HomeVideos

How To Plan Better | Simple Analog System | Cal Newport

Now Playing

How To Plan Better | Simple Analog System | Cal Newport

Transcript

2904 segments

0:00

Okay, so I have a question for you. How

0:03

do you figure out what to do with your

0:05

time during any given day? Now, I think

0:09

this question matters more now than it

0:12

ever has before because if you don't

0:14

have a good answer to it, if you just

0:16

sort of wing it as your day unfolds,

0:19

guess what forces are going to take

0:22

control of your intention? Email, Slack,

0:25

social media, online chatter, YouTube,

0:27

streaming services. This is a show about

0:29

finding depth in a distracted world. And

0:30

to succeed in this goal, you need a good

0:34

planning system. But how do you create a

0:37

system that's not only going to work,

0:39

but is something you're going to stick

0:40

with over time. This is what I want to

0:43

talk to you about today. And I have an

0:44

expert that's going to join me to help

0:46

us in this conversation. Her name is

0:48

Sarah Harter. She's a a doctor and a

0:51

mother uh and also a planning

0:54

afficionado. She's the host of the best

0:56

laid plans podcast on which I've been a

0:58

guest. Um, and in December, she

1:00

published a book with that same name

1:01

that had the subtitle a simple planning

1:04

system for living a life that you love.

1:06

Amazon selected it as one of the best

1:08

non-fiction books of the month. So, I

1:11

invited Sarah on to get into the

1:14

nitty-gritty details of how to build a

1:16

useful and realistic planning system.

1:19

She even helps me figure out solutions

1:22

to some problems I've been having with

1:24

my own systems. So, there's some changes

1:26

I make after talking to her. She also

1:28

makes a case for why she only uses

1:30

analog tools, which I think is

1:32

interesting. I'm not quite sold on that,

1:33

but I think it's an interesting case.

1:34

So, anyways, this is a deeply practical

1:36

discussion and one that I think is

1:38

absolutely vital to our mission here on

1:40

this show. So, let's get into it. As

1:44

always, I'm Cal Newport and this is Deep

1:48

Questions, the show for people seeking

1:50

depth in a distracted world. And we'll

1:53

get started right after the music.

2:05

>> All right. Hey Sarah, welcome back to

2:07

the show.

2:08

>> Thank you so much for having me on. I'm

2:10

excited to be back.

2:11

>> Of course. I mean, I'm excited about

2:13

your book and I'm excited to get into

2:15

the weeds on planning. I have a whole

2:17

list here of practical things. I want to

2:20

learn from you. I want to talk about

2:21

like what makes a good planning system

2:23

good. How do you keep systems

2:25

sustainable over the long run, digital

2:29

versus analog, family versus personal

2:31

versus work, tasks and planning and how

2:34

that differs. I I actually saw a lot of

2:36

connections between your new book and

2:38

slow productivity. So, I want to get

2:39

into that as well. So, we're going to

2:41

walk away from here with like lots of

2:43

ideas about how to get your life under

2:46

control, but I want to start by just

2:47

motivating this entire conversation for

2:50

my audience. Like, why is planning

2:52

important? We need to ask that question.

2:54

Why is it being talked about? Like, why

2:56

do I care about it on this show, which

2:57

is largely about fighting back against

2:59

digital distractions? I actually think

3:02

that it's uh really well connected. So

3:05

I'm going to give you my take for why I

3:06

think planning is important Sarah and

3:08

then I'm going to ask you to sort of

3:09

give your the way you think about it.

3:12

Right. So from what I noticed is there

3:14

was a period I really kick it off around

3:17

2019 uh with Jinny Odell who brought a

3:21

sort of anti-neoliberalism anti-

3:23

capitalism critique to the world of

3:25

things like planning and productivity

3:27

and the sort of related topics and

3:29

essentially the the anti-neoliberal

3:30

critique was to care too much about

3:33

planning is to uh commoditize time to to

3:38

think about your efforts as things that

3:40

can be turned into productive value and

3:43

the sort of ideal anti-productivity

3:46

vision that was being pushed starting

3:48

with Odell and then lots of commentaries

3:49

during the pandemic was really what you

3:51

should be doing is just in an

3:53

unstructured way walking through fields

3:56

and watching birds and uncommodifying

3:59

your life and that this was the tension

4:01

between commodifying your time and

4:04

watching birds in a park in San

4:06

Francisco and this was sort of the setup

4:08

that never rang true for me. Uh, you

4:10

know, like you, I have three kids. I

4:12

have seven jobs. Like, there's a lot

4:14

going on. And to me, the opposite of

4:16

having a planning system is not walking

4:19

through the fields and enjoying birds.

4:20

It's chaos. It's stress. It's anxiety.

4:23

And, and this is how I connect it back

4:25

to my program here on this show, it puts

4:27

you into exactly the state where the

4:29

digital overlords can dominate. Because

4:32

when you are overwhelmed and reactive

4:34

and don't know what's going on, guess

4:36

what suddenly becomes really appealing?

4:38

Well, let me just pull up the phone or

4:40

let me just fall back onto like email

4:42

and just sort of shoot messages back and

4:44

forth. Uh, let me zone out to a streamer

4:48

because it's going to numb out the

4:49

anxiety I feel. So, I I I thought of

4:51

planning

4:53

as a key step towards a deeper life, not

4:55

as something that was getting in the way

4:57

of a deeper life. And there was this

4:58

sort of clash that was happening. All

4:59

right. So that's my soapbox speech, but

5:01

you've been working on this this topic

5:03

so practically for years with your

5:05

podcast and now with your book and with

5:07

your blog.

5:09

Why do you think about planning as being

5:11

important?

5:12

>> Yeah. Well, first I guess it's super

5:14

interesting to bring back to that like

5:16

Jenny Odell kind of movement because I

5:18

do think people get stuck in thinking

5:21

about planning as having to be married

5:23

to productivity. Meaning if I want to

5:26

plan, it means that I'm trying to cram

5:28

in as many quote productive things as

5:30

possible and capitalism, you know, the

5:32

wheels spinning, etc. But that to me is

5:36

such a unfair way to characterize

5:40

planning because to me, planning is so

5:42

much more about thinking ahead of time

5:44

about what you want to do in your life

5:46

and then making sure that you have

5:48

things lined up so that you can do those

5:50

things. And for me, if I were to want to

5:52

go bird watching in a San Francisco

5:53

park, let me tell you what I'd have to

5:55

do. I would have to do a lot of planning

5:58

to make sure that that could be

6:00

accommodated in my life without, you

6:01

know, having a kid not get picked up

6:03

from an activity or not pay the bills or

6:05

whatever it is. So, I guess that kind of

6:08

goes along with what you're saying as

6:09

well, which is that those two things

6:11

don't have to be mutually exclusive. The

6:13

the free time, the intentional leisure,

6:17

and the planning. And in fact, I think

6:19

if if anything for mo many people

6:22

depending on their stage of life, the

6:24

planning piece is actually required in

6:26

order to make the best use or I don't

6:29

know the use that fits aligns most with

6:31

what they really want to do with their

6:33

time. And so that is what has driven my

6:36

passion about planning. It's not about

6:37

turning out more widgets, you know,

6:39

earning more money necessarily, but it's

6:42

about fitting in the things that you

6:44

want to do in this one life that we all

6:46

have. You know, I'm also a huge fan of

6:48

sort of the mortality focused

6:50

literature, the sort of Oliver Burkeman,

6:52

Jodie Wellman type stuff. Um, and that

6:54

just for me lights a fire around

6:56

planning, which to me also has sort of

6:58

two prongs to it in a way. One is about

7:02

making sure we're not just going on

7:03

autopilot and making sure that we are

7:05

fitting in the things that we want to

7:07

do. And the other side is making sure

7:08

we're not getting overwhelmed by little

7:10

tasks coming at us trying to kind of

7:12

take a bite into our lives. And by

7:15

making sure you're managing all those

7:16

tasks and making sure you're

7:18

purposefully adding in the things you

7:19

want, then hopefully you get to do more

7:22

things you want to do, like I don't

7:23

know, bird watching a San Francisco

7:25

park.

7:26

>> Well, let me give you an analysis. I'm

7:28

going to not psycho analyze, but I'm

7:31

going to analyze you and then you're

7:32

going to tell me if I have this right

7:33

because I have this theory about

7:35

partially why you're you personally are

7:37

in a very good situation to be leading

7:40

people through these topics. Um, and I I

7:42

think it it I don't really understand

7:44

your profession. You're a pediatric

7:45

endocrinologist, right? A clinical

7:47

doctor.

7:48

>> But my but I think it's important that

7:50

you're a clinical physician because my

7:53

understanding in in some sense that's a

7:55

that's a very demanding job, but it's

7:58

also very structured, right? You have

7:59

this sort of uh cadence of appointments

8:02

that's like probably pretty standardized

8:03

in your practice. Whereas a lot of

8:06

people and maybe in the Jin Odell camp

8:08

and people in my world, you're often in

8:09

like a a more vague knowledge work

8:11

environment where there is this sort of

8:14

which I this is where I get the Odell

8:15

critique. There is this sort of sense of

8:17

like an endless knob of productivity

8:19

that you can turn that seems tied to

8:21

like busyness and how many hours you're

8:23

willing to work outside of work. And

8:25

there's like a rightful, you know,

8:28

negative association that people in like

8:30

a email-based office job start to build

8:33

where they're like, "All right, enough

8:34

of this productivity talk because my

8:36

boss just wants me to do emails till

8:37

midnight and like enough is enough." Did

8:40

it matter that your job had enough

8:42

structure that you you could stand aside

8:46

a little bit from some of the

8:48

maladaptive stuff that was happening in

8:50

certain knowledge work jobs. It was I

8:52

think smoke screening the importance of

8:53

organization and planning because it was

8:55

sort of like an orthogonal issue that

8:56

also needed to be solved. Am I getting

8:59

medicine right there or am I just romant

9:01

am I romanticizing? I've personally

9:03

experienced both sides because I've had

9:05

more like leadership type roles where

9:07

the emails are like rolling in and the

9:08

meetings and everything is a little bit

9:10

more you know kind of like a world

9:12

without email but the opposite of that

9:13

kind of but then yes the rest of my job

9:16

has been very very structured and you

9:18

are right a lot of my passion was born

9:21

out of a time period when almost all of

9:25

not all but like a very large fraction

9:27

of my hours were very much accounted for

9:28

by others like it was during my

9:30

residency training where we had caps at

9:32

80 hours per week that we could be at

9:33

the hospital, but other than that, you

9:34

know, our time was not really our own.

9:36

And it made sense to be incredibly

9:38

intentional with the hours that were

9:40

left. And I guess that is where a lot of

9:42

my passion around planning was born. Um,

9:46

but you're right that my current life is

9:48

is much more around that. Much of my

9:50

time is fairly structured and that is

9:52

one of the things I love about my

9:53

clinical job is that I can go in, see my

9:56

patients, write my notes, and kind of

9:58

feel like I did everything for the day.

10:00

Is it true you had your first kids when

10:02

you were still this over overlapped

10:03

residency?

10:05

>> My first kid was during fellowship. So

10:07

the subsp specialty training after

10:09

residency.

10:10

>> Can I ask you a a brief unrelated

10:13

question that is related to the pit on

10:16

HBO?

10:16

>> I love the pit. You can ask me anything

10:18

about the pit. My husband and I, because

10:20

he's a vascular surgeon, we like sit

10:21

there and analyze every episode um for

10:23

correctness and maybe misinformation.

10:27

vascular surgeons think that they should

10:28

be bringing they're doing too many

10:30

things in the ED that they should be

10:31

bringing consults in. That's what I

10:32

heard is like no you can't don't mess

10:34

with that nerve in the hand. You got to

10:36

bring down um okay but here's here's a

10:38

question on behalf of my whole audience

10:39

more important than anything else we're

10:40

going to talk about. Can you please

10:41

distinguish between

10:43

thirdyear medical student intern like

10:46

pre- residency first I cannot my sister

10:49

is a attending you know ER doctor and I

10:52

still don't understand

10:54

>> can you just what is the order of things

10:55

that happened and then we'll get back to

10:57

platty but I got to understand this is I

10:58

don't understand which character is what

11:00

when

11:01

>> well I'm trying to remember like who's a

11:02

third year and who's a fourth year like

11:04

Javati is she a she a fourth year maybe

11:06

so in med school you usually do your

11:08

core rotations so that's the very first

11:10

year in the clinic your third year of

11:12

med school and then the fourth year is

11:14

more like subsp specialty rotations. I

11:16

don't feel like the pit does a great job

11:17

of saying who's a third year and who's a

11:19

fourth year.

11:19

>> Is that intern yet or not fourth year?

11:21

Is that is fourth year the same as

11:23

intern or is that post fourth year?

11:25

>> So medical school has four years. Then

11:27

begins your intern year which is also

11:29

known as the first residency year. And

11:31

most residencies well the ER residency

11:33

is actually four years long. So, um,

11:37

sometimes it's totally unclear, but we

11:39

know Santos is R2 because I keep saying

11:40

it over and over again.

11:42

>> Yes. And the the really young doctor in

11:45

the first season, I think, was third

11:47

year or fourth year. Maybe like a fourth

11:49

year. Okay. And then when do you get

11:50

called doctor?

11:51

>> You get called doctor when you begin

11:52

your residency. So, after med school.

11:54

Before that, I used to use like an

11:56

archaic student doctor.

11:58

>> Yeah.

11:58

>> Heart or whatever. But yeah.

12:00

>> Yeah. Interesting. All right. Well, we

12:02

we now we got the important stuff

12:03

covered. we can get back to the easy

12:05

stuff like trying to manage life in this

12:06

chaotic world. Um, all right. So, let's

12:09

let's go back then. Uh, you've

12:12

>> been thinking about uh planning and

12:13

organization for a long time. You've had

12:15

your podcast, your blog, and your book.

12:17

I think I have that order not quite

12:18

right. Probably blog, podcast, book.

12:21

>> That is correct.

12:22

>> How today do you think about the

12:25

elements that have to go into a

12:26

successful planning system?

12:27

>> Yes. So, in my opinion, and I know it

12:30

might differ a little bit from how you

12:31

talk about it, but I feel like there are

12:33

three big ones. The first one is a

12:35

calendar that's completely functional

12:37

and shows everything. And in my book, I

12:39

refer to that as like one master

12:42

calendar. And that can be it sounds so

12:45

straightforward, like of course I have a

12:46

calendar, but a lot of people are

12:48

actually consulting multiple places,

12:50

even on a day-to-day level, to actually

12:52

figure out where they're supposed to be.

12:53

So, master calendar is number one.

12:55

Number two is a really robust task

12:59

management system. I've coined the term

13:01

airtight task management because I want

13:03

to communicate that like you know

13:04

exactly what's coming in, where to look

13:06

for it, how often to look for it, and

13:08

where to put it so that you know you

13:10

will see it. And to me, that's the part

13:11

where you're sort of preventing the moth

13:14

eating like things coming at you from

13:16

really um getting too much of your time

13:19

and attention and you know putting the

13:21

tasks in their place where they belong.

13:23

And then finally, you need a fantastic

13:25

and robust goal setting system. Um, you

13:28

talk about yours in like a multi-level

13:30

scale planning, and I have a very

13:32

similar version of that called nested

13:34

goals. It has a couple more levels than

13:36

yours has because I I love a month. I

13:38

love the monthly level, which you don't

13:39

really talk about. Um, but similarly,

13:42

you know, you're planning every year and

13:44

then every season you're looking at that

13:45

yearly plan. Every month you're looking

13:46

at that seasonal plan. Every week you're

13:48

looking at your monthly plan and every

13:50

day you're looking at your weekly plan.

13:51

And that sounds so much more involved as

13:53

it is than it actually kind of is in

13:55

practice. But by doing that and having

13:58

like a really clear-cut, purposeful

14:00

ritual at each of those time points, you

14:02

know that you're going to be integrating

14:04

kind of the urgent and what you need to

14:05

do in a given day or week with the kind

14:08

of higher level goals that you've set um

14:10

in more thoughtful planning sessions.

14:12

>> Right? So this is fascinating and I

14:14

think this is a a key distinction. I I

14:16

struggle to communicate this sometimes

14:18

as well is that there's there's these

14:20

different elements that all go under the

14:21

the umbrella of planning. Uh you have

14:24

the whole sort of information

14:25

organizational aspect of it and then you

14:26

have the sort of time control aspect of

14:28

it which you're calling like goal

14:29

setting system. Um and I think often

14:32

people will zoom in on just one piece

14:34

could be the like I I have a planner a

14:37

planner called a time block planner but

14:38

it's not a planning system. It's like

14:40

one piece like in your terminology it's

14:42

like one of multiple pieces that goes

14:44

into a goal setting system that itself

14:45

could be large part of a larger planning

14:47

universe but there's people who say I

14:49

bought my time block planner um so can I

14:53

organize my whole life with this thing

14:55

and I was like no no no no that's like

14:56

you just you bought an exercise band

14:59

that's probably a good thing to use as

15:01

part of a large health and fitness

15:02

routine but just having that exercise

15:04

band is not the is not the whole thing

15:07

um okay so I want to go through let's go

15:09

through these in this order because I

15:11

think it actually I think calendar to

15:13

task airtight task management to goal

15:14

setting system is easiest to hardest or

15:18

simplest to most complex. I I feel like

15:19

things get more and more complex as we

15:21

move down. Um all right so master

15:23

calendar when you say shares everything

15:24

so you're talking about professional

15:27

personal family we need everything in

15:29

one place. Are you a digital person? Are

15:30

you a Google calendar where you could

15:32

have like multiple different calendars

15:33

you turn off and on

15:35

shocked and everyone is always shocked

15:37

but I'm largely paperbased. Um, I have

15:39

three kids. I also have like five, not

15:42

five jobs, but maybe maybe three jobs if

15:44

you count like the podcast is one and

15:46

then all my other media stuff and then

15:48

my physician job, which is three days a

15:50

week. I do work part-time as of now on

15:52

my clinical side. Um, but for me, I'm

15:55

able to actually have my master I have

15:57

it right next to me, my master beer.

16:00

Meaning, okay, is every detail of every

16:02

little thing in here? No. Meaning there

16:05

are blocks in here? This is not going to

16:07

show up, but where it just says patients

16:09

and I can't like see exactly what the

16:11

patients are that I'm going to see

16:12

because first of all that would not be

16:13

HIPACO compliant and second of all that

16:15

would be you know way too much to put on

16:16

paper anyway. But I know that when I go

16:18

to work I'm going to log into our

16:20

electronic health you know system and

16:22

see exactly which patients I have to

16:23

see. But still this is enough for me to

16:26

know this is where I have to be on any

16:28

given day. And on my you know kids level

16:31

I have a whole section on the bottom

16:33

that talk about like where the drop offs

16:34

and pickups are. Um,

16:36

>> wait. What do you mean by section on the

16:37

bottom? This is outside of the flow of

16:39

time. It's like at the bottom you have

16:41

like kind of like a to-do list for like

16:43

listing out drop off pickoff times.

16:45

>> That's a choice that I've made. But I do

16:47

use a vertical planner so I can see

16:49

pretty much everything kind of like

16:50

scaled to time just like you would pull

16:51

up in Outlook or Google Calendar. But

16:54

because I don't always do all the

16:56

driving, um, you know, I'm like I have

16:58

we have a nanny, I have my husband, I

16:59

drive, I have three kids, they're going

17:01

in different directions. I kind of like

17:02

to still know where all the kids are.

17:04

So, I kind of put a row beneath there

17:06

where I put all the comingings and

17:07

goings of gymnastics and basketball and

17:10

dance and all that kind of stuff.

17:11

>> So, it'll be like drop off at 3:30, pick

17:13

up at So, just like listing it. Okay.

17:14

Yeah. Oh, that's interesting. We we've

17:16

taken to So, we we're Google calendar

17:18

people.

17:19

>> Um my wife and I uh because then I have

17:22

my work calendar so she can see and I

17:24

can see what she's doing. But, we put

17:26

the kids uh like family stuff. We put

17:29

those as those are like appointments on

17:30

there as well. And we'll we'll we'll try

17:32

to span the time the driving actually

17:34

takes.

17:35

>> So like that half hour will be now a

17:37

reality of this calendar is there's a

17:39

ton of overlap stuff happening because

17:41

now everything is on the same screen. So

17:43

you know in Google calendar things that

17:45

intersect time-wise overlap. So there's

17:47

a lot of

17:47

>> you can you can hide right like so you

17:49

can decide to only look at your bar.

17:51

>> You can uncclick it off. Yeah.

17:52

>> No and I'm not against digital

17:54

whatsoever but you did ask what I use

17:55

personally. I think both are fantastic.

17:57

I just sometimes people write off paper

17:59

kind of thinking like well if your life

18:01

is you know complicated there's no way

18:03

that will work and like I've been making

18:05

it work for a really long time. I do

18:07

have very small writing and I enjoy

18:09

using paper. So if that does not apply

18:11

to you I 100% say embrace a digital

18:14

solution. When my kids get a little bit

18:16

older as well and you know right now I

18:18

kind of have one using um digital but my

18:20

two younger ones not so much but I could

18:22

imagine us migrating when it makes more

18:24

sense for everybody.

18:25

>> Could I ask how how large the formatting

18:26

is? So is it day per page, five days per

18:29

page, like how big are these columns?

18:31

>> So the my calendar exists on the weekly

18:35

pages. It's like kind of could see on

18:37

the video of a Hobonichi cousin planner

18:40

which is A5 size. So each column is like

18:43

a little more than an inch wide. Um but

18:46

it has a very small grid lines and it

18:47

goes all the way from you know midnight

18:49

to to midnight. So

18:50

>> So you can see a whole week.

18:52

>> You can see an entire week at a glance.

18:53

>> Yeah. Okay. Interesting. And then how

18:55

much are you putting non uh non-appoint

18:59

things on there? In other words, and

19:01

when are you putting those things on

19:02

there? So things that are not um you

19:04

know, I need to be here, there's a

19:05

meeting, there's an appointment, I'm

19:06

seeing patients doing these errors, but

19:07

optional uh tasks that you're adding

19:09

just to kind of keep track of what

19:10

you're doing with your time. Is that

19:11

>> we're bleeding into task management and

19:14

>> and goal setting probably as well,

19:15

right? This probably touches on

19:17

everything.

19:17

>> This is it. So, this is super

19:18

interesting because

19:20

people love to like fixate on like,

19:22

well, is it all in one tool or is it

19:24

not? And in my case, it is, but I do

19:26

think like this is an important time to

19:28

step back and like realize there it's

19:29

still performing different functions for

19:31

me. Um, and there's no reason it has to

19:33

be allin-one tool. But for me, I do

19:36

actually do most of my pretty much all

19:38

of my shorter term task management on

19:40

paper as well. So, I have two places.

19:44

Well, we're kind of skipping ahead to

19:45

task management, but um when you are

19:48

deciding where to put a task, you want

19:50

to put it in a place that it makes sense

19:52

that you're going to see it at the right

19:53

time. You can either assign it to a very

19:55

specific time, like you can literally

19:56

calendar it in, you can assign it to a

19:59

day, and you can do all these things

20:00

digitally as well, or you could assign

20:02

it to a week. That's a little bit harder

20:03

to do digitally, but you can you can

20:05

find some workarounds. And so for me,

20:07

many of my like day-to-day tasks and I I

20:10

use the word task instead of goal here

20:12

because I often talk about kind of goals

20:14

turning into tasks around the weekly

20:16

level. Um but I have a more like a the

20:19

eighth column on the lefth hand side has

20:21

a lot of tasks that I want to do for the

20:22

week. If I have a task that I come

20:24

across that isn't that urgent, then I

20:27

might assign it to a future week. So

20:29

well, next week doesn't have anything,

20:30

but the week after that has a couple of

20:32

tasks. Or I may actually stick a task up

20:34

at the top of a day if I don't have a

20:37

specific time slot for it, but I want to

20:38

assign it to a specific day. And what I

20:41

do with this is so arbitrary. Like you

20:44

can do the exact same thing in Apple

20:47

Notes or to-doist or to-do or things

20:50

like the actual place, the vessel where

20:53

you're holding these things is going to

20:54

be unique to what your style is and how

20:58

often you like to use devices versus

21:00

paper, etc. The important thing is

21:02

defining for yourself where these

21:04

holders are. Where do you put tasks that

21:06

you want to see for the week, but you

21:08

don't want to, you know, assign to a

21:09

specific day? Where do you put a task

21:11

that you know you're going to see at the

21:12

beginning of each day? And where do you

21:14

maybe put a longer term task that you

21:15

don't want in your face for a given

21:17

week, but you know you're going to want

21:18

to see later? Let's take a quick break

21:21

to hear from our sponsors.

21:23

As listeners of the show know, I'm not a

21:25

huge fan of huge overhyp pronouncements

21:28

about AI. I'm much more interested in

21:30

the specific applications of this

21:31

technology to specific tasks. This is

21:35

where Zapier enters the scene. I've

21:38

known about Zapier for a long time. It's

21:40

a tool that helps you automate tasks or

21:42

actions on your computer. And people in

21:44

my circles have long used it to build

21:46

systems for tracking information or

21:48

speeding up regular tasks and so on.

21:49

It's really cool stuff, right? I'm been

21:51

a fan of this for a while. But more

21:52

recently, Zapier did something smart.

21:56

They seamlessly integrated AI into their

21:58

automation platform. So you can now as

22:02

part of their automations query a

22:05

leading AI model like chat GPT or cloud

22:08

and then integrate those responses into

22:10

the actions that your automations take.

22:13

All right. So now it really opens up the

22:16

possibilities for building these type of

22:17

automations on your machine or for your

22:19

team. Now here's the thing. Zapier is

22:21

for everyone tech expert or not. No IT

22:24

bottlenecks, no complexity. You can

22:25

start building smarter automations right

22:27

away. This is why teams have already

22:30

automated over 300 million AI tasks

22:33

using Zapier. Are you ready to join

22:35

them? Get started for free by visiting

22:37

zapier.com/deep.

22:39

That's zap ie.com/deep.

22:45

I also want to talk about our friends at

22:46

Calder Lab. Men, let me level with you.

22:49

We need to take better care of our skin.

22:51

And here's the way to do it. using

22:53

Calira Lab. Calira Lab makes high

22:56

performance skincare designed

22:57

specifically for men's skin. And more

23:00

importantly, they've simplified the use

23:01

of their products into a straightforward

23:03

three-step routine. Step one, use their

23:06

Clean Slate product, a cleanser to get

23:09

the the dirt, oil, and sweat off your

23:11

skin. Step two, use the Great, a serum

23:15

clinically proven to reduce wrinkles

23:16

form uh and improve elast uh elasticity.

23:20

Step three, use their hydro layer

23:23

moisturizer to lock in moisture all day.

23:25

That's it. I have all three products and

23:27

I can tell you from experience, this

23:28

routine is simple and effective,

23:31

especially the moisturizing. I'm so used

23:33

to my skin feeling dry all winter, I was

23:35

amazed to learn that it doesn't have to

23:37

be this way. So, if you're interested,

23:39

go to calderab.com/deep

23:41

and use the code deep for 20% off your

23:44

first order. All right, Jesse, let's get

23:47

back to the show. Well, okay. So, let's

23:49

move on to airtight task management. Um,

23:51

so the word airtight here, this is a

23:53

reference to like a David Allen style

23:55

full capture. Don't not in your head and

23:58

not somewhere where you're going to

24:00

forget that it exists.

24:01

>> Correct. And I make a big emphasis on

24:04

making sure that you are very aware of

24:06

where tasks come at you because it's

24:09

usually for most of us not just one

24:10

place. You might have text messages,

24:13

your WhatsApp chat, your email, your

24:15

work email, and your personal email.

24:17

people that just like stop you on the

24:19

street and tell you they want to do XYZ.

24:21

And you need to have a really thoughtful

24:23

way to make sure that each of these

24:25

pathways has a pipeline that like makes

24:28

sense. Like you're checking them enough,

24:30

but not necessarily all the time. And I

24:33

actually kind of teach people that every

24:35

given box that you might receive a task

24:37

in might have its own cadence that makes

24:38

sense. So maybe you look at the sports

24:40

team app twice a week, but you only look

24:42

at your email um three times a day or

24:44

something like that. Like I'm making

24:45

that up. And then to be very clear about

24:48

once those tasks come in, where are they

24:50

going so that you are not going to lose

24:51

track of them and you see them at the

24:53

right time. Sometimes the answer is to

24:54

just do the task. You know, something

24:56

comes at you that's one minute or less.

24:58

You just get it done. Um but then a lot

25:00

of the times, uh the answer is to put it

25:02

into whatever system you're using for

25:04

task management so that you see it at

25:06

the right time.

