HomeVideos

Daredevil Michelle Khare — How to Become a YouTube Superstar

Now Playing

Daredevil Michelle Khare — How to Become a YouTube Superstar

Transcript

4813 segments

0:00

What are you putting off out of fear?

0:02

I'm putting off quitting my job. I'm

0:05

putting off reaching out to all the

0:08

people I need to to make this dream a

0:09

reality because it means I have to say

0:12

it out loud. I'm waiting for a false

0:14

sense of security to inspire me to take

0:17

a leap. But I'm actually being

0:19

challenged and invited to create my own

0:21

security. I've never designed my own

0:25

rubric of success. And that's because I

0:27

don't trust myself to define success.

0:30

I'm scared to assume that

0:32

responsibility.

0:34

That was my fear setting.

0:37

It's very personal process.

0:39

>> Michelle, at long last, here we are.

0:42

>> Here we are.

0:44

>> So nice to meet you in person.

0:45

>> It's so nice to meet you, too. This is

0:47

so exciting and surreal for me. So,

0:50

thank you for letting me infiltrate your

0:51

podcast studio today.

0:53

>> Absolutely. I am thrilled. It looks like

0:56

about three years ago that I first put

1:01

you and your channel in my newsletter,

1:05

Five Bullet Friday. And I think it was

1:09

probably even before that that one of

1:11

our mutual friends, Adam Grant, had been

1:13

telling me repeatedly,

1:16

you have to have Michelle on the show.

1:19

And the reason that I was so excited to

1:22

put you in the newsletter, I don't even

1:24

remember the line. I went back and I

1:26

looked at what I said exactly. And one

1:29

of the things I said was, "I'm so happy

1:32

that someone finally cracked sort of

1:35

this premise and did it right." But

1:38

since people probably have no idea what

1:41

I'm talking about, although I would have

1:42

already said something in the intro,

1:44

what's the log line so to speak for

1:47

Challenge Accepted?

1:48

>> Of Challenge Accepted. What is it?

1:49

>> So, Challenge Accepted is a show where I

1:52

attempt the world's toughest stunts and

1:54

professions. And that can range from

1:57

learning and attempting Harry Houdini's

2:00

deadliest trick, the water torture cell,

2:03

to training with the Secret Service for

2:05

a week to most recently I recreated Tom

2:09

Cruz's stunt from Mission Impossible

2:11

where I was hanging off the side of a

2:13

military aircraft as it was taking off.

2:18

and you have more than 6 million

2:20

followers, more than a billion views,

2:24

and I'm going to read, you know what,

2:27

we'll probably just skip the intro

2:28

because I'm basically getting into it

2:29

anyway. Michelle hopes to prove that

2:31

with enough dedication and failure,

2:34

anything is possible. And that's one of

2:36

the characteristics that I most

2:37

appreciate about the show is like if you

2:39

have a breakdown, if you're flat on your

2:42

back, if you stumble and fall, it's in

2:47

there, right? That's a feature and not a

2:48

bug.

2:49

>> Exactly.

2:50

>> So, it's not just the highlights, it's

2:51

also the low lightss. And since we're

2:54

already getting into it, I'm just going

2:56

to read this paragraph. All right.

2:59

Michelle's work has earned multiple

3:00

streaming awards, including show of the

3:02

year, has been featured in the New York

3:03

Times, Forbes, Vogue India, and more. In

3:05

2025, challenge accepted, made history.

3:08

Congratulations. Successfully

3:09

petitioning to join the prime time Emmy

3:11

ballot. Michelle was named a Time 100

3:14

honore for her impact as a creator and

3:16

storyteller. Let's rewind way back. We

3:20

were chatting a little bit before we got

3:22

started about Shriefport, Louisiana.

3:26

>> Oh yes,

3:27

>> shout out Shrieport.

3:29

>> And I mentioned I had been there and you

3:31

were like, I'm so sorry.

3:34

>> There's not much there.

3:36

>> Why was I there? Why had I been there?

3:38

And why does that tie into your

3:40

background a little bit, your history

3:42

growing up? Oh, I was just say if you

3:44

want to hop into it because I'll I'll

3:46

suppose answer my own question which is

3:48

the reason I was intrigued is because

3:49

they have very compelling tax incentives

3:52

and other incentives for filming.

3:55

>> Right. So what was your first exposure

3:58

to sort of the business broadly speaking

4:01

in air quotes? My very first exposure to

4:04

the business was my dad is a big big

4:07

movie and television lover. He actually

4:09

learned English after immigrating from

4:12

India by watching films even on the

4:15

plane from India to America.

4:19

>> So growing up because there's not much

4:21

to do in Shreport. Every Friday night we

4:24

were at the movies. It didn't matter if

4:26

it was a blockbuster or a, you know,

4:30

very lowrated Rotten Tomatoes B-side

4:32

movie. I saw everything. Kids movies,

4:36

PG-13 up, like we saw it all. And then

4:39

we would go to a pizza shop and talk

4:42

about the movie afterwards. Again,

4:44

there's nothing to do in street. So,

4:46

this was like the pinnacle of

4:47

entertainment. And so just naturally I I

4:50

started experiencing

4:52

a homegrown little film school, if that

4:55

makes sense. We printed out the AFI top

4:58

100 movies and had them in our living

5:00

room and we would check them off as we

5:02

watched them, me and my dad. And what

5:05

was special is as I got a little older,

5:07

all these tax incentives started

5:08

happening, bringing films to New Orleans

5:11

and to Shreveport.

5:13

We got a lot of like Twilight knockoff

5:16

movies. I think one of the scary movies

5:18

was shot in Shreport. And so our town

5:22

sort of experienced this little economic

5:26

art renaissance which was really

5:28

exciting. And so all of our friends and

5:31

and family members were becoming extras

5:33

in movies and TV shows and and feeling,

5:36

you know, very excited about all of

5:38

that. And so one of my first jobs was

5:43

I had an internship on a movie starring

5:46

The Rock. It was a movie called Snitch.

5:49

It came out in 2013. And I I think I was

5:52

like so low on the call sheet. I was

5:54

like it was after all the PAs. It was PA

5:57

intern. It was the last person on the

5:59

call sheet was me. And I was just

6:01

getting coffee for people and learning.

6:03

And it it was an incredible experience.

6:06

And I love that because I got a window

6:09

into the traditional scope of what it

6:12

could take to tell a story at a higher

6:14

Hollywood level.

6:16

>> And that's what I hope to bring a lot of

6:18

to what we do even on Challenge Accepted

6:20

today is this midpoint of digital

6:23

freedom ownership but structure and

6:27

understanding and respect of the history

6:30

of where our visual storytelling medium

6:32

has come from. Mhm. Part of the reason I

6:35

said I'm so glad somebody finally sort

6:37

of cracked this is

6:40

you'll know this, some people may not.

6:44

There are basically two reasons why I'm

6:46

doing this podcast or the catalyst that

6:48

led to this podcast and they both relate

6:51

to ownership in a sense. The first was

6:54

the 4-hour chef, which was basically

6:56

just a suicide mission of a deadline.

6:58

Book that should have taken three years

7:00

was done in a year and that's just

7:02

physically effectively impossible. So

7:05

ran myself into the ground with that

7:07

>> because you are self- testing all of

7:09

these techniques.

7:09

>> I'm self test. Yeah, exactly. I mean, I

7:11

was doing everything in the book full of

7:12

experiments and somehow thought it would

7:14

be a good idea to try to learn

7:16

photography to do

7:19

hundreds of photographs in the book

7:20

myself, which turns out to be a craft in

7:22

and of itself that takes a lot of time

7:25

if you want to be even halfway decent.

7:27

>> And what ended up happening in that case

7:30

was

7:32

distribution got hamstrung. I expected

7:34

some of it because it was a book. It was

7:37

the largest title that had been acquired

7:38

by the then very naent Amazon

7:41

publishing. And because people in some

7:44

ways rightly fear Amazon as this

7:47

omnipowerful, you know, omnipotent

7:50

entity that controls all of these

7:53

different aspects of in most cases

7:55

distribution. But now Amazon Publishing

7:58

was going to be competing with the big

8:00

publishing houses for author talent. And

8:02

this scared the hell out of everybody.

8:04

So, I expected that there would be, say,

8:07

boycott by Barnes & Noble. I did not

8:10

anticipate it would include all the big

8:12

box retailers and much more. So, the

8:15

book basically I I don't want to say it

8:17

died on the vine because it did as well

8:20

as it could have. But at the same time,

8:23

roughly, this is the part I haven't

8:25

talked as much about. I had been filming

8:29

and then debuted in 2013 the Tim Ferrris

8:34

experiment. And the Tim Ferris

8:37

experiment had me doing these

8:38

experiments as you might expect on a

8:41

weekly basis. And that was through a

8:43

startup within Turner Broadcasting

8:45

called Upwave. But there were all these

8:47

problems internally at Upwave.

8:49

Ultimately that that got shut down.

8:51

there was a regime change and then what

8:53

h what happens? The catalog of episodes.

8:57

If it succeeds, the new leadership is

8:59

not going to get any credit and if it

9:00

goes poorly, they're going to get all

9:01

the blame. So, it just got locked up.

9:03

And it took me like 2 years or 3 years

9:05

to get back the rights and then quote

9:09

unquote self-publish on Apple. And it it

9:12

did very well at the time. But what you

9:16

just said is so important. And I want to

9:18

underscore it for people because I've

9:20

heard you discuss. I want to give a

9:22

shout out to Colin Samir, two of the

9:24

best interviewers out there in my

9:25

opinion, especially when it comes to

9:27

creator economy and the nuts and bolts

9:30

of making things in this modern era. I

9:32

really want to give them due credit.

9:35

When you've had conversations, and I'm

9:37

going to talk for a second, I apologize,

9:38

but when you've had conversations with

9:40

some of these larger, let's call it

9:42

traditional outlets or platforms, right?

9:46

and you start to talk about your

9:47

production schedule, they're like,

9:48

"Well, wait a second. It takes you 6

9:51

months or a year or fill in the blank in

9:54

their mind excessively long period of

9:56

time. Could we compress it into a week?"

9:58

>> Mhm.

9:58

>> And you have figured out very artfully

10:02

how to have largely complete editorial

10:06

control. There are some constraints,

10:07

right, depending on how you want to go

10:09

about it with partners and sponsors and

10:11

things like that, but largely you

10:12

control your schedule, your direction.

10:14

actually you do completely right you're

10:16

choosing positive constraints depending

10:18

on your objectives

10:20

but what ended up happening with Tim

10:21

Ferris experiments like okay we have a

10:23

week for each one

10:24

>> and so I would be in compression pants

10:29

and like putting on DMSO and all this

10:31

crap because I had a ton of injuries

10:33

from one episode but we were already

10:35

going into post and then we'd have a day

10:37

of travel and then I'm starting the next

10:39

episode and it was impossible right it

10:41

was just physically I'm still contending

10:44

with injuries from that. We might talk

10:46

about that with respect to some of the

10:47

stuff that you're doing. I want to hear

10:48

about it. But there were two issues,

10:50

right? There was the kind of production

10:52

side control

10:54

>> problem and then ultimately didn't

10:57

control distribution. And

11:00

for

11:02

those reasons, those two straws that

11:05

broke the camel's back, I was like,

11:07

"Fuck this." And I'd used podcasts to

11:10

launch the 4-hour chef. And I thought to

11:12

myself, you know what? I like RSS feeds.

11:15

I like this idea of being able to do

11:17

whatever I want, be myself. If I want to

11:19

curse, I can curse. Not that that's

11:21

ultimately, I suppose, can be an art

11:24

form in and of itself, depending on

11:25

where you grow up. And that's how we

11:28

ended up here today, right? So,

11:30

>> just so I understand, you were human

11:33

guinea pigging, 4-hour chef. Yeah.

11:35

>> And shooting Tim Ferris experiment at

11:37

the same time.

11:38

>> They were basically backtoback and there

11:40

was probably some overlap. So, I was

11:42

doing pre-production while I was

11:44

finishing the 4-hour chef cuz I'm a

11:46

glutton for punishment. For people who

11:47

haven't seen that, it's my first

11:48

fourcolor book. It's something like 600,

11:50

700 pages, cut down from like a thousand

11:52

probably. And

11:55

the biggest

11:58

difference, I'd say the absolute biggest

11:59

difference between the 4-hour chef and

12:01

the books that came before it, the

12:03

4-hour work week and the 4-hour body, is

12:05

that in the case of the 4-hour body, I

12:06

did all of the experiments, then

12:08

digested it all, combed through

12:10

everything, and compiled the book. In

12:13

the case of the 4-hour chef, I was still

12:16

because of the deadline doing a lot of

12:19

the experiments as I was already

12:21

beginning to write the earlier sections

12:23

of the book, which is a very risky

12:25

gambit.

12:26

>> Uhhuh.

12:27

>> And then on top of that, because I did

12:30

not know, and I thought this was

12:32

actually a good idea, although there

12:33

were a lot of pitfalls, because the

12:36

4-hour chef was a huge gamble,

12:38

particularly from a distribution

12:40

perspective. I expected I was going to

12:42

get kneecapped in certain ways and I was

12:44

like, well, if this doesn't work out the

12:47

way I wanted to, I still have the

12:49

benefit of the doubt in the eyes of most

12:52

people and I can use the success of the

12:54

prior book and the blog at that time,

12:57

remember blogs, people to parlay that

13:00

into the television. So, I was like,

13:02

"Let me get the deal before The 4Hour

13:05

Chef fully comes out so that I have the

13:08

leverage that might become a question

13:10

mark once it's published."

13:12

>> Oh my gosh. Okay. So, I for those of you

13:15

I feel like there are so few people in

13:18

the world who can truly empathize with

13:21

what you put yourself through. I'm

13:23

thinking of Morgan Spurlock.

13:26

>> Yeah.

13:26

>> The true pioneer of whatever it is we're

13:28

doing. And rest in peace, my gosh. David

13:31

Blaine

13:32

>> is another that comes to mind.

13:34

>> And I think what people don't realize

13:37

when they watch your content or even

13:39

mine is that it's not filmed in a

13:42

vacuum. Life is happening. As you

13:45

mentioned, you're not just going to

13:46

Japan to learn Yabusame for 5 days.

13:49

You're struggling with a jet lag. And

13:51

then you're also probably answering

13:53

questions and emails about what next

13:55

week's episode is going to entail. And

13:57

that is a level of professional athlete

14:00

that is so unappreciated. So I much

14:04

empathize with that.

14:06

>> I Yeah, I really appreciate that. And

14:08

>> but we were talking about decisions.

14:10

>> Decisions. Yeah. So decisions and then

14:12

we're going to go back chronologically.

14:14

Okay.

14:15

>> Thank you for saying all that. And I was

14:18

also building initially the the the

14:21

writing side of things based on in some

14:23

ways models from let's call it

14:26

experiential journalism who came before

14:28

me.

14:29

>> And there were quite a few. Usually it

14:30

was done with some type of satirical or

14:33

humor twist right like AJ Jacobs would

14:36

be a great example for people who don't

14:37

know. The year of living biblically I

14:39

think is an amazing amazing book.

14:42

>> I met him a couple months ago and I said

14:44

you need to do that again and make it a

14:45

YouTube video. It would bang. He is such

14:47

a sweet guy. Morgan Spurlock for people

14:49

who might not have recognized the name

14:51

immediately superersized me.

14:53

>> Really a sort of a genre breaking

14:55

category redefining experiment and many

14:59

more who came earlier from a writing

15:02

perspective but questions. So what I

15:06

would love to know and this is going to

15:08

get in the weeds a bit guys but we're

15:10

going to zoom out and get the Genesis

15:12

story as well. But part of what I'm so

15:15

curious about is you have in some ways

15:18

the dizziness of freedom, right? You

15:20

have a paradox of choice challenge where

15:25

having complete lack of constraints

15:28

can be almost as bad if you don't have a

15:31

framework for figuring it out as having

15:33

too many constraints. So when you have

15:36

things running concurrently, right, you

15:38

might, as I understand it, be working on

15:40

like two or three challenges at the same

15:42

time, right? You're doing

15:43

post-production for one, maybe you're

15:44

doing planning for another, and you're

15:46

in the middle of a third.

15:48

>> First of all, how far in advance do you

15:50

plan your editorial calendar?

15:52

>> The editorial calendar for Challenge

15:53

Accepted can be anywhere from 12 to 15

15:57

months out from idea to upload. Yeah.

16:01

>> And an example of concurrent things

16:03

happening would be

16:05

>> there was one day where I had to do

16:08

astronaut training for our NASA episode.

16:10

So naturally, I began my day by going up

16:14

in a fighter jet in the middle of

16:16

nowhere in California, flying around,

16:18

having no idea what I was getting myself

16:20

into.

16:20

>> Hope you took your Zopran. Yeah,

16:23

>> I threw up.

16:25

>> Yeah.

16:25

>> While there closed,

16:28

>> I exited the plane. We finished filming

16:31

that. I got in my car, drove 3 hours

16:34

back to Los Angeles, and had a ballet

16:37

lesson.

16:39

I think that like is just a a good

16:41

window into what one day of of life is

16:44

like and often training for multiple

16:47

things at once. But when you have a

16:49

situation and and a privilege honestly

16:52

of the gift of choice and getting to

16:55

choose how you use your time, I like to

17:00

maximize my output for each year as far

17:04

as it really comes down to

17:09

something that I learned early, which is

17:12

the more

17:14

milestone memories you experience, the

17:16

longer life feels. for sure.

17:18

>> And I've realized that that goes hand in

17:21

hand with my business. The more

17:24

milestone memories I create and can

17:26

capture and turn into stories, it

17:28

actually is a better episode, it it

17:32

leads to more revenue, more

17:33

opportunities. And so I've sort of

17:35

merged those together. But it comes from

17:39

I am an athlete. I am a person who

17:42

operates in an environment where if you

17:45

give me a coach, you give me a training

17:46

plan, I'll follow it. I'll do exactly

17:48

what you tell me to and I really thrive

17:50

in that environment. And being a

17:52

business owner is such an oppositional

17:54

to that because now you are both the

17:58

coach and the athlete at the same time.

18:00

And so what I have had to do is, and I'm

18:02

stealing this term from one of my other

18:04

friends, is put a Formula 1 team around

18:06

myself.

18:07

>> A Formula 1 team, you know, we love Max

18:10

Vers Stappen. He's an incredible driver

18:13

and he's not able to do what he does

18:15

without the support of all of the

18:16

mechanics and engineers. So what I have

18:19

done at every step in my life is try to

18:22

find who are the best people to put

18:24

around myself to continually challenge

18:26

me whether it's business,

18:30

personal relationships, content, story

18:34

and assembling that team is really

18:37

important to me. Those are the people

18:40

who help me decide how do I spend each

18:42

minute of a calendar day.

18:43

>> We're going to double click on a few

18:44

things here and we're going to go all

18:46

over the place, folks. So,

18:48

>> buckle up.

18:49

>> Buckle up. Right.

18:52

It's not quite going to be the vomit

18:54

comet for astronaut training. Hopefully,

18:57

it'll be a little It'll be more like a

18:59

tour through the countryside with lots

19:00

of interesting sites and vistas, but a

19:03

few things come to mind that I want to

19:05

mention and then ask about. The first is

19:06

that

19:08

and Colin and Samir made this point like

19:10

you sort of exemplify

19:13

something that I hope continues to gain

19:16

traction which is a focus on

19:19

quality over quantity

19:21

>> right because there was a point where

19:23

it's like hey you have to post 50 times

19:24

a day you have to do this you have to do

19:26

that you have to like vlog 20 minutes

19:28

every 12 hours no matter what you do

19:31

>> and you're you're borrowing a lot of the

19:34

best storytelling techniques and

19:36

production quality of quote unquote

19:38

traditional, right?

19:39

>> But also applying it to this sort of

19:42

digital native environment,

19:45

>> which has a lot of its own upsides and

19:47

also

19:49

potentially long-term damaging

19:50

temptations, which you have to be aware

19:52

of, and I think you very much are. when

19:55

you're publishing fewer videos however

19:58

right in a sense you not in all senses

20:02

but in some senses you're kind of like

20:03

fighting the drive of the algorithm and

20:07

there are economic incentives

20:10

that drive the frequency with which a

20:12

lot of people publish right

20:14

>> so when you're doing less and again had

20:17

tip to Colin Samir it's like you are I

20:20

want you to modify this because it's

20:21

been a minute since you spoke with them

20:23

but you can keep the lights on, right,

20:26

to some extent with like AdSense and the

20:29

sort of ad revenue from that. Then

20:32

you've got brand partners, right? And

20:34

that's part of the reason why it seems

20:36

like it's helpful to have an editorial

20:38

calendar out for a period of time,

20:41

right? Because you can

20:44

>> have some type of I don't want to call

20:46

it sales process, but you have sort of

20:49

forwardlooking thematic opportunities

20:52

>> to look for those types of deals.

20:55

And then you've got your app, right,

20:58

among other things.

21:00

>> And I' I'd like to hear you talk about

21:01

that. But when you're going to break a

21:04

mold and you're trying to do something

21:06

that people say can't be done, right?

21:09

Like traditional TV on the internet,

21:10

right? Or whatever it might be, you may

21:13

have to find a new approach to financing

21:16

what you want to do, right? And so I'd

21:18

love to hear you speak for just a moment

21:20

about kind of what you have had to build

21:24

and how you've had to think differently

21:25

in order to do what you want to do. And

21:29

then I do want to return to and you can

21:30

mention this in your answer if you want,

21:33

but when you have certain episodes that

21:35

take a day to film, right? Some that

21:37

take a week, some that take six months,

21:39

some that take a year to set up, how the

21:42

hell do you create like a Gant chart or

21:44

whatever to actually do that? And my

21:47

understanding is like production is one

21:48

of your superpowers, right? So

21:51

>> that is a very gigantic half-page

21:54

question. But

21:55

>> okay.

21:55

>> Yeah. If you could speak to basically

21:57

how you make it work,

21:59

>> how we make it work,

22:00

>> right? Because a lot of creators I think

22:03

are succumbing to the culture of

22:05

cortisol drive.

22:07

>> Mhm.

22:08

>> Where they feel like they have to keep

22:09

up, keep up, keep up often in terms of

22:12

just frequency, right? And I think

22:14

that's a really dangerous game to play

22:16

for a lot of reasons. Somebody else is

22:18

always going to be able to sacrifice or

22:20

be willing to sacrifice their entire

22:22

lives to publish more frequently. So if

22:24

that can't be your sole metric, right?

22:26

So how do you do what you do? And how do

22:28

you have to think differently, operate

22:29

differently?

22:30

>> How do we operate differently? Our

22:33

business is super antithetical to what

22:36

most creators are doing. And I started

22:38

in that place that you're referring to,

22:39

uploading multiple long form videos a

22:42

week. I mean I was uploading before Tik

22:45

Tok existed. So it was all long form.

22:47

Then of course short form came along.

22:50

But what happened at the beginning of my

22:53

career was I was trying to grow my

22:58

channel to create financial and personal

23:01

stability. I

23:03

had taken a big risk by leaving my job.

23:06

And as a part of that, the first entry

23:10

point was stability in some sense. So I

23:14

was making videos about anything I

23:16

thought would perform well and still

23:18

with my own lens, of course,

23:20

>> but I would have this strategy of I'm

23:23

going to do three videos a month for the

23:25

studio, if you will, which is a term

23:27

from traditional TV and film, where a

23:30

big director will do a big blockbuster

23:31

movie and then the studio will allow

23:33

them to do their passion project. So, I

23:35

would do that for myself or once a month

23:37

I would do a passion project. And at the

23:40

beginning of my channel, it was I would

23:43

DM stunt performers like Tom Holland's

23:46

stunt double and ask them, would you

23:49

train with me for a week and and can we

23:51

make a video together? And it was cool

23:53

because we were targeting communities

23:55

that were undervalued and unseen often.

23:59

I mean, many stunt performers aren't

24:02

allowed to share their work. And so

24:03

giving them an opportunity to highlight

24:05

their work was helpful to them and

24:08

exciting for them and exciting for me

24:10

selfishly because I want to learn how to

24:11

do all these incredible stunts and make

24:13

an amazing story about it. And I saw a

24:16

market opportunity because when you see

24:19

BTS stuff from movies, it's it's very

24:22

>> behind the scenes.

24:23

>> Yeah, behind the scenes. My apologies.

24:24

When you see behind the scenes content

24:26

from big Marvel movies, it's very

24:28

manicured and very short. And I really

24:31

wanted to give space and breathability

24:33

to this experimental process. And what

24:36

ended up happening is those passion

24:39

projects started outperforming

24:42

the things I expected to just perform

24:44

well. And it got to this point where I

24:48

was limited resource-wise, just like my

24:50

own time even, of of being able to do

24:53

more of that passion thing. And I just

24:56

decided, we decided as a team, we're

24:58

only going to focus on challenge

25:00

accepted. Let's just try that for

25:03

>> was it when did it get named Challenge

25:06

Accepted?

25:07

>> It got named Challenge Accepted after

25:10

Challenge Accepted existed. So when you

25:12

go back and look at season one of

25:14

Challenge Accepted, which is a while ago

25:16

now, I think we went back and named it

25:18

that because we're like, "Oh yeah, this

25:20

was the beginning of this show." Which

25:21

is so funny. But we were we were doing

25:23

many things on the channel and we

25:24

decided to strip away everything and

25:26

only go in on that and that is where a

25:29

true inflection point came on the

25:31

channel. I would honestly say Tim, you

25:33

were asking earlier about key decisions.

25:37

I think a lot of the inflection points

25:40

of my life have happened when my back

25:41

has been against the wall.

25:43

>> Not in a a place of I get to make a

25:45

decision, but more like I have to make a

25:48

decision because everything's going to

25:49

break if I don't. And this was a risky

25:51

decision to make to go all in on a show

25:56

where I am physically committing myself

25:58

for up to months at a time. At this

26:01

point in 2026, 2025, we release 8 to 10

26:05

episodes per year.

26:06

>> Mhm.

26:07

>> That's my upload cadence. And so every

26:09

opportunity is a is a big bet. But what

26:14

I have found is that when I did that,

26:17

something even more special happened. It

26:20

created something unique. And I have

26:23

found that defining something unique can

26:27

be even more valuable than consistency

26:30

or mass viewership. We're very blessed

26:32

that challenge accepted does get a lot

26:34

of views and we feel strong about the

26:36

bets that we make on these episodes. But

26:40

I have found that creating something

26:42

special attracts even more people to

26:44

want to support it. And so now what we

26:47

ironically have on the channel is a

26:48

scarcity mindset for advertisers that if

26:52

you want to be in an episode of

26:53

Challenge Accepted, there are 10. The

26:56

train's going. Are you getting on or are

26:57

you getting off? Because we only have so

26:59

much inventory to sell. We're able to

27:01

sell it at a premium. And it makes what

27:04

we're doing so one of

27:08

my like big thesis is whatever we do has

27:12

to be one of one. A few things come to

27:14

mind as as you're talking you know one

27:16

is

27:18

the importance of owning or creating

27:21

even better yet a category right

27:24

>> so this category of one idea

27:28

blue ocean strategy I think at least at

27:30

the time I read it which was a long time

27:31

ago 10 years ago pretty good exploration

27:33

of this but separately

27:36

as I look at the landscape now

27:40

I've had a lot of people ask me about

27:42

podcasting if you were to are now what

27:43

would you do? And

27:46

I could throw out sort of examples of

27:48

what I might do, but just from a broader

27:51

kind of meta level, I say I think it

27:53

would be very difficult for me to do

27:57

now or start now what I started in 2014,

28:00

which was kind of a broad exploration of

28:04

deconstructing world-class performers in

28:06

an interview format. Now there are 600

28:08

of those. And

28:12

if you want something that is

28:14

sustainable and this is not exactly the

28:17

right way to frame it, but premium from

28:20

a partnership perspective,

28:22

>> right? From a CPM perspective, from a

28:24

whatever perspective, the best examples

28:27

that I would try to model are shows like

28:30

yours. Although I'm not really um kind

28:32

of shy with video, so I probably

28:34

wouldn't do video first, but it would be

28:35

a show like yours. I mean, if I were 20

28:37

right now, I'd be like, "That's what I

28:38

want to do." If I could have a job, it

28:40

would be Michelle's job. I mean,

28:42

honestly, it would be. But if you want

28:44

to look at some other examples where I

28:45

probably wouldn't pursue it, but they're

28:47

doing excellent jobs. Acquired, for

28:49

instance, founders, you know, David

28:52

Senra, highly focused,

28:55

long form, very hard to replicate

28:57

because there's so much goddamn work,

29:00

right? Yes.

29:01

>> Which is true with yours also. It's

29:02

like, oh, you want to spend six months

29:03

making a video? Like, let's let's see.

29:05

It's a lot easier to publish frequently

29:09

without thinking as hard about the lead

29:12

time of doing something that's very

29:13

complex.

29:14

>> And that was part of the strategy with

29:15

challenge accepted too is you see many

29:18

people copying one another online in any

29:22

form of art. People are copying

29:24

constantly and part of our defensive

29:26

strategy was how do we do something that

29:28

is so crazy? No one would be no one

29:33

would be crazy enough I don't think to

29:35

run seven marathons on all seven

29:37

continents in in one single week and

29:40

make a documentary about it and go

29:41

through all of the production headache

29:43

of that or call the FAA 300 times to get

29:46

permission to hang off the side of a

29:47

military plane to recreate the Mission

29:49

Impossible stunt. It's almost like the

29:51

things that feel so untouchable

29:53

instantly become opportunities for story

29:57

because it's a great story to try and

29:59

overcome that.

30:00

>> And also the second mover scenario will

30:05

at least take them so long to catch up

30:08

to us to get there,

30:09

>> right? Because you're going to be the

30:10

comp. They're going to say it's like

30:11

challenge accepted but dot dot dot. And

30:14

that is going to be very difficult for

30:16

other people to overcome, right? And I

30:19

want to explore this a little bit more

30:20

because it's I think so critical and you

30:25

see it in a lot of different places.

30:27

Sometimes the hard thing

30:30

is the easier thing long term. Meaning

30:34

like if if you solve a very hard problem

30:37

upfront,

30:39

it makes your life a little easier or a

30:42

lot easier long term.

30:44

>> And this applies everywhere, right?

30:46

There's a amazing amazing guy. You

30:49

should meet him at some point.

30:50

>> Okay.

30:51

>> Jersey Gregorick and his wife Annella

30:54

Gregorick. They're Polish immigrants.

30:56

They immigrated to the US with like 10

30:59

or 100 bucks in their pocket. They were

31:01

political refugees. Landed in California

31:04

and still to this day, they both have

31:08

multiple world records in Olympic

31:10

weightlifting. And I would say they're

31:14

both around mid60s.

31:17

And Jersey can get on an indo board like

31:21

a balance board with a fully loaded

31:23

barbell and do a perfect Olympic snatch

31:26

like as to heels and then drop the

31:28

weight and repeat while balancing on a

31:29

board. He's got to be at least 65 now.

31:33

his wife Angela, who also, as I

31:35

mentioned, has a bunch of world records,

31:38

can, you know, her her daughter's, I

31:40

guess, ball got caught in a tree a few

31:42

years ago, and she just like ran up the

31:44

tree and got it and came down. I mean,

31:46

they are incredible physical specimens.

31:49

They take no prescription medications.

31:52

And the reason I'm bringing them up is

31:55

that Jersey has this expression, which

31:57

is hard choices, easy life, easy choice

32:00

is hard life. And so so it applies in

32:03

physical training and health. It applies

32:06

in

32:08

>> creation broadly speaking, right? It's

32:11

like with what you're doing, right?

32:12

You're creating a moat that is is is

32:15

very defensible in a lot of ways.

32:17

>> Yeah.

32:18

>> It applies to startups, right? Where

32:20

it's like, okay, sure. Yeah, you can

32:22

vibe code and create something in 20

32:23

minutes and that's interesting and you

32:25

should experiment with that. and the

32:27

barrier to entry has has been lowered

32:29

dramatically on the production of say an

32:32

app but the barrier to attention has

32:34

never been higher. Therefore, like there

32:36

is actually something to be said for the

32:39

hard startup being the easier startup

32:42

where if you're solving a hard problem

32:44

that requires a really good team and

32:46

like hardware and this that and the

32:47

other thing, most people are never going

32:48

to attempt it. Therefore, you actually

32:51

have a margin of safety in some respect

32:52

if you can execute. Right? So, I I just

32:55

wanted to mention that because I I see

32:57

this all over the place where

33:01

if you spend the time to work on

33:03

something hard up front, it buys you a

33:07

lot of safety.

33:08

>> Yes.

33:08

>> Is at least one way that I think about

33:10

it. And you've talked about assembling

33:12

this Formula 1 team.

33:14

>> But let's rewind because I'm sure some

33:17

people are like, "Well, if I don't have

33:19

any money and I'm just getting started,

33:20

how do you afford to hire the Formula 1

33:23

team? That sounds expensive. So, let's

33:24

go back a little bit before you became

33:29

active on YouTube. What were you doing?

33:32

>> What was I doing?

33:33

>> Yeah.

33:34

>> Gosh. So, I grew up in Shreport. Got my

33:37

first taste of the film industry there.

33:39

I went to college at Dartmouth.

33:42

>> Good school.

33:43

>> Yeah, it was great. And while I was in

33:47

college, I did some internships in the

33:48

industry, but I also did an internship

33:51

at Google. And so there I sort of saw

33:53

the behind the scenes of the platform I

33:56

guess I upload to now which was really

33:58

interesting

34:00

and as I was mentioning to you Tim a lot

34:02

of things that have driven key moments

34:05

in my life have been moments when my

34:07

back has been against the wall and one

34:09

of those moments for me was when you do

34:12

a Google internship I don't think I've

34:13

like talked about this much but when you

34:16

do a Google internship at the end of the

34:17

summer like many big internship you find

34:20

out if you get the job.

34:22

>> Mhm.

34:22

>> And you can go into your senior year of

34:24

college like, "Oh my gosh, I'm rocking.

34:27

I I got the job. I'm set. I can chill

34:29

out the last year." And there was one

34:32

day where they called everybody from my

34:36

internship class letting them know if

34:37

they got the job. And we're all in a big

34:40

text chain together and everyone's like,

34:41

"I got it. See you next year." Blah blah

34:43

blah.

34:44

>> I get my phone call.

34:46

>> I didn't get the job.

34:48

>> Yeah. And I would say that this was

34:51

pivotal and ironic now that I'm so

34:54

embedded in YouTube in a completely

34:56

different way. But what it forced me to

34:59

do was my whole life had been about as

35:03

as an athlete finding a coach doing

35:06

exactly what they tell me to do. In

35:08

school, it was here are all the books to

35:11

do well on the SAT. I will do them. I

35:14

will wake up at 5 in the morning over

35:16

the summer and memorize everything and

35:18

do it because that's the formula

35:19

>> executing to plan on the

35:21

>> exact and I think it's part of the

35:23

immigrant mentality of the holy trinity

35:26

of doctor lawyer engineer is because

35:28

those are systems for safety

35:32

>> and also from my family like with many

35:35

immigrant families they know so

35:38

intimately what instability feels like

35:42

>> and So that led me on the course that

35:45

eventually led me to Buzzfeed, which was

35:49

in many ways sort of the first creative

35:51

risk I had taken on myself. And at the

35:54

time it was the fastest growing YouTube

35:57

channel in the world.

35:58

>> What was the job that you had at

35:59

BuzzFeed?

36:00

>> So I started as an intern again.

36:02

>> Mhm.

36:02

>> And eventually I became a producer at

36:04

BuzzFeed. And producer is such a strange

36:08

term even in traditional but what it

36:10

meant at BuzzFeed was doing everything.

36:13

So I was responsible for everything from

36:15

ideiation to filming, editing, uploading

36:19

and I didn't have any of those skills

36:21

even though you know my homegrown shripp

36:24

Louisiana

36:25

shout out Vet K my dad putting on his

36:27

little AFI film school in our house. It

36:30

did not cut it for what we needed to do.

36:32

But what I loved about that was you had

36:34

to learn every part of the process.

36:36

Unlike when I interned on a traditional

36:39

film set, it's very specialized. There

36:41

are unions. You don't even touch

36:44

equipment from a department that's not

36:45

yours.

36:46

>> I've seen that. You get yelled at.

36:47

>> You and you do get yelled at. And there

36:49

are great reasons for that. But the

36:51

learning environment was so important

36:53

for me to to learn. When you ingest

36:57

footage, you can accidentally delete it

36:59

all.

37:01

that sucks. I needed to learn all of

37:04

those processes because even today now

37:08

we have an amazing team, a massive

37:10

production team

37:13

and

37:15

it helps me as a leader to be able to

37:19

empathetically chat with each

37:21

department. Yeah,

37:22

>> we've all been at companies or on film

37:25

sets where the director or CEO has never

37:28

done the jobs of anyone that they're

37:31

asking to do a job for. And I like being

37:33

able to talk to the sound person in my

37:36

basic understanding of what are the

37:38

frequencies we're on, is there anything

37:41

we need to adjust about this set that is

37:43

is disruptive to the way you have the

37:45

boom pole set up? Like I like knowing

37:47

all of the details and being able to

37:49

think critically about each department

37:51

so everyone can succeed.

37:54

>> So this is going to be a leading

37:55

question, but

37:56

>> I'm going to try it anyway. Do you think

37:58

it's fair to say that if you had not had

38:01

the BuzzFeed job and you'd gone straight

38:03

from not getting the gig at Google to

38:06

YouTube that

38:08

>> the outcome would have been very

38:10

different?

38:10

>> Exponentially different.

38:12

>> Yeah. I don't think I would have

38:14

succeeded period.

38:16

>> So, I want to spend a second on this

38:18

simply to say because I get

38:21

asked about starting companies all the

38:23

time, right? And someone's like, "I'm

38:26

graduating and I'm going to start my

38:27

company." And

38:30

I think they're sometimes surprised, and

38:32

a lot of professors disagree with me on

38:34

this, which is fine because I think that

38:36

makes for interesting conversations. But

38:38

my default recommendation is do not

38:43

start a company right after school.

38:47

>> Go get an MBA or a master's degree in X

38:51

where you get to do every job

38:53

>> where someone else is paying you for it.

38:55

>> Exactly.

38:56

>> So that you are learning learn make all

38:58

your dumb mistakes or make your first

39:01

massive round of dumb mistakes on

39:03

someone else's dime. And if you

39:06

immediately start your own company,

39:08

you're also not necessarily going to get

39:10

the breadth of experience in a more

39:13

mature and that by mature that could be

39:15

10 or 20 or 30 employees. It doesn't

39:17

have to be a gigantic company, but get

39:20

that experience first and then

39:25

increase the odds of your own success

39:28

at that point by going and starting your

39:30

own gig.

39:31

>> Right. And I'm curious if you think

39:34

that's still applies for instance in the

39:37

world of and I know this is painting

39:38

with a broad brush but YouTube if

39:40

somebody came to you and they said I

39:42

want to get really good at and the world

39:44

has changed so quickly in in terms of

39:46

video and entertainment and visual

39:48

storytelling

39:50

with a startup I would still tell

39:52

someone hey if you can I know we're all

39:55

painting this dystopian picture of

39:56

MadMax in 10 years let's just for the

39:59

time being for planning purposes assume

40:01

that's not going to be case, work at a

40:02

startup first, then start your own

40:04

startup. But in the world of visual

40:06

storytelling, would you suggest people

40:08

get a job kind of working at a place

40:12

like a Buzzfeed or something like that

40:13

before making the leap into YouTube now,

40:15

or is there a better way to learn the

40:18

skills necessary to do in-depth long-

40:20

form stuff? I definitely think having

40:23

experience working for someone else in

40:25

the field that you want to be a part of

40:28

is so educational. Not just to be in the

40:31

mail room and see how things work,

40:34

>> but also to define a core tenant list of

40:38

what you enjoy about the company and all

40:41

the little things you don't like. Mhm.

40:43

>> When I left my job, I had a very clear

40:45

list of

40:47

this worked great for for this company,

40:49

but at my company, I'm never going to do

40:51

X, Y, or Z. And that was super super

40:54

helpful to define company culture, to

40:57

ensure people's voices are heard, to

40:59

keep employee retention high.

41:03

And I think that's why with challenge

41:04

accepted, our sets operate so

41:07

differently that everybody has a digital

41:10

mind of we need to shoot it this way

41:12

because it will perform well or we're

41:14

thinking critically about retention and

41:16

the intro and whatnot, but we're also

41:18

thinking about storytelling as a medium

41:21

has been solved.

41:23

>> Traditional Hollywood, they clearly did

41:25

something right and and let's learn from

41:27

that.

41:29

It's as simple as breaking for lunch

41:31

every six hours. It's as simple as

41:35

making sure we have enough

41:36

pre-production meetings. And those are

41:37

the things that were pain points for me

41:40

at prior jobs. And I'm able to apply

41:43

them in this really special space where

41:45

we have an amazing amazing culture and

41:48

and work environment where people can

41:50

hopefully feel that they're able to

41:52

express themselves artistically,

41:54

experiment, and learn at the same time.

41:57

So, I'm trying to figure out where to go

41:58

next because

42:02

I think it's probably going to be fear

42:03

setting just because I want to hear how

42:05

that factors into things.

42:07

>> Okay,

42:08

>> why don't we just go there because I've

42:10

read about and

42:13

the whiteboard of fears and and other

42:16

things. I'm sure we'll spend a second on

42:18

cycling also, but the way that this

42:21

interview ultimately happened was

42:23

because of an exchange, right? Like I

42:26

put I put up a post about YouTube

42:28

channels. Are there any YouTube channels

42:30

out there that have some type of

42:32

intersection with the 4-hour work week

42:34

or anything in it? And that's how we we

42:39

ultimately personally connected.

42:42

How does fear setting fit into the

42:44

story?

42:45

>> Well, Tim, it fits into the story in a

42:47

few ways. Challenge accepted at its core

42:50

originally began by me taking a

42:52

whiteboard and writing all of my fears

42:54

out and then connecting each fear to a

42:57

circumstance that would cause me to

43:00

address it.

43:01

>> Not just as a like personal self-help

43:05

type of thing because I am a very

43:07

anxious person internally,

43:10

>> but more specifically because it makes

43:12

for a better story. Mhm.

43:13

>> We realized very early on showing the

43:15

vulnerability, showing the fear, that's

43:18

a key part of Snider's beats of

43:20

storytelling. So, starting with the all

43:22

is lost moment of the story led us to

43:26

unlock really, really fascinating

43:27

episodes. And we would structure the

43:29

thesis of each of like I want to be a

43:32

firefighter, but I'm not brave enough.

43:34

Okay, that's an interesting story. And

43:36

we're thinking about that in every piece

43:38

of the edit, every piece of the

43:39

pre-production. And that is the climax

43:42

of the emotional core of when I finally

43:44

go in a burning building.

43:46

>> Why we care so much? It's the same in

43:48

the Mission Impossible project. I would

43:51

love to be in a Mission Impossible

43:52

movie. But am I actually brave enough to

43:55

strap myself to the side of a plane like

43:57

icon Tom Cruz? Okay, I've got to do that

44:00

first. But I actually brought something,

44:03

Tim.

44:03

>> You brought something?

44:04

>> I brought something to help demonstrate

44:06

fear setting.

44:07

>> Okay,

44:07

>> I'm going to bring it out now.

44:08

>> Yeah, let's do I'll describe it for the

44:10

audio listeners.

44:15

>> No, I ren

44:18

the colors.

44:19

>> Okay. Unfortunately, you are dealing

44:21

with a fan in the chair opposite from

44:22

you. But reading the 4-hour work week

44:25

changed my life.

44:27

>> This is the original copy I have from

44:29

2016. I was a bit young when it came out

44:32

in 2007, so I didn't have that that

44:33

version. So, this might be slightly

44:36

revised, but I went back into my

44:38

archives

44:40

>> and I found this email.

44:43

The date is, what is today? March 31st,

44:46

2026.

44:48

>> Mhm.

44:48

>> The date of this email,

44:51

I'm not making this up. March 18th,

44:54

2016. It has been exactly 10 years since

44:58

I sent this email.

44:59

>> Okay. I have to shout out my therapist

45:01

Jodie because she's the one who told me

45:03

to read your book and I wanted to read a

45:05

section of my fear setting.

45:07

>> Oh my god. Amazing.

45:08

>> Now, as you know, because these are your

45:11

memories in your brain. This was prior

45:14

to the define

45:17

prevent repair chart of your 2017

45:20

talk.

45:21

>> So, this isn't even in a chart. These

45:23

are just a couple of questions that you

45:24

had. But I wrote here this 20. This is

45:27

so crazy. My dream is to leave my job,

45:31

start a YouTube channel, somehow

45:33

succeed, own my ideas, and start a

45:36

company where I can grow as a

45:38

storyteller and help other storytellers

45:40

grow without traditional barriers to

45:42

entry.

45:43

>> Number one, define your nightmare. I'm

45:45

just going to read a few of the

45:46

highlights,

45:46

>> please. Oh, yeah. No, take your time. to

45:48

find my nightmare was going broke, never

45:51

figuring out what I'm best at since I

45:54

find the most joy in trying everything

45:57

rather than specializing.

46:00

People not thinking I'm funny. And the

46:03

last one is actually not being funny.

46:09

>> And of course, I went through the steps

46:11

of repairing the damage.

46:12

>> Do you have any examples there? Of

46:14

course. Yeah. Yeah. Because for just I

46:15

want to give like a quick

46:18

No, no, not spiel. Just like a quick

46:19

context rapper. So, fear setting is a

46:22

pretty straightforward thing. It's

46:23

basically barred from the Stoics. I'm

46:24

not the first person to look at this. I

46:26

just tried to systematize it for myself.

46:28

It was in the 4-hour work week. And it's

46:30

like goal setting, but it's identifying

46:33

your fears very specifically

46:35

>> and then making them as concrete as

46:38

possible, then talking about what you

46:39

might do to prevent them and or repair

46:42

them if they inevitably happened. And

46:44

the objective here is to in a sense

46:46

demystify and take your fears from being

46:50

this nebulous cloud of anxiety to

46:53

something that you can put under a

46:54

microscope

46:55

>> to test.

46:56

>> Yes. So the first part is defining the

46:58

nightmare. The second is what steps

47:01

would you take to repair the damage even

47:02

temporarily? And here I had

47:06

using some

47:08

using using my savings from my Google

47:11

internship.

47:12

>> Yeah. So, I did have savings from that.

47:15

And then making sure that my resume or

47:20

LinkedIn was ready for other jobs in the

47:22

industry. This is number three. If you

47:24

were fired from your job today, how

47:25

would you get things under financial

47:26

control? And I I said that I would

47:29

temporarily use my savings and if that

47:31

didn't work out, aggressively apply for

47:33

other jobs. Enlisted some other

47:35

companies I would reach out to. This is

47:38

where it gets very intense. What are you

47:40

putting off out of fear? I'm putting off

47:43

quitting my job. I'm putting off

47:46

reaching out to all the people I need to

47:48

to make this dream a reality because it

47:50

means I have to say it out loud. I've

47:52

reached out to some people, but I know I

47:54

can do better. What is it costing you

47:56

financially, emotionally, physically to

47:58

postpone action?

48:01

I'm under emotional high stress. I want

48:04

to tell stories that really resonate

48:06

with other people. I want to be around

48:08

people who share creative joy in the

48:10

same values of quality that I do. I am

48:14

unhappy in an environment where I feel

48:16

like people feel the opposite. What are

48:19

you waiting for? So this is the last

48:22

section. I'm waiting for a false sense

48:24

of security to inspire me to take a

48:27

leap. A brand offering to collaborate,

48:31

someone else offering financial

48:32

stability, etc.

48:35

But I'm actually being challenged and

48:36

invited to create my own security for

48:39

the first time. I have

48:43

Oh, this is like crazy to read.

48:47

I've continually found success in other

48:50

people's rubric of success, but I've

48:53

actually never found happiness.

49:00

I've

49:01

never designed

49:04

my own rubric of success

49:11

and that's because I don't trust myself

49:13

to define success.

49:15

I'm scared to assume that

49:17

responsibility.

49:20

That was my fear setting.

49:24

It's very personal process.

49:26

>> It is.

49:26

>> I know you and anyone listening who have

49:29

actually like done it can can empathize

49:31

with that.

49:32

>> Mhm. I'm a very emotional person as you

49:35

can see from my videos. It's real.

49:38

>> Anyways, I was so excited to share that

49:39

with you.

49:40

>> I'm so moved by you sharing that and I

49:44

really appreciate you bringing that.

49:46

>> Yeah, of course.

49:47

>> And you [ __ ] did it also, right?

49:50

>> God, that's crazy. Like, guys, it works.

49:53

It It actually works. Wait, I didn't

49:54

tell you the funniest part of this. Here

49:56

was the funniest part. So, this has

49:58

obviously been on my bookshelf for 10

50:00

years at this point, and I am a copious

50:03

like you, handwriter, notetaker. I beat

50:06

up my books. I write in the margins and

50:09

proof. I mean, like, this is you can see

50:11

the wear and tear on this thing. But

50:12

when I opened this, there was absolutely

50:16

no annotation. And I was like, why is

50:18

this? And I I felt stumped on it. And it

50:20

wasn't until I found this email where it

50:22

was revealed. Okay, this is how I wrote

50:24

to my therapist with the chart.

50:27

OMG, all caps. I am obsessed with the

50:31

4hour work week. Several exclamation

50:33

points. I just got the book on Monday

50:35

from my coworker and I've been reading

50:37

it incessantly every night. Here's my

50:39

fear setting exercise.

50:42

I stole this book apparently.

50:45

And I sat and I was like I called my

50:47

therapist last night before the

50:48

recording. I was like, who would I have

50:50

borrowed this book from? I couldn't I

50:52

have no idea whose book is in my lap

50:54

right now, but it's been on my shelf for

50:57

10 years. Whoever it is, I'm so sorry.

50:59

By the way, I did buy all of your other

51:01

books, so I did contribute to that

51:03

economy, but I have a stolen Tim Ferris

51:06

book.

51:09

>> I should like contribute to the cycle

51:11

and donate it to a library or something.

51:14

But

51:15

>> oh my god, that is so good. It's so

51:17

funny because the person from my job who

51:21

let me borrow and steal this has no idea

51:25

how much they impact me because I don't

51:27

even remember who it was. I mean, we

51:29

were all in a bullpin with 30 desks. I

51:32

probably just borrowed it from someone

51:34

who sat next to me. But

51:35

>> so here's a follow-up question on the on

51:37

the fear setting. And this isn't a trick

51:39

question because when people

51:43

experience

51:45

any

51:47

ambitious or scary journey for

51:51

themselves, often the same thing.

51:53

>> It's not a straightforward line up and

51:56

to the right. It's a bumpy path.

51:59

>> After doing that, when did you take

52:03

action towards realizing the dream?

52:07

could have been a very small thing. I

52:08

don't know. But like what was the kind

52:10

of defining first step that kind of set

52:13

you on the actual path to realizing what

52:17

you laid out?

52:18

>> I took action pretty immediately, but it

52:21

took me a year to quit my job. And I'll

52:23

define what the difference is. I took

52:26

action immediately by this might be

52:29

crazy. This was a Tim Ferrris

52:30

experiment. I really resonated with what

52:34

you wrote about

52:36

coming to terms with the worst possible

52:38

outcome.

52:40

>> And so I decided I'm going to train

52:42

myself for the worst possible outcome.

52:44

>> I love it.

52:45

>> So I moved into a studio apartment with

52:48

a roommate.

52:50

>> I cut like like financially stripped

52:53

down. I mean, I didn't have much

52:54

anyways, but stripped as much as I could

52:57

to simulate if if I'm truly failing at

53:00

this and having having to live in a

53:02

Hollywood apartment with a bunch of

53:03

roommates. I'm just going to get used to

53:04

that. I'm going to get used to it right

53:05

now. I'm going to cancel all of my

53:07

memberships and figure out how to stay

53:09

healthy with just myself. Just myself in

53:13

in this small place. I am also going to

53:16

commit to working on my own stories

53:20

after work on the weekends because if I

53:23

can't do it now with stability, I I need

53:25

to prove to myself that I actually give

53:29

a [ __ ] about this really. And I did that

53:32

for an entire year.

53:35

growing a little bit of a personal

53:37

savings but also growing mental and

53:39

physical stamina towards

53:42

I'm already in still a place of safety

53:45

of course but I am in a situation where

53:49

I think I can handle this I got this

53:51

like the LinkedIn is up to date the

53:53

resume is up to date I am so ready I

53:56

have defined prevent and hopefully we

53:58

don't got to go to that third column

54:00

repair and so then a year later exactly

54:03

I quit my job. And when I quit, I had

54:08

two months of videos backlogged, ready

54:11

to go. Also, legally, for the record, on

54:13

my own machine, not company resources.

54:17

All of that was ready to go. And I knew

54:20

what my first big project would be,

54:22

training with stunt doubles. I had a

54:25

shoot date ready. I had taken, you know,

54:28

I only had like three months of savings

54:30

at that point. And I had had allocated

54:33

this is going to be for the dream

54:35

project, my first risk on my channel.

54:38

Nothing will touch that. The rest is is

54:40

for operating daily life expenses. And I

54:44

said, I got three months to to make this

54:46

work. And like you said, you know, like

54:47

we've been talking about sometimes you

54:49

got to put your back against the wall

54:51

and go.

54:52

>> I love this. So So this is I feel like

54:56

we were separated at birth. So So

54:59

a few things I I'll say. number one to

55:01

try to not that I have I'm not a paragon

55:05

of self-awareness but I I will say that

55:07

I for different reasons have a certain

55:10

like hypervigilance focus on safety and

55:13

security which might sound strange to

55:15

people listening but I'm always trying

55:19

to risk mitigate right I'm actually I

55:21

don't view myself as a big risk taker I

55:24

have done a few things that have ended

55:25

up with me accumulating injuries that

55:28

maybe in retrospect shouldn't have done

55:30

But broadly speaking, I'm always trying

55:32

to mitigate risk, which is underscores

55:34

this entire fear setting exercise,

55:36

right? Cuz it's not just about

55:38

convincing yourself. It's also in my

55:40

mind completely intertwined with what

55:43

you did, which is

55:46

preparing

55:48

and training yourself and your

55:51

circumstances, right? So

55:54

when I flash back to starting my first

55:58

company, it's like how did I start the

56:00

first company? I started my first

56:02

company during lunch hours, evenings,

56:05

and weekends basically while still doing

56:09

my other job and doing my other job

56:11

well.

56:11

>> Mhm.

56:12

>> But I wanted to have a head start so

56:15

that I wasn't beginning from scratch

56:17

after quitting a job. Right. So I did

56:20

that. By the way, you're simultaneously

56:23

developing skills as you're doing that

56:26

and proving that you don't need the

56:28

crutch or the or the training wheels of

56:30

your company,

56:31

>> right,

56:31

>> to enable you to do those things, right?

56:34

So, the moonlighting aspect, this is

56:35

another thing that that

56:38

at least in in my mind maybe conflicts

56:41

with

56:42

how some listeners might think about me,

56:44

but there's a difference between I'd be

56:47

curious to hear you speak to this.

56:48

There's a difference between putting

56:50

your back against a wall, in other

56:52

words, like highly pushing yourself to

56:54

make a decision,

56:56

>> and like burning all the ships and

56:58

burning all the bridges.

57:00

And the way I would frame the difference

57:02

is

57:05

when like a year to the to the day

57:08

almost, right, you quit your job and

57:10

you're setting up this groundwork and

57:12

you have some videos ready to go and you

57:15

were in where were you at the time? This

57:16

was in

57:16

>> in LA.

57:17

>> In LA. So, you've got probably Cobra,

57:19

right? You might have some like residual

57:21

health care after you quit. I'm not sure

57:24

what how it was set up benefit-wise, but

57:26

like in my company, I knew I had at

57:27

least like a handful of months where I

57:29

wasn't going to have to pay for my own

57:30

healthare. And in that case, right, as

57:33

you're thinking about what could I do

57:37

if this fails, right? If it doesn't work

57:39

out, what could I do? You've got your

57:40

LinkedIn and resume ready to go.

57:42

>> Yeah.

57:43

>> Right. And in my fear setting, and for a

57:45

lot of people, it's like, well, I could

57:46

get like a temp waitering job. I could

57:49

>> bartend. I could sell a bunch of my

57:52

furniture. I could sell my piece of [ __ ]

57:54

used car and, you know, take public

57:57

transport. I could whatever, right?

58:00

Sleep on an air mattress in a friend's

58:02

room. So, in a sense, like you've proven

58:04

to yourself that the permanent

58:08

irreversible risk is actually low,

58:11

right? while at the same time propelling

58:14

yourself towards this like defining

58:16

decision which is like taking the leap

58:18

>> and I think the emotional stability of

58:21

that decision is important. You want to

58:24

be able to brainstorm what should I do

58:26

in the worst case scenario from a place

58:28

of safety which is what I had at the job

58:32

still. So I was able to be creative

58:35

about thinking about solutions without

58:37

being panicked at the same time in that

58:39

situation.

58:39

>> Exactly. What an amazing story. What

58:41

fun. And it's so it's a recipe, right?

58:46

It's replicable. It's going to be

58:48

different for every person, but it is

58:51

actually it's a formula that works like

58:54

a lot of things. And

58:56

I I want to also mention a few things

59:00

that come to mind just to draw some

59:01

parallels. So you mentioned

59:04

BuzzFeed where you learn to do all of

59:06

these different jobs, right? And there's

59:08

a benefit to that above and beyond the

59:11

expertise of say spot-checking your

59:15

team's work or something like that. Your

59:17

team will also respect you more because

59:20

they know you have done the thing you

59:21

are asking them to do which you did kind

59:23

of mention in passing but it's really

59:25

important right I think of I have some

59:27

PTSD memories of this book but the

59:30

4-hour chef like which which which

59:32

confusingly is a book about accelerated

59:34

learning actually tried to do a lot with

59:36

that book very proud of it think it

59:37

worked but the reason I bring it up is

59:40

there's a chef who's profiled in that

59:42

named Grant Ackets who was basically

59:47

one of two superheroes in a sense. I

59:49

mean, they both have superpowers, right?

59:51

You had Grant Ackets, the like chef

59:54

Vundakint genius, and then you have Nick

59:57

Kakonis, who I've become very close

60:00

friends with, who is a former

60:02

genius options trader at the in Chicago

60:06

who then decides to get in touch with

60:09

Grant. He he's magical at cold emailing,

60:12

which I want to talk to you about. Very

60:14

good at cold emailing. and they got

60:16

together and Nick is from a business

60:20

kind of challenging and redesigning of

60:22

systems perspective incredible. But the

60:24

reason I bring it up is that Grant

60:27

can work every station in the restaurant

60:30

better than everybody else. which is not

60:31

to say automatically that I or you can

60:34

do that with all of our team members,

60:36

but he's at at the very least incredibly

60:39

good at each of the stations so that he

60:43

can when need be improve systems, change

60:46

things. He can also teach and coach. He

60:48

can give feedback and if he gives

60:50

feedback, people take it seriously

60:52

because they know he's done it himself

60:55

and he knows what he's talking about,

60:57

right? So there's a huge advantage to

60:59

that and it makes your mistakes later

61:03

less expensive also and it it allows you

61:06

to hire more effectively whether that

61:08

hiring is a contractor or full-time.

61:10

>> Mhm.

61:10

>> Okay. So you I just wrote this down and

61:13

I I have to mention it because like

61:16

basically I'm living vicariously through

61:18

you now.

61:19

>> Oh my god. um in a sense because your

61:21

channel is like oh my god like that's if

61:23

I could have sort of self authored a

61:26

path to doing that like oh man what an

61:29

amazing thing and I know there's a lot

61:31

under the hood and behind the scenes

61:32

that I'm sure is very difficult which

61:35

we'll talk about but if you have not

61:37

connected and maybe you've graduated on

61:39

from the stunt work and so on but Damen

61:42

Walters have you seen Damian Walters?

61:44

>> No.

61:45

>> Okay. I don't know if he's still in the

61:47

game, but Damen Walters, he's a former

61:50

highle British gymnast who then entered

61:54

the world of stunt work and just has the

61:57

most insane yearly highlight videos that

62:00

he put out for a while. This is an older

62:02

vintage. He's been doing it a long time.

62:04

But in any case, I thought he could be

62:08

>> incredibly fun to connect with at some

62:11

point.

62:12

>> That's awesome.

62:13

>> I've never really interacted with him,

62:14

so I can't so much love and heart for

62:17

the stunt community. That's really where

62:19

the channel started. And the stunt

62:22

coordinator that I work with today, his

62:25

name is Steve Brown.

62:27

>> And this is how crazy the world is,

62:29

right? Back in

62:31

2016, so a few months after I sent this

62:33

email, I went to a kebab shop in LA, sat

62:37

down at the counter, and was just eating

62:40

dinner by myself. And I I remember I was

62:43

really critically thinking about this

62:45

decision of going off on my own and

62:48

applying this. And this guy comes in,

62:51

sits next to me. We just start talking,

62:53

have a nice conversation, go our

62:55

separate ways. I go on to start my

62:57

channel and do what I'm doing. He goes

63:00

on to choreograph and do stunts and lead

63:04

stunts for Logan, several Marvel

63:08

projects, and most recently all of the

63:11

Avatar films.

63:13

>> That guy also does all of the stunt

63:16

coordination on our channel.

63:17

>> That's incredible. Um and it's amazing

63:19

that when you meet people who are

63:22

passionate like you know when you meet a

63:25

flavor of a person before they have hit

63:28

their

63:29

>> their peak moment it's special to

63:32

connect with them and and rise together.

63:34

And that's what's been awesome about

63:35

Steve is between his Avatar movies he'll

63:37

come over and strap me to the side of a

63:39

plane or throw me in the Houdini tank

63:41

and and make sure that everything's okay

63:44

because we have that we have that kebab

63:46

friendship.

63:48

Well, this speaks also to putting

63:50

yourself in the center of the action,

63:51

right? And I've had very famous investor

63:56

named Bill Gurley on the show before I

63:58

sat where you're sitting right now,

63:59

legendary investor, and he talks about

64:02

this a lot, which is putting yourself

64:04

where the action is. Right. So, if you

64:06

want to have those types of connections,

64:08

it's less likely to happen in a small

64:11

town in Montana than it is in Los

64:12

Angeles.

64:13

>> Right.

64:14

>> Right. Similarly, depending on your

64:16

industry, IRL still matters a lot,

64:19

right? As much as we would like to think

64:21

it doesn't, it's like if you want to be

64:22

in certain games and tech and you want

64:27

to have access to the talent, etc.,

64:29

still to this day in in a lot of

64:31

instances, you have to be in San

64:33

Francisco or somewhere near San

64:35

Francisco. That's just where you have to

64:37

be.

64:37

>> And this is coming from the the virtual

64:39

guy.

64:40

>> It is. It is. And yet, if you look at

64:42

what the virtual guy did, because I was

64:44

trying and wanted to get involved in

64:47

tech and then ultimately angel

64:49

investing, where was I? I was in the Bay

64:51

Area for 17 years.

64:52

>> Mhm.

64:52

>> If I had not done that, I think my

64:54

success would have had a 0% likelihood.

64:57

>> I mean, literally 0%. If I look at how a

65:01

lot of the ultimately best advising or

65:04

investing relationships came together,

65:05

they almost all started with Chance

65:07

Encounters at the equivalent of a kebab

65:09

shop, right? I go to a barbecue at

65:12

someone's house and like accidentally

65:14

bump into someone and spill their drink

65:15

and start a conversation and then boom,

65:17

that turns into like one of the most

65:19

ends up defining 30% of my net worth,

65:21

right? I

65:24

sure there's luck involved, but you have

65:26

to provide and I'm borrowing this term

65:28

from someone else, but surface area for

65:30

luck.

65:30

>> So, what have we learned? Barbecue,

65:32

kebab, spilling drinks, key to success,

65:35

30% of Tim's chapter one. Chapter one,

65:37

bump into people. actually really could

65:39

be. The other thing I wanted to mention

65:40

is you talked about in a sense and this

65:43

is not the most elegant way to put it,

65:46

but like practicing poverty, right? That

65:48

was one of your fears, right? It was

65:50

like running out of money, right? So,

65:51

you move into the apartment where you're

65:53

sharing a studio with someone else or

65:55

multiple people and you get rid of your

65:58

memberships and so on and you prove to

66:00

yourself

66:02

number one, you can certainly survive.

66:05

Number two, probably it's not that bad.

66:08

Like you can figure it out. And sure,

66:10

maybe if you're depending on the

66:12

roommate, I mean, you might want to get

66:14

rid of said roommate. But it reminded me

66:16

of not to belabor this, but since the

66:19

genesis of fear setting is stoic

66:22

philosophy and the stoics, Senica the

66:24

Younger talks about practicing in this

66:26

way. very close friend of mine, Kevin

66:28

Kelly, who was the founding editor of

66:31

Wired magazine and fascinating person on

66:34

all levels. Also has a big Amish beard

66:37

and has spent time with the Amish to

66:38

study how they accept or reject

66:39

technology, etc., etc. really

66:42

interesting guy, but he also, I don't

66:44

know if he does it anymore, he's got to

66:46

be mid70s now, but he used to routinely

66:51

spend periods of time, I want to say

66:53

every year, where he would just camp out

66:55

in his living room in a sleeping bag and

66:57

have like instant coffee and instant

66:59

oatmeal and just do that for like a week

67:02

>> and he's like, "Oh, yeah, great. Yeah, I

67:04

don't really need that much." Yeah. And

67:07

by doing that, it gives you

67:11

courage, which I think is a practiced

67:14

skill, right? Your subconscious has to

67:16

believe that you can do something. It's

67:19

you can't just read books and suddenly

67:21

have confidence in all situations. And I

67:23

mean, you're I think a walking example

67:25

of of how you can do that.

67:27

>> So, my question for you, Formula 1 team,

67:30

all right, Formula 1 is expensive,

67:32

right? It's like these cars in some

67:33

cases are like what $250 million, right?

67:36

When you start to add everything in

67:38

pricey, yes, very high performance. But

67:41

when you quit your job and you're like,

67:45

I have 3 months.

67:46

>> Mhm.

67:47

>> How did you assemble or enroll the help

67:51

that you needed in the early days, the

67:53

first like 3 to 6 months after quitting

67:55

your job? Or did you just do everything

67:57

yourself? I don't know. Right. So, what

67:59

did it look like in the early days?

68:00

Because once you get some momentum, sure

68:02

you get some money coming in. Okay, you

68:03

can start to add, you can start to

68:05

upgrade, you can start to do various

68:06

things, but in the beginning, you're

68:08

very capital constrained, right?

68:10

>> Yes.

68:10

>> What do you do? How did you assemble the

68:12

help that you needed or enlist it?

68:14

>> This is a strategy I employ for every

68:16

challenge I take on now. And hindsight

68:18

is 2020. And with that 2020 hindsight, I

68:22

think it comes down to having three

68:24

people on your Formula 1 team. And it

68:26

doesn't need to be fancy. It's really

68:29

a coach, a mentor, and a cheerleader.

68:32

>> Okay.

68:34

>> What does that mean?

68:35

>> Yeah.

68:35

>> In a specific episode of Challenge

68:37

Accepted, the coach is the most

68:40

important person that I want to find

68:43

before we pursue an episode, like

68:45

>> in a recent episode, I attempted to get

68:48

a black belt in taekwond do in only 90

68:50

days. In martial arts, that's a somewhat

68:52

controversial thing to even attempt to

68:54

do. Mhm.

68:55

>> And so I knew I could only do it with

68:57

the blessing of a really respected

68:59

master. So objective number one was to

69:02

find the best master and coach in the

69:04

world. And I think it's important to to

69:08

find someone and again I'll give an

69:10

example for what I did in that specific

69:11

situation. But that's number one for me

69:14

because this is the person I'm going to

69:16

be spending all of this time with and

69:18

learning from them. The second person is

69:21

a mentor who is different from the

69:23

coach. This is a person who has most

69:28

recently

69:30

done the thing you're trying to do. So

69:33

for me, that's other students in the

69:35

black ballot class. They're my mentors.

69:37

They have gone through this process.

69:38

They know what it's feels like to break

69:40

a brick with their hands and get through

69:43

that. Mhm.

69:44

>> And it's important that it's different

69:45

from the coach because coaching is a

69:48

different skill set and art form from

69:51

mentoring.

69:52

>> Also, it's harder for the coach to put

69:55

themselves in your shoes because so much

69:57

of what they do is second nature and

69:58

they're probably decades removed from

70:00

the experience you're about to have.

70:02

>> You want someone who has the experience

70:04

of leading somebody to that finish line

70:06

of greatness. And you also want someone

70:08

who knows what it feels like to be the

70:10

man in the arena. Mhm.

70:11

>> And then the third person is a

70:13

cheerleader, which is someone who is

70:15

completely detached from the outcome. So

70:18

for me, that's my best friend Olivia. It

70:21

could be a sibling, friend, family

70:23

member, someone who is going to root for

70:26

you and love you no matter whether you

70:28

succeed or fail. So that's how I

70:30

approach every single challenge on the

70:33

channel. Metawise, at the beginning of

70:35

the channel, what was that for me? It

70:37

was the mentor figure or figures for me

70:42

were other people who had recently

70:44

started channels and were just a few

70:46

steps ahead of me in the process. Maybe

70:48

they had 50,000 subscribers. Maybe they

70:50

had 100,000 subscribers. They were

70:52

people I met at little meetups at, rest

70:55

in peace, the YouTube space, which

70:57

doesn't exist anymore. But those peer

71:00

groups were really special and important

71:02

to me to keep me motivated and to just

71:06

reach out to people even today. Reaching

71:08

out to other creators, what do you guys

71:10

think of this thumbnail? What do you

71:11

think of these titles? Having people who

71:13

are just a couple steps ahead of you or

71:15

on similar playing fields can be so so

71:19

helpful in that process.

