It actually happens. Chat GPT 5.6 is out

and I am totally blown away. But, is it

better than Fable 5? I have a definitive

answer for you. In this video, I'll

cover what Chat GPT 5.6 is, the

improvements it made, do an in-depth

breakdown against Fable 5, show you who

the clear winner is, and then show you

an amazing workflow that will change how

you use AI forever. This is the most

important video you'll watch in a very

long time. Make sure you lock in and

let's get into it. Days like today are

the absolute best if if you're into

technology, congratulations, you are

going to have a lot of fun right after

this video. This is Chat GPT 5.6. I've

had early access. I've been using it

time. So, all the people that go in the

comments go, "Oh, how'd you get a video

out so quick? What the hell? What's

going on?" Shut up. I've been using it.

Now, let's get into it. Chat GPT 5.6,

three models, Luna, Sol, Terra. The one

we're going to talk about today is Sol.

That's their biggest model. That's the

one everyone goes, "Oh, how's it

compared to Fable? Is it better than

Fable?" That's the one we're going to be

talking about is Sol. So, Sol is the

smartest, Terra is kind of the medium,

Luna is the efficient one, like the Chat

GPT mini. So, it's Sol is the one we

care I care about brains. So, let's talk

about that. They also have many

different thinking levels now. They have

like seven different thinking levels.

Ultra is the one I'm using. The reason

why we can use the smartest Chat GPT

model with the highest level thinking is

because Chat GPT is so kind when it

comes to usage. It gives you a ton of

usage. So, you don't have to be scared

like you are with Anthropic of using the

highest thinking levels then two prompts

later you have no more usage. Chat GPT,

you can use the highest thinking levels

and still get a ton of usage out of it.

They have a fast mode, which is in my

opinion revolutionary. I'll tell you

you're getting Fable level thinking on a

really, really fast speed. One challenge

I've had with Fable over the last couple

weeks is it's just slow. It's a slow

model. But, ChatGPT 5 6 Soul Ultra on

fast mode, lightning fast. It is the

best model in some ways. We'll get into

the Fable comparison in just a second.

Stick around me. Here we go in-depth.

Who's the winner? I hand a trophy out.

It is the best model in some ways, but

it is without a doubt the best harness

Codex, which we'll also talk about that

in a second. It's gone. Is the best

harness at the best price at the best

speed. Some also Also, some changes

announced today. We'll go into in-depth

breakdowns on subsequent videos. Let me

know what you want me to do most.

ChatGPT works on these other things.

Codex app no more. It's gone. They

combined it with the ChatGPT app, which

I actually believe is a very smart move.

Codex was the best harness. They're

bringing all those nice features over to

the ChatGPT app. It's all in one. I

didn't like the separate apps. I'm a fan

of this move. Codex is no more. It is

changed on mobile as well. So, if you

use Codex on mobile, if you use Codex on

iPad, which I highly, highly recommend

you do, it's now called remote sessions.

They really want you using this in a

very specific way on mobile, which I'll

talk about a little bit in a second as

well. I actually think the iPad

experience now is like the best

experience. I I use the iPad a ton. I'll

talk about that, too. But, the iPad

experience for chat I don't even think

they're like trying to make it good. It

actually is very good. I'll talk about

why I think it's awesome, too. But,

let's do the comparison everyone and

their mothers is waiting for. ChatGPT 5

6 with Fable 5. Which is the winner?

Well, I'm going to show you the

comparison between the two, what the

differences are, and then I'll tell you

the winner once we go through this.

We'll make this quick. I have been using

the absolute booty load out of Fable 5

last week. I don't even know what booty

load means. I just dropped that. As you

can see here, I hit extra usage

yesterday. I've spent $500 of credits in

the last 24 hours of Fable 5. I've been

using the absolute hell out of it. So, I

am in-depth in the weeds on Fable 5. I

know how it works inside and out. How

does it compare to 5.6? Well, let's take

a look at this here. Fable 5 is still

better for planning and high-level

thinking and understanding of large code

bases. It is the best when it comes

specifically to that. I'll give you an

example. I have like an entire software

factory I've built out inside of Codex

and Claude code that allows you to kind

of autonomously build a lot of software.

It's very complex, in-depth. If you want

a video on that, let me know down below.

I'll do a whole video on loops and

software factory if you're interested.

