Joe Rogan Experience #2479 - Bob Lazar & Luigi Vendittelli
4800 segments
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
>> The Joe Rogan Experience.
>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
NIGHT. All day.
>> We're up.
>> Hey Joe.
>> Great to see you again, Bob.
>> Same here. Long time.
>> Luigi.
>> Joe.
>> Um, you are still to this day the most
watched ever podcast we have ever done.
That's on YouTube.
>> That's That's just unreal. It's unreal.
It is unreal because it it shows you how
many people are just absolutely
fascinated by the story and what you
guys have done in this new film is
essentially recreate S4 and using AI,
recreate you as a young man and these
experiences that you had and it was
really excellent. Luigi, uh you're the
one who put the film together. you
figured it all out. And first of all,
what was the technology that you guys
used to recreate everything that you
did?
>> I I just want to say there's there's
about 10% AI in the film, but there's
90% Blender, and that's actually
handmade CGI. So everything you see is
all handmade.
And even the deaging of Bob Lazar, we
scanned Bob. We went over to his house,
scanned his face, took a process of
deaging him through that, then creating
a digital model of Bob in different ages
and then placing him in the environment.
And then in some instances at the very
end, we perfected or kind of put a bow
on it with a little touch of AI, but the
whole thing is handmade. So the craft,
the environment, the papoose slake, the
the the facility, the equipment, and the
people were all made. And some of the
people are actually real actors that we
put in there. So it's not it's it's
there's one of the guys that is Barry in
the film is a guy called Luis Martinez
that's been working with me for the past
10 years, and he laughs at it because he
goes, "I can't believe I'm Barry." You
know? So
>> does he look anything like Barry?
>> Actually, he does. He does.
>> That's why we chose him.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Where is Barry? the actual Barry. Now,
>> I don't know. You know, I kind of
thought at one point after all this
happened, we would at least hear from
one of those guys, but uh I never heard
from anybody after, you know, after the
the initial
release of all the information. Yeah, it
seems like, wow, I don't know. If people
are able to keep secrets for this long,
it's got to be very difficult to just
blurt it out. like, you know, you're
holding on to a secret for 20, 30, 40
years. You're
>> it's like
>> I guess these guys were lifers, though.
>> Yeah.
>> I mean, they spent most of their time
there. They spent at least two weeks at
a time and then one week off. So, they
stayed at the base. I mean, these guys
were hardcore. I had just come in on the
project, you know. So, um
I don't know. I don't know what happened
to him. I'd love to know. I suspect that
Dennis Mariani, my supervisor, died.
I've seen people track him down, you
know, all the way to point to speaking
to his family and they said, "Yeah, he
had some classified job out in the
desert or something and they showed me
his gravestone and stuff." So, you know,
at least they were able to track him
down. But I've never heard of any leads
on Barry or Renee or anybody like that.
>> What is it like seeing the recreation of
it in a film? cuz I mean essentially it
was your
direction for lack of a better word,
your description of it, you you telling
them exactly how everything was laid out
and then once they recreated it, what is
that feeling like when you watch it?
Well, the final product is absolutely
mindblowing because as I've said to
Luigi, it looks like you guys downloaded
that out of my brain. I mean, you know,
you can describe something a hundred
times and until you actually make a a
picture, it doesn't become clear. But,
uh, you know, this took years. I think
it was like five and a half years from
when I first met Luigi and he said,
"Yeah, I can do this." And um the
quality kept improving to where he
started showing me pictures and I went,
"Jesus, that's that's really it. It's
not really it. It's really it." And uh I
mean, it it blew me away. Later on, he
showed me a 3D environment where I could
put goggles on and move around inside. I
mean, that made the hair stand up on my
arms. It was it was unbelievable. So,
um, I don't know if I could really
describe how that made me feel, but it
felt like I was teleported back there.
And that's, you know, that's when really
I developed an admiration for Luigi's
talent. I said, I, you know, I'm behind
this. And, uh, flew out to Canada a
couple times. I didn't have much to do
with the film other than, I guess, a
couple times going out there and going,
"No, that's right. That's the wrong
color. Move this here. Do that." And uh
but those guys spent over three years
working on it. And um you know what they
and they never showed me anything. You
know, I'd speak to Luigi, you know, a
couple times a month and you know, he'd
always say, "You you oh my god, you
won't believe this." I said, "Show me.
No, it's not it's not done yet." So I
really didn't get it to to to see
anything till close to the end. But when
I did um
really without trying to sound dramatic,
it really put tears in my eyes going
that that's it. That's it. You you did
it. Just stop. It's perfect.
>> So I had the pleasure of watching the
movie with you and sitting there with
you. There was a bunch of times during
the movie you were like,
>> "Yeah." Yeah.
>> Like you could tell
>> Yeah.
>> that it was just like
>> I swear I could feel that place. I I
could feel it watching that movie. It it
it just it really freaks me out because
as I've said before, it's not like what
I saw. It's it's exactly what I saw. Um
it's it's perfect. It's just like Luigi
was at S4 with a camera. So, um
>> was very unique. It worked. It's a it's
a very unique documentary in that
regard. and and watching it with you,
seeing you experience this thing and
then me trying to imagine what it's like
for you. You're this young scientist who
gets brought in on this thing without
much explanation and then all of a
sudden you're confronted by this craft
and you you know the way it's broken
down in the film and you get to actually
see you viewing this thing and being in
the presence of this thing for the first
time. It's just very I could just only
imagine what that must have been like
for you. And it's so weird to watch you
watch it again and see your wheels spin.
What the happened to my life, man?
>> What did they do to me? What did they
what did they make me experience? Like
what the hell?
>> Yeah. I I I really can't fill in the
blanks there. It's uh I I want to just
say that there was a time when Bob got
angry at me a lot cuz I wouldn't show
him and he was like, "Come on, show me."
And I said, "It's not ready yet. I don't
want to show you something." But at a
certain point, we had to. And Bob
started remembering more stuff.
>> Yeah, that's true. M it really made a
big difference when he when he showed me
some things and you know walking down
the Carter here and turn oh stop wait
there's another door there I mean it was
like I was going back into the facility
and uh really brought I mean actually
seeing it again uh really brought some
things back that I that I had completely
forgotten about. So that you know
>> well what's really fascinating is for
people that don't know your story you
came up with the story you talked to
George Knapp and was it 89
>> 88
>> 88 89 somewhere in there.
>> Yeah.
late 80s you've essentially told the
exact same story all these years and
then within the last you know 9 10 years
we've started to get all these reports
there was the New York Times story there
was the goast video and the fleer video
and all these videos that show a craft
that's moving the way you described this
sport model moving
>> right
>> which kind freaked a lot of people out
with the way it rotated and turned.
>> Rotate. Yeah. Does the belly roll faces
at the bottom towards where it's want to
go and then it it takes off and Yeah.
>> It's exactly how you described all those
years ago, which is really
crazy.
>> Well, that's I mean that's the way it
was.
>> But it's just it's it's crazy because
you had this story way way way back then
and everybody's like this guy's just
making things up. This is all cockami
And then you see those videos
from these fighter jets and you're like,
wait a minute. This is it's moving the
exact same way he described. It's doing
what he described in 1989.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
Um
>> time to take a drink. Cheers.
>> Cheers.
>> Cuz it's so weird. I can't. I mean, I've
had so many conversations with people
and you know, one of the things that
comes up is, uh, do you think Bob Lazar
is telling the truth? And I say, look, I
don't know. There's no way I can know,
but he doesn't seem like he's lying.
I've been around a lot of liars.
>> Look, nobody can know unless you're
there. You know, I'm the biggest skeptic
of all. Although, if you look at
Wikipedia, it says I'm a conspiracy
>> theorist or something. Conspiracy
theorist. I
>> think it says I'm a faright podcaster.
>> Yeah. Right. I mean, yeah, it's crazy.
But, uh, you know, that's my train of
thought now.
>> Well, they that that if if you like
basically, are you a conspiracy
theorist? No, you don't even look at
this stuff.
>> Well, you've had if you have a lie, you
have one lie and it's amazing because
you've told the same one for all these
years.
>> It's a pretty detailed lie.
>> It's also not normal. Like normally when
people lie they get bored with the same
lie and then they come up with another
lie and there's some other story some
you catch them eventually you catch them
there's some cockami new thing that they
come up with and it's the type of people
that are that deceptive I mean it's just
it doesn't make sense it doesn't fit the
standard model of someone
>> well there are other people involved
with it I mean this is for the first
time Gan Huff finally is on film you
know because when I had the you know the
test flight information. Um he was one
of the not one of the he was the first
person I told about that and uh you know
we were all able to go out and and see
it and so everybody knew that I wasn't
crazy. Um it was
>> and then also all the confirmation that
you were being with that you know
when you were in the gym they would show
up and open up your locked car doors and
open up your trunk and leave it there so
you'd go out there and see it. They'd go
to your house when you weren't there.
>> Yeah. They were even Right. They were
even following George Knapp and and uh I
mean all of us, anybody that had
anything to do with it at that time.
Yeah.
>> Uh they were keeping eyes on. It was uh
>> not just eyes, but a lot of intimidation
tactics. Just letting you know,
>> letting you know that they could touch
you.
>> Yeah. It's a I I've really worked for
decades to push this out of my mind. So,
it's always tough to bring it back, you
know, and and talk about it. And it's
yeah, although it might be funny now, it
wasn't funny then at all. Um, it was a
really stressful time and still is a
very stressful thing for me.
>> I know it's so many years ago, but do
you remember the thought that came in
your mind when you realized that it
wasn't ours?
>> Do I remember the thought?
>> Do you remember the experience? Yeah, I
I remember the feeling
>> of recogni because initially you saw the
American flag.
>> Yeah. When I saw the American flag when
I first went in it the first time I went
in through the hanger door instead of
around the back. Um you know slid my
hand across it saw the American flag and
I thought, "Oh my god, you know, this
explains the UFO nuts." You know, um
>> it's ours.
>> Yeah, this is ours. This is a new top
secret fighter. we came up with a new
propulsion system and uh you know it
explains everything because I never
believed in flying saucers. I thought
people were nuts. Um
but when they started reviewing
everything with me, they were trying I
was trying to replace somebody or they
were trying to use me to replace
somebody as quick as possible and um
they had two directives. One was to
directive one was to duplicate the
technology with available material at
any cost, which is exact verbatim what
it was. And directive two was to be able
to disable this technology at a distance
at any cost. And
you know, once you start thinking about
that, wait, don't you guys know how the
thing you built worked? And it's kind of
like they left that out that this, by
the way, this isn't ours. And Barry is
the guy that filled me in going, "No,
no, no. This is an alien craft." And we
need to figure out how this works. Look
at the technology here. I mean, this is
decades, light years ahead of where we
are. And uh
I I it it was a it was a shock really to
me. I remember going home that night and
just laying in bed and reviewing
everything that everybody said that day.
And uh
I really don't remember
how I felt the following days, but I it
was just a different it was just a
different feeling.
>> Like the world just changed.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
>> Yeah. It was
>> I don't know. I really can't put it into
words.
>> Well, I couldn't imagine I couldn't
imagine what that experience is like.
And it's also very strange that they
would bring you in and not specifically
state to you that this is not ours. They
just bring you in and just give you a
directive. This is your what you are
trying to accomplish.
>> Well, they gave me the they gave me a
bunch of briefings. Everything was
moving at a very fast pace and I don't
know why. Um I think I mentioned in the
movie uh right prior to I got there the
there were Russians involved and it you
know from what I can ascertain there was
an exchange of information and then we
discovered something something of great
importance and of course kicked the
Russians out and just held on to that
information ourselves and uh there was
kind of a knowledge vacuum there. There
was also an accident and I was told I
was replacing someone uh that was
injured. I believe he actually died. Um
>> there's no record of who this person was
or has anybody tried to figure it out.
>> I don't know. I don't have any names. I
just know that Barry told me, you know,
I'm replacing somebody that he used to
work with and he was without a lab
partner for a while. So when I came in
there, um
>> how long is a while?
>> I don't know. But I mean that brings up
a good point.
First of all, we're dealing with alien
or another civilization technology,
whether it, you know, it's from another
dimension, another time, another planet.
I mean, who really knows? Um, so
I'll eventually get to answer the
question here, but uh wouldn't you think
this place would be more like the lunar
receiving lab where everything is white?
you know, so you can see a speck of
dust. There's everything is sterile.
People are being extremely careful with
what they're doing, but you're not
seeing that. This is in now something
akin to an aircraft hanger in the middle
of the desert. There is dust on
everything. People are taking everything
nonchalantly. There's a there's a
freaking poster about the thing, you
know, they're here, poster there. Um,
>> and thank you, Luigi, for getting me. We
got to figure out a place for that and
put it in here somewhere.
>> It's awesome. I think but but I mean
they went to the trouble of making a
poster. They actually
>> I think right here.
>> That's a good place.
>> Right. That's a good spot right there.
>> Um but the uh I mean they actually cut
one of the amplifiers out of the craft.
So that my point is
>> this is in the film as well. You could
see.
>> Yeah. But my my point is it's so
nonchalant
at this point. when they first had it,
it had to be at that level and they
became so used to it,
so familiar with it that, you know, to
them it just became like another, you
know, fighter aircraft or something from
another country. So it's uh it must have
been there a long time is what my point
is
because look as soon as you have
something that unique
you don't let it just sit there in a
hanger and be exposed to the environment
and have security people walking by and
people touching it. I mean it's in an
isolated sealed secure environment and
they were past that. So I think it had
been there for a decade or decades a
long time. And these guys were
intimately familiar with it, not afraid
of it, you know, and knew what was going
on.
>> So they essentially had gotten just
completely acclimated to the fact that
this craft exists, that it was there,
and there had been relatively little
progress as far as figuring it out and
figuring out what it does and how to
recreate it. So it just kind of sat
there. And so
>> I think they were making very little
progress. And I think they kept going
over the same road again and again and
they probably had other experts there
and just didn't and I think the reason I
got hired is because I was a guy out in
left field that didn't necessarily
follow what was going on. I mean, the
biggest distractors in the in in in,
you know, to me anyway, in the story,
um, are other scientists, other
physicists. Well, they would have hired
me because I'm the top guy in the field.
Yeah, you you probably are, but I think
they hired plenty of you guys. And you
just kept going down the same road and
didn't do anything. I think they were
looking for somebody that just would
have some radical idea and just to push
the, you know, the project forward
because everything had stalled when I
got there and it was I I think they were
just in a desperate move to make some
progress. One of the things you talked
about in the first podcast that I think
is really important is that the only way
for science to really progress is that
these various
scientists have to be able to
communicate and you have to be able to
share ideas and you have to be able to
collaborate. But that's not how this was
run because it was so top secret.
Everything was compartmentalized.
like the metallurgists weren't talking
to the propulsions people who weren't
talking to if there were biologics
experts like everybody
>> super frustrating super frustrating
because I I think I I don't remember
exactly where that started again it's 40
years ago but I think it started with uh
with the seats
and uh no it it started with the actual
skin of the craft because everything
looked like it was made from the same
material and I wanted some information
um about you the skin the superructure
of the craft and they said no that's
that's restricted what's you know we we
need a reason for you to I I just want
to see if everything is exactly the same
material and what I call the seats in
the craft I still don't know if they're
the seats but they might be I think it'd
be hilarious if they were actually
something else um but I wanted some
information on those and that was
restricted information too. There were
other groups working on that. So they
compartmentalized stuff so much. There
was no exchange of information between
any groups. I mean you could submit a
written response that your supervisor in
my case Dennis would have to carry over
and they would have to approve and you
know you'd get a two or three line
response from you know the other group.
But that's it's just that's not how
science works. science works on the free
exchange of information and it they they
were just killing themselves with
security and uh it was it was really
frustrating. It was terribly
frustrating.
>> So was this a function of security
people people that are concentrated on
top top security that don't truly
understand how collaborative science
works?
>> Yeah, that's it right there. You can
stop right there that they had no idea
how that works
>> because it stands to reason that
whatever that thing was made out of
probably in some way interacts with the
propulsion system and whatever controls
that are in it that this material has to
be particularly unique.
>> Exactly. That's exactly my point. And I
suspected the material was an electric.
You know what an electric is?
>> No. Okay. You know, like a magnet, a
permanent magnet is like,
you know, it's a magnet. It's forever.
It's a magnet. It has a magnetic field.
>> An electric is a material that has a
permanent static field to it,
>> a static electric field to it. And I
strongly suspected that's that the craft
was made out of an electric. And I was
not because again that's the material
science guys. I was not allowed to
connect that too. But that's a that
that's so important to connect it to the
propulsion system and how the propulsion
system uh interacts with the amplifier
or the emitters. And I just I I wasn't
allowed, you know, the information I
needed. So it was uh
>> I don't know. It it it was
self-defeating is what it It seems like
they were treating it like a fighter jet
or a automobile. Like in an automobile,
you have the outer area, the shell of
the car. You have the doors, the skins,
the hood, the roof, all that stuff,
which is me. But then you have the
propulsion system, which is the engine,
and the transmission and the tires and
the wheels and the suspension.
>> But they're all not connected. They're
connected because they're bolted
together, but they have different
functions, right? I think the idea or
the concept at least is as I'm gathering
from you is that this thing all worked
as a cohesive unit
>> right with no physical connection
between
you know between the subsystems
>> and all of it made out of the same
material
>> at least on the outside at least on the
outside all made of the same material
and the other crafts all had the same
power plant in them so that brings to
mind, you know, like a like a GM plant
that makes a car with a Chevy 350 and
makes, you know, a dozen different
models to it,
>> right?
>> So, that makes you think about, boy, is
there a a factory making these things?
And, um, you know, your brain can just
wander off in directions, but I tried to
stick with just the technology. Um,
>> did you know who the metallurgists were?
the people that were
>> Oh, I s I saw them, you know, I know
them. And Barry, we'd go to the
lunchroom, Barry would point them out,
you know,
>> and you weren't allowed to communicate
with them at all.
>> Oh, hell no. You have a a lab partner,
which my in in uh my case was Barry, and
you're you have you're allowed to talk
to your lab partner, but you can't talk
to any other group. That has to go
through a written request. has to go to
your um supervisor and he'll bring it
over to them and they'll bring it back
and so on and so forth. But uh yeah,
that's that's ridiculous that that that
it slows down any progress you might be
making,
>> which is why they were probably stalled
out for decades.
>> Yeah.
>> Did you ever expressly
communicate to them that you
you theorized at least that this all
could be connected? that there's there's
something about the way the metal works.
>> Oh, we all knew that. We all knew that
because we'd get requests from other,
you know, from other groups and you
could tell they're desperate just like
we are and and and fighting against the
system.
>> What kind of requests would you get?
>> Just exactly what we found out. You know
what? Where is the energy being
transferred here? If the reactor fires
up, is there a field present around it
or is the field just absorbed into the
emitter and you can touch the, you know,
reactor itself? And I just l little
things like that, you know, if uh and
actually that that was an important
thing when the reactor is operating,
is it perfectly tuned the uh emitter to
where it removes all the energy from the
reactor and pushes it out the bottom?
And the the answer to that was no. I
remember that as a specific request from
you know from one of the groups. Um the
metallergy group is the one that we
really wanted to hear from. Uh and some
of the group I didn't I don't even know
what some of the other groups were.
But how many groups were there?
>> I I don't know. There were only 22
people there total including myself.
So, um
I I would like for you to tell Joe one
of the things that also interested me
because I built the craft is how the
wave guide worked with the ceiling in in
the interior and how it blended. If you
can explain, there was no telescopic.
>> Well, this is why we wanted to talk to
the metallurgist people. The uh the
reactor that sits on the bottom of the
craft has a little dome over it and
there's something that looks like a pipe
that's slide. You can lift it up and
take the reactor out. Put the reactor in
and lift it down. But you know like a
antenna works on an old walkie-talkie.
>> It has different sections.
>> There it is. There's from the video.
>> There it is. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Um,
yeah, you can retract the pipe, but
there's no sections and it doesn't get
any thicker.
It just becomes smaller. And if you look
underneath,
um, where the emitters hang down, um,
they turn
it, and it it it doesn't buckle. It's
it's a magical material. This is the
this is the basis of the craft is really
the material that it's made of. It's a
it's amazing the way it works. It just
you can push it into a smaller volume
and it doesn't change at all. It doesn't
it doesn't get bigger physically. It's
um I don't really know how to describe.
>> So you're lifting the pipe up and down
but it's not going anywhere. Look, if
you had a big pipe
>> Mhm.
>> and you push it together, it has to get
thicker,
>> right?
>> Because the material has to go
somewhere. This doesn't.
>> Okay. It stays in exactly the same
dimensions. It just becomes smaller.
>> How?
>> Well, yeah,
>> because you couldn't talk to the
metallergist, so you have no idea.
>> Yeah, but those guys knew how.
>> They did know how.
>> I Well,
>> well, they know it did it.
>> They know it. They know it did it. And
that's their job. So, I imagine they
have more information than I did. Um,
but that was fascinating. It really was.
And the uh the waveguides that hold the
emitters, they come down and the
emitters can turn and bend and the pipes
bend and nothing changes in them. It's
And there's no wires or anything to make
the pipe bend.
Um,
I'm I'm trying to relate it to
something, but I can't think of anything
to relate it to.
>> Well, one thing that you said that I I
also thought was fascinating, this is no
seams, so everything looks like it's 3D
printed
>> again. Right. It comes down to the
material,
>> which at the time 3D printers weren't
real, right? They
>> Yeah. At the time that really confused
me. I said, "How did they build this? It
must have been built out of wax or
something and then melted. Um cuz you
can't build anything without seams. And
then 3D printing came into existence and
you know you could build stuff from
layers up. Um
that made sense. I know some sort of 3D
printer or they grew it uh you know in
some
of course it's not a crystal in fashion
but um
I I don't know how that was fabricated
but it was fabricated different than
anything that we have. I don't even
think it was 3D printed. And so you
never got any inkling or any
understanding of what the metal was,
what what kind of an alloy, what it
consisted of.
>> All I can say it was cold to the touch
because the you know when I when I
touched it, but um I can't say it was if
it was a ceramic or I say it was metal
because it was cold um
>> because it looks like metal.
>> And this is
>> Yeah, it looks like metal. Does that
This is the Designs by Perry um version
of it. Does that How much does that look
like? It
>> No, that's 100%. That's it.
>> It's got to have the uh the first ripple
supposed to be black.
>> Yeah. Right. See?
>> Yeah.
>> So, Luigi has gone over this. I mean, so
many things. Uh the
>> there's an insulator ring in
>> Jamie, show what it looks like in the
film. If you could show one of the
images. I don't I was pulling it off the
trailer and I don't they might not
they've been holding that back. Oh
>> yeah, on the trailer there's a ring
shot. I got it. Yeah, there's there's a
ring around it and we measured the
voltage on the craft and there was a
high voltage on it.
>> Um
and above that ring there is
>> this is not a good shot. There's
probably
>> this is the original trailer. It's the
new trailer that would actually Yeah,
that one there. And you'll get to see it
right
there. Actually, right after this,
it's actually before this. I believe
you're going to see the craft. And if
you see there's a black, right? There's
like a black line.
>> It's the first ripple. That's actually
not metal.
>> Yeah, we call that the Yeah, there it
is. That's a good shot. We call we call
that the insulator ring because below
that there's a high voltage present on
the craft all the time and above that
there isn't um
>> I would imagine that your life has like
two completely different chapters is
before this and after this whereas like
once you see it the whole rest of your
life is now going to be very different
and you are you are in in its presence
for how long would you work there for?
>> I don't know, maybe 6 months or so.
>> So for 6 months you're around this thing
and I would imagine has to occupy your
thoughts 24 hours a day.
>> Well, at the time it did for sure. It's
actually three stages to the life. It's
before it, during, and after it. Before
it was just my life. During was when it
happened and then the after part of my
life is almost trying to dismiss it, you
know, to just go on.
>> Yeah. You didn't talk about it for a
long time. I mean, you did the George
Nap interviews. You talked about it a
little. You made some videos explaining
things and how things worked.
>> No, I don't I don't really like public
attention and uh I don't really like
doing interviews. Um, as you probably
know and
you know, but um I know there's people
that thrive on that stuff, but you know,
uh
it I felt privileged to be part of the
project, but it left me with an
insatiable appetite. Oh my god, I want
to know where it's gone. Look, even when
I was there in the 80s, they were
talking about moving the project at that
time. So,
um
I really I I'm dying to know is it still
there? Has it moved on? So, did they
split it up and move it to other places?
Um yeah, I remember Barry talking about
moving it to uh the South Pacific like
in Quadrilan or something, but they said
the expenses were so great they couldn't
do that, but they wanted away from
everybody. and the they hated the fact
that it was right alongside the highway
in Nevada, you know, by south of Area
51. Uh but that's the best place they
had at the time and the most affordable.
And of course now with, you know,
budgets being so tight,
who knows where it is.
>> Well, who knows if budgets are tight for
this though. I mean,
>> yeah, that that's true. That's true.
>> I mean, they did say at whatever
expense, figure this out. Yeah, they
were serious about that. We don't really
care what it was. It was like the
original Apollo program, you know, back
in the Apollo program, if they needed
parts and if somebody had something
ordered UPS or through the mail or
whatever, they had the authority to stop
that shipment to that other person and
take their stuff if they needed it. And,
you know, they had an unlimited budget.
I mean, if you're working like that, you
could do anything.
and uh
>> or at least anything that's currently
possible with today's technology.
>> There you go.
>> Which there in lies the problem is that
they're dealing with something that's
not possible with like you couldn't
build it from scratch with American
technology in 1989.
>> No, but that's what they wanted to do.
And really thinking about that now, I'm
not sure I'm not exactly sure these guys
should be allowed to do that. This is
really powerful technology and the world
has really changed. I mean we have a lot
of crazy people doing stuff now and
nonsense
transmits through the population at the
speed of light and uh you know I don't
know this can be a very powerful world
conquering technology and look for 40
years I think I've said this before for
40 years all the people in control of
this information have all agreed to keep
it quiet and these aren't idiots idiots.
These aren't idiots for 40 years. You
have a line of people that all have
agreed, "No, let's not say anything. No,
let's not say anything. No, let's not
say anything." There has to be a reason
why.
And if they all agreed to that,
maybe I'm the
No, really. Maybe they're right. And
>> maybe you would have figured that out if
you kept working for them.
>> Yeah. I don't know. But I'm increasingly
thinking I'm the one that made the
mistake. Maybe this is supposed to be
just kept quiet. Yeah. But that doesn't
ring true because I don't think it's
ever healthy if small groups of
individuals have information that would
change our understanding of where we
are.
>> Yeah, there's that. There's that.
>> It's I don't think they I don't think
they deserve it. I don't think it's
right. I don't think it makes any sense.
I think you
>> I don't know. I mean, really, but really
think about it. What if it's something
that's really dramatic?
>> Like, how's like what do you think would
be like
>> I don't know. May maybe I mean, what if
it's I'm not saying this is what it is,
but I mean, what if it's like,
you know, like we like we raise cows out
in a field and just feed them grass and
they're just going to be food. What if
it's something like that? What if we're
just like, you know, a a population of
creatures that are just to be consumed
in some way?
>> I don't know if we're to be consumed,
but I do think we are
>> not physically consumed like eaten, but
I mean,
>> I think we have a task.
And I am uh more and more convinced as
time goes on that we were engineered.
>> I don't think we came about as a normal
evolutionary process like all the other
animals. Yeah, I I agree with that. I I
really agree with that, too.
>> There's a lot of people that think that
it just doesn't make sense objectively.
I mean without seeming like a cook or
someone who buys into conspiracy
theories, if you just look at all the
other biology on Earth, why is one so
uniquely able to manipulate its
environment, communicate instantaneously
at distance, do can't really even exist
in its environment in most places that
it lives without clothes and shelter.
We're a weird animal. We're we're very
strange. Like we don't seem to have
normally adapted to our environment with
the way we've completely controlled our
environment with air conditioning and
electricity and electronics and flight
and travel. We're so beyond everything
else that evolved. Whereas every other
animal, predator or prey, planteater or
meate eater, all seems to cohesively
exist inside of its ecosystem. And then
you have us, which is like almost like
an invasive species. Like invasive
species destroy ecosystems like because
they don't belong there.
>> Well, that's kind of what we do. Like we
suck all the fish out of the ocean. We
pollute the rivers with our technology,
you know, mess up underground water
systems with fracking and drink. We
We're like an invasive species in a lot
of ways.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> We're really weird. I can't argue with
that at all.
>> Yeah, this B Tim Bashett thing. Um, so
Tim Bashett has recently been talking
about this and that he can't talk about
it because it's classified, but he said
you'd be up at night with the things
that I've seen if the things that I've
seen have released.
>> Yeah. He said, "We just need you to
close disclose it all. I'm sick of it."
Uh, well, I was briefed and I will tell
you this. I was briefed last week on an
issue or excuse me two weeks ago and it
would have set the earth on this country
would have become unglued. I think if
they would have heard all that I heard.
>> Well, this is what I was talking about.
Yeah. If
>> you know it's not like there's a bunch
of space brothers coming down going,
"Oh, look what we discovered. You know,
here I have some information." And you
know what?
>> What if it's not that? What if all the
information is bad?
>> But what would be bad? Like have you
ever thought about this? Tried to like
play it out to its natural conclusion?
Like what do you think the scenarios
could be that's bad?
>> I don't know. Everything that we're
we're Look, we view ourselves at the top
of the food chain. What if we're not
anywhere near there?
>> I don't think we are.
>> Okay. What if we're just consumables?
>> Well, I don't know if like chimpanzees
are consumables, right? They're not at
the top of the food chain either, right?
But
>> no, but there's I I would consider them
substantially lower than we are, right?
Like my
>> my good friend that died, John Leer, who
had a bunch of crazy thoughts.
>> I mean, he used to come over and tell us
that uh
you know on the moon there was a soul
sucker and when you he did he said this,
you better give me that bottle.
>> Have another drink before you explain
this one.
Um,
>> oh boy, a soul sucker.
>> John Leer was a eccentric individual.
I'm kind of sad I never met him,
>> man. He he
>> supporting evidence.
>> He was a
>> what? Terrence McKenna talking about the
moon.
>> Yeah. No, and he'd give me pictures of
these giant antennas on the moon and
>> um in fact, I'll tell you a story. He um
uh you know, he was an accomplished
pilot. had many world records and and
things of that, you know, um part of the
Lear family that his father invented
autopilot, the eight track tape, all
kinds of stuff. And uh but he John Leer
was a loose cannon at the time. uh
he'd fly from Las Vegas and uh
you know shuttle L1011s which are giant
planes back and forth and he'd say uh
you know be kind of lonely. He goes,
"Hey, you want to go to Minneapolis
tonight?" He'd call me like at 9:00 at
night and say, "Well, no, not really.
Come on, come on, fly with me." He said,
"Just put on a suit and, you know, come
to so and so." And I'd go to McCarron
airport and you know go there and uh
yeah I'm going to tell everybody you're
you know an inspector from the FAA and
okay great you know and I get on the
plane and they said you know just act
like you're you know going to kick
everyone's ass. So I go on there and I'd
sit in the they fold down a jump seat
behind the plane and I just sit there
looking at everybody and
god all this stuff is so illegal and um
you know get on there and and fly and
you know John would take and the L1011
was a pretty advanced plane at the time.
This was in the 80s and uh you know John
would be smoking his pipe. He'd take
off. He'd put his feet up and smoke his
pipe and he'd fall asleep and I'd just
be, you know, hanging out there and, you
know, before the plane would land, he'd
just, you know, wake up and, you know,
be smoking his pipe and the, you know,
plane would land itself. At the time, my
wife was taking flying lessons and, um,
he said, "Yeah, yeah, you know, bring
her up here." And um
I think they had an engineer also on
another panel. I don't I don't quite
remember, but I was there with my wife.
There were people on board and he he'd
say, "Hey, come on here and take the
wheel." And he'd get the captain of the
plane would,
you know, I think my wife was in her 20s
at the time, and just sit her down and
say, "Yeah, hold on to it." And, you
know, just keep correcting. and he'd
just let her fly the plane, which is
insane. And um you know, the co-pilot
would just look over and I remember
looking over at I think the engineer
that looked at the gauges and he just
put his head down and pretended like
nothing was happening. And um that was
just one time. Another time he was f uh
fing in L1011
going by Roswell. At the time I was
living in New Mexico and they called him
and told him he wasn't getting paid
that the company was, you know,
defaulted or something like that and
he was coming up to New Mexico and
landed at the Roswell just took the
plane and landed at the Roswell airport.
This the whole 10-11. got off, walked
out, walked up to a bus station, gave me
a call on the the pay phone and said,
"Hey, Bob, I'm coming over."
Okay. You know, you're in New Mexico.
Yeah. And he drove up, taxi would drop
him off at the house. He'd walk he
walked in. He went, "Boy, I'm tired."
And he'd just lay down on the couch, you
know, and go to sleep. And I said, "You,
what are you doing here? What's going
on?" "Oh, I just dropped the plane up.
They're not paying me." you know that
that's it. But I mean, John Lair was
such like a loose cannon. Um he was he
was a great friend to have, but uh he
had no filter. if he had a
retired general come up and give him all
kinds of information
or if he had a psychic come up from, you
know, the neighborhood and give him all
kinds of information, he'd put him in
the same category,
>> you know, and uh so he really did have
useful information that was difficult to
get, but it was mixed up with nonsense,
>> right? And you and sometimes he would
just really lean into that nonsense.
Like he was convinced that the sun
wasn't hot and there were people living
inside. And I used to die laughing. I
went, "You are insane." I said, "You you
can't prove it's hot." Yes, I can. You
know, just go outside,
you know, on a hot day, you know, and
and uh you know, and John said, "That's
not the sun. that's just the the son's
atmosphere that's on fire. And I said,
"You're just crazy." But we got along
and he knew that I I thought he was
crazy. But the thing is, a lot of people
did come to him and give him good
information. Um
anyway, I don't remember where I was
going with this.
>> That's the thing about some people. Some
people will tell you nonsense and then
they'll tell you true things. And it's
difficult to accept that true things
also come from people that say nonsense,
right?
>> Like just because they've said something
that's nonsense doesn't mean necessarily
that this thing they're saying is not
true. This other thing
>> and you've got to be able to discern.
You've got like I talk to a lot of
people that say a lot of kooky things
that don't make any sense, but then
they'll say something that rings true
and it's it's difficult because you have
to have some sort of an understanding of
the human psyche and of those kind of
people because there are kind of people
that have very loose nets.
>> You're counting on their filter working
like yours
>> and it doesn't
>> and it No, it doesn't. Some
>> but some good stuff gets in there and
you go, "Hold on. What did you just
say?"
>> Right.
>> Tell me that again. How does that one
work? Yeah, you can't really discount
people because somebody comes up with
some absolute nonsense. It just means
their filter is defective,
>> right?
>> But
>> which is also the reason why they're
willing to entertain things that are
outside of the normal spectrum,
>> right?
>> So like they might have actual real
useful information, but it's wrapped up
in there with Bigfoot.
>> Exactly. Yeah. Exactly.
>> But so the soul catcher thing.
>> Oh yeah, that's where I was going. The
soul catcher. So, um, I remember him
sitting and I think he was telling my
wife Joy the story because I walked in
on it and he said, "Yeah, there are
these giant antennas and when you die,
>> my god,
>> your soul goes up and I think he said
the grays, you know, this alien race set
up this soul catcher and that's what
this whole thing is about. And as you
die, it sucks your soul in. And they use
it in some way. And um it's not where
your soul is supposed to go. They just
like set some sort of intercept.
>> Did he say where your soul was supposed
to go?
>> No.
>> No.
>> No. He was just more re really into the
soul catcher.
>> Well, that was one of the weirder things
about some of the documents that you had
at least been alerted to when you were
on the base. And one of them being that
humans are
>> containers. Yeah. Right.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. And
>> which the likely conclusion is
containers of souls. If a soul is a real
thing, whatever that is,
>> that's what you would think,
>> right? I mean, that's what I thought.
>> Yeah. I mean,
>> it's just a
>> I would prefer to believe that that's
not true.
>> Um, but maybe it is. I just they I don't
know. As Barry said, you know, they mix
absolute nonsense in there. So if they
give if you and it's unique to each
person. So if you give out any
information and they go I we heard some
stuff about soul catchers. Oh, we know
that came from Lazar, you know. So um
that's just a way where they can direct
where it where it came to. But
>> then the problem is like decades and
decades, generations, generations of
people working there. How many people
know what the real truth is? And how
many people know?
>> I don't know. I mean, there must be
Yeah, there must be a group of people
that really have the pure information of
what's going on.
>> I would assume, but not necessarily.
I would think
>> there has to be there has to be a group
of people that know what's going on. And
um
>> who are those people,
>> you know? And to me, like I I was
telling Luigi, I have a bunch of
questions for me, you know,
>> right?
>> Um
>> like what would be your questions for
you if you met you?
>> Yeah. Now questions for me are people
that ask me over decades the same same
questions. You know why is it the Navy?
The Navy paid me I always said the N
everything has been the Navy instead of
the Air Force because you know back in
the 60s and 70s you know there's project
blueberg and the air force and all that
but um everything associated with this
was the Navy.
So,
and in these days you hear some of these
new types of craft that are
>> transmedium.
>> Yeah. You you hear the word trans medium
and you know David Fraver, Commander
David Fraver, you know, with the tic tac
and you know things are under the water
and you know supposedly the the craft
that
the sport model was an archaeological
recovery and that itself was underwater.
So what is
what is the deal with the water? I mean,
it's it
it's by far the biggest medium of the
planet. I mean, if you want to hide
people down there, almost an entire
civilization down there, you could do it
in the ocean as long as you do it deep
enough and away from people. So, yeah,
number one is what's the deal with the
ocean? That's probably the the number
one question
>> because there's a ton of sightings where
people see things come out of the water.
and go into the water.
>> Yeah, there has to be a reason for that.
>> Well, it just in terms of if they have
the ability to travel through space, if
they if whatever that thing is really
does create some sort of a gravity
bubble or some sort of a space-time
bubble.
>> Yeah, but maybe it's not space.
Maybe it's not space. Maybe maybe it's
time. Maybe it's another dimension.
There's
there's really no limits. If you can
start manipulating
physics in that way, um
you can bend time, you can open doorways
into other dimensions. So
maybe it has nothing to do with going I
look we all want it to be like Star
Trek,
>> right?
>> You know, because Star Trek is really
understandable,
>> right? You go out there, you fly to
another planet, you meet the people
there, you go to another one. Well,
these guys are happy, those guys aren't,
you know, and it all makes perfect
sense.
>> I don't really think it's like that.
Look, you know, if you look in history,
especially, you know, United States
history, anytime a superior
race or intelligence meets with an
inferior one, it's never good for the
inferior guys. Never. We never come over
and go, "Oh, we just want to teach you
guys everything that we know." No. No.
It's like, "We're going to rape all your
women, take all your stuff, and then
just kill you. resources.
>> Yeah. Right. And just consume everything
you want. That's just always the way it
goes. Now, maybe that's just what humans
do. But I would be concerned that's what
all life does.
>> Well, we are territorial primates
>> and that makes sense that that's what we
do. The thing that always fascinates me
about particularly the grays, they seem
to be genderless
and they seem to have no muscle at all.
They and they seem to have enormous
heads. And the stories at least the
anecdotal accounts of people having
communication with these creatures is
that they communicate in some way
telepathically.
>> Yeah. If you transcend all of our weird
biological needs, like all the things
that are attached to being a human
being, ego, lust, greed, desire to
conquer, desire to control resources,
all those things are territorial primate
instincts. And one of the conversations
I had yesterday with my friend Theo, we
were talking about like what's happening
to people's bodies is that people are
slowly
we we're consuming microplastics and
phalates and all these things that are
reducing our reproductive system, our
testosterone dropping.
>> Right. Right.
>> All this stuff like leads you to say,
well, where does this go ultimately?
Like, well, like, how many more people
are autistic now than were before? It's
one out of 12 boys in California now. It
used to be one out of 10,000 just a few
decades ago. Like, we're moving into
this very weird direction without us
recognizing it.
>> Let me stop you there. It's one out of
how many?
>> One out of 12 boys in California are
diagnosed autistic now.
>> But do you think that might be the way
they're diagnosed?
>> No. No. I think it's exposure. I think
it's exposed to chemicals, vaccines, um,
environmental toxins.
>> You think that, too? Yeah,
>> I think that
>> it's not just me. There's tons of
studies in in a lot of buried studies,
too.
>> Okay. I mean, if that's accurate, that's
frightening. Yeah.
>> Well, it is. It's It can't be just
diagnosed because I mean, I know so many
people that have non-verbal autistic
kids where I didn't know anybody that
had non-verbal autistic kids when I was
younger. Well,
you know, I mean, back in the 60s and
70s, there was no there were no kids
with ADHD.
>> Kids that were like that were just
>> Mhm.
>> You know,
>> I think that's still the the case. I
don't think ADHD is a real diagnosis. I
think it's a real excuse to give people
medication. I think ADHD is essentially
a superpower. What ADHD is allows you to
concentrate on things that you really
enjoy, but you cannot concentrate on
things you don't enjoy. I think I have
it, you know, and I think I'm very
fortunate that I'm not diagnosed and
medicated or wasn't or was born in the
right time when they weren't doing that
as much.
>> No, I actually I'll stop you there and
say I I agree that that's a superpower,
too,
>> because it's very unusual. I can if I
find a thing that I like, I can lock in
and concentrate on it for 12, 14 hours
with no sleep, no food.
>> All I need is like water or coffee and
and I'm locked in.
>> I locked in for four and a half years.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I know.
>> I don't I don't think I think with ADHD
is you're taking kids, you're putting
them in a completely unnatural
environment. You're making them sit
down. They don't want to sit down.
They're very active and energetic.
You're making them study things by very
unenthusiastic teachers. They don't want
to pay attention. They're off in
class because they're completely bored.
And then you're saying, "That kid's got
a problem. We have to diagnose them."
And then what do you give them? You give
them aderall. And all a sudden the kids
locked in cuz they're on speed.
>> Yeah.
>> And I just think
>> Yeah. But if you focus in and let them
do what they're interested in,
>> give that kid a video game, watch them
play it for 10 hours with no
food, cuz that's what happens. Cuz
that's something that they're actually
engaged with. It's not that they can't
be focused on anything. They just don't
focus on things they enjoy. And we want
to turn people into nice little factory
workers.
>> And the only way to do that is you got
to get a kid to comply. You got to get a
kid to pay attention, follow the rules.
>> We're on the same channel. It's a really
great point.
>> I don't believe that ADHD is a real
thing. I just think there's some people
that are wired differently and they
should pursue different things in life,
>> right?
>> The difference between that and autism
is very different. And autism is
especially when it happens like almost
directly after multiple vaccinations.
There's a lot of them they point to
particularly the MMR vaccine. There's
there's but there's quite a few when you
look at the schedule of vaccines and how
it ramped up and it completely
correlates with the ramping up of the
diagnosises of autism.
>> But without casting aspersions or
getting into some antivaccine
conversation
>> you just did.
>> Yeah, I did. But what I'm saying is but
ultimately the human race is moving into
a very weird place.
>> So I had a conversation with doc um uh
Shannana Swan, Dr. Shannon Swan who is
uh she studies environmental endocrine
disruptors. So various toxins, phalates,
microplastics and plasticizers that are
completely disruptive to people's
endocrine system, reproductive system.
And from the introduction of these
prochemical products in the 1950s
and60s, you see a direct correlation
between the dip in testosterone rates in
amongst men, the uh increase of
miscarriages and infertility and then on
top of that the actual shrinking of
their taint. So, one of the ways they
find out the difference between mammals,
um, some mammals in particular, when you
see a a a child, a baby mammal, the
difference between a male and a female
is easily recognized by the size of the
gap between their anal their anal hole
and where their genitals are.
>> But that could just be correlation,
you know? It's like,
>> no, no, no, no, no. I'll explain why
it's not. Because when they've done
studies where they've used phalates,
particularly phalates, okay? And they've
introduced them specifically purposely
into certain mammals and rodents, their
taint shrinks.
>> And their taint shrinks and their
penises, their penis size shrinks. And
there's studies on alligators where
alligators when they live in polluted
rivers, they have smaller penises. And
she she talked about all this and all
this. These are endocrine disruptors
that are in the environment that are
doing something that reduces fertility
and it changes the way the human biology
functions and it makes men more feminine
and it makes women less fertile.
>> Okay.
>> Well, ultimately you look at the grays
what do they look like?
>> Yeah,
>> they look like they have no genitals.
They look like they have no sex. They
have that might be where biology has to
go to transcend away from our
territorial primate biology. Our
territorial primate biology that is
insistent on war and violence and
>> Right. And we think this is the place to
stay.
>> Exactly.
>> And it may not be.
>> It may not be. It it it may be
completely nonbeneficial to all life.
>> Right. Right.
>> We have to transcend that. And well, we
are transcending it whether we like it
or not. And what I was saying is that I
don't know if it's a bug. I think it
might be a feature of evolution that our
insistence on using plastics and
technology and all of these different
environmental toxins that we use to
produce energy and all the goods and
services that we need. also are
disrupting our endocrine system and
changing us from being these hulking
haircovered cave men to being these very
small slight autistic men that could
code 24 hours a day without
sleep,
>> right?
>> It seems like if you extrapolate and you
naturally take that further, well, what
do you get? You get really skinny things
with no muscles and giant heads. My my
take also and I and I do agree with that
is what I find out what I find sometimes
really uh concerning is how fast that's
moving. So it's not just a question of
like is this actually
this is probably a thing but it's moving
so incredibly fast. If I look at my
father's generation or my grandfather's
generation and my generation, I mean,
it's it's similar, but now it's moving
so fast. I I I do agree with you're
saying, and I'm thinking if it's moving
so fast, there could be a not a natural
component to it, but there's an
intentional component,
>> right? If you wanted to do something to
erase to change it, like think about
what we did with wolves,
>> right? All dogs are wolves,
>> right? I have two dogs that are the
furthest thing from wolves you
could possibly imagine.
>> Is that Marshmallow?
>> Marshall. Marshall. He might be a
marshmallow. Might as well. I have
Marshall who's a golden retriever. The
sweetest dog of all time. And I have
another dog named Charlie who's a King
Charles Cavalier Spaniel who is even
further from a wolf than Marshall. He's
just a cute little fuzzy little
sweetheart. They have no killer
instincts whatsoever.
>> That used to be a wolf, right? But what
happened? We softened them to the point
where there was something compatible
with our modern life with households and
families and babies and can
>> we made them safe and that's happening
to people.
It's happening to people whether we like
it or not. We could attribute it to all
these different factors. Oh, it's a
problem. We have to remove these things
from the environment. This is what's
going on. Maybe. Or maybe we just look
at the overall picture. There seems to
be an insatiable desire for innovation
and technology. the human beings have.
If you looked at us from afar, if you
weren't part of the human race and
you're just studying us, you're like,
"What does this species do?" Well, makes
better things. Makes better things all
the time constantly. You know, look, I
have a iPhone 16 here. It's not as good
as the iPhone 17. iPhone 17's better.
Why don't you get an iPhone 17? You
know, it just like keeps going. It never
stops. It never ends. The TVs get
bigger. They get stronger. Your cars get
faster. Your computer just more cores.
does processing, video editing so much
quicker. Everything moves faster and
better. We keep making better things. We
never stop and say, you know what,
society right now, we have a lot of
problems. The problems that we don't
have are technology. Our technology
seems completely suitable to this world
that we're living in right now. Let's
just stop making new things and
concentrate on cleaning the rivers and
concentrate on stopping crime and
concentrate on educating people.
Concentrate on counseling for troubled
young people. No. No. We just plow
forward ahead with the one thing that we
absolutely guaranteed do. We make better
things. We make better weapons, better
cars, faster planes. Everything we do,
we make things better. And I'll and I
sorry I have to add we do that and we
also do it in a way where it's
economically beneficial to the ones that
are making it because we make things
break now. Think about it. We make
better things but we make them so that
you have to buy the better thing after
>> right engineered obsolescence.
>> Yeah that's also important.
>> Yeah it is because then it also human
beings have this very bizarre desire for
materialism. Like what? Why would a
thing with a finite lifespan want to
accumulate objects? Like I know people
that are in their 80s that collect
things. Like what are you doing
with that stuff?
>> You're going to die. You have maybe like
10 summers left on on Earth and here you
are collecting stamps or cars.
>> 10 summers. Yeah. No. No. I have gotten
to that.
>> It's weird.
>> Yeah. I mean at some point you you have
to bypass the accumulating stuff,
>> right,
>> part of life.
>> But materialism ensures a constant
fueling
>> of innovation because this is one of the
things that gets people excited about
collecting new stuff is that you're
going to make a better version. Like it
doesn't m care how good your Mercedes
is. It's not a 2026 Mercedes.
>> It's even better. It has new features.
It's a new thing. And so it's like all
built into the human psychology and also
to this thing that I said like I said if
you were somewhere from somewhere else
and studying this species what does it
do it it makes better things. What do
sharks do? They eat things. They just
swim around. They can't even stop
swimming. They eat things. What do
people do? They they really just make
better things. They go to war. Why do
they go to the war? Really? They go to
war so they can control resources so
they have more money so they can make
more things and better things. And also
the amount of innovation that is in
warfare, in war weapons, in war
fighting.
>> Yeah. That Yeah. That's actually
critical. Yes.
>> To keep the system going. Yeah. Well,
ultimately all that does it all of it
releases more endocrine disruptors, more
contact with all these different
chemicals and toxins, feminizes men,
ruins women's reproductive systems to
the point where ultimately we say, "Oh,
for the survival of the race, we're
going to have to figure out how to
reproduce nonbiologically."
>> When I first got involved in uh Yeah,
it's
>> it's something to ponder, right? It's
something because we're so wrapped up in
who we are. We're so wrapped up in look,
I love being a person. I love living in
Texas. I love driving an American car. I
love all those things. But what does it
mean? Like what is that? What is that?
You know, these are just weird identity
points that you connect with whatever
this species is. But if you just could
just have a above view and you look down
and go, what are we doing?
Yeah, that's a that's a good question.
>> That's a good question.
>> Yeah, like how far are we going and how
fast are we going there?
>> We're going pretty fast. And now
with AI, I think we're going way faster
than we even understand because with
clawed, I mean, they they think that the
clawed AI, the the engineers, they we
think it's sentient already. It just
doesn't have a physical body to move
around.
>> AI is going to kill us. Everybody agrees
with that. There's no question. I don't
think it's going to kill us. You know
what I think it's going to do? I think
it's going to prevent us from breeding.
I think it's going to let us die off.
>> I don't think that's going to kill us.
>> But I think we're going to willingly go
with it because we're going to get like
mates like exmachina. We're going to
just something that takes
>> as soon as they come out
>> with a female robot.
>> Uhhuh.
>> Yeah.
>> That's sexually attractive or whatever.
>> Game over.
>> The game over. There's there's just
going to be no more babies and we're
just going to die out. Yeah. So, or
integrate. And I think it's much more
likely that we integrate. And that's
where you get the grays. I think that
what the grays are is a combination of
technology and biology. And if you just
if you just go very well,
>> chimp to caveman to gray, you go, "Oh, I
see where that's going. Kimp, chimp,
caveman, human, modern human,
gelatinous, soft, slowm moving, weak
modern human. Grace,
>> look, I've always
leaned into what Barry told me because
it's the only information I had that the
craft came from Zeta Reticuli, which is
a star system 30 some odd light years
away. And um you know again it was just
like a Star Trek thing.
>> They came over here
>> for whatever reason
but that information may not be true
>> right that mir information information
might be one of those things they put
out that's nonsense. Again, if it's if
it has to do with time, I think uh from
what George has told me, Jacques Valle
and some, you know, other really
credible researchers have have said that
uh these are people either from another
dimension or another time or maybe
they're us from the future, right?
>> You know, just coming back to interact
with us in some way.
>> Um
>> make sure we don't everything up
irreparably.
>> Yeah, but it see it doesn't seem like
they're doing a good job. Well, maybe
things up somewhat is also part
of the plan. Maybe that actually has to
take place.
>> I mean, holy cow, disrupt, look at the
look at the way things are going right
now. Holy cow.
>> Exactly.
>> Things are off totally off the rails.
>> But maybe that's part of the plan. Maybe
part of it is like it has to get so far
sideways that we realize how up
everything is that we start making
meaningful changings and implement AI as
government.
That's a dangerous thing.
>> Exactly. But is it as dangerous as Iran
getting nukes? I don't know. Is it as
dangerous as global Islamic caliphate?
No, it's not Iran.
>> Iran's not getting nukes. I mean, they
>> never mind. I I don't want to get into
political stuff.
>> No, you could. You could look if you
gave Iran the technology to get nukes.
Everyone has any any physicist has the
technology to get nukes,
>> right?
>> I mean the difficulty is actually making
the material. So I mean if I was Iran, I
would enrich to 80 or 90% because that's
where you can make a weapon and and stop
there.
>> Right? It's not like they would be the
only people with a weapon. Pakistan in
North Korea.
>> But that doesn't make you have a weapon.
It just gives you a shortcut to it. and
making a weapon from there and being
able to deliver a weapon,
>> you know, to 4,000 miles away. Good luck
with that. That's a big deal. So, um
>> Right. But they're in communication with
China who has that. They're in
communication.
>> Then they don't need to they don't need
to enrich uranium or do anything. They
just can you give me a a missile and
>> Right. But wouldn't they rather make
their own? But that's but that's not
even the point.
>> Rather make their own. Why? Why would
you do that? Would you rather make your
own car or just somebody give it to you?
No. Why? Why would Why would you do
that? You got a buddy that'll just give
you one?
>> Cuz you'd want to be self-sufficient.
You'd want to have your own production
where you don't have to rely on someone.
>> No, you can always do that. You can
always do that. I I don't I don't think
they're ever they were ever going to
they're going to absolutely make a
weapon now,
>> right?
>> Because we're, you know, kicking their
ass. I as as everyone has learned I
guess you have to have nuclear weapons
now to right you know but
it this is a really bad situation.
>> Oh it's a horrible situation but my
point is
>> why is this situation taking place? The
situation taking place is because human
beings suck,
>> right? We suck in how we interact with
each other. We suck. We suck because
we're territorial primates with weapons
of mass destruction.
>> Can't we just all get along?
>> Well, what is the way to stop that from
ever happening? Well, one, you let a
catastrophe unfold and then you offer a
solution to make sure these catastrophes
never unfold again.
>> Well, what's the best solution? Well, we
have something far smarter than people
that will take over control of resources
in government.
>> AI.
>> AI.
>> Yeah. This is this is Colossus. You ever
seen the movie Colossus?
>> Got to watch it.
>> Well, that that's merit against you.
>> Okay. Yeah.
>> The movie Colossus was a 1960s or 70s
movie and uh it's about um
you know the scientist makes deep inside
this mountain a computer to take over
the defense of the United States. And
you know they build this gigantic
computer inside Cheyenne Mountain or
something similar to it. And you know,
they flip the switch and they went,
"Okay, we're we're protected. We're
we're in good shape." And um
shortly after time goes on, you know,
they realize, "Wow, the computer's
really performing better than we
expected." And as it turns out,
Russia had done the same thing. and the
computers want to communicate together
>> and um you know they start communicating
and then the United States goes well
they might be giving our our secrets
away so we better you know cut the
communication line and the computers
freak out and they go well I guess we'll
just launch nuclear bombs you know at
everybody and they it launches weapons
and you know essentially holds everybody
hostage but Um,
>> it's kind of like a trap. It's kind of
like a trap. If we go that way, it could
trap us.
>> It's exactly a trap.
>> Well, you know, in simulated war games,
AIs use
>> nuclear 98% of the time. Yeah. I mean,
yeah, because they're crazy. Why
wouldn't they? Because I mean, look, the
goal is to win,
>> right?
>> And we're going to present you with the
scenario. And they go, okay, nuke them.
>> You know, and why wouldn't you pick
that? What you going to start with
slapping them in the face?
>> Why is it better to just bomb them over
and over and over again until you
achieve the same amount of
>> slap in the face? Nuke them, it's over
with. We can move on from there, right?
>> So, yeah.
>> Well, you think about what happened in
Gaza. Like, you look at the leveling of
all those buildings, the mass
destruction,
>> it's terrible.
>> It looks like a nuke.
>> Yeah.
>> It looks like one nuke instead of
thousands of missiles and bombs. Just
one nuke. But but it's not
>> right in terms of the amount of damage
it could do instantaneously
>> because I mean because we can detect a
nuke.
>> Was there ever any conversation that you
were privy to where they discussed?
Because one of the things that does come
up over and over again in UFO
discussions is these crafts that show up
at these military bases and shut down
all the weapon systems.
>> No, I I actually know nothing about
that. Um, most of the UFO stuff or UFO
lore that I've heard I I don't know
anything about. I I I've just looked at
and found
>> That's so fascinating because you're the
most prominent figure in all of UFO.
>> That's what I was telling him yesterday.
>> Yeah. But I I I I really I really only
like like to talk about what I know
about. Of course.
>> And I've heard I mean I've heard other
stories, but I've never heard them
officially. I don't know if they're
really real. Um,
>> what's one of the things that makes you
most credible? Because you're not a UFO,
>> I guess. But I mean,
>> yes, it does with me because when people
are like way too into it, they want to
believe too much, you know.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But no, I I I don't
know.
>> Do you know who these people are?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Betty and Barney Hill.
>> Okay. Well, so you know,
>> Yeah. They they were the first
abductees. I mean to me they're I don't
I don't know who first introduced those
to me and I I looked them up and
you know I people said do you believe
them and I'm kind of inclined to believe
them because look in the 1960s
right where they're from the last thing
you want to do is be recognized
as a mixed race couple right I mean
>> right and go public. Yeah. I mean, holy
cow, they would hate you.
>> Yeah.
>> A black person and a white person that
were, you know, in any kind of
relationship. But um
>> crazy story.
>> Yeah.
>> And you hear that? Actually, on top of
that,
>> I have a connection to that because
Barry said they're from the Zeta
Reticuli star system and I believe it's
Betty Betty Hill drew a map of the Zeta
Reticuli star system and said this is
part of their roots.
>> Whoa.
>> But did you know that?
>> You didn't know that?
>> I don't remember that. I don't I
remember it from what you said from your
>> Okay. But if you look up in Betty and
Barney Hill,
>> um, she said,
>> um, I think I don't know, I can never
get this stuff right. They show her a
map and they said, "Well, this is a
map." She wanted to know why they were
here, what's going on? They showed her a
map. Am I right?
>> They showed her a map
>> and uh they said, "Do you do you
understand this?" And she said, "No."
And they said, "Well, why should we tell
you anymore?" And uh maybe something
like that. But they they showed her this
star map, you know, and she obviously
>> look at that.
>> Yeah.
>> Under hypnosis, Betty Hill describes a
map she was shown by the leader aboard
the ship. Later, she sketched it. She
said she was told the heavy lines marked
regular trade routes. That's right. The
broken lines recorded various space
expeditions. The following year, the map
seen at right was published in the New
York Times. Mrs. Hill, struck by the
similarity between the Times map and her
sketch, then added the corresponding
names.
>> Yeah.
>> And it ended up being the Zeta Reticuli
binary star system, which was really
interesting. And I remember when I first
heard about Bob's story back in 1989,
and he said Zeta Reticuli, I remember
thinking, wow, that's what Betty Hill
saw. So that made me also question, is
that real in that document? Did did
these guys really come from there? You
know, because it was mentioned in 1968,
>> right?
>> So, why would the government the US Navy
write that in there that would correlate
to something that we already kind of
knew? I think that was a a purposeful
disinformation to disinform someone. I
think so.
>> But why? If maybe it's true.
>> Yeah. Go ahead. We'll we'll we'll pause
right here and use the restroom. We'll
be right back, folks. I really got it.
>> Yeah, I get it. No worries. No worries.
We'll be right back.
>> Um, we were talking about this whole
zeta reticulite thing. So,
>> when you're dealing with so many
different crafts and so many different
things, the idea that only one
species or one thing more advanced than
us is visiting us seems kind of silly.
If the universe is populated by all
these things,
>> I don't know. Does it?
Does it
>> kind of kind of
>> I mean the universe is really big. I do
do you think everybody can find this
place? I mean
>> yeah I would imagine um it's like spots
that you visit like uh you know there's
Machu Picchu, there's ancient Egypt,
there's you know subsaharan Africa.
There's a bunch of different places
where people go you know just humans on
Earth. And I would imagine if you have
an understanding of how life is evolving
in the cosmos, you there's probably
stages where things reach certain
levels. And if you are a
>> but they're far apart,
>> right?
>> They're far apart. I mean, one could be
in this quadrant of the Mil Milky Way
galaxy and they reach that point where
they can travel and explore
>> and there's
a far distant point where another civil
civilization can do that and I mean
really do you think there are that many?
I don't think there are that many
civilizations visiting us. There's
certainly there's no doubt that there's
a one from somewhere, another planet,
another time, another dimension,
whatever it may be.
>> Someone else is here. We're not the top,
you know, of the pyramid. No,
>> we're absolutely not there. There's no
question.
Well, I think if you got technology that
say let's let's just say the grays,
let's say the grays are real. Let's say
they fly around these little crafts. Why
would we assume that it stops there? Why
wouldn't we assume that technology gets
to the point where not only are they far
more advanced than them, but they also
are completely undetectable?
>> Well, if you want to view the universe
as infinite,
>> Yeah.
>> then it then it never stops. It scales
out. somebody above them and there's
somebody above them and there's somebody
above them and it never stops.
>> I was watching this lecture where this
woman was talking about quantum
entanglement and she was talking about
how maybe our understanding of space and
the distance between things is limited
by what our our current technology is
and our current understanding of what
what space and time actually are. And
she what she was saying
>> what she was saying is there might not
be we might at one point in time given
enough time thousands of years or
whatever be able to instantaneously
travel anywhere
>> and that just how like quantum like like
like subatomic particles are connected
in some sort of a strange way that we
don't totally understand even at far
distance spooky action at a distance
right
>> as Einstein said that we might
eventually get to a point where that's
how travel works it's instantaneous
travel everywhere.
>> I think we just have hints of these
technologies.
>> Look, everything,
>> you know, we look at Maxwell's equations
and things like that that we base all
electromagnetic, electrostatic,
>> you know, um actions on and how they
relate to time and how they relate to
things in our universe. But, uh that may
be nothing. there there may be an entire
level of physics that we're unfamiliar
with that you know these crafts these
people or these civilizations
just utilize. So,
um,
>> of course, I mean, if you just stop and
think about going from Morse code
>> to a cell phone
>> in a relatively short period of time
historically.
>> If you go to the the difference between
1,200 and,400 is not that big of a
deal in terms of technology,
what's available. The difference between
>> 1,800 and 2026 is massive.
>> Yeah, right. It is a massive crazy
change, right? So 2026 to 226,
who knows what we're talking
about, right?
>> Especially when you have sensient AI,
you have nuclear power plants that are
controlling sensient AI that are fueling
them and giving them resources.
>> I mean,
you really have no limit to where this
goes. to scale out a thousand years, you
scale out 2,000 years.
>> You really can't scale out a thousand
years.
>> Right. It's not possible
>> even even at a hundred years. It's way
>> Yeah.
>> too much.
>> Way more than we would have ever
considered.
>> Also, it's exponential. Right.
>> Right. That's that's why you can't scale
out to a thousand years. And if you
think it's exponential now, imagine when
you have AI able to generate better
versions of itself, which is what's
happening with chat GPT5 is essentially
made by chat GBT4.
>> No, I a AI is absolutely the death of
us. There's there's there's no there's
no question.
>> Well, we're going to become obsolete in
terms of our thinking.
>> But if we're obsolete in terms of our
thinking, we're obsolete.
>> Yeah. I mean, all all AI needs is hands,
right?
>> I think we integrate.
>> That's what I think happens.
>> Yeah, it's a scary
>> and and that's a Yeah, I was going to
say and that's a scary thought. That's a
scariest thought because it's like we're
going to integrate. I think it's
inevitable. I think you're right about
that. We're just going there. It's It's
not like even if you and I are not going
to actually do it, somebody will and
it's going to integrate because other
people will and it's going to happen.
>> But it's still the same primate. We're
still the same human.
>> Sort of, but we we already have problems
with joints and so we replace them with
fake ones. We, you know, t titanium
knees and, you know,
>> Yeah. But they don't work as good.
>> They don't for now.
>> Yeah.
>> But before they used to not work at all.
Like, you know, I've met people that had
surgeries in the 1980s, like knee
surgeries, and oh my god,
>> they they're crippled for life. Even
though they put your knee back together
again, it's still destroyed. Mhm.
>> You know, you get a knee surgery today,
6 months later, you're 100%.
>> No, I' I'd love to know the future.
>> Yeah. Well, it's kind of
>> I'd love to know the future.
>> Well, that is So, one of the things that
I want to talk about is the the actual
the generator, this thing that works on
this element that bombards it with
radiation. How did you guys figure out
what the function of it was and what it
did? So, when you're first introduced to
this craft and you see this this dome,
the reactor,
>> the reactor that's covering this this
thing that's generating this power,
>> what what was what was the introduction
to it? How do they explain it to you?
>> The introduction was was way before me.
Um,
and that's where the guy prior to me
either got hurt or killed.
So,
They determined that this was the power
source
and at some point they decided to take
that out to the nuclear test site
because they wanted to cut into it. Um
they x-rayed it. They they only found a
small tube that run went around it. They
really couldn't determine how it worked
or what was going on. So,
at some point and and Barry made this
somewhat clear that they cut into the
reactor while it was running
or or while it was under load, I should
say, and the reactor exploded. That's
what killed or hurt the person that I
replaced.
But
um it produced
the the base gravitational wave or base
energy that provided that propelled the
craft that provided the craft the
propulsion. I mean when they removed it
the craft didn't work. When they put it
in every single other craft they found
had something either exactly like it or
similar to it. So uh they determined
that was the power source. That's at the
point that I was introduced into the
project.
>> So when you say gravitational wave, is
that for lack of a better term or is it
something that's measured? Is it
>> No, it's a it's for lack of a better
term. Like there there's nothing I mean,
as I said in Luigi's movie, you can take
magnets with like poles and push them
together and they repel. But you can't
take your hands ever and push on
something and they repel them. That's a
force field, right? That's science
fiction stuff. But that's what this did.
And this produced a field that repelled
the craft from the ground.
>> Did you try to touch it?
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> And when you try to touch it, what did
you feel?
>> An elastic field. You can push down, but
you can't get close to it. The closer
you get to it, the the the more it
pushes back. So you you can
>> like how much distance between you and
the actual thing you able to
>> I mean, I would say about
>> six inches or so. uh maybe about nine
inches, which is about a span. And
um
no, it's at some point you you can't
push back on it at all. But the
important thing is
if you have a magnet,
a little disc magnet sitting on the
ground and you have another magnet and
you push on it, that magnet moves away,
right?
>> Yeah. cuz it's pushing on it.
But the craft didn't the reactor didn't
if you had the cra the reactor there and
you pushed back on it, it didn't push
away when you pushed on it.
>> It just prevented you from touching it.
>> Yeah. And so when Dennis said, "Go out
there and look under the craft."
Um here's the craft,
whatever it weighs suspending itself
above the ground. And I went underneath
it. You would think it's translating its
weight onto the ground and pushing and I
should be
>> squashed.
>> Squashed without any doubt, but I'm not.
There's no feeling there at all. So,
it's not translating its weight or its
push to the ground and pushing off the
ground. It's just cancelelling out its
weight, which is something completely
different.
And so when so element 115
>> um so you have it in this
triangle-shaped form.
>> Did you ask how they got into a
triangle-shaped form? Was it made like
this? This is how it came.
>> I'm sure I did. But I mean it only
worked like that. It worked like a stack
of discs and had to be cut at a certain
angle to work in the reactor. And
>> and did they say they cut it or did they
say it was already cut?
>> Well, it was already cut and they were
duplicating it.
>> Pull that microphone up, too.
>> So the they were duplicating it. Did
they have more of it? This element?
>> Yeah. Yeah, they had quite a bit of it.
So either there was a quantity in other
other crafts or other reactors that they
removed.
>> Yeah.
But was there any discussion that there
had been some sort of an exchange where
they had been giving this?
>> No.
>> So one of the things like do you know
Diana Pasulquez? She's an author that's
uh written some interesting stuff about
UFOs and she's worked with Gary Nolan
and you know on uh material recollection
from supposed crash crash sites and she
said that the way these researchers
refer to these crafts they refer to them
as donations
and
>> I guess that's possible
>> right well doesn't it make sense if if
this thing crashed why is it perfect
>> why is it not destroyed
Look, I I've heard so many I'm not into
UFOs, right?
>> As crazy as it's that's crazy. Um I'm
just interested in the technology and I
feel very privileged to have been
involved in the project.
>> But um
I don't know. I I I don't I don't think
I don't think there can be that many
crashes. Do you? No.
>> This advanced technology, you think
they're coming to Earth and just there's
a thunderstorm and they're crashing into
the ground. I'm not I'm not buying that.
>> There's one logical explanation that
does actually make sense. There were
some high alitude nuclear tests that
they did and
>> well there was the the teak test, you
know, back in the 60s.
>> Starfish Prime
>> and Starfish Prime, right?
>> Yeah. Um if you had no idea that this
was about to happen and you were
hovering over Earth observing us,
>> what are the chances? I mean, what are
the chances? They're not very high.
>> Yeah, they're not very I mean, what are
the chances a crash is coming over and a
nuclear test at that exact second
>> unless there's a lot more observation
than we know and that they just observe
us in a way that we can't see them. If
especially if you're going back to the
1950s and 1960s,
we have very few satellites whereas very
>> that was the nuclear cowboy era. Yeah.
Where there were just
>> Well, just Starfish Prime. Explain to
people what they did.
>> Yeah. I They had a 1.4 megaton, you
know, detonation up there and just I
think all they did, let's see what
happens if we blow it up at this
altitude. I mean, that's crazy. You
know, there was another test planned to
blow up on the moon just just to make
the Russians look uh you know, like
like we were awesome. Um,
you know, but they
>> detonate the moon. What if they pushed
it away and it up our orbit?
>> No, I think that would take a lot more.
I know.
>> I mean, there was re I I don't remember
what the uh
the project
>> project A19.
>> Oh, A19. That was it. Yeah.
>> Study of lunar research flights
>> detonated nuclear. Yeah. I I can't pull
up these numbers, but yeah. A project
A11. And
>> Crazy. Yeah, we're gonna do that because
that like everybody on Earth could just
go outside and look at the moon
>> get blown up
>> and the the explosion would be faintly
visible to the human eye to people on
Earth.
>> Yeah,
>> boy.
>> I still think they should have done
that. But um
>> yeah, but you're the guy that put a jet
engine in the back of a Honda like
>> I honestly think they should detonate a
nuclear bomb on the 4th of July every
year, but that's just me. Um,
>> well, also you live in Nevada, well, I
used to at least that had a long history
of them doing that,
>> right?
>> Oh, man.
>> So, going back to this uh reactor.
>> So,
did how was it explained to you? Did
they explain to you how the technology
works or what they know about it? Like
>> now the way it was explained to me is is
when I got to be alone with Barry, he
said he was excited to show this to me.
He said, "I'm going to turn this is the
reactor that we assume powers the
craft."
>> Sorry.
>> No worries.
>> I'm uh I'm going to uh show you the
reactor that powers the craft. And he
turned it on. Small little dome on a
flat little plate. I said,
>> "Was this in the craft or was this on a
table?"
>> This is in the experimental area.
>> Okay.
>> And um
>> so this was not the one that was in the
sport craft. This was another one.
>> This was another one.
>> This is it right here.
>> Yeah, that's it.
>> Okay. That's in the film.
>> And yeah, on on the table and he had it
there and he went over to the uh emitter
and rotated it and he said, "Try and
touch it." and I put my hand on it and
it it rebounded off. And I the closer
you got to it, the more it pushed back.
And um that's that's a real shock
because there's nothing that pushes back
like that. That that's a that's a living
force field. That's science fiction
stuff. So um that really got my
attention. So explain what is happening
like in terms of the the rotation of
this thing like what what is happening
like what energy is going into it that's
causing it to go on.
>> Well actually we don't know that. I mean
that that's the whole thing. It's it's
pushing back. It's a it's a repulsive
gravitational field. Look as far as we
know gravitate gravity only has an
attractive force to it. We've never even
with any matter we've analyzed it and it
still has an attractive force to it.
There's no repulsive force that we've
discovered because that would be a great
propulsion system. But this repulsed.
So this was a a new field completely.
>> But how was he turning it on?
>> He had the emitter which is a big pipe
part of
>> what is an emitter like what is
The craft itself has on the main level
has the reactor and what we call the
amplifiers. Three re the reactor and
three amplifiers. Right underneath that
there are three emitters
that are right under the amplifiers. And
we believe the energy from the reactor
is amplified by the emitters and by the
amplifiers by the amplifiers sorry and
transmitted to the emitters and they
produce this field that lifts the craft
off the ground and that's how it works.
But there is nothing nothing even in our
physics or our science that
that correlates to that at all. What is
the energy that's going to them that
causes it to turn?
>> We don't know. I mean, we just assume
it's gravity because it's the only thing
we know like that. But it has a negative
gravity effect. So,
it might be a new force entirely.
>> But when you were saying, so you have
this machine that's next to it that you
do something to that causes it to turn
on
>> the emitter. there. There's the
amplifier and there's the emitter which
looks like a big pipe,
>> right?
>> And if you rotate the emitter, I don't
remember how many degrees was it 20° 20°
or something like that
>> that connects it in some way
to
the reactor and it begins to be powered.
>> And what is the emitter doing?
>> It emits that field. It's not a gravita.
It could be a gravitational field, but
it's an anti-gravitational field that
pushes on the ground.
>> And what's happening in the emitter? Did
you study the emitter?
>> Well, we attempted to, but no, there was
nothing that we really came up with
that.
>> What does it look like? Like, what's the
internal structure of it?
>> It's just it's a hollow pipe with
I guess little copper colored plates all
inside. It's kind of in the in the film.
Mhm.
>> Um,
>> but there's I I mean these guys have
been working on it for years before I
got there and there was really no
no concept of what they were doing.
>> Did they explain to you why element 115
is crucial to this working and what what
its role is?
>> No.
So, element 115 um was not even really
discussed back when you were doing this.
This was it wasn't even discovered or
proven physically until it was a large
hedron collider experiment in the 2000s,
right? No, I know they they synthesized
that, but look, and you know, in in any
element, there's always
there's always a large amount of
>> um well, it it doesn't decay. There's
like the
>> that was the thing about in the large
hadron collider experiment, they they
were able to achieve it, but it only
existed for a few milliseconds.
>> Yeah. Sorry, I've too much.
>> No worries.
So,
>> um,
>> did they how did they define this
material?
>> No, there's I mean there's different
isotopes of of every element and element
115 just like any other element. Uh,
there can be a stable version of it and
aund or 50 different unstable elements
to them. So,
I'm sorry. I
>> No, no, it's all just try to continue
the train of thought. So,
>> it's basically different isotopes of it.
>> Yeah, different isotopes. I've I need to
stop drinking this.
>> It's okay. Have a cup of coffee.
>> I can't I can't even remember. Coffee is
good.
>> Oh, we got coffee.
>> Oh my god. All right. Holy cow.
>> There you go. That'll help. Um,
>> yeah, there's I mean there's there's
different isotopes
>> and you were able to physically touch
this element with
>> Oh, abs. Absolutely. I was
>> physically able to touch the element.
Yeah.
>> But when you're physically able to touch
it, there's no adverse effects. It
doesn't have any effect on the Does it
feel like metal? Does it feel like
plastic?
>> It looks it it looks copper like I mean
maybe it's not as dark as copper is, but
it it's that color. Um and
uh I haven't seen an element like that.
It has unique properties that other
elements don't have. It produces
an anti-gravitational field
>> when combined with energy with some kind
of energy. It produces this field.
>> Yeah. And was it understood what is
happening like what is the relationship
between this element and this like how
is what is going on like you're
bombarding this element with something.
>> Yeah. I from what we understood we
x-rayed the reactor itself and there was
a path around it that looked it made it
look like a cyclron. So it looked like
there was an accelerator.
>> So when they were explaining it to you,
is this is is this just your work
partner that's explaining this stuff to
you?
>> It's it's just Barry that's explain
>> and did you ask him how do you know
this? Where are you getting this from?
Is this
>> Yeah, he got this information prior to
me. Um, and they e x-rayed it, found
um a a structure in there to where they
believed it was an accelerator and it
was interacting
the point of the one the 115 is in a
little triangular
>> piece
>> and it was um interacting with that in
some fashion. So,
>> and did he say whether or not the United
States government or whoever was doing
this research had tried to recreate one
of those on their own?
>> That that was our job to try to recreate
one of those on their own.
>> But what was the metal that it was made
out of?
>> We don't know.
>> We don't know. Again, the metallurgy was
not that was not
>> It seems insane that you couldn't
communicate to them that whatever this
stuff is made out of, this whole thing
acts as one cohesive unit. It's not like
you could make the same exact thing with
aluminum or carbon fiber.
>> No, you can't. This thing acted
differently. This thing acted
differently than any material that we
knew. And I mean, I think all the
answers are in the metallurgy, guys.
you know, that's that's who knew what
was going on, who was able to provide
the answers. But, um,
as far as we knew, if we didn't have the
connection with those other groups, we
weren't really going to make any
progress.
>> You were speculating that there was a
type of
metallic alloy that would work better
with
this concept. Was it Byzantine? Like
what? was bismouth.
>> Bismouth. Yes.
>> Did I say that?
>> I don't think so.
>> No, it wasn't you. No. Someone someone
that I talked to was explaining to me
>> it's related to on the periodic table. I
mean bismouth is above it
>> and 115 is below it. But um we never did
see any correlation between bismouth
that this was a completely new material.
>> Well, I think Oh, that's what it was.
Oh, this is what it was. So, one of the
pieces that Gary Nolan had found that
was uh Gary Nolan is the guy out of
Stanford that has examined these pieces
that are from supposedly crashed sites.
Crash sites where something had gone
down and scattered. Some of these
pieces, they're atomically layered and
I've heard that
>> magnesium and bismouth seem to be
prevalent.
>> Bismouth is the thing.
>> Yeah,
>> bismouth is the thing. It's right above
115 on the periodic chart. And there's
Yeah, there's something about that.
There's something about 115. Yeah. All
this weird magnetism stuff with
bismouth. There's a video from the
action lab. The strange magnetism of
bismouth and it's a bunch.
>> It's diamagnetic. Yeah.
>> So, let him play it out a little bit.
>> I was trying to find the
>> What is diamagnetic?
>> Diamagnetic is it opposes magnetic
fields. I see.
>> So, it kind of makes sense if they're
finding these pieces that are the way he
was explaining. That's business. Yeah.
>> The way he's explaining this whatever
this alloy was this very small piece
that was found I believe in
>> prior to the 1970s. I don't remember the
exact date that he's had from one of
these crash. One of them was from Brazil
that they had recovered
>> and someone had gotten possession of it
in the 1990s and someone had gotten it
eventually to Gary Nolan.
>> He said that to create this on Earth
first of all it can't be done with
current technology. We don't have the
ability to do this
>> the layering technology
>> and that it would cost billions of
dollars just theoretically to make this
and it's it doesn't exist.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. This is it. Alleged
extraterrestrial metal the bottom of a
wedge haze craft that 1940s 26
alternating layers one to four microns
dark bismouth with 100 to 200 microns of
silver magnesium zinc alloy. Each piece
received from the US Army source were
formed with a curvature that tapered.
>> Well, in the for in the 40s. Yeah.
>> Right.
>> That good good luck making that.
>> It says wedge shaped craft in late
1940s. That's Roswell. I mean that's
that's Roswell.
>> Well, I mean what what does it do? I
would like to see the test results of
just the material.
>> Um we can make that now.
>> We can. Yeah. One to four microns of
bismouth,
200 microns of silver. Yeah.
>> The thing is like making something like
that in the 1940s is absolutely
>> No, in the in the 40s, forget it. It's
impossible.
>> But I mean now we could fabricate
something like that
>> and it would cost a shitload of money.
So like the idea that you would make
something like that and just scatter it
around and go,
>> but what but what does it do,
>> right? What does it do? Why why is
magnesium and bismouth? Why in that
particular array? There is something
about Bismouth. There is something about
Bismouth. But that's that's why it's so
fascinating. I would I would love to
know where they Look, it's been 40
years. I would love to know where
they're at now.
>> Yeah. Where they're at now. If they
continued.
>> Well, they had to have continued. I I
can't imagine. You go, "Ah, we're done."
>> No, I mean, they made them moved it. I
mean, like I like I said before, I mean,
they were anxious to move it out of
there at that time. But
>> are you aware of um the labyrinths in uh
Egypt that they've discovered?
>> So there's this
>> are you talking about the the columns
>> columns?
>> No, no, no. This is unrelated. This is
something different. So Herodotus
discussed this. Now uh my friend Ben Van
Kirkwick, he has Uncharted X on um
YouTube. It's an amazing channel where
he was a tech guy who just got
absolutely fascinated by all these
stories of ancient history and really
got obsessed with Egypt and Peru and and
left his field and started making these
incredible videos. But he's highly
intelligent, incredibly articulate. And
so these videos are just absolutely
fantastic and really uh he's he's very
well-versed scientifically so you can
understand these things and explain them
to you. Like they're examining like the
construction of the pyramids and the
whatever technology was used to carve
the stones. And there's just so much of
it that is like confusing because it's
it clearly is like a very high level of
sophistication and technology that's
involved in creating these things. Well,
Herodotus described these labyrinths
>> that were underground in Giza. Not not
not in Giza, but Hara. Is that where it
was? Jamie will find it. But this these
the way Heroditus described it, he said
they were far superior and more
impressive than the the the pyramids of
Giza underground. Well, these massive
labyrinths that exist underground were
all flooded in the 1960s accidentally
when they created dams in order to uh
provide irrigation to agriculture that
was in the area. So, they changed the
water table, it up. this whole
area got flooded.
>> Did they know they were there when they
accidentally
>> No, they didn't because a lot of this
stuff like this is from thousands and
thousands of years ago. A lot of it was
covered over with sand and you know
there there had been some explorers a
long time ago that went there and saw
some of what was in there. But the way
Herodotus described it just absolutely
fantastic.
>> Interesting.
>> So then they started using ground
penetrating radar and they started using
these various technologies that could
detect what was under the surface. And
one of the things that they found was
there's a massive atrium and inside this
mentioned this to me. Yes. There is a 40
meter long metallic object that is
inside this atrium. 40 m of some unknown
metal.
>> How deep is it?
>> I believe it's 100 meters into the
ground.
>> So you're telling me ground penetrating
radar can get to 100 meters underground?
stuff that Filippo Bondi has used from
satellites that we were talking about
>> more than a kilometer into the ground
>> and
>> with decent resolution.
>> Well, no,
>> not decent resolution, but enough that
you could see symmetry enough that they
can also detect things that are wellnown
>> chambers. Well, listen to this. They got
they detected accurately a particle
collider in Italy that is inside of a
mountain 1.2 2 kilometers below the
mountain. It sees through the mountain
and can detect this thing in the exact
diameter, the exact dimensions that this
thing exists. So they can show you
>> and they
a particle collider.
>> Yes. So this is a particle collider that
they know exists, right? So this is an
actual particle collider.
>> They're looking for the proof.
>> So they just it's just proof that this
technology is not just
>> Well, wait. I mean, hang on. I mean, how
do they know it's a particle collider?
Well, no. The particle collider exists.
This is a the the Italians have this
particle collider. It it it it's known.
They made it. It's like it's always
right. No, it's not like we found a
particle coll
no. So, this particle collider, they use
this technology to show that you can see
straight through this mountain to this
particle collider that's underneath the
mountain. So, they know the exact
dimensions of this particle collider.
You could see you could draw you can
almost draw a schematic of it. Well,
through this technology they've also
found these columns that are below the
pyramids. These columns are 22 m 20 plus
meters in uh diameter and they have
something that resembles coils around
all of them and they're positioned in
various points all around where the
structure is. It goes all the way down
through hundreds of meters down and then
it goes to another structure and the
whole complex of it. these structures
goes to over a kilometer into the
ground.
>> But how can you see a kilometer
underground?
>> Well, you would have to understand this
technology. What was it called? Radio
tomography. He explained it to me.
>> Synthetic aperture radar, right?
>> Yes. Well, whatever this
>> being a kilometer underground at decent
resolution.
>> It's not decent resolution, but it's
enough to understand the scope of what
it is. It's enough to understand where
spaces are and where
>> like everybody knows about this but me.
I mean,
It's pretty fascinating. I'll send you
the podcast and I'll send you some of
his conferences where he's explaining
this to room filled with scientists.
>> You would think they'd be anxious to dig
this up.
>> They are. And there's there's there's
actual like studies that are currently
being discussed. Well, they already know
that there's these channels that go in
the ground that have since been covered
with silt and sand because, you know,
the the sands constantly move. But these
things go hundreds of meters down.
shafts that go down.
>> If they find hundreds of If they find
shafts hundreds of meters down with
coils around them,
>> look, that's advanced technology.
>> Exactly. This is the point. This is the
point.