71:21

The cheerleader for me at that time was

71:24

was my sister Maline who was one of the

71:27

only people I told I was going to quit

71:28

my job and and fully believed in me. And

71:31

then the coach figure for me when I was

71:33

starting from ground zero was

71:38

cold emailing

71:40

people I respected. Now, that's not the

71:43

same as having a coach who's with you

71:46

every day in the way mastery is training

71:48

taekwond do with me every day. But I saw

71:51

those as coaching opportunities because

71:52

they were people light years ahead who

71:55

had the teaching component, I should

71:57

say, of being able to advise even in

72:00

small doses.

72:01

>> What did those emails look like?

72:02

>> Okay, I love a great email. You

72:05

mentioned that you have an amazing cold

72:08

emailer. I I need to to see their art

72:10

and their work because I I love

72:12

comparing notes on emails.

72:15

I personally believe that a really

72:17

well-written email can open any door.

72:20

>> I agree. By the way, assuming the person

72:22

sees it, right, there's there's some

72:23

friction, but

72:24

>> true,

72:25

>> but people underestimate

72:27

what they can do.

72:29

>> I agree. And there's there's something

72:31

about an email that's different from an

72:33

Instagram DM or I don't know. I love an

72:36

email. Well, I love a Google calendar.

72:39

This is where we're talking about true

72:40

passions to emails.

72:43

So, when at the beginning of my channel,

72:45

when we didn't have millions of

72:48

subscribers,

72:49

>> and we wanted to collaborate with

72:51

institutions like the FBI, the Secret

72:54

Service, and ultimately, we became some

72:57

of the first YouTube channels to ever do

72:59

that. came from not a producer, not a

73:02

friend of a friend sending email, but me

73:04

sending a cold email. An example of that

73:07

is I wanted to do a video with the FBI.

73:11

So, I went on FBI.gov. I called the

73:14

1-800 number of the FBI, which by the

73:17

way is for like crime tips, which I

73:21

didn't realize.

73:22

And I pitched them this idea over the

73:25

phone and they're like, "So, I'm here to

73:27

receive crime tips, but I can connect

73:29

you to someone else." And I wasn't

73:31

anticipating that. I thought it would

73:33

kind of be a dead end.

73:34

>> So, I just want to pause here for the

73:36

specifics.

73:37

>> Ring ring. Hello. FBI 800 number. What

73:40

are you What are you saying?

73:41

>> Hi, my name is Michelle K. I know this

73:44

might come off as a little strange or

73:46

unexpected, but I was trying to contact

73:48

someone in your department who might

73:50

work with film and television. I'm a

73:51

content creator online. We have several

73:54

hundred thousand subscribers and I was

73:55

hoping to talk about a collaboration.

73:57

>> All right, great.

73:59

>> And usually they're like, YouTube, what?

74:03

But this person was was generous enough

74:05

to connect me to someone else and we

74:07

kind of got kicked down a few a few

74:10

different routes. But we ended up

74:12

connecting with someone called the

74:15

Hollywood guy. This is a job at the FBI.

74:19

He's just like, "How did I get stuck in

74:21

this department?" Every email that comes

74:23

over the transom about some kind of film

74:26

television thing.

74:27

>> It's the Hollywood guy. And now this is

74:29

the person within the Federal Bureau of

74:33

Investigation

74:34

who is assigned to

74:38

documentaries or even scripted shows to

74:41

ensure that the seal of the FBI is

74:44

accurately and and not displayed not

74:47

misrepresented or or shown in a

74:48

derogatory manner.

74:50

>> This is the guy who did the McDonald's

74:52

Monopoly HBO documentary. He He was the

74:55

FBI's representative for that amazing

74:58

docky series.

74:59

>> I'm sorry. I'm not familiar with this.

75:01

Monopoly, like the game Monopoly.

75:03

>> Oh my god, you're not familiar. What is

75:04

this called? I think Oh, the

75:05

documentary. It's called McMillions.

75:08

>> Okay.

75:08

>> Have you heard of this doc?

75:09

>> I mean, what is it about Happy Meals or

75:10

something?

75:11

>> Riveting documentary series.

75:13

>> McMillions. Okay.

75:14

>> Oh, Tim, you're going to love it.

75:15

>> So, there's probably some fraud involved

75:16

and the FBI gets involved. Do you

75:18

remember in the '9s, 2000s, there was

75:22

the Monopoly game at McDonald's? Sure.

75:25

Where you could peel off the sticker and

75:27

see if you won a vacation or a bunch of

75:29

money. Turns out all of the winners of

75:34

that

75:35

>> were all related in some way.

75:37

>> Or they figured out how to game the

75:38

system. They're all family relatives or

75:41

friends of friends or people within this

75:44

group of people that they hired

75:47

>> to win.

75:48

>> I don't want to reveal how they did it

75:50

because it's riveting. The documentary

75:54

tells the story from the perspective of

75:55

the FBI agents who uncovered it,

75:58

>> right? So, Hollywood guy gets an email.

76:00

Hey,

76:00

>> so this guy just did McMillions, one of

76:03

the, you know, an incredible docu series

76:05

for HBO.

76:06

>> Gets an email from me. YouTuber

76:10

and effectively what happened was he was

76:13

like, "Well, I'm retiring in a couple

76:16

months. Let's try it out."

76:18

>> It's so wild how these things work out

76:21

sometimes.

76:22

>> It's amazing.

76:22

>> Now, so that again, this like surface

76:25

area for luck, right? Like you have to

76:27

have some pinballs in the pinball

76:29

machine

76:30

>> for the possibility of something like

76:31

that happening.

76:33

Is there anything else in your email or

76:36

communication with the Hollywood guy

76:38

that you think increased the likelihood

76:40

of him saying yes?

76:41

>> I do. I think a great email and a cold

76:44

email specifically has to have some key

76:46

components. The first is the subject

76:48

line needs to show your value to the

76:52

reader. For me right now, it would look

76:55

like something and I'll be totally

76:56

honest. Collaboration with Michelle

76:59

Caren this many followers. In the

77:02

beginning, that was a small number for

77:05

me, but I still put it in the subject

77:06

line. It could be a number of views. It

77:09

could be collaborated with X, Y, and Z

77:13

institutions.

77:14

It just needs to be enough for the

77:17

reader to see some value in what you're

77:19

doing. Then the body of the email is

77:22

three paragraphs, very short paragraphs.

77:25

In fact, three blocks of two sentences

77:27

each. I wouldn't even call it a

77:28

paragraph. The first paragraph is

77:32

One sentence about who you are and your

77:35

legitimacy has to be encompassed in one

77:37

sentence. Hi, my name is Michelle K. I'm

77:40

a content creator with this many

77:41

followers

77:43

and I've done this, this, and this. It's

77:46

very succinctly proving your value.

77:49

Second sentence of that first paragraph,

77:51

what are you asking for or offering to

77:55

the other person? And ideally, you're

77:57

doing both. You're you're offering

77:59

something. Second sentence of that email

78:01

to the FBI would be, "I'm reaching out

78:03

to inquire about an opportunity

78:06

to film a collaboration

78:09

for my channels."

78:11

>> What you're offering there is access to

78:13

our audience

78:16

in the eyes of many of the people we

78:18

collaborate with. It's a marketing

78:19

opportunity potentially,

78:21

>> recruiting opportunity.

78:22

>> Yeah, something like that. Paragraph two

78:25

is two sentences or less of what you

78:27

want to do. This would be the details of

78:31

we're hoping to do a shoot following

78:33

just a few days of the academy embedding

78:35

in existing activities ultimately

78:39

leading up to a final scenario as

78:42

follows academy protocol. So that second

78:45

paragraph is about a window into the

78:49

vision you hope to come to together and

78:52

a peak at some of the resources you

78:54

might be asking for. And ideally, you do

78:57

it in such a way that you show you've

78:59

done your homework. You know, I'm not

79:00

just cold emailing the FBI hoping to do

79:02

a video with them. I know very clearly

79:04

I've watched everything I can online

79:06

about what does the academy take to do?

79:10

What are the activities? What are the

79:12

ones that are best for camera? So,

79:14

you're showing your

79:17

it's an opportunity to flatter them and

79:19

to to put them at ease. We speak the

79:21

same language. So, that there's that.

79:24

Paragraph three is the call to action.

79:27

Two sentences or less.

79:30

Would love to hop on the phone. Let me

79:32

know a good time. Here's my phone

79:34

number. Text me anytime. I think that's

79:37

honestly potentially the most important

79:39

part. Here's my phone number. Text me

79:41

anytime. This is an anti- Tim Ferrris

79:43

tactic potentially.

79:44

>> Not when I'm sending cold emails to to

79:47

to people who are very busy that I want

79:49

to connect with. And what that does is

79:52

say, "I'm available. I don't know you,

79:55

but here's my phone number." It

79:57

exhibits, "I'm trusting you."

79:59

>> And it says, "You don't have to respond

80:02

with a crazy detailed formal email back

80:05

to me. Hit me up anytime. We can talk on

80:07

the phone." It removes the barrier to

80:09

entry for them to have to come back to

80:11

you.

80:12

>> And then have a nice email signature.

80:14

You know

80:15

>> what is a nice email signature?

80:17

>> Just uh in a sans Sarah font. Maybe add

80:20

a little color.

80:20

>> No comic sands. I'm not kidding.

80:22

>> No comic sands. No times in your room.

80:24

Tim, it's not 2007 anymore.

80:25

>> No, I saw this photograph. I have a lot

80:28

of friends who work at Google and there

80:31

was this big like printed out sign to to

80:34

employees talking about like snacks or

80:37

things and refrigerators and it was in

80:40

comic sands and then someone else took a

80:42

marker and wrote on it. They're like,

80:44

"This is Google and it is a serious

80:46

place of work. Please do not use comic

80:48

sands. I just thought it was pretty

80:50

funny because there are a lot of people

80:53

with high IQ at Google who may not have

80:55

the social graces, but I have to agree

80:57

on comic sands. So, let me say a few

80:59

things about this email.

81:00

>> Okay,

81:01

>> I in some ways owe my entire career as

81:04

it is to cold emails. And what you learn

81:10

in crafting

81:12

cold emails is directly translatable to

81:17

in person and talking to people. In a

81:19

way, it's the same thing. There are some

81:20

differences, but I want to highlight a

81:22

couple of things that you just said.

81:24

Number one, including your cell phone.

81:26

>> Mhm.

81:26

>> I am shocked by how many emails I get

81:30

that are actually somewhat interesting.

81:31

they get surfaced by my team because I

81:33

have people who triage my email

81:36

that do not have a phone number and I'm

81:38

like I don't have time to have a bunch

81:40

of my team does not have time to do a

81:42

bunch of back and forth to figure out a

81:44

time to talk even though you didn't even

81:46

offer a time to talk and blah blah blah

81:49

blah blah blah blah

81:51

archive like I just don't have time for

81:53

it like this seems interesting but it's

81:55

not definitively interesting if you gave

81:58

a cell phone I would figure out a way to

82:00

maybe call you and for five minutes. I'd

82:02

be like, I have three quick questions.

82:03

Interesting. But like this is it, five

82:05

minutes.

82:06

>> And in a friendly way, obviously, it's

82:08

like include if it's important to you,

82:10

include your cell phone.

82:11

>> And I think it's important to include

82:12

it. This is just me personally as the

82:15

final sentence of the email, not tucked

82:17

under your name. No,

82:18

>> you want to truly invite them.

82:20

>> Make it explicit. 100% agreed.

82:23

>> So, I want to just mention a couple of

82:26

direct parallels between what you just

82:28

mentioned is this formula. And if you're

82:30

open to it, maybe we could share like a

82:32

few examples or a template of

82:35

>> a downloadable PDF on Tim. Blog.

82:37

>> Well, exactly. PDF for a blog post or

82:39

something or like show notes just so

82:40

people can actually see it.

82:42

>> Yes, of course.

82:42

>> And I will just draw a few parallels.

82:45

So, number one, you need credibility up

82:47

front. And one way to think about this,

82:49

and I I always if I'm thinking about

82:51

reaching out to someone who's above my

82:52

pay grade, and trust me, there's I mean

82:54

there are plenty of people who are way

82:56

above my pay grade. The first thing in

82:58

the subject line, I'll give a tip that I

83:00

sometimes use. So, let's just say that

83:03

who knows. All right, somebody knows,

83:06

you know, Mr. Beast or Tom Cruz or

83:09

whoever it might be. Now, practically

83:11

speaking, everything's going to have to

83:13

get routed through someone else for Tom

83:14

Cruz. And if you do get their personal

83:17

information, they're going to be very

83:18

annoyed. Um, so, but where I'll start

83:21

with the subject line is one of two

83:24

places or both. So you mentioned like

83:26

the credibility indicator in the

83:28

subject, right? I'll use that. But if we

83:31

actually have someone in common who

83:34

actually recommended I connect,

83:36

>> but they haven't made the intro, I will

83:38

say for instance,

83:40

it would be again just to use the Tom

83:42

Cruz example, who I think would make an

83:44

amazing interview, but like for Tom Cruz

83:47

via

83:49

mutual connection,

83:50

>> oo,

83:51

>> Tim Ferrris, whatever the credibility

83:53

indicator is, right? So I will mention

83:56

the mutual connection first because

83:57

subject lines often get truncated on

84:00

mobile or elsewhere.

84:01

>> So if they just see for Tom Cruz from

84:04

Tim Ferris is going to be like who the

84:05

[ __ ] is Tim Ferrris archive.

84:07

>> They see the name they know

84:08

>> if it's for Tom or for Tom Cruz via

84:12

person who actually made the suggestion

84:14

and then my name you have a huge

84:17

advantage because chances are it's going

84:19

to get truncated. I love the via I've

84:22

done referral from X and then my stuff

84:25

after, but I like the via because it

84:27

doesn't necessarily mean that they're

84:29

going to have to vet and call that

84:31

person up, you know.

84:32

>> Yeah, exactly. Well, that brings up

84:34

another point, which is if you're going

84:35

to mention mutual connections and I'm

84:37

shocked by how many people violate this.

84:40

You better actually know, assume the

84:43

person you're emailing is going to

84:44

immediately text those people

84:46

>> and they will.

84:47

>> And I certainly will. And I would say

84:49

nine times out of 10 that person's like

84:51

either I have no idea who that person is

84:52

or I met that person once and we shook

84:55

hands at a party. I don't know them at

84:56

all. And I'm like you're gone. You just

84:59

misrepresented implicitly or explicitly.

85:03

>> But when I'm writing an email, right,

85:04

I'll have that subject line. If there is

85:05

a via I'll include that name and with

85:07

and the subject line I'll keep as short

85:09

as possible. Then the always default to

85:13

Mr. or Mrs. or Ms. something like

85:15

something that I really appreciate about

85:17

you because it doesn't cost anything is

85:20

you are very default polite and even

85:23

though it makes me feel like an old

85:24

bastard, you said you were like yes sir

85:26

and you used sir with me a couple times

85:28

when you came in and it's no but you're

85:30

always better off being on the safe side

85:34

and I am consistently surprised and

85:37

maybe this just makes me a salty

85:39

crotchety

85:41

>> old bastard but when people are

85:44

Hey, hey, Tim. Yo, bro. Yo, Ferris or

85:48

whatever. I'm just like, did we go to

85:50

pizza?

85:50

>> Someone says, "Yo, Ferris."

85:51

>> I've got so many guys, it's always guys

85:54

who think that that bro, it could be

85:57

anything, but they think that like

85:58

shoulder slapping immediate camaraderie

86:01

is helpful. I will say that's a very

86:03

risky gambit. Maybe it works one out of

86:05

10 times. In my case, I'm just like

86:08

>> this is a liability, right? Because

86:10

here's how I think about it is I'm like,

86:11

well, even if it doesn't bother me, that

86:14

shows a general lack of awareness. And

86:16

if they're going to ask me to connect

86:18

them with someone or they're going to

86:20

work with anyone who I care about and

86:22

they pull that

86:23

>> Mhm.

86:24

>> it's a reputational risk. And so most of

86:27

the time that's going to be an auto

86:28

archive. It's going to be like, you know

86:30

what, like the people you're reaching

86:33

out to, if they're really busy and if

86:36

they're well known enough that you think

86:38

to email them have more opportunities

86:40

than they can even look at.

86:42

>> So your your job number one is don't do

86:44

anything stupid.

86:46

Don't don't do anything that's going to

86:47

disqualify your email.

86:49

>> And the yo fairest of it all emotionally

86:52

feels as if a stranger is coming up to

86:54

you at the airport and giving you a hug.

86:56

Whoa, wait, who are you? What? Like

86:58

that's what it feels like. Just another

87:00

pro tip, this because we're in Austin

87:01

and this is like kind of man bun baggy

87:05

pants slash like Bitcoin Iaska CrossFit

87:08

Central is like don't just walk up to

87:11

someone you don't know and say after

87:13

they offer a hand, oh I'm a hugger and

87:15

just go for the hug. Don't do that. Like

87:18

just really don't do that.

87:19

>> Like assume you're in Japan and they're

87:22

going to strike you down with a sword if

87:23

you do that. Like the person who wants

87:25

the most distance wins that

87:27

conversation. It's kind of like skiing

87:29

in the back country with avalanche risk

87:30

or something. Whoever's the most

87:32

concerned gets to veto. But let's come

87:34

back to the cold email. So we've got the

87:36

subject line, different subject lines

87:37

for different purposes. In the first

87:40

line, it's going to be credibility

87:41

indicator. All right. Couple of points

87:44

on this, right? So you've got like your

87:46

credibility indicator in the subject

87:48

line potentially also which I will also

87:50

do,

87:52

you know, be like for interview

87:54

parenthesis 1 billion plus downloads,

87:56

right? In the case of the podcast,

87:57

right? something like that,

87:58

>> right? And I'll note for if you don't

88:00

have a billion downloads or millions of

88:03

followers, in the beginning for me, it

88:05

was examples of the work. Yeah.

88:08

>> That would at least show I've I've done

88:10

my homework.

88:11

>> No one's watched this, but it looks

88:13

really really good and it's it

88:15

beautifully edited.

88:16

>> Yeah. So, I am going to come back and

88:18

ask you about just to plant the seed,

88:20

the mentors in the very early days when

88:23

you didn't really have

88:24

>> much, right? Like what that email looked

88:26

like. We're going to come back to that.

88:29

>> I'll give my example. When I first got

88:31

to Silicon Valley, I volunteered for

88:33

organizations that had name cache. So I

88:36

volunteered for, for instance, Tai, the

88:39

indis entrepreneur last time, I'm sure

88:42

people checked. I'm not Indian but Thai

88:46

super wellknown at the time maybe still

88:49

entrepreneurial organization like the

88:51

per capita density in the kind of Indian

88:54

diaspora in Silicon Valley with talent

88:56

is [ __ ] bananas

88:57

>> shout out those people

88:59

>> exactly and u so I volunteered there and

89:02

then I could say I'm emailing someone in

89:05

tech and it would be for so and so via

89:09

Tai or the indis entrepreneur and I

89:11

wouldn't even put my name cuz who the

89:12

hell am I? And that gets the email open.

89:16

So, I would volunteer and then do things

89:18

on behalf of the nonprofit as a way of

89:20

establishing some kind of relationship.

89:22

Ideally, inviting them to speak or

89:23

something like that.

89:24

>> All for free, by the way. Right. Like

89:27

some of the highest paying jobs you'll

89:29

ever get, you don't get paid for in the

89:31

beginning in my opinion.

89:32

>> I love that.

89:33

>> It does pay in dividends ways you don't

89:35

expect.

89:36

>> Yeah. I did that and ultimately had for

89:39

instance Jack Canfield who co-created

89:41

Chicken Soup for the Soul which has sold

89:42

hundreds and hundreds of millions of

89:44

copies and then they ultimately sold as

89:46

a franchise. But I met him through an

89:48

email like that from the Silicon Valley

89:50

Association of Startup Entrepreneurs and

89:53

we are still friends to this day 25

89:56

years later or whatever it is. And he's

89:58

the one who introduced me to the agent

90:00

who ultimately sold the 4-hour work week

90:02

after like 26 rejections. So long-term

90:06

greedy, not short-term greedy, right?

90:08

Like you don't need to be paid upfront

90:09

for something that will ultimately be

90:11

very very

90:13

>> important to your life, right? To the

90:15

email for the credibility indicator. And

90:17

guys, we'll give some templates just so

90:19

you don't have to piece this together in

90:20

like a momento fashion, but I like to

90:23

and I suggest include some text that

90:26

establishes who you are. If someone

90:29

says, "Hey, here I am, Link, and like a

90:34

sketchy attachment." I'm like, "I don't

90:36

have time to go on some scavenger hunt

90:39

to figure out who you are." Right? So,

90:43

include a line or two on who the hell

90:45

you are. Do you know what I mean?

90:47

>> Yes.

90:47

>> Don't require them to like click through

90:49

and find this, this, and this, and this,

90:51

and this, and this.

90:52

>> A hyperl here.

90:54

>> Uh-uh.

90:54

>> Yeah. It's not enough.

90:55

>> You know what I mean? When it's like

90:56

click here. No, it should be and I've

91:00

done this thing. Hyp hyperlink the and

91:02

I've done this thing.

91:04

>> Exactly.

91:04

>> So if I want to learn more

91:05

>> Yeah. And just to give people some intel

91:08

on that,

91:10

one reason for that is that it just

91:13

takes more time for someone and any you

91:16

need to remove the reasons for them to

91:17

say no. And you might think to yourself

91:19

like who the hell doesn't have 30

91:22

seconds or a minute to click through.

91:23

And I'm like somebody who gets a

91:24

thousand email a day. That's answer

91:27

number one. Number two, anyone who is

91:29

reasonably wellknown has a lot of

91:31

fishing attacks. Like they have people

91:33

from different vectors who are trying to

91:34

get them to click on links that are very

91:36

dangerous

91:37

>> and intended to to steal information or

91:40

set the team up for social engineering.

91:42

So

91:43

>> I have been a recipient of a false

91:45

you're invited to the Tim Ferrris

91:46

podcast email.

91:48

>> Oh yeah, those that's a very clever

91:50

scam. Do you know how that works?

91:52

>> No.

91:52

>> Okay. So, how that works? This is

91:54

because these are still going around. I

91:56

think the jig is up because people have

91:58

realized most of these are fake. But, so

92:00

I'm guessing the email was like, "We

92:02

place people or we're inviting you on

92:03

the show." Either if they're not very

92:06

sophisticated, they'll be like, "It

92:07

costs this much to go on the show." And

92:09

then anyone who knows me should be like,

92:11

"That doesn't sound right." But there's

92:12

there's kind of like this payforplay

92:14

thing which most people will sniff out.

92:16

The other one is let's get on a Zoom

92:18

call and discuss. And what happens is

92:21

you get on a Zoom call and they somehow

92:24

figure out a way to get you to provide

92:28

basically screen access, not just

92:31

sharing screen, but screen access. And

92:34

they'll take you to your Facebook page

92:35

or something like that and they will

92:38

hijack your Facebook page, then use it

92:40

to promote like a crypto scam on a large

92:42

page and then hold that for ransom also

92:45

to get money from you. So, this is just

92:48

a way of saying guys include some

92:50

[ __ ] text. Um, right. And then to

92:53

your point again, like be very clear

92:54

about the ask.

92:56

>> The number of emails I get that is like

92:58

even if they establish, hey, I'm like

93:00

credible, but I'm not like, you know, a

93:04

president or the CEO of a Fortune50

93:07

company. It's like if if they're like,

93:09

okay, this might be kind of interesting,

93:11

right? If it's like Rick Rubin who's,

93:13

you know, I did his first interview on a

93:15

podcast ever in his sauna, but it's like

93:17

if you're like, "Oh, it's [ __ ] Rick

93:18

Rubin." And he's like, "Hey, let's jump

93:19

on the phone." You're like, "Yeah, of

93:20

course. Okay, fine. As long as I can

93:21

confirm that's who the person is,

93:23

>> right?"

93:23

>> But otherwise, assuming that you who's

93:25

cold emailing is not Rick Rubin, which

93:27

is likely, then be clear about your ask,

93:31

right? If it's like, "Would love to

93:32

discuss something vague. Let's hop on

93:34

the phone to discuss how's next Tuesday

93:35

at 2 p.m." I'm never going to respond to

93:37

that, right? Because if you can't write

93:40

a professional first cold email, I'm

93:42

skeptical of everything that's going to

93:44

follow. Right. Right. You're not placing

93:46

a value on the recipient's time

93:50

that you've thought through. Does that

93:51

make sense? So, it's like be really

93:54

clear in the ask. And then when I close,

93:57

again, to your point, right? Make your

93:59

cell phone. And by the way, you can use

94:00

a burner or you can use Google Voice.

94:02

You can spin up a Google Voice number

94:04

very easily from any G Suite, etc., etc.

94:07

But have a number, right, where somebody

94:09

can reach you. Do not just bury it in

94:10

your signature. Make it explicitly

94:12

clear. Feel free to text me anytime.

94:15

>> Right. We can schedule or just feel free

94:18

to hop on the phone. I promise it will

94:19

not take more than 10 minutes. By the

94:20

way, if you say that, do not go over 10

94:22

minutes.

94:23

>> Yeah.

94:23

>> And then I'll almost always say,

94:28

if you've read this far, I really

94:30

appreciate it. And if you're too busy to

94:32

get back to me, I totally understand.

94:33

>> Okay, that's a great learning. I'm going

94:35

to add that.

94:36

love that.

94:37

>> And by displaying as little or zero

94:42

entitlement as possible, you get a much

94:46

higher response rate. Why? Because your

94:49

cold email is an audition for everything

94:51

else to come. So, if you're like,

94:53

"Here's this vague email. How about next

94:56

Tuesday or Thursday at 2 p.m." It's

94:58

like, "Bro, slow down." Like, you're

95:00

humping my leg already. We haven't even

95:02

established who you are or what you

95:04

want. And that reflects a certain lack

95:08

of awareness and kind of business savvy

95:12

that is going to be a problem later,

95:13

right? That's kind of how the train of

95:15

thought goes. And that's it. Here's

95:17

another pro tip. If you send that email,

95:19

do not follow up two days later with

95:22

bumping this up and then do that two

95:23

days later bumping this up. You get to

95:25

do that once.

95:26

>> I think it's got to be at least a week.

95:28

>> Yeah. You got to wait and you're allowed

95:30

to do it once and then just assume

95:31

they're not interested. And that's okay.

95:34

move on. World is full of great people

95:37

and if people are not responding to your

95:40

email, it's probably common denominator

95:43

or problem with the email.

95:45

You know what I mean? So, in the

95:47

beginning when you're reaching out to

95:48

mentors, you ju, you know, you just quit

95:50

your job.

95:51

>> Yes.

95:52

>> What are you saying in the email?

95:54

>> Here, here's an example. I sent a cold

95:57

email to Hank Green who is

96:01

>> just one of the great

96:02

>> describe describe who Hank Green is.

96:03

>> Hank Green is if sunshine and joy and a

96:08

human encyclopedia were bundled into one

96:11

person. Just one of the smartest,

96:12

coolest, groundbreaking people,

96:16

especially in the YouTube world ever. He

96:18

came and gave a talk at Buzzfeed once

96:21

when I worked there. And maybe this was

96:24

while I was still working there or

96:26

shortly after I left, I sent him an

96:28

email. And this is actually a counter to

96:30

everything we've discussed. I wasn't

96:32

explicitly reaching out about a a

96:34

business idea or anything or trying to

96:36

get something from him, but I wanted to

96:39

get to know him. And so I sent him an

96:41

email

96:43

saying that I'm learning as I consider

96:47

pursuing my own creative endeavor. And

96:49

I'm curious,

96:51

what was the most

96:54

formative pinpoint for you as a child to

96:58

pursue this profession? And it's just a

97:01

fun question. Honestly, there's not much

97:04

strategy here. And he sent back a

97:06

multi-page answer. And I think he

97:09

>> What was your subject line? Do you

97:10

remember?

97:11

>> What was the subject line? The subject

97:12

line was hello from Michelle Caren

97:16

Buzzfeed. So using the the title of some

97:19

some form of legitimacy, but he sent me

97:21

this multi-page

97:23

response

97:25

>> and at the end said, "Thanks for the

97:27

thoughtful question. No one's asked me

97:29

before." And so sometimes I find that

97:32

people are excited to share themselves.

97:35

And of course in him sharing that story,

97:37

I learned a lot about how I could find

97:39

creative inspiration or even find

97:42

parallels with someone who externally I

97:44

don't have a lot of overlap with.

97:47

And I think that was awesome. And now

97:49

today where I know him in a more

97:52

friendly capacity as peers in the space

97:55

is really special to have those email

97:58

like these emails like this are so crazy

98:00

to go back on. So even if you send a

98:02

cold email and never hear back, it might

98:04

make for a great story later.

98:06

>> And guess what? You're practicing your

98:09

ability to craft emails and your ability

98:11

to communicate.

98:13

And this would be like I interviewed

98:16

Brandon Sanderson, one of the most

98:17

legendary fantasy writers in the world,

98:20

who is prolific. And I think he wrote I

98:24

think it was five

98:26

books before he even attempted to

98:30

publish one.

98:30

>> He intentionally said, "I'm not

98:32

publishing my first several books."

98:33

Isn't that right?

98:34

>> That's right. That's right. I did a just

98:36

a huge romp with him. Met up at his HQ

98:39

in in Utah. fascinating, brilliant guy.

98:43

But the point is, maybe your first five

98:46

to 10 cold emails are just to improve

98:48

getting better at cold emails. And

98:53

by the way, something I did also is I

98:58

would ask people who I had not sent

99:00

those cold emails, but who are like

99:01

better known folks. I'll be like, "Hey,

99:03

would you mind taking a look at I I

99:05

would do this at events sometimes. I'd

99:06

be like, "This is going to seem like a

99:08

weird request.

99:10

Don't worry, it's not anything like

99:11

super super bizarre, but would you be

99:15

willing to critique this email? Like I

99:17

I've sent this to a couple people. You

99:19

know, I haven't gotten a response or I

99:20

only got one response. Like, how would

99:21

you change this?

99:23

>> And like that is a very concrete

99:25

question. And it's also not clearly a

99:28

question that's just setting up the

99:30

thing you actually want. Do you know

99:32

what I mean? Like cuz sometimes people

99:33

will do that via email. They'll be like,

99:35

>> "Hey, I loved your sweater. How did you

99:37

train your dog?" And then like 5 seconds

99:39

after I reply to that, they're like, "So

99:41

anyway, I was thinking of having, you

99:43

know, myself on your podcast." I'm just

99:44

like, "Oh, you asshole." Like I like

99:46

clearly you're just setting it up. So

99:48

just be aware of that.

99:50

>> You got click baited.

99:51

>> I got click baited. So a few things.

99:53

Hank Green I I don't know him

99:55

personally, but I remember seeing him at

99:57

VidCon once. And there are two things I

99:59

want to say. One is just what a sweet

100:01

guy. Seems like a really sweet human

100:03

being. Number two is you reached out

100:07

with let's say a mentoring question

100:12

>> to someone who already has demonstrated

100:15

that they mentor. Does that make sense?

100:17

>> Yes.

100:18

>> Right. So that will make your life

100:20

easier in the beginning.

100:22

>> Mhm.

100:23

>> When you're sending out these these cold

100:25

emails. The other thing is if you do get

100:27

a response from somebody, treat it

100:32

like you're not at a sex party, you are

100:35

dating someone in like the 1800s, right?

100:39

This is like Downtown Abbey. Do not

100:41

reply 5 seconds later with like, "Oh,

100:44

great. Now here are 10 more questions.

100:46

Don't do that." Right? Like

100:48

>> be patient. Like life is longful and

100:52

thoughtful. Life is long. If you want

100:53

these relationships, I mean, I will also

100:55

say you do not need to have a 100

100:57

relationships with people who are steps

101:00

ahead of you. If you actually develop

101:03

genuine,

101:05

mutually respectful

101:07

communication with a few people, in most

101:11

cases, in a lot of cases, you are set,

101:13

right? So, it's like don't be greedy.

101:15

Don't be a greedy little piglet. Don't

101:16

be in a rush. Mhm.

101:18

>> And I've certainly had to learn that by

101:21

[ __ ] that up over and over again

101:23

because I'm like constitutionally very

101:25

impatient. Like I want to get stuff done

101:26

like very quickly and some things do not

101:30

lend themselves to that. You mentioned,

101:32

you know, Snider's beats of

101:33

storytelling. I think

101:35

>> for sure.

101:36

>> Don't quiz me on that.

101:37

>> I won't I won't I won't quiz you on it.

101:39

As far as storytelling goes,

101:42

>> as far as developing like narrative

101:44

arcs, does not need to be a book, but it

101:46

could be like, are there any particular

101:48

resources you would point people to

101:50

where you're like, "Okay,

101:52

>> oh gosh,

101:52

>> I know there's like being in the

101:53

trenches and working on it and and

101:55

testing and split testing and using kind

101:58

of warm audiences in the beginning,

101:59

etc." But if you're like, "All right,

102:01

look, if you want to do something

102:03

analogous to what I'm doing on YouTube,

102:07

right? And there are other examples of

102:09

people who put put out very few videos,

102:11

right? But this sort of longer form

102:15

narrative arc storytelling. If you were

102:18

teaching a class on that, like what's

102:19

the syllabus like? What do you what do

102:21

you tell people to read or watch?"

102:22

>> Challenge accept like reality

102:25

>> docu class. Okay. Welcome to my class.

102:28

On the syllabus, we're going to be

102:30

studying a few things. First of all, I'm

102:32

going to make everyone watch Survivor

102:33

and every week we're going to discuss

102:35

it. First of all, because it's the best

102:37

ever. I'm obsessed with Jeff Probes.

102:40

>> And

102:42

I think that part of

102:45

reality doc in particular, Survivor is a

102:49

reality competition show, but there's a

102:51

lot that can be learned in doing your

102:53

own vlogs or self-filmed

102:56

human stories. They do an excellent job

103:00

at taking hundreds of hours of footage

103:03

and pulling out the story beats that

103:05

make sense. You watch an episode of

103:07

Survivor, it might feel like things are

103:10

just happening and they are, but they're

103:13

also curated from thousands and

103:16

thousands of moments, storylines that

103:17

were left on the floor. And so I think

103:20

Survivor is an amazing lesson in first

103:22

of all hosting and second of all killing

103:25

your babies in a way. We know on that

103:28

island they're out there for a month and

103:29

a half. A lot's going to happen that's

103:31

not going to make the edit. But why have

103:34

the producers chosen this storyline to

103:36

tell? Why is it engaging? Why is this

103:39

the act break for the commercial? I

103:42

think that's number one. Selfishly,

103:44

Propes is the goat. Also, sidebar,

103:48

Proped is an excellent example also of

103:52

creating defensible IP, right? Which a

103:55

lot which a lot of people don't realize.

103:57

They're like, "Oh, isn't he just the

103:58

host guy?" It's like, "No, no, no, no,

103:59

>> no. He's he's the Einstein of that

104:02

operation.

104:03

>> It's amazing." And when you watch his

104:06

hosting, it's so masterful because

104:10

he is a fan and also a researcher of the

104:16

people on the show. I mean, you see him

104:17

at tribal council. He is recounting

104:20

things that have happened decades ago.

104:22

He knows the details of the

104:24

contestants's life and he asks a

104:25

question not as a leading question, but

104:27

as a way for the contestant to open up.

104:30

I think that is incredible interviewing

104:32

and it's something that I study too. I

104:35

did a show called Karma on HBO which was

104:38

a kids survival show um produced by JD

104:42

Roth, you know, another like huge

104:44

reality legend. And again, I think

104:48

people watch these shows and and think

104:49

the hosts are just there to say lines

104:51

and deliver

104:53

information to the audience, but there

104:55

is a massive amount of research. I mean,

104:58

you have a binder of every kid's head

105:01

shot, where they're from, their family.

105:03

You're taking notes. You're sitting in

105:06

MCR, which is this trailer with hundreds

105:08

of video feeds as it's happening live,

105:11

so that when you go to meet with the

105:13

contestants, you know what things to ask

105:15

and how long to sit with them. So, I I

105:17

think that's just masterful story, not

105:19

from just a a great host, but also a

105:21

producer.

105:22

>> Okay. So, on the syllabus, you got

105:24

>> We got We're watching some reality

105:25

shows.

105:26

>> Yep. This is like Robert McKe I guess

105:29

the story seminar with like Casablanca.

105:31

He's like we're going to walk by this

105:32

second by second.

105:34

>> Exactly.

105:35

>> Look at what's going on. All right. So

105:36

So we got Survivor as one part of the

105:38

syllabus.

105:39

>> Survivor is one part of the syllabus.

105:41

>> Part two is we are going to study

105:43

Snider's Beats and we're going to study

105:46

the save the cat of it all.

105:48

>> Those two books are so good

105:50

>> and I have I have some screenwriter

105:53

friends who are like, "Yeah, they are

105:54

really good." And others were like,

105:56

"Please, no, don't don't suggest it."

105:59

I'm like, "They I you look, I haven't

106:02

practiced as much as you have or other

106:03

folks." I'm like, "These make it very

106:06

tangible,"

106:07

>> right? I think it's important to

106:09

understand

106:11

the bones of a of a story. What are the

106:14

the hills and the valleys? What is the

106:16

all is lost? And and I think a lot of

106:19

people look at that material and think

106:21

it only applies to scripted content.

106:25

But it is so important in any piece of

106:28

story.

106:29

>> Storytelling storytelling. It

106:30

>> applies to my It applies to books. It

106:32

applies to all of it.

106:34

>> Yes. Exactly. I would even go as far to

106:36

say that a 5-second vine, if it performs

106:40

well, hits all of the pieces of a story

106:42

arc in just a few seconds. It sets a

106:44

premise. It upends it. And there's a

106:46

resolution where the character is

106:48

changed by the end. Even a video of like

106:51

a a cat leaping off something

106:55

and doing something crazy has a

106:56

beginning, middle, and end where the cat

106:59

is different at the beginning and the

107:00

end of that America's Funniest Home

107:02

video clip. And that's why we like it.

107:04

That's why we laugh. That's why we

107:06

engage with it. And so I think it's

107:08

really important to understand that.

107:10

Part three of the syllabus. Let's see. I

107:13

feel like we have to have three parts of

107:14

the syllabus. The third part of the

107:16

syllabus would be an area of the class

107:20

where everyone brings a piece of work

107:24

released online within the last week

107:25

that impacted them. This would be the

107:28

assess and dissect portion of the class.

107:31

Why did this YouTube video speak to you?

107:34

Oh, well, I I just wanted to learn about

107:36

how the Corona virus spread originally

107:38

and I saw this video on Kisagot.

107:41

Okay, but let's break it down. What was

107:43

interesting? What what was the title?

107:44

What was the thumbnail? What why did

107:46

this Tik Tok speak to you? Why did it

107:48

stand out? And I would want people to

107:50

bring things that performed well or

107:52

didn't so we can understand resonance.

107:56

As you mentioned earlier, attention is

107:58

such a very very valuable and finite and

108:03

rare resource these days that I would

108:06

want a discussion component of of the

108:08

class to talk about relevant impact in

108:11

recent media. So, that would be the

108:13

wackiest class ever, but that's what

108:15

we'd be doing.

108:16

>> If you had,

108:20

and I know we're doing this on the fly,

108:22

but

108:23

>> let's just say

108:26

project assignments, right? And I'll buy

108:28

you some time because I'm going to

108:29

>> drink some water.

108:30

>> I know this is on the spot, but

108:32

>> the most formative writing class that I

108:34

took, and I really only took one

108:38

seminar ever focused on writing. I got

108:40

very lucky in college. But we there were

108:44

two components to the class. There there

108:47

were these once-weekly lectures

108:50

two or three hours long, pretty long on

108:53

writing with a tremendous focus on

108:56

structure primarily.

108:59

And then

109:01

there were reviews of work that we had

109:05

already submitted. So each week we had a

109:08

writing assignment

109:09

and typically in the range like three to

109:13

10 pages, but let's just call it three

109:15

to five pages.

109:17

And you would you would write your

109:19

piece. Then you would sort of submit it

109:23

at the beginning of of the lecture. Then

109:26

you would have a one-on-one with the

109:28

professor, in this case, John McY. If

109:30

people haven't read John McY, they

109:32

should. Just tremendous. If you want to

109:34

read something short, Levels of the Game

109:36

is incredible.

109:38

He's won one or two Peele surprises.

109:40

Just a phenomenal writer, can make

109:42

anything interesting. And wrote an

109:44

entire book on oranges, for instance.

109:46

Another one on handcarved wooden canoes

109:49

and another one on the geology and

109:53

nature of Alaska. I mean, the guy,

109:55

>> wow,

109:56

>> is just incredible. The levels of the

109:57

game is is about basically the entire

109:59

game of tennis, but told through the

110:00

lens of one match involving Arthur Ash.

110:03

So, we had the lecture, then we have

110:04

these writing assignments. You turn in

110:06

whatever your new assignment is at the

110:08

beginning of each of the lectures, and

110:10

then you have your one-on-one with

110:12

Professor MCI. He gives you back your

110:16

printed out writing, which typically

110:18

will have, at least in the be in the

110:20

first few weeks, more red ink from his

110:23

edits and notes than what you put on the

110:26

page. It is brutal. Brutal, but

110:30

incredibly

110:31

>> helpful. Okay, so you've got these

110:33

writing assignments and the writing

110:34

assignments are all over the place, but

110:37

it might be something as seemingly

110:40

simple slash difficult as find us find a

110:43

sculpture on campus and write three to

110:46

five pages on it. And we're like, can

110:48

you give us any more direction? He's

110:50

like, no.

110:51

>> Oh my god.

110:52

>> So everybody would take a slightly

110:54

different approach because you're like,

110:55

wait a second. Should I write about the

110:56

history? Should I write about the

110:57

subjective experience? should I write

110:59

about? Uh oh. But no matter what I do, I

111:02

have to think about kind of structure

111:03

and some of the points that he's made in

111:04

class.

111:06

And then at the end of the seminar

111:09

lecture,

111:11

we would share our work, right? And so

111:13

we would we would actually read out loud

111:15

some of our work

111:16

>> after the revisions have been applied

111:18

from him.

111:19

>> No. So I guess I'll probably scram the

111:21

chronology a little bit in the lecture.

111:22

We would read something that has not yet

111:24

been corrected and then subject it to

111:27

peer review,

111:28

>> right?

111:29

>> Yeah.

111:29

>> And get his comments. So there were a

111:33

couple of different ingredients and he's

111:34

taught this. He doesn't teach it any

111:36

longer but taught it for 15 20 years

111:39

very infrequently like once every year

111:40

or two. So I got very lucky. So this is

111:42

a very roundabout way of asking if there

111:47

were like an assignment component.

111:49

>> Mhm. or people are doing their own work.

111:52

What are perhaps some of the things you

111:54

would have them do?

111:55

>> The assignment component of the class

111:56

would be making the content.

112:00

>> Yeah.

112:00

>> So, I would require all of the students

112:02

to make an account if they don't already

112:05

have one on some platform.

112:07

>> And at the beginning of the class, I

112:08

would want them to set and define the

112:11

type of content. I would want them to

112:13

define why is this uniquely yours? How

112:17

is this different from what other people

112:19

have done? And then at the same time,

112:21

how is this databacked by what other

112:23

people have done? And then from there, I

112:25

would require them to actually make and

112:27

produce videos. If this if the purpose

112:30

of the class is become a YouTuber, let's

112:33

say,

112:33

>> I would ask them to to make and produce

112:35

the videos weekly and actually post them

112:39

so that we could do some peer review of

112:41

course, but then actually see how does

112:43

it play live in the world. We would I

112:46

would also want them to do data analysis

112:48

at the end and try to make educated

112:51

guesses on why it something did or

112:53

didn't perform well and receive critique

112:57

and feedback not just on the data and

113:00

performance but specifically the work

113:02

itself. Why did this introduction work

113:04

or not work? How could the technique be

113:06

improved next time?

113:08

>> You know, I was thinking it could also

113:09

be fun. And you'd have to have a pretty

113:10

small class to make this work. But

113:12

assuming the videos are short and

113:14

they're doing it weekly, like have them

113:16

show the videos in class and then make

113:18

predictions like what is your

113:19

hypothesis. You know what I mean?

113:21

>> Like you can invest in videos.

113:23

>> Yeah. And then they can choose to like

113:25

modify the video or not based on kind of

113:28

feedback or your thoughts or something.

113:29

You obviously want to let them learn

113:31

their own lessons. I think that would be

113:32

a a good way of refining kind of the

113:35

thinking process.

113:36

>> Someone's got to teach this class.

113:38

You are infinitely. You actually made

113:41

this whole format work. So I think it's

113:44

you

113:44

>> only if you're a guest lecturer.

113:46

>> Sure. I mean guest lectures like all the

113:49

fun with none of the heavy lifting. So

113:52

I'm I'm very much into that.

113:54

>> I want to mention two books and I'm

113:57

curious if if they're still relevant

114:00

>> because they came up in doing research

114:02

for this conversation. Radical Cander by

114:04

Kim Scott and The Six Thinking Hats by

114:07

Edward Dabono. Do either of these ring a

114:09

bell?

114:09

>> Yeah, of course.

114:10

>> Okay. All right. Got it. So,

114:11

>> my boy Edward with his hats.

114:13

>> Yeah, there you go.

114:14

>> Um,

114:16

>> so how did these both factor in? Because

114:18

these were these were basically the two

114:20

books that I was able to find mentioned

114:21

by title. Some of them I think were

114:25

mentioned by people you work with and

114:29

not directly

114:31

>> or maybe Garrett mentioned the mono

114:33

hats. The six thinking hats. I don't

114:36

even remember where I learned or heard

114:38

of this concept or

114:40

>> Oh, I actually think this was Jodie.

114:43

>> This was shout out Jod therapist.

114:44

>> Jody Jod puts me on all the great books.

114:47

I was coming to her talking about just

114:50

various problems I was facing and and

114:53

she told me of this concept of the six

114:55

thinking hats and effectively I'm I

114:58

might butcher this but it is a way of

115:01

looking at a problem by filtering only

115:06

by thinking type. So for example, we're

115:09

going to put on a yellow hat and look at

115:12

this potential idea. And the yellow hat

115:15

means we're only going to say things

115:17

that could go well by pursuing this

115:20

idea. Versus when we put on our black

115:23

hat, that is we're saying all of the

115:25

things that could go completely wrong.

115:26

And it's six different techniques of

115:29

being able to assess and determine if an

115:33

idea is good or or how to solve a

115:35

problem. That thinking was really

115:38

helpful to me as someone who often prior

115:42

to understanding this would immediately

115:43

go to black hat. And this is coming from

115:46

the mentality of everything's going to

115:47

go wrong. I'm going to fail at

115:49

everything. I'm a person who growing up

115:52

always defaulted to black hat. No, no,

115:55

no, no, no. It's not going to work. That

115:56

doesn't inspire creativity. That does

115:59

not inspire entrepreneurship. It also

116:02

gives an unfair shot to an idea that

116:05

respspun

116:07

may provide a new idea altogether. I

116:10

think this is also something I learned

116:12

from a design thinking class. I I might

116:15

be crossing my wires here, but another

116:17

class I took at Dartmouth was design

116:19

thinking where similar to your writing

116:21

class, it was an engineering class where

116:24

every week we would have some wacky

116:26

assignment like the professor would give

116:28

us each a sheet of poster board and say,

116:32

"Next weekend you come to class, it has

116:34

to be a chair. Turn this poster board

116:37

into a chair that supports your body

116:39

type. You can't use any glue, any

116:42

scissors, any other

116:44

structural components. You can make cuts

116:46

to it and and shape it, but that's it.

116:50

And it has to support your body weight.

116:51

And that class taught me a ton about,

116:54

you know, myself before that class would

116:56

look at that and say, "Not possible. Why

116:57

am I even trying it?" And he, Professor

117:01

Roby really forced us to think

117:03

critically through how could something

117:05

be possible. So that uh concept of the

117:08

six hats is really impactful to me.

117:11

>> Let's pause there for a second because

117:12

this book, believe it or not, was

117:15

incredibly helpful to me

117:18

>> really

117:18

>> in my first few years of building my

117:22

first business and trying to figure out

117:25

what I might be good at. But also as a

117:28

solo operator effectively had lots of

117:31

contractors but as a as a solo operator

117:34

for the most part

117:37

effectively turning myself into a

117:40

virtual

117:42

board of directors with different

117:43

perspectives by using these different

117:45

hats because I also default to black hat

117:48

which I think has its place right part

117:50

of the part of the genius of this

117:52

approach is you're not saying oh that's

117:55

negative thinking saying, "Shame on you.

117:58

Let's only look at the bright side." No,

118:00

it's saying there's a place it's saying

118:02

there's a place for that,

118:03

>> but there's going to be a set time for

118:05

it, and we're going to go through each

118:07

of these six. I haven't read it in

118:09

decades, but Edward Dabono, six thinking

118:12

hats. He also had, I believe, a book

118:14

called Lateral Thinking, which I found

118:16

helpful. I don't know how those would

118:17

age for me if I read them now. Right.

118:20

Sometimes it's like I'm like, "Oh god,

118:22

you haven't seen this movie I haven't

118:23

seen in 20 years. Let's watch it." And

118:24

within 10 minutes I'm like, "Oh god,

118:25

this is not as good as I remember."

118:28

There are definitely others like,

118:30

well, it's very unPC, but Airplane and

118:32

others that actually do age.

118:34

>> I'm trying to remember what the other

118:35

hats are. I haven't like looked at this

118:38

in such a long time because I feel like

118:39

we just sort of

118:40

>> I can't recall what the specifics are. I

118:42

mean, if I had to guess, I'm imagining

118:44

one is like analytical by the numbers

118:46

and one is like emotional. I mean, I'm

118:48

imagining there's probably some version

118:50

of that,

118:51

>> but it is I it stuck out to me because I

118:53

was like, that's really interesting that

118:56

>> this book, which not a lot of people

118:58

reference,

118:59

>> actually also popped up in both of our

119:01

timelines professionally. That's super

119:04

interesting. All right. Radical Cander.

119:06

>> Okay. Kim Scott.

119:10

It's like Tim, Adam Grant, Kim Scott.

119:14

These are like Mount Rushmore for me.

119:16

Kim Scott, I mean, is just phenomenal. I

119:20

mean, I I thought Radical Cander, and I

119:24

know many of these works have been

119:26

critiqued and refreshed in many ways,

119:29

but her quad chart of how to

119:35

provide feedback to people was really

119:37

instrumental to me because effectively

119:39

what happened was I quit my job when I

119:43

was 23. I had never I'd never made it to

119:47

a I mean at 23 like a managerial

119:49

position in a a corporate setting. So I

119:51

never had any manager training.

119:53

>> Could you give an example of how Kim's

119:56

teaching or frameworks look when applied

120:00

like for an example?

120:01

>> Yes. So Kim talks about four types of

120:06

management and giving feedback to

120:08

people. And the quadrant I identify with

120:11

the most is ruinous empathy, which is

120:14

the idea of you are so nice to everyone

120:17

around you that when you need to give

120:20

critical feedback to someone, they might

120:22

leave the meeting feeling like, wait, am

120:24

I actually doing great? I I don't know

120:27

because you're sandwiching compliments

120:29

in in or downplaying the critique and

120:32

you're not direct enough. And so

120:34

transforming that into radical cander is

120:38

about being more direct with feedback.

120:41

And so some of the things that Kim has

120:43

helped me very applicably work through

120:47

are workshopping

120:49

giving critical feedback to people and

120:52

hearing live feedback from her on cut

120:55

off that sentence that's fluff you know

120:58

like that is so so amazing. I think an

121:01

applicable setting here or an example of

121:05

this would be let's say we have a

121:09

collaborator on set who's very very good

121:12

at what they do but they don't

121:16

compliment or uplift other people when

121:19

they do a great job.

121:20

>> Got it. So good good at execution maybe

121:24

a little prickly around the edges. just

121:26

a little prickly or internally they're

121:29

thinking that person is doing a great

121:31

job but they're not vocalizing it.

121:32

>> I see. Got it.

121:33

>> And so it creates an environment on set

121:35

where everyone's like, "Oh, does this

121:36

person not like what I'm doing?" So

121:40

stepping in as a manager, the feedback,

121:43

it's a tough piece of feedback because

121:44

how do you say, "Dude, I just need you

121:47

to go out of your way and provide

121:49

positive feedback to people." And it can

121:51

be as simple as that. But what Kim has

121:54

taught me in that in in this specific

121:56

situation is communication exists on two

122:00

wavelengths.

122:01

It is

122:04

first of all the wavelength of

122:07

communicating the need the the tactical

122:10

information but there's another

122:11

wavelength that's equally as important

122:12

which is the emotional component. And so

122:16

being able to define that with that

122:18

person and say, "Hey, you're doing a

122:21

great job communicating, but there's an

122:23

emotional side you're completely missing

122:24

that's actually really important to that

122:27

communication

122:29

was really helpful because it provided

122:33

necessary value to that action for that

122:36

person rather than just like, so I got

122:38

to like tell people they're doing a good

122:40

job. Like I got to take an hour out of

122:42

my day and send nice emails." giving

122:43

them the why as

122:45

>> Exactly. Exactly.

122:46

>> This could include full-time

122:49

and contractors. What is your org chart

122:52

look like, so to speak? What does the

122:53

team?

122:54

>> Yes. I mean, I I remember reading 4-hour

122:56

work week and and the whole virtual

122:58

assistant chapter blew my mind. So, we

123:00

do have someone in Singapore.

123:02

>> Yeah.

123:03

>> Which is funny. Our internal team

123:04

full-time is intentionally tight.

123:08

>> It's seven full-time staff. So that is

123:11

myself, Garrett who's the chief creative

123:13

officer, Nick, head of production,

123:17

three editors,

123:19

and an assistant for me.

123:23

But we have what I call a slinky

123:25

operation where that's where it is when

123:28

it's tight. But when we get ready to do

123:31

a big project, it balloons up very

123:33

quickly. But what's cool is all of the

123:36

people that are on on the internal team

123:39

are department heads. So when it's time

123:41

to recreate the Mission Impossible

123:44

stunt, each of us know how to staff up

123:48

camera team of seven people, stunt team

123:51

of six people, and build that out to a

123:54

team of 50 who come in to do that one

123:56

specific project, and then we slink you

123:58

back down. and your head of production

124:00

would be responsible for the like

124:03

scoping and finding and hiring of those

124:06

people.

124:06

>> Sometimes

124:08

also just within our entire team, we're

124:11

all very connected and embedded in the

124:13

industry. So the team I just mentioned

124:15

is pretty much half people from the

124:18

traditional entertainment world. Nick,

124:21

for example, the head of production,

124:23

came from working at Broadway Video

124:25

under Lauren Michaels and did Taco Bell

124:28

Super Bowl commercials. So, he

124:30

understands feature film, high budget

124:34

commercial world. Then people like

124:36

myself or our editor Ryan Gonzalez, we

124:41

come from the digital first world. So,

124:43

our training was at a a content studio

124:45

where it was fast output, but you know

124:48

how to do everything. And so bringing

124:51

those worlds together is a really

124:54

special and cool environment

124:55

intentionally set because that is

124:58

exactly the midpoint I want to occupy is

125:00

the bridge between the two worlds,

125:02

>> right? And I'm curious how you suppose

125:06

the sort of context behind my question

125:07

is how you separate responsibilities in

125:10

a sense with the understanding that on a

125:12

small team you're going to end up

125:12

wearing a lot of hats. Not to be

125:14

confused with Edward Dabono, but

125:18

when [ __ ] needs getting done, people are

125:20

going to roll up their sleeves and kind

125:21

of I imagine at that size do whatever.

125:23

But for instance, on the you could pick

125:27

the episode, right? So could be any

125:29

episode, but where do your

125:31

responsibilities say? How are they

125:33

different from chief creative officer as

125:36

one example?

125:36

>> Yes. So, we have a giant spreadsheet

125:39

called the Areas of Responsibility

125:41

Chart, which I learned from a book

125:44

called The Great CEO Within. Again, I'm

125:46

trying to learn all this Silicon Valley

125:48

management stuff on my own. I even like

125:51

called my YouTube partner manager and I

125:53

was like, "Can I please sit in on the

125:56

YouTube corporate management training

125:58

the next time it happens?" And she said

126:01

I couldn't. So, I'm trying to piece meal

126:03

it all for myself and learn from people

126:05

like you and Kim. But in that book, it

126:08

it details actually making a giant chart

126:13

that outlines every single action that

126:16

the company takes. And this can go from

126:21

in our case something as big as decides

126:25

if brand deal is worth taking

126:29

all the way down to takes out the trash.

126:32

>> Who is going to be doing all these

126:34

things? So this this is I think hundreds

126:37

of responsibilities.

126:38

>> So what would be some just so I

126:40

understand because it's not a role that

126:41

I'm familiar with like chief creative

126:43

officer. So for chief creative officer

126:45

in this chart for Garrett that includes

126:49

so Garrett Garrett's role as a whole

126:51

within the company is to define the

126:54

creative tone and thesis of everything

126:57

that we do. So he is overseeing story

127:01

for each of the episodes. He's directing

127:03

the episodes and post. But he's also

127:06

making sure that if we're updating our

127:08

brand book or we're having our Emmys for

127:11

your consideration event in a couple

127:13

weeks, he is going through all of the

127:14

marketing materials and confirming yes,

127:17

this fits

127:18

>> the tone and the style of challenge

127:20

accepted. This tells one cohesive story.

127:23

What we don't want is a channel or a

127:26

show that is chaoticed

127:30

or

127:30

>> Exactly. We wanted to hit a certain

127:33

level of quality of storytelling. So for

127:36

Garrett, that means on a macro level

127:38

overseeing those decisions, but also on

127:40

a micro level

127:42

approving edits and directing edits to

127:44

make sure the stories we're telling hit

127:46

that bar of excellence, too. So he's

127:48

sort of like chief creative officer and

127:51

chief storyteller in a way. And then

127:53

head of production, what percentage of

127:56

the time for head of production is spent

127:58

on

128:00

kind of in production episodes versus

128:03

pre-planning beforehand and

128:05

post-production, would you say?

128:07

>> Oh, that's hard. I would need to ask

128:09

Nick exactly, but Nick

128:12

primarily spends when we greenlight an

128:14

episode and it's we're we're now in

128:17

preparation to go shoot it, a lot of his

128:19

time is spent assembling the crew,

128:22

getting insurance permissions.

128:24

In the case of the seven marathons

128:27

project we did where we ran seven

128:29

marathons on all seven continents in one

128:31

week, he was handling all the logistics

128:34

of the local crews we were working with.

128:36

We say that as we the royal we

128:38

>> [ __ ] I mean it was it was a team effort.

128:40

It was a team effort. Many people did it

128:43

besides me.

128:44

>> Of course there is a certain level of

128:46

physical brutality.

128:47

>> I I can't I did it

128:49

>> with the help of an amazing team and

128:52

he's also figuring out permissions and

128:56

and cash flow

128:59

>> working with our branded partners. So

129:01

he's sort of touching many things more

129:04

like including head of ops in a way I

129:07

would say. So the physical operation of

129:10

the company itself

129:12

>> when you look

129:14

out three or five years and I imagine

129:17

you've thought about this because to the

129:19

best I can tell you you do like planning

129:23

uh the spreadsheets and editorial

129:25

calendars. So I imagine that you've

129:28

given this some thought, but it strikes

129:30

me that this I mean this is a very

129:32

demanding

129:34

job that you have.

129:35

>> Mhm.

129:36

>> And the company can

129:40

and the kind of strategic vision and

129:42

where you go can go in a lot of

129:44

different directions. So like three to

129:46

five years from now, what would you be

129:48

happy with in terms of what your life

129:53

and the channel looks like? And maybe

129:56

the channel is too constraining, but I'm

129:58

just wondering like 3 five years out

130:00

>> understanding a lot of things can change

130:02

technologically and otherwise, but

130:04

>> what does it look like?

130:06

>> What does it look like?

130:06

>> Yeah. You have a magic wand and you're

130:08

like

130:09

>> a magic wand

130:10

>> to some extent. I want to preserve the

130:11

option that it'll turn out this way.

130:13

Bing. Ooh. It's worth noting that I'm so

130:17

privileged to be happy now.

130:19

>> Yeah.

130:20

>> I

130:21

love what I do. I love how our industry

130:26

is evolving. I love being a part of that

130:29

evolution of when you hear the word

130:32

content creator, what that means and the

130:35

and the social expectation of what that

130:38

profession is. I'm really really proud

130:41

of and excited for the future of the

130:43

evolution of that and the convergence

130:46

specifically of traditional and digital

130:49

a future for myself. First of all, I

130:52

want to be doing this

130:54

as long as I possibly can. And I look to

130:57

people like Tom Cruz, David Blaine, Jeff

131:01

Propes, again, they're in their 50s and

131:04

60s and they have just decided they're

131:08

going to keep going. Richard Branson, he

131:11

going out there.

131:13

And I find that exciting and inspiring.

131:19

And and also I I look forward to a world

131:23

where the names of the people that I

131:25

just mentioned are all men and I look

131:27

forward to helping lengthen the list of

131:30

women who have longevity in careers like

131:32

this too.

131:34

So I think a future for me external to

131:36

the channel is participating in that

131:39

bridge, supporting legacy studios and

131:43

companies in understanding our world and

131:45

helping burgeoning creators find

131:48

inspiration and solace and a path

131:50

forward in a very seemingly nebulous

131:54

career. I love sharing with other

131:58

creators the wins and the learnings and

132:00

don't do what I did here. here's my

132:02

Google Excel spreadsheet. Skip all of

132:05

the stuff I had to learn. And so that

132:08

mentorship component of giving

132:10

trajectory and systems to younger

132:13

creators is really, really important to

132:16

me and something I'm passionate about.

132:18

In addition to having to lead by example

132:21

and practicing what I preach,

132:23

>> I look forward to the next 3 to 5 years

132:26

because I know that's the sphere of

132:29

where I'm headed. Like that's where our

132:30

arrow is headed. I don't know where the

132:32

arrow is going to land very

132:34

specifically,

132:36

but I am so excited about the ride.

132:38

>> All right, I'm going to be the detective

132:41

here for a second.

132:42

>> Oh, do you have a magnifying glass?

132:44

>> Not in a spooky way. Well, I do have my

132:45

brand new fancy spectacles,

132:48

but part of the reason I'm asking is

132:51

that

132:53

you have to make decisions around how

132:55

many episodes you pursue, how much they

132:59

overlap,

132:59

>> right? And for instance, against my

133:05

quote unquote better financial interest,

133:07

there was a point where

133:09

I had decided, well, in my best

133:11

interest, I I had realized pretty

133:13

quickly, well, I make X amount per

133:15

episode of the podcast, especially

133:17

during like the golden era of

133:20

2020 COVID and like the two or three

133:23

years that was just an absurd like

133:26

embarrassment of riches for anyone who

133:29

was doing something reasonably

133:30

defensible. At that point, I was like,

133:32

well, four is pretty easy for me to do

133:35

per month.

133:36

>> Okay.

133:36

>> Like, if I want to increase the annual

133:38

revenue of this thing, which is very

133:41

high profit margins, to do things with

133:43

the foundation and my employees and blah

133:45

blah blah blah blah blah, I can just do

133:47

two more episodes a month, easy, right?

133:49

And if I wanted to double it, I can do

133:51

eight. There are other ways you can

133:53

double it, right? And I've looked at

133:54

those levers, too. But suffice to say,

133:57

it was very self-evident to me at the

134:00

time that

134:02

it was going to be very easy to grow if

134:04

I so wanted it to grow. So I ended up at

134:06

different points doing six, seven, eight

134:09

episodes a month or doing different

134:11

types of batch recording. And then a few

134:13

things happened, right? About 2 or 3

134:15

months into doing this,

134:18

yes, there were more financial resources

134:20

to bring to bear on like the funding

134:22

science through the foundation and many

134:24

other things.

134:26

>> We could do fancy offsites for the team

134:28

and fly to these very like far-flung fun

134:30

exotic places. Yes, which we can still

134:32

do. But what I started to notice is

134:36

there was this very subtle energetic

134:39

change. I wasn't exhausted, but I

134:41

started maybe dragging my feet a little

134:44

bit. I started to feel I noticed when I

134:48

put a like a fine point on it that it

134:53

was becoming a jo o in the unpleasant

134:57

sense. Does that make sense? And it's

134:59

very very easy for this to happen in

135:01

people who have small operations that

135:03

are not dependent on or in some cases

135:06

like venture financing or something like

135:07

that. So, and I also recognized that I

135:11

could make it work, right, by in my case

135:14

batching these episodes together. But

135:16

when I batched them together, I didn't

135:19

actually get to retain and study and use

135:22

and apply what I was learning from these

135:24

people in these conversations.

135:25

>> That's a really fatiguing day.

135:27

>> Yeah. Or a week, right? So, I decided

135:30

that I would step back to four or five a

135:34

month, right?

135:36

And I'm in a fortunate financial

135:39

position to be able to make that type of

135:42

decision. But it was really important

135:45

for not just the longevity of the

135:48

podcast, which is now 11 years or 12

135:50

years, whatever it is, but my enjoyment

135:53

of it,

135:54

>> right?

135:54

>> And I'm just curious how you think about

135:58

what drives the actual work product of

136:01

the show, right? because

136:04

your priorities may change. I have no

136:06

idea. Right? It's like for some people

136:08

it's like if they want if they're

136:10

thinking about a family then you have

136:12

family consideration. You also have the

136:15

professional

136:17

motivations. You can end up getting

136:19

driven by your team in some cases where

136:21

it's like you want to offer them the

136:22

opportunity for advancement and

136:24

increased scope and so on, but that can

136:26

end up steering the ship sometimes. So

136:30

there are a lot of pitfalls that are

136:33

hard to spot because they are gradual in

136:36

terms of their onset, right? So So I'm

136:39

curious how you think about like the

136:42

actual work schedule, the number of

136:44

episodes, the amount you take on.

136:46

>> Mhm.

136:47

>> Because I hear all the top level

136:49

priorities, which are awesome, and the

136:51

vision for three to five years. I think

136:52

you can do all of those things.

136:54

>> Oh, thank God.

136:55

>> But

136:56

>> tell me if you don't think it's

136:57

possible. Well, I don't think it's

136:58

possible if the show ends up taking on

137:02

lots of features and obligations and

137:04

scope creep.

137:05

>> I agree.

137:06

>> And splintering

137:08

>> that just removes the time and energy

137:11

required to do those things.

137:13

>> I have a lot of empathy with what you're

137:15

saying about, oh, I can just fit in one

137:17

more recording. I can fit in one more

137:19

shoot day. I mean, even separate of the

137:22

channel, this didn't impact the channel,

137:24

but last year I was on a plane 73 times.

137:30

Maybe not that high for many of the

137:31

guests who have been in this chair. It

137:33

was a record for me at least.

137:35

>> That's a lot of flights.

137:36

>> It's a It was a lot of flights.

137:38

And I told Kim this and she she said,

137:41

"How many how many vacations did you go

137:44

on?" And I and I couldn't answer it. You

137:48

know, I could think that's a sign. And I

137:49

I went I went on I did a couple things,

137:52

but she gave me some advice at the

137:54

beginning of this year. She's like, "The

137:55

next time you're sent abroad, your

137:57

assignment is," and I need someone to

137:59

say your assignment is for me to take it

138:00

seriously. Your assignment is you need

138:04

to take at least 6 hours of a day. You

138:06

don't have to stay an entire extra day.

138:08

Take six hours of a day to do something

138:11

for yourself. And I did this last week.

138:12

I was in Italy for a speaking engagement

138:15

and my friend Olivia and I took 6 hours

138:18

and we saw the whole city and it was

138:20

incredible. And I think that avoiding

138:26

the scope creep is something we've had

138:28

to be very very precise about. As you

138:31

mentioned, there are so many shiny

138:33

objects around. Oh, like you should just

138:36

do this collab and start a merch line or

138:38

even in our our world there's a

138:40

temptation of promote this product and

138:42

big check comes in. Well, I don't know

138:44

if I agree with this product and maybe I

138:46

I won't do it. And I think being really

138:48

brutal about

138:51

if I don't protect this, all of it falls

138:54

apart. I don't not in a way of fragility

138:57

but in a sense of if I take the brand

139:00

deal for a lot of money for the thing

139:03

I'm not a 100% on it fractures

139:06

trustworthiness

139:08

that as we both know is something that

139:11

cannot be bought back. It's so precious

139:13

to what we're doing. Or even the idea of

139:16

we've had so many people come to us say,

139:18

"We'll license the challenge accepted

139:21

brand and we'll we'll start a kids

139:23

channel and we'll run the whole thing

139:25

for you." And these pitches sound great

139:27

on paper when I know

139:30

I'm not going to like the first few

139:31

things you do. I'm going to have to get

139:33

in the weeds. I'm going to have to be

139:34

giving feedback. And you know what? I

139:36

don't have time for that. I I have to

139:38

remain really focused on the tip of the

139:40

spear, which is making Challenge

139:42

Accepted the best show it possibly can

139:44

for all of the reasons that are

139:46

emotionally important to me, financially

139:48

important to the team, and and socially

139:51

important to our industry. So,

139:55

we've had to say no a lot, which I know

139:58

you've been writing a lot about

139:59

recently. Yeah.

140:00

>> But the saying of no is something I'm

140:02

still learning how to do. And I think

140:05

like that has been why the show has

140:07

lasted so long. I have never I'm

140:11

literally knocking on wood. I don't even

140:12

know if this is real wood. Knocking on

140:14

wood right now. I've never experienced

140:17

creator burnout in the way that many of

140:20

my colleagues have. Many of my

140:23

colleagues have had a time where they

140:26

hit the wall and have to take months off

140:30

entirely.

140:32

That's never happened to me because all

140:34

along the way, it's been a kind like a

140:36

fast growth, but still slow and steady.

140:39

You can look at the growth of our

140:40

channel and it's it's not like I blew up

140:44

on TikTok overnight. It it's been slow

140:46

and steady. And for that I feel

140:48

fortunate because I've had the slowness

140:51

to be able to make those adjustments to

140:53

acknowledge scope creep where I'm being

140:56

asked for more things

140:59

and still learning how to practice that

141:01

>> better. Few thoughts pop into my head.

141:04

Uh the first is that more so than with

141:10

most I actually have

141:13

I'm very confident that you'll figure it

141:15

out. And I'll tell you why. The first

141:17

the first is that not that I'm who the

141:20

[ __ ] am I? I'm just saying I've like

141:21

there have been a lot of people in that

141:23

chair and I've met with a lot of

141:25

creators and writers and so on of

141:27

different types. Number one is that you

141:30

have an inbuilt novelty in the format of

141:32

the show. Right? So a lot of the

141:34

YouTubers I run into who are just

141:36

crashing and burning, they have a few

141:38

things stacked against them. one, they

141:40

chose something that was interesting to

141:42

them five or 10 years ago, but it is a

141:45

fairly narrow lane

141:47

>> and

141:49

at some point they get tired of being

141:50

that person.

141:51

>> Yeah.

141:52

>> Or they pretended to be something in the

141:55

beginning and they got a lot of positive

141:58

feedback and they're fatigued because

142:01

they're wearing a mask.

142:03

>> Yes.

142:03

>> And there's more to it. There's audience

142:05

capture issues and other things, but you

142:07

have an inbuilt novelty in the nature of

142:09

the show itself, right?

142:10

>> Every episode, my whole life changes.

142:13

>> Yeah.

142:14

>> Right now, I'm training for Taekwondo

142:15

Nationals. I'm going to take a flight

142:17

back to LA and go to Taekwondo training

142:18

for 3 hours tonight. Every day is

142:21

different and varied and interesting and

142:23

I I feel lucky that like my life changes

142:26

frequently to adjust for that. So this

142:28

is something I wanted to take a moment

142:30

to point out because

142:34

willpower, discipline, all these things,

142:35

yes, they sound great. You know, I agree

142:38

with a lot of folks that ultimately

142:41

systems

142:43

beat like certainly dreams and even

142:46

goals. I mean, you have to have an idea

142:48

of where you want to head, but inherent

142:51

to what you chose to do, there's a kind

142:55

of cycling and rejuvenation to it,

142:57

right? So, I just wanted to highlight

142:59

that because it's a feature of what you

143:01

chose to do.

143:03

>> It's it's not just something you have to

143:06

fit in in the empty pockets with

143:08

something that is uniform from start to

143:10

finish, right? So, I think that's one

143:11

thing I wanted to mention. And then

143:14

separately, just as an anecdote, right?

143:16

guest lecturing you mentioned. So the

143:19

guest lectures at at Princeton High-Tech

143:22

Entrepreneurship that that turned into

143:23

the 4-hour work week, the notes from

143:25

that class was based on a talk initially

143:28

called drug dealing for fun and profit

143:30

because my first company was sports

143:32

nutrition.

143:33

The through line of that lecture from

143:36

start to finish because I was one of the

143:38

few entrepreneurs

143:39

my professor invited, maybe the only one

143:42

who bootstrapped. Everyone else was

143:43

venturebacked, right? And that's why it

143:45

was interesting to him.

143:47

>> So I was like, I, you know, Ed, who's Ed

143:49

Sha, amazing guy. I've had him on the

143:50

podcast. Said, I don't think I have

143:52

anything to offer. I'm only a few years

143:53

out of college. I'm bootstrapping this

143:56

thing. It's a lot smaller than any of

143:57

the other companies that get highlighted

143:58

by these CEOs or taking companies

144:01

public, etc. And he said, well, that's

144:02

kind of the point. like you're closer to

144:04

the students so they can see

144:08

>> emulating or borrowing from what you're

144:10

doing more easily than they can someone

144:12

who's 20 years older and has taken four

144:13

companies public

144:14

>> and aligned with your throughine of

144:17

owning everything you do that's really

144:20

special yeah exactly and like there are

144:23

times for like debt and venture and all

144:25

that stuff I'm just constitutionally

144:28

allergic to it I just I just it doesn't

144:30

make me feel like safe and pleasant. So,

144:34

I generally avoid those things. Like, I

144:36

didn't even have a credit card until a

144:37

few years after college because I

144:39

thought foolishly that if you have no

144:41

debt, you're going to have good credit.

144:42

That's just not how it works. So, I had

144:44

to get credit cards. I've never carried

144:46

a balance except for like a short very

144:48

short period. The reason I bring that up

144:49

though is that in my class, the one it

144:52

changed over time, this two times per

144:54

year, it's guest lecture cuz I kind of

144:56

followed what I was learning. The one

144:58

thing that never changed was how I

144:59

started it. And how I started it every

145:01

time is I'd say, "How many people here

145:04

want to be a salesperson?" And this is

145:06

Princeton, right? It's in an electrical

145:08

engineering, like operations, research,

145:11

finance class, and no one raises their

145:14

hand. They're like, "Salespeople? Yuck."

145:16

Right?

145:17

>> And I'm like, "Okay, how many people

145:19

here want to be good at negotiating?"

145:21

Every hand goes up. I'm like, "Okay, how

145:24

many people here want to be good deal

145:25

makers?" like almost every hand goes up.

145:27

I'm like, guess what? They're all the

145:28

same thing.

145:31

>> Good news, bad news, you're all gonna

145:33

have to be sales people. True. That's

145:35

true. Whether you're selling a position,

145:36

whether you're selling yourself as a

145:39

romantic partner, whether you are trying

145:42

to persuade someone

145:44

>> of anything and everything,

145:47

the skill set is the same.

145:49

>> Yes. And because you have that ability

145:51

and you've honed the ability to

145:53

communicate

145:55

with the cold emails and everything

145:56

else, you have a lot of practice with

145:57

that. And you have someone like Kim

145:59

Scott in your corner on the honesty.

146:04

>> You can't take it too far, but like

146:05

honesty above people pleasing.

146:08

>> Oh yeah.

146:09

>> This what did you call it? Not insidious

146:11

empathy, but something close.

146:12

>> Ruinous empathy.

146:13

>> Ruinous empathy. That is where I tend to

146:15

lean also or have historically. And if

146:20

you are trapped in that quadrant and you

146:24

start to see the ship heading towards

146:26

this iceberg of burnout for you

146:28

personally or overall,

146:31

you're kind of [ __ ] Like that's not

146:33

the time to learn how to steer the ship,

146:35

>> which means these other quadrants,

146:37

right? And you write about that in your

146:39

upcoming book too about how when you say

146:41

yes to everything, it make you become

146:44

resentful towards other people when it's

146:47

actually you creating the problem.

146:49

>> I'm going to be diving back into the the

146:51

it's placeholder name, but the notebook

146:53

850 pages that's going to get hacked

146:55

down. It's going to be

146:57

just as a teaser. I I'm just it makes me

147:00

so happy. I literally just got a text

147:01

about this two days ago. I've had quite

147:03

a few test readers read that book and

147:06

it's rough around the edges, but they

147:09

read this book like six months ago, a

147:11

year ago, and they text me to be like,

147:14

"Look at how I am still using this

147:16

stuff." So, I'm I'm excited to get it

147:18

out cuz it's super like just we're as we

147:20

were talking about template emails and

147:21

so on.

147:22

>> It's really tactical. It's not just

147:25

handwavy stuff. So, I'm excited about

147:27

it. The But you have the you have sort

147:29

of the

147:29

>> And I promise I'll buy it. I won't steal

147:31

it on accident. I'm okay. I'm okay with

147:33

stealing my books. Well, I mean, it's

147:35

not okay cuz you're stealing it from

147:36

someone else, but

147:37

>> Correct. It was not stolen from a Barnes

147:39

& Noble. It was stolen from the desk of

147:41

a coworker.

147:42

>> Yeah. So, I have I have confidence

147:43

you'll figure it out because you have

147:44

the toolkit for correction, right? And I

147:47

think part of what a lot of folks miss

147:48

about saying no. It's not like saying no

147:52

is a lot like working out. It's not like

147:54

you you figure it out and you do it for

147:56

a week or two and then your problems are

147:59

solved.

147:59

>> It's a practice.

148:00

>> It's a practice. not only a practice but

148:04

99.9% of the population sure there are a

148:07

few exceptions but are going to fall off

148:10

the wagon occasionally. So the question

148:12

is how do you get back on the wagon

148:13

right? So in the case of

148:17

say a book on no like a lot of the book

148:19

is case studies of people and their

148:23

toolkits for renegotiating. It's like if

148:26

you're reading the book it probably

148:27

means you say yes to too much stuff and

148:28

overcommit.

148:30

you're probably still gonna do that.

148:31

It's kind of like aa and alcoholics like

148:34

right like once once an addict always an

148:35

addict like you're probably gonna do

148:37

that again. So the question isn't how do

148:39

I avoid it

148:40

>> permanently from this point forward.

148:42

It's how do you actually correct it and

148:44

how do you renegotiate commitments? How

148:46

do you cancel things?

148:47

>> Which is arguably harder than saying no

148:49

out the gate once you've committed to

148:51

something.

148:51

>> It is it's it's it's basically signing

148:54

up for long-term pain instead of

148:56

short-term pain, right? But you're going

148:58

to deal with both, which is why, you

149:01

know, Kim Scott's teachings are so

149:02

valuable. I have to recommend I I don't

149:04

know if it was with respect to Kim

149:07

specifically, but AJ Jacobs, who I

149:10

mentioned earlier,

149:10

>> I love him,

149:11

>> wrote this long Esquire piece called his

149:15

poor wife. The title of it is called I

149:18

think you're fat. And it's like 30 days

149:21

of experimentation with radical honesty

149:23

or something like that.

149:24

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. And

149:27

>> I saw him give a presentation last fall

149:29

and he included this

149:31

>> and I think your fat is like when his

149:33

wife was like how do I look in this

149:34

dress and also you know point is his

149:38

wife has put up with so much with his

149:39

experiments but she's like are you even

149:42

listening to me and he's and he's like

149:43

no honestly I stopped listening five

149:45

minutes ago and I'm thinking about AB

149:47

and C. Oh what a saint his wife is. but

149:50

also makes for pretty good reading cuz

149:52

you know everything in excess kind of

149:53

becomes its opposite.

149:55

>> I want to kind of talk about wishlist

149:58

stuff because you because you never know

150:01

who's listening to this podcast. You

150:03

just never know. I am constantly

150:04

surprised.

150:06

>> Maybe you can give some backstory but

150:07

have you met Mindy Kaling yet?

150:11

>> I have not met our Lord and Savior Mindy

150:14

Kaling.

150:15

>> Okay.

150:18

Why did I even come across this? What?

150:20

Yeah,

150:20

>> I know why you came across this. And it

150:23

is because my first Twitter handle was

150:27

Mindy Kaling fan. I think it's since

150:30

changed to my name. It's normal now. I

150:32

think I've deleted all the tweets. Maybe

150:34

I would love to meet Mindy Kaling one

150:36

day when we're talking about wishlist

150:38

items for a few reasons. I feel like we

150:43

have sort of

150:45

traveled the same path in different

150:48

flavors.

150:49

>> We went to the same college. I obviously

150:52

admire her work. We're both Indian women

150:55

in entertainment. And seeing someone

150:57

like her on a show like The Office was

151:01

instrumental to me as someone from

151:03

Shreveport, Louisiana who didn't see

151:07

someone like me on Disney Channel. And I

151:09

think that's why

151:11

The mentality I had of approaching a job

151:13

like this was so black hat, if we're

151:16

going to go back to that, I was very

151:19

negative on the idea of doing something

151:21

in entertainment

151:24

because I didn't see a path or an

151:27

example forward

151:29

for someone like me. And factually,

151:33

that's incorrect. I mean there's a very

151:34

thriving industry of Bollywood and there

151:37

are many many amazing women in

151:39

entertainment but something shifted for

151:42

me when I saw her success and felt that

151:44

parallel path of we're going to the same

151:46

school and seeing how she took her

151:49

opportunity at the office and spun it

151:51

into her own production company and new

151:54

shows that continued to uplift and

151:56

elevate

151:58

female centered stories I think is

152:00

incredible and something that I look up

152:03

to often when I think about how I

152:06

started at a media company and am now

152:08

doing my own thing and hoping to shift

152:10

culture and expectation of what it means

152:13

to be an Indian woman in entertainment

152:15

and also what it means to be a content

152:17

creator on the internet. I love upending

152:21

people's expectations. It's one of my

152:24

secret favorite things to do. I love

152:28

when people hear that I'm a YouTuber and

152:31

then they go watch Challenge Accepted

152:32

and are pleasantly hopefully pleasantly

152:34

surprised by what they see and wouldn't

152:37

expect that maybe from someone on the

152:39

platform. And I think about how she and

152:43

Shondaanda Rimes and other incredible

152:46

showrunners have done that. All right,

152:48

Mindy, if you're listening,

152:51

>> and there are definitely a few people

152:53

who have been on this podcast, like BJ

152:55

Novak, who know Mindy, so if you guys

152:57

are listening,

152:58

>> I'm obsessed with both of them, like as

153:00

a unit.

153:01

>> Yeah, BJ is incredible.

153:03

>> BJ is also incredible. The Office, I

153:06

mean, there are a few examples like

153:07

this, but it's kind of like the PayPal

153:08

mafia where you're like, how did all

153:10

these people come out of this?

153:12

>> Yeah, the PayPal mafia. How is it even

153:14

possible that this density of talent was

153:16

in one place at the same time? It's

153:18

crazy.

153:19

>> Let me ask a question, right? Let's just

153:22

say Mindy's listening. She's like,

153:23

"Maybe I'll check her out.

153:25

>> Which episode should she start with?"

153:27

>> Okay, let me think.

153:29

>> And that applies more broadly to people

153:30

listening, but but like where should

153:33

where should where should Mindy go?

153:34

>> This is a really tough question. For

153:37

Mindy specifically,

153:39

I'm going to recommend I tried Tom

153:41

Cruz's Deadliest Stunt because Mindy is

153:45

in the Hollywood world. And I think

153:47

that's the most Hollywood episode we've

153:49

done. It's an episode where I strapped

153:52

myself to the side of a C130 to become

153:54

the first person to recreate the stunt

153:56

that Tom did for the Mission Impossible

153:59

franchise. And I truly am hanging off

154:02

the side of a plane. And what's

154:04

interesting about that story is not just

154:06

the stunt, which is cool, of course,

154:10

but it's an amazing story of being an

154:14

underdog. The only people who have

154:16

accomplished this previously are

154:18

literally Tom Cruz and Paramount the

154:20

Studio. And so to come at it from our

154:22

angle

154:24

was me sending more crazy cold emails.

154:26

It was calling foreign militaries at

154:29

3:00 in the morning asking if they would

154:31

lend us a plane. Those are the phone

154:33

calls I'm making. And additionally, when

154:35

you're doing something that's only been

154:37

done once before or in some cases has

154:39

never been done before, you have to get

154:42

really creative with the training and

154:44

testing, which maybe you've experienced

154:46

in in in all of your work too. How do

154:49

you prepare your body to to do something

154:51

like that? And it led us to training in

154:54

wind tunnels. But even more

154:55

interestingly, I had to go to a

154:58

specialized optometrist who fabricated

155:02

custom scaral contact lenses for me to

155:05

wear because for this stunt you don't

155:06

wear goggles. And so there was a

155:09

dedicated person on set called a lens

155:11

technician and his only job was to

155:14

insert and remove these massive contact

155:17

lenses that went over my eyes. Sounds so

155:19

uncomfortable

155:20

>> cuz when you're up there at multiund

155:22

mileph winds, even just a tiny pebble

155:24

could blind you.

155:25

>> Oh yeah.

155:26

>> So I think it's a really cool story of

155:30

being a little bit of an underdog and

155:32

accomplishing something great in an

155:33

unexpected way. So I hope you watch it,

155:36

Mindy.

155:36

>> Amazing. All right, this is going to

155:39

sound it's a nonsequittor/sequittor,

155:42

but people should study take a look at

155:45

paragan falcons and how their eyes and

155:47

noses and nostrils are evolved. It's

155:50

[ __ ] wild. And aircraft have actually

155:52

been designed based on paragan falcon,

155:56

like evolved.

155:57

>> Why do I feel like you've spent a week

155:59

in Mongolia training falconry?

156:01

>> I would love to do that. I had my first

156:04

experience with falconry on New Year's

156:07

Day this year, so it's fresh in my mind.

156:09

>> Wow.

156:10

>> Got to work with some amazing hawks.

156:12

There are different different birds that

156:15

are appropriate for different levels of

156:17

training, and it's not necessarily the

156:19

easiest bird. In some cases, they're

156:21

going to give you slightly more stubborn

156:25

or difficult birds because if you have a

156:28

very easy bird, you don't actually

156:30

develop the trainer technique that you

156:32

need to use for a spectrum of birds. It

156:35

would be kind of like giving if you give

156:36

everyone a really intrinsically

156:38

motivated high energy dog like a Belgian

156:40

Malininoa to train that is like bred for

156:45

being very very very very trainable.

156:48

You're going to develop a false sense of

156:50

confidence around your ability to do

156:52

that with other breeds.

156:53

>> I see.

156:54

>> So yes, I'm interested in falconry.

156:56

>> Have you seen that meme that went viral

156:57

recently that's like you hit a certain

156:59

age and all of a sudden you're obsessed

157:01

with birds?

157:03

That's really funny. I Maybe that's

157:06

what's going on. Next thing you know, I

157:08

was just like smoking a pipe on a porch

157:10

talking about World War II all the time.

157:11

I don't know.

157:11

>> There you go.

157:12

>> It could future. Worst things could

157:14

happen. All right. I want to ask more

157:16

episode questions. But before we do

157:19

that, any anyone else that you'd like to

157:23

sort of invoke? Like are there any other

157:25

>> partners, partners, companies, people?

157:28

>> Anything that you'd like to check out

157:30

your work? This is such a special

157:32

opportunity to do that. There are many

157:35

people I would love to meet and

157:36

generally as we move into this really

157:39

exciting new chapter for the company and

157:42

and content creators in general. I'm

157:44

excited to meet with anyone from

157:47

traditional media who is excited to join

157:50

forces.

157:51

>> So that's just like a general statement.

157:54

>> But if I have one shout out, here's the

157:56

shout out. I'm gonna ask for the Royal

157:59

Nanny School in England.

158:02

>> You've been working you've been working

158:04

on this one for a while.

158:04

>> The Norland College. We're your biggest

158:07

fans. We've been wanting to collaborate

158:09

for years. If you see this, hit me up.

158:14

>> Incredible.

158:15

>> Okay, let me tell you about the Norland

158:17

Nannies. You're going to appreciate

158:18

this, Tim.

158:18

>> I'm ready.

158:19

>> You know Mary Poppins, the silhouette

158:21

with the the pleated skirt and the

158:23

little hat. It is based off of a real

158:26

school called the Norland College where

158:29

these are the nannies that are trained

158:31

to serve billionaires and royal

158:34

families. So when you look at and they

158:36

wear that outfit. So you look at footage

158:39

from this school and it's literally

158:40

they're wearing this outfit and hat

158:42

pushing a pram stroller while also

158:45

wielding a gun because they they have to

158:49

protect the kids. So they know defensive

158:52

driving. It's like Secret Service meets

158:54

Butler Academy, which you shouted out in

158:56

the Five Bullet Friday. So, it's it's

158:59

two amazing worlds coming together. I

159:01

think more people need to know about it.

159:03

So, I'm I'm very passionate about it.

159:06

>> And I imagine the fact that they're

159:08

like, "No, thank you. We don't need

159:10

that." Makes you just want it that much

159:12

more.

159:12

>> Of course it does, Tim. But also,

159:15

>> I respect it.

159:16

>> What What have we been talking about?

159:17

Saying no. So, I have to respect when

159:20

someone else says no, too. But also just

159:22

letting you know we're still available,

159:23

still interested and excited. Love you

159:25

guys from afar. Big fan

159:26

>> of your episodes when you look back.

159:28

>> Mhm.

159:29

>> And you can't say all of them. That's

159:31

disallowed. That answer is no. No, no

159:33

good.

159:34

>> No fly.

159:36

>> Which if you were starting, if you did

159:38

not have a YouTube channel, but you had

159:40

a thriving career, so you had some

159:42

money. Which of those you can like pick

159:45

two or three of the experiences that you

159:47

would pay to have looking back

159:49

>> that I would do again in a heartbeat?

159:51

>> Do again. Or you're like, "Okay, I only

159:53

get to pick two or three,

159:55

>> but like I would absolutely pay for

159:58

these."

159:59

>> Okay.

159:59

>> If I if I had to,

160:01

>> I would pick first of all

160:05

the black belt challenge. So, as this

160:09

video, I had 90 days to try and get a

160:12

black belt in Taekwondo. Part of this

160:14

came from a personal passion of having

160:16

done all of these stunts and working

160:18

with a lot of stunt performers. All of

160:20

them come from worldclass martial arts

160:23

backgrounds. And I realized I had never

160:26

actually taken the time to learn a

160:30

martial art from the ground up and that

160:34

it was lacking in my performance and

160:37

mental fortitude and I wanted to

160:39

experience that. So what do I do? I make

160:41

it a challenge so that I can devote my

160:42

whole life to it.

160:44

>> And that experience changed me. When I

160:48

look at clear before and after,

160:52

you know, from having put your body

160:53

through a lot, there are moments when

160:55

you have a photo before and after. My

160:57

body changed. But there are moments in

160:59

life when you as a person change before

161:02

and after, and that can't be captured by

161:03

a photo always.

161:05

>> That was one of those for me. getting to

161:07

study with master Grandmaster Simon Ray,

161:10

one of the greatest martial artists on

161:12

planet Earth, took me under his wing and

161:16

did what most instructors would have

161:18

never done, which is believe in me and

161:21

push me to try and actually get a black

161:23

belt in 90 days. And we're talking about

161:27

politeness. I think martial arts has

161:30

taught me all of that. when you bow to

161:31

the mat before you step on when you yes

161:34

sir yes ma'am everything it might sound

161:37

gimmicky to someone on the outside but

161:40

it does become a practice and an

161:42

automation and a way of life and that's

161:44

something I'm really proud of as a now

161:46

black belt

161:48

and grateful for it I I would pay to do

161:51

that again and in fact I am because

161:53

we're doing a sequel so I am paying to

161:55

do it again and I'm trying to qualify

161:56

for nationals this year with Mastery so

162:00

I'm I'm very excited about it. I would

162:02

recommend it to anybody. The other one I

162:04

was going to say that I would pay to do

162:06

again for the experience I had

162:08

ultimately, not when I was going through

162:10

it, is the Houdini challenge.

162:12

>> Yeah. So for that I had six weeks to

162:16

learn how to hold my breath and pick

162:18

locks to attempt Houdini's water torture

162:20

cell which famously is hanging upside

162:24

down in a glass box filled to the brim

162:26

with water escaping a series of

162:28

lockpicks with one breath of air. And

162:32

that I would say is probably

162:36

among the most physically challenging

162:38

>> I'm sure

162:39

>> challenges I've done. Free diving,

162:42

breath holding is a level of athleticism

162:45

that is so bizarre to me because when

162:47

you're in a workout class and it gets

162:49

hard, they say, "Keep breathing. This is

162:51

the one time you can't do that."

162:53

>> Yeah.

162:54

>> You're you're holding your breath. So, I

162:55

was having to learn how to push through

162:58

that.

162:59

>> Ultimately, I got to 3:30 and most Navy

163:02

Seals is like 2 3 minutes is pretty

163:05

good. Houdini's was best time was also

163:08

3:30.

163:10

But on the production side, it was a

163:12

really fascinating challenge because it

163:14

was the first time we

163:17

creatively designed our own obstacle and

163:20

solution. So in the beginning, we spent

163:23

months trying to connect with other

163:26

magicians on earth who own a water

163:29

torture cell. There are not many.

163:31

>> Yeah. And ultimately we came to the

163:34

conclusion of designing our own which

163:36

was really really incredible and

163:38

creatively challenging. How do you

163:41

create a glass box that can f be filled

163:44

with so many gallons of water and

163:47

maintain the structural integrity when

163:48

there's a person inside

163:51

and function with all the locks and the

163:53

hinges with water as an involved

163:56

substance. It was a huge huge

163:58

engineering challenge for our team

164:01

and I'm really really proud of the final

164:04

result because both of those things are

164:07

things I would have never guessed that

164:08

like 2016 me would have been able to do.

164:11

First of all, holding my breath that

164:12

long. Second of all, taking the creative

164:16

liberty to design something that was

164:19

inspired by a work of history but also

164:22

our own.

164:24

>> Next question. So this one you may not

164:27

want to answer. Okay. Because I

164:29

understand

164:30

>> I would understand why. I have a little

164:32

bit more freedom in answering this for

164:34

myself. So I can also go first and buy

164:36

>> challenge accepted. Let's hear it.

164:38

>> Yeah. So which one would you pay not to

164:41

do again?

164:42

>> Oh gosh.

164:43

>> One or two. And and the one I would say

164:45

for me just to offer it up is and holy

164:48

[ __ ] did did I make a mistake. This was

164:52

episode one of the Tim Ferrris

164:54

experiment in terms of filming.

164:55

>> Okay.

164:56

>> And we keep in mind we had I think it

164:57

was 11 or 13 episodes or 10 or 13

165:01

episodes that we filmed in that number

165:03

of weeks. So I mean it was every week we

165:06

were filming.

165:06

>> As a viewer I never realized that it was

165:08

13 consecutive weeks.

165:09

>> It was consecutive weeks.

165:10

>> That's crazy.

165:11

>> And the first one was parkour. And there

165:15

were a couple of inherent problems with

165:17

that. Number one, even if you tried to

165:20

prepare your body for it, the impact of

165:24

falling onto hard surfaces is very hard

165:27

to train your body for even over the

165:30

course of say a year with proper

165:32

technique because of the the connective

165:35

tissue adaptations and sort of ligament

165:37

and tendon adaptations that need to take

165:39

place which require quite a bit of time.

165:41

Secondly,

165:43

the promise of the show was I haven't

165:46

cheated, right? So, it's like I can't

165:48

pre-prepare for it

165:50

>> if I'm showing what it's like to start

165:53

from zero. And I am still contending

165:56

with injuries from that week.

165:58

>> No way.

165:58

>> To this day.

165:59

>> Wow.

166:00

>> You know, 12 13 years.

166:01

>> Tempest, right? Tempest.

166:03

>> Amazing gym. I mean, I mean, those guys

166:05

are amazing. Tempest free running. Check

166:07

it out. It's incredible. But I will say

166:10

I have like dropped from the monkey bars

166:12

and pull my back.

166:13

>> Yeah,

166:14

>> it's crazy.

166:15

>> Yeah, I mean I ended up tearing multiple

166:18

heads of the quadricep in both legs

166:21

>> and then you continued filming for 12

166:22

weeks.

166:23

>> 12 more weeks. So you can imagine

166:25

>> and that included the Yabusami episode.

166:27

>> No, the Yabusami episode was actually

166:30

from a totally different TV show,

166:32

>> a pilot of which was filmed right after

166:36

the first book came out. It might have

166:37

even been before. I think it was right

166:38

after the first book came out. So that

166:41

was a completely separate thing with

166:43

like a production company in Singapore.

166:44

It was kind of wonky to be honest.

166:46

>> Oh wow.

166:46

>> But the Abusam was way earlier back when

166:49

I had hair or a little bit of hair. I

166:50

was white knuckling.

166:51

>> Okay. Cuz all of my experience

166:53

transparently of the show has been in

166:55

like online rips cuz it's many of this

166:58

material is no longer available. all of

167:01

the Tim Fresh Experiment stuff. I got

167:04

the rights back for a launch on iTunes

167:08

as it was called back then and it was

167:09

the number one non-fiction show when it

167:11

launched for a while which I was very

167:13

happy about although it was excruciating

167:15

you can imagine talking about

167:16

negotiating with like a big behemoth

167:18

where you just don't really have any

167:19

leverage whatsoever. Uh yeah,

167:22

>> and they were helpful, but a lot of

167:24

employee changes and so on that made it

167:25

difficult and then ultimately getting

167:27

the rights back completely so I could

167:29

just release it for free on YouTube,

167:31

right?

167:32

>> But which would you pay not to do? Any

167:36

come to mind?

167:37

>> What would I pay not to do? I have a few

167:40

answers for this actually. First one is

167:42

chess. And again, I I recognize the

167:45

people who have sadness here. I feel

167:47

like 99.9%

167:49

of of people in the Tim Ferris sphere,

167:52

everybody plays chess. Everybody is on

167:55

chess.com. When you go to these

167:57

entrepreneur events, there's always a

167:58

chess board. Everyone loves chess. So, I

168:00

feel a little shameful saying this.

168:02

Chess was very challenging for me.

168:03

>> There are plenty of people on this show

168:04

who don't like chess, including people

168:06

who used to be professional players.

168:07

>> Really? Oh my goodness. Now, I loved

168:10

many aspects of it, but the the

168:12

challenge for that was originally I had

168:15

one month to prepare for a competition

168:17

and I did the month of training. I got

168:19

to the competition. I didn't do as well

168:21

as I had wanted. And something about the

168:23

episode just felt empty. And I think you

168:26

and I both know this. You know, when you

168:27

haven't gone the distance with

168:29

something, you haven't given it your

168:30

all. And I knew that deep down. So, I

168:33

continued training for nine more months,

168:35

10 months in total, I believe, to

168:37

achieve this goal of my ELO rating and

168:41

finally did it. And I was like, I'm

168:44

good. I am so good on the London system,

168:48

all this stuff. Like, I was studying so

168:51

hard and I'm so glad I did it. But I'm

168:55

good to be a casual chess player.

168:58

>> Good to be a casual chess player. I

169:00

think the other one I don't think I'll

169:03

do again is one that hasn't come out

169:05

yet,

169:06

>> which makes it interesting, I suppose.

169:08

The most challenging physical thing I've

169:11

ever done is the seven marathons on

169:14

seven continents in one week,

169:16

which is going to be coming out this

169:18

April. The three-part series on the

169:20

channel. We're so excited about it.

169:22

Specifically within that, the Antarctica

169:25

marathon

169:26

>> is something I probably won't do again.

169:29

People got frostbite when we were out

169:30

there. It was

169:31

>> sure they did.

169:32

>> But the sneaky sleeper marathon is most

169:37

people think Antarctica is the worst

169:40

when they hear about this challenge. But

169:42

the sneaky one is marathon number six,

169:45

which is in Colombia.

169:47

And the reason this one is so crazy is

169:50

because historically people have gone to

169:52

the hospital from

169:56

heat exposure.

169:58

It's marathon number six. So, you have

170:00

five other marathons in your body that

170:02

you have done in the five previous days

170:04

before. And they actually scheduled this

170:06

marathon to happen overnight to try and

170:10

avoid the sun. But because our flight

170:12

was slightly delayed, we started around

170:15

300 a.m. And that meant we were

170:19

literally racing against the sunrise.

170:22

And the slower you go, the more heat

170:24

exposure you have. So, it was like 100%

170:27

humidity.

170:29

It's It's so hot.

170:32

And psychologically, you feel like

170:34

you're at the finish line cuz tomorrow's

170:36

the finale. Tomorrow's Miami. Tomorrow's

170:38

race number seven. But really, number

170:40

six is the unexpected one.

170:43

>> Yeah, that sounds brutal.

170:45

>> What's crazy about that is there are the

170:48

most unexpected people who do this

170:50

marathon. Like, okay, there was a guy,

170:53

you're not going to believe this, there

170:54

was a guy named Adrian

170:56

for whom his first marathon he ever ran

170:59

was marathon one of that week.

171:02

He like knew some of the race organizers

171:04

and just decided to come along. And

171:06

originally, he was going to run half

171:07

marathons and just decided, I'm going to

171:09

go for the fulls.

171:11

That's crazy to do your very first

171:14

marathon as in a week where you're going

171:16

to do seven.

171:18

Yeah. So, that was nuts. you know there

171:20

are sort of breeds and then there are

171:22

breeds also I mean there are mutants for

171:25

each of these disciplines right there

171:27

are mutants for all these disciplines

171:28

we've discussed

171:30

>> and you meet some folks you mentioned

171:33

stunt work on Avatar right but like I

171:35

remember

171:36

>> you know I've met people who are like

171:37

professional high jumpers and I'm just

171:39

looking at them and I'm like we are not

171:42

>> the same species

171:45

>> just like your attachment points and

171:47

like where your Achilles is like

171:49

Everything is different and that's true

171:51

for

171:53

every discipline including chess of

171:55

course.

171:56

>> There's an 83y old man named Dan Little

171:58

who does this event. It's it was his

172:01

fourth time doing it.

172:02

>> The seven and seven or

172:04

>> seven and seven. He's done it four

172:06

times. He's 83 years old. He's this guy

172:09

named Dan from Oklahoma and just the

172:12

most incredible person you'll ever meet.

172:14

like so joyful and excited and he's the

172:18

last person on course every day.

172:21

>> He takes seven or eight hours to do the

172:23

full marathon

172:24

>> and he is smiling the whole time. And I

172:27

think that's one of the coolest things

172:29

about our job, our jobs is perspective.

172:35

The people you meet, it really redials

172:38

your compass.

172:39

>> Yeah, for sure. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, if

172:42

you're the average of the people you

172:43

spend the most time with, it's like,

172:45

choose those people really carefully.

172:47

>> Gosh.

172:47

>> You know, and I mean, the older I get,

172:49

it's not that surprising, but the more I

172:51

enjoy spending time with people who are

172:54

doing things like that. Not necessarily

172:56

that in that much of an extreme, but it

172:58

could be like Arthur Brooks, like who we

172:59

were just talking about, cuz there was

173:00

some footage from a prior interview of

173:02

mine up there. He's a busy guy or Adam

173:05

Grant, right? But they take fantastic

173:07

care of themselves.

173:09

>> And particularly with each passing year,

173:12

it seems as you get older,

173:14

>> the sort of entropy that leads people to

173:16

gather and just complain about their new

173:18

aches and pains or how little time they

173:20

have or how busy they are with the kids

173:23

or whatever it might be

173:25

increases. And

173:29

I try and I I've succeeded fortunately.

173:31

I have a lot of friends who are counter

173:33

examples, right? And I'm like, okay, if

173:36

this if there's only one counter example

173:38

in the world, okay, well, maybe it's

173:40

just sort of inevitable. But I'm like,

173:41

if if I've gathered five to 10 close

173:44

friends who are all counter examples,

173:45

like that's something you can do because

173:48

all of these people

173:49

>> Yes.

173:50

>> from a personality perspective, from a

173:51

life perspective, from a financial

173:53

perspective, very different, which means

173:55

like if you want it badly enough, you

173:57

can be the counter example.

173:59

>> And I find that super uplifting. Let me

174:03

ask a couple of very quick questions and

174:04

then we'll lay on this plane.

174:06

>> Okay.

174:08

>> This has been so fun.

174:09

>> Yeah. I'm really happy to spend time

174:11

together. You mentioned McMillions.

174:14

Other favorite documentaries? I know you

174:16

like documentaries. Are there any other

174:18

documentaries

174:20

that stand out to you?

174:21

>> My favorite one is Freelo.

174:23

>> Free is so good.

174:24

>> So good. Alex Honold, what you doing?

174:27

Talking about counter examples here. I

174:29

am just endlessly inspired by him as a

174:33

person and I think Jimmy Chin's work

174:35

directing filming it's just outstanding

174:38

given the care and the sensitivity of

174:42

the subject nature

174:43

>> terrifying

174:45

>> and how he executed it. Wow.

174:46

>> Yeah. So for people who maybe watched

174:48

the recent live Netflix climbing of

174:51

>> Taipei

174:52

>> Taipei go watch Free Solo if you haven't

174:55

seen it. And fun fact, I actually

174:58

interviewed Alex about 6 months before

175:01

he did his free solo ascent of

175:04

>> of LCAP.

175:05

>> I just got chills

175:06

>> and he was in that white van that is in

175:10

the movie and freaked me out cuz he like

175:13

parked outside of my house and I was

175:15

like, who's in this like creepy van with

175:18

no windows parked in front of my house?

175:21

And it's also before he got media

175:23

training. So if you want to see like

175:24

pre-polish Alex and I I want to give nod

175:29

also freestyl is an amazing movie to

175:30

Chai Vaserelli. So Chai is married to

175:34

Jimmy Chin. She is

175:37

>> I mean in a lot of ways the filmmaker

175:40

and Jimmy obviously without his

175:41

expertise and these crazy complicated

175:44

rigs and the ability to climb and

175:46

actually be suspended around Alex and so

175:50

on. I won't ruin any thing with

175:53

spoilers, like there are a lot of

175:54

adjustments that need to be made with

175:55

that, but

175:57

that is a fantastic one. I think it was

175:59

The Dive. They've also had some

176:01

follow-up films that are just

176:02

incredible.

176:03

>> I remember seeing a tweet when Alex did

176:06

the Taipei climb that was like,

176:08

"Everyone's freaking out about this.

176:10

What if I told you this is actually not

176:12

the craziest thing he's ever done?"

176:14

Referring to free. All I mean it is so

176:17

far not the craziest thing in the sense

176:19

that watch watch the LCAP climb. It is

176:23

infinitely hard to any really really

176:26

seasoned climber. Yes, it's risky to

176:28

climb with no ropes. Yes, the tower is

176:31

dangerous if you make a mistake. From a

176:33

technical perspective, it's actually not

176:35

that difficult. Right. Doing what he did

176:37

on LCAP,

176:39

it is very much in the deathdeying

176:42

category. Yeah, I'm out.

176:45

>> People I'm sure people ask you this too,

176:47

but people are always like, "What's

176:48

something you wouldn't do?" I'm like,

176:50

"I'm going to let Alex Honold own the

176:52

category of whatever it is he's doing."

176:54

>> Yeah. Yeah.

176:55

>> I think that category is well covered.

176:57

>> The category of things I wouldn't do is

176:59

pretty is pretty broad and it gets

177:00

broader every day. After a few very

177:03

scary avalanche experiences with

177:05

backcountry skiing and heli skiing where

177:08

people have gotten really injured and

177:10

could have been buried, I'm done. like

177:12

avalanche risk. If there's any real

177:15

avalanche risk, I'm out. Like that.

177:16

>> So, you're out from Everest.

177:17

>> Oh, there are many reasons I'm out.

177:19

>> There are many reasons I'm out from

177:20

Everest, too.

177:21

>> Yeah. No, there there are a lot of

177:22

reasons I'm out from Everest.

177:24

>> People ask me all the time,

177:25

>> not the least of which is like plenty of

177:26

people have already done it. Like, why

177:28

would

177:28

>> Exactly. I think the story's been told.

177:30

>> Yeah. Why would I risk my life for

177:32

something that's not even going to be a

177:33

notable footnote for anything or anyone?

177:36

>> There you go.

177:37

>> Book or books you've given most as a

177:39

gift or recommended a lot? any books

177:41

come to mind?

177:42

>> I have recommended Radical Cander to

177:44

pretty much everybody I know who's a

177:46

content creator trying to figure out

177:48

their business. The other one is The

177:49

Great CEO Within, which is a really fast

177:52

and easy read. And for anyone who didn't

177:57

start in Silicon Valley or a startup

177:59

culture or a startup of any kind was

178:01

really helpful to me to just understand

178:04

here's what a company is and how it

178:05

works. And then I've given Adam Grant's

178:09

originals to a few people, too.

178:11

>> Dang it. All right.

178:12

>> I would say this, but I feel like that's

178:14

cheating, so I've tried to exclude it

178:16

from my answer, so I can't say that. But

178:19

obviously, I talk about it all the time.

178:21

>> If you could have one giant billboard

178:23

anywhere, obviously this is

178:24

metaphorically speaking with anything on

178:26

it. Could be a quote, nothing

178:28

commercial, right? But could be a

178:31

mantra, quote from someone else, a

178:33

picture, anything, question. What might

178:35

you put on that?

178:36

>> I feel like this one has been overused

178:38

at this point, but one that was really

178:43

helpful for me starting my channel was

178:46

everything you want is on the other side

178:48

of fear. Very simple. Again, overused at

178:51

this point, but I love that one because

178:53

it's what I return to when things are

178:55

hard in any aspect of life and

178:57

especially when I'm doing a challenge.

179:00

It's a way for me to remind myself this

179:03

is the struggle I asked for to make

179:05

myself better at the thing I want to be

179:07

better at. And it's also a reminder to

179:10

move forward through it

179:11

>> and not shy away from it. As we talked

179:14

about, challenge accepted was born out

179:16

of writing my fears on a whiteboard. And

179:18

so for me, I've have a very intimate

179:21

connection with that sentiment. And I

179:24

think about it even in an exterior

179:26

capacity. When I get nervous about

179:28

something, personal life, business,

179:30

whatever, exterior to the challenge

179:32

itself, I return to that often.

179:34

>> Mhm. I have quotes related to that

179:38

etched onto driftwood from ranging from

179:41

Anias Nin to others all over all over my

179:44

house.

179:45

>> I think I've done enough talking today.

179:47

So, I'm going to keep the focus on you,

179:49

Michelle. Where can people find you?

179:51

Where would you like to point people to?

179:53

>> You can follow me at Michelle Kar on

179:56

everything. And the three-part series of

179:59

my experience

180:01

attempting seven marathons on all seven

180:03

continents in one single week will be

180:05

coming out on my YouTube channel in

180:07

three consecutive weeks throughout April

180:10

and May. And we're going for a prime

180:13

time Emmy this year, which I'm really

180:15

excited about. We're on the ballot for

180:17

outstanding hosted non-fiction series or

180:20

special. It's a very long title for a

180:22

category and I'm excited about it for a

180:26

lot of reasons.

180:28

Most of which is I want to be a part of

180:32

a future where it's

180:35

not unheard of that a YouTube channel is

180:37

going for something like this. And

180:39

that's why I'm excited about it for

180:41

myself and other creators.

180:44

>> I'm excited for you.

180:45

>> Thank you. So, if you're a voter,

180:47

>> I'd vote for you. I'd vote for you. And

180:50

just for people who may miss this, K h a

180:55

r e.

180:56

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. M I C H E L L E. K H A R

180:59

E.

181:01

>> Uh Michelle, is there anything else

181:02

you'd like to say? Any parting words?

181:05

Anything you'd like to add before we

181:07

wind to a close?

181:09

>> I want to say thank you, Tim. It was

181:12

really special to go back through the

181:15

archives and realize that

181:19

your impact in my life started 10 years

181:22

ago and to almost to the date

181:26

be meeting you 10 years later is really

181:29

full circle and affirming for me. And I

181:32

hope that anyone listening can can hear

181:35

the very grassroots fear setting chart

181:38

that I had for myself in the beginning.

181:40

And I think it's a special moment for me

181:43

to reflect on the the length of time it

181:46

takes to do something special

181:49

>> and how that commitment can lead you

181:51

somewhere unexpected.

181:53

>> Thank you for that. And I have to say it

181:57

makes me so deeply

182:01

happy. I mean joy is probably a better

182:04

word. I get so much joy out of the fact

182:07

that that you exist and you're doing

182:10

what you're doing because it tests a lot

182:13

of assumptions about a direction that I

182:16

would view as pretty dystopian about

182:18

online content creation. like you're

182:21

putting out long form

182:25

positive

182:26

life affirming

182:28

non-fiction where you show that

182:32

failure is not a terminal sentence. It's

182:35

just feedback along the path. And I just

182:40

love that you're doing what you're

182:43

doing. And I'm such a fan of your work,

182:47

such a fan of Challenge Accepted.

182:50

And I hope you keep doing it for a super

182:52

long time.

182:53

>> Me, too. Thank you, Tim.

182:54

>> Yeah. All right, everybody. Until next

182:57

time, we're going to put show notes,

182:58

including some template emails for

183:01

people in the show notes at

183:03

tim.blog/mpodcast.

183:05

I assure you, if you search Kh, there

183:08

will be only one

183:10

response. Until next time, be just a bit

183:13

kinder than is necessary to others, but

183:16

also to yourself. And thanks for tuning

183:18

in.

183:19

Thank you.

Interactive Summary

The conversation between Tim Ferriss and Michelle Khare explores Michelle's journey as a creator, focusing on her YouTube channel "Challenge Accepted." Michelle details her early experiences in filmmaking, starting with an internship on a movie set and her upbringing in Shreveport, Louisiana, which exposed her to the film industry through local tax incentives. She discusses the challenges of content creation, including the pressure to maintain a high output, the importance of owning one's narrative, and the strategy behind "Challenge Accepted," which involves attempting extreme stunts and professions. Michelle highlights the role of fear setting in her decision-making process and how embracing challenges, even with the risk of failure, has led to unique opportunities and personal growth. They also delve into the practical aspects of content creation, such as building a team, managing finances, and the art of cold emailing for collaborations. The discussion touches upon key books and concepts like "Radical Candor" and "Six Thinking Hats," and how these have influenced their professional approaches. Michelle shares personal anecdotes, including her experience with a Google internship rejection that pushed her towards entrepreneurship, and her admiration for figures like Mindy Kaling. The episode concludes with reflections on the importance of passion, resilience, and the continuous pursuit of learning in navigating a career in the creator economy.

Suggested questions

7 ready-made prompts