HomeVideos

The SIMPLE (& Proven) Way To Earn $100,000 From Nothing! | The Money Making Experts

Now Playing

The SIMPLE (& Proven) Way To Earn $100,000 From Nothing! | The Money Making Experts

Transcript

4684 segments

0:00

I've got three boxes here. One of them

0:02

contains $1,000. One of them contains

0:04

$10,000. And one of them contains

0:05

$100,000. And you three are the avengers

0:08

of entrepreneurship on the internet. So,

0:10

you're going to tell me what you would

0:11

do with that amount of money to build a

0:13

scalable business.

0:14

>> So, do I get to give the money? Is that

0:15

how this works?

0:17

>> Okay. So, I would three highly

0:20

successful entrepreneurs with three very

0:22

different perspectives. This is the

0:24

ultimate master class in creating and

0:26

scaling your businesses to make

0:27

millions. There's two paths to making

0:30

money quickly if you don't have any. And

0:31

the first path is go find the best

0:33

entrepreneur and go work for them. Learn

0:35

as much as you can.

0:36

>> Totally agree. Like Kim Kardashian was

0:37

Harris Hilton's assistant and she

0:39

learned the playbook for being famous.

0:41

And then she took it to a new level.

0:42

>> And then the second way is high risk but

0:44

highest reward. Go do it yourself.

0:46

>> And the first business that you start,

0:48

you're going to be learning the game of

0:49

business even more than you're learning

0:50

the business that you're doing. Things

0:52

like if you wait 8 seconds after you ask

0:53

someone to buy, you close 30% more

0:55

sales. And there are actual studies now

0:57

that show that if I'm a woman, you make

0:59

more money if you do one thing. You wear

1:02

makeup, which is wild.

1:03

>> And what about making content?

1:05

>> Building a content empire that builds

1:07

your business. This is brand new to a

1:09

lot of people. And so a lot of creators

1:10

online don't think about how do I

1:12

monetize on top of this,

1:13

>> right? And I can name some Tik Tokers

1:14

with 50 plus million followers that have

1:16

had failed launches because they have

1:18

views but they have zero influence. And

1:20

in order to create influence, there's

1:22

four things. So number one is

1:24

>> okay so let's go on to simple actionable

1:26

frameworks.

1:26

>> So I have a framework in order to raise

1:28

money.

1:28

>> I have a framework for pitching

1:30

>> and I have one that can increase sales

1:31

by 20 to 40%.

1:32

>> And then if you want to know if your

1:33

business is going to make you money or

1:35

not we use the moat strategy

1:37

>> and there's a lot more. So let's go

1:38

through all of this.

1:42

[Music]

1:44

Daniel, Cody, Alex, I feel like I have

1:49

waited a long time to have this

1:50

conversation with you three because in

1:51

my mind, you three are the avengers of

1:54

entrepreneurship on the internet. And

1:57

for very different reasons, you do very

1:58

different things. You have very

1:59

different perspectives. You run very

2:01

different businesses. But for those

2:02

people that are sat at home and they

2:03

have an idea and they're mulling whether

2:05

that is the idea worth pursuing, is

2:07

there a framework for knowing if it's a

2:08

good idea or a bad idea? What we use

2:11

that comes from private equity. If you

2:12

want to know if your business is going

2:13

to make you money or not or investable

2:15

or not, we use the MOAT strategy which

2:18

is basically M stands for margin. So you

2:20

want a business that actually makes you

2:22

money, doesn't just generate revenue.

2:23

And so a good business typically has at

2:25

least 15% net margin. So that's the

2:27

money you put in your your pocket,

2:29

right?

2:29

>> So that's profit.

2:30

>> Yeah. Yeah.

2:30

>> Exactly. And then uh the O stands for

2:33

operations. So operations being can this

2:35

thing actually scale over time or will I

2:37

really have a job, not a business? And

2:39

what's the difference there?

2:40

>> The difference between the two is if you

2:42

have a job, not a business, that might

2:43

be for instance without AI, if my entire

2:46

business was just me talking

2:47

continuously to camera and I'm an actor,

2:49

it's really hard to turn acting to a

2:52

business, right?

2:52

>> You're trading time,

2:54

>> right? You're still an employee. You're

2:55

just self-employed as opposed to a

2:57

business owner. And there's a real

2:58

difference between a CEO and a

2:59

self-employed person. And then the A

3:02

stands for advantage, which is, do I

3:04

have an unfair advantage in my business?

3:05

I think over time all arbitrage windows

3:08

close. So, if you don't have some sort

3:09

of advantage, it's hard to stay in

3:11

business over a long time. An advantage

3:12

might be I have distribution because I

3:14

have social media, so I can get more

3:16

eyeballs. I can figure out how to talk

3:17

to 2,000 people quickly because I can do

3:20

it via video as opposed to knocking on

3:21

20 doors. H or it could be logistics or

3:24

it could be uh 10 years of experience in

3:27

an industry. And then the T stands for

3:29

TAM, total addressable market, which

3:31

goes back to the doggy teeth issue,

3:33

which is, you know, is this a real

3:35

market that enough people are interested

3:37

in that I can build a business that is

3:39

big enough for me? And, you know, to

3:41

Alex's point, I don't think everybody

3:42

should try to play the trillion or

3:44

billion dollar uh game. In fact, I think

3:47

it can be quite miserable to to strive

3:49

for billions. And so the the total

3:52

addressable market for your local fruit

3:54

stand in your community may be a perfect

3:56

amount of income for you, but let's

3:58

actually know what amount of income is

3:59

reasonable for you. And the cool thing

4:01

about entrepreneurship in like today's

4:03

age, the data is available everywhere.

4:06

>> And so in private equity, you would take

4:08

this model like that. So you'd go moat,

4:10

you would I take them and for each one,

4:12

I rank them one to 10 and businesses. So

4:15

margin, operations, advantage, total

4:17

addressable market. each one of them. A

4:19

10 is perfect. A one is the worst you

4:22

could have. And businesses that are

4:25

better than 30 across all four, well,

4:27

that's a fund it. That's a fundable

4:29

business model. Businesses that are less

4:31

than 30 but more than 20, that's a fix

4:33

it. You've got some problems in the

4:35

model. And businesses that are less than

4:36

20, that's a flee it. This is probably

4:39

not right for you and a hard business to

4:40

do.

4:41

>> I think it's not just the people who are

4:43

looking for a new opportunity or people

4:45

who don't currently have a business. I

4:46

personally think at the moment every

4:48

single person on the planet who has a

4:49

business should assume that their

4:51

business is on borrowed time because AI

4:54

is going to disrupt everything and in

4:56

that disruption everyone has the

4:57

opportunity to rethink whether they want

4:59

a different opportunity or whether they

5:00

want to pivot. It's the perfect time. I

5:02

look at simple things when I'm thinking

5:04

about is it a good opportunity. I think

5:06

every good business is built upon

5:08

somebody's case study. So when I look at

5:11

not just businesses as a thing on their

5:13

own, I think businesses as a thing on

5:14

their own have to be taken in

5:16

consideration with who's the

5:17

entrepreneur. So your entre like

5:19

something that's a great opportunity for

5:21

Cody may be just a disaster for me and

5:23

like and likewise.

5:24

>> So I'm looking at the background of the

5:26

entrepreneur. Do you have a case study

5:28

to leverage? Do you have knowledge? Do

5:30

you have a network? Do you have

5:31

resources? Have you got a reputation in

5:33

something? Because those are the things

5:35

that we can then leverage. And then I'm

5:37

just going to have a look at three

5:38

little things. I'm going to say this

5:40

idea that you've got going forward.

5:42

Does this address someone's pain? Right?

5:45

Is there some sort of problem that this

5:47

solves? And that to we could measure

5:49

that, right? Because people pay to move

5:50

a metric. They love to move some sort of

5:52

a number. So, is there a pain that we

5:54

can measure and can I take people out of

5:55

that pain based on my story?

5:58

>> The next thing is does that type of

6:00

person who I'm going to solve that for,

6:01

do they have money to spend? Because

6:04

ultimately 60% of all the money is in

6:06

the top 10%. So the top 10% have about

6:09

60% of the available disposable income.

6:12

So groups that t tend to have money is

6:15

business owners, executives, people

6:18

who've got accumulated wealth. Um you

6:21

know, so you're looking at like some

6:22

sort of indication that you're selling

6:23

to a group of people who have money.

6:25

Underneath that top 10%, Amazon's

6:27

already got them, McDonald's has already

6:29

got them. Like that's a saturated part

6:31

of the market. You looking for that top

6:32

10% who've got disposable income. And

6:35

then the final part is passion. Like are

6:38

you passionate about this? And my

6:39

definition of passion is a willingness

6:42

to suffer. So it's not do you get joy

6:44

from it, not are you super happy from

6:45

it. It's are you willing to suffer for

6:47

this? Are you willing to have delayed

6:49

gratification um would an objective

6:52

third party who looks at your behavior,

6:54

who looks at the way that you show up in

6:55

the world, would they agree that you

6:57

seem to be willing to push through

6:59

difficult times in order to have this?

7:01

So those are some of the conversations

7:02

I'd have with anyone. And not just

7:04

people who are starting out, people who

7:05

have already got a hundred million

7:06

dollar business.

7:06

>> It's like the adult marshmallow test

7:08

basically.

7:09

>> Yeah. I think Cody had a had a great

7:11

framework in terms of thinking about

7:12

this from an investing perspective for

7:14

the people who are considering starting

7:15

their first business. I like the pain

7:17

passion profession angle of like

7:19

typically it'll be something that comes

7:20

from a personal pain that you overcame

7:21

whether it's you had an eating disorder

7:23

or you have kids who have allergies and

7:26

you figured out how to pack lunches or

7:27

you figured out how to store stuff for

7:28

twice as long because of some unique

7:30

thing that that you retrofitted a cooler

7:32

with. whatever some passion which is

7:33

just like a hobby that's that's you're

7:35

deeply interested in or it's a

7:37

profession so something that you already

7:38

currently do like in a way this is I

7:40

think one of the easiest self-

7:41

entrepreneur you know self-employment

7:42

path is just going from employed to

7:44

self-employed doing the same thing that

7:46

somebody already pays you for

7:47

>> so like you don't need to worry about

7:48

like market risk of like I wonder if if

7:51

accounting is still going to be desired

7:52

by other people like right now because

7:54

everyone's so interconnected like remote

7:56

work and being able to be fractional

7:58

like many people can start kind of mini

8:00

consulting businesses doing, you know,

8:02

because a lot of businesses and

8:04

entrepreneurs are very um bad at

8:06

allocating resources. And so they have a

8:07

lot of quote full-time employees that

8:09

are working 20% of their effort and

8:11

still keep, you know, keeping their

8:12

paycheck and at the end of the day like

8:13

they do enough to keep their job, but

8:15

not so much that they are nearly at

8:17

their full discretionary effort. And so

8:19

all of a sudden you think, okay, well, I

8:20

could probably do the same work for half

8:22

the price and the entrepreneur be

8:23

willing to pay it, but I could do that

8:25

same work for half the price for five

8:26

times the people and make three times as

8:28

much and do it on my own time. And so

8:29

that becomes I think a great like foray

8:31

into entrepreneurship. Now what do you

8:32

have to learn there? It's like well you

8:34

already have delivery down because you

8:35

already do the job. You just have to

8:36

learn how to promote. It's just like how

8:37

do you reach out to people and ask them

8:38

if they want what you have and then get

8:40

them to trade you money for it. Um but

8:41

that like at least takes half of it out

8:43

of the equation. And almost all three of

8:44

those pain, passion, profession, you

8:46

already have kind of the back end. Like

8:47

you have the pain, you figured out the

8:49

thing. Uh the passion, you've already

8:50

spent all this time loving this thing.

8:52

So you've already done a lot of the the

8:53

work and research. And so really you

8:54

just need to learn the front end which

8:56

is like how do I promote and how do I

8:57

sell, right? how to get someone to give

8:58

me money for it. And then in terms of um

9:01

how much money you make, I think Dana

9:02

had a great perspective of like, you

9:03

know, sell the rich, like they're the

9:04

ones who have the money. And if you uh

9:06

sell rich people, you get to sell at

9:08

rich people prices, which is more fun.

9:10

Uh and so I mean, I'll give you a simple

9:13

example. Um I have a CRO company that

9:15

that we do a conversion rate

9:17

optimization across our sites and our

9:18

portfolio. And so if that company go

9:21

works with an e-commerce business and

9:22

they, you know, add 10% to, you know,

9:24

topline and goes from 1 million to 1.1

9:26

million, they make $100,000 of value. If

9:28

they work with an e-commerce business

9:29

that's doing $100 million a year and

9:30

they do the same exact work and they add

9:32

10%, they add $10 million a year. So

9:35

it's a hundred hundred times more in

9:36

terms of value that's being created. And

9:38

so fundamentally, you have the value

9:39

they create, your ability to negotiate a

9:41

slice of that pie, how unique that is.

9:43

As in, for example, I could have plenty

9:45

of sales guys are like, "Hey, Alex, I

9:46

could sell millions of dollars of stuff

9:48

for I'm like, "Yeah, but so could every

9:49

other salesperson." So, you have

9:51

significantly less uh you know,

9:53

negotiating power even if you have the

9:55

negotiating skill just because many

9:56

other people can do it, right? And then

9:58

the third the the final component is

9:59

risk. And that's the one that I would

10:01

multiply everything by, which is how

10:02

much risk you take on.

10:03

>> People often say this idea of selling to

10:05

the rich, but as you explained it there,

10:06

what what it actually sounded more like

10:08

is sell to the person who's going to

10:10

yield the most returns from your skill.

10:13

>> And I I reflect on this because I spent

10:14

the first half of my career doing social

10:15

media marketing. Yeah. I think I said

10:17

this when we sat down that I used to

10:20

work with fast fashion companies or

10:21

fashion and the net return

10:26

>> of me selling them all dresses was tens

10:28

of thousands. I then left that business

10:30

and spent two years working in

10:32

psychedelics in the biotech industry

10:34

where if this was around the g the meme

10:36

stock thing where if they could

10:37

galvanize people on social media to care

10:39

about their stock the upside the swing

10:41

was billions of dollars. I was the only

10:44

employee in this biotech firm that ended

10:46

up listing on the NASDAQ for $3.2

10:49

billion. And so their remuneration to me

10:52

for the six months contract was many

10:55

many many many many millions.

10:57

>> Yeah.

10:58

>> Because they they made billions.

11:00

>> So for me they they thought they were

11:01

ripping me off.

11:02

>> Yeah.

11:02

>> And and I think about funnily enough

11:04

when you put the same company on

11:05

different stock markets

11:07

>> the the company is worth wildly

11:09

different. And I think the same about

11:10

our skills where think about the stock

11:13

market where you're trading your skills.

11:15

>> I've got a I got a small example of that

11:17

really small example. There was a guy

11:18

who we worked with who was an

11:20

occupational health and safety uh

11:22

consultant and inside the workplace in a

11:25

typical office he would charge a couple

11:26

of grand a day

11:27

>> uh to go in and it was about 10 days so

11:29

about 20 grand to do an occupational

11:31

health and safety. And I asked him the

11:32

question, "What is the most dangerous

11:35

workplace you've ever worked in?" And he

11:36

says, "Well, there's this type of

11:38

manufacturing that has lasers, freezing

11:40

stuff, boiling stuff, lava, you know,

11:42

the sharks, you know, the whole thing,

11:44

right? Whatever it is, and not actual

11:46

sharks, but you get the idea." And I

11:49

said, "Do you know how to solve the

11:50

problems of that workplace?" And he

11:52

says, "Yeah, I absolutely know how to

11:54

fix those problems." I said, "Why don't

11:56

you position yourself and why don't you

11:58

run a campaign that you're one of the

12:00

best in the world for that and that

12:01

you're actually going to just run a

12:03

campaign around that?" Um, within a year

12:06

his day rate had gone to 20,000 a day

12:08

from 2,000 a day and a typical

12:10

engagement had gone up to 400 grand.

12:12

>> Mhm.

12:13

>> Mainly because he went from, you know,

12:16

the same skill set, but he applied it to

12:18

a a much, you know, more valuable

12:20

environment. Podcasting is somewhat

12:22

similar, you know, because if I podcast

12:24

in the UK, the amount of money I get per

12:27

view from YouTube is half versus if I do

12:30

the same activity, the same amount of

12:33

effort, the same amount of hours in the

12:35

United States, the platforms pay me

12:37

double for the same amount of views. And

12:38

I think many of us are like trying to

12:40

get a pay rise from our boss or

12:41

whatever, but actually thinking about

12:43

are you trading your skills on the

12:44

highest return market is a great way. We

12:47

I used to hire writers at my old company

12:49

and those writers would be paid you know

12:51

30 $40 $50,000 whatever it was in the UK

12:54

when when I was working in biotech and

12:55

we were looking for someone that could

12:56

write about biotech it was a quarter of

12:59

a million the salary it was five times

13:00

more for the same fundamental skill of

13:02

writing.

13:03

>> I think that I think that a lot of times

13:05

when you're starting out as a brand new

13:06

entrepreneur it's scarier to sell to

13:08

rich people. You're like I don't know

13:10

rich people. I'm not a rich person. I'm

13:11

going to sell to my friends. That is

13:12

very normal. That's the people that you

13:14

have the closest proximity to. But the

13:16

problem is is that means you have to

13:18

play the volume game. And the volume

13:19

game is actually really hard. It's hard

13:21

to get a lot of people to buy your

13:22

thing. Incredibly difficult. It's

13:24

actually much easier to get a few rich

13:26

people to buy your thing. And so, you

13:28

know, we had this home inspection

13:30

company and I didn't know it at the

13:31

time, but

13:32

>> he was telling me they were having like

13:34

major cash issues in their business. And

13:36

uh and I could kind of tell because when

13:38

an entrepreneur is under stress, like

13:39

you can sort of see it, you know, it's a

13:41

it's a a visual thing, too. and he was

13:43

about 45 days away from uh running out

13:45

of cash. And when I was sitting down and

13:47

talking to him, I was trying to

13:48

understand his business. Home inspection

13:49

has been around forever. It's a

13:51

normalized business. This business

13:52

works. It functions. It has good

13:54

margins. It's a rollup for private

13:55

equity. The business model is not the

13:57

issue. So, what was the issue? The issue

13:59

was their clients and their pricing. So,

14:02

he was trying to be the home inspector

14:04

for everyone at a lower price point. And

14:07

what does that mean? It means it was

14:08

actually really hard for him to

14:09

advertise because he wasn't niching

14:11

down. He was competing with all of the

14:12

major players and he had very little

14:15

margin because he was competing for

14:18

people who couldn't afford very much in

14:20

their home inspection costs. We made one

14:22

change which is we just said in front of

14:24

his business name and in all of his ads

14:26

luxury home inspections instead of just

14:29

San, you know, San Diego home

14:30

inspections or whatever city he was in

14:32

previously. And that one change

14:34

increased his margins by 45% and they

14:37

saved his business. He didn't do more

14:39

volume. He didn't hire more people. He

14:41

didn't get smarter. He didn't get

14:42

better. He just sold to rich people

14:45

instead. And because that increased the

14:47

surface area that he was covering, so

14:49

each house was like, I don't know,

14:50

thousands of dollars instead of a couple

14:52

hundred bucks to inspect, his business

14:54

was saved forever. And so I I think

14:56

protecting your profit is so crucial

14:59

when you start a business. And nobody

15:01

tells you that because it feels safer to

15:03

sell things cheaply to people who don't

15:05

have very much money. But there's that

15:07

old adage which is, you know, try to

15:10

work with a $50 client and they will

15:11

say, "I need everything under the sun

15:12

for this $50 I'm going to give you." And

15:14

then go to a $50,000 client and they'll

15:16

say, "Why are scent?" And so, you know,

15:19

so

15:19

>> in the beginning, go for the $50,000.

15:22

And the last thing I'll say on that is

15:23

also when you're a young gun

15:24

entrepreneur, a lot of times people who

15:27

have money, they got there through

15:28

business nine times out of 10. They see

15:30

themselves in you as a young hard

15:32

worker. You can often get away with

15:34

things when you are young working for

15:36

somebody who is rich and sees themselves

15:37

in you, especially in service businesses

15:40

that you just can't at volume when

15:42

you're selling to people that really

15:43

need that last dollar. And so I think

15:45

that's why most businesses go

15:47

servicebased business. You trade your

15:49

time for money in some sort of way. Then

15:51

you productize the service. So now you

15:53

make the service so other people can run

15:55

it too. And then finally you turn it in

15:57

technology software as a service. you

15:59

increase your margin at every single one

16:00

or your profit at every single one, but

16:02

they're the same business. You're just

16:04

smarter. You're you're a higher level

16:06

entrepreneur when you're able to create

16:08

tech around it. And but really all tech

16:10

is is process at scale. And so it sounds

16:13

scary when you're just starting out, but

16:15

it it's it's really just the difference

16:17

between 10 years in entrepreneurship and

16:18

learning and not

16:20

>> I think when you um when you're starting

16:21

out, you a lot of times you sell out of

16:23

your own wallet to to Cody's point. So,

16:25

it's like you have no dollars in your

16:26

wallet, so you assume everyone else has

16:27

no dollars in their wallets either.

16:29

>> And you're so afraid of getting

16:31

rejection that you continue to lower the

16:32

price until you get here. You hear

16:33

people say yes. But just as like a

16:36

benchmark for people who are starting

16:37

out is that like usually you're

16:38

appropriately priced when seven out of

16:40

10 people are saying no. Um that's like

16:43

about the appropriate price. So if you

16:44

have like if I you know see a business

16:46

and they're doing 80% close rates as in

16:48

like 80% of uh the people they talk to

16:49

say yes, they usually have a double or

16:51

triple in pricing just sitting there. If

16:53

they're at like 60% close rates, they

16:55

usually have a one and a half to 2x

16:57

price increase that's sitting there. If

16:58

they're at, you know, 40 to 50, they've

17:00

got a 50% price raise in there. And if

17:02

they're right at that, you know, 30-ish

17:03

35%, then they're usually appropriately

17:05

priced. And if they're at 20, they just

17:07

need to learn how to sell better. But

17:09

and so, but fundamentally, I say this

17:11

because usually, you know, in the

17:12

beginning of entrepreneurship, you're so

17:13

afraid of hearing no. Um, but the

17:17

reality of it is that you need to be

17:18

hearing no more than you hear yes to

17:20

know that you're being appropriately

17:21

priced

17:22

>> because you like I way back in the day I

17:25

had a gym. Um, and I had I can't

17:27

remember how many members it was, but uh

17:29

I I said that's it. And I decided to

17:31

triple my prices, which is a pretty big

17:33

move. Uh, we have a recurring membership

17:35

base. And so I gave everyone a trial of

17:37

the new level of service I wanted to

17:38

give. I wanted to go from large group to

17:39

semi-private. And um, I tripled the

17:42

price alongside that. and I lost

17:43

one-third of my customers. Um, but I had

17:45

twothirds of the people at three times

17:47

the price. And so I made um two times

17:50

the revenue and I cut my costs by

17:52

twothirds.

17:53

>> And so I made a lot more money.

17:56

>> And it was probably better for your

17:57

clients as well. More exclusive

17:59

experience.

17:59

>> 100%. And it was like right as I was

18:01

beginning to learn how like pricing uh

18:03

worked with profit in a business. And so

18:05

it and by doing that tripling in price,

18:07

it didn't like triple my profit. It did

18:09

way more than that. And so like when you

18:11

have a 10% or 15% margin business, like

18:13

Cody saying, if you actually can pull

18:15

off a double in your pricing, it'd be a

18:16

6x or 7x increase in profits.

18:19

>> So there's a lot more sensitivity to

18:21

that price number. What's interesting is

18:22

that it's really just like, you know, a

18:24

lot of like, how do I raise my price?

18:25

It's like you do the exact same thing

18:26

you normally do and then right when

18:28

you're about to say the number, you just

18:29

add a zero and then and then you just

18:31

act the same. Dan Kenny had this great

18:33

quote. He said, um, go as high as you

18:35

can without cracking a smile. Uh, and I

18:37

think that's usually a pretty a pretty

18:38

decent place to start. Yeah. And if

18:40

nobody is giving you push back on

18:41

pricing, that means you're too cheap

18:43

immediately. Like I mean value metrics I

18:45

think are so un listen the thing is like

18:47

if you're a serious business person, you

18:49

want to make more money, pricing is

18:50

going to be really interesting to you.

18:52

If you're not a serious person wanting

18:53

to make a lot of money, pricing seems

18:55

like such a boring conversation. This

18:57

will never go viral on the internet

18:58

except for people who actually are in

19:00

the game of business and they understand

19:02

that pricing save saves businesses. And

19:05

the the thing that I learned that I

19:07

thought was like wrong at first, and I'd

19:09

be curious if you guys were the same. I

19:10

thought it was wrong to charge different

19:12

people different prices. I was like,

19:13

"No, no, everybody gets the same price.

19:15

That's the right way to do business."

19:17

And then I realized there's something

19:18

called value metrics, which is basically

19:20

your prices should be a representative

19:22

of three things. Usage, so does somebody

19:25

use this service a ton? Then you should

19:27

charge them more. Do they have a lot of

19:28

users? Do lots of people use it on their

19:31

behalf. Or then finally, uh, value. How

19:34

much value do they derive from it? Do

19:35

they make a ton of money? Um, you know,

19:37

can they have some sort of quantifiable

19:39

return? And if you're charging everybody

19:41

90 bucks a month for whatever your

19:43

service is, you are wasting a ton of

19:45

money from a segment of your clients

19:47

that would pay you way more.

19:48

>> Like Typeform is a good example. I I

19:50

started using Type Form, started using

19:52

it myself. They charge me $50 a month.

19:55

Then I started running tens of thousands

19:57

of surveys through there and I put my

19:58

whole team on there. Now I'm paying

19:59

$1,000 a month. It's the same [ __ ]

20:02

tool.

20:02

>> Yes, it is. But I'm using it way more

20:04

and I've got more of my team using my

20:05

account as well. So they're charging me

20:07

a thousand just over $1,000 a month

20:08

>> and they only had to acquire you which

20:10

is amazing. So from acquiring one person

20:13

and you're like you know your cost of

20:14

good or their cost of goods don't

20:16

escalate at the same rate at all. So

20:18

that's how these SAS companies get this

20:19

80% margins.

20:20

>> That's it. When you look at uh this this

20:23

little pyramid of customer segmentation,

20:25

you get 1% of people who have 15% of the

20:28

budget, 9% of people have 45% of the

20:30

budget. 90% of people combined 40%.

20:33

Right? So when you actually break that

20:35

down, you have one person willing to pay

20:38

15 grand, you have nine people willing

20:40

to pay 5 grand each, and you have 90

20:42

people willing to pay 445 each. So you

20:46

are almost always better off going I

20:49

think the best place for most small

20:50

businesses to go is that 9%. And the

20:52

reason is the top 1% typically shop on

20:55

pedigree. They want to work with the

20:57

best businesses out there. They want to

20:58

win work with the ones who have won

21:00

awards and the ones that have been

21:01

around for a long time.

21:02

>> Relationships

21:02

>> and and through trusted relationships.

21:05

>> The 90% they shop on price. They have a

21:07

fixed price and they only want to shop

21:09

on that price. The 9% shop on passion.

21:12

They want to follow someone who's an

21:14

interesting uh who has an interesting

21:15

new take on things who's putting

21:17

together a group who's done some

21:18

education or entertainment around it. So

21:20

the this 9% I would call that the

21:22

affluent niche. And that affluent niche

21:25

is really good place to start. And that

21:26

9% are the ones that are closest to

21:28

moving into the 1%. So you can grow with

21:30

a client over time, which we saw a lot.

21:32

>> You could help get them up to the 1% and

21:33

then then they'll take you and introduce

21:35

you to all the others.

21:36

>> This was one of the really fascinating

21:37

things for me when I was running a

21:38

marketing business, which is I think you

21:40

you referenced this Cody, which is when

21:42

I started the company, I was working

21:43

with founders who had a 10K budget and

21:45

the amount of times they would call me

21:47

because of that 10k budget because that

21:49

was do or die for them. And then when we

21:51

signed Uber and Coca-Cola and Samsung,

21:55

the budgets are massive and they they

21:58

call me less.

21:59

>> They sign things off quicker.

22:01

>> The meetings are easier, life is easier.

22:03

And that's just one of these sort of

22:05

interesting phenomenons with um with

22:07

client services, I guess, and service

22:08

businesses generally is the bigger the

22:10

budget, it typically it requires the

22:13

same or less units of effort to keep

22:14

them happy than someone whose life is on

22:17

the line because it's their five grand

22:18

out of their own pocket.

22:20

I think part of that you earn too as an

22:22

entrepreneur. I think I mean I'll speak

22:24

for myself. I uh you start out selling

22:27

way too cheap.

22:28

>> Um because you also need the money

22:30

because as much as it's like a nice it's

22:31

very comfortable for me to say like yeah

22:33

you need to add a zero to your price

22:34

tag. If I don't get paid for the rest of

22:36

my life it doesn't matter.

22:38

>> And so I have a lot of leverage and

22:40

people can feel that. That's really

22:41

interesting,

22:42

>> right? Whereas I mean this is also like

22:44

if you behave as if, right? If I behave

22:47

as if I have a significant amount of

22:48

money, then I tend to attract people who

22:50

are going or basically somebody else who

22:51

also has a lot of money will recognize

22:52

that behavior and say, "Okay, this guy's

22:54

a player." And so then they'll be more

22:55

willing to do business with me. Now,

22:56

it's tougher when you don't have that

22:58

and you present that way, right? Which

23:00

is so I think that a lot of this kind of

23:02

does become earned because like either

23:04

you're faking it, which is not my not my

23:05

recommendation, or you just do a decent

23:07

amount of volume and you realize you're

23:08

like, "You know what? can't charge $99 a

23:10

month for this. It doesn't make sense

23:11

for me. And then you have a different

23:12

level of confidence going into this

23:14

where you just look at someone, you're

23:14

like, I just can't do it for that price.

23:16

>> That's the word confidence, isn't it?

23:17

>> Yeah. Well, that's how I how

23:20

>> does one build that confidence or

23:22

portray that confidence when really they

23:24

don't believe it themselves.

23:25

>> You outwork yourself, right? You do you

23:27

do so much volume that um you get bored

23:29

of it. Like when you can basically train

23:31

out your your affective response or your

23:33

emotional response to a given activity,

23:35

then at that point I would say like you

23:36

are ready. And so whenever I hear

23:38

someone, he's like, "How do you get rid

23:38

of nerves?" I was like, "You're just not

23:40

you haven't done it enough times like

23:41

until you're bored and you hate it."

23:43

>> At that point, I'm like, "Okay, now

23:44

you're ready."

23:45

>> Is that what like self-belief is to you?

23:48

>> To me, yeah.

23:49

>> There's two two types of confidence.

23:51

There's a confidence that comes from

23:52

repetition. And I think it takes courage

23:54

the first 30 times and then you get a

23:56

little bit of confidence and then it

23:57

takes courage and then you get

23:58

confidence. But I think it's like 30

24:00

block little blocks of 30 repetitions

24:02

and then you get rewarded with a little

24:04

bit of confidence upgrade. That's one

24:06

type of confidence. There's another type

24:07

of confidence which is an abundance of

24:09

options. So, let's say you run a lead

24:13

generation campaign and you want to get

24:15

10 clients and you're hoping to sign up

24:17

10 clients and a thousand people

24:18

respond. You end up with this with or

24:20

without you energy. And the with or

24:21

without you energy is I'm going to be

24:23

fine with or without you. I'm going to

24:24

definitely make my 10 sales. I've got a

24:26

thousand leads. I've got 10 sales I can

24:28

make. So, therefore, it's out of

24:30

balance. Mhm.

24:31

>> I I go back and forth on this because

24:33

the good thing about today actually is I

24:36

think people do less than ever but think

24:39

that they do more than ever in

24:40

entrepreneurship. And so we have a lot

24:42

of mental masturbation that goes on.

24:43

I've thought about this a lot. I've

24:45

really pondered it. I've wondered about

24:47

this. I've worried about it, etc. Right?

24:49

I've watched all these videos. I've

24:50

consumed all this stuff, but I've

24:51

actually done nothing.

24:52

>> Keep watching the videos.

24:55

>> Like and subscribe.

24:58

But you know I if if if I if you take

25:02

the quantity advice then what you do

25:05

when you try to go get a job let's say

25:06

whether it's it's a job uh that that you

25:09

have in your business or you're trying

25:10

to get an actual job then you just go

25:11

and you apply to 15,000 of them. I

25:13

actually think you'd be much better off

25:15

by applying to five and doing as much

25:18

work as it would take to reach out to

25:20

15,000 to obsess on those five. And so

25:23

even if you haven't done 10,000 hours of

25:25

painting uh somebody's house, if you go

25:28

and sit down and you sit down with uh

25:29

AI, get in front of Perplexity and you

25:31

write down, okay, what is the average

25:33

painting job cost? What are the problems

25:34

that come up with painting jobs? Uh who

25:36

are who is the most expensive? Um how do

25:38

I upsell them? And you put together a

25:40

package that is like here is everything

25:42

that you think you need to know

25:44

data-wise on this job that I want. Like

25:46

you will be the 1%. Nobody preps for

25:49

anything anymore to the degree that you

25:51

need to execute. And so I don't think

25:53

you always have to do the job if you do

25:55

the preparation to show that you care

25:57

about the job. And just think about it

25:59

like how many times have we all had

26:00

people reach out to us and they're like,

26:02

I want to come work for you or I want to

26:04

come get this job and they're like, hey,

26:06

can I send you a video of XYZ and if I

26:09

do it then then you'll hire me or can I

26:11

do a sales pitch for you? You know what

26:14

you should actually do? Make the video.

26:16

Make the video. Put together an entire

26:18

prep document. Put together a strategy

26:20

document on why I should hire you. And

26:22

make it so that it is almost impossible

26:24

for somebody to say no to you because it

26:26

shows how obsessed you are in a world of

26:28

super curious, uninterested, not that

26:30

deep obsession. And I've hired God, I

26:33

probably hired 15, 20 people solely

26:35

because obsession is rare and competence

26:38

is rare. And if you can show those two

26:40

things, you can be people who have been

26:42

doing it for 20 years. Because I know

26:44

many painters. We we own one of the

26:45

bigger painting franchises in the

26:47

country and I know very many painters

26:49

that have all the experience but they

26:51

don't know how to properly communicate

26:53

it and show the preparation that they've

26:55

already done.

26:56

>> Let's talk about that because that's a a

26:57

function of really sales. I guess that's

27:00

sales that's marketing. Um, I was

27:02

mulling the other day because I've I've

27:03

just hired someone called Harry who's

27:04

our new head of happiness in our in

27:06

Flight Story. And she and she didn't

27:08

just make a seven-minute video. She also

27:11

sent the video via unsaturated, less

27:14

noisy channels. And it made me think

27:15

about this framework of the resonance of

27:18

the message and the high signalness of

27:22

the medium

27:23

>> because as you all know, you're getting

27:25

DMs from people that say, "Any jobs

27:27

going?" that's like low emotional

27:30

resonance and a terrible medium. So I

27:32

think of it as like this four sort of um

27:35

square quadrant where in the top right

27:36

of the quadrant you have message the

27:38

7-inute video but then figuring out how

27:40

to get it round back past the PAS not

27:43

into the saturated inboxes maybe into

27:45

the post. I think post is so like

27:47

unbelievably unappreciated as a medium

27:50

in a world of like laziness where nobody

27:52

wants to like go to the post box. you

27:54

you're all on the receiving ends of

27:55

thousands of DMs and messages a month

27:57

and sometimes some of them get through.

28:00

Sometimes some of them result in someone

28:02

being offered a job or you investing in

28:04

their company. So if I'm listening at

28:05

home and I'm thinking, okay, I've got

28:06

four people here who get thousands of

28:08

DMs. What is the secret that penetrates

28:10

your your fortresses?

28:12

>> I would be careful reaching out to

28:14

people who get who have millions of

28:15

followers because it's hard for you if

28:17

you've never had millions of followers

28:19

um or even hundreds of thousands of

28:20

followers. It's it would blow most

28:22

people's minds just how much traffic is

28:26

moving on in the background on any given

28:28

day. There are plenty of people who have

28:30

10,000 followers or 20,000 followers or

28:32

they've got a very successful business.

28:34

They don't get a,000 emails a day. They

28:36

get maybe a thousand emails a year. So

28:39

there's a there's something that you can

28:40

reach out with which is called a proof

28:41

story which you mentioned. And the

28:43

format that I like to use is I did

28:45

something special. I recently worked

28:47

with a extremely famous uh YouTuber

28:51

>> um who has over 22 million followers

28:54

>> and we were able to spin out a new

28:56

business

28:57

>> um which became very very successful and

29:00

exitable

29:01

>> um and that business uh got you know 10

29:05

million worth of revenue in the first

29:06

six months uh and I project managed the

29:08

whole thing and I can explain exactly

29:10

how we did that step by step. So that

29:11

the format is I did something special

29:13

with a certain type of person. We got a

29:16

great result. Here's what the result was

29:17

and here's how I can explain it step by

29:19

step.

29:19

>> And what's in that for me or am I making

29:21

the the link?

29:21

>> So I'm reaching out to you with my proof

29:23

story. Yeah.

29:24

>> So I'm telling you this is this is what

29:25

I've done

29:26

>> and are you asking me for something?

29:27

>> I'm saying would you like to know how we

29:28

did it step by step? Now the other way

29:30

we can do this that works pretty well is

29:33

to do this in the public domain. So, for

29:35

example, you could reach out by actually

29:37

posting a video or a or a post on

29:39

LinkedIn or on Instagram or um or on uh

29:43

X. And what you can do is have five,

29:46

six, seven, eight friends who then jump

29:48

in and start commenting on it. Now, for

29:50

me personally, if you've tagged me in

29:52

something in the public domain and

29:53

people are now commenting it, so that

29:55

the the the the thing might be I've got

29:57

a little bit of advice for Daniel

29:59

Priestley

30:00

>> and I go, oo, what's going on here?

30:02

Right? And then I see that there's a

30:03

public video and I see several people

30:05

commenting on it. And then I look at the

30:07

video and it's a proof story and it's

30:09

really complimentary. I really like your

30:10

stuff and here's what here's going and

30:12

here's the here's my proof story. And by

30:14

the way, Daniel, I'd love to get in

30:15

touch. Drop me a DM. I'm I'm going to

30:18

check that out because it's in the

30:19

public domain

30:20

>> because

30:21

>> well because it could be negative. It

30:22

could be

30:25

>> like I don't know.

30:27

>> I want to know what the heck's what

30:28

what's being said there, right? I I

30:30

think the real thing is don't confuse

30:32

famous with rich. Like you guys

30:35

shouldn't care about us and reaching out

30:37

to us. There are people that are richer

30:39

than all of us even though we all have

30:41

some means as far as I understand. There

30:43

are people that are way richer than us

30:44

that nobody knows that nobody's reaching

30:47

out to that want to give you their

30:49

money. And so I think a lot of people

30:50

spend time focusing on fame as opposed

30:52

to rich. And when you're young, who

30:54

cares? Like you can't eat fame. Fame is

30:56

not lasting. We will all be totally

30:59

irrelevant probably sooner than we even

31:01

want to

31:01

>> speak for some

31:04

>> like and subscribe.

31:06

>> Alex will be remembered in 500.

31:08

>> So like it, you know, for young people,

31:11

I do think sometimes uh because we get

31:13

DMs, we think that it's important, but

31:15

if you're watching this, you should

31:16

really be obsessed with just making

31:18

money and then you can be sitting at a

31:19

table like this and not worry about, you

31:22

know, slipping into our DMs. I mean, the

31:23

richest guy that you know probably

31:25

started a sprinkler head company, lives

31:27

down your street in a big house, and if

31:28

you went and asked knocked on his door

31:30

and asked him how he made it, and if you

31:32

could do a service for him, he would

31:33

probably let you.

31:35

>> So true.

31:35

>> I wouldn't mess around with famous

31:37

people.

31:37

>> The people that gave me my first leg up

31:39

in the world of business were no one.

31:41

They didn't have followers.

31:42

>> They were some guy who had built a

31:44

business similar in the city and was now

31:45

living out in Monaco, living an isolated

31:47

life. It was someone who'd sold some

31:48

kind of company was running uh you know

31:50

some kind of marketing business but and

31:52

they were at that level. They were

31:53

probably at the $50 million level in

31:56

terms of net worth and they were

31:57

delighted to have an email from me

31:58

tickling their ego

32:00

>> of course

32:00

>> and saying that I was reading their blog

32:02

etc.

32:03

>> Yeah.

32:03

>> It's very exhausting to do the very deep

32:05

level of work that you do in order to

32:06

get a high level client and then have no

32:08

response. Right. That can be that can be

32:10

really you know extinguishing from a

32:11

behavior perspective. But if you do that

32:13

work for, you know, Steven Bartlett and

32:16

then you make the post and you say,

32:18

"Hey, this is this like I'm a XYZ, you

32:20

know, whatever designer and I've worked

32:21

with these types of clients and let me

32:23

just show you my breakdown of what I

32:24

would do. I think his stuff's awesome.

32:26

This is just some stuff I would do." And

32:28

then I tag you, then I'll probably like

32:31

things is enough people will see that

32:33

that you'll get it sent to you from

32:34

somebody else who you will answer the

32:36

response from messenger messaging type

32:37

perspective. like somebody whose DMs you

32:39

will open will be like, "Hey, I don't

32:40

know if you saw this

32:41

>> team member."

32:41

>> Right. Exactly. Um and you do respond to

32:44

them.

32:44

>> I do. Yeah.

32:46

>> And so all of a sudden it's like that's

32:47

actually how you can get in, but you

32:48

also get all the free exposure of the

32:50

work that you're doing. And then another

32:51

person who might not be you and it might

32:53

be me and saying, "Hey, I like Stephen

32:55

stuff too and I thought this was a

32:56

pretty good breakdown. Um hey, do you

32:58

have services?" Uh you know, in exchange

33:00

for money.

33:02

>> Yeah. I'm I'm nab that [ __ ] Um, and so

33:04

and so yeah, I actually actually really

33:06

like that perspective because it doubles

33:08

it allows the work that you do for your

33:09

lead magnets to basically double as

33:11

content and so doubles as promotion. And

33:13

so you get you kind of get multiple

33:14

bites of the app, which I think is

33:15

really uh good.

33:16

>> And I think if you do do it though, be

33:18

sure you're good because

33:20

>> because you know the truth of this

33:22

happens all the time with you and I. I

33:24

mean there we go back and forth because

33:26

people will say online like, I built

33:28

everything that Alex Formoszi owns. Can

33:30

I come work for you, Cody? Yeah, you

33:31

know, I received those emails, too. I

33:34

built

33:35

>> He'll have this. He has the same people.

33:37

You know, I built everything Cody has.

33:38

How? And then, you know, kind of

33:40

funnily, I'll be like, "God, I don't

33:42

remember that person ever working for

33:43

me." Like, did

33:45

>> did this actually happen? And so, I do

33:47

think this is just a little listen, you

33:49

got to hustle when you're young. You got

33:50

to do things you're going to cringe

33:51

about later. I am so on board for all of

33:53

that. But also remember that the world

33:55

is small, especially with people. pause

33:57

on that cuz I think this is an important

33:58

point is all the people that have had

34:00

the biggest net impact on my success, my

34:02

career in my team, they don't they don't

34:04

seem to have time to be telling the

34:06

world that they did everything.

34:08

>> Yeah.

34:08

>> I mean, Jack is a good example. Jack is

34:10

Jack was here from episode one of the

34:11

podcast, but Jack in my view is doing

34:14

the like least personal branding,

34:17

milking the cow, and he's in my view

34:20

arguably the most responsible

34:21

>> Yeah.

34:21

>> for all of this stuff. And there's

34:23

almost this inverse correlation between

34:24

someone that works for you for three

34:25

months and then builds a personal brand

34:27

off the back of that

34:28

>> and is on stage claiming, you know, the

34:30

success versus the people in the in the

34:32

trenches

34:33

>> in the circle. Yeah,

34:34

>> it's a it's a bit of a side point, but

34:35

um one of the things people are so

34:37

fascinated by is this idea of passive

34:38

income.

34:39

>> And I think I think they're fascinated

34:41

by it because it's a promise of big

34:43

returns for no work. And that's you talk

34:46

about offers a lot. That's like the

34:48

perfect offer.

34:49

>> Yeah.

34:51

What what's your what's your thoughts on

34:52

passive income, Alex, and is it

34:54

something we should be aspiring for?

34:56

>> So, um, first I think it'd be helpful

34:58

for everyone to even define in terms of

35:01

how to think about passive income versus

35:02

active income. So, one is that people

35:04

often discuss it in binary terms,

35:06

passive versus actum, when it's really

35:07

more of a continuum of how passive is it

35:09

versus how active is it? And that way it

35:11

becomes way less black and white. When I

35:13

think about passive versus active, um,

35:15

when people are starting out, I

35:16

generally just discard it entirely

35:18

because they typically don't have

35:19

sufficient capital in order to actually

35:21

make meaningful passive income and they

35:22

would get significantly higher returns

35:24

on increasing their active income. And

35:25

virtually every extremely rich person

35:27

who self-made as my asterisk generally

35:29

has gigantic active income and only

35:31

begins to look at passive when they have

35:33

so much money from reinvesting in their

35:34

higher return things, which is what got

35:36

them this very large active income that

35:38

they're like, where else should I put

35:39

it? And then at that point it's really a

35:41

question of diversification which is

35:42

like how much more do I not want to

35:43

double down on the main thing and that's

35:45

a completely personal question and I

35:46

don't there is no in my opinion there's

35:48

no right answer to that um of because

35:50

that's a fundamental like how much risk

35:51

do I want to take um which I see is

35:53

entirely personal but I'll give you a

35:55

very a real example of like an

35:57

investment I made you know 5 years ago

35:59

which was um we did ex exited the

36:02

business um and I had more time on my

36:04

hands and I was like okay well why don't

36:07

I just start spending you a couple

36:09

million bucks a year on making content.

36:12

Now, that had basically zero return in

36:14

that time period, but if I were to look

36:16

at the return on capital for that, you

36:17

know, $2 million a year I did for the

36:19

first few years compared to today was

36:20

probably the highest return capital that

36:22

I made. But is that was that a passive?

36:24

No, it's definitely not passive. It was

36:25

100% active in from an investing

36:27

perspective. And so, this is when people

36:28

are like, what do you mean by investing

36:29

yourself? I mean that right like you're

36:31

investing in either the skills that

36:32

you're acquiring the businesses that

36:34

that you have and a very simple

36:36

investment a lot of times uh can get you

36:38

ideally leverage on your time and so I

36:41

would rather think for the person who's

36:42

starting out not like how do I make this

36:44

passive I would say how do I get more

36:45

leverage on my active and so like I

36:48

could start by shoveling snow in the

36:50

beginning and then once I save up enough

36:51

of my shekels then I'll buy a snow

36:53

blower and all of a sudden I can go from

36:54

doing you know one driveway an hour to

36:57

doing three driveways an hour and then

36:58

boom I tripled my income. Now, for that

37:00

one week that my cash flow is down

37:01

because I had to buy the equipment, I'll

37:02

I'll have made less money, but then I'll

37:04

very quickly recoup it. Now, to the same

37:06

degree, that's in a capital expense from

37:07

an equipment perspective, but you can do

37:09

the same thing from a skills perspective

37:10

of I give a classic example of a

37:12

phabotamist as somebody who draws blood.

37:14

Um, in the US, I think they make

37:16

somewhere in the neighbor of like $25 an

37:17

hour or something like that. It doesn't

37:18

take very long in order to become a

37:19

phabotamist and it doesn't take a lot of

37:21

money. And so, you know, a couple weeks

37:22

you do the studies, you get your cert,

37:23

and then all of a sudden you take

37:24

minimum wage and as long as you're not

37:26

in San Francisco, you will have double

37:27

or tripled your earning capacity in just

37:29

a very short period of time. And so,

37:30

that's a very good return on capital.

37:32

And so, that's where I think about the

37:34

best investments for people who are

37:35

starting out who have call it sub

37:37

$10,000, sub maybe $25,000. It's like I

37:39

put all my money into how I get more

37:41

leverage on my active, which is either

37:42

going to be more skills or or more

37:44

actual physical equipment in order to

37:45

get returns on the skills I already

37:47

have.

37:48

>> Interesting. more leverage on my time.

37:52

>> I I personally like the idea of asset

37:54

income versus passive income. So if you

37:56

actually look at what's really going on

37:57

with passive income, it's that there is

37:59

a an asset and that asset is in some way

38:02

generating income. So for example, you

38:04

own a house and you get rental income or

38:06

you write a book and you've got

38:07

intellectual property and that

38:08

intellectual property generates a

38:09

royalty income. So first there's an

38:11

asset. Income follows assets. So the

38:13

first thing you need is an asset and

38:15

then you get the yield from the asset.

38:18

And there's traditional assets which are

38:21

very very good if you've already made

38:22

money or you already have money and you

38:24

want to park it somewhere and you want

38:25

to stay ahead of inflation.

38:27

>> Traditional assets are terrible for

38:29

trying to make money.

38:29

>> Give me an example of a traditional

38:31

asset in this definition.

38:32

>> Um I think of something like art, wine

38:34

and watches as more like a speculation

38:36

but or or perhaps a store of value. But

38:39

then there's something else which is

38:41

called a performance asset. And a

38:43

performance asset is typically

38:45

intellectual property, media, code, or

38:47

data. And when you have these

38:49

performance assets, if you can build

38:51

these, these are ones you don't have to

38:53

buy, you build them. So, for example,

38:54

you could write a book, and now you've

38:56

got intellectual property. You could

38:58

build a system like a a SAS platform.

39:00

Uh, and now that SAS platform is in some

39:03

way an asset, and you can rent that out

39:05

to to more people. uh you could build a

39:08

database of a thousand people and build

39:10

a relationship with those thousand

39:11

people and then every time you write one

39:12

email it goes out to a thousand people

39:14

and they've got a little newsletter. So

39:16

that's a performance asset. So typically

39:18

when you look at um the people around

39:20

this table we're actually got we we're

39:22

very lucky to have a lot of performance

39:24

assets big followings uh lots of media

39:27

and content um books that we've written.

39:30

So these are kind of like the

39:31

performance assets that anyone can

39:32

create. It used to be until very very

39:35

recently that you just couldn't build

39:38

assets like you couldn't. It was very

39:40

very difficult. But we live in this

39:42

magical moment where almost anyone with

39:45

a phone and a laptop can start creating

39:48

performance assets with intellectual

39:50

property, media, data, and code. And uh

39:52

and then you can basically start the

39:54

process of building those assets and and

39:56

then those assets produce more income.

39:58

>> Here's my conspiracy theory about

39:59

passive income. And uh I think that

40:04

passive income, it's a tax code, right?

40:05

It is a real thing. It exists. You pay

40:07

less money to the government if you have

40:09

passive income than active income. Like

40:11

that's where the word comes from. But I

40:13

think the reason that it's been so

40:14

idealized is because there's an entire

40:17

industry where people have told all of

40:20

us for decades that they are better at

40:22

managing our money than we are. That's

40:25

the mutual fund industry, that's the

40:26

investment industry, that's the real

40:27

estate industry, that's the private

40:29

equity industry. and they have said we

40:31

are uh professionals and thus we will

40:33

charge you 2 and 20. We'll charge you uh

40:35

an investment fee on top of your assets

40:37

for you to give us the professionals

40:39

your money to beat inflation over time.

40:42

The problem is is that to your point

40:45

they will never make you wealthy.

40:46

Investing overtime in those assets are

40:48

are great for beating inflation or

40:50

making sure you have downside protection

40:52

for your cash over time in order to

40:54

allow it to grow and have

40:55

diversification. But they're very bad if

40:57

you want to get rich. If you want to get

40:58

rich, you're not going to get rich in

41:00

mutual funds and sitting it in somebody

41:02

else's private equity fund. The people

41:04

who get rich off those things, they do

41:06

the active income. They're the ones who

41:08

are running the private equity fund.

41:10

They're the ones that are running the

41:11

private equity companies and they're the

41:12

ones that are running the real estate.

41:14

And so there's this fascinating world we

41:17

live in actually where people think that

41:18

it is better and more sophisticated to

41:22

not teach you how to become capable of

41:25

running your own business and creating

41:26

active income, but that instead uh

41:29

you're more sophisticated if you're on

41:31

Wall Street. And and so I think that

41:33

passive income was actually in a lot of

41:34

ways a way for the wealthy class to gain

41:37

a lot of our assets.

41:39

>> But people click it. And this is why

41:41

there's a generation of younger people

41:42

as well that are obsessed with trying to

41:44

figure out how to make passive income.

41:46

It's it's it's clickbait, isn't it?

41:48

>> I think it's forex trading,

41:49

>> but I think it's almost deeper than

41:51

that. I think it is actually that um it

41:53

sounds, you know, if Alex says this, I

41:56

say it too, but like invest in yourself.

41:58

People are like, "What does that mean?

41:59

What do of course I'm trying to but how

42:00

do I invest in myself? That's hard. I

42:02

don't know exactly how to do it. What

42:04

are you trying to sell me courses or

42:06

tell me to buy your books or whatever?"

42:07

And that's the the reaction. But the

42:10

truth of the matter is is that you will

42:12

never be able to have the return on

42:14

investment in somebody else's asset that

42:16

you will in yourself. You just won't.

42:18

>> Okay. So, let's go on to that then.

42:19

Investing in yourself.

42:22

If you were starting out in your career

42:23

today without the skills that you have,

42:25

without the audience that you have, and

42:27

you had to choose how to invest in

42:29

yourself, what is that investment you

42:31

would make in yourself today in 2025?

42:35

>> I'm going to give two answers. So um so

42:38

I started at zero once and then I've

42:40

lost everything twice. And so I have the

42:42

I have done that three times now. Um

42:44

starting from zero without a reputation

42:46

um or money. And so um what I did in all

42:49

three times was the same thing which was

42:51

the first thing I did was I learned how

42:53

to advertise which is how to let people

42:54

know about the stuff I have. The second

42:56

thing I did was that I went to people

42:58

who had an existing business and I said,

43:00

"Hey, for as little as little money as

43:02

possible, what would you do to fulfill

43:04

your existing services

43:07

and then when someone uh I would then

43:09

use the advertising that I had, so at

43:10

the time it was Facebook ads. Um, I

43:12

would run ads and then I would sell

43:14

those leads into that business based on

43:16

the pre-determined price. And so let's

43:18

say it's a a chiropractor or for me it

43:20

was a gym. So I went to a gym owner. I

43:22

said, "What would you, you know, take

43:23

for a member?" And they said, you know,

43:26

we would actually take them for if you

43:27

can just bring them, you can keep the

43:28

money. We just want the customer for

43:30

free. And so I said, okay, well, the

43:32

first six weeks of the time that they

43:33

spend money with you is mine, and then

43:35

after that, they're all yours. And they

43:36

said, "That's fair." And so then I just

43:38

spent money and I sold into someone

43:39

else's business, and I kept everything

43:41

above the spread, which since the basis

43:43

was zero, I kept all of the money, and I

43:45

had zero cost of delivery. So literally,

43:47

it was just cash collected minus CAC,

43:49

all of that was profit. And so when I

43:52

started over from zero the third time,

43:55

um I was able to make $100,000 in the

43:57

first month when I needed it

43:58

>> because you had that skill of

43:59

advertising.

44:00

>> And so when we say like invest in

44:02

yourself, it's just a it's a it's a very

44:04

uh amorphous term, but fundamentally you

44:06

have to learn the the the skills of

44:08

generating money. And so you're going to

44:10

have to have some level of promotion.

44:11

You have to let people know about your

44:12

stuff, which is either be through

44:13

content, through paid ads, through

44:14

outreach, right? Or it's going to be

44:16

through affiliates. So somebody already

44:17

has an audience you negotiate some sort

44:18

of thing with. Honestly, so many

44:20

businesses, like you can go to a

44:21

chiropractor and say, "Hey, you know,

44:23

how little will you do 10 sessions for?"

44:24

And you'd be amazed if I say, "Hey, I

44:26

can bring you a hundred people. How

44:27

little can you do 10 sessions for?" They

44:28

might say 20 bucks a session. Now, I

44:30

might sell it for 200, but that's on me.

44:32

>> And I make my 90% spread. I don't have

44:33

to do anything. I just have to promote

44:35

and sell. And so, that is an example of

44:37

something that like I have done and did

44:39

do each of the times when I needed to

44:41

make money in the beginning when I had

44:42

nothing.

44:43

>> What skill that you currently have?

44:45

>> Yeah. would get you back to being a

44:47

hund00 million entrepreneur.

44:50

>> So, it's a really good question. I think

44:52

it's actually stacking skills. So, a lot

44:55

of a lot of times like when this

44:56

question gets asked um basically the

44:58

assumption is that you have to stay in

44:59

the same vehicle. And so, like the

45:01

fastest way to make $100,000 is not the

45:03

fastest way to make $10 million, but I

45:05

might make $10 million faster if I

45:07

started with $100,000. And so, if I have

45:09

zero, then I'm going to do something

45:11

that costs zero capital and is pure

45:12

skill, which is exactly what what that

45:14

was. right now to make let's say to

45:16

actually start running those ads I might

45:17

need $1,000. And so it's like I might

45:19

drive Uber for a,000 bucks, get my

45:21

thousand, then spend the,000 on ads to

45:23

make my 30,000 and during that process I

45:26

can reinvest that to get the hundred.

45:27

Okay, great. Now I've got the hundred.

45:28

Now with the hundred I can flip that

45:30

into and the key of each of those is

45:31

that none of those are really businesses

45:33

per se and that like I can just walk

45:34

away from them whenever. I don't have

45:36

ongoing delivery or ongoing commitments

45:38

and so that gives you a lot of

45:40

flexibility. And I mean, I think there

45:42

are a lot of entrepreneurs, at least the

45:43

ones that I know, um, have have had

45:45

these moments where they needed to

45:47

generate a lot of capital in a short

45:48

period of time and have a few kind of

45:50

like fast money skills that they don't

45:52

flex normally because there's there's

45:54

caps to them, right? What

45:56

>> I think is cool about entrepreneurship,

45:57

too, is we can all do it. You have to

45:59

find your unfair advantage. One of your

46:00

unfair advantages is you're very good at

46:02

paid promotion and getting to the

46:04

masses, right? That was never really my

46:07

unfair advantage. I think there's two

46:08

different ways you could do this. One

46:10

would be promotion. So, are you an

46:11

incredible salesperson to go direct to a

46:13

ton of people? The other way is

46:15

partnerships. And I think you can think

46:16

of these different ways. Promotion could

46:18

be BTOC often, which is like going

46:20

direct to consumer. Um, often

46:22

partnerships is B2B, going to a few big

46:25

people. Um, I think of partnerships as

46:27

employment, which is a very fast way

46:29

often to make money, too. Like Jack

46:31

might make way more millions with you

46:32

than he does individually. And so, my

46:34

background when I didn't have any cash,

46:36

I didn't know how to go to people

46:38

directly. I didn't know how to do paid

46:40

ads. I wasn't sure how to do promotion,

46:42

which is a volume game that you have to

46:44

be good at. So, I went towards

46:45

partnerships. I said, I can get to

46:47

fewer, bigger, faster. I can't get to

46:49

many fast. And so, I think there's like

46:52

two paths to making money quickly if you

46:55

don't have any. And and the first path

46:56

has less risk, but perhaps midsize

46:59

returns. And that is go find the best

47:01

entrepreneur, founder, business builder

47:03

you can find who you can still get to on

47:06

a daily basis in some way and go work

47:08

for them. Learn as much as you can, earn

47:10

as much as you can. As you learn more,

47:12

ask for more continuously over time.

47:14

This is how I mean Cheryl Sandberg is

47:16

one of the richest people in the world

47:17

and she's never had her own business,

47:18

right? She's only worked for other

47:19

people and she's doing just fine. So I

47:21

think that's the first way and that

47:22

would be what I would call partnerships

47:23

or employment. And then the second way

47:25

is to go do it yourself, right? which is

47:28

high risk but probably highest reward.

47:30

And in that instance, you have to go and

47:32

figure out how to get people to buy your

47:33

things continuously over over time. But

47:36

like when I didn't have money in the

47:37

beginning, um you know, I had just I had

47:40

gotten out of finance. I didn't want to

47:41

work for somebody else again. I was

47:43

pretty miserable. I had worked for a

47:45

billion hours for people in investment

47:46

banking and asset management. And uh I

47:49

had massive gold in handcuffs. Like I

47:51

made a lot of money. And um I had no

47:53

brilliant idea. I didn't have a business

47:55

idea. I had no idea what to do next and

47:57

I'm pretty riskaverse actually. I was

47:58

like way too scared to go do do what you

48:01

guys all did which is start businesses

48:02

from scratch. And so instead I partnered

48:05

up. I went to another company that

48:07

needed to raise capital and get a few

48:09

investments in it. And I went to them

48:10

and said, "I can raise money from a few

48:12

of these people that I know. If I do

48:14

that, can I negotiate a little bit of

48:15

equity in the company? Can I negotiate

48:17

upside return for the money and dollars

48:20

that I bring in? And I want to I want to

48:22

be a partner in the company." And so you

48:24

don't always have to start your own

48:25

thing. If you can negotiate with

48:27

partnerships, I think sometimes you can

48:28

skip to the front of the line if you're

48:30

not a great natural salesperson, you

48:33

know, or marketer. And so you really

48:34

just need to decide which one. And

48:36

neither of them are better than any

48:38

others. They're just better for you.

48:40

>> The amount of resources you have access

48:42

to is a factor of knowledge, network,

48:43

and reputation. So you're at all times

48:47

you're trying to build your knowledge.

48:48

You're trying to build your network.

48:49

You're trying to build your reputation.

48:51

A lot of people are worried about the

48:53

knowledge, but they've probably done

48:54

interesting things already in their

48:56

history. They probably if they looked

48:57

over the last 3, four, five years, they

48:59

could say, "Actually, I've done all

49:00

sorts of things, but I've never told

49:01

anyone about that, right? I've never

49:03

actually explain to I've never posted on

49:04

LinkedIn. I've never posted an update

49:06

telling people what I've done. So

49:08

therefore, I've actually got things that

49:09

could build a reputation, but I've never

49:11

leveraged that reputation." If you're a

49:14

young person, especially, network is

49:16

actually you've got a superpower with

49:17

network. And I'll tell you why. Because

49:20

if you go to a private bank that

49:22

normally banks people with 3 million,

49:24

but you say, "I want to be an

49:25

entrepreneur. I want to come to some of

49:26

your entrepreneur events that you host,

49:28

they'll bring you along cuz you're

49:29

you're an ambitious young person." If

49:31

you go to a large accounting firm and

49:33

say, "Do you ever host big events? Could

49:34

I attend some? Can I jump on a

49:36

newsletter that lets people know about

49:38

the events?" They'll invite you along.

49:39

And I'm talking about like Ernston Young

49:41

and KPMG. Every single week, they've got

49:43

some thing that they're doing in their

49:45

offices. They've got experts, they've

49:47

got rich people, they got all that sort

49:49

of stuff happening there and they'll

49:50

invite you along. So, you've got this

49:53

ability to build your network, you got

49:54

this ability to leverage uh your

49:56

reputation. I actually don't think that

50:00

you can make good decisions about the

50:02

knowledge on your own. I think you need

50:04

someone who's at the higher level to

50:06

tell you this is the skills you should

50:08

go for. These are the things you should

50:10

do. So, for example, at the time that

50:11

Alex did ads, it was a great time for

50:14

doing ads. But now fast forward to

50:16

today, it's probably better to study AI

50:18

and and to bring that to the table. So

50:21

sometimes those rep sometimes those

50:23

things change. So let's say you figure

50:25

out what is your reputation? What can

50:26

you talk about when you're in front of

50:28

people, you go networking, you go to a

50:30

few of these events, you outreach, you

50:32

get yourself in front of some people,

50:33

and you actually ask the question, what

50:35

kind of skills do I need? What what sort

50:36

of um I need to build my skills? I need

50:38

to build my knowledge. What do you think

50:39

would be a valuable thing uh to do?

50:41

because people who are at that next

50:43

level up, they're they're noticing what

50:45

they what they need. Uh they're noticing

50:47

what's hot, what's not. Um so they're

50:49

going to be able to teach you or or

50:51

guide you. And and um to Cody's point,

50:54

you know, you you want to have a mentor

50:55

in your life. You want to have someone

50:56

who's who's been there, done it. You

50:58

want to, you know, partner with a bigger

51:00

organization and get some of those.

51:02

Before Kim Kardashian was Kim

51:04

Kardashian, she was Paris Hilton's uh

51:06

assistant and she learned the playbook

51:09

for being famous for being famous. and

51:10

then she took it to a new level. Took it

51:12

to a new level. So she she uh she did an

51:15

apprenticeship and then she applied the

51:16

apprenticeship.

51:17

>> One of the things that all of us have in

51:19

common is we make content and it's

51:23

almost a bit of an elephant in the room

51:24

that no one's no one's really doubled

51:26

down on when I asked what what you guys

51:27

think is the most sort of like

51:28

undervalued skill or the best place to

51:29

invest in yourself. I was actually

51:30

expecting you all to say start making

51:32

content for a variety of reasons. Not

51:34

just because you want to build an

51:35

audience so you have more customers, but

51:37

actually

51:38

>> and I can see it on all of you. It's

51:39

helped you to think better.

51:41

>> It's helped you to communicate better.

51:42

It's helped you to sell better. When you

51:44

get that chance to sit down with that

51:45

investor or that rich person, you said a

51:47

second ago, you said earlier that if I'd

51:49

sat old Alex here, one of the big

51:51

differences is this one's much more

51:53

focused, concise, articulate. So, I'm

51:56

wondering what you guys think of that

51:57

content as a undervalued,

51:59

underappreciated skill in the world

52:00

we're heading in.

52:01

>> If I'm starting to today rather than

52:03

when I had, you know, zero, there's

52:05

still a huge amount of attention that

52:06

sits on social media, if not more. And

52:09

there's even more demand for content now

52:12

than there was. And so you can supply

52:14

that and get compensated for it. And

52:15

you'll have to do repetitions for a

52:17

period of time until eventually you get

52:18

good. And then you can develop an

52:19

audience and then you obviously can sell

52:20

things to them.

52:21

>> I think um content content's a little

52:24

bit of an interesting one because

52:26

content works when you've got

52:27

intellectual property to leverage. So I

52:29

remember Alex popped onto my screen the

52:31

first time and he says, "I've sold my

52:33

company for $40 million and I've got

52:35

nothing to sell you. I'm just going to

52:36

tell you how I did it." Cody's the same.

52:37

She's like, uh, you know, I, uh, I was

52:40

working at Goldman Sachs, but then I

52:42

left Goldman Sachs to earn more money

52:44

through laundromats. I'm like, that's

52:46

interesting. That's fascinating. Right.

52:48

So, I'm going to watch that content

52:49

because there's some interesting

52:50

intellectual property there. Um, my

52:52

channel took off when I started talking

52:53

about I've done seven startups that went

52:55

zero to a million in the first 12

52:57

months. So, it's that ability to have

53:00

some intellectual property that people

53:01

are going to want to get to. I can think

53:04

of a bunch of examples of creators that

53:06

hadn't done anything but their ideas

53:09

were the value. So if you think of

53:11

someone like George Mack or even James

53:12

CLA or lots of other of these sort of

53:15

like J Shetty online writers who

53:18

>> J Shetty had a great one which was uh

53:20

I've got monk wisdom for the modern

53:22

world

53:22

>> and we've got Ali Abdal I left the I

53:25

quit being a doctor to be a YouTuber. M

53:28

>> so there's these little hooks that work

53:30

and

53:30

>> does everyone have a you don't have to

53:32

have sold a business for tens of

53:33

millions or made millions

53:35

>> from I think there's some intellectual

53:36

property that you've got but bear in

53:38

mind that there was a different time

53:40

where you could just burst onto the

53:41

scene and we now have AI generated

53:44

content so if you imagine like airplanes

53:46

and they're at the airport and the fog

53:48

rolls in and if you're on the ground

53:50

it's very hard to take off but if you're

53:52

already up in the air it's very easy to

53:53

stay up in the air and it's kind of like

53:55

the AI content that's coming in is is

53:57

that fog Right? There's just going to be

53:59

thousands of AI generated content pieces

54:02

just flooding onto everyone's feed. And

54:04

if you don't have a really good hook,

54:06

you're just not going to drown out that

54:08

noise.

54:08

>> You guys must all be thinking about

54:09

this.

54:10

>> I have I have so much I'm all right. All

54:12

right. So So

54:14

one thing I think everyone has to decide

54:15

on if they're going to start making

54:16

content is am I an entertainer or am I

54:17

an educator? Right. Right off the bat.

54:19

And so I think AI content for sure will

54:20

have tremendous leverage on

54:22

entertainment more so than education

54:24

because the big underlying thing that

54:25

Daniel's hitting at is that you have to

54:27

have proof, right? Like like an AI

54:29

avatar cannot come in and say I sold my

54:31

company for free. They can't. They

54:32

didn't do anything because they don't

54:33

exist in the real world. Which is why in

54:35

my opinion like the absolute foolproof

54:37

method for making educational content is

54:39

dop Epic [ __ ] and then talk about the

54:40

epic [ __ ] you did. Period. And so like I

54:42

um so yes I'm in you know I'm in LA.

54:44

Yesterday we also um we had the school

54:46

games winners come out schools platform

54:48

that hosts online communities and the

54:49

winner of the last school games. So 90

54:51

days he got to like 300 and something

54:53

thousand a month from a YouTube uh

54:55

channel that he started 16 months ago.

54:56

So he started 16 months ago making

54:58

videos about AI. Now what was his

55:00

interesting thing? So he was just always

55:02

into AI learned about the tools and then

55:05

he started helping small businesses for

55:07

like $1,500 $2,500 a month where he

55:09

would just help them implement these

55:10

automations that would save them money

55:11

and time. And then people were like well

55:12

how did you do that? And so he just

55:14

basically would just explain each of the

55:15

automations that he made for each of

55:17

these businesses on his channel. And he

55:18

made one video a day explaining one of

55:19

the automations. And then he said, "If

55:22

you want I have a group that's whatever

55:23

$300, $400 a month that shows you how to

55:25

build the same automations." To your

55:27

point about the education is like you

55:28

just need some proof. And it doesn't

55:31

like you don't have to like the bigger

55:32

the proof you have the wider basically

55:34

the wider TAM you'll be able to reach

55:36

because more people be I'll just put the

55:38

words impressed. if you just are in your

55:40

20s and to be fair, you just quit

55:42

Goldman Sachs. It's like that is enough

55:44

of a thing that because that's it's a 1%

55:46

type deal, right? But you can also you

55:48

can 1% through achievement. But the

55:50

other side that I think people widely

55:52

underestimate is you can 1% through

55:53

volume of work. So if I said I read 200

55:56

books last year,

55:58

>> let me show you the 200. They're all

56:00

dog, you know, dogeared. Let me tell you

56:02

what I learned. Like I'd be like, well

56:03

shoot. Because I think everybody wants a

56:05

bargain on time, right? Like I went on a

56:06

100 speed dates. this is what I learned.

56:09

It's like, well, I don't want to go on

56:11

100 dates, but like anyone can do that.

56:12

So, it's either 1% achievement or 1%

56:14

effort, but this one you can do. And

56:16

even if you have zero outcome, there's

56:18

still stuff that you'll learn. And then

56:19

that will people find interesting that

56:21

you can build an audience around. And if

56:22

you do that enough times, eventually you

56:24

do achieve something that is

56:25

interesting. And then that kind of

56:26

becomes permanent. But at the end of the

56:27

day, like proof always beats promise. I

56:28

>> I also think anybody can go viral online

56:31

with one of two things. We've talked a

56:33

lot about experience. So if you do have

56:34

experience, if you built a billion

56:36

dollar and assets under management

56:37

business, gone to Goldman, built seven

56:40

startups, that's incredible. That's not

56:42

normal. That's totally fine. But that

56:43

means that you could just have the

56:46

everyday other e of starting the

56:49

experience. I think we we obsess on

56:51

expertise. Expertise is the way to make

56:53

content online and make millions. But

56:55

what about just the experience? You

56:56

could say, "Actually, I've done nothing.

56:58

I'm a college dropout. I've [ __ ]

56:59

around a lot. I don't have much figured

57:01

out, but over the next year, I'm gonna

57:02

try to make a million dollars. And you

57:04

can go just as viral, if not more. I

57:06

mean, a good example would be like Ryan

57:07

Tran, who who I love, who's in Austin,

57:10

Texas, too. And Ryan is just like, I'm

57:11

trying stuff, and this might fail and I

57:13

have no idea, and you guys can come

57:14

along. The proof could actually be you

57:17

just trying a thing and it not working

57:19

one way or the other. And so I think the

57:21

only problem with this type which is

57:23

experience as opposed to expertise is

57:25

that with expertise you have attention

57:27

and intention aka intent to buy whereas

57:30

if you're just experiencing thing you

57:32

might have attention but what are you

57:33

going to sell because you don't have

57:35

like a value derived from it where's

57:37

your intent I mean if you think about

57:39

who are the biggest creators online

57:42

only fans the Kardashians you know what

57:44

are the biggest websites online porn

57:46

sites that's a lot of attention but the

57:49

intent to buy is going to be low for any

57:51

of those over time at large. And so I

57:54

think you have to ask yourself, okay, if

57:55

I get a ton of attention, let's make

57:57

sure I'm really thoughtful on what I get

57:58

attention for. And then let's think

58:00

about once I have that attention, where

58:02

do I actually have some sort of

58:03

expertise or value that I can trade in

58:05

order for people to have an intent to

58:07

buy? And I think about it like this.

58:09

Rihanna, huge star, right? Big

58:12

celebrity, billionaire now because of

58:14

Fenty Beauty. Drake, giant celebrity,

58:17

arguably more views, more hits than

58:19

Rihanna, worth one, one six, 1/8 what

58:22

Rihanna is worth. Why? Because he has

58:24

ton of sub attention, but he hasn't

58:26

actually done much to get intent to buy

58:28

from him. And so Rihanna's just

58:31

categorically better, if we define

58:33

better as bank account and scoreboard on

58:37

uh net worth, than Drake is at

58:39

monetizing their intention. And so, um,

58:42

I think that a lot of creators online

58:45

think too much about views, likes,

58:47

subscribes, and don't think very much

58:49

about how do I monetize on top of this

58:51

because nobody stays relevant forever

58:53

online. And so, I think while you're in

58:55

the spotlight, you do have to think

58:56

about how you going to convert that

58:57

funnel in some way.

58:58

>> That's a really great point. A lot of

59:00

the people you see blowing up online,

59:01

they do have a backend that monetizes it

59:04

because to your point, it costs money.

59:06

you know, I probably spend 40 50,000 a

59:08

month just on retainers of people who

59:11

are working on that stuff and

59:13

>> content.

59:14

>> Yeah. Content related stuff and you know

59:17

because I have businesses that can

59:18

monetize that then it it worth doing but

59:20

it's hard to compete with that if you

59:22

don't have a back end. The the other

59:24

option is to work with someone who does

59:26

have a business and they do have

59:28

experience. they do have something to

59:30

talk about, but they're busy and they

59:31

need someone to project manage this

59:33

because one thing that's happened is

59:35

that to the traditional business owner,

59:37

this personal brand thing and this

59:40

building a content empire uh that builds

59:42

your business, this is brand new to a

59:44

lot of people. So, there are plenty of

59:46

people who've got a $50 million a year

59:47

business and they're going, "Oh, should

59:49

I show up online at all? Maybe I

59:52

should." and they're just starting to

59:54

tiptoe into the water and they've got a

59:56

story, they've got a back-end business,

59:57

they can monetize it, they can allocate

59:59

budget to it, you could be the person

60:00

who does that and you'd be, if you did

60:02

do that, you would be one of the very

60:04

special people in their life. Um, I had

60:06

a guy come to me a couple of years ago

60:08

and said, "Daniel, I just cannot believe

60:10

you've written five books at the time.

60:13

You've got seven different companies.

60:15

You've got all this stuff going on and

60:16

you've got a few thousand followers and

60:19

I've had a look online. You get like

60:21

10,000 views a month." And I'm like,

60:23

"Yeah, but I'm busy. I'm running my

60:25

businesses." And he came to me and said,

60:27

"I will project manage you into the

60:29

millions per month." And he just

60:30

literally picked this up, a guy called

60:32

Martin, right? And he just said, "I I'm

60:33

going to do this and I'm going to turn

60:35

up at your house, do a day of filming

60:36

every month. I'm going to edit it. I'm

60:38

going to chop it all up. I'm going to do

60:39

all this stuff and I'll project manage

60:42

the whole thing." Now, the two of us are

60:44

very uh close now. We've got a good

60:45

relationship. And he's now got an idea

60:47

for an AI startup, and I'm going to back

60:49

that. Every single one of you watching

60:52

this right now has something to offer,

60:53

whether it's knowledge or skills or

60:54

experience. And that means you have

60:56

value. Stands, the platform I co-own,

60:59

who are one of the sponsors of this

61:00

podcast, turns your knowledge into a

61:02

business through one single click. You

61:05

can sell digital products, coaching,

61:06

communities, and you don't need any

61:08

coding experience either, just the drive

61:10

to start. This is a business I really

61:13

believe in. And already $300 million has

61:16

been earned by creators, coaches, and

61:17

entrepreneurs just like you have the

61:19

potential to be on Stan's store. These

61:20

are people who didn't wait, who heard me

61:22

saying things like this, and instead of

61:24

procrastinating, started building, then

61:25

launched something and now they're

61:27

getting paid to do it. Stan is

61:29

incredibly simple and incredibly easy.

61:30

And you can link it with a Shopify store

61:32

that you're already using if you want

61:33

to. I'm on it and so is my girlfriend

61:35

and many of my team. So, if you want to

61:37

join, start by launching your own

61:38

business with a free 30-day trial. Visit

61:41

stephvenbartlet.stan. stan.store and get

61:44

yours set up within minutes.

61:46

>> If you guys were starting from zero

61:47

today

61:48

>> with AI in the picture and all of these

61:50

platforms and the way things are going,

61:52

I I spent I've spent a lot of time

61:54

thinking about the next big opportunity

61:56

in content and I think about the next

61:57

big platform. Where would you be

62:00

starting today based on who you guys are

62:03

and the skills that you have and the

62:05

things you're interested in is probably

62:06

a better way of saying it. Would you be

62:08

on LinkedIn posting once a day? Would

62:09

you be on Tik Tok making videos? Would

62:11

you be on YouTube starting a channel?

62:13

Would you start a newsletter?

62:15

And with AI in the picture, I think it

62:16

changes the answer because content is

62:19

going to become very easy to make. So

62:21

where does the value acrew to? Like

62:23

where does the value move to in a world

62:25

where every kid a kid in Mumbai could

62:27

make uh a real or a quote picture now

62:30

with Chat Gyt? So where is the value

62:32

going to acrew and how are you going to

62:34

milk that cow? How are you going to

62:36

capitalize? Like what is the one thesis

62:38

you have about the future of content

62:39

that you haven't told anybody yet? Tell

62:42

me.

62:44

>> Well,

62:44

>> I'll tell you mine. I'll tell you mine.

62:45

>> I want to ask a question too for

62:47

everybody at the end of I'll give you my

62:48

my quick thing. One, I will say like um

62:50

and I'd be curious if you all agree.

62:52

When I first started making content, um

62:55

most people that I knew thought it was

62:56

really cringe. Actually, they're like uh

62:58

why would you make content? If you've

62:59

actually had any success that you

63:01

supposed to have had, why would you be

63:03

so idiotic as to be on the internet

63:05

making content, it can't be true that

63:07

you've done these things if you're

63:09

making Tik Toks all day? And um and I

63:11

think they totally miss the boat that

63:13

like the 21st century concern uh

63:15

currency is attention and attention

63:17

could be bought with ads or attention

63:19

could be bought in a different way but

63:21

through organic content creation. And so

63:23

you go like cringe to content to

63:25

conversion. And actually, I think all of

63:27

us would probably agree it was a pretty

63:28

good play, but like I'm sure Did you

63:30

guys all get laughed at when you first

63:31

got on the internet?

63:32

>> Of course.

63:32

>> Yeah. Right.

63:33

>> Never.

63:35

>> Like still get laughed at now.

63:36

>> I still get I still get laughed at. So

63:39

like I just want to prepare. If you get

63:40

online, be prepared. People will think

63:41

you're idiotic and

63:42

>> and your friends the shedding period

63:45

where you transition to

63:46

>> 100%. And and people who are serious for

63:49

whatever reason have not figured out

63:51

that there is a huge arbitrage

63:52

opportunity with being known. Even if

63:55

even if you don't care about the views

63:56

and all I have as something that's a

63:58

differentiator is that if I ping Stephen

64:00

you'll respond to me because I am

64:03

somehow I have some prefence online.

64:04

Same with Alex, you know, right with all

64:06

of us. And so one I just want to say

64:07

that up front because it will suck. You

64:09

know, I'm in these creator groups and at

64:11

some point it just happened yesterday.

64:13

I'm in a group with like some of the

64:14

biggest creators in the world and uh all

64:16

of them were listening. I mean maybe 50

64:18

responses of a moment where um everybody

64:21

hated them on the internet. it was super

64:23

dark. You know, they couldn't stop

64:25

watching and reading the comments and

64:27

they felt like there was like a fight

64:29

orflight situation from a bunch of

64:30

strangers. And so, I think it's worth

64:32

just saying content can have a little

64:34

bit of a downside and you got to like

64:35

protect against that, but like also go

64:38

full [ __ ] bore into it because who

64:39

cares? Uh, you'll be forgotten anyways.

64:42

And, um,

64:43

>> embarrassment is the price of entry as

64:44

they say.

64:45

>> Yeah.

64:45

>> And we've all all faced that and had to

64:47

go through that to get to the other

64:48

side. Now, I want your content secret.

64:50

We talk about social media and I think

64:52

um there's been a lot of talk about it

64:54

shifting really more towards interest

64:55

media rather than social media. Right.

64:56

So I think this is extremely important

64:58

because what what Cody was referencing

65:00

earlier is again entertainment versus ed

65:03

education. And so Rihanna and Drake I

65:05

see both as entertainers. Now what's

65:08

interesting is that where do they have

65:09

influence? So she used the word intent

65:11

but fundamentally I say like how do we

65:13

increase the likelihood that someone

65:14

complies with a request or complies with

65:16

a solicitation. Right? Right? If I tell

65:17

you to do something one, I mean, we've

65:19

all seen some creators who have tiny

65:20

audiences, but if they say, "Hey, go do

65:21

this thing." You know, they have 100%,

65:23

not really 100, but they have a huge

65:24

conversion on a very small audience. And

65:25

then other people, you know, I can name

65:27

some Tik Tockers right now that have,

65:28

you know, 50 plus million uh followers

65:30

that have had 13 failed launches because

65:33

they have views, but they have zero

65:35

influence. No one listens to them for

65:37

their advice.

65:38

>> And so, um, in order to create

65:41

influence, there's four things. So,

65:42

number one is, and so I just remember

65:44

SPCL, right? So, you have status. So

65:46

somebody who controls scarce resources.

65:48

So a bartender at a bar, there's alcohol

65:50

behind them. It's a scarce resource. In

65:51

the bar, they have status. When they

65:52

walk outside of the bar, no one cares

65:53

about them. But in the bar, they have

65:55

status, right? So that get so they give

65:56

influence. The second is power. And so

65:59

power is basically um say do

66:02

correspondence, meaning if I tell you to

66:04

do something, follow these instructions,

66:05

and a good thing happens, then you I

66:07

I'll increase the likelihood that you

66:08

comply with requests in the future. And

66:10

so like for example, Martha Stewart uh

66:13

was the first self-made female

66:14

billionaire. And I think there's there's

66:15

a huge amount of reasons for that. And

66:16

one of the biggest ones is that she

66:18

literally gave people recipes and they

66:20

followed their recipes and they had a

66:22

good thing happen. And then people told

66:23

them they were great and this cake was

66:25

great and this lasagna was amazing.

66:27

Their family, their friends, they got

66:28

they also got status. So a massive good

66:30

thing happened after following explicit

66:31

directions. And so then when she said

66:33

follow my next directions and by this

66:34

thing, people said okay the last 10

66:36

times I did it, it worked. I'll do this

66:38

too. And so that's why she had so much

66:40

influence. The next is credibility,

66:42

which is do you have proof? Right? Now,

66:45

all of these can um happen at the same

66:47

time or separately. So, I'm trying to

66:48

give more isolated examples for each of

66:49

them, but like one thing can check

66:51

multiple boxes. So, if I say, "Hey, I

66:52

sold a company for $46.2 million." I

66:54

have money, which is where the status

66:55

comes from, but I also have credibility

66:57

that the stuff that I do works. I

66:59

wouldn't have power yet though until I

67:01

say, "Hey, if you take what you're

67:03

currently doing and then add a bonus,

67:05

urgency, scarcity, a guarantee, you

67:06

know, think about a value equation, all

67:08

of a sudden you can sell it for way more

67:10

money." And then you followed those

67:11

instructions and then you do make more

67:12

money. Then you're like now I'll be more

67:15

likely to comply with this person's

67:16

requests in the future. And so then that

67:17

person gains influence. And then the the

67:19

fourth L is likeness, right? Do they

67:21

look like me, right? Do they act like

67:22

me? Which is both, you know, physical

67:24

but also psychographic. Like do they

67:25

have they share the same values as me?

67:26

Are they similar? And so if I have two

67:28

people that both have SPC, so they have

67:30

status, they have power, they have

67:31

credibility, and then one of them just

67:33

also looks like me, I'm more likely to

67:34

listen to that person. So each of these

67:35

are additives. So if you have all four,

67:36

you'll be more influential, right? And

67:38

so, um, lading this back up to

67:40

conversion, we think, okay, well, if I'm

67:42

going to make content with the purpose

67:44

of conversion, then I want to make stuff

67:46

that demonstrates these four things,

67:48

right? And so, that is why educators

67:49

typically have significantly smaller

67:50

audiences, but can usually

67:52

>> generate a lot more money than

67:54

entertainers can. And entertainers

67:55

typically can monetize almost

67:57

exclusively through sponsorships as the

67:58

most efficient means or vehicle. Now,

68:00

where does an entertainer have

68:02

influence? Rihanna is beautiful and so

68:07

she does have credibility in terms of

68:10

beauty. She does have um and then

68:13

especially if she starts making content

68:14

around that stuff, she takes her

68:16

entertainment audience but she's talking

68:17

about something she has credibility to

68:18

and then she can add power to that

68:20

because people start following what she

68:21

does, right? And then they start looking

68:22

a good way and then they say, you know

68:23

what, she really does know what she's

68:24

talking about here. And then all of a

68:26

sudden when she does point people to,

68:27

you know, to to a thing that that that

68:29

they can buy, then they're more likely

68:30

to do so. And so it's it's it's how do

68:33

we merge those two things together? And

68:34

then when we're making the content, and

68:36

I think a lot of people we're starting

68:37

out are very obsessed with views, which

68:38

I would strongly recommend, especially

68:39

in this interest media time, that it's

68:41

it's so irrelevant. And what I mean by

68:43

that is if we think, all right, I want

68:46

to I want to start a a bait and tackle

68:48

drop shipping business, whatever, right?

68:50

You for for fishermen. Well, if I just

68:52

start making videos on philosophy, I

68:55

might get way more views than I do if I

68:57

make, you know, videos on bait and

68:59

tackle stuff. But the likelihood that

69:01

the people who are watching philosophy

69:02

also want bait and tackle is very low.

69:05

And because the content is now the

69:06

targeting for social, like if if

69:08

anyone's run ads before, you have to

69:09

select, okay, I think I want 42 year

69:11

olds and I want, you know, men and I

69:12

want, you know, whatever, right, as you

69:13

go through it. But the thing is is that

69:15

the algorithms are so good and the AI is

69:16

so good at understanding what the

69:17

content is about. And they also know

69:19

what type of people consume this type of

69:20

content, they just do the targeting for

69:22

you. And so if you want to reach a

69:24

certain type of person, you just only

69:25

make content that that certain type of

69:26

person wants to consume. It's actually

69:27

easier now than it was before. And so

69:29

you can have a 40,000 person audience,

69:31

but that 40,000 person audience might be

69:32

made up entirely of fishermen who buy

69:35

tackle, which I'll bet you you'll crush.

69:37

>> And so, um, that is how I kind of see

69:40

the the the quote future of of media at

69:42

least, um, is that if you want to have

69:44

maximum persuasion or conversion power,

69:47

we want to make content that is

69:48

explicitly for a specific audience. And

69:51

we want to demonstrate the proof that

69:52

we've done, right? We want to have

69:54

things that they want. We want to give

69:55

them instructions that they follow that

69:56

good things will happen for them. and we

69:58

want to look like them. And if you do

69:59

that, you have somebody who's gonna make

70:00

a lot of money from an audience.

70:02

>> That last point is super interesting as

70:04

well. How do I make myself look more

70:05

like my audience? And I think

70:07

relatability

70:08

>> and humanizing yourself is one of the

70:11

great ways to do that.

70:13

>> I think it's a very fair point. I mean,

70:15

I also think it's not just physical

70:17

traits. So, you know, let's say that you

70:20

don't look like the audience that you

70:23

want physically. what are the values

70:25

that that audience has that you can have

70:27

them see themselves in you and and you

70:29

know it's kind of like whether or not

70:32

you like the guy who cares but let's say

70:34

you know Trump for instance really looks

70:36

not a lot like his audience

70:38

predominantly you know in suits and ties

70:40

constantly sort of a blueblood

70:43

billionaire from the east coast how does

70:45

he associate with this group of people

70:46

when really he doesn't look like them on

70:48

average well it's because they believe

70:50

that he has a similar moral compass to

70:51

them they believe that he has similar

70:52

ethics to them. And so I don't think

70:55

that creators have leaned into this

70:56

enough. And I don't mean to become

70:58

clickbaity or political or or divisive

71:00

or anything like that. I mean that it is

71:02

rare to see people in business h take a

71:05

stance that could hurt their business

71:07

values, for instance. And Chris and I

71:09

have a rule which is we don't have close

71:11

friends that haven't done something

71:12

publicly that could be against their

71:14

best interests. I I just don't want

71:16

friends that don't have that that

71:17

haven't done that because I think that

71:20

the world is really hard and I want to

71:22

see if somebody's going to have like

71:23

moral fiber before I become quite close

71:25

with them.

71:26

>> Super interesting.

71:27

>> Yeah. And so I I think you could do that

71:29

as somebody who is a content creator

71:32

today like be value aligned with your

71:34

users and show that and um also to the

71:38

point about the algorithm becoming about

71:40

interest based. It's also becoming value

71:41

based. We're seeing echo chambers emerge

71:43

around ways of thinking, right?

71:45

>> Well, I the content that I saw of you

71:47

that most interested me was when you

71:49

were talking about um how important

71:52

ownership is and you were talking about

71:54

just the philosophy of ownership and you

71:56

said there's a group of people who want

71:57

you to own nothing and be happy about it

71:59

>> and I was like I really resonate with

72:01

that. I want people to own their

72:03

businesses and I want them to own their

72:04

stuff. And I liked the fact that you

72:06

were standing in front of a huge

72:07

audience taking that position and

72:09

everyone knew that it was a little bit

72:10

of a a position to take and it wasn't

72:13

specifically content about how to build

72:15

a business, but you were sharing

72:16

something about yourself.

72:16

>> I have a belief you don't actually ever

72:18

sell anybody anything. You only find

72:19

those who are already predisposed to

72:21

want the thing that you are selling.

72:23

>> And if you believe that, then I think

72:24

your business gets easier too, easier to

72:26

target people. That's why I never kind

72:28

of got off on that content. You know,

72:29

it's really big online on sales where

72:30

it's like here's how you close them, you

72:32

know, here's how you do this. Here's how

72:34

you you switch them and you give them a

72:35

hot dog and then they buy the car

72:37

because you gave them the hot dog

72:38

because of reciprocity and you're like,

72:40

"Huh, I've never bought a car because

72:41

somebody gave me a hot dog." But

72:42

apparently this is what works on

72:44

Instagram. And so I don't think that's

72:46

actually true. I think you just find

72:48

people at a trigger moment that they

72:49

want something and then you give it to

72:50

them.

72:51

>> Mhm. Regarding content, for me

72:52

personally,

72:54

I find that the only reason I'm going to

72:56

create content is if it's in alignment

72:58

to a mission that I've got. So I don't

72:59

actually want to create content. I don't

73:01

want to be out there naturally. I would

73:02

much rather be a way more private

73:05

person. Um, and you won't you won't find

73:08

a lot of stuff about my family or my my

73:10

kids, my you know, very rarely do I post

73:12

anything like any of that sort of stuff.

73:14

But for me, I do it in alignment with

73:16

the mission. I really believe that if

73:18

you're on a mission, you've got

73:19

something you want to achieve in the

73:20

world, you're going to need other people

73:21

to believe in it. You're going to need

73:22

other people to get involved. Um, you're

73:24

going to want to hire talented people.

73:25

Those talented people are going to want

73:26

to, you know, see you online first. And

73:29

it's all about the building

73:30

relationships at scale. And content is

73:32

just people discovering someone new like

73:35

you would a friend and then getting to

73:37

know someone. And I think the big play

73:38

in a postAI world is having really deep

73:41

relationships with a lot of people using

73:44

long form content

73:45

>> uh where you share who you are, what

73:47

you're about, what's your mission,

73:48

what's your origin story, what's your

73:50

vision,

73:50

>> um what are your values and people then

73:53

say in a very noisy world I will pay

73:56

attention to what Steven says.

73:58

>> I agree. And so to give my answer to

74:00

this question, my thesis here in the

74:02

world of AI is actually that if you look

74:06

at who has the most loyal engaged fan

74:08

bases, it's not necessarily podcasters.

74:11

We're doing pretty well, but it's not

74:12

podcasters. Podcasters can sell out

74:14

arenas and when they go on tour, they

74:16

can sell out globally. Streamers.

74:19

>> And it's I think it's because of this

74:21

the depth of the parasocial relationship

74:23

is the the equity value of the

74:25

connection. And I was sat with a

74:26

streamer who's 18 years old, massive in

74:28

Europe. And we were on we're playing at

74:30

Old Trafford for the for the soccer aid.

74:32

And I got just got to sit down with him.

74:34

So I was like, "Explain to me what you

74:35

do." He goes, "So I wake up in the

74:36

morning." I go, "Then what?" He goes, "I

74:37

sit there." And I go, "For how long?" He

74:39

goes, "Eight hours." And I go, "What do

74:40

you do?" He goes, "Like nothing." And I

74:42

go, "How many people tune in?" He's

74:43

like, "100,000." I'm like, "Concurrently

74:45

100,000 people sit there with you." He

74:47

goes, "Yeah, people are quite lonely. I

74:48

sit there and what we do is we watch TV

74:50

together." Now the So when when we got

74:53

to the the stadium, 70,000 people in the

74:56

stadium, we're playing soccer. The

74:58

stadium when they announced your name,

75:00

the size of the cheer correlates to the

75:03

amount of hours you spend with your

75:05

audience. The streamers are the

75:06

celebrities.

75:07

>> The podcasters sometimes come in, but

75:09

the the actors almost, you know, but the

75:12

but the streamers own the stadium. When

75:14

you play Soccer Aid, it doesn't matter

75:16

how much money you've got or how big

75:17

your following is, the streamers are the

75:18

ones. the streamers have this particular

75:20

streamer has less of an audience than

75:21

me, but he sits with them for 7 to 8

75:23

hours a day,

75:24

>> deep connection.

75:25

>> So, if we think about depth as the as

75:27

the metric that you you can you can

75:28

exchange on, especially if you have

75:30

authority in a niche and you're

75:31

educating, as Alex was saying,

75:33

>> that's why I think a lot about my behind

75:35

thes scenes channel. I think it's when

75:37

we go on tour, it's so funny. We we do

75:38

we did a tour in Australia and

75:40

remarkably I'd say about 50% of people

75:42

were talking to me about Dario and then

75:44

50% of people were talking to me about

75:45

behind the diary which is the behind the

75:47

scenes channel where you get to know me

75:48

a bit better

75:49

>> and that that channel has a fraction of

75:52

the viewership and actually that same

75:54

thesis is the reason I started

75:56

podcasting. I was doing Facebook watch

75:58

videos. They were getting tens of

75:59

millions of views, which by the way, no

76:00

one remembers because no one remembered

76:02

any of them. And no one came up to me in

76:05

the street and said, "I love that

76:06

two-minute viral philosophical video you

76:08

made about motivational fluff." No one

76:10

ever said that. Then I started this

76:11

podcast and it got a thousand downloads.

76:13

And it felt like I was like Oprah

76:14

Winfrey. Like people were coming up to

76:16

me and I was like, "Oh, there's this

76:17

interesting correlation between like the

76:18

depth of the medium and the resonance

76:20

and the memorability and therefore the

76:22

value." So just pursue depth as much as

76:25

you can. the strength of the parasocial

76:27

relationship

76:27

>> part of the brain that has short-term

76:30

memory. We've driven a truck through

76:31

that.

76:32

>> You know, we've now got just hundreds of

76:34

things a day that hit that. But then

76:36

there's this other part of the brain

76:37

where I've spent seven hours with

76:39

someone and if that's the depth.

76:41

>> Are you guys thinking about that?

76:43

>> Because you guys, you all make content

76:45

which is educational but is less

76:47

personal. And I mean you you two

76:50

podcast, Alex and Cody, you both

76:51

podcast. You don't podcast yourself.

76:53

>> I'm a guest.

76:54

>> You're a guest.

76:56

but you don't like run your own podcast.

76:58

So, are you thinking about a deeper

76:59

format for for yourselves? What are you

77:02

thinking about?

77:03

>> Yeah. Well, there's two things I want to

77:04

talk about there. One, I think it's it's

77:06

depth, but I would also wonder if it's

77:08

not rawness like in an era in which we

77:12

cannot trust what we see anymore because

77:14

of AI and anything can be recreated,

77:16

reproduced, and overproduced.

77:18

Increasingly, a stream is interesting

77:20

because it is raw. it is it is for a

77:23

thous% whatever is happening on there is

77:25

happening in real time and thus we can

77:26

actually trust it and so I think as I

77:30

mean we've all seen it content has

77:31

gotten so produced and overdone and that

77:35

actually I think decreases trust because

77:37

we can't tell if something is real or

77:40

not because it's been edited and

77:41

filtered and overlaid

77:43

>> we say with our 40 person teams yeah

77:45

great

77:46

>> but it's true but think about think

77:48

about the content even like this is like

77:50

sort of tact practical, but um maybe a

77:52

year ago, the big content uh change in

77:56

video on Instagram was that you had a

77:58

lot of um B-roll and images overlaid on

78:01

top of videos. And I don't know if you

78:02

guys have noted, but that doesn't work

78:03

very well anymore. Actually, the more

78:05

that you have third-party assets in your

78:08

video and it's been overdone, the less

78:09

the video works,

78:10

>> the more you're just walking along with

78:11

your handout,

78:12

>> right? Because it's it's more real. So,

78:14

I think it might actually be like depth

78:17

and rawness.

78:18

>> Rawness. Yeah. Authenticity, I guess.

78:20

>> Yeah. [ __ ] hate that word, but yes.

78:21

>> Yeah. It's like 60 minutes versus Joe

78:23

Rogan, you know? 60 minutes is like just

78:25

it's just

78:26

>> no cuts.

78:26

>> No cuts. Yeah. Yeah.

78:27

>> And then when it comes to am I thinking

78:29

about this for our channel? Yeah. I

78:30

mean, I think about it. We we have

78:32

something that we teach everybody which

78:33

is like the marketing affinity loop. And

78:35

and basically it goes like this. I'll

78:37

show the graph so you can see it, but

78:39

you start with awareness, right? And

78:41

that awareness is what we're all talking

78:42

about. How do we get more people to just

78:43

see us? And then we go to consideration.

78:46

Okay, I maybe I like this person. Maybe

78:47

I'll follow them. I'll give them a quick

78:49

follow. And then we go, well, I actually

78:51

I like them. I follow them. And I might

78:52

buy something from them. Okay, that's

78:54

interesting. And then I might not only

78:57

buy something from them, but advocate

78:58

for them. Write a testimonial, a review,

79:00

something like that. And then finally, I

79:02

might be loyal to them. Aka, I'll refer

79:04

a friend. I'll sign up for their

79:06

year-long program. I'll buy again and

79:08

again. And so, we go from awareness to

79:09

consideration to purchase to advocacy to

79:12

loyalty. And like, if you can get most

79:15

people stop at awareness. Very few

79:17

people can get somebody to go from

79:18

awareness to purchase. Even fewer people

79:21

can get them to advocate for them, leave

79:23

a review, and the very very fewest refer

79:25

a friend. And so like the holy grail of

79:27

business is always have your clients

79:30

tell other people nice things about you.

79:31

And so I think in content, what I think

79:33

about is I don't always care that people

79:36

buy things from me at this point. Like I

79:38

I love money, don't get me wrong. I want

79:39

to keep making it, but I actually really

79:41

care that they're loyal and they tell

79:43

other people about what we're doing. And

79:45

that is something we now measure for

79:46

videos. We can actually now measure with

79:48

like a little UTM link how many of all

79:50

of our videos get shared and how many of

79:53

those shares actually go to a a purchase

79:55

or something that goes a little bit

79:56

deeper. And so I I am thinking about

79:58

that. But then I think you also have to

80:00

decide what's your personal line is. So

80:02

for me, I can't imagine wanting to

80:05

stream all of my life continuously

80:07

because I'm not sure that's good for the

80:08

audience actually. I think they should

80:10

live not watch. So it's like I just have

80:13

a line that like I kind of don't want to

80:15

cross.

80:16

>> Yeah.

80:16

>> And Chris and I actually have a rule

80:18

too. We only post so much about our

80:20

relationship. We actually because it

80:21

always does well. So the team's like

80:23

just full send Chris shirtless nipples

80:26

every day. The internet loves it. And

80:29

and and Chris has been really good about

80:30

saying no, we have to keep some things

80:32

sacraant. And so I think you have to

80:34

decide how deep you want to go down the

80:35

rabbit hole in order to win.

80:37

>> Yeah. I've I've been the same with my

80:38

kids. it's their decision as to whether

80:40

they want to build a profile and how

80:41

they want to build it. So you won't, you

80:42

know, I won't put them in that position.

80:45

The depth that I'm loving is writing

80:47

books because someone who reads a book

80:50

like you really get to go deep with a

80:53

book. Um, and also live experiences. So

80:56

every year for the last four years, I've

80:57

taken about 80 of my clients to the uh

80:59

to the snow and we go skiing. and those

81:02

80 clients who if if someone has gone on

81:05

my ski trip, the level of loyalty and

81:08

depth because we've shared fund

81:09

together, I'm about to take 30 clients

81:11

to Neker Island and spend a week with uh

81:14

Sir Richard. And I' I'm convinced that

81:17

just doing that with 30 people will

81:19

build, you know, lifelong like

81:22

friendships. So this idea that like

81:25

there, you know, that you do stuff in

81:27

the online and offline world, you know,

81:29

that you actually figure out who are the

81:31

people who are at the core group, those

81:33

real uh dieh hard fans, and then let's

81:35

do something together and and and do fun

81:37

stuff together. Go skiing, go to

81:39

islands, go sailing, that sort of stuff.

81:41

>> Alex, I see you wrote uh it looked like

81:43

you drew the universe or something.

81:46

>> Oh, I was thinking about um again, it

81:48

was we're just talking about like

81:49

authenticity. Um, and so with each with

81:52

each of like SPCL, right, all of them

81:54

exist in a continuum, right? And so I

81:56

can say credibility. I could say, "Hey,

81:57

I sold a company." But I if you see a PR

81:59

article, that will increase the

82:00

credibility. If you were uh somebody you

82:02

heard about it from somebody else,

82:03

that'll increase the credibility of that

82:04

specific credibility driven event.

82:06

Likeness is the same thing. And so I

82:08

think um like the connection between

82:09

streamers and having huge influences

82:11

that they have tremendous likeness and

82:13

that because they are quote authentic

82:15

and that there's very few there's

82:17

there's very little ability to distort

82:19

you have basically when you what you see

82:21

is what you get. And so if you're the

82:22

type of person who likes that particular

82:24

streamer then you'll have super strong

82:26

you know affinity towards them and

82:27

you'll be likely to you know comply with

82:29

their requests like show up to a stadium

82:30

so that you can support me. Um but you

82:33

know even authenticity is again a term

82:34

it's like how do you define authenticity

82:36

right which I see is how you how you act

82:38

when you have no risk of punishment and

82:41

so

82:43

different way of saying this is like how

82:44

do you act when you're alone when no one

82:45

else is around and so I see the

82:47

discrepancy between how you behave when

82:48

you're alone and how you behave in

82:50

public as basically your authenticity

82:52

you know score right the question is or

82:54

the problem is that no one really knows

82:55

how you behave when you're alone and so

82:57

>> unless you're

82:59

unless you're like streaming all the

83:00

time

83:01

>> right yeah and So,

83:02

>> so you're saying authenticity is that

83:04

there's not a difference between how you

83:06

act when there's when there's no risk of

83:08

punishment and how you act normally. Is

83:09

that okay? Got it.

83:10

>> Right. And I think that also being like

83:13

very candid for all of us is like they

83:16

were like sure we have audiences that

83:18

can punish us with their comments I

83:20

guess but our like we've all built

83:24

enough of call it a fortress if you will

83:26

of currency network relationships etc

83:29

that like even even within our companies

83:31

like if you go into the room like I can

83:32

be really authentic in my company

83:34

because no one can fire me right like my

83:36

risk of punishment is low is is lower

83:38

than saying employees is and So, it's a

83:41

a relatively I'd never use this word,

83:42

but it's a relatively privileged, you

83:44

know, um position to be in to to be more

83:47

authentic because no one can really

83:48

punish you. And I think this is kind of

83:49

the the essence of the like [ __ ] you

83:51

money that people want to get to, which

83:52

is like I just want to be me, but I

83:54

can't be me because I have this risk of

83:55

punishment.

83:56

>> And so, um since degrees of freedom

83:58

basically, um I think your happiness is

84:00

is very correlated with your degrees of

84:02

freedom.

84:02

>> So, Elon's authentic.

84:06

>> I mean, I don't think anyone would argue

84:07

that he's not authentic. They might not

84:09

agree with him, but I don't think they

84:10

think that he's he's trying to pull one.

84:12

>> I do think that when like if you're

84:14

going to go online, one of the ways to

84:16

inoculate yourself against being

84:18

cancelled or to inoculate yourself

84:19

against caring so much is to do

84:21

ridiculous things every so often that

84:23

are super authentic to who you are out

84:26

loud because then what happens is the

84:28

people that hate you, they leave. Uh and

84:30

the people that like you kind of like

84:31

you a little bit more or trust you a

84:32

little bit more for it. So I think um

84:35

you know one of the things that that I

84:36

do not really on purpose but it it is

84:39

just like it's like getting a vaccine.

84:41

You go out on the internet and you say

84:43

something that you know other people are

84:44

not going to like but you believe

84:46

strongly in. And when you do that kind

84:48

of consistently over time I also think

84:50

that increases your trust because we've

84:52

all met like other creators that you're

84:54

like

84:55

>> ah man like you're just never going to

84:57

say anything that's not PC. Like I can

85:00

think of two in my head where I'm like

85:02

they're never going to say anything and

85:03

if it could hurt their audience, they're

85:05

not going to say it. And that just

85:07

decreases my trust level. And I think

85:08

the audience is really smart. People are

85:10

smart. And so um I think you should

85:12

inoculate yourself more often.

85:14

>> Before we move on to a little game that

85:16

I've prepared for us here, um I you're

85:18

all very good at pitching and you all

85:20

have your own frameworks for pitching.

85:21

>> So I wanted to to pause on that for a

85:23

second. What is Daniel? What is your

85:25

framework for pitching a business or an

85:27

idea? There there's two things to start

85:29

with which I believe that

85:30

entrepreneurship is the journey of a

85:32

thousand pitches. That basically what we

85:34

do as entrepreneurs is we pitch stuff

85:36

into existence. Um and the penalty for

85:39

an average pitch is that you do a

85:41

thousand pitches and you get nothing to

85:43

show for it at the end of it. And the

85:45

payoff for a great pitch is that you do

85:47

a thousand pitches and you end up with

85:48

10 to$100 million. You end up with an

85:50

amazing team of people and lots of

85:52

customers and everything everything's

85:53

great. I think treat entrepreneurship as

85:56

the journey of a thousand pitches and

85:58

also treat pitching as

86:01

this magical thing where you get what

86:04

you pitch for and you can't switch it

86:06

off. So for example, if you say the

86:09

economy is bad, the economy is bad, the

86:11

economy is bad, as if by magic the

86:13

economy is going to be bad. Uh if you

86:15

say I'm seeing lots of opportunities

86:16

right now, I'm seeing lots of

86:18

opportunities right now. You you start

86:20

conversations where people go, oh I I've

86:22

seen an opportunity as well. So,

86:23

whatever you're out there talking about,

86:25

you tend to bring those conversations to

86:26

the surface and then it's a

86:28

self-fulfilling loop. With that said,

86:32

you have to have a framework for

86:33

pitching. If you're going to do a good

86:34

pitch, it's got to be a framework. I've

86:36

got social pitching framework, scheduled

86:39

pitching framework, and sales pitching

86:40

framework. So, social pitch, name, same,

86:44

fame, pain, aim, game.

86:46

>> What's a social pitch?

86:47

>> Social pitch is on social media.

86:49

>> Yeah. or um in a social situation, it's

86:53

basically a situation where you've got

86:54

about 30 seconds before someone thinks

86:56

that you're being uh too obtuse.

86:59

>> Okay?

86:59

>> Right? So, you've got about 30 seconds

87:01

of people's attention, and you're going

87:03

to say, "What is your name? What are you

87:04

the same as that they already

87:05

understand? What makes you famous or

87:07

different? Uh what are you aiming for

87:09

right now? What's your bigger game? Or

87:11

what pain do you solve? What are you

87:12

aiming for? What's your bigger game?"

87:13

So, there's a few things you can put in

87:14

there and it rhymes so you can remember

87:16

it in a in a social situation. scheduled

87:19

pitches, I always do something called

87:22

capstone. And it's clarity, authority,

87:25

problem, solution, traction, or the why,

87:27

either way, opportunity, next steps, and

87:31

an emotional ending. Right? So, that

87:34

spells out capstone. Now, is that the

87:37

best pitching framework? Maybe, maybe

87:38

not. Maybe there's better frameworks.

87:40

But the point is is that you've got a

87:42

framework that you're not just winging

87:43

it. You're not just, you know, randomly

87:46

spewing words. you've actually gone

87:48

through the process of thinking through

87:49

your pitch uh in a framework approach.

87:51

One thing that's really fascinating is

87:53

the three of us have a framework for

87:54

everything like we we're just like very

87:57

framework thinkers and I've noticed that

87:58

with a lot of entrepreneurs. Um do you

88:00

guys have pitching frameworks? Be

88:02

shocked if you didn't.

88:03

>> Yeah, I do. I mean I think I'm like lazy

88:05

intellectually and frameworks help you

88:07

remember things and so if you don't have

88:08

very good memory then it's just easy to

88:11

put it in something that can make sure

88:13

that you remember it. It's why when we

88:14

were in school, you know, they used to

88:16

make us sing songs about how to remember

88:18

the varian states. If if if I wanted to

88:20

raise a bunch of money from other people

88:22

that didn't know me and I wanted to

88:24

never have a problem raising money

88:26

again, I didn't want to use any of my

88:27

money ever, I would use what I learned

88:30

in venture capital, which is the

88:31

mightest touch. And and basically, I

88:34

think you need one of these four in

88:36

order to raise money. You don't have to

88:38

have all four, but if you do, that makes

88:40

it really, really easy. The easiest one

88:42

is profit, right? If you have a business

88:43

right now that's making money profit in

88:45

your pocket, you can raise capital. You

88:47

can raise money from people as long as

88:50

that amount that you're raising is

88:51

reasonable to the amount of profit. If

88:53

you don't have any profit, but you have

88:55

growth, let's say like Replet, we were

88:57

talking about a big AI company, great.

88:59

You can raise a bunch of money if you

89:00

got growth, too. The third thing, if you

89:03

don't have either one of those, you

89:04

don't have profit, you don't have

89:05

growth, but you have a history. I've

89:07

sold a company before. I've built this

89:09

before. you can raise purely on the fact

89:11

that you've done this before. And if you

89:13

haven't done any of those three, you've

89:14

done nothing in life, then you need a

89:16

really good story. And the story is

89:17

something that you can often raise money

89:19

off of. So I believe that we are going

89:21

to create the next XYZ. And if we do

89:23

this thing, then you will all make

89:24

money, I will make money, and we will

89:26

change the world together. And so I call

89:28

it the touch because I think people who

89:30

accum if you can accumulate this over

89:32

your life, it's not that hard, right? So

89:34

eventually at some point you'll have a a

89:36

history which is your proof. Then you

89:38

can craft a story. You'll get better at

89:40

it as you continue to grow. You will

89:42

learn how to get profit in some way. And

89:44

because you've driven profit before,

89:46

you'll know how to get growth. So I

89:47

think like almost any entrepreneur over

89:50

time, if you focus on those four things,

89:52

can raise money. And you start with only

89:54

the story when you have nothing.

89:57

>> Alex, I have a lot of pitching.

90:00

>> Yeah.

90:01

>> Um I I I'll say first and foremost like

90:03

if you're trying to sell anyone

90:04

anything, um proof will always be

90:06

promised. And I can say that, you know,

90:07

a thousand times in a row. Like you

90:08

could literally say nothing, get on

90:10

stage and then just hit next on

90:12

testimonials for 60 minutes and you will

90:14

close a percent. Like literally the last

90:16

slide just says like go over there to go

90:18

buy something and you could say nothing

90:19

and you will you will sell.

90:21

>> Why?

90:22

>> Because I think um proof acts as a as a

90:24

as a an an approximation of something

90:27

that would happen uh for the prospect.

90:29

And so like the only reason that like

90:30

that proof works is that they think, oh,

90:32

some element of this is like me. And so

90:34

if I do the same thing that this person

90:36

did, and the closer the proof is to the

90:38

prospect, the more compelling it is for

90:40

that specific prospect, which is like

90:42

when we used to um, you know, run ads

90:44

for different markets, we'd go into

90:45

like, you know, an entirely black market

90:46

and surprise surprise, if we had black

90:48

testimonials, the pages would convert

90:49

better than if we had white testimonials

90:50

and then flip-flop in the other

90:52

direction, too. And so, right, and so we

90:54

want to show as many different types of

90:55

proof as we possibly can. And obviously,

90:57

not all proof is created equal. You can

90:58

have live proof versus recorded proof.

91:00

You can have a demonstration of

91:01

something that like us using the thing

91:03

is going to be more compelling uh than

91:05

than than not using and just describing

91:07

it, right? If I have a um like and so

91:09

there's there's a bunch of things on

91:10

proof. But that's just like big thing

91:12

number one. And so that's why for me if

91:13

somebody's going to sell something, I

91:15

recommend most people just get five or

91:16

10 clients for free up front with the

91:19

primary purpose of getting proof because

91:20

you're going to make more money on the

91:21

proof than you will have trying to, you

91:23

know, just get the the tiny amount that

91:25

you can charge with absolutely no proof.

91:27

Mhm.

91:27

>> So, it's like, don't do that. Just get

91:29

10 and on your 11th, you'll be able to

91:30

charge 10 times more because you'll be

91:32

able to say, "Hey, look at the 10 people

91:33

that I helped." And realistically,

91:34

you'll get more out of that than they

91:35

will because you probably suck.

91:37

>> Yeah.

91:38

>> So, so it's probably for everyone's best

91:40

interest that you don't charge anything.

91:42

Um, but from an actual like closing

91:44

perspective, and I'll talk about this

91:45

from a from appointments, I think to use

91:46

uh Daniel's language, I've taught the

91:48

closer framework for a very long time.

91:49

Um, which is C L O S E R. Uh, and so C

91:52

is clarify why they're there, which is,

91:54

and typically anybody who's going to be

91:55

in that appointment has taken some

91:57

action. So whether that's they

91:58

responded, you know, to a post, they

92:00

commented, they liked, they actually, I

92:02

mean, if someone's already set an

92:03

appointment or they walked in the door,

92:04

like there's always some like why'd you

92:06

pick up the phone? Like there's always

92:07

some reason like, "Why'd you give me 5

92:09

seconds?" There's always something

92:10

they've done that you could say, "Hey,

92:11

so tell me why, right?" And so then

92:12

you're you're you're clarifying why

92:13

they're there, why they're still

92:14

listening. So you listen to them because

92:17

we often think about sales as me just

92:19

hitting you with [ __ ]

92:20

>> So the perfect salesman says nothing and

92:22

only ask questions

92:23

>> because there's nothing to disagree

92:24

with.

92:27

>> And fundamentally they're going to

92:28

believe way more of what they say than

92:29

what you say. So you want them to say

92:30

it, not you. And so you clarify whether

92:33

they're there. See,

92:34

>> it reminds me of spies. I've interviewed

92:35

a couple of CIA spies now and every

92:37

single one of them, I was expecting some

92:38

like incredible technique or whatever.

92:40

They all say, "No, we just spend six to

92:42

eight weeks in the back of the cab

92:43

listening to the Iranian taxi driver to

92:45

figure out what that his son has a

92:48

health issue that we can then leverage

92:50

later to get him to turn against his

92:52

country." For the first eight weeks,

92:53

you're just listening to him offload.

92:55

And they're like, "It's crazy how people

92:56

will just offload if you let them.

92:58

Everyone wants to talk."

92:59

>> Oh, 100%. So, one is, you know, clarify

93:02

where they're l is label them with a

93:03

problem that you can solve. So it's like

93:05

okay so it sounds like you're here you

93:06

respond to my ad you DM me thing or you

93:08

you whatever it because of this reason

93:10

is that right? Right. So you get

93:11

confirmation on the problem uh which is

93:13

L. Then you O which is overview past

93:15

experiences or past pain. So it's like

93:16

what have you done so far to try and

93:17

solve this? And this is important

93:18

because uh motivation is the equal

93:20

opposite of deprivation. So the more

93:21

deprive someone is of something the more

93:23

motivated they are to solve it. And so

93:24

like if you haven't eaten in an hour

93:26

you're probably not that motivated. If

93:26

you haven't eaten in two days you're

93:27

very motivated. If you haven't slept in,

93:29

you know a day or you're normal

93:31

motivated. I guess that was a bad one.

93:33

But if you haven't slept in 3 days,

93:34

you'll be incredibly motivated to sleep.

93:36

And so we want to find we want to find

93:38

what they're deprived of and then try to

93:40

increase that deprivation uh in the

93:42

conversation. Basically, uh make them

93:43

more aware of the deprivation, the

93:45

things that they don't have, right? Then

93:47

once we have, you know, enough

93:48

deprivation that it's very clear it's

93:50

like, okay, this is this is what why

93:52

you're here. This is you agreed with

93:53

this is the problem that you want to

93:54

solve. You've tried all these things and

93:56

it hasn't worked for you. I can imagine

93:58

how frustrating that would be. Um S,

94:00

which is then you sell, right? you sell

94:01

the vacation, which typically is just

94:02

three points. Um I I usually keep it to

94:05

three cuz most people can't remember

94:06

more than that anyways. And the three

94:07

points are usually you can always find

94:09

three. And if you need two, you can

94:11

chunk up if you've got five. And if

94:12

you've got, you know, two chunk down as

94:14

in like break into smaller pieces. But

94:15

like when I was in the fitness world, it

94:16

was fitness, nutrition, accountability.

94:18

If when I was selling, you know,

94:19

mortgage leads, it's like you want the

94:20

leads to be unique, you want them to be

94:21

timely, and you want them to be

94:22

exclusive, right? And so like or

94:24

qualified. And so it's like there's

94:25

always three things that you can usually

94:26

triangulate. But when you say the three

94:28

points, you don't then feature, you

94:30

know, Jarble about the the points. You

94:32

then just usually put like a one

94:34

sentence analogy of of what that thing

94:36

is. So, it's kind of like this. And so,

94:38

these are like little 30 secondond sound

94:40

bites to make the three points. That

94:41

should never last longer than 90 seconds

94:43

cuz um most people waste all this time

94:45

on the selling part and that doesn't

94:47

really matter because the more we can

94:48

talk about them, the more they're going

94:49

to want to buy. Um and then E, like at

94:52

the end of that, you say, "Cool, ready

94:52

to get started, ready to rock and roll,

94:54

ready to start on Monday, whatever it

94:55

is." And then E, E and R around what

94:57

happens if they say no, right? You

94:58

explain it with their concerns. E, and

95:00

then R is you reinforce the decision.

95:02

And so R was actually something I added

95:03

much later when I was teaching, you

95:05

know, many sales people because um after

95:06

they would like explain away and then

95:08

close, they would just like see you

95:09

later. I got the credit card. It's like

95:11

you're dead to me. Um but the R is like

95:13

no, no, like reinforce the decision like

95:15

I think it's a great decision. I'm going

95:16

to introduce you to Polly. Paulie's

95:17

going to get you onboarded. And then

95:18

Polly also continues the R and being

95:20

like you know Jack definitely helped you

95:22

out. Let me let's get you all squared

95:23

away.

95:24

There's no safe like Simply Safe, the

95:26

sponsor of today's episode. A few years

95:28

ago, someone broke into the Diary of a

95:29

SEO studio and stole all of our cameras

95:31

and a few key hard drives, and it was

95:33

devastating and one that led us on a

95:35

quest to figure out how we could secure

95:37

our building. And through this, we

95:39

discovered Simply Safe. Interestingly,

95:41

we did have security at the time, but

95:42

the type that we had only triggered an

95:44

alarm once intruders were inside the

95:46

building. What I like about Simply Safe

95:48

is their active guard outdoor protection

95:51

notifies you and their live monitoring

95:54

agents when suspicious characters are

95:56

outside, but it also means that guards

95:58

can trigger alarms or turn on spotlights

96:00

to deter someone from entering your

96:02

building. If we had had Simply Safe, we

96:04

would have known earlier that intruders

96:06

were trying to get in. So maybe this is

96:07

your reminder to make sure your home and

96:09

workplace is secure. Simplysafe is

96:11

offering my listeners in the United

96:12

States an exclusive discount of 50% off

96:14

their new Simplysafe security system

96:16

when you sign up by visiting

96:18

simplysafe.com/doac

96:21

to claim 50% off your new system with a

96:23

professional monitoring plan and get

96:25

your first month free. That's

96:27

simplysafe.com/doac.

96:29

There's no safe like Simply Safe.

96:33

I've just invested millions into this

96:35

and become a co-owner of the company.

96:37

It's a company called Ketone IQ. And the

96:39

story is quite interesting. I started

96:41

talking about ketosis on this podcast

96:43

and the fact that I'm very low carb,

96:44

very, very low sugar, and my body

96:46

produces ketones which have made me

96:48

incredibly focused, have improved my

96:50

endurance, have improved my mood, and

96:52

have made me more capable at doing what

96:54

I do here. And because I was talking

96:55

about it on the podcast, a couple of

96:57

weeks later, these showed up on my desk

96:59

in my HQ in London, these little shots.

97:01

And oh my god, the impact this had on my

97:05

ability to articulate myself, on my

97:08

focus, on my workouts, on my mood, on

97:11

stopping me crashing throughout the day

97:13

was so profound that I reached out to

97:15

the founders of the company and now I'm

97:17

a co-owner of this business. I highly,

97:19

highly recommend you look into this. I

97:21

highly recommend you look at the science

97:22

behind the product. If you want to try

97:24

it for yourself, visit

97:25

ketone.com/stephven

97:27

for 30% off your subscription order. And

97:29

you'll also get a free gift with your

97:31

second shipment. That's

97:32

ketone.com/stephven.

97:35

And I'm so honored that once again, a

97:37

company I own can sponsor my podcast. A

97:40

lot of people say that 70 60 80% of our

97:43

communication is body language. Do you

97:45

think much about that, Alex? You have a

97:47

with or without you energy body

97:49

language. It's a casual It's a very

97:52

casual body language, which in fact

97:54

reinforces your authority in a way. So

97:56

do you think about if people are right

97:58

that 60 or 70% of our communication is

98:00

the things we don't say. Do you think

98:01

about training people on how to hold

98:03

themselves, how to be you kind of

98:05

alluded to something there which I think

98:06

people don't think about which is

98:07

actually the less you say sometimes the

98:09

higher conviction and the more I believe

98:10

you.

98:11

>> Yeah.

98:11

>> And some people can oversell because

98:14

>> Yeah. So, I'll So, I'll because I think

98:17

getting So, I'll just There's so many

98:19

variables here, but I'll just try and

98:20

focus on the ones that um a lot of

98:21

people sell over the phone and even via

98:23

Zoom, it's harder to see body language

98:25

as well, which nowadays I think a lot of

98:26

selling happens in those two

98:27

environments, even more than in person,

98:29

even though that's where I came from,

98:30

which I actually think is the best place

98:32

to learn because you have to control

98:33

every variable. And then you have far

98:35

more leeway on the phone or on Zoom than

98:37

you do in person.

98:38

>> And so, to that extent, um there's

98:41

basically five things you can control

98:42

about how you talk. And so you have your

98:43

speed of talking, like how t how fast

98:45

you talk. You have your cadence. You

98:47

have your um basically your um your

98:50

annunciation, like do I pronounce every

98:52

letter in the words that I'm saying? You

98:54

have the volume that you speak at

98:56

because if I talk too low like you on a

98:58

phone, it doesn't really matter because

98:59

they're just going to increase the

99:00

volume. But if I lower what I'm saying

99:02

right now, it sounds more important in

99:04

person. It's more important to volume is

99:05

more important in person. And so those

99:07

first three I consider there's kind of a

99:09

persuasive tone which all three are

99:11

constant. And the only point of those is

99:13

to maximize comprehension. It's just

99:15

that they can hear you, that they can

99:17

understand what you're saying because

99:18

you're talking in a speed that they can

99:20

understand. Like I'm somebody who talks

99:21

fast and I have to I have to pull back

99:24

how fast I talk when I'm in like a

99:26

selling situation. There's only two that

99:28

you that I teach sales people to try and

99:30

actively control, which is going to be

99:32

pauses

99:35

to draw attention

99:37

and when do I raise my voice.

99:40

And the reason that those are the only

99:41

two things you really need to teach a

99:42

salesperson outside of the persuasive

99:44

tone, which is that that you're going to

99:45

talk at a certain speed, which usually

99:47

about 150 to 170 words a minute, because

99:49

that's the amount of speed that most

99:50

people can understand. You're going to

99:51

enunciate the words, which is going to

99:53

force you to actually speak at that

99:54

speed.

99:55

>> Um, and you're going to talk loud enough

99:57

they can understand you. This sounds

99:59

very simple, right? Like this sounds

100:00

like so simple, like I can't believe

100:02

people don't do this. Except they don't

100:04

and they don't close. And so the only

100:06

things that you have to teach a

100:07

salesperson and these are so important.

100:09

Like there's been three independent

100:11

studies that are like massive

100:12

metaanalyses of sales people,

100:15

the sales people who one speak less

100:16

close more. And number two, the sales

100:18

people who know when to shut up most

100:20

importantly after you ask for the sale,

100:22

like if you wait 8 seconds after you ask

100:24

someone to buy, you close 30% more sales

100:26

>> if you wait 8 seconds.

100:27

>> Yeah. So you ready to start?

100:33

>> Okay. So

100:34

>> Mhm. And so people they'll like they'll

100:37

close themselves but the sales people

100:39

are so afraid of that silence that they

100:41

then jump back in. It's like you had the

100:43

sale just shut up. And so I used to talk

100:46

about how emphasis was super important.

100:49

And so like a very easy example to

100:50

demonstrate this in terms of

100:51

communication is that if I say I didn't

100:54

say he hit his wife. I didn't say he hit

100:56

his wife. I didn't say he hit his wife.

100:58

I didn't say hit his wife. Those all

101:00

mean very different things. But

101:02

fundamentally it's just cuz I change

101:03

where I pause. Right. Mhm.

101:04

>> What word? So, I'm emphasizing a

101:05

different word. And so, I used to talk

101:07

about emphasis a lot, but I've I've

101:08

trained more and more and more and more

101:09

sales people over time. I just say, when

101:11

do you shut up and when do you raise

101:12

your voice? That's it. The rest of this

101:14

we we speak in the exact same tone. And

101:16

the reason that I feel very confident

101:18

about this is that AI is doing

101:19

increasingly good job at ads. If I don't

101:21

know if you you've noticed this, but

101:22

like a lot of ads are just being voiced

101:24

over AI and they convert higher because

101:25

people can understand them.

101:27

>> I think a huge part of it is just they

101:28

can comprehend it. they can actually

101:30

hear all the words and it's set in a

101:32

tone that's loud enough and there's

101:33

annunciation and they actually get it

101:35

cuz most like it's like one of the

101:37

easiest ways you can improve copy on a

101:38

website is just get it below third grade

101:40

reading level like 50% of people can't

101:42

read above sixth grade

101:45

>> in the US

101:46

>> it's crazy

101:46

>> so you're you're alienating 50% of the

101:49

market now you might think oh well those

101:50

are the idiots no I know plenty of

101:51

people I mean like I've got two friends

101:53

who dropped out of high school and are

101:54

super super successful entrepreneurs

101:57

barely can write their names and they

101:58

like they make fun of it, but like

101:59

they're smart. They just didn't weren't

102:00

educated. Those are different things,

102:02

right? And so I say this to say like if

102:04

if you're if you're in these selling

102:06

situations and you're like because what

102:07

happens is you get nervous, right? You

102:08

get this fight, flight, freak out, the

102:10

ones that Daniel was saying earlier. And

102:11

so your adrenaline kicks up and so you

102:12

want to talk faster, you want to talk

102:13

louder, uh you interrupt the other

102:15

person. And all those things are

102:16

antithetical to closing. And so just

102:19

teaching someone to be okay with pauses

102:23

can increase the likelihood that people

102:24

pay attention to the words that they

102:26

say. Because all we do is we draw

102:28

attention when we pause. You have short

102:30

pauses that draw attention. And then you

102:31

have long pauses that solicit response.

102:33

If I pause long enough, what do people

102:35

do? They talk.

102:36

>> And I just think of someone as being

102:37

higher value if they if they're taking

102:40

pauses. Mhm.

102:41

>> Um, one of my one of my great mentors

102:42

early in my career, he

102:45

there's something about the way that he

102:46

spoke, he was incredibly slow with the

102:51

way he sp he was like that. And the

102:52

minute he started speaking when when my

102:54

company were over there and having these

102:55

men mentorship sessions with him,

102:57

everybody would stop and just like was

102:58

fixated on him. And then I remember this

103:00

girl who worked in my New York office,

103:01

he was

103:04

>> opposite.

103:04

>> And it's just it's just the use of your

103:06

this instrument. Yeah.

103:07

>> Um, do you think much about that? Do you

103:09

think much about how you present

103:10

yourself? Do you think much about your

103:11

body language?

103:12

>> I think it it's natural. I think more

103:15

important is the distinction between are

103:18

you coming across as a newbie? Are you

103:20

coming across as a standard worker be or

103:22

are you coming across as high status,

103:24

key person of influence level? And each

103:27

one of those has body language

103:28

associated. It has different ways of

103:30

presenting yourself. But it's a

103:32

self-identity thing. And if you can

103:33

shift that selfidentity, you can

103:36

naturally become more of a key person of

103:38

influence. When we meet someone, we

103:39

within a few seconds, we evaluate their

103:41

status level relative to us. And you

103:43

can't switch it off. And there's plenty

103:44

of evidence to say that like

103:45

unfortunately, you just do it

103:47

automatically. I've seen people

103:50

completely change their life by just

103:52

simply changing the way that they pitch

103:54

from a a newbie worker B to a key person

103:56

of influence. I can think of an example.

103:58

There's this woman who I asked her,

104:00

"What do you do?" And she said, "I'm a

104:01

financial planner. I can help anyone

104:03

with their financial planning. If anyone

104:05

wants to talk about their wills or any

104:06

of those sorts of things, then that's

104:07

what I can help people with, right? And

104:09

it sounds workery. And her her body

104:12

language was kind of like this.

104:15

>> Uh I asked her a question. I said, "When

104:16

did you do something special that was

104:19

really transformational, something

104:21

something important?" She said, "Last

104:22

month, I went out to the countryside. I

104:24

worked on a farm and I worked with the

104:25

owner of the farm and their kids and

104:27

their grandkids to get alignment between

104:29

the three generations. the farm was

104:31

going to be sold off to private equity

104:33

and instead I helped them to get

104:34

alignment as to how they're going to

104:36

keep the family farm. And I said, "How

104:38

did you do that?" And she said, "Well, I

104:39

used to be a city girl and then I

104:40

married a country boy and I I learned

104:42

how to do it." I got her to change her

104:44

pitch and I said, "Pitch yourself as a

104:47

key person of influence at that." So she

104:49

stood up in front of the group and she

104:50

said, "For the last 20 years, I've been

104:52

working with rural families who own

104:54

farms and I help them with their

104:56

financial planning and I secure their

104:58

family farm for the next two

104:59

generations."

105:01

>> And her body language just went like

105:04

like key person of influence and

105:05

everyone just responded differently. And

105:07

when I asked the audience, in the first

105:09

instance, what do you think her day rate

105:11

was? Everyone said $500. I said, in the

105:13

second instance, what do you think she

105:14

charges per day? 10 grand. And it was

105:16

just the ability to pitch yourself as

105:18

that key person of influence in the

105:20

room.

105:20

>> You know what's fascinating is there are

105:22

actual studies now that show for women

105:23

in particular that you make more money

105:26

if you do one thing which is you wear

105:28

makeup which is wild. So they did

105:30

there's three studies that have been

105:32

done totally different groups one by

105:33

Harvard one by Stanford and I can't

105:34

remember it was either Oxford or

105:36

Cambridge and the studies showed that

105:38

women who there was no attractiveness

105:41

differential between them but one wore

105:44

makeup consistently uh at work and one

105:46

didn't. They made anywhere from 20 to

105:48

40% more money inside of this study.

105:50

What I thought was really interesting

105:52

about that, because I'm not really

105:53

historically a makeup girl, although

105:54

being fully face painted for this, is

105:57

that that actually makes sense in a lot

105:58

of ways because we do have this initial

106:00

reaction that we always have uh with

106:01

people. You know, we judge somebody like

106:03

you talked about almost immediately. And

106:05

so when I saw that study, I thought,

106:06

well, first of all, that's interesting.

106:08

You don't have to be smarter, better

106:10

looking uh or anything else, and you can

106:12

make more money just by the way you

106:13

present yourself. And so I thought

106:15

thought, well, what about the way that

106:16

you dress? Is is that also the same? And

106:18

there are studies that back this as well

106:20

that in fact you can make more money as

106:22

a man for dressing one way and as a

106:24

woman and women are interesting because

106:28

you are not the norm.

106:30

>> What am I missing?

106:30

>> You got the lumberjack.

106:31

>> I've got 20% sitting on the table right

106:33

now.

106:35

>> But what's fascinating is, you know, I

106:37

like things where you don't have to you

106:40

don't have to be better than anybody

106:42

else. You can just use human psychology

106:43

to make more money. And so if I'm a

106:46

woman, I know that the way that I dress,

106:48

so when I pay attention to my dress and

106:50

dress professionally, whatever that

106:51

means in this instance, in the study

106:52

that I saw, it was like, you know, what

106:54

what I would have on a blouse, a suit,

106:56

something like that, women make two

106:58

times more than men when they dress when

107:00

they dress better. Men, it actually is

107:01

less important. Still more important

107:03

though, if you dress professionally in a

107:05

suit and you don't have all the other

107:06

proof and things you have, you have this

107:08

sort of interesting thing that's like a

107:09

you have sort of um diametric

107:12

opposition. I make a lot of money and

107:14

yet I care so little about money that I

107:16

dress in a wife theater. Yeah. Exactly.

107:18

And so and so men make somewhere between

107:20

15 and 18% more when they dress in

107:22

suits. So I think there's a a real um

107:25

argument to be made for if you're going

107:27

to pay attention to the way your voice

107:28

sounds. That takes some training.

107:30

Doesn't take much training to change the

107:32

way that you look professionally and and

107:34

how you dress. And the only other thing

107:36

that I would talk about on sales and

107:38

pitching is we tell all of our company

107:40

people. Um the line is show don't tell.

107:42

We increasingly do not believe the

107:44

things that were heard. So like think

107:45

about a sales pitch that goes like this.

107:47

Um you know uh we for instance have a

107:51

lot of home service companies. So these

107:52

home service companies are selling a

107:55

homeowner on let's say landscaping. And

107:57

so I'm going to come and we're going to

107:59

clean up your lawn and here's what we're

108:01

going to do and this is how much it's

108:02

going to charge. I'm going to charge and

108:03

this is how long it's going to take. And

108:05

you can tell the client that we're an

108:08

expert at this. I've been in business

108:09

for 42 years. We have, you know, 1,000

108:12

reviews on Trustpilot, etc. Or you could

108:14

do something that'll double your

108:16

conversion, which is simply bring a

108:18

phone or an iPad with you and say, "Can

108:20

I show you what we did for your

108:21

neighbors down the street?" And just

108:23

show them the image of it. Just go, "We

108:25

do have a thousand Trust Pilot views. I

108:27

don't right here. We could see what the

108:28

last one said. Click on it. Show them

108:30

the Trust Pilot review." You don't have

108:32

to train that. And I really like my

108:34

salespeople to not have to become

108:36

experts but to be enabled by what's

108:38

called sales enablement or technology

108:40

just to show because we are a visual

108:42

species. And so wherever possible if you

108:45

want to increase your conversions I tell

108:47

my team you are not allowed to close a

108:50

sale without showing something.

108:51

>> Some visuals

108:52

>> you have to have a visual because it's

108:54

just a trust transfer and a higher

108:56

signal. What's wild now is that in that

108:58

same business, you could take a photo

109:01

>> just right there in chat GBT say do the

109:02

landscape gardening and then show them

109:04

this is your house. Exactly.

109:06

>> Fully landscaped. People are vis 70% of

109:08

the brain is visual processing.

109:10

>> Exactly. And then you believe it and

109:12

then you've already seen it happen.

109:14

>> I work with a lot of entrepreneurs and I

109:15

get them to create a brochure

109:17

>> like a physical brochure for their

109:19

business and people are like what on

109:21

earth am I creating a brochure for in

109:22

2025? I because the the act of creating

109:25

a brochure gets what's in your head, out

109:28

of your head, and into a document we can

109:29

all explore. And I I still think a

109:32

brochure is actually one of the coolest

109:34

things that an entrepreneur can do as an

109:36

activity to really just solidify what

109:39

they do.

109:40

>> I saw you scribbling again, Daniel.

109:41

>> Oh, I have lots of things, but yeah. No,

109:43

I was thinking about like uh makeup

109:45

versus suits and whatnot. And so, you

109:46

know, one it's like if you have if you

109:48

have zero status, you have no credit,

109:50

like SPCL like we went through, then

109:52

it's like, well, then what are the

109:53

smallest versions of that that you can

109:54

demonstrate? And so, I would also bet

109:56

that if the girls did makeup like hooker

109:57

makeup and then you also do like

109:58

professional makeup, I'll bet you

109:59

there's a very different outcome that

110:01

happens because if you have like

110:03

understated business makeup, then that

110:04

probably signals a certain level of

110:05

status and they will treat you like

110:07

other people that they have treated in

110:08

the past because that associates with

110:09

the status people had. Same thing with a

110:11

man in a suit. Like literally fancy

110:13

pants, right? Um, it's like this guy's

110:15

got fancy pants, therefore he is must be

110:17

15 18% better on average. Now, to to to

110:20

comment on on on Cody's point earlier,

110:21

it's like I have other statusinducing

110:24

points that are superior to a suit and

110:25

so I don't need one,

110:26

>> right? So, like how how do I get away

110:28

with that? It's like, yeah, like having

110:30

a suit only means that you have $500,

110:31

right?

110:32

>> But billionaires don't wear Louis

110:33

Vuitton because in the status game

110:36

they're playing that would be an inverse

110:37

signal of wealth.

110:38

>> Exactly. Yeah. Who you're trying to And

110:39

then um to Cody's point about proof,

110:41

like proof is always number one, right?

110:42

And so like

110:44

trust pilot reviews is a kind of proof.

110:47

Somebody down the street is a closer

110:49

approximation which is a higher form of

110:52

proof. And so proof is always going to

110:53

be number one what you can lead with.

110:55

You can almost immediately in any sales

110:57

process if they don't have one of these

110:59

just implement a video sales letter and

111:01

increase sales by 20 to 40% with like

111:03

really doing nothing else. Um sometimes

111:05

more. And so that typically is like,

111:08

okay, what's the what's the promise that

111:11

we're gonna, you know, what do we do?

111:12

What's the pain that we're solving? What

111:14

is the uh plan or sorry, what is the

111:17

proof that we have that we can solve it?

111:19

And then what is the plan for the rest

111:20

of this video? And then typically after

111:22

you have you've demonstrated each of

111:23

those P's, you then say great picture

111:25

number five. Uh which then gives you

111:27

kind of the visual road map. And then

111:28

after that, I typically like to have

111:30

people just respond to the all of the

111:33

biggest objections that people have

111:34

around whatever the specific service is

111:37

um as the main points of the video. And

111:39

then after that, you just make your call

111:40

to action or you just reinforce the

111:42

appointment. Say, "Hey, like if you like

111:43

this video, text me this keyword. That

111:44

way, I know you watched it and we'll

111:45

give you an extra 5% on whatever." And

111:47

that way the salesperson knows the

111:48

person watched it. Um and it gives them

111:50

incentive to do so. So it's like, "Hey,

111:52

if you watch the video, you get 5%."

111:53

It's like, "Oh [ __ ] that's amazing." Um

111:54

but then that way they know that they

111:56

actually watched it. The one other thing

111:58

that I've found that is the most

111:59

powerful sales closer

112:01

>> is to pitch the assessment. And to pitch

112:04

the assessment is, I don't know if I can

112:06

help you, but if we answer these 40

112:08

questions and we go through this

112:09

assessment, then we'll figure out

112:12

whether we can help you or not. So, it's

112:14

kind of like if you went to the doctor

112:16

and said, I don't know whether you need

112:17

anything, but we'll put you through a

112:18

blood test and and an X-ray and then

112:21

we'll see. So one of the biggest way I

112:24

I've scaled multiple companies where you

112:26

pitch the assessment. You just you don't

112:28

tell people whether you can can or can't

112:30

help them. You just simply say the next

112:32

step is to take an assessment and when

112:33

we do the assessment it will tell us

112:35

whether I can help you or not. And it's

112:36

one of the best sales closing

112:38

techniques.

112:38

>> There's a lot of psychology around that.

112:39

They did that the study where they had

112:41

the boring focus group and they had one

112:43

group of people who were allowed

112:44

straight into the boring f community

112:46

group and then they had the other group

112:48

of people who had to take a survey to

112:49

get in and the group of people that took

112:51

the survey to get into the boring

112:53

community group all said that it was

112:55

great in there.

112:56

>> So much better.

112:56

>> And there's something about how friction

112:58

upon entry makes you value the thing

113:00

more

113:00

>> bazillion%. Like I can't I cannot I c I

113:05

can't emphasize this more. Like in every

113:07

single CRO split test that we increase

113:09

friction or increase the quality of

113:10

leads, we make more money.

113:12

>> CRO split test.

113:13

>> So conversion optimization test that

113:14

you'd run across a a landing page or

113:16

funnel or sales sales motion. Um like

113:19

when you add more friction and it's good

113:21

friction ideally, meaning you're not

113:23

getting out bad people, you're getting

113:25

sorry, getting out good people, which is

113:26

bad friction. You want good friction

113:28

which gets out bad people.

113:29

>> Yeah. um you will typically always

113:32

increase the cost per action. So your

113:34

lead cost will go up, your cost per call

113:36

will go up, but your show rates will go

113:38

up and your close rates will go up and

113:39

your cash collected will go up.

113:40

>> And it seems counterintuitive to apply

113:42

friction to a process, but

113:44

>> and I can almost promise that like it I

113:47

I have so few examples where it didn't

113:49

work that I almost believe that it's law

113:51

at this point. And I think it's law

113:52

because it's so counterintuitive because

113:54

it's scary to add friction because you

113:56

know that you're actively decreasing

113:58

your lead flow and increasing your cost

114:00

per lead. You're decreasing your calls,

114:01

you're increasing your cost per call.

114:02

Like that is frightening for just about

114:04

every business, which is usually why it

114:05

works.

114:06

>> At the Louis Vuitton store, they put a

114:08

security guard to keep you out and then

114:10

it pushes the prices up.

114:11

>> Yeah. Like they they after co none of

114:13

them stopped doing because they're like,

114:14

"Oh, wow. We made more sales during CO

114:16

because we had people wait in line and

114:18

showed scarcity."

114:19

>> It's like, isn't it? You don't even get

114:20

to pick the bag you get and you have to

114:22

join a waiting list. Then they interview

114:23

you to buy the bag

114:25

>> and then they decide whether they should

114:27

let you have

114:28

>> what do you bring to the table.

114:30

>> That's how Ferrari works. You're not

114:31

allowed to buy Ferraris unless you go

114:33

through this list. And if you're ever so

114:34

shown to to flip them or sell them,

114:36

you'll never buy another Ferrari again.

114:38

So

114:39

>> I've got three boxes here and these

114:42

three suitcases contain different

114:44

amounts of money. One of them contains

114:47

$1,000. one of them contains $10,000 and

114:49

one of them contains $100,000. You're

114:51

going to pick a suitcase and you're

114:54

going to tell me what you would do with

114:55

that amount of money if you were

114:56

starting with that amount of money today

114:58

to build a scalable business.

115:01

>> So,

115:02

>> do we keep the money?

115:04

>> He wants to buy a watch.

115:06

>> I'm like, I'm feeling 100,000.

115:09

>> All right. What do we got?

115:12

>> Oh, I have $1,000.

115:15

>> So, do I get to keep the money? Is that

115:16

how this works?

115:17

>> Yeah, you can keep it. It smells smells

115:19

like money. Okay, so I have $1,000. So I

115:21

would um take the $1,000, put it in my

115:24

pocket, do nothing with it, and I would

115:25

watch YouTube videos on AI integration

115:27

into small businesses. And then I would

115:29

go to small businesses, and once I had a

115:31

specific integration that I would do,

115:33

which I would probably bet would be

115:35

around likely email list activation

115:38

because that's typically like fastest,

115:39

easiest money that most business owners

115:41

have, is their contact list. They've

115:43

got, you know, they've been in business

115:44

10 years. They've got, you know, 8,000

115:46

customers they've sold over that whole

115:47

time period and maybe a list of, you

115:49

know, call it 20,000 leads that they've

115:51

had. They never email them ever. If they

115:53

do, it's just like, here's our random

115:54

discount that we send once a quarter for

115:56

Christmas or whatever. And I would say,

115:57

hey, um, I will email those people and I

116:00

will uh get everything approved by you

116:02

and don't pay me anything. Just pay me a

116:03

percentage of the sales that we generate

116:05

afterwards. How's that sound? And that

116:07

offer tends to do well. And I know that

116:09

because I've done it. So, that's what I

116:11

would do. in the thousand dollars, I

116:12

would, you know, go buy Leila something

116:14

for a little bit of time so that she can

116:16

stay with me until uh I make the money

116:18

for my my email reactivation campaign.

116:22

>> See what I get?

116:27

I got the 10K.

116:28

>> Ah,

116:29

>> all right. We're going around the circle

116:30

here. Um, I like it.

116:34

I would find the person who would buy

116:36

what I was selling for the highest

116:38

dollar amount humanly possible, which

116:40

means I would probably go to private

116:43

equity companies. So, Alex gave me the

116:45

idea for Main Street. I I know that Main

116:47

Street businesses are like often cash

116:49

crunched, right? They don't have a lot

116:50

of money and they often cannot extract

116:53

enough value from a lead that I need

116:56

them to. So, Alex would need to find the

116:58

perfect company to do that and there's

117:00

lots of them or he would build his own

117:01

which would be great. I think in my

117:02

specific instance, I want to go to the

117:04

people who are already good at

117:05

extracting the most value humanly

117:06

possible. So, I'd probably try to go to

117:08

a private equity firm. And I would

117:10

>> What's a private equity firm?

117:11

>> It's basically a fancy way for saying

117:13

that people use their own money to buy

117:14

businesses as opposed to public equity

117:16

where people use the stock markets

117:18

dollars to buy businesses. And so,

117:20

examples would be like u you know KKR,

117:23

Carile, uh Cberus are some of the

117:26

biggest in the world.

117:26

>> So, they go around buying people's

117:28

businesses with their own money.

117:29

>> That's right. Yeah. Yeah. they find

117:30

entrepreneurs right about the point

117:31

where they cannot take it anymore and

117:33

they buy those businesses and then they

117:35

they grow them hugely and and and again

117:37

because I'm better at partnerships I

117:39

would want to go to them and I would

117:40

want to say and it really what's

117:41

interesting is I bet all of us are going

117:43

to be really similar the money actually

117:45

doesn't matter and so even though I have

117:48

$10,000 10x what Alex has it doesn't

117:51

actually matter because what I would do

117:52

still $10,000 is not enough for me to

117:55

make a couple million which is what I

117:56

would want to do with this so what

117:58

actually is the differentiator what is

118:00

the business model I choose? Who do I go

118:02

to sell it to so that I can get the most

118:04

value out of it? And with these PE

118:06

companies, what I would do is I would go

118:08

to them and they're buying companies all

118:09

the time. And so there's two ways to

118:12

sell to a PE company and I'd see which

118:13

ones I could get them to sign up for. On

118:15

one hand, there's something called a

118:16

deal sourcing fee, which is if you can

118:18

find companies that are in the niche

118:20

that PE companies want to buy, they will

118:22

pay you for sourcing the company. Um,

118:24

and I know this because I pay deals

118:26

fees. And so I would go to private local

118:29

private equity companies. You're not

118:30

going to be able to get to Cberus or the

118:31

big guys. So I would go to the ones in

118:32

my local neighborhood that you could

118:34

find by searching on AI to say local

118:36

private equity companies buying these

118:38

types of companies. I would reach out to

118:40

the GPS. Those are the general partners

118:41

of the company, the guys who run it. And

118:43

I would say what type of companies are

118:45

you actively purchasing right now?

118:46

What's your investment thesis and

118:47

dealbox? And if I could get them to

118:49

respond to me, great. If not, I'd

118:51

search, what do private equity companies

118:53

typically want to buy? what what is the

118:54

deal box or investment thesis of a

118:56

private equity company? I would find

118:58

that dealbox and then I'd play the game

118:59

of doornocking. I'd go to a bunch of

119:01

these businesses and try to find

119:02

companies that wanted to sell and then

119:04

when they tell me they want to sell and

119:06

I have a buyer, which is the private

119:07

equity uh company, the private equity

119:10

company will pay me either a percentage

119:11

of the sale or a flat fee for sourcing

119:13

it.

119:13

>> What might that look like in terms of a

119:15

percentage and dollar number? Yeah, I

119:17

mean, if you're like a a

119:18

non-institutional player doing this, I

119:21

think you would go to them and say, "Can

119:22

I get like 10k for every company that I

119:24

source you that's over a million dollars

119:25

in revenue that's profitable and within

119:27

your dealbox?" They'd probably say yes.

119:29

The normal sourcing fee is somewhere

119:30

between 3 and 5%. But you're not going

119:32

to get that when you're brand new. So,

119:34

but I like the idea of making 10K on one

119:37

deal to start. Then, what else am I

119:38

learning while I'm doing this? I'm also

119:40

learning simultaneously how do you buy

119:42

businesses? What type of businesses? How

119:44

do you find businesses for sale? I think

119:45

this is the highest leverage activity I

119:47

know how to do. Like I just I know more

119:50

how to buy a business that's already

119:51

making money and make it make more money

119:53

with a higher degree of certainty

119:54

because if it's already profitable, it

119:56

gets out of the valley of death, which

119:57

is where a company starts and never

120:00

actually makes any profit. And so I

120:02

would start there and then what would I

120:04

do for that? Well, the second that they

120:05

see that I'm good at sourcing deals,

120:06

there's going to be they're going to be

120:07

throwing offers at me. But what I might

120:09

do instead is go to those GPS and say,

120:11

"Hey, I'm pretty good at doing the

120:13

hardest part of private equity, which is

120:14

finding the deals. Why don't you guys

120:16

back me for me to find the deals for

120:18

you?" Maybe they'll invest in my company

120:20

for me to then run a private equity

120:22

firm. Or maybe they'll say, "Come work

120:23

for me, and then I can make a couple

120:24

hundred,000. I can learn what I think is

120:26

the best uh skill out there to learn,

120:28

which is dealm. And I can use my

120:30

leverage, which is knowing what a

120:32

company's worth and how to buy it using

120:34

other people's money in order to

120:36

increase uh my earnings. And that's

120:39

>> interesting. You'd both use the money

120:40

for personal things, probably just pay

120:41

your rent or take your

120:42

>> doesn't make a difference at that level.

120:44

And I mean,

120:45

>> no,

120:45

>> even the hundred is close to I mean,

120:47

it's more than 10 in one, but

120:49

>> yeah. And and this is just one idea. I

120:52

think there's so many things you could

120:53

do with one and

120:54

>> but they're all very similar in their

120:55

fundamentals

120:56

>> where you go to find some like the

120:57

leverage comes from going tapping into

120:59

existing networks. You find an existing

121:01

business and either you're selling the

121:02

business as the product or you're

121:03

selling the product of that business.

121:05

Right. Exactly. So you're selling either

121:07

way and all of it is promotion. You're

121:09

selling and you're trying to get a

121:11

percentage of upside. I'm getting a

121:12

percentage of because like to Cody's

121:14

point, a lot of mainstream businesses

121:15

don't have money and you're like, "Cool,

121:16

pay me on money that I make you and

121:18

they're usually very very generous with

121:20

money they don't have yet."

121:22

>> Um, same same for, you know, a deal that

121:24

we haven't made yet, I'll give you, you

121:26

know, a fee for those things. Again, it

121:27

depends on the timeline. If I have 30

121:28

days, then like

121:30

>> getting a deal done in 30 days will be

121:32

tough.

121:32

>> Um, but like getting a brick and mortar,

121:35

it's like probably do that in 48 hours

121:36

to get somebody to say yes to free money

121:38

for like no risk and I do all the work.

121:40

It's an easy offer. So again, I think it

121:42

dep that's where like the constraints of

121:43

the initial prompt is like how much

121:45

money and how much time. If it's a year,

121:47

it's like all of this changes. If it's

121:49

30 days and I have nothing, it's like

121:50

well then we want to generate as much

121:51

cash as we can in little time as

121:52

possible with no risk.

121:53

>> Yeah.

121:53

>> Daniel's about to invest in the S&P 500.

121:57

>> Right. Because

121:57

>> he's like, I take your your $10,000 and

121:59

I raise you. Yeah.

122:00

>> So I have 100,000.

122:03

>> So

122:04

>> he's leaving with it.

122:06

>> This this is a dangerous amount of

122:08

money.

122:08

>> Yeah. This is the worst case scenario

122:11

for most people because if you have a

122:13

thousand, you know, you don't have

122:14

money. If you have 10,000, okay, you

122:17

might get a cleaner, you might get an

122:19

assistant, you might do a few little

122:20

things with it. The danger of a h

122:22

100,000 is you can kid yourself into

122:24

thinking that you've got money. And it

122:25

will make your head spin how fast you

122:27

can blow through $100,000 if if you

122:30

don't know what you're doing. If you

122:31

give me a Formula One car and ask, "What

122:34

am I gonna do with it?" I'm gonna crash

122:36

it, right? if I can get it even started

122:38

in the first place. So, I've got to come

122:39

up with something that the first problem

122:41

that I have is I don't have the

122:43

knowledge. I don't have the network. I

122:44

don't have the reputation. So, here's

122:46

what I'm going to do. I'm going to

122:47

leverage Cody's. I'm going to go to Cody

122:49

and I'm going to say, "Cody, can I do a

122:50

deal with you? I would like to start a

122:53

business. I know you've got lots of

122:54

ideas that you just don't have time for.

122:56

I'm going to invest $100,000 as debt for

122:58

equity for 10%. So, I'm going to put 100

123:01

grand in and that'll come out of the

123:02

business at some point, but debt for

123:03

equity on 10%. and I'm going to do sweat

123:05

equity for 10% and you keep 80%. And

123:09

it's your idea and it's your network and

123:11

it's your reputation, but I'll be the

123:13

person who's heavily invested in this.

123:16

And the only condition is that as the

123:18

business becomes profitable, we can

123:19

repay the 100 grand. Um, and then once

123:22

it's repaid the 100 grand, either you

123:24

buy it or we can sell the business.

123:26

Now, what I'm doing there is I'm

123:28

basically acknowledging I don't know

123:29

what I'm doing. I'm acknowledging I

123:31

don't have the reputation. I don't have

123:32

the knowledge. um all I have is this 100

123:34

grand and I have a very strong desire or

123:37

will to be an entrepreneur. Now, what's

123:38

going to happen is that probably with an

123:40

hour of Cody's time per month, she's

123:43

going to be able to say, "Here's the

123:44

idea. Here's here's my CFO. Talk to my

123:46

CFO. Here's my head of marketing. Talk

123:48

to my head of marketing. Here's my

123:50

friend who's actually got even more

123:51

money and wants to invest." And she's

123:53

just going to like fire off a few emails

123:55

and she's going to love the idea because

123:57

it's her idea. And I'm going to I'm

123:59

going to work hard, right? And what's

124:01

cool is that when the time comes that

124:03

that business becomes valuable, I've got

124:05

one buyer on the table. Cody's either

124:07

going to say, "Hey, look, I'll buy you

124:08

out because it's only 20% and now I own

124:10

the whole thing." Uh, or we go to market

124:13

and Cody will know someone who can buy

124:14

the business and I get 20% of the exit.

124:17

So, but the key here is that just that

124:20

acknowledgement that the it's really

124:22

it's the knowledge, the network, and the

124:23

reputation that is the valuable bit. And

124:25

the money is a bit of a red herring.

124:27

>> And you're going to get Cody's skills

124:28

because you're going to be in her

124:29

proximity. you're going to get a little

124:30

bit of her reputation

124:31

>> at the end of that deal. I will then

124:33

have knowledge. I'll then have

124:36

reputation. I'll then have uh all of

124:39

those things will have leveled up for

124:40

me.

124:40

>> You know what else is interesting too?

124:42

It's really what you're proposing is is

124:44

something that I used to not like and

124:46

since have think and since think that

124:48

when you find the right ones, it's it's

124:50

really fascinating which it's a

124:51

franchise model. You're essentially

124:53

saying which is what you do when you

124:54

come to a franchise. If you come to

124:55

Resibrands, you go, "Okay, I have

124:57

$75,000. I don't know anything about

124:59

window cleaning. I don't know anything

125:01

about running a business. But I do know

125:03

that you know how to do it. And I know

125:05

that you have all these case studies,

125:06

aka proof of other people just like me

125:09

that have done it. So, I'm actually

125:10

going to pay you for this business for

125:13

the right for you to take a percentage

125:15

of my ownership forever in perpetuity.

125:17

Um, but I will teach you how to or you

125:19

will teach me how to run the business.

125:20

And so I think that's actually I I think

125:24

I used to think that franchises weren't

125:25

good for entrepreneurs because I am

125:27

relatively unemployable and I don't like

125:29

to be told what to do. But for people

125:31

that have never run a business before

125:34

like what you're saying is like I'm

125:35

paying you for the right to learn

125:37

because you have a proven system that if

125:39

I use it over time I have a lower

125:41

likelihood of failure because we know

125:44

the truth which is 90% of startups fail.

125:46

>> Most startups never make any money. you

125:48

pay for the right to maybe potentially

125:50

one day make money. And so I do think

125:52

stealing other people's homework is is

125:54

real and valuable. I

125:55

>> I wanted to ask you all a question which

125:57

I have an answer to. So I assumed you

125:59

would but maybe you don't, which is what

126:01

is the one thing about entrepreneurship,

126:03

wealth creation, finance that you think

126:07

most people undervalue that you you put

126:11

a a disproportionate amount of weight

126:13

on. So like for me, I can think of a

126:14

game in business. I think of business as

126:16

a set of games we're playing. I can

126:17

think of a particular game in business

126:19

that I don't think other entrepreneurs

126:20

understand the value of and I'm

126:22

wondering if you all have an answer to

126:24

that as well. Is there one game in this

126:26

game of business, one fundamental game

126:28

that you think most entrepreneurs

126:29

listening now don't appreciate and they

126:31

should from the entrepreneurs you've

126:32

worked and invested in and being one

126:34

yourself?

126:35

>> Well, I think I'll say one that everyone

126:36

here at the table will agree with. But I

126:37

think that brand and distribution is

126:39

still wildly undervalued. M

126:41

>> I mean I think that's the reason that

126:42

all of us decided to get into it is

126:44

because you just I mean at least I saw

126:45

just the wild discrepancy between cost

126:48

of of building brand and building

126:50

distribution versus the value of that

126:52

distribution and you know the the primes

126:55

the lunches the you know some of these

126:57

in insane zero to many billion dollar

127:00

case studies uh term huda beauty proper

127:03

proper uh whatever it is for yeah like

127:05

there's there's so many examples at this

127:07

point that it's almost trite um I still

127:09

think it's undervalued distribution,

127:11

which is building an audience that you

127:13

own

127:13

>> that has a high likelihood of of

127:15

complying with requests,

127:16

>> aka brand.

127:18

>> Yeah. I mean, well, I think that's a

127:20

very good one. And and the reason that

127:22

we know that it's so undervalued is

127:24

we're all offered things all the time

127:26

that do not I mean, I remember talking

127:28

to my president of my company, and I was

127:30

the former president of Mr. Beast. It

127:32

was interesting is he said like every

127:34

deal we looked at,

127:36

>> we almost regretted doing it. Like we

127:38

couldn't I think you and I talked about

127:39

this. We we we couldn't do a deal that

127:41

the other party fully understood the

127:43

power of our distribution upfront. We

127:45

almost had to like prove it, put in a

127:47

bunch of milestones on a later date

127:48

because the deal is so good. And I found

127:50

the same thing in the deals that I did.

127:51

Like we've talked about like I mean I

127:53

did a bunch of deals early on where I

127:55

bought businesses and they couldn't

127:57

benefit from distribution. All my

127:58

laundromats, my car washes, like it

128:00

doesn't matter that I have a big

128:01

audience online and so the leverage

128:03

wasn't there for me. So I think um I

128:06

think distribution and brand are huge.

128:08

Uh the secondary thing that I do not

128:10

think most entrepreneurs understand is

128:13

financial engineering. The richest

128:15

people in the world are rich if if they

128:17

didn't get it from daddy and mommy and

128:19

they didn't get it from uh investing in

128:22

third party companies. They got it from

128:25

um they got it from owning companies and

128:27

buying them over time. Like every

128:29

billion there is not a billion dollar

128:30

company that exists that hasn't bought

128:32

other companies. It doesn't exist. When

128:34

you say financial engineering, how do

128:35

you simplify that for someone that's 16

128:37

years old?

128:38

>> Man, understanding how to get other

128:40

people's money, to say it really simply,

128:42

like how to get other people's money,

128:43

which sounds a little scammy, except

128:45

it's not. You know, most businesses are

128:47

bought with the SBA loans, loans from

128:50

the government that allow you to buy a

128:51

business. Businesses need lines of

128:53

credit. That's just money from the bank

128:55

for future state. So, like if you

128:57

actually understood how money and

128:58

finance works in your business, it's

129:00

harder to die because cash flow is what

129:03

keeps your company alive. And also, it's

129:05

easier to buy your competitors because

129:07

whoever is most funded wins typically.

129:10

>> Um, and so I think

129:11

>> I think more entrepreneurs need to

129:13

obsess on the thing that uh isn't the

129:16

magic. Like the magic is coming up with

129:18

an idea, having the grit, doing the

129:20

brand, doing the distribution. That

129:21

stuff's actually really really hard.

129:23

financial engineering is is modelable.

129:26

It's just it's the same every single

129:29

time. It's just been gatekept by by Wall

129:31

Street

129:31

>> money games. I I had this I had such an

129:33

epiphany moment when I was like 20 23 24

129:36

years old when my um a German group had

129:40

basically bought the majority of my

129:41

company out and I got to spend a lot of

129:42

time because we now had this German

129:43

office. So, I was there a lot and I just

129:45

observed this one individual who I shan

129:47

and I I I'm there building this business

129:49

and pitching to clients and doing all

129:50

this hard work and I met him and he

129:52

says, "I don't want to do any hard work.

129:53

I just want to do deals."

129:55

>> And I was like, "Tell me more." And I

129:56

lent in. I'm like, "What do you mean

129:57

deals?" Cuz I'm like, "I'm not sleeping

129:59

here." And this guy looks like he's

130:01

sleeping like tremendous amounts of

130:02

hours. And he was like, "I just want to

130:04

play money games.

130:05

>> I want to be in the middle of the

130:06

transaction of the deal and taking

130:08

some." But then he's also when he says

130:09

money games is like leverage and

130:13

arbitrage

130:14

>> raising money against an asset,

130:16

overvaluing that asset and buying lots

130:18

of cheaper assets with the value of the

130:20

expensive asset.

130:21

>> And he made a lot of money doing exactly

130:23

that and almost never working cuz he

130:25

understood exactly what you're saying is

130:27

that really really rich people

130:28

understand money games.

130:30

>> Just how to use money leverage to make

130:33

more money.

130:34

>> Look at the Forbes 100 list. It's all

130:35

comprised of people who do financial

130:37

arbitrage in one way or another.

130:38

>> How do I go learn that skill? Do I have

130:40

to go work in finance?

130:41

>> No, you don't have to work in finance.

130:42

But I mean, the best business school is

130:44

always be in business. So, get into

130:45

business and then obsess on one like I

130:47

think it's like tiered. Bottom level is

130:49

like understand a P&L. Most

130:51

entrepreneurs don't have a profit and

130:52

loss statement. They don't actually

130:54

track their profit and loss statement. I

130:56

mean, we invested at a $60 million a

130:58

year year business. The guy didn't have

131:00

an up-to-date profit and loss statement.

131:01

It's incredibly common. I'm sure you see

131:03

it. you look at a bunch of businesses

131:05

too. Second level after a profit and

131:07

loss statement is do I understand where

131:09

my financing is coming from? All you

131:10

need to do to understand that is talk to

131:12

your bankers like do you have a bank

131:15

that will lend you money? Understand

131:16

why. Uh explain to them what you do and

131:20

see if they understand it and how much

131:21

money they'll give you. And then the

131:23

third level of the game is go and talk.

131:25

Every like learning that needs to be

131:27

done is just getting in the room with

131:28

other people who have their Tuesdays are

131:30

like your dream days. So I think you

131:33

know you want to get in a room with a

131:34

bunch of people who are doing deals.

131:35

That's how you do more deals.

131:37

>> When I um I told you earlier we were

131:38

talking about psychedelics before we

131:39

started recording.

131:40

>> Yeah.

131:40

>> Um when I left my last company I had

131:42

that year and a half where I invested in

131:43

this massive psychedelics company and it

131:45

was the pandemic. So we're working from

131:47

everyone was working from home. I was

131:49

working from the billionaire's apartment

131:50

in London. And I got to see in the

131:52

leadup to the IPO he did 10 IPOs a year.

131:55

So I got to sit in his kitchen and he we

131:56

used to work over there and I just got

131:58

to see what was going on. And all he was

132:00

doing was making phone calls to people

132:02

with lots and lots of money and he was

132:04

giving them access to the IPO before it

132:06

IPOed at a valuation which we all knew

132:09

was going to 10x. And I just thought, oh

132:11

my god, like this is how rich people

132:12

make money. They have some kind of

132:14

access or arbitrage and they move money

132:16

around to capitalize on on these

132:18

multiples. And I thought, [ __ ] hell,

132:20

like that's

132:21

>> that's the game.

132:21

>> Get around billionaires. I know it's a

132:23

crazy thing, but you started a podcast.

132:26

>> I've done a podcast. Well,

132:28

>> I'm slightly older than you guys. Like,

132:31

I remember before the internet, before

132:33

YouTube, before all of this sort of

132:35

stuff. There was no access to the this

132:37

information. You couldn't get this

132:38

information. And now you can you can

132:40

listen to podcasts. You can chat to chat

132:42

GBT. You don't even have to get in the

132:44

room and like it's it's all on the

132:46

internet. And it blows my mind because I

132:48

remember a time before that. I I love

132:50

what you said. I totally agree with what

132:52

you said. I'm going to go with um the

132:54

one game that most people don't

132:55

understand is bananas.

132:58

That's the end of the podcast.

133:01

>> In lesson one of every economics class,

133:03

they say if you've got 10 bananas and a

133:05

100 people want a banana, you're going

133:07

to have high prices and profit. Demand

133:09

outstrips supply. If you've got 10

133:11

bananas and only one person wants

133:12

banana, you're going to drop the price

133:14

of those bananas and you're going to

133:15

make a loss and your business is going

133:16

to go badly. And what most people do not

133:18

understand is that the whole game

133:21

relates to constrained supply and excess

133:23

demand. And if you can't constrain the

133:25

supply and create excess demand, you

133:27

won't get a profit. You can take

133:29

something like Google Maps, which

133:31

probably costs 500 million to set up and

133:33

and launch satellites and everything,

133:34

they have to give it away for free

133:36

because they have infinite supply. They

133:39

have they can supply everyone on the

133:40

planet with Google Maps. So, because

133:42

there's infinite supply, they just give

133:44

it away for free. But Google Ads,

133:47

there's a limited number of people who

133:48

can advertise on every search. So

133:51

because that's limited, the the price

133:53

goes up. So I have a client who saves

133:56

lives and they do first aid training and

133:58

they're an amazing person and they

134:00

literally save children's lives and all

134:02

this sort of stuff. And she's telling

134:03

me, you know, why aren't I able to

134:05

trade, you know, charge more money? I'm

134:07

literally saving lives. I'm a really

134:08

good person and I'm very valuable. I say

134:11

because the whole game, no one that

134:13

that's not the game. The game is demand

134:14

outstrip supply. So you need to

134:17

constrain the supply of something and

134:18

you need to manufacture excess demand

134:21

and unfortunately as as much as you

134:24

might be the most amazing human being if

134:27

you can't manufacture demand and supply

134:28

tension you can't make a profit.

134:31

>> I was hoping and thinking someone might

134:33

say hiring

134:35

>> because for me my answer is hiring.

134:37

That's the first thing I go to. I

134:38

remember Richard Branson sitting me down

134:39

when we spoke in New York and saying

134:40

listen I built one of the biggest groups

134:42

in Europe and my CFO had pulled me out

134:44

of the room and said I don't know what

134:46

net profit is and he says my CFO got

134:48

crayons and a piece of paper and drew

134:50

fishes in a net in an ocean and said

134:52

Richard that's your net profit and then

134:53

they walked back in the room and he was

134:54

at the time running one of the biggest

134:55

groups in Europe.

134:57

When he said that to me, I was like,

134:58

"Wow." He was like, "You don't really

134:59

need to know much if you're a really

135:00

masterful delegator."

135:02

>> And he said I was a dyslexic thinker.

135:03

So, I was always forced from the very

135:05

beginning to just find someone to do it.

135:07

That was exceptional. And actually, the

135:09

further I've gone in my career, the more

135:10

just like you figure out like

135:12

>> the game, this game, that it's actually

135:13

just a couple of fundamental things that

135:15

sway the outcomes. Like most of the

135:17

returns come from like a couple of

135:18

things. In business, I've just come to

135:20

learn the further I've got that my

135:22

returns come from truly exceptional

135:24

people, binding them with a culture and

135:26

then setting them the sort of strategy

135:27

or more technical things that

135:29

>> I would agree with that. And the reason

135:32

you can find such amazing talented

135:34

people and so could Richard Branson is

135:36

because first he could create excess

135:38

demand for that role and then you could

135:41

choose from that list.

135:42

>> So I go back to when I was 18. I was 18,

135:44

broke, drop out of university, parents

135:46

aren't speaking to me, shoplifting food.

135:48

I managed to get a guy called Chris who

135:50

was running a business to

135:53

um stop his business. He was he was

135:55

double my age and successful to stop his

135:58

business and to decide to come and build

136:00

a social network with a kid who was

136:01

stealing Chicago town pizzas in

136:02

Manchester who had never built a

136:04

technology company before in exch I

136:06

didn't pay him in exchange for 30% of

136:08

the company. And this goes back to this

136:10

whole thing about offers. My pitch, my

136:12

offer at that time, I was trading in

136:14

future money, equity, and he believed in

136:16

the value of the future money. So I say

136:18

to kids all the time, actually, you

136:19

don't need to be in my position now.

136:21

You've all got future money. And the

136:23

future money is determined by how good

136:24

your pitch is. Yeah.

136:25

>> Your sell is.

136:26

>> But I think that goes back to that like

136:27

how I talk about pitching for money.

136:29

That's your mightest touch. You didn't

136:30

have profit.

136:31

>> You didn't have growth. You didn't have

136:33

a track record. What did you have? An

136:34

incredible [ __ ] story. Yeah. So if

136:36

you got nothing else but a story, then

136:38

you can hire people much smarter.

136:39

>> Exactly.

136:40

>> This actually brings me to a point that

136:42

I haven't told the world about yet. I've

136:44

just built something called culture

136:46

test. You can find it at culture

136:47

test.com. Essentially, the thinking is

136:50

that one bad hire, as I'm sure all of my

136:52

guests here will agree, can ruin your

136:55

business. It can ruin your idea. So,

136:56

culture test helps you figure out and

136:58

spot red flags and people you're

137:01

thinking of working with or currently do

137:02

work with by making a personalized

137:05

culture test survey and it scores that

137:07

person in terms of how aligned they are

137:09

to you and your mission. It has been a

137:12

gamecher for my business. We've culture

137:13

tested about 40,000 people. I just wish

137:18

I was doing this before. Check it out.

137:20

Cultureest.com. Make your own culture

137:22

test. Use it and thank me later. Alex,

137:25

you you've got this book about to drop

137:27

called 100 million money models. What is

137:30

the one money model in this book that's

137:32

added the most to your net worth?

137:35

>> So, it's more the concept. So, like each

137:37

of the the so offers had the value

137:38

equation which is kind of the core

137:39

concept that the book was built around.

137:41

Uh the lead's book was about the core

137:42

four um the ways to promote anything.

137:45

And so, $100 million money models is

137:47

about client finance acquisition which

137:49

is fundamentally how you get customers

137:50

to fund your own expansion. And so Cody

137:54

said this earlier, but depending on the

137:55

source, it's roughly like 80% of

137:57

businesses fail because of uh poor cash

137:59

flow or they they just don't have enough

138:00

money, right? And the other 20 is

138:01

probably just people just give up. And

138:03

so as long as you don't give up, the

138:04

reason you go to business is you just

138:05

don't have cash flow. And so that book

138:08

solves cash flow, which is why the sub

138:09

headline is how to make money, which is

138:11

pretty pretty on the nose. But

138:12

fundamentally like each of the examples

138:14

that I had in my business um and I

138:16

define that within client fun

138:18

acquisition as I define it when you have

138:19

like a $100 million money model is that

138:21

you're able to get a customer to pay you

138:24

twice as much as you spend on them in

138:26

the first 30 days. And by doing that the

138:29

the more specific equation would be that

138:31

your 30-day gross profit from a customer

138:34

exceeds two times CAC plus COGS meaning

138:36

CAC is in cost of car customer plus cost

138:38

uh COGS which is cost of goods sold. So,

138:40

how much does it cost me to get them?

138:42

How much does it cost me to deliver

138:43

them? Times two. If I can get that from

138:45

one person, then for the rest of my

138:47

expansion, all the customers finance the

138:49

acquisition of the next customer and

138:51

then cash flow is no longer a constraint

138:52

of the business. You'll still have

138:53

constraints, you'll still have supply

138:54

constraints, you still have hiring

138:55

constraints, you'll still have other

138:56

constraints, but cash won't be one of

138:57

them. And so, as a result, you can grow

138:59

B pretty much as fast as you can handle.

139:01

And so, that is how I've grown all the

139:03

companies that I've started without

139:04

funding and been able to grow very fast

139:06

in each of them um is with that core

139:09

concept.

139:11

Thank you. Thank you for uh choosing to

139:13

be here today. And I invited you here

139:14

because you're the three people that

139:16

guide me, that I listen to, that I think

139:17

have the most credible, important

139:20

information that can guide my audience.

139:22

And I know who they are. They're people

139:23

that want to improve their lives in some

139:24

subjective medium to that the northstar

139:27

that they have. And you all represent

139:28

different perspectives and also

139:29

different strategies. But there's so

139:31

much so many overlaps that I think

139:33

actually getting three people like you

139:34

around the table to understand where we

139:36

overlap and where you think the same is

139:38

incredibly powerful. Um, I highly

139:40

recommend everybody goes and reads Cody

139:42

Sanchez's book, Main Street Millionaire,

139:44

>> how to make extraordinary wealth buying

139:46

ordinary businesses, which is really

139:48

what, you know, one of the things Cody

139:49

has pioneered the idea of um, and made

139:52

accessible to the masses because most

139:53

people didn't think you could do that.

139:54

So many of my friends are now buying

139:56

boring businesses, as Cody says, because

139:58

Cody has laid out a framework to do that

140:00

and to create wealth in this book. And

140:01

my favorite book of Daniel, if I was

140:02

over subscribed, how to get people

140:04

lining up to do business with you. And

140:05

there's so many that I could have chose

140:06

from, but also you all have YouTube

140:08

channels and your YouTube channels are

140:09

amazing. So, I'd ask my audience, I'm

140:11

going to link them all below, to go and

140:12

check out your YouTube channels. Um,

140:14

Daniel, you're just starting out on

140:15

YouTube. You're getting you're getting

140:16

your your feet wet in YouTube.

140:19

>> But, but Cody and Alex have been making

140:21

so much incredible actionable content. I

140:24

love one of your new your new formats

140:26

where you sit with someone and you sort

140:28

of redesign their business with them.

140:30

and Cody's been making some of the most

140:32

entertaining and informative content on

140:33

on how to get going with with simple um

140:37

companies and businesses for the longest

140:38

time. So, please go check out their

140:39

their work and go follow them on social

140:41

media. These are the people that I

140:43

admire the most in this space. And if

140:45

you like what we do here on the

140:46

Darvisio, you're going to love what they

140:47

do. So, thank you so much everybody for

140:49

being here, for being so generous with

140:50

your time and hopefully we'll do this

140:51

again sometime soon.

140:52

>> This has always blown my mind a little

140:54

bit. 53% of you that listen to this show

140:57

regularly haven't yet subscribed to the

140:59

show. So, could I ask you for a favor

141:01

before we start? If you like the show

141:02

and you like what we do here and you

141:03

want to support us, the free simple way

141:05

that you can do just that is by hitting

141:06

the subscribe button. And my commitment

141:08

to you is if you do that, then I'll do

141:10

everything in my power, me and my team,

141:12

to make sure that this show is better

141:13

for you every single week. We'll listen

141:15

to your feedback. We'll find the guests

141:17

that you want me to speak to and we'll

141:18

continue to do what we do. Thank you so

141:20

much.

141:22

[Music]

Interactive Summary

This video features a masterclass in entrepreneurship where three highly successful experts—Daniel Priestley, Cody Sanchez, and Alex Hormozi—share actionable frameworks for scaling businesses, pricing strategies, and achieving long-term profitability. The conversation covers key concepts like the MOAT strategy, the importance of selling to the right market, and the critical role of distribution and financial engineering in scaling wealth. The guests discuss the realities of content creation, the power of personal brand as an asset, and provide practical advice for those starting from scratch, emphasizing that true growth