25:07

>> Okay. And so your vessel agnostic, but

25:10

the idea is you have a singular vessel

25:13

that when you check these various

25:14

pipelines

25:16

uh stores the tasks and then there's a

25:19

separate sort of system or cadence for

25:21

taking it out of that vessel and getting

25:23

it onto your weekly plan, your daily

25:25

plan. Is is that more or less right?

25:29

>> Yes. I mean sometimes there's not really

25:32

like an extra step there. Like if the

25:33

vessel is your text messages um and

25:37

someone sends you a task there, it's not

25:39

like it's going to some holding place,

25:40

you would you would then, you know,

25:41

let's say you make sure that at the part

25:43

of your processing, and I know you talk

25:45

about processing at the end of every

25:46

day, either with a TXT file or however

25:49

they're doing it, but as you're

25:50

processing the end of each day, you take

25:52

any text message that's left, you leave

25:55

it unread if it's something you have to

25:56

handle, and you put it straight into

25:58

whatever tool that you are going to use,

25:59

whether that is again the to-doist app,

26:01

your planner, whatever, whatever. ever

26:03

it is. And being very careful about once

26:06

you've chosen where these tasks are

26:08

living, you cannot be swapping around

26:10

and using multiple storage vessels,

26:13

you've got to be like, "This is my one

26:15

place and you have to have rituals that

26:17

include looking at that place." And

26:19

again, that seems kind of obvious, but I

26:21

get a lot of people, they're like,

26:22

"Well, I put some place some stuff on my

26:24

monthly and some my week." I was like,

26:25

"Well, when are you looking at those

26:26

pages?" Right? You want it to be

26:28

somewhere that you're going to be

26:29

checking at the appropriate cadence so

26:31

you know you're going to see it.

26:32

>> All right. So, what do you use right

26:33

now?

26:34

>> Yeah. So, right now, um, I do a few

26:37

things. So, if something comes at me

26:39

like randomly throughout the day, I do

26:40

exactly what I just said, which is that

26:41

I will text myself or email myself and

26:44

leave it unread. And one of the things I

26:46

do at the end of every single day before

26:47

as I'm shutting down is to make sure

26:49

that those anything that's left unread

26:51

is captured. Um, I do that with WhatsApp

26:53

as well. Like if I get something from

26:54

school and I'm like, "Oh, I need to deal

26:55

with that. that then needs to go into my

26:57

system that gets left unread and that

26:59

inbox gets checked by the end of the

27:00

day.

27:01

>> You said unread emails and unread

27:04

messages

27:04

>> or WhatsApp messages.

27:05

>> Okay. So that's what that's going to be

27:07

during your processing step what you're

27:08

looking for. So if you if you think up

27:10

something just you know ex nilo like oh

27:12

god I forgot I need to like start

27:14

planning for X. You might send yourself

27:15

an email.

27:16

>> Yes.

27:17

>> So that it'll be there unread

27:18

>> and I'm leaving it unread because it

27:19

means it hasn't been processed.

27:20

>> Okay. So then when you process you

27:22

process when end of the day

27:23

>> end of the day by end each day I want to

27:25

see no unread texts no unread WhatsApp

27:28

messages and no unread emails doesn't

27:30

mean I've like archived them or dealt

27:31

with them but they are they're not black

27:33

>> so then what are the I don't even know

27:35

can you send yourself tech I'm so tech

27:37

bad

27:39

and then you can actually leave them you

27:40

can like I don't know you swipe over and

27:42

you click the thing so it so it shows

27:43

that it's unread my fingers know how to

27:45

do it my my brain can't describe it

27:47

>> there's some sequence of things I do all

27:48

day long which I can't actually tell you

27:50

what it is Um, okay. So then what are

27:51

the options then? So I this is

27:52

fascinating to me. I I like to the the

27:54

nitty-gritty here. Um, you're at the end

27:56

of the day you're processing what are

27:57

the options for what happens to the

28:00

information in like one of these unread

28:01

emails or text messages.

28:03

>> Yeah. So that is where this like where

28:05

my task management system comes into

28:07

play which again tool agnostic but I

28:09

largely use my planner. So I'm either

28:12

assigning it to like this week if I need

28:14

to get it done this week. I'm assigning

28:16

it to a future week or I'm giving it a

28:18

specific calendar slot within my

28:20

planner. So that I know on Wednesday I'm

28:22

going to wake up and be like, "Oh, at

28:24

10:00 a.m. I said I had to sign the kids

28:26

up for that camp that's going to sell

28:27

out in 30 seconds. Perfect. I'm going to

28:29

see that that morning. I'm going to know

28:30

about it and then I'm going to do it."

28:32

>> But so this is interesting. So your your

28:34

main place you uh you store the task.

28:36

It's your planner itself. It it it

28:38

exists somehow tied to time. Be it at

28:40

the weekly scale or the daily scale or

28:42

in like a particular slot.

28:43

>> I put almost all of my tasks and even my

28:46

goals tied to time. I mean, that's kind

28:48

of how I link. I call them goals kind of

28:50

at the larger time horizons, like year

28:51

or season. And I call them tasks when we

28:54

get down to the weekly or daily level.

28:56

Um, again, they're not always

28:58

specifically tied to time, but they I

29:00

mean, I guess they kind of are because

29:02

even if I'm putting it in a future

29:03

week's time frame, and even if I haven't

29:05

entirely committed to dealing with it in

29:07

that future week, it means I'm going to

29:08

see that task on that given week. Um

29:10

because again just like the day and I

29:12

have things that I want to make sure I

29:14

process by the end of the day. I'm never

29:16

going to exit a week without doing

29:18

something and this is actually a very

29:20

key point of task management to

29:22

everything I've put there. It doesn't

29:23

mean I've gotten them all done but I've

29:25

either decided you know what I don't

29:27

want to do that anymore. I'm crossing it

29:28

off or I'm migrating it. And I actually

29:30

this is kind of comes from the bullet

29:32

journal world but I tend to write a

29:33

carol.

29:34

>> Yeah. Like an arrow through it and then

29:35

I move the task to somewhere else.

29:37

>> Oh interesting. Okay. And then do you do

29:39

that uh at the end of each day? Are is

29:41

that when you're looking at tasks that

29:42

were assigned to that day you didn't do

29:44

or is it more at the weekly cadence? You

29:46

look at the whole week of things that

29:47

were assigned either either to the week

29:48

or to particular days that didn't get

29:50

done.

29:50

>> So I do make a list for each day as

29:52

well. We didn't even get into that. Um

29:55

but I tend to do the exact same process.

29:57

Again, this is going to be much much

29:59

quicker on a daily level. Maybe I had

30:01

six tasks I assigned myself. There was

30:02

one I didn't get done. But as I'm doing

30:04

that sort of like end of day processing,

30:06

if I have a empty checkbox on my

30:08

planner, I better figure out what I need

30:10

to do with that task. Um, if I miss a

30:13

day here or there, usually I'm able to

30:15

kind of catch up by making sure I

30:17

haven't crossed it off the weekly. So

30:18

there's kind of multiple layers in

30:20

there. Um, but in general, I do that

30:21

processing really at the end of every

30:23

day and as I move forward to the next

30:25

week. Something that's interesting to me

30:26

about this approach is it it may be a

30:30

way around a real issue I have and I

30:32

think a lot of people have which is task

30:33

system aversion which is this notion of

30:35

if things are going into a task system

30:37

it could be a singular vessel in a very

30:38

good program and things are being stored

30:41

and categorized in there's a sort of

30:43

activation energy that builds up

30:45

especially if like you're stressed or

30:46

you're overwhelmed or the the week is

30:48

going difficult and you're like my day

30:50

is full like I often have days where uh

30:53

you know because I work within a very

30:54

fixed amount amount of time where I'm

30:57

constantly racing the clock. It's, you

30:59

know, I got to get this article in.

31:01

These edits are due. There's these

31:03

urgent things or whatever. And the

31:05

activation energy of like, let me now

31:07

load up a task system and read all these

31:10

tasks and confront all that I have to do

31:12

and like I don't have time to do

31:13

anything in this day and I don't want to

31:14

do that and then I fall out of the task

31:16

system for multiple days. So if you're

31:18

just on your C the one tool I always say

31:20

like everyone uses at least this one

31:21

productivity tool or organization tool

31:23

is a calendar because you can't remember

31:25

when your dentist appointment is without

31:27

it. So you know you're going to look at

31:28

your plan like the the the weekly like

31:31

what am I doing today? What am I doing

31:32

this week? Like that will get used

31:34

because you have to see and so having

31:36

the task in there means there's no

31:38

separate activation energy. This is huge

31:42

and it's actually like why David Ellen

31:45

stuff doesn't totally work for me. And

31:47

it's what you said. It's like that

31:48

residue of like I don't want to look at

31:50

all the things I want to do. I don't

31:52

want to look at like six weeks worth of

31:53

accumulated stuff when I know I have

31:55

like two free hours on a given day. So

31:57

like that's exactly that activation

31:58

energy. I haven't heard it described in

32:00

that way. But I think you're right. For

32:02

me it's so much less stressful to be

32:04

like, okay, what's on today? Oh look,

32:07

today's really crowded. Let's only look

32:09

at that weekly list. We're not looking

32:11

beyond that and then like selecting

32:12

maybe one thing if that's all I have

32:14

time for. Creating my new list for the

32:16

day and then never looking back for the

32:18

rest of that day until I you know maybe

32:20

when it's time to do monthly planning

32:21

I'm going to look go larger scale. But I

32:24

designed this system in part because I

32:27

am like you stressed out by the idea of

32:29

seeing everything I need to do more

32:31

often than I actually need to

32:32

>> and and things that are non-trivial in

32:34

terms of time but are still in that task

32:35

category. I mean, in my experience, the

32:37

way those things get done is they live

32:38

on they they're on your calendar for the

32:40

day. Like, that's how it happens is

32:41

like, no, this is what I'm doing at 12

32:43

is I'm going to the dry cleaner and then

32:44

calling like whatever information that

32:46

list that exists in list is not very

32:50

it's much less actionable, but okay. So,

32:52

are you also here's the other idea that

32:55

I'm just thinking about ideas that are

32:56

catching my attention is like, oh, wait

32:57

a second. Yes, I think there's there's

32:59

there's something here that's like

33:00

explaining an issue that I want to

33:02

solve. Because when I'm thinking about

33:03

my task vessel, I'm using primarily

33:06

things three right now. One of the

33:08

things I do is like I'll often there'll

33:10

be like a bigger project and I'll I'll

33:13

generate as I come up with like steps

33:14

and tasks related to that project. I'll

33:16

be adding them to this list and I'm

33:18

like, okay, I can't have I couldn't put

33:20

all of these on my calendar like I have

33:22

hundreds of tasks in there. But it

33:23

sounds like and tell me if I have this

33:24

right. what what you would say is you

33:27

shouldn't be you're expanding too much

33:29

of the goal and the practicality too

33:31

early like that project should exist as

33:33

a goal and when we get to your goal um

33:37

setting system which we'll do next I'm

33:39

there's a cadence in which those goals

33:41

or projects generate tasks for the near

33:45

future and that like probably you would

33:47

say if I have this right like yeah your

33:49

list are too long because you're you're

33:51

unfurling too much from these things

33:53

you're working on. You don't need to do

33:55

that in advance. You need to see what

33:57

the projects are. Look at your week and

33:59

figure out what am I going to try to

34:02

make progress on this week with these

34:03

projects and what does that actually

34:04

look like practically and let me put

34:05

those task for the week or for

34:07

particular days. Is that

34:08

>> Yeah. And there's nothing bad I don't

34:10

think about keeping future potential

34:13

project steps somewhere convenient. Like

34:15

for you it might be things. For me I

34:17

love using

34:17

>> I'm looking at my list while you talk by

34:19

the way. Now now I'm thinking

34:20

>> fun we can experiment with like an

34:21

actual thing that you wanted to do. Um,

34:24

like there's nothing wrong with having a

34:26

receptacle for ideas. Like, um, I'm I'm

34:29

imagining maybe you have like a

34:30

renovation list and there's a whole

34:32

bunch of things on there, but the truth

34:33

is you're not assigning yourself all of

34:35

those things at once because there's no

34:38

way that fits in Kalen Newport's

34:39

lifestyle when he's also working and

34:41

dealing with kids from day to day. So,

34:43

that's exactly right. You might have

34:44

that as a reference, but you're not like

34:46

putting on your plate all of those

34:48

things until you've decided to put one

34:50

of them on your plate, if that kind of

34:51

makes sense. And that might happen, not

34:53

to skip ahead, at a higher level goal

34:55

setting system. Like maybe you're

34:57

planning your summer and you're like,

34:59

you know what, now is the time. I'm

35:01

ready to tackle that bathroom rena. And

35:04

um maybe I'll just put like begin

35:07

bathroom rena on the list. And then on

35:08

the monthly level, you think about,

35:09

well, what piece am I going to do first?

35:11

I'm going to get quotes. And then again,

35:12

that kind of generates more smaller

35:14

tasks at the weekly level where you're

35:16

like, oh, let me text my friend and find

35:18

out which contractor he used or

35:19

whatever. So things will trickle down,

35:21

but the idea that you kind of need to

35:24

have

35:26

all of them assigned to you as tasks

35:28

when they're not really happening yet, I

35:30

find that stressful. And again, I think

35:32

that's partly why I built the things the

35:33

way that I did.

35:34

>> Well, like I I just noticed looking at

35:35

my list now that there's like multiple

35:37

pretty technical tasks related to one of

35:39

the courses I'm teaching right now. Um

35:41

because I, you know, at some point I was

35:43

like, "This needs to get done. and I

35:44

need to post this the syllabus for the

35:46

second half of the year and I need to

35:47

you know check in with the TAs on this

35:49

or that right I'm kind of like putting

35:50

these things down so that it's not just

35:52

in my head but there's also a notion of

35:54

like well if you trust yourself that

35:55

there's just like a standing project for

35:57

the semester which is the course and

36:00

like part if I just at the beginning of

36:01

each week was like where am I in the

36:03

course what's coming up what needs to

36:05

get done this week I'm not going to

36:07

forget though like I mean I I will be

36:09

able to generate those things as the

36:12

time comes up most likely Right? I said,

36:14

"Okay, I'm looking ahead at this week."

36:15

You know, like I need to the rest of my

36:18

syllabus should probably go up like

36:19

we're getting towards the end of it. So,

36:20

let me uh schedule that for this week or

36:22

I don't need to the TA thing maybe is

36:24

relevant when there's an exam to grade

36:25

or something like that. So, there's some

36:27

>> there's some interesting balance here.

36:29

>> Some sort of system and I'm sure you

36:30

already do something like this where

36:31

you're like looking ahead at your week

36:33

and that's often going to generate tasks

36:35

that kind of like make sense for what's

36:37

coming up. So, you know, part of

36:39

planning at every time horizon, and this

36:40

even includes the day. Um, you're not

36:43

just looking back at like, well, what do

36:45

my previous self want to do? You're

36:46

like, oh, what's actually coming up

36:47

ahead? Is there anything associated? And

36:50

you being Cal, you you would do it. You

36:51

you can trust yourself. Like, I'm sure

36:53

that you would look ahead of the week

36:54

and be like, oh, you know, we have this

36:56

coming up. And if you had to do

36:57

something that's longer range, maybe you

36:59

would live your leave yourself some kind

37:01

of a a note prior to that. But I feel

37:03

like if these are things that are just

37:05

like generally part of your job and your

37:06

your flow anyway that yeah, you'd come

37:08

up with them and you probably don't need

37:10

to

37:11

have them somewhere separate. Now, if

37:12

having a list of everything is just

37:15

helpful to like have a reference, I

37:17

don't even know if I would call it part

37:19

of your task management system almost

37:20

just more of like a a collection or

37:22

reference then that that could make

37:24

sense. Um but you haven't like truly

37:26

assigned it to yourself. So let me tell

37:28

you my goal setting system and then I

37:31

want to hear let's do there's a CS term

37:33

we'll do a diff that's it was an old

37:35

command line program you you give it to

37:37

text files and it would highlight

37:38

exactly where they differed so it was it

37:40

was like how you would tell if there's

37:41

like changes to source code in a shared

37:43

code repository this is the type of

37:45

stuff people come here for they want

37:46

>> this is the type of stuff where I'm like

37:48

okay

37:48

>> Linux command line interfaces

37:50

>> um all right so my multiscale so now I

37:52

know my multis scale planning is what

37:54

you would call goal uh goal setting

37:56

system Nested goals. Yes,

37:58

>> nested goals. All right. So, the way I

37:59

run it is I typically have like a

38:00

semester or quarterly check-in like what

38:02

are the big things that are happening

38:03

this season. I mean, they roughly

38:04

correspond to my academic semesters

38:06

>> and I write it out freehand. It's in a

38:08

text file. It's like, hey, this is I

38:10

don't want this to be too structured

38:12

yet. Um, so it'll be things like I'm

38:14

teaching this course and here's type of

38:16

things I have to keep in mind. um where

38:18

am I on like if I'm writing a book like

38:20

I'm really looking to be you know done

38:22

with uh submit the manuscript by

38:24

December which means like I probably

38:25

need to be doing a chapter a month and

38:27

so it's sort of like thinking through at

38:28

a high level like what's happening at

38:29

this scale then and this has sort of

38:32

been my my secret sauce that I think you

38:34

were one of the few people who actually

38:35

talked about this scale as well is

38:37

actually for me is the weekly the weekly

38:39

scale is critical um because it's where

38:42

I interface that plan in the calendar

38:44

and this was always this was like a big

38:45

thing for me um I look at that. Okay,

38:47

what are these things that are these big

38:49

picture goals? I look at my task list,

38:52

which now I'm learning are probably too

38:53

detailed. And so this could be a lot

38:54

easier. These could be like more stakes

38:56

in the ground instead of like long list

38:58

of things. Um I look at my task list and

39:00

I look at my calendar, which at this

39:02

point is really just going to have

39:03

things that are appointments and

39:04

meetings. So I can see like what's the

39:06

layout of my week, when do I have time,

39:08

when do I not have time, which days are

39:10

busy or not. Um are there this was a key

39:13

innovation. It came at some point I was

39:15

like, "Oh, this is the time to look for

39:16

big win changes. If I cancel this one

39:18

appointment Friday at 11:00 a.m., that's

39:20

going to free up like 6 straight hours."

39:22

And so, like, I see now I'm going to be

39:24

frustrated when I get there. I'm just

39:25

going to move that to like another day

39:26

or something like that. And this is when

39:28

I start putting stuff on the calendar

39:29

that's not meeting or appointment. So,

39:31

now I'm like, I want to make progress on

39:33

this goal. I'm going to now block time

39:36

on my calendar like a meeting or

39:37

appointment for that particular goal.

39:40

Like, I'm going to be writing this day,

39:41

this day, and this day. I'm going to

39:42

work on this like project this afternoon

39:44

and now I'm starting to protect time at

39:45

that scale. It's also where if there's

39:47

key tasks uh I'll start when am I going

39:49

to get these done and I'll start

39:50

actually adding them to my calendar. So

39:52

by the end of my weekly plan the

39:53

calendar is like a lot fuller. There's a

39:55

lot less space in it but only some of it

39:57

is actually meetings or appointments. A

39:58

lot of it's what I came up with and then

40:00

I go to the daily scale. Every day I

40:02

make a time block plan for the day. Now,

40:04

what I found is if I don't time block

40:06

plan, it's uh unless it's a writing day

40:08

where it's like all that really matters

40:10

is I write as much as possible, like I'm

40:13

on deadline and then it's just survival

40:15

mode for everything else. Outside of

40:16

those days, uh a lot of that day by the

40:18

time I get to it, the calendar is pretty

40:20

full because I've been making use of it.

40:22

But I transfer that into a daily time

40:24

block plan and I fill in the remaining

40:26

gaps in the workday for what do I want

40:28

to do during that time? Um, and then I

40:30

execute off of the daily time block plan

40:32

for the day as opposed to like list

40:34

reactive method. All right, so that's my

40:36

goal setting system. What's our diff

40:38

there? Where are the places where we

40:39

differ?

40:40

>> Where do I do things differently? So, I

40:41

would say I'm I lean a little bit less

40:44

heavily on scheduling things. Um, which

40:47

is interesting. So, like when I go I

40:50

actually will also add that I love to

40:52

have a monthly level as well because I

40:54

have actually figured out that I'm going

40:56

to pull my little monthly out. And yes,

40:59

this one's analog, too. My schedule's

41:02

very weird and varies a lot from month

41:03

to month because I have weeks where I'll

41:05

be entirely on call, entirely clinical,

41:07

like can't do anything for the podcast.

41:09

And then I'll have other weeks that um

41:11

maybe I've taken like time off to do

41:13

work for the podcast. So, like my months

41:15

can be incredibly variable. So I

41:17

actually have a step in here even on the

41:18

monthly level where I'll look to see how

41:21

many like kind of work days do I have.

41:23

When I say work days I mean like how

41:25

many clinical work days and how many

41:26

work for myself days and how many days

41:28

is the family going away etc. Um and

41:30

that's how I will kind of decide how

41:32

much I want to take on from a creative

41:36

perspective because that's the lever

41:37

that kind of moves the most. Um can go

41:39

high on some months and low on other

41:41

months. Um

41:42

>> so monthto month kids there it's not

41:44

just week to week. You're like, "This

41:46

month might be a clinical month."

41:49

>> Correct. Or maybe not the entire month

41:50

is clinical, but like

41:51

>> but like whatever. That's the like the

41:53

ca this the the feel of this month is

41:55

like I'm actually doing a lot more like

41:57

in office stuff. It's so Okay.

41:59

Interesting.

41:59

>> Correct. Like January, I had lots of

42:01

days that I could play around and work.

42:02

And then February, we had a week of

42:04

family vacation. I had something medical

42:06

going on and I had a week of call. So

42:08

that left me like I don't know. This is

42:10

like one out of four days is today that

42:12

I actually have time to do anything. So

42:14

that kind of helps me take a larger

42:16

overview like how much can I actually

42:18

take on here? Do I even want to add

42:19

anything kind of new over the course of

42:21

the month and then that kind of informs

42:25

um you know the bigger things that I'm

42:26

taking on and I actually do usually

42:28

create a list for the month that I look

42:30

uh look towards as I'm planning each

42:32

week and then my weekly process is

42:34

similar to yours but I don't tend to do

42:37

as much of what you're saying which is

42:38

where I'll say oh I have to write this

42:40

I'm going to like give it a specific

42:42

time slot. I tend to just sort of look,

42:45

okay, I have this many hours, I have

42:46

this many projects, and on a day-to-day

42:49

basis as I'm planning my day, that is

42:52

when I'll actually commit to like what

42:54

fits where. And that's just personal

42:55

preference. I don't like to feel

42:57

entirely locked in. Like I think maybe

42:59

it is kind of a backlash to on my

43:00

clinical days, every minute is spoken

43:02

for. So on my nonclinical days, I want

43:04

to be like, do I want to write from 10

43:06

to 12 or 1 to 3? I want to make that

43:08

decision that day. And I do purposefully

43:11

make it on that day. kind of my own

43:13

version of time block planning and think

43:14

about what fits where, but I don't go

43:16

ahead and kind of preschedule it

43:18

throughout the week. So, my weekly

43:20

schedule um aside from the clinical days

43:23

actually probably looks less full than

43:24

yours does um when I'm going to the

43:27

daily level and then it's on the daily

43:28

level where I say, "Okay, which of these

43:29

tasks am I selecting and where do I

43:31

actually want to fit it within the day?"

43:33

But otherwise, I think our systems are

43:36

have a lot of parallels. I think I I

43:37

mean I prefer that if my issue the

43:40

reason why I have to do the the way I do

43:41

it is that if I don't protect that time

43:43

like Monday morning god everyone comes

43:46

and takes it. So that's my main issue is

43:48

like I'm like I if I say I'll figure out

43:49

Thursday when I get to Thursday everyone

43:51

in the world wants that time and by the

43:53

time I get to Thursday like the time to

43:55

work on these things uh is gone. So it

43:58

helps me basically helps me say no to

43:59

appointments. But I had this

44:01

conversation when when uh Oliver

44:02

Burkeman stopped by earlier this year

44:04

and we were you know talking about

44:05

various things. We he was like here's he

44:08

he was like here's my ideal schedule and

44:09

I agreed with him. He's like the ideal

44:11

schedule just from like human nature not

44:13

fix a particular job would be kind of

44:16

deep work in the morning like you're

44:18

working on something important. Um, and

44:20

then when you're done, then you're like,

44:22

based on how much energy I have, like

44:24

let me like do a few other smaller

44:26

practical things more or less depending

44:28

on my mood and then be done. And I was

44:30

like, Oliver, I'm with you, man. Like

44:31

that would be that's my rhythm as well.

44:34

Unfortunately, the world has conspired

44:37

to prevent that because I'm not a

44:38

full-time writer. Uh, okay. So, that's

44:40

interesting though. I get that. Like I

44:42

also I get stressed out by my calendar

44:43

and and I think this is but and I feel

44:45

like I have to do it because otherwise

44:48

it's just it's the chess game's too

44:50

complicated I'm playing. But I think

44:52

that's more a problem with the game I'm

44:54

playing.

44:55

>> Well, I think again you're an

44:57

academician academic. I don't know.

44:59

Sorry. I don't even know how to

45:00

pronounce the word. But um with certain

45:02

careers, people can dump things on your

45:04

calendar if they see open space. And I

45:06

can see why that would really lend it to

45:08

like no no no this says writing so don't

45:10

you dare put anything there. I am lucky

45:12

in that um well my patient time is all

45:14

up for grabs and that will get as filled

45:16

as it get filled but my time for myself

45:18

I'm really the only one who could dump

45:19

stuff on there. Um that's just how I've

45:21

designed things and I think that allows

45:23

me to be a little bit less scheduled.

45:25

>> I'll tell you my big innovation of this

45:27

year now and I can I can get away with

45:30

this now because like I'm out of

45:31

promotions to get you know I'm a full

45:32

professor been tenured for a decade.

45:35

like there's no there's no no nothing

45:36

else that you know for me to worry about

45:38

upsetting people about. I introduced the

45:40

notion of a studio day

45:42

>> and for me it's Tuesdays. Um because now

45:45

that I'm doing a lot more digital ethics

45:46

and not sort of hardcore computer

45:48

science I was like look the this podcast

45:50

my newsletter this is a big part of like

45:52

my work as a public intellectual on

45:54

technology etc. So studio days as I just

45:57

tell my employer um I'm not available on

46:00

Tuesdays. I don't I don't do meetings on

46:03

Tuesday. This I'm in my studio. I'm

46:05

recording. I'm writing and this is I've

46:08

consolidated it this one day, but it's

46:09

like I'm reaching millions of people and

46:11

this is important and I'll ask for, you

46:13

know, uh forgiveness instead of

46:14

permission. And that's been like a huge

46:17

that's been a big boon actually. It's

46:18

like yeah, I just don't I don't do

46:20

things on Tuesday and people grumble and

46:22

then they have lives and they they stop

46:23

caring because it's not that interesting

46:25

to them.

46:26

>> That totally makes sense. And I feel

46:28

very privileged that I'm doing this not

46:29

on your studio day, but thank you for

46:31

accommodating my patient schedule.

46:33

>> Oh, I'm I'm happy to do things on other

46:34

days, too, but like I'm just don't put

46:36

like I have to go into I have to go

46:38

teach today, you know, that's which I

46:40

which which I do enjoy. Um, okay. So

46:41

then let's talk about seasonality

46:43

because this is something in your book

46:45

best laid plans, the book, not the

46:46

podcast best plays. Um there's a lot on

46:49

this and I think we're like very

46:50

congruent on this idea of moving away

46:53

from the notion of just year round no

46:56

variation to your it's just like you're

46:59

turning the crank at like a certain

47:01

level of intensity and February feels

47:03

the same as June feels the same as

47:05

December.

47:06

>> Um talk to me about varying rhythms,

47:09

pace, workloads over time.

47:12

>> Well, first of all, I just love the

47:14

concept of seasons in general. And I

47:15

don't know if that's partly because I

47:16

live in South Florida and I don't really

47:18

get to experience them, but I just like

47:20

to really really like think about them

47:22

and think about how my year makes sense

47:24

divided up. And I actually kind of talk

47:26

about different ways that you might

47:28

think about dividing up your year other

47:29

than the traditional quarters or even

47:31

trimesters if you're an academic. Um,

47:34

but I really do like to take a very

47:36

purposeful like almost half a day kind

47:38

of planning session four or five times a

47:41

year. For me, it's five because I like

47:42

to divide the year up into five pieces

47:44

and think about what do I want out of

47:46

the upcoming season and not to assume

47:48

that, you know, season C is going to be

47:50

exactly like season A. For me, um, the

47:54

first season of the year is like January

47:56

1st to spring break and that's usually a

47:57

very go season. And then we kind of have

48:00

a very kid focused season from spring

48:02

break until the end of the year when we

48:03

have all that like May stuff and every

48:05

single kid is in every single

48:06

competition, whatever. And then summer I

48:09

treat as much more like let's just be

48:11

lower key do fun stuff. Um and by the

48:14

way I didn't mention this previously but

48:16

I think one other place we differ a

48:18

little bit is I am very passionate about

48:21

not just planning my work but planning

48:24

the fun stuff like planning the

48:26

gettogethers with friends and the travel

48:28

and the massage or you know whatever it

48:30

is that I'm trying to build into my life

48:31

to make it more fun. And so summer might

48:34

be a time that I have like a lot of fun

48:36

planned and it's just like a looser time

48:37

period. Then we have back to school

48:39

which has that rhythm of like okay kids

48:42

are going back. We're in our routines.

48:44

I'm also because I'm in the planning

48:45

world tend to be really really busy in

48:47

like January and back to school season.

48:49

So that kind of makes sense. And then I

48:51

have what's called reflection season

48:53

from November 1st to the end of the year

48:55

where I just feel like the world takes

48:56

on a different pace. It's a little

48:58

celebratory. everyone's reflecting and

49:00

um I just like to like acknowledge that

49:02

as having its own energy. So yes, I'm

49:05

super super big into a like

49:07

acknowledging the seasonal flows and b

49:09

like purposefully setting time to think

49:11

very hard about what you want each

49:13

season to be like in advance of that

49:15

season.

49:15

>> So wait, so your quintiles are um so you

49:18

got like new years through spring break,

49:21

right? Spring break to the end of the

49:22

school year

49:23

>> like end of school year. Yeah. Period.

49:25

Which I agree with you. kind of like I

49:26

think of it's a time when it's coaching

49:28

time for me too. It's like I I coach

49:30

multiple different things. Um summer

49:33

>> summer

49:33

>> then back to school to like Thanksgiving

49:36

>> and then until Halloween and then

49:38

November 1st to December 31st to me just

49:40

feels a little bit different.

49:41

>> Well, but you got like holiday Yeah. And

49:43

you have uh there's like the

49:44

Thanksgiving holiday. There's going to

49:45

be like the Christmas holiday. There's

49:47

going to be and people wind down. What I

49:49

think a I love it. Um, and I think

49:52

similarly, and I think what's important

49:54

here though is because a lot of times

49:56

when I talk about seasonality, you

49:58

probably get the same thing. People will

50:00

push back because they'll say, "Well,

50:01

like my job isn't seasonal." But like

50:03

this is true for you, right? Like

50:05

nothing about pediatric endocrinology

50:07

changes in March versus January. But I

50:11

think what what's captured by the way

50:12

you talk about it is so much of the

50:14

feeling of your day and what you're

50:16

focusing on busyiness like expands

50:18

beyond just what you're doing in your

50:19

job. is what you're doing on the

50:20

weekends, in the evenings, on the day

50:22

that you're not in the office. And

50:24

turning the knob on those things you do

50:26

control is actually has a much bigger

50:27

impact than people realize that it's not

50:29

just I can't take time off of work in

50:32

this, you know, the summer, so I can't

50:34

have a seasonality. Like, well, it's

50:35

completely different what you're doing

50:37

with your time, even outside of work.

50:39

And then my argument, you can't do that.

50:40

I in your job, I don't think this would

50:42

work, but in like a lot of knowledge

50:43

work jobs, because it's a lot of it's a

50:44

little more BSE. um you have like a lot

50:48

of give and you can really turn

50:50

intensity up and down is something that

50:52

I I'm often telling knowledge workers in

50:54

general because the job is so amorphous

50:56

and there is no just like here's you

50:58

know here's a list of things that you're

51:00

working on and here's your prog it's all

51:01

like email and meetings or this or that

51:03

and you can often get away with like oh

51:04

I want to turn things down in the summer

51:06

and you could do it for a couple months

51:07

and no one will notice if you do it for

51:09

a year they'll eventually notice but

51:10

you're just like taking on less things

51:12

and moving slower and then you speed up

51:13

in other times so I think people have

51:16

way more control over the rhythm of

51:19

their life than they realize.

51:21

>> Have a totally structured job. For me, I

51:23

get around that by taking more vacation

51:25

in the summer. So, you know, many jobs,

51:27

even if they're extremely structured and

51:29

yeah, I can't get away with, oh, let me

51:31

see 75% of my patient volume in July.

51:34

Like, that wouldn't fly. But I can take

51:36

two weeks off and like save my vacation

51:37

time for those times when I want things

51:39

to be slower and then maybe take on a

51:41

little bit less on the creative side and

51:43

then kind of create that slower rhythm

51:45

for myself.

51:46

>> Isn't this like the the people who do

51:48

this to the most extreme? Do I have this

51:50

right? There's like it's like uh er

51:53

doctors who sort of travel, right? And

51:55

it'll be like, okay, I'm going to come

51:58

>> spend three months at this hospital in

52:00

Boulder so that I and then I'm going to

52:01

ski for 3 months. And they really got

52:03

that locked in, right? we get to shift

52:05

work.

52:05

>> There are definitely certain professions

52:07

who either have tons of vacation time or

52:09

tons of flexibility or there are a lot

52:11

of doctors these days that will do like

52:13

locoms work. So they could decide that

52:14

like they're going to work their butt

52:15

off in March and April and then like not

52:17

at all for two months. So yeah, that

52:18

would be extreme version.

52:20

>> Yeah. And and it's it's all like the

52:22

pit. This is

52:23

>> it's all Yeah. Everything I do all day,

52:25

it's just like that.

52:26

>> Everyone is super reasonable like on the

52:27

pit, right? That's just every doctor's

52:29

experience where people just talk slowly

52:30

and quietly and are just very

52:31

reasonable. It's never chaotic at all in

52:34

the ER. It's very peaceful and Yeah.

52:36

>> Yeah. Just it's it's very peaceful. Um

52:38

Okay. I like that then. Okay. So, we we

52:39

we agree on the seasonality. All right.

52:41

So, to pull this together for people, um

52:44

can we build I want to build an on-ramp.

52:46

So, like for a typical member of my

52:48

audience might be they've messed around

52:50

with individual type of tools you might

52:52

use in this conversation. They've had a

52:54

to-do manager. They have a calendar that

52:55

they they sometimes use. They've used a

52:58

time block planner and then stopped

52:59

using a time block planner. They have a

53:01

task list they haven't looked at in a

53:02

month because it stresses them out, but

53:04

they they're they're liking what you're

53:05

saying and like, okay, I think I'm going

53:07

to be less susceptible to being pushed

53:09

around by big tech and distractions and

53:11

numbing if I can take more intention

53:13

about my life knowing now as we talked

53:15

about it. Intention might be like I'm

53:16

intentionally slowing down and then

53:18

speeding up here and it's not just it's

53:20

not productivity. It's not trying to

53:22

increase the amount of work. How do we

53:24

onramp? Because we talked about a lot of

53:26

things. So, how do we onramp someone

53:27

beyond the obvious answer is read

53:28

Sarah's book. I was going to say you buy

53:30

best laid plans and you read. No, I'm

53:32

just kidding.

53:32

>> Which I blurbed and it's a it's a great

53:34

book. I mean, it really walks through

53:35

all these details, lots of examples. Um

53:37

and and you can kind of pick and choose.

53:38

I feel like in your book there's though

53:40

you don't do it explicitly. Um there's

53:43

sort of like here's what's key and then

53:45

here's like a little bit more advanced

53:46

things you can add on and so like the

53:48

reader already has a system can plus it

53:50

up but like the new reader.

53:51

>> Yeah. So, so how do we onboard the new

53:54

>> the the newbie to planning? So, I would

53:56

just focus on those three things that I

53:58

talked about. Like, do you have a

53:59

calendar that makes sense where you're

54:01

really able to see what you have to do

54:03

each day in a way that makes sense to

54:04

you? Do you have a task management

54:06

system that works and it enables you to

54:09

see what you need to see at the right

54:11

time? And are you checking your various

54:12

inboxes in a thoughtful manner versus a

54:16

when things come at me manner? and how

54:19

are you organizing your goals both

54:20

larger scale and smaller scale and

54:22

adapting some sort of it could be a bare

54:24

bones version and by the way the tools

54:26

really truly don't m like I could do all

54:29

of this in a binder in Apple notes in um

54:32

on paper on like a really in notion and

54:35

a really fancy system like there's no

54:37

specific tool but to have somewhere to

54:40

have rituals around setting larger scale

54:42

goals whether you're doing the yearly or

54:44

seasonal level and then also ways that

54:47

you're going to bring that into the more

54:48

practical timelines. So a way of looking

54:50

at your seasonal stuff every week, maybe

54:52

incorporating monthly in there and then

54:55

day-to-day assigning yourself the task

54:56

that makes sense. So I think that would

54:58

be my sort of like bare bones minimum

55:00

calendar, understand your task

55:02

management and have some kind of larger

55:04

and smaller scale way of looking at your

55:07

goals on a you know daily or weekly

55:09

level plus seasonal or yearly. That

55:11

would be that would be the most bare

55:12

bones version.

55:13

>> And that latter piece requires a thing

55:15

to write the things down in. Right? So

55:18

this the latter piece of like I want to

55:20

look at the the the monthly scale and

55:22

the seasonal scale for you that's a

55:23

notebook and it's a separate notebook

55:25

than your planner but you need somewhere

55:26

where you're and it could be a Google

55:27

doc it could be a text file you need

55:29

somewhere you're taking

55:30

>> people have done like a lot of people

55:32

that I've worked with have had really

55:34

cool systems and even just like Google

55:36

Sheets where things are actually very

55:38

much like you know they'll have a whole

55:39

page for the year and then you can

55:41

actually tab it and separate by seasons

55:42

and they have different categories of

55:44

their life all colorcoded. Um, so yes,

55:46

you do have to capture all this stuff.

55:48

The medium in which you do that doesn't

55:49

really matter, but you're going to have

55:51

to commit to something and continue to

55:52

use it and to look at it. Um, and I

55:55

usually also talk about creating rituals

55:57

that make sense for the time scale. So,

56:00

if you're planning the year or the

56:01

season, you want to dedicate like a good

56:04

amount of presents and time to that. So,

56:07

you're going to really want to clear out

56:08

an afternoon or for the year. um Laura

56:10

Vanderham who has been on this show

56:12

before I believe as well. She and I host

56:14

a like live planning retreat that lasts

56:16

two days. And I'm not saying everyone

56:18

needs to, you know, come to our retreat

56:19

specifically, but um we do not run out

56:22

of things to talk about with our

56:24

participants in those two days for

56:25

planning the year. So really giving

56:27

yourself the gift of space um when it's

56:29

a larger time frame to think about

56:31

what's coming up and what do you want

56:33

out of that time frame makes sense. And

56:35

then when you're going to the day, you

56:37

want something very, very quick.

56:38

Obviously, we can't do a two-day retreat

56:40

every day, right? But we should have

56:42

things kind of laid out so that you can

56:44

look at your calendar, which is

56:45

organized, look at your week, which has

56:48

already been thought through, and select

56:50

your task for the day in like 5 to 10

56:52

minutes and be done with it.

56:54

>> And then let me finally, I have to rope

56:56

you in, as I do with all guests, into

56:58

some sort of AI realism rant because,

57:01

you know, this has been been my

57:04

correcting the narrative on AI has been

57:05

a big part of my work recently. Um, I

57:08

want to rope you into my side on this

57:10

the intersection of AI and productivity

57:12

because I feel like there's this, you

57:14

know, tech people aren't the best people

57:16

to talk about organizational systems

57:18

because what makes a tech person happy

57:20

is like complexity and pieces fitting

57:23

together and whatever, but they've

57:24

really been pushing this this idea that

57:27

oh, the missing piece in people being

57:28

organized could be solved by AI. And it

57:32

really doesn't seem to be the issue

57:34

based on like our whole conversation.

57:36

The issue is not when I am looking at

57:39

what I need to do, understanding it,

57:42

figuring out priorities, figuring out

57:44

what I should work on today. We're

57:47

really good at that. Like our brains

57:48

have embedded in it all of the relevant

57:51

information. What's coming up,

57:52

importance, how you're feeling, health,

57:54

other things that's happening. That's

57:55

not hard at all. What's hard is

57:57

consistency and capture. It's sticking

57:59

with a system. um maintaining

58:02

intentionality instead of just falling

58:05

back into like let me just be reactive

58:06

because like I'm exhausted and none of

58:08

that's helped by AI. So I don't know can

58:10

I can I rope you into my rant on this is

58:12

that that

58:13

>> I am always up for an AI rant. Um so

58:16

that's totally works for me. Um yeah I

58:20

just don't want to give some large

58:21

language model like that control over

58:23

what I do all day. I mean I want to be

58:25

the one selecting my tasks. I um one of

58:29

my biggest and again I'm not a techie so

58:31

I don't understand like the inner

58:33

workings like you do but one of my

58:34

biggest concerns about AI is that it's

58:36

giving power to someone else that I you

58:39

know I'm not consciously giving so even

58:41

like as simple as oh let me have AI plan

58:43

my vacations for the year then I mean

58:46

who's not to say that like various

58:48

places haven't like paid the model to

58:50

suggest some things versus another or if

58:52

we're not there yet we're going to be

58:53

very soon so I mean for me life The most

58:57

precious thing of life is our time and

58:59

our relationships. And I would like to

59:02

maintain control over that myself. And

59:04

so I want to decide what goes on my

59:06

calendar. I haven't I'm not saying that

59:08

AI tools might not be helpful for some

59:10

people. Like you know there are things

59:12

like the skylight calendar and I think

59:14

some of these apps where you could take

59:16

the soccer schedule and it will you know

59:18

scan it and add those events to your

59:20

calendar. Like those kind of wrote tasks

59:23

see being helpful. But in terms of

59:25

selecting what I want to do with my

59:27

time, I would like to leave computer

59:29

algorithms out of that personally. And I

59:32

think um most people probably don't want

59:34

to

59:36

live a life that was just suggested to

59:38

them. They want to actively choose what

59:39

they're going to do. That's kind of the

59:41

planning in the first place.

59:42

>> I've never seen someone be stumped by

59:44

looking at their calendar and their

59:46

to-do list and be like, I don't know

59:47

what to do next. What I I need someone

59:49

else to come tell me. I've never seen

59:51

someone stumped on that. That's not that

59:52

not that hard decision. All right, sir.

59:54

This has been fantastic. Um, I want to

59:57

make sure people know where to get more

59:58

of this information. So, you have two

60:00

podcasts. Would tell us about both.

60:01

>> I do. So, the first one is the one

60:03

that's more planning adjacent. It's

60:05

called Bestlaid Plans and I literally

60:07

describe it as all things planning and

60:08

planning adjacent. That one is just me

60:10

with the occasional guest. Cal has been

60:12

on it before and I will be having him on

60:13

again. Um, the other one is called Best

60:16

of Both Worlds and that is done with

60:17

Laura Vanderkin. We co-host it together

60:19

and that's about making work and life

60:21

fit together. Um, she's an awesome

60:23

writer and time management guru. So, we

60:26

make a fun team there.

60:27

>> And your book, Bestlaid Plans, that what

60:29

that come out in the fall when not too

60:30

long.

60:31

>> Uh, December of 2025 called Best Plans,

60:34

a simple system for living a life that

60:36

you love.

60:36

>> One of Amazon's best non-fiction books

60:39

of the month, right?

60:41

>> Yes. It got chosen for December. It was

60:43

like a big shock. Um, people are like,

60:44

"Did you pay for that?" I'm like, "No."

60:47

So, but that was a really fun honor. And

60:48

it it says like editor's pick on there.

60:50

Um, of course you can get it at anywhere

60:52

other than Amazon as well, but that was

60:53

kind of a a fun thing.

60:55

>> Excellent. All right. Well, Sarah,

60:56

always a pleasure to have you on. Thanks

60:57

for getting the weeds with us. I think

60:58

this type of thing is going to be

60:59

helpful for a lot of my listeners who

61:01

you got to take control of your time. If

61:03

you don't, Big Tech will happily take

61:05

control of it for you. So, this is the

61:07

the first step. Um, I'm sure we'll be

61:08

talking again soon, but thanks as always

61:10

for coming on.

61:11

>> Oh, thank you so much for having me on,

61:13

and I very much enjoyed talking about

61:14

the pit. All right. So, that was my

61:16

discussion with Sarah Hart Anger. Um, I

61:21

looked it up. I I was on the show,

61:23

Jesse, so it's worth people going back.

61:24

I also years back, I think we had Sarah

61:26

on our show.

61:27

>> Yeah, we did.

61:28

>> Yeah. So, sort of a a long-term friend

61:29

of the show. I love geeking out about

61:32

planning systems. To me, the key point

61:34

that prefaces the whole discussion

61:36

because I think her advice is spot on. I

61:37

actually picked up some ideas there that

61:38

I think are important. But the key point

61:41

that I think ties here the whole

61:42

conversation is that Sarah did not like

61:44

to associate the word productivity

61:47

with planning. She like that's two

61:49

different things. Productivity is about

61:51

I don't know professionally you're

61:53

trying to increase the amount of

61:54

something you produce and like that's

61:56

that. But what she cared about was

61:58

controlling your time. How how do you

62:00

have a say over what you're doing with

62:01

your time so you have control? Uh I

62:03

often use the term internally attention

62:05

shaping. How do you shape your own

62:06

attention so other services don't? And I

62:08

think that's really useful. If we

62:09

separate planning from productivity, we

62:11

realize like, oh, this is one of the

62:13

tier one skills, not just for living a

62:14

deep life, but for pushing back uh on

62:17

the digital distraction. So, very good.

62:19

It was good to have Sarah on the show.

62:22

Let's take another quick break to hear

62:24

from our sponsors.

62:26

This episode is sponsored by Better

62:29

Help. March is here, a month that

62:33

includes International Women's Day, a

62:34

moment to celebrate women's strength and

62:36

progress while also recognizing how much

62:38

they carry every day. Now, as someone

62:40

who writes about time management and

62:41

organization, I've heard from countless

62:44

women about how much harder these goals

62:46

can be for them as compared to men,

62:47

right? They have to deal with more

62:49

household labor at home, more

62:50

non-promotable activities at work, and

62:52

play the role of listener and chief and

62:54

problem solver for so many different

62:55

people in their lives. And this can be a

62:56

lot. So for anyone who feels like you

63:00

have a lot on your plate, this is a good

63:01

time to remember that therapy offers a

63:03

space to take care of yourself in the

63:05

way that you deserve. And if you're

63:07

going to consider therapy, consider

63:08

BetterHelp. With over 30,000 therapists,

63:11

BetterHelp is the world's largest online

63:13

therapy platform, having served over 6

63:16

million people globally. And it works.

63:18

They have an average rating of 4.9 out

63:21

of five for a live session based on over

63:24

1.7 million client reviews.

63:28

Your emotional well-being matters. Find

63:31

support and feel lighter in therapy.

63:33

Sign up and get 10% off at

63:34

betterhealth.com/deep

63:37

questions. That's

63:38

betterhp.com/deepquests.

63:43

I also want to talk about our friends at

63:45

Shopify. Starting a new business is

63:47

hard. I remember what it was like

63:48

starting up the media company that

63:50

produces this podcast. Here's what I

63:52

learned. Don't reinvent the wheel if you

63:55

can avoid it. Trust industry leaders

63:58

where you can. This is where Shopify

64:01

enters the scene. If you need to sell

64:02

something, you need Shopify.

64:06

Shopify is the commerce platform behind

64:09

millions of businesses around the world,

64:11

including uh 10% of all e-commerce in

64:14

the US. We're talking big names like All

64:16

Birds and Mattel to new brands just

64:18

getting started. You want to sell

64:19

online? They can help you with their uh

64:22

design studio that features hundreds of

64:24

ready to use templates. You need help

64:26

spreading the word, they can help you

64:28

easily create email and social media

64:30

campaigns. Look, if we ever start

64:32

selling products on this show, I know

64:34

exactly what platform we'll use. It will

64:36

be Shopify. So, it's time to turn those

64:38

whatifs into with Shopify today. Sign up

64:42

for your $1 per month trial today at

64:44

shopify.com/deep.

64:46

Go to shopify.com/deep.

64:48

That's shopify.com/deep.

64:52

All right, let's get back to the show.

64:54

All right, so you've heard me talking

64:57

with Sarah and now I want to hear from

65:00

you. So, let's move on to the part of

65:02

the show where we check our inbox to see

65:04

what you have to say.

65:07

All right, Jesse. What interesting

65:10

emails or messages have we gotten

65:11

recently that's worth reviewing?

65:14

>> The first one's from Sandra. Here's an

65:17

email from her who is wondering if our

65:18

dopamine addiction is changing how they

65:20

make TV shows.

65:22

>> Okay, let's see. I got this. This is a

65:23

good one because we are it's going to be

65:26

not until later in the spring, but we

65:27

are having Anna on who is the the

65:31

researcher uh who wrote Dopamine Nation

65:34

like the the leading the world's leading

65:35

experts on dopamine, how it affects us.

65:37

So, we're going to get I'm learning a

65:38

lot about dopamine now. So, I'm glad to

65:40

have this question. All right, so let's

65:41

see here. I got Sandra's email here.

65:42

Here's what she said. Have you noticed

65:45

that in uh TV programs

65:48

such as The Great Pottery Throwdown,

65:52

when the program finishes, they say next

65:54

time and then they show you the

65:56

highlights of the next show like a

65:58

trailer. I hate this as I don't want to

66:00

know what happens next time. I want a

66:02

surprise. They also do this at the start

66:04

of the next program saying this time and

66:05

then show the trailer which highlights

66:07

the show again. Um is this an effect of

66:10

dopamine? There is no delayed surprise.

66:12

Basically, you don't have to watch the

66:14

whole show. You can just watch the first

66:15

five minutes and decide if you really

66:17

want to see the full detail. All right.

66:21

So, first of all, Jesse, I assume you

66:23

are a great pottery throwdown

66:26

completist.

66:28

You've seen every season of that show.

66:30

>> I have.

66:31

>> Do you think that's literally people

66:32

just making pottery?

66:35

>> Probably. So when they were like, "All

66:36

right, next time. Next time on the

66:39

show," and it just shows people very

66:40

quietly at the pottery wheel

66:42

>> and then there's all this drama of like

66:43

something's ready to topple over.

66:45

>> Well, yeah. Like it wobbles a little bit

66:48

and then they straighten it

66:51

and then kind of sticks on that for a

66:53

second and then one of the contestants

66:55

comes in the frames, stabs him in the

66:57

neck. See, that's where the drama is.

66:59

That's why you got to watch. Is this

67:00

going to be a stabbing episode or just

67:01

an episode where they make pottery? Um,

67:03

all right. There's a couple interesting

67:04

things here because you know what this

67:05

reminded me of Jesse is the advice that

67:08

we heard from professional YouTubers

67:11

about how you have to build a YouTube

67:13

video to get big viewership on YouTube.

67:17

And remember like the the various

67:18

YouTube people we work with have told us

67:20

like oh the thing is like watch a Mr.

67:21

Beast video you'll see this. You have to

67:24

show the people the audience right off

67:26

the bat this is what's coming and you

67:28

show quick clips of the biggest exciting

67:32

things that's going to happen. And so

67:33

like a a Mr. Beast video, if they're,

67:35

you know, crashing a train into

67:37

something, you'll see the train crashing

67:38

into something, right? They just show

67:39

you, here's all the things that are

67:40

going to come. And then you go and you

67:43

deliver the things you said you're going

67:44

to come later in the show with very

67:47

limited friction. So quick cuts, moving,

67:49

moving, moving, moving to the things you

67:51

already showed that was going to come.

67:52

That sounds like it's exactly what's

67:53

happening on these TV shows as well. Um,

67:56

I don't know the role of dopamine

67:57

because we haven't had Anna on the show

67:59

yet, but there is a bigger phenomenon

68:02

here that may or may not be tied to

68:03

dopamine that we need a good name for.

68:04

Jesse, we got to think about like a good

68:06

name for this. But there's something

68:08

about the abundance of choice in media

68:12

where now if I go into a streaming

68:14

service, there is u endless things I

68:17

could choose. that makes it hard to

68:20

choose and commit to something to watch

68:21

because your brain is always thinking

68:24

there might have been a better choice.

68:26

And I hear this a lot. I think we see

68:27

this in our letters sometimes, right?

68:28

Like young people in particular will be

68:30

like, "I have uh such a hard time

68:33

>> like choosing and sticking with a

68:35

movie." I think we got this in response

68:36

to last week's episode because a lot of

68:37

people wrote in about movies and a lot

68:39

of people like, "Yeah, I don't even

68:40

people who don't use their phone a lot

68:42

were like, I just have a hard time

68:43

sticking with the movie."

68:45

>> And so I wonder if there's something

68:46

like this going on. is the abundance of

68:48

choice makes it really hard for us to

68:50

commit to something because your mind is

68:51

like there is other options in a way

68:53

there wasn't if you were just turning on

68:54

TV and you flip through the channels

68:55

you're like this is the literally the

68:57

only thing on right now that's like a

68:58

little bit interesting to me I have no

69:00

other option your brain's like let's

69:02

watch it or if you're at the movie

69:03

theater you're like there's no other

69:04

place for me to go so I might as well

69:06

watch it but if you have one click away

69:08

from those horizontal carousels on

69:09

Netflix like my god there could be

69:10

something better so maybe that's what

69:12

these TV shows are recognizing we have

69:13

to show them the audience here's all the

69:15

stuff that's coming you're like okay I

69:16

want to see that that and that. All

69:18

right, this show is worth me watching.

69:20

Um I hate that as well. My kids hate it.

69:22

They're always like, "Don't fast

69:24

forward. Fast forward whenever we're

69:26

watching a show that has a next time."

69:27

All right, what else do we got here?

69:31

>> Next up is from Kendra. We have an email

69:34

from Kendra with a reaction to your

69:35

discussion last week of film students

69:37

who couldn't make it through entire

69:38

films.

69:39

>> We got a lot of reaction for that one.

69:40

Yeah,

69:41

>> I because people like it's something a

69:43

lot of people have personal experience

69:44

with. All right, let's see here. Kendra

69:46

says, "What I don't see mentioned here

69:49

or most other places is that the length

69:51

of movies has actually increased over

69:53

the last 10 plus years. It used to be

69:55

that a movie was between 1.5 hours and 2

69:57

hours, but that time is creeping up.

69:59

Seems like most of them are over two

70:00

hours now, and personal opinion, it

70:02

doesn't always make the movie better."

70:04

Um, I I intuitively I guess I've had

70:07

that same effect. My wife and I started

70:09

last night um Train Dreams, which is one

70:13

of the best picture nominees. is out of

70:15

Netflix studios and we noted like it

70:17

actually caught our attention that it

70:19

was an hour 47 so this must be a fact

70:22

like that felt short notably short u I

70:26

found an article I haven't really read

70:28

this yet so we're going to kind of do

70:29

this on the air I found a Vanity Fair

70:31

article about exactly this phenomenon

70:33

I'm a little bit curious about what's

70:35

going on so let's let's look at this uh

70:38

I'm going to see if there's any

70:39

interesting stats in this piece I like

70:41

this ad of James Cameron wearing

70:44

Rolex. Why is James Okay, I'm sorry to

70:46

go do a divergence here. If you're James

70:49

Cameron, why are you agreeing to do a

70:51

Rolex ad?

70:52

>> You get free watches.

70:54

>> He's so rich. He's so rich. He's I think

70:57

his net worth is like a billion dollars.

71:00

>> Is it really?

71:00

>> Yeah. I mean, he's the he's the director

71:03

and producer with significant profit

71:05

participation

71:07

in three out of the top five highest

71:10

grossing movies of all time. I think

71:12

with those watches, they don't really

71:13

have to do much and they just get cool

71:14

watches in cool places. So maybe just

71:16

wants to do that.

71:17

>> I don't but I mean a billion dollars,

71:19

right? So like I'm just let's make this

71:20

relative, right? Like so for us like

71:24

what would be the the cost of a Rolex to

71:26

James Cameron? What would be the

71:27

equivalent for like us and the money we

71:29

have? That would be like I think if

71:32

someone is like come do this photo shoot

71:35

and like I'm if you do it I I'm going to

71:38

give you uh a a tall coffee from

71:41

Starbucks at 50% off. Like you only got

71:44

to pay like a$125 for it. Like I'm not

71:47

going to go do an all day photo shoot.

71:48

Like I could just buy a cup of coffee.

71:50

The only thing I can imagine I'm sure

71:51

this is fascinating for audience. The

71:52

only thing I can imagine is that the the

71:54

diving, deep sea diving aspect, they

71:57

sponsored

71:58

the documentary. I think they sponsored

72:01

the documentary he did where he went to

72:02

the bottom of the Mariana. It might make

72:05

more sense because if you do you ever

72:06

see that documentary where he goes to

72:08

the bottom of the Mariana's Trench?

72:09

>> No, I haven't.

72:10

>> It's really interesting. But they have a

72:13

arm coming off of the submersible that's

72:15

just holding I think it's a Rolex watch

72:18

to show that like look this diver watch

72:20

at the bottom of the Mariana's trench is

72:21

still working or something like that.

72:22

Okay. So it's probably just part of the

72:24

deal.

72:24

>> Yeah.

72:24

>> Yeah. Because he didn't want to pay for

72:26

that documentary. All right. We figured

72:27

it out. All right. Anyways, here we go.

72:28

Um here's some stats about the Let's see

72:30

if

72:31

>> Kindra is right about this. Here's what

72:33

Vanity Fair says. In 2002, even as two

72:37

nearly three-hour Lord of the Ring

72:39

movies dominated theaters, the average

72:41

length of the top 20 box office

72:44

performers was a breezy 1 hour and 59

72:48

minutes. 20 years later, movie goers had

72:51

to sit through an extra 13 minutes of

72:54

footage on average. Okay. So, we went

72:56

from hour 59 in 2002 on average to, if

73:00

I'm doing my math right, uh 2 hours and

73:03

12 minutes

73:06

uh in

73:08

2022. All right. So, movies did get

73:10

longer. Um, is there a reason I skimmed

73:12

some of the rest of this article? Here's

73:14

what's interesting about it is they have

73:16

a lot of people saying, "All right, here

73:18

here's a let me read this quote here.

73:20

The studios are definitely not

73:22

encouraging three-hour movies that I can

73:25

guarantee, says a senior movie

73:26

executive. As a consumer, speaking for

73:29

myself and on behalf of many other

73:30

people like me enough already. All

73:32

right. So, if the studios aren't

73:34

encouraging this, why are the movies

73:36

getting longer? It seems like it's just

73:37

the filmmakers want to make longer

73:38

movies.

73:40

>> Why do you think that is?

73:41

>> They like them. Like, here we go. Well,

73:43

let me read you from the article, Jesse.

73:45

Uh, cinema purists might see a long film

73:48

as a sign of a director with something

73:49

to say. So, yeah, it just seems better.

73:52

I have another theory for this as well,

73:53

though. All right, so yes, the studios

73:55

don't want it. The audiences don't

73:56

necessarily want it. The directors want

73:57

it, but they've always wanted long

73:58

movies, right?

74:00

>> Um, I suspect the difference is there's

74:03

fewer movies.

74:05

Like, it's, you know, they mentioned

74:06

like, well, 2002, sure, the Lord of the

74:09

Ring movies were 3 hours long, but the

74:11

average movie was short. But at 2002,

74:13

you probably had a lot more movies in

74:16

the theater and you had a lot of uh

74:18

mid-tier movies because there's just a

74:20

lot more movies coming out than there

74:21

are now. And the mid-tier movies they

74:22

were not going to allow to be long, but

74:24

it seems now there's fewer movies and

74:26

the movies that are made, they tend to

74:28

be more like big event movies. It's

74:30

going to be like a Chris Nolan movie.

74:31

It's going to be Martin Scorsese, Killer

74:33

of the Flowers Moon, right? It's going

74:34

to be these big event movies. Maybe

74:36

those have always been long. We just

74:38

don't have shorter movies to pull it

74:39

down. Like

74:41

>> do you think that's true? There's less

74:42

movies now cuz you always talk about

74:44

>> many fewer.

74:44

>> Why is that?

74:45

>> Uh post pandemic

74:47

>> there's still recovering.

74:48

>> The global box office is never came has

74:51

not made it back to 2019. Hasn't come

74:53

close.

74:53

>> But in terms of book sales, books

74:55

>> books are okay.

74:56

>> Interesting.

74:57

>> But even that it's a little bit

74:59

misleading. Book sales industrywide are

75:02

doing fine. They've continued to like

75:04

rise at like a reasonable pace. But

75:05

what's really happening is non-fiction

75:07

sales are down, which is bad for me, but

75:10

it's being compensated for because of

75:11

these massive hits, especially in like

75:13

women oriented fiction and fantasy

75:15

fiction. So you have like the dark

75:18

fantasy uh books where like people are

75:22

marrying dragons and books like uh Colin

75:25

Hoover books that come out of uh book

75:27

talk and they're selling huge numbers,

75:30

you know, 20 million copies of a book

75:32

like just huge numbers mainly among more

75:34

among female readers than male readers.

75:37

Non-fiction is not doing as well and in

75:38

part that tended to be more of where you

75:41

had male book readers and they're not

75:42

reading as much. So books are doing

75:45

fine, but uh it's a little bit uneven.

75:47

But movies are not doing nearly as well.

75:49

They just and even the biggest hits

75:51

aren't as big of hits as they were sort

75:52

of pre- pandemic. Um because yeah, I

75:55

mean think about all the movies like we

75:56

talked about it last week like the

75:59

probably the the greatest movie of that

76:00

decade came out in 2002 which was the

76:03

Britney Spears Vehicle Crossroads.

76:06

>> But there's a lot of movies like that in

76:08

2002. There's not as many of those

76:10

today. And those were all short because

76:11

they were like, "No, you can't make it

76:12

long. We want to like move as many

76:14

movies through." But then when Peter

76:15

Jackson came along, he's like, "I want

76:16

to do Lord of the Rings." He was like,

76:17

"I'm going to do three hours." Like,

76:18

"Ah, I guess sure." And now it's like

76:20

all Peter Jackson movies. That's my

76:22

theory. All right. Um, do we have

76:24

another email?

76:25

>> Yep. This is from an anonymous person.

76:29

It's a comment saying that extends some

76:32

of the issues you discuss about

76:33

attention span last week from the

76:35

context of movies to the workplace.

76:37

>> All right, anonymous. Let's read this

76:39

note here.

76:41

One angle of smartphone addiction I

76:44

haven't seen discussed is the fact that

76:45

it's torpedoing the ability of people to

76:47

focus at work. Anecdotally, I've heard

76:50

from many people

76:52

saying that they have trouble paying

76:53

attention in meetings and experienced

76:55

aloofness from my co-workers firsthand

76:57

if corporate America cares mostly about

76:59

profits. Why don't we see pressure from

77:02

companies on their employees to curb

77:03

their smartphone induced fragmentation?

77:06

Would love to hear your take signed

77:07

anonymous. That's an interesting point.

77:08

It's become a bigger issue. These used

77:11

to be separate magisteria for me in my

77:13

writing and I would have to always make

77:14

the point when I would do interviews etc

77:16

like these are two separate issues.

77:18

Distraction in the workplace is driven

77:19

by workplace communication tools like

77:21

email and Slack. Distraction at home is

77:24

being driven by attention economy

77:25

platform tools on your smartphones like

77:27

social media. And I said the effects are

77:30

similar. It your attention is fragmented

77:33

but the causes are different and

77:34

therefore the solutions are different.

77:36

The the issue in work has to do with the

77:38

way we collaborate

77:40

because we collaborate with this

77:42

hyperactive hive mind approach of

77:43

everyone just talks to everyone on

77:45

demand as you're needed. It creates a

77:47

situation which you have to constantly

77:48

monitor communication channels, not

77:50

because they're super addictive or super

77:52

sticky or because you have bad work

77:53

habits, but because that's where the

77:55

work is happening. And if you don't

77:56

monitor it, you fall behind and that's

77:57

what's distracting you. Whereas on your

78:00

phone, outside of work, the reason why

78:01

you're looking at that phone all the

78:02

time is because it's engineered to be

78:04

hyperengaging and is creating a reward

78:06

loop within your short-term motivational

78:08

system and then those neuronal bundles

78:09

are voting for the phone whenever they

78:10

see it and it wins out over other

78:12

activities most of the time. Two

78:13

separate problems. But what Anonymous is

78:16

saying is something that I've seen to be

78:17

increasingly true, which is that the

78:19

distractions from the phone have gotten

78:21

so good that, as we talked about last

78:23

week, they're overall reducing people's

78:25

cognitive patience. They're overall

78:27

reducing people's comfort with any sort

78:29

of sustained attention even when they're

78:30

in a non-phone context.

78:33

Like they're in a meeting and they they

78:36

can't pick up their phone, right?

78:38

Because they're they're if we want to

78:39

look inside the brain, the short-term

78:41

reward system, you have these neuronal

78:43

bundles that vote if they feel like the

78:44

expected reward of a behavior is going

78:46

to be high. They're not going to vote

78:48

for picking up the phone if you're in

78:49

the middle of a meeting with five people

78:50

with your boss because it's measuring

78:52

the the benefit you'll get by seeing

78:54

something interesting with the massive

78:57

negative impact of your boss being like,

78:58

"Are you looking at your phone like

79:00

right in front of me while I'm trying to

79:01

talk to you?" So in a meeting we're not

79:04

being drawn to pick up our phone because

79:06

our mind is saying this is not there's a

79:08

low reward to that but we're still as

79:11

reported by anonymous having a hard time

79:13

paying attention drifting aloof like

79:15

can't keep our mind focused this is

79:17

becoming this is a sign I guess I would

79:19

say of the cognitive impacts of consumer

79:24

non-professional consumer digital

79:25

attention economy tools moving to a new

79:28

level of of uh magnitude of pain a new

79:31

level magnitude of negative impact that

79:34

it's not just now it's hard when I have

79:36

my phone not to look at it like when I'm

79:38

out to dinner with my friends it's I'm

79:40

beginning to permanently lose my ability

79:42

to be comfort sustaining focus delaying

79:45

gratification

79:46

even if I can't look at the phone I just

79:48

can't do it anymore so these worlds have

79:50

now come together so yeah both of these

79:53

again we have two different problems the

79:55

the solve the phone problem really the

79:58

only solution is you have to stop

79:59

participating in the attention economy

80:01

I'm so tired tired. It's been a decade

80:02

now of people trying to convince me that

80:04

this is the p the it's inevitable.

80:07

It's the digital town square. We still

80:10

hear these arguments today, you know,

80:13

that if we don't let 12y olds in

80:15

Australia be on TikTok, they won't be

80:17

able to know about world events and all

80:19

these type of things. But that I'm so

80:21

tired of that argument. It's just a

80:24

giant money-making scheme that strip

80:26

mines your mind to like allow Mark

80:29

Zuckerberg to buy the second half of

80:30

Kawaii. So, we have to stop

80:32

participating in that economy and you'll

80:34

eventually gain back from that cognitive

80:35

patience. But then we still have to

80:36

solve the email and Slack problem at

80:38

work, which is has to do with

80:39

collaboration style. So, it's a hard Oh

80:41

god, Jesse, there's a lot of hard

80:42

challenges out there, but I guess it

80:44

gives me something to do.

80:47

Um,

80:48

all right. So also as always uh towards

80:51

the end of the show I like to discuss

80:52

what I have been up to recently in my

80:54

own quest to cultivate a deep life. So

80:57

give you my update

80:59

first. People have been asking about

81:01

this AI programmer project. So I'm not

81:02

sure if you saw this Jesse but last well

81:04

I guess it'll be two weeks ago now when

81:05

this comes out. I sent out an email to

81:07

my newsletter list saying if you're a

81:10

computer programmer I want to hear how

81:11

you're using AI. The good, the bad, what

81:13

you love, what you hate, whatever it is.

81:14

I just want you're not using all you use

81:15

it every day. I just want to hear about

81:17

it because

81:18

there's a lot of discussion right now

81:20

about cloud code and agentic AI

81:24

and a lot of discussion is a little bit

81:25

for someone like me who follows the

81:27

industry closely and for a lot of people

81:30

like programmers it's a little the it's

81:32

a little confusing the the sudden

81:34

attention because these sort of AI tools

81:37

for programming have been big since

81:40

before chat GPT came out the sort of

81:42

autocomplete tab complete you know we go

81:44

way back we go to cursor these sort of

81:45

pre chat GPT products. And then as I

81:48

reported in January for the New Yorker,

81:50

when I did a lot of interviews with

81:52

people who work on these programming

81:53

agents, these command line interface

81:54

agents like Cloud Code, those really

81:56

started showing promise in 2024.

81:59

And that's what allowed at the beginning

82:01

of 2025, this was the article I

82:03

published in January. At the beginning

82:04

of 2025, it led to all these tech

82:06

leaders to say, "We're going to have

82:08

agents in all parts of your life this

82:10

year. 2025 will be the year of the agent

82:13

because we're seeing how good these are

82:15

already working in programming. And then

82:17

what happened is uh it turns out

82:19

non-programming agents are much harder

82:21

and nothing really happened in 2025. But

82:23

the computer programming agents

82:24

continued to get better. And about 6

82:26

months ago, I guess it's just like a

82:28

tipping point thing. There's a lot of

82:30

programmers using these agents because

82:31

they're really they were good. It was

82:33

the only thing agentic thing that was

82:34

really working well in AI. Um but

82:37

there's more people started using them

82:39

about six months ago with some of the

82:41

latest updates. Cloud code switching

82:42

from Opus to Sonnet. There's like these

82:44

little things got just good. Nothing big

82:46

happened. No new technology was

82:49

introduced but just like these little

82:50

changes happened where I think it became

82:52

just easy enough that in more context

82:54

people used them. And also I think it's

82:55

just a reporting thing. People started

82:58

talking about yeah I'm using these

82:59

agents. They're pretty cool. And then

83:00

that got a lot of other people that who

83:02

hadn't been using them to use them. So

83:04

there wasn't really a technological

83:05

breakthrough six months ago, but there

83:07

was a

83:09

awareness breakthrough within the the

83:11

wider world of these tools which have

83:13

been like ste you know they've been

83:14

around for a while. Anyways, I want to

83:16

know what's really going on. So I've

83:17

heard from I'm never going to get

83:19

through this Jesse 350 people have sent

83:21

me in detailed briefings and I'm trying

83:23

to go through them in detail, take notes

83:25

and I'm also coding them like this.

83:28

>> How are you coding them?

83:29

>> Uh I'm coding the AI use of the person.

83:31

So is it like uh from one extreme like

83:34

doesn't basically uses rarely or only

83:37

occasionally uses any AI um Agentic uses

83:40

rarely all programmers now people don't

83:42

understand AI completely changed

83:44

programming in like 2022 like everyone

83:46

tab completes all sorts of things and

83:47

tab complete is where

83:49

>> the it'll finish the code that's like

83:51

right in front of what you're doing

83:52

because it's like oh you start writing a

83:54

function name and press tab and it'll

83:56

finish the calls for you and so like

83:57

everyone does that uh but with aentic

83:59

coding it's like rarely uses it uses it

84:03

for some types of situations but not for

84:06

others like there's just it depends um

84:09

uses it for the majority of their coding

84:12

and then uh vibe coding which is so use

84:16

it for the majority of their coding but

84:17

closely supervised I should say and then

84:19

vibe coding which is like the way Matt

84:21

Schumer talked about in that article we

84:22

talked about last week you're like build

84:24

this app and you come back later and

84:25

it's built it and tested it so I'm also

84:27

like coding so I can keep statistics um

84:31

and just trying to keep track of notes

84:32

and god it's I'm through like 50.

84:35

>> I've made it through 50 of the 350.

84:37

>> People probably write a lot, right?

84:39

>> Yeah. And I would say a good portion of

84:41

them are written by AI. Which is

84:43

interesting. I mean the people disclose

84:45

it. They're like, I'm not a very good

84:46

writer. I wrote this by AI. So it's

84:48

interesting. I much prefer the non-AI

84:50

written reports though because AI like

84:52

you can see where it's just it's so

84:54

bland and just like summarizing like

84:56

it's almost like viby. So I get better

84:58

reports when they don't write the report

84:59

by AI. Anyways, um that's ongoing and I

85:04

don't know what to do with it. I just

85:05

want to be more informed about it so

85:07

that when we talk about these issues in

85:08

the future, I know exactly what people

85:10

are doing because there's so much room

85:11

for hype and vibes as well as fear,

85:13

dystopia, and utopian rhetoric here that

85:16

I want to be super grounded. It's really

85:17

complicated though, so I don't uh I

85:20

don't have my arms around it yet. The

85:24

main thing I can say

85:26

is I think you have to think about there

85:29

is for sure a new style of programming

85:32

that is significantly spreading.

85:35

50% of the first 50 reports I've gone

85:39

through are now largely using a agents

85:43

to produce code under close supervision.

85:45

Almost no one's vibe coding. That's not

85:47

really a thing. Vive coding is fine if

85:48

you're, you know, you're not a

85:50

programmer and you need to build a quick

85:51

web application to help organize your

85:53

team, but that's like a separate thing.

85:54

And these are all serious programmers.

85:55

There's like four of them so far or

85:57

doing anything that looks like vibe

85:58

coding. Um, but half of them are uh and

86:03

the other half aren't because also turns

86:05

out that like it has to be a language

86:08

and a type of thing on which is trained

86:09

a lot for it to be good. So if you're

86:10

trying to write like advanced Rust code

86:12

or something, it doesn't work well with

86:13

that. Doesn't work well with Go. And

86:15

it's a really new type of work where

86:18

it's very interactive.

86:21

A lot of like moni

86:25

agent with you're writing specs and it

86:27

checks the spec and does it understand

86:29

what you like all this like

86:30

specification. You do all this work and

86:31

then finally like okay now build this

86:33

piece and then it builds that piece and

86:35

then you you test it and you let it

86:37

write tests and you have it look at your

86:38

test and then you fix things. you try

86:40

again and you kind of have the it's like

86:42

supervising someone told me it's like

86:44

supervising like a junior employee who's

86:46

like a pretty good coder but like super

86:48

literal and you have to like really be

86:50

on them.

86:51

>> That's like what it is right now. I

86:54

think it's like a beta. We're in the

86:56

beta phase of this. I think there's the

87:00

there's a core in here that's going to

87:02

stick and increase the speed with which

87:05

senior programmers make progress on what

87:07

they're doing. I think there's a lot of

87:09

other stuff that's surrounding it that's

87:10

probably unnecessarily wasting time and

87:13

I think there's going to be new

87:14

processes and procedures. There's going

87:15

to be some things where we strip this

87:16

back away from and other things where we

87:18

keep it. So my main thing I can say now

87:20

is the way a lot of programmers are

87:22

experimenting with this. A lot of

87:23

programmers are spending most of their

87:24

time experimenting with it and not

87:26

actually doing their work. And it's a

87:27

beta phase and I think it's going to

87:29

take six months till this shakes out and

87:31

then we see what how this more

87:34

permanently changes how certain types of

87:35

programming happen. So, I don't know.

87:37

That's what's going on.

87:38

>> I listened to your Zitron interview or

87:40

>> Oh, me on his show.

87:41

>> Yeah.

87:42

>> Yeah. On his haters couple days ago.

87:43

>> Yeah. What' you think?

87:44

>> I liked it. I liked how you explained

87:46

some stuff cuz I was confused and he

87:49

explained it.

87:50

>> I've been doing these videos. I might

87:51

record another one today uh with my

87:54

friend Rob Montz. We record him here in

87:55

the studio and he's like a philosophy

88:00

brown Ivy League guy. So he like plays

88:02

the role of the smart person doesn't

88:04

understand technology and then he sort

88:06

of interrogates me on whatever's going

88:07

on in AI. So you should check those

88:09

videos out as well.

88:11

>> Um

88:11

>> yeah, so I like those.

88:14

>> Quick question before I get into what

88:15

I've read and watched recently. Quick

88:16

question for the audience. If you want

88:17

to send us into interesting newort.com.

88:20

I'm thinking I'm scared of this idea

88:23

to hate new commitments, but I'm

88:26

thinking because I'm under some pressure

88:27

about this about maybe having a

88:30

standalone short podcast and newsletter

88:32

just to do the AI reaction so they keep

88:34

this show and the newsletter kind of

88:36

focused on what it's meant for which is

88:37

like helping individuals in their fight

88:39

for depth in a distracted world and then

88:42

have a maybe on this feed or on its own

88:45

feed is sort of like here's like what's

88:47

in the news on AI this week. Let me give

88:48

you my AI realist take and then maybe

88:50

like a newsletter version of it. I I'm

88:52

terrified of that work, but also I feel

88:56

like I have a voice in this that's

88:57

important right now. I don't know. So,

89:00

if you have feedback, uh, send the

89:03

interesting kelport.com. All right. What

89:05

did I read or watch? Uh, so we're

89:08

recording this, Jesse, confirm. We're

89:10

recording this on February 24th. Plenty

89:12

of days left in February. I have

89:14

completed my fifth book for February.

89:17

Yeah, baby. I read The Last Kings of

89:19

Hollywood by Paul Fischer. My wife gave

89:22

it to me. Again, I've mentioned maybe I

89:23

mentioned this before. This is a book

89:24

that was basically like invented in a

89:26

lab to be exactly what I want to read.

89:28

The rise of Spielberg, Lucas, and

89:30

Copela.

89:30

>> So, obviously, obviously, I love this

89:33

book. All right, so that's my uh fifth

89:34

book for February. I would go through

89:36

them all, but I don't have the list with

89:37

me. I forgot. Lost Island, Intensity,

89:40

Last Kings of Hollywood, Lost Book of

89:42

the Bible, The Hidden Book in the Bible,

89:44

and

89:45

>> Potensify.

89:46

>> I said that there's one there's one.

89:48

There's one other one I'm forgetting.

89:49

Um, whatever.

89:51

>> Oh, Lost Oh, you said Lost Island.

89:53

>> Yeah, I said Lost Island. Speaking of

89:54

Lost Island, I did see in the podcast

89:57

last week, uh, when I was talking about

90:00

Lost Island. I don't know what the hell

90:02

book cover you found. I guess it was a

90:04

book with the same name.

90:05

>> Is that a different one?

90:06

>> Oh, yeah. So, I looked it up. You put up

90:08

a book cover for it's a children's book.

90:10

So, the audience is like, "What the

90:12

hell?" There's a ver There's a book

90:14

called The Lost Island that's aimed it

90:16

said for the like 9 to 12 year old

90:19

market and it's like kids exploring or

90:21

whatever.

90:21

>> So, the other one must not be popular at

90:23

all.

90:23

>> It's old. It's like a decade old. Yeah.

90:26

>> Yeah.

90:27

>> Um, so no, I didn't read a kids book.

90:29

Uh,

90:31

in case people are wondering, I'm also

90:33

watching things. Um, people want to hear

90:34

about movies after last week's episode.

90:36

I watched the smashing machine

90:38

which starring Dwayne Johnson. Dwayne

90:40

Johnson was great. The filming was in

90:42

that like really confident impressive

90:44

like standard safety style naturalism

90:46

which I think is like really impressive

90:48

alterior film making. Uh the movie

90:50

though they couldn't they couldn't find

90:51

a core of the movie in the script. It

90:53

was at least my opinion is it was like

90:55

episodic and impressionistic.

90:57

uh but you they they struggle to

90:59

actually have an arc or attention or you

91:02

just kind of felt like you were in this

91:04

person's life and then they added in the

91:07

sort of Emily Blunt sort of like very

91:08

cliche not very interesting story line

91:10

of like there's his wife she'd be crazy

91:13

and it's a real problem for him and but

91:15

then they like make up again after they

91:17

fight and like I guess that's his main

91:19

villain was like overcoming his wife's

91:20

craziness like there was no it's like a

91:23

beautifully crafted acted movie that

91:25

they didn't have the core and I think

91:26

that's why otherwise The pieces were

91:28

great, but it didn't I don't think it

91:29

came together.

91:29

>> I'm going to watch that soon, actually.

91:30

>> Uh yeah, it's worth watching. John Rock

91:32

is great. It's really good acting. Um I

91:35

also He's huge.

91:36

>> He's a monster.

91:37

>> Monster. He's like what, 85 years old?

91:40

What is he now?

91:42

Monster. Uh we also watched Song Blue,

91:46

which was starring Hugh Jackman and Kate

91:50

Hudson about dramatizing the life of a

91:53

Neil Diamond husband wife tribute band.

91:57

from the 90s and 2000s. Uh, you know, it

91:59

was like an parts of it were like a

92:00

jukebox musical, right? Like it's very

92:02

like good-hearted and and they're just

92:04

like super happy and they're great

92:06

singers and like singing Neil Diamond

92:08

and it's shot like a concert film those

92:10

parts and it's really nice. It was fine.

92:12

Um, it it had to be edited to the

92:14

problem is is not to spoil too much,

92:16

there's multiple tragedy beats in it, so

92:19

it's like things are going well,

92:20

tragedy, things are going well tragedy.

92:22

And it's like they they had to cover too

92:24

much ground too quickly. And like you're

92:26

just as you're getting started like I

92:27

kind of like this kind of feelood

92:29

infectious Tupac musical. You get to

92:31

that tragedy beat pretty quickly and

92:33

you're like I don't think I'm bought in

92:34

enough into these characters to care and

92:36

then so again I I it's one of these

92:39

movies like good not great.

92:40

>> Good components but uh good components

92:44

but didn't all come together. All right.

92:46

So that's what I was up to. I think

92:49

that's it for this week.

92:51

you and there's a note here about you're

92:53

finishing up the best picture nominees.

92:56

>> Oh yeah. So that's why we watched um

93:00

that's why we were watching Train

93:01

Dreams. Yeah. So my wife and I are

93:02

trying to finish

93:03

>> that's the one where he's a tree cutter,

93:04

right?

93:05

>> Yeah.

93:05

>> I saw that. That was good.

93:07

>> Yeah. Okay. I'm about halfway through.

93:08

Yeah. Beautifully shot.

93:10

>> Mhm.

93:10

>> Um so we we try to watch all the best

93:12

picture nominees. We're we're pretty

93:13

close. We are doing one exchange where

93:18

there's one movie she saw I didn't and

93:19

one I saw she didn't. We're going to

93:20

count it for both. She didn't want to

93:22

see Frankenstein. I didn't want to see

93:23

Hamnet. And so we're kind of we're still

93:26

counting this. We We've got to see Train

93:27

Dream still, Secret Agent. Um which I'm

93:31

looking forward to. And I think there's

93:33

only one Oh, Sentimental Value.

93:36

>> All I can think about with the movie

93:38

watchings in our theme last couple weeks

93:39

is when you're talking you're um to take

93:43

30 minute breaks and read a article with

93:45

the three-hour movies. I'm like, that's

93:46

going to take a long time.

93:48

It doesn't take it takes five minutes.

93:50

>> No, no, I think it's fine. You're right.

93:51

The videos are pretty long. I love

93:53

that's what I do. And then

93:54

>> I have never tried it, but I want to try

93:56

it eventually.

93:56

>> Yeah. Like re-energizes you. It really

93:58

makes a difference. And then you like

93:59

learn a lot of film stuff. All right.

94:01

Anyways, um enough of this nonsense.

94:03

Let's uh we'll call it for now. We'll be

94:05

back next week with another episode. And

94:06

until then, as always, stay deep. Hey,

94:09

if you like today's discussion of

94:10

planning systems, you might also like

94:12

episode 360, which was about my one-page

94:16

productivity system, a minimalist system

94:18

for trying to get your life minimally in

94:20

order. Check it out. I think you'll like

94:22

it. So, here's a truth about modern time

94:24

management that we often ignore. The

94:27

systems required to tame the avalanche

94:30

of messages and meetings and tasks that

94:33

bury us in this current world of digital

94:35

work. These systems are demanding to

94:37

run. They require focus.

Interactive Summary

Cal Newport interviews Sarah Harter, a doctor, mother, and planning expert, to discuss the importance and elements of an effective planning system. Sarah emphasizes that planning is not solely about productivity but about intentionally controlling one's time and making space for desired activities in a distracted world. She outlines three key components: a functional master calendar, a robust "airtight" task management system, and a comprehensive goal-setting system with nested goals (yearly, seasonal, monthly, weekly, daily). Sarah primarily uses analog tools, integrates family and personal commitments into her planning, and highlights the value of seasonal planning to adjust rhythms and workloads. Both Cal and Sarah agree that planning is crucial for resisting digital distractions and maintaining control over one's life, rather than being overwhelmed by chaos. They also touch upon the limitations of AI in truly managing personal time and intentions, stressing human agency.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts