HomeVideos

Memory Chip Frenzy Sends SK Hynix, Micron Into $1T Club | Bloomberg Businessweek

Now Playing

Memory Chip Frenzy Sends SK Hynix, Micron Into $1T Club | Bloomberg Businessweek

Transcript

926 segments

0:02

Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts,

0:05

radio, news.

0:08

>> This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily

0:11

reporting from the magazine that helps

0:13

global leaders stay ahead with insight

0:16

on the people, companies, and trends

0:18

shaping today's complex economy. Plus,

0:21

global business, finance, and tech news

0:23

as it happens. The Bloomberg Business

0:25

Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and

0:28

Tim Stenc on Bloomberg Radio.

0:31

>> Ian King is Bloomberg News US

0:33

semiconductor. He joins us.

0:34

Semiconductor reporter. He joins us from

0:36

>> He's not our semiconductor. He's our

0:37

semiconductor reporter. Uh not yet, Ian.

0:40

>> Although he thinks just as quickly. He

0:41

thinks just as quickly.

0:42

>> Maybe one day soon they will they will

0:44

make a robot Ian King. But today we are

0:47

glad to have the real human being Ian

0:49

King. Ian, we're glad to have you

0:50

because you have such great experience

0:52

not just covering different

0:52

semiconductor cycles, but also living in

0:55

Korea earlier in your career and just

0:57

seeing what's going on in the Korean

0:58

market right now with memory chip

1:00

stocks. I mean, what is what is your

1:02

reaction here? Have you ever seen

1:03

anything like this in your career?

1:05

>> To the extent that they've gone up,

1:08

absolutely not. We've certainly seen

1:10

booms and busts for these companies uh

1:13

along the way. I was there when he was

1:16

actually created as a force merger by

1:18

the government. This was, you know, two

1:20

companies, LG Semiconductor and Hyundai

1:22

Electronics that were sort of on their

1:24

way out of business. Things were that

1:25

bad. And now in combination owned by the

1:28

SK Group, it's uh worth more than a

1:31

trillion dollars. This was not something

1:33

that anybody would have believed um even

1:35

a few short years ago.

1:37

>> Do you think that growth is sustainable?

1:39

And there are more people, more

1:42

whispers. There's still whispers talking

1:44

about bubbles, not just in AI, but in

1:46

these chip manufacturers. I mean,

1:47

there's uh thank you to Bloomberg, who's

1:49

now adapted my algorithm online to feed

1:51

me finance memes. Uh and there's one

1:53

going around talking about all these

1:55

trillion dollar valuations and how that

1:57

is worth more than all the farmable land

2:00

in Australia and they go, "It's fine.

2:01

It's fine. We're making money. We're

2:03

making money. Just buy." Are there real

2:04

concerns here about these valuations and

2:06

how big they're getting?

2:08

>> I mean, there there absolutely have has

2:11

to be. I mean, we've seen an enor amount

2:13

of money come flowing in, but that's

2:15

very much for the market to decide. And

2:16

if you look at some of the other

2:18

metrics, these companies are actually

2:20

cheap. What a trillion dollar company

2:22

that's cheap. But look at the the

2:24

forward pees for these companies. We've

2:26

got one, I think Micron's about 15. You

2:28

know, he is less than 10, which means

2:31

that Wall Street analysis believes that

2:34

these companies fundamentally have a

2:36

massive earnings growth spurt ahead of

2:38

them and that investors haven't actually

2:40

caught up. Who knows? Obviously, we

2:42

don't know. And we, as I've said, we've

2:44

seen massive boom and busts in this

2:47

industry in the past. It wasn't what, 3

2:49

years ago, and they're actually losing

2:50

money. So, who knows? But, um, you know,

2:53

there is certainly a ground swell of

2:56

opinion that believes this time is

2:57

different. Arguably the most dangerous

2:59

words anybody can ever say, right?

3:02

>> That's what people believe.

3:03

>> I'm glad you couched it with that, Ian.

3:06

Hey, um I I do want to know a little bit

3:09

just about sort of the chip ecosystem

3:11

when we're talking about these memory

3:12

names. We had uh Eric Weiner join us a

3:15

little earlier along with Sarah Hunt

3:17

over at Alpine Sax and Woods who who

3:19

covers markets. And you know, we kind of

3:21

had this exchange where they talked

3:22

about, yeah, higher memory prices,

3:24

they're a good thing for, you know,

3:26

SKHEX and and Micron and a handful of

3:28

other companies, but not necessarily a

3:30

good thing for the companies that are

3:32

are the customers. talk a little bit

3:34

about the way that it's affected those

3:35

companies because we have seen some

3:36

companies such as Apple, you know,

3:38

they're able to navigate this, but but

3:40

who who are the losers when memory gets

3:43

this expensive?

