HomeVideos

What other reviewers aren't saying! AirPods Max 2.

Now Playing

What other reviewers aren't saying! AirPods Max 2.

Transcript

387 segments

0:00

All right, so I got through most of the

0:01

day one or the day two videos of the

0:02

AirPods Max 2. And quite frankly, I

0:05

don't trust most of the reviews I saw,

0:07

and I've definitely seen a few of those

0:09

Apple Focus channels say that this is

0:10

the best overear headphones that they've

0:13

ever heard. That is BS, straight up. And

0:16

I've heard some other reviewers say that

0:17

they sound the same. Some of them say

0:19

that they sound much better. So, I was

0:20

like, "Oh man, I just really need to buy

0:22

my own." So, let's just get right into

0:24

it. I did have the original AirPods Max

0:26

with the lightning cable, but those were

0:28

outdated, so I ended up selling them a

0:30

while back. So, I was kind of excited to

0:32

check these out. I do want to start off

0:34

with the comfort because these are more

0:36

lifestyle headphones than like audio

0:38

file grade quality headphones. They're

0:40

meant to be taken out and about and to

0:42

be worn for a long period of time. And

0:44

man, have I never felt a headphone this

0:47

heavy. I forgot how heavy the original

0:50

ones were. If you are not used to these,

0:52

they'll take a few days to get used to.

0:54

I think you'll need to develop some

0:55

muscles in the back of your head. So,

0:57

that is definitely something to keep in

0:59

mind. But, as I did mention before, they

1:01

are really comfortable. Once they're on

1:03

your head, they kind of disappear. I do

1:06

feel that because these ear pads are not

1:08

really breathable, my ears do tend to

1:10

get a little bit hot, especially in the

1:12

South Florida heat here when I take

1:14

these outside or even when I'm just

1:15

wearing them for a while. And another

1:17

thing too, typically because these are

1:19

so heavy, you would start to feel a lot

1:21

of pressure on the top of your head.

1:23

You'll get what's called hot spots to

1:25

where you'll start to feel some pain on

1:26

the top of your head. You never really

1:28

feel that. This headband, they call it

1:29

the canopy design, does do a very good

1:32

job with that. But what also really

1:34

helps is the clamping force is

1:36

incredibly tight on these. And because

1:39

it's so tight, it's actually clamping to

1:41

the side of your head. it's not relying

1:44

so much of the pressure of the canopy

1:46

headband to keep it on your head. So,

1:49

the two of those in conjunction helps

1:51

make this a lot more comfortable than

1:53

you would expect, even though it is so

1:54

heavy. But, I do find that the clamping

1:56

force is a little bit too tight and I do

1:59

tend to get fatigued after wearing these

2:01

for a while. All right, it's been a few

2:02

days and I spent like 6 hours wearing

2:05

these headphones all day long and I got

2:08

to say it's really starting to hurt

2:10

around this area especially. It does get

2:12

a little bit heavy, which I did mention

2:13

before, but these aren't as comfortable

2:16

as I was thinking they would be. I'm

2:17

glad I spent a little bit of extra time

2:19

before just posting this video cuz I got

2:21

a little cuz I got a little extra time

2:23

to deal with the comfort. And I don't

2:25

think I could use this professionally.

2:26

Like if I was going to be doing working

2:28

on some project for like 6 hours

2:29

straight, after like 2 3 hours, I would

2:31

like to take a break from wearing these.

2:34

So overall, comfort is good and it's

2:36

also bad. I don't want to waste any

2:37

time. Let's just get into the sound

2:39

quality because that's mainly what most

2:41

of us care about. Overall, these sound

2:43

good. I don't have the AirPods Max ones

2:47

to compare them to. I was thinking about

2:48

buying a used copy from Best Buy or

2:50

something just so I could compare them,

2:52

but the moment I started listening to

2:53

these, these sound much better than the

2:56

Lightning versions that I've had before.

2:58

The new amp is definitely on notice

3:01

here. It is improving the bass and it's

3:03

definitely improving the highs.

3:06

Everything sounds more rich and more

3:08

full than what I remember from the

3:09

AirPods Max originals. Overall, I think

3:13

the bass is a bit more elevated. So,

3:15

Apple used to have like a really good

3:17

sound signature. Everybody has like

3:18

their own like house sound signature.

3:21

Sennheisers tend to be a bit more veil.

3:23

Sony's tend to have more of like a warm

3:26

rich speaker sound. You know, I could go

3:28

on and on. They all have like their

3:30

signature sound. Apples was always

3:32

fairly neutral with an emphasis on the

3:34

highs, especially when it comes to the

3:36

symbols. What they are doing now, they

3:39

are going for more of a V-shaped curve.

3:41

So, the bass is more pronounced more

3:43

than I'm used to. If you've seen some of

3:45

my other videos, I mentioned that I have

3:47

been getting much more accustomed to

3:49

more of a neutral sound profile than a

3:52

lot of the Vshape boommy bass with the

3:54

shrill highs, etc. So, coming back to

3:57

this, when I first got it, I was like,

3:59

"Oh, man. The bass is a bit elevated,

4:01

but not too much. The mids are a little

4:03

bit scooped, a little bit more recessed.

4:05

That's coming back to the whole Vshape

4:07

that I mentioned, but it's done well.

4:09

Still able to hear a lot of fine

4:11

details. I'll get some more nuances when

4:13

I start comparing against some of the

4:14

other headphones that I have here. But

4:16

they are nicely presented. And the

4:19

highs, I might have hinted that earlier.

4:21

These are probably the best highs that

4:23

I've heard from like a consumer-based

4:25

wireless headphone with noise cancelling

4:27

that's meant to be taken outside.

4:29

Symbols, I'm a sucker for crisp sounding

4:32

symbols on recordings, and this does

4:35

amazingly well, and that's something

4:37

that the AirPods Max one did as well,

4:40

too. The new amp is overall helping. I'm

4:42

not sure how much the H2 chip might be

4:45

helping with the processing, but it does

4:47

seem like it's doing a better job. But

4:49

maybe the H2 chip is helping with the

4:52

sound stage, which is what I want to

4:53

talk about next. And what that

4:54

essentially means is how open do these

4:57

sound? Do they just sound like they're

4:59

coming from headphones, or do they start

5:00

to sound like they're expanding beyond

5:02

that to where you could actually feel

5:04

like they're getting like a surround

5:05

sound effect? And thankfully, the sound

5:08

stage is incredibly wide on this. Among

5:10

the best that I've heard from a

5:11

closedback wireless headphone, which is

5:14

good because a lot of people will be

5:15

connecting these to like their MacBooks

5:17

or their iPads or even their iPhones to

5:19

watch like Netflix and movies and TV

5:22

shows, etc. This is a multi-purpose

5:24

headphone, not just for music. So, I

5:26

think Apple tuned these more to have a

5:29

more open and wide sound stage. And if

5:31

you know audio products, you might know

5:33

that the wider the sound stage usually

5:35

means the worse the overall sound

5:37

signature is. And while I won't say that

5:40

this suffers too much, I definitely feel

5:41

like Apple prioritize that more than

5:44

audio fidelity. All right. Wow. I hope

5:48

that didn't take too long cuz I need to

5:50

start comparing these to some of these

5:51

other headphones. Like the king here is

5:53

a Sennheiser HDB 630s. These kind of

5:56

came out of nowhere last year. without

5:58

sugar coating it. The Sennheisers are a

6:00

lot better. I was listening to them both

6:03

side by side on Bluetooth and both with

6:05

an iPhone, too. So, the Sennheisers are

6:08

already at a disadvantage cuz if you do

6:10

have Android, then you have access to

6:12

Qualcomm's Appex codecs. But because I

6:15

was only testing it on an iPhone,

6:17

because this is an Apple product, most

6:19

people will only be using it on Apple

6:21

products. But I also tested USB audio.

6:24

And once you start listening to it,

6:26

there's a lot more detail on the

6:28

Sennheisers from the bass to the mids.

6:31

The mids especially, that's when you

6:32

notice it the most. And even the highs,

6:34

I think they take the crown for being

6:36

the best overall sound quality for

6:39

general use headphone that's meant to be

6:41

taken out and about with noise

6:42

cancelling, etc. The overall bass is

6:45

much cleaner on this. This, like I said,

6:48

gets a tiny bit muddled. Not much.

6:50

Before I continue, let me just say that

6:52

these do sound good. And if you were

6:54

buying these as your only headphone,

6:56

you're into the Apple ecosystem, you're

6:58

going to be happy with these. But when

6:59

you start comparing to other ones and

7:01

you start really listening, you'll

7:03

notice the difference. So yeah, the

7:05

overall entire sound signature is better

7:07

on the Sennheiser. Sennheisers go for

7:09

more of a veil sound. So if you like

7:11

crisp highs, then these don't have it.

7:13

But this does have an EQ that you can

7:16

mess with. Apple doesn't use EQs, which

7:18

is okay with me because I don't mess

7:19

with EQs because I mentioned in previous

7:21

videos, if I start messing with EQs, I

7:23

will never stop. I'm just like

7:24

inherently a tinkerer. Okay, so next,

7:27

the Sony's. I think these Sony's, not

7:29

only are they cheaper, but they are

7:31

better in every way in terms of sound

7:33

quality. And the Sony's are a lot

7:35

better. These have like a warm like

7:38

speaker-like sound. It just makes me

7:40

feel good listening to it. It's just a

7:42

lot of fun to listen to. The overall

7:44

bass presentation is deep. It's

7:46

definitely tuned for the masses, not the

7:48

audio files, the Sony's I'm talking

7:51

about, but it's just handled better. The

7:52

the the mids sounds so much better. I

7:54

was listening to this song today and I

7:56

was comparing both the Sony's and the

7:58

AirPods Max 2Os's. When you listen to

8:00

the vocals, there's like a throatiness

8:02

to his voice that the Sony's are able to

8:06

pick up that the AirPods just quite

8:08

can't. And there's some cool pans with

8:11

the guitar that are going left and

8:12

right. and I can just pick apart the

8:14

guitar a little bit better on the Sony.

8:16

So, I don't know. I don't want to spend

8:17

too much time. The Sony's are better.

8:19

The Sennheisers are better. The AirPods

8:21

Max is not competitive in 2026 with some

8:24

of the best out there. So, if you only

8:25

care about sound quality, I probably

8:27

already lost you. Thank you for stopping

8:29

by. But, and I also compared it to some

8:31

of my other gaming headsets. Like, this

8:33

is a gigantic headphone. This is not

8:35

really meant to be taken out. But, some

8:37

of these game sets these days, man, do

8:39

they do a good job. These are the

8:40

Odyssey Maxwell 2. So, if you're going

8:42

to be using your headphones more for

8:44

like indoor use video editing or just be

8:46

going to be connected to your MacBook

8:47

and you're not going to be taking them

8:48

out and about, I would I would

8:50

definitely recommend something like the

8:51

Maxwells 2 cuz you get a USB dongle. You

8:54

just plug it right into your laptop and

8:55

you get lossless audio wirelessly. And

8:58

then another thing too, let me just talk

9:00

about the pricing really quickly. $549

9:03

for this. These are some new headphones

9:06

by ASUS and co-designed with Hi-Fimen.

9:09

These are excellent. And again, the the

9:11

these are completely open back. These

9:13

are meant to be taken out. The reason

9:14

why I'm bringing this up because this

9:16

has out of all of these here, this has

9:18

the best sound signature for only $300.

9:21

And then you need an amp. You can get

9:22

like the full. I didn't swear

9:24

that's the name of the company. That

9:26

combination might cost as much as this.

9:27

And you'll get a much better sound

9:30

experience. I think $549 for these are

9:33

really expensive. But people don't buy

9:36

AirPods just to listen to music. you'll

9:38

you'll be watching a lot of movies or

9:40

maybe TV shows on this too. And I think

9:42

these this is where these shine because

9:44

one reason like I mentioned is that

9:45

wider sound stage and the Dolby Atmos

9:49

sounds immensely better than the AirPods

9:53

Max one. I found that to be unusable. I

9:55

think the H2 chip is really coming in

9:57

handy here. That better processing is

10:00

able to better decode Dolby Atmos. So,

10:02

it's actually usable now and it sounds

10:04

really good. You could go on Apple Music

10:06

and listen to a few Dolby Atmos tracks.

10:09

They're mostly trash. Dolby Atmos needs

10:11

to be mixed properly. So, there are a

10:13

few good examples out there. Apple has a

10:17

made for spatial audio playlist, and I

10:20

hate to say it again, most of them are

10:22

bad. So, the thing is though, good Dolby

10:25

Atmos recordings can sound amazing, but

10:27

bad mediocre ones sounds worse than the

10:30

actual tracks in just stereo. One of the

10:32

coolest ones you need to check out is

10:34

Thriller by Michael Jackson. And make

10:36

sure you get this little Dolby Atmos

10:38

logo on it. And also make sure you go to

10:41

the settings by just tapping on the

10:43

volume on the control panel. And then

10:45

make sure spatial audio is set to

10:47

headtracked. And just kind of keep the

10:49

phone in front of you when you're

10:50

listening to this. So, the beginning of

10:52

Michael Jackson's thriller, there's you

10:54

can hear like a door opening and closing

10:56

and there's like things going all around

10:58

you and it really does create a 3D space

11:00

like it's coming from all around you and

11:02

it's quite surreal. It's not as good as

11:04

like something like the Sonos Aeros 300

11:06

which is like dedicated speakers for

11:08

Dolby Atmos but it sounds good and

11:10

there's like wolves howling and a whole

11:12

bunch of stuff and you can actually hear

11:14

it all over you and the AirPods Max one

11:17

did not do a good job representing that.

11:20

So, and also by nature movies are

11:23

incredible with these. And I've been

11:25

gaming with these as like a dedicated

11:27

gaming headset. And this is one of my

11:29

favorite ones so far. I mean, 549 is one

11:32

of the most expensive ones out there.

11:34

But because the noise cancellation is so

11:37

good, when I'm using my gaming laptop,

11:39

I'm not hearing the fans anymore. All

11:40

right, so here's a microphone test of

11:42

the AirPods Max 2, that sounds pretty

11:45

good. And I can hear there is some side

11:47

tone that is kind of just replicating my

11:50

voice through the actual headphones. So

11:51

it doesn't sound too muffled, so it

11:53

sounds a little bit more natural. It

11:54

doesn't sound too natural though. It

11:56

still sounds a little bit artificial.

11:57

This is something that I've gotten

11:58

pretty good at being able to pick up by

12:00

covering so many gaming headsets. This

12:02

is a pretty good site tone, but I won't

12:04

say that it is class leading. So this is

12:07

how it sounds on Windows. I wonder if

12:09

you're still getting that same pretty

12:10

good mic quality as you would on Apple

12:13

devices. And this is what it sounds like

12:16

on my iPhone. So clearly that amazing

12:20

mic quality only seems to be working if

12:23

you're using an Apple product. And next,

12:26

I just tested these working out. I went

12:27

to the gym. I wanted to go for a run,

12:29

but it was raining today, so I just went

12:31

on the treadmill. And what I like to do

12:33

is test over the ear headphones when

12:36

running to see if you hear like that

12:38

thumping thud when your feet are

12:41

touching the ground. And I didn't hear

12:44

any of that once I had the noise

12:45

cancelling or the transparency mode on.

12:49

There's not much over the ear headphones

12:50

that I could run with. And because the

12:53

build quality is so good, I'm not

12:55

hearing any creaking or any clanking or

12:57

anything when anything um high impact on

13:00

these with like some other headphones

13:02

where you would hear like different

13:03

parts of the headphone like jamming

13:05

together. And because the clamping force

13:07

is so high, you can lift weights on

13:09

these and without them falling off. I

13:12

mean depending on how big your head is,

13:14

but I think that most people will be

13:16

fine because of that strong clamping

13:17

force. So great for working out even

13:20

though this is not IP rated. So, you

13:23

know, use it at your own risk. But yeah,

13:26

there's a billion of videos of these

13:28

AirPods Max 2 already just after 48

13:31

hours of coming out. So, if you got

13:32

anything useful out of this, feel free

13:34

to hit that like button, leave me a

13:36

comment or subscribe, etc. I appreciate

13:38

you

Interactive Summary

The review of the AirPods Max 2 highlights that while the headphones offer improved sound quality, a wide sound stage, and excellent performance for movies and spatial audio, they face stiff competition from brands like Sennheiser and Sony in terms of raw audio fidelity. They are heavy but use a canopy design and tight clamping force to maintain comfort, though this can lead to fatigue after long periods. Additionally, they perform well at the gym due to their secure fit, despite lacking an official IP rating.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts