HomeVideos

This 24-Year-Old AI Billionaire Just Bet $8.5B Against Nvidia

Now Playing

This 24-Year-Old AI Billionaire Just Bet $8.5B Against Nvidia

Transcript

415 segments

0:00

One of the most aggressive, successful,

0:02

some would say genius billionaire

0:04

investors in the market right now just

0:07

made a move that should make every

0:08

investor stop for a second. And yes, I'm

0:11

talking about Leopold Aeschbacher, an

0:12

ex-OpenAI researcher who founded

0:15

AI-focused hedge fund called Situational

0:17

Awareness that reportedly ramped up to

0:20

roughly 20 billion in assets. And the

0:23

craziest part, he's only 24 years old.

0:25

Because this is not just some random

0:27

bear on Twitter saying the video's over.

0:29

This is somebody who made his entire

0:31

name riding the AI wave. And now Leopold

0:34

Aeschbacher is suddenly going against

0:36

some of the biggest winners in the stock

0:39

market, some of which he bet on himself

0:41

that made him rich. So we're talking

0:43

about shorting exposure tied to Nvidia,

0:46

AMD, Broadcom, Micron, ASML, Intel, and

0:51

the broader semiconductor complex. This

0:54

is very strange. What is Leopold

0:56

Aeschbacher doing right now? And this is

0:58

not just some rumor or some vague Wall

1:00

Street chatter. This started getting

1:02

real attention because the firm's 13F

1:04

filing, which pointed to something like

1:06

$8 million to about $8.5 million

1:09

of bearish exposure with one of the

1:11

biggest puts tied to names like Nvidia,

1:14

AMD, and Broadcom. And seeing this, you

1:17

have to ask yourself, does he know

1:19

something that we don't know? Does

1:21

Leopold Aeschbacher suddenly think the

1:22

whole AI boom is done? As an ex-Wall

1:25

Street analyst myself, this made me very

1:27

curious. So that's exactly what I'm

1:28

going to be answering in this video. And

1:31

actually, don't really think this is the

1:32

most interesting part of all. The most

1:34

interesting part is where the money is

1:36

moving next and what he's doing with his

1:39

money instead. Because if you really

1:41

break down the thesis here, this looks a

1:43

lot less like an anti-AI call and a lot

1:46

more like a rotation call. A call that

1:49

says the easy money may already have

1:50

been made in obvious AI names and the

1:53

next bottleneck might be in power,

1:55

memory, data centers, and physical

1:58

infrastructure. Now, the reason this

2:00

matters is because a lot of people still

2:02

think AI investing is simple, and they

2:04

think that if you just buy Nvidia, or,

2:06

you know, even some of Leopold's

2:08

holdings himself, like Nebius, then it's

2:11

all going to be easy work, right? But,

2:13

that is not the case. Look, I get why

2:15

people think that, but Leopold's

2:17

position sizing right now, and his new

2:19

positions, is completely different from

2:21

what investors think. Those stocks have

2:23

absolutely exploded already. They have

2:26

been some of the cleanest winners of the

2:27

last couple of years. Some of these

2:29

stocks are on generational runs. Like,

2:31

in the last year alone, look how much

2:32

Micron Technology is up. Look how much

2:34

Nebius is up year-to-date. But, the

2:36

market is changing very quickly. And

2:39

once a trade becomes too obvious, too

2:41

crowded, too universally loved, you at

2:43

least have to ask where the next big

2:45

opportunity is somewhere else in the

2:47

stock market. Now, let me make this

2:49

super simple for you, and not gatekeep

2:51

any information. If you look at the

2:52

situation itself, the shock value is

2:55

obvious. The big headline is that

2:57

Leopold Ashchenbrenner appears to be

2:59

very aggressive on the short side

3:01

against a lot of AI semiconductor names.

3:04

So, what it's looking like to me is that

3:05

semiconductor names are overvalued. And

3:08

when you see a 13F from Situational

3:10

Awareness LP pointing to roughly $8.5

3:12

billion in bearish exposure, you cannot

3:15

simply brush that off, right? That is

3:17

absurd information that might move the

3:19

stock market. But, this is where I want

3:20

to slow everyone down, because I do not

3:23

think the smartest takeaway here is to

3:24

say, "Okay, let's sell everything. AI

3:26

stocks are going to be crashing

3:28

tomorrow." Because I think that smarter

3:30

takeaway is to ask, "What exactly is he

3:33

betting on against, and what exactly is

3:35

he still bullish on?" This is where the

3:38

thesis gets way more interesting,

3:40

because this is not just Leopold getting

3:41

bearish across the board and going

3:43

entirely into cash. It's not like he

3:45

woke up and said, "AI is a bubble, and

3:47

everything is going to be connected, and

3:48

everything is going to come crashing

3:49

down." What's actually going on here is

3:52

we're really looking at a split book. On

3:55

one side, pressure against obvious

3:57

winners is in semiconductors. On the

3:59

other side, continued interest in names

4:01

connected to data centers, power,

4:04

memory, and infrastructure is something

4:06

that he still likes. So, although

4:08

there's pressure one from one side, he's

4:10

rotating to another side. So, if you

4:12

actually zoom out, the message is not AI

4:15

is dead, AI is over, and there's no more

4:18

money to be made. The message instead is

4:21

that AI trade is inside this new change,

4:24

and he is making that pretty public, and

4:27

he's not doing that by choice. He's not

4:28

doing it out of the goodness of his

4:30

heart. We are seeing that live happening

4:32

right now by his 13F filing changes. And

4:36

before we go even further, one important

4:38

clarification. A 13F is a quarterly end

4:42

snapshot. Meaning that when I'm

4:43

referring to some of his positions that

4:45

I'm seeing within his, you know,

4:47

portfolio, I am looking back at some of

4:49

the positions that he has already

4:51

opened, and they're at the end of March

4:53

31st. Had disclosed put option exposure

4:56

at the end of the quarter. However,

4:58

based on my own research, I still

5:00

believe that Leopold Aschenbrenner has

5:02

some of these positions open. It does

5:04

not give us a real-time look at every

5:06

single trade that he has made since

5:08

then, but it does give us a very good

5:10

picture of what likely he is thinking

5:12

and the reasoning behind some of his

5:14

trades. Now, the nuances really matter

5:17

here. So, make sure to listen up. So,

5:19

look, the biggest bearish position in

5:21

his portfolio right now, the largest

5:23

one, is a put on Van Eck Semiconductor

5:25

ETF SMH, at just over $2 billion of

5:29

reported value. Right behind Nvidia,

5:32

which is at $1.5 billion in puts. And

5:35

then Oracle at about $1 billion in puts.

5:37

And by the way, if you looked at Oracle,

5:39

here's the chart. Just in the past week

5:41

alone, Oracle has been on a very huge

5:43

decline. So, for me, I believe that

5:46

Leopold is personally profiting right

5:47

now. That is my personal belief. I still

5:49

think he's in the Oracle trade.

5:50

Broadcom, he has 1 billion of short.

5:53

AMD, 969 million dollars of short.

5:56

Micron at 584 million. TSM, about 500

6:00

million. And ASML, about 494

6:04

million dollars. Then, he has smaller

6:06

put positions in Intel and Corning. So,

6:09

it's very clear Leopold Aschenbrenner is

6:12

making a very strong bet in the market

6:15

right now. If you don't pay attention,

6:16

you might be making a very big mistake

6:18

because this guy, I'm not saying he has

6:20

info that we don't have, but honestly,

6:22

this story kind of smells like a like

6:24

kind of like a Nancy Pelosi here because

6:25

this guy is a little too good. At age

6:27

24, this guy has literally built his

6:30

fund. You can see how his fund has grown

6:32

since Q4 2024 and then what happened in

6:35

just 15 months. So, what he's doing

6:37

right now is a broad bet against a huge

6:40

part of the current AI hardware and

6:42

semiconductor trades. And that is what

6:45

makes the filing so interesting because

6:47

the long side tells a very different

6:50

story. His biggest long common stock

6:52

position is still Bloom Energy at

6:55

roughly 879 million dollars plus another

6:58

rough 55 million dollars in call

7:00

options. He also owns about 724 million

7:03

dollars of SanDisk plus roughly 389

7:06

million dollars and call options. So,

7:09

Leopold Aschenbrenner is not only long

7:11

stock in SanDisk, he's long call

7:13

options. We're seeing a very interesting

7:15

bet because obviously call options is a

7:17

massive bet. If it goes down, your call

7:19

options lose all their value. So, he's

7:21

making a very clear message right now in

7:23

the market on his own beliefs. Now, he

7:25

also has 556 million dollars of Core

7:27

Weave and he has 141 million dollars in

7:30

call options in Core Weave. And then,

7:32

you get to IREN at roughly 400 million

7:34

dollars. Core Scientific, Applied

7:36

Digital, and Ride Platforms at about 142

7:39

million dollars. And then, And his

7:40

smaller position, CleanSpark at $100

7:42

million.

7:43

This is not somebody saying that AI is

7:45

over. It's actually pretty much the

7:47

opposite. From my observation, he thinks

7:50

that semiconductor trade is overcrowded

7:52

and not worth it, and that a lot of

7:54

investors are going to be heading for

7:55

the exits and making a new rotation. So,

7:57

this is somebody that's saying the

7:58

market may be paying too much for the

8:00

design layer and not enough for the

8:03

deployment layer. And when you compare

8:04

this to the previous quarter, the shift

8:07

gets even clearer. The big semiconductor

8:10

book is new, while several

8:11

infrastructure names were either

8:13

maintained or increased. Coreweave moved

8:15

higher, Applied Digital moved higher,

8:17

IREN moved higher, Riot moved higher,

8:20

and CleanSpark jumped sharply. So,

8:22

Leopold Aschenbrenner seems to have, you

8:24

know, the wisdom, the foresight, the

8:27

technical analysis, or just the industry

8:29

experience that has been telling him

8:32

that some of his plays, including

8:33

SanDisk, that is higher as well, has

8:36

been very successful for situational

8:38

awareness. He's leaning away from the

8:40

crowded chip winners and leaning in to

8:43

power, memory, Neocloud in data center

8:46

capacity. Now, let's talk about why

8:48

those names make sense if that is a

8:50

thesis. So, Coreweave and CoreScientific

8:53

are basically expressions of compute

8:55

deployment. Applied Digital, Riot,

8:58

CleanSpark, IREN, Bitdeer, and Bitfarms

9:02

are tied in different ways to data

9:04

center capacity, power access, or

9:06

infrastructure that can be repurposed

9:07

for AI workloads. Bloom Energy is the

9:10

obvious power angle, which he has liked

9:12

for a long time now. And the stock has

9:14

run so much. It's like $350 per share.

9:17

So, this stock kind of seems obvious to

9:19

me, but he's still holding it. SanDisk

9:21

is the memory angle, so obviously all

9:23

this data has to be stored somewhere, so

9:25

the memory angle is very important. And

9:27

I'm pretty bullish on SanDisk myself

9:28

personally. Now, these picks is very

9:31

different. It's a different map

9:32

completely of the AI trades that average

9:35

retail investors has on top of their

9:37

head. This is completely the opposite of

9:39

most likely what many investors are

9:41

doing, and that is where it gets really

9:42

interesting as an opportunity for

9:44

investors looking at what to do today.

9:46

Cuz most people still think that AI

9:47

investing means you just buy GPU

9:49

winners, and then you're done. What the

9:51

filing is really arguing is that the

9:53

harder problem now may not be designing

9:56

the chip. That is already kind of

9:58

yesterday's issues that are already

10:00

pretty much solved. It may actually

10:02

today be powering those chips, housing

10:05

them, cooling it, and actually getting

10:07

it online fast enough. And that is a

10:10

serious point. If compute demand keeps

10:12

rising, then the next bottleneck may

10:14

belong to whoever controls electricity,

10:16

memory, data center slots, and physical

10:18

capacity. And that is the real analysis.

10:20

So, the actual question now is where the

10:22

next dollar of AI capex is going. Now, I

10:25

also want to be careful here, because

10:26

this is where most people overreact. A

10:28

filing like this does not prove that

10:30

Nvidia's broken. It does not prove that

10:32

Broadcom is done for or semi suddenly

10:35

stopped working. What it proves is that

10:37

at the end of the first quarter,

10:38

Situational Awareness LP had a very

10:40

large put book positioned for a lot of

10:43

these stocks going down against those

10:45

names while still owning a lot of

10:48

AI-adjacent infrastructure on the long

10:50

side. So, this is actually what a hedge

10:52

fund is for. Hedge funds, the name

10:54

hedge, was originally done for

10:55

protection. That's where options also

10:57

came into place. A hedge or buying a put

11:00

option was for hedge funds back in the

11:02

day to protect investors from downside.

11:04

That's exactly what Leopold

11:06

Aschenbrenner is doing. He's making

11:07

large bets on what he thinks is going to

11:09

go down, what he thinks is going to go

11:10

up. And this is much more than a precise

11:13

statement. And once you say it that way,

11:14

the debate becomes very clear. He has

11:17

put options because he thinks that

11:18

semiconductors are overpriced, and then

11:20

he has call options because he has a

11:22

view that the infrastructure layer in

11:24

the AI cooling capacity, electricity, is

11:27

going to be in high demand. So, the real

11:28

question is whether semis are actually

11:31

crowded, where their power and

11:33

deployment is becoming the next

11:35

bottleneck and whether the market may

11:37

end up paying more for physical scarcity

11:40

than for more turns of excitement in the

11:42

obvious chip names that have already

11:44

ran. So, that is the conversation that I

11:47

personally care about because that's

11:48

going to give me insight and my discord

11:50

community on what we could be doing next

11:53

that could be the next money-making

11:54

opportunity within the stock market. So,

11:56

my own read is that the most interesting

11:58

part of the filing is not actually the

12:01

bearishness. It's actually the

12:03

selectivity. Because if he were simply

12:05

calling the top of AI, the book would

12:08

look very different. Instead, the book

12:09

says something more nuanced. It says

12:11

that you can still believe AI spending

12:13

is real while thinking that the best

12:15

risk reward may be shifting away from

12:17

names that already is owned by everyone

12:19

else. That is very different from saying

12:21

Nvidia is doomed and honestly, that

12:23

distinction matters a lot. Nvidia can

12:25

remain a phenomenal company and still be

12:27

a harder stock to buy after huge move if

12:29

expectations are already extreme. And at

12:31

the same time, power, memory, and

12:33

infrastructure names can still have room

12:35

if the market has not fully priced how

12:37

important they have become in the next

12:39

stage of the build-out. This is why I

12:41

would not treat this as an all or

12:43

nothing call. I would instead treat this

12:45

as a watch list call. If I were doing

12:48

the work from here, I would split the

12:49

spaces into buckets. First, the obvious

12:52

one is chip leaders. Second is memory.

12:54

Third is power. Fourth is neo cloud and

12:56

data center capacity. That one I'm

12:58

personally most bullish on myself. And

13:00

then, I would ask whether expectations

13:02

already look perfect and where the

13:04

bottleneck is getting worse faster than

13:06

the market is appreciating. This is

13:07

exactly how a retail investor should use

13:10

this information. Use it as a smarter

13:12

question. Where is AI spending actually

13:14

flowing next? Because that is where the

13:15

next winners probably come from. Now,

13:17

here is my personal pushback on

13:19

Leopold's bearish side. I still think

13:22

betting too aggressively against Nvidia

13:24

is very dangerous. This is the leader in

13:26

all of AI. They're supplying the whole

13:28

entire AI boom. And betting against

13:29

Nvidia to me doesn't really make sense

13:32

because that's just timing. And I mean,

13:33

unless Leopold has information on

13:35

exactly when the stock is going to go

13:37

down, this is not something that I would

13:38

look at as a retail investor. Nvidia

13:41

still has real software lock-in, real

13:42

customer demand, and real ecosystem

13:44

advantage. So, if his view is that

13:46

Nvidia is simply over, I would actually

13:48

completely disagree with that. But, if

13:50

his view is that the semis can remain

13:52

great businesses while the better

13:53

incremental upside move to power,

13:55

memory, and deployment, well, I can

13:57

agree with that. I do think that is a

13:59

strong argument. The right takeaway is

14:01

to notice where a very smart, very

14:03

aggressive investor seems to be thinking

14:04

is the next move within the stock

14:06

market. In this case, the answer looks

14:08

pretty clear. Power, memory, deployment,

14:10

and physical AI infrastructure. So, if

14:12

you're a retail investor, I would leave

14:13

this video thinking about two questions.

14:15

First, am I too concentrated in obvious

14:17

AI winners just because they worked in

14:19

the first phase of the AI build-out?

14:21

Second, if the bottleneck really is

14:22

moving from chip design to real-world

14:24

deployment, which names are actually

14:26

going to benefit the most from this

14:27

shift? That is the part of the video

14:28

that matters most for you as a retail

14:30

investor. The long book tells you that

14:32

AI stocks are still going to explode. Do

14:34

you believe that Leopold Aschenbrenner's

14:36

bearish call on semis is overblown? Let

14:38

me know in the comment section below.

14:40

Thanks for watching. Make sure to like

14:41

and subscribe. It's totally free, and

14:43

I'll see you in the next video.

Interactive Summary

Leopold Aeschbacher, a notable young AI-focused investor, has made headlines with his fund's 13F filing, which reveals significant bearish put positions on major semiconductor companies like Nvidia and AMD, while maintaining bullish long positions in AI infrastructure, power, and data center companies. The video argues this is not a general rejection of AI, but rather a strategic rotation, signaling that while the 'easy money' in popular chip stocks may have been made, the next phase of growth will likely shift toward the physical infrastructure and resources required to deploy AI at scale.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts