How Private Equity Turns Your Favorite Channels Into Slop
626 segments
Take a look at the YouTube channels that
you're subscribed to. There's a good
chance at least one of them was quietly
sold to private equity.
But hold on, how? The creator is still
there and the thumbnails look the same,
but behind the scenes, the same guides
behind Blackstone are now calling the
shots for your favorite creator. And
unlike an Adie, the creator is under no
legal obligation to tell you that the
channel quietly changed hands. So
really, you actually have no idea
whether this channel was bought out too
or not.
It's not. It turns out it's not slowing
down because private equity firms have
quietly spent over $4 billion buying
YouTube channels. But what's weird is
that it's not even really going that
great. Early signs are seeing the
creators who built the channels walking
out, videos starting to slowly suck, and
the private equity firm that bought them
can't even milk the ad dollars that they
were counting on. So then why is private
equity continuing to double down? Well,
because what they're really paying for
is your trust. Trust that doesn't just
sell VPNs and mattresses, but trust that
can help pick whichever candidate
protects private equity's interest. And
not only was 2024 proof of this, it's
just the beginning. And so I followed
the money across every deal that I could
find and mapped out exactly how this
works and what will happen in the
future. And what I found is that it's
looking increasingly likely that private
equity is about to take it all for
themselves. And if something doesn't
change, we won't just lose the platform
that we all love, but the last bastion
of trust at a time when there's nothing
much left to trust.
So to understand this whole thing, I
think the best way is by showing you how
a private equity firm even buys a
YouTube channel. And I'll show you by
being private equity in this
demonstration. And once you see how this
actually works step by step, you will
understand why so many YouTube channels
you watch are quietly changing and why
nobody had to tell you about it. So
let's say I work at a private equity
fund, a a big fund with this big suit.
And the fund I manage is called
Blackstone. Actually, scratch that
subscriber stone capital. And anyways, a
bunch of wealthy people recently gave me
a lot of money. And my job is to buy
businesses, make them more valuable, and
sell them in the next five to seven
years. So with the clock already
running, the pressure was already on to
deliver. But the problem is big returns
only exist in places that nobody else
has risk going to before. And right now,
all the obvious targets are taken.
Manufacturing, healthcare, logistics,
and retail because there's been so much
private equity activity over the last
few years that the big firms have
already bought most of it. So as a newer
fund manager on the block, I had to find
an industry that the big guys haven't
figured out yet. And if I wanted to make
a name for myself, I was going to have
to get creative and lock in. But where
would I even start? And so, just as I
was able to lock in and, you know, put
on my favorite playlist, it hit me. The
next investment was staring me right in
my face, a platform that now has more TV
streaming hours than Netflix, a platform
called YouTube.com.
So, over the next few days, I furiously
started doing research on my next
target, I mean channel. And after
looking through every niche and crevice
of this website, I may have just found
the one.
So let me walk you through how I as
private equity exactly would identify
the perfect fit. So thank you for
joining subscriber stone investors for
today's meeting. I have three criterias
on why we need to invest in this
channel. And the first and foremost is
this channel has a proof of concept.
This channel has predictable revenue
every single month from AdSense. in this
channel probably has a tiny team. Let's
just say probably around five to six
people with low overhead. But this
brings me exactly to number two, which
is potential. So, as you can see here,
this channel has inconsistent views, but
it has a loyal audience. So, as long as
we find the right topics and format,
this can be something we can grow into.
Third, running out of time. So, I'll
tell you about it later on in a
different meeting. So anyways, even
without that third criteria, you can
start to see what private equity firms
are looking for when they decide what
channels to invest in. But here's why
we've only seen the beginning of this.
Because after crunching the numbers,
let's say I found this Gen channel makes
say a million dollars a year. And in any
other industry, a business doing a
million a year with margins like this
would cost me a fortune to invest in.
But with YouTube channels, I come to
find out that they sell to three to five
times their annual earnings. But what I
can sell it for is a completely
different number. But before I get to
that, I had a problem. Because when my
boomer boss has never even heard of Mr.