3:45

>> Yeah. I mean, 85% gross margins at these

3:49

companies tells you all you need to know

3:51

about their pricing power. So

3:53

>> amazing.

3:54

>> Yeah.

3:54

>> And that's for hardware. Like that's

3:56

crazy.

3:58

>> Those are like software,

4:01

that's that's insane. uh and the these

4:04

companies own manufacturing facilities

4:06

as well. They're not just designing

4:07

these chips and outsourcing. They

4:08

actually own these multi-billion dollar

4:10

plants and they are running them uh at

4:13

that kind of level. So, this is

4:14

obviously a great market for them right

4:15

now. But to answer your question, um PC

4:19

market, we're going to see HP report

4:21

today, Dell I believe tomorrow. So,

4:23

these guys the prices of of what their

4:25

their components has gone up massively.

4:27

Obviously, we've seen the influence on

4:28

the smartphone market. Companies like

4:30

Qualcomm have had to rein back their

4:33

outlook for the number of devices that

4:35

get built because we've seen this

4:36

massive shift of production into the

4:39

higher value, higher margin sort of high

4:41

bandwidth memory that's going into these

4:43

massive data centers. So that's, you

4:46

know, supply and demand is elastic.

4:48

These companies there aren't really new

4:50

players coming into the market because

4:52

you can't because of the the high

4:54

barriers to entry. So that's that's what

4:55

the market dynamics are right now. If

4:57

you're a device maker, then you know

4:59

times are tough, right? Your margins are

5:01

getting squeezed.

5:03

>> And we've also seen the impact some of

5:04

these uh companies have had on the South

5:07

Korean economy and even the Cosby, which

5:09

overtook the UK and then overtook

5:12

Canada's stock exchange and is now I

5:14

think the seventh largest in the world.

5:16

Talk to us about what that does for the

5:17

economy overall in South Korea. And

5:20

there is also this concern that if the

5:21

straight of hormone stays closed, this

5:23

this energy crunch is going to be

5:24

acutely felt in Asia first. Any chance

5:28

that that's going to impact these uh

5:30

these huge growths that we've seen in

5:31

some of these companies?

5:33

>> I mean the company that we've not

5:35

mentioned is Samsung Electronics which

5:36

is actually a larger memory manufacturer

5:39

than both of these guys and obviously

5:41

that's a South Korean company as well.

5:43

So the combination of SKHEX and

5:45

Samsung's success has clearly had a

5:48

massive impact. Samsung has always been

5:50

central to the Korean economy and the

5:52

Korean story. This is, you know, the

5:54

first arguably their first worldclass

5:56

company that proved that, you know, the

5:58

the export economy could work for Korea

6:00

and and helped with their success and

6:02

we've seen that filter into other areas

6:04

of their economy. On the flip side, yes,

6:07

South Korea is an energy importer. Um,

6:10

it has nuclear power, but it'll is is

6:13

still heavily dependent on outside

6:14

sources of of energy.

6:17

That's going to be, you know, cost and

6:19

and

6:21

negative for these companies, but, you

6:22

know, it's not going to hold back

6:23

production of memory chips at Samsung or

6:25

SKH Heinix. You know, they're going to

6:27

go full ahead of that. We've seen them

6:28

even get over their historic kind of

6:30

tension with the labor unions there. You

6:33

know, we've found a way and and you

6:35

know, everything's moving forward.

6:36

That's an economy that's very focused on

6:38

this success story.

6:39

>> You know, Thomas Thordon over at Hedge

6:41

Fund Telemetry, he's he joined us last

6:43

week and he just sent me a an IB on the

6:45

terminal. He said that SKH Highix and

6:47

Samsung now are 55%

6:50

of the total Korean market last Yeah.

6:53

this right now. I mean what what was the

6:55

Korean market like when you were when

6:57

you were covering these stocks, you

6:58

know, earlier in your career?

7:00

>> No, I mean that's a very good question.

7:02

Sam Samsung

7:04

was went from being a very important

7:06

company to being 20% of the market. So

7:09

Samsung's kind of position in the

7:11

spotlight has kind of ebed and flowed

7:14

over the years, but it's always pretty

7:16

much been there. Uh SK Hinx was kind of

7:18

the the the sort of weakling younger

7:20

brother that you kind of hoped would

7:22

survive, but kind of flirted with going

7:25

out of business for a long time. It's,

7:28

you know, time in the spotlight is very

7:30

very recent and and very very immediate

7:33

based upon this uh this recent

7:35

phenomenon, this AI surge. So a lot of

7:38

what is happening in that South Korean

7:40

market is dependent arguably more than

7:43

any other market on whether this AI

7:46

story pans out or whether as you

7:48

mentioned earlier this is all a bubble

7:49

and we're all going to go back down

7:51

again soon.

7:51

>> Oh, we got to end it there. Ian, I'm

7:53

just kidding. We're not going to end it

7:54

on the bubble comment. But but one final

7:56

question on a potential bubble. Just we

8:00

have 20 seconds left. Given that you've

8:01

covered different cycles, what would you

8:03

say about where we are right now? The

8:06

extent of how far it's gone up exceeds

8:08

all prior cycles and that creates

8:11

obviously downside risk to an extent

8:13

that we've never seen before as well in

8:15

this particular area.

8:16

>> Yian King, he covers semiconductors for

8:19

Bloomberg News. Intel, AMD, Texas

8:22

Instruments, Qualcomm, Applied

8:23

Materials, but we made him go outside of

8:25

the US and we made him go to memory chip

8:28

companies, too. And he does it all. Ian

8:30

is out there in our Bloomberg bureau in

8:32

San Francisco.

8:34

Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

8:36

Business Week Daily coming up after

8:38

this.

8:42

You're listening to the Bloomberg

8:43

Business Week Daily podcast. Catch us

8:46

live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5:00

8:48

p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay

8:50

and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

8:52

Business App

8:53

>> or watch us live on YouTube.

8:56

>> All right, Tim, I have a question for

8:57

you. Were you a mall rat?

8:59

>> I mean, everyone in the '90s was a mall

9:00

rat. We had

9:01

>> there wasn't that much to do in the 90s

9:02

and then go did you

9:03

>> Southern California 1990s

9:07

>> yeah skateboarding

9:08

>> did you have a puka necklace

9:10

>> I for a very brief time I did and there

9:12

might be uh pictures to prove it very

9:14

brief yeah

9:15

>> all right we're going to I'm a little

9:16

sad we don't have this I should have dug

9:17

this in advance

9:18

>> sixth grade seventh grade

9:19

>> we all make questionable fashion

9:20

decisions in middle school I mean listen

9:22

they were the thing and one of the it

9:23

brands when we were in high school of

9:25

course was Pack Sun's

9:27

gone through a lot of changes they filed

9:28

for bankruptcy in 2016 but now It's

9:31

back. It's rebranded and it's thriving.

9:33

And it's capitalizing on a couple

9:34

things, including this wave of

9:36

millennial nostalgia and a new

9:38

generation of shoppers who are more

9:39

socially aware, but no less fashionable

9:42

than we were uh when we were their age.

9:44

Uh Paxon CEO, Brienne Olsen, joins us

9:47

now. Her book Co-created, here we go. We

9:49

got right here, talks about the

9:50

turnaround of the company and how much

9:52

to my joy. She says, "Bick and mortar

9:54

stores are not dead. They just need to

9:56

reinvent themselves." Thank you so much

9:58

for coming on. You were telling us at

10:00

the break, you've been at the company a

10:02

long time and in your time I think you

10:04

said 17 18 years. In that time, how has

10:06

the company evolved into what it is now?

10:08

Yeah, I've been at the company almost

10:10

two decades. And when I joined, we were

10:12

a surf skate legacy retailer. And today,

10:16

after a transformation of almost two

10:18

decades and a real focus on the power of

10:20

co-creation, we have successfully moved

10:22

from being a retailer where Pacson's

10:25

brand was just on the outside of the

10:27

store to an actual brand that young

10:31

people today love. And so 50% of what we

10:34

sell in a Paxon store today now carries

10:36

the Paxon label.

10:38

>> How does that work in a world where, and

10:41

look, I'm going to totally age myself

10:43

here.

10:43

>> Oh, we've already we're both there.

10:44

>> You know, when I when I when I drop my

10:46

kids off at school, they're they're

10:47

young. They're three and seven, but when

10:48

I drop them off at school, I walk by a

10:49

middle school. And at the middle school,

10:51

these kids literally are dressing like

10:53

we used to dress when we were in middle

10:55

school. It is crazy. It's like the

10:57

widelegg jeans, like the same oversized

11:00

sweatshirts, like it's

11:01

>> the platform chunky sandals.

11:02

>> Here's the difference though. They are

11:04

all glued to iPhones and we didn't have

11:06

that. No.

11:07

>> And we didn't have that till relatively

11:09

recently. Again, not to date myself. Um,

11:12

how do you reach a consumer that is

11:15

glued to their phone?

11:16

>> So, as a brand centered at the youth, I

11:19

actually think all of these touch points

11:21

from a digital standpoint offer us a

11:23

real advantage. If you lean in and meet

11:26

the customer where they are. Pakistan

11:28

has two million followers on Tik Tok.

11:31

We're on Reddit. We're on Discord, on

11:33

IG. There's so many different ways to

11:35

engage with the consumer today. YouTube

11:38

Shorts. And so I talk about it as this

11:41

constant listening loop and listening

11:43

feedback. If you want to know something

11:44

in live time, you can just engage with

11:46

the consumer. And so the premise of my

11:49

book, Co-created, is really about

11:51

treating the consumer not like an

11:53

audience. We're not marketing to them.

11:55

We're not building product to then

11:57

market to them. Instead, on the reverse,

12:00

we're building with them. So, we've

12:02

brought the consumer in and we are

12:04

actually co-creating the future of our

12:06

brand with these young people. How does

12:09

that work in the creator economy? We've

12:11

seen so many brands kind of fumble those

12:13

opportunities. Is there a specific

12:15

strategy to taking advantage of people

12:17

who are exciting about the brand and

12:18

bringing them in in a way that feels not

12:20

exploitive but um you know communal and

12:23

productive?

12:24

>> Yeah, I think we've had tremendous

12:26

success in the creator economy and

12:28

really the brand has to shift the notion

12:31

of control. So you have to relinquish

12:34

and

12:34

>> but that's really hard because you get

12:35

paid to have control.

12:36

>> We have to relinquish some of the

12:38

control and build what I call brand and

12:41

community trust. And so by empowering

12:44

these young people to be your

12:47

storyteller, you are in essence enabling

12:50

them not only to create economic ability

12:53

for themselves, but also to storytell

12:56

and amplify in a way that is otherwise

12:58

impossible. And in 2023, a Pacon fan and

13:02

customer, Llaya Bixs, based in

13:04

Nashville, Tennessee, who had just

13:06

amassed 5,000 followers on Tik Tok, went

13:09

to her local Nashville store, bought a

13:11

pair of jeans, created a video in her

13:14

bedroom. She has 5,000 followers. She

13:16

sold 11,000 pairs of jeans in the next

13:19

36 hours. And so, it's the power of the

13:22

algorithm. It's the power of authentic

13:24

storytelling and really allowing to lean

13:27

into your into your community and

13:29

empower them.

13:30

>> So on that, if you look at the Paxon

13:32

website right now, there's, you know, a

13:33

dozen vertical videos that uh talk about

13:36

it says Pax Unstyled by you. Are are

13:38

these coming from how does this work?

13:41

Like are these are these collaborations

13:43

that you have with like actually actual

13:45

normal people or are these like thought

13:47

up in a marketing department and they're

13:49

like made to look like they'd see

13:51

vertical video? Like are these actually

13:52

like co like co-creators?

13:53

>> The majority of the videos you would see

13:55

on our site are actually co-creations.

13:58

So then we seek permission from those

14:00

creators and folks will tag you and then

14:02

you reach out.

14:03

>> Absolutely. And on Tik Tok with the open

14:06

creator platform, we actually don't

14:08

select any of the people who are then

14:11

advocating or promoting the brand. They

14:13

are selecting and we say everyone is

14:15

welcome. And there's a real magic and

14:17

synergy that happens in that. We're

14:19

speaking with Brienne Olsson, the CEO of

14:21

PAX Sun. She's the author of the new

14:23

book Co-created: The Cultural Strategy

14:25

That Redefined Pac.

14:27

Christina's got

14:28

>> Wait, I'm looking at the wrong camera

14:29

again. Sorry, it's not my usual studio.

14:30

There it is. There it is. Talk to us

14:32

about how you manage a brand turnaround

14:34

because the company did file for

14:35

bankruptcy in 2016. Um,

14:37

>> and you were there. You were there

14:38

pre-bankruptcy and post

14:39

>> and retail turnarounds are hard. Um,

14:42

partially because you do have a legacy

14:44

that can either a good or a bad thing.

14:46

reinvention can be really difficult when

14:48

customers have a certain way they think

14:49

about your brand. How do you do that?

14:51

How did you manage that and how do you

14:53

think it's been successful? So I've been

14:55

in the CEO role just over three years

14:57

now and I've been with the brand 18 plus

14:59

years and so the turnaround I would say

15:02

was absolutely a team effort and as

15:05

you'll see in the book co-created the

15:07

fingerprints and the stories of so many

15:09

different people brands creators and you

15:12

know leaders within our organization and

15:14

our brand associates are a part of this

15:16

beautiful story of co-creation but the

15:18

real honest truth is you have to do the

15:20

inside work first and we had to do a lot

15:23

of res-crubbing of our structure, our

15:26

internal organization, our operating

15:28

system, how quickly we were getting

15:30

product to market, the silos that had

15:32

existed in our organization for a long

15:34

time. And we did that by leading with

15:36

purpose. And I think a purpose-led brand

15:39

can perform better. And our results have

15:41

followed from the moment we established

15:43

our purpose, which is to inspire the

15:45

next generation of youth and create

15:47

community at the intersection of

15:49

fashion, sport, art, and music. we have

15:52

really been able to rally both our

15:54

internal teams and our external

15:56

constituents which include our community

15:59

brands creators all of the stakeholders.

16:01

>> I want to talk about some of those

16:02

stakeholders just that you just

16:04

mentioned the brands specifically if if

16:06

50% of what you're selling is packs

16:08

unlabeled and then then how do you

16:10

ensure the brands that they're going to

16:12

be given um you know both virtually and

16:16

physically shelf space that has

16:18

prominence. Yeah, I think listening to

16:21

the consumer, leveraging data,

16:24

leveraging our youth advisory council,

16:26

leveraging our Pakistan youth report

16:28

which surveys 6,000 young people. These

16:31

are ways that we can listen in a more

16:33

efficient way and then ensuring that

16:35

we're being true to our purpose and our

16:37

pillars. So, we have a long-standing

16:39

relationship with the Metropolitan

16:40

Museum of Art. The misconception is that

16:43

young people don't care about the arts.

16:46

But what we've been able to prove year

16:48

after year is that actually young people

16:50

do care about arts and they care about

16:52

the fine arts and they care about

16:54

self-expression. And so we were very

16:56

confident that this collaboration and

16:58

co-creation would work similar to

17:00

Formula 1. It's hot now, but we started

17:02

working with Formula 1 almost four and a

17:04

half, five years ago. So I think really

17:08

ensuring that we're staying at the pace

17:10

of culture and we're moving at the speed

17:12

of culture ensures that we stay that one

17:14

step ahead and ensures relevancy for the

17:17

products and brands that we curate and

17:19

bring into our store.

17:20

>> You said you have a annual youth report.

17:22

What are some of the surprising

17:23

takeaways when you read that report each

17:25

year? What are the some of the things

17:26

that stand out that surprised you even

17:27

though you've been in this business?

17:29

Yeah. So last year in the youth report

17:31

surveying 6,000 young people, Gen Alpha

17:33

and Gen C, one of the things that came

17:36

out was that music is the most important

17:39

piece of their life in terms of

17:42

self-expression and fashion. And so it

17:45

ranks higher than fashion. And so I

17:47

think music is this throughine for

17:49

people to express themselves and it's

17:52

variable and fluid, right? So I think

17:54

that was a big um kind of unlock.

17:57

Another unlock was mental health. And

18:00

mental health was both the largest

18:03

challenge but also opportunity when you

18:06

spoke to young people above physical

18:08

health and academia. But if you really

18:10

look at it, I think it actually shows

18:12

true optimism because these younger

18:14

generations are willing to lean in.

18:16

They're vulnerable. They're having the

18:18

conversations and they want to have the

18:20

conversation also in the workplace. And

18:22

so I think it's giving us an opportunity

18:24

as brands and corporations to really

18:27

rethink our social responsibility and

18:29

how does that tie into our corporate

18:31

responsibility. And so I think the youth

18:33

report from a data standpoint and deeply

18:36

understanding the emotive reasons that

18:38

consumers are shifting their buying

18:40

pattern, shifting consumption patterns

18:43

was absolutely important to kind of

18:45

strategizing our path forward.

18:47

>> We're going to talk more. We're going to

18:48

do some news and then we'll we'll come

18:50

back and and talk more with you. Uh

18:52

before we do that though, I want to talk

18:54

and we'll talk retail. Before we do that

18:56

though, I just want to go back to

18:57

marketing and and hear from you about

18:59

the mix of organic marketing versus

19:00

paid. Can you just give us like what

19:03

percentage goes is organic, what

19:05

percentage is paid?

19:06

>> We're at a pretty even 50/50 split.

19:08

Okay. And we did bring all of our paid

19:10

teams inhouse. So we're not leveraging

19:12

any agency. And that is a big pivot and

19:15

has proven to have significant results

19:17

because the people working on the team

19:19

are living and breathing the brand and

19:22

listening to our consumers. So I think

19:24

that's the biggest fundamental shift

19:25

that we've made.

19:26

>> And then what are they doing on on

19:27

social media to find those those

19:29

reliable voices, those people you want

19:31

to partner with?

19:32

>> I think first the first level of

19:34

partnership is looking at who's already

19:36

talking about your brand because they

19:37

are the authentic storytellers. So that

19:40

is usually our first step in identifying

19:42

a collaborator or co-creator.

19:44

>> Okay, we got a few more minutes with

19:45

you. I want to talk retail. I want to

19:47

talk about the future of the company.

19:48

Let's start with with retail. Uh unlike

19:51

some other companies in the last few

19:52

years who have decreased their retail

19:54

footprint, uh bricks and mortar

19:56

footprint, I should say. You guys are

19:57

actually opening stores. You opened 10

19:59

last year, you're opening 10 this year.

20:01

What is what is the way to get consumers

20:03

into the store? How do you do it? I

20:05

think first of all we open in areas and

20:08

malls where we already have a high

20:10

demand. So we look at the data we cross

20:12

>> there are fewer malls now. So like

20:14

there's so many malls that don't exist

20:16

anymore. There are empty malls.

20:17

>> I think there's about 450 really great

20:20

malls in the US and we're only in 305 of

20:23

them. So when I look at the white space

20:25

for expansion where there's real

20:27

customer demand for Pacon, there's still

20:30

quite a bit of runway there for us. And

20:33

we saw last year our store traffic in

20:36

our malls at Pacon was up 17%.

20:39

And so clearly consumers are voting for

20:42

Pacon. They want us to open stores and

20:44

they're looking for experiential retail.

20:46

So whether that's us showing up

20:47

trackside at Formula 1 in Austin or in

20:50

Miami where it's unexpected, Pacon has a

20:53

pop-up store at the track or it's what

20:57

we're doing with get ready with me the

20:59

night before New Year's Eve and getting

21:01

our consumers ready. We're bringing them

21:03

in and meeting them where they are in

21:04

their lives at that moment.

21:05

>> When did the name change from Paxon or

21:07

from Pacific Sun to Paxon?

21:08

>> About 15 years ago.

21:10

>> All right. So that's how that's how long

21:11

>> I mean I always called it Paxon. Did you

21:13

call it the whole thing?

21:14

>> Yeah. I mean, that's what it was called.

21:16

>> There's a fun on that actually.

21:18

>> Oh, there is.

21:19

>> Yeah. There's a nostalgic throwback and

21:21

younger people think it's really fun

21:22

that we used to be called Pacific

21:24

Sunware. So, we've brought it back

21:27

through capsules and it's been great.

21:28

>> When you look at appealing to this youth

21:31

customer, you were talking about in your

21:32

survey how they do care about the source

21:34

of things. They do care about arts. They

21:36

do care about ethics. I feel like that

21:38

runs into a couple other market trends,

21:41

including this love of like fast

21:43

fashion. So how do you how do you have

21:46

those two competing wins? How do you

21:48

make sure that you are keeping that

21:49

genuiness and that ingenuity and the

21:52

uniqueness and then also providing the

21:54

number of items and the churn that these

21:56

customers want? I think first of all we

21:58

have to acknowledge that the consumer is

22:00

under some price pressures and cost

22:02

pressures and I think by acknowledging

22:05

that you also acknowledge that they

22:06

might at some point shop at a brand that

22:09

might be considered fast fashion but

22:11

that at Pacon is not what we stand for.

22:13

We stand for quality first and foremost,

22:15

creating real exclusive product that

22:18

means something to them and will last in

22:20

their closet and giving it to them at

22:22

the best value that we can. And so we

22:25

recognize that fast, you know, the fast

22:27

fashion shopping might be a part of that

22:30

ecosystem, but we don't play into that

22:31

lane.

22:32

>> Pacon, before we go, we got to talk

22:34

business. Pacon was a publicly traded

22:37

company in the 1990s. It it IPOed. it

22:39

went private and then filed for

22:40

bankruptcy back in in 2016. Are you on

22:43

the path right now to become a public

22:44

company again?

22:45

>> We're certainly exploring that option.

22:47

>> Uh are you profitable now?

22:49

>> We're profitable. We just came in near a

22:52

billion dollars last year. That was from

22:55

700 plus million three years prior. A

22:58

billion dollars. So really exciting to

23:01

see the growth. And the growth has been

23:02

nice and steady over the last three

23:05

years. And we're seeing the growth

23:06

across both genders and across a

23:09

multitude of great brands inclusive of

23:10

the Pacon brands.

23:12

>> Brienne Olsen, she's the CEO of Pacon.

23:14

She's the author of the new book

23:15

co-created the cultural strategy that

23:18

redefined Pacon joining us here in the

23:20

Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.

23:21

Congratulations on the book and thank

23:22

you for joining us.

23:24

>> Thank you so much. And if you want to

23:25

bring back the Puka Shell necklace, we

23:26

know you have a model right here ready

23:28

to go.

23:29

>> Stay with us. More from Bloomberg

23:31

Business Week Daily coming up after

23:33

this.

23:37

You're listening to the Bloomberg

23:38

Business Week daily podcast. Catch us

23:41

live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5:00

23:43

p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay

23:45

and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

23:47

Business App or watch us live on

23:49

YouTube. President Donald Trump wants

23:52

lower rates, but accelerating inflation

23:53

and resistance from hawks on the Apple

23:55

MC leave little room to ease policy. Or

23:58

so the story goes. In reality, Anna

24:01

writes, "The bond market may have done

24:03

much of the heavy lifting already with

24:04

the 10-year Treasury yield rising 50

24:06

basis points since the start of the Iran

24:08

war." We've got Kelsey Barrow with us,

24:10

global fixed income, currency, and

24:12

commodities portfolio manager over at JP

24:14

Morgan Asset Management. She joins us

24:16

here in the Bloomberg Interactive

24:17

Brokers Studio. Welcome. Welcome. How

24:19

are you?

24:20

>> I'm well. How are you doing?

24:21

>> We're doing pretty well. What do you

24:22

make of um what uh our chief economist

24:24

Anna Wong is saying that a lot of the

24:26

heavy lifting is being done in the bond

24:28

market for the Fed chair?

24:30

>> Yeah, I I think that's fair. And in

24:32

terms of that difficult job that chair

24:35

Worsh is going to have, it's not just

24:37

the hawks that have changed or spoken

24:40

more loudly. It's also the people who

24:43

were uh previously doves on the

24:45

committee like chair uh governor Waller

24:48

who spoke last week and and he mentioned

24:51

that even he who had previously

24:53

dissented in favor of cuts because he

24:55

was concerned about the labor market is

24:57

now less concerned about the labor

24:59

market and endorses uh removing the

25:02

formal easing bias from the statement

25:04

which is why we had three dissents at

25:07

the last meeting. So what I think is

25:09

actually really interesting is the fact

25:10

that I think the consensus around what

25:13

the Fed is going to do at the June

25:14

meeting has essentially already been

25:17

formed. It's kind of frontr run uh Chair

25:19

Wars's first meeting.

25:21

>> But you said you think the bars are is

25:23

still with all that notwithstanding

25:24

pretty high for a hike. Why is that?

25:27

>> Yeah, that is true. So there is a big

25:29

difference between the Fed staying on

25:31

hold for an extended period of time

25:33

versus seriously considering rate hikes.

25:36

And I think there are a number of things

25:38

that the Fed would need to see to feel

25:40

that rate hikes are appropriate. Um the

25:43

first thing is where is policy now? Is

25:45

it appropriate or not? And I'll go back

25:47

to what Waller described policy as which

25:51

is neutral to modestly restrictive. So

25:54

if we keep policy rates around here, um

25:57

you know, we generally feel like it's a

25:59

pretty good place. And what would get us

26:02

to feel like that's not a good place

26:03

anymore? Well, if we saw inflation

26:06

expectations start to rise a lot, that

26:08

would be of concern. If we started to

26:11

see the labor market shift for out of

26:13

balance, so right now the labor market

26:15

is really an incredible equilibrium

26:17

where you have one job opening for every

26:20

unemployed. You know, we went from two

26:22

job openings to every unemployed. Lots

26:24

of

26:25

>> It took us a long time to get here.

26:26

>> Yeah, it it has. And we're kind of in

26:30

this stable equilibrium. And the

26:31

question is, are we going to continue on

26:34

this path of a gradually cooling labor

26:37

market that keeps the Fed comfortable or

26:40

are we start going to start to see an

26:42

inflection higher?

26:43

>> Well, what what do you think the biggest

26:44

challenge will be for the for the for

26:47

the new Fed chair uh when it comes to

26:49

the dual mandate? Is is he going to have

26:51

to be more focused on inflation or on

26:54

maximum employment?

26:56

>> Well, I think for now he's going to have

26:57

to be more focused on inflation. I was

27:00

remember he said inflation's a choice.

27:02

>> Yeah. No, I mean it it's part of his own

27:04

framework. I I think it's just right now

27:07

we're very much beholden still in the

27:09

rates market to energy. You look at the

27:13

movements in oil and you look at the

27:14

movements in yield in the US as well as

27:17

the rest of the world and they're still

27:19

very highly correlated. And I think if I

27:22

look back to where we were back in

27:23

March, you know, we thought there were

27:25

probably two likely outcomes. One is

27:27

that this war would be over by now. Oil

27:30

would have returned to where it was uh

27:33

pre-war and yields would be trading back

27:36

in line with the traditional growth and

27:38

inflation dynamics like they normally do

27:41

or you would get in a prolonged war

27:44

where oil actually went up to $150 and

27:48

we would have started to see demand

27:49

destruction. Yeah. What we actually have

27:51

end up is is in between those two

27:53

outcomes where oil is up enough that

27:56

central banks have to stay on hold. They

27:59

cannot credibly convince anyone that

28:02

they should be cutting rates right now.

28:03

But at the same time, oil isn't high

28:05

enough to really start to see companies

28:07

or consumers under stress. Talk to us a

28:09

little bit about the picture outside the

28:11

US. You know, we talked about these

28:12

factors that are true for our Federal

28:14

Reserve, but you know, I'm talking about

28:16

the more mixed picture you're seeing in

28:17

the UK, Canada, Australia, Euro zone.

28:19

like how does this play in?

28:21

>> So, this is really interesting. So, you

28:23

know, one of the reasons that we've had

28:25

some stability in the bond market over

28:27

the last few days, we've come come back

28:29

from some of these higher levels on the

28:31

10-year yield that we tested last week.

28:34

Part of that is oil. Part of that is

28:36

optimism around uh the straight being

28:38

real.

28:38

>> Yeah, don't get me started on that

28:39

optimism, but keep going. But some of it

28:42

is also because of stability in non US

28:46

uh bond markets and in other parts of

28:50

the world we actually are starting to

28:52

see economic data both inflation and

28:55

labor market data start to surprise to

28:58

the downside and actually constrain some

29:01

of the hawkishness of central banks. So

29:03

for example in Australia you've seen

29:06

weaker labor market data. They've been

29:08

very hawkish. They've been hiking. Now

29:10

they are under this question. Do we

29:12

really need to be hiking any further?

29:14

The ECB, they've signaled to us that

29:16

they're going to deliver a hike in June,

29:18

but will they be able to deliver any

29:20

more if the growth data continues to

29:22

look squishy? So, we are starting to see

29:24

and the US is a bit of anomaly right now

29:26

because the data has been so resilient.

29:28

But outside of the US, there probably is

29:31

already becoming a point for some

29:33

economies where the data is constraining

29:36

to a certain extent uh how hawkish

29:39

central banks can be in the face of

29:40

higher energy prices.

29:42

>> The what about the higher yield on the

29:44

longer end of the curve just in the last

29:46

couple of weeks? What we saw in happen

29:48

with the 30-year?

29:49

>> Yep. Yeah. So, we've been seeing a

29:51

little bit of uh a move higher in

29:54

yields. Uh I would say it's been

29:57

somewhat parallel. Um, if you look at

29:59

the 530s curve, for example, it's it's

30:01

actually been been flattening more

30:03

recently. And what we're hearing is that

30:06

this move higher in yields has actually

30:08

been met by more demand. And to me, this

30:10

is interesting because it does

30:12

differentiate this period from 2025. So,

30:15

we had a similar selloff to similar

30:17

yield levels a year ago, right? And at

30:20

that time, it was all on the back of

30:22

liberation day. And there was a lot of

30:25

narratives in the market about getting

30:26

rid of your US fixed income, right?

30:28

Getting rid of the dollar, sell America,

30:31

all of these themes. This time around,

30:34

as yields have moved higher, we've

30:36

actually seen demand and flows come to

30:39

match those higher yields, particularly

30:42

when you look outside of rates and you

30:44

look out into credit.

30:45

>> Okay.

30:46

>> All right. We've only got about 30

30:47

seconds, but talk to me quickly about

30:49

Japan. Is it stabilizing? Is it still

30:51

anchorless? I'm fascinated by this

30:53

story. what is going on there?

30:54

>> Yeah, I anchorless is a great descriptor

30:56

for the the Japanese bond market and I

30:59

think there's a couple challenges. One

31:01

is on the monetary policy side, which is

31:03

they've been very slow to hike rates.

31:06

Um, and the markets are kind of seeing

31:08

through that and as a result, you've

31:10

seen this really incredible convergence

31:12

of inflation break evens between uh

31:16

Japan and the US. That is an amazing

31:18

chart. You can pull up the 10-year

31:20

Japanese break even and the 10-year US

31:22

break even. they've converged and it's

31:24

all coming from actually higher

31:25

inflation expectations in Japan. So we

31:28

have that challenge. On the other hand,

31:30

we also have this challenge around uh

31:32

fiscal. You know, what are they going to

31:34

do? I do think that there is some room

31:37

for both the monetary policy and the

31:40

fiscal policy to kind of step in and

31:42

stabilize the market here. And you are

31:43

starting to see that.

31:44

>> Kelsey Barrow,

31:46

>> got to get you back soon. Not enough

31:48

time. Global Fixed Income Currency and

31:50

Commodities Portfolio Manager over at JP

31:52

Morgan Asset Management.

31:55

>> This is the Bloomberg Business Week

31:56

daily podcast available on Apple,

31:59

Spotify, and anywhere else you get your

32:02

podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons

32:04

from 2 to 5:00 p.m. Eastern, on

32:06

Bloomberg.com, the iHeart Radio app,

32:09

TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app.

32:12

You can also watch us live every weekday

32:14

on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg

32:17

terminal.

Interactive Summary

The podcast explores various segments including the semiconductor industry, particularly focusing on the rapid growth and valuation of Korean memory chip manufacturers like SK Hynix and Samsung amidst the AI boom. It also features an interview with PacSun CEO Brienne Olsen on brand reinvention, community co-creation, and the importance of physical retail. Finally, it touches on macroeconomic trends, the bond market, and global central bank policies with JP Morgan's Kelsey Barrow.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts