How To Plan Better | Simple Analog System | Cal Newport
2904 segments
Okay, so I have a question for you. How
do you figure out what to do with your
time during any given day? Now, I think
this question matters more now than it
ever has before because if you don't
have a good answer to it, if you just
sort of wing it as your day unfolds,
guess what forces are going to take
control of your intention? Email, Slack,
social media, online chatter, YouTube,
streaming services. This is a show about
finding depth in a distracted world. And
to succeed in this goal, you need a good
planning system. But how do you create a
system that's not only going to work,
but is something you're going to stick
with over time. This is what I want to
talk to you about today. And I have an
expert that's going to join me to help
us in this conversation. Her name is
Sarah Harter. She's a a doctor and a
mother uh and also a planning
afficionado. She's the host of the best
laid plans podcast on which I've been a
guest. Um, and in December, she
published a book with that same name
that had the subtitle a simple planning
system for living a life that you love.
Amazon selected it as one of the best
non-fiction books of the month. So, I
invited Sarah on to get into the
nitty-gritty details of how to build a
useful and realistic planning system.
She even helps me figure out solutions
to some problems I've been having with
my own systems. So, there's some changes
I make after talking to her. She also
makes a case for why she only uses
analog tools, which I think is
interesting. I'm not quite sold on that,
but I think it's an interesting case.
So, anyways, this is a deeply practical
discussion and one that I think is
absolutely vital to our mission here on
this show. So, let's get into it. As
always, I'm Cal Newport and this is Deep
Questions, the show for people seeking
depth in a distracted world. And we'll
get started right after the music.
>> All right. Hey Sarah, welcome back to
the show.
>> Thank you so much for having me on. I'm
excited to be back.
>> Of course. I mean, I'm excited about
your book and I'm excited to get into
the weeds on planning. I have a whole
list here of practical things. I want to
learn from you. I want to talk about
like what makes a good planning system
good. How do you keep systems
sustainable over the long run, digital
versus analog, family versus personal
versus work, tasks and planning and how
that differs. I I actually saw a lot of
connections between your new book and
slow productivity. So, I want to get
into that as well. So, we're going to
walk away from here with like lots of
ideas about how to get your life under
control, but I want to start by just
motivating this entire conversation for
my audience. Like, why is planning
important? We need to ask that question.
Why is it being talked about? Like, why
do I care about it on this show, which
is largely about fighting back against
digital distractions? I actually think
that it's uh really well connected. So
I'm going to give you my take for why I
think planning is important Sarah and
then I'm going to ask you to sort of
give your the way you think about it.
Right. So from what I noticed is there
was a period I really kick it off around
2019 uh with Jinny Odell who brought a
sort of anti-neoliberalism anti-
capitalism critique to the world of
things like planning and productivity
and the sort of related topics and
essentially the the anti-neoliberal
critique was to care too much about
planning is to uh commoditize time to to
think about your efforts as things that
can be turned into productive value and
the sort of ideal anti-productivity
vision that was being pushed starting
with Odell and then lots of commentaries
during the pandemic was really what you
should be doing is just in an
unstructured way walking through fields
and watching birds and uncommodifying
your life and that this was the tension
between commodifying your time and
watching birds in a park in San
Francisco and this was sort of the setup
that never rang true for me. Uh, you
know, like you, I have three kids. I
have seven jobs. Like, there's a lot
going on. And to me, the opposite of
having a planning system is not walking
through the fields and enjoying birds.
It's chaos. It's stress. It's anxiety.
And, and this is how I connect it back
to my program here on this show, it puts
you into exactly the state where the
digital overlords can dominate. Because
when you are overwhelmed and reactive
and don't know what's going on, guess
what suddenly becomes really appealing?
Well, let me just pull up the phone or
let me just fall back onto like email
and just sort of shoot messages back and
forth. Uh, let me zone out to a streamer
because it's going to numb out the
anxiety I feel. So, I I I thought of
planning
as a key step towards a deeper life, not
as something that was getting in the way
of a deeper life. And there was this
sort of clash that was happening. All
right. So that's my soapbox speech, but
you've been working on this this topic
so practically for years with your
podcast and now with your book and with
your blog.
Why do you think about planning as being
important?
>> Yeah. Well, first I guess it's super
interesting to bring back to that like
Jenny Odell kind of movement because I
do think people get stuck in thinking
about planning as having to be married
to productivity. Meaning if I want to
plan, it means that I'm trying to cram
in as many quote productive things as
possible and capitalism, you know, the
wheels spinning, etc. But that to me is
such a unfair way to characterize
planning because to me, planning is so
much more about thinking ahead of time
about what you want to do in your life
and then making sure that you have
things lined up so that you can do those
things. And for me, if I were to want to
go bird watching in a San Francisco
park, let me tell you what I'd have to
do. I would have to do a lot of planning
to make sure that that could be
accommodated in my life without, you
know, having a kid not get picked up
from an activity or not pay the bills or
whatever it is. So, I guess that kind of
goes along with what you're saying as
well, which is that those two things
don't have to be mutually exclusive. The
the free time, the intentional leisure,
and the planning. And in fact, I think
if if anything for mo many people
depending on their stage of life, the
planning piece is actually required in
order to make the best use or I don't
know the use that fits aligns most with
what they really want to do with their
time. And so that is what has driven my
passion about planning. It's not about
turning out more widgets, you know,
earning more money necessarily, but it's
about fitting in the things that you
want to do in this one life that we all
have. You know, I'm also a huge fan of
sort of the mortality focused
literature, the sort of Oliver Burkeman,
Jodie Wellman type stuff. Um, and that
just for me lights a fire around
planning, which to me also has sort of
two prongs to it in a way. One is about
making sure we're not just going on
autopilot and making sure that we are
fitting in the things that we want to
do. And the other side is making sure
we're not getting overwhelmed by little
tasks coming at us trying to kind of
take a bite into our lives. And by
making sure you're managing all those
tasks and making sure you're
purposefully adding in the things you
want, then hopefully you get to do more
things you want to do, like I don't
know, bird watching a San Francisco
park.
>> Well, let me give you an analysis. I'm
going to not psycho analyze, but I'm
going to analyze you and then you're
going to tell me if I have this right
because I have this theory about
partially why you're you personally are
in a very good situation to be leading
people through these topics. Um, and I I
think it it I don't really understand
your profession. You're a pediatric
endocrinologist, right? A clinical
doctor.
>> But my but I think it's important that
you're a clinical physician because my
understanding in in some sense that's a
that's a very demanding job, but it's
also very structured, right? You have
this sort of uh cadence of appointments
that's like probably pretty standardized
in your practice. Whereas a lot of
people and maybe in the Jin Odell camp
and people in my world, you're often in
like a a more vague knowledge work
environment where there is this sort of
which I this is where I get the Odell
critique. There is this sort of sense of
like an endless knob of productivity
that you can turn that seems tied to
like busyness and how many hours you're
willing to work outside of work. And
there's like a rightful, you know,
negative association that people in like
a email-based office job start to build
where they're like, "All right, enough
of this productivity talk because my
boss just wants me to do emails till
midnight and like enough is enough." Did
it matter that your job had enough
structure that you you could stand aside
a little bit from some of the
maladaptive stuff that was happening in
certain knowledge work jobs. It was I
think smoke screening the importance of
organization and planning because it was
sort of like an orthogonal issue that
also needed to be solved. Am I getting
medicine right there or am I just romant
am I romanticizing? I've personally
experienced both sides because I've had
more like leadership type roles where
the emails are like rolling in and the
meetings and everything is a little bit
more you know kind of like a world
without email but the opposite of that
kind of but then yes the rest of my job
has been very very structured and you
are right a lot of my passion was born
out of a time period when almost all of
not all but like a very large fraction
of my hours were very much accounted for
by others like it was during my
residency training where we had caps at
80 hours per week that we could be at
the hospital, but other than that, you
know, our time was not really our own.
And it made sense to be incredibly
intentional with the hours that were
left. And I guess that is where a lot of
my passion around planning was born. Um,
but you're right that my current life is
is much more around that. Much of my
time is fairly structured and that is
one of the things I love about my
clinical job is that I can go in, see my
patients, write my notes, and kind of
feel like I did everything for the day.
Is it true you had your first kids when
you were still this over overlapped
residency?
>> My first kid was during fellowship. So
the subsp specialty training after
residency.
>> Can I ask you a a brief unrelated
question that is related to the pit on
HBO?
>> I love the pit. You can ask me anything
about the pit. My husband and I, because
he's a vascular surgeon, we like sit
there and analyze every episode um for
correctness and maybe misinformation.
vascular surgeons think that they should
be bringing they're doing too many
things in the ED that they should be
bringing consults in. That's what I
heard is like no you can't don't mess
with that nerve in the hand. You got to
bring down um okay but here's here's a
question on behalf of my whole audience
more important than anything else we're
going to talk about. Can you please
distinguish between
thirdyear medical student intern like
pre- residency first I cannot my sister
is a attending you know ER doctor and I
still don't understand
>> can you just what is the order of things
that happened and then we'll get back to
platty but I got to understand this is I
don't understand which character is what
when
>> well I'm trying to remember like who's a
third year and who's a fourth year like
Javati is she a she a fourth year maybe
so in med school you usually do your
core rotations so that's the very first
year in the clinic your third year of
med school and then the fourth year is
more like subsp specialty rotations. I
don't feel like the pit does a great job
of saying who's a third year and who's a
fourth year.
>> Is that intern yet or not fourth year?
Is that is fourth year the same as
intern or is that post fourth year?
>> So medical school has four years. Then
begins your intern year which is also
known as the first residency year. And
most residencies well the ER residency
is actually four years long. So, um,
sometimes it's totally unclear, but we
know Santos is R2 because I keep saying
it over and over again.
>> Yes. And the the really young doctor in
the first season, I think, was third
year or fourth year. Maybe like a fourth
year. Okay. And then when do you get
called doctor?
>> You get called doctor when you begin
your residency. So, after med school.
Before that, I used to use like an
archaic student doctor.
>> Yeah.
>> Heart or whatever. But yeah.
>> Yeah. Interesting. All right. Well, we
we now we got the important stuff
covered. we can get back to the easy
stuff like trying to manage life in this
chaotic world. Um, all right. So, let's
let's go back then. Uh, you've
>> been thinking about uh planning and
organization for a long time. You've had
your podcast, your blog, and your book.
I think I have that order not quite
right. Probably blog, podcast, book.
>> That is correct.
>> How today do you think about the
elements that have to go into a
successful planning system?
>> Yes. So, in my opinion, and I know it
might differ a little bit from how you
talk about it, but I feel like there are
three big ones. The first one is a
calendar that's completely functional
and shows everything. And in my book, I
refer to that as like one master
calendar. And that can be it sounds so
straightforward, like of course I have a
calendar, but a lot of people are
actually consulting multiple places,
even on a day-to-day level, to actually
figure out where they're supposed to be.
So, master calendar is number one.
Number two is a really robust task
management system. I've coined the term
airtight task management because I want
to communicate that like you know
exactly what's coming in, where to look
for it, how often to look for it, and
where to put it so that you know you
will see it. And to me, that's the part
where you're sort of preventing the moth
eating like things coming at you from
really um getting too much of your time
and attention and you know putting the
tasks in their place where they belong.
And then finally, you need a fantastic
and robust goal setting system. Um, you
talk about yours in like a multi-level
scale planning, and I have a very
similar version of that called nested
goals. It has a couple more levels than
yours has because I I love a month. I
love the monthly level, which you don't
really talk about. Um, but similarly,
you know, you're planning every year and
then every season you're looking at that
yearly plan. Every month you're looking
at that seasonal plan. Every week you're
looking at your monthly plan and every
day you're looking at your weekly plan.
And that sounds so much more involved as
it is than it actually kind of is in
practice. But by doing that and having
like a really clear-cut, purposeful
ritual at each of those time points, you
know that you're going to be integrating
kind of the urgent and what you need to
do in a given day or week with the kind
of higher level goals that you've set um
in more thoughtful planning sessions.
>> Right? So this is fascinating and I
think this is a a key distinction. I I
struggle to communicate this sometimes
as well is that there's there's these
different elements that all go under the
the umbrella of planning. Uh you have
the whole sort of information
organizational aspect of it and then you
have the sort of time control aspect of
it which you're calling like goal
setting system. Um and I think often
people will zoom in on just one piece
could be the like I I have a planner a
planner called a time block planner but
it's not a planning system. It's like
one piece like in your terminology it's
like one of multiple pieces that goes
into a goal setting system that itself
could be large part of a larger planning
universe but there's people who say I
bought my time block planner um so can I
organize my whole life with this thing
and I was like no no no no that's like
you just you bought an exercise band
that's probably a good thing to use as
part of a large health and fitness
routine but just having that exercise
band is not the is not the whole thing
um okay so I want to go through let's go
through these in this order because I
think it actually I think calendar to
task airtight task management to goal
setting system is easiest to hardest or
simplest to most complex. I I feel like
things get more and more complex as we
move down. Um all right so master
calendar when you say shares everything
so you're talking about professional
personal family we need everything in
one place. Are you a digital person? Are
you a Google calendar where you could
have like multiple different calendars
you turn off and on
shocked and everyone is always shocked
but I'm largely paperbased. Um, I have
three kids. I also have like five, not
five jobs, but maybe maybe three jobs if
you count like the podcast is one and
then all my other media stuff and then
my physician job, which is three days a
week. I do work part-time as of now on
my clinical side. Um, but for me, I'm
able to actually have my master I have
it right next to me, my master beer.
Meaning, okay, is every detail of every
little thing in here? No. Meaning there
are blocks in here? This is not going to
show up, but where it just says patients
and I can't like see exactly what the
patients are that I'm going to see
because first of all that would not be
HIPACO compliant and second of all that
would be you know way too much to put on
paper anyway. But I know that when I go
to work I'm going to log into our
electronic health you know system and
see exactly which patients I have to
see. But still this is enough for me to
know this is where I have to be on any
given day. And on my you know kids level
I have a whole section on the bottom
that talk about like where the drop offs
and pickups are. Um,
>> wait. What do you mean by section on the
bottom? This is outside of the flow of
time. It's like at the bottom you have
like kind of like a to-do list for like
listing out drop off pickoff times.
>> That's a choice that I've made. But I do
use a vertical planner so I can see
pretty much everything kind of like
scaled to time just like you would pull
up in Outlook or Google Calendar. But
because I don't always do all the
driving, um, you know, I'm like I have
we have a nanny, I have my husband, I
drive, I have three kids, they're going
in different directions. I kind of like
to still know where all the kids are.
So, I kind of put a row beneath there
where I put all the comingings and
goings of gymnastics and basketball and
dance and all that kind of stuff.
>> So, it'll be like drop off at 3:30, pick
up at So, just like listing it. Okay.
Yeah. Oh, that's interesting. We we've
taken to So, we we're Google calendar
people.
>> Um my wife and I uh because then I have
my work calendar so she can see and I
can see what she's doing. But, we put
the kids uh like family stuff. We put
those as those are like appointments on
there as well. And we'll we'll we'll try
to span the time the driving actually
takes.
>> So like that half hour will be now a
reality of this calendar is there's a
ton of overlap stuff happening because
now everything is on the same screen. So
you know in Google calendar things that
intersect time-wise overlap. So there's
a lot of
>> you can you can hide right like so you
can decide to only look at your bar.
>> You can uncclick it off. Yeah.
>> No and I'm not against digital
whatsoever but you did ask what I use
personally. I think both are fantastic.
I just sometimes people write off paper
kind of thinking like well if your life
is you know complicated there's no way
that will work and like I've been making
it work for a really long time. I do
have very small writing and I enjoy
using paper. So if that does not apply
to you I 100% say embrace a digital
solution. When my kids get a little bit
older as well and you know right now I
kind of have one using um digital but my
two younger ones not so much but I could
imagine us migrating when it makes more
sense for everybody.
>> Could I ask how how large the formatting
is? So is it day per page, five days per
page, like how big are these columns?
>> So the my calendar exists on the weekly
pages. It's like kind of could see on
the video of a Hobonichi cousin planner
which is A5 size. So each column is like
a little more than an inch wide. Um but
it has a very small grid lines and it
goes all the way from you know midnight
to to midnight. So
>> So you can see a whole week.
>> You can see an entire week at a glance.
>> Yeah. Okay. Interesting. And then how
much are you putting non uh non-appoint
things on there? In other words, and
when are you putting those things on
there? So things that are not um you
know, I need to be here, there's a
meeting, there's an appointment, I'm
seeing patients doing these errors, but
optional uh tasks that you're adding
just to kind of keep track of what
you're doing with your time. Is that
>> we're bleeding into task management and
>> and goal setting probably as well,
right? This probably touches on
everything.
>> This is it. So, this is super
interesting because
people love to like fixate on like,
well, is it all in one tool or is it
not? And in my case, it is, but I do
think like this is an important time to
step back and like realize there it's
still performing different functions for
me. Um, and there's no reason it has to
be allin-one tool. But for me, I do
actually do most of my pretty much all
of my shorter term task management on
paper as well. So, I have two places.
Well, we're kind of skipping ahead to
task management, but um when you are
deciding where to put a task, you want
to put it in a place that it makes sense
that you're going to see it at the right
time. You can either assign it to a very
specific time, like you can literally
calendar it in, you can assign it to a
day, and you can do all these things
digitally as well, or you could assign
it to a week. That's a little bit harder
to do digitally, but you can you can
find some workarounds. And so for me,
many of my like day-to-day tasks and I I
use the word task instead of goal here
because I often talk about kind of goals
turning into tasks around the weekly
level. Um but I have a more like a the
eighth column on the lefth hand side has
a lot of tasks that I want to do for the
week. If I have a task that I come
across that isn't that urgent, then I
might assign it to a future week. So
well, next week doesn't have anything,
but the week after that has a couple of
tasks. Or I may actually stick a task up
at the top of a day if I don't have a
specific time slot for it, but I want to
assign it to a specific day. And what I
do with this is so arbitrary. Like you
can do the exact same thing in Apple
Notes or to-doist or to-do or things
like the actual place, the vessel where
you're holding these things is going to
be unique to what your style is and how
often you like to use devices versus
paper, etc. The important thing is
defining for yourself where these
holders are. Where do you put tasks that
you want to see for the week, but you
don't want to, you know, assign to a
specific day? Where do you put a task
that you know you're going to see at the
beginning of each day? And where do you
maybe put a longer term task that you
don't want in your face for a given
week, but you know you're going to want
to see later? Let's take a quick break
to hear from our sponsors.
As listeners of the show know, I'm not a
huge fan of huge overhyp pronouncements
about AI. I'm much more interested in
the specific applications of this
technology to specific tasks. This is
where Zapier enters the scene. I've
known about Zapier for a long time. It's
a tool that helps you automate tasks or
actions on your computer. And people in
my circles have long used it to build
systems for tracking information or
speeding up regular tasks and so on.
It's really cool stuff, right? I'm been
a fan of this for a while. But more
recently, Zapier did something smart.
They seamlessly integrated AI into their
automation platform. So you can now as
part of their automations query a
leading AI model like chat GPT or cloud
and then integrate those responses into
the actions that your automations take.
All right. So now it really opens up the
possibilities for building these type of
automations on your machine or for your
team. Now here's the thing. Zapier is
for everyone tech expert or not. No IT
bottlenecks, no complexity. You can
start building smarter automations right
away. This is why teams have already
automated over 300 million AI tasks
using Zapier. Are you ready to join
them? Get started for free by visiting
zapier.com/deep.
That's zap ie.com/deep.
I also want to talk about our friends at
Calder Lab. Men, let me level with you.
We need to take better care of our skin.
And here's the way to do it. using
Calira Lab. Calira Lab makes high
performance skincare designed
specifically for men's skin. And more
importantly, they've simplified the use
of their products into a straightforward
three-step routine. Step one, use their
Clean Slate product, a cleanser to get
the the dirt, oil, and sweat off your
skin. Step two, use the Great, a serum
clinically proven to reduce wrinkles
form uh and improve elast uh elasticity.
Step three, use their hydro layer
moisturizer to lock in moisture all day.
That's it. I have all three products and
I can tell you from experience, this
routine is simple and effective,
especially the moisturizing. I'm so used
to my skin feeling dry all winter, I was
amazed to learn that it doesn't have to
be this way. So, if you're interested,
go to calderab.com/deep
and use the code deep for 20% off your
first order. All right, Jesse, let's get
back to the show. Well, okay. So, let's
move on to airtight task management. Um,
so the word airtight here, this is a
reference to like a David Allen style
full capture. Don't not in your head and
not somewhere where you're going to
forget that it exists.
>> Correct. And I make a big emphasis on
making sure that you are very aware of
where tasks come at you because it's
usually for most of us not just one
place. You might have text messages,
your WhatsApp chat, your email, your
work email, and your personal email.
people that just like stop you on the
street and tell you they want to do XYZ.
And you need to have a really thoughtful
way to make sure that each of these
pathways has a pipeline that like makes
sense. Like you're checking them enough,
but not necessarily all the time. And I
actually kind of teach people that every
given box that you might receive a task
in might have its own cadence that makes
sense. So maybe you look at the sports
team app twice a week, but you only look
at your email um three times a day or
something like that. Like I'm making
that up. And then to be very clear about
once those tasks come in, where are they
going so that you are not going to lose
track of them and you see them at the
right time. Sometimes the answer is to
just do the task. You know, something
comes at you that's one minute or less.
You just get it done. Um but then a lot
of the times, uh the answer is to put it
into whatever system you're using for
task management so that you see it at
the right time.
>> Okay. And so your vessel agnostic, but
the idea is you have a singular vessel
that when you check these various
pipelines
uh stores the tasks and then there's a
separate sort of system or cadence for
taking it out of that vessel and getting
it onto your weekly plan, your daily
plan. Is is that more or less right?
>> Yes. I mean sometimes there's not really
like an extra step there. Like if the
vessel is your text messages um and
someone sends you a task there, it's not
like it's going to some holding place,
you would you would then, you know,
let's say you make sure that at the part
of your processing, and I know you talk
about processing at the end of every
day, either with a TXT file or however
they're doing it, but as you're
processing the end of each day, you take
any text message that's left, you leave
it unread if it's something you have to
handle, and you put it straight into
whatever tool that you are going to use,
whether that is again the to-doist app,
your planner, whatever, whatever. ever
it is. And being very careful about once
you've chosen where these tasks are
living, you cannot be swapping around
and using multiple storage vessels,
you've got to be like, "This is my one
place and you have to have rituals that
include looking at that place." And
again, that seems kind of obvious, but I
get a lot of people, they're like,
"Well, I put some place some stuff on my
monthly and some my week." I was like,
"Well, when are you looking at those
pages?" Right? You want it to be
somewhere that you're going to be
checking at the appropriate cadence so
you know you're going to see it.
>> All right. So, what do you use right
now?
>> Yeah. So, right now, um, I do a few
things. So, if something comes at me
like randomly throughout the day, I do
exactly what I just said, which is that
I will text myself or email myself and
leave it unread. And one of the things I
do at the end of every single day before
as I'm shutting down is to make sure
that those anything that's left unread
is captured. Um, I do that with WhatsApp
as well. Like if I get something from
school and I'm like, "Oh, I need to deal
with that. that then needs to go into my
system that gets left unread and that
inbox gets checked by the end of the
day.
>> You said unread emails and unread
messages
>> or WhatsApp messages.
>> Okay. So that's what that's going to be
during your processing step what you're
looking for. So if you if you think up
something just you know ex nilo like oh
god I forgot I need to like start
planning for X. You might send yourself
an email.
>> Yes.
>> So that it'll be there unread
>> and I'm leaving it unread because it
means it hasn't been processed.
>> Okay. So then when you process you
process when end of the day
>> end of the day by end each day I want to
see no unread texts no unread WhatsApp
messages and no unread emails doesn't
mean I've like archived them or dealt
with them but they are they're not black
>> so then what are the I don't even know
can you send yourself tech I'm so tech
bad
and then you can actually leave them you
can like I don't know you swipe over and
you click the thing so it so it shows
that it's unread my fingers know how to
do it my my brain can't describe it
>> there's some sequence of things I do all
day long which I can't actually tell you
what it is Um, okay. So then what are
the options then? So I this is
fascinating to me. I I like to the the
nitty-gritty here. Um, you're at the end
of the day you're processing what are
the options for what happens to the
information in like one of these unread
emails or text messages.
>> Yeah. So that is where this like where
my task management system comes into
play which again tool agnostic but I
largely use my planner. So I'm either
assigning it to like this week if I need
to get it done this week. I'm assigning
it to a future week or I'm giving it a
specific calendar slot within my
planner. So that I know on Wednesday I'm
going to wake up and be like, "Oh, at
10:00 a.m. I said I had to sign the kids
up for that camp that's going to sell
out in 30 seconds. Perfect. I'm going to
see that that morning. I'm going to know
about it and then I'm going to do it."
>> But so this is interesting. So your your
main place you uh you store the task.
It's your planner itself. It it it
exists somehow tied to time. Be it at
the weekly scale or the daily scale or
in like a particular slot.
>> I put almost all of my tasks and even my
goals tied to time. I mean, that's kind
of how I link. I call them goals kind of
at the larger time horizons, like year
or season. And I call them tasks when we
get down to the weekly or daily level.
Um, again, they're not always
specifically tied to time, but they I
mean, I guess they kind of are because
even if I'm putting it in a future
week's time frame, and even if I haven't
entirely committed to dealing with it in
that future week, it means I'm going to
see that task on that given week. Um
because again just like the day and I
have things that I want to make sure I
process by the end of the day. I'm never
going to exit a week without doing
something and this is actually a very
key point of task management to
everything I've put there. It doesn't
mean I've gotten them all done but I've
either decided you know what I don't
want to do that anymore. I'm crossing it
off or I'm migrating it. And I actually
this is kind of comes from the bullet
journal world but I tend to write a
carol.
>> Yeah. Like an arrow through it and then
I move the task to somewhere else.
>> Oh interesting. Okay. And then do you do
that uh at the end of each day? Are is
that when you're looking at tasks that
were assigned to that day you didn't do
or is it more at the weekly cadence? You
look at the whole week of things that
were assigned either either to the week
or to particular days that didn't get
done.
>> So I do make a list for each day as
well. We didn't even get into that. Um
but I tend to do the exact same process.
Again, this is going to be much much
quicker on a daily level. Maybe I had
six tasks I assigned myself. There was
one I didn't get done. But as I'm doing
that sort of like end of day processing,
if I have a empty checkbox on my
planner, I better figure out what I need
to do with that task. Um, if I miss a
day here or there, usually I'm able to
kind of catch up by making sure I
haven't crossed it off the weekly. So
there's kind of multiple layers in
there. Um, but in general, I do that
processing really at the end of every
day and as I move forward to the next
week. Something that's interesting to me
about this approach is it it may be a
way around a real issue I have and I
think a lot of people have which is task
system aversion which is this notion of
if things are going into a task system
it could be a singular vessel in a very
good program and things are being stored
and categorized in there's a sort of
activation energy that builds up
especially if like you're stressed or
you're overwhelmed or the the week is
going difficult and you're like my day
is full like I often have days where uh
you know because I work within a very
fixed amount amount of time where I'm
constantly racing the clock. It's, you
know, I got to get this article in.
These edits are due. There's these
urgent things or whatever. And the
activation energy of like, let me now
load up a task system and read all these
tasks and confront all that I have to do
and like I don't have time to do
anything in this day and I don't want to
do that and then I fall out of the task
system for multiple days. So if you're
just on your C the one tool I always say
like everyone uses at least this one
productivity tool or organization tool
is a calendar because you can't remember
when your dentist appointment is without
it. So you know you're going to look at
your plan like the the the weekly like
what am I doing today? What am I doing
this week? Like that will get used
because you have to see and so having
the task in there means there's no
separate activation energy. This is huge
and it's actually like why David Ellen
stuff doesn't totally work for me. And
it's what you said. It's like that
residue of like I don't want to look at
all the things I want to do. I don't
want to look at like six weeks worth of
accumulated stuff when I know I have
like two free hours on a given day. So
like that's exactly that activation
energy. I haven't heard it described in
that way. But I think you're right. For
me it's so much less stressful to be
like, okay, what's on today? Oh look,
today's really crowded. Let's only look
at that weekly list. We're not looking
beyond that and then like selecting
maybe one thing if that's all I have
time for. Creating my new list for the
day and then never looking back for the
rest of that day until I you know maybe
when it's time to do monthly planning
I'm going to look go larger scale. But I
designed this system in part because I
am like you stressed out by the idea of
seeing everything I need to do more
often than I actually need to
>> and and things that are non-trivial in
terms of time but are still in that task
category. I mean, in my experience, the
way those things get done is they live
on they they're on your calendar for the
day. Like, that's how it happens is
like, no, this is what I'm doing at 12
is I'm going to the dry cleaner and then
calling like whatever information that
list that exists in list is not very
it's much less actionable, but okay. So,
are you also here's the other idea that
I'm just thinking about ideas that are
catching my attention is like, oh, wait
a second. Yes, I think there's there's
there's something here that's like
explaining an issue that I want to
solve. Because when I'm thinking about
my task vessel, I'm using primarily
things three right now. One of the
things I do is like I'll often there'll
be like a bigger project and I'll I'll
generate as I come up with like steps
and tasks related to that project. I'll
be adding them to this list and I'm
like, okay, I can't have I couldn't put
all of these on my calendar like I have
hundreds of tasks in there. But it
sounds like and tell me if I have this
right. what what you would say is you
shouldn't be you're expanding too much
of the goal and the practicality too
early like that project should exist as
a goal and when we get to your goal um
setting system which we'll do next I'm
there's a cadence in which those goals
or projects generate tasks for the near
future and that like probably you would
say if I have this right like yeah your
list are too long because you're you're
unfurling too much from these things
you're working on. You don't need to do
that in advance. You need to see what
the projects are. Look at your week and
figure out what am I going to try to
make progress on this week with these
projects and what does that actually
look like practically and let me put
those task for the week or for
particular days. Is that
>> Yeah. And there's nothing bad I don't
think about keeping future potential
project steps somewhere convenient. Like
for you it might be things. For me I
love using
>> I'm looking at my list while you talk by
the way. Now now I'm thinking
>> fun we can experiment with like an
actual thing that you wanted to do. Um,
like there's nothing wrong with having a
receptacle for ideas. Like, um, I'm I'm
imagining maybe you have like a
renovation list and there's a whole
bunch of things on there, but the truth
is you're not assigning yourself all of
those things at once because there's no
way that fits in Kalen Newport's
lifestyle when he's also working and
dealing with kids from day to day. So,
that's exactly right. You might have
that as a reference, but you're not like
putting on your plate all of those
things until you've decided to put one
of them on your plate, if that kind of
makes sense. And that might happen, not
to skip ahead, at a higher level goal
setting system. Like maybe you're
planning your summer and you're like,
you know what, now is the time. I'm
ready to tackle that bathroom rena. And
um maybe I'll just put like begin
bathroom rena on the list. And then on
the monthly level, you think about,
well, what piece am I going to do first?
I'm going to get quotes. And then again,
that kind of generates more smaller
tasks at the weekly level where you're
like, oh, let me text my friend and find
out which contractor he used or
whatever. So things will trickle down,
but the idea that you kind of need to
have
all of them assigned to you as tasks
when they're not really happening yet, I
find that stressful. And again, I think
that's partly why I built the things the
way that I did.
>> Well, like I I just noticed looking at
my list now that there's like multiple
pretty technical tasks related to one of
the courses I'm teaching right now. Um
because I, you know, at some point I was
like, "This needs to get done. and I
need to post this the syllabus for the
second half of the year and I need to
you know check in with the TAs on this
or that right I'm kind of like putting
these things down so that it's not just
in my head but there's also a notion of
like well if you trust yourself that
there's just like a standing project for
the semester which is the course and
like part if I just at the beginning of
each week was like where am I in the
course what's coming up what needs to
get done this week I'm not going to
forget though like I mean I I will be
able to generate those things as the
time comes up most likely Right? I said,
"Okay, I'm looking ahead at this week."
You know, like I need to the rest of my
syllabus should probably go up like
we're getting towards the end of it. So,
let me uh schedule that for this week or
I don't need to the TA thing maybe is
relevant when there's an exam to grade
or something like that. So, there's some
>> there's some interesting balance here.
>> Some sort of system and I'm sure you
already do something like this where
you're like looking ahead at your week
and that's often going to generate tasks
that kind of like make sense for what's
coming up. So, you know, part of
planning at every time horizon, and this
even includes the day. Um, you're not
just looking back at like, well, what do
my previous self want to do? You're
like, oh, what's actually coming up
ahead? Is there anything associated? And
you being Cal, you you would do it. You
you can trust yourself. Like, I'm sure
that you would look ahead of the week
and be like, oh, you know, we have this
coming up. And if you had to do
something that's longer range, maybe you
would live your leave yourself some kind
of a a note prior to that. But I feel
like if these are things that are just
like generally part of your job and your
your flow anyway that yeah, you'd come
up with them and you probably don't need
to
have them somewhere separate. Now, if
having a list of everything is just
helpful to like have a reference, I
don't even know if I would call it part
of your task management system almost
just more of like a a collection or
reference then that that could make
sense. Um but you haven't like truly
assigned it to yourself. So let me tell
you my goal setting system and then I
want to hear let's do there's a CS term
we'll do a diff that's it was an old
command line program you you give it to
text files and it would highlight
exactly where they differed so it was it
was like how you would tell if there's
like changes to source code in a shared
code repository this is the type of
stuff people come here for they want
>> this is the type of stuff where I'm like
okay
>> Linux command line interfaces
>> um all right so my multiscale so now I
know my multis scale planning is what
you would call goal uh goal setting
system Nested goals. Yes,
>> nested goals. All right. So, the way I
run it is I typically have like a
semester or quarterly check-in like what
are the big things that are happening
this season. I mean, they roughly
correspond to my academic semesters
>> and I write it out freehand. It's in a
text file. It's like, hey, this is I
don't want this to be too structured
yet. Um, so it'll be things like I'm
teaching this course and here's type of
things I have to keep in mind. um where
am I on like if I'm writing a book like
I'm really looking to be you know done
with uh submit the manuscript by
December which means like I probably
need to be doing a chapter a month and
so it's sort of like thinking through at
a high level like what's happening at
this scale then and this has sort of
been my my secret sauce that I think you
were one of the few people who actually
talked about this scale as well is
actually for me is the weekly the weekly
scale is critical um because it's where
I interface that plan in the calendar
and this was always this was like a big
thing for me um I look at that. Okay,
what are these things that are these big
picture goals? I look at my task list,
which now I'm learning are probably too
detailed. And so this could be a lot
easier. These could be like more stakes
in the ground instead of like long list
of things. Um I look at my task list and
I look at my calendar, which at this
point is really just going to have
things that are appointments and
meetings. So I can see like what's the
layout of my week, when do I have time,
when do I not have time, which days are
busy or not. Um are there this was a key
innovation. It came at some point I was
like, "Oh, this is the time to look for
big win changes. If I cancel this one
appointment Friday at 11:00 a.m., that's
going to free up like 6 straight hours."
And so, like, I see now I'm going to be
frustrated when I get there. I'm just
going to move that to like another day
or something like that. And this is when
I start putting stuff on the calendar
that's not meeting or appointment. So,
now I'm like, I want to make progress on
this goal. I'm going to now block time
on my calendar like a meeting or
appointment for that particular goal.
Like, I'm going to be writing this day,
this day, and this day. I'm going to
work on this like project this afternoon
and now I'm starting to protect time at
that scale. It's also where if there's
key tasks uh I'll start when am I going
to get these done and I'll start
actually adding them to my calendar. So
by the end of my weekly plan the
calendar is like a lot fuller. There's a
lot less space in it but only some of it
is actually meetings or appointments. A
lot of it's what I came up with and then
I go to the daily scale. Every day I
make a time block plan for the day. Now,
what I found is if I don't time block
plan, it's uh unless it's a writing day
where it's like all that really matters
is I write as much as possible, like I'm
on deadline and then it's just survival
mode for everything else. Outside of
those days, uh a lot of that day by the
time I get to it, the calendar is pretty
full because I've been making use of it.
But I transfer that into a daily time
block plan and I fill in the remaining
gaps in the workday for what do I want
to do during that time? Um, and then I
execute off of the daily time block plan
for the day as opposed to like list
reactive method. All right, so that's my
goal setting system. What's our diff
there? Where are the places where we
differ?
>> Where do I do things differently? So, I
would say I'm I lean a little bit less
heavily on scheduling things. Um, which
is interesting. So, like when I go I
actually will also add that I love to
have a monthly level as well because I
have actually figured out that I'm going
to pull my little monthly out. And yes,
this one's analog, too. My schedule's
very weird and varies a lot from month
to month because I have weeks where I'll
be entirely on call, entirely clinical,
like can't do anything for the podcast.
And then I'll have other weeks that um
maybe I've taken like time off to do
work for the podcast. So, like my months
can be incredibly variable. So I
actually have a step in here even on the
monthly level where I'll look to see how
many like kind of work days do I have.
When I say work days I mean like how
many clinical work days and how many
work for myself days and how many days
is the family going away etc. Um and
that's how I will kind of decide how
much I want to take on from a creative
perspective because that's the lever
that kind of moves the most. Um can go
high on some months and low on other
months. Um
>> so monthto month kids there it's not
just week to week. You're like, "This
month might be a clinical month."
>> Correct. Or maybe not the entire month
is clinical, but like
>> but like whatever. That's the like the
ca this the the feel of this month is
like I'm actually doing a lot more like
in office stuff. It's so Okay.
Interesting.
>> Correct. Like January, I had lots of
days that I could play around and work.
And then February, we had a week of
family vacation. I had something medical
going on and I had a week of call. So
that left me like I don't know. This is
like one out of four days is today that
I actually have time to do anything. So
that kind of helps me take a larger
overview like how much can I actually
take on here? Do I even want to add
anything kind of new over the course of
the month and then that kind of informs
um you know the bigger things that I'm
taking on and I actually do usually
create a list for the month that I look
uh look towards as I'm planning each
week and then my weekly process is
similar to yours but I don't tend to do
as much of what you're saying which is
where I'll say oh I have to write this
I'm going to like give it a specific
time slot. I tend to just sort of look,
okay, I have this many hours, I have
this many projects, and on a day-to-day
basis as I'm planning my day, that is
when I'll actually commit to like what
fits where. And that's just personal
preference. I don't like to feel
entirely locked in. Like I think maybe
it is kind of a backlash to on my
clinical days, every minute is spoken
for. So on my nonclinical days, I want
to be like, do I want to write from 10
to 12 or 1 to 3? I want to make that
decision that day. And I do purposefully
make it on that day. kind of my own
version of time block planning and think
about what fits where, but I don't go
ahead and kind of preschedule it
throughout the week. So, my weekly
schedule um aside from the clinical days
actually probably looks less full than
yours does um when I'm going to the
daily level and then it's on the daily
level where I say, "Okay, which of these
tasks am I selecting and where do I
actually want to fit it within the day?"
But otherwise, I think our systems are
have a lot of parallels. I think I I
mean I prefer that if my issue the
reason why I have to do the the way I do
it is that if I don't protect that time
like Monday morning god everyone comes
and takes it. So that's my main issue is
like I'm like I if I say I'll figure out
Thursday when I get to Thursday everyone
in the world wants that time and by the
time I get to Thursday like the time to
work on these things uh is gone. So it
helps me basically helps me say no to
appointments. But I had this
conversation when when uh Oliver
Burkeman stopped by earlier this year
and we were you know talking about
various things. We he was like here's he
he was like here's my ideal schedule and
I agreed with him. He's like the ideal
schedule just from like human nature not
fix a particular job would be kind of
deep work in the morning like you're
working on something important. Um, and
then when you're done, then you're like,
based on how much energy I have, like
let me like do a few other smaller
practical things more or less depending
on my mood and then be done. And I was
like, Oliver, I'm with you, man. Like
that would be that's my rhythm as well.
Unfortunately, the world has conspired
to prevent that because I'm not a
full-time writer. Uh, okay. So, that's
interesting though. I get that. Like I
also I get stressed out by my calendar
and and I think this is but and I feel
like I have to do it because otherwise
it's just it's the chess game's too
complicated I'm playing. But I think
that's more a problem with the game I'm
playing.
>> Well, I think again you're an
academician academic. I don't know.
Sorry. I don't even know how to
pronounce the word. But um with certain
careers, people can dump things on your
calendar if they see open space. And I
can see why that would really lend it to
like no no no this says writing so don't
you dare put anything there. I am lucky
in that um well my patient time is all
up for grabs and that will get as filled
as it get filled but my time for myself
I'm really the only one who could dump
stuff on there. Um that's just how I've
designed things and I think that allows
me to be a little bit less scheduled.
>> I'll tell you my big innovation of this
year now and I can I can get away with
this now because like I'm out of
promotions to get you know I'm a full
professor been tenured for a decade.
like there's no there's no no nothing
else that you know for me to worry about
upsetting people about. I introduced the
notion of a studio day
>> and for me it's Tuesdays. Um because now
that I'm doing a lot more digital ethics
and not sort of hardcore computer
science I was like look the this podcast
my newsletter this is a big part of like
my work as a public intellectual on
technology etc. So studio days as I just
tell my employer um I'm not available on
Tuesdays. I don't I don't do meetings on
Tuesday. This I'm in my studio. I'm
recording. I'm writing and this is I've
consolidated it this one day, but it's
like I'm reaching millions of people and
this is important and I'll ask for, you
know, uh forgiveness instead of
permission. And that's been like a huge
that's been a big boon actually. It's
like yeah, I just don't I don't do
things on Tuesday and people grumble and
then they have lives and they they stop
caring because it's not that interesting
to them.
>> That totally makes sense. And I feel
very privileged that I'm doing this not
on your studio day, but thank you for
accommodating my patient schedule.
>> Oh, I'm I'm happy to do things on other
days, too, but like I'm just don't put
like I have to go into I have to go
teach today, you know, that's which I
which which I do enjoy. Um, okay. So
then let's talk about seasonality
because this is something in your book
best laid plans, the book, not the
podcast best plays. Um there's a lot on
this and I think we're like very
congruent on this idea of moving away
from the notion of just year round no
variation to your it's just like you're
turning the crank at like a certain
level of intensity and February feels
the same as June feels the same as
December.
>> Um talk to me about varying rhythms,
pace, workloads over time.
>> Well, first of all, I just love the
concept of seasons in general. And I
don't know if that's partly because I
live in South Florida and I don't really
get to experience them, but I just like
to really really like think about them
and think about how my year makes sense
divided up. And I actually kind of talk
about different ways that you might
think about dividing up your year other
than the traditional quarters or even
trimesters if you're an academic. Um,
but I really do like to take a very
purposeful like almost half a day kind
of planning session four or five times a
year. For me, it's five because I like
to divide the year up into five pieces
and think about what do I want out of
the upcoming season and not to assume
that, you know, season C is going to be
exactly like season A. For me, um, the
first season of the year is like January
1st to spring break and that's usually a
very go season. And then we kind of have
a very kid focused season from spring
break until the end of the year when we
have all that like May stuff and every
single kid is in every single
competition, whatever. And then summer I
treat as much more like let's just be
lower key do fun stuff. Um and by the
way I didn't mention this previously but
I think one other place we differ a
little bit is I am very passionate about
not just planning my work but planning
the fun stuff like planning the
gettogethers with friends and the travel
and the massage or you know whatever it
is that I'm trying to build into my life
to make it more fun. And so summer might
be a time that I have like a lot of fun
planned and it's just like a looser time
period. Then we have back to school
which has that rhythm of like okay kids
are going back. We're in our routines.
I'm also because I'm in the planning
world tend to be really really busy in
like January and back to school season.
So that kind of makes sense. And then I
have what's called reflection season
from November 1st to the end of the year
where I just feel like the world takes
on a different pace. It's a little
celebratory. everyone's reflecting and
um I just like to like acknowledge that
as having its own energy. So yes, I'm
super super big into a like
acknowledging the seasonal flows and b
like purposefully setting time to think
very hard about what you want each
season to be like in advance of that
season.
>> So wait, so your quintiles are um so you
got like new years through spring break,
right? Spring break to the end of the
school year
>> like end of school year. Yeah. Period.
Which I agree with you. kind of like I
think of it's a time when it's coaching
time for me too. It's like I I coach
multiple different things. Um summer
>> summer
>> then back to school to like Thanksgiving
>> and then until Halloween and then
November 1st to December 31st to me just
feels a little bit different.
>> Well, but you got like holiday Yeah. And
you have uh there's like the
Thanksgiving holiday. There's going to
be like the Christmas holiday. There's
going to be and people wind down. What I
think a I love it. Um, and I think
similarly, and I think what's important
here though is because a lot of times
when I talk about seasonality, you
probably get the same thing. People will
push back because they'll say, "Well,
like my job isn't seasonal." But like
this is true for you, right? Like
nothing about pediatric endocrinology
changes in March versus January. But I
think what what's captured by the way
you talk about it is so much of the
feeling of your day and what you're
focusing on busyiness like expands
beyond just what you're doing in your
job. is what you're doing on the
weekends, in the evenings, on the day
that you're not in the office. And
turning the knob on those things you do
control is actually has a much bigger
impact than people realize that it's not
just I can't take time off of work in
this, you know, the summer, so I can't
have a seasonality. Like, well, it's
completely different what you're doing
with your time, even outside of work.
And then my argument, you can't do that.
I in your job, I don't think this would
work, but in like a lot of knowledge
work jobs, because it's a lot of it's a
little more BSE. um you have like a lot
of give and you can really turn
intensity up and down is something that
I I'm often telling knowledge workers in
general because the job is so amorphous
and there is no just like here's you
know here's a list of things that you're
working on and here's your prog it's all
like email and meetings or this or that
and you can often get away with like oh
I want to turn things down in the summer
and you could do it for a couple months
and no one will notice if you do it for
a year they'll eventually notice but
you're just like taking on less things
and moving slower and then you speed up
in other times so I think people have
way more control over the rhythm of
their life than they realize.
>> Have a totally structured job. For me, I
get around that by taking more vacation
in the summer. So, you know, many jobs,
even if they're extremely structured and
yeah, I can't get away with, oh, let me
see 75% of my patient volume in July.
Like, that wouldn't fly. But I can take
two weeks off and like save my vacation
time for those times when I want things
to be slower and then maybe take on a
little bit less on the creative side and
then kind of create that slower rhythm
for myself.
>> Isn't this like the the people who do
this to the most extreme? Do I have this
right? There's like it's like uh er
doctors who sort of travel, right? And
it'll be like, okay, I'm going to come
>> spend three months at this hospital in
Boulder so that I and then I'm going to
ski for 3 months. And they really got
that locked in, right? we get to shift
work.
>> There are definitely certain professions
who either have tons of vacation time or
tons of flexibility or there are a lot
of doctors these days that will do like
locoms work. So they could decide that
like they're going to work their butt
off in March and April and then like not
at all for two months. So yeah, that
would be extreme version.
>> Yeah. And and it's it's all like the
pit. This is
>> it's all Yeah. Everything I do all day,
it's just like that.
>> Everyone is super reasonable like on the
pit, right? That's just every doctor's
experience where people just talk slowly
and quietly and are just very
reasonable. It's never chaotic at all in
the ER. It's very peaceful and Yeah.
>> Yeah. Just it's it's very peaceful. Um
Okay. I like that then. Okay. So, we we
we agree on the seasonality. All right.
So, to pull this together for people, um
can we build I want to build an on-ramp.
So, like for a typical member of my
audience might be they've messed around
with individual type of tools you might
use in this conversation. They've had a
to-do manager. They have a calendar that
they they sometimes use. They've used a
time block planner and then stopped
using a time block planner. They have a
task list they haven't looked at in a
month because it stresses them out, but
they they're they're liking what you're
saying and like, okay, I think I'm going
to be less susceptible to being pushed
around by big tech and distractions and
numbing if I can take more intention
about my life knowing now as we talked
about it. Intention might be like I'm
intentionally slowing down and then
speeding up here and it's not just it's
not productivity. It's not trying to
increase the amount of work. How do we
onramp? Because we talked about a lot of
things. So, how do we onramp someone
beyond the obvious answer is read
Sarah's book. I was going to say you buy
best laid plans and you read. No, I'm
just kidding.
>> Which I blurbed and it's a it's a great
book. I mean, it really walks through
all these details, lots of examples. Um
and and you can kind of pick and choose.
I feel like in your book there's though
you don't do it explicitly. Um there's
sort of like here's what's key and then
here's like a little bit more advanced
things you can add on and so like the
reader already has a system can plus it
up but like the new reader.
>> Yeah. So, so how do we onboard the new
>> the the newbie to planning? So, I would
just focus on those three things that I
talked about. Like, do you have a
calendar that makes sense where you're
really able to see what you have to do
each day in a way that makes sense to
you? Do you have a task management
system that works and it enables you to
see what you need to see at the right
time? And are you checking your various
inboxes in a thoughtful manner versus a
when things come at me manner? and how
are you organizing your goals both
larger scale and smaller scale and
adapting some sort of it could be a bare
bones version and by the way the tools
really truly don't m like I could do all
of this in a binder in Apple notes in um
on paper on like a really in notion and
a really fancy system like there's no
specific tool but to have somewhere to
have rituals around setting larger scale
goals whether you're doing the yearly or
seasonal level and then also ways that
you're going to bring that into the more
practical timelines. So a way of looking
at your seasonal stuff every week, maybe
incorporating monthly in there and then
day-to-day assigning yourself the task
that makes sense. So I think that would
be my sort of like bare bones minimum
calendar, understand your task
management and have some kind of larger
and smaller scale way of looking at your
goals on a you know daily or weekly
level plus seasonal or yearly. That
would be that would be the most bare
bones version.
>> And that latter piece requires a thing
to write the things down in. Right? So
this the latter piece of like I want to
look at the the the monthly scale and
the seasonal scale for you that's a
notebook and it's a separate notebook
than your planner but you need somewhere
where you're and it could be a Google
doc it could be a text file you need
somewhere you're taking
>> people have done like a lot of people
that I've worked with have had really
cool systems and even just like Google
Sheets where things are actually very
much like you know they'll have a whole
page for the year and then you can
actually tab it and separate by seasons
and they have different categories of
their life all colorcoded. Um, so yes,
you do have to capture all this stuff.
The medium in which you do that doesn't
really matter, but you're going to have
to commit to something and continue to
use it and to look at it. Um, and I
usually also talk about creating rituals
that make sense for the time scale. So,
if you're planning the year or the
season, you want to dedicate like a good
amount of presents and time to that. So,
you're going to really want to clear out
an afternoon or for the year. um Laura
Vanderham who has been on this show
before I believe as well. She and I host
a like live planning retreat that lasts
two days. And I'm not saying everyone
needs to, you know, come to our retreat
specifically, but um we do not run out
of things to talk about with our
participants in those two days for
planning the year. So really giving
yourself the gift of space um when it's
a larger time frame to think about
what's coming up and what do you want
out of that time frame makes sense. And
then when you're going to the day, you
want something very, very quick.
Obviously, we can't do a two-day retreat
every day, right? But we should have
things kind of laid out so that you can
look at your calendar, which is
organized, look at your week, which has
already been thought through, and select
your task for the day in like 5 to 10
minutes and be done with it.
>> And then let me finally, I have to rope
you in, as I do with all guests, into
some sort of AI realism rant because,
you know, this has been been my
correcting the narrative on AI has been
a big part of my work recently. Um, I
want to rope you into my side on this
the intersection of AI and productivity
because I feel like there's this, you
know, tech people aren't the best people
to talk about organizational systems
because what makes a tech person happy
is like complexity and pieces fitting
together and whatever, but they've
really been pushing this this idea that
oh, the missing piece in people being
organized could be solved by AI. And it
really doesn't seem to be the issue
based on like our whole conversation.
The issue is not when I am looking at
what I need to do, understanding it,
figuring out priorities, figuring out
what I should work on today. We're
really good at that. Like our brains
have embedded in it all of the relevant
information. What's coming up,
importance, how you're feeling, health,
other things that's happening. That's
not hard at all. What's hard is
consistency and capture. It's sticking
with a system. um maintaining
intentionality instead of just falling
back into like let me just be reactive
because like I'm exhausted and none of
that's helped by AI. So I don't know can
I can I rope you into my rant on this is
that that
>> I am always up for an AI rant. Um so
that's totally works for me. Um yeah I
just don't want to give some large
language model like that control over
what I do all day. I mean I want to be
the one selecting my tasks. I um one of
my biggest and again I'm not a techie so
I don't understand like the inner
workings like you do but one of my
biggest concerns about AI is that it's
giving power to someone else that I you
know I'm not consciously giving so even
like as simple as oh let me have AI plan
my vacations for the year then I mean
who's not to say that like various
places haven't like paid the model to
suggest some things versus another or if
we're not there yet we're going to be
very soon so I mean for me life The most
precious thing of life is our time and
our relationships. And I would like to
maintain control over that myself. And
so I want to decide what goes on my
calendar. I haven't I'm not saying that
AI tools might not be helpful for some
people. Like you know there are things
like the skylight calendar and I think
some of these apps where you could take
the soccer schedule and it will you know
scan it and add those events to your
calendar. Like those kind of wrote tasks
see being helpful. But in terms of
selecting what I want to do with my
time, I would like to leave computer
algorithms out of that personally. And I
think um most people probably don't want
to
live a life that was just suggested to
them. They want to actively choose what
they're going to do. That's kind of the
planning in the first place.
>> I've never seen someone be stumped by
looking at their calendar and their
to-do list and be like, I don't know
what to do next. What I I need someone
else to come tell me. I've never seen
someone stumped on that. That's not that
not that hard decision. All right, sir.
This has been fantastic. Um, I want to
make sure people know where to get more
of this information. So, you have two
podcasts. Would tell us about both.
>> I do. So, the first one is the one
that's more planning adjacent. It's
called Bestlaid Plans and I literally
describe it as all things planning and
planning adjacent. That one is just me
with the occasional guest. Cal has been
on it before and I will be having him on
again. Um, the other one is called Best
of Both Worlds and that is done with
Laura Vanderkin. We co-host it together
and that's about making work and life
fit together. Um, she's an awesome
writer and time management guru. So, we
make a fun team there.
>> And your book, Bestlaid Plans, that what
that come out in the fall when not too
long.
>> Uh, December of 2025 called Best Plans,
a simple system for living a life that
you love.
>> One of Amazon's best non-fiction books
of the month, right?
>> Yes. It got chosen for December. It was
like a big shock. Um, people are like,
"Did you pay for that?" I'm like, "No."
So, but that was a really fun honor. And
it it says like editor's pick on there.
Um, of course you can get it at anywhere
other than Amazon as well, but that was
kind of a a fun thing.
>> Excellent. All right. Well, Sarah,
always a pleasure to have you on. Thanks
for getting the weeds with us. I think
this type of thing is going to be
helpful for a lot of my listeners who
you got to take control of your time. If
you don't, Big Tech will happily take
control of it for you. So, this is the
the first step. Um, I'm sure we'll be
talking again soon, but thanks as always
for coming on.
>> Oh, thank you so much for having me on,
and I very much enjoyed talking about
the pit. All right. So, that was my
discussion with Sarah Hart Anger. Um, I
looked it up. I I was on the show,
Jesse, so it's worth people going back.
I also years back, I think we had Sarah
on our show.
>> Yeah, we did.
>> Yeah. So, sort of a a long-term friend
of the show. I love geeking out about
planning systems. To me, the key point
that prefaces the whole discussion
because I think her advice is spot on. I
actually picked up some ideas there that
I think are important. But the key point
that I think ties here the whole
conversation is that Sarah did not like
to associate the word productivity
with planning. She like that's two
different things. Productivity is about
I don't know professionally you're
trying to increase the amount of
something you produce and like that's
that. But what she cared about was
controlling your time. How how do you
have a say over what you're doing with
your time so you have control? Uh I
often use the term internally attention
shaping. How do you shape your own
attention so other services don't? And I
think that's really useful. If we
separate planning from productivity, we
realize like, oh, this is one of the
tier one skills, not just for living a
deep life, but for pushing back uh on
the digital distraction. So, very good.
It was good to have Sarah on the show.
Let's take another quick break to hear
from our sponsors.
This episode is sponsored by Better
Help. March is here, a month that
includes International Women's Day, a
moment to celebrate women's strength and
progress while also recognizing how much
they carry every day. Now, as someone
who writes about time management and
organization, I've heard from countless
women about how much harder these goals
can be for them as compared to men,
right? They have to deal with more
household labor at home, more
non-promotable activities at work, and
play the role of listener and chief and
problem solver for so many different
people in their lives. And this can be a
lot. So for anyone who feels like you
have a lot on your plate, this is a good
time to remember that therapy offers a
space to take care of yourself in the
way that you deserve. And if you're
going to consider therapy, consider
BetterHelp. With over 30,000 therapists,
BetterHelp is the world's largest online
therapy platform, having served over 6
million people globally. And it works.
They have an average rating of 4.9 out
of five for a live session based on over
1.7 million client reviews.
Your emotional well-being matters. Find
support and feel lighter in therapy.
Sign up and get 10% off at
betterhealth.com/deep
questions. That's
betterhp.com/deepquests.
I also want to talk about our friends at
Shopify. Starting a new business is
hard. I remember what it was like
starting up the media company that
produces this podcast. Here's what I
learned. Don't reinvent the wheel if you
can avoid it. Trust industry leaders
where you can. This is where Shopify
enters the scene. If you need to sell
something, you need Shopify.
Shopify is the commerce platform behind
millions of businesses around the world,
including uh 10% of all e-commerce in
the US. We're talking big names like All
Birds and Mattel to new brands just
getting started. You want to sell
online? They can help you with their uh
design studio that features hundreds of
ready to use templates. You need help
spreading the word, they can help you
easily create email and social media
campaigns. Look, if we ever start
selling products on this show, I know
exactly what platform we'll use. It will
be Shopify. So, it's time to turn those
whatifs into with Shopify today. Sign up
for your $1 per month trial today at
shopify.com/deep.
Go to shopify.com/deep.
That's shopify.com/deep.
All right, let's get back to the show.
All right, so you've heard me talking
with Sarah and now I want to hear from
you. So, let's move on to the part of
the show where we check our inbox to see
what you have to say.
All right, Jesse. What interesting
emails or messages have we gotten
recently that's worth reviewing?
>> The first one's from Sandra. Here's an
email from her who is wondering if our
dopamine addiction is changing how they
make TV shows.
>> Okay, let's see. I got this. This is a
good one because we are it's going to be
not until later in the spring, but we
are having Anna on who is the the
researcher uh who wrote Dopamine Nation
like the the leading the world's leading
experts on dopamine, how it affects us.
So, we're going to get I'm learning a
lot about dopamine now. So, I'm glad to
have this question. All right, so let's
see here. I got Sandra's email here.
Here's what she said. Have you noticed
that in uh TV programs
such as The Great Pottery Throwdown,
when the program finishes, they say next
time and then they show you the
highlights of the next show like a
trailer. I hate this as I don't want to
know what happens next time. I want a
surprise. They also do this at the start
of the next program saying this time and
then show the trailer which highlights
the show again. Um is this an effect of
dopamine? There is no delayed surprise.
Basically, you don't have to watch the
whole show. You can just watch the first
five minutes and decide if you really
want to see the full detail. All right.
So, first of all, Jesse, I assume you
are a great pottery throwdown
completist.
You've seen every season of that show.
>> I have.
>> Do you think that's literally people
just making pottery?
>> Probably. So when they were like, "All
right, next time. Next time on the
show," and it just shows people very
quietly at the pottery wheel
>> and then there's all this drama of like
something's ready to topple over.
>> Well, yeah. Like it wobbles a little bit
and then they straighten it
and then kind of sticks on that for a
second and then one of the contestants
comes in the frames, stabs him in the
neck. See, that's where the drama is.
That's why you got to watch. Is this
going to be a stabbing episode or just
an episode where they make pottery? Um,
all right. There's a couple interesting
things here because you know what this
reminded me of Jesse is the advice that
we heard from professional YouTubers
about how you have to build a YouTube
video to get big viewership on YouTube.
And remember like the the various
YouTube people we work with have told us
like oh the thing is like watch a Mr.
Beast video you'll see this. You have to
show the people the audience right off
the bat this is what's coming and you
show quick clips of the biggest exciting
things that's going to happen. And so
like a a Mr. Beast video, if they're,
you know, crashing a train into
something, you'll see the train crashing
into something, right? They just show
you, here's all the things that are
going to come. And then you go and you
deliver the things you said you're going
to come later in the show with very
limited friction. So quick cuts, moving,
moving, moving, moving to the things you
already showed that was going to come.
That sounds like it's exactly what's
happening on these TV shows as well. Um,
I don't know the role of dopamine
because we haven't had Anna on the show
yet, but there is a bigger phenomenon
here that may or may not be tied to
dopamine that we need a good name for.
Jesse, we got to think about like a good
name for this. But there's something
about the abundance of choice in media
where now if I go into a streaming
service, there is u endless things I
could choose. that makes it hard to
choose and commit to something to watch
because your brain is always thinking
there might have been a better choice.
And I hear this a lot. I think we see
this in our letters sometimes, right?
Like young people in particular will be
like, "I have uh such a hard time
>> like choosing and sticking with a
movie." I think we got this in response
to last week's episode because a lot of
people wrote in about movies and a lot
of people like, "Yeah, I don't even
people who don't use their phone a lot
were like, I just have a hard time
sticking with the movie."
>> And so I wonder if there's something
like this going on. is the abundance of
choice makes it really hard for us to
commit to something because your mind is
like there is other options in a way
there wasn't if you were just turning on
TV and you flip through the channels
you're like this is the literally the
only thing on right now that's like a
little bit interesting to me I have no
other option your brain's like let's
watch it or if you're at the movie
theater you're like there's no other
place for me to go so I might as well
watch it but if you have one click away
from those horizontal carousels on
Netflix like my god there could be
something better so maybe that's what
these TV shows are recognizing we have
to show them the audience here's all the
stuff that's coming you're like okay I
want to see that that and that. All
right, this show is worth me watching.
Um I hate that as well. My kids hate it.
They're always like, "Don't fast
forward. Fast forward whenever we're
watching a show that has a next time."
All right, what else do we got here?
>> Next up is from Kendra. We have an email
from Kendra with a reaction to your
discussion last week of film students
who couldn't make it through entire
films.
>> We got a lot of reaction for that one.
Yeah,
>> I because people like it's something a
lot of people have personal experience
with. All right, let's see here. Kendra
says, "What I don't see mentioned here
or most other places is that the length
of movies has actually increased over
the last 10 plus years. It used to be
that a movie was between 1.5 hours and 2
hours, but that time is creeping up.
Seems like most of them are over two
hours now, and personal opinion, it
doesn't always make the movie better."
Um, I I intuitively I guess I've had
that same effect. My wife and I started
last night um Train Dreams, which is one
of the best picture nominees. is out of
Netflix studios and we noted like it
actually caught our attention that it
was an hour 47 so this must be a fact
like that felt short notably short u I
found an article I haven't really read
this yet so we're going to kind of do
this on the air I found a Vanity Fair
article about exactly this phenomenon
I'm a little bit curious about what's
going on so let's let's look at this uh
I'm going to see if there's any
interesting stats in this piece I like
this ad of James Cameron wearing
Rolex. Why is James Okay, I'm sorry to
go do a divergence here. If you're James
Cameron, why are you agreeing to do a
Rolex ad?
>> You get free watches.
>> He's so rich. He's so rich. He's I think
his net worth is like a billion dollars.
>> Is it really?
>> Yeah. I mean, he's the he's the director
and producer with significant profit
participation
in three out of the top five highest
grossing movies of all time. I think
with those watches, they don't really
have to do much and they just get cool
watches in cool places. So maybe just
wants to do that.
>> I don't but I mean a billion dollars,
right? So like I'm just let's make this
relative, right? Like so for us like
what would be the the cost of a Rolex to
James Cameron? What would be the
equivalent for like us and the money we
have? That would be like I think if
someone is like come do this photo shoot
and like I'm if you do it I I'm going to
give you uh a a tall coffee from
Starbucks at 50% off. Like you only got
to pay like a$125 for it. Like I'm not
going to go do an all day photo shoot.
Like I could just buy a cup of coffee.
The only thing I can imagine I'm sure
this is fascinating for audience. The
only thing I can imagine is that the the
diving, deep sea diving aspect, they
sponsored
the documentary. I think they sponsored
the documentary he did where he went to
the bottom of the Mariana. It might make
more sense because if you do you ever
see that documentary where he goes to
the bottom of the Mariana's Trench?
>> No, I haven't.
>> It's really interesting. But they have a
arm coming off of the submersible that's
just holding I think it's a Rolex watch
to show that like look this diver watch
at the bottom of the Mariana's trench is
still working or something like that.
Okay. So it's probably just part of the
deal.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Because he didn't want to pay for
that documentary. All right. We figured
it out. All right. Anyways, here we go.
Um here's some stats about the Let's see
if
>> Kindra is right about this. Here's what
Vanity Fair says. In 2002, even as two
nearly three-hour Lord of the Ring
movies dominated theaters, the average
length of the top 20 box office
performers was a breezy 1 hour and 59
minutes. 20 years later, movie goers had
to sit through an extra 13 minutes of
footage on average. Okay. So, we went
from hour 59 in 2002 on average to, if
I'm doing my math right, uh 2 hours and
12 minutes
uh in
2022. All right. So, movies did get
longer. Um, is there a reason I skimmed
some of the rest of this article? Here's
what's interesting about it is they have
a lot of people saying, "All right, here
here's a let me read this quote here.
The studios are definitely not
encouraging three-hour movies that I can
guarantee, says a senior movie
executive. As a consumer, speaking for
myself and on behalf of many other
people like me enough already. All
right. So, if the studios aren't
encouraging this, why are the movies
getting longer? It seems like it's just
the filmmakers want to make longer
movies.
>> Why do you think that is?
>> They like them. Like, here we go. Well,
let me read you from the article, Jesse.
Uh, cinema purists might see a long film
as a sign of a director with something
to say. So, yeah, it just seems better.
I have another theory for this as well,
though. All right, so yes, the studios
don't want it. The audiences don't
necessarily want it. The directors want
it, but they've always wanted long
movies, right?
>> Um, I suspect the difference is there's
fewer movies.
Like, it's, you know, they mentioned
like, well, 2002, sure, the Lord of the
Ring movies were 3 hours long, but the
average movie was short. But at 2002,
you probably had a lot more movies in
the theater and you had a lot of uh
mid-tier movies because there's just a
lot more movies coming out than there
are now. And the mid-tier movies they
were not going to allow to be long, but
it seems now there's fewer movies and
the movies that are made, they tend to
be more like big event movies. It's
going to be like a Chris Nolan movie.
It's going to be Martin Scorsese, Killer
of the Flowers Moon, right? It's going
to be these big event movies. Maybe
those have always been long. We just
don't have shorter movies to pull it
down. Like
>> do you think that's true? There's less
movies now cuz you always talk about
>> many fewer.
>> Why is that?
>> Uh post pandemic
>> there's still recovering.
>> The global box office is never came has
not made it back to 2019. Hasn't come
close.
>> But in terms of book sales, books
>> books are okay.
>> Interesting.
>> But even that it's a little bit
misleading. Book sales industrywide are
doing fine. They've continued to like
rise at like a reasonable pace. But
what's really happening is non-fiction
sales are down, which is bad for me, but
it's being compensated for because of
these massive hits, especially in like
women oriented fiction and fantasy
fiction. So you have like the dark
fantasy uh books where like people are
marrying dragons and books like uh Colin
Hoover books that come out of uh book
talk and they're selling huge numbers,
you know, 20 million copies of a book
like just huge numbers mainly among more
among female readers than male readers.
Non-fiction is not doing as well and in
part that tended to be more of where you
had male book readers and they're not
reading as much. So books are doing
fine, but uh it's a little bit uneven.
But movies are not doing nearly as well.
They just and even the biggest hits
aren't as big of hits as they were sort
of pre- pandemic. Um because yeah, I
mean think about all the movies like we
talked about it last week like the
probably the the greatest movie of that
decade came out in 2002 which was the
Britney Spears Vehicle Crossroads.
>> But there's a lot of movies like that in
2002. There's not as many of those
today. And those were all short because
they were like, "No, you can't make it
long. We want to like move as many
movies through." But then when Peter
Jackson came along, he's like, "I want
to do Lord of the Rings." He was like,
"I'm going to do three hours." Like,
"Ah, I guess sure." And now it's like
all Peter Jackson movies. That's my
theory. All right. Um, do we have
another email?
>> Yep. This is from an anonymous person.
It's a comment saying that extends some
of the issues you discuss about
attention span last week from the
context of movies to the workplace.
>> All right, anonymous. Let's read this
note here.
One angle of smartphone addiction I
haven't seen discussed is the fact that
it's torpedoing the ability of people to
focus at work. Anecdotally, I've heard
from many people
saying that they have trouble paying
attention in meetings and experienced
aloofness from my co-workers firsthand
if corporate America cares mostly about
profits. Why don't we see pressure from
companies on their employees to curb
their smartphone induced fragmentation?
Would love to hear your take signed
anonymous. That's an interesting point.
It's become a bigger issue. These used
to be separate magisteria for me in my
writing and I would have to always make
the point when I would do interviews etc
like these are two separate issues.
Distraction in the workplace is driven
by workplace communication tools like
email and Slack. Distraction at home is
being driven by attention economy
platform tools on your smartphones like
social media. And I said the effects are
similar. It your attention is fragmented
but the causes are different and
therefore the solutions are different.
The the issue in work has to do with the
way we collaborate
because we collaborate with this
hyperactive hive mind approach of
everyone just talks to everyone on
demand as you're needed. It creates a
situation which you have to constantly
monitor communication channels, not
because they're super addictive or super
sticky or because you have bad work
habits, but because that's where the
work is happening. And if you don't
monitor it, you fall behind and that's
what's distracting you. Whereas on your
phone, outside of work, the reason why
you're looking at that phone all the
time is because it's engineered to be
hyperengaging and is creating a reward
loop within your short-term motivational
system and then those neuronal bundles
are voting for the phone whenever they
see it and it wins out over other
activities most of the time. Two
separate problems. But what Anonymous is
saying is something that I've seen to be
increasingly true, which is that the
distractions from the phone have gotten
so good that, as we talked about last
week, they're overall reducing people's
cognitive patience. They're overall
reducing people's comfort with any sort
of sustained attention even when they're
in a non-phone context.
Like they're in a meeting and they they
can't pick up their phone, right?
Because they're they're if we want to
look inside the brain, the short-term
reward system, you have these neuronal
bundles that vote if they feel like the
expected reward of a behavior is going
to be high. They're not going to vote
for picking up the phone if you're in
the middle of a meeting with five people
with your boss because it's measuring
the the benefit you'll get by seeing
something interesting with the massive
negative impact of your boss being like,
"Are you looking at your phone like
right in front of me while I'm trying to
talk to you?" So in a meeting we're not
being drawn to pick up our phone because
our mind is saying this is not there's a
low reward to that but we're still as
reported by anonymous having a hard time
paying attention drifting aloof like
can't keep our mind focused this is
becoming this is a sign I guess I would
say of the cognitive impacts of consumer
non-professional consumer digital
attention economy tools moving to a new
level of of uh magnitude of pain a new
level magnitude of negative impact that
it's not just now it's hard when I have
my phone not to look at it like when I'm
out to dinner with my friends it's I'm
beginning to permanently lose my ability
to be comfort sustaining focus delaying
gratification
even if I can't look at the phone I just
can't do it anymore so these worlds have
now come together so yeah both of these
again we have two different problems the
the solve the phone problem really the
only solution is you have to stop
participating in the attention economy
I'm so tired tired. It's been a decade
now of people trying to convince me that
this is the p the it's inevitable.
It's the digital town square. We still
hear these arguments today, you know,
that if we don't let 12y olds in
Australia be on TikTok, they won't be
able to know about world events and all
these type of things. But that I'm so
tired of that argument. It's just a
giant money-making scheme that strip
mines your mind to like allow Mark
Zuckerberg to buy the second half of
Kawaii. So, we have to stop
participating in that economy and you'll
eventually gain back from that cognitive
patience. But then we still have to
solve the email and Slack problem at
work, which is has to do with
collaboration style. So, it's a hard Oh
god, Jesse, there's a lot of hard
challenges out there, but I guess it
gives me something to do.
Um,
all right. So also as always uh towards
the end of the show I like to discuss
what I have been up to recently in my
own quest to cultivate a deep life. So
give you my update
first. People have been asking about
this AI programmer project. So I'm not
sure if you saw this Jesse but last well
I guess it'll be two weeks ago now when
this comes out. I sent out an email to
my newsletter list saying if you're a
computer programmer I want to hear how
you're using AI. The good, the bad, what
you love, what you hate, whatever it is.
I just want you're not using all you use
it every day. I just want to hear about
it because
there's a lot of discussion right now
about cloud code and agentic AI
and a lot of discussion is a little bit
for someone like me who follows the
industry closely and for a lot of people
like programmers it's a little the it's
a little confusing the the sudden
attention because these sort of AI tools
for programming have been big since
before chat GPT came out the sort of
autocomplete tab complete you know we go
way back we go to cursor these sort of
pre chat GPT products. And then as I
reported in January for the New Yorker,
when I did a lot of interviews with
people who work on these programming
agents, these command line interface
agents like Cloud Code, those really
started showing promise in 2024.
And that's what allowed at the beginning
of 2025, this was the article I
published in January. At the beginning
of 2025, it led to all these tech
leaders to say, "We're going to have
agents in all parts of your life this
year. 2025 will be the year of the agent
because we're seeing how good these are
already working in programming. And then
what happened is uh it turns out
non-programming agents are much harder
and nothing really happened in 2025. But
the computer programming agents
continued to get better. And about 6
months ago, I guess it's just like a
tipping point thing. There's a lot of
programmers using these agents because
they're really they were good. It was
the only thing agentic thing that was
really working well in AI. Um but
there's more people started using them
about six months ago with some of the
latest updates. Cloud code switching
from Opus to Sonnet. There's like these
little things got just good. Nothing big
happened. No new technology was
introduced but just like these little
changes happened where I think it became
just easy enough that in more context
people used them. And also I think it's
just a reporting thing. People started
talking about yeah I'm using these
agents. They're pretty cool. And then
that got a lot of other people that who
hadn't been using them to use them. So
there wasn't really a technological
breakthrough six months ago, but there
was a
awareness breakthrough within the the
wider world of these tools which have
been like ste you know they've been
around for a while. Anyways, I want to
know what's really going on. So I've
heard from I'm never going to get
through this Jesse 350 people have sent
me in detailed briefings and I'm trying
to go through them in detail, take notes
and I'm also coding them like this.
>> How are you coding them?
>> Uh I'm coding the AI use of the person.
So is it like uh from one extreme like
doesn't basically uses rarely or only
occasionally uses any AI um Agentic uses
rarely all programmers now people don't
understand AI completely changed
programming in like 2022 like everyone
tab completes all sorts of things and
tab complete is where
>> the it'll finish the code that's like
right in front of what you're doing
because it's like oh you start writing a
function name and press tab and it'll
finish the calls for you and so like
everyone does that uh but with aentic
coding it's like rarely uses it uses it
for some types of situations but not for
others like there's just it depends um
uses it for the majority of their coding
and then uh vibe coding which is so use
it for the majority of their coding but
closely supervised I should say and then
vibe coding which is like the way Matt
Schumer talked about in that article we
talked about last week you're like build
this app and you come back later and
it's built it and tested it so I'm also
like coding so I can keep statistics um
and just trying to keep track of notes
and god it's I'm through like 50.
>> I've made it through 50 of the 350.
>> People probably write a lot, right?
>> Yeah. And I would say a good portion of
them are written by AI. Which is
interesting. I mean the people disclose
it. They're like, I'm not a very good
writer. I wrote this by AI. So it's
interesting. I much prefer the non-AI
written reports though because AI like
you can see where it's just it's so
bland and just like summarizing like
it's almost like viby. So I get better
reports when they don't write the report
by AI. Anyways, um that's ongoing and I
don't know what to do with it. I just
want to be more informed about it so
that when we talk about these issues in
the future, I know exactly what people
are doing because there's so much room
for hype and vibes as well as fear,
dystopia, and utopian rhetoric here that
I want to be super grounded. It's really
complicated though, so I don't uh I
don't have my arms around it yet. The
main thing I can say
is I think you have to think about there
is for sure a new style of programming
that is significantly spreading.
50% of the first 50 reports I've gone
through are now largely using a agents
to produce code under close supervision.
Almost no one's vibe coding. That's not
really a thing. Vive coding is fine if
you're, you know, you're not a
programmer and you need to build a quick
web application to help organize your
team, but that's like a separate thing.
And these are all serious programmers.
There's like four of them so far or
doing anything that looks like vibe
coding. Um, but half of them are uh and
the other half aren't because also turns
out that like it has to be a language
and a type of thing on which is trained
a lot for it to be good. So if you're
trying to write like advanced Rust code
or something, it doesn't work well with
that. Doesn't work well with Go. And
it's a really new type of work where
it's very interactive.
A lot of like moni
agent with you're writing specs and it
checks the spec and does it understand
what you like all this like
specification. You do all this work and
then finally like okay now build this
piece and then it builds that piece and
then you you test it and you let it
write tests and you have it look at your
test and then you fix things. you try
again and you kind of have the it's like
supervising someone told me it's like
supervising like a junior employee who's
like a pretty good coder but like super
literal and you have to like really be
on them.
>> That's like what it is right now. I
think it's like a beta. We're in the
beta phase of this. I think there's the
there's a core in here that's going to
stick and increase the speed with which
senior programmers make progress on what
they're doing. I think there's a lot of
other stuff that's surrounding it that's
probably unnecessarily wasting time and
I think there's going to be new
processes and procedures. There's going
to be some things where we strip this
back away from and other things where we
keep it. So my main thing I can say now
is the way a lot of programmers are
experimenting with this. A lot of
programmers are spending most of their
time experimenting with it and not
actually doing their work. And it's a
beta phase and I think it's going to
take six months till this shakes out and
then we see what how this more
permanently changes how certain types of
programming happen. So, I don't know.
That's what's going on.
>> I listened to your Zitron interview or
>> Oh, me on his show.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. On his haters couple days ago.
>> Yeah. What' you think?
>> I liked it. I liked how you explained
some stuff cuz I was confused and he
explained it.
>> I've been doing these videos. I might
record another one today uh with my
friend Rob Montz. We record him here in
the studio and he's like a philosophy
brown Ivy League guy. So he like plays
the role of the smart person doesn't
understand technology and then he sort
of interrogates me on whatever's going
on in AI. So you should check those
videos out as well.
>> Um
>> yeah, so I like those.
>> Quick question before I get into what
I've read and watched recently. Quick
question for the audience. If you want
to send us into interesting newort.com.
I'm thinking I'm scared of this idea
to hate new commitments, but I'm
thinking because I'm under some pressure
about this about maybe having a
standalone short podcast and newsletter
just to do the AI reaction so they keep
this show and the newsletter kind of
focused on what it's meant for which is
like helping individuals in their fight
for depth in a distracted world and then
have a maybe on this feed or on its own
feed is sort of like here's like what's
in the news on AI this week. Let me give
you my AI realist take and then maybe
like a newsletter version of it. I I'm
terrified of that work, but also I feel
like I have a voice in this that's
important right now. I don't know. So,
if you have feedback, uh, send the
interesting kelport.com. All right. What
did I read or watch? Uh, so we're
recording this, Jesse, confirm. We're
recording this on February 24th. Plenty
of days left in February. I have
completed my fifth book for February.
Yeah, baby. I read The Last Kings of
Hollywood by Paul Fischer. My wife gave
it to me. Again, I've mentioned maybe I
mentioned this before. This is a book
that was basically like invented in a
lab to be exactly what I want to read.
The rise of Spielberg, Lucas, and
Copela.
>> So, obviously, obviously, I love this
book. All right, so that's my uh fifth
book for February. I would go through
them all, but I don't have the list with
me. I forgot. Lost Island, Intensity,
Last Kings of Hollywood, Lost Book of
the Bible, The Hidden Book in the Bible,
and
>> Potensify.
>> I said that there's one there's one.
There's one other one I'm forgetting.
Um, whatever.
>> Oh, Lost Oh, you said Lost Island.
>> Yeah, I said Lost Island. Speaking of
Lost Island, I did see in the podcast
last week, uh, when I was talking about
Lost Island. I don't know what the hell
book cover you found. I guess it was a
book with the same name.
>> Is that a different one?
>> Oh, yeah. So, I looked it up. You put up
a book cover for it's a children's book.
So, the audience is like, "What the
hell?" There's a ver There's a book
called The Lost Island that's aimed it
said for the like 9 to 12 year old
market and it's like kids exploring or
whatever.
>> So, the other one must not be popular at
all.
>> It's old. It's like a decade old. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Um, so no, I didn't read a kids book.
Uh,
in case people are wondering, I'm also
watching things. Um, people want to hear
about movies after last week's episode.
I watched the smashing machine
which starring Dwayne Johnson. Dwayne
Johnson was great. The filming was in
that like really confident impressive
like standard safety style naturalism
which I think is like really impressive
alterior film making. Uh the movie
though they couldn't they couldn't find
a core of the movie in the script. It
was at least my opinion is it was like
episodic and impressionistic.
uh but you they they struggle to
actually have an arc or attention or you
just kind of felt like you were in this
person's life and then they added in the
sort of Emily Blunt sort of like very
cliche not very interesting story line
of like there's his wife she'd be crazy
and it's a real problem for him and but
then they like make up again after they
fight and like I guess that's his main
villain was like overcoming his wife's
craziness like there was no it's like a
beautifully crafted acted movie that
they didn't have the core and I think
that's why otherwise The pieces were
great, but it didn't I don't think it
came together.
>> I'm going to watch that soon, actually.
>> Uh yeah, it's worth watching. John Rock
is great. It's really good acting. Um I
also He's huge.
>> He's a monster.
>> Monster. He's like what, 85 years old?
What is he now?
Monster. Uh we also watched Song Blue,
which was starring Hugh Jackman and Kate
Hudson about dramatizing the life of a
Neil Diamond husband wife tribute band.
from the 90s and 2000s. Uh, you know, it
was like an parts of it were like a
jukebox musical, right? Like it's very
like good-hearted and and they're just
like super happy and they're great
singers and like singing Neil Diamond
and it's shot like a concert film those
parts and it's really nice. It was fine.
Um, it it had to be edited to the
problem is is not to spoil too much,
there's multiple tragedy beats in it, so
it's like things are going well,
tragedy, things are going well tragedy.
And it's like they they had to cover too
much ground too quickly. And like you're
just as you're getting started like I
kind of like this kind of feelood
infectious Tupac musical. You get to
that tragedy beat pretty quickly and
you're like I don't think I'm bought in
enough into these characters to care and
then so again I I it's one of these
movies like good not great.
>> Good components but uh good components
but didn't all come together. All right.
So that's what I was up to. I think
that's it for this week.
you and there's a note here about you're
finishing up the best picture nominees.
>> Oh yeah. So that's why we watched um
that's why we were watching Train
Dreams. Yeah. So my wife and I are
trying to finish
>> that's the one where he's a tree cutter,
right?
>> Yeah.
>> I saw that. That was good.
>> Yeah. Okay. I'm about halfway through.
Yeah. Beautifully shot.
>> Mhm.
>> Um so we we try to watch all the best
picture nominees. We're we're pretty
close. We are doing one exchange where
there's one movie she saw I didn't and
one I saw she didn't. We're going to
count it for both. She didn't want to
see Frankenstein. I didn't want to see
Hamnet. And so we're kind of we're still
counting this. We We've got to see Train
Dream still, Secret Agent. Um which I'm
looking forward to. And I think there's
only one Oh, Sentimental Value.
>> All I can think about with the movie
watchings in our theme last couple weeks
is when you're talking you're um to take
30 minute breaks and read a article with
the three-hour movies. I'm like, that's
going to take a long time.
It doesn't take it takes five minutes.
>> No, no, I think it's fine. You're right.
The videos are pretty long. I love
that's what I do. And then
>> I have never tried it, but I want to try
it eventually.
>> Yeah. Like re-energizes you. It really
makes a difference. And then you like
learn a lot of film stuff. All right.
Anyways, um enough of this nonsense.
Let's uh we'll call it for now. We'll be
back next week with another episode. And
until then, as always, stay deep. Hey,
if you like today's discussion of
planning systems, you might also like
episode 360, which was about my one-page
productivity system, a minimalist system
for trying to get your life minimally in
order. Check it out. I think you'll like
it. So, here's a truth about modern time
management that we often ignore. The
systems required to tame the avalanche
of messages and meetings and tasks that
bury us in this current world of digital
work. These systems are demanding to
run. They require focus.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
Cal Newport interviews Sarah Harter, a doctor, mother, and planning expert, to discuss the importance and elements of an effective planning system. Sarah emphasizes that planning is not solely about productivity but about intentionally controlling one's time and making space for desired activities in a distracted world. She outlines three key components: a functional master calendar, a robust "airtight" task management system, and a comprehensive goal-setting system with nested goals (yearly, seasonal, monthly, weekly, daily). Sarah primarily uses analog tools, integrates family and personal commitments into her planning, and highlights the value of seasonal planning to adjust rhythms and workloads. Both Cal and Sarah agree that planning is crucial for resisting digital distractions and maintaining control over one's life, rather than being overwhelmed by chaos. They also touch upon the limitations of AI in truly managing personal time and intentions, stressing human agency.
Videos recently processed by our community