Beast, he came from this world of
spending $500 million on a single
hospital. How was I going to pitch him
this opportunity? Now, after some
convincing, he reluctantly agreed. But
now the pressure was really on. If it
all goes wrong, I'm cooked. Now my job
was on the line, and I was stressed.
Maybe this was a dumb idea. What am I
even doing? I should have just invested
in another hospital. But then I remember
something a wise man once told me,
>> just do it. And
>> that's when I realized I had to go all
in because just buying one channel isn't
the play. The play was something much
bigger. So I bought nine more similar
channels for a similar price. But here's
where the math gets really interesting.
What I do next is to combine all 10
under one company in what's known in the
private equity world as a rollup. And
what it unlocks is a few things. One
being greater efficiencies because now
the same legal team handles all the
contracts. Same person negotiates every
brand deal and same thumbnail testing
operation, account and compliance. It's
exactly what private equity has been
doing for years with hospitals. But the
biggest unlock is what this now means
for me and my investors. Because
remember, I bought each channel for 3 to
five times its earnings. But after this
roll up into my portfolio as a whole,
this now sells for 12 to 20 times
earnings. So without making any of the
channels better just by buying them,
putting them under one roof, the
valuation is now 20 times more. It's
exactly how I make a ton of money.
And it's the power of multiple
arbitrage. So a few years pass and now
my boomer boss is happy and he can't
stop bragging to his friends about how
much money he's making from this site
called YouTube.com. The problem is I
still haven't paid back any of my
investors. We're at year four now, but
remember our funds investors are
expecting returns by year five and
seven. So the clock was starting to run
out. So now it wasn't just about locking
in. I I have to make money. So now it's
all about optimization. That extra day
that we used to give to make the videos
better or cut. No, we want more videos
per week. Let's also optimize content
strategy. Those videos that the creator
thinks that is interesting, who cares?
Those need to be under strict
questioning now. Instead, what we need
to be doing are videos that are proven
to perform. That's the priority. And
just like that, similar videos are now
starting to get put out week over week.
And we're pumping them out like a
content factory. And audiences are
slowly starting to notice that something
is a bit off in the comments. But who
cares? We're here to make money now. And
if I want to maximize profits, I have to
eliminate these risks. And the biggest
risk is staring right at my face here.
Gen here may have been the one that
built his channel from the ground up.
But if the whole channel depends on just
Gen and he burns out or gets sick or
decides to leave, this asset stops
becoming worth anything. And I can't
have that happen. It's what's called the
keyman risk. And there is no way in hell
I'm going to lose out on my investment
because of Gen. So I start hiring new
hosts that happen to be slightly more
attractive and taller than Gen. And they
slowly start getting introduced. And now
that we have more hosts, we can start
launching more channels like Gen Plus.
And since we're now pumping out videos
every day, it's too expensive to hire a
creative director. So scripts start
getting approved by AI to make sure it's
brand friendly and it's at least good
enough to go before filming. And weeks
pass and now the channel slowly becomes
something that could keep running
without the person who built it. But
thing is, comments now really start
noticing. And some now even start
commenting that this is the last Gen
video that they'll watch. But here's the
part that matters and why no one has
told you about this. The FTC updated
their endorsement rules in 2023 that if
a creator gets paid to promote a
product, they have to tell you ex
exactly like you see on this video. But
if a private equity firm buys that
creator's entire channel, even if every
video they make going forward is
produced inside a portfolio being
managed toward a financial exit, the
creator doesn't have to say anything.
And that hush hush is exactly what
allows any of this to even work. Because
here at Subscriber Sum Capital, what I
didn't tell you is we do businesses with
these creators in two ways. Either we
own it outright 100% or a majority stake
acquisition of 50 to 80% where the
original creator remains. And we
actually prefer those deals because now
the creator also becomes a shareholder
and subscriber stone capital. Okay, but
why do we do that? Well,
oh, time's up. Sorry. Anyways, well,
when their financial interest is now
aligned with mine, he or she is going to
damn well make sure he's going to keep
cranking out videos. But more
importantly, he or she is going to damn
well make sure to not tell you, the
audience, that he or she was owned by me
all along because we both know how that
will go, right? By aligning our
incentives and having stakes in each
other's companies, now the creator is
handcuffed because at the end of the
day, we both want the exit to go well,
right? So, it seems like I was joking.
But the thing is, none of that was even
a bit. Like, yeah, Subscriber Stone
Capital is fake as but it's
similar to what actual private equity
firms that bought your favorite channels
have been doing for the last 5 years.
And a few main players are increasingly
driving up all of the deal flow. And
it's not just happening to YouTube. The
same dynamic is playing out everywhere
online. Platforms that seem free are
really just collecting everything about
you and selling it to whoever will pay
like your inbox, your habits, and your
behavior over time. And all of it is
becoming an ass on someone else's
balance sheet. That's where today's
sponsor, Proton Mail, comes in. It's a
private email service built on the idea
that your data belongs to you and nobody
else. And recently, they've announced
their born private campaign, which lies
on a simple belief that digital privacy
should be the default for everyone and
not a privilege. Unlike traditional big
tech email providers, this just gives
you a truly clean inbox. There's no
tracking, no scanning, and no intrusive
ads competing for your attention. And
your emails aren't monetized or mine for
data. Everything is endto-end encrypted,
which means only you and the person
you're emailing can actually read it. If
you want a safer alternative to regular
email and protect your digital identity
from day one, go to proton.me/bp/gen
to try Proton Mail for free. So, now
let's talk about which channels have
actually been bought and the few players
behind them all. And look, some of these
names are going to surprise you, but the
bigger surprise might be where that
money is going and where it's coming
from.
So, we'll be looking at three main
players and their portfolio, but why not
start with the first and the biggest,
Electrify Video Partners. based in
London with $135 million raised and
backed by another private equity firm
called Capital D. They've been buying up
a bunch of channels over the last five
years and you'll definitely recognize at
least one of them from Fireship which is
a coding education, Simple History,
History Animation, Improvement Pill,
Self-improvement, and this one really
surprised me. Fern, that amazing
documentary channel, but the biggest and
most significant one is Veritassia, ran
by Derek Mohler. Electrified became the
majority owner and took over hiring,
logistics, compliance, taxes in a deal
that allowed Mhler to stay on as
co-owner on his 20 million subscriber
channel.
>> They would take care of things like
hiring, production, logistics.
>> This deal was actually announced a few
years ago in April 2023. But hold on,
take a look at that date. The deal
closed in 2023, but he didn't directly
tell his audience on YouTube until
Christmas Eve of 2025. So why did he
wait? Well, I imagine it's because they
knew exactly how people would react. Oh,
and I say they because he also became a
shareholder in Electrify itself.
>> I signed the deal in April 2023 and
since then, Feritasium has been owned
and run by me and Electrify.
>> So, obviously, his financial interest is
also aligned with the firm's eventual
exit. But to be fair, it was also a
smart business move by keeping it
low-key and in going on to create three
of the channel's most watched videos
ever and subscriber counts continue to
grow by 50%. By showing that nothing has
changed and then announcing it, there's
not much things that an audience could
say. And especially if Mhler is still
there and the videos are still quality,
if we look at just the numbers,
Electrify did make Veritassium better.
So, the important nuance here is that
private equity takeover of a channel
doesn't automatically equal bad. But you
know by now that if every deal looked
like this there there'd be no video
because remember what I said earlier
about Keyman Risk which is a perfect
transition to our second player Lunar X
which was specifically launched by
former KKR executives to invest in
digital first media brands. And they
made a splash onto this scene in 2022 by
acquiring the game theorist with 40
million plus combined subscribers across
their five channels. And similar to
Veritassium's Derek, the sale was framed
as this thing that would let MattPat,
the guy who built it, to finally be able
to step back.
>> On March 9th, I'll be hosting my last
theory episode.
>> The deal was that Matt Pat would handle
the creative direction behind the scenes
and Lunar X would handle all the boring
business stuff. And since MattPat has
officially stepped away from the camera,
on the surface, it actually seems like a
success. They gained a million new
subscribers across all five channels,
but the revenue tells a different story.
Estimated monthly earnings has dropped
70% from roughly 52,000 in March 2024 to
around 13,000 to 17,000 by February
2026. So, what this tells you is that
once the keyman has removed himself from
camera, the loyal audience also went
away with it. Now, it remains to be seen
if they will recover, but for some, they
didn't even get that luxury. Which leads
us to our third and final player,
Recurrent Ventures. Oh, and they've
raised $300 million from our favorite
private equity firm, Blackstone. Their
portfolio is huge, from Task and Purpose
to even Popular Science. But their most
important acquisition is Donut Media.
Found in 2015, these four guys built a
cult following around automotive content
with their 5.8 million subscriber
channel. So, it's no surprise that
Recurrent Ventures was all over this to
acquire Donut, and they successfully did
so in November 2021. And the big promise
that they made here was that all
founding staff would remain. But that
soon changed. After securing that sweet
$300 million funding from Blackstoneone,
Recurrent started moving different. They
overhired across the portfolio,
attempted to squeeze more revenue from
product reviews, and when the economics
deteriorated, they started to cut costs.
And even though raw subscriber count
continued to grow 8 million by 2024,
what didn't, and sounds a little bit
corny, was that magic that made them
great. Less than three years after
acquisition, three of the four guys all
departed within weeks of each other and
so did the audience because two of the
hosts launched their own independent
channels big time in speed and just
within a matter of weeks crossed 1.6
million combined subscribers. So with
all these different outcomes and right
now it's showing more bad than good
ones. What's interesting to see though
is that private equity money keeps
flowing and flowing. And when you look
at the channels that they're targeting,
it starts to kind of make sense. Take a
look at that acquisition map again.
Veritassium, Fireship, Economics
Explained, these are all channels aimed
at educated adults in high value niches
like finance, education, and science.
And this matters a lot because a regular
TV ad around these niches costs around
$10 to $15 to reach a,000 people. But
with YouTube, in one of these niches, it
can cost $50 per thousand. And again, it
goes back to advertisers not just paying
for impressions, but they're paying for
that trust. It's the same reason that
subscriber stone capital would go after
a channel like because if I had to
guess, you watching probably have more
disposable income than someone regularly
watching slop tamement or kid channels.
But turns out even that is changing
because one of the biggest deals in this
entire space that I haven't even talked
about yet has nothing to do with
educated adults. It has everything to do
with toddlers. If you have kids or for
some reason watch this show, which is
which is kind of weird, you know exactly
what this is. But also, it's probably
more weird that you've never heard of
them, considering that they're the
second most subscribed YouTube channel
on Earth with 120 million subscribers.
But in November 2021, Candle Media, run
by former Disney executives and backed
again by Blackstone, acquired Coco
Melon's parent company for $3 billion.
And what they built with that money is a
system that literally tracks second by
second when a toddler stops paying
attention to their videos.
>> And by figuring out the exact moment a
2-year-old looks away, they can engineer
every video onwards to make sure that
never happens again. So point is, it's
not just channels for adults. Private
equity is increasingly reaching the
youngest audiences who know nothing
other than to press play on their damn
iPad. Because as long as those kids keep
watching and begging their parents to
buy the latest merch or game, that's all
the return on investment anyone needs.
The thing is, every deal that I've
showed you so far are only the ones that
we know about. And when collective
investment into YouTube channels have
now reached $4 million, there's probably
a lot more that we don't. Like again,
maybe this channel. But before I reveal
that truth, we have to talk about what
all this actually means. Because
everything I've talked about isn't just
about entertainment getting worse or
bought out. Matter of fact, all this
even goes beyond money. This means
controlling what the next generation
believes and how our future is already
getting manipulated.
And if you think that's hyperbolic,
think again, because we already saw what
creator trust can do when it's pointed
at politics. During the 2024 election,
Trump sat down with Joe Rogan, Aiden
Ross, the Nelk Boys, Theo Von, and
dozens of creators, most boomers and big
heads that traditional media has never
heard about.
>> President Trump back on the podcast.
>> We're back.
>> I'll say that to the Nek Boys.
>> Our last chance.
>> If she wins, the country is finished.
>> His appearance on Rogan alone pulled
nearly 38 million YouTube views within
hours. And during his victory speech,
Dana White got on stage and thank
content creators by name. I want to
thank the Nel Boys, Aiden Ross, Theo
Vaughn, AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST, THE
MIGHTY AND POWERFUL Joe Rogan.
>> Among the listeners who said podcast
influenced their vote, 54% went for
Trump. But where I'm going with this is
here's where it gets uncomfortable.
Private equity acquired channels already
are being told to change content to be
safer because controversy scares the
advertisers and their portfolio
managers. So, if that's already
happening, what's stopping a private
equity firm from acquiring political
commentary channels and steering their
editorial direction towards candidates
who would pass laws that benefit the
firm's other investments. Because the
thing is, there's currently no rules
against it. And right now, when an
influencer is cheaper to acquire than
some mainstream news network, plus the
audience trusts them more. And like we
established, when a creator doesn't have
to disclose what private equity firm
they're owned by, it really becomes a
no-brainer on both sides. And so,
remember that third criteria I mentioned
in the subscriber stone investor
meeting? That third criteria I'm sure
private equity firms consider is how
much the channel values money over
principles. Because I can tell you from
experience, I've gotten offers for this
channel that I can't fully disclose. But
what I can tell you is that when those
conversations happen, the first thing
that gets discussed is the sort and list
of topics that you're not allowed to
touch anymore. So really think about
where all this is heading. We stopped
trusting the banks after 2008. We
stopped trusting the government a long
time ago hopefully and you stopped
trusting mainstream media. And now it's
pretty undeniable that that trust has
been transferred to your favorite
YouTuber like myself. But at the same
time, when 80% say that the biggest
trust killer is when influencers reveal
themselves as not genuine or
transparent, unlike the other
institutions we name that lost trust
slowly over decades, this relationship
is something that can break overnight.
And what we're now beginning to see is
that it's not just private equity, but
the largest companies is making their
way into one of the last institutions
that people sort of trust. As I was
finishing this video, Open AAI just
bought TBPN, a live stream talk show
that's like the sports center of the
tech industry.
>> A core part of this is editorial
independence. We can say whatever we
want because we're live and we don't
need to run anything through anyone.
>> Well, we'll see about that. But when
reports are saying that the deal was
somewhere near $100 million, we'll see
how much independence that truly means.
So whether this is the beginning of the
end, one thing is for certain. within
the next 10 to 15 years, a major
influencer is going to run for president
and he or she is going to win. And when
that happens, the question won't be
whether they're qualified. The question
you need to think about is who owns
them. And so, I'll be going even deeper
into this issue next week on my free
newsletter in the video description. But
if you don't want to join the special
2,800 of you and would rather watch how
private equity isn't just breaking your
favorite YouTube channel, but
potentially the global economy, go and
watch this video on how private equity
will break America. Yeah.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video exposes how private equity firms are quietly acquiring popular YouTube channels. By leveraging 'multiple arbitrage'—rolling up several channels into one entity—these firms can dramatically increase valuations while often compromising content quality, introducing 'keyman' risks, and exploiting audience trust. The creator explains that since there is no legal obligation for channels to disclose these acquisitions, audiences are often unaware that the creators they trust are now answering to corporate financial interests. The video warns that this trend could extend into political manipulation, threatening the last remaining bastion of authentic, non-corporate influence.
Videos recently processed by our community