If these are autonomous ships, well, you

can remove things. I don't know what

percentage of a Corsair or battleship

are there to uh support humans on the

ship, but I got to think it's half the

mass of it is to is to keep humans on

it. Am I directionally correct?

>> That's a little excessive, but there is

a significant percentage of the

components, the cost, the labor that

actually goes into catering to human

beings on board. I would say at a high

level, you know, you're really reducing

the complexity of the entire product,

right? You don't need to worry about a

separate electrical system for humans.

You don't need to worry about as we

mentioned doors, bathrooms, stairs, etc.

And then at the end of the day, you can

actually start to end optimize a lot of

different things. So even if you look at

Corsair for example, you know, if you

were to buy a commercial 24T boat, it's

unlikely to be a thousand nautical

miles. It's also unlikely to drive and

have the control authority um of the

boat that we've built here. Um because

you don't have again, you don't have to

worry about you know a person feeling uh

you know you know taking in the middle

of the ocean.

Um, and so you can actually optimize

across a bunch of different areas. Naval

architecture, the speed, range, and

payload of the craft itself. And then

again reduce a lot of the complexity

where you're removing subsystems that

are meant for humans.