Noctua AIO Engineering and Thermosiphon Cooler, ft. Technical Discussion
599 segments
So for Noctua at Comp Computex, we have
a lot of stuff to talk about. All
technical as we've done the last couple
years. We actually have a whole separate
video on this thing, but I'll show it
briefly. This is a carbon nano tube
thermal pad. Basically, super cool.
We're not going to talk about it in this
specific video, but we do have a full
in-depth interview talking about that.
Uh Naka is working with another company,
Carbise, to sell pads. They also have
this lowprofile AM5 cooler where you can
see they're really maximizing the
keepout zone on the motherboard. So,
right up against kind of the the limits
of the keepout zone for AM5 near the
heat sinks and then just kind of using
that memory area. So, you need lower
profile memory uh to accommodate it. But
that's a 70mm tall cooler. It's not
ready to launch yet. They don't have a
price target yet, but I just wanted to
show it for the stuff we're actually
going to be focusing on today. So, the
thermosiphen is back. We've talked about
this at least once, maybe twice now for
uh booth visits. And Jacob off to the
side over here is going to be joining
again for now the I'm not sure how many
years running, but we'll be go going
over all the details for this, the
changes they've done in the last year on
the technical side. And then also on the
opposite side of the booth, the liquid
cooler, which is now actually coming to
market. A lot of cool technical detail
on that, too. So, this one is going to
be mostly focused on uh I I know this is
scary, but education and talking about
science, so should be pretty fun. We
brought you this video with our brand
new Wireframe V2 mouse mat on
store.ac.net.
Also accompanied by our new Micro Slop
t-shirt that's on its way to our
warehouse right now. These feature a
parody micro slop logo with a blue
screen of death frowny face, warning
marks from event viewer, and our
rendition of Tux the penguin hidden away
and of course micro slop. So everyone
you pass either thinks you work there
for now or they know your thoughts on
AI. The wireframe V2 mouse mat on the GN
store was made by Andrew on the team in
Blender. Fully 3D modeled and then
represented in a high quality mouse mat
that you see here. The Mac can easily
accommodate a keyboard and mouse, has
fine detail with the city built of
wireframe components for the heat sink,
RAM, because let's be honest, it's the
only place any of us can get any now,
and cooling tubes, and we use a matching
blue stitching for anti- fray with a
blue rubber underside for some unique GN
flare. We modeled these to ridiculous
levels of depth in that there are things
in the model that you can't even see in
the product because we went that deep
with it. like for example the springs
underneath the switch underneath the
keycap that's represented in the matte
surface. Head to store.gamersacess.net
to support our deep dive independent
research content like this directly.
Okay, so I'm joined by Jacob again.
Jacob, we've done this at least a couple
years in a row now.
>> And uh last year you had a a pretty
early version of the thermosiphen
actually. This if I remember correctly,
this was like basic it looked like that,
right? It was just metal and a sheet in
the front, a glass sheet. Um, so on the
in the past year, what's the biggest
thing that's changed for the
thermosiphen?
>> Well, I would say the most important
thing to mention is that we've made a
major leap towards reaching the
performance targets we set out. Um, if
you recall last year, we mentioned that
our performance target is to reach the
same roughly the same performance level
as today's best all-in-one water
coolers. And we're very happy and
excited to show you a prototype here
this year uh that's actually like
reaching that target. Last year we were
uh demoing on a 9,800 X3D. I stressed
that it was not a performance demo. It
was a functional demo to show you that
we are okay to run like typical
workloads, but this is like around 100
watts territory. Um this year we are uh
running a 9950X3D
at 230 watt pitting um our uh latest
prototype against our AIO
>> and looks like a OCCT here running the
test.
>> Absolutely stress test. This is all
fluctuating here a little bit. It's not
a lab environment but you can see that
the moment the thermosiphen prototype is
at 81° C. Uh the all-in-one is at 81.5.
Um the the point to demonstrate is not
that this is slightly better than the
other but just they are roughly on the
same level
>> trying to get at least performance
parody for thermals I guess. Um what uh
we've kind of gone over some of the
basics of like what you guys are trying
to do for the last year but one of the
things I remembered was you had a wall
of like six different cold plates or
something. Did you end up deciding on
what direction to go with those?
>> Yeah, I think we are are pretty set on a
specific direction now. Um last year uh
a lot of the stuff we done and we've
experimented with uh was about dealing
with the high heat flux densities of
modern CPUs and the issue these hotspots
create for two-phase coolers. Um if you
remember last year we uh discussed the
thermodynamics background of the boiling
curve and uh that point of critical heat
flux where uh vaporization becomes so
intense that uh bubbles not only rise
and uh form full streams and jets
columns of of vapor but actually uh
vapor cushions form against the surface
and thermally insulate the surface
against the working fluid. uh which then
uh causes excessive temperature exactly
at that those points where you need
cooling the most.
>> You still have a version of that chart
here today. Is that over here? Yeah,
>> we've uh shrked it down a little bit so
that we can fit in all the other stuff.
Um but we still have uh that boiling
curve here. Um that starts with the
phase of nucleate boiling isolated
bubbles then from the inflection point
on goes into jets and columns. And
here's the point of critical heat flux
from where um the uh amount of heat that
we can transfer per excess temperature.
So temperature above the separ
separation temperature of the working
fluid draps drops drastically until the
light and frost point where the film
boiling phase starts and the hot surface
is fully insulated with a vapor film. So
that's still uh the background we're uh
we're battling with. Um but we've taken
a slightly different approach in the
end. A lot of the cold plates we've
shown last year uh were focused on um
like mitigating that uh hot spot
formation on a um structural level. Um
paradoxically making the the inside
surface of the evaporator um a little
bit cooler where the hot spot is so that
we don't run into these uh kind of
phenomena. And what we ended up doing
now is that we um actually have vertical
guiding ridges that have the main
purpose of um making the fluid
circulation inside the evaporator more
controlled, more predictable. And with
having better circulation inside, we are
becoming less dependent on that specific
hotspot u optimization because we have
more fluid going over the surface
removing heat.
>> Is is there I'm sure there's a purpose
for it. the height difference here
between so walk me through that.
>> Definitely. So when we look at it at a
micro level, um the first thing that's
important to point out is that when
vapor rises, it also drags liquid fluid
up with the vapor. Um and what we want
to have is a um as smooth as possible
recirculation of that liquid down in the
evaporator and up again. And um the
different height ridges allow for
pathways of for the liquid to circulate
back down uh without being disrupted by
turbulence from the from the upstream uh
vapor and liquid with the circulation
being more predictable and more
controlled. we have uh less issues of
vapor basically shooting out that so
violently towards the top uh that it
drags up um drops of of liquid fluid
into the into the vapor line
>> basically traffic jam is what I came to
when you were describing it but you're
just talking about I guess is this uh is
this liquid here bubbles of liquid
>> droplets basically clogging the uh the
vapor line restricting its uh its
efficient diameter and thereby
increasing uh the the fluid resistance
for the vapor to rise. And any kind of
this undesired uh uh flow impedance in
parts of the system um can cause uh the
the performance to go down. And this is
why it's so important to make um both
the evaporator circulation in the
evaporator but also the condenser work
more predictably. Um because whenever we
have situations like for example in the
condenser um uh of in this case
premature condensing where in one or
more of the of the micro channels of the
condenser the fluid uh condenses before
it actually should uh that increases uh
flow resistance through the condenser
and then may end up with fluid liquid
fluid pooling in the condenser and less
fluid being available in the evaporator
which can lead to dry out conditions in
the in the worst case
>> with an AIO. Typically they'll leave a
little bit of air in the liquid cooler
for you know a number of reasons
shipping being one of them. But uh with
a thermosiphen
do you follow the same principles? Do
you leave any air in it at all?
>> No we absolutely don't want any air
inside our system uh the system uh um we
create a vacuum in the system before
filling in the refrigerant. Uh and
that's crucial because any uh
non-condensible gases would um uh
accumulate uh in the condenser and then
actually reduce the uh the performance
of the condenser insulated towards uh
towards the fins where the where the
heat where the fans can then remove the
air. Um over the years um permeation
will introduce minutes amount amounts of
air. But this is precisely why we are so
uh careful and deliberate in selecting
the tubing materials uh to make sure
that we reach a 10-year lifespan without
any significant impact of performance
due to to permeation. When you look at a
water cooling radiator, you just care
about the delta t between inlet and
outlet. How that happens, where that
happens, you don't care. With a
condenser, if you have premature
condensation in one of the micro
channels and then increased fluid
resistance in that channel, that's a
major problem. Or conversely, if you
cool down the working fluid too much,
you end up with a phenomenon called
subcooling where the returning liquid is
too cold and takes long longer to vap
vaporize. And uh basically that means
that the system is working in a
singlephase uh stage until the the
liquid reaches uh the desired boiling
point and the entire system is not
optimized for single phase. Right.
>> So you really need to uh adjust fill
rate, pressure and temperature gradients
within all parts of the system. Uh make
sure that the fluid balance is is ideal
in all parts of the system to ensure
consistent performance. So what's what's
going on here? I see non-treated surface
surface with micro layer. This is giving
me some hints. And then micro layer of
porous cin copper also sounds like some
some concepts taken from other parts of
cooling.
What what is it special you guys are
showing here?
>> Micro layer of scinted copper is very
critical to ensuring the performance
levels we're seeing now and to increase
hotspot resistance as well. Um so it's
pretty similar technically uh as what
you use in a cinder copper heat pipe. Um
so small copper particles that form a
porous uh mesh and uh the the the
benefit of this structure is quite
similar to what you have in a heat pipe
that you have very strong capillary
action but at the same time the porous
structure allows uh for enough pathways
for vapor to escape. So we're not
running into these conflicts here and
also the v vapor pressure is generally
high enough to break through um layers
of liquid fluid. compared to a heat
pipe, the technical situation is
different in the sense that we're in a
pool boiling environment, meaning that
in a heat pipe, um you have liquid flow
only through the wick and the open area
in the middle is vapor. In our case,
we're in a pool where vapor has to find
its uh its path outwards of the of the
weted surface. Um due to the high
surface area of the of the copper weak
structure um we have better heat
transfer, better nucleation and this is
not a puzzle piece to avoid the vapor
blankets forming.
>> Um I guess a vapor blanket really just
creates an does it create an insulating
layer?
>> Yeah, totally. For for any uh typical
working fluid uh the gaseous phase of
the fluid is uh um higher thermal
resistance than the liquid phase. And
that means that if you have a vapor
blanket forming somewhere, it will
insulate from a from a thermal
perspective. And that's why it's so
critical to avoid this,
>> right? You you want to use the phase
change for its benefit, I guess, and
then kind of get it out of the way as
quick as possible.
>> Yeah, absolutely. Um, if we look at it
at a bit more micro level, um, it's
actually the so-called evaporating
miniscus uh that does the heavy lift
heavy lifting. That's the the extremely
thin um minuscule um vapor to liquid
interfaces that form within all these
crevices of the of the mesh structure.
And zooming in uh deeper one more once
more. Um the way the miniscus works is
that we have an absorbed film region
where uh the the film liquid film is
extremely thin. So adhesion forces are
very high and thermal interface
resistance is very high. So not much
ever evaporation going on at all. And
then we have the thicker bulk region
where the liquid film is so thick um
that the thermal resistance is also
quite high. But the intermediate
transition uh region is where the magic
really happens. Um because the the
thermal resistance is low and when the
fluid evaporates uh it will cool off the
thin liquid layer and then that
increases surface tension and you're
getting these Maragoldi stresses or
Marangoni flows that pull additional
liquid uh downwards uh to vaporize
again. And uh yeah, the vaporizing
liquid is drawing in additional
capillary actions. And uh yeah, that's
the beauty of the of the um yeah uh
vaporization enhancing surface. This
cold plate here is actually with the
surface uh enhancement applied with the
porous copper layer. You may wonder why
it looks grayish. That's due to the
additives that we use to control um pore
size. Um tuning the pore size, the
particle size, and the the the layer
thickness of of the entire thing is
crucial to really getting the best out
of it.
>> Right. Let's uh let's hop over to the
AIO and wrap there. Yeah. Okay. So, on
the AIO, we actually we just got these
into the office. You'd sent them. So,
we'll be testing those soon and you
know, posting benchmarks uh on the
channel. So, we'll we'll have all those
numbers pretty soon, but you guys do
have some interesting stuff to talk
about here, too. One of my favorite
tests. I still haven't been able to use
a vibrometer for any kind of testing
yet, but I've seen them in a lot of
labs. And this is, correct me if I'm
wrong, I I think when we've seen these,
it's been for like video cards and power
supplies where they'll shoot lasers at
it to basically look for really, I'll
say, microscopic movement in the
surface, right, for noise.
>> Definitely. It's a contactless uh
surface vibration measurement device. Uh
and the reason why we care so much about
uh surface level vibration is because uh
the the vibration will typically
translate into airborne noise and uh
obviously we want to cut down on that as
much as we possibly can.
>> Just looking at the frequency, you know,
spectrum and spread. I'm seeing it looks
like maybe some improvement in some of
this like 2K or 20 2500, but the chart
up there it really looks like most the
improvement is going to be in that we'll
say like 4,000 plus hertz range. Yeah, I
would say we definitely have some
improvements in the lower frequency
areas as well. You can see uh those
spikes around like what is this maybe
330 uh 500 uh 6 uh 670 they are slightly
reduced but the bulk of the improvement
is definitely uh in this like 1500 to
2,000 uh hertz zone and then the 3 kHz
to 10 kHz zone. So we're really uh we're
really significantly reducing the high
frequency noise content. Um that's also
something that's clearly audible in in
the video. we can we can uh share that
maybe you can you can cut that in. It
will also be available on YouTube from
our side. Um so the important message
that we uh that we want to get across is
that uh sound pressure level reduction
in terms of like dBA is is one important
thing. We're seeing typically one to
four dBA low noise levels with uh the um
the noise damping cover installed. Um,
but the sound quality improvement is
another very important aspect uh that
may often be easier to to perceive for
customers than the actual SPL drop. Last
year we were still looking at the 3D
printed dummy. Now we have the final uh
foam here uh two layers of uh open pore
soft acoustic form uh and a dense
barrier in between to uh target the
lower frequencies. Um the whole um pump
noise absorber is mounted on these uh
floating silicon mounts uh that ensure
that uh no vibrations or as little as
possible uh as few vibrations as
possible are transmitted uh to the outer
shell of the cover. And uh as we've
discussed last year uh the entire
assembly works both as an uh acoustic
soundproofing device but also as a tube
mass damper that reduces vibrations.
>> Right. Um what are we looking at for
these like uh sort of distribution maps?
What is that showing?
>> So you can see um our uh damping cover
uh at the bottom here and and two covers
with screens above. And what we can see
from the measurements is that the covers
with screens have a much higher um uh
vibration amplitude and a much bigger
gradient in terms of high to low uh
versus our cover having a lower
amplitude in general. and uh a much
smoother gradient. So we can spread the
entire vibr v vibratory energy over a uh
smaller surface area and this uh will
transmit uh into airborne noise uh much
less than these high uh differences in
terms of uh vibration amplitude. So the
way psycho acoustics work and the way
these types of analysis work is that we
use mathematic standardized mathematical
models that have been developed um uh in
in the scientific literature and then
score um recordings based on that uh on
these on these models and uh yeah so in
this sense it is uh very controlled very
reproducible and not something
subjective in the sense of you and me
listening to the video and you say it
sounds better I say it sounds worse. Uh
this is like uh as controlled as it gets
uh for something that uh is intended to
reflect subjective perception
>> objective basis for noise. Yeah. I mean
for example like uh typically higher
frequency people find more annoying. So
there's some objective truth to that.
But
>> totally we we discussed about the
frequency spectrum and how we uh can uh
very efficiently reduce high frequency
content. Um and uh that is for example
reflected in the sharpness core.
Sharpness uh is a metric that describes
how much high frequency uh content you
have in the acoustic spectrum. And you
can see that we're doing much better
with the cover. Um loudness is another
key metric um where uh that describes
describes perceived intensity of the
sound but it's not directly translatable
into dba db or even dba that can be
converted into like physical pascal
pressure differences because it factors
in um things like um sensitivity to
critical bands um temporal composition
of the of the sound signal. Um yeah, and
those are all the the the um the
complexities of acoustics that get lost
in a simple DBA score.
>> Um you mentioned annoyance before. Um
it's uh um not uh maybe not as commonly
known as I don't know loudness,
sharpness, tonality, roughness. Uh this
is something very a lot of people know.
Annoyance is a composite score that
basically uh combines all the other key
scores. So from from our perspective
it's maybe the most important one
because it shows uh that the overall um
net result is is very positive with our
cover.
>> What's the uh unit of measurement here?
Are you
>> uh this is just for psycho acoustic uh
annoyance. It's a dimensionless abstract
unit. So it it cannot be converted into
anything because it's based on on
subjective perception.
>> Cool. Uh, one thing I just realized is
that we should um mention the
differences. I think for regarding uh
last year's data regarding the the SPL
measurements because some viewers may
remember that last year we had an
average improvement of I think it was
5.7 dBA. Now we're uh talking about 1.4.
Why is that? Did the cover get worse?
>> Was this the because you were testing
free floating rubber band suspension
versus
>> Yeah, exactly. Um so last year's data
was in a lab pump suspended on rubber
bands. Um so we have no way for the
vibration or acoustic energy to go
except uh into the cover. Um and this
data now here has been collected on a
real user setup uh AM5 in installed
inside the Antiflux Pro Noctu Edition
case. And in such a scenario obviously
we have limited control over how
vibration and uh yeah resonance uh
spread through the CPU through the
motherboard and into the case. That's
the first reason why we're um seeing
slightly lower scores. Now, the second
reason is that we changed the me
measurement methodology. Last year's
data was from a standard um uh fixed
distance between uh the microphone and
uh the noise uh radiating surface um
methodology and now we've uh switched uh
to keeping the distance between uh the
original source of noise and the
microphone constant. So that actually
means that the microphone is closer to
the noise radiating surface uh with the
cover installed just to make sure that
we we cannot be accused of like uh uh
using a test condition that would favor
favor our own product. Um so they do
have other stuff too. We already filmed
the uh thermal grizzly wire view
collaboration that's on the channel if
anyone's curious. But that'll wrap us
for the thermosiphon and for the cooler
the AIO. There's also the pad video
coming out separately. Jacob, thank you
again.
>> My pleasure. Thanks for coming.
Absolutely.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video features an interview with Jacob from Noctua at Computex, focusing on their ongoing development of a thermosiphon CPU cooler and a new liquid AIO cooler. Key highlights include improvements to the thermosiphon's performance stability using refined evaporator designs and vertical ridges for better fluid circulation, alongside the implementation of a specialized porous copper layer to manage heat hotspots. The segment on the AIO cooler dives into advanced acoustic testing, utilizing vibrometers and psychoacoustic analysis to demonstrate how a custom noise-damping cover improves sound quality by reducing high-frequency noise and overall annoyance levels, despite smaller absolute SPL reductions in real-world scenarios compared to initial lab tests.
Videos recently processed by our community