>> Whatever this thing is that they have in
an atrium, like if they said that they
got that craft from an archaeological
dig,
>> I mean, what
maybe the Egyptians had found something
similar to this thousands and thousands
and thousands of years ago.
>> Yeah, I believe that's possible. Yeah.
>> Well,
>> the object that you're I didn't I I
actually got to speak to Filipondi, by
the way. He's in Italy. He's in Rome. We
got to I speak Italians. We got to talk
and we talked about that. I had no idea
they found something with a metal object
down there, though.
>> This is not Filipo Bondi's work. Oh,
>> this is some different scientists that
are just studying the labyrinth. Jamie,
pull up some uh some schematics of the
labyrinth.
>> So, in the labyrinth, there's like a
basic large atrium. You got to pee
again. Go ahead. Sorry. Head up.
>> Yeah.
>> God, I feel like a ass.
>> Don't worry about it. Get some air.
Clear your head.
>> I have a prostate.
>> So, in this in this labyrinth, there's a
large atrium. And in this large atrium,
there is essentially a tic tac
>> really
>> a tic-tac-shaped object that is 40 m
long that is of some unknown metal. They
don't know what it is. They don't know
how it works. But this is this structure
is all underground
in Egypt,
>> which is wild because and how how it's
100 meters.
>> Well, look, we'll we'll get a chance to
look at it. This is Hara. So,
>> so there it says the 40 meter metallic
object. See that where it says Hara
rising.
>> So, if you click on that, it talks about
the 40 meter metallic object discovered
in Egyptians.
>> I can't we can't read a report.
>> Subterranean labyrinth. people talking
about it,
>> right? Got it. But so whatever it is,
play out some of the video just so we
could talk about it.
So
this this whole thing, if you see some
of the images that they're discussing,
>> my friends,
I think
>> and today we're about the work that I
Chicago.
>> Huh.
>> Uh and the team that was in uh Poland as
well. And at that point is when I had
met the person Lucina Lobus who later
became my wife six months later.
>> So yeah, you you actually um we're
working with the NAG and then the
>> I don't know what they're talking about.
>> Yeah, that this is not going to help us.
But if you could just go to some of the
images where they've sort of outlined
>> trying to find it. That's there is not a
very clear image of the metallic object
that
>> No, no, that's fine. But just the
labyrinth itself, what they think the
structure of it was. So I don't know
where they got this from is also the
other issue 40 meter mystery metal
object.
>> It's a weird rendering that doesn't
usually come out from
>> right but there's some other drawings of
like from the Heroditus days and like so
this is what they think it looks like
under the ground
>> which is completely bonkers. And
if there is some 40 meter metallic
object that's under the ground and we
are talking about like the sport model
being a part of an archaeological dig,
right? They might have found something
back then and worship that thing and had
that thing as like
>> turned it into this right
>> as a pyram. Yeah.
>> I I I I think there's something to that.
Well, there you know all these people
that believe that there was a incredibly
advanced civilization before some sort
of apocalyptic disaster that reset
civilization and it took thousands of
years and what we are essentially is uh
not the first advanced civilization but
a rebuild a rebuild thousands and
thousands and thousands of years later.
You know, that rings true with me. And
as Graham Hancock always says, we're a
species with amnesia. And I think that
makes sense. And I think if you're
dealing with people that were basically
knocked back into the stone age 11,000,
12,000 years ago, and it took us forever
to rebuild to where we are now. I think
we've gone down a completely different
path than whatever the people that were
able to build the pyramids of Egypt and
all these fantastic megalithic
structures where in and we don't
understand the technology we used. We
don't and it doesn't it literally
doesn't make sense that they were able
to do this.
>> It's it's even like when we see those
big gigantic stones and they're not just
piled together, they're like interlocked
in weird shapes and all that. It's like
how do we how did that happen? I mean
that you know those are things that
Yeah, I agree with you. Yeah,
archaeologists are very reluctant to
admit it, but there's tremendous
evidence that not only were these people
far more advanced than we think people
should have been back then, but they're
probably more advanced than we are now
with some different kind of technology.
>> And maybe like it it again it's like a
it's like advanced but in a different
way.
>> Right.
>> Right. Cuz otherwise
>> a different pathway. They did they
didn't go
>> our way.
>> Yeah. They didn't go internal combustion
engine and electronics
>> because we would see something.
>> Exactly. Right.
>> But might not. If you're thinking about
a 100,000 years ago, there might not be
anything left, which is part of the
problem.
>> But whatever this metallic object is, if
they are able to figure out a way to
divert some of the water there, see all
layers converge at a central corridor or
avenue. He said like the atrium of a
shopping mall where you could see all
floors from one vantage point. a hall
consisting of a massive space 40 m wide
and no less than 100 meters long.
>> My personal interpretation, Tim said, is
that the entire hall was constructed to
house a centrally positioned
freestanding object about 40 m long.
>> Wow.
>> So, this hall they believe was
constructed to house whatever this 40 m
long unknown metallic object.
>> How could they not dig that up?
>> Well, they could, but it's going to cost
an immense amount of money. And the
thing is about the Egyptians, the people
that run it. I had one of them on the
podcast, Zahi Hawas, and he's incredibly
dogmatic about his ideas of who built
this and what. And when you say, "How
did they make these structures?"
2,300,000 stones that weigh between two
and 80 tons, the biggest stones cut from
quaries that were hundreds of miles away
through the mountain. And it's like this
was a national project.
>> The Egyptians did everything because
they were awesome. Yeah. I'm sure they
were awesome. I'm sure they were
awesome, but it doesn't explain the
technology involved cuz there's extreme
technology just to be able to cut those
things. Like one of the things that they
don't understand is these voses, these
voses that they made that are perfectly
perfectly designed where there's the the
difference between like the edges and
the symmetry is like a thousandth of a
human hair. And these are cut out of
incredibly hard granite. They don't
>> really I've never heard. Yeah, you guys
are familiar with that.
>> But these this is a 3D print of one of
them that exists.
>> Yeah. And they're fascinated by the
perfection and they're saying, "How did
they do that? We don't even know how to
do that."
>> Incredibly hard stone
>> built with an incredible precision and
and granite.
>> Incredibly hard granite, incredible
precision. Back when they had no metal
alloys, they had copper tools. It
doesn't make any sense. None of it makes
any sense. Then there's the symmetry
involved in some of these statues. Like
they're perfectly symmetrical in terms
of the distance between the eyes, the
nose, the lips. Most no one's face is
symmetrical. Your your left side of your
face is different. If you combine the
two sides, they look it looks weird.
>> But when you look at these statues,
these statues which are massive carved
out of granite. Again, supposedly before
they had steel, like they didn't have
diamond tipped instruments to do this.
They polished them. They're perfectly
symmetrical and massive. Some of them
are a thousand tons. And they don't have
any understanding of how these people
built these things or put them there.
And they all seem to be the biggest,
most spectacular ones are the oldest.
>> How could you not want to dig those up?
>> Yeah. Well, they
>> and look at them, pick I mean, they're
concerned about national pride, but if
you dig them up, um,
>> it's not just national pride. It's the
pride of the people that have been
espousing this one narrative for so
long. That's part of the problem. The
gatekeepers of the information.
>> It's still national pride.
>> It is. But these people are idiots. That
that's part of the problem. Like they
their own ego is preventing them from
being open-minded and calling out to the
world's research communities and saying,
"Listen, there's something going on
here. We don't have the big picture. We
have a picture that we have formed from
a limited amount of information and
we've been incredibly arrogant about
what we're assuming. We also know that a
lot of these pharaohs would carve their
name and carve their hieroglyphs into
existing things. They would claim
existing things.
>> Some of the carvings on these things are
far crudder in the way they've done it
than the actual construction of the
thing. And they think that these are old
things that were there already. And then
these later pharaohs
>> just wanted to attach their name,
>> chiseled their hieroglyphs into these
things.
>> And another thing, and this has been
mentioned a lot, is the fact that
there's no tools that were ever
discovered in those areas that would
prove that those things that those
things were made with those and they had
to use tools. They had to have
something, right?
>> So there's not even that that's not even
available. So it's like, how did they do
it? Did they hide the tools? that they
it I mean why would they do that?
>> It doesn't none of it makes any sense.
And also these incredibly hard voses
that you find they're the oldest ones.
They're the the things that they find in
the oldest sites. It's like the most
complicated, complex, confusing
technology seems to be the oldest stuff.
>> Yeah.
>> There's also like
>> you had another guy here that in that
does research on Peru and he was talk I
can't remember his name. I got to meet
him.
>> Luke Caverns
>> was it him?
>> Yeah. goes to Peru and he has a show
about that about the the ancient stuff
that they're finding underground in
Peru.
>> There's a couple guys. What was the
other guy?
>> He he he's got black hair. I can't
remember his name.
>> That's Luke. The younger guy.
>> Yeah, younger guy.
>> Yeah, that's Luke. Yeah.
>> So, basically, he was talking about the
fact that there's two layers of ancient
stuff in Peru. The first layer is
younger
>> and what's below it is what's really
incredible
>> and more complex.
>> More complex. but they don't want to go
there because you're going to destroy an
existing archaeological site that's on
top of it. So, what's happening is
they're having trouble now getting
permission to go to the lower level,
which is even better because they're
going to have to break an archaeological
site of a of a more recent part of that
civilization.
>> Well, this is a common theme among
people. We build on older sites. There's
a place that I go to in Italy in the
Amalfi Coast and there's this incredible
old uh church there that's over a
thousand years old, but it's built on an
even older church and there's a
plexiglass floor
>> and it shows the old church.
>> Yes. The old church is underneath it and
you can see the structure of this old
church and I was asking them how old is
the old church. They go we don't know.
>> It's over a thousand years old. So it's
over a thousand years old this church
and then this really old church is on
top of it that's like hundreds and
hundreds of years old also but they
built it on top of an existing
structure. So this is a common theme.
This is a theme in Peru where you see
the Inca construction which is like much
less complicated smaller stones you know
mud mortar and but it's on top of these
megalithic structures that are carved in
these jigsaw shapes where it seems like
they're they've been melted. Yeah.
>> It's freaky stuff. They have no
understanding of what technology was
used, who did it, how they did it, how
they moved these immense thousand ton
stones and cut them with precision in
this jigsaw way so that it will absorb
the energy of earthquakes and not fall
down.
>> Yeah, that's crazy. I mean, that's
>> there's a lot of that stuff that's
really really freaky. And then you get
into old religious texts and that's when
things get really freaky. You get to
things like the book of Enoch that talk
about the watchers who came down from
the sky and created.
>> Clearly, a lot of unusual stuff happened
a long time ago. A long time ago
>> and we don't have a good record of it.
We just have what we know. And what we
know we get very arrogant about. We know
what happened 300 years ago.
>> That's a really good point of what we
know we get very arrogant about.
anything else. We don't
>> these academics
and and these people that are in charge
of the narrative like the people in
Egypt where they're very arrogant and
they're gatekeepers cuz their whole
identity is based on them being the ones
that explain to the world how these
incredible sites were produced. And if
something comes along that is counter to
that narrative,
>> they fight it. They fight it because it
is their it's part of them. It's their
identity. Uh when I spoke to Philippi, I
talked to one of my cousins in Italy. I
spent a lot of my time in Italy when I
was younger. One of them, she was
younger than I was when I was there, but
she's now become a respected archae
archaeologist in Rome and she's an
Egyptologist. Okay? And I went out to
Italy to visit family and I was sitting
at the table. This is not even that long
ago. And she's sitting next to me and I
mean I remember her from from being a
kid. And she nudged me at the table.
There's her family's all academic.
Everybody's a doctor or scientist or
something like that. So, there's always
that pride of the science and she nudges
me and in Italian she says, "I'm really
interested in what what you do, what
you're looking into." And I knew what
she meant. It was about UFOs. And I just
responded, "I'm I'm even more interested
in what you know about what's out there
in Egypt." And she looked at me and she
says, "We don't really know all of it.
Some a lot of she said a lot of it makes
no sense." But she said it whispering
because she knew that that's not well
seen at the table cuz now she's going to
come across as this pseudocience type of
like, "Oh my god, she's going to come
out of the the the mainstream, you
know." So, and then she she came she
went to her place and I was still there.
We were there for a couple of days. She
came and gave me a little book and uh
in Italian, I don't know how to say it.
The the the missing I don't know how to
say it in English, but the missing
evangelo like the missing scriptures.
Basically, it's a little book in Italian
about the missing scriptures that are
not in the Bible that speak of things
that are not convenient for what we are
arrogant to think we understand.
>> And one of the fascinating things about
these missing scriptures is they found
them alongside existing scriptures. So
when they found the Dead Sea Scrolls in
Kuman, so they found these in a cave in
Kuman and it's kind of a crazy thing
like someone threw a rock and hit a clay
pot and heard the shattering of a clay
pot. So they threw a rock into this high
cave and realized there was something in
there and then they started looking and
they found these scrolls that were in
these clay pots. Inside the scrolls they
found the book of Isaiah. It was a
thousand years older than the oldest
version of the book of Isaiah that we
had ever found. And it's identical
verbatim to the book of Isaiah that is
currently in the Bible. Along with it is
the book of Enoch.
>> And the book of Enoch is
squirly.
>> Yeah, the book of Enoch.
>> Yeah, that's a good way to describe it.
Just a few rabbis decided that the book
of Enoch was too weird because it didn't
jive with the Torah. So, they left it
out of the biblical cannon. That's
right. That's why it's not taught. But
the Book of Enoch is readily available.
You could read it. And it's also in the
Ethiopian Bible. The Ethiopian Bible
includes the book of Enoch. Really? Yes.
And those are the people that supposedly
are in possession of the Ark of the
Covenant.
>> The Arc of the Covenant. Yeah.
>> Which is like
>> Graham Hancock talks about it. is like a
person is set to like they have a job of
watching the ark of the covenant but
it's known that it's going to kill them.
So they all get cataracts and cancer bad
things. Yeah.
>> Well, it has some sort of radiation
apparently and they they exhibit signs
of radiation poisoning when these people
are designed to be the curators.
>> Where is the archae coming in?
Supposedly in Ethiopia.
>> So you guys think that's
>> I mean I'm very
>> I think it's ancient technology. I think
it's probably ancient technology. It's
probably some completely
not understood ancient technology.
>> I'm I'm not discounting it. I'm just I'm
just wondering.
>> Well, I like the fact that you're
skeptical even though you have the
craziest story of all time. But
it's it it speaks to your integrity. It
really does because you're not a guy who
believes kooky So for you, a guy
who doesn't believe kooky is a hard
rational scientist who's an engineer
who's done things like put a rocket
engine in the back of a Honda
and then or a hydrogen-powered Corvette
and then you go and see these things,
you're like, "Wait, what? What the
is this thing you have?"
>> I just I worship technology,
>> right?
>> Nothing else, right? So I mean to hear
something like that, it's Do you think
that that that actually exists?
>> I don't know. Um, Graham Hancock is
convinced it exists. It's very carefully
guarded and these people have been
guarding it for centuries throughout
history, right? So,
>> I mean, there's too many missing pieces
of the puzzle to really say one way or
another. I don't think
>> whether or not it was just mythology or
an actual, right?
>> But it is weird that he's talked to
these people that have these
cataracts and these people all say the
same thing. They die. the people that
are designed or that are designated to
be the curators of this particular
religious.
>> I relate this back to the I I think I
told you the first time we met, you
know,
>> if somebody found a nuclear reactor,
>> right?
>> Yeah.
>> Back at that time, you know, and they
took it apart.
>> They just would drop dead, right? You
know, from the radio Yeah.
>> magically from that. And anybody that
came in to check on them would also die
and they go, "This is evily evil. It's
cursed or whatever." or something that
you're not supposed to have access to
because some other Yeah. Right. And
could this be something at another
level? You know,
>> that I have to say and I I mean I'm the
one to say it, but I struggle with
divine stuff because I'm like it this
this craft or this technology. I mean,
our phones to somebody a thousand years
ago would look like some divine object.
I mean it it's technology to us. So we
have to be very cautious in like I'm not
saying there is no divine something.
Maybe there is. We don't know. But
>> I think technology really could mask
itself as divine power
>> 100%. Or
>> divine energy itself could be technology
taken to its final form.
>> That's that I'm open to. Well, if you
think about what we're talking about
with sensient AI, an AI that has the
ability to make better versions of
itself, what happens if it's left alone?
>> Yeah.
>> For a thousand years to do this. Well,
what do you have? You have something
that can harness the power of the
universe itself,
>> access the zero point energy, can do
whatever I mean has a complete
understanding of quant quantum
entanglement, complete understanding of
how the universe functions, how it was
created. I mean, there's new theories
that believe that the entire universe
itself exists inside of a black hole.
They're trying to figure out whether or
not there ever was a big bang or if it's
a continuous cycle of things existing
inside black holes.
>> So, where where do you think we are?
What do you think this is?
>> I think it's a process. I think we're
we're at a stage of a process. Our
problem is we have ideology. We have we
have dogma. We have ego. We have people
that are smarter than most people. but
want to think that they have all the
information and I don't think they do.
And then we have open-minded people that
are curious but don't want to look like
cooks and they're all trying to figure
it out while we're making a
digital god while these weirdo on the
spectrum
>> egg we are literally manufacturing our
own god.
>> But if you are if you take that and you
you extrapolate you go from where it is
now you think about the exponential
increase of technology. Well, where does
that go? It kind of goes divine. I mean,
that might be what God is. We want to
think that God is a thing that exists.
It just exists. It created everything.
Maybe we make God.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We're on the
same channel. Yeah. I I think we created
we I think we created God.
>> I think human curiosity and the this
thirst for innovation is all a part of
it.
>> I'll say something about the technology
because it always fascinates me. I mean,
I spent four years with Bob and I had to
build it in a virtual environment. So, I
kind of had to think about it while I'm
doing it. But if you really think about
what this technology that you saw does,
it essentially creates this artificial
field of whether it's art, maybe it's
natural, maybe it's a natural field, but
it creates a field that we're not
familiar with. And that field, I mean,
Joe, you saw the movie. There was a test
that was done in the lab that froze a
candle flame. Right. Right.
>> Okay. But the but the photons are still
visible within our realm here outside of
the field and you're still seeing the
photons yet it looks like it's frozen to
me is the is this is that technology
like a black hole is it some type of
time stop and they and it basically
gives us the power to utilize time in
our advantage.
If you think about progression in
technology, anything we do, it takes
time. Anything takes time. Whether it's
computing power, we're now we're seeing
quantum computers do things that uh
they're faster and faster and they could
do a trillion processes in an instant
and Japan is coming up with better and
then China. But because everything has
to do with how long does it take to do
that,
>> right? If a technology can make you
bypass time, it's like the record player
playing music, but you're you're now
able to lift it, lift the little pin on
the record and move it to wherever you
want.
>> Yes. And
>> that's a good way to describe it.
>> Right. And now at that point, time is in
your hands. And if we have a technology
similar to what you saw, because you
always said gravity is a control.
gravity and time it it's interlocked,
right?
>> And space and time are interlocked.
>> Exactly. So if that's interlocked,
>> then we have to look at it not just as a
propulsion system or some type of cool
weapon, but how is it affecting time and
how can we use that to our benefit to
evol to evolve faster? Because again,
the faster we can compute, the faster we
could do something, the faster we're
evolving. And if we could lift that
needle and bring it faster to get there,
to get somewhere, why not use it?
>> Or should I mean, should we be allowed
to do that?
>> Us in our current form.
>> Yeah. No,
>> I I'm like I said, I'm I'm not exactly
on our side anymore. Well, that was one
of the Now, do you remember Jamie who
discussed the way they were describing
the use of some of this alien technology
as instantaneous weapon deployment
systems?
>> Yeah. Yeah. I'm not sure we should be
trusted with this stuff, right? No.
Really?
>> Well, really, you think about what we're
doing in Iran right now, you would say
no.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I would say no.
>> We're still flying over patches of dirt
and bombing the out of
>> No. Imagine if we had something a a
million times that power. Um
>> really humans should not be trusted with
that,
>> right? We got to trust it to AI. That's
why we're making it, Bob.
>> This is this is getting scary. Yeah,
>> it is getting scary. But it's it's not
science fiction.
>> No, it's not. I mean, we're making fun
of it now, but No, this is this is
dangerous stuff. And I'm, you know, I'm
sorry for the people that think this is
all a joke. It's not. This is real.
Yeah.
>> And um
>> I'm really not sure we should be trusted
with this. That's maybe why for 40 years
or 60 years people have agreed to keep
it quiet.
>> I would agree.
>> And and um
>> well that's the most logical conclusion.
>> Yeah. This is incredibly dangerous
stuff. And again, it's a world
dominating technology and I I don't know
what to do with it other than to keep it
from people. So, and how do we know if
it comes out? The something I always
struggle with is let's say they they
let's say we do get an some some type of
thing saying, "All right, we we have we
have to see it from somebody in the
government, the president, whoever that
says, okay, here we are. We have this."
Well, first of all, we have to validate
it. The journalists are the whole world.
The media is not going to just trust
somebody saying that. They're going to
go, "Okay, wait a minute. What are you
talking about?" Right? So, it's not like
because somebody says it, we just have
to swallow it. It's like, "All right, go
show us." Right?
>> And then when you do that, well, now
you're exposing something else. What do
we what what happens when we need to
believe it? like as as a as a as people,
what do what has to happen for me to
believe something that somebody says,
>> there really has to be something serious
that makes me believe it,
>> right?
>> You know what I mean? Like some if a
president or anybody, prime minister,
whoever it is says something to me, I'll
still go like, okay, I mean, show me,
right?
>> And then if when they show it,
>> how do I know that's actually that?
>> Think about that.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. And then from there we now have
to go to another level of okay well if
we have to prove it we have to bring in
scientific community okay that means
they have access to it what's the
security parameters there
>> right and then you get
compartmentalization
right and then that stops any sort of an
understanding of it and that's why you
have this stagma this this stagnation of
where you've got these people working on
this thing for decades and not making
any progress Yes.
>> You know how far we could have gotten if
there was free discussion between all
the groups working on this,
>> right?
>> Yeah.
>> But then you also have these
psychos like from Doctor Strange Love
that want to turn it into a nuclear
delivery system.
>> Yeah.
>> To where you don't have to worry about
them detecting nuclear bombs headed
their way. You just instantaneously
devastate Moscow in one shot.
You don't have to take credit for it.
>> Yeah, but we
>> Right. No, it's like we are not ready,
right? We are not ready.
>> I know we're not ready, but we'd be more
advanced if we did that. No, I I mean I
I agree that I agree with that.
>> But um
>> it's all very strange and no one knows
more strange than you. Like
>> No, there are plenty of people that know
more strange than me. I mean, Dennis
knew more strange than me. Anybody above
him knew that. I just knew a small part
of it. But you out of all the people
that can talk about it that are out
there communicating about it, you have
actually seen it physically.
>> Yeah. I'm I I try to only talk about
what I I've seen and touched and
verified. I've heard plenty of other
stuff that I don't know if it's true or
not. And there's no sense in repeating
that because nonsense moves at the speed
of light these days. Right. Yeah. And
that's that's just it's terrible.
>> You live in a weird existence, Bob. You
really do because you're, you know,
you've been holding on to this and you
have this experience from 40 years ago
that's just
become a part of folklore. It's become a
part of the zeitgeist. Like this is why
your podcast that we did is the most
watched podcast I've ever done. This
resonates with people in a way that
look, I've done a lot of UFO ones. I had
Travis Walton on. I've had a lot of
people that have stories. They're all
very interesting. They don't get nearly
the amount of traction that yours does.
And I think it's because you're uniquely
credible. You're uniquely credible in
the fact that you are very skeptical.
You're not interested in like these
fantastic ideas. You you're very
dismissive of nonsense, but yet you have
this burden like you actually physically
touched these things and went
inside.
>> Yeah, I did. I I mean I was fortunate
enough to have this really unique job
that that's about it. And I am
fascinated with the technology, but
that's where it stops. I'm not
interested in anybody else's story.
Although everybody has to email me and
you know I I understand it. You know
that they're looking for somebody. Hey,
I saw this thing out when I was on my
boat and you know what is it? I don't
know. You know, I mean they're they're
they're
just looking for something and it's like
I don't know. Maybe it was Venus or
something and oh my god you suck. you
know, you work for the government. You
know, it's like
>> true,
>> dude. I'm just looking for a prosaic
explanation, right? And um
>> you know, but I only know what I saw and
I touched for myself and everything
else, even in official government
documentation, it's just words on paper.
I don't know if that stuff is true. So,
you got to draw the line there.
>> Yes.
>> But, um you know, I know what I what I
did see. I know for a fact and there is
no way you can tell me that that's not
real.
>> Yeah. I I mean I I have to say in having
worked with him and having you know
inadvertently there's no way that myself
or people on my team weren't trying to
dig deeper and maybe there's a problem.
Maybe there's going to be a gap. Maybe
we'll find something wrong with the
story because we went we went very deep.
We had to build S4. We had to build a
sport model. And there were things that
happened over the years, things that he
had said to us before we had built it
that there's no way he could have known
because there was physicalities, real
things that we built. When you build
something in a 3D environment, you're
actually building a real world. It's got
light bounce and refractions like the
real world. Like when you turn on a
light, it does the same thing. If a
material has a sheen, you see it. It's
literally the same thing. It's just
computing power that gives you access to
another world. And he mentioned things
that were absolutely impossible to know
>> and like what
>> one of the things that got two things
really convinced me. One of them was in
the interior of the craft. You had said
to us it was very dark in there. And
while Bob is explaining to us the this
interior of the craft and many times he
kept repeating it was really dark in
there
>> even though there were h hallogen lights
in there.
>> And so at a certain point he says as I'm
crawling in there's like these extension
cords and I remember going extension
cords like I it then hadn't computed and
he's like yeah they had lights in there
and I'm thinking it's true. I mean there
there's no light switch inside this big
thing. It's 50 52 feet. It's big. And so
they said, "Yeah, there were two big
industrial yellow uh industrial lights
with four spots each pointed up." And so
we decided to make those. We decided to
research the type that were used back
then in the United States, especially on
military bases, the H hallogen power
because it was H hallogen in 1988. And
we turned them on
>> and it was still dark
>> and it was super dark. And I remember
Christopher Matau, by the way, a big
shout out to Christopher Matau that's on
my team who made a lot of those visuals
and he's like a magician. He's he's the
best. He he's there and I I said,
"Chris, turn on the lights cuz we have
to film in the craft." And he's like,
"They're they're on." I said, "They're
not on. I can't see anything."
He's like, "They're fully on." And I
said, "Well, that that doesn't make any
sense. It's so dark in there." I
remember thinking,
>> "It consumes light in there." So, we
upped the power of the light so that you
could see more and it was still dark.
And I thought, "What the hell is
happening?" I go, "Is there a bug? Is it
Is there something wrong?" He goes, "No,
I don't know. It's it's it's absorbing
the light in there." We had to up the
light intensity on those tripods by
20fold
in order for you to see the visuals you
see in our film. Otherwise, it would be
really dark in that crowd. So how did
you compute that? Like what what what
parameters did you establish?
>> So what you do is you're you're inside a
3D environment. You're an actual a three
you're in a 3D world. Now we're inside
the craft that is 52 feet in diameter.
It's we bring a camera in there. So we
were filming the whole film was was done
with the Blackmagic 6K cam. So we would
bring our Blackmagics in the 3D
environment. you can actually set that
so that we could film inside the craft.
So it matches the filming of of our real
cameras. And so the c as soon as the
camera's on, it's the same lens, it's
the same aperture, everything is as you
would have it. And so you're trying to
adjust for this dark room, but if the
room is really dark, you can't really
get a good look at it. Cuz if you go
close enough, you would have seen like a
seat and a little bit of the reactor,
but you would have been like, "What's
the black screen I'm looking at?"
>> So, what is the explanation for why it's
so dark?
>> It's just the way the light reflects
>> and and that is exactly Yeah. It's when
you're in that space.
>> Exactly.
>> But but here's the question like what
what are you when you're making this in
a computer model, right? Right. What are
you putting in that would make it absorb
light that way?
>> I didn't do that. So, what we did is we
spent over a year with Bob. I'm I'm not
I'm not kidding. It was like a year of
trying to figure out the material of the
craft, the the actual skin of the craft.
That was the hardest thing to do.
>> The specularity and the reflectivity of
the actual material and the angle. And
then when the lights are in there, they
just reflect at a weird angle. And it
never gets bright in there unless you
have, you know, tremendous amounts of
light in there. It's always dark
>> and and sorry to interrupt, but that
would have been So when when that
happened and we have the right material,
which is like this, let's call it
unpolished stainless steel. It's got a
little bit of usage to it just to give
it some texture. It's it's as it's got
the same sheen, reflection, refractions
of a real material like that. Cuz every
time we put a fake light in there, okay,
it's reacting like that. And now you
turn these big H hallogen lights on and
it's like the part of where the H
hallogen is hitting the ceiling of the
craft because they were turned upwards.
Remember you Bob said they were not
pointed like this. They were pointed to
the ceiling of the craft. So you got two
of them.
>> It's like wherever the light was going
was getting eaten up by that portion of
the material. So it's not reflecting all
the way. you have a 52 foot distance and
it's being lost in a maybe 7 8 foot
diameter environment area where the
light is and we're like why is that
happening but that's how it that's the
reality
>> he could not have known that if he if
he's trying to make that up
anybody who's inventing a story says
there's two industrial light with four
howlet bright halogen spots in there. A
liar would not say it was really dark in
there. You don't know that. You have to
build it,
>> right?
>> So, to me, that was a physicality of
being inside the craft that made me go,
Lazar could not have known that if he
was making that up.
>> You wouldn't know it until you
experimented.
>> Exactly.
>> Right. So, I'm like, unless Bob back
then decided to go and in his garage
build himself a fake dome, which I don't
think you did. I'm like, how would he
have known that? We didn't expect that.
We were We were struggling with why is
it so dark in there?
>> And you make films, so you're used to
using lighting.
>> Exactly. And and Chris was like, "Dude,
this thing is just eating up the light."
And I'm like, Bob kept saying, "It's so
dark in there." And it just h how do you
how do you how is that possible?
>> What were the other things?
>> The other one I laugh about this with
Bob all the time. It's about the flag
>> on on the craft that you could have seen
it.
>> I don't remember.
>> So when he walked into the hanger the
very first time he saw uh the very first
time
>> the backwards flag
>> he saw the craft and he saw the American
a reversed American flag sticker on the
craft.
>> Wonder why it was reversed.
>> I I I'll get to that in a sec. I think I
know. But I whatever I I'll I'll say
what I think. And
there's a lot of stuff I researched a
lot of stuff on Bob Lazar before I did
this. And there's a lot of bad
information out there. So I I really I I
really tell people if you really want to
see what he saw. Don't go read what's
out there, check this out cuz Bob
actually vetted everything. So it's not
the wrong information to read. But
anyway, there's a lot of detractors
saying there's no way Lazar could have
seen that flag. If the craft was that
size and it was on the hull on the on
the craft shell, there's no way the
angle he's 5 something. He wouldn't have
been able to see it. So, we built it. We
built a 52 foot diameter craft. We put
it in the hanger. It's there. And my my
team Chris gives me the goggles, the
ones I made you try on. And it is the
very first time I go in there and I know
the craft is there. So, I put them on
and now they're they're hoping because
they're there with with notes. They're
hoping I'm giving them all the notes.
Oh, no. That's not good. That's not
good. And the first thing I did is I
look to my right. I'm looking at the
craft. And I'm I asked uh Chris to put
me at 5 foot 10, which is your height.
So, I said, "At 510, I'm Bob's height
with the goggles. I want to see."
>> And the first thing I said is, "Oh, it's
there it is." And they're like, "There
is." I said, "The flag?" And they
thought I was pointing at a flag on a
wall and they're like, "There's no flag
in the hanger." I said, "No, on the
craft." And they're like, "Yeah." I
said, "You can clearly see it. It was
clear." That was something that also
made me go, "Yeah, this is this is it.
This is the real size." So, had Bob
Lazar not actually seen that, the
majority of the the detractors out there
kept saying, "There's no way at that
angle a a human eye could see a sticker
on the top of the craft, which is on the
top shell."
>> But you can. It's as clear as day.
>> So, those were two things that I
considered to be like, you know, h it's
there. So I I know to may maybe some
people that's not a lot, but as a person
like I am who's very technical, I'm very
ve I'm super difficult. It took a long
time to do this cuz I'm a perfectionist
and I wanted to make sure it was
accurate to what he saw. I look at stuff
like that because I analyze everything
like that and I analyzed his story
inside out. And if you couldn't see the
flag from that position, it would be a
big Yeah, that would have been a red
flag for me. I would have been like,
"Wait, you can't see it." But you can.
>> So, you can't you can't put uh enough of
a value on little details like that
because he didn't say this in 2026. He
said this in 1989,
>> right?
>> Why
>> Why do you think the flag was reversed
>> in American uh flag use law? the the the
the only thing we were able to ascertain
is the fact that on military or on
vehicles, anything military on a on a
uniform, if ever you see an American
flag on your right shoulder, it's
reversed because it's how the wind is
blowing the flag. On your left side,
it's like the flag is because the wind
is blowing this way. If you look at
vehicles, uh, let's say a Greyhound bus,
they have American flags on each side
and they have a normal one on the left
one on the left side and a reversed on
the right side because it's the right
side of the vehicle.
>> So, it's blowing
>> it's blowing
>> because the wind is blowing the flag
that way.
>> So, the reversed American flag is a is a
is a actual uh it's the law of how to
use the flag in the United States
military or on vehicles. And it has to
be like that on the right side. So to to
say, is that the right side of the
craft?
>> Yeah, it must be.
>> It must be because if you go into the
craft, the seats when you're when you go
into the craft, I I can't wait for you
to go in the craft. When you go inside,
the seats are facing the right side,
meaning the hatch is the right side of
the craft. It's the only thing that came
to mind. I mean, is that what the they
did at S4? They put a sticker on
it. I mean, it's the only logical thing
we could think of is that's why it was
there.
>> I don't know. Um, you know, my other my
other because if it was an American
flag, if it was just for identifying
this as America, why would you reverse
it?
>> Right.
>> Right.
>> You're reversing it because it's
indicating the direction in which it
travels. Exactly.