But, here's the thing. When I gave that

to Fable 5, I said, "Hey, look at my

entire software factory and understand

how it works." It understood it pretty

much instantly. It was able to pick it

up and start doing work in the factory

like it was been there like it's been

there for years. When I handed the

software factory over to ChatGPT 5.6

initially when I got early access, I'm

going to be honest, it did not pick it

up immediately. It took a while. I had

to kind of nudge it in different

directions until it finally grasped how

it worked. So, when it comes to

understanding large code bases, being a

high-level wise thinker, understanding

from like a CEO level what's going on, I

would say Fable 5's better. But, now

let's talk about actual execution,

actual building. 5.6 the winner. 5.6 is

the winner for many, many different

reasons. The code quality is just as

good as Fable 5. The code it's putting

on is just as good, but it is more

eager. So, the tables have kind of

flipped here where ChatGPT 5.6 is more

eager than Fable. So, it will get tasks

done. You can give it major, major

tasks, and it will grab it, it will get

it all done, it will add a whole bunch

of extra features to it. It'll be

fantastic at that. This was Claude's

strength for a long time. That kind of

eagerness of getting a ton done was

Claude's strength for a very long time.

ChatGPT has overtaken that. So, when it

comes to execution, when it comes to

actual building, 5.6 is the winner. Now,

after this comparison we're going

through, I'm going to actually show you

the workflow. Everyone and their mothers

is going on Twitter saying, "Oh, use

ChatGPT as a sub-agent inside of Claude

code." No, that's not the best way to do

it. I'll show you the best way to do it

in a second. You'll learn the best

workflow once we go through this, once I

declare the winner between ChatGPT 5.6

and Fable 5. Workflow coming right after

this. Let's talk about price, and this

is going to be a deal breaker for most

people. Fable 5 unreasonably expensive.

So expensive, I actually think this

model will die. I think Fable 5 is the

smartest AI model, potentially the

greatest technology ever made. I think

it's dead in the water. I was shocked

when I started going into API pricing,

and I within a few hours used hundreds

of dollars of credits. That's absolutely

insane. No normal person is going to

want to pay that price, and then you

even look at the enterprise right now.

Companies are cutting out frontier

models and using things like GLM 5.2 cuz

costs are getting so high. I don't know

who Fable 5 is for. It's absolutely

genius level. I was uh prepared to tell

everyone, "Hey, to be paying API pricing

for it." And the moment I started paying

API pricing for it, I'm like, "Wait a

second. No, no, no, no, no. Done with

this, done with Fable." Uh unreasonably

expensive. It is so unreasonable, in

fact, that I believe they're going to

push up Opus 5. I think in the next week

Opus 5 comes out. I believe I don't

think it's Fable level. I believe it's

very close to Fable level, but at way

more reasonable prices. I just don't see

how Fable fits into the picture with

what I'm about to show you with ChatGPT.

No one in their right mind, unless

you're just outrageously rich, is going

to be spending $500 a day on credits.

And this wasn't even like a full day of

coding. This was like an afternoon, like

1:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. of coding, $500.

That is crazy. ChatGPT 5.6, it's more

affordable, right? It's way more

affordable than Fable 5. It is still

costly. I have never, I'm going to be

honest with you, and I do this all day,

I've never hit my limits with ChatGPT

before. That's never happened to me. 5,

5, everything before that, I've never

hit my limits. I hit my limits for the

first time yesterday using ChatGPT 5.6.

That's never happened before. So, it is

more expensive than the other ChatGPT

models. I did hit my 5-hour window. I

didn't come close to the weekly window.

5-hour window though, I hit the limit. I

I started having to use API pricing. I

was using Soul at Ultra level. So, like,

if you go super hardcore on their most

expensive model, you could hit limits.

But, at the end of the day, it is way

more affordable and reasonable than

Fable 5. UI was always ChatGPT's

weakness. It's now good. It's good

enough at UI now. It It certainly

improved it. It's good enough. It's not

a concern now where you need to jump to

Claude every single time. Claude is

better at UI still. Here's where I

actually think the winner comes in, and

this is why I am going to declare

ChatGPT 5.6 the winner.

The harness around ChatGPT is so much

better. It's so much better. The

computer use is significantly better.

The browser use is significantly better.

Claude has made jumps here lately, but

ChatGPT, the harness, doing things for

you, signing up for websites, getting

API keys, I've never been more confident

when giving a model a task that it will

do literally whatever it takes to get it

done. It will pop open the browser, will

control your computer, it will do

whatever it needs in order to get that

task done. And that is a feeling and

emotion that I've never had with Claude

inside their harness, which for me leads

me to crown Chad GPT 5.6 the winner

because that feeling of knowing when you

give a task to a model, knowing it will

get done is an invaluable feeling. Even

though there's some weaknesses when it

comes to planning, high-level thinking,

figuring very large code bases out that

it doesn't really match up with Fableon,

the fact that you can give it a task and

you know for certainty at the end it

will be done for a reasonable price

leads me to make Chad GPT 5.6 the

winner. The question becomes also little

things here. I'll do a video. Let me

know down below. Do you want a full

video on Hermes using Chad GPT 5.6 as

well? I'll do that. But this leads me to

the next section of this video, which is

the workflow. How do you actually use

it? We talked about what is better, how

it compares to Fable 5, what the new

changes are. How do you actually use it?

Everyone and their mother's been telling

you if you pay attention, Twitter, if

you're in the Twitter bubble, "Oh, set

up Chad GPT 5.6 as a sub agent inside

Claude code." No, do not do that. I will

show you the best way to do this. And

before we do that real quick, if you

learned anything so far, leave a like

down below, subscribe, turn on

notifications. All I do is make the

absolute stone cold best content about

AI on the entire internet. And if you

want to work with me live, I do live

bootcamps every single Friday in the

Vibe Coding Academy. It's the number one

community for people building with AI on

planet Earth. We're also doing a $1,000

hackathon right now. It ends in 2 weeks.

You can still join it, get in, build

something cool, submit it, you go in a

thousand dollars. We're doing it every

single month. Join the Vibe Coding

Academy, link down below for that. Let's

get into the workflow now. So, this is

the Codex app. I'm using Codex app for

now cuz I am filming this right before

the model comes out. So, I'm still using

the Codex app before it's combined with

ChatGPT. But, here's how you want to use

this. Here's how you want to use ChatGPT

5.6. First, we'll talk about from the

harness level. You want to choose one

computer or device you own to be kind of

the head development machine. The reason

why you want to do this is the remote

control capabilities of ChatGPT are

incredible. You can control ChatGPT from

any device you have, iPad, iPhone, any

of your computers, Mac Mini. So, what

you want to do is choose your kind of

main developer machine. This should be a

desktop device. I'm using one of my Mac

Studios, my Mac Studio 1. I have three

of them, not to flex on you, but kind of

a flex. I'm using my first one as my

main developer machine. Now, every other

device you have will be a node to that.

Here's how you want to think about it.

So, you have your main development

machine where you're using ChatGPT or

Codex, and then every other device you

own will control that. So, if you have a

desktop and you have a laptop, your

laptop controls it, your iPad, your

iPhone, everything controls this one

place. And the reason why you want to do

it this way is so that you have all your

code in one place. Instead of having

some features on your laptop, your

desktop, some features on your iPhone,

your iPad, it all goes to one place. And

because the remote control functionality

is so good on the ChatGPT and Codex

apps, you can easily control from all

your different devices. So, choose a

device, make sure it's a desktop if you

have one. The reason being is you can

leave your desktop on 24/7 365. Laptops,

you got to close it, puts it in sleep

mode, different things like that. So,

make sure you have kind of a desktop

device, a Mac Studio, a gaming computer,

whatever you got, make that your main

computer. Even if you just have like an

old dusty laptop in your closet that you

can put on 24/7 mode and plug it in, use

that. Something that can be up 24/7 365.

So, from there you have your projects

and you have your chats inside of each

of the projects. I'm going over kind of

high-level tips in here. We can do a

deep dive building out a full app end to

end on a subsequent video if you want,

let me know down below. But, what we're

going to do is you want to kind of have

your factory admin chat in each project.

This is the high-level chat where you

can be like, "Okay, merge the code,

create a PR, do this." Where it's kind

of managing your entire factory. And

then every other chat from there is

going to be building out specific

features for that project. So, you have

your main admin chat where you can go in

from any of your devices and say, "Hey,

what's the status? What's uncommitted

code we have? What PRs do we have to

merge?" Things like that. It's kind of

your high-level admin. And then every

other chat is for specific features

you're building out. Now, we said

earlier Fable 5 is a better planning

model and I I stand by that. So, what

you want to do is you want to use Fable

5 for planning. So, if you have a

project, you open it up inside Claude

Code, you go into Fable 5 mode. I'd go

on high. If you go on ultra code or

higher, you spend hundreds of dollars

for a single prompt. Just use high. When

you're doing any sort of planning,

you'll come into Claude Code, you will

ask for the plan. "Hey, this is what I'm

thinking about building. Please build

out a very large spec." If you've been

paying attention to all my videos, you

know I talk about Linear and how I use

Linear in my entire process. So, if

you're using Linear, have it build the

spec out in Linear. If not, totally fine

to say, "Hey, build a markdown file."

Then, what you will do is you will take

that markdown file, go into your

projects, drop it in, and say, "Here's

the plan, build this out for me." Now, a

lot of people are telling you to use a

ChatGPT sub-agent inside of Claude Code

to do execution. I don't like that at

all because when you do that, you're

missing out on all the amazing features

of the ChatGPT harness. The ChatGPT

harness does so many things so well for

you. So, for instance, I'm building out

my app, Henry Intelligent Machines, link

down below if you want to get an early

preview of that, and I'm having it test

some of the action generation inside the

app. In Henry, you launch a venture, and

then it generates a bunch of actions

that you need to do to push your

business forward. I wanted to test that.

Typically, when testing that, you would

need to open up a browser, go through

the flow yourself, click on things

yourself, but all I do is I go in and I

say, "Hey, test this out for me. Load it

up into a browser, walk through it for

me, do it five times, and then build the

report on that." And that is what

ChatGPT does. It opens up its own

browser and runs all the servers. It

gets whatever API keys it needs, it

plugs them in, and it runs through

everything. So, it said what I tested,

actually opens it up, started a venture,

did a bunch of different actions, tested

everything out. It did all the testing

for me. Something that would have

typically taken me an hour before took

24 minutes for ChatGPT while I did other

things. So, your workflow is get the

planning from Claude Code, move it over

to ChatGPT,

and then you give the actions to

ChatGPT. Here is the mindset I have.

Anything you would manually need to do

before when vibe coding, I just tell

ChatGPT to do it. Anything it is. It

doesn't matter what it is. If they say,

"Hey, sign up for this account," I go,

"No, you do it." If they say, "Hey, can

you grab this API key?" I say, "No, you

do it." If they say, "Hey, can you

connect these two things together move

this file over here, I say no, you do

it. Chad G P T literally 100% of the

time I have said hey, no, you do it.

It's figured out how to do it. That's

why this harness is so good when it

comes to computer use, when it comes to

browser use, it is absolutely next

level. It is bar none not comparable to

Claude code whatsoever. That's why the

workflow is get your plans from Claude

code, move them over to Chad G P T code

X and then you say no, you do this. You

handle this. And it will get done and it

will save you tons of time. Now while

you're in here, I do soul ultra for

everything. It's the stone cold best. If

you're on the $200 a month plan, you can

get away with using fast for a lot of

things. Again, I hit my limits using

fast here for the first time in my

entire life in Chad G P T. So maybe you

don't use fast quite as much, but if

you're on soul ultra on normal speeds,

you can use up your $200 plan. Like you

you're not going to hit your limits.

You're going to have plenty of usage,

which I cannot say for fable because I

use the plan up in like a day and then

when I went into API pricing, it was

outrageous, out of control. 5.6 is the

winner. It is my new daily driver. It is

what you need to be using for pretty

much everything outside of high level

understanding, planning and some kind of

UI tweaks if need be. It's still pretty

good at UI. By the way, for the hardcore

Alex Finn fans who know all about the

world famous Alex Finn benchmark, yes,

it blew away the benchmarks. This is the

first person shooter test. It is

absolutely incredible. It has it has

crits, dynamic enemies, it has great

explosions, it has great waves.

The graphics are fantastic. The sounds

are amazing. I don't know if you can

hear the sounds or not. The power ups

are incredible. Like there's like 10

different dynamic enemies. It's

incredible. Chad G P T 5.6 won the

benchmark test. I am really, really

impressed. And what's incredible is over

the next few weeks we're actually

expecting G P T 6. We're expecting the

next level. The The rumors I am hearing

are that it's coming very soon. They're

already done training it. They're just

doing testing now. So, expect more

videos like this very very soon. If you

learn anything at all, likes,

subscribes, turn on notifications.

Again, live boot camp tomorrow, $1,000

hackathon next couple weeks. Join the

Vibe Coding Academy link down below. I

love you all. It's an honor to teach you

these things. It's an honor to work with

you. We will talk soon.