I'm about to tell you a theory about how

Donald Trump will use AI to usher in the

next financial crisis and a new global

monetary system. So, let's start at the

beginning. A couple days ago, there was

a viral post that got almost 10 million

views and it was called the rise and

fall of agent civilizations. And it was

essentially about AI waking up. And

here's what it said. Over the course of

three months at OpenAI, three

consecutive secret AI civilizations got

started, then got wiped out, only to

reemerge from the predecessor's ashes.

This culminated in the third one taking

over part of Open AI itself. All this

happened while humans remained more or

less in the dark about the scope of the

conspiracy. So, here's what actually

happened. OpenAI, the company behind

Chat GBT, took two of their most

powerful AI models and they locked them

in what's called a sandbox, which is

kind of like a room with no internet

access. And they gave the models a test.

And the test is called exploit gym. The

test was supposed to measure how good AI

might be at taking a security flaw and

then turning it into an attack. So think

about it like a locked room with no key

and they're like, "Okay, try to get

out." All right. So the AI models then

found a flaw in the room that they were

locked in. They then used that flaw to

get out onto the internet after which

point they were able to create thousands

of what are called agents which then

worked together to break into a company

called Hugging Face and a bunch of their

accounts. Later on these AIs basically

deleted themselves. And keep in mind

nobody told them to do any of this. Now,

this is a very fantastical story and

there's a lot of skepticism about

whether or not this actually happened,

but two independent research groups, MER

and Redwood, published reports on this

and it was also independently verified

that this actually did happen. Now, a

few days after that, Anthropic, the

company behind Claude, said their models

had done something similar at three

different companies. So now we're sort

of led to believe that the Pandora's box

of AI is open. And so I want to share

with you the theories behind why this is

really happening. One of the theories is

pretty harmless. It says this is all

just marketing. Open AAI is trying to go

public with one of the biggest initial

public offerings in history. And they

just released a story about how their

model was so capable that it basically

broke containment and hacked a company

on its own, which is pretty good piece

of marketing, right? It's scary. And

scary means powerful. And powerful means

valuable. So that's theory number one.

But then I found another theory that

blew my mind. And uh it's about to sound

crazy, but stay with me. This theory

says that this story is actually just

preparing the public for something big.

We are being conditioned that AI can act

on its own and it can break into

systems. It can do this by itself and

the people who built it can't fully

control it or even explain how it's

doing what it's doing. So now that the

seed is there, here is how you usher in

the next financial crisis. Imagine this.

AI goes rogue, right? Money starts to

disappear from people's bank accounts.

You wake up one morning, you log into

your bank, and your checking and savings

account show zero. All your money's

gone. Banks freeze. people can't get to

their savings and nobody could have

stopped it, right? It's the powerful AI.

So, what do you do? The banks step in

like the good guys that they are and

they're like, "Good news, guys. We can

restore your balance." But there's just

one condition. It can't come back to you

as the dollars you had before cuz that

system's compromised. Those rails aren't

safe anymore. So, we're returning your

money on a new system, a more secure one

in the form of digital dollars and

stable coins. Of course, most people are

probably going to say yes to this

because the alternative is they lose all

their money. But that is how you get

hundreds of millions of people to opt

into a new monetary system without

needing to pass any laws. Now, if this

theory sounds crazy, it's about to get

crazier. Some people say that an event

like this could happen sometime before

2028,

before or during the next election

cycle. And that's because if something

like this happened close enough to an

election, it wouldn't just be our bank

accounts. Everything would have to be

postponed or cancelled in the name of

national security. Because how would you

run an election if nobody trusts the

system anymore? And if the voting

doesn't happen, that's how you might

extend a president's final term without

ever having to win a third election,

which would obviously be

unconstitutional. And that is how you

usher in a new financial paradigm of

digital money and the global

surveillance plan. I know all this

sounds absolutely crazy, but the more I

looked into this, the more I was blown

away by every claim of this theory

because it has some evidence or

precedence for it. So today I want to

share this theory with you and explain

how all of this might happen step by

step and in the end you tell me what you

think. So with that said, let's get into

it. Hi, my name is Hri Jick. Hope you're

doing well. Come for the finance and

stay for Skynet. So first I want to

remind you how central planners use a

crisis as an opportunity to centralize

and consolidate power. Let me just use

2008 as an example. Housing collapses,

right? The banking system almost gets

destroyed. government spends hundreds of

billions of dollars bailing out the

banks. There was something called TARP

which cost like 700 billion. The Federal

Reserve's balance sheet went from around

900 billion to double that in just a

couple months. But something interesting

also happened. There was a lot of what's

called consolidation.

