From Bold Idea to Global Legacy: 25 Years of MIT OpenCourseWare Live Webcast
6682 segments
for you
a little bit. I don't know.
>> Okay.
>> Actually, too much uh improvements.
>> Might not be.
>> Forget it.
>> But does this work? Uh
>> yes,
>> it does.
Can I just make a quick announcement?
>> Good morning. Good morning.
Good morning everybody. Thank you so
much for coming to celebrate Open
Corser's 25th anniversary with us. For
folks in the room, please take a moment
to silence your phones. Please
appreciate that. And your laptops or any
device. We appreciate that. Thank you so
much.
Good morning.
>> Um, my name is Dimmitri Bert Simas. I'm
the vice provos for open learning. I
have been at MIT 41 years and uh, as
many of you, I love this institution.
Dear colleagues, friends,
dear colleagues, friends, members of the
MIT community and the world. I'm certain
there are people who came um I know
actually some people came all the way
from many far places. 25 years ago at a
time when most universities were asking
how do we monetize online content? MIT
asked a fundamentally different
question. How do we give it away? That
question, bold, counterintuitive, and
unmistakenly MIT, changed the world.
President Charles Vest Chuck, uh, as
he's known, saw what others could not.
He declared that MIT would freely share
its knowledge with anyone, anywhere, an
act of breathtaking institutional
generosity.
Jack understood what that knowledge
unlike material resources grows when you
share it.
Hal Abson was the intellectual architect
who saw that openness was not a threat
to academic academic excellence but its
greatest amplifier. His advocacy laid
the found the philosophical and pra p
practical foundations for everything we
celebrate today. Dig Yu who is in the
audience had the original idea I'm told
he also turned vision into reality with
extraordinary operational skill and
quieted quiet determination he built the
infrastructure and teams that transform
an audacious idea into a living platform
to all three on behalf of this community
and the millions you have touched thank
you
500 million learners ers from villages
in Sapharan Africa, from bustling cities
in South Asia, from small towns in Latin
America and Eastern Europe have come to
MIT's virtual doors and found them wide
open. Six millions more on our YouTube
channel alone.
But let me make it more personal.
Several of my own PhD students have told
me the same story. They grew up far from
Cambridge.
They had talent, drive, and curiosity.
But what they lacked was access. And
then they found OCW, a lecture on
optimization, a problem set that opened
a door they did not know existed.
OCW did not just teach them, it found
them. It reached across oceans and said,
"You belong here." And now they are here
contributing to MIT and to the world.
And yet we are just beginning.
Artificial intelligence, adaptive
learning, immersive digital experiences.
These tools gives us the ability to do
what Chuck, Hal, and Dick dreamed of at
a scale and depth they could scarcely
have imagined.
We will move from open access to open
impact. I aspire ensuring not just that
knowledge is available but it transforms
lives. If OCW prove one thing, it is
this. When MIT opens its doors, the
world walks in.
25 years ago, MIT made a bet on
openness, on generosity, on the belief
that knowledge is a public good. That
bet has paid off 500 millions times
over. To President V's memory, to Hal,
to Dick, and to everyone who made OCW
possible, you gave the world a gift that
keeps giving. Now it is our turn to
carry it forward with the same courage,
the same conviction, and the same
unmistakable MIT spirit. you will see
today that the future of open learning
is bright and it belongs to all of us.
Thank you.
I would like to invite um my colleague
and friend Kurt Newman who heads OCW.
>> Thanks Dmitri and thank you to everyone
for joining us on this wonderful
celebration day. Um, while some of the
numbers that Dmitri has just shared with
you, reaching 500 million learners for
instance, that just tells part of the
story, the true measure of this work
lives in the experiences of the learners
and the educators around the world and
their stories of curiosity sparked,
resilience strengthened, and
opportunities unlocked.
We hear from learners around the globe
who've used open courseware in deeply
personal ways. For some, it begins with
curiosity. For others, it's really a
tool for navigating challenging times.
And for many others, it provides a
flexible, self-directed path for
upskilling and for growth. Take for
example a learner named Thomas from
Chile who first discovered open
courseware. When he was 17 years old, he
explored a course principles of
pharmarmacology to advance his
after-school scientific project of
extracting and studying medicinal
properties of plants and then shared
what he learned with the members of his
16person science group. His story
reflects the power of access to meet
learners where they are and what they're
interested in. He told us speaking in
Spanish, "Thanks to the pharmarmacology
course, I can collect and synthesize the
information we need to learn to prepare
the medicines for our project.
Take advantage of MIT's free digital
technologies and tools." He says, "Keep
an open mind as to how the knowledge can
be applied."
And this is also where the the
distinction an important distinction
between simply free and truly open
knowledge becomes so important. Free
access is powerful and absolutely
necessary. But openness goes further. It
invites participation. It allows
learners and educators not just to
consume knowledge but to adapt it, to
share it, and make it meaningful in
their own communities and their
contexts.
We see that in the ways educators around
the world are using these materials,
enriching their teaching, experimenting
with new approaches, and building a more
connected and collaborative global
learning community. We're grateful to
know that this brave leap into open
education that MIT took 25 years ago has
been in the words of our colleague James
Gapagosclan
of educational technology and learning
resources and distance learning at
College of the Canyons. He says not just
pathbreaking it's been path making for
other institutions to follow
and we see this in the broader momentum
of open education as a movement through
the dedication and leadership of our
colleagues like James the rise of open
textbooks for instance just one form of
open educational resources has already
saved students in the United States and
Canada hundreds of millions of dollars
while also improving their learning
outcomes. comes.
So with this, I'd like to invite my
colleague Dmitri back up to
introduce our very special guest.
As we celebrate 25 years of MIT Open
Courseware, we also recognize the
leadership that continues to carry this
mission forward. It is my honor to
introduce MIT's president, Sally
Kornflum.
President Kornflum. Sally led has led
with clarity and conviction championing
MIT core values of excellence, openness,
freedom of expression, and institutional
independence, especially important in
these trying times. She has also
articulated with remarkable clarity
MIT's mission to advance knowledge to
serve the nation and the world grounded
in merit, access and open educational
opportunity. These are the very
principles that have saved MI have
shaped MIT open courseware which is part
of MIT open learning from the beginning
and that continue to guide the future of
open education at MIT. Please join me in
welcoming Profess uh President Klu.
Thanks so much Demetus and Kurt. Uh and
good morning to everyone here. Uh and a
special greeting to the faculty and
staff who organized today's symposium
and to all the faculty, educators,
learners who share their experiences and
insights today. So, uh, 25 years ago
when OCW sprang to life, I lived 600
miles away. So, I can't say I was at MIT
for 40 years. Um, but even over that
distance, we heard the reverberations
right away and for a long time
thereafter. It was an incredibly brave,
selfless, and bold thing for MIT to have
done. So generous and so generative both
at the same time. Now more than two
decades later, this MIT spirit and
values that inspired OCW, the boldness,
the instinct for service, and the desire
for impact that were really central to
OCW is what drew me here to MIT. So it's
a wonderful honor to join you for this
milestone. And although I wasn't
actually here at the time, in some ways
I feel that I was because MI OCW's
founding story is woven deeply into sort
of the mythology and ethos of MIT. In
2001, the whole world of higher
education was talking about digital
learning. Actually, the world of higher
education, more accurately, was
fretting. Um, no one knew what to do.
And then the institute made a big bet
with the full weight of its reputation.
With the announcement of MIT Open
Courseware, it committed to a 10-year
initiative to do something no university
of MIT stature had ever dared to open
the doors without requiring a key. The
idea was to share lecture notes, problem
sets, syllabi, exams, and video lectures
from thousands of courses. a public
website covering the MIT curriculum.
Now, at the time, the prevailing wisdom
in higher education was to protect the
brand, to be cautious. Actually, I still
hear that about lots of things,
protecting the brand.
But leaders like Chuck Vest, Dick Yu,
Chagaru, Miaawa, and Hal Abson along
with all of MIT's at the time, 950
faculty members saw it very differently.
They believe that the brand of MIT
wasn't something to be hoarded. It was
something to be shared. At its core,
open courseware is a bold digital
manifestation of MIT's fundamental
mission to advance knowledge, to educate
students, and to serve the nation and
the world. By its very existence, it
asserts that the MIT experience should
not be defined by the walls of our
classrooms, but by the reach of our
ideas. Today, this risky experiment has
evolved into a global cornerstone of
educational equity. Open courseware has
cemented MIT's leadership in open
knowledge and access to education. We
have proven, as Demetra said, when you
share excellence, you don't actually
diminish its value, you multiply its
impact. As Curtain and Demetrius both
noted, the numbers are striking. More
than 500 million people have learned
from MIT's materials thanks to open
courseware. In fact, you know, I was in
meeting with some first year students
earlier this year, and I asked a student
how she wound up at MIT. She was in a
sort of underprivileged area. She hadn't
had access to any AP courses. She had
taken five MIT classes before even
applying to MIT. And I think that this
is the kind of story that we hear over
and over again um when we talk to
students who are here at MIT and we talk
to others elsewhere who were touched by
uh the influence of these courses. For
perspective, 500 million is the
population more than the population of
uh US and Mexico. Um, but the true
legacy isn't in the metrics. It's in the
landscape of education that has been
fundamentally reshaped. OCW didn't just
open MIT's doors. It kicked off a global
movement. It inspired universities
across the world to launch their own
open course initiatives, expanding the
open education movement far beyond what
anyone could have imagined in 2001.
Today, OCW is cited in national
education strategies, in by nonprofit
initiatives, by international
development programs. Proof that
openness can scale when you lead with
vision and with courage. It's actually
embodied in things like the teacher in
rural Appalachia using OCW to refine
their physics curriculum. It's in the
high school in Virginia who used OCW, as
I mentioned before, to stand in for AP
coursework not being offered at the
school and a student who found yes, she
could do the work. She could go to
college. And it's in the lifelong
learners living anywhere in the world
who through OCW found the spark to
improve their own knowledge and to
change their communities for the better.
That includes learners like uh Sujud
Aluma from Sudan. Sjude discovered OCW
when she was struggling with her
university's programming courses. She
went on to complete more than 20 OCW
courses, strengthening her skills and
ultimately discovering a passion for
data science. Today, she uses that
knowledge and passion to tackle real
world challenges, including responding
to devastating floods in her own
country. Her story is a reminder of how
open knowledge can transform not only
individual learners but their whole
communities. As you'll hear from
panelists today, open courseware has
broadened MIT's impact to every corner
of the globe. It has democratized the
school the the tools of discovery and
given millions of people the power to
change their lives. We feel its impact
here on campus as well. What we often
don't emphasize enough is that OCW isn't
doesn't just share MIT's teaching, it
improved MIT's teaching. Faculty came to
see their teaching in a new light. They
were able to collaborate across
departments and they embraced digital
tools that have shaped how we educate
our own students. In fact, OCW laid the
groundwork for every digital learning
advance that follows. MITx, MIT Open
Learning, MicroMasters, and now MIT
Learn. Each new platform stands on the
shoulders of this original brave idea.
With MIT Learn, our new online platform,
people have access to even more online
courses and resources from across the
institute, so they can learn with and
from MIT.
In short, the world is different because
of a bold idea that started here. And
I'll note that much of this progress was
made possible by the contributions of
thousands of supporters, including early
funders, the Huelet Foundation, the
Melon Foundation, Abinio, as well as
newer foundations like Arcadia. We're
deeply grateful for all that they do to
support MIT learning. Needless to say,
OCW would be an empty vessel without the
extraordinary intellectual contributions
of our faculty sustained over many
years. So again I do want to thank the
faculty. I want to thank the devoted OCW
staff and team past and present whose
perseverance, creativity and excellence
have powered this for a quarter century.
Their work in curating, organizing,
digitizing, maintaining thousands of
courses is a remarkable collective act
of s service to the world and this is
the legacy being celebrated today. We
know that the work of equitable access
is unfinished. Barriers to highquality
learning still exist, whether
linguistic, economic, geographic, or
technological. MIT remains committed to
lowering those barriers, expanding
reach, and really ensuring that
knowledge is not a privilege, but a
public good. As we look ahead, let's
continue to imagine boldly. Let's keep
asking what knowledge we can share, what
tools we can invent, and whose lives we
can help change next. As AI accelerates
the way we create, personalize, and
deliver knowledge, this mission becomes
even more vital. The world needs
trusted, rigorous, openly accessible
knowledge. And I believe MIT will
continue to lead in this era of
learning. So, thank you all for being
part of the journey. Um, I look forward
to seeing what exciting futures uh you
all will continue to build and to help
enable it in any way possible. So, thank
you
video.
>> There's this consistent vision.
MIT has asked itself in the words of TS
Elliott, do I dear disturb the universe?
And the consistent thing about MIT is
MIT has been willing to say yes.
Thank you all for u joining us here
today. As president of MIT, I've come to
expect top level innovative and
intellectually entrepreneurial ideas
from the MIT community.
>> Today, the word democratize seems very
cliched.
>> We invented that with knowledge and I
think it's a profound thing.
>> We went into this expecting that
something creative and cutting edge and
challenging would emerge, something that
would be consistent with MIT's mission.
But I must admit that open courseware is
not exactly what I had expected.
>> This idea started in 1999 2000 and
people would say there's this thing
called the internet. What is MIT going
to do about it?
>> It was sort of a feeding frenzy on the
possibilities of profiting from
knowledge.
The prevailing idea then was this is a
gold mine for universities to publish
their stuff and market it.
Part of the response was to create this
educational technology council.
The proposal on the table was that MIT
could enter into the space by offering
small modules packaged as a maybe at
that time a CD or some medium like that
whether it could go beyond that. We we
weren't sure
and the financial model conclusion was
it wouldn't work unless we do it at some
scale and at the end of the day it's
really not the pot of gold at the end of
the rainbow.
The question was what can we do that
really reflects MIT's values of
leadership of impact of excellence.
>> The key person really was Dick Yu. He's
the one who really had the initial idea.
>> I know exactly where I was. I was at
home. What I was doing, my wife
remembered where it was.
>> He was getting some food out of his
refrigerator, thinking about all of
this, and suddenly occurred to him
saying, "Why don't we just give it
away?"
>> I've heard it different ways.
>> Hal told us the story, and I don't know
if it's the right story.
>> I I was on an exercise bike at home.
I think I was on exasp
came about that we would give it away.
We won't make a dime but we would get
impact.
Open Courseware is a web-based program
that will provide free access to primary
materials for virtually every course at
MIT.
>> I remember hearing about open courseware
when it first got announced and we're
like, "Yes, this is so right. This is so
much what MIT is about."
>> It literally almost took my breath away.
I thought it was stunning.
No one was open licensing content at
that point in time, let alone full
courses. It was breakthrough thinking in
a lot of
a pretty long time of gee making sure
there's real real support from the
faculty and a lot of hearing, you know,
both enthusiasm and just a lot of
skepticism.
If students can go get this stuff on the
web, why do they need to come get a
university education?
>> People said, "Oh my god, you're giving
your crown jewels away." And many said,
"No, we're not because what is our crown
jewel is thinking. It's reasoning. It's
creating new knowledge. The knowledge
itself should be made available." I
mean, the sheer wisdom of that is pretty
incredible. Actually,
>> we have institutions like MIT and they
can only serve a limited population. But
if you can take the things that are
fundamental to how a faculty member here
teaches, many, many, many other students
can be affected.
The first time ever that my intro to
development class was put on OCW. I
think that very first year I taught more
student than I had ever taught before.
We taught this course on advanced
graduate level deep learning. In just 2
months, hundreds of thousands of people
engaged with the content online. The
fact that something that we worked so
hard to build can spread so far beyond
these institutions doors I think is
amazing.
>> We were able to grow in terms of courses
very steadily but it was one course at a
time, one faculty member at a time.
Growth though in terms of users was
exponential.
The OCW YouTube channel with its 6
million subscribers is the most
subscribed YouTube channel from any.edu
out there. So, an indication of just the
the kind of global hunger for knowledge.
It's about empowering people to actually
use this technology to improve their
lives and improve the world.
I first came upon OCW when I was about
14 years old.
I'm originally from Ukraine and when the
war started and I was trying to find an
opportunity to learn more beyond high
school's curriculum.
I think I started with calculus one. My
English wasn't that good back in the
day, but I was trying to grasp what the
professor was drawing on the board.
>> And that is just one over 101.
>> Then as I learned English more, I became
a big user of the platform.
>> I remember my first interaction with
this. I was looking up something on
YouTube and then I see results of an AI
class in MIT and I remember asking
myself which MIT is this? This can't be
the MIT. Why would they give this out
for free?
>> OCW became this stepping stone
and right now I'm a first year student
here and I'm deeply grateful for that.
If you can inform someone and give them
that knowledge and help them make better
decisions as people, multiply that fact
a thousand times and you know you're
building a better world. In my opinion,
>> it's not only us putting out stuff that
other people can use for free. It's to
encourage other people to improve and
build on it.
One of the cool things about using MIT's
OCW is being able to go in there and use
what works or using it as a starting
point and then adding a bunch of
examples. Somebody gets more, the other
person has to get less. So, we could use
them in a way that actually makes sense
to the things my students need to know.
Me and a few other students, we got this
idea that we can translate OCW materials
into first Ukrainian and then maybe
other languages.
They were really welcoming for us to
translate their materials.
>> It's always good to ask how could it
fail. For most of the courses we've
done, it's caption translation, but also
there is one specific course where we
translated audio and you can turn on the
toggle and professor Kvisher will speak
Ukrainian.
>> It maintains her natural pace, her tone,
and it's really fascinating.
Our
most popular courses tend to be in
calculus and physics and learning to
program.
>> Let's look at what this code's supposed
to do.
>> But a vitally important part of the
education in MIT is the integration of
other disciplines across the social
sciences, humanities, and the arts.
People might not realize that there's a
pretty vibrant set of physical education
experiences reflected on open
courseware, such as videos about scuba
diving and archery.
President Fest's vision was always that
open courseware would be a permanent
part of MIT and for that to happen we
had to make sure that it delivered real
value to MIT.
One of the way in which we're using the
open courseware material is as part of
flip classroom. students who listen to
the video at home and when they come to
class my students do case studies. So
open courseware material is used as very
very very very rich textbook in a way.
I work with many PhD students and every
year two or three of my students would
not be at MIT if it wasn't for OCW.
They learned maybe linear algebra,
quantum mechanics and so forth,
increasing their aspirations to proceed
further in science and technology. So in
addition to helping people, it also
helped MIT because it definitely
attracted people that would ordinarily
not be here.
It's a face that launched a thousand
ships. A lot of later online efforts
look back to open courseware and say
that was the model.
Open courseware was a big part of my
thinking of like well you know what if
MIT could stand on this principle that
certain things should just be free and
available to the world I want to stand
for that same principle. So there's a
direct through line from what MIT did
with open courseware to the existence of
Khan Academy.
This is also maybe my origin story with
open education because when I was going
to start going to college, you know, in
my early 20s, I, you know, six years not
thinking about math at all. Like I
didn't remember anything. I didn't
remember how to add fractions. And so I
actually very heavily used things like
Khan Academy to kind of get me back up
to speed. And for someone who was kind
of taking this not straightforward path,
it was vital.
UCW was a pioneer
in making educational resources
available to the public. The whole open
education resources movement has led to
thousands of open textbooks and many
many open courses that are available on
the web.
>> I've been teaching with almost
exclusively open education resources for
like 10 years now.
It's really made me think about some
things differently because, you know,
education is a human right. Everybody
has a right to learn, not just people
who can afford to pay for it.
If we democratize education, we will
have those future geniuses who can push
society forward.
>> I envision the future where we combine
multimodel data in a more global way in
languages that are not only English but
multiple others
>> is what we call speed. Having a trusted
source like open coursework is critical
for the future and we at MIT are
committed to maintain that.
Courage is not when you do something
because you know it's going to work.
Courage is when you do something because
you're doing it because it's right. Um
and you know there are risks. I mean
there's something very profound about
our ability as an institution
collectively to take the risk when we
make these forays.
If we ever say we won't do something
because it's too risky,
that's not the MIT brand and in fact
it'll take us away from the very thing
that brought us to where we are.
>> Think's next for open courseware and
open education. What is the next 10
years hold? the next 10 years for open
courseware is going to be an adventure.
I certainly don't know exactly where
this will lead just as we didn't really
know 10 years ago where it would lead.
But it's incumbent on all of us to think
hard about it. And it's incumbent on OCW
to listen a lot to its users around the
world for clues to where we could most
productively go because it's impacted
the lives of a huge number of people in
ways that you couldn't possibly have
envisioned.
Thank you.
I thought I might tear up a little bit.
Um, that's a world premiere of that
video. Uh,
congratulations to the whole team that
helped make this happen. Uh, so I'd like
to invite uh the panelists for uh for
this panel with uh three current MIT
faculty to follow up on that as we're as
we're coming up and getting started. Um
just wanted to say um there are so many
people that have helped build this
movement and you know unfortunately we
couldn't uh we couldn't get all their
voices included. Um so I just want to
give another sort of collective big
heartfelt thank you and round of
applause for everyone who's contributed
to make the open education movement
possible.
you know who you are.
So,
OCW at MIT exists because the MIT
faculty have been willing to share their
teaching freely and openly with the
world. And so, I'm so glad to now be in
conversation with three of these faculty
to share their their perspectives more
in the moment. I'd like to start with
Annabelle, senior lecturer in electrical
engineering, computer science and a
digital learning scientist in open
learning's delta team. Delta stands for
disciplinary experts in learning
technology and applications where she
focuses on introductory computer science
education. She teaches and develops
MIT's foundational programming courses
working to make rigorous computer
science accessible to beginners. Um, we
currently have three OCW courses by
Anna. She's also featured in a recent
pot radio video podcast episode where
rubber duck ducks play a really good
supporting role.
Um,
Professor John Gruber is forward
professor of economics and chair of the
economics department here at MIT, former
director of the healthc care program of
the National Bureau of Economic
Research, and a former president of the
American Society of Health Economists
and the Eastern Economics Association,
published more than 200 research
articles, edited seven research volumes,
and has written three books, including
Public Finance and Public Policy, a
leading undergraduate text in its
seventh edition. In 2006, he received
the American Society of Health Economist
inaugural medal for the best economist,
health economist in the nation aged
under 40. During the 1997 98 academic
year, Dr. Gruber was deputy assistant
secretary for economic policy, the
Treasury Department, key architect of
Massachusetts ambitious health reform
effort, and served on the health
connector board, the main implementing
body for that effort. and in 2009 to
2010 served as technical consultant in
the Obama administration worked with the
administration and congress to help
craft the patient protection and
affordable care act
on OCW. John's m introduction to
microeconomics course is the most
visited non- stem subject that we've got
and a brand new version of his public
policy and public finance course is
getting lots of attention. He's also a
recent guest on the Chalk Radio video
podcast and uh you should check out the
bonus content where he responds to some
YouTube comments. It's quite a treat. Uh
Christopher Capzola is the Elting E.
Morrison professor of history from 2022
to 25. He also served as senior
associate dean for open learning in that
role overseeing open education offerings
including open courseware MITx as well
as several other programs. He continues
to facilitate conversations about
generative AI in teaching and learning
at MIT and advocate for open,
affordable, and equitable post-secary
learning in US higher ed. For over 20
years, he's taught US history at MIT and
is the author of two books on US
political history. Chris was also an
early OCW participant starting with
three courses in our big 500 courses
launch back in 2003. So I'd like to
start um with a with a reflection on the
range of reasons that people have for
participating in open coursework. I'd
like to hear from you if I may
professionally and personally why you
choose to do so. So start with you Anna.
You know your introductory programming
courses are collectively I think our
most popular topic in the last few
years. What's motivated you to to share
this stuff with the world on OCW and to
keep doing so?
>> Uh thanks. Uh so both personally and
professionally there I guess two
reasons. So OCW I think came out when I
was in high school and I probably
started using it in undergrad. Uh there
were, you know, probably physics and
calculus courses and a couple of CS
courses originally and I just used them
as resources to help augment my learning
uh with the assignments that were
available for free and the exams that
were available for free and I would
just, you know, use them to just help me
study. And it is absolutely wild to
think that 15 years later, I would then
put my own courses that uh I was
teaching at MIT on OCW. And it was it's
just I was reflecting on that yesterday
and it it was just wild to think about
just that, you know, going from a user
to uh someone who's just now making
these um you know uh materials. It's
just it's been great to have this
opportunity. I just like again I have no
words for that. Um and so that's my
personal reason. Professionally I think
I I've been thinking a lot about the way
students learn and they learn best by
repetition. Um, and so, you know,
repeated exposure to concepts is very
important for students to learn the
materials. And so I feel like if I put
my materials out there, it gives
students an opportunity to see the same
material they might be learning in their
own classrooms in a completely different
light from a completely different
perspective. You know, me, um, you know,
is different than their current teacher.
And so I think, um, that it it helps
them retain the material a lot a lot
better. and it kind of, you know, it's
it's a reinforcement learning uh outside
of their own classrooms. And so, in a
sense, I feel like it's rewarding
students who put in the effort to um to,
you know, who have to put in the effort
to learn, who have students who have
this intrinsic motivation to just go out
there and uh actually understand the
material as opposed to just, you know,
pass the class. So, those are my two
reasons. Personal, I used it, now I get
to contribute. Second, it's just
pedagogically a a good thing to do.
>> Wonderful. Thank you. Yeah. Um I have
all kinds of follow-up questions I'd
love to ask, but we're running a little
bit behind time, so going to keep
rolling. Um so to you, John, now you've
also been a long-term participant. In
fact, uh we've done several versions
each of your intro to microeconomics and
and public policy and finance courses.
And you were also one of the first
participants back in 2003. I wonder if
you could cast your mind back to that
early moment when you were first invited
to participate in this thing that we
didn't know what it would turn into.
What what motivated you to to take the
leap?
>> You made it incredibly easy. I mean,
look, we're getting a lot of praise, but
like what's it involve? I got to put a
mic on when I lecture. I got to upload
my problem sets and notes, and you come
back to me and say, "It's done. Look at
it." I'm like, "Okay, that's great." I
mean, what's not to like? You just made
it unbel you. The resources MIT put in
to making this easy for our incredibly
busy faculty are the differencemaker. If
MIT had come to me and said look we want
you to go record a whole bunch of
separate lectures. I would have said no.
Uh basically we are busy busy people and
you have taken the resources to make it
easy. And uh the benefit to me all comes
from something that no one under 45 or
under 50 will understand which is there
used to be a time before phones when you
talk to people on planes. You won't
remember this. And every single time I
sat down next to someone and said I
taught economics, they'd say to me,
"God, that's the worst course I ever
took." And I thought, "How can this be?"
I mean, I said I'm not your favorite,
but it can't be your worst. I thought
it's just taught badly. often it's
taught in high schools by the gym
teacher or the history teacher. They
don't know what they're talking and so
to me the benefit is to be able to get
the world to understand economics uh in
in in much better and and improve their
lives in that way. Wonderful. Thank you.
Um, Chris, um, I'm especially curious,
you know, having published on OCW, then
you took the leap to like join the
family and work with us very closely for
a number of years kind of what what drew
you in to just be that much more
involved in this in this open courseware
work.
>> Yeah. No, it's been uh it was a great
adventure and part of it is, you know, I
blame Sanjay Sarma for um, you know, for
coming up with the idea. Um, but I think
the real answer is I'm going to start
actually with with a with an equation.
And that equation is 4 + 10 equals 16.
Right? So Anna is sitting here saying
like, what's going on over in the
humanities?
>> God, we let this guy in OCW. I'm not
sure we want to teach it our students.
>> So those those are UN sustainable
development goals. Four is education. 10
is reducing inequality. And 16 is just
in democratic institutions. Right? And
so I just fundamentally believe that 4
plus 10 equals 16. And I believe that if
that MIT through open courseware um and
all of our open education initiatives,
right, um has committed, right, to
solving that problem, right? And I just
wanted to kind of roll up my sleeves and
be part of it. And I had the chance to
work with 175 amazing staff members who
make that happen every day.
>> Thank you. Yeah, we're grateful that you
made that Jeep. That
>> four plus 10 equals 16. I'm going to
remember that. Thank you. Yeah. Um I
want to turn a little bit more attention
to the the stories of impact that you've
heard. Um John, you you uh referred to,
you know, the people you sat next to an
airplane who didn't necessarily have a
good experience. Um is there a story of
positive impact that you've heard from,
you know, things that you've shared
yourself or more broadly in open
education that that really stands out
for you?
>> Yeah, I started I'm I'm arrogant enough
that I keep a little folder of all the
nice emails I get. I started to go
through them and rather than just
reading a particular one, I just thought
I would reflect on the incredible
diversity of countries and uh people
that I hear from who say, you know, I
never thought I could take a class of
this quality. I never thought I could
learn so much about economics. Thank you
so much for setting me on this
educational path or for educating me.
And I guess personally I love
particularly the ones that say now I'm
going to go study economics. You know
that's what I wanted. And I love in
particular the messages I I get which
are you know I didn't really know about
economics. I attack your I took your
class. I'm going to go major economics.
I'm going to go further in economics.
And that is uh just incredibly
gratifying.
>> Wonderful. Thank you. How about you
Anna? Anything stand out?
>> Uh I have not been recognized on an
airplane yet. That's very growth mindset
but it's coming.
>> Yeah I know. growth mindset of me. Um,
again, I I don't have any specific
story, but like uh John here, I think
it's just there's um like an incredible
reach that OCW has. So, I've also been
contacted by, you know, students who
have taken the courses and there are
eight-year-olds who have taken the
courses. There are 80 year olds who have
taken the courses. There are students
who are blind who have taken these
courses and successfully gone through
it. Um there are people who you know go
through power outages every single day
and they have successfully gone through
the course and it's just like this
motivation to just you know their love
of learning that just kind of pushes
them on to just continue and you know
complete these courses and also
educators have taken the courses and
have gone on and you know taken some of
the things that we implement in our
classrooms and implemented in their own
like in um Nigeria especially they've uh
taken a lot of things that we've done
and just kind of implemented in their
own. So yeah, just a huge reach and love
of learning.
>> Yeah,
>> amazing to see.
>> Yeah, I'll I'll lift up that investments
that we make to make sure that our
content is accessible in all of the
different manifestations, you know,
really glad to hear that. Chris, any
particular impact stories for you? you
know there I mean there are so many but
I think uh it's worth putting a a thumb
on the scale for the people who take uh
OCW materials and do things with them
that we didn't imagine either in our own
classrooms or at open learning right who
and um and that that's the fundamental
sort of um motivation I think behind
open courseware and and why it's openly
licensed allows for reusing remixing um
and sort of making allowing people to do
creative things with it. And of course
uh some of the that most creative stuff
happens when people need to solve their
own educational challenges, right? And
we heard from Sophia from Ukraine and in
the video and there have been many other
learners who are displaced, refugees,
etc. Um who have like who have not let
that displace or or deter their
educational mission and that's been
super inspiring over the last few years.
>> Good. Thank you. Um, next question I'd
like to ask has to do with how
wonderful it's been to discover OCW's
reach across the whole lifelong learning
spectrum. You know, there was an idea, I
think originally, that it would mostly
be used by other educators in school
settings. And, you know, well over half
of our reach and impact has nothing to
do with people who are officially in
school. And each of you teaches a topic
that feels like especially sort of
resonant with sort of broad citizen
awareness at at this moment, you know.
Um what perspective might you have about
what OCW and open education more broadly
can do to support people's lifelong
engagement in in this field that you are
very deeply connected to? And Chris, I'd
like to start with you. This being a a
moment when so much history is being
made. Yes, more. Yes, more of it every
day. Um uh and
>> I think, you know, I'm going to answer
that question not just um thinking about
American history, although I'll get back
to that, but I think in many ways all of
these big concepts that we talk about
right now around lifelong learning, um
around workforce development, all of
those imagine people who are going to
school forever, right? people who will
who they may get a degree or not but
they will never graduate right they will
always be learners and if you trace that
back to its intellectual roots I think
you get back to 2001 um and the launch
of open courseware right because you
can't be a lifelong learner unless
there's lifelong learning materials out
there right um and I think that in order
to kind of empower those those those
learners um OCW and all of MIT's
initiatives play a real role in
Good. Thank you, John. How about how
about you? So much attention is put on
this thing that we call the economy and
its intersections with people's lives.
What do you what do you hope for there?
>> Look, I think another moment while I was
making history where where we're we're
struggling with democracy as a world
right now and there is a fundamental
link between being well educated and
supporting democracy. uh the the bedrock
of authoritarian leaders is they try to
cut down education. They try to limit
people's ability to understand what's
going on in the world. And the
fundamental resource we can provide to
fight that is free online education so
that people around the world can be
informed about what's really going on
about how to program a computer about
what's going on in history about how
economies work so that they can
understand that they should support free
and democratic societies uh to make the
best decisions and to support people in
the best way. And I just can't think of
a better way than what y'all have done
in making this kind of resource
available freely to people so that all
over the world where their leaders may
be trying to stop them from getting the
education they deserve and need, they're
meeting this human human goal of getting
that education.
and Anna um learning the program has
been for the past bunch of years an
incredible sort of gateway into you know
better jobs and so forth and so much
change a foot with what's happening with
AI. How do you think about this?
>> Uh so I'm not super worried about Gen AI
taking over our uh jobs. I'm super
excited about it because wait, not
because I don't want the jobs because it
will evolve as things always do. So, I
think uh okay, if I wore a hoodie, I'd
put that on right now because like the
thing about computer science is you
think about just hackers supposed to
like write code really quickly and, you
know, come up with, you know, come up
with it quickly and just like type type.
Um, but it's not about that. And I think
that's been a barrier for a lot of
people to get into computer science and
and programming because that is the
misconception. Even now I think that's
the misconception. But with Genai coming
on board, that part of doing the actual
coding is now going to be outsourced
most of the time to Genai. So I
personally think that now the computer
science education is going to go into
the bookend parts of programming
computer science which is the creative
part of coming up with the solution and
you don't need a typy type for that. You
just need a pen and pencil and
creativity. Um and then the other part
is the uh the testing. So you get code
back. How do you know if it's right or
not? And you'd have to do that whether
you did it yourself or whether the AI
wrote it for you. you can't really trust
yourself or the AI. So, both of those
pieces are a lot more creative than just
typy typy type code. Um, so I think it's
going to make programming a lot more
accessible to people um who, you know,
it's no longer like this hacker, you
know, this hacker thing. It's now just
going to be thinking up with uh coming
up with solutions to problems and then
figuring out, you know, well, what are
some tests that I need to run? what are
some possible, you know, ways that I can
break this code or things like that. So,
>> yeah.
>> So, we'll keep learning about that.
>> Keep learning about it and Yeah. Yeah.
>> Good. All right. Um, like to wrap up
with just an open question briefly. Um,
what's a hope that you have for the
future of this work? You know, we're
celebrating the 25 years today and also
projecting forward into the future. Um,
Anna, anything you'd like to start with
there?
>> Um, yeah. So I hope that uh OCW
continues to be offered exactly as is no
strings attached. I think uh learners
know what they're getting into whenever
you know when they see OCW. It's been
the same for 25 years and there's no you
know you know no hidden fees you know
nothing like that. It's a very
incredibly simple model for what
learners get out of it. Right? So you
have useful content and a glimpse into
MIT courses. That's it. And I think I
hope I hope it stays that way because
it's very simple and it works well.
>> Thank you, John.
>> Um I hope that we can find a more
effective hybrid of online learning and
inerson learning to provide lowerc cost
educational opportunities. I I think OCW
has been incredible. It must be continue
to be offered. At the same time, I feel
like the labor market is not yet
recognizing the credentialism of open
courseware because they still want some
of that real college feel. And I I'm
hoping that uh we can figure out a way,
you know, Esther in the video talked
about flip classrooms. We can figure out
a way to effectively partner with what
we're doing with in-person instruction
to provide a lowerc cost educational
alternative. I wish MIT be offered to 10
times as many people. It it can't
physically. it can online. Can we create
in ways that we can take the MIT OCO
material, pair it with some in-person
learning that sort of labor market
values and that people seem to want and
produce much less expensive education
for the masses.
>> Hear that?
>> All right, Chris. So, um, you know,
everybody all morning has been talking
about how big open courseware is and how
big it got and how fast. Um and my hope
actually is that MIT open courseware is
something small right a small part of a
much bigger open ecosystem right and
here it's worth thinking about MIT's
role in the development and adoption of
open software through the MIT license
and other mechanisms the role of MIT
community members in creating and
sustaining the creative commons um and
other tools for creatively sharing uh
work uh the leadership of the MIT
faculty and libraries in MIT's open
access policy, ongoing efforts to
challenge uh the market actions of large
for-profit publishers that disort
distort scholarly uh priorities. Uh
initiatives toward open science um
codified in federal legislation um in
the previous administration that enabled
the rapid broad dissemination of
publicly funded knowledge. Um and more
broadly uh both at our campus and and
beyond uh an open culture of sharing,
giving and openness um to make uh MIT
into the kind of institution that builds
bridges and not walls.
>> Yeah. If I may, sounds like you're
advocating let's keep losing market
share in the open space. Yeah,
>> indeed. What a Indeed. Let's do it.
>> All right. Thank you. Well, please uh
join me in thanking our panelists here.
We're we're we're running just a little
bit behind schedule. We now pretty much
caught up. Um I'm hoping that at the end
of our many of our panels will have an
opportunity for a little bit of Q&A at
the audience. Didn't quite land here.
our next, you know, our next session
will start at 15 past the hour and we
got to turn things around, bring up our
next panelists. Um, so that next
session, learning without limits, how
OCW opens opportunity for curious minds
worldwide. Again, we'll begin uh in
about 12 minutes from now. Please stay
tuned for this panel with learners and
educators.
I did not
go. the next
day.
Heat. Heat.
I got
water.
Okay.
All right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
that
number
That's probably
I can hear you as well, Victor.
>> Hi. It's so great to meet you.
Ah,
hey.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Come here.
Hey
Monday.
I can get a hug.
We should get going. You guys
Thank you.
Come on.
Yeah.
Thank you.
I
What did I get from there?
May I ask you to take my seat please so
we can get started.
All right, we're gonna get our next
session started
if we can get everybody seated again.
And uh hello to our online participants
as well. Sarah, my colleague Sarah
Hansen, I'll hand it off to you to get
us rolling. Thank you.
>> Thank you so much and thank you to all
of you.
>> I am I think it's just not on.
>> Yay. Welcome back everybody. Thank you
for joining our very special session on
learning without limits. It's wonderful
to see everyone in person and everyone
online. As we mark the 25th anniversary
of Open Courseware, we're not just
celebrating the breadth of knowledge
that's been shared, but we're also
celebrating the impact that it's had on
people around the world. And we're lucky
to be sitting next to some educators and
learners today. My name is Sarah Hansen.
I'm the assistant director for open
education innovation at MIT Open
Learning. and much of my work focuses on
the experiences of educators and
learners. So I really couldn't be more
pleased than to be moderating this this
panel today. Our session brings together
learners and educators whose stories
show the power of curiosity and access.
And I'm really excited for you to hear
directly from them. And bonus for you
today at the end if there's time you'll
have an opportunity to ask them
questions too. So, I'd like to introduce
the panelists. Um, we'll start right
here. Hinata Yamahara is a high school
student, a high school senior from
Georgia whose discovery of OCW opened
the door to his passion for urban
planning and helped him explore far
beyond what a typical high school
curriculum can offer.
>> Yeah,
I know. Please. Yes.
Dr. Victor Odum Muiwa joins us online.
We actually worked together, Victor, a
few years ago, so it's lovely to see
you. Um, he is an associate professor of
computer science at the University of
Logos, a leader in responsible AI
research and a former MIT empowering the
teachers fellow who has used OCW to
strengthen teaching, research, and
innovation capacity across Africa.
Dr. Yeah, please.
You're in the presence of greatness. You
should appreciate it.
>> Thank you. Thank you.
>> Good afternoon, everyone. Good day,
everyone. Thank you.
>> So wonderful to see you, Victor. Dr.
Elizabeth Syler
>> is a professor in the business
administration and economics department
at Worcester State University. You saw
her in the video. She advocates for open
educational resources like OCW and uses
them almost exclusively in her teaching.
And finally, Andrea Henchel is a
superstar. She's a PhD candidate in
aeronautics here at MIT. She's also a
veteran of the Air Force. And I know and
uh she's used OCW to adjust back into
academia. So, I'm really excited for you
to hear her story. So, let's give her a
round of applause, too.
Let's start at the beginning. I'm
curious, what inspired you to learn or
to teach with open courseware?
Was it curiosity, a specific need, or
may maybe even an unexpected discovery?
Um, and Hinata, I'd like for you to
start us off.
>> Sure. Yeah. So, um, is my mic working?
Uh I started off uh with open open
courseware um really unexpectedly. I was
just browsing the web for different uh
like I guess research just getting data
on a topic I wasn't really familiar with
but I wanted to learn more about. So I
was on a train from um Tokus Narita
airport if you guys have ever been
there. It's really far from the city and
you go through nothing to get into the
city. And in those like quote unquote
nothing areas they're building these new
towns and I was really curious to what
those were. And then while I was
researching that on the train, I was
really jet-lagged so I didn't get to
read it until I got to the hotel. But it
was MIT's open courseware course and I
was reading that. I knew nothing. So I
had to do a bunch of research as I was
reading the articles and listening to
lectures and stuff like that. But I got
to know a lot more and then I just kept
on being curious and then you know I was
on a trip to Japan but I just ended up
staying in my hotel room reading about a
bunch of other things.
I kind of wasted my parents' money, but
yeah, it was really nice. Um, I got to
pursue my uh I guess like passion in uh
urban planning. After that, uh I
continued to study it throughout my high
school years and uh open course where I
supported my time through that. It's
free. Um I thought they were going to
ask me for money. They never ended up
doing that. So that was a big part of
me. Yeah. As a broke high school
student, I can't really afford any extra
money to pursue my passion. So yeah,
that's where I got started with Open
Courseware. Nice.
>> Wonderful. And I'm seeing a pattern. So,
>> Professor Gruber talked about talking
about OCW on an airplane. You're talking
about trains. So,
>> Dimmitri, this might be an avenue we
need to explore in the future. Uh,
Victor, how about you? Can you share how
you first discovered OCW?
>> Yeah, thank you. Uh so my first
experience with OCW was based on my
application for the fellowship at MIT
which is the MIT ET program and so I had
to look at uh similar courses to the
courses I teach back home and so that
was my first experience with OCW and
when I actually came into MIT for the
fellowship uh I discover more resources
and then I got glued to it because I
could see a lot of content and more
interestingly the design of this content
made it more interesting to me and uh
that was the starting point. Thank you.
>> Thank you
Elizabeth.
So about 10 years ago, I was going to
teach a new class in teach a class for
the first time in negotiation. And as
you do, I looked at what commercial what
commercial textbooks were out at the
time and picked one and was and taught
from it. And you know, it was okay.
Actually, it sucked. Um, sorry, I'm not
going to tell you what it was. And also
at the same time um my our librarians I
think this was part of a state statewide
thing in Massachusetts but the
librarians at Worester State were really
promoting this thing called open
education resources and I had most of us
had never heard of this and you know
what there were these lists of like you
could go to these websites and look for
stuff and I was like yeah sure there's
going to be something at MIT about
negotiation and guess what there was
>> and so I found a course by that Mary row
I think you're the onbuds asked lots of
nods. I Yeah. Uh the ombbudsman been
here for many years, possibly decades,
uh taught a class for the graduate
business school here for um in 2001. So
her OCW materials are basically a stack
of paper, right? Paper. Yes. And it was
a treasure chest. It was amazing. It was
I didn't only get things that I could
use for my students for free instead of
having them try to
try to go online to pay $8 to buy
something from another school in
Cambridge. And um
yeah uh
I'm really sorry about that.
But also I learned so much about
negotiation because things that I did
not learn any place else because of she
was teaching from her experience with
literally thousands of people in
conflict and solving them
>> and um yeah it was amazing. So
>> thank you. Yes,
>> thank you for sharing that.
>> Andrea, I'd invite you to also share
your story.
>> Thank you so much. If I can say quickly,
thank you Sarah for moderating and I
could not be more grateful to be able to
celebrate 25 years of open courseware
with this incredible group. Um my
journey started
um pretty much by necessity. Um so I was
lucky enough my first assignment in the
military was actually to come to MIT and
earn a master's degree in the department
of aeronautics and astronautics. Um but
my first semester here was a little bit
rough. I got a B and a C in my classes,
which at MIT that's that's not very
good. And actually for my program as
well, I ended up being put on academic
probation, which meant the military was
concerned about my performance and
considering uh having me withdraw from
the program. Luckily, I had a great
active mentor who said, "I think the
issue is that you don't have the linear
algebra background that you need for
these courses." And he asked me if I had
heard of open courseware. And he pointed
me towards uh Professor Gil String's
linear algebra course. And I've I've
heard that he may be there in person. Is
that true?
Fantastic. Professor String, thank you
so much.
I I took two of his courses um between
the fall and spring semester and ended
up uh in the spring semester getting an
A and a B. And literally ever since then
uh because of open courseware I've
gotten all A's in my academic programs
since then I just I can't imagine where
else I would have had such an incredible
tool. Um, so again, Professor String,
uh, the open courseware team, you guys
saved my master's degree, so thank you
so much for that.
>> Thank you.
Open courseware often becomes a
meaningful part of learners and
educators lives. And I'd like to ask
each of you to reflect on how open
courseware has helped you grow
personally, professionally,
how it might have helped you meet a
goal. I think that our audience would
love to hear those stories. Hinata,
would you like to start us off?
>> Sure. Um, well, as you probably know,
I'm 18. Um, I've been having the
privilege to travel a lot. And when my
parents bring me to these cities that
I've never heard of, I often used to
look at them as like, oh, they're just
old cities. They're not really that
important. Or they're, you know, on the
opposite side. They're really new. They
feel really artificial. There's no life
to it. I don't really care. So now after
open courseware, I started to appreciate
like how they actually planned out these
new cities or these old cities. how
they, you know, let's say there was a
river running through the city and then,
oh, they use that river to put business
around it to get people around that
river. Those little things translate to
looking at a bunch of cities and
everywhere I travel at a really
different lens. I feel like that has
really grown me as a traveler. Um, and I
think I'm getting my parents money worth
money's worth as well. So, I think
they'll really appreciate that. But
yeah.
>> Wow, that's neat. So OCW is shaping
literally shaping how you see the world,
how you read the world.
>> Exly. Very different. Yeah.
>> Andrea, can you tell us about your
story? And you know, you you are looking
at the world from the perspective of
aeronautics. So I'm really curious what
perspective
>> OCW is helping you to have.
>> Open courseware has
opened uh no pun intended, but opened
you so many different avenues for me.
But I think the most salient one, the
most memorable one for me was as I was
transitioning out of the military. Uh I
knew I wanted to continue to serve and
just in a different capacity. I wanted
to serve as as an engineer and
researcher and I'd been out of the
classroom for a decade by this point. So
I knew I needed to refresh my academic
skills. I looked online for open
programs and ke kept coming back to open
courseware. It wasn't even deliberate. I
wasn't targeting open courseware. It was
just the courses that I wanted to take
were available on open courseware. And
that's actually what made me decide that
MIT it was MIT robust. I wanted to come
back to MIT for my PhD because of this
attitude of educational philanthropy. I
didn't want to go any place else. I
wanted to come to MIT.
Um I knew I needed to prove that I could
still hack it academically to get
accepted here. Um I wanted to get a
second masters in computer science to do
that. But I didn't have an undergraduate
degree in computer science. So I used
open courseware to computer
architecture, networks, programming and
C algorithms
and
it absolutely 100% set me up for
success. I went to Auburn University. I
scored so high on the baseline test
architecture. The professor told me I
didn't need to attend classes. I did
anyway. Uh and I was able to complete
that program in months including thesis
when it's scheduled for 21. And once I
sent those transcripts to MIT, I was
accepted to the PhD program here. And
again, MIT's open course enabled all of
that. All the professors that offer
their materials, the staff, the
administration, all of you enabled me to
do that. You enabled me to start this
new career to continue to serve as an
engineering researcher.
>> I feel so proud to be part of the team
that enabled you to do that because I
feel like you're making such a
difference in the world. And if I can be
even like an atomsized piece of that um
just feel very lucky.
>> Victor, I am
>> Victor, I am so curious how open
courseware has shaped your teaching in
the past. I've been able to talk with
you about your dedication to education.
Um could you tell the audience a little
bit about that?
>> Yeah, thank you. Uh so uh I remember
when I came to MIT that was in 2013 that
should about 13 years ago uh and one of
the professors managing the fellowship
program told me you have to go to take
6005 and check out what it's all about
that was elements of software
construction and so I was interested in
raising very solid worldass software
engineers. So that was my goal and when
I look at the course I saw that that was
well structured and designed course. Uh
it was very very interesting. So even
for me as a professor I had to learn a
lot of things. Yeah. And I had to even
sit down to in class apart from using
OCW to even sit down in class and see
how it's been taken live as well. And so
that was a really turning point because
it made me to see how the um MIT
students have been prepared for the
future and uh how the world content and
the whole evaluations everything design
how they design and so I learned a lot
and I applied the same approach back
home and sincerely I've got a lot of
positive feedbacks people getting jobs
in the global companies after taking the
course design when I came back to
Nigeria based on that course uh people
getting jobs at Google Microsoft because
of the content and the structure of the
course. So I I actually followed it and
redesign my own course back up. It was
really a very good experience and uh I
love the way the um the recitations
I design and also I mean things around
the assignment and very interesting not
only software construction I also use
this another course which is human
interface design user interface design
or postgraduate was also very
interesting so one of the things I found
there was at times when you use
textbooks you don't get everything you
want because uh this the flow flow in
the books may not be good enough for you
to actually help you to learn. But I see
that the way the courses are designed I
mean they are not following textbook per
se but the designing a way how do we
communicate knowledge to people and get
them to understand it from beginning to
the end. So I see that holistic design
that changes the way people learn and
make sure when somebody come to a
classroom as a novice or you follow the
material because it's based on a MIT
curriculum really and you come in as a
novice then you come out of the class at
the end of the semester you come out as
a as a mini expert. So I think that is
very interesting design and that has
actually also helped me also in
designing my courses back home. Thank
you.
>> Thank you.
It's one of the things I love about open
courseware is that we share not only the
content but the how the teaching happens
and that seems to have been important in
your journey.
>> So thank you for sharing that Elizabeth.
How about you?
>> Yeah. Um so I'm going to say this in
maybe two sentences but to be clear this
is a very longterm nonlinear process.
untethering my classes, untethering my
teaching from a textbook because
teaching, you know, because teaching a
textbook is just how we've always done
it has made me question so many other
things about how we've always done it.
So many other assumptions and I'm going
to leave you all to find your own
examples for that because I think you
probably can.
>> Yeah. Thank you.
>> So this sort of leads into my next
question which maybe we'll start with
you then and that's about barriers. So
one of the most powerful aspects of open
knowledge is how it can remove barriers.
So my question would you like to see
>> I don't remember what my I don't
remember what I said for this. Okay. Oh
right. Okay.
>> Let me let me ask the question.
>> My notes are in. Yeah.
>> Um can you share a moment when OCW
helped you overcome a challenge whether
academic, financial, personal or
something related to access?
>> Sure. Um one challenge that I think just
just two challenges really fast. One is
the uh public discourse around higher
education and to be clear I work for a
public institution right so we are
supposed to be serving the entire public
um but the public discourse around
higher education and it's been I don't
know 20 years about just oh go to
college and get a better job
>> that's it which is not the function of
public higher education historically and
not what I believe or not only what I
believe so just the fact that OCW exists
thank you keep keep doing this. Okay.
The other one and the other one is
really small for my student for my
classes because um are really micro not
small
is that um it's probably not a stretch
to say most MIT students are good at
school. Yeah. Um my students maybe do
not come in a lot of them do not come in
thinking they are good at school. A lot
of my students have came in with people
telling them that they are not good at
school that they are bad at many many
things. And um
so when I teach this class in particular
and I tell them look these materials
came from a graduate class at MIT and
yes you guys can do this too and I mean
I have to scaffold I have to you know
give them other support which is normal
because they're 18. Um they're like
what? Sorry.
>> How many consulting firms have you
worked at? None. Okay. Um
>> not yet.
>> Not yet. Not yet. Well, that's it. Not
yet. Right.
But they're like, "What? I can What? I
can do this?" Yeah. Of course you can.
>> Yes. Yes. You can do a whole lot more
than you think you can. You can do more
than people have told you you can.
>> Yes.
>> So, yeah.
>> Thank you.
>> Yeah. That's huge.
>> Um, I love the idea that open courseware
is a yes, you can.
>> Yeah.
>> I love that.
>> We might have to put that on some swag.
That's good.
>> Andrea, how about you? What barriers has
open courseware removed for you?
>> Gosh. So, and not just for me, for so
many of the people I mentor as well. So,
I talked about, you know, having these
um asynchronous
uh courses and materials available meant
that I could get the material that I
wanted on the timeline that I wanted
anywhere. So, anytime, anywhere, 100%
free as Hinata highlighted. And it was
important not just for my journey, but
now that I'm getting to mentor other
veterans, service members,
underrepresented, non-traditional
applicants, you know, getting to tell
them, hey, it's okay if you work strange
hours or you travel a lot or, you know,
money is tight. you can take worldclass
courses to prepare for whatever is next
for you, whether you're going straight
into the workforce or or whether you're
going into an academic program. Um, and
it's because of open courseware.
And
you know, it it also means something to
the people who are applying to these
selective academic programs to put on
their application that they're preparing
using open courseware courses. people
recognize open courseware for how high
quality it is and what it means to be an
independent learner taking those
courses. And so a lot of the people that
I've I've had the opportunity to mentor
have been accepted to these very
selective programs having used open
courseware to help get themselves there.
And if I can jump on what Elizabeth said
as well also that attitude of hey this
is from MIT the number one engineering
school in the world. you've taken this
course from this number one engineering
school in the world. Yes, you can you
can learn at that level. You can be at
institutions like this. So removing
mental barrier I think is is also
critical.
>> Thank you Victor. Has OCW helped remove
any barriers for you or your students?
>> Yeah, thank you. Like I said earlier, uh
the first thing is that it's made my
students even including myself to kind
of learn from the best professors. Even
though you're not having physical
contact with them, but from the
materials you created, you're having
learning from the best of the best.
Yeah, that's the first thing. So you are
getting exposed to knowledge that um
that MIT students are having. uh and so
that alone changed the understanding of
the students and secondly what it did
was also to make them to understand uh
the global market when you see the
content that's preparing student for
global market and you are using the it
makes to understand you're not just
trying to get ready for the market in
your country but you're getting ready
for the market a global market so this
barriers of entering the global market
was removed because when they go through
the content it makes them really ready
for a global market. So that was one of
the biggest barriers it's remote and
making them to see the kind of
difficulty that uh the best university
in engineering like mentioned by the
kind of difficulty the kind of problems
they give to their students. So when you
do that your confidence level goes up
and then you become more confident that
if they can do that and you are doing it
here then that means you are fine that
means you can compete anywhere in the
world. So confidence level increased and
also they get ready for global market.
Thank you. That's so um interesting that
the common theme that we've heard so far
um is lifting the confidence barrier
that it's a confidence enabler. That's
so interesting. Um we might circle back
to Hinata after we fix our technical
problems, but um I'd like to move us on
to the next question
and this is unexpected impacts and
surprises. So OCW has a way of
surprising us. I know it surprised me
when I saw the the job opening online
11 years ago. I was like, "This can't be
real. Like, OCW can't be real. Like, we
can't be like giving this away for
free." So, the very premise of it
surprised me. And I'd love to hear from
each of you how OCW has created surprise
connections,
a new way of thinking. However you want
to take this, I'd love to hear. Um,
Hinatada, are you are you too freshly
backed? Do you need a second to settle
in?
>> I mean, um, okay,
>> I'll answer your first question like
Okay.
>> So, we were talking about barriers to
entry, right? So, uh, my high school, I
go to a really good high school, um, in
John's Creek, Georgia. It's one of most
affluent suburbs in Georgia. So um we
have a lot of programs in med and
business and you know everything you can
imagine except for really niche topics
like urban planning and I was really
passionate in urban planning but I
couldn't pursue it in all my years of
high school. I took all these AP classes
and dual enrollment class I can't find
one that's like actually good about
urban planning and so through open
courseware I think like the barrier to
entry to you know more niche topics more
specialized topics that is also a lot
easier to enter now so I think that's
how and could you repeat your second
question for me again
>> sure it's a really fun one so in what
ways has OCW surprised you
>> well um aside from me being the only
high schooler in this room I think in
the
MIT, Harvard. Yeah. Um it's really
surprising like um I've I've been able
to talk to these so many uh accomplished
people and I've been able to learn from
so many of them
>> and I feel like the connections I've
gained just through these past two days
is really really really important and I
want to continue that as well. So
through open courseware yeah just want
to keep on learning and then also just
keep on growing my network and then
hopefully I'll be able to keep growing
as a person myself too.
>> Yeah,
>> maybe I'll be at MIT or Harvard. Yeah,
>> I'm sure you will be. Yes, hopefully.
>> So, I'm hearing all sorts of things
about connections and access and
confidence. These are really
>> getting at the heart of why we do what
we do. Elizabeth, any surprises for you?
>> Huge surprise. Um,
through my getting involved with OCW,
Sarah and I developed a friendship for
the last like we were actual friends in
real life.
>> Yeah.
>> Huh. Yeah. That was a really nice
>> It's pretty It's a really wonderful
surprise.
>> Yeah, open education is a great
connector.
>> Um,
our collaborations and engagement senior
manager Shira Seagull is in the audience
and she can attest to the power of
connecting people across institutions
through open education.
>> Victor, any surprises?
>> Oh, well, I will say I can't say
surprises really.
So what I can just say is like uh the
opportunities it bring to people.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh I remember I have one undergrad
students that wanted to do his postgrad
at MIT. Okay.
>> And so because he knew he was interested
in doing his postgrad at MIT, he started
using OCW to prepare. So that he came
out as a very very brilliant student,
one of the best students during that
session. But because he already followed
the OCW, the MIT materials, he was
already getting set for the MIT
environment. So easily got his admission
to MIT and was able to cope well during
his masters program. So I see this as
giving knowledge to everybody wherever
you are in the world and helping you to
have access.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. To access. So I think it's not a
surprise but it's I say it's a very good
opportunity and I see as a very good
contribution to the world. Yeah. Thank
you.
>> Very true. Thank you,
Andrea. Any surprises for you?
>> You know, sir, I have to echo what you
said earlier. The fact that such a
program exists is incredible.
>> Um, it shouldn't surprise me any anymore
given all the wonderful things that open
courseware does. But, you know, seeing
uh, you know, Hinata
kind of the the spec specificity of some
of the courses on there, the uniqueness
of some of the courses on there
continues to impress me. And I love uh
there's so many stories. You know, we're
a small sample of the people who were
impacted by open courseware. So, getting
to hear those those little snippets,
those little stories of of uh the real
world impact of the program is always
amazing.
um being up myself and I saw that Hinata
was working on his pilot's license,
which is fantastic. I'm I'm very biased,
you know, being a pilot. I'm always
excited to see other people learning to
fly. Uh I was reading his bio, I
thought, "Huh, I I wonder." And I
searched for pilot training on Open
Courseware and sure enough, I found uh
Philantina's
ground school course on Open Courseware.
So on open courseware you can take
private pilot ground school train from
two not just instructor pilots but they
are also PhDs from MIT
>> and that is an incredible thing I think
uh anybody training to be a to take that
course uh if for another reason than
just bragging that that's where you took
you know grad school was at MIT from
those incredible instructors.
>> Yeah, I recommend it. Um, I was I took
my uh private pilot written two days ago
before getting on the plane and uh MIT
helped me pass it. Yeah. So, I'm one.
>> Congratulations.
>> Fantastic.
>> We'll have to fly together someday.
>> Cool.
>> Oh gosh. When I was flying here last
night, the pilot had to reboot the plane
and he said, "Just a second while we
control altdelete
and I feel like I should take this
course so I have a better understanding
of what that means for my safety."
>> It's fine. I made it.
>> Okay.
>> Um, let's think about the future.
>> Yeah. I'd love to hear from each of you
what open education should look like in
the future.
>> Okay. Well, I could I have a really I in
the interest of time I am because we
were supposed to finish five minutes
ago, right? Yeah.
>> Oh, we have 45 minutes.
>> Woohoo. Never mind. Oh, we have an hour.
Oh my gosh, I'm so excited. Um what?
Like a professor wanting to talk more?
What? Um two things. One is that um
again it go it kind of goes with being
at school or being good at school or
being not good at school and teaching
everybody right because I teach the
whole range of the world comes through
my classes which is one of the reasons
that I absolutely love my job. Um
but
sometimes
taking what one professor has done and
then trying to use it again is a lot of
work, right? and also
taking what one professor has done for
excuse me for a web particular audience
um I was really influenced by Maad talk
here at I can't remember the name of the
department that does your teacher
training stuff uh that Sarah invited me
to see on Zoom um well during lockdown
and um one thing I've learned from
learning about equitable teaching is
that really making things finding ways
for students to connect these things
they may never have heard of or thought
about to their lives, to their values,
to their communities, to their goals is
really important.
>> Um, and a lot of times they don't even
know how to do that. You know, they
don't even they they can't see. And I
mean, I can I can, you know, tell them
examples from my, you know, white middle
class life. Yay. But um
to have you know to have examples of to
have ways to show to ask them the
questions to way be to ask them the
questions about how this go how they
could use these things to have examples
you know um so that they can figure out
ways to better learn this right and then
to go out and make the world a better
place because when I ask my students
that their eyes like so how are you
going to make the world a better place
and their eyes get really big they're
like what? That's why I'm in school. I
mean, yeah, that's why you're in school.
>> Yeah.
>> Whether you know it or not. And the
other thing is just to um keep leading
with courage. You may not quite be
aware, but that has a huge effect on the
rest of us to see that.
>> I think something you're saying speaks
to something I've always believed, and
that's that people power open.
>> You can give access to the materials,
but it's the people using them and the
people teaching with them that really
>> power them. So we need to continue to
support those people and to learn from
them.
>> Victor,
open education, what should it look like
in the future?
>> Well,
we're in the age of AI and uh so it
means that things have to evolve. The
content alone may not be enough. Uh why
you said a very important thing that is
more about people using it to teach and
people using it to learn. So I think
also we need to begin to see the
integration of hair into open education.
I don't know how to put it but in such a
way that can be that kind of uh
personalized effect coming up. I don't
know. Yeah. But those are the things I'm
thinking about because that will make it
more interesting because content alone
is not enough today. Yeah. So you will
begin to see people not paying attention
to just content. they they want to pay
attention to what guides them and help
them to uh understand the content better
and more so to understand the content
they need to get uh they need to use. So
>> in open education design you have to be
looking at how we bring in AI and still
ensure as we making content available at
the same time we are making sure that
the experience is getting personalized
and enhanced. So I think that is what we
should begin to look at the experience
the learning experience in using open uh
education open res open open education
resources. So how can he help us to
enhance that experience and so doesn't
go doesn't mean only content sharing but
it goes beyond that and then we can also
learn more from the learners. Yeah
that's my those are my thoughts for now.
Yeah, thank you for sharing that and
come back for the 3:15 session where
Dimmitri is going to talk about the
future of open learning and he's already
and our team is already thinking about
some of the things you've just
mentioned. So the future is NAS. Okay,
Andrea, what should the future look
like?
Yeah, I'm I'm going to hop on what uh
Elizabeth said earlier about, you know,
considering how we've always done things
and and how we should do things going
forward and what Victor said about
incorporating AI into, you know, how do
we present the information or
um you know, what tools are created to
help people learn. So, we've I I'm sure
Victor's way more experienced in this
area than I am, but there's been
research that shows, you know,
>> certain uses of generative AI tools can
actually inhibit learning and
information retention because they don't
allow students to kind of struggle with
the the learning process. And there's
there's
>> um growth in a certain amount of
struggle, but you don't want them to get
to the point that now they're
discouraged. You you want that
confidence. you want them to know, yes,
they can succeed at this level of
programming. So, I think there's going
to be a lot of uh development there. It
sounds like uh I'm excited for the 315
to hear what you guys are already doing
>> in that vein. And then um I'd also be
interested in in seeing uh you know
we've got a a lot of learners who
are across the spectrum in terms of
demographics and that's any demographics
it's age you know it's so cool to see
Hanada here and talk about using open
courseware as a high school student I'd
love to see you know open courseware
incorporated at pretty much any level of
learning from you know I I don't think
it's
a stretch to say that you know
elementary school students can learn
from some of these courses and I don't
think it's any stretch to say that you
know people who've been doing research
for decades can learn from these courses
as well. So both the way that we present
information and the demograph
demographic of people that are using it
is kind of what I'm hoping to see.
>> Thank you
Hannada. In some ways, you are our
future and so I'm curious what future
you want to step into and how open
education will be a part of it.
>> Yeah. No pressure though.
>> Yeah.
>> It's a lot of Yeah. But
>> um for the future, well, uh me
personally, my goal is to become like a
pilot, but also being able to do more
than just being a pilot, right? Um I
have a lot of different passions. I'm a
naturally curious guy. So, um, well,
being able to pursue all of my passions
like urban planning and stuff like that
on my off time. Um, so because being a
pilot, I'm going to be everywhere. I'm
not going to be able to commit to, you
know, going to school for 2 years, four
years and continuing my education. So,
maybe opening up access um or keep
opening up access to everybody like that
um would be a great future for open
courseware. and yeah being able to use
that to you know tickle my curiosity you
know keep on pursuing what I like and
yeah like that's a good future.
>> Great. So we have a few minutes if
anyone would like to ask a question to
the educators or learners that are
sharing their time. I will repeat your
questions so they can hear it through my
mic. Um yes.
>> Oh we have a mic coming. One moment.
>> Here it comes.
>> Thank you. Uh this has been an
interesting talk. Uh and speaking to the
issue of obstacles that have been
overcome and continue to be overcome. Uh
open courseware has done a lot to breach
the obstacles of economics and
geography. But we are in a world that is
increasingly being siloed. And I see a
lot of open courseware and education in
general going to people who already
recognize and respect education. And
there's another group that rejects
education as being partisan, which
education is not. And I'm wondering what
is being done and can be done to reach
to people with either ideological
differences to help them understand how
useful and important education is or who
don't have mentors or other people to
encourage them and therefore don't even
know to look for the resources we have.
>> So I can share one example. Uh we
created a podcast uh a special season of
the Chuck radio podcast which focused
solely on learner voices
and the two hosts one was from Memphis
Tennessee and one was from Kala Uganda.
They talked openly about how learning
out in the open was not necessarily safe
for them in their communities
and learners hearing from them saying
that is way more powerful than anyone
from our institution trying to say that.
So I think one strategic thing we can do
is to continue to put the spotlight on
the actual users of open courseware and
open learning to share their stories in
their own words to touch people all over
the world in all sorts of different
circumstances.
Anything else?
Yes.
If you were to change one thing
for OCW, what would that be?
>> It's a hard question, but um
>> that's why I'm a professor,
>> right? You're right.
>> Yeah.
>> I don't know. It's pretty good how it
is. I like it. I don't have an answer
for you.
>> I don't have an answer for that because
I'm really my exposure with it is really
limited, right? Like my one class has
been fantastic,
but nothing to nothing new to add to
that. Yeah.
>> Okay. Andrea or or Victor,
what would you change about open
courseware to improve it?
I already know what Victor is going to
say.
>> Go ahead.
>> Uh, so for me, uh, it's more about it's
not about the content. It's more about
making the navigation easy
>> for people to be able to easily discover
what they what they are looking for.
>> Yeah. I mean not just for um people in
the university but I mean anybody that
jumps on the platform should be able to
easily find something that relates to us
or query. So I think is more about how
do we facilitate that interaction with
the system for you to know that there
are resources there are treasures here.
So because if you don't know there are
treasures here you won't go there.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh so how do we make sure people can
understand and search and know that
there are treasures they can get from
that platform. So I think that is one.
The second will be like going forward
uh how do we ensure that the content are
created in such a way that we have a
consideration for different demography
and also different geography. Uh so
apart from just we recorded video or we
put the materials we are looking at uh
the the the models or people have access
all over the world. So how do we ensure
that the majority
can actually follow the content anywhere
they're coming from.
>> It's not an easy uh it's not an easy one
to do. There's a lot of work to do it
but I think if we want more adoption we
need to be thinking beyond we just
record or put it there but to begin to
look at where the demography and the
geography of access and how do we make
it more relevant to them. Yeah.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> It's kind of a copout to say I just want
more.
It's
as as wide of a breadth of topics as are
available in open courseware. There's
constantly new issues popping up, new
discussions in just within STEM, you
know, Victor's Victor's field of AI. I I
swear every day there's a new critical
paper that fundamentally changes, you
know, how we're looking at training
models, uh how we're looking at
evaluating them, how we're looking at
creating certificates of guarantees,
and uh I I know that's extremely
challenging. There's there's time
investment, there's resource investment,
things like that. Um uh to kind of uh
again jump on on Victor's what Victor
said, I think a lot of the tools that
are uh coming up in terms of AI are
going to make the accessibility easier.
So meeting people with where they're at
in terms of how they learn um what
languages they they speak or you know if
they're uh sign language uh users. Um,
so it'll be really amazing to see, you
know, that development again. I think at
3:15 we're probably going to um see a
lot of what that that looks like and I'm
excited to see that.
>> Thank you. I think we have time for one
more. TJ, hi.
>> Okay, great. I'll make it an easy one.
So uh this question this is this panel
has shown an example of how people are
using finding value in MIT open
courseware without needing the value of
the credential right it's going to lead
to something you have plans but you you
find great intrinsic value in the
content so a two-part question one for
Hatada and Andreas how do you plan to
communicate with future employer or or
or educational institution the value
that you receive from these that's a big
challenge that somebody mentioned
earlier is how do we communicate
industry hasn't really adapted fully to
recognizing all types of learning right
they're still waiting for that degree or
that credential and the second question
is this a problem this may be for
everybody is this credentiing problem
and communication of this value to
employers and others is that something
that that MIT open courseware MIT itself
needs to solve or should somebody else
be working on that I just who should be
solving for that problem and and what
should we be doing with it?
>> Yeah, I think I have a good answer for
that. Um, I was doing college
applications cuz I'm a high school
senior. I'm sure if you have kids or,
you know, if you know anyone that's
applying to colleges, they probably
struggle with the same thing. But, um, I
took all these, you know, MIT open
courseware courses. I worked really
hard, but I didn't put it on my
application. And you might ask why,
like, you know, it's MIT, like you
probably should put down an app. But the
reason why I didn't is because I think
all my other achievements will speak for
that value that MIT has given me. I
don't have to necessarily cite that I
did MIT courses.
>> So like you know for the private pilot
written I was talking about earlier,
right? I took these MIT courses but the
proof that or I guess the value the
credentials are my results on that test.
It's not if I took it or not. It's like
you don't you don't credit the baseball
bat that you use to hit the home run.
You hit the home run. So it doesn't
matter. Does that make sense? Yeah.
>> Yeah. That's a great analogy.
>> Thank you.
Yeah, I think Hinata hits on a kind of a
key point. It's not that you took the
course, it's what en it enabled you to
do. So, there has to be some litmus test
of, you know, what your capabilities
are. And I think that's kind of
universal. Just because you have a
degree from someplace doesn't mean
necessarily
um that you have the same capabilities
as somebody getting the same degree from
someplace else or somebody who just you
know did extra work in class or outside
of class. So I think it's asking a lot
personally of open courseware to be able
to do such a I think a very narrow
assessment of ability to apply knowledge
because I think it's going to be so
job specific um so area specific so role
specific so I think it's I think it's
going to have to kind of be left up to
you know the people evaluating the
individual's capility for that specific
role.
Um, but I agree with Hanata very much
that there has to be a measure of
outcome, not just the fact that you
check the box and you take the court.
>> Interesting. Um, so the second part of
TJ's question, Dimmitri, I'm wondering
if you would like to speak to that to
how we're thinking about MIT's role in
workforce credentiing
and and open learning.
We'll have an opportunity to talk at
later at 3:15. But um as you perhaps
know MIT had um led the effort with uh
digital credentials
which uh in fact um has led uh few
months ago to an actual digital
credential. They they studied u the
group that worked on that studied the
the principles together with our
engineering team. they have developed
um an actual digital credential that is
now in use um in the MIT PL in the learn
MIT platform. We plan to continue um you
know the the development of this not as
concepts uh but rather we are investing
in the effort and um my hope is that
this will be further enhanced. Uh it's
still ongoing. I think the the jury is
not yet uh but we are definitely have um
included in our thinking the development
of credentials um within open learning.
Uh it is part of our strategy.
>> Thank you.
>> Example I have one right here.
>> Oh Brandon has an example.
>> So so this is the credential that
Demetri was just talking about that I'm
carrying with me on my phone
>> from Annabelle's course.
>> Wow. Thank you.
this wonderful. I would like to thank
all of the panelists for joining us. Um,
I learned a lot from you. I hope all of
you learned a lot. Thank you for
participating in the conversation. I
think it captures everything that is
foundational to open courseware,
curiosity, impact, and people powering
open. So, thank you, and I hope to see
you more as the day unfolds.
Thank you. And uh we will reconvene at
uh 1 pm Eastern time with a uh with a
session about the other opens beyond
open education. Uh really looking
forward to that session.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat. N.
Heat. Hey, Heat.
Heat. Hey, heat. Hey, heat.
down.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat
up here.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat. N.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat. N.
Hey.
Heat. Heat.
Heat
up
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Hey. Hey. Hey.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat
up
here. Heat. Heat.
Down.
Down.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Hey. Hey. Hey.
Oh,
hey.
Heat. Heat.
Everything.
Heat. Hey, Heat.
Hey everybody.
Heat. Hey, Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Hey. Hey. Hey. Heat. Heat. N.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Hey,
hey,
hey. Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
I want you.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Oh,
hey. Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Hey,
hey, hey.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat. N.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat. N.
Heat. Heat. N.
Heat
down.
Heat. Heat. N.
Heat. Hey, Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Hey.
Heat.
Heat
up
here.
Heat. Heat.
heat.
Hey
Hey, hey, hey.
In any particular order?
>> No particular order.
Yeah, it's a nice
>> It's really cool.
Are we rolling?
>> We're rolling. Okay.
>> Well, good afternoon. Welcome back from
lunch. Uh, I'm thrilled to have you here
for our next session. Um, knowledge
without walls, MIT's ethos of open. This
session brings together leaders from
across the institute to explore a core
part of MIT's identity, the belief that
knowledge should be shared widely,
freely, and responsibly for the benefit
of all. The open education movement is
frankly inseparable from these other
threads of open knowledge manifest here.
We are braided together and stronger
together when we collaborate across open
access, open publishing, open science.
And so we'll hear this afternoon from
several of these key leaders how this
ethos of open is evolving and where we
might go from here. I'd like to
introduce Amy Brand is a leader in
scholarly publishing, open access and
knowledge dissemination. She's the
director of the MIT Press which is one
of the largest university presses in the
world and an important figure in open
access publishing. The MIT Press is well
known for its publications in emerging
fields of scholarship and its p
pioneering use of technology.
Chris Borg is the director of libraries
at MIT and a national advocate for
equitable access to knowledge. She's the
founding director of the center for
research on equitable and open
scholarship here at MIT.
Rebecca Saxs is the John W. Jarve Jarva
>> Jary
>> Jarvy professor of cognitive
neuroscience and the associate dean of
science at MIT. She's the assoc she is
an associate investigator at the
McGovern Institute and her work has
advanced transparency and openness in
scientific research.
So thank you for joining me here. Um
let's dive right in. um like to start
with a question about the way that
values drive this work and MIT's
leadership and open knowledge seems to
be driven from deeply held values around
openness in teaching, publishing and
collaboration. So Amy, what motivates
your commitment to openness and the work
you do at the press?
>> Um well, first of all, I just want to
say thank you. It's an honor to be part
of this wonderful celebration of 25
years of open courseware. Um I well I
first came to MIT in the mid80s not to
date myself as a as a grad student and
always experienced this place as you
know very open-minded open doors you
know people who don't stand on ceremony.
Um and that's part of what I've loved
about it and has kept me coming back you
know most recently to this as role as
director of the press. uh and you know
we have always kind of embodied those
open values. We did our first open
access book back in 1995
um and that work has continued to grow
and our first open journal um in in
2000. But you know to answer your
question more directly it's just you
know it's really a belief that to serve
as a publisher our authors our readers
you know we want to provide the deepest
impact of their work the widest possible
audience and and open models are the way
to do that.
>> Thank you. Thank you Chris. Libraries
are such a longunning champion for open
open and equitable access. what uh what
drives your work here?
>> Yeah, and I'll echo what Amy said. It's
it's just a privilege to be here and to
be part of this celebration. So, thank
you for inviting us. But um you know, I
was initially drawn to a career in
libraries
because libraries are sort of the
perfect example of public community
infrastructure, right? Like it's this
public space and service that's open to
anyone in the community. It's like whole
point is to open up equitable access to
information, to books, to tools, to
people. Um, you know, and that's just
that's uh very appealing to me and is
part of what drew me into um libraries.
But I'll also say that I mean access to
education, public education, qu high
quality public education, access to
books, access eventually access to
databases and online journals made a
huge difference in my life and my career
path. And so I'm motivated to make sure
that that is available to others as
well. And so the work we do in in the
libraries, you know, sort of fits that
for me. um you know to be able to do
that at a place like MIT we're talking
about values literally open is written
into our value statement um and I will
quote we champion the open sharing of
information and ideas like to work at a
place that actually states that as
clearly as that is I think for me a real
privilege. Um, it also carries some
responsibility I think to do it as well
and as broadly as we can to make what we
do here available to the world.
>> Thank you.
>> Yeah,
just a follow from there.
>> Yeah, Rebecca, you know, across kind of
the whole research enterprise, certainly
in your field of neuroscience, but well
beyond that, um, what's what's driving
your your commitment to open? Yeah, I
think and I'll just start again saying
thank you so much for having me.
>> Um, and I strongly share the sense that
you started with that this is about
values. So for me thinking about what it
is to be a scientist, why I'm a
scientist. Um, the core of that is a set
of ideals of what it what science is,
right? Science is um the freedom we have
to make true discoveries and to turn
them into useful knowledge. And I think
this core definition of science um
requires openness. Right? So what do we
mean by true? Right? That's a there's a
long philosophy of science trying to
figure out what is truth. And a current
view is that one of the things about
truth is standing up to scrutiny. Right?
Being open to scrutiny from as many
perspectives as possible. And so to
constitute a true discovery means to be
open to the most rigorous scrutiny you
can be. So openness is core to that. And
then similarly when we say we want to
make useful discoveries, we want the
things that we discover to have lives
beyond the moment of discovery. Whether
that's in cumulative reuse and expanding
the next part of the conversation,
opening new questions, or whether it's
in the sense of applications in
engineering and technology or in policy
and society, all of those forms of use
require that somebody be able to have
access to your discovery, right? If
you're keeping it private, then it can't
be used for any of those purposes. So it
feels to me that the openness of the
work that we do is just a fundamental
core backbone of what it would mean to
be a scientist and live up to our
ideals.
>> Wonderful. Thank you. Yeah. Um I think
those are really powerful perspectives
and it's it's great to know, you know,
the sort of intrinsic deep roots of this
work help keep us motivated and aligned
on all this. Um, I'm curious
how
living these values, you know, sometimes
can say shift or change or transform the
work that we're doing. Um, you know, new
new things that it might open up,
whether it's around, you know, different
forms of access or, you know, other
other ways to provide this sort of
transparency. um and in the work you're
doing, what um what changes have you
witnessed in trying to do this work?
Chris, you want to start us off with
that?
>> Yeah, I mean, one of the things that's
changed about how we do this work at the
MIT libraries is um how do I say this
delicately? present company accepted. uh
learning that many faculty who are
brilliant in their own fields un
undoubtedly and brilliant in many ways
actually don't have a very deep
understanding of how scholarly
publishing works right and many of their
perspectives on many of them think that
the the closed system of scholarly
publishing is not the right system but
they have uh solutions that are more
based on anecdotes and assumptions than
on rigorous examination of um behavior
and incentives. Um so one of the things
that changed here for us is that we did
launch this center for research in
equitable and open scholarship so that
we could meet the challenges of um sort
of reinventing scholarly sharing um
based on actual data and actual
information about what motivates people,
what are the economics of this. Um, so
we launched that um in 2019 and continue
to work on trying to bring in research
funding to really answer some of the
nutty the the really hard questions.
>> Good. Um
Oops. Um Amy, anything comes to mind for
you there? Yeah, I was thinking as I was
watching the the wonderful documentary
earlier um about the way in which open
courseware has had an impact so far
beyond MIT and and certainly in terms of
the the learners that it's reached but
but also in terms of the way it's
impacted what other universities do and
how they and and that that really has
been I think you know in the last
several years for us coming up with
replicable able sustainable open models
that we sort of trial at MIT press. We
do a lot of experimentation, a lot of
innovation and then you know see go out
into the watch go out into the world you
know and and get picked up elsewhere. So
um you know we we innovated a a model
for open monograph publishing um with
support of a very generous funer and um
have not only been able to publish all
of our books open access as a result but
we see others and so I I think you know
it's it's that value of openness and
also being at a place like MIT is is
about having kind of leadership here
that goes beyond just what we do you
know at the press.
talk about other examples, but
>> yeah, we'll come back. Um, how about for
you, Rebecca? What's uh what's been
helping support and drive the progress
and the changes that you're seeing here
in in open science?
>> Yeah. Well, so connected to all of
these, there's so many things you could
say because the landscape is changing so
much so fast. Um in terms of thinking
about how scientists share the process
of their knowledge um the the means for
sharing the options for how you might
share your science have you know
exploded over the time I've been faculty
at MIT for nearly 20 years and in those
20 years the ways in which scientists
could communicate their science have
exploded. So you know it's now possible
to fully film protocols and share them
as video protocols. It's possible to
share enormous data sets, all of which
are hosted online. It's, you know,
possible to share them in much more
well-managed, you know, with better
metadata so they can be reused better.
It's possible to think of what you're
doing as contributing to the um text
analysis in addition to the readers of
that work. So just you know and
protocols can be shared in implementable
forms for any work that's being done
computationally. there's GitHub and
hugging face just like an incredible
explosion of tools for sharing the parts
of our scientific work. Um and so that
creates a huge number of opportunities
um and some I know we'll come to
challenges in terms of uh teaching these
pract instantiating the practices
teaching the practices making sure our
students are at the cutting edge of all
of these practices um incentivizing them
through policies and recognition. Um so
so yeah I think in both in my own lab
and then in our department there have
been a huge number of new tools created
actually many of them have already gone
through the full cycle of being created
and adopted and then died and obsolete
became obsolete you know there's a very
fast turn right now I think in tools
available for ways of communicating
science um more openly though often then
you have to figure out are they open in
the ways that you wanted them to be. Um
so this has created many opportunities
and I'll just say briefly that the one
opportunity that connects to everything
we're saying here is um I've started
teaching a core class to the graduate
students in our department. Um which is
the whole point of the class is on how
to use contemporary tools to make
science more true and useful through
making it more rigorous and transparent.
Right? So all tied up in using these
tools for openness. um teaching a class
like that. It's the class that I have on
Open Courseware. And when I was invited
to put it on Open Courseware, I
hesitated at the time because I changed
that class every year because the tools
are different every year. I can't this
year teach last year's tools. Some of
them have been completely superseded.
Some of them, you know, are already
obsolete. So, it's a it's a huge
opportunity to stay up to date to make
sure my students are staying up to date.
um and also kind of overwhelming to
realize that I'm reconstructing this
curriculum every year to meet the the
changes. Um and just to highlight what
Amy said, yesterday I taught scientific
publishing in this class and we had
visit us the editor of a diamond open
access journal hosted by MIT Press who
was talking about how diamond open
access models are changing right now as
opposed to when I started this class
four years ago.
>> Yeah. Yeah. The name of that course is
tools for robust science. You'll find
that on open courseware. Um and uh we
should follow up on updating that
version here pretty soon. Yeah. Yeah.
Um, one of the great things about
getting these different perspectives and
braiding them together, as I talked
about at the beginning, is seeing the
themes emerge. And I'm I'm hearing maybe
a couple of themes here already about
like how do we communicate to our
broader sort of communities, you know,
what are these values and why do it and
also maybe sharing some of the best
practices around methods and tools and
just as kind of an open question, you
know, around those sort of themes, you
know, what what are what are you seeing
what are we seeing collectively around
how we message this build support and
how, you how to think about sharing sort
of tools, expertise. Anyone care to jump
in on those?
>> Um, it was interesting that you
commented on, you know, your students
who had developed new solutions that
sort of went through the whole life
cycle. I mean, we, you know, we've
certainly been there at the MIT Press,
too. Um,
you know, I but I continue to see sort
of a very robust, like Rebecca, creative
space around open infrastructure and
open tools. Um, and I'm seeing a lot
more kind of crossun university
partnerships in those areas. Um, but you
know, it's just yeah, often these are
grant funded projects. So that's that's
definitely an issue. Um, and I mean it's
I don't know many people that that teach
the kind of course that you teach, but
that's terrific.
Yeah, I was going to say maybe the same
thing if we're heading into
communication challenges is I think um
there's a robust core of people who are
activated and passionate and
knowledgeable and really see this as
central to their work and the challenge
has been expanding these practices to
become the default or the standard.
Right? I I am finding it frustrating
teaching this class for the fourth or
fifth time to that many of my students
are still encountering this material for
the first time from me and and of course
they're new students. They're not the
same students as four years ago. But but
I I I sort of hoped my whole course
would be obsolete within seven years.
You know that the the whole question of
open science would come to just be
science and I could move on to teaching
something else. Um, and so and to that's
not happening as much and as fast as I
would want it to. And that feels to me
like the challenge is not knowledge
creation or innovation or tool
development. All of that is happening
incredibly powerfully with people for
whom that is their core passion. What I
see as the major challenge is
disseminating all of those tools until
they're default for people for whom it
is not their passion. so that they're
using it without thinking about it the
way that they're currently using the
terribly broken old systems right now.
>> Yeah. So, if I can build off that, I
mean, I think Rebecca's always right,
but she's right on this, too. Um, you
know, there is a core of of people who
are incredibly passionate and work on,
you know, create classes and work on
infrastructure and so forth. Uh one of
the things that we found in a couple of
different research projects that we've
done through Creos is that actually
support for open science practices is
generally high. If you ask people their
attitudes about it people's faculty
everyone says yeah sure I think sharing
data is really a good idea sharing code
great sharing my research openly I
believe in that. Then you look at
behavior and it lags far behind that,
right? And so that the challenge is
getting people to act on their beliefs
because you I think what what happens is
when the rubber hits the road, is that
that how that expression goes? Is that
the right? Okay. Um you know, people are
making choices, scholars are making
choices um to uh I'll I'll stick with
journal articles. they're making choices
to publish their journal article in the
venue that they think will give them the
most prestige, right? And will help
their career the most or will help their
um co-authors, you know, more junior
co-authors careers. Um so getting that
behavioral change has been a sticking
point because the incentives I think are
are misaligned for many faculty to turn
that into a positive. I we are also
seeing some movement among early career
scholars who really are committed to
behaving differently and to truly
sharing their stuff openly and um the
MIT's graduate student council recently
passed a resolution on scientific
publishing um where among other things
they said uh what did they say? I had
the note somewhere. Anyway, it was all
in support of of open scholarship and
specifically they called out that they
wanted scholars and their faculty to be
evaluated on scientific merit not on you
know the name of the journal or H index
or whatever um and that and that science
should be shared openly. So I'm seeing
that that um you know the junior
scholars are sort of pushing the um
pushing for better behavior or more open
sharing of research. So,
>> it's a challenge, but I I'm choosing to
believe this is a turning point. We we
need you know we need different more new
incentives and you know other than where
did you publish you know there's work
underway to develop a data sharing index
that people could use the same way they
use agendex things like that but I also
think the um the dspace repository is a
great example too because you know MIT's
been very successful in getting faculty
I think more than other institutions
>> to open their work Yeah, through the
repository.
>> I mean, yeah, just to riff off that, I
mean, MIT has one of had one of the
first uh all faculty open access
policies, which uh gives MIT uh the
right to distribute faculty journal
articles freely and openly to the world.
Um which we do through DSpace, which was
also invented here at MIT before my
time. But, um and we do that through
DSpace. And I I'm going to get the
number wrong, but at present we have
over 60% of faculty articles that have
been published since that policy was
passed are openly available in DSpace,
which whenever I give talks, I always
claim that's the highest percentage of
any US university. And no one has
contradicted me. Um, but but no one but
no one keeps there's no stats on it any
there's no like
>> uh nobody shares their stats on it but
nobody's contradicted me that we're at
the highest and that's in part because
faculty self-deposit but it's also
because we in the libraries resource the
work to go and get those articles so
that faculty don't have to find the
right one to deposit. Um, so we resource
the work to make uh MIT scholarship
available online and openly.
>> Can I tell a story riffing off what?
>> Well, just a minute ago when you were
saying we've done research on support
for open scholarship at MIT. Um, part of
that research was work Chris and I did
together and um was a was a really fun
opportunity to pair uh Creos and um my
role as associate dean of science
because it so there is a robust field of
meta science which studies support for
open practices among scientists
generally and the practice there is
typically to survey scientists and ask
them how much do you support these
following open practices? um and that
literature reports across US scientists
high support for open practices but very
low participation in the surveys right
so out of all the people invited to
participate in the survey 15 to 20% of
the people participated and that 15 to
20% of the people reported very high
support for open science and so that I
have always been bothered by that I
don't know whether scientists are really
into open science or whether the 15% of
scientists to answer a request to
participate in a survey about open
science are really into open science.
That's a very different number. And the
question of whether what we're facing is
pluralistic ignorance or genuine
opposition is completely unanswerable
when you have 15% of people responding
to your survey. Um so Chris and I
concocted a research program together in
which we would ask the same survey
questions. So what's your support for
open science? But using two different
recruitment methods. So one was the same
thing. We sent an email to all the
scientists in the school of science at
MIT. Well, in five five departments in
the school of science at MIT and just
opt in are you how what's your support
for open science and we got 20%
participation rate very standard and the
support for open science was very high
in this 20%. Um and then we took a
random sample of labs in the same
departments and I wrote to them and I
said in my capacity as associate dean I
want to visit your lab. Can I come to
your lab meeting? And everybody said
yes. and I said, "Thank you for inviting
me to your lab meeting. Before we get
started, I want you to do the survey."
So, I got 95% participation rate. Okay.
I believe this is the only meta-cience
experiment that's ever had 95%
participation rate. Right? So, we had
incredibly representative samples. And
the question was in this representative
sample where now basically you were
coerced to answer our questions about
open science, what would the support for
open science be? So, can I do audience
participation? Okay. So the standard
rate of support for open science is like
85 90% in the optin right the people who
chose to answer this question. So who
thinks that in the representative sample
of open science I'm going to ask you to
raise your hand we got so 20%
participation I'm going to go up from
here who thinks that it was only 20%. So
approximately the people who would have
opted in or more 20% or more.
Everybody's got to raise their hands.
Not less than 20% guys. Okay lower your
hand if you think it was only 20%. So if
your hands still up, you think it was
more than 20%. Okay? If your hands still
up, you think it was more than 40%. If
your hands still up, you think it was
more than 60%. If your hands up, you
think it was more than 80%. So that is
the percent support for open science was
the same in the representative sample as
in the opt-in sample. Sue knows the
answer.
>> Yeah,
>> it was the same. The support for open
science was above 80% in the in the
representative sample. So then when we
wrote this paper, we had to say either
support for open science is very high
everywhere or it's very high at MIT.
So
>> either finding is good.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's fascinating
to to to hear some of these details and
think about what are the things that get
in the way of translating those values
into practice, you know, and I I think,
you know, each of you is is doing some
really interesting things. curious if we
might just lean into that a little bit
more and you know just talk and share a
little bit about how how are we working
to bridge that that gap between the
values and the practice here and what
what might be a really like exciting
opportunity I know to let people know
about
>> um I mean the you know this this
indirectly gets to that question of
challenges that you said you were you
know you're going to to raise and um you
know we're running a business right with
a hundred or so staff to support and um
but a very clear mission. We're not like
commercial publishers and it's you know
it's it's an ongoing challenge to be as
open as we want to be um and to sustain
what we do.
>> Um but you know I've been really excited
about the success of as I I think I
mentioned our open books model. It's a
model in in which um we have a
collective subsidy from hundreds of
institutions around the world and they
each contribute a pretty modest amount
and if we reach a threshold contribution
level we can open up all the books you
know and and and that's been going
strong for several years now and it it's
had you know lots of copycat models at
other presses. So that that's a that's I
think a really good example. Um another
um was early in the pandemic we you know
recognized that the explosion in
preprint publishing around corona corona
virus which you know made very good
sense that science was you know wanted
to publish people wanted to publish as
quickly as possible um to address this
incredible public health crisis um that
that there was some public
misunderstanding and media
misunderstanding around you know whether
or not this content had been peer-
reviewviewed and so we stood as a public
service a very rapid peerreview overlay
model that was one of the first and is
is also we're seeing that spread and I
see a lot of I think that's a very very
promising future for journal publishing
you know it's kind of publish curate
where you use existing um open
repositories whether they're
institutional or or field-based like the
archive or bioarchchive and then layer
peer review and other forms of curation
on top of it. So
I think so. The sticking point that I
see is the one that um Chris described
which is our collective perceptions of
prestige and merit, right? How do we
evaluate the merit of a scientist and um
that so there the topic of how we how we
actually evaluate the merit of a
scientist and how we expect the merit of
a scientist to be evaluated there's a
lot of very persistent myths that are
hard to undo. So for example, in the um
graduate student council resolution that
Chris referred to, they call on MIT to
evaluate scientists by their scientific
merit and not by bad proxies like H
indexes and journal names. So I will say
I know because I do these cases, right?
I both see and present promotion cases
for the school of science. I've seen all
the cases that have been presented in
the last five years. No one has ever
mentioned an H index. So on the one hand
they're trying to solve a problem that
does not exist right that problem that
problem doesn't exist.
>> On the other hand the question of
journal name is much more complicated
because journal name itself is not
particularly prominent. We don't
particularly we don't for example say
this person should be promoted because
they had three nature papers. That would
never cross our lips. On the other hand
we are looking for impact on a field.
Right? So we do ask how has their work
made impact on a field and there is a
very complicated ecosystem by which
scientific discovery especially right
now we are inundated with scientific
discoveries and scientific papers right
the number of scientific papers is
increasing literally exponentially and
it is far beyond any human capacity to
read the all the papers in their
discipline now it was already hard when
I started 20 years ago but it's
completely impossible now and so there's
Now, as there is in every other aspect
of our lives, a very dysfunctional
attention economy, right, of people
trying to get your attention to their
work. And what you buy for an
extraordinary price with the named
publishers is competition in the
attention economy, right? One of the
things that you are literally just
buying is eyes on your science. And so
that is a way to pay for impact, right?
More people have seen your work. Now,
it's not the same as merit and
excellence, right? And is unambiguous
when we promote when we hire and promote
people. What we talk about is the
science and we evaluate it for for
rigor, right? Somebody who is not a
rigorous and excellent scientist would
never get hired and would never get
promoted at MIT. That's not there's no
problem there. The problem is that we
also look for impact on your field. And
that one I think is more intertwined
with the messed up economics and the
information the attention economy that's
happening and harder to undo through
individual choices even at the scale of
an institution. Right? So I keep saying
to my colleagues and my students we get
to decide what we mean by excellence.
like what do you mean we're helpless in
the face of these nameless incentives um
to do you know to publish our places in
to publish our science in um you know
coercive and unethical publishing houses
and they say well we might get to decide
what we mean by excellence but impact is
this faceless nameless other that we
can't do anything about and therefore
we're helpless and therefore we have to
pay $12,000 per paper and undermining
that belief. I think that's one of the
hardest problems that I'm facing. I will
say I got a grant from NIH just before
the new government um to that gave us
three years to try to improve this in my
department and in the school of science.
It's specifically about policies and
incentives at the scale of institutions.
Um so at least a year and a half ago,
NIH was interested in helping fix this.
>> Yeah. And we did get a mention of open
data sharing in the school of science
eval uh like oh yeah remember
>> we no these are when we evaluate
excellence there's no problem we look
for rigor transparency scrutiny there's
no problem in our evaluation I really
genuinely believe we have the right
standards but it's much harder to unpeel
>> impact
>> yeah actually it's NIH that's funding
the the data data sharing index project
as well. So I think I mean these federal
agencies are really motivated to fix
this.
>> Well, anybody who's funding science
because they want science in the
interest of anything, whether it's
health or innovation or discovery or
policy, whatever you're funding it for,
it's not in your interest to send
$12,000 per paper to a private company
that's making a 25% profit off of it. So
anyone who cares about the actual impact
of science
sees that they have to fix this problem.
>> That's good. We're we're we're leaning
into some sticky structural stuff.
>> Chris, go. I mean, and you know, I'll
also note that like, you know, one of
our motivations in the library is to try
and sort of what I often say is break
the strangle hold of these, you know,
large for-profit commercial publishers
with their opaque charges and and um
high rent seeking. Um so uh six years
ago now almost six years ago now um
based on their uh lack of alignment with
our open ethos and our open access pol
our faculty open access policy we
actually canled our journal subscription
to Elsair our thank you uh and we have
been we have not had a severe journal
subscription for six years now and you
know we've tried to tell that story that
you know
MIT has survived. Research and teaching
at MIT has not grown to a halt without a
subscription to Elsair. And after, you
know, almost six years, we are starting
to see, I mean, probably prompted also
by, you know, financial crisis at many
of our peer institutions, we are
starting to see some of our peer
institutions actually follow that lead
and and similarly break up with the
large commercial publishers. um in many
cases our breaking up with those
publishers also means that we're no
longer paying in bulk for publishing
charges right and so now we're seeing
that faculty are now faced with choices
that actually impact their pocketbook I
mean not really their grants or their
discretionary funds but again I'm trying
to be hopeful here and think that that
um uh I I have heard faculty who've
never talked to me about open publishing
before say things like I guess I need to
rethink my publishing strategy which is
exactly what we want them to do right
and so anyway I'm trying to be hopeful I
think there's some uh something here um
that again may be a turning point that
between the the junior scholars
demanding change and the sort of
financial crunch that both the
institution and now individual authors
are facing
>> um is some incentive
>> and related to that you We we've seen
whole editorial boards from these
commercial publishers jump ship and
start new journals with us and
>> yeah yeah
>> much much less expensive publishing
charges.
>> Great.
>> So
>> so thank you. Um final question for the
panel. Um what's your hope for the
future in this work and especially
thinking kind of collaboratively and
working in a more kind of braided
fashion across these different opens. Um
you want to start us off on that? Oh,
um, yeah, there's there's so much there.
We're really focused and, you know,
related to the conversation today on on
um figuring out our way forward with
open textbooks and and more partnership
with open learning. We're doing we got
one of the um the MIT um generative AI
consortium grants um and some other
funding to explore interactive AI
enhanced textbooks um based on all the
open publishing we're doing. And I I um
you know I I am at at the same time as a
publisher who worries a lot about
copyright and what these companies are
doing with our content. You know that
raising the question of maybe open for
humans to read is not the same for open
for these commercial companies to use
without permission. Um, you know, I'm
very excited about the way in which AI
is um, further democratizing access to
information because it's not just about,
you know, here here it is, you know,
delivered to you. It's also about here
it is translated for you at the level
you can read it in the language you can
read it, all of those things. So, um,
you know, figuring out the role of a
university press like the MIT press in
that space is is challenging and
exciting. So I mean I'm excited to look
at um ways in which you know MIT press
and the libraries and faculty can
collaborate around opening up the
research that comes out of some of uh
MIT's recent presidential initiatives
right so there's a big focus there's the
climate project right there's uh the AI
initiative there's quantum um heels
health I never know what
>> health and life sciences
>> thank you health and life sciences right
I mean Those are those are places where
uh you know there's been an investment
in interdisciplinary work on these big
real world problems and if we can work
together to make sure that the output of
you know and the idea is that that the
research in those areas would have
impact more quickly and so if we can
work together across the various parts
of MIT that are committed to open to
make sure that the fruits of those
initiatives really is open in a in a way
that is uh consumable by I think humans
and machines. I think that's a game
changer.
>> Well, I'll maybe finish exactly on topic
and say what gives me the most hope for
the future is the class I teach um which
is again on open courseware if you want
to see a version of it. But the um I'm
teaching it in person right now and at
the end of every class you we spend
three hours per week on each of the
different topics and challenges in
science and how to increase transparency
and rigor in that part of science. And
at the end of every three hours I spend
the last 10 minutes asking everybody in
the room to tell me one thing, one
concept or tool from that week's
materials that they'll take into their
practices. And while this is coerced, it
is the most amazing uh mental health
intervention on me because I leave every
Tuesday morning at noon feeling like 18
more MIT graduate students are going to
implement these practices in their lives
wherever they go from here on out and
that gives me hope.
>> Yeah, thank you. Yeah, I'll say um from
an open courseware perspective at MIT
because our mandate from day one has
meant to kind of reflect across the
entire curriculum and that includes
advanced graduate level subjects which
are so grounded in like the research
academic literature. I think it's
incumbent on us to continue to pay extra
attention to this aspect of the open
knowledge world. Um and you know we'll
continue to work collaboratively with
you all. So, just want to thank you for
for joining me here on this session. I
Yeah, I think we're just at the right
time for ending. Sorry, we didn't save
time for questions, but maybe you can
catch folks up here if you if you have
one during the break. And I believe at 2
PM we will start our next session, which
is um catalysts of open philanthropy's
role in open the the open education
movement. So, please join me in thanking
Amy, Chris, and Rebecca.
I like
>> one of the things
I want science
to ask people to pretend to do something
with what they got which they don't know
yet. So I'm nudging them.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Okay.
Heat.
Sorry.
2.4.
Stop it.
So I don't
I mean the last thing that you said
that's that's also over
you.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
That's for you.
Heat.
Heat.
Friday.
You don't want to pay for that service.
What was that?
Single
guys.
It looks like
a lot of
I think that's
I know.
I will practice.
Oh my god.
Heat. Heat. N.
1.
Yeah.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Hallelujah.
Thank you.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
United States.
Heat. Heat.
Hello.
>> Oh my god.
Say something interesting. He said he
does.
Shall we start?
Um,
my name is Peter Calfman and I work at
uh open learning and I have absolutely
the best job here on campus. Together
with our team in resource development, I
have the opportunity in fundraising to
work uh
with the most progressive,
the most generous, the wisest,
the most courageous,
the most creative, the bravest, and I'm
just reading the adjectives they sent
me. Uh the most the most creative, the
bravest, the h the most handsome,
elegant, the strongest, most
intelligent,
uh the most exciting and intelligent
people, the most visionary and
courageous philanthropists, the most
generous people in the world. of the uh
thousands literally thousands of people
who have given so generously to open
courseware over the past 25 years. Yes.
Um three people stand out as exemplars
of this kind of vision.
You'll find out which three in a minute.
Three people stand out as exemplars of
the kind of uh vision, commitment and
courage uh we admire. We admired then uh
at the start of open courseware and
today now uh more than ever. Kathy
Casserly is an adviser, strategic
consultant, executive coach and a
pioneer of our global OAR movement.
Kathy led the creation and launch of
Hulet's initial hundred million dollar
uh portfolio in open education and later
served as CEO and president of Creative
Commons. her uh work at and with the
Carnegie Foundation, the Aspen
Institute, Open Stacks at Rice
University, Open Education Global, and
across the uh philanthropy and
technology sectors have influenced
countless leaders um and organizations
advancing openness today and uh forever.
Peter Baldwin is research professor of
history at UCLA, global distinguished
professor at NYU, and chair of Arcadia,
the Londonbased philanthropy that he
founded together with his wife, Lisbet
Rousing. Peter chairs the digital
committee of the New York Public
Libraryies Board of Trustees, serves on
the Wikipdia Endowment Board, and is the
author of, among other books, Athena
Unbound:
Why and How Scholarly Knowledge Should
Be Free for All. This is an MIT Press
book. Uh, everybody should go out and
get an MIT Press book today, but it's
also available open access, and we'll
return to this. Arcadia supports open
access to knowledge as one of its
priorities and has been a catalyst of
expanding open at MIT because open
learning as we've heard throughout today
is not alone here. uh the MIT press, the
MIT libraries, the MIT Museum, the MIT
Media Lab all play a role in this uh
enterprise of what Hal Abson or maybe TS
Elliott has called daring to disturb the
universe. TJ Bliss is a former uh
program officer at the William and Flora
Hewlet Foundation where he led the
foundation's strategy for open education
uh resources. He uh co-developed the
costs, outcomes, uses and perceptions
research framework which is foundational
to open education resource uh research
throughout the world and he was
instrumental in developing the UNESCO
recommendation on OEER.
Dr. Bliss is the associate commissioner
of academic affairs for the Utah system
of higher education and a clinical
assistant professor in education
leadership at the University of Idaho.
Dr. Bliss can also read Toltoy and
Dosetski in the original Russian which
no doubt increases the likelihood that
as a human being he will understand the
world in all of its fullness and
actually find fulfillment.
Uh please join me in uh welcoming them
again to this celebration.
>> Well, that was really good. So, um, uh,
we're describing our part of the MIT OCW
conversation as one about the essential
role that philanthropy has played and
continues to play in driving forward a
global movement centered on access,
equity, and the belief that knowledge
should be a public good. We should start
with some origin stories and questions
for Kathy Casserly here. In particular,
I have with me the original funding
proposals to the Huelet and the Melon
Foundations. Um, some signature blocks
are still blank and unsigned in these
documents. So, the whole enterprise
might be invalid or whatever, but um,
we'll ignore that right now. It says in
one of these from 2001 the following
o from 2001 OCW clearly has the
potential to fulfill the educational
promise of the worldwide web. The OCW
concept will help transform the way
colleges and universities define their
role in disseminating knowledge, their
outreach to new audiences
uh around the world and their
institutional and faculty engagement
with the internet as a vehicle for
service not just for profit.
2001
>> all the MIT schools, all the MIT
departments. I mean, what on earth were
you thinking when you decided to fund
this kind of thing?
>> I was thinking back to that document and
I I recall it was a 20page document and
there are a few 20page documents that
got through the Ullet Foundation with a
$50 million grant and this was one of
them. And we did have Melon Foundation
as a partner. We trusted Melon
Foundation and Bill Bowen and Ira Fuse
who were key leaders there. And um
I don't know what we were thinking, but
we knew it was the right big idea. And I
think at Ullet it was or I I'd say for
the ecosystem it was what I call synergy
or synchronicity
kind of meets preparation meets
opportunity and meets timing.
>> The internet was changing the world. We
knew something had to happen at Ullet.
Bill Ullet made his money on innovation.
>> The ULIT program Mike Smith was new. He
was leading the program. He had just
joined and he wanted to bring the
changes in the internet into the
education. Where could ULIP make a
significant difference? And so we be
that was the questions we began to
ponder. And so when this big idea came
through when Chuck Vesque sold it to
Ullet in his magnificent way that he
does it and did
>> it has had this lasting legacy. And
because Ullet had a partner in Melon, I
think there was just this synergy that
was created at that moment in time where
um the Ullet board understood it right
away. Uh Bill Ullet's son understood it
right away because he was he loved music
and gave a lot of his scores away.
President Paul Bre, who was part of the
film, understood it right away. And so
it was a big risk worth taking and it's
had its amazing halo effect. So that's
where it began.
>> Thank you. In in in some of the renewal
proposals that we also reviewed from the
mid from the mids um funding proposals
to Huelet, we came across this kind of
statistic. Um TJ, I'll turn turn to you
with this one. um among educators 85%
feel so this is a few years into the
experiment 85% feel that OCW has helped
them improve their courses
88% of students and 90% of self-arners
say OCW helps them learn 88% of MIT
students um so given your work in
education and more generally in access
to knowledge your uh board affiliations
and and more. As a funer, as a
professor, do you buy it?
>> So, I'm going to start by saying former
funer.
>> Former funer.
>> I don't have any money.
>> I've got to go. I was Yeah.
>> Okay.
>> Uh yeah, I do.
>> All right.
>> I I I buy it. And it's interesting you
asked that because my origin story
started with David Wy, who I has been
mentioned a couple times. Um,
and I didn't believe a word he said
about this in the first class I took
with him, which was grant writing.
>> Uh, but he sent me to a meeting with
some Gates money that he had from the
Gates Foundation
>> in the other Cambridge
>> across the pond, which was the OCW
meeting. It was the now OE global, but
at that time it was it was my first
introduction to anything OEER, open
education at all. I didn't do that work.
work. I was a grad student and that's
where I met many people. Some of them
are in this room
>> today. Um people who literally changed
my life and I sat and listened to them
talk about this kind of data. That was
2012.
>> Yeah. Because because they went the next
week and and that was the the UNESCO
declaration on OAR in 2012. That's where
everyone was going and all that buzz
around getting that going. I had no idea
what was going on. uh no idea what I was
about to be a part of. And as I've moved
through this space, as I as I spent time
at Huelet and got to really meet
incredible people and stand on the
shoulders of giants, not just in the
funding community, but the people you
saw in the film, the people that are
still in this room who believe in these
ideals
around what knowledge can do for the
world and what the technologies that we
have can do to expand access to that
knowledge in the world. Uh it's it's
incredible. And what I've heard today,
what's been very heartening is not just
about access.
>> When you listen to faculty talk about
it, when you listen to students talk
about it, they talk about how this has
changed the way they think about
teaching. And this has been a tough nut
to crack. Access to knowledge is an
easier nut to crack because of the
technology that we have, because
distribution is essentially free,
because we can work through the
copyright issues and the legal things,
right? The barriers to access. But
getting faculty to change what they do,
as someone once said, it's harder to
change a history course than it is to
change the course of history.
It's funny.
>> So, but the point is is that it's very
difficult to get any teacher to change
what they do. And what we've heard
today, the evidence is is that is that
once you engage in this kind of work,
then you
see that there's something more that you
can do. And then something I was working
on at Huelet and where I went after that
was to the Wiki Education Foundation
because they were doing something in the
space of open pedagogy that really
nobody else was doing
>> in that way at that scale with that kind
of impact. But it was literally changing
how students learn and how teachers
teach because of open knowledge creation
of knowledge in the classroom which
often you don't get to until you're in a
place like this and you can work with
someone who's creating knowledge all the
time. How do you do that at a community
college in the middle of the the West in
the United States? Right? So that's I I
believe those stats. I believe them
because I've seen them, but I think this
open pedagogy piece is is the nut to
crack now.
>> So to you again, like uh how important
is it for people to be able to have the
ability to adapt MIT originated content
in in the work that they do as teachers
and learners. It's essential that they
be able to do it. Will everyone do it?
Absolutely not. Will some people just
use it for as is? Yes. Well, most people
probably use it as is. Is that value?
100%. It's amazing value at scale. But
those that do take the time and energy
and hopefully some of them get paid to
do that labor. More and more are getting
paid to do that kind of labor. Uh the
more value that it can bring, the the
value can be amplified exponentially. as
people adapt that content. We've heard
one example, just translating it for
heaven's sakes, just translate it. The
Ukraine I we speak Russian together,
been to Ukraine. Um Sophia's story is
absolutely incredible to me as I think
about what's going on there. And that
first attempt,
>> this work to translate it and and to
hear that being taught in Ukrainian was
incredible.
>> We we can do more of that and it needs
to be done. And not just by MIT, by
anybody out there. MIT is not going to
translate everything into every single
dialect and language that's out there,
but it can be done now with with AI. It
can be done quickly, and that permission
to do that remains ever more it's it's
more essential today than it was ever
before.
>> Thank you. Um,
Peter, I work at MIT, but I'm not very
good at math. I know that your the
Arcadia has given
$1 billion like I can't even get there
in my imagination but north of1 billion
dollars to support um uh culture uh open
access um an extraordinary variety of
things that align with a lot of what
we're speaking about today. Does this
work? Um I mean I shouldn't say does it.
How does this work resonate with
Arcadia's interests and your uh own?
>> How does the work that we're talking
about here?
>> Yes.
>> Well, look, we're just simple funders.
So, we need
>> sure we need people who have good ideas.
Um, we we stand no taller than the
people on whose necks we stand on whose
shoulders ride.
>> Other people stand on our necks, right?
>> Take it as you will. funders do that too
sometimes. Um,
>> so we're only as good as the people we
work with and and for us it's, you know,
we've been doing open access for 15
years or so. It's been a it's been a
steep learning curve. We naively entered
the field thinking that, oh, research
libraries at universities, they must be
precisely the people to partner with
because they're interested in knowledge.
They're interested in getting it out.
They're interested in education and
enlightenment. Well, it turns out
they're not really because they see
their content.
>> Yeah,
>> if one may call it that,
>> right?
>> Those August volumes and Widner and
elsewhere with such a blean term. They
see what they have as sort of the crown
jewels. This is a way of recruiting
faculty. If you give it away, they don't
have it anymore. So, the research
libraries are not actually very good
partners. Other libraries are MIT
library and press of course are
exceptional in this. I believe we had an
entire panel on this recently so I don't
need to go to that. I could skip lightly
over that.
>> No, but feel free to you know how
exceptional we are.
>> This kind of thing.
>> I I'll come back and lube you up later
on as well.
>> It's them. It's it's
>> uh we've worked a great deal with the
Internet Archive. uh their concept of
controlled digital lending is extremely
persuasive. Uh it's also of course
illegal and that's what got them into
trouble. We paid a big chunk of their
illegal bills uh to get them out of the
hole that they dug themselves into but
now they seem to be out and sort of
continuing. But the institution that
we've had the most success with and I'd
like to sing their praises as well. Not
just this has been a sort of love fest
for MIT. May I introduce an outsider as
it were into
>> I don't think so
>> into the mix. tough.
>> Okay. Okay.
>> And and that is the the New York public
>> uh the New York public library is of
course you know not only the biggest
actual public library system in the
country I think if it's not the biggest
it's the second biggest something like
that depending I don't really know what
the metrics and how they measure this
but it's also you know one of the top
five research collections in the
country. So they both they do it and
they want to get it out the door. uh
they want research and they want
enlightenment and they want to uh spread
it. So they are in a sense they're very
different from other research libraries.
I mean what distinguishes the New York
public from others is you know they
don't really have any vested interests
that want to hamster their holdings. you
know, they don't have any faculty, they
don't have any students, they don't have
any university administrators, and above
all, they don't have any university
librarians sitting there, you know,
shouting Gollum like mine, precious, all
mine, and you know, keeping keeping the
content to themselves. Um, and so
they've been very open to this idea of
of making open access a reality. And the
the first way they we've been doing it
is um a sort of a slightly mis
restrained version of control digital
lending along the lines of the internet
archive except that we decided we needed
to ask for permission and we didn't want
to get sued and we have deeper pockets
than Brewster Kale and therefore we
definitely don't want to get sued.
>> Mhm.
>> Um but we also quickly discovered that
that that was a
that couldn't really be scaled. if you
have to go and ask everyone for
permission, you know, then then it gets
to be a very slow process.
>> And then fortuitously in the meantime,
of course, AI happened. And so we
thought surely this has to be in the mix
as well. And what we're now doing, and I
don't want to be too specific about it
because it's a work in progress, but
we're sort of on the verge of having
something uh to show um the world, is
we've we we're harnessing LLMs to work
over a very controlled database,
>> which is basically the public domain
stuff that we've gotten back from
Google. Um so about a million and a half
books. So, you know, nice reasonable
collection to start on. And um the LLMs
that we're using they present the data
they don't summarize it because of the
controlled data because of the because
they present results not summarizing
them. We think that the hallucination
issue has been if not solved then at
least uh attained and and the idea is
that you can essentially read in a very
different way because you put in your
questions and you get back a great deal
of information that's very precise and
then because of the exception that
paragraph 108 in the copyright log
affords libraries
>> we can also deliver a fair amount of it
you know directly to the
>> to the reader. So we're hoping that this
is going to sort of allow us to harness
AI in on behalf of open access and to
make an enormous and ideally growing
corpus of material available not just to
New York public library card holders but
you know anyone who can get into the
system
>> and that could be something that's worth
emulating at other
>> one might hope so
>> and when will that be available to
>> well this this remains on the glitches
being eyed up but I we're we're sort of
within striking distance of having
something to show.
>> That's great.
>> So, uh we like to open learning. We say
at open learning uh using open as a
verb. We like to open learning.
>> So, if we for Peter also but uh you know
for the panel um
>> to interrogate a little bit uh the
importance of freeing knowledge
generally today. Um
you know uh um Peter in Athena Unbound:
Why and how scholarly knowledge should
be free uh for all available from the
MIT press. Did I say say that? Um also
in an open access edition. You write um
the vested interests of rights holders
are open access's biggest hurdle 2023.
Um and some scientific publishers in all
their trickery have quote adopted the
open access mantra chanting it all the
way to the bank. Um still valid
as critiques
of
uh boundaries to open access. I guess
what I'm asking is what are the forces
that seem to be closing access to
knowledge or trying to keep it closed or
trying their darnness? Whether these are
state interests, whether these are
commercial business interests um you
know, especially now uh as someone has
put it uh uh especially now that as
someone has put it, the truth is so
often paywalled, but so many lies are
free.
Well,
oddly enough, in my neck of the woods,
which is to say the humanities and the
social sciences, those who most
jealously guard their rights are the
authors. And in this case, those authors
who are scholars,
>> Mhm.
>> who think that they have a product that
they can market
>> effectively people who think that they
might be able to write a bestseller or
at least something that's going to
generate some level of royalties for
them. And so, especially in my own
field, historians, you know, historians
>> actually do occasionally write
bestsellers. You know if you write a
good book about the civil war it might
actually sell in four and possibly five
figures. If you write one in you know
compl lit probably not. So there are
certain fields that you know more with
the illusion uh still remains you know
viable that one might come up with
something. I find that they are often
the most jealous guardians whereas the
scientists
>> there it seems to be strictly an
economic problem. There are interests
that are making money off of open access
in a way that probably is is goes beyond
the pale and needs to be reigned in and
needs to be made more affordable. But
the scientists themselves have no
illusion of ever profiting from their
output from their content. And it's only
the publishers who are sort of in it.
Whereas, you know, for the humanities
and social science people, the authors
and the publishers still collude.
>> Can I just pick up on a point?
>> Yes, please. Panel.
>> So, it's fascinating because
in the origin of MIT open courseware to
get the first five faculty I don't know
Steve are you here Bill Dick you and
Shagura to get the first five faculty
they weren't lining up
they were not lining up they were afraid
if I open up my classroom will anyone
come to class
>> it was like Ann Margus I'm pulling teeth
all that work that the OCW does of like
making it easy for faculty just hand me
your notes we'll give it back to you
we'll tape you like it's 25 years later
it's the same story now once that
happened the first five or 10 got
released and those faculty became rock
stars is Gilbert Strand still here
like his linear algebra course got
disseminated around the world so quickly
>> within 24 hours someone found an error
in like chapter six of his courses in
the 24th page and he's like who has read
this from Vietnam so quickly, right? So
like so when they became rock stars then
everyone became signing up, right? So
the incentive structures are really
interesting and and of course now it's
the you know we were we're still here.
25 years later, but there were so many
blockages along the way which MIT open
courseware figured out and with the
faculty and with the going back to the
values and with Chuck Ves always saying
that it was around about improving
teaching and learning at MIT
>> that's part of what he sold the story
to. So we can improve it at our
university and we can show other
universities could do the same. And so
it's just a it's interesting to hear
>> the same story uh two decades later.
It's odd that in in in academia that
money should count more than publicity.
You would think that the po point of
this is besides of course the obvious
thing that we all want knowledge to be
spread and that's I mean that's sort of
that goes without saying that's the
hallmark reading card version of what
academia sells itself as but um you
would think that publicity would be
something that our colleagues would
crave much more than a few dribbles of
royalty. Mhm.
>> I mean, it is it is the fear that
someone in in some obscure province
somewhere is making money selling a CD
of your content somehow and you're not
getting a piece of it. Um TJ, you want
>> Yeah. So um the the the thing we're
thinking about right now in in the
higher education space governance
curriculum
uh all the institutions that I'm
uh involved with uh being an
administrator of administrators so watch
out for me
>> um
>> if you're a faculty member but uh
reminds me of a comment that Barbara
Chow made and Barbara was the director
of of the education portfolio uh at the
Hillet Foundation when I was there. She
came to me one day and she said, "TJ,
what if tomorrow all the publishers just
decide to give away all their content at
a much reduced price, probably not free,
but what if they just lowered their
prices overnight?
>> Would we still need to be doing this
work in open?
>> So good."
>> And I I had to think about that for a
little bit. And that my response to her
was, well, there there's more there's
more to this than just affordability.
And that's a very American kind of
context because of the structures that
we have. However, that has happened
recently in the last two years with
what's known as inclusive access and
equitable access or flat fee models at
our institutions or first day access.
The publishers are ostensibly are
claiming to solve the very problems that
OEER has been yammering about solving
for a while, which is first day access
and affordability by offering their
content in a Netflix model where you pay
very little and it can be rolled into
your funding um method like Pell grants
and scholarships and so it's part of
tuition and students don't really feel
it all these things. And when the
question is what's what's threatening
OAR, what we're seeing right now is a
disincentivization for faculty to even
engage in this work because in their
minds a lot of them it's been solved.
The biggest problem has been solved for
their students.
>> What they don't realize which I've
learned just yesterday I was sitting in
a meeting like this with OAR advocates
and and workers and others in the West
>> is that the publishers aren't making
good on their promises. They've lowered
the price for a minute. it's going to go
back up. But even the first day access
programs aren't there.
One student didn't get their books for
six weeks in their first day access
program. And so as a policy maker, which
is the role I'm in now, I'm thinking how
can we how can we establish policies and
guidelines and frameworks and
protections against the the damage that
this is actually doing to open knowledge
and to the the halo effect, which I hope
becomes more than a halo effect. becomes
the real effect of changing the
educational practice. Well, if faculty
feel like, "Oh, my students all get
their textbooks for free. They don't
have to pay for them now." The the
incentive to actually engage in this is
going away at at the institutions that
have adopted these models. That's what
we're seeing right now. And it's I think
that's the saddest thing for me. I get
why I'm I'm not faulting the publishers
for it, by the I know there's some might
like they are incentivized but by they
do everything exactly the way that
they're going to do it because of the
incentives that are there the business
model the thing that they're doing like
I'm surprised it took so long to get
there but I don't know that we are
responding in a way yet that is is
addressing those challenges headon. I'm
trying in my role
>> through policy that we hope to have
through the door on in June uh to to put
some barriers on this but I still don't
know how to solve for the the
disincentivization to actually adopt OAR
to change your pedagogy to care about
student affordability when they think
the problem is solved and er and it's
erroneous because it's not solved for
the students it still costs them it's
now just a piling into their debt so
it's so it's being hidden from them
that's what's worrisome to
Can I add a point?
>> Yes, please.
>> So, I think one of the challenges is,
and I think you've given a nod to this
already, is that we
can't spend all our energy defending
ourselves. We have to get proactive. And
so, we have a lot of organizations who
are open in lots of different ways. And
they're still siloed in, you know, there
are consortiums coming together. Open Ed
Global is certainly one a consortium of
universities that spun out of the
interest of universities from around the
world who wanted to replicate the MIT
model. But MIT Open Courseware sits
here, Khan Academy sits here, Creative
Commons sits over here, the licensing
structure, New York public library,
right? We have this huge public commons
and we haven't yet created a governance
structure
to protect the commons, whatever that
means. Exactly. But being individual,
we're now 25 years in. We now have the
content. How do we create some
governance structure so we have the
sustainability so we can build together
and jointly and not doing it all alone?
Because there's certainly going to be
more power together to create that kind
of system.
>> I wonder whether the whole process of
finding data andor reading as we in the
HSS call it um isn't going to be
radically changed by AI. I go back a bit
to the our experience at the New York uh
public because once stuff is up there
and it when it's in the cloud it doesn't
much matter how it got to be in the
cloud
>> whether published by a publisher or
uploaded by you
>> and the LLMs have pled it
>> right
>> then it's going to be equally available
to anyone who asks the right question
and the difference will be that between
those people who are asking questions
that are factually nubblelike where they
want to know something specific and can
get a specific answer will which they'll
find in all kinds of surprising places
thanks to the LLMs and those who want to
have a sort of more general question
what is the meaning of life how did the
civil war start whatever something like
that
>> for whom of course there will be so many
answers
it'll be useless um and so that won't do
them um very much good but the the the
sort of the distinction between the
publish um then curate or the curate
then publish models that you know often
get discussed I think have largely
evaporated because once it's up there,
regardless of how it got up there, it'll
be available to everyone. And I think
the AI is going to sort of challenge us
to develop a whole new method of
assimilating data and reading than has
been the case.
>> A governance structure to protect the
commons. just um uh um hope one hopes
that this panel will also leave time for
question and answer discussion because
this is a unique opportunity to really
um have that kind of conversation. But
last week, our friend uh and supporter
from the Sloan Foundation uh was up on
campus and we were talking about where
his program popularizing the public
understanding of science will go. We uh
we work with YouTube. Um uh as Kurt and
others have mentioned, perhaps we're the
largest educational presence there. Um,
and we're now, you know, given the new
attention economy, as Rebecca Saxs
mentioned, uh, that we have now, we're
trying to understand, you know,
Instagram and Tik Tok, but a little
wearily given who owns them and what
their real perhaps, uh, purpose is. So
who you know uh with a nod to our Huelet
Foundation supported open 2030 working
group a number of members are here
members we've hosted from other
universities Wikipedia the internet
archive creative commons who might our
natural allies be um
uh a number of them have already perhaps
been mentioned here but
>> what do you what do what
That
>> is that directed at me?
>> Yes, it is. Actually, I'm I'm trans I'm
not translating.
>> You won't translate. Can you get auto?
>> Yeah. What do you think?
>> What does the panel think? Who might our
natural allies be?
If we are creating a governance
structure to protect the commons, who if
we might, if we think about it,
>> with whom are we
>> marching? So Tony Aay who used to run
who developed BBC's I player or whatever
it was called um and then worked at the
New York public as their digital chiefly
is in the process of trying to put
together something he calls public.com
>> which is to create a entire new whatever
that's called when you have a do you
know new layer of the internet um that
will in effect be a kind of sort of good
housekeeping seal of approval
You don't necessarily have to change
your thing to do. Sorry, not
public.com.public is of course what it's
called being confused in old age. Thank
you. Sorry for being
>> vague, right? I got the right. Um, and
the idea is you don't necessarily have
to sort of change your own domain name
to public, but you could be routed
throughpublic and you will have to meet
certain criteria to be allowed to do
that. But that these criteria will help
you sort the wheat from the chaff in the
blooming buzzing mess that is today's
internet. So, it's an attempt in a sense
to curate the internet.
>> I like that. I mean,
>> we thought early about creating curating
systems to give signals of approval
around open educational content and not
just in open courseware, but we funded a
lot of projects. Open University UK,
>> Rice University, Carnegie Melon,
UNESCO, a lot of projects. And so, but
how could quality content be found?
Because sometimes there was junk, I call
it junk and gems, right? Like a lot of
content was being created. What had the
signal of approval? You had this whole
publishing process here that made sure
the quality of MIT open courseware was
solid. But there were lots of different
nuggets of content being shared and when
was it most useful to whom and the
curation systems are really diff were
difficult at that time. We tried a few
things. We tried something with witchy
you may not even know that and like they
worked to a point but then things were
changing so fast or not everyone was
participating. So I like this idea about
public and I think a lot of it is how
you get higher ed institutions to join
in in a consortium way how you get
others to join in early. I mean MIT
joined in early around sharing their
courseware but it was difficult to get
another USbased
>> university to follow MIT because MIT's
brand was so strong.
>> We used that for a halo effect to create
the open educational resources movement.
We did that intentionally. We used
Carnegie Melon intentionally. using
intentionally but that also because of
the competitiveness other R1's didn't
necessarily wanted to do it or they
wanted to do it in their own way. So
when you create something like
this.public, how do we make sure
everyone joins in and it's just not a
few and the content is for community
college students and for the rural
schools and for students of all, you
know, abilities. And so how do we make
sure that happens? And so I just having
gone through this journey for 25 years,
what are the things that we could have
maybe done differently had we known? But
we did the best we could at the time we
were at. But now since we have people
still leading this, how do we pass a
baton and make sure people are really
thinking about that inclusiveness um and
bringing all players to the table. So I
and just one other nod, Ullet did a few
great things as they built the open
educational resources portfolio. One is
they never wanted to take credit. I mean
that came out of the board. We don't we
don't need our name on anything. We just
wanted to happen. I would be like, but
right now we need it because this is
very early and usually actually has a
signal. But we're very flexible with
other funders and if a funder wanted to
do the research piece, we would use our
money for something else if they wanted
to do the technology. So we brought a
lot of different funders in and that
also and that brought all their networks
in and that then makes things expand and
scale much faster. So that was really
interesting along the way.
So I don't have an answer to your
question beyond beyond this uh except
but but I do have a question
>> for your question.
>> Okay.
>> And that is what what is what should be
the role of government?
>> Yes.
>> In governing the commons. And I think
about this and this is from Kathy who
taught me all about this as we walked
around the Boston Commons. The original
Commons the idea like the foundational
idea of what a commons is right here.
were in the birthplace uh at least in
the in in the United States and um
>> I don't I don't know what the role of
government should be in this. I do know
that governments have a very strong
interest in it whether it's an economic
interest
>> and a lot of governments see open as a
as a way to save money at the
governmental level but they also you
know they are the purveyors of public
goods
>> right
>> right I mean like that is the that is
one of the roles of I say democratic
governments truly democratic governments
>> um de democracy is threatened so
therefore the commons are threatened I
would say where you don't have where you
don't have strong democracy, you don't
have a a common understanding of the
idea of public good. I even had this
conversation
>> uh just this week with someone who asked
a question, what is a public good?
>> How do we answer that? I didn't know
that. I thought I was thought that was
an assumed
>> right
>> thing. So I I I guess I'm posing that
question back to you, Peter, or anyone
else that wants to tackle it is what
role should governments play in in
protecting and governing and governing
the commons and should they have a role
or is this going to be done without the
governments? Is this some is this a
bunch of nonprofit organizations and
philanthropy and aren't constrained by
governments and bureaucracies that need
to be doing this or is there is it all
of us?
>> Well, we we we need a panel. Can this
day go till tomorrow? Actually, we
because we need we need a panel on, you
know, government's role um in protecting
the commons or in promoting education as
a public good, which used to be
self-evident.
We may need to wait um for what Rebecca
Saxs was calling a new government um uh
to explore that further. But bringing
all the bringing all the and perhaps in
the question and answer uh discussion
section today we can um um have a
vigorous uh chat about some of that. But
bringing all the players to the table, I
I know that in the o early uh proposals
to Hulet and Melon, um there was uh a
remarkable
level of attention being paid to
creating a movement, not just to funding
>> uh um MIT, and I withdraw the word just,
not just funding MIT, but um to creating
a movement. And so the um open education
consortium that Steve Carson and other
people here had such a major role to
play in um OE global which is coming up
uh and MIT is hosting that in October.
Uh also bringing all the players or many
of the players to the table. Uh I wonder
how we can go about encouraging the
players to come philanthropy to support
their uh movement
in this direction. Um
it's a key question that hasn't died at
all since 2001. Quite perhaps the o
opposite.
>> Well, and something we haven't we
haven't even solved yet is how to get
the open communities to work
collaboratively together in in a in a
real it's still it's still siloed. the
the free and open source software folks
are different than the open education
folks. There's a tiny little bit of
overlap right there. Even even open is
is siloed and and
I don't know like even at Huelet I was I
didn't do much work on open access.
That's that's another we just don't have
the we can we can focus on this thing
open educational resources and open
access is a is a different it's a
different strategy. It's a different
funding line. It's a different
foundation that's going to do that yours
right largely right and there are a few
organizations Nicole Allen's here from
Spark that that even there you have two
people one's on open access and one's on
OEER right and they're they've tried to
have conferences together and they've
gone
>> they've been interesting let's say but
we haven't we haven't even found a way
to do that so I'm just the challenges
are real here even in the open space
whether it's open science open culture
open knowledge
>> open education They're still distinct.
>> They're still distinct
>> disciplines or groups or
>> communities maybe is the word.
>> So protecting the commons which
encapsulates all of them.
>> Yeah, that's a different
>> is is I guess I'm just highlighting it's
a big challenge. It's it's there's no
easy solution to this.
>> Well, I think each part of the ecosystem
had to grow and become stable enough as
its own entity for then it to begin to
create the network among them. It was
the same with organizations in the open
education space, right? It was like, you
know, Open University UK and Michig, you
know, in Michigan was doing work and um
UNESCO was doing work and then we had
work with VJ in India and like they're
all coming to me and I'm like you guys
got to talk to each other because I'm
only one person, right? And now like
look at this amazing ecosystem. The
thing on the funders too is that I think
philanthropy is there for a while but
they're not there forever. 25 years ago,
the idea was that we would help
kickstart this initiative at MIT, but
that MIT would build it into its
institutional line. It would become so
valuable to the organization. We know
alumni still love it. We know students
who are coming to MIT. We've heard the
stories who take the courses who then
can join in. So there's a lot of
benefits that MIT has experienced as a
part of this and that there are real
costs and those real costs have to be
borne and they can't be borne by
philanthropy forever. And so that's
where I think governments come in.
Nicole Allen, I mean she led a lot of
the work in California, $15 million
going to the open initiative in
California. So what about if every state
did that or many states that did did
that, right? So there can be some
different replication. So I think we
have to think about governments and when
we talk about governments we don't have
to talk just about the United States.
There are governments around the world
who are supporting this work in
important ways too.
>> Yeah. But be careful what you wish for
when it comes to government. Really look
at the debate over whether or not social
media should be reigned in. I mean is
there any agreement other than that
something needs to be done on that or
safe harbors and fair use. When I talk
to Europeans, it is very common among
even bian liberals that you know safe
harbor is an absolutely atrocious thing
and must be shut down immediately and
fair use is you know wildly uh something
that goes against author's moral and
other interests and you know the reason
why the system in this country even
today is more flexible more open is
precisely because of these things like
fair use and safe harbors that the
Europeans have basically shut down. So
>> too much government meddling is also a
problem.
>> So So I I've been thinking about this
this week. Um I was talking with our
with our chief financial officer um
about this who's new to this topic. He
might be listening. So I hope I don't
get in trouble with this comment. Um but
he he he challenged I said it's always
been my
um belief that the solution for
sustainability the business model for
open education is government. That
actually I tri that to Wayne Macintosh
in New Zealand
>> that he said that all the time the
business model the sustainability model
for open education needs to be the
public. It needs to be government
because that's where the public funds
are. Um but this you know this this
person who is been in public finance for
a long time challenged that a little bit
by saying there are so many competing
interests that are so heavy especially
here in the United States. He just
mentioned Medicaid that it's even
threatening higher education generally.
Public higher education is threatened as
it as existentially threatened. We've
seen a flip in public funding for that
and tuition. It's becoming privatized
basically, right? Which means people are
valuing it less as a public good and
think and with that things like this,
even though the ROI is incredible, you
can show it, it's it's threatened. And
so his argument was
>> there's also just an incalculable amount
of new money and philanthropy out there.
That was his argument. And maybe I'm
throwing this out as a challenge to say
there are lots of people with lots of
money who could fund all of this pretty
easily without even really feeling it
when where although governments play in
big numbers the the competition for that
is so so fierce that it that it's hard.
Now we've seen it happen, right? We've
seen it happen in California and New
York and Texas and
>> Idaho. Yay. I was there when that
happened. um we've seen it happen, but
is it sustainable? What what what comes
to compete with it? And I don't know the
answer. I don't know that I buy it or
not because I I spent years trying to
work and get more funders involved, more
of private philanthropy involved in this
space and with some success, but always
not always indirectly. Oh, this this
fits what we what we really care about
is this problem and OAR helps or open
education helps.
But no one came in and said, "This is
the thing we're going to fund like like
Hila did or like Arcadia has done."
There's very few of them.
>> You're kind of looking at them right now
in a way. So
>> I'm not giving any hope here. I'm sorry.
I'm this is not a
>> brutal um true uh truth. Um
to look a little further into the
future. Um last question from this side
anyway. Um so you know what should we be
thinking about and what should we all be
doing in the months and the years ahead?
Uh hopefully panel audience um in those
2001 proposals again we wrote for
example about the power of translation.
We expect OCW we said to be of
particular value for developing
countries. MIT will be pleased, we
wrote, uh, to have other universities
translate OCW into many other languages.
Uh, we've begun to explore how we might
work with Wikipedia to advance Demetrius
Bertimus' vision of reaching a billion
learners and more. and uh you know
working more effectively with the
commons um to bring uh to campus a
Wikipedian and residents a Wikipdian uh
Wikipedian at large uh who who's joined
us today actually he's here with us um
what should we be thinking about um I
keep looking at the screen and thinking
we have 25 minutes left but that's just
because it says 25 years it hasn't
changed 20 so we don't have 25 minutes
left, but um uh you know, one thing, two
things, if our panel would be so kind as
to listen to that prompt.
>> Here's what wakes me in a dead sweat in
the middle of the night. Who's going to
be stewarding digital content?
>> It's used to be the libraries that took
care of content. The Library of Congress
in this country, the ultimate steward.
>> Um libraries don't own their content
anymore. They just lease it from the
publishers.
>> We'd be fools to think the publishers
are going to be stewards of it. When
they go belly up, it disappears. When
the content goes into the public domain,
are the publishers the ones who are
going to keep it on their servers and
maintaining it? If not them, then who?
Right now, we have, you know, various
organizations like locks and clocks and
portico and things like that. Third
party organizations that are the backup
systems for the digital content. But,
you know, is that really what we're
willing to rely on as the digital
equivalent of the Library of Congress?
If so,
>> yeah,
>> you know, that's a bit fishy, it seems
to me. Um,
>> so I worry a lot about who's actually
going to be responsible for maintaining
digital content, especially when it goes
into the public domain.
>> The the cold sweat question for the
other panelists.
>> I don't wake up in a cold sweat.
That's a figure of a speech. I think
>> we live in California.
>> California.
>> But um I mean when I think about the so
the movement has had so many challenging
periods.
>> Yeah.
>> There's been the rest in peace blogs of
OEER. There's been you know there
there's oh there's the publishers we're
you know we're going to take you out.
There's been people who have always been
not hopeful. And I do believe there's
enough champions. I do believe the work
is situated now in enough places around
the world and institutions that this
will go on but it needs to evolve. So
how and where AI will evolve with open
education resources is a big one
>> and that will make the translation that
will make the ability to take the
content and create it in ways that are
most useful for different learners is
going to be extraordinary and this is a
moment in time when that can happen. And
tied to that, the human element is still
so critically important as has been
raised throughout the day today. And
this will actually, I think, free the
humans up to do what they do best is to
flip the classroom to teach in different
ways to work with certain students to
re-imagine teaching and learning like we
had hoped from the very beginning
because the inspiration was not to free
content. the inspiration was to improve
teaching and learning for people around
the globe to have that access to
knowledge and that's the piece that I
think we're really getting to. So, um
remain hopeful as I have been for the
past 25 years.
>> Well, and here's some good news. I can
say that I do know that a focus on
improving teaching and learning is is is
growing across higher education in
America. Organizations like AQ, the
American Conference on Undergraduate
Educators, I think that's what that
stands for. Um they're they offer now
certificates that faculty can get in
teaching and learning. And yes, Huelet
funded them for a minute to do some
things around OAR. The reality is is if
more and more faculty are being expected
to focus on their pedagogy and their
teaching and learning, there's going to
be a place for for open education, open
access, scholarship, all of it. Um, so
that's good news, right? That's
happening. The other thing that gives me
hope is that I think the one of the
original strategies and Kathy can tell
me if I'm wrong on this, is that the
idea was also to institutionalize
this approach, right? And MIT, the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
has done that. That's why we're here. I
mean, it is institute.
It is institutionalized. And it's also
the whole idea around open open
education, OAR, open access has been
institutionalized in so many places
around the world. But I can tell you I
just came from a meeting yesterday where
there were people from Saipan and Guam
and all the other western states and
territories and many of them had the
title OEAR librarian or OAR director or
OAR something
>> in this meeting that I was in with James
Gothic Grossclag
>> right
>> that you quoted today. I texted him and
told him that you quoted open this
meeting. He said he can't be here but
he's in that meeting with his colleagues
there focused on this. That gives me a
ton of hope that that we're already
seeing it institutionalized. Can that go
away? Sure. Is it likely once it's
institutionalized?
No, because that's that's the thing that
higher ed's the best at is just
maintaining its status quo. So,
>> we've got OEAR as as partly as a status
quo and scholarships happening too. So,
that that there are challenges ahead.
Surely there are all these things we've
talked about, but I'm also hopeful
because what I've seen is that it's it's
here. So, now what do we do with it? How
do we move it forward? How do we make
sure every president, every provost,
every dean, every department chair and
then as many faculty as we can
understand that it's here and that what
what what's possible with with open that
that's I think the next frontier at
least I'm speaking as a higher education
as a government person now. But that's
what I want to do.
>> Oh, that's right. You're a government
person.
>> I'm a government person. That's why
>> I see. I remember. Um
um it's fascinating to hear AI uh creep
in again and again into our discussions
in New York Public Library, the future
of teaching uh and learning. Um
um and I'm sure we're going to hear more
about that in the session that follows.
Uh but this is a um session on uh you
know essentially uh philanthropy's role
resource development. I I would be
remiss if I didn't take a second to um
say that our RD team, Ivon Ang and
Deianne Nigen and and Laura White and
the venerable and everpresent Tom Smith
uh um have done so much to make this
conversation during this panel and this
whole uh um day uh um uh happen. Um and
I just want to
Um today's discussion reminds us that
philanthropy does more than fund
projects seeds movements, nurtures
experimentation
and ensures that the world's knowledge
can be shared more freely and equitably.
Um so please join me and my RD
colleagues uh um in thanking these
visionaries from the world of
philanthropy.
Thank you. I love what you're doing.
>> So, in a few minutes, we'll hear from
open learning leadership on the future
of MIT open education. Um, hope you'll
join us for the final session of the
day. Thank you. Thank you very much.
>> We are not
Amen.
Wonderful.
Heat.
Hey, Heat.
Do you
feel
Hey, hey, hey.
Heat. Heat.
Heat
up
here.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Good.
Hey,
hey, hey. Hey. Hey. Hey.
Heat.
Heat.
Oh yeah.
Interest
was very good.
I know, but if we did a Q&A with the
audience, I need to
I will go.
>> Is this thing on?
>> Yes, we just got the thumbs up.
>> Okay,
welcome back everyone. We've had a
wonderful day so far. Welcome to those
of you who are just joining us online,
maybe just tuning in. We've come to our
last session.
It's a really special one focused on the
future of MIT open learning, MIT open
education. Once again, I'm Sarah Hansen,
the assistant director of open education
innovation, and I'm with Dmitri
Spartimus and Kurt Newton. And for those
of you just tuning in now, Dimmitri is
the vice pro vice provost for open
learning at MIT as well as a professor
and associate dean at Sloan School of
Management. Kurt Newton is the director
of MIT open courseware.
It's an honor to engage both of you in
this conversation about the future and I
hope that all of you will leave feeling
inspired um for the future.
I always like to start with a personal
question that helps everyone here get to
know you as a person. And one of the
leading goals for our organization is
reaching 1 billion learners within 10
years. And uh Dimmitri, I'd like to
start with you and ask you why you are
passionate about that. Where did that
come from? You didn't just wake up one
day and decide that's the goal.
>> Yeah. Well, most of my colleagues at MIT
think I'm dreaming. On the other hand,
we heard in the morning that OCW has
reached half a billion. It seems a
factor of two maybe in 10 years as
opposed to 25 years. It's not a huge
reach to be honest. When I have the 1
billion, I do not know exactly the the
numbers. But look, MIT is an institution
by its history that it has always put
high aspirations
uh to convince and my colleagues to
participate in such a movement. I can
tell you if I suppose I tell you I would
like to do a 100 million people who OCW
has
you know it's not exciting enough. So
that's the other part but I also believe
as an objective for the world you know
MIT as an institution educates 11,000
students some of one in a million people
roughly very very smart kids in 41 years
I have educated maybe 15,000
um of of the students over 40 years uh
aspiring to to educate one in eight in
the world especially in uh areas you
know uh if you look at Africa for
example only 10% of the population goes
to university to aspire to educate you
know a sizable portion of the rest of
the 90% and I just picked one um one
particular continent which the
demographics are exponentiating I think
it's a I thought it was a worthy a
worthy objective that can uh mobilize
our u our community of faculty students
and open learning
That's so interesting that a key aspect
for you is motivating faculty and our
team. It seems like you went to the
Sloan School of Management maybe.
>> Well, I have some experience about
success or failures. I mean, part of my
background, thank god I have this
background otherwise I wouldn't be doing
I wouldn't be successful. I mean I know
I successful aspiring to be successful
in this job is that you know I have
serial I have been a serial entrepreneur
my life. Yeah. And I have found the key
characteristic of success and failure is
to motivate the people to to do it as a
force.
>> Uh and it has been my effort the last
year and a half. My colleagues uh I
suspect have observed but I try to
decrease the silos we have to move as a
force. Uh we have made progress but
there is room to go.
>> Thank you Kurt. How about you? Why is it
personally important to you to reach 1
billion learners?
>> Um well, I feel a very deep sort of
intrinsic motivation
>> to the some of the values that we've
talked about throughout this session
about um
the the incredible force that knowledge
as a public good can be. Um, you know,
and I've I've lived for I've been here
almost the full 25 years, 22 years here
at Open Courseware. Just seeing, you
know, year by year how that progress
builds and I can I can see in a sense
that it is in reach with a, you know,
with a few more things which I think
we'll get into over the course of this
hour that I think we'll we'll open that
up. um you know and I see how um
we we've had this tremendous impact but
that impact through really reaching a
relatively small percentage especially
in certain countries around the world
and so just a a huge opportunity I think
is very motivating.
>> Yeah.
>> Interesting.
Thank you for bringing in your personal
values, your personal motivations. So if
we extend that to the organization,
Kurt, thinking about open courseware in
particular, what core values of open
courseware should we hold on to as we
move through the next 25 years?
>> Yeah. Um
a few, you know, a few things that that
really are top of mind for me there. um
the the commitment to
share broadly from across you know all
possible disciplines from MIT feels
really important you know there's a I
think there's a there's a risk if we
allow ourselves to be too focused on
just the say top 10 topics we lose the
richness that we've heard from from some
of our you know learners you know that
we and educators that we've heard from
today um you Hanata speaking about urban
studies for instance, you know, probably
won't be a top 10 topic, but there's a
there's something really special that's
been enabled by MIT by Open Courseware's
commitment to sharing from across the
full curriculum that I think is really
important to carry forward. Um, another
one, you know,
as you know, these new tools, AI tools
come in increasingly into our hands is
to keep the proper focus on
humans as being really fundamentally
important and essential and working
collaboratively with other humans in
this work and, you know, continuing to
figure out the right way to do that. Uh,
I think is is another core value that we
want to carry forward. Yeah.
>> And similarly, what new needs, Dimmitri,
have emerged in global education that
you think we need to be paying attention
to going forward?
>> Well, um, everybody and their brother is
talking about AI. Yeah, it would be I
mean I'm an AI guy.
>> I know. So I it's not exactly uh it it
has occurred to me that AI and as you
perhaps know we have launched uh already
it's now past tense launched yeah
>> we have launched what I call universal
AI the idea to educate universal is not
a random title is to educate in a in an
area that is growing fantastically uh
everybody in the world we aspire in in
AI I in the use of AI to improve lives,
careers, trajectories of people. Uh but
in addition uh there are other other
forces. Um if you think about um
universities, universities are
structured vertically. We have civil
engineering number one, mechanical
engineering, this is MIT has numbers for
those of you who don't know. Number two,
I'm I I graduate from mathematics course
18 and so forth. But that's not how the
world is is organized. The world is
organized horizontally. There is
problems of health, of climate. If you
look at the major problems of the world,
energy and so forth. Uh they are not
organized neatly in a vertical way. So I
think there is an opportunity in my
opinion to educate the the world and
especially the young people in a way the
problems come because you know com
problems don't come with labels problems
come as they are and it's up to us to
organize knowledge so that's the second
opportunity first AI use broadly
uh third uh and it was actually my dream
when I joined actually was one of the
most important dreams I had and I I
would not have expected to be so close
to realizing it. Personalized education,
traditional university education is not
personalized. What what we do today is
definitely not personalized. We say the
same thing. It is absorbed by you the
same, you know, might be differently,
but we say the same things. But but uh
the opportunity in online education is
to personalize the the and we know for
there's significant research to suggest
that uh
uh people do not understand the same
way. They have different values. they
have different absorption rates and so
forth. I think the dream of personalized
education has been a dream of mine for
decades before. I I thought maybe in
five 10 years I will be able to do
something in that. Uh we're about to
launch personalized education in the
summer. So uh based on some gen AI
research we're doing. So that's an
that's a third fourth area that I think
needs adaptation. Um the the traditional
unit of uh of knowledge is classes. We
have semester courses at MIT. Our are
our OCW our OCW courses. You know, we
export what we do at I'm not
criticizing. I'm saying I'm doing it
myself by the way. So uh it is uh but
that's not how especially younger people
do not absorb this way. They they they
absorb knowledge in shorter horizons. In
fact, my friend uh Kurt educated me on
this. I'm a good student, Kurt. So, and
I check with my students, they they
absorb in different ways. So, I think
trying to organize knowledge in a
certain chunks also, it's easier to to
revise uh you know, if you expect our my
colleagues at my team, me included, to
revise 50% of a class that change in AI
26 lecture, 50% 13, good luck. I mean,
they will it will never happen. But if
you have a module of four or five to to
change two two lectures, it's feasible.
I mean, and I have evidence on that
because we already have been doing it.
So, uh, for fifth, uh,
>> I'm having a hard time keeping track of
all these. I'm like mentally repeating
them in my head, but go ahead.
>> What's Yeah, I got it. Personalized
learning. Modularized learning. And then
there was another one, but I forget it.
>> The complication is I forgot it, too.
So
we I it was interesting that um when we
were reading uh I think uh Peter read
the original OCW proposal. It talked
about translations. I've never read the
original proposal but it talked about
translations. Is this correct, Peter?
>> Yeah.
>> Well, it was my hope to create
translations.
>> Mhm.
>> But it hasn't happened. It was the
scope, but I haven't seen it in open
learning. Well, we are launching this
month translation 12 languages. Yeah.
>> So, uh
translations are critical in my opinion.
You have countries like Japan that 80%
of the of the people don't speak don't
speak uh English. So, if you have
content fantastic content that is that
is only in English, I mean you you
limit. But if you have content in the
local language, adaptable, personalized
and so forth, you have a higher chance
of adopting. So it is indeed uh you know
I I have few things more to say but
otherwise if you are losing it I'm
certain you are not the only one. Uh
>> no the other one you mentioned was
horizontal learning that Yeah. Thank
you. Um
>> good student. She's good.
>> Yeah.
Um
>> very important horizontal learning.
>> Yeah. Uh and it's it informs later on
we'll talk about our strategy. It
informs our strategy.
>> Yes.
>> Namely, you know, AI the first thing we
launched is it's definitely cuts across
all 26 departments we have at the mat
and all the centers is it's you know I
don't know anyone who is not even
affected. Climate is our next objective.
Energy as you know they cut across.
Yeah. you know uh health name it there
is a in my opinion organiz you know if
you especially with the young people
whom I have as you can tell I'm not
indifferent to my young friends.
>> Yes.
>> So um I I do feel that uh educating in
the world they will face
>> in the with the same with the same
orientation I think it goes a long way.
I actually argued to our to Sally that
we should also do it uh residentially
not only online that is it's our in my
obl it is our obligation to also teach
our own students.
>> Yeah. So can we back up for a second for
the people who are maybe just joining us
online or are new to MIT open learning.
Can you explain what universal learning
is like we Yeah. Go ahead.
>> That's a good that's appropriate. Yes.
So uh what is universal learning? So let
me start with universal AI because it's
it's in in our past you know for those
of you that have an MIT account MITDU
account and you you you register on the
left side on learn MITDU you can see
universal AI it has 16 modules of uh the
fundamentals and at the moment six
vertical modules
>> so altogether 22 about 30 faculty have
participated in this effort and there
are another 18 cooking another 18
verticals. So what does it mean? The
first collection of modules uh is four
modules on the fundamentals of
programming and machine learning.
>> Okay.
>> Uh Annabelle, I don't know if Annabelle
is here is was a significant participant
in the first uh four this content by the
way is free.
>> Okay.
>> Second set of modules it is uh the
fundamentals of deep learning.
Um there are three modules. Each module
has of the order of four to five
lectures altogether 15 to seven I forget
the exact number lectures. Next one is
prescriptive AI decision making with AI.
Next one is is the is uh large language
models and generative AI. Uh next
modules are uh is the ethics of AI
>> and the future of work. Um and then the
from a from a vertical perspective we
have uh AI and energy, AI and health, AI
and um and um law AI and you know AI
plus X basically the X and so forth
that's sort of the fir in other words we
teach people not at the level of
graduate level you know u see if we if
we want if you are genuinely trying to
reach a billion learners you have to
teach things in a way that not an MIT
student only understands but the the
world and which means high quality
content applicationoriented
that that speaks to problems of the
world with an applied orientation and
quite more accessible. So that's the
foundational piece and then if somebody
wants to deepen their understanding you
would like to understand what is the
implication of of AI in law
>> of which there subsidive or health or or
biology and so forth that's the idea of
that part so this is on AI so then we
have a new effort that um two of my
colleagues lead Chris Rab and Desire
Plata I think Chris is in the room I
think it was in the morning
>> um is to do similar things on climate
and energy foundational. I mean climate
is a significant existential threat of
our times especially important for the
people who who have another 70 80 years
to live. So um it has similar educating
people in the fundamentals and then
verticals. Next one is biology. We call
it universal biology. Fourth one is
universal health. the the first two
biology, climate and energy. We are
hoping to have our first modules in
September and hopefully the end. Uh so I
would like to encourage you to uh
especially many of you have MIT and by
the way even if you don't you can uh
register we are actually launched March
30th uh to individuals not only
institutions and there are two ways we
we go about it. The first way is to try
to reach uh individuals We now have the
platform. I'm very excited about this
platform. We are moving uh all of OCW or
FMITX uh our professional education I I
hope June 30 July 30th
um to the new learn platform. So in a
sense we are and and in a sense we are
controlling our destiny. We are
controlling quality. We are controlling
uh
um you know all all of our innovations
will be there. We we we are going to
create we are creating translations in
end of April. We are the first guinea
pig so to speak would be universal AI
but rest assured I will make certain
that uh OCW gets it MI all of our
efforts benefit from that. So that's the
another advantage of fully controlling
your destiny and everything is on based
on open edex which is a a
platform and I asked my my colleagues in
engineering where should I bet I I'm not
very knowledgeable in this area you know
they proposed to me uh um open edex this
is where we are putting so it's it's a
it's in a sense MIT if you think about
it fundamentally
uh MIT is going solo on uh providing
knowledge controlling quality and so
forth but this is only the beginning
there is a phase two and phase three I I
actually believe MIT while it's a great
institution doesn't have the the
totality of knowledge so we first start
MIT leading with universal learning
second phase which is actually happening
as we speak institutions from other
countries other in in the United States
but different than MIT
develop their own content because
everything lands on learn. Their
students in phase two have access. We
have no control on what they put. But
phase three, some of the best of this
material, we put it, we embed it and
then we offer it to the world as well.
In other words, the collective
intelligence of the world is um is
capable of addressing of of doing that.
Um so we don't restrict but there is one
difference. We control quality. I mean
in my opinion edx cosera and so forth
have exceptional content and extremely
poor content that's my opinion of course
you might not agree but uh but but if
you look at the totality I mean some of
them I don't know if it's even correct
tell the truth forget about
pedagogically so that's sort of the
overall strategy I mean people can also
ask questions afterwards you know I like
interacting with the audience as you I
will get us there.
>> Okay, great. I'm sorry I spent I spent
more time. I apologize.
>> You you are allowed. It's okay.
>> All right.
>> Um, so one thing you got at Dimmitri is
this idea of others contributing and and
knowledge as a public good. Yeah. Which
is so interesting and that speaks so
much Kurt to the ethos of OCW. And I'm
wondering how you're envisioning that
OCW's foundational beliefs might be
represented within universal learning
either as it is now or has it as it
might be in the future.
>> Yeah, I think it's a really important
thing that we continue to be committed
to. Um,
you know, one of the great things that's
that's being enabled by MIT Learn is is
having all of these lifelong learning
materials available for people in one
place. And so you have a kind of a
seamless discovery experience. Um,
Demetri, you talked, you know, about
personalized learning. I like to think
about what OCW has is, you know,
personal personalizable,
>> right, materials. it's put out there in
a wide openen form so you can grab as
little or as much as you want. We need
enhanced tools which we are working on
to make it easier to do so. But I feel
like um building on that foundation that
we've got with those OCW materials, you
know, shared openly and freely with the
world, you know, provides a really
important foundation that, you know,
will be, you know, uh kind of unleashing
in new ways through through the learn
platform.
>> Yeah.
>> Can I can I make a comment?
>> So, I'd like to give a concrete example
how OCW material could be utilized great
>> in uh in the new world
>> as we envision it. new world hasn't
fully arrived. So in the morning John
Gruber was here uh very distinguished
person in economics who has exceptional
material and um
so the way I would envision it is that
which is sort of starting at the moment
slowly is that you take you can take
parts of of this strong material
uh modularize it make it smaller add
other things to it so create what I call
uh universal economics
>> and then other people participate as
well. So you provide more of more global
educational system supported with
translations with personalized learning
with customiz with all of we have
launched for example a tutor called ask
team MIT reversed not this is not ask
dim
>> so um and um and this is uh supporting
every aspect so there are roundtrip
influences you can take OCW material
adopt it and you can take some of the
innovative things we have done and
distribute it to everything else open
learning does. That's an in my opinion
an advantage where all of these great
great progress we have made on multiple
arenas we can work together as opposed
to siloed to move to the future.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Could I um lean into another
aspect of the public good? It's not
knowledge is a public good for everyone
who speaks English, right? Um, and
having done this work for 25 years, we
also have the benefit of trying some
stuff and it worked for a while and then
it didn't and we composted it and we're
going to, you know, we prepared the soil
for for doing it new, right? We had
actually a really vibrant translations
program in the late as early teens.
Yeah.
>> Which was very manually done, handone. I
think we had over well over a thousand
OCW courses translated into like 10
different languages. But over time that
became unsustainable and so we composted
it right the soil is rich right the
interest is really deeply there we see
in the usage statistics how much the
opportunity would be and now with you
know the AI tools that are being brought
now to bear we've crossed the tipping
point they're good enough showing up on
learn to really kind of unleash the the
access to this knowledge as a public
good for all languages
>> we now sit on the cusp And I'm
incredibly excited about that for for
the next years to come.
>> And I can tell you I know Greek.
>> Yes,
>> it's my native language. We checked
Greek around 10 million Greeks. It's not
like it's a gigantic. But I would like
to check in something I understand that
it's of good quality.
>> Yes.
>> A+.
>> Wow.
>> And I can say I didn't do anything AI
and you know some of my students our
engineering team has worked on it.
>> The quality is high.
>> Mhm. I mean perfection is outside the
human condition anyway but but uh it is
high quality translations. I would I
have evidence on this because we I tried
experimentally in two high high schools
by the way in Greece about 80 people in
one 70 people in the other.
You know the comments are very positive.
>> Yeah. This is a really exciting future.
Um
>> I definitely hope so.
>> I know. I'm ready. I'm ready for it.
>> A billionaire. We better start. we got
to get working. Um, so in this new
future, you talked about desiloing and
working together as a force to meet our
goal of of reaching 1 billion learners
>> and we have done you know UI is a
reality
>> 50 people across open learning
collaborating on this just to to say
it's not a pipe dream only.
>> No, you're doing it. A+ it's happening.
Um,
>> you don't know if I get an A. A minus. I
have rooms to grow. So,
>> yeah. Okay. A minus. Um,
Kurt, we think and Dana is in the
audience. Yeah. Hi, Dana Doyle. So we
think a lot about the future of MIT open
education because we've really taken to
heart what you're saying about like why
are why try to be open courseware owls
like these separate entities when we
could be more powerful together. So Kurt
could you speak a little bit to our
emerging vision for what MIT open
education might become or the processes
we're going through? Yeah, I think it's
it's a really exciting opportunity here
that we get to um reconsider, you know,
broadly the things that are happening
and definitely sustain the things that
that are really key, but then kind of
restructure and take another take
another run at it. Um, you know, we're
in a different world than we were, you
know, five years ago, 10 years ago.
Things are shifting. And so what we've
alluded to for instance in this like um
modularized
and and then wellsupported learning
journeys is one that I think is really
important and to show up for that with
the open education ethos of making sure
that it's freely available you know to
everyone around the world regardless of
institutional affiliation or or
financial situation as a starting point
is really really key you know um it's I
don't know If you uh remember taking a
trip and navigating with paper maps and
if you were a AAA member, you could get
a trip tick, right? And they would do
the routing for you. You know, I feel
like, you know, from a learning pathway
perspective or on the cusp of getting
ready to uh take the leap with a
functional like GPS enabled, just hit
the road and figure it out and get the
verted, hit that coffee shop, you'll
still get there. You don't have to like
have the manually created curated tptic
to tell you where you're going. Again,
some of these some of these emerging
technologies, the ability to personalize
these learning journeys based on the
infrastructure, the personaliz
personalizable because I haven't said
that very often yet. Personalizable
materials that we've got in open
education will really make this make
this possible. So, I'm super excited
about that.
>> I would also like to comment the
following. you know to reach a billion
learners
>> 95 97% of those should be free
>> that is I haven't yet lost it I don't
believe that uh because even if we get
uh 97% of people like it would be naive
of me to believe that uh people in
subaran Africa would would would be
willing or even able to pay even $5 for
this but but but But but uh on the other
hand we need to be sustainable that is
uh you know perhaps you don't know but
uh but uh the the MI the MIT
administration announced and I actually
agree with that it's not against my
wishes that um we had a subsidy of about
$20 million from the institution. This
will go to zero in four years. So
therefore for for us to be able to
support these visions and al you know uh
we better have the ma the vast majority
in open education but it cannot be only
in open education because we will not
exist. So um
so realistically speaking we organized
open learning to open education that
Dana and Kurt are leading and then we
have a workforce learning and then
universal learning because some of it is
free some of it is not is like
intersecting both of them. Mhm.
>> So uh and I believe that uh we can
achieve both um uh both sustainability
as well as uh significant number of
learners. So that's uh that's an
significant move forward. And speaking
about strategy, I would like to
acknowledge Andrea here from Wikipedia.
You know, Wikipedia uh you heard from
Kurt or or Peter was it uh is uh you
know it is my personal go-to place to
learn something information from
something okay I've reached four five
billion learners so I would you know
Wikipedia in my opinion and agrees
because I checked yesterday has some
weaknesses had fantastic success this is
truly an A+ but there is you know areas
that they don't you know they don't have
uh characteristics they they don't
actually teach you know they they they
they
translate information it's not
multimedia it's primarily text we are
hoping in fact we have started the a
project together to uh combine forces
you know the gentleman uh in the
previous talk about collaboration
between open forces so to speak
>> I it it is my aspiration Any way that
this collaboration will help both
institutions and most importantly the
world because you know our learners can
can have u significant information from
Wikipedia and Wikipedia learners can
also get significant information from
it. So stay tuned but uh that's a
significant bet. So to to know that is
significant bet whoever comes to my
office I have a list of things when we
accomplish IRA it keep it is number one.
Andrew saw it yesterday. So which means
I will only erase it when I think we
succeeded.
>> Oh wow. Okay.
>> So you haven't been to my own sees it
and he sits there. He's right.
>> You don't you don't like to just cross
them out so you can remember your
accomplishments.
>> No, because I then uh will focus on the
new thing.
>> Then I have then I keep space. I I will
replace it. I had translations.
>> Yes, that's I I erased it.
>> Okay.
Oh, I have so much to learn from you.
>> Well,
>> okay.
>> You come to my office, okay?
>> Not only Zoom.
>> Yeah. Okay.
>> Um, Kurt, let's look into the future.
>> Yeah.
>> I'm not going to ask you to look 25
years out because we're just going to be
holograms by then.
>> Thank you.
>> Yeah.
>> So, five years from now,
>> 10 5 10 5 to 10. All right. Which is my
horizon.
>> Okay. Yeah, that's Yes, there. So 5 to
10 years from now, what are the
opportunities for Open Courseware's
legacy to live on, but maybe be dynamic
and change and become something new?
>> Yeah. Um I'm going to channel a couple
things from that video, that wonderful
video we saw this morning
>> about
>> that was a plus.
>> True. Truly. Yes. Um
there was something about that moment
2001ish
with some of the forces that were that
were at play right that opened up the op
a kind of a special opportunity somewhat
in that moment right of that moment to
with a simple brilliant brave leap
disrupt the universe as as you will
right
>> and I I look at what's going on with AI
and it's absolutely certainly going to
disrupt itself, our kind of relationship
with knowledge and how, you know, how we
work with each other and all of that. It
feels like what we've glimpsed with the
emergence of chat GPT recently and some
of this new agentic AI is like, wow, the
first mosaic web browser and Alta Visa
and Yahoo search and maybe some pets.com
stuff is in there too distracting us.
But like sometime over the next, I'll
say five years,
>> I'm looking for some way that history
rhymes with what happened 25 years ago.
What's the
opening the refrigerator or on the
exercise bike sudden just like rupture
of of of conception that like what's the
brilliant thing to drop in there? It's
like simple
and can like galvanize this this new
movement for this frankly really at the
moment pretty confusing world that we're
heading into. That's what I'm looking
for and that we play continue to play a
really important role in that.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. That's what I hope for. I have a
prediction on this.
>> Oh, good.
universal learning supported uh by AI
where the entirety of the world
contributes.
>> I have bet the house on that.
>> I have a little question about that.
>> Please.
>> And I don't even like that I'm asking
it, but like how do you protect the MIT
brand if everyone is contributing?
or see you know because everybody would
remember that this started at the MIT
you see I I don't believe you know I I
started the morning saying I love this
institution it's true I have a a deep
affection to it and its people and
students but I definitely don't believe
that we are the only people in the world
that can have exciting thoughts exciting
so I believe smart organizations utilize
the world if you look at um the the the
winning companies of today they they
somehow manage to engage the world like
for example Google uses the entire
internet to learn and so forth.
>> Yeah.
>> It's not just you know they have an
algorithm but the the knowledge base. So
you know in the end of the day we if if
we succeed in reaching a billion
learners with this initi and so forth
everybody will remember it's don't
forget learn everything runs on learn
MIT edu
>> we have bet the house on that so
there might be Stanford content there
might be university of uh you know Lima
content but in the end of the day
>> it it runs on MIT on things that that's
my my susp my my bet anyway.
>> Yeah, thank you. That's helpful. Chris,
did you want to add?
>> Yeah, I want to pick up on that a little
bit. Um, this is in the spirit
definitely of kind of radical
disruptions in the universe. Uh,
>> you channel a provocation from from my
friend the brilliant thinker Bio
Akamalaf. Uh, he gave this talk at the
United the UNESCO digital learning
summit this past fall.
um where some of his experiences have
him thinking that what we're heading
towards actually is a is a big reset and
perhaps a real frankly a really useful
one about the very concept of authorship
of ideas, right? when this incredible
new species that we've created out of
our knowledge kind of gets in the middle
there,
maybe there's there's a a sort of
letting go of the concepts of ownership
and authorship that get very inshed with
things like brands. And I don't know how
this is going to play out, but um I feel
like there's there's momentum that's
leading us in this direction, right?
that's going to be provocative in some
really interesting ways, you know. So,
we have to we have to have the right way
of holding this.
>> Yeah.
>> But if you look at the scientific
experience, I write papers with my
colleague from Amsterdam Dan Hertok. I
write papers and books with my colleague
in Germany and uh we work it's a very
intern the scientific endeavor is a very
much a collaboration endeavor right
100 years ago it's the single scientist
and so we engage our students and so
forth why not in education actually
universal AI has you know admittedly
they were visiting professors at MIT but
we have a visitor from Greece a visitor
from from the from the Netherlands
a visitor from University of Seattle. I
mean they are all MIT related but and
oneplus 1 is bigger than two. I mean you
know you can't tell I mean the so I
actually believe that uh you know the
key objective is to impact the world
positively
>> everything is on learn MIT will get a
share a s and I would like also to also
share with the audience a personal story
of Jack vest whom I was a big fan of.
Jack felt that uh in his 12 years as a
president uh his two most important uh
contributions to the world was OCW
>> which is our MIT stories number two and
our MIT stories number three the the the
women faculty movement which I would
like to preview. So we that's all this
was the the second story on MIT stories.
We are working on number three. One of
my colleagues uh Lana Scott is working
on the matter. I'm hoping that Sally
when her time to
>> to change will say well open learning
>> it's universal whatever we do and so
forth would be a defining moment in her
life.
>> Yeah that's really exciting. I
definitely believe that I would succeed
on that.
>> Yeah, you got to write Sally Sally's
dream on the top of your whiteboard. You
know,
>> she knows already.
>> We talked.
>> Okay, that's good.
>> Um, I feel like now would be a great
time to open it up to questions in the
audience because you've all said you've
both said
>> good
>> several provocative things that I think
people might want to pick up on.
>> No questions.
I was expecting you
>> couple of
>> the body language suggested.
>> Hello
>> number two there.
>> Um so I have a question. Um I I totally
believe in this modularization
movement. But I also um know that um OCW
users um like this opening of the MIT
classroom and getting that feeling of
being in the classroom. And I kind of I
want to hear about how you see what
happens in the classroom in the future.
What how is the how is the MIT
classroom? What's happening in the
classroom?
>> You mean residentially? residentially
because that's one of the really I mean
>> well
>> they want modularization but they also
want to be in the classroom with the
students
>> well I have a proposal to the MIT
faculty to do something like that I
believe the future of residential
education is hybrid where I don't
believe we should teach uh you know is
uh Gil Frank here I saw him in the
morning so suppose you want to learn
algebra He has exceptionally good
lectures really A++
you know uh but on the other hand if you
want to understand
uh you know for the residential
experience you you can utilize hybrid
for learning the theories and so forth
but if you want to to solve a real world
application at least for our residential
students you can you can you can have a
flip classroom Esther Dullo was talking
about that
>> we already do that though
>> we do that and I would like to continue
I think but But in a in a larger I mean
not many classes are are hybrid I would
say. So I have a proposal to the you
know I come from the Sloan school about
doing the there's no hybrid degree at
MIT
none MIT does not give it would be a
first of its kind. So that would be a
step in the right direction. So uh to be
honest given the financial pressures it
would be I would say I would be
surprised if the faculty who or in
ordinary years they will say no. I'm
optimistic that
first of all I think it's a good idea
but but in addition
uh and and if we do that we can actually
educate more students at MIT you know uh
10x not you know that's my this is a bit
more futuristic but we'll have evidence
on this because there will be a it has
to be an MIT vote we shall see I'm
optimistic
>> yeah I'd like to respond briefly to that
kind of at a different level which is I
predict that our online learning
materials will continue to show faculty
teaching on chalkboards for many years
to come,
>> right? And we will continue to get
questions. You guys still using chalk?
Yeah, we are. Because it's a really
really valuable pedagogical approach. Um
those chalkboard lectures will become
less, you know, 110 minutes long
>> and more, you know, carved up or at
least discoverable in smaller pieces.
But we'll still be showing the
chalkboard for for many years. And that
and that sense of I have no difficulties
with that actually.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> I'm okay. I
>> I'm not a particularly good
how do you call it?
>> Chalkboard instructor,
>> but I know others that are Wow.
>> Yeah.
>> You have to have good handwriting.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I am excluded
>> and more patient
>> by definition.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Kathy.
>> Yeah. So I'm wondering um when you talk
about the universal education piece and
then having MIT content there but also
allowing other universities or colleges
to contribute. Do you think there's
certain universities and colleges in the
US that would be more likely and some
less likely and the same outside the US?
>> Um I'll tell you what I know for sure
and then the other is conjecture. So you
know we have we have started uh this
phase two with the top engineering
school in Greece. I have lots of
connections there. So I have tried to
connect with some of my colleagues at
MIT to develop AI and drug design AI and
uh you know satellite data and so forth.
They told me yes but they haven't done
anything. But the people in Greece
actually both of them were MIT educated
but they are professors there. They
start doing it. I've seen what they have
done. Excellent excellent content. So
the answer is definitely uh from
universities abroad and I have another
one more I have two examples. it's it's
happening whether Stanford would
contribute in this effort where MIT is
leading I have my doubts but but uh but
I I see why not uh you know multiple
uh
take for example a two-year college that
uh they might have see we at MIT I don't
think we have particular expertise in
teaching two-year college students I
mean I have none some of my colleagues
have more some colleagues have more but
if you have very dedicated exceptionally
good instru instructors in the pedagogy
they can contribute and if it's if we
feel that is good for the overall after
all the fundamentals are more I would
definitely see that I will see four year
college Williams college might be you
know I do believe the major research
universities in the beginning they will
not if it becomes a a global movement
you never know but don't forget we
control quality
>> and would you control who you invite in
or would you allow people would you
control who you invite in or would it
be?
>> Everybody can propose.
>> Okay, that's
>> Everybody can propose
>> but we have the judgment of whether
>> Yes.
>> Yes. Uh thank you. Uh this is a very
interesting thing and I have sort of
three pieces of
>> one at a time though. Oh, I
>> I'll do I cannot keep them straight.
That's the problem. You already observed
I lost one.
>> Okay. Um if you could say a few words
then and take one of them. The PK
through 12 initiative. Much of the old
school open learning is college level
courses but uh you have a new initiative
to address through to the earlier grades
and uh so that's the first of three
quick things.
>> So how PK12 look we already have some
experience in high schools in Greece. We
have two of the major high schools and
we are currently talking with the
minister of education for all of the
high schools of Greece and he has moved
quite far. This is high schools people
that are 16, 17, 18. I have personally
no experience of how to teach five,
seven years old, 8 years old. I mean I I
don't have and what we develop is not
appropriate for that. But my colleagues
in PK12 have some ideas. So
you know would like to participate in
this effort. My view is that the current
MIT how MIT is structured it's quite
likely that our content will be quite
appropriate for 18 17 but then as you go
lower ages you have to do different
things you have to educate the educators
so uh my colleagues have good ideas on
that we are still developing our
strategy stay tuned on that
>> okay well and that ties into the second
piece which is uh
it's one thing to learn from a lecture
from from courseware that's online but
there are a lot of things that hands-on
materials are useful to support the
learning process particularly as you go
down to younger students.
>> I completely agree with that.
>> And then the question is how do you work
in either a subscription model or the
ability to purchase and then for people
with economic need how do you arrange
scholarships for things like the
>> kits? We hope philanthropy can help that
is uh
we are also willing to offer you know my
the primary the primary objective is
impact positive impact in the world
financial sustainability constraint but
it doesn't have to be everything we do
has to be appropriately so we we have a
reasonable strategy on that and um I am
all right offering things for free uh
assuming we are financially sustainable
because I have to make certain
You know, imagine if on my hands uh open
learning collapses. That would be I have
a pretty successful career at MIT, but
this would be remembered as a big
failure of this fellow.
It's not in my intentions. So, I would
like to do both.
>> That that all sounds great. And that
connects directly to the the third piece
which is I agree with you very much that
a lot of what's out there is not worth
the the space that take takes up but and
you have to keep the quality high but I
think that that is an opportunity for
the MIT brand to be applied to things
that came from elsewhere that are
appropriate particularly in the realm of
these kits and things like that that are
available to support
>> MIT brand will be there that is if
something is on learn MIT DU within
universal AI MIT started it and it's a
module that a professor at at uh Carnei
Melon will develop which is actually
this is cooking already uh but an
individual I don't think it would be the
brand would be diluted I really don't
believe that unless we make mistakes on
quality if we make mistakes on quality
we delude the brand but if we don't
have a question
>> yeah you speak about um positive impact
worldwide.
>> Oh, sorry.
Yeah, you speak about positive impact
worldwide and practical applications of
uh of the learning. Um there's a
shortage of trades people. Um you know,
>> what what have you thought about that?
And I I'll give a personal anecdote. My
refrigerator broke. I didn't know how to
fix it. I went online. There is there's
nothing about practical applications,
fixing appliances, whatever. But on on o
open courseware, I I looked at the fluid
dynamics portions of some courses and
the electrical circuit board design so I
could troubleshoot the refrigerator and
those types of things. I also use it as
a learning experience for my kids. But
I'm thinking people in in developing
countries, it could be something that's,
you know, necessary for them to survive.
um it could be a path to uh get the
financial security so then they can move
on to the higher level education. So I
just go ahead.
>> Yeah. Um I think you rais a really
important point. You know the materials
that we put out have a sort of an MIT
frame on it, right? There's frequently a
lot more theoretical grounding than than
the the sort of typical trades person uh
expectation would be. But one of the
wonderful things about working in an
ecosystem with others is we get to work
with for instance schools and educators
who do really understand how to do you
know relevant education for people from
from a wide range of needs such as you
know how to how to be the most awesome
refrigeration repair person you can be
you know so Sarah you've you've done
stuff for instance you know building
collaboration with community colleges
who have a little bit more of a
footprint in that direction maybe you
care to share an aspect of that?
>> I mean, it's just really wonderful to
see open education in action and to see
our content adapted for different
learners who then go on and do really
powerful things with them.
>> Yeah, I'm glad to hear that you found
some value in working on your
refrigerator from open courseware. Yeah,
>> that's great.
>> Yeah.
>> Um, hi. So, uh, I was in the internet,
so I've come live. I'm hybrid. Thank
you. Sorry I couldn't be here earlier,
but I just want to first share something
and then I have a comment on something.
The first one is just a really cool
history point. I was lucky to be a young
MIT corporation member when we launched
OCW and when we hired Chuck Best who was
extraordinary and I I think the points
you made about not only OCW but also the
women's reports and getting more
equality for like all of us in um but I
want to share something that still
relates to us that's deeper in history
as it rhymes as you were talking about.
Um, so in 1865
is the first year that MIT taught
classes. And there's this super cool
timeline that's on the wall if you kind
of go down the infinite quarter and take
a little right into building three. And
in 1865 it says on February 20th free
the the first classes were held in the
Merkantile building and it goes on and
talks about more and
LOL free courses began in the evenings
year one um open to both men and women
taught by MIT faculty under the opaces
of lol you know and and that's from an
earlier time but just isn't it amazing
to think of our our early days the first
faculty and that the the threads of OCW
were going to teach for free. Obviously,
it wasn't digital. Uh so, you had to be
in the Boston area, but everyone could
join for free, which was amazing. And of
course, MIT is a land grant uh
university with all of our neighbors in
other states. And so, we were part of
that idea of everyone open learning for
everybody and including the community.
So, just a po cool point of history for
everybody. And then the second point is
just um I was lucky to be a student of
Woody Flowers who was part of creating
first robotics and 207 and now we have
Fab Labs. And so I'm just so excited
about what you were talking about which
is the the partnerships we can do. We
don't have to make all these things but
Carnegie made all these libraries. I
think there's more libraries than
McDonald's in the United States. So we
can partner with them. And I I just
brought to share you know most kids they
they know about their phone uh but they
don't know about the board inside.
that's just a Raspberry Pi or they could
do, you know, air quality sensors and
these things. How do we get the
physical? And it just I've been so
inspired by how OCW has been doing great
work with partners and I think we can
triple down on that because a lot of
young people are also facing loneliness.
And so a way to not be lonely is to be
in a community. And so having not just
the course, let's not have AI just teach
us, let's have each other and have AI
helping us, which also was in invented
in a media lab way.
>> Um
>> anyway, so just a a congrats to
everybody on this and then
>> No, no, but I would like to respond to
something.
>> Yeah, I know. Just congrats to OCW. I'm
so happy where we've come. But uh one of
the areas that I think the plan I
outlined does not address is the the
inperson connection. So I have been
talking quite extensively actually to
Neil Gersonfeld the Fab Labs. Fab Labs
for those of you who don't know is uh a
significant success. They have
>> there's massive number of Fab Labs. I've
heard this and there's going to be a new
FAB right here. Fab and Fab 26 this
summer. All of the community from all
over the world will be here at the end
of July.
>> But I would like to connect with with
what we are doing. So we have a
collaboration with Neil. I mean at the
moment I haven't even discussed it with
my colleague because I'm not convinced
it will succeed but if we succeed I'll
bring it. So uh the idea would be you
know take AI for for example you can
build a a model like that in which
individual uh labs around the world can
do things can meet themselves and so
forth. they have some hybrid education
where we at open learning teach courses
and so forth teach modules rather but
there will be an in-person component at
but at the distributed level uh so we
have some experiment with cyber security
first and AI second so we shall see but
if we succeed on that believe me I I
because I I definitely believe that
while I'm a big proponent of hybrid
education I also believe that the
inerson The human component in education
is nothing to laugh about. That is the
loneliness aspect and so forth. I mean
>> opportunity.
>> It's an opportunity but you know this is
at the experiment you know I haven't
even read write wrote it in my board
because if I write it I only erase it if
this might not it's an experiment in a
way a silent experiment although it's
not so silent today.
>> That's right.
>> We have time for one last question. Yes
sir.
Hi. So,
several studies from MIT have shown that
using AI to supplement learning can
sometimes actually hinder those like
learning faculties in the brain. So, my
question is how do you decide how much
AI is enough?
>> Well, I can tell you what what our
answer is. We have launched as I
mentioned
>> I don't know why but
Yeah, I think the mic did not like what
I was saying. So it says sils as the
guy.
>> We can take a hint.
>> Okay. So we launched uh ask team which
is a tutor system. A tutor system. You
see one of the issues with AI it gives
sometimes wrong answers. It
hallucinates. However, ask team when it
as a helper for problem does not
hallucinate. Why? Because we give the
answers the the the we constructed the
problem sets. The the answers are known.
AI knows that. The only thing is that it
does not reveal.
>> So you see what I mean?
Okay,
>> we might be
>> we continue outside.
>> Thank you.
Well, that was dramatic. Can I Can I
just just very very very briefly
just very briefly
>> I just wanted to express my appreciation
for the open learning and especially the
OCW team for pulling this together.
Thank you to all of our collaborators in
doing this work. We wouldn't be here
without it. You know, too many to name,
but again, I'm grateful for those of you
who are here, those of you who have been
online. Thank you. And share what we do
in the world. People don't know
in the
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video celebrates the 25th anniversary of MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW), highlighting its history, impact, and future. Key figures, including Dmitri Bertsimas, Kurt Newton, and President Sally Kornbluth, discuss how the bold decision to freely share MIT's educational materials transformed global education. They touch upon how OCW empowers learners worldwide, improves teaching methods, and sets the foundation for new initiatives like MIT Learn, emphasizing the commitment to making knowledge a public good. The event also features a panel of faculty and learners who share personal stories of how OCW provided access, sparked curiosity, and enabled professional development across different fields. The discussions look ahead to how AI and new platforms can scale impact and democratize education further.
Videos recently processed by our community