>> Wow.
>> That's just an interesting
>> Yeah.
>> Right.
>> It's all interesting. The the goggles is
a trip.
>> When I put on the uh 3D AR goggles and
you VR goggles rather, and you you stand
in that
>> warehouse, that hanger, and look at it,
it's very strange. It feels weird.
>> Exactly like it was.
>> It feels very weird. It feels very weird
because I I mean I'm only imagining what
it's like to actually be you in 1988 and
be standing there
>> when you put the goggles on. That's
exactly how it was.
>> What did What did Dennis say when you
first saw it? He was like, "Huh? Huh?"
Like, "Come on."
>> No, Dennis. Dennis was hardcore.
>> Yeah,
>> he was. Yeah, he was here. Look at that.
You know, come back in here. I mean, it
there was no reaction. Barry, on the
other hand, was out of his mind. He he
couldn't wait to show me stuff and you
know he said check this out. Oh my god
it was that awesome you know but Dennis
was uh it was like a hardcore
you know military guy.
>> How much of a view did you get of the
other crafts because it's one of the
things in the film you only see like
hints of them.
>> That's it.
>> That's it. What you saw in the film is
exactly what it was. It was just a
passing thing. And as I was walking out
there going, "Wow, there's more.
Everything looks different." And other
than the the first two hangers, I really
couldn't tell what was passed out there,
but there were other hangers and there
were things inside them. But
>> it's also interesting that at the time
in 1988, this site was not even
confirmed. This was like for you to have
to know about this and know the exact
location of it is kind of strange.
>> Right now Luigi did that. I mean I gave
him the general idea. I said,
>> you know, I know what time I got out
there and I could see Papoose Lake and
behind me.
>> He pul he pulled up a lot of stuff from
there. But another interesting thing he
pulled up was there was an old silver
mine exactly there
>> in the exact same place. case. And I
wonder if they used that as the It was
already drilled. There was already, you
know, carters in there.
>> I actually I actually held this for this
show. What I'm about to say is the first
time ever. It's not even It didn't make
it in my film. I wish it did, but it
didn't make it in the film. Veronica at
on our team, she's my sister. She's like
my right hand, and I if I didn't have
her, I wouldn't be here right now. She
found this and at a certain point we
were looking at the maps out there and
we we you'll see in my film that Gene
Huff sent us some US Department of the
Interior official maps of that
environment at the Groom Groom Lake
Papoose Lake. But we weren't satisfied.
We wanted to go deeper. We said there's
got to be more. And there's one map in
POS that is a publicly available map.
It's super not easy to find, by the way.
That is in the hands of the US
Department of the Interior.
I could get it to you if you want. I can
email it to you. That map is the oldest
map of Papoose Lake known in the hands
of the government that is that is public
domain. that map and everybody's going
to be listening to this clearly shows a
road that goes right into where S4 was
is. It doesn't show a road near it. It
shows a road going right in the mountain
and they removed it. That map is from
1941.
Okay. Right after that, the map is 1950
and 1952 and those roads were removed,
but the the late the oldest map we ever
found, it's going to be available. We're
going to post it on our website. It's
going to be everywhere.
It shows clear as day a road that goes
right into the mountain exactly where
Bob Lazar said S4 was.
>> So, do you think that that was the road
to the silver mine initially?
>> Yes, I believe that. Yeah. I
>> It makes sense that they would use an
existing facility and just enlarge it
instead of start from nothing,
>> right? Of course. Especially if it's
abandoned.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> And it also makes sense that if Roswell
was real and if they really did
>> find a crashed UFO in 1947,
like in the 1950s, they'd be like,
"Let's get rid of this road,
>> right?"
>> Yeah. If we're putting this out there,
if we're building this facility out
there, and if they did have it, that
also makes sense that they've worked on
this for decades. You come along in
1988, they've got this happening in the
1950s and it's still there.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> I think what happened is when the CIA
took over, cuz CIA is the one took over
Area, they're the ones at Area 51. I
think what happened is as they took
over, they just removed the the road. It
wasn't even because there was a UF a
flying saucer there. I I just think they
got in there, took control of that
terrain, that whole landscape, and said,
"Remove it off the maps because it's
there prior to them taking ownership of
that land."
>> So, I mean, it's clear that there was a
road there and then they came in, CIA
said, "Take it out." And S4 might have
had already an install. Not, it wasn't
an installation, but they probably had a
a tunnel in there already because they
were it was a mine. So, it was an easier
way to build a big facility in the in
the side of the hill. Makes sense.
>> It does make sense. And then there's
also the images that you got of what
looks like the hangar bay doors that are
camouflaged.
>> And I have to say that
>> got to go again.
>> Yeah.
>> Sorry.
>> No worries.
>> That's all good.
>> Prostate problem.
>> Technology will fix that.
It'll remove your prostate, turn you
into a alien. Um, so though that
that image that you got um of the
unfortunately it's kind of blurry, but
it you do see something that looks very
similar to what you'd expect to be
camouflage garage bay doors.
>> I got contacted by a guy called Scott
Mitchell and I was getting contacted by
everybody, Joe. Everybody everybody was
trying to get in and find getting to
make me work with them or use something
they found. So I was I was ignoring 95
99% of people's like is getting tiring.
Everybody's like you got to listen to
me. I know stuff about that. I'm like
whatever. I'm working with Bob Lazar. I
I have enough right now. And but this
guy, we had built the base and I knew
exactly where it was. I knew exactly the
layout. And this guy, he not only
contacted me, but he sent me an image
that he had that he had drawn. He didn't
want to send me the real what he had
found, but he says, "Here it is. This is
where the doors are, and this is exactly
where they they point to." And I looked
at the image and I said, "Not bad." I
mean, he really nailed it in the image
and I thought, "Okay." I I at first I
thought somebody on my team leaked
something we had to be honest. I'm like,
"Ah, who did that? who sent out one of
our renders to somebody and cuz that's
what I thought and they're like no no no
this is what so I re I I I re I talked
to this guy and uh he's a he's really
really good at researching and he ended
up becoming probably one of the best
I've ever like he's one of the best I've
ever seen his name is Scott Mitchell and
uh he says there are pictures that were
taken in 2020 and they ironically those
pictures were taken on December 25th
2020 which is Christmas Day in the
middle of CO, which means the base might
have been shut down if you think about
that. You know what I mean? Like it's
CO, it's like in the heat of it. Plus,
it's 20 it's 20 25th of December, so
there's probably nothing going on there.
And this private u uh pilot in in a
small Cessna requested access inside the
perimeter and they granted him
permission and he had a big Nikon camera
on board with a big telescopic zoom and
he took a ton of pictures and
they're amazing. They're all public.
They're all available. You could
download them. And there's this p these
pictures of Papoose Lake and the Hill,
but they were being used on the internet
for a long time. Everybody's like, "You
see Bob Lazar is a fraud. It's not real.
There's nothing there. Well, of course
you can't see it. It's first of all, 17
miles away. And secondly, they're not
designed for you to see it. And that
also, let's talk about something that
Bob was talking about in 1988. The
picture was taken in 2020. I mean, there
could be a that's could be a different
landscape now. Anyway, so he said,
"Look, this image, if you change the
contrast, you you got to keep the
original, but just move and try to
extract data from your image." You know,
anybody who knows how to use that do
that with photography, you can do that.
And he and he pulls out these this this
geometric sh these geometric shapes. You
could see them. They're they're like
little they look like rectangles.
>> And I thought, what if this is not real?
I I'm I was super skeptical. I'll be
honest with you. I wasn't I'm talking
about the the picture with the doors on
the door
>> the hanger doors, the one from Scott
Mitchell, the one that we have in the
film.
>> Oh, right. Right.
>> And uh and so I I I didn't believe it. I
thought there's no way. I go, there's no
way this is real. I I don't believe it.
So Scott was really cool. He said,
"Look, man. I I understand you're a
skeptic. I get it. I want you to do me a
favor. Go online, search it yourself. I
won't even tell you where it is. I'll
just tell you what who who took the
pictures. The the only thing he gave us
is the picture number is 0501. That's
what the picture number is. He goes, "If
you find it, have whoever on your team
play around with it until you see it."
That was fair cuz I said, "Okay." Cuz I
mean, if it's if it's out there, there's
two different places it was uh on online
and the one place we got it from was the
source of it. Okay. was the from the
photographer, the guy himself.
We take it. I had three different people
on my team. Everybody's really good at
all this stuff on my team. So, I said,
"Guys, this is what we need to see. If
you guys could pull it up, I I'm I'm I'm
not going to be as skeptical." Everybody
got it almost in the same time. They
were playing around. And eventually, the
the easiest software we used to get that
detail out was Da Vinci Resolve. And
with Da Vinci, it's a faster process
than if you're messing around with
Photoshop or whatever. And it came and I
was like, "Oh my god, it it it's it's
really there. You could clear." So what
I did is I had them scan the rest of the
picture because it's pixels, right? So I
said, "Let's also see if it's not some
pixel pixelation. Is it maybe just what
the photo does? Maybe we just got lucky
and it looks like that there. Maybe it's
going to show something similar
elsewhere." and it doesn't. And then I
said, "All right, go get me 0502. I want
0500. I want because like I kept
snapping pictures. I want you to do the
same." Like we went really military.
Like I said, I want to make sure this is
this is real. I don't I'm not going to
put our name on this if it's not.
>> And it ended up being other pictures
also show it by the way because he he
went click click click. So it's like
it's not just that one. That's the
clearest one. And so I was at a certain
point I go to Bob's house and I'm
sitting there and the guy calls me.
Scott Scott Mitchell calls me and he has
no idea I'm with I'm with Bob Lazar. So
I pick up. It's a video call. And he
goes, "Hey man, what's going on?" I
said, "Well, look." I said, "Look who
I'm with." And he just like exploded
because he was like, "Oh my god, you're
with Bob." And I said, "Show him." And
so Bob was there and we showed it. We
ended up transferring the call on a on a
Zoom call and he showed it and you said,
"Yeah, like I remember you going, "Yeah,
that's it."
>> Yeah. Yeah. That
>> What did that look like to you when you
saw those images?
>> Yeah, that was it was awesome. Yeah,
>> it was awesome. What what was really
shocking was the first hanger was bigger
because that was the big hanger. Yeah.
Yeah. Because the first hanger is the
big hanger and there's smaller ones. And
I said, "Jesus, the first hanger is
bigger." You You found it. You found it.
So, I mean that that was I I just lit up
at that point. Yeah. It was
>> What happens if you look at that site
with Google Earth?
>> That is with Google Earth.
>> No, no, that was the picture. But Google
Earth, but Google Earth. And I'll tell
you something about Google. Yeah, that
was the
>> That wasn't with Google Earth.
>> No, the the picture is a real photo. The
picture of the hanger doors is a real
photo.
>> Okay. I thought that was Google Earth.
>> No. No. The picture is a real photo. The
Google Earth though. You see that in the
film?
>> Yeah.
>> I can't make this up. I didn't want to
put anything in the film. That was one
of my things. I did not want to put
anything in the film that would make me,
the whole team, or even Bob look like
we're trying to like maggyver some
something in there. It has to be you go
look for it yourself. It's public. If
you don't believe it, go check it out
yourself. I that's how that's what was
that's the only thing we allowed in
there. And
when you go on Papoose Lake
on June 20, so June 22nd of 2024,
June of 2024,
Google Earth changed. There's you're
you're going to be right over Papoose
Lake. If you zoom in, you're you're not
going to notice it because it it's kind
of a yellowish uh tint to the to the
image. And I remember going, why is it
so yellow? I mean, I had been there so
many times. I was like, why why the
it turned so yellow? And I'm like, so I
I'm zooming out and I'm like, why did
they it up? I thought they
ruined everything. It's all yellow. And
as I go further, you see this box that
is like right over Papoose. So, I'm
like, what is that? And I put my mouse
over it. And wherever you're in the box,
it's June 22nd, 2024. And as soon as you
put your mouse outside of the box, well,
it's an older date. And I thought, oh,
they just did that. And the M. So, I
think what they thought they were going
to do is that new filter right over
Papoose Lake removes every possible
detail on the terrain, the landscape
where the brushes are and the the Joshua
trees are. It really, really removes all
that. It blurs. It blurs everything out,
but it makes they made a mistake. They
made a huge error, I believe. So, and I
think if they're listening, they're
going to go, "Yeah, our bad to the to
the DoD cuz they're going cuz you see
all the tracks on the lake." It for some
reason that filter accentuates the
tracks on Papoose Lake and removes the
landscape brushes for I don't know why
it just did that. And I was like, "Holy
shit." You see all these tracks?
>> What it looks like is they're trying to
purposely obscure the area.
>> Yes.
>> And the fact that it's in a very clear
box.
>> Yeah.
>> And you talked about that in the film.
It's kind of bonkers.
>> There's really no reason.
>> There's no reason
>> to pick one little square box out of
>> Why don't that nobody goes to, right?
Yeah.
>> To try to obscure it.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Why would
>> And so I thought, geez, we got to put
this in there. I mean, it's so cool,
right? It's all very compelling. Um, I
think we should wrap this up, but uh,
the film's excellent.
>> Thank you.
>> Congratulations. You could tell it took
a tremendous amount of effort and, uh, I
could tell by watching you watch it when
we watched it together that it had an
insane impact on you.
>> It It really
>> And you had already seen it before. I
saw it with you.
>> So, you're just seeing it again. It's
just like it's bonkers.
>> Yeah, it it it really affected me. And
uh is is there anything else you want to
say? There's a couple things I want to
bring up.
>> Okay.
>> You know,
>> um
>> just because I've heard stuff Luigi has
told me, people think that I make
millions of dollars off of this stuff
>> and Oh, yeah.
>> And I don't I would I would love to sign
on to the millions of dollars program.
Um you know, Jeremy made made his movie
and I didn't get a scent from Jeremy's
movie. I said, "Anything you make, give
to George." Um, you know, Luigi has
spent millions of dollars of his own
money, literally, right? You know,
making this stuff, and I can't see how
he's ever going to make the money back
if he does. That's awesome.
>> I drive a a 1980 something.
>> Uh,
>> not a 1980. You drive?
>> No. 19
>> 2008?
>> No. a 20 2018 Chevy Bolt electric car. I
mean, it's a car you'd buy for your
teenage daughter. It's embarrassing to
drive. It cost me $18,000.
>> You know, my house on the 10 acres costs
$450 grand. And, you know, back when I
when I got it, I mean, that's that's I
work six to seven days a week at United
Nuclear, my business. I mean, if there's
anyone that wants to give me millions of
dollars, please contact contact me
immediately because I would like to
retire, but but no, I don't make
millions of dollars off this stuff. And
uh I I my my wife and I do fine. We grow
our food in our greenhouse and we live
in our little place up in the mountains
and that that that's it. But I um you
know, this is Luigi's thing. That's why
he's here. I think the film's gonna be
very successful and I think you're
probably gonna make money off of it. At
least I'm hoping.
>> He'll make money off.
>> Well, you'll make money.
>> Yeah, I Thank you, Joe.
>> Um,
>> I think we should wrap it up. Thank you
very much, Luigi. You knocked it out of
the park.
>> Thank you.
>> It's fantastic. Bob, great to see you
again as always.
>> I'm sorry I had to pee so much.
>> That's okay.
>> It's understandable. It's
understandable. And uh again, the film
uh let's show it on the screen, Jamie,
so people can know uh where they could
see it, when to
>> when it's available.
>> Yeah, it's available actually as of
right now.
>> Let's play the trailer. We'll we'll
we'll end it with
>> Let's do that.
>> S4 The Bob Lazar story. We'll end it
with a trailer.
>> It's on Amazon. And uh we are not alone.
>> We are not alone, right?
Physical
evidence now exists which proves that
there is life elsewhere and at least one
form of that life has been here.
As of 1989, that evidence was in the
custody of the United States government.
Between December of 1988 and April of
1989, I worked as a senior staff
physicist in what has to be the most
secret project in history.
My job in this program was to be part of
a back engineering team.
This particular disc appeared to be in
excellent condition and because of its
sleek appearance, I nicknamed it the
sport model.
The goal in this program was to see if
the technology of the disc could be
duplicated with Earth materials.
To start up the reactor, of course, we
need some element 115.
In fact, you need 223 g machined into a
wedge like this.
The program outed us for consisted of
three projects. Project Galileo, Project
Sidekick, and Project Looking Glass.
>> The file on top was Project Galileo. And
as it turned out, that's the project
that I was part of. And that clearly
referred to reverse engineering a
recovered alien spacecraft.
Just cannot be a secret from from
anyone, not just the American people,
but the rest of the world.
>> All this stuff is something that
happened to him. It's not who he is.
They're doing everything they can to
keep this information secret.
That's empirical evidence. I saw a craft
to do that thanks to him.
Now this story spills
and the world changed.
Bye for now.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video features Joe Rogan interviewing Bob Lazar and filmmaker Luigi regarding a new documentary that recreates Lazar's time at the S4 facility using advanced CGI and AI. They discuss the technical specifics of the 'sport model' spacecraft, including its propulsion system driven by Element 115 and its unique material properties. The conversation expands into the challenges of scientific compartmentalization, the potential for humans being an engineered species, and recent satellite/radar discoveries of anomalous objects in ancient sites like Egypt.
Videos recently processed by our community