HomeVideos

How Influencers Hijacked The Consumer Economy

Now Playing

How Influencers Hijacked The Consumer Economy

Transcript

890 segments

0:00

If you look at an example like Chili's

0:01

and their triple dipper, like they have

0:03

credited in earnings calls that the

0:05

triple dipper has changed their business

0:07

and that's because it's people posting

0:08

about it online. And then you're seeing

0:11

Duncan selling a bucket of coffee. That

0:14

has to be in that meeting thinking about

0:16

how does that show up online? What type

0:18

of content are people making about it?

0:20

You know, we're in a time where anyone

0:22

can get views. And so I think that what

0:25

holds cultural currency right now is

0:27

participation. and how do we get people

0:28

to make posts about our thing? That's

0:30

where momentum is built. And so I think

0:33

that I would not be surprised that in a

0:35

lot of brands are behind the scenes

0:37

developing products with that in mind.

0:43

Welcome to Profy Markets. I'm Eden. It

0:46

is June 10th. Let's check in on

0:48

yesterday's market vitals. The S&P 500

0:52

and the Nasdaq fell with tech and

0:54

semiconductor stocks leading the

0:56

declines. News that Iran shot down a US

0:58

helicopter added to the selling

1:01

pressure. Oil declined earlier in the

1:03

day, but rose again as President Trump

1:05

said the US would respond to the attack.

1:08

And finally, Apple shares slid nearly 4%

1:11

on day two of its developers conference

1:14

as investors remained unimpressed by its

1:17

AI vision. By the way, that was its

1:18

worst day since February. Okay, what

1:22

else is happening?

1:26

There's a lot happening in the markets

1:27

this week with the biggest IPO in

1:29

history coming on Friday. We will be

1:31

covering all of it throughout the week.

1:33

But today, we wanted to take a break

1:35

from the AI news cycle and discuss

1:38

something a little bit different, and

1:39

that is the influencer economy. If you

1:42

walk around New York City long enough,

1:45

you'll notice something strange right

1:46

now, and that is a lot of people

1:48

standing in a lot of lines. 60% of Gen Z

1:53

say they have waited for more than 30

1:54

minutes in a line for a specific food in

1:58

the past year after seeing it on social

2:00

media. For instance, people start lining

2:03

up at 6:00 a.m. for a dot cake, which is

2:05

an $11 cup of cake that just went viral

2:08

on Tik Tok. But it's not just food. More

2:11

than 80% of Gen Z discover new music

2:14

through social media and user generated

2:16

content. Marketing companies like

2:18

Chaotic Good Projects create networks of

2:20

Tik Tok accounts engineered to push

2:23

artists into recommendation algorithms.

2:26

They call this the process of trend

2:28

simulation. What they've really mastered

2:30

though is the science of going viral.

2:33

All of this raises an important question

2:35

which we will answer in this

2:37

conversation and that is do influencers

2:40

run the consumer economy right now?

2:42

Joining us to answer that question,

2:43

we're speaking with Rachel Carton,

2:45

author of the Lincoln Bio newsletter,

2:47

and also Allison Shrager, senior fellow

2:50

at the Manhattan Institute and columnist

2:52

for Bloomberg, who just wrote about the

2:54

influencer economy. Rachel, Allison,

2:57

thank you for joining me on ProfG

2:59

Markets. Allison, I'm going to start

3:01

with you because you just wrote this

3:02

article. The article is titled, quote,

3:04

"The influencer economy has crossed the

3:06

line." I gave a little bit of an intro

3:09

as to like what these lines are, but if

3:11

you could kind of explain to us what are

3:13

we seeing right now? What are these

3:15

lines that everyone's seeing on the

3:16

blocks uh in New York City and in other

3:18

cities as well?

3:20

>> Well, in the article, I'm actually quite

3:22

bullish on it. I call it, you know, a

3:24

manifestation of capitalism on display.

3:27

You know, technological innovation on

3:29

display. And what we're seeing is um you

3:33

know you a lot of people hear about a

3:36

good or service usually a good like

3:38

frozen yogurt on uh on Instagram on Tik

3:42

Tok. They want to try it themselves and

3:44

then film it for themselves for their

3:46

network either to try to grow their

3:48

audience or um just to impress their

3:51

friends that they they've tried this

3:52

good and you create a lot of hype. I

3:54

mean I think the cliche in New York is

3:56

now becoming people used to wait in line

3:58

for nightclubs. now they wait in line

3:59

for bagels. Um

4:02

it's kind of true. I I saw someone

4:04

speculate recently that um because it's

4:07

a more antisocial generation, this is

4:08

their sort of new uh inerson experience.

4:11

Um I I you know, there's problems with

4:13

it. You know, like any new market, um

4:16

it's very winner take all like a lot of

4:18

aspects of our economy. Like most

4:20

influencers can't earn a living at it.

4:22

It also sort of shines a lot of economic

4:24

activity on certain businesses uh that

4:27

manage to sort of catch fire for reasons

4:29

that aren't sort of very well

4:30

understood.

4:31

>> There's so much in there happening. I

4:33

mean, one is these random products are

4:35

going viral and then suddenly everyone

4:37

has to get this bagel or everyone has to

4:39

get this dot cake. And then there's also

4:41

the fact that young people are willing

4:44

to wait in 2hour lines for a dot cake.

4:48

And I think the comparison to waiting in

4:50

the line for a nightclub versus waiting

4:52

in the line for a bagel is a genuinely

4:55

apt comparison. Rachel, I just want to

4:58

get your views. Allison sees this as a

5:01

good thing economically or maybe a good

5:04

thing, something technologically good

5:06

about it. How do you see what's

5:09

happening? And what do you make of the

5:10

fact that young people are down to do

5:11

this?

5:12

>> Well, I think also to understand why

5:15

this feels so prevalent right now. Now,

5:18

it's also important to look at like how

5:19

the algorithms have changed. And so, I

5:21

think when you think of the traditional

5:22

view of an influencer, it was like you

5:24

grow your following and you grow your

5:26

views and that's how you have influence.

5:29

And with these interest based

5:30

algorithms, now somebody with 500

5:32

followers can have a million views

5:35

reviewing a product. And maybe they're

5:36

actually seen as more trustworthy

5:38

because they aren't an influencer, quote

5:41

unquote. And so I think that we're

5:43

seeing this explosion at this time also

5:45

because everyone is an influencer now.

5:48

It's not because you have spent 5 years

5:50

growing your following to have some sort

5:52

of influence. If you get on TikTok and

5:54

speak, you are an influencer essentially

5:56

at this point. And so you know I think

5:59

that to some degree lines lining up for

6:02

things I worked at Bone Appetite for

6:03

four years before I started my

6:04

newsletter in 2016. People were lining

6:06

up for milkshakes then and cronuts and

6:09

supreme drops. And so I do think lines

6:11

and people wanting to uh sort of

6:15

thinking it's worth it to you know spend

6:16

30 minutes online is not a new thing.

6:18

But I also think that the way that Tik

6:20

Tok has created conversation around it

6:22

has created urgency around it and has

6:24

essentially created a uh new content

6:27

stream which is I tried the viral thing

6:29

as a way to go viral feels really

6:31

different right now.

6:33

>> Yeah. I tried the viral thing feels

6:35

really important. I think a lot of

6:36

people might be thinking like why are we

6:38

talking about this topic on this show?

6:40

Uh the reason we're talking about it is

6:42

because I'm interested in it. But also I

6:44

think it matters for businesses. It

6:47

seems to matter in the actual real world

6:49

economy where it seems as though the way

6:52

you succeed today if you are selling any

6:56

consumer product is you go viral. You

6:59

have a random, you randomly hit the

7:02

lottery, the algorithmic lottery, and

7:04

suddenly everyone's saying, "Oh, I tried

7:06

the viral cronut bagel donut dot cake,

7:09

whatever it may be." Um, I I just

7:12

wonder, and I'll start with you, Rachel,

7:14

on this question. Do you think that that

7:16

is true? Do you think it's true that you

7:18

basically have to cater to the algorithm

7:22

if you want to succeed in consumer

7:24

business today? I mean, I will never say

7:27

you have to be on social media because

7:29

I'm exhausted by social media myself,

7:30

but I think it's a very powerful lever

7:32

that businesses can pull. And I think

7:34

that if you look at an example like

7:36

Chili's and their triple dipper, like

7:38

they have credited in earnings calls

7:39

that the triple dipper has changed their

7:42

business. And that's because it's people

7:43

posting about it online. And then you're

7:45

seeing I think when you look at you know

7:47

Duncan selling a bucket of coffee that

7:51

has to be in that meeting thinking about

7:53

how does that show up online? What type

7:55

of content are people making about it?

7:57

You know we're in a time where views are

8:00

anyone can get views. And so I think

8:02

that what holds cultural currency right

8:05

now is participation and how do we get

8:07

people to make posts about our thing?

8:09

That's where momentum is built. And so I

8:11

think that I would not be surprised that

8:13

and a lot of brands are behind the

8:15

scenes developing products with that in

8:17

mind.

8:18

>> Right, Alison? This is the part where

8:20

you might see I'm not so excited about

8:23

this because I worry that we're just

8:26

creating all of these kind of BS

8:28

products like a bucket of coffee

8:30

because we want to go viral. And in a

8:33

way, I mean, do consumers really want

8:35

that? I guess how would you respond to

8:38

that view? Well, I I don't, you know, I

8:41

agree. I think the question is, is this

8:44

worse than what we had before? Um, you

8:47

know, in my column, I talk about that

8:49

there was this wonderful article written

8:50

in the late 90s about uh the sort of PR

8:54

power girls, as they call them, these

8:56

women in their 20s who were like the

8:58

precursor to influencers who were

8:59

effectively girls from very rich,

9:01

influential New York families who ran

9:03

the city through their own self-started

9:05

PR companies. and they they're the ones

9:07

who instigated lines. Usually like

9:08

places like Mumba, like a nightclub that

9:10

was cool in the '9s and they could get

9:12

Leonardo DiCaprio to go and then that

9:14

created the hype. And you know, I'm not

9:16

sure that was better. Um, in some ways

9:18

it was worse because to be an influencer

9:21

then you had to come from wealth in a

9:23

very well-connected family and you only

9:26

really had to please this elite group of

9:28

people as opposed to there is something

9:29

more democratic about this. As Rachel

9:32

pointed out, anyone can be an

9:34

influencer. You don't even have to live

9:35

in New York. you can, you know, you

9:37

don't even have to have a lot of money.

9:38

You just need to have, you know, a good

9:40

Wi-Fi connection and you're good to go.

9:43

So, I mean, in some ways, you know,

9:45

there seems something more ephemeral

9:46

about these things that like how you

9:48

build a brand, it's hard to sustain it

9:50

and that sort of I think is sort of

9:52

feels scary and there's certainly

9:53

problems. It's also not clear. I mean,

9:56

most influencers don't earn a living at

9:57

it, but if you do, I mean, are you

9:59

building skills that are going to age

10:01

with you? like, can you be a 50-year-old

10:03

influencer? And if you dedicate your

10:05

human capital to this, you know, where

10:07

does this go for you? I think these are

10:09

all like very concerning questions. But

10:12

I'm not convinced that this is

10:13

necessarily worse than what we had

10:15

before either.

10:16

>> Yeah, it certainly was true. There was

10:19

an element of, you know, what we would

10:21

call the gatekeepers. If you make it on

10:24

the list, whether it's, you know, the

10:26

New York Times list or those PR machine

10:28

lists, you had to be on the list. you

10:30

had to get approved by the taste maker,

10:33

the gatekeeper, and then you succeed.

10:36

But I wonder if influencers

10:40

are essentially just another version of

10:42

the same thing. And there's just some

10:44

statistics that we have here. So for

10:47

one, 74% of Gen Z say they have ordered

10:50

a restaurant item after seeing it go

10:52

viral on social media. So that alone

10:54

seems striking that you I mean it seems

10:58

as though you kind of need to go viral

11:00

if you want to sort of make it today. Uh

11:02

but then just looking at some of this

11:04

other data here on YouTube the top 1%

11:06

mostwatched videos account for 91% of

11:09

the total viewing time and on Tik Tok

11:11

the top 1% of Tik Tok creators capture

11:14

81% of the total views. So, it seems as

11:16

though we still have kind of a lopsided

11:21

world where a handful of influencers,

11:24

and I don't know if this is actually

11:25

true, and I want to hear your guys's

11:27

views on this, but it seems as though

11:29

influencers have a a crazy amount of

11:32

power. And I'd be interested to hear

11:35

more, Allison, on on why that's I guess

11:39

better. Maybe it's because they they

11:42

were sort of chosen at random by the

11:44

algorithm. I'm not totally sure, but I

11:46

wonder if you agree with this notion

11:47

that you that these economies, the

11:50

restaurant business, maybe even the

11:52

music business is predominantly

11:55

dominated by a small handful of

11:57

influencers.

11:58

>> That's absolutely true. In economics, we

12:00

call it the winner take all economy and

12:02

it is more prevalent than ever. Like

12:04

before, you might have a lot of pop

12:05

stars who are successful. Now, like it's

12:07

just Taylor Swift and like maybe a

12:09

handful of people. So, it's harder to

12:11

make it in any industry. I think even

12:13

like public speaking I'm told like you

12:15

know there's the top who get millions of

12:17

dollars and then there's everyone else.

12:19

um pretty much any industry

12:23

>> every industry has become winner take

12:24

all and that is maybe sort of a a sign

12:27

of our change but one thing I think that

12:29

makes me sort of less worried about it

12:31

than other people is who are those

12:33

people and as I said if in the '9s you

12:36

had to be wor born into wealth and

12:37

privilege to be in that top percent and

12:39

now I mean I think there's also

12:41

something I find reassuring about the

12:43

fact that yeah it's the algorithm but it

12:45

is also pleasing the masses it is that

12:47

ability to connect with a wider audience

12:49

which does also make it more democratic.

12:51

So I mean it's an interesting parable I

12:53

think of technology in general and where

12:55

the economy is going and how you have a

12:58

new technology and it completely you

13:00

know wipes out these jobs and sort of

13:03

these incumbents who maybe were there

13:05

for a variety of reasons sometimes

13:06

fairly sometimes unfairly and you get

13:08

these new jobs coming in with new people

13:10

maybe like who don't have much of a

13:13

business background maybe people who

13:14

came from very humble business sometimes

13:16

yes sometimes no and so in a lot of ways

13:19

what we're seeing with this influencer

13:20

economy and what replacing is just sort

13:23

of bigger than just this. It is for the

13:26

whole economy and you know there's good

13:28

things and bad things about it but it is

13:30

change.

13:31

>> Yeah. Rachel, do you think that

13:33

influencers run it now? Is it basically

13:36

is is the trajectory of businesses

13:39

whether it's in New York or otherwise

13:40

are they I mean consumer businesses

13:42

specifically is their trajectory mostly

13:45

determined by how much sunlight they get

13:47

from a handful of influencers? I don't

13:49

think that that's like a makeorb breakak

13:52

thing for a business. And I think, you

13:54

know, I just ran a survey in my

13:55

newsletter of like what are the best

13:56

brands on social media to you and some

13:59

of the top brands are brands like this

14:01

company called Merit, a beauty company,

14:03

a fragrance brand called Fern. And

14:05

people are really reacting to actually

14:07

their restraint on social media. They

14:09

don't feel like they're flooding the

14:10

zone and trying to be everywhere and

14:11

work with every influencer. They're

14:13

actually very strategic of how they show

14:15

up. Um, and there's a lot of intention

14:17

behind it. And so I do, you know, it's

14:20

always fun to talk about what has

14:21

momentum right now, which is this moment

14:23

with influencers and, you know, sort of

14:25

a volume game. And what I'm always

14:27

interesting is like what's the reaction

14:28

to that going to be? And is it sort of a

14:30

pullback of like maybe a brand says we

14:33

actually don't work with influencers or

14:34

we've never paid anyone to talk about

14:36

our products. And what would that look

14:38

like as sort of a way to gain trust with

14:40

consumers is uh a reaction that I I

14:43

foresee maybe coming along.

14:46

>> We'll be right back. And if you're

14:47

enjoying the show, be sure to subscribe

14:49

to the ProfG Markets YouTube channel at

14:52

the link below.

14:57

Support for the show comes from ODU.

14:59

Running a business is hard enough, so

15:01

why make it harder with a dozen

15:03

different apps that don't talk to each

15:05

other? One for sales, another for

15:07

inventory, a separate one for

15:08

accounting. Before you know it, you are

15:10

drowning in software instead of growing

15:12

your business. This is where ODU comes

15:15

in. ODO is the only business software

15:17

you'll ever need. It's an all-in-one

15:19

fully integrated platform that handles

15:21

everything. CRM, accounting, inventory,

15:24

e-commerce, HR, and more. No more app

15:28

overload. No more juggling login. Just

15:30

one seamless system that makes work

15:33

easier. And the best part, ODU replaces

15:35

multiple expensive platforms for a

15:38

fraction of the cost. It's built to grow

15:40

with your business, whether you are just

15:42

starting out or already scaling up.

15:44

Plus, it is easy to use, customizable,

15:47

and designed to streamline every process

15:50

so you can focus on what really matters,

15:52

running your business. Thousands of

15:54

businesses have made the switch, so why

15:56

not you? Try ODO for free at odo.com.

16:00

That's odo.com.

16:07

Support for the show comes from

16:08

Vanguard. To all the financial advisers

16:11

listening, let's talk bonds for a

16:13

minute. Capturing value in fixed income

16:15

is not easy. Bond markets are massive,

16:17

murky, and let's be real, lots of firms

16:20

throw a couple flashy funds your way and

16:21

call it a day. But not Vanguard.

16:24

Vanguard bonds are institutional

16:26

quality. Institutional quality isn't a

16:28

tagline. It's a commitment to your

16:30

clients. It means top grade products

16:32

across the board. The lineup includes

16:34

over 80 bond funds. They are actively

16:36

managed by a 200 person global squad of

16:39

sector specialists, analysts, and

16:41

traders. Lots of firms love to highlight

16:44

their star portfolio managers like it's

16:46

all about that one brilliant mind making

16:48

the magic happen. Vanguard's philosophy

16:51

is a little different. They believe the

16:52

best active strategies shouldn't be

16:54

locked away with one person. They should

16:56

be shared across the team. That way,

16:58

every client benefits from the

17:00

collective brain power, not just one

17:02

individual's take. So, if you're looking

17:04

to give your clients consistent results

17:06

year in and year out, go see the record

17:08

for yourself at vanguard.com/audio.

17:12

That's vanguard.com/audio.

17:15

All investing is subject to risk.

17:17

Vanguard Marketing Corporation

17:19

distributor.

17:23

Support for the show comes from

17:25

LinkedIn. It's a shame when the best B2B

17:27

marketing gets wasted on the wrong

17:28

audience. Like imagine running an ad for

17:31

cataract surgery on Saturday morning

17:32

cartoons or running a promo for this

17:35

show on a video about Roblox or

17:37

something. No offense to our Gen Alpha

17:39

listeners, but that would be a waste of

17:41

anyone's ad budget. So when you want to

17:43

reach the right professionals, you can

17:45

use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to

17:48

a network of over 1 billion

17:49

professionals and 130 million decision

17:51

makers according to their data. That's

17:53

where it stands apart from other ad

17:55

buys. You can target your buyers by job

17:57

title, industry, company role,

17:59

seniority, skills, company revenue. All

18:01

so you can stop wasting budget on the

18:03

wrong audience. That's why LinkedIn ads

18:05

boast one of the highest B2B return on

18:06

ad spend of all online ad networks.

18:09

Seriously, all of them. Spend $250 on

18:12

your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and

18:13

get a free $250 credit for the next one.

18:16

Just go to linkedin.com/scott.

18:18

That's linkedin.com/scott.

18:20

Terms and conditions apply.

18:25

This gets to sort of the other question

18:27

that I have which is why are people

18:29

interested

18:31

uh in those products that go viral? Um

18:34

like what is it about we could use the

18:36

dot cake as an example but any other

18:39

sort of viral product that suddenly blew

18:41

up? Like what what resonates would you

18:44

say for young people specifically?

18:48

What is that moment where suddenly

18:51

you're the hot thing? I mean, I think I

18:53

think a there's small pieces of it. I

18:56

think like auditory like when I think

18:58

about what blows up on TikTok in terms

19:00

of food, there's a crunchy or there's

19:02

actually like a hook of like an auditory

19:05

element. The dot cake videos all start

19:07

with the spoon scraping along the top of

19:09

it. So there's that piece of it which is

19:11

just a good hook on social media and

19:13

then I think another piece of it is

19:15

truly like almost a self-interest of if

19:18

I review this thing like Allison was

19:20

saying like I will go viral too. Um

19:23

that's sort of the themes that I've

19:24

seen. I'm curious what you would think

19:25

Allison.

19:26

>> I think of it like Rachel does is like

19:28

um you know going viral can be

19:29

sufficient but not necessary to becoming

19:32

successful. Um, it is. I think one thing

19:35

that might be one of the reasons this

19:37

sort of explains our economy right now

19:39

is it's accessible. I mean, as you said,

19:41

I haven't waited in line for a dot cake,

19:43

but you said it's $11.

19:44

>> Yes.

19:45

>> I mean, like I mean, only so many people

19:47

could party with a Leonardo DiCaprio

19:49

Mumba, but like anyone can uh buy a dot

19:52

cake.

19:53

>> It's a lot. It's a lot for a small cake,

19:55

I would say. I would say it's a little

19:57

overpriced, but I agree. Most of us can

20:00

can partake if we're down. and the

20:02

opportunity cost of waiting in line for

20:03

two hours. I mean, this is time you

20:06

could be I mean, I guess in if you're a

20:07

professional influencer, it's worth the

20:09

time, but for the rest of us, I mean,

20:10

this is significant uh opportunity cost,

20:13

but you know, you get to partake in the

20:15

sort of the excitement of what's hot as

20:17

opposed to before again, it was less

20:19

accessible and that was in some ways

20:20

interesting, too, because being

20:22

inaccessible was what made it

20:23

interesting and now you want to promote

20:25

goods that are accessible.

20:27

>> Yeah. This also gets to something we've

20:29

been talking about on the show recently,

20:30

which is young people's interest in

20:33

reducing their screen time or getting

20:35

off of these online spaces. And also, by

20:39

the way, and I can't I don't know if

20:40

this has anything to do with the trends

20:41

we're seeing, but getting off of

20:43

alcohol. I mean, we've seen that young

20:45

people aren't really drinking anymore.

20:46

There are these more sort of sober,

20:49

curious event gatherings. And I wonder

20:51

if these lines

20:54

if that's part of it, if it's a an

20:56

opportunity to kind of get together with

20:58

your peers, be outside, partake in a

21:02

social event versus it just, you know,

21:05

going to get the product, whatever the

21:06

product is.

21:07

>> Maybe you'll fall in love online,

21:10

>> right?

21:11

>> That'd be that'd be a great story.

21:12

That'd be a great vow column. We fell in

21:14

love waiting for dot cake.

21:16

>> I'm waiting for it to happen. I feel

21:18

like it's going to happen at some point.

21:19

That would be their wedding cake.

21:22

>> That's beautiful.

21:23

>> A giant multi-layered dot cake. Do you

21:26

think that might have something to do

21:27

with it though?

21:28

>> Um yeah. I mean, especially as you said

21:30

because they're not going to bars and

21:31

drinking that, you know, it's it's like

21:34

I once um interviewed the CEO of um

21:38

Cinnaban and she was telling me in the

21:40

Middle East they had a huge following.

21:43

No, they didn't have lines, but just

21:44

because she said when people drink less,

21:45

sugar becomes sort of their their vice.

21:48

So um if people are turning away from

21:50

drinking then yeah food treats sort of

21:52

fulfill that and also it's the

21:54

socialization um it is forcing you to

21:57

have this in inerson experience um you

22:00

know it is your phone is actually kind

22:01

of part of it in a messed up way but it

22:04

is sort of a socialization of a kind.

22:07

>> Yeah would you agree Rachel? Yeah,

22:09

there's sort of a phenomenon that I've

22:11

been noodling on around like offline but

22:14

online where you have these sort of uh

22:16

lookalike contests uh things that are

22:20

happening offline but you're documenting

22:21

it for online or like you know uh analog

22:25

trend well you're posting about it so

22:27

how analog really are you and so I think

22:29

there is this sort of like social

22:31

signifier of like I'm offline I'm

22:33

documenting it um but it's this tension

22:36

I think of of knowing that they want to

22:39

be off their phone but still feeling

22:40

that urge to tell everyone about it.

22:42

>> Something I've also been thinking about

22:44

here, let's say you go viral. You're

22:47

you're running a small business and you

22:49

come out with uh a great new product and

22:51

suddenly everyone's doing it. I tried

22:53

the viral cronut, whatever it is. I

22:55

wonder what the longevity of that

22:57

actually is for the business. It seems

23:00

as though you want to try to go viral.

23:03

um you want the line around the block,

23:05

but I wonder if the line exists 2 weeks

23:08

from then or 3 weeks from then or if

23:10

suddenly it just sort of falls off a

23:12

cliff. Um Allison, I mean, I don't know

23:16

if you have any insight into this, but

23:19

do we know if this actually is a good

23:23

thing long-term for businesses or is it

23:26

more of a fad and therefore kind of a a

23:29

business red herring maybe? I mean my

23:32

guess would be it's like anyone who gets

23:34

attention in this sort of attention

23:36

economy is it can be a great start but

23:39

do you have a good business? Do you have

23:40

a good product? Do you have a good

23:42

marketing plan? Are you willing to work

23:43

hard to do something with that

23:45

opportunity?

23:45

>> Yeah.

23:46

>> And sort of build on it. I mean if you

23:48

sort of just have one, you know, viral

23:51

product and you don't really have a good

23:52

business plan to back up back it up or

23:54

you don't have other goods and services

23:57

that people want, you probably it's not

23:59

good. But certainly maybe it can sort of

24:01

spark a business for you.

24:03

>> Yeah. Rachel, as someone who writes

24:05

about a lot of these topics, I mean,

24:09

what is your advice or or what would you

24:11

recommend to businesses who see this

24:15

hear this conversation, they see these

24:16

trends, and they're kind of like, I

24:18

don't really know what to do with this

24:19

information. Like, is this the are these

24:21

the kinds of trends that businesses need

24:23

to actually be acknowledging and

24:25

thinking about? You know, I wouldn't be

24:27

like, get in the lab and make something

24:29

that you think will go viral

24:30

necessarily, but I, you know, when I'm

24:32

talking to small businesses who are

24:34

like, do I need to be on social media? I

24:36

say, you know, it's a powerful thing. I

24:39

have an example, uh, there's a coffee

24:40

shop in Minnesota called Little Joy.

24:42

They've used their own social. So,

24:44

essentially treating their own social

24:45

like, how do we become the influencer?

24:47

Let's not hand over the keys or we're

24:49

happy to hand over the keys, but let's

24:50

make our social page the hub of where

24:52

people want to watch. And I think

24:54

they've built a really amazing customer

24:56

base by being really consistent and

24:58

essentially creating like a serialized

24:59

show on their own social. So they own

25:01

that conversation and people are coming

25:04

in to try the viral things as it comes

25:06

up. But they've created that consistent

25:07

show that really instead of building a

25:09

viral like pop builds loyalty and people

25:12

are like my show is on. I'm so happy to

25:14

be watching this. And so, you know, if

25:16

you have that momentum, one of your

25:17

drinks goes viral, I'd be thinking, how

25:19

do we keep up that momentum through our

25:21

own social presence so we're not relying

25:22

on somebody coming in and making a video

25:24

about it necessarily?

25:26

>> Right. Yeah, it's a really good point.

25:27

Do you think that businesses at this

25:30

point need to think of themselves as

25:33

creators, specifically consumer

25:34

businesses?

25:35

>> I think they need to be thinking about

25:37

how do we find entertaining ways into

25:40

social media that make people want to

25:42

stick around and watch our content.

25:44

Allison, any thoughts on that?

25:46

>> You know, it's a tall order. I mean, I I

25:49

love the idea that you sort of can

25:51

control your own marketing and

25:52

narrative, and maybe that's where this

25:53

is going is rather than being dependent

25:56

on an influencer is building your own

25:58

brand, but then maybe we're circling

26:00

back to bigger marketing teams because,

26:02

you know, for a coffee shop to sort of

26:04

also run a a major social media

26:07

strategy. I mean, that's a different set

26:08

of skills. It's also a lot of time and

26:10

effort,

26:11

>> right? So perhaps ultimately that'll be

26:13

outsourced and what is old is new again.

26:16

Um and we go back to sort of hiring a

26:18

marketing team to do that for you.

26:20

>> Yeah. I mean it seems as though what's

26:23

nice about it for on the side of the

26:26

viewer who's seeing these products on

26:28

their Instagram or their Tik Tok is it

26:30

feels kind of organic and it feels like

26:33

something's actually happening that's

26:35

real. Someone just stumbled into this

26:36

place. They have this interesting

26:38

product. everyone's going now and I'm

26:40

gonna meet all these people. But I also

26:42

wonder the extent to which these are

26:45

potentially planned or uh paid for or

26:49

set up in some sort of way. And you know

26:52

this this becomes especially pertinent

26:54

in the world of the influencer economy

26:56

where these influencers go in and they

26:58

say, "Oh, I just tried out this new hot

27:00

product." And then we don't know that

27:02

behind the scenes they're getting paid

27:04

to go in and say that. And it seems as

27:06

though this is going to become a really

27:08

big business really um which is kind of

27:12

pretending as though you have this

27:14

organic moment which in reality has been

27:16

set up and is paid for. Rachel I I just

27:20

be curious is that happening and is that

27:24

something that I guess influencers are

27:27

are thinking about? I think that, you

27:31

know, as social media becomes

27:34

essentially that slot machine where you

27:35

can pull the lever, brands are going to

27:37

be saying, "How do I manufacture this?"

27:39

Like, "Okay, we can't pay an influencer

27:41

to come in or we can't guarantee that

27:43

they're going to come in. Can we

27:44

manufacture this?" We're seeing this

27:46

already. There are shadow accounts that

27:47

are are they employees posting this? Are

27:50

they influencers? Are they just sort of

27:52

UGC creators? And they're just every day

27:54

pumping out content about that brand.

27:56

And so, we are seeing that. I worry

27:59

about that and what that does to the

28:01

state of social media especially as

28:02

people are showing up more skeptical of

28:04

what they're seeing on their timelines

28:05

and uh I don't think that that's

28:08

necessarily a good thing and and so I do

28:10

worry about businesses saying how do we

28:12

you know do this from scratch there is

28:14

an organic sort of momentum that happens

28:17

and trying to manufacture that it's a a

28:20

scary prospect to me

28:22

>> you wonder is it inevitable I mean this

28:25

is becoming a big part of the economy

28:27

perhaps And this is largely how

28:30

marketing happens. So inevitably it

28:32

becomes professionalized. It becomes

28:34

commercialized. Like so I mean I I

28:37

suppose it's sort of it just has to go

28:39

this way. And maybe the um what keeps it

28:42

fresh is this sort of sheen of

28:45

authenticity. But maybe it was never

28:47

there. And I I suppose eventually people

28:50

sort of cut it's like watching an

28:52

advertisement on the Super Bowl. you

28:54

know, this isn't authentic, but

28:55

eventually maybe this just turns into

28:57

that because you can't have this share

28:59

of marketing be so important to the

29:02

economy and have it eventually just not

29:04

become professionalized in some way or

29:06

commercialized in some way.

29:07

>> I think what I worry about is that the

29:09

FTC is about 10 years behind on what's

29:11

happening. Right now, people aren't

29:12

disclosing when something is an ad. Uh

29:15

it's a very big gray area. And so I

29:18

think that in the meantime, you're going

29:21

to have consumers that feel duped by

29:24

certain marketing. And that's not what

29:25

we've been talking about. What I think

29:27

people are trying to manufacture will

29:29

confuse a lot of people. Is this

29:30

marketing? Is this real? I don't know.

29:33

That's a tough place to be putting

29:35

people in on social media. And I do

29:37

worry about like the long-term effects

29:39

of that and not enforcing proper

29:41

disclosures.

29:42

>> Yeah, it's a really interesting point.

29:44

Just as we start to wrap up here, kind

29:46

of a broad question, but Allison,

29:48

where do you think this is all headed

29:50

over the next several years? Do you

29:52

think that this influencer economy is

29:55

going to grow? Will marketing budgets

29:57

maybe just completely reshift around

30:01

this? Uh what do you think is going to

30:03

happen over the next few years? Well, I

30:05

think it's just going to become more

30:06

mainstreamed in our culture and more

30:07

institutionalized and probably, as I

30:10

said, become the standard way of how to

30:11

communicate just because how people

30:13

communicate is different. Like young

30:14

people now like tend not to watch TV as

30:17

much. They just consume short form

30:18

video. So, if you want to reach that

30:20

audience, this is where you have to go,

30:22

which means again money is going to

30:24

follow. And um you're just going to sort

30:27

of it's it's probably going to

30:28

eventually people are just going to

30:29

assume that they're being paid to be

30:32

told what this is and it just becomes

30:33

commercialized. Um you know you you lose

30:36

that authenticity. You you lose you feel

30:38

like you're getting a genuine review of

30:39

a product,

30:40

>> right?

30:41

>> Um but you know what did we have before?

30:44

>> I mean well I I never been great.

30:47

>> I see this is imperfect but maybe not

30:49

any worse than what we had before. Maybe

30:50

in some ways still better.

30:52

>> Yeah. Rachel, I'll I'll pose the same

30:54

question to you before we end.

30:56

>> What I I think we're going to see right

30:58

now like the top top influencers are

31:00

extremely expensive and I think we're

31:02

going to see businesses start to realize

31:04

that the follower count doesn't

31:07

necessarily matter anymore and they can

31:09

be paying much smaller influencers also

31:11

to be posting about their product. And

31:13

so I think we're going to see the split

31:14

where they'll still be paying the really

31:16

expensive influencers, but a good chunk

31:18

of that budget is going to go to much

31:20

smaller influencers who can still get

31:21

scale um despite not having a high

31:24

follower count.

31:25

>> Really interesting stuff. Rachel Carlton

31:27

is the author of the Lincoln Bio

31:28

newsletter. Allison Shreger is senior

31:30

fellow at the Manhattan Institute and

31:32

columnist for Bloomberg who just wrote

31:35

about this topic. You should go check it

31:37

out, read it on Bloomberg. Rachel

31:39

Allison, thank you so much for joining

31:41

me on the show. This was really

31:42

interesting.

31:43

>> Thank you.

31:44

>> Okay, that's it for today. We appreciate

31:47

you joining us for another Prof Markets

31:49

panel. If you have a guest you think we

31:50

should speak to on this topic or any

31:52

other, please drop us a line in the

31:54

comments or email our producer

31:56

claimedia.com.

32:00

We hope to hear from you. Thanks for

32:03

listening to Prof Markets from Profia.

32:05

If you liked what you heard, subscribe

32:06

to our YouTube channel and tune in

32:08

tomorrow for more.

Interactive Summary

The video explores the growing influence of the 'influencer economy' on consumer behavior and business strategy. Guests Rachel Carton and Allison Shrager discuss how viral social media trends, such as waiting in long lines for specific products like 'dot cakes' or bagels, are reshaping how brands market themselves. They highlight the shift towards algorithms that prioritize participation over traditional follower counts, the democratic yet 'winner-take-all' nature of this new economy, and the emerging ethical challenges regarding transparency, paid versus organic endorsements, and the potential for long-term business sustainability in a landscape driven by fleeting trends.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts