HomeVideos

We pretty much have evidence for life in other solar systems.

Now Playing

We pretty much have evidence for life in other solar systems.

Transcript

65 segments

0:00

Scientists have found tentative evidence  for life in another solar system.  

0:05

There's been headlines like this for several years  now. The most recent one comes from data from the  

0:13

James Webb Space Telescope and a planet called  K28b. Today I want to have a look at what we know  

0:20

about life on this and other exoplanets and why I  think astrophysicists have pretty much found life  

0:28

on other planets. It's just that they're not yet  allowed to say it. When astrophysicists talk about  

0:35

life on other planets, they mean biosignatures  that some sort of evidence that life in a form  

0:41

we know of might be present. They look for this  by scanning the atmosphere of these planets for  

0:47

certain molecules or combinations of molecules  that at least on Earth signal the presence of  

0:53

life. Bio signatures will be evidence for  life but not necessarily for complex life.  

1:00

To tell the two apart, astrophysicists also look  for technosignatures. That would be signs of any  

1:07

sort of technology indicating intelligent beings.  But it's a very crude distinction in that there is  

1:14

a lot that can happen between microbes and air  pollution so severe you can literally spot it  

1:20

from light years away. The key bio signatures I  look for are molecular combinations that should  

1:26

not exist in chemical equilibrium because  there are no geological processes that could  

1:32

produce them. At least none that we know of.  That said, let's look at the headline cases.  

1:37

The most intensively discussed potential detection  of life on an exoplanet is K218b. This planet is a  

1:45

little larger than Earth in a solar system about  124 light years away. It sits in the habitable  

1:51

zone of a red dwarf. Already in 2019, the Hubble  telescope detected water vapor in its atmosphere.  

1:58

That's not a biosignature on its own, but it's  suggestive. In 2023, an analysis of preliminary  

2:05

data from the James Webb Space Telescope revealed  methane and carbon dioxide. And then last year,  

2:13

the same team returned with better data and  reported a three sigma detection of dimethyl  

2:19

sulfide at concentrations that seems to be  thousands of times higher than on Earth. On Earth,  

2:26

this gas is produced almost exclusively by marine  microbes. They called it the strongest evidence  

2:33

yet of possible bio signature activity outside  the solar system. Alas, reanalyses by independent  

2:41

groups found that the data was consistent with  many other possible chemical compositions and  

2:47

basically inconclusive. There have been other  planets of interest. For example, TOI270D.  

2:55

This planet too is a little larger than Earth and  orbits around a dwarf star about 73 light years  

3:02

away from us. However, it's rather close to the  star which puts it at the edge of the habitable  

3:08

zone. For this planet, the data is much better.  Two independent groups have found reasonably  

3:15

strong signatures of methane, carbon dioxide, as  well as carbon dulfide and ethane. Again on Earth  

3:23

these are produced by microorganisms. However, in  this case one can't rule out that there are other  

3:30

nonbiological sources. So the data is also  inconclusive though for a different reason.  

3:37

There are many more planets that have attracted  interest in the past years. But where the data has  

3:43

remained inconclusive for one reason or another.  For example, the Trappist system that's only about  

3:50

40 light years away from us. Its sun is a red  dwarf, only slightly bigger than planet Jupiter,  

3:56

but it has at least seven rocky planets, three of  which seem to be in the habitable zone. So, if the  

4:03

system is that much closer to us, and that much  more promising, then why don't astrophysicists  

4:10

just look at those? It's because the red dwarf  is so small and yet very active. That it's so  

4:16

small means that the habitable zone is very close  to the star and that it's so active makes it very  

4:22

difficult to find out whether the planets there  even have an atmosphere. Astrophysicists have  

4:28

looked at this over and over but not been able to  get any good data. They've now scheduled more than  

4:33

a dozen additional observation runs with the James  Webb Space Telescope. So maybe we'll soon know  

4:40

more. There are more than these example planets  that astrophysicists have found in habitable  

4:46

zones. Some look promising, some not so much. The  sense I get is that it's only a matter of time  

4:54

until they'll find a candidate that checks all  boxes and the significance for the bio signatures  

5:01

is high enough. You can basically see it coming.  I have reason to believe I'm not the only one who  

5:08

thinks this way. The other day I came across  this comment on X Twitter was speaking to an  

5:13

academic astrophysicist in spectroscopy who told  me that they have so many plausible exoplanetary  

5:20

atmospheric bio signatures at this point that  there's no longer any real doubt. But the  

5:25

standard of proof for official acceptance is just  incredibly high. This is exactly my impression as  

5:33

well. Then again, some in the field have recently  claimed that with the James Webb telescope,  

5:40

we'll never be able to reach the required  significance to declare we have evidence for life  

5:46

on an exoplanet. Maybe they're right, but I think  it's just an excuse to ask for a bigger telescope,  

5:54

not necessarily a bad one. I don't know about you,  but I need to write down things to remember and  

6:00

understand them. And when it comes to writing,  nothing beats the Hoverpens from Novium. The  

6:06

Hoverpens float in their base thanks to strong  permanent magnets and can freely spin. They're  

6:12

really well balanced. You don't have to fumble to  put them in and they don't drop out either. This  

6:17

particular version is the Hoverpen Interstellar  balanced at the same angle as the tilt of Earth's  

6:23

axis. It has a premium version with a meteorite  embedded. Yes, a real meteorite. So, there's part  

6:30

of your pen that actually flew through outer  space! The Hoverpen doesn't just look good,  

6:35

it's also a pleasure to write with. It flows  nicely across the page, and it's refillable, too.  

6:42

They also have gift sets for the Hoverpens, like  this one, which comes with a notebook and cards  

6:47

for to-do lists. The hoverpens are amazingly well  designed, and I'm happy to recommend them. And of  

6:53

course, I have a special offer. You'll get 15% off  in the next 72 hours and 10% after this if you use  

7:01

my QR code or the code SABINE. Links in the info  below. Thanks for watching. See you tomorrow.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the ongoing search for life on exoplanets, focusing on biosignatures detected in planetary atmospheres. It highlights several promising candidates, including K218b, where dimethyl sulfide (a molecule primarily produced by marine microbes on Earth) was detected but later found inconclusive. Other planets like TOI270D and the Trappist system also show interesting atmospheric compositions, though their data remains ambiguous due to alternative non-biological explanations or observational challenges. The speaker expresses a strong belief that astrophysicists have likely already found evidence of life, but the extremely high standard of proof required for official declaration prevents confirmation.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts