Memory Chip Frenzy Sends SK Hynix, Micron Into $1T Club | Bloomberg Businessweek
926 segments
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts,
radio, news.
>> This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily
reporting from the magazine that helps
global leaders stay ahead with insight
on the people, companies, and trends
shaping today's complex economy. Plus,
global business, finance, and tech news
as it happens. The Bloomberg Business
Week Daily podcast with Carol Masser and
Tim Stenc on Bloomberg Radio.
>> Ian King is Bloomberg News US
semiconductor. He joins us.
Semiconductor reporter. He joins us from
>> He's not our semiconductor. He's our
semiconductor reporter. Uh not yet, Ian.
>> Although he thinks just as quickly. He
thinks just as quickly.
>> Maybe one day soon they will they will
make a robot Ian King. But today we are
glad to have the real human being Ian
King. Ian, we're glad to have you
because you have such great experience
not just covering different
semiconductor cycles, but also living in
Korea earlier in your career and just
seeing what's going on in the Korean
market right now with memory chip
stocks. I mean, what is what is your
reaction here? Have you ever seen
anything like this in your career?
>> To the extent that they've gone up,
absolutely not. We've certainly seen
booms and busts for these companies uh
along the way. I was there when he was
actually created as a force merger by
the government. This was, you know, two
companies, LG Semiconductor and Hyundai
Electronics that were sort of on their
way out of business. Things were that
bad. And now in combination owned by the
SK Group, it's uh worth more than a
trillion dollars. This was not something
that anybody would have believed um even
a few short years ago.
>> Do you think that growth is sustainable?
And there are more people, more
whispers. There's still whispers talking
about bubbles, not just in AI, but in
these chip manufacturers. I mean,
there's uh thank you to Bloomberg, who's
now adapted my algorithm online to feed
me finance memes. Uh and there's one
going around talking about all these
trillion dollar valuations and how that
is worth more than all the farmable land
in Australia and they go, "It's fine.
It's fine. We're making money. We're
making money. Just buy." Are there real
concerns here about these valuations and
how big they're getting?
>> I mean, there there absolutely have has
to be. I mean, we've seen an enor amount
of money come flowing in, but that's
very much for the market to decide. And
if you look at some of the other
metrics, these companies are actually
cheap. What a trillion dollar company
that's cheap. But look at the the
forward pees for these companies. We've
got one, I think Micron's about 15. You
know, he is less than 10, which means
that Wall Street analysis believes that
these companies fundamentally have a
massive earnings growth spurt ahead of
them and that investors haven't actually
caught up. Who knows? Obviously, we
don't know. And we, as I've said, we've
seen massive boom and busts in this
industry in the past. It wasn't what, 3
years ago, and they're actually losing
money. So, who knows? But, um, you know,
there is certainly a ground swell of
opinion that believes this time is
different. Arguably the most dangerous
words anybody can ever say, right?
>> That's what people believe.
>> I'm glad you couched it with that, Ian.
Hey, um I I do want to know a little bit
just about sort of the chip ecosystem
when we're talking about these memory
names. We had uh Eric Weiner join us a
little earlier along with Sarah Hunt
over at Alpine Sax and Woods who who
covers markets. And you know, we kind of
had this exchange where they talked
about, yeah, higher memory prices,
they're a good thing for, you know,
SKHEX and and Micron and a handful of
other companies, but not necessarily a
good thing for the companies that are
are the customers. talk a little bit
about the way that it's affected those
companies because we have seen some
companies such as Apple, you know,
they're able to navigate this, but but
who who are the losers when memory gets
this expensive?
>> Yeah. I mean, 85% gross margins at these
companies tells you all you need to know
about their pricing power. So
>> amazing.
>> Yeah.
>> And that's for hardware. Like that's
crazy.
>> Those are like software,
that's that's insane. uh and the these
companies own manufacturing facilities
as well. They're not just designing
these chips and outsourcing. They
actually own these multi-billion dollar
plants and they are running them uh at
that kind of level. So, this is
obviously a great market for them right
now. But to answer your question, um PC
market, we're going to see HP report
today, Dell I believe tomorrow. So,
these guys the prices of of what their
their components has gone up massively.
Obviously, we've seen the influence on
the smartphone market. Companies like
Qualcomm have had to rein back their
outlook for the number of devices that
get built because we've seen this
massive shift of production into the
higher value, higher margin sort of high
bandwidth memory that's going into these
massive data centers. So that's, you
know, supply and demand is elastic.
These companies there aren't really new
players coming into the market because
you can't because of the the high
barriers to entry. So that's that's what
the market dynamics are right now. If
you're a device maker, then you know
times are tough, right? Your margins are
getting squeezed.
>> And we've also seen the impact some of
these uh companies have had on the South
Korean economy and even the Cosby, which
overtook the UK and then overtook
Canada's stock exchange and is now I
think the seventh largest in the world.
Talk to us about what that does for the
economy overall in South Korea. And
there is also this concern that if the
straight of hormone stays closed, this
this energy crunch is going to be
acutely felt in Asia first. Any chance
that that's going to impact these uh
these huge growths that we've seen in
some of these companies?
>> I mean the company that we've not
mentioned is Samsung Electronics which
is actually a larger memory manufacturer
than both of these guys and obviously
that's a South Korean company as well.
So the combination of SKHEX and
Samsung's success has clearly had a
massive impact. Samsung has always been
central to the Korean economy and the
Korean story. This is, you know, the
first arguably their first worldclass
company that proved that, you know, the
the export economy could work for Korea
and and helped with their success and
we've seen that filter into other areas
of their economy. On the flip side, yes,
South Korea is an energy importer. Um,
it has nuclear power, but it'll is is
still heavily dependent on outside
sources of of energy.
That's going to be, you know, cost and
and
negative for these companies, but, you
know, it's not going to hold back
production of memory chips at Samsung or
SKH Heinix. You know, they're going to
go full ahead of that. We've seen them
even get over their historic kind of
tension with the labor unions there. You
know, we've found a way and and you
know, everything's moving forward.
That's an economy that's very focused on
this success story.
>> You know, Thomas Thordon over at Hedge
Fund Telemetry, he's he joined us last
week and he just sent me a an IB on the
terminal. He said that SKH Highix and
Samsung now are 55%
of the total Korean market last Yeah.
this right now. I mean what what was the
Korean market like when you were when
you were covering these stocks, you
know, earlier in your career?
>> No, I mean that's a very good question.
Sam Samsung
was went from being a very important
company to being 20% of the market. So
Samsung's kind of position in the
spotlight has kind of ebed and flowed
over the years, but it's always pretty
much been there. Uh SK Hinx was kind of
the the the sort of weakling younger
brother that you kind of hoped would
survive, but kind of flirted with going
out of business for a long time. It's,
you know, time in the spotlight is very
very recent and and very very immediate
based upon this uh this recent
phenomenon, this AI surge. So a lot of
what is happening in that South Korean
market is dependent arguably more than
any other market on whether this AI
story pans out or whether as you
mentioned earlier this is all a bubble
and we're all going to go back down
again soon.
>> Oh, we got to end it there. Ian, I'm
just kidding. We're not going to end it
on the bubble comment. But but one final
question on a potential bubble. Just we
have 20 seconds left. Given that you've
covered different cycles, what would you
say about where we are right now? The
extent of how far it's gone up exceeds
all prior cycles and that creates
obviously downside risk to an extent
that we've never seen before as well in
this particular area.
>> Yian King, he covers semiconductors for
Bloomberg News. Intel, AMD, Texas
Instruments, Qualcomm, Applied
Materials, but we made him go outside of
the US and we made him go to memory chip
companies, too. And he does it all. Ian
is out there in our Bloomberg bureau in
San Francisco.
Stay with us. More from Bloomberg
Business Week Daily coming up after
this.
You're listening to the Bloomberg
Business Week Daily podcast. Catch us
live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5:00
p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay
and Android Auto with the Bloomberg
Business App
>> or watch us live on YouTube.
>> All right, Tim, I have a question for
you. Were you a mall rat?
>> I mean, everyone in the '90s was a mall
rat. We had
>> there wasn't that much to do in the 90s
and then go did you
>> Southern California 1990s
>> yeah skateboarding
>> did you have a puka necklace
>> I for a very brief time I did and there
might be uh pictures to prove it very
brief yeah
>> all right we're going to I'm a little
sad we don't have this I should have dug
this in advance
>> sixth grade seventh grade
>> we all make questionable fashion
decisions in middle school I mean listen
they were the thing and one of the it
brands when we were in high school of
course was Pack Sun's
gone through a lot of changes they filed
for bankruptcy in 2016 but now It's
back. It's rebranded and it's thriving.
And it's capitalizing on a couple
things, including this wave of
millennial nostalgia and a new
generation of shoppers who are more
socially aware, but no less fashionable
than we were uh when we were their age.
Uh Paxon CEO, Brienne Olsen, joins us
now. Her book Co-created, here we go. We
got right here, talks about the
turnaround of the company and how much
to my joy. She says, "Bick and mortar
stores are not dead. They just need to
reinvent themselves." Thank you so much
for coming on. You were telling us at
the break, you've been at the company a
long time and in your time I think you
said 17 18 years. In that time, how has
the company evolved into what it is now?
Yeah, I've been at the company almost
two decades. And when I joined, we were
a surf skate legacy retailer. And today,
after a transformation of almost two
decades and a real focus on the power of
co-creation, we have successfully moved
from being a retailer where Pacson's
brand was just on the outside of the
store to an actual brand that young
people today love. And so 50% of what we
sell in a Paxon store today now carries
the Paxon label.
>> How does that work in a world where, and
look, I'm going to totally age myself
here.
>> Oh, we've already we're both there.
>> You know, when I when I when I drop my
kids off at school, they're they're
young. They're three and seven, but when
I drop them off at school, I walk by a
middle school. And at the middle school,
these kids literally are dressing like
we used to dress when we were in middle
school. It is crazy. It's like the
widelegg jeans, like the same oversized
sweatshirts, like it's
>> the platform chunky sandals.
>> Here's the difference though. They are
all glued to iPhones and we didn't have
that. No.
>> And we didn't have that till relatively
recently. Again, not to date myself. Um,
how do you reach a consumer that is
glued to their phone?
>> So, as a brand centered at the youth, I
actually think all of these touch points
from a digital standpoint offer us a
real advantage. If you lean in and meet
the customer where they are. Pakistan
has two million followers on Tik Tok.
We're on Reddit. We're on Discord, on
IG. There's so many different ways to
engage with the consumer today. YouTube
Shorts. And so I talk about it as this
constant listening loop and listening
feedback. If you want to know something
in live time, you can just engage with
the consumer. And so the premise of my
book, Co-created, is really about
treating the consumer not like an
audience. We're not marketing to them.
We're not building product to then
market to them. Instead, on the reverse,
we're building with them. So, we've
brought the consumer in and we are
actually co-creating the future of our
brand with these young people. How does
that work in the creator economy? We've
seen so many brands kind of fumble those
opportunities. Is there a specific
strategy to taking advantage of people
who are exciting about the brand and
bringing them in in a way that feels not
exploitive but um you know communal and
productive?
>> Yeah, I think we've had tremendous
success in the creator economy and
really the brand has to shift the notion
of control. So you have to relinquish
and
>> but that's really hard because you get
paid to have control.
>> We have to relinquish some of the
control and build what I call brand and
community trust. And so by empowering
these young people to be your
storyteller, you are in essence enabling
them not only to create economic ability
for themselves, but also to storytell
and amplify in a way that is otherwise
impossible. And in 2023, a Pacon fan and
customer, Llaya Bixs, based in
Nashville, Tennessee, who had just
amassed 5,000 followers on Tik Tok, went
to her local Nashville store, bought a
pair of jeans, created a video in her
bedroom. She has 5,000 followers. She
sold 11,000 pairs of jeans in the next
36 hours. And so, it's the power of the
algorithm. It's the power of authentic
storytelling and really allowing to lean
into your into your community and
empower them.
>> So on that, if you look at the Paxon
website right now, there's, you know, a
dozen vertical videos that uh talk about
it says Pax Unstyled by you. Are are
these coming from how does this work?
Like are these are these collaborations
that you have with like actually actual
normal people or are these like thought
up in a marketing department and they're
like made to look like they'd see
vertical video? Like are these actually
like co like co-creators?
>> The majority of the videos you would see
on our site are actually co-creations.
So then we seek permission from those
creators and folks will tag you and then
you reach out.
>> Absolutely. And on Tik Tok with the open
creator platform, we actually don't
select any of the people who are then
advocating or promoting the brand. They
are selecting and we say everyone is
welcome. And there's a real magic and
synergy that happens in that. We're
speaking with Brienne Olsson, the CEO of
PAX Sun. She's the author of the new
book Co-created: The Cultural Strategy
That Redefined Pac.
Christina's got
>> Wait, I'm looking at the wrong camera
again. Sorry, it's not my usual studio.
There it is. There it is. Talk to us
about how you manage a brand turnaround
because the company did file for
bankruptcy in 2016. Um,
>> and you were there. You were there
pre-bankruptcy and post
>> and retail turnarounds are hard. Um,
partially because you do have a legacy
that can either a good or a bad thing.
reinvention can be really difficult when
customers have a certain way they think
about your brand. How do you do that?
How did you manage that and how do you
think it's been successful? So I've been
in the CEO role just over three years
now and I've been with the brand 18 plus
years and so the turnaround I would say
was absolutely a team effort and as
you'll see in the book co-created the
fingerprints and the stories of so many
different people brands creators and you
know leaders within our organization and
our brand associates are a part of this
beautiful story of co-creation but the
real honest truth is you have to do the
inside work first and we had to do a lot
of res-crubbing of our structure, our
internal organization, our operating
system, how quickly we were getting
product to market, the silos that had
existed in our organization for a long
time. And we did that by leading with
purpose. And I think a purpose-led brand
can perform better. And our results have
followed from the moment we established
our purpose, which is to inspire the
next generation of youth and create
community at the intersection of
fashion, sport, art, and music. we have
really been able to rally both our
internal teams and our external
constituents which include our community
brands creators all of the stakeholders.
>> I want to talk about some of those
stakeholders just that you just
mentioned the brands specifically if if
50% of what you're selling is packs
unlabeled and then then how do you
ensure the brands that they're going to
be given um you know both virtually and
physically shelf space that has
prominence. Yeah, I think listening to
the consumer, leveraging data,
leveraging our youth advisory council,
leveraging our Pakistan youth report
which surveys 6,000 young people. These
are ways that we can listen in a more
efficient way and then ensuring that
we're being true to our purpose and our
pillars. So, we have a long-standing
relationship with the Metropolitan
Museum of Art. The misconception is that
young people don't care about the arts.
But what we've been able to prove year
after year is that actually young people
do care about arts and they care about
the fine arts and they care about
self-expression. And so we were very
confident that this collaboration and
co-creation would work similar to
Formula 1. It's hot now, but we started
working with Formula 1 almost four and a
half, five years ago. So I think really
ensuring that we're staying at the pace
of culture and we're moving at the speed
of culture ensures that we stay that one
step ahead and ensures relevancy for the
products and brands that we curate and
bring into our store.
>> You said you have a annual youth report.
What are some of the surprising
takeaways when you read that report each
year? What are the some of the things
that stand out that surprised you even
though you've been in this business?
Yeah. So last year in the youth report
surveying 6,000 young people, Gen Alpha
and Gen C, one of the things that came
out was that music is the most important
piece of their life in terms of
self-expression and fashion. And so it
ranks higher than fashion. And so I
think music is this throughine for
people to express themselves and it's
variable and fluid, right? So I think
that was a big um kind of unlock.
Another unlock was mental health. And
mental health was both the largest
challenge but also opportunity when you
spoke to young people above physical
health and academia. But if you really
look at it, I think it actually shows
true optimism because these younger
generations are willing to lean in.
They're vulnerable. They're having the
conversations and they want to have the
conversation also in the workplace. And
so I think it's giving us an opportunity
as brands and corporations to really
rethink our social responsibility and
how does that tie into our corporate
responsibility. And so I think the youth
report from a data standpoint and deeply
understanding the emotive reasons that
consumers are shifting their buying
pattern, shifting consumption patterns
was absolutely important to kind of
strategizing our path forward.
>> We're going to talk more. We're going to
do some news and then we'll we'll come
back and and talk more with you. Uh
before we do that though, I want to talk
and we'll talk retail. Before we do that
though, I just want to go back to
marketing and and hear from you about
the mix of organic marketing versus
paid. Can you just give us like what
percentage goes is organic, what
percentage is paid?
>> We're at a pretty even 50/50 split.
Okay. And we did bring all of our paid
teams inhouse. So we're not leveraging
any agency. And that is a big pivot and
has proven to have significant results
because the people working on the team
are living and breathing the brand and
listening to our consumers. So I think
that's the biggest fundamental shift
that we've made.
>> And then what are they doing on on
social media to find those those
reliable voices, those people you want
to partner with?
>> I think first the first level of
partnership is looking at who's already
talking about your brand because they
are the authentic storytellers. So that
is usually our first step in identifying
a collaborator or co-creator.
>> Okay, we got a few more minutes with
you. I want to talk retail. I want to
talk about the future of the company.
Let's start with with retail. Uh unlike
some other companies in the last few
years who have decreased their retail
footprint, uh bricks and mortar
footprint, I should say. You guys are
actually opening stores. You opened 10
last year, you're opening 10 this year.
What is what is the way to get consumers
into the store? How do you do it? I
think first of all we open in areas and
malls where we already have a high
demand. So we look at the data we cross
>> there are fewer malls now. So like
there's so many malls that don't exist
anymore. There are empty malls.
>> I think there's about 450 really great
malls in the US and we're only in 305 of
them. So when I look at the white space
for expansion where there's real
customer demand for Pacon, there's still
quite a bit of runway there for us. And
we saw last year our store traffic in
our malls at Pacon was up 17%.
And so clearly consumers are voting for
Pacon. They want us to open stores and
they're looking for experiential retail.
So whether that's us showing up
trackside at Formula 1 in Austin or in
Miami where it's unexpected, Pacon has a
pop-up store at the track or it's what
we're doing with get ready with me the
night before New Year's Eve and getting
our consumers ready. We're bringing them
in and meeting them where they are in
their lives at that moment.
>> When did the name change from Paxon or
from Pacific Sun to Paxon?
>> About 15 years ago.
>> All right. So that's how that's how long
>> I mean I always called it Paxon. Did you
call it the whole thing?
>> Yeah. I mean, that's what it was called.
>> There's a fun on that actually.
>> Oh, there is.
>> Yeah. There's a nostalgic throwback and
younger people think it's really fun
that we used to be called Pacific
Sunware. So, we've brought it back
through capsules and it's been great.
>> When you look at appealing to this youth
customer, you were talking about in your
survey how they do care about the source
of things. They do care about arts. They
do care about ethics. I feel like that
runs into a couple other market trends,
including this love of like fast
fashion. So how do you how do you have
those two competing wins? How do you
make sure that you are keeping that
genuiness and that ingenuity and the
uniqueness and then also providing the
number of items and the churn that these
customers want? I think first of all we
have to acknowledge that the consumer is
under some price pressures and cost
pressures and I think by acknowledging
that you also acknowledge that they
might at some point shop at a brand that
might be considered fast fashion but
that at Pacon is not what we stand for.
We stand for quality first and foremost,
creating real exclusive product that
means something to them and will last in
their closet and giving it to them at
the best value that we can. And so we
recognize that fast, you know, the fast
fashion shopping might be a part of that
ecosystem, but we don't play into that
lane.
>> Pacon, before we go, we got to talk
business. Pacon was a publicly traded
company in the 1990s. It it IPOed. it
went private and then filed for
bankruptcy back in in 2016. Are you on
the path right now to become a public
company again?
>> We're certainly exploring that option.
>> Uh are you profitable now?
>> We're profitable. We just came in near a
billion dollars last year. That was from
700 plus million three years prior. A
billion dollars. So really exciting to
see the growth. And the growth has been
nice and steady over the last three
years. And we're seeing the growth
across both genders and across a
multitude of great brands inclusive of
the Pacon brands.
>> Brienne Olsen, she's the CEO of Pacon.
She's the author of the new book
co-created the cultural strategy that
redefined Pacon joining us here in the
Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio.
Congratulations on the book and thank
you for joining us.
>> Thank you so much. And if you want to
bring back the Puka Shell necklace, we
know you have a model right here ready
to go.
>> Stay with us. More from Bloomberg
Business Week Daily coming up after
this.
You're listening to the Bloomberg
Business Week daily podcast. Catch us
live weekday afternoons from 2 to 5:00
p.m. Eastern. Listen on Apple CarPlay
and Android Auto with the Bloomberg
Business App or watch us live on
YouTube. President Donald Trump wants
lower rates, but accelerating inflation
and resistance from hawks on the Apple
MC leave little room to ease policy. Or
so the story goes. In reality, Anna
writes, "The bond market may have done
much of the heavy lifting already with
the 10-year Treasury yield rising 50
basis points since the start of the Iran
war." We've got Kelsey Barrow with us,
global fixed income, currency, and
commodities portfolio manager over at JP
Morgan Asset Management. She joins us
here in the Bloomberg Interactive
Brokers Studio. Welcome. Welcome. How
are you?
>> I'm well. How are you doing?
>> We're doing pretty well. What do you
make of um what uh our chief economist
Anna Wong is saying that a lot of the
heavy lifting is being done in the bond
market for the Fed chair?
>> Yeah, I I think that's fair. And in
terms of that difficult job that chair
Worsh is going to have, it's not just
the hawks that have changed or spoken
more loudly. It's also the people who
were uh previously doves on the
committee like chair uh governor Waller
who spoke last week and and he mentioned
that even he who had previously
dissented in favor of cuts because he
was concerned about the labor market is
now less concerned about the labor
market and endorses uh removing the
formal easing bias from the statement
which is why we had three dissents at
the last meeting. So what I think is
actually really interesting is the fact
that I think the consensus around what
the Fed is going to do at the June
meeting has essentially already been
formed. It's kind of frontr run uh Chair
Wars's first meeting.
>> But you said you think the bars are is
still with all that notwithstanding
pretty high for a hike. Why is that?
>> Yeah, that is true. So there is a big
difference between the Fed staying on
hold for an extended period of time
versus seriously considering rate hikes.
And I think there are a number of things
that the Fed would need to see to feel
that rate hikes are appropriate. Um the
first thing is where is policy now? Is
it appropriate or not? And I'll go back
to what Waller described policy as which
is neutral to modestly restrictive. So
if we keep policy rates around here, um
you know, we generally feel like it's a
pretty good place. And what would get us
to feel like that's not a good place
anymore? Well, if we saw inflation
expectations start to rise a lot, that
would be of concern. If we started to
see the labor market shift for out of
balance, so right now the labor market
is really an incredible equilibrium
where you have one job opening for every
unemployed. You know, we went from two
job openings to every unemployed. Lots
of
>> It took us a long time to get here.
>> Yeah, it it has. And we're kind of in
this stable equilibrium. And the
question is, are we going to continue on
this path of a gradually cooling labor
market that keeps the Fed comfortable or
are we start going to start to see an
inflection higher?
>> Well, what what do you think the biggest
challenge will be for the for the for
the new Fed chair uh when it comes to
the dual mandate? Is is he going to have
to be more focused on inflation or on
maximum employment?
>> Well, I think for now he's going to have
to be more focused on inflation. I was
remember he said inflation's a choice.
>> Yeah. No, I mean it it's part of his own
framework. I I think it's just right now
we're very much beholden still in the
rates market to energy. You look at the
movements in oil and you look at the
movements in yield in the US as well as
the rest of the world and they're still
very highly correlated. And I think if I
look back to where we were back in
March, you know, we thought there were
probably two likely outcomes. One is
that this war would be over by now. Oil
would have returned to where it was uh
pre-war and yields would be trading back
in line with the traditional growth and
inflation dynamics like they normally do
or you would get in a prolonged war
where oil actually went up to $150 and
we would have started to see demand
destruction. Yeah. What we actually have
end up is is in between those two
outcomes where oil is up enough that
central banks have to stay on hold. They
cannot credibly convince anyone that
they should be cutting rates right now.
But at the same time, oil isn't high
enough to really start to see companies
or consumers under stress. Talk to us a
little bit about the picture outside the
US. You know, we talked about these
factors that are true for our Federal
Reserve, but you know, I'm talking about
the more mixed picture you're seeing in
the UK, Canada, Australia, Euro zone.
like how does this play in?
>> So, this is really interesting. So, you
know, one of the reasons that we've had
some stability in the bond market over
the last few days, we've come come back
from some of these higher levels on the
10-year yield that we tested last week.
Part of that is oil. Part of that is
optimism around uh the straight being
real.
>> Yeah, don't get me started on that
optimism, but keep going. But some of it
is also because of stability in non US
uh bond markets and in other parts of
the world we actually are starting to
see economic data both inflation and
labor market data start to surprise to
the downside and actually constrain some
of the hawkishness of central banks. So
for example in Australia you've seen
weaker labor market data. They've been
very hawkish. They've been hiking. Now
they are under this question. Do we
really need to be hiking any further?
The ECB, they've signaled to us that
they're going to deliver a hike in June,
but will they be able to deliver any
more if the growth data continues to
look squishy? So, we are starting to see
and the US is a bit of anomaly right now
because the data has been so resilient.
But outside of the US, there probably is
already becoming a point for some
economies where the data is constraining
to a certain extent uh how hawkish
central banks can be in the face of
higher energy prices.
>> The what about the higher yield on the
longer end of the curve just in the last
couple of weeks? What we saw in happen
with the 30-year?
>> Yep. Yeah. So, we've been seeing a
little bit of uh a move higher in
yields. Uh I would say it's been
somewhat parallel. Um, if you look at
the 530s curve, for example, it's it's
actually been been flattening more
recently. And what we're hearing is that
this move higher in yields has actually
been met by more demand. And to me, this
is interesting because it does
differentiate this period from 2025. So,
we had a similar selloff to similar
yield levels a year ago, right? And at
that time, it was all on the back of
liberation day. And there was a lot of
narratives in the market about getting
rid of your US fixed income, right?
Getting rid of the dollar, sell America,
all of these themes. This time around,
as yields have moved higher, we've
actually seen demand and flows come to
match those higher yields, particularly
when you look outside of rates and you
look out into credit.
>> Okay.
>> All right. We've only got about 30
seconds, but talk to me quickly about
Japan. Is it stabilizing? Is it still
anchorless? I'm fascinated by this
story. what is going on there?
>> Yeah, I anchorless is a great descriptor
for the the Japanese bond market and I
think there's a couple challenges. One
is on the monetary policy side, which is
they've been very slow to hike rates.
Um, and the markets are kind of seeing
through that and as a result, you've
seen this really incredible convergence
of inflation break evens between uh
Japan and the US. That is an amazing
chart. You can pull up the 10-year
Japanese break even and the 10-year US
break even. they've converged and it's
all coming from actually higher
inflation expectations in Japan. So we
have that challenge. On the other hand,
we also have this challenge around uh
fiscal. You know, what are they going to
do? I do think that there is some room
for both the monetary policy and the
fiscal policy to kind of step in and
stabilize the market here. And you are
starting to see that.
>> Kelsey Barrow,
>> got to get you back soon. Not enough
time. Global Fixed Income Currency and
Commodities Portfolio Manager over at JP
Morgan Asset Management.
>> This is the Bloomberg Business Week
daily podcast available on Apple,
Spotify, and anywhere else you get your
podcasts. Listen live weekday afternoons
from 2 to 5:00 p.m. Eastern, on
Bloomberg.com, the iHeart Radio app,
TuneIn, and the Bloomberg Business app.
You can also watch us live every weekday
on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg
terminal.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The podcast explores various segments including the semiconductor industry, particularly focusing on the rapid growth and valuation of Korean memory chip manufacturers like SK Hynix and Samsung amidst the AI boom. It also features an interview with PacSun CEO Brienne Olsen on brand reinvention, community co-creation, and the importance of physical retail. Finally, it touches on macroeconomic trends, the bond market, and global central bank policies with JP Morgan's Kelsey Barrow.
Videos recently processed by our community