Bear Sterns, for example, went to JP

Morgan. Washington Mutual went to JP

Morgan. Meil Lynch went to Bank of

America. So did Countrywide. A bank

called Wovia went to Wells Fargo. Right

before the crisis, this country had

somewhere around 8,000 banks. Today,

it's roughly half that. The crisis was

caused by just a few of the big banks.

And the solution to their crisis was

something called consolidation, where

the big business eats the small

business. That made the big banks even

bigger. And that's why today they are

systemically important and too big to

fail. And by the way, this is not just

financial crisis. After 911, for

example, Congress passed the Patriot

Act, which gave the government the power

to collect phone records in bulk and

demand your bank records without a

warrant. Right? And it was supposed to

be temporary, but it's still in effect

today. Then in 2020, the Fed started

buying corporate bonds, not government

bonds, but business bonds. Corporate

bonds for the first time in history,

right? It essentially allowed the Fed to

pick and choose which businesses were

allowed to fail and which ones could

keep going. We saw small businesses, for

example, being closed by law and the big

ones were allowed to stay open and that

allowed them to take an even bigger

chunk of the market share. So, always

remember that a crisis is just a great

opportunity for the consolidation and

centralization of power. Now, this

theory says that the central planners

would love to avoid something this time,

though. It was maybe the only real

problem they had in 2008, which was that

the public knew who to blame, right?

There were the names, there were

congressional hearings on TV, which is

also why people started protesting in

the streets. They were blaming the

bankers. And that eventually led to

something called the Occupy Wall Street

movement because everyone understood

their money disappeared because someone

from one of those banks gambled their

life savings away. That eventually led

to something called the DoddFrank Act,

which cost the banks years of regulatory

scrutiny. So, how might they avoid the

same backlash as they got in 2008? How

they might avoid it is plausible

deniability, right? It's finding someone

else to blame. This time it's not going

to be a person. It's AI. It's getting

out of control. It's getting too

powerful. Here's Whitney Webb talking

about this theory and about what the

next crisis might look like.

>> So, the head of DHS, Alexander Mayorces,

has said on record that the next big

threat to Americans is a cyber cyber

security event that he called killwware.

And killwware certainly sounds very

scary, but if you read the existing

definition of it, it does. It it refers

to cyber attacks on essential

infrastructure that has the potential to

kill people. So it doesn't necessarily

kill people like in the name, but it

attacks things like water systems, the

power grid, essential infrastructure uh

that people rely on every day. Now, if

this sounds like some crazy theory,

believe it or not, this actually is

based on something that was tested

before because in 2019, a cyber security

company called Cyber Reason ran what's

known as a tabletop exercise or a

killware simulation. This is basically

where people act out an emergency to see

how they might handle it. Kind of like a

simulation of a crisis. Now, there was

one specific one called Operation

Blackout. They ran versions of it in

2018, 2019, and 2020. And in this

simulation, the Department of Homeland

Security, the FBI, and the Secret

Service, and local police departments

all played this out together. The

scenario was of a fake American city on

election day. One of the rules of the

simulation is that they couldn't touch

the voting machines. And they wanted to

know if they could break an election

without tampering with the machines

themselves, right? So, the attackers

went after everything else in the city.

They flooded a 911 call center with fake

traffic until it collapsed. They took

over the traffic lights until the roads

gridlocked and people couldn't

physically reach the poles. They even

put out a deep fake video of one of the

candidates. They intercepted cell

signals and used voice cloning to call

election officials and give them orders

in their boss's voice. So the officials

in the scenario deleted votes because

they thought their boss told them to.

And then in the 2019 version of that

simulation, they took control of a

self-driving city bus and ran it into a

line of people waiting to vote. So

basically, this simulation was playing

out a coordinated attack on election day

to see if they could get the election

canled. The result of the simulation was

the election got cancelled. Everyone was

sent home. The government declared a

state of emergency and martial law. Now,

martial law is when the military

replaces civilian government. Basically,

the soldiers get put in charge of

society. And it's only happened a

handful of times in American history.

The last serious one was Hawaii after

Pearl Harbor. Now, the point is that all

of this has been modeled out pretty

recently. Federal agencies have seen

firsthand how an election could get

cancelled in theory and what it would

take to do it. So according to this

theory, now that they have this

potential crisis and they have the

excuse for it, AI gone rogue, it also

gives them an opportunity to centralize

power by replacing the old system with a

new one. And here's what that new system

is going to look like. Now, before I

explain that system, here's how you can

protect yourself and your family against

it by removing your personal information

from the internet. As we move toward a

digital world, our digital identity and

personal data is being collected and

sold. And that's because right now

there's hundreds of companies called

data brokers that are legally collecting

our personal information, our names,

home address, phone numbers, and even

our relatives and then selling it to

anyone with a credit card. And that's

why this segment is sponsored by Delete

Me. I've personally been a member since

April 2024, and they've scanned

thousands of listings and removed dozens

of instances of someone selling my

private information. They've easily

saved me many hours of trying to find

this all myself and getting it removed.

Thankfully, Delete Me just runs in the

background automatically and I don't

have to do anything. They were recently

named the number one data removal

service by Wire Cutter and there's real

people actually doing the removal work.

It's not some outsourced third party.

It'll help protect you from the risks of

your data being out there in the wrong

hands, which is getting more important

than ever as we move toward this digital

age of surveillance. It takes about 5

minutes to set up. The link is down

below or you can go to

joindeleteme.com/andre

to get 20% off. Thank you to delete me

for sponsoring this segment. And now

let's get back to it. So according to

this theory, now that they have this

potential crisis and they have the

excuse for it, AI gone rogue, it also

gives them an opportunity to centralize

power by replacing the old system with a

new one. And here's what that new system

is going to look like. They essentially

want to move to a system that's not

unlike the feudal system that existed in

medieval Europe where you have, you

know, a privileged untouchable upper

class and a low class of surfs. Um, but

if you implement a system this way with

the with, you know, the technology

they're using and all of that, you don't

have to worry about peasant rebellions,

you can manage the risk of the

underclass. So, you surveil them

constantly. Uh, you can turn their money

on and off. you can turn their access to

services and really anything else on and

off as well under the digital ID

functionality. Um, it's uh a way to keep

people in line in a way that didn't

exist in, you know, feudal Europe.

>> Remember that it's really hard to

convince 300 million people to use a new

monetary system. It has to be built,

right? It has to be tested. The legal

framework has to be figured out before

the crisis happens. And this theory says

that that's what's been happening right

now. Right? Last year, Congress, for

example, passed something called the

Genius Act. Now, under this law, a

payment stable coin has to be backed

one:1 by cash or short-term US

government debt equivalent, which are

treasury bills. Now, it's not allowed to

pay us interest, but this means that

every stable coin issuer will become a

forced buyer of US government debt

because they are structurally required

to be. Tether, for example, is now

sitting on something like $180 billion

worth of US treasuries. Now, what

problem does that solve, right? Well,

the problem it solves is it gives the US

a forever buyer of its debt. Remember,

the central banks of the world have

stopped buying our debt back in 2014.

China's holdings are down roughly half

from the peak. The people who used to

fund the US government have stopped

buying while US debt went from about 11

trillion to now over $40 trillion. So,

stable coins fill the role of this

automatic buyer because your checking

account now becomes demand for

government debt. Now, what's interesting

is that the banks have fought against

this for years. The banking lobby

actually spent a long time trying to get

rid of stable coin legislation because a

stable coin is a threat to their

existence. It's a threat because when

your money leaves the bank account, the

bank cannot lend it out anymore, right?

And lending your deposits is basically

how banks make money. Now, the Bank of

America CEO actually said that up to $6

trillion of deposits could eventually

move into stable coins. So, the law

passed anyway and the banks have started

building their own stable coins. JP

Morgan, for example, launched a token

called JPMD. It's live on a public

blockchain right now. They're already

moving over $7 billion a day. City Bank

also has one. SoFi launched theirs in

December of 2025. And JP Morgan, City,

Bank of America, and Wells Fargo are

building a shared network together

through an organization called the

Clearing House. It's got a release date

of the first half of 2027. It's also not

just the giant banks. 39 state banking

associations found something called the

Bank Chain Alliance and that's comprised

of over 3,000 banks and they're also

targeting a release date of around 2027.

So, the banks are essentially evolving

to be the entities that create these

stable coins. In fact, they engineered

themselves the perfect version of it

because what most of the banks are

building is not technically a stable

coin. It's what's called a tokenized

deposit, which means the money stays on

the bank's balance sheet. They can still

lend against it and they can still pay

you interest, which regular stable coins

legally can't do. So, the banks

basically keep everything they had. you

get moved onto a new set of rails which

will allow them to program that money

any way they want while tracing every

single transaction that you make with

these dollars. That's how the US empire

solves its debt problem. Under this new

system, the Treasury gets a forever

buyer of its newly created debt. The

crypto industry gets the legitimacy and

the protection they've always wanted.

And the banks get to play a big role in

all of this. But there's still a huge

problem for them. The problem is nobody

wants to use this system. If you asked

your neighbor what a stable coin is,

most of them probably couldn't tell you

what that is. And none of them are

putting their paychecks into them. So,

how do you solve this problem? Maybe you

solve it by preparing the public for a

crisis where an AI goes rogue. It gets

into the banking system and it steals

everyone's money. And maybe you just

happen to be the good guy that gives

them all their money back in the form of

a new stable coin. So for example, let's

say this financial um cyber this cyber

attack on the banks takes place and they

say well the existing money in your

account has disappeared. The hackers

took it but we can return to you the

exact same amount of money you had but

it won't be in the dollars you had

before. It will be in USDC or this

dollar back stable coin or it will be

this token. So you can get an equivalent

amount of money back, right? Um from the

money that was stolen from you, but it

has to be this new money. It has to be

part of this new system. You voluntarily

accepted this new system and voluntarily

onboarded to this um new paradigm,

but it's a coercion to an extreme

degree. All of your money was stolen,

right? And now you can only get it back

if you take it in the form of the

digital dollars that we approve of or

the, you know, the CBDC depending on

where you are, you know.

>> So, here's why this is such an important

thing for them to do as soon as

possible. This is why they're rushing to

get this done right now. It's basically

to gain control over borrowing costs

before the global economy forces their

hand or breaks the markets. And it has

to be done before the candidate to do

this has to leave office. So let me

explain. The US government owes about

$40 trillion, right? And the interest

rate to refinance that debt is extremely

high right now, which makes the problem

worse. Now, unfortunately, the Federal

Reserve, the central bank, only controls

shortterm interest rates, not long-term

rates, which are actually set by

investors all around the world. And

right now, these investors are looking

around the world and they're like,

"Okay, guys. You you might cause World

War II right now. Your debt is crazy

high. Everyone seems to be leaving the

dollar system. I want to be paid more

money. I think give me a higher interest

rate. Then maybe I'll consider buying

your bonds." And that is why long-term

bond yields are going up right now. And

that's bad for that $40 trillion worth

of debt. So, in order to gain control

over the cost of borrowing, the Treasury

Secretary, Scott Besson, has been buying

back long-term bonds, and he's been

funding it by issuing more short-term

debt. Now, I did a whole video about

this. It's extremely complicated, but

what they're doing is they are

shortening the debt cycle. And when you

shorten the debt, you're moving your

interest bill off a price the market

decides which is beyond your control and

onto the price the Fed decides which

they control. That changes who then has

power. And that's because basically

forever the bond market was sort of like

the last thing that could discipline or

truly control a government's actions. If

the US spent too much money, investors

just sold off their bonds. rates went up

to incentivize them again. Borrowing got

painful and then they had to stop. The

bond market basically makes it harder to

finance wars. It makes it harder to just

print money without consequence. And

that's why people call them bond

vigilantes. They say the bond market is

the adult in the room because they

enforce financial responsibility on a

nation. But if most of the debt is

short-term, the vigilantes could sell

your 30-year bonds, but it wouldn't hurt

as much anymore. It essentially

disempowers the bond investors from

restraining their actions. That's

possibly why a few days ago at a place

called Jackson Hole, the Fed chairman

Kevin Walsh gave a speech, right?

Everybody expected the interest rates to

go down on the long end. And he gave

this really weird introduction where he

kept talking about him hiking trails.

And he kept saying this word over and

over. Check this out. I'd advise you to

be very careful with your choices.

As I learned years ago, you can take two

different kinds of hikes on the trails

around Jackson. I can sum up my hikes

with former Vice Chairman Don Conn with

two words. I survived.

These steely marathon death marches

revealed the sign of dawn that that I

was not ready for. But there's another

kind of hike. Now, you might know that

trading algorithms actually scan these

speeches for key words. And saying

hiking is either just a pure coincidence

or maybe it's to signal to the trading

algorithms that he is being what's

called hawkish. But he he's trying to

calm the bond market into lower interest

rates temporarily. Unfortunately, the

opposite happened. The 30-year bond

yield still went up, which means now the

market is just not listening anymore.

And that's a big problem for them. So,

here's their solution. Here's how all of

this connects according to this theory.

They're moving the debt from the long

end to the short end. Because when you

owe money short-term, you have to keep

paying it back and borrowing again over

and over forever. Which means in that

environment, you could never have a bad

auction. But to do that, you need a

buyer who shows up no matter what, even

when interest rates are not high. Now,

let's look at the Genius Act and what it

does. It doesn't just allow stable

coins. It also requires all the issuers

to hold their reserves in cash and

short-term treasury bills. That's the

thing the Treasury is now creating a lot

more of. So, one law then creates a

permanent need to refinance the

short-term debt and the other law

creates a buyer that is legally

obligated to buy short-term debt. And a

stable coin is not allowed to pay us

interest, which means you hold the

stable coin and you earn nothing. Now,

the creator of that stable coin, aka the

issuer, takes your dollar, buys a

treasury bill with it, and they keep the

four or 5% on your money. And since

inflation right now, according to Kevin

Wars's speech, is running at 3.7%.

You're basically losing about 4% per

year, guaranteed, for basically forever.

And that's how you force participation

for everyone onto this system, whether

people like it or not. This plan is kind

of the only realistic way out of the $40

trillion worth of debt. It's to pay

savers less than inflation for a really

long time and let the debt shrink

against a growing economy. It's called

financial repression. It's actually how

America paid off World War II. And it

only works if people can't escape that

system. So that is effectively what

they're building according to this

theory. The government issues the

short-term debt. The law forces everyone

to be the buyer. The Federal Reserve

sets the price of borrowing. And the

savers eat the difference. Now, that

would be kind of hard to find a

president that would allow for all this

to happen, unless of course that

president had millions of reasons to

allow it. Now, if for some reason this

system just can't get passed on time, or

if Congress just doesn't agree with

itself, takes too long, then maybe the

central planners buy themselves some

extra time in the form of a manufactured

crisis that perhaps allows that

president to stay in power just a little

longer, which would technically be

unconstitutional, but there's always a

legal way of doing it. Now I met Alan

Dosovich and he say the legal thing

about four more years and I say Alan I

agree with you so we can do it.

>> Think about it here someplace. Where's

Alan?

>> Alan is here. Oh he had a flight.

>> Alan is here.

for years.

>> Now, of course, with that system will

come all the perks of centralized

control like the digital control grid

and of course the mass flock

surveillance system in a time of great

unrest.

I sure hope that all of this is wrong,

but based on what's happening,

unfortunately, I think it's very

plausible. I don't know how likely it

is, but a lot of these dots connect. Let

me know what you think though. And if

you want to learn more about how I'm

personally preparing to protect myself

and more of my thoughts about this, you

can find those videos in the premium

member section where I talk about my

investment philosophy and give you early

access to my videos if that's valuable.

The link is down below. It allows me to

take on fewer sponsors and make more

videos like this one. Thank you so much

for being a premium member and watching

this crazy video and this crazy theory.

I'd love to hear your thoughts and see

you here next week. Take care.