they called out that they

199:16

wanted scholars and their faculty to be

199:20

evaluated on scientific merit not on you

199:24

know the name of the journal or H index

199:27

or whatever um and that and that science

199:30

should be shared openly. So I'm seeing

199:33

that that um you know the junior

199:35

scholars are sort of pushing the um

199:40

pushing for better behavior or more open

199:42

sharing of research. So,

199:45

>> it's a challenge, but I I'm choosing to

199:48

believe this is a turning point. We we

199:50

need you know we need different more new

199:54

incentives and you know other than where

199:57

did you publish you know there's work

199:59

underway to develop a data sharing index

200:01

that people could use the same way they

200:03

use agendex things like that but I also

200:06

think the um the dspace repository is a

200:10

great example too because you know MIT's

200:13

been very successful in getting faculty

200:15

I think more than other institutions

200:17

>> to open their work Yeah, through the

200:20

repository.

200:20

>> I mean, yeah, just to riff off that, I

200:22

mean, MIT has one of had one of the

200:24

first uh all faculty open access

200:27

policies, which uh gives MIT uh the

200:30

right to distribute faculty journal

200:33

articles freely and openly to the world.

200:35

Um which we do through DSpace, which was

200:38

also invented here at MIT before my

200:40

time. But, um and we do that through

200:43

DSpace. And I I'm going to get the

200:46

number wrong, but at present we have

200:48

over 60% of faculty articles that have

200:51

been published since that policy was

200:53

passed are openly available in DSpace,

200:56

which whenever I give talks, I always

200:58

claim that's the highest percentage of

201:00

any US university. And no one has

201:02

contradicted me. Um, but but no one but

201:05

no one keeps there's no stats on it any

201:07

there's no like

201:09

>> uh nobody shares their stats on it but

201:11

nobody's contradicted me that we're at

201:13

the highest and that's in part because

201:15

faculty self-deposit but it's also

201:17

because we in the libraries resource the

201:20

work to go and get those articles so

201:22

that faculty don't have to find the

201:25

right one to deposit. Um, so we resource

201:28

the work to make uh MIT scholarship

201:31

available online and openly.

201:33

>> Can I tell a story riffing off what?

201:36

>> Well, just a minute ago when you were

201:38

saying we've done research on support

201:40

for open scholarship at MIT. Um, part of

201:43

that research was work Chris and I did

201:45

together and um was a was a really fun

201:48

opportunity to pair uh Creos and um my

201:53

role as associate dean of science

201:55

because it so there is a robust field of

201:57

meta science which studies support for

202:00

open practices among scientists

202:01

generally and the practice there is

202:04

typically to survey scientists and ask

202:06

them how much do you support these

202:08

following open practices? um and that

202:10

literature reports across US scientists

202:14

high support for open practices but very

202:16

low participation in the surveys right

202:19

so out of all the people invited to

202:20

participate in the survey 15 to 20% of

202:23

the people participated and that 15 to

202:26

20% of the people reported very high

202:28

support for open science and so that I

202:32

have always been bothered by that I

202:34

don't know whether scientists are really

202:36

into open science or whether the 15% of

202:38

scientists to answer a request to

202:40

participate in a survey about open

202:42

science are really into open science.

202:44

That's a very different number. And the

202:46

question of whether what we're facing is

202:47

pluralistic ignorance or genuine

202:49

opposition is completely unanswerable

202:51

when you have 15% of people responding

202:53

to your survey. Um so Chris and I

202:56

concocted a research program together in

202:59

which we would ask the same survey

203:01

questions. So what's your support for

203:02

open science? But using two different

203:05

recruitment methods. So one was the same

203:07

thing. We sent an email to all the

203:08

scientists in the school of science at

203:10

MIT. Well, in five five departments in

203:12

the school of science at MIT and just

203:13

opt in are you how what's your support

203:15

for open science and we got 20%

203:17

participation rate very standard and the

203:19

support for open science was very high

203:21

in this 20%. Um and then we took a

203:24

random sample of labs in the same

203:26

departments and I wrote to them and I

203:28

said in my capacity as associate dean I

203:31

want to visit your lab. Can I come to

203:33

your lab meeting? And everybody said

203:34

yes. and I said, "Thank you for inviting

203:36

me to your lab meeting. Before we get

203:38

started, I want you to do the survey."

203:40

So, I got 95% participation rate. Okay.

203:44

I believe this is the only meta-cience

203:46

experiment that's ever had 95%

203:48

participation rate. Right? So, we had

203:50

incredibly representative samples. And

203:52

the question was in this representative

203:55

sample where now basically you were

203:56

coerced to answer our questions about

203:58

open science, what would the support for

204:00

open science be? So, can I do audience

204:03

participation? Okay. So the standard

204:05

rate of support for open science is like

204:07

85 90% in the optin right the people who

204:10

chose to answer this question. So who

204:13

thinks that in the representative sample

204:15

of open science I'm going to ask you to

204:16

raise your hand we got so 20%

204:19

participation I'm going to go up from

204:20

here who thinks that it was only 20%. So

204:24

approximately the people who would have

204:25

opted in or more 20% or more.

204:27

Everybody's got to raise their hands.

204:28

Not less than 20% guys. Okay lower your

204:31

hand if you think it was only 20%. So if

204:34

your hands still up, you think it was

204:35

more than 20%. Okay? If your hands still

204:37

up, you think it was more than 40%. If

204:39

your hands still up, you think it was

204:40

more than 60%. If your hands up, you

204:43

think it was more than 80%. So that is

204:45

the percent support for open science was

204:47

the same in the representative sample as

204:50

in the opt-in sample. Sue knows the

204:52

answer.

204:53

>> Yeah,

204:53

>> it was the same. The support for open

204:56

science was above 80% in the in the

204:59

representative sample. So then when we

205:01

wrote this paper, we had to say either

205:03

support for open science is very high

205:05

everywhere or it's very high at MIT.

205:09

So

205:09

>> either finding is good.

205:11

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's fascinating

205:14

to to to hear some of these details and

205:18

think about what are the things that get

205:20

in the way of translating those values

205:21

into practice, you know, and I I think,

205:24

you know, each of you is is doing some

205:26

really interesting things. curious if we

205:28

might just lean into that a little bit

205:30

more and you know just talk and share a

205:32

little bit about how how are we working

205:35

to bridge that that gap between the

205:39

values and the practice here and what

205:40

what might be a really like exciting

205:43

opportunity I know to let people know

205:45

about

205:50

>> um I mean the you know this this

205:53

indirectly gets to that question of

205:55

challenges that you said you were you

205:57

know you're going to to raise and um you

206:00

know we're running a business right with

206:02

a hundred or so staff to support and um

206:06

but a very clear mission. We're not like

206:08

commercial publishers and it's you know

206:10

it's it's an ongoing challenge to be as

206:14

open as we want to be um and to sustain

206:17

what we do.

206:18

>> Um but you know I've been really excited

206:22

about the success of as I I think I

206:25

mentioned our open books model. It's a

206:26

model in in which um we have a

206:29

collective subsidy from hundreds of

206:31

institutions around the world and they

206:32

each contribute a pretty modest amount

206:34

and if we reach a threshold contribution

206:36

level we can open up all the books you

206:39

know and and and that's been going

206:41

strong for several years now and it it's

206:42

had you know lots of copycat models at

206:45

other presses. So that that's a that's I

206:47

think a really good example. Um another

206:50

um was early in the pandemic we you know

206:53

recognized that the explosion in

206:55

preprint publishing around corona corona

206:58

virus which you know made very good

207:00

sense that science was you know wanted

207:02

to publish people wanted to publish as

207:04

quickly as possible um to address this

207:07

incredible public health crisis um that

207:10

that there was some public

207:12

misunderstanding and media

207:13

misunderstanding around you know whether

207:15

or not this content had been peer-

207:17

reviewviewed and so we stood as a public

207:19

service a very rapid peerreview overlay

207:23

model that was one of the first and is

207:24

is also we're seeing that spread and I

207:27

see a lot of I think that's a very very

207:29

promising future for journal publishing

207:33

you know it's kind of publish curate

207:35

where you use existing um open

207:37

repositories whether they're

207:38

institutional or or field-based like the

207:41

archive or bioarchchive and then layer

207:44

peer review and other forms of curation

207:46

on top of it. So

207:49

I think so. The sticking point that I

207:52

see is the one that um Chris described

207:55

which is our collective perceptions of

207:57

prestige and merit, right? How do we

207:59

evaluate the merit of a scientist and um

208:04

that so there the topic of how we how we

208:08

actually evaluate the merit of a

208:09

scientist and how we expect the merit of

208:11

a scientist to be evaluated there's a

208:13

lot of very persistent myths that are

208:15

hard to undo. So for example, in the um

208:18

graduate student council resolution that

208:20

Chris referred to, they call on MIT to

208:23

evaluate scientists by their scientific

208:26

merit and not by bad proxies like H

208:29

indexes and journal names. So I will say

208:31

I know because I do these cases, right?

208:34

I both see and present promotion cases

208:36

for the school of science. I've seen all

208:37

the cases that have been presented in

208:39

the last five years. No one has ever

208:42

mentioned an H index. So on the one hand

208:44

they're trying to solve a problem that

208:45

does not exist right that problem that

208:48

problem doesn't exist.

208:49

>> On the other hand the question of

208:51

journal name is much more complicated

208:54

because journal name itself is not

208:58

particularly prominent. We don't

209:00

particularly we don't for example say

209:02

this person should be promoted because

209:03

they had three nature papers. That would

209:05

never cross our lips. On the other hand

209:08

we are looking for impact on a field.

209:10

Right? So we do ask how has their work

209:13

made impact on a field and there is a

209:16

very complicated ecosystem by which

209:20

scientific discovery especially right

209:22

now we are inundated with scientific

209:24

discoveries and scientific papers right

209:26

the number of scientific papers is

209:27

increasing literally exponentially and

209:30

it is far beyond any human capacity to

209:32

read the all the papers in their

209:34

discipline now it was already hard when

209:36

I started 20 years ago but it's

209:37

completely impossible now and so there's

209:40

Now, as there is in every other aspect

209:41

of our lives, a very dysfunctional

209:44

attention economy, right, of people

209:46

trying to get your attention to their

209:47

work. And what you buy for an

209:51

extraordinary price with the named

209:54

publishers is competition in the

209:56

attention economy, right? One of the

209:57

things that you are literally just

209:59

buying is eyes on your science. And so

210:02

that is a way to pay for impact, right?

210:05

More people have seen your work. Now,

210:07

it's not the same as merit and

210:09

excellence, right? And is unambiguous

210:11

when we promote when we hire and promote

210:13

people. What we talk about is the

210:15

science and we evaluate it for for

210:16

rigor, right? Somebody who is not a

210:18

rigorous and excellent scientist would

210:20

never get hired and would never get

210:21

promoted at MIT. That's not there's no

210:23

problem there. The problem is that we

210:26

also look for impact on your field. And

210:28

that one I think is more intertwined

210:31

with the messed up economics and the

210:33

information the attention economy that's

210:35

happening and harder to undo through

210:37

individual choices even at the scale of

210:40

an institution. Right? So I keep saying

210:42

to my colleagues and my students we get

210:45

to decide what we mean by excellence.

210:47

like what do you mean we're helpless in

210:49

the face of these nameless incentives um

210:53

to do you know to publish our places in

210:55

to publish our science in um you know

210:58

coercive and unethical publishing houses

211:01

and they say well we might get to decide

211:03

what we mean by excellence but impact is

211:07

this faceless nameless other that we

211:09

can't do anything about and therefore

211:10

we're helpless and therefore we have to

211:12

pay $12,000 per paper and undermining

211:17

that belief. I think that's one of the

211:20

hardest problems that I'm facing. I will

211:22

say I got a grant from NIH just before

211:25

the new government um to that gave us

211:28

three years to try to improve this in my

211:30

department and in the school of science.

211:32

It's specifically about policies and

211:34

incentives at the scale of institutions.

211:36

Um so at least a year and a half ago,

211:38

NIH was interested in helping fix this.

211:41

>> Yeah. And we did get a mention of open

211:44

data sharing in the school of science

211:47

eval uh like oh yeah remember

211:49

>> we no these are when we evaluate

211:52

excellence there's no problem we look

211:55

for rigor transparency scrutiny there's

211:57

no problem in our evaluation I really

211:59

genuinely believe we have the right

212:02

standards but it's much harder to unpeel

212:06

>> impact

212:07

>> yeah actually it's NIH that's funding

212:10

the the data data sharing index project

212:12

as well. So I think I mean these federal

212:14

agencies are really motivated to fix

212:16

this.

212:16

>> Well, anybody who's funding science

212:19

because they want science in the

212:20

interest of anything, whether it's

212:22

health or innovation or discovery or

212:24

policy, whatever you're funding it for,

212:27

it's not in your interest to send

212:28

$12,000 per paper to a private company

212:31

that's making a 25% profit off of it. So

212:34

anyone who cares about the actual impact

212:37

of science

212:38

sees that they have to fix this problem.

212:42

>> That's good. We're we're we're leaning

212:43

into some sticky structural stuff.

212:46

>> Chris, go. I mean, and you know, I'll

212:48

also note that like, you know, one of

212:50

our motivations in the library is to try

212:52

and sort of what I often say is break

212:54

the strangle hold of these, you know,

212:56

large for-profit commercial publishers

212:59

with their opaque charges and and um

213:04

high rent seeking. Um so uh six years

213:07

ago now almost six years ago now um

213:10

based on their uh lack of alignment with

213:16

our open ethos and our open access pol

213:18

our faculty open access policy we

213:20

actually canled our journal subscription

213:22

to Elsair our thank you uh and we have

213:27

been we have not had a severe journal

213:29

subscription for six years now and you

213:32

know we've tried to tell that story that

213:34

you know

213:35

MIT has survived. Research and teaching

213:38

at MIT has not grown to a halt without a

213:41

subscription to Elsair. And after, you

213:43

know, almost six years, we are starting

213:45

to see, I mean, probably prompted also

213:48

by, you know, financial crisis at many

213:50

of our peer institutions, we are

213:52

starting to see some of our peer

213:53

institutions actually follow that lead

213:56

and and similarly break up with the

213:59

large commercial publishers. um in many

214:02

cases our breaking up with those

214:04

publishers also means that we're no

214:06

longer paying in bulk for publishing

214:09

charges right and so now we're seeing

214:12

that faculty are now faced with choices

214:16

that actually impact their pocketbook I

214:18

mean not really their grants or their

214:20

discretionary funds but again I'm trying

214:23

to be hopeful here and think that that

214:25

um uh I I have heard faculty who've

214:29

never talked to me about open publishing

214:31

before say things like I guess I need to

214:33

rethink my publishing strategy which is

214:36

exactly what we want them to do right

214:38

and so anyway I'm trying to be hopeful I

214:41

think there's some uh something here um

214:44

that again may be a turning point that

214:46

between the the junior scholars

214:49

demanding change and the sort of

214:52

financial crunch that both the

214:54

institution and now individual authors

214:56

are facing

214:58

>> um is some incentive

214:59

>> and related to that you We we've seen

215:01

whole editorial boards from these

215:02

commercial publishers jump ship and

215:04

start new journals with us and

215:06

>> yeah yeah

215:07

>> much much less expensive publishing

215:10

charges.

215:10

>> Great.

215:11

>> So

215:11

>> so thank you. Um final question for the

215:14

panel. Um what's your hope for the

215:17

future in this work and especially

215:19

thinking kind of collaboratively and

215:21

working in a more kind of braided

215:23

fashion across these different opens. Um

215:27

you want to start us off on that? Oh,

215:29

um, yeah, there's there's so much there.

215:30

We're really focused and, you know,

215:32

related to the conversation today on on

215:35

um figuring out our way forward with

215:38

open textbooks and and more partnership

215:40

with open learning. We're doing we got

215:42

one of the um the MIT um generative AI

215:46

consortium grants um and some other

215:48

funding to explore interactive AI

215:50

enhanced textbooks um based on all the

215:53

open publishing we're doing. And I I um

215:55

you know I I am at at the same time as a

215:58

publisher who worries a lot about

216:00

copyright and what these companies are

216:02

doing with our content. You know that

216:04

raising the question of maybe open for

216:06

humans to read is not the same for open

216:08

for these commercial companies to use

216:10

without permission. Um, you know, I'm

216:13

very excited about the way in which AI

216:16

is um, further democratizing access to

216:19

information because it's not just about,

216:21

you know, here here it is, you know,

216:23

delivered to you. It's also about here

216:26

it is translated for you at the level

216:28

you can read it in the language you can

216:29

read it, all of those things. So, um,

216:33

you know, figuring out the role of a

216:36

university press like the MIT press in

216:38

that space is is challenging and

216:40

exciting. So I mean I'm excited to look

216:44

at um ways in which you know MIT press

216:48

and the libraries and faculty can

216:49

collaborate around opening up the

216:52

research that comes out of some of uh

216:55

MIT's recent presidential initiatives

216:57

right so there's a big focus there's the

216:59

climate project right there's uh the AI

217:02

initiative there's quantum um heels

217:06

health I never know what

217:07

>> health and life sciences

217:08

>> thank you health and life sciences right

217:10

I mean Those are those are places where

217:12

uh you know there's been an investment

217:14

in interdisciplinary work on these big

217:16

real world problems and if we can work

217:19

together to make sure that the output of

217:22

you know and the idea is that that the

217:24

research in those areas would have

217:26

impact more quickly and so if we can

217:28

work together across the various parts

217:30

of MIT that are committed to open to

217:32

make sure that the fruits of those

217:34

initiatives really is open in a in a way

217:37

that is uh consumable by I think humans

217:40

and machines. I think that's a game

217:43

changer.

217:45

>> Well, I'll maybe finish exactly on topic

217:49

and say what gives me the most hope for

217:51

the future is the class I teach um which

217:54

is again on open courseware if you want

217:56

to see a version of it. But the um I'm

217:59

teaching it in person right now and at

218:02

the end of every class you we spend

218:04

three hours per week on each of the

218:06

different topics and challenges in

218:07

science and how to increase transparency

218:09

and rigor in that part of science. And

218:11

at the end of every three hours I spend

218:13

the last 10 minutes asking everybody in

218:14

the room to tell me one thing, one

218:17

concept or tool from that week's

218:19

materials that they'll take into their

218:20

practices. And while this is coerced, it

218:22

is the most amazing uh mental health

218:25

intervention on me because I leave every

218:28

Tuesday morning at noon feeling like 18

218:31

more MIT graduate students are going to

218:33

implement these practices in their lives

218:35

wherever they go from here on out and

218:36

that gives me hope.

218:38

>> Yeah, thank you. Yeah, I'll say um from

218:41

an open courseware perspective at MIT

218:43

because our mandate from day one has

218:45

meant to kind of reflect across the

218:46

entire curriculum and that includes

218:49

advanced graduate level subjects which

218:51

are so grounded in like the research

218:54

academic literature. I think it's

218:56

incumbent on us to continue to pay extra

218:59

attention to this aspect of the open

219:01

knowledge world. Um and you know we'll

219:04

continue to work collaboratively with

219:05

you all. So, just want to thank you for

219:07

for joining me here on this session. I

219:11

Yeah, I think we're just at the right

219:13

time for ending. Sorry, we didn't save

219:15

time for questions, but maybe you can

219:18

catch folks up here if you if you have

219:19

one during the break. And I believe at 2

219:23

PM we will start our next session, which

219:26

is um catalysts of open philanthropy's

219:29

role in open the the open education

219:31

movement. So, please join me in thanking

219:34

Amy, Chris, and Rebecca.

219:58

I like

220:02

>> one of the things

220:08

I want science

220:11

to ask people to pretend to do something

220:14

with what they got which they don't know

220:16

yet. So I'm nudging them.

220:31

Heat. Heat.

220:59

Heat.

221:01

Heat.

221:06

Heat. Heat.

221:32

Okay.

221:36

Heat.

222:02

Sorry.

222:11

2.4.

222:46

Stop it.

223:07

So I don't

223:48

I mean the last thing that you said

223:51

that's that's also over

224:02

you.

224:12

Heat. Heat.

224:22

Heat.

224:41

Heat.

224:46

Heat. Heat.

225:19

That's for you.

225:24

Heat.

225:26

Heat.

225:51

Friday.

226:12

You don't want to pay for that service.

226:28

What was that?

226:40

Single

227:01

guys.

227:20

It looks like

227:30

a lot of

227:46

I think that's

228:01

I know.

228:26

I will practice.

228:42

Oh my god.

228:52

Heat. Heat. N.

229:02

1.

229:26

Yeah.

229:29

Heat.

229:47

Heat.

229:53

Heat.

230:16

Heat.

230:19

Heat. Heat.

230:41

Hallelujah.

230:57

Thank you.

231:21

Heat. Heat.

231:55

Heat. Heat.

232:16

Heat. Heat.

232:28

Heat. Heat.

232:42

Heat. Heat.

233:04

United States.

233:19

Heat. Heat.

233:57

Hello.

234:03

>> Oh my god.

234:14

Say something interesting. He said he

234:18

does.

234:38

Shall we start?

234:40

Um,

234:42

my name is Peter Calfman and I work at

234:45

uh open learning and I have absolutely

234:48

the best job here on campus. Together

234:51

with our team in resource development, I

234:54

have the opportunity in fundraising to

234:56

work uh

234:58

with the most progressive,

235:01

the most generous, the wisest,

235:05

the most courageous,

235:08

the most creative, the bravest, and I'm

235:11

just reading the adjectives they sent

235:13

me. Uh the most the most creative, the

235:17

bravest, the h the most handsome,

235:20

elegant, the strongest, most

235:22

intelligent,

235:24

uh the most exciting and intelligent

235:27

people, the most visionary and

235:29

courageous philanthropists, the most

235:32

generous people in the world. of the uh

235:36

thousands literally thousands of people

235:39

who have given so generously to open

235:42

courseware over the past 25 years. Yes.

235:46

Um three people stand out as exemplars

235:50

of this kind of vision.

235:52

You'll find out which three in a minute.

235:57

Three people stand out as exemplars of

236:01

the kind of uh vision, commitment and

236:03

courage uh we admire. We admired then uh

236:08

at the start of open courseware and

236:10

today now uh more than ever. Kathy

236:13

Casserly is an adviser, strategic

236:16

consultant, executive coach and a

236:18

pioneer of our global OAR movement.

236:22

Kathy led the creation and launch of

236:24

Hulet's initial hundred million dollar

236:28

uh portfolio in open education and later

236:30

served as CEO and president of Creative

236:33

Commons. her uh work at and with the

236:36

Carnegie Foundation, the Aspen

236:38

Institute, Open Stacks at Rice

236:41

University, Open Education Global, and

236:43

across the uh philanthropy and

236:45

technology sectors have influenced

236:48

countless leaders um and organizations

236:52

advancing openness today and uh forever.

236:56

Peter Baldwin is research professor of

236:58

history at UCLA, global distinguished

237:00

professor at NYU, and chair of Arcadia,

237:04

the Londonbased philanthropy that he

237:06

founded together with his wife, Lisbet

237:08

Rousing. Peter chairs the digital

237:11

committee of the New York Public

237:12

Libraryies Board of Trustees, serves on

237:15

the Wikipdia Endowment Board, and is the

237:18

author of, among other books, Athena

237:21

Unbound:

237:23

Why and How Scholarly Knowledge Should

237:25

Be Free for All. This is an MIT Press

237:28

book. Uh, everybody should go out and

237:30

get an MIT Press book today, but it's

237:33

also available open access, and we'll

237:35

return to this. Arcadia supports open

237:38

access to knowledge as one of its

237:41

priorities and has been a catalyst of

237:44

expanding open at MIT because open

237:47

learning as we've heard throughout today

237:49

is not alone here. uh the MIT press, the

237:52

MIT libraries, the MIT Museum, the MIT

237:56

Media Lab all play a role in this uh

238:00

enterprise of what Hal Abson or maybe TS

238:04

Elliott has called daring to disturb the

238:07

universe. TJ Bliss is a former uh

238:11

program officer at the William and Flora

238:13

Hewlet Foundation where he led the

238:16

foundation's strategy for open education

238:19

uh resources. He uh co-developed the

238:22

costs, outcomes, uses and perceptions

238:24

research framework which is foundational

238:26

to open education resource uh research

238:29

throughout the world and he was

238:31

instrumental in developing the UNESCO

238:33

recommendation on OEER.

238:37

Dr. Bliss is the associate commissioner

238:39

of academic affairs for the Utah system

238:41

of higher education and a clinical

238:44

assistant professor in education

238:46

leadership at the University of Idaho.

238:50

Dr. Bliss can also read Toltoy and

238:52

Dosetski in the original Russian which

238:55

no doubt increases the likelihood that

238:57

as a human being he will understand the

238:59

world in all of its fullness and

239:01

actually find fulfillment.

239:04

Uh please join me in uh welcoming them

239:07

again to this celebration.

239:10

>> Well, that was really good. So, um, uh,

239:14

we're describing our part of the MIT OCW

239:17

conversation as one about the essential

239:20

role that philanthropy has played and

239:22

continues to play in driving forward a

239:25

global movement centered on access,

239:27

equity, and the belief that knowledge

239:29

should be a public good. We should start

239:32

with some origin stories and questions

239:35

for Kathy Casserly here. In particular,

239:37

I have with me the original funding

239:40

proposals to the Huelet and the Melon

239:43

Foundations. Um, some signature blocks

239:46

are still blank and unsigned in these

239:49

documents. So, the whole enterprise

239:51

might be invalid or whatever, but um,

239:54

we'll ignore that right now. It says in

239:56

one of these from 2001 the following

240:01

o from 2001 OCW clearly has the

240:04

potential to fulfill the educational

240:07

promise of the worldwide web. The OCW

240:10

concept will help transform the way

240:12

colleges and universities define their

240:14

role in disseminating knowledge, their

240:17

outreach to new audiences

240:19

uh around the world and their

240:21

institutional and faculty engagement

240:23

with the internet as a vehicle for

240:25

service not just for profit.

240:29

2001

240:31

>> all the MIT schools, all the MIT

240:33

departments. I mean, what on earth were

240:37

you thinking when you decided to fund

240:38

this kind of thing?

240:40

>> I was thinking back to that document and

240:43

I I recall it was a 20page document and

240:46

there are a few 20page documents that

240:49

got through the Ullet Foundation with a

240:51

$50 million grant and this was one of

240:54

them. And we did have Melon Foundation

240:57

as a partner. We trusted Melon

241:00

Foundation and Bill Bowen and Ira Fuse

241:03

who were key leaders there. And um

241:07

I don't know what we were thinking, but

241:09

we knew it was the right big idea. And I

241:11

think at Ullet it was or I I'd say for

241:15

the ecosystem it was what I call synergy

241:18

or synchronicity

241:20

kind of meets preparation meets

241:23

opportunity and meets timing.

241:25

>> The internet was changing the world. We

241:27

knew something had to happen at Ullet.

241:30

Bill Ullet made his money on innovation.

241:33

>> The ULIT program Mike Smith was new. He

241:36

was leading the program. He had just

241:38

joined and he wanted to bring the

241:41

changes in the internet into the

241:42

education. Where could ULIP make a

241:44

significant difference? And so we be

241:47

that was the questions we began to

241:48

ponder. And so when this big idea came

241:52

through when Chuck Vesque sold it to

241:55

Ullet in his magnificent way that he

241:58

does it and did

241:59

>> it has had this lasting legacy. And

242:02

because Ullet had a partner in Melon, I

242:05

think there was just this synergy that

242:07

was created at that moment in time where

242:11

um the Ullet board understood it right

242:13

away. Uh Bill Ullet's son understood it

242:17

right away because he was he loved music

242:19

and gave a lot of his scores away.

242:22

President Paul Bre, who was part of the

242:24

film, understood it right away. And so

242:27

it was a big risk worth taking and it's

242:31

had its amazing halo effect. So that's

242:34

where it began.

242:36

>> Thank you. In in in some of the renewal

242:39

proposals that we also reviewed from the

242:41

mid from the mids um funding proposals

242:45

to Huelet, we came across this kind of

242:48

statistic. Um TJ, I'll turn turn to you

242:51

with this one. um among educators 85%

242:56

feel so this is a few years into the

242:58

experiment 85% feel that OCW has helped

243:02

them improve their courses

243:05

88% of students and 90% of self-arners

243:09

say OCW helps them learn 88% of MIT

243:14

students um so given your work in

243:17

education and more generally in access

243:19

to knowledge your uh board affiliations

243:23

and and more. As a funer, as a

243:26

professor, do you buy it?

243:31

>> So, I'm going to start by saying former

243:33

funer.

243:34

>> Former funer.

243:35

>> I don't have any money.

243:36

>> I've got to go. I was Yeah.

243:40

>> Okay.

243:40

>> Uh yeah, I do.

243:42

>> All right.

243:42

>> I I I buy it. And it's interesting you

243:44

asked that because my origin story

243:45

started with David Wy, who I has been

243:48

mentioned a couple times. Um,

243:51

and I didn't believe a word he said

243:52

about this in the first class I took

243:55

with him, which was grant writing.

243:57

>> Uh, but he sent me to a meeting with

244:00

some Gates money that he had from the

244:02

Gates Foundation

244:03

>> in the other Cambridge

244:05

>> across the pond, which was the OCW

244:09

meeting. It was the now OE global, but

244:11

at that time it was it was my first

244:13

introduction to anything OEER, open

244:15

education at all. I didn't do that work.

244:18

work. I was a grad student and that's

244:20

where I met many people. Some of them

244:22

are in this room

244:23

>> today. Um people who literally changed

244:27

my life and I sat and listened to them

244:29

talk about this kind of data. That was

244:32

2012.

244:34

>> Yeah. Because because they went the next

244:36

week and and that was the the UNESCO

244:38

declaration on OAR in 2012. That's where

244:40

everyone was going and all that buzz

244:42

around getting that going. I had no idea

244:44

what was going on. uh no idea what I was

244:47

about to be a part of. And as I've moved

244:50

through this space, as I as I spent time

244:52

at Huelet and got to really meet

244:54

incredible people and stand on the

244:55

shoulders of giants, not just in the

244:57

funding community, but the people you

244:59

saw in the film, the people that are

245:00

still in this room who believe in these

245:03

ideals

245:05

around what knowledge can do for the

245:07

world and what the technologies that we

245:10

have can do to expand access to that

245:12

knowledge in the world. Uh it's it's

245:16

incredible. And what I've heard today,

245:17

what's been very heartening is not just

245:19

about access.

245:21

>> When you listen to faculty talk about

245:22

it, when you listen to students talk

245:24

about it, they talk about how this has

245:25

changed the way they think about

245:27

teaching. And this has been a tough nut

245:29

to crack. Access to knowledge is an

245:31

easier nut to crack because of the

245:33

technology that we have, because

245:35

distribution is essentially free,

245:36

because we can work through the

245:38

copyright issues and the legal things,

245:39

right? The barriers to access. But

245:42

getting faculty to change what they do,

245:45

as someone once said, it's harder to

245:47

change a history course than it is to

245:49

change the course of history.

245:52

It's funny.

245:54

>> So, but the point is is that it's very

245:57

difficult to get any teacher to change

246:00

what they do. And what we've heard

246:01

today, the evidence is is that is that

246:04

once you engage in this kind of work,

246:06

then you

246:08

see that there's something more that you

246:10

can do. And then something I was working

246:12

on at Huelet and where I went after that

246:14

was to the Wiki Education Foundation

246:16

because they were doing something in the

246:17

space of open pedagogy that really

246:19

nobody else was doing

246:21

>> in that way at that scale with that kind

246:23

of impact. But it was literally changing

246:25

how students learn and how teachers

246:27

teach because of open knowledge creation

246:30

of knowledge in the classroom which

246:33

often you don't get to until you're in a

246:35

place like this and you can work with

246:37

someone who's creating knowledge all the

246:38

time. How do you do that at a community

246:39

college in the middle of the the West in

246:42

the United States? Right? So that's I I

246:45

believe those stats. I believe them

246:46

because I've seen them, but I think this

246:48

open pedagogy piece is is the nut to

246:51

crack now.

246:52

>> So to you again, like uh how important

246:55

is it for people to be able to have the

246:58

ability to adapt MIT originated content

247:02

in in the work that they do as teachers

247:05

and learners. It's essential that they

247:08

be able to do it. Will everyone do it?

247:11

Absolutely not. Will some people just

247:13

use it for as is? Yes. Well, most people

247:16

probably use it as is. Is that value?

247:18

100%. It's amazing value at scale. But

247:23

those that do take the time and energy

247:25

and hopefully some of them get paid to

247:27

do that labor. More and more are getting

247:29

paid to do that kind of labor. Uh the

247:32

more value that it can bring, the the

247:34

value can be amplified exponentially. as

247:36

people adapt that content. We've heard

247:39

one example, just translating it for

247:41

heaven's sakes, just translate it. The

247:42

Ukraine I we speak Russian together,

247:44

been to Ukraine. Um Sophia's story is

247:46

absolutely incredible to me as I think

247:48

about what's going on there. And that

247:49

first attempt,

247:51

>> this work to translate it and and to

247:52

hear that being taught in Ukrainian was

247:54

incredible.

247:55

>> We we can do more of that and it needs

247:57

to be done. And not just by MIT, by

247:58

anybody out there. MIT is not going to

248:01

translate everything into every single

248:02

dialect and language that's out there,

248:04

but it can be done now with with AI. It

248:06

can be done quickly, and that permission

248:09

to do that remains ever more it's it's

248:12

more essential today than it was ever

248:14

before.

248:16

>> Thank you. Um,

248:19

Peter, I work at MIT, but I'm not very

248:22

good at math. I know that your the

248:24

Arcadia has given

248:27

$1 billion like I can't even get there

248:30

in my imagination but north of1 billion

248:33

dollars to support um uh culture uh open

248:38

access um an extraordinary variety of

248:42

things that align with a lot of what

248:45

we're speaking about today. Does this

248:47

work? Um I mean I shouldn't say does it.

248:51

How does this work resonate with

248:54

Arcadia's interests and your uh own?

248:58

>> How does the work that we're talking

248:59

about here?

249:00

>> Yes.

249:00

>> Well, look, we're just simple funders.

249:04

So, we need

249:06

>> sure we need people who have good ideas.

249:08

Um, we we stand no taller than the

249:11

people on whose necks we stand on whose

249:15

shoulders ride.

249:17

>> Other people stand on our necks, right?

249:20

>> Take it as you will. funders do that too

249:22

sometimes. Um,

249:24

>> so we're only as good as the people we

249:25

work with and and for us it's, you know,

249:27

we've been doing open access for 15

249:29

years or so. It's been a it's been a

249:31

steep learning curve. We naively entered

249:33

the field thinking that, oh, research

249:36

libraries at universities, they must be

249:38

precisely the people to partner with

249:39

because they're interested in knowledge.

249:41

They're interested in getting it out.

249:43

They're interested in education and

249:44

enlightenment. Well, it turns out

249:47

they're not really because they see

249:49

their content.

249:51

>> Yeah,

249:51

>> if one may call it that,

249:53

>> right?

249:54

>> Those August volumes and Widner and

249:56

elsewhere with such a blean term. They

249:59

see what they have as sort of the crown

250:00

jewels. This is a way of recruiting

250:03

faculty. If you give it away, they don't

250:05

have it anymore. So, the research

250:07

libraries are not actually very good

250:10

partners. Other libraries are MIT

250:13

library and press of course are

250:15

exceptional in this. I believe we had an

250:17

entire panel on this recently so I don't

250:19

need to go to that. I could skip lightly

250:21

over that.

250:21

>> No, but feel free to you know how

250:23

exceptional we are.

250:26

>> This kind of thing.

250:26

>> I I'll come back and lube you up later

250:28

on as well.

250:30

>> It's them. It's it's

250:32

>> uh we've worked a great deal with the

250:33

Internet Archive. uh their concept of

250:36

controlled digital lending is extremely

250:39

persuasive. Uh it's also of course

250:41

illegal and that's what got them into

250:43

trouble. We paid a big chunk of their

250:45

illegal bills uh to get them out of the

250:47

hole that they dug themselves into but

250:49

now they seem to be out and sort of

250:50

continuing. But the institution that

250:52

we've had the most success with and I'd

250:54

like to sing their praises as well. Not

250:56

just this has been a sort of love fest

250:58

for MIT. May I introduce an outsider as

251:01

it were into

251:02

>> I don't think so

251:02

>> into the mix. tough.

251:05

>> Okay. Okay.

251:06

>> And and that is the the New York public

251:10

>> uh the New York public library is of

251:12

course you know not only the biggest

251:14

actual public library system in the

251:17

country I think if it's not the biggest

251:18

it's the second biggest something like

251:20

that depending I don't really know what

251:21

the metrics and how they measure this

251:24

but it's also you know one of the top

251:26

five research collections in the

251:28

country. So they both they do it and

251:31

they want to get it out the door. uh

251:33

they want research and they want

251:34

enlightenment and they want to uh spread

251:36

it. So they are in a sense they're very

251:38

different from other research libraries.

251:39

I mean what distinguishes the New York

251:41

public from others is you know they

251:43

don't really have any vested interests

251:44

that want to hamster their holdings. you

251:46

know, they don't have any faculty, they

251:48

don't have any students, they don't have

251:50

any university administrators, and above

251:52

all, they don't have any university

251:54

librarians sitting there, you know,

251:56

shouting Gollum like mine, precious, all

251:59

mine, and you know, keeping keeping the

252:01

content to themselves. Um, and so

252:04

they've been very open to this idea of

252:06

of making open access a reality. And the

252:10

the first way they we've been doing it

252:13

is um a sort of a slightly mis

252:15

restrained version of control digital

252:17

lending along the lines of the internet

252:19

archive except that we decided we needed

252:21

to ask for permission and we didn't want

252:22

to get sued and we have deeper pockets

252:24

than Brewster Kale and therefore we

252:26

definitely don't want to get sued.

252:28

>> Mhm.

252:28

>> Um but we also quickly discovered that

252:31

that that was a

252:33

that couldn't really be scaled. if you

252:35

have to go and ask everyone for

252:36

permission, you know, then then it gets

252:37

to be a very slow process.

252:40

>> And then fortuitously in the meantime,

252:42

of course, AI happened. And so we

252:44

thought surely this has to be in the mix

252:46

as well. And what we're now doing, and I

252:49

don't want to be too specific about it

252:51

because it's a work in progress, but

252:52

we're sort of on the verge of having

252:54

something uh to show um the world, is

252:57

we've we we're harnessing LLMs to work

252:59

over a very controlled database,

253:03

>> which is basically the public domain

253:04

stuff that we've gotten back from

253:06

Google. Um so about a million and a half

253:09

books. So, you know, nice reasonable

253:12

collection to start on. And um the LLMs

253:16

that we're using they present the data

253:18

they don't summarize it because of the

253:20

controlled data because of the because

253:22

they present results not summarizing

253:24

them. We think that the hallucination

253:26

issue has been if not solved then at

253:29

least uh attained and and the idea is

253:32

that you can essentially read in a very

253:35

different way because you put in your

253:36

questions and you get back a great deal

253:38

of information that's very precise and

253:40

then because of the exception that

253:44

paragraph 108 in the copyright log

253:46

affords libraries

253:48

>> we can also deliver a fair amount of it

253:50

you know directly to the

253:51

>> to the reader. So we're hoping that this

253:53

is going to sort of allow us to harness

253:55

AI in on behalf of open access and to

253:59

make an enormous and ideally growing

254:02

corpus of material available not just to

254:06

New York public library card holders but

254:08

you know anyone who can get into the

254:10

system

254:10

>> and that could be something that's worth

254:12

emulating at other

254:14

>> one might hope so

254:16

>> and when will that be available to

254:18

>> well this this remains on the glitches

254:21

being eyed up but I we're we're sort of

254:23

within striking distance of having

254:24

something to show.

254:26

>> That's great.

254:28

>> So, uh we like to open learning. We say

254:31

at open learning uh using open as a

254:34

verb. We like to open learning.

254:36

>> So, if we for Peter also but uh you know

254:39

for the panel um

254:41

>> to interrogate a little bit uh the

254:44

importance of freeing knowledge

254:46

generally today. Um

254:49

you know uh um Peter in Athena Unbound:

254:54

Why and how scholarly knowledge should

254:56

be free uh for all available from the

254:59

MIT press. Did I say say that? Um also

255:02

in an open access edition. You write um

255:06

the vested interests of rights holders

255:08

are open access's biggest hurdle 2023.

255:13

Um and some scientific publishers in all

255:17

their trickery have quote adopted the

255:20

open access mantra chanting it all the

255:24

way to the bank. Um still valid

255:28

as critiques

255:31

of

255:33

uh boundaries to open access. I guess

255:36

what I'm asking is what are the forces

255:38

that seem to be closing access to

255:40

knowledge or trying to keep it closed or

255:44

trying their darnness? Whether these are

255:46

state interests, whether these are

255:48

commercial business interests um you

255:51

know, especially now uh as someone has

255:53

put it uh uh especially now that as

255:57

someone has put it, the truth is so

255:59

often paywalled, but so many lies are

256:02

free.

256:05

Well,

256:07

oddly enough, in my neck of the woods,

256:10

which is to say the humanities and the

256:12

social sciences, those who most

256:15

jealously guard their rights are the

256:18

authors. And in this case, those authors

256:21

who are scholars,

256:22

>> Mhm.

256:23

>> who think that they have a product that

256:25

they can market

256:27

>> effectively people who think that they

256:29

might be able to write a bestseller or

256:31

at least something that's going to

256:32

generate some level of royalties for

256:36

them. And so, especially in my own

256:38

field, historians, you know, historians

256:41

>> actually do occasionally write

256:42

bestsellers. You know if you write a

256:43

good book about the civil war it might

256:44

actually sell in four and possibly five

256:46

figures. If you write one in you know

256:48

compl lit probably not. So there are

256:50

certain fields that you know more with

256:53

the illusion uh still remains you know

256:56

viable that one might come up with

256:58

something. I find that they are often

257:00

the most jealous guardians whereas the

257:02

scientists

257:03

>> there it seems to be strictly an

257:04

economic problem. There are interests

257:06

that are making money off of open access

257:09

in a way that probably is is goes beyond

257:12

the pale and needs to be reigned in and

257:14

needs to be made more affordable. But

257:16

the scientists themselves have no

257:17

illusion of ever profiting from their

257:19

output from their content. And it's only

257:22

the publishers who are sort of in it.

257:24

Whereas, you know, for the humanities

257:25

and social science people, the authors

257:27

and the publishers still collude.

257:30

>> Can I just pick up on a point?

257:32

>> Yes, please. Panel.

257:32

>> So, it's fascinating because

257:35

in the origin of MIT open courseware to

257:39

get the first five faculty I don't know

257:41

Steve are you here Bill Dick you and

257:45

Shagura to get the first five faculty

257:48

they weren't lining up

257:51

they were not lining up they were afraid

257:53

if I open up my classroom will anyone

257:55

come to class

257:58

>> it was like Ann Margus I'm pulling teeth

258:02

all that work that the OCW does of like

258:05

making it easy for faculty just hand me

258:07

your notes we'll give it back to you

258:08

we'll tape you like it's 25 years later

258:12

it's the same story now once that

258:14

happened the first five or 10 got

258:16

released and those faculty became rock

258:18

stars is Gilbert Strand still here

258:22

like his linear algebra course got

258:24

disseminated around the world so quickly

258:27

>> within 24 hours someone found an error

258:29

in like chapter six of his courses in

258:32

the 24th page and he's like who has read

258:34

this from Vietnam so quickly, right? So

258:37

like so when they became rock stars then

258:40

everyone became signing up, right? So

258:42

the incentive structures are really

258:44

interesting and and of course now it's

258:47

the you know we were we're still here.

258:49

25 years later, but there were so many

258:52

blockages along the way which MIT open

258:55

courseware figured out and with the

258:56

faculty and with the going back to the

258:58

values and with Chuck Ves always saying

259:02

that it was around about improving

259:04

teaching and learning at MIT

259:06

>> that's part of what he sold the story

259:08

to. So we can improve it at our

259:09

university and we can show other

259:11

universities could do the same. And so

259:13

it's just a it's interesting to hear

259:16

>> the same story uh two decades later.

259:18

It's odd that in in in academia that

259:21

money should count more than publicity.

259:23

You would think that the po point of

259:25

this is besides of course the obvious

259:27

thing that we all want knowledge to be

259:29

spread and that's I mean that's sort of

259:30

that goes without saying that's the

259:31

hallmark reading card version of what

259:33

academia sells itself as but um you

259:36

would think that publicity would be

259:37

something that our colleagues would

259:40

crave much more than a few dribbles of

259:42

royalty. Mhm.

259:44

>> I mean, it is it is the fear that

259:45

someone in in some obscure province

259:48

somewhere is making money selling a CD

259:51

of your content somehow and you're not

259:53

getting a piece of it. Um TJ, you want

259:57

>> Yeah. So um the the the thing we're

260:00

thinking about right now in in the

260:04

higher education space governance

260:06

curriculum

260:08

uh all the institutions that I'm

260:11

uh involved with uh being an

260:13

administrator of administrators so watch

260:15

out for me

260:17

>> um

260:18

>> if you're a faculty member but uh

260:21

reminds me of a comment that Barbara

260:22

Chow made and Barbara was the director

260:24

of of the education portfolio uh at the

260:27

Hillet Foundation when I was there. She

260:28

came to me one day and she said, "TJ,

260:30

what if tomorrow all the publishers just

260:32

decide to give away all their content at

260:34

a much reduced price, probably not free,

260:36

but what if they just lowered their

260:37

prices overnight?

260:39

>> Would we still need to be doing this

260:40

work in open?

260:43

>> So good."

260:43

>> And I I had to think about that for a

260:45

little bit. And that my response to her

260:47

was, well, there there's more there's

260:49

more to this than just affordability.

260:52

And that's a very American kind of

260:53

context because of the structures that

260:55

we have. However, that has happened

260:59

recently in the last two years with

261:01

what's known as inclusive access and

261:03

equitable access or flat fee models at

261:06

our institutions or first day access.

261:08

The publishers are ostensibly are

261:09

claiming to solve the very problems that

261:12

OEER has been yammering about solving

261:14

for a while, which is first day access

261:16

and affordability by offering their

261:20

content in a Netflix model where you pay

261:24

very little and it can be rolled into

261:26

your funding um method like Pell grants

261:29

and scholarships and so it's part of

261:31

tuition and students don't really feel

261:32

it all these things. And when the

261:36

question is what's what's threatening

261:37

OAR, what we're seeing right now is a

261:40

disincentivization for faculty to even

261:42

engage in this work because in their

261:43

minds a lot of them it's been solved.

261:45

The biggest problem has been solved for

261:47

their students.

261:48

>> What they don't realize which I've

261:50

learned just yesterday I was sitting in

261:52

a meeting like this with OAR advocates

261:54

and and workers and others in the West

261:58

>> is that the publishers aren't making

262:00

good on their promises. They've lowered

262:01

the price for a minute. it's going to go

262:03

back up. But even the first day access

262:05

programs aren't there.

262:07

One student didn't get their books for

262:09

six weeks in their first day access

262:11

program. And so as a policy maker, which

262:13

is the role I'm in now, I'm thinking how

262:15

can we how can we establish policies and

262:18

guidelines and frameworks and

262:19

protections against the the damage that

262:23

this is actually doing to open knowledge

262:26

and to the the halo effect, which I hope

262:29

becomes more than a halo effect. becomes

262:30

the real effect of changing the

262:33

educational practice. Well, if faculty

262:35

feel like, "Oh, my students all get

262:36

their textbooks for free. They don't

262:37

have to pay for them now." The the

262:39

incentive to actually engage in this is

262:41

going away at at the institutions that

262:44

have adopted these models. That's what

262:46

we're seeing right now. And it's I think

262:48

that's the saddest thing for me. I get

262:50

why I'm I'm not faulting the publishers

262:52

for it, by the I know there's some might

262:54

like they are incentivized but by they

262:57

do everything exactly the way that

262:58

they're going to do it because of the

263:00

incentives that are there the business

263:01

model the thing that they're doing like

263:02

I'm surprised it took so long to get

263:04

there but I don't know that we are

263:07

responding in a way yet that is is

263:09

addressing those challenges headon. I'm

263:12

trying in my role

263:14

>> through policy that we hope to have

263:16

through the door on in June uh to to put

263:19

some barriers on this but I still don't

263:21

know how to solve for the the

263:23

disincentivization to actually adopt OAR

263:26

to change your pedagogy to care about

263:27

student affordability when they think

263:29

the problem is solved and er and it's

263:30

erroneous because it's not solved for

263:32

the students it still costs them it's

263:33

now just a piling into their debt so

263:36

it's so it's being hidden from them

263:38

that's what's worrisome to

263:42

Can I add a point?

263:43

>> Yes, please.

263:44

>> So, I think one of the challenges is,

263:49

and I think you've given a nod to this

263:51

already, is that we

263:54

can't spend all our energy defending

263:56

ourselves. We have to get proactive. And

263:59

so, we have a lot of organizations who

264:01

are open in lots of different ways. And

264:03

they're still siloed in, you know, there

264:06

are consortiums coming together. Open Ed

264:09

Global is certainly one a consortium of

264:11

universities that spun out of the

264:13

interest of universities from around the

264:14

world who wanted to replicate the MIT

264:16

model. But MIT Open Courseware sits

264:20

here, Khan Academy sits here, Creative

264:23

Commons sits over here, the licensing

264:24

structure, New York public library,

264:26

right? We have this huge public commons

264:29

and we haven't yet created a governance

264:32

structure

264:34

to protect the commons, whatever that

264:37

means. Exactly. But being individual,

264:40

we're now 25 years in. We now have the

264:43

content. How do we create some

264:45

governance structure so we have the

264:46

sustainability so we can build together

264:49

and jointly and not doing it all alone?

264:51

Because there's certainly going to be

264:52

more power together to create that kind

264:55

of system.

264:55

>> I wonder whether the whole process of

264:58

finding data andor reading as we in the

265:02

HSS call it um isn't going to be

265:05

radically changed by AI. I go back a bit

265:08

to the our experience at the New York uh

265:10

public because once stuff is up there

265:12

and it when it's in the cloud it doesn't

265:14

much matter how it got to be in the

265:16

cloud

265:16

>> whether published by a publisher or

265:18

uploaded by you

265:19

>> and the LLMs have pled it

265:22

>> right

265:22

>> then it's going to be equally available

265:24

to anyone who asks the right question

265:26

and the difference will be that between

265:28

those people who are asking questions

265:29

that are factually nubblelike where they

265:33

want to know something specific and can

265:35

get a specific answer will which they'll

265:37

find in all kinds of surprising places

265:39

thanks to the LLMs and those who want to

265:42

have a sort of more general question

265:43

what is the meaning of life how did the

265:44

civil war start whatever something like

265:46

that

265:47

>> for whom of course there will be so many

265:48

answers

265:50

it'll be useless um and so that won't do

265:53

them um very much good but the the the

265:57

sort of the distinction between the

265:59

publish um then curate or the curate

266:02

then publish models that you know often

266:04

get discussed I think have largely

266:06

evaporated because once it's up there,

266:09

regardless of how it got up there, it'll

266:11

be available to everyone. And I think

266:14

the AI is going to sort of challenge us

266:18

to develop a whole new method of

266:20

assimilating data and reading than has

266:23

been the case.

266:24

>> A governance structure to protect the

266:27

commons. just um uh um hope one hopes

266:32

that this panel will also leave time for

266:35

question and answer discussion because

266:38

this is a unique opportunity to really

266:40

um have that kind of conversation. But

266:44

last week, our friend uh and supporter

266:46

from the Sloan Foundation uh was up on

266:49

campus and we were talking about where

266:52

his program popularizing the public

266:55

understanding of science will go. We uh

266:59

we work with YouTube. Um uh as Kurt and

267:03

others have mentioned, perhaps we're the

267:05

largest educational presence there. Um,

267:09

and we're now, you know, given the new

267:11

attention economy, as Rebecca Saxs

267:15

mentioned, uh, that we have now, we're

267:17

trying to understand, you know,

267:20

Instagram and Tik Tok, but a little

267:22

wearily given who owns them and what

267:25

their real perhaps, uh, purpose is. So

267:28

who you know uh with a nod to our Huelet

267:33

Foundation supported open 2030 working

267:35

group a number of members are here

267:37

members we've hosted from other

267:39

universities Wikipedia the internet

267:41

archive creative commons who might our

267:44

natural allies be um

267:48

uh a number of them have already perhaps

267:50

been mentioned here but

267:53

>> what do you what do what

267:59

That

268:00

>> is that directed at me?

268:01

>> Yes, it is. Actually, I'm I'm trans I'm

268:02

not translating.

268:03

>> You won't translate. Can you get auto?

268:06

>> Yeah. What do you think?

268:08

>> What does the panel think? Who might our

268:11

natural allies be?

268:13

If we are creating a governance

268:15

structure to protect the commons, who if

268:18

we might, if we think about it,

268:20

>> with whom are we

268:23

>> marching? So Tony Aay who used to run

268:27

who developed BBC's I player or whatever

268:30

it was called um and then worked at the

268:33

New York public as their digital chiefly

268:35

is in the process of trying to put

268:38

together something he calls public.com

268:41

>> which is to create a entire new whatever

268:43

that's called when you have a do you

268:46

know new layer of the internet um that

268:50

will in effect be a kind of sort of good

268:52

housekeeping seal of approval

268:54

You don't necessarily have to change

268:55

your thing to do. Sorry, not

268:57

public.com.public is of course what it's

268:59

called being confused in old age. Thank

269:02

you. Sorry for being

269:06

>> vague, right? I got the right. Um, and

269:09

the idea is you don't necessarily have

269:10

to sort of change your own domain name

269:12

to public, but you could be routed

269:14

throughpublic and you will have to meet

269:16

certain criteria to be allowed to do

269:18

that. But that these criteria will help

269:20

you sort the wheat from the chaff in the

269:22

blooming buzzing mess that is today's

269:25

internet. So, it's an attempt in a sense

269:27

to curate the internet.

269:28

>> I like that. I mean,

269:30

>> we thought early about creating curating

269:33

systems to give signals of approval

269:36

around open educational content and not

269:38

just in open courseware, but we funded a

269:41

lot of projects. Open University UK,

269:43

>> Rice University, Carnegie Melon,

269:47

UNESCO, a lot of projects. And so, but

269:49

how could quality content be found?

269:51

Because sometimes there was junk, I call

269:53

it junk and gems, right? Like a lot of

269:55

content was being created. What had the

269:57

signal of approval? You had this whole

269:58

publishing process here that made sure

270:00

the quality of MIT open courseware was

270:03

solid. But there were lots of different

270:04

nuggets of content being shared and when

270:07

was it most useful to whom and the

270:09

curation systems are really diff were

270:11

difficult at that time. We tried a few

270:13

things. We tried something with witchy

270:14

you may not even know that and like they

270:17

worked to a point but then things were

270:19

changing so fast or not everyone was

270:20

participating. So I like this idea about

270:23

public and I think a lot of it is how

270:25

you get higher ed institutions to join

270:27

in in a consortium way how you get

270:29

others to join in early. I mean MIT

270:32

joined in early around sharing their

270:34

courseware but it was difficult to get

270:36

another USbased

270:38

>> university to follow MIT because MIT's

270:40

brand was so strong.

270:42

>> We used that for a halo effect to create

270:45

the open educational resources movement.

270:47

We did that intentionally. We used

270:48

Carnegie Melon intentionally. using

270:50

intentionally but that also because of

270:53

the competitiveness other R1's didn't

270:56

necessarily wanted to do it or they

270:57

wanted to do it in their own way. So

271:00

when you create something like

271:01

this.public, how do we make sure

271:03

everyone joins in and it's just not a

271:06

few and the content is for community

271:08

college students and for the rural

271:10

schools and for students of all, you

271:13

know, abilities. And so how do we make

271:16

sure that happens? And so I just having

271:19

gone through this journey for 25 years,

271:22

what are the things that we could have

271:23

maybe done differently had we known? But

271:25

we did the best we could at the time we

271:27

were at. But now since we have people

271:29

still leading this, how do we pass a

271:31

baton and make sure people are really

271:33

thinking about that inclusiveness um and

271:36

bringing all players to the table. So I

271:38

and just one other nod, Ullet did a few

271:41

great things as they built the open

271:42

educational resources portfolio. One is

271:44

they never wanted to take credit. I mean

271:46

that came out of the board. We don't we

271:48

don't need our name on anything. We just

271:50

wanted to happen. I would be like, but

271:51

right now we need it because this is

271:53

very early and usually actually has a

271:55

signal. But we're very flexible with

271:57

other funders and if a funder wanted to

271:59

do the research piece, we would use our

272:01

money for something else if they wanted

272:02

to do the technology. So we brought a

272:04

lot of different funders in and that

272:06

also and that brought all their networks

272:08

in and that then makes things expand and

272:11

scale much faster. So that was really

272:13

interesting along the way.

272:16

So I don't have an answer to your

272:18

question beyond beyond this uh except

272:20

but but I do have a question

272:22

>> for your question.

272:24

>> Okay.

272:25

>> And that is what what is what should be

272:27

the role of government?

272:28

>> Yes.

272:29

>> In governing the commons. And I think

272:31

about this and this is from Kathy who

272:33

taught me all about this as we walked

272:34

around the Boston Commons. The original

272:36

Commons the idea like the foundational

272:38

idea of what a commons is right here.

272:41

were in the birthplace uh at least in

272:43

the in in the United States and um

272:46

>> I don't I don't know what the role of

272:48

government should be in this. I do know

272:50

that governments have a very strong

272:52

interest in it whether it's an economic

272:54

interest

272:55

>> and a lot of governments see open as a

272:58

as a way to save money at the

273:00

governmental level but they also you

273:02

know they are the purveyors of public

273:04

goods

273:05

>> right

273:05

>> right I mean like that is the that is

273:07

one of the roles of I say democratic

273:09

governments truly democratic governments

273:12

>> um de democracy is threatened so

273:15

therefore the commons are threatened I

273:18

would say where you don't have where you

273:20

don't have strong democracy, you don't

273:22

have a a common understanding of the

273:25

idea of public good. I even had this

273:27

conversation

273:28

>> uh just this week with someone who asked

273:30

a question, what is a public good?

273:33

>> How do we answer that? I didn't know

273:34

that. I thought I was thought that was

273:35

an assumed

273:36

>> right

273:37

>> thing. So I I I guess I'm posing that

273:40

question back to you, Peter, or anyone

273:41

else that wants to tackle it is what

273:43

role should governments play in in

273:45

protecting and governing and governing

273:47

the commons and should they have a role

273:48

or is this going to be done without the

273:51

governments? Is this some is this a

273:52

bunch of nonprofit organizations and

273:54

philanthropy and aren't constrained by

273:57

governments and bureaucracies that need

273:58

to be doing this or is there is it all

274:00

of us?

274:01

>> Well, we we we need a panel. Can this

274:03

day go till tomorrow? Actually, we

274:05

because we need we need a panel on, you

274:08

know, government's role um in protecting

274:12

the commons or in promoting education as

274:16

a public good, which used to be

274:17

self-evident.

274:19

We may need to wait um for what Rebecca

274:23

Saxs was calling a new government um uh

274:28

to explore that further. But bringing

274:30

all the bringing all the and perhaps in

274:33

the question and answer uh discussion

274:36

section today we can um um have a

274:40

vigorous uh chat about some of that. But

274:43

bringing all the players to the table, I

274:46

I know that in the o early uh proposals

274:49

to Hulet and Melon, um there was uh a

274:54

remarkable

274:56

level of attention being paid to

274:59

creating a movement, not just to funding

275:04

>> uh um MIT, and I withdraw the word just,

275:07

not just funding MIT, but um to creating

275:11

a movement. And so the um open education

275:15

consortium that Steve Carson and other

275:17

people here had such a major role to

275:20

play in um OE global which is coming up

275:24

uh and MIT is hosting that in October.

275:28

Uh also bringing all the players or many

275:31

of the players to the table. Uh I wonder

275:35

how we can go about encouraging the

275:38

players to come philanthropy to support

275:40

their uh movement

275:43

in this direction. Um

275:47

it's a key question that hasn't died at

275:50

all since 2001. Quite perhaps the o

275:53

opposite.

275:54

>> Well, and something we haven't we

275:55

haven't even solved yet is how to get

275:57

the open communities to work

275:59

collaboratively together in in a in a

276:01

real it's still it's still siloed. the

276:03

the free and open source software folks

276:06

are different than the open education

276:08

folks. There's a tiny little bit of

276:09

overlap right there. Even even open is

276:14

is siloed and and

276:18

I don't know like even at Huelet I was I

276:20

didn't do much work on open access.

276:22

That's that's another we just don't have

276:24

the we can we can focus on this thing

276:25

open educational resources and open

276:28

access is a is a different it's a

276:31

different strategy. It's a different

276:32

funding line. It's a different

276:33

foundation that's going to do that yours

276:35

right largely right and there are a few

276:38

organizations Nicole Allen's here from

276:40

Spark that that even there you have two

276:42

people one's on open access and one's on

276:44

OEER right and they're they've tried to

276:46

have conferences together and they've

276:48

gone

276:48

>> they've been interesting let's say but

276:51

we haven't we haven't even found a way

276:53

to do that so I'm just the challenges

276:55

are real here even in the open space

276:58

whether it's open science open culture

276:59

open knowledge

277:01

>> open education They're still distinct.

277:03

>> They're still distinct

277:04

>> disciplines or groups or

277:06

>> communities maybe is the word.

277:08

>> So protecting the commons which

277:10

encapsulates all of them.

277:11

>> Yeah, that's a different

277:12

>> is is I guess I'm just highlighting it's

277:14

a big challenge. It's it's there's no

277:16

easy solution to this.

277:17

>> Well, I think each part of the ecosystem

277:19

had to grow and become stable enough as

277:22

its own entity for then it to begin to

277:25

create the network among them. It was

277:27

the same with organizations in the open

277:30

education space, right? It was like, you

277:33

know, Open University UK and Michig, you

277:35

know, in Michigan was doing work and um

277:38

UNESCO was doing work and then we had

277:40

work with VJ in India and like they're

277:42

all coming to me and I'm like you guys

277:44

got to talk to each other because I'm

277:45

only one person, right? And now like

277:46

look at this amazing ecosystem. The

277:49

thing on the funders too is that I think

277:51

philanthropy is there for a while but

277:52

they're not there forever. 25 years ago,

277:55

the idea was that we would help

277:57

kickstart this initiative at MIT, but

277:59

that MIT would build it into its

278:01

institutional line. It would become so

278:03

valuable to the organization. We know

278:06

alumni still love it. We know students

278:08

who are coming to MIT. We've heard the

278:10

stories who take the courses who then

278:13

can join in. So there's a lot of

278:14

benefits that MIT has experienced as a

278:17

part of this and that there are real

278:20

costs and those real costs have to be

278:22

borne and they can't be borne by

278:23

philanthropy forever. And so that's

278:26

where I think governments come in.

278:28

Nicole Allen, I mean she led a lot of

278:30

the work in California, $15 million

278:32

going to the open initiative in

278:34

California. So what about if every state

278:37

did that or many states that did did

278:39

that, right? So there can be some

278:41

different replication. So I think we

278:42

have to think about governments and when

278:45

we talk about governments we don't have

278:46

to talk just about the United States.

278:48

There are governments around the world

278:49

who are supporting this work in

278:51

important ways too.

278:52

>> Yeah. But be careful what you wish for

278:54

when it comes to government. Really look

278:56

at the debate over whether or not social

278:57

media should be reigned in. I mean is

278:59

there any agreement other than that

279:01

something needs to be done on that or

279:04

safe harbors and fair use. When I talk

279:06

to Europeans, it is very common among

279:10

even bian liberals that you know safe

279:12

harbor is an absolutely atrocious thing

279:14

and must be shut down immediately and

279:16

fair use is you know wildly uh something

279:20

that goes against author's moral and

279:22

other interests and you know the reason

279:24

why the system in this country even

279:26

today is more flexible more open is

279:29

precisely because of these things like

279:31

fair use and safe harbors that the

279:33

Europeans have basically shut down. So

279:36

>> too much government meddling is also a

279:38

problem.

279:38

>> So So I I've been thinking about this

279:41

this week. Um I was talking with our

279:43

with our chief financial officer um

279:47

about this who's new to this topic. He

279:48

might be listening. So I hope I don't

279:50

get in trouble with this comment. Um but

279:52

he he he challenged I said it's always

279:54

been my

279:56

um belief that the solution for

279:59

sustainability the business model for

280:01

open education is government. That

280:03

actually I tri that to Wayne Macintosh

280:05

in New Zealand

280:06

>> that he said that all the time the

280:07

business model the sustainability model

280:09

for open education needs to be the

280:12

public. It needs to be government

280:14

because that's where the public funds

280:15

are. Um but this you know this this

280:18

person who is been in public finance for

280:20

a long time challenged that a little bit

280:22

by saying there are so many competing

280:24

interests that are so heavy especially

280:27

here in the United States. He just

280:29

mentioned Medicaid that it's even

280:31

threatening higher education generally.

280:33

Public higher education is threatened as

280:35

it as existentially threatened. We've

280:38

seen a flip in public funding for that

280:40

and tuition. It's becoming privatized

280:41

basically, right? Which means people are

280:43

valuing it less as a public good and

280:45

think and with that things like this,

280:48

even though the ROI is incredible, you

280:50

can show it, it's it's threatened. And

280:52

so his argument was

280:53

>> there's also just an incalculable amount

280:56

of new money and philanthropy out there.

281:00

That was his argument. And maybe I'm

281:01

throwing this out as a challenge to say

281:02

there are lots of people with lots of

281:05

money who could fund all of this pretty

281:08

easily without even really feeling it

281:12

when where although governments play in

281:14

big numbers the the competition for that

281:17

is so so fierce that it that it's hard.

281:22

Now we've seen it happen, right? We've

281:23

seen it happen in California and New

281:24

York and Texas and

281:26

>> Idaho. Yay. I was there when that

281:28

happened. um we've seen it happen, but

281:31

is it sustainable? What what what comes

281:33

to compete with it? And I don't know the

281:34

answer. I don't know that I buy it or

281:36

not because I I spent years trying to

281:39

work and get more funders involved, more

281:41

of private philanthropy involved in this

281:43

space and with some success, but always

281:46

not always indirectly. Oh, this this

281:48

fits what we what we really care about

281:50

is this problem and OAR helps or open

281:53

education helps.

281:54

But no one came in and said, "This is

281:56

the thing we're going to fund like like

281:58

Hila did or like Arcadia has done."

282:00

There's very few of them.

282:01

>> You're kind of looking at them right now

282:03

in a way. So

282:05

>> I'm not giving any hope here. I'm sorry.

282:07

I'm this is not a

282:08

>> brutal um true uh truth. Um

282:14

to look a little further into the

282:15

future. Um last question from this side

282:19

anyway. Um so you know what should we be

282:23

thinking about and what should we all be

282:25

doing in the months and the years ahead?

282:28

Uh hopefully panel audience um in those

282:32

2001 proposals again we wrote for

282:35

example about the power of translation.

282:38

We expect OCW we said to be of

282:41

particular value for developing

282:43

countries. MIT will be pleased, we

282:46

wrote, uh, to have other universities

282:49

translate OCW into many other languages.

282:53

Uh, we've begun to explore how we might

282:56

work with Wikipedia to advance Demetrius

282:59

Bertimus' vision of reaching a billion

283:02

learners and more. and uh you know

283:05

working more effectively with the

283:07

commons um to bring uh to campus a

283:10

Wikipedian and residents a Wikipdian uh

283:14

Wikipedian at large uh who who's joined

283:17

us today actually he's here with us um

283:20

what should we be thinking about um I

283:24

keep looking at the screen and thinking

283:25

we have 25 minutes left but that's just

283:28

because it says 25 years it hasn't

283:30

changed 20 so we don't have 25 minutes

283:34

left, but um uh you know, one thing, two

283:37

things, if our panel would be so kind as

283:41

to listen to that prompt.

283:45

>> Here's what wakes me in a dead sweat in

283:47

the middle of the night. Who's going to

283:50

be stewarding digital content?

283:53

>> It's used to be the libraries that took

283:56

care of content. The Library of Congress

283:58

in this country, the ultimate steward.

284:00

>> Um libraries don't own their content

284:02

anymore. They just lease it from the

284:04

publishers.

284:05

>> We'd be fools to think the publishers

284:07

are going to be stewards of it. When

284:09

they go belly up, it disappears. When

284:12

the content goes into the public domain,

284:14

are the publishers the ones who are

284:16

going to keep it on their servers and

284:18

maintaining it? If not them, then who?

284:21

Right now, we have, you know, various

284:23

organizations like locks and clocks and

284:25

portico and things like that. Third

284:27

party organizations that are the backup

284:29

systems for the digital content. But,

284:31

you know, is that really what we're

284:33

willing to rely on as the digital

284:35

equivalent of the Library of Congress?

284:37

If so,

284:39

>> yeah,

284:39

>> you know, that's a bit fishy, it seems

284:41

to me. Um,

284:43

>> so I worry a lot about who's actually

284:46

going to be responsible for maintaining

284:49

digital content, especially when it goes

284:51

into the public domain.

284:53

>> The the cold sweat question for the

284:57

other panelists.

284:58

>> I don't wake up in a cold sweat.

285:01

That's a figure of a speech. I think

285:02

>> we live in California.

285:04

>> California.

285:05

>> But um I mean when I think about the so

285:08

the movement has had so many challenging

285:11

periods.

285:12

>> Yeah.

285:12

>> There's been the rest in peace blogs of

285:15

OEER. There's been you know there

285:17

there's oh there's the publishers we're

285:19

you know we're going to take you out.

285:20

There's been people who have always been

285:23

not hopeful. And I do believe there's

285:24

enough champions. I do believe the work

285:26

is situated now in enough places around

285:30

the world and institutions that this

285:33

will go on but it needs to evolve. So

285:35

how and where AI will evolve with open

285:39

education resources is a big one

285:41

>> and that will make the translation that

285:43

will make the ability to take the

285:46

content and create it in ways that are

285:48

most useful for different learners is

285:49

going to be extraordinary and this is a

285:51

moment in time when that can happen. And

285:54

tied to that, the human element is still

285:56

so critically important as has been

285:58

raised throughout the day today. And

286:01

this will actually, I think, free the

286:03

humans up to do what they do best is to

286:06

flip the classroom to teach in different

286:08

ways to work with certain students to

286:10

re-imagine teaching and learning like we

286:13

had hoped from the very beginning

286:15

because the inspiration was not to free

286:18

content. the inspiration was to improve

286:22

teaching and learning for people around

286:24

the globe to have that access to

286:26

knowledge and that's the piece that I

286:29

think we're really getting to. So, um

286:32

remain hopeful as I have been for the

286:34

past 25 years.

286:36

>> Well, and here's some good news. I can

286:38

say that I do know that a focus on

286:42

improving teaching and learning is is is

286:46

growing across higher education in

286:48

America. Organizations like AQ, the

286:51

American Conference on Undergraduate

286:52

Educators, I think that's what that

286:54

stands for. Um they're they offer now

286:56

certificates that faculty can get in

286:58

teaching and learning. And yes, Huelet

287:01

funded them for a minute to do some

287:03

things around OAR. The reality is is if

287:05

more and more faculty are being expected

287:08

to focus on their pedagogy and their

287:10

teaching and learning, there's going to

287:11

be a place for for open education, open

287:15

access, scholarship, all of it. Um, so

287:17

that's good news, right? That's

287:18

happening. The other thing that gives me

287:20

hope is that I think the one of the

287:23

original strategies and Kathy can tell

287:24

me if I'm wrong on this, is that the

287:26

idea was also to institutionalize

287:28

this approach, right? And MIT, the

287:31

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

287:34

has done that. That's why we're here. I

287:36

mean, it is institute.

287:39

It is institutionalized. And it's also

287:42

the whole idea around open open

287:44

education, OAR, open access has been

287:46

institutionalized in so many places

287:49

around the world. But I can tell you I

287:51

just came from a meeting yesterday where

287:53

there were people from Saipan and Guam

287:54

and all the other western states and

287:56

territories and many of them had the

287:58

title OEAR librarian or OAR director or

288:00

OAR something

288:02

>> in this meeting that I was in with James

288:05

Gothic Grossclag

288:06

>> right

288:06

>> that you quoted today. I texted him and

288:08

told him that you quoted open this

288:09

meeting. He said he can't be here but

288:10

he's in that meeting with his colleagues

288:12

there focused on this. That gives me a

288:14

ton of hope that that we're already

288:16

seeing it institutionalized. Can that go

288:18

away? Sure. Is it likely once it's

288:20

institutionalized?

288:22

No, because that's that's the thing that

288:24

higher ed's the best at is just

288:26

maintaining its status quo. So,

288:28

>> we've got OEAR as as partly as a status

288:31

quo and scholarships happening too. So,

288:32

that that there are challenges ahead.

288:34

Surely there are all these things we've

288:35

talked about, but I'm also hopeful

288:37

because what I've seen is that it's it's

288:40

here. So, now what do we do with it? How

288:42

do we move it forward? How do we make

288:43

sure every president, every provost,

288:45

every dean, every department chair and

288:47

then as many faculty as we can

288:49

understand that it's here and that what

288:51

what what's possible with with open that

288:54

that's I think the next frontier at

288:57

least I'm speaking as a higher education

288:59

as a government person now. But that's

289:01

what I want to do.

289:02

>> Oh, that's right. You're a government

289:03

person.

289:03

>> I'm a government person. That's why

289:05

>> I see. I remember. Um

289:08

um it's fascinating to hear AI uh creep

289:11

in again and again into our discussions

289:13

in New York Public Library, the future

289:15

of teaching uh and learning. Um

289:19

um and I'm sure we're going to hear more

289:21

about that in the session that follows.

289:23

Uh but this is a um session on uh you

289:27

know essentially uh philanthropy's role

289:30

resource development. I I would be

289:32

remiss if I didn't take a second to um

289:36

say that our RD team, Ivon Ang and

289:40

Deianne Nigen and and Laura White and

289:43

the venerable and everpresent Tom Smith

289:47

uh um have done so much to make this

289:50

conversation during this panel and this

289:52

whole uh um day uh um uh happen. Um and

289:57

I just want to

290:03

Um today's discussion reminds us that

290:06

philanthropy does more than fund

290:09

projects seeds movements, nurtures

290:12

experimentation

290:13

and ensures that the world's knowledge

290:15

can be shared more freely and equitably.

290:19

Um so please join me and my RD

290:22

colleagues uh um in thanking these

290:25

visionaries from the world of

290:26

philanthropy.

290:32

Thank you. I love what you're doing.

290:35

>> So, in a few minutes, we'll hear from

290:36

open learning leadership on the future

290:38

of MIT open education. Um, hope you'll

290:42

join us for the final session of the

290:44

day. Thank you. Thank you very much.

290:57

>> We are not

291:36

Amen.

291:56

Wonderful.

293:34

Heat.

293:46

Hey, Heat.

295:26

Do you

295:32

feel

297:10

Hey, hey, hey.

297:32

Heat. Heat.

298:29

Heat

298:44

up

298:56

here.

299:45

Heat. Heat.

300:26

Heat. Heat.

301:14

Good.

304:33

Hey,

304:50

hey, hey. Hey. Hey. Hey.

305:32

Heat.

305:33

Heat.

307:03

Oh yeah.

308:24

Interest

308:48

was very good.

309:17

I know, but if we did a Q&A with the

309:19

audience, I need to

309:22

I will go.

309:36

>> Is this thing on?

309:38

>> Yes, we just got the thumbs up.

309:39

>> Okay,

309:41

welcome back everyone. We've had a

309:44

wonderful day so far. Welcome to those

309:47

of you who are just joining us online,

309:49

maybe just tuning in. We've come to our

309:52

last session.

309:54

It's a really special one focused on the

309:57

future of MIT open learning, MIT open

310:01

education. Once again, I'm Sarah Hansen,

310:04

the assistant director of open education

310:06

innovation, and I'm with Dmitri

310:08

Spartimus and Kurt Newton. And for those

310:11

of you just tuning in now, Dimmitri is

310:14

the vice pro vice provost for open

310:16

learning at MIT as well as a professor

310:19

and associate dean at Sloan School of

310:21

Management. Kurt Newton is the director

310:24

of MIT open courseware.

310:26

It's an honor to engage both of you in

310:29

this conversation about the future and I

310:31

hope that all of you will leave feeling

310:34

inspired um for the future.

310:38

I always like to start with a personal

310:41

question that helps everyone here get to

310:44

know you as a person. And one of the

310:48

leading goals for our organization is

310:51

reaching 1 billion learners within 10

310:53

years. And uh Dimmitri, I'd like to

310:56

start with you and ask you why you are

310:59

passionate about that. Where did that

311:01

come from? You didn't just wake up one

311:02

day and decide that's the goal.

311:05

>> Yeah. Well, most of my colleagues at MIT

311:08

think I'm dreaming. On the other hand,

311:10

we heard in the morning that OCW has

311:13

reached half a billion. It seems a

311:16

factor of two maybe in 10 years as

311:19

opposed to 25 years. It's not a huge

311:21

reach to be honest. When I have the 1

311:23

billion, I do not know exactly the the

311:26

numbers. But look, MIT is an institution

311:30

by its history that it has always put

311:32

high aspirations

311:35

uh to convince and my colleagues to

311:39

participate in such a movement. I can

311:41

tell you if I suppose I tell you I would

311:44

like to do a 100 million people who OCW

311:47

has

311:50

you know it's not exciting enough. So

311:52

that's the other part but I also believe

311:53

as an objective for the world you know

311:56

MIT as an institution educates 11,000

311:59

students some of one in a million people

312:01

roughly very very smart kids in 41 years

312:04

I have educated maybe 15,000

312:07

um of of the students over 40 years uh

312:12

aspiring to to educate one in eight in

312:15

the world especially in uh areas you

312:20

know uh if you look at Africa for

312:22

example only 10% of the population goes

312:26

to university to aspire to educate you

312:29

know a sizable portion of the rest of

312:32

the 90% and I just picked one um one

312:35

particular continent which the

312:36

demographics are exponentiating I think

312:39

it's a I thought it was a worthy a

312:42

worthy objective that can uh mobilize

312:46

our u our community of faculty students

312:49

and open learning

312:51

That's so interesting that a key aspect

312:53

for you is motivating faculty and our

312:56

team. It seems like you went to the

312:58

Sloan School of Management maybe.

313:00

>> Well, I have some experience about

313:02

success or failures. I mean, part of my

313:04

background, thank god I have this

313:06

background otherwise I wouldn't be doing

313:08

I wouldn't be successful. I mean I know

313:10

I successful aspiring to be successful

313:11

in this job is that you know I have

313:13

serial I have been a serial entrepreneur

313:16

my life. Yeah. And I have found the key

313:19

characteristic of success and failure is

313:21

to motivate the people to to do it as a

313:25

force.

313:26

>> Uh and it has been my effort the last

313:29

year and a half. My colleagues uh I

313:33

suspect have observed but I try to

313:34

decrease the silos we have to move as a

313:37

force. Uh we have made progress but

313:39

there is room to go.

313:41

>> Thank you Kurt. How about you? Why is it

313:44

personally important to you to reach 1

313:47

billion learners?

313:49

>> Um well, I feel a very deep sort of

313:53

intrinsic motivation

313:55

>> to the some of the values that we've

313:56

talked about throughout this session

313:58

about um

314:00

the the incredible force that knowledge

314:03

as a public good can be. Um, you know,

314:06

and I've I've lived for I've been here

314:08

almost the full 25 years, 22 years here

314:11

at Open Courseware. Just seeing, you

314:14

know, year by year how that progress

314:16

builds and I can I can see in a sense

314:19

that it is in reach with a, you know,

314:22

with a few more things which I think

314:23

we'll get into over the course of this

314:25

hour that I think we'll we'll open that

314:27

up. um you know and I see how um

314:33

we we've had this tremendous impact but

314:36

that impact through really reaching a

314:38

relatively small percentage especially

314:40

in certain countries around the world

314:42

and so just a a huge opportunity I think

314:45

is very motivating.

314:46

>> Yeah.

314:46

>> Interesting.

314:50

Thank you for bringing in your personal

314:51

values, your personal motivations. So if

314:54

we extend that to the organization,

314:56

Kurt, thinking about open courseware in

314:59

particular, what core values of open

315:01

courseware should we hold on to as we

315:05

move through the next 25 years?

315:08

>> Yeah. Um

315:12

a few, you know, a few things that that

315:13

really are top of mind for me there. um

315:17

the the commitment to

315:21

share broadly from across you know all

315:25

possible disciplines from MIT feels

315:27

really important you know there's a I

315:29

think there's a there's a risk if we

315:31

allow ourselves to be too focused on

315:34

just the say top 10 topics we lose the

315:38

richness that we've heard from from some

315:40

of our you know learners you know that

315:42

we and educators that we've heard from

315:43

today um you Hanata speaking about urban

315:47

studies for instance, you know, probably

315:49

won't be a top 10 topic, but there's a

315:53

there's something really special that's

315:54

been enabled by MIT by Open Courseware's

315:57

commitment to sharing from across the

315:59

full curriculum that I think is really

316:01

important to carry forward. Um, another

316:03

one, you know,

316:06

as you know, these new tools, AI tools

316:09

come in increasingly into our hands is

316:11

to keep the proper focus on

316:16

humans as being really fundamentally

316:19

important and essential and working

316:21

collaboratively with other humans in

316:23

this work and, you know, continuing to

316:26

figure out the right way to do that. Uh,

316:28

I think is is another core value that we

316:30

want to carry forward. Yeah.

316:33

>> And similarly, what new needs, Dimmitri,

316:37

have emerged in global education that

316:40

you think we need to be paying attention

316:42

to going forward?

316:43

>> Well, um, everybody and their brother is

316:46

talking about AI. Yeah, it would be I

316:49

mean I'm an AI guy.

316:50

>> I know. So I it's not exactly uh it it

316:54

has occurred to me that AI and as you

316:56

perhaps know we have launched uh already

317:00

it's now past tense launched yeah

317:03

>> we have launched what I call universal

317:06

AI the idea to educate universal is not

317:09

a random title is to educate in a in an

317:13

area that is growing fantastically uh

317:16

everybody in the world we aspire in in

317:20

AI I in the use of AI to improve lives,

317:24

careers, trajectories of people. Uh but

317:27

in addition uh there are other other

317:30

forces. Um if you think about um

317:35

universities, universities are

317:37

structured vertically. We have civil

317:40

engineering number one, mechanical

317:42

engineering, this is MIT has numbers for

317:44

those of you who don't know. Number two,

317:46

I'm I I graduate from mathematics course

317:48

18 and so forth. But that's not how the

317:51

world is is organized. The world is

317:53

organized horizontally. There is

317:55

problems of health, of climate. If you

317:57

look at the major problems of the world,

317:59

energy and so forth. Uh they are not

318:02

organized neatly in a vertical way. So I

318:05

think there is an opportunity in my

318:06

opinion to educate the the world and

318:10

especially the young people in a way the

318:12

problems come because you know com

318:14

problems don't come with labels problems

318:16

come as they are and it's up to us to

318:19

organize knowledge so that's the second

318:20

opportunity first AI use broadly

318:25

uh third uh and it was actually my dream

318:28

when I joined actually was one of the

318:30

most important dreams I had and I I

318:32

would not have expected to be so close

318:34

to realizing it. Personalized education,

318:37

traditional university education is not

318:39

personalized. What what we do today is

318:41

definitely not personalized. We say the

318:43

same thing. It is absorbed by you the

318:45

same, you know, might be differently,

318:46

but we say the same things. But but uh

318:49

the opportunity in online education is

318:51

to personalize the the and we know for

318:54

there's significant research to suggest

318:56

that uh

318:58

uh people do not understand the same

319:00

way. They have different values. they

319:02

have different absorption rates and so

319:04

forth. I think the dream of personalized

319:06

education has been a dream of mine for

319:08

decades before. I I thought maybe in

319:11

five 10 years I will be able to do

319:13

something in that. Uh we're about to

319:15

launch personalized education in the

319:17

summer. So uh based on some gen AI

319:20

research we're doing. So that's an

319:23

that's a third fourth area that I think

319:26

needs adaptation. Um the the traditional

319:30

unit of uh of knowledge is classes. We

319:35

have semester courses at MIT. Our are

319:38

our OCW our OCW courses. You know, we

319:42

export what we do at I'm not

319:45

criticizing. I'm saying I'm doing it

319:47

myself by the way. So uh it is uh but

319:49

that's not how especially younger people

319:52

do not absorb this way. They they they

319:55

absorb knowledge in shorter horizons. In

319:57

fact, my friend uh Kurt educated me on

320:00

this. I'm a good student, Kurt. So, and

320:03

I check with my students, they they

320:04

absorb in different ways. So, I think

320:07

trying to organize knowledge in a

320:09

certain chunks also, it's easier to to

320:13

revise uh you know, if you expect our my

320:16

colleagues at my team, me included, to

320:19

revise 50% of a class that change in AI

320:22

26 lecture, 50% 13, good luck. I mean,

320:24

they will it will never happen. But if

320:26

you have a module of four or five to to

320:29

change two two lectures, it's feasible.

320:32

I mean, and I have evidence on that

320:34

because we already have been doing it.

320:36

So, uh, for fifth, uh,

320:39

>> I'm having a hard time keeping track of

320:40

all these. I'm like mentally repeating

320:43

them in my head, but go ahead.

320:44

>> What's Yeah, I got it. Personalized

320:47

learning. Modularized learning. And then

320:50

there was another one, but I forget it.

320:52

>> The complication is I forgot it, too.

320:56

So

320:57

we I it was interesting that um when we

321:01

were reading uh I think uh Peter read

321:04

the original OCW proposal. It talked

321:07

about translations. I've never read the

321:08

original proposal but it talked about

321:11

translations. Is this correct, Peter?

321:12

>> Yeah.

321:13

>> Well, it was my hope to create

321:17

translations.

321:18

>> Mhm.

321:19

>> But it hasn't happened. It was the

321:21

scope, but I haven't seen it in open

321:22

learning. Well, we are launching this

321:25

month translation 12 languages. Yeah.

321:28

>> So, uh

321:30

translations are critical in my opinion.

321:33

You have countries like Japan that 80%

321:36

of the of the people don't speak don't

321:38

speak uh English. So, if you have

321:40

content fantastic content that is that

321:43

is only in English, I mean you you

321:45

limit. But if you have content in the

321:48

local language, adaptable, personalized

321:50

and so forth, you have a higher chance

321:52

of adopting. So it is indeed uh you know

321:55

I I have few things more to say but

321:57

otherwise if you are losing it I'm

321:59

certain you are not the only one. Uh

322:01

>> no the other one you mentioned was

322:02

horizontal learning that Yeah. Thank

322:04

you. Um

322:06

>> good student. She's good.

322:07

>> Yeah.

322:09

Um

322:10

>> very important horizontal learning.

322:12

>> Yeah. Uh and it's it informs later on

322:15

we'll talk about our strategy. It

322:16

informs our strategy.

322:18

>> Yes.

322:18

>> Namely, you know, AI the first thing we

322:20

launched is it's definitely cuts across

322:23

all 26 departments we have at the mat

322:25

and all the centers is it's you know I

322:28

don't know anyone who is not even

322:30

affected. Climate is our next objective.

322:33

Energy as you know they cut across.

322:35

Yeah. you know uh health name it there

322:38

is a in my opinion organiz you know if

322:41

you especially with the young people

322:42

whom I have as you can tell I'm not

322:45

indifferent to my young friends.

322:46

>> Yes.

322:47

>> So um I I do feel that uh educating in

322:52

the world they will face

322:54

>> in the with the same with the same

322:57

orientation I think it goes a long way.

322:59

I actually argued to our to Sally that

323:02

we should also do it uh residentially

323:05

not only online that is it's our in my

323:08

obl it is our obligation to also teach

323:10

our own students.

323:12

>> Yeah. So can we back up for a second for

323:15

the people who are maybe just joining us

323:18

online or are new to MIT open learning.

323:21

Can you explain what universal learning

323:23

is like we Yeah. Go ahead.

323:25

>> That's a good that's appropriate. Yes.

323:26

So uh what is universal learning? So let

323:29

me start with universal AI because it's

323:31

it's in in our past you know for those

323:34

of you that have an MIT account MITDU

323:37

account and you you you register on the

323:40

left side on learn MITDU you can see

323:44

universal AI it has 16 modules of uh the

323:48

fundamentals and at the moment six

323:51

vertical modules

323:52

>> so altogether 22 about 30 faculty have

323:56

participated in this effort and there

323:58

are another 18 cooking another 18

324:00

verticals. So what does it mean? The

324:02

first collection of modules uh is four

324:05

modules on the fundamentals of

324:07

programming and machine learning.

324:08

>> Okay.

324:09

>> Uh Annabelle, I don't know if Annabelle

324:11

is here is was a significant participant

324:14

in the first uh four this content by the

324:17

way is free.

324:19

>> Okay.

324:21

>> Second set of modules it is uh the

324:24

fundamentals of deep learning.

324:26

Um there are three modules. Each module

324:31

has of the order of four to five

324:33

lectures altogether 15 to seven I forget

324:36

the exact number lectures. Next one is

324:39

prescriptive AI decision making with AI.

324:42

Next one is is the is uh large language

324:45

models and generative AI. Uh next

324:50

modules are uh is the ethics of AI

324:54

>> and the future of work. Um and then the

324:58

from a from a vertical perspective we

325:00

have uh AI and energy, AI and health, AI

325:04

and um and um law AI and you know AI

325:10

plus X basically the X and so forth

325:12

that's sort of the fir in other words we

325:14

teach people not at the level of

325:16

graduate level you know u see if we if

325:20

we want if you are genuinely trying to

325:22

reach a billion learners you have to

325:24

teach things in a way that not an MIT

325:28

student only understands but the the

325:30

world and which means high quality

325:33

content applicationoriented

325:36

that that speaks to problems of the

325:39

world with an applied orientation and

325:42

quite more accessible. So that's the

325:45

foundational piece and then if somebody

325:46

wants to deepen their understanding you

325:47

would like to understand what is the

325:49

implication of of AI in law

325:52

>> of which there subsidive or health or or

325:55

biology and so forth that's the idea of

325:58

that part so this is on AI so then we

326:00

have a new effort that um two of my

326:05

colleagues lead Chris Rab and Desire

326:08

Plata I think Chris is in the room I

326:10

think it was in the morning

326:12

>> um is to do similar things on climate

326:17

and energy foundational. I mean climate

326:19

is a significant existential threat of

326:21

our times especially important for the

326:24

people who who have another 70 80 years

326:26

to live. So um it has similar educating

326:30

people in the fundamentals and then

326:32

verticals. Next one is biology. We call

326:35

it universal biology. Fourth one is

326:39

universal health. the the first two

326:41

biology, climate and energy. We are

326:43

hoping to have our first modules in

326:45

September and hopefully the end. Uh so I

326:48

would like to encourage you to uh

326:51

especially many of you have MIT and by

326:54

the way even if you don't you can uh

326:57

register we are actually launched March

326:59

30th uh to individuals not only

327:02

institutions and there are two ways we

327:04

we go about it. The first way is to try

327:06

to reach uh individuals We now have the

327:11

platform. I'm very excited about this

327:12

platform. We are moving uh all of OCW or

327:16

FMITX uh our professional education I I

327:20

hope June 30 July 30th

327:23

um to the new learn platform. So in a

327:25

sense we are and and in a sense we are

327:28

controlling our destiny. We are

327:30

controlling quality. We are controlling

327:32

uh

327:34

um you know all all of our innovations

327:36

will be there. We we we are going to

327:38

create we are creating translations in

327:41

end of April. We are the first guinea

327:43

pig so to speak would be universal AI

327:46

but rest assured I will make certain

327:48

that uh OCW gets it MI all of our

327:51

efforts benefit from that. So that's the

327:53

another advantage of fully controlling

327:55

your destiny and everything is on based

327:57

on open edex which is a a

328:03

platform and I asked my my colleagues in

328:05

engineering where should I bet I I'm not

328:08

very knowledgeable in this area you know

328:10

they proposed to me uh um open edex this

328:14

is where we are putting so it's it's a

328:16

it's in a sense MIT if you think about

328:20

it fundamentally

328:23

uh MIT is going solo on uh providing

328:28

knowledge controlling quality and so

328:30

forth but this is only the beginning

328:32

there is a phase two and phase three I I

328:34

actually believe MIT while it's a great

328:35

institution doesn't have the the

328:37

totality of knowledge so we first start

328:40

MIT leading with universal learning

328:43

second phase which is actually happening

328:45

as we speak institutions from other

328:48

countries other in in the United States

328:50

but different than MIT

328:52

develop their own content because

328:53

everything lands on learn. Their

328:55

students in phase two have access. We

328:58

have no control on what they put. But

329:00

phase three, some of the best of this

329:01

material, we put it, we embed it and

329:05

then we offer it to the world as well.

329:06

In other words, the collective

329:07

intelligence of the world is um is

329:11

capable of addressing of of doing that.

329:15

Um so we don't restrict but there is one

329:18

difference. We control quality. I mean

329:20

in my opinion edx cosera and so forth

329:25

have exceptional content and extremely

329:27

poor content that's my opinion of course

329:30

you might not agree but uh but but if

329:34

you look at the totality I mean some of

329:36

them I don't know if it's even correct

329:38

tell the truth forget about

329:40

pedagogically so that's sort of the

329:42

overall strategy I mean people can also

329:44

ask questions afterwards you know I like

329:47

interacting with the audience as you I

329:50

will get us there.

329:51

>> Okay, great. I'm sorry I spent I spent

329:53

more time. I apologize.

329:54

>> You you are allowed. It's okay.

329:56

>> All right.

329:56

>> Um, so one thing you got at Dimmitri is

330:00

this idea of others contributing and and

330:03

knowledge as a public good. Yeah. Which

330:04

is so interesting and that speaks so

330:06

much Kurt to the ethos of OCW. And I'm

330:10

wondering how you're envisioning that

330:13

OCW's foundational beliefs might be

330:16

represented within universal learning

330:18

either as it is now or has it as it

330:20

might be in the future.

330:22

>> Yeah, I think it's a really important

330:23

thing that we continue to be committed

330:25

to. Um,

330:29

you know, one of the great things that's

330:31

that's being enabled by MIT Learn is is

330:34

having all of these lifelong learning

330:37

materials available for people in one

330:38

place. And so you have a kind of a

330:40

seamless discovery experience. Um,

330:42

Demetri, you talked, you know, about

330:44

personalized learning. I like to think

330:45

about what OCW has is, you know,

330:48

personal personalizable,

330:51

>> right, materials. it's put out there in

330:53

a wide openen form so you can grab as

330:55

little or as much as you want. We need

330:59

enhanced tools which we are working on

331:01

to make it easier to do so. But I feel

331:04

like um building on that foundation that

331:08

we've got with those OCW materials, you

331:10

know, shared openly and freely with the

331:13

world, you know, provides a really

331:15

important foundation that, you know,

331:16

will be, you know, uh kind of unleashing

331:19

in new ways through through the learn

331:21

platform.

331:22

>> Yeah.

331:22

>> Can I can I make a comment?

331:24

>> So, I'd like to give a concrete example

331:26

how OCW material could be utilized great

331:29

>> in uh in the new world

331:31

>> as we envision it. new world hasn't

331:34

fully arrived. So in the morning John

331:36

Gruber was here uh very distinguished

331:39

person in economics who has exceptional

331:41

material and um

331:46

so the way I would envision it is that

331:49

which is sort of starting at the moment

331:51

slowly is that you take you can take

331:55

parts of of this strong material

331:59

uh modularize it make it smaller add

332:02

other things to it so create what I call

332:06

uh universal economics

332:08

>> and then other people participate as

332:10

well. So you provide more of more global

332:14

educational system supported with

332:16

translations with personalized learning

332:18

with customiz with all of we have

332:20

launched for example a tutor called ask

332:23

team MIT reversed not this is not ask

332:26

dim

332:28

>> so um and um and this is uh supporting

332:34

every aspect so there are roundtrip

332:36

influences you can take OCW material

332:39

adopt it and you can take some of the

332:42

innovative things we have done and

332:45

distribute it to everything else open

332:47

learning does. That's an in my opinion

332:49

an advantage where all of these great

332:52

great progress we have made on multiple

332:55

arenas we can work together as opposed

332:58

to siloed to move to the future.

333:00

>> Yeah.

333:01

>> Yeah.

333:01

>> Yeah. Could I um lean into another

333:03

aspect of the public good? It's not

333:06

knowledge is a public good for everyone

333:07

who speaks English, right? Um, and

333:11

having done this work for 25 years, we

333:13

also have the benefit of trying some

333:15

stuff and it worked for a while and then

333:17

it didn't and we composted it and we're

333:20

going to, you know, we prepared the soil

333:22

for for doing it new, right? We had

333:24

actually a really vibrant translations

333:26

program in the late as early teens.

333:29

Yeah.

333:29

>> Which was very manually done, handone. I

333:32

think we had over well over a thousand

333:34

OCW courses translated into like 10

333:37

different languages. But over time that

333:39

became unsustainable and so we composted

333:43

it right the soil is rich right the

333:46

interest is really deeply there we see

333:48

in the usage statistics how much the

333:50

opportunity would be and now with you

333:53

know the AI tools that are being brought

333:55

now to bear we've crossed the tipping

333:57

point they're good enough showing up on

333:59

learn to really kind of unleash the the

334:03

access to this knowledge as a public

334:04

good for all languages

334:06

>> we now sit on the cusp And I'm

334:08

incredibly excited about that for for

334:11

the next years to come.

334:12

>> And I can tell you I know Greek.

334:14

>> Yes,

334:15

>> it's my native language. We checked

334:17

Greek around 10 million Greeks. It's not

334:20

like it's a gigantic. But I would like

334:22

to check in something I understand that

334:24

it's of good quality.

334:26

>> Yes.

334:27

>> A+.

334:28

>> Wow.

334:28

>> And I can say I didn't do anything AI

334:30

and you know some of my students our

334:33

engineering team has worked on it.

334:35

>> The quality is high.

334:37

>> Mhm. I mean perfection is outside the

334:39

human condition anyway but but uh it is

334:42

high quality translations. I would I

334:44

have evidence on this because we I tried

334:46

experimentally in two high high schools

334:49

by the way in Greece about 80 people in

334:51

one 70 people in the other.

334:54

You know the comments are very positive.

334:56

>> Yeah. This is a really exciting future.

334:59

Um

335:00

>> I definitely hope so.

335:01

>> I know. I'm ready. I'm ready for it.

335:04

>> A billionaire. We better start. we got

335:07

to get working. Um, so in this new

335:11

future, you talked about desiloing and

335:14

working together as a force to meet our

335:17

goal of of reaching 1 billion learners

335:19

>> and we have done you know UI is a

335:22

reality

335:23

>> 50 people across open learning

335:25

collaborating on this just to to say

335:27

it's not a pipe dream only.

335:29

>> No, you're doing it. A+ it's happening.

335:33

Um,

335:34

>> you don't know if I get an A. A minus. I

335:37

have rooms to grow. So,

335:39

>> yeah. Okay. A minus. Um,

335:44

Kurt, we think and Dana is in the

335:46

audience. Yeah. Hi, Dana Doyle. So we

335:50

think a lot about the future of MIT open

335:52

education because we've really taken to

335:53

heart what you're saying about like why

335:56

are why try to be open courseware owls

335:59

like these separate entities when we

336:01

could be more powerful together. So Kurt

336:04

could you speak a little bit to our

336:06

emerging vision for what MIT open

336:08

education might become or the processes

336:11

we're going through? Yeah, I think it's

336:13

it's a really exciting opportunity here

336:15

that we get to um reconsider, you know,

336:19

broadly the things that are happening

336:21

and definitely sustain the things that

336:23

that are really key, but then kind of

336:25

restructure and take another take

336:27

another run at it. Um, you know, we're

336:29

in a different world than we were, you

336:31

know, five years ago, 10 years ago.

336:33

Things are shifting. And so what we've

336:35

alluded to for instance in this like um

336:38

modularized

336:40

and and then wellsupported learning

336:42

journeys is one that I think is really

336:44

important and to show up for that with

336:47

the open education ethos of making sure

336:50

that it's freely available you know to

336:53

everyone around the world regardless of

336:55

institutional affiliation or or

336:58

financial situation as a starting point

337:00

is really really key you know um it's I

337:04

don't know If you uh remember taking a

337:06

trip and navigating with paper maps and

337:08

if you were a AAA member, you could get

337:10

a trip tick, right? And they would do

337:12

the routing for you. You know, I feel

337:14

like, you know, from a learning pathway

337:18

perspective or on the cusp of getting

337:20

ready to uh take the leap with a

337:22

functional like GPS enabled, just hit

337:24

the road and figure it out and get the

337:26

verted, hit that coffee shop, you'll

337:28

still get there. You don't have to like

337:31

have the manually created curated tptic

337:33

to tell you where you're going. Again,

337:35

some of these some of these emerging

337:36

technologies, the ability to personalize

337:39

these learning journeys based on the

337:42

infrastructure, the personaliz

337:44

personalizable because I haven't said

337:46

that very often yet. Personalizable

337:49

materials that we've got in open

337:50

education will really make this make

337:52

this possible. So, I'm super excited

337:54

about that.

337:55

>> I would also like to comment the

337:56

following. you know to reach a billion

337:58

learners

337:59

>> 95 97% of those should be free

338:03

>> that is I haven't yet lost it I don't

338:06

believe that uh because even if we get

338:10

uh 97% of people like it would be naive

338:14

of me to believe that uh people in

338:16

subaran Africa would would would be

338:19

willing or even able to pay even $5 for

338:24

this but but but But but uh on the other

338:27

hand we need to be sustainable that is

338:30

uh you know perhaps you don't know but

338:33

uh but uh the the MI the MIT

338:36

administration announced and I actually

338:38

agree with that it's not against my

338:40

wishes that um we had a subsidy of about

338:44

$20 million from the institution. This

338:47

will go to zero in four years. So

338:49

therefore for for us to be able to

338:52

support these visions and al you know uh

338:56

we better have the ma the vast majority

338:59

in open education but it cannot be only

339:03

in open education because we will not

339:04

exist. So um

339:08

so realistically speaking we organized

339:11

open learning to open education that

339:13

Dana and Kurt are leading and then we

339:16

have a workforce learning and then

339:18

universal learning because some of it is

339:20

free some of it is not is like

339:23

intersecting both of them. Mhm.

339:25

>> So uh and I believe that uh we can

339:28

achieve both um uh both sustainability

339:32

as well as uh significant number of

339:34

learners. So that's uh that's an

339:38

significant move forward. And speaking

339:41

about strategy, I would like to

339:42

acknowledge Andrea here from Wikipedia.

339:44

You know, Wikipedia uh you heard from

339:47

Kurt or or Peter was it uh is uh you

339:52

know it is my personal go-to place to

339:56

learn something information from

339:58

something okay I've reached four five

340:00

billion learners so I would you know

340:03

Wikipedia in my opinion and agrees

340:06

because I checked yesterday has some

340:08

weaknesses had fantastic success this is

340:11

truly an A+ but there is you know areas

340:14

that they don't you know they don't have

340:16

uh characteristics they they don't

340:18

actually teach you know they they they

340:20

they

340:22

translate information it's not

340:24

multimedia it's primarily text we are

340:27

hoping in fact we have started the a

340:30

project together to uh combine forces

340:34

you know the gentleman uh in the

340:35

previous talk about collaboration

340:38

between open forces so to speak

340:41

>> I it it is my aspiration Any way that

340:44

this collaboration will help both

340:46

institutions and most importantly the

340:48

world because you know our learners can

340:52

can have u significant information from

340:55

Wikipedia and Wikipedia learners can

340:57

also get significant information from

340:59

it. So stay tuned but uh that's a

341:02

significant bet. So to to know that is

341:05

significant bet whoever comes to my

341:06

office I have a list of things when we

341:09

accomplish IRA it keep it is number one.

341:12

Andrew saw it yesterday. So which means

341:15

I will only erase it when I think we

341:17

succeeded.

341:18

>> Oh wow. Okay.

341:19

>> So you haven't been to my own sees it

341:21

and he sits there. He's right.

341:24

>> You don't you don't like to just cross

341:26

them out so you can remember your

341:27

accomplishments.

341:28

>> No, because I then uh will focus on the

341:30

new thing.

341:32

>> Then I have then I keep space. I I will

341:35

replace it. I had translations.

341:37

>> Yes, that's I I erased it.

341:40

>> Okay.

341:42

Oh, I have so much to learn from you.

341:44

>> Well,

341:44

>> okay.

341:46

>> You come to my office, okay?

341:47

>> Not only Zoom.

341:49

>> Yeah. Okay.

341:51

>> Um, Kurt, let's look into the future.

341:53

>> Yeah.

341:53

>> I'm not going to ask you to look 25

341:55

years out because we're just going to be

341:56

holograms by then.

341:57

>> Thank you.

341:58

>> Yeah.

341:59

>> So, five years from now,

342:00

>> 10 5 10 5 to 10. All right. Which is my

342:03

horizon.

342:04

>> Okay. Yeah, that's Yes, there. So 5 to

342:08

10 years from now, what are the

342:09

opportunities for Open Courseware's

342:11

legacy to live on, but maybe be dynamic

342:15

and change and become something new?

342:17

>> Yeah. Um I'm going to channel a couple

342:20

things from that video, that wonderful

342:22

video we saw this morning

342:24

>> about

342:24

>> that was a plus.

342:26

>> True. Truly. Yes. Um

342:29

there was something about that moment

342:31

2001ish

342:33

with some of the forces that were that

342:34

were at play right that opened up the op

342:39

a kind of a special opportunity somewhat

342:41

in that moment right of that moment to

342:45

with a simple brilliant brave leap

342:48

disrupt the universe as as you will

342:51

right

342:52

>> and I I look at what's going on with AI

342:55

and it's absolutely certainly going to

342:59

disrupt itself, our kind of relationship

343:01

with knowledge and how, you know, how we

343:04

work with each other and all of that. It

343:07

feels like what we've glimpsed with the

343:10

emergence of chat GPT recently and some

343:12

of this new agentic AI is like, wow, the

343:15

first mosaic web browser and Alta Visa

343:18

and Yahoo search and maybe some pets.com

343:21

stuff is in there too distracting us.

343:23

But like sometime over the next, I'll

343:26

say five years,

343:28

>> I'm looking for some way that history

343:31

rhymes with what happened 25 years ago.

343:34

What's the

343:36

opening the refrigerator or on the

343:38

exercise bike sudden just like rupture

343:42

of of of conception that like what's the

343:46

brilliant thing to drop in there? It's

343:49

like simple

343:51

and can like galvanize this this new

343:54

movement for this frankly really at the

343:58

moment pretty confusing world that we're

344:00

heading into. That's what I'm looking

344:02

for and that we play continue to play a

344:06

really important role in that.

344:08

>> Yeah.

344:09

>> Yeah. That's what I hope for. I have a

344:11

prediction on this.

344:12

>> Oh, good.

344:13

universal learning supported uh by AI

344:18

where the entirety of the world

344:19

contributes.

344:22

>> I have bet the house on that.

344:24

>> I have a little question about that.

344:26

>> Please.

344:27

>> And I don't even like that I'm asking

344:29

it, but like how do you protect the MIT

344:31

brand if everyone is contributing?

344:35

or see you know because everybody would

344:39

remember that this started at the MIT

344:42

you see I I don't believe you know I I

344:45

started the morning saying I love this

344:47

institution it's true I have a a deep

344:49

affection to it and its people and

344:51

students but I definitely don't believe

344:53

that we are the only people in the world

344:56

that can have exciting thoughts exciting

344:59

so I believe smart organizations utilize

345:03

the world if you look at um the the the

345:07

winning companies of today they they

345:10

somehow manage to engage the world like

345:14

for example Google uses the entire

345:16

internet to learn and so forth.

345:18

>> Yeah.

345:18

>> It's not just you know they have an

345:20

algorithm but the the knowledge base. So

345:23

you know in the end of the day we if if

345:27

we succeed in reaching a billion

345:28

learners with this initi and so forth

345:30

everybody will remember it's don't

345:33

forget learn everything runs on learn

345:35

MIT edu

345:38

>> we have bet the house on that so

345:41

there might be Stanford content there

345:44

might be university of uh you know Lima

345:49

content but in the end of the day

345:52

>> it it runs on MIT on things that that's

345:55

my my susp my my bet anyway.

345:58

>> Yeah, thank you. That's helpful. Chris,

346:00

did you want to add?

346:01

>> Yeah, I want to pick up on that a little

346:02

bit. Um, this is in the spirit

346:05

definitely of kind of radical

346:07

disruptions in the universe. Uh,

346:09

>> you channel a provocation from from my

346:12

friend the brilliant thinker Bio

346:13

Akamalaf. Uh, he gave this talk at the

346:16

United the UNESCO digital learning

346:19

summit this past fall.

346:22

um where some of his experiences have

346:24

him thinking that what we're heading

346:25

towards actually is a is a big reset and

346:29

perhaps a real frankly a really useful

346:31

one about the very concept of authorship

346:34

of ideas, right? when this incredible

346:38

new species that we've created out of

346:41

our knowledge kind of gets in the middle

346:43

there,

346:45

maybe there's there's a a sort of

346:47

letting go of the concepts of ownership

346:50

and authorship that get very inshed with

346:53

things like brands. And I don't know how

346:54

this is going to play out, but um I feel

346:58

like there's there's momentum that's

347:00

leading us in this direction, right?

347:03

that's going to be provocative in some

347:05

really interesting ways, you know. So,

347:06

we have to we have to have the right way

347:09

of holding this.

347:10

>> Yeah.

347:11

>> But if you look at the scientific

347:13

experience, I write papers with my

347:16

colleague from Amsterdam Dan Hertok. I

347:19

write papers and books with my colleague

347:22

in Germany and uh we work it's a very

347:25

intern the scientific endeavor is a very

347:28

much a collaboration endeavor right

347:32

100 years ago it's the single scientist

347:34

and so we engage our students and so

347:36

forth why not in education actually

347:39

universal AI has you know admittedly

347:42

they were visiting professors at MIT but

347:44

we have a visitor from Greece a visitor

347:46

from from the from the Netherlands

347:50

a visitor from University of Seattle. I

347:52

mean they are all MIT related but and

347:56

oneplus 1 is bigger than two. I mean you

347:58

know you can't tell I mean the so I

348:00

actually believe that uh you know the

348:03

key objective is to impact the world

348:05

positively

348:06

>> everything is on learn MIT will get a

348:08

share a s and I would like also to also

348:11

share with the audience a personal story

348:13

of Jack vest whom I was a big fan of.

348:16

Jack felt that uh in his 12 years as a

348:21

president uh his two most important uh

348:25

contributions to the world was OCW

348:28

>> which is our MIT stories number two and

348:31

our MIT stories number three the the the

348:34

women faculty movement which I would

348:37

like to preview. So we that's all this

348:40

was the the second story on MIT stories.

348:43

We are working on number three. One of

348:45

my colleagues uh Lana Scott is working

348:48

on the matter. I'm hoping that Sally

348:53

when her time to

348:56

>> to change will say well open learning

349:00

>> it's universal whatever we do and so

349:02

forth would be a defining moment in her

349:05

life.

349:05

>> Yeah that's really exciting. I

349:08

definitely believe that I would succeed

349:10

on that.

349:10

>> Yeah, you got to write Sally Sally's

349:14

dream on the top of your whiteboard. You

349:16

know,

349:17

>> she knows already.

349:19

>> We talked.

349:20

>> Okay, that's good.

349:22

>> Um, I feel like now would be a great

349:25

time to open it up to questions in the

349:27

audience because you've all said you've

349:29

both said

349:30

>> good

349:30

>> several provocative things that I think

349:32

people might want to pick up on.

349:35

>> No questions.

349:37

I was expecting you

349:39

>> couple of

349:40

>> the body language suggested.

349:44

>> Hello

349:44

>> number two there.

349:45

>> Um so I have a question. Um I I totally

349:51

believe in this modularization

349:54

movement. But I also um know that um OCW

349:58

users um like this opening of the MIT

350:04

classroom and getting that feeling of

350:06

being in the classroom. And I kind of I

350:10

want to hear about how you see what

350:12

happens in the classroom in the future.

350:16

What how is the how is the MIT

350:18

classroom? What's happening in the

350:20

classroom?

350:20

>> You mean residentially? residentially

350:22

because that's one of the really I mean

350:25

>> well

350:25

>> they want modularization but they also

350:27

want to be in the classroom with the

350:28

students

350:30

>> well I have a proposal to the MIT

350:33

faculty to do something like that I

350:36

believe the future of residential

350:37

education is hybrid where I don't

350:40

believe we should teach uh you know is

350:44

uh Gil Frank here I saw him in the

350:47

morning so suppose you want to learn

350:50

algebra He has exceptionally good

350:52

lectures really A++

350:55

you know uh but on the other hand if you

350:57

want to understand

350:59

uh you know for the residential

351:01

experience you you can utilize hybrid

351:04

for learning the theories and so forth

351:06

but if you want to to solve a real world

351:08

application at least for our residential

351:11

students you can you can you can have a

351:14

flip classroom Esther Dullo was talking

351:16

about that

351:17

>> we already do that though

351:18

>> we do that and I would like to continue

351:20

I think but But in a in a larger I mean

351:23

not many classes are are hybrid I would

351:26

say. So I have a proposal to the you

351:29

know I come from the Sloan school about

351:31

doing the there's no hybrid degree at

351:33

MIT

351:35

none MIT does not give it would be a

351:38

first of its kind. So that would be a

351:41

step in the right direction. So uh to be

351:44

honest given the financial pressures it

351:47

would be I would say I would be

351:48

surprised if the faculty who or in

351:50

ordinary years they will say no. I'm

351:52

optimistic that

351:55

first of all I think it's a good idea

351:57

but but in addition

351:59

uh and and if we do that we can actually

352:01

educate more students at MIT you know uh

352:05

10x not you know that's my this is a bit

352:10

more futuristic but we'll have evidence

352:12

on this because there will be a it has

352:14

to be an MIT vote we shall see I'm

352:16

optimistic

352:17

>> yeah I'd like to respond briefly to that

352:20

kind of at a different level which is I

352:22

predict that our online learning

352:25

materials will continue to show faculty

352:26

teaching on chalkboards for many years

352:28

to come,

352:29

>> right? And we will continue to get

352:30

questions. You guys still using chalk?

352:32

Yeah, we are. Because it's a really

352:35

really valuable pedagogical approach. Um

352:38

those chalkboard lectures will become

352:41

less, you know, 110 minutes long

352:45

>> and more, you know, carved up or at

352:47

least discoverable in smaller pieces.

352:50

But we'll still be showing the

352:51

chalkboard for for many years. And that

352:53

and that sense of I have no difficulties

352:55

with that actually.

352:56

>> Yeah. Yeah.

352:57

>> I'm okay. I

352:58

>> I'm not a particularly good

353:01

how do you call it?

353:02

>> Chalkboard instructor,

353:04

>> but I know others that are Wow.

353:07

>> Yeah.

353:07

>> You have to have good handwriting.

353:10

>> Yeah. Yeah. I am excluded

353:12

>> and more patient

353:12

>> by definition.

353:13

>> Yeah.

353:14

>> Yeah.

353:15

>> Kathy.

353:16

>> Yeah. So I'm wondering um when you talk

353:18

about the universal education piece and

353:20

then having MIT content there but also

353:24

allowing other universities or colleges

353:26

to contribute. Do you think there's

353:28

certain universities and colleges in the

353:30

US that would be more likely and some

353:32

less likely and the same outside the US?

353:36

>> Um I'll tell you what I know for sure

353:38

and then the other is conjecture. So you

353:41

know we have we have started uh this

353:43

phase two with the top engineering

353:46

school in Greece. I have lots of

353:47

connections there. So I have tried to

353:51

connect with some of my colleagues at

353:52

MIT to develop AI and drug design AI and

353:57

uh you know satellite data and so forth.

353:59

They told me yes but they haven't done

354:01

anything. But the people in Greece

354:04

actually both of them were MIT educated

354:06

but they are professors there. They

354:08

start doing it. I've seen what they have

354:09

done. Excellent excellent content. So

354:12

the answer is definitely uh from

354:15

universities abroad and I have another

354:16

one more I have two examples. it's it's

354:19

happening whether Stanford would

354:21

contribute in this effort where MIT is

354:23

leading I have my doubts but but uh but

354:26

I I see why not uh you know multiple

354:30

uh

354:32

take for example a two-year college that

354:34

uh they might have see we at MIT I don't

354:37

think we have particular expertise in

354:39

teaching two-year college students I

354:41

mean I have none some of my colleagues

354:43

have more some colleagues have more but

354:45

if you have very dedicated exceptionally

354:47

good instru instructors in the pedagogy

354:49

they can contribute and if it's if we

354:51

feel that is good for the overall after

354:53

all the fundamentals are more I would

354:55

definitely see that I will see four year

354:57

college Williams college might be you

354:59

know I do believe the major research

355:02

universities in the beginning they will

355:04

not if it becomes a a global movement

355:09

you never know but don't forget we

355:12

control quality

355:13

>> and would you control who you invite in

355:15

or would you allow people would you

355:17

control who you invite in or would it

355:20

be?

355:20

>> Everybody can propose.

355:21

>> Okay, that's

355:22

>> Everybody can propose

355:24

>> but we have the judgment of whether

355:31

>> Yes.

355:34

>> Yes. Uh thank you. Uh this is a very

355:36

interesting thing and I have sort of

355:37

three pieces of

355:38

>> one at a time though. Oh, I

355:40

>> I'll do I cannot keep them straight.

355:42

That's the problem. You already observed

355:43

I lost one.

355:45

>> Okay. Um if you could say a few words

355:48

then and take one of them. The PK

355:50

through 12 initiative. Much of the old

355:52

school open learning is college level

355:55

courses but uh you have a new initiative

355:58

to address through to the earlier grades

356:02

and uh so that's the first of three

356:04

quick things.

356:05

>> So how PK12 look we already have some

356:07

experience in high schools in Greece. We

356:09

have two of the major high schools and

356:11

we are currently talking with the

356:12

minister of education for all of the

356:14

high schools of Greece and he has moved

356:15

quite far. This is high schools people

356:18

that are 16, 17, 18. I have personally

356:21

no experience of how to teach five,

356:22

seven years old, 8 years old. I mean I I

356:25

don't have and what we develop is not

356:27

appropriate for that. But my colleagues

356:29

in PK12 have some ideas. So

356:34

you know would like to participate in

356:35

this effort. My view is that the current

356:38

MIT how MIT is structured it's quite

356:41

likely that our content will be quite

356:44

appropriate for 18 17 but then as you go

356:49

lower ages you have to do different

356:50

things you have to educate the educators

356:52

so uh my colleagues have good ideas on

356:55

that we are still developing our

356:57

strategy stay tuned on that

356:59

>> okay well and that ties into the second

357:02

piece which is uh

357:05

it's one thing to learn from a lecture

357:07

from from courseware that's online but

357:10

there are a lot of things that hands-on

357:12

materials are useful to support the

357:14

learning process particularly as you go

357:16

down to younger students.

357:18

>> I completely agree with that.

357:19

>> And then the question is how do you work

357:21

in either a subscription model or the

357:23

ability to purchase and then for people

357:25

with economic need how do you arrange

357:27

scholarships for things like the

357:29

>> kits? We hope philanthropy can help that

357:34

is uh

357:36

we are also willing to offer you know my

357:38

the primary the primary objective is

357:41

impact positive impact in the world

357:44

financial sustainability constraint but

357:46

it doesn't have to be everything we do

357:48

has to be appropriately so we we have a

357:50

reasonable strategy on that and um I am

357:54

all right offering things for free uh

357:56

assuming we are financially sustainable

357:58

because I have to make certain

358:00

You know, imagine if on my hands uh open

358:03

learning collapses. That would be I have

358:05

a pretty successful career at MIT, but

358:08

this would be remembered as a big

358:09

failure of this fellow.

358:13

It's not in my intentions. So, I would

358:16

like to do both.

358:17

>> That that all sounds great. And that

358:18

connects directly to the the third piece

358:21

which is I agree with you very much that

358:23

a lot of what's out there is not worth

358:25

the the space that take takes up but and

358:28

you have to keep the quality high but I

358:30

think that that is an opportunity for

358:32

the MIT brand to be applied to things

358:35

that came from elsewhere that are

358:37

appropriate particularly in the realm of

358:40

these kits and things like that that are

358:42

available to support

358:43

>> MIT brand will be there that is if

358:46

something is on learn MIT DU within

358:49

universal AI MIT started it and it's a

358:52

module that a professor at at uh Carnei

358:56

Melon will develop which is actually

358:58

this is cooking already uh but an

359:01

individual I don't think it would be the

359:03

brand would be diluted I really don't

359:05

believe that unless we make mistakes on

359:08

quality if we make mistakes on quality

359:10

we delude the brand but if we don't

359:14

have a question

359:16

>> yeah you speak about um positive impact

359:19

worldwide.

359:22

>> Oh, sorry.

359:24

Yeah, you speak about positive impact

359:25

worldwide and practical applications of

359:28

uh of the learning. Um there's a

359:30

shortage of trades people. Um you know,

359:35

>> what what have you thought about that?

359:36

And I I'll give a personal anecdote. My

359:39

refrigerator broke. I didn't know how to

359:41

fix it. I went online. There is there's

359:44

nothing about practical applications,

359:46

fixing appliances, whatever. But on on o

359:49

open courseware, I I looked at the fluid

359:53

dynamics portions of some courses and

359:56

the electrical circuit board design so I

359:59

could troubleshoot the refrigerator and

360:01

those types of things. I also use it as

360:02

a learning experience for my kids. But

360:03

I'm thinking people in in developing

360:06

countries, it could be something that's,

360:09

you know, necessary for them to survive.

360:11

um it could be a path to uh get the

360:14

financial security so then they can move

360:16

on to the higher level education. So I

360:18

just go ahead.

360:19

>> Yeah. Um I think you rais a really

360:21

important point. You know the materials

360:24

that we put out have a sort of an MIT

360:26

frame on it, right? There's frequently a

360:29

lot more theoretical grounding than than

360:32

the the sort of typical trades person uh

360:35

expectation would be. But one of the

360:38

wonderful things about working in an

360:39

ecosystem with others is we get to work

360:43

with for instance schools and educators

360:45

who do really understand how to do you

360:48

know relevant education for people from

360:50

from a wide range of needs such as you

360:52

know how to how to be the most awesome

360:55

refrigeration repair person you can be

360:57

you know so Sarah you've you've done

360:59

stuff for instance you know building

361:01

collaboration with community colleges

361:03

who have a little bit more of a

361:04

footprint in that direction maybe you

361:06

care to share an aspect of that?

361:09

>> I mean, it's just really wonderful to

361:11

see open education in action and to see

361:13

our content adapted for different

361:15

learners who then go on and do really

361:17

powerful things with them.

361:19

>> Yeah, I'm glad to hear that you found

361:20

some value in working on your

361:22

refrigerator from open courseware. Yeah,

361:23

>> that's great.

361:26

>> Yeah.

361:26

>> Um, hi. So, uh, I was in the internet,

361:29

so I've come live. I'm hybrid. Thank

361:32

you. Sorry I couldn't be here earlier,

361:34

but I just want to first share something

361:36

and then I have a comment on something.

361:37

The first one is just a really cool

361:39

history point. I was lucky to be a young

361:41

MIT corporation member when we launched

361:43

OCW and when we hired Chuck Best who was

361:46

extraordinary and I I think the points

361:47

you made about not only OCW but also the

361:49

women's reports and getting more

361:51

equality for like all of us in um but I

361:54

want to share something that still

361:55

relates to us that's deeper in history

361:58

as it rhymes as you were talking about.

362:00

Um, so in 1865

362:02

is the first year that MIT taught

362:04

classes. And there's this super cool

362:06

timeline that's on the wall if you kind

362:08

of go down the infinite quarter and take

362:09

a little right into building three. And

362:12

in 1865 it says on February 20th free

362:15

the the first classes were held in the

362:17

Merkantile building and it goes on and

362:19

talks about more and

362:22

LOL free courses began in the evenings

362:24

year one um open to both men and women

362:28

taught by MIT faculty under the opaces

362:31

of lol you know and and that's from an

362:33

earlier time but just isn't it amazing

362:35

to think of our our early days the first

362:38

faculty and that the the threads of OCW

362:41

were going to teach for free. Obviously,

362:43

it wasn't digital. Uh so, you had to be

362:45

in the Boston area, but everyone could

362:47

join for free, which was amazing. And of

362:49

course, MIT is a land grant uh

362:51

university with all of our neighbors in

362:53

other states. And so, we were part of

362:55

that idea of everyone open learning for

362:57

everybody and including the community.

362:59

So, just a po cool point of history for

363:00

everybody. And then the second point is

363:02

just um I was lucky to be a student of

363:05

Woody Flowers who was part of creating

363:07

first robotics and 207 and now we have

363:10

Fab Labs. And so I'm just so excited

363:12

about what you were talking about which

363:14

is the the partnerships we can do. We

363:16

don't have to make all these things but

363:17

Carnegie made all these libraries. I

363:19

think there's more libraries than

363:20

McDonald's in the United States. So we

363:22

can partner with them. And I I just

363:23

brought to share you know most kids they

363:26

they know about their phone uh but they

363:28

don't know about the board inside.

363:30

that's just a Raspberry Pi or they could

363:32

do, you know, air quality sensors and

363:34

these things. How do we get the

363:36

physical? And it just I've been so

363:38

inspired by how OCW has been doing great

363:40

work with partners and I think we can

363:42

triple down on that because a lot of

363:44

young people are also facing loneliness.

363:47

And so a way to not be lonely is to be

363:50

in a community. And so having not just

363:52

the course, let's not have AI just teach

363:54

us, let's have each other and have AI

363:56

helping us, which also was in invented

363:58

in a media lab way.

364:00

>> Um

364:00

>> anyway, so just a a congrats to

364:03

everybody on this and then

364:04

>> No, no, but I would like to respond to

364:06

something.

364:07

>> Yeah, I know. Just congrats to OCW. I'm

364:09

so happy where we've come. But uh one of

364:12

the areas that I think the plan I

364:15

outlined does not address is the the

364:19

inperson connection. So I have been

364:21

talking quite extensively actually to

364:23

Neil Gersonfeld the Fab Labs. Fab Labs

364:27

for those of you who don't know is uh a

364:29

significant success. They have

364:31

>> there's massive number of Fab Labs. I've

364:32

heard this and there's going to be a new

364:34

FAB right here. Fab and Fab 26 this

364:36

summer. All of the community from all

364:38

over the world will be here at the end

364:39

of July.

364:40

>> But I would like to connect with with

364:41

what we are doing. So we have a

364:42

collaboration with Neil. I mean at the

364:45

moment I haven't even discussed it with

364:46

my colleague because I'm not convinced

364:47

it will succeed but if we succeed I'll

364:49

bring it. So uh the idea would be you

364:53

know take AI for for example you can

364:56

build a a model like that in which

365:00

individual uh labs around the world can

365:03

do things can meet themselves and so

365:05

forth. they have some hybrid education

365:08

where we at open learning teach courses

365:11

and so forth teach modules rather but

365:13

there will be an in-person component at

365:16

but at the distributed level uh so we

365:19

have some experiment with cyber security

365:22

first and AI second so we shall see but

365:25

if we succeed on that believe me I I

365:28

because I I definitely believe that

365:30

while I'm a big proponent of hybrid

365:32

education I also believe that the

365:35

inerson The human component in education

365:37

is nothing to laugh about. That is the

365:39

loneliness aspect and so forth. I mean

365:42

>> opportunity.

365:42

>> It's an opportunity but you know this is

365:45

at the experiment you know I haven't

365:46

even read write wrote it in my board

365:50

because if I write it I only erase it if

365:53

this might not it's an experiment in a

365:55

way a silent experiment although it's

365:57

not so silent today.

366:00

>> That's right.

366:01

>> We have time for one last question. Yes

366:04

sir.

366:05

Hi. So,

366:08

several studies from MIT have shown that

366:11

using AI to supplement learning can

366:15

sometimes actually hinder those like

366:17

learning faculties in the brain. So, my

366:21

question is how do you decide how much

366:24

AI is enough?

366:27

>> Well, I can tell you what what our

366:30

answer is. We have launched as I

366:32

mentioned

366:33

>> I don't know why but

366:38

Yeah, I think the mic did not like what

366:40

I was saying. So it says sils as the

366:42

guy.

366:45

>> We can take a hint.

366:53

>> Okay. So we launched uh ask team which

366:58

is a tutor system. A tutor system. You

367:02

see one of the issues with AI it gives

367:04

sometimes wrong answers. It

367:05

hallucinates. However, ask team when it

367:08

as a helper for problem does not

367:10

hallucinate. Why? Because we give the

367:13

answers the the the we constructed the

367:16

problem sets. The the answers are known.

367:18

AI knows that. The only thing is that it

367:20

does not reveal.

367:28

>> So you see what I mean?

367:35

Okay,

367:40

>> we might be

367:43

>> we continue outside.

367:56

>> Thank you.

368:03

Well, that was dramatic. Can I Can I

368:06

just just very very very briefly

368:11

just very briefly

368:14

>> I just wanted to express my appreciation

368:18

for the open learning and especially the

368:20

OCW team for pulling this together.

368:27

Thank you to all of our collaborators in

368:29

doing this work. We wouldn't be here

368:31

without it. You know, too many to name,

368:34

but again, I'm grateful for those of you

368:36

who are here, those of you who have been

368:37

online. Thank you. And share what we do

368:41

in the world. People don't know

368:46

in the

Interactive Summary

The video celebrates the 25th anniversary of MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW), highlighting its history, impact, and future. Key figures, including Dmitri Bertsimas, Kurt Newton, and President Sally Kornbluth, discuss how the bold decision to freely share MIT's educational materials transformed global education. They touch upon how OCW empowers learners worldwide, improves teaching methods, and sets the foundation for new initiatives like MIT Learn, emphasizing the commitment to making knowledge a public good. The event also features a panel of faculty and learners who share personal stories of how OCW provided access, sparked curiosity, and enabled professional development across different fields. The discussions look ahead to how AI and new platforms can scale impact and democratize education further.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts