HomeVideos

Your Soulmate Isn’t On Hinge

Now Playing

Your Soulmate Isn’t On Hinge

Transcript

714 segments

0:00

Do you want to find your soulmate? Are

0:01

soulmates even real? And if they're

0:03

real, how do you find them? The more

0:06

messed up your dopamine circuitry is,

0:08

the harder it is to fall in love. Dating

0:10

apps actually shoot us in the foot

0:12

because they're selecting for

0:15

friendship. They're selecting for

0:17

compatibility. But compatibility is not

0:20

love. Today, we're going to talk about

0:22

soulmates. So, if you look at the world

0:24

today, everyone wants to find well, I

0:26

don't know if everyone wants to find a

0:27

lot of people want to find their

0:28

soulmate. But if we look at sort of

0:30

outcomes data and things like that,

0:32

there it's really really really hard to

0:34

find a soulmate in today's world. Dating

0:37

is an absolute mess. The number of pics

0:39

exchanged is at an all-time historic

0:42

high. We see uh you know the lowest

0:45

fertility rates that we've seen in many

0:47

many many decades or centuries. In East

0:49

Asia, in the United States and in the

0:51

Western world, people are getting

0:53

married later. Fewer people are getting

0:55

married. The number of kids that we're

0:56

having is going down. People are

0:58

struggling. There's a loneliness

0:59

epidemic across the globe that is

1:01

probably the worst loneliness epidemic

1:03

that we've ever faced as the human race.

1:05

So despite the fact that we have so many

1:07

opportunities for connection, we are the

1:10

loneliest that we've ever been. And

1:11

there are all these things called dating

1:13

apps, right? And these dating apps

1:14

promise that, hey, if you use this app,

1:16

you will be able to find love, find your

1:18

soulmate. I don't know if they promise

1:19

that. I don't know what they actually

1:20

promised, but something weird is going

1:22

on because as our access to potential

1:25

partners has actually increased

1:26

theoretically, right? The cool thing

1:28

about dating apps is I can run into and

1:30

interact with people that I would not

1:32

normally run into. People are like

1:34

struggling even more than ever. And so

1:35

then this question becomes, okay, do you

1:37

want to find your soulmate? Are

1:38

soulmates even real? And if they're

1:40

real, how do you find them? So this is

1:42

such a challenging question to answer

1:45

because there aren't studies on soul

1:48

mates, right? No one's doing randomized

1:50

control trials or prospective cohort

1:52

studies on soulmates. How do you define

1:54

it from a scientific term? So the first

1:56

thing that we're going to talk about is

1:57

when we talk about love, what does this

1:59

mean? So the thing about soulmates is

2:01

that we fall in love. So this is a a

2:03

paper called critical review of the

2:05

meaning of the concept of love. Great

2:07

paper. You know, there was a researcher

2:09

in 1977 who conducted an in-depth

2:11

research into the phenomenon of love and

2:13

found that the concept of love can

2:15

actually be decided into several

2:17

different types or sub aspects. Okay. So

2:19

this is something that was actually

2:20

defined in I think ancient Greece. So

2:23

aeros this type of love is characterized

2:25

by strong uh and passionate passion.

2:29

People feel fascinated and crazy about

2:31

their partner. Classic form of romantic

2:33

love. Okay. So when you find your

2:35

soulmate, do you feel passion? Do you

2:38

feel fascinated and crazy? Ludus. This

2:41

type of love reflects a more comp

2:43

competitive or playful approach to

2:44

relationships. People who adear to this

2:46

type of love tend to see relationships

2:48

as a game to be won or as a challenge to

2:50

be completed. Right? So the this is kind

2:52

of a more playful love. It's kind of

2:54

like you know who wins in the end. So

2:58

storage the type of love that grows from

3:00

friendships and relationships that build

3:01

on similar in interests. So this is a

3:05

love that slowly grows and de develops

3:07

from the intimacy and mutual

3:09

understanding that has existed over a

3:10

long time. So when people say like how

3:12

do I get out of the friend zone? Right?

3:15

This is a big debate. Can can someone

3:17

who if you've fallen in love with your

3:19

best friend, can something happen? Yes.

3:22

I think the answer is yes. Pragma love

3:24

that is seen practically or

3:25

pragmatically. People who adhere to this

3:27

type of love tend to choose partners

3:28

based on practical criteria such as

3:30

suitability of values, social status,

3:32

and financial stability. Power couples

3:35

relationships is a means to achieve

3:37

goals or fulfill certain needs. Mania is

3:40

a type of love that tends to be

3:42

obsessive, may feel anxious or insecure

3:44

in their relationships, tend to pursue

3:46

their partners with a need for constant

3:47

attention and validation, characterized

3:49

by strong and unstable emotions. A gape

3:52

love, a a love, a form of love based on

3:54

commitment, sacrifice, and selfless care

3:57

for one's partner, altruistic and

3:59

enobling love, prepared to make

4:01

sacrifices for the happiness and

4:02

well-being of their partner. So, the

4:04

first thing that I want to point out,

4:05

see, when we talk about finding your

4:07

soulmate, what does that mean? Does that

4:09

mean that you you fall in love with

4:11

someone? But if we look at the concept

4:13

of love, it actually encompasses a lot

4:16

of different things. And I think the

4:18

first mistake that we make when we try

4:19

to find our soulmate is that we mix all

4:22

of these things together. So I I think

4:24

this is where we see the first problem

4:26

with dating apps, which is that if we

4:29

look at it, right? So there's a

4:30

practical kind of love, right? So we

4:32

have pragma love. So, this is a love

4:34

where it's like you're looking at this

4:36

other person and you're saying, "I have

4:38

I'm this religion. I want kids. This is

4:41

what I want. My financial I want to be a

4:43

stay-at-home dad. I want to be a

4:44

stay-at-home mom. I want my and my

4:46

partner wants to be married to a

4:48

stay-at-home mom, a stay-at-home dad."

4:50

Right? They want to work. They want

4:52

someone to be at home with the kids.

4:53

They want to have kids. We have a

4:55

similar religion. This is qualitatively

4:58

different from passion for aeros from

5:02

mania. So that's a a second dimension.

5:04

Now I think the biggest problem and and

5:06

this is why it's important to understand

5:07

these two things are different because

5:09

the majority of using dating apps we're

5:11

selecting for pragma not passion. We're

5:13

not falling in love. We're gauging

5:16

people like job interviews. So this is

5:18

actually closer to matchmaking.

5:21

Relationships have never been easy.

5:23

Anytime you interact with someone,

5:24

you're dealing with their unique soup of

5:27

emotions, expectations, and even

5:29

traumatic baggage. And the fact that

5:31

we're all texting now and dating apps

5:33

are a thing is not making things easier.

5:36

That's why we developed a coaching

5:37

program to help our community with

5:39

modern relationship problems. So if

5:41

y'all are struggling with your

5:42

relationships, check out the link in the

5:44

description below.

5:46

So in India even to this day, we have

5:49

arranged marriages. So arranged

5:51

marriages are when like your parents and

5:53

somebody else's parents get together.

5:56

They look at your religious like do you

5:58

eat meat? Do you drink alcohol? Are you

6:00

like financially stable? Do you all want

6:02

to have kids? Like they look at all of

6:04

these factors and they try to match them

6:06

up. It is a pragmatic approach to love.

6:08

And love is not even a part of that,

6:10

right? So it's like even in arranged

6:12

marriages what what tends to happen. So

6:14

this is like how it's been described to

6:15

me is that you match initially. And so I

6:18

was talking to uh you know one of my

6:21

close family friends and I was asking

6:23

him like you know what was it like when

6:25

you met your wife? and he was like, "We

6:26

met the day before we got married and it

6:29

was decided to be a a good match." And

6:32

then over time, so they've been married

6:34

for like 40 years and happily so they've

6:36

raised a couple of kids. Their kids are

6:38

doing great. Their grandkids are doing

6:39

great. They're like living their best

6:40

life. And so then they also develop this

6:43

other kind of storage love, right? So

6:45

this is a love that is based on

6:47

friendships and relationships. So this

6:49

is like we we've been together for a

6:51

long time. We've grown together for a

6:53

long time. It's not this passionate

6:55

aeros kind of love. So the first thing

6:58

that we have to be careful about and

7:00

we'll understand why this is in a minute

7:02

is that if we're selecting for one type

7:05

of love it may actually come at the cost

7:08

of another kind of love. So over time, I

7:11

think you can develop them all in all of

7:12

the aspects, but at the beginning, as

7:15

we'll see, there are a couple of really

7:16

interesting models of love and passion

7:20

and intimacy that make it hard to fall

7:24

in love and feel that spark and that

7:26

chemistry if you are mentally

7:28

approaching it like a job interview. If

7:30

you're trying to find your best partner,

7:32

the partner that fits with your life.

7:36

This is utilizing a different part of

7:38

your brain than the part of your brain

7:40

that falls in love. So I think what's

7:42

actually going on is that what we're

7:44

seeing, the reason it's so hard to find

7:45

chemistry with people is because we are

7:47

actually selecting for one part of our

7:49

brain instead of the other. So let's

7:51

talk about that for a second. If we look

7:52

at uh studies on falling in love, what

7:55

fuels passion, an integrative review of

7:58

competing theories of romantic passion.

8:00

So we're going to talk about two

8:01

theories. So there's something called

8:02

the rate of change in intimacy model and

8:05

there is something called the

8:06

self-expansion model. So let's explain

8:08

what these are. So if you look at like

8:11

studies on how human beings fall in

8:13

love, there are a couple of different

8:16

models that describe the romantic love,

8:19

the aeros love. Okay, so here's how

8:21

we're approaching this lecture. So

8:23

soulmates, question number one, are they

8:26

real? If yes, is there a biology

8:30

to soul mates? And is there a let's call

8:34

it spirituality to soul mates? So are we

8:37

talking about a soul is like a

8:39

transcendental concept or is the

8:41

experience of soulmates just humans in

8:44

their brains. So next thing that we have

8:46

to do is that there are different types

8:48

of love. Aeros, pragma, storage. Okay.

8:52

And then a gape. This is the

8:54

sacrificial. So now the question becomes

8:56

are there biological

8:59

mechanisms towards these different

9:01

things and the answer is yes. So pragma

9:05

love is going to be from your frontal

9:06

loes right this is we're making

9:08

calculations

9:10

analyses storage love is going to be

9:14

friendship allies partners I'm not sure

9:17

exactly where that comes from maybe this

9:19

is something related to oxytocin but

9:22

maybe not. And then there's a gape love

9:24

which is sacrifice. So you put this

9:27

person ahead of yourselves. So this

9:29

comes from the parts of our brain that

9:31

give us compassion, right? So this is a

9:33

different kind of love. And then we have

9:35

aeros. So now we're going to look at a

9:37

couple of different models. So this is

9:39

falling in love. This feeling of of a

9:40

soulmate. Like what does it what does it

9:42

feel like to meet your soulmate? You

9:44

feel so connected. You love them. You

9:47

just met them and you feel a spark.

9:49

That's why we're going to talk about the

9:51

rate of intimacy model. Okay. So, let's

9:55

understand this. Here's time. Here is

9:58

how well you know someone. So, when I

10:00

meet a soulmate, I don't know them very

10:02

well. I just met them for the first

10:03

time. And I learn a little bit about

10:05

them. Then I learn a little bit more.

10:07

Then we start hanging out. Then we start

10:09

hanging out more. And I'm learning more.

10:10

Oh my god, now we're trauma bonding. Now

10:12

we're connected. Now I'm discovering

10:15

this. And now, oh my god, we like all

10:17

the same bands. And then eventually,

10:19

actually, this is maybe a better

10:21

indication of it. So now I'm falling in

10:23

love, but then something starts to

10:24

happen. Now I know a lot about them. Now

10:26

I'm starting to, you know, we're kind of

10:28

getting into a relationship. I'm still

10:29

learning things about them. These things

10:30

are not as fun as before. And then

10:32

eventually I know them. So what this

10:35

model posits and I think this there's

10:38

neuroscientific evidence of this is that

10:40

the rate at which you are getting to

10:42

know someone. So how much more how much

10:45

is intimacy increased here, right? Like

10:47

let's say it's increased zero. How much

10:49

has it intimacy increased here? It's

10:51

increased three. How much has it

10:53

increased here? It's increased five. How

10:55

much has it increased here? Now it's

10:57

increased 10. So this is like if we're

10:59

looking at calculus, it's the rate of

11:01

change. The level of intimacy is

11:03

accelerating. So I knew one fact about

11:06

them today. Then I knew three things

11:08

about them. Then I knew five things

11:10

about them. Then I knew 10 things. So

11:11

this is + two + one plus oh, this is

11:15

plus two. So that doesn't really make

11:16

sense. And here's plus five, right? Does

11:18

that make sense? So this number has to

11:20

be going up. When this number is going

11:23

up, we are falling in love. And then

11:25

what the rate of intimacy model even

11:27

shows us is that thus this model

11:30

suggests that when intimacy is rising

11:32

quickly, it's not whether intimacy is

11:34

high or low. It's the rate at which it

11:36

accelerates. Passion will be high. In

11:39

contrast, when intimacy is stable and no

11:42

longer increasing, few new details and

11:44

experiences are being shared, passion

11:46

will be low. Given that there is only so

11:49

much information to be learned about a

11:50

partner, intimacy often plateaus in

11:53

relationships, at which point passion

11:55

starts to decline. So this is what the

11:57

intimacy model sort of shows us. So when

11:59

we meet our soulmate, we fall in love

12:01

with them. We are already in love with

12:03

them and then we learn more and we learn

12:04

more and we learn more and we fall

12:06

further and further and further in love.

12:07

And then what often times happens when

12:09

we meet our soul mates, things kind of

12:11

sta get stable. They kind of like fall

12:13

out of whack, things like that, right?

12:16

Uh it's not so much anymore falling out

12:18

of love. So if we want to have a healthy

12:21

relationship that starts with a with an

12:23

aeros love, once we get to this phase,

12:27

we have to replace it with something

12:29

else. And this is where you can start

12:31

out with aeros, but then do you add

12:34

pragma? Do you add storage? Do you add a

12:37

gape? Right? This is what allows people

12:40

to fall in love for like three months

12:43

and then be happily married for 40

12:46

years. The quality of love is different.

12:49

The neuroscience of the love is

12:50

different. So let's talk about

12:52

neuroscience a little bit. So this kind

12:54

of love is governed by the nucleus and

12:56

dopamine. So if we remember dopamine

12:58

gives us a sense of pleasure, gives us a

13:01

sense of craving and gives us a sense of

13:03

behavioral reinforcement. Right? So if I

13:06

smoke a cigarette, I get some pleasure

13:09

from it and then I want another one and

13:10

then I smoke another one. So what we

13:12

know from studies on love is that when

13:16

you are with someone that you love,

13:18

we're talking about this phase, okay?

13:20

The rate of intimacy. We're talking

13:21

about aeros. So their presence secretes

13:25

dopamine in your brain. That's it. Just

13:27

their presence. They don't even have to

13:29

be doing anything. You'll And then like

13:31

if you've been in love, like you kind of

13:32

know what I'm talking about, right? like

13:33

you're just with them and you can't wait

13:35

to be with them. I crave you. What part

13:38

of you? Any part of you. You're holding

13:39

hands, you're hanging out, you're

13:41

walking around, you're eating meals,

13:43

you're just with the other person. You

13:44

don't need any kind of activity. And

13:46

that's just simply because their

13:47

presence secretes dopamine, gives you

13:50

pleasure, causes you to crave them,

13:52

right? And causes you to seek them out

13:55

again. Another key thing about this is

13:57

that this also suppresses

14:00

your risk assessment. circuits and

14:04

suppresses your analytical circuits.

14:07

This is why when you fall in love you do

14:11

stupid things. This is a feature not a

14:13

bug. Now if we sort of look at this what

14:15

that means is that aeros is going to

14:19

inhibit pragma. Now the question becomes

14:21

does pragma also inhibit aeros? So now

14:25

let's look at a different model. So this

14:27

is time here is intimacy. So now let's

14:31

look at the dating app model. So if we

14:33

look at dating apps, what we see is that

14:36

the level that you get to know someone

14:39

over time is actually way higher, right?

14:41

So you start out learning a lot of stuff

14:44

about them before you even talk to them.

14:46

You learn what they do, what their prior

14:49

relationships are, do they have kids,

14:51

what do they like, do they share

14:52

interests, and then we select people

14:55

based on this. So there are a couple of

14:57

big problems with this. The first is

14:59

that shared interests develop into

15:02

friendships, right? So storage love or

15:04

the love of friendships and

15:06

relationships built on similar interests

15:08

is not actually like that's not what

15:10

leads to falling in love. And we also

15:12

see this from a rate of intimacy change

15:15

model. So if I already know people and

15:17

then I start talking to them, I get to

15:19

know them a little bit. I get to know

15:20

them a little bit. Maybe we hang out,

15:22

maybe we talk a little bit. I really

15:24

felt some connection, but then they're

15:26

ghosting me the next day. So this is +

15:28

one or this is plus 0 + one sorry that's

15:31

a not a four + one + one + one. So the

15:36

rate of change is constant, right? This

15:39

is this is just it's moving by a factor

15:41

of plus one. Whereas if we look at the

15:43

Aeros model, it's moving like this. So I

15:45

think this is why it's so hard to fall

15:47

in love on dating apps because the

15:50

requisite circuitry to release the

15:53

chemicals in our nucleus ccumbent that

15:55

causes us to find pleasure and craving

15:58

and behavioral reinforcement. Dating

16:00

apps actually shoot us in the foot

16:02

because they're selecting for

16:04

friendship. They're selecting for

16:08

compatibility, but compatibility is not

16:10

love, y'all. In fact, compatibility, I

16:13

think, is sometimes the opposite of

16:14

love. And now we get to something that's

16:16

also kind of interesting from a like a

16:17

neuroscience perspective. See, at a

16:20

given time, your right hemisphere or

16:23

your left hemisphere is dominantly

16:25

active. A great example of this is if we

16:27

look at the way that art is made. So if

16:30

I'm like writing something a creative

16:31

pursuit within me there is an author and

16:35

there's an editor. There's a person who

16:37

feels inspired to create and then

16:40

there's another person who judges the

16:41

creation and says that it is not good

16:43

enough and needs to be improved in

16:45

certain ways. Often times when we engage

16:47

in creative pursuits until we resolve

16:50

this conflict it becomes impossible to

16:52

write. Right? You can't when you're

16:53

painting a a a painting, you can't judge

16:58

your painting while you're painting it.

17:00

Otherwise, you won't be able to paint.

17:01

There is a balance for sure. So, I think

17:03

what's going on in in especially in

17:06

dating apps in the way that we are

17:07

meeting, it's not just apps. It's the

17:10

way that we're meeting people is we

17:11

don't open ourselves up to soulmates. We

17:14

are judging people before we even meet

17:17

them. We are learning a lot before we

17:19

even meet them. And the more that we

17:21

learn, the more we shortcircuit our

17:24

brain's ability to fall for someone.

17:26

Second thing here is that aeros love

17:29

comes from the right hemisphere. Pragma

17:31

love comes from the left hemisphere.

17:34

Storage love, not quite sure, but

17:36

probably more left than right. And so

17:38

when we're approaching these dating

17:39

situations, it feels like a job

17:41

interview. We're trying to find the

17:42

right partner, but the right partner

17:44

partner on paper. No one ever said that

17:47

a soulmate is perfect for you on paper.

17:49

Or maybe they did. I don't know. They

17:50

tend to be perfect for you as a person.

17:52

So, I think this is one of the biggest

17:54

problems with finding soulmates is we're

17:55

not in a neuroscience situation that is

17:58

conducive to creating the chemical soup

18:02

that makes us feel like we found our

18:04

soulmate. Okay, that's number one.

18:06

Couple of other things to keep in mind.

18:09

Since this is governed by our dopamine

18:11

circuitry, the more messed up your

18:14

dopamine circuitry is, the harder it is

18:16

to fall in love. So as we use video

18:19

games, pornography, social media,

18:21

substances, it becomes harder to fall in

18:24

love from this aeros perspective, right?

18:26

So if we have like our dopamine stores

18:28

are exhausted, our dopamine system is

18:30

all messed up, you just can't feel it in

18:32

the same way. Now people may say, but

18:34

like you know, drugs and love go so well

18:37

together. Dr. K. Agreed. But this is

18:40

where I think it's useful to talk about

18:42

manic love. So manic love is an insecure

18:44

love and a very emotional love, an

18:47

emotionally unstable love. So often

18:49

times I think the other thing that

18:50

happens is that we mistake people for

18:54

our soulmates. And the reason we mistake

18:56

them for our soulmates is because we

18:58

have an emotional deficit that this

19:01

person is filling and that feels so

19:04

good. We think they are our soulmate. So

19:06

if I have insecure attachment and

19:08

someone treats me well, I may think that

19:10

this person is my soul soulmate. you

19:12

know, when I'm using substances, my

19:14

emotions are all over the place. They're

19:16

more activated. They're more

19:18

deactivated. Maybe I'm hung over. And

19:20

so, I think that like the the chemistry

19:22

is altered. And when the chemistry is

19:23

altered, a feeling of something like

19:26

love can arise from it. But then the

19:28

problem is that this relationship, if

19:30

the feeling of aeros arises because both

19:33

of y'all are high, what happens to the

19:36

feeling of aeros when both of y'all are

19:38

sober? So, I think that there's a lot of

19:40

needs being met that can be mistaken for

19:43

someone being my soulmate. Now, over

19:46

time, let's say that you guys both get

19:48

sober together or you figure out some

19:50

system, you all become really good

19:52

friends, you actually do start dating,

19:54

like good things can come out of that.

19:55

Maybe the person is your soulmate. My

19:57

point is that, you know, you have to be

19:59

careful about is this person meeting my

20:02

needs for the first time. So I also

20:04

recently saw a study that showed that

20:06

men are more devastated by breakups than

20:09

women are psychologically objectively.

20:11

And the reason for that is because for a

20:13

man they are not just losing a lover

20:16

they are losing for most men their

20:18

primary they're also losing their best

20:20

friend. So the likelihood that you're in

20:22

a heteronormative relationship the

20:24

likelihood that your female partner is

20:26

the primary source of emotional support

20:29

in your life is very high. whereas women

20:31

tend to have other sources of emotional

20:33

support on average. So it's kind of like

20:35

you're losing everything at once. So

20:37

when you're when you're hungry for

20:39

something, it can appear like something

20:41

is your soulmate. But I would say this

20:43

is the more manic love. Okay. So this is

20:45

a quick neuroscience jaunt into

20:48

soulmate. So I think that if we take a

20:50

biological approach in summary, there is

20:53

a set of things that create the

20:56

subjective experience of meeting your

20:59

soulmate. And if we look at the stories

21:01

of meeting your s soulmate, I think

21:03

these are consistent. So a key thing

21:05

about meeting your soulmate is that you

21:07

don't know a whole lot about them first.

21:09

Usually you run into them somewhere. You

21:12

don't know much about them and then you

21:14

get to know them and you feel this

21:15

powerful connection. And the connection

21:17

is not because they have a certain

21:19

profession or they have a certain, you

21:21

know, their genitals are configured a

21:24

particular way. There's something about

21:25

them that you feel connected to. And the

21:28

more you learn about them, the more the

21:30

connection intensifies. Often times,

21:32

soul mates don't share interests with

21:34

you. Like this is also something that I

21:35

consistently see in my practice.

21:37

Definitely true of my my wife and I were

21:40

talking the other day. Our marriage

21:41

would so be so much easier if we liked

21:44

one thing that was the same. We don't we

21:46

don't share a single interest generally.

21:49

It's like I'm into these three things.

21:51

She's into these three things. They

21:52

don't overlap like at all. So, dating

21:54

apps are really leaning into this like

21:56

pragmatic accountability. And when I

21:59

talk to people about, you know, meeting

22:00

their soulmate, like this is usually

22:02

I'll share with y'all like a a story

22:03

from a patient of mine. So, patient of

22:05

mine went to a conference and as part of

22:07

their networking job, they met someone

22:10

and there was something of a spark. And

22:12

so, the my my patient was manning a

22:14

booth. And so, they met this person at

22:16

like some mixer. Next day the person

22:18

stopped by, said hello. They chatted for

22:21

a little bit like you know, oh I'm

22:23

wrapping up for the day. You want to

22:25

grab a drink? Sure. Is this networking?

22:28

Is it business? Is it a date? That's

22:29

what's fun about conferences. So then

22:31

they exchanged contact info, you know,

22:33

oh, my company will be in touch with

22:34

your company. Maybe we can do a deal

22:36

together. Fantastic. Then the fun

22:39

started. Hey, it was great meeting you

22:41

last month at this conference. There's,

22:44

are you going to the expo in Vegas next

22:47

month? Cool. I'll see you there. And so

22:50

for one year, two different people,

22:53

completely different set of interests.

22:54

They would meet just like neither of

22:57

them like visits each other cuz they're

22:58

it's not clear that they're dating even,

23:00

but they're like chasing each other

23:02

around the country at conferences. And

23:04

then I'm I'm sure they started having

23:07

sex at some point. I'm not exactly sure,

23:09

but I'm, you know, I think that's what

23:10

happened. But they like basically had

23:13

this relationship that was like, you

23:15

know, I'm going to see you for four days

23:17

once every other month and if you're

23:19

going to that because it's crazy. It's

23:20

like we're not dating, right? Like it's

23:22

stupid to be dating now, but I can't

23:24

stay away from you. And both of them are

23:25

like and this is what happens with

23:27

soulmate connections and they don't know

23:29

each other well. They it's not even

23:30

clear that they're a good match for each

23:32

other or anything like that. They're

23:33

just so there's a connection. And the

23:35

cool thing is if we look at the

23:36

neuroscience like we can talk about this

23:38

connection. Now the second thing that

23:39

we're going to talk about so what what

23:40

do you replace it with? So you start

23:42

with aeros love and then maybe some

23:44

pragma comes in maybe some storage comes

23:46

in maybe some a gape comes in I'm sorry

23:48

if I'm butchering those pronunciations

23:50

and as those three things start to come

23:52

in we move to another model of passion

23:56

the self-expansion model. So this is

23:59

another thing about soulmates. Describe

24:01

passion as arising from individuals

24:04

expanding their sense of self through

24:06

their romantic partner or

24:08

self-expansion. So what does this mean?

24:10

So human beings like to level up. So I

24:12

grow in this way. I'm going to I'm a

24:15

medical student. I'm a college student.

24:17

Then I'm a medical student. Now I'm a

24:18

doctor. Now I'm a psychiatrist. Right?

24:20

So we like to level up. And at some

24:22

point what some human beings start to do

24:23

is they start leveling up through

24:26

someone else. I am leveling up. Now we

24:29

are a wei. Now my partner's

24:31

accomplishments become my sources of

24:33

pride. Now we're celebrating, right? So

24:36

when I when I graduated from medical

24:38

school, I was broke and my wife was not

24:42

and then she took us on a trip to

24:44

celebrate and then so that was like her

24:46

accomplishment too, you know? So like

24:48

like we start to grow like we become a

24:50

wei. Now it's our life together now.

24:52

Like so the way that I was leveling up

24:54

now I have kids. Now we want our kids to

24:56

do well. Now we have a house. Now we're

24:58

going on vacation. You know, now she

25:02

gets to trot me around when she wants

25:04

to. So like this is this is the

25:07

self-expansion model. So this is where

25:08

like when you meet your soulmate, it's

25:10

so I'm leveling up over here. My

25:12

soulmate is leveling up over here. And

25:13

at some point we we join and then we

25:15

start leveling up together. Now it is

25:17

our life. Now this person becomes a part

25:20

of me. They've always felt like they're

25:21

a part of me, but we're starting to

25:22

build a life together. Does that make

25:25

sense? So soulmates will they were meant

25:27

to be together and then now like the

25:30

meantness of being together also like

25:33

ripples out into your life. Now y'all

25:35

build a life together and that's what we

25:37

it was not it was not just that initial

25:39

spark. We really were meant to be. So I

25:41

think we transition from this rate of

25:43

intimacy model to a self-expansion

25:45

model. So this could explain how we find

25:50

our soulmates in the real world.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the concept of soulmates, love, and modern dating challenges. It differentiates between various types of love: Eros (passionate), Ludus (playful), Storge (friendship-based), Pragma (practical), Mania (obsessive), and Agape (sacrificial). The speaker argues that dating apps often select for Pragma and compatibility rather than Eros, hindering the process of falling in love. The video introduces two models for understanding falling in love: the Rate of Change in Intimacy model, where passion is fueled by the *rate* at which intimacy increases, and the Self-Expansion model, where passion arises from individuals expanding their sense of self through their partner. It's suggested that a messed-up dopamine system due to excessive use of things like video games, pornography, and social media can make it harder to experience Eros. The video concludes that while initial passion (Eros) is important, long-term relationships require integrating other forms of love like Pragma and Storge, and that self-expansion through a partner is crucial for sustained passion.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts