We pretty much have evidence for life in other solar systems.
65 segments
Scientists have found tentative evidence for life in another solar system.
There's been headlines like this for several years now. The most recent one comes from data from the
James Webb Space Telescope and a planet called K28b. Today I want to have a look at what we know
about life on this and other exoplanets and why I think astrophysicists have pretty much found life
on other planets. It's just that they're not yet allowed to say it. When astrophysicists talk about
life on other planets, they mean biosignatures that some sort of evidence that life in a form
we know of might be present. They look for this by scanning the atmosphere of these planets for
certain molecules or combinations of molecules that at least on Earth signal the presence of
life. Bio signatures will be evidence for life but not necessarily for complex life.
To tell the two apart, astrophysicists also look for technosignatures. That would be signs of any
sort of technology indicating intelligent beings. But it's a very crude distinction in that there is
a lot that can happen between microbes and air pollution so severe you can literally spot it
from light years away. The key bio signatures I look for are molecular combinations that should
not exist in chemical equilibrium because there are no geological processes that could
produce them. At least none that we know of. That said, let's look at the headline cases.
The most intensively discussed potential detection of life on an exoplanet is K218b. This planet is a
little larger than Earth in a solar system about 124 light years away. It sits in the habitable
zone of a red dwarf. Already in 2019, the Hubble telescope detected water vapor in its atmosphere.
That's not a biosignature on its own, but it's suggestive. In 2023, an analysis of preliminary
data from the James Webb Space Telescope revealed methane and carbon dioxide. And then last year,
the same team returned with better data and reported a three sigma detection of dimethyl
sulfide at concentrations that seems to be thousands of times higher than on Earth. On Earth,
this gas is produced almost exclusively by marine microbes. They called it the strongest evidence
yet of possible bio signature activity outside the solar system. Alas, reanalyses by independent
groups found that the data was consistent with many other possible chemical compositions and
basically inconclusive. There have been other planets of interest. For example, TOI270D.
This planet too is a little larger than Earth and orbits around a dwarf star about 73 light years
away from us. However, it's rather close to the star which puts it at the edge of the habitable
zone. For this planet, the data is much better. Two independent groups have found reasonably
strong signatures of methane, carbon dioxide, as well as carbon dulfide and ethane. Again on Earth
these are produced by microorganisms. However, in this case one can't rule out that there are other
nonbiological sources. So the data is also inconclusive though for a different reason.
There are many more planets that have attracted interest in the past years. But where the data has
remained inconclusive for one reason or another. For example, the Trappist system that's only about
40 light years away from us. Its sun is a red dwarf, only slightly bigger than planet Jupiter,
but it has at least seven rocky planets, three of which seem to be in the habitable zone. So, if the
system is that much closer to us, and that much more promising, then why don't astrophysicists
just look at those? It's because the red dwarf is so small and yet very active. That it's so
small means that the habitable zone is very close to the star and that it's so active makes it very
difficult to find out whether the planets there even have an atmosphere. Astrophysicists have
looked at this over and over but not been able to get any good data. They've now scheduled more than
a dozen additional observation runs with the James Webb Space Telescope. So maybe we'll soon know
more. There are more than these example planets that astrophysicists have found in habitable
zones. Some look promising, some not so much. The sense I get is that it's only a matter of time
until they'll find a candidate that checks all boxes and the significance for the bio signatures
is high enough. You can basically see it coming. I have reason to believe I'm not the only one who
thinks this way. The other day I came across this comment on X Twitter was speaking to an
academic astrophysicist in spectroscopy who told me that they have so many plausible exoplanetary
atmospheric bio signatures at this point that there's no longer any real doubt. But the
standard of proof for official acceptance is just incredibly high. This is exactly my impression as
well. Then again, some in the field have recently claimed that with the James Webb telescope,
we'll never be able to reach the required significance to declare we have evidence for life
on an exoplanet. Maybe they're right, but I think it's just an excuse to ask for a bigger telescope,
not necessarily a bad one. I don't know about you, but I need to write down things to remember and
understand them. And when it comes to writing, nothing beats the Hoverpens from Novium. The
Hoverpens float in their base thanks to strong permanent magnets and can freely spin. They're
really well balanced. You don't have to fumble to put them in and they don't drop out either. This
particular version is the Hoverpen Interstellar balanced at the same angle as the tilt of Earth's
axis. It has a premium version with a meteorite embedded. Yes, a real meteorite. So, there's part
of your pen that actually flew through outer space! The Hoverpen doesn't just look good,
it's also a pleasure to write with. It flows nicely across the page, and it's refillable, too.
They also have gift sets for the Hoverpens, like this one, which comes with a notebook and cards
for to-do lists. The hoverpens are amazingly well designed, and I'm happy to recommend them. And of
course, I have a special offer. You'll get 15% off in the next 72 hours and 10% after this if you use
my QR code or the code SABINE. Links in the info below. Thanks for watching. See you tomorrow.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses the ongoing search for life on exoplanets, focusing on biosignatures detected in planetary atmospheres. It highlights several promising candidates, including K218b, where dimethyl sulfide (a molecule primarily produced by marine microbes on Earth) was detected but later found inconclusive. Other planets like TOI270D and the Trappist system also show interesting atmospheric compositions, though their data remains ambiguous due to alternative non-biological explanations or observational challenges. The speaker expresses a strong belief that astrophysicists have likely already found evidence of life, but the extremely high standard of proof required for official declaration prevents confirmation.
Videos recently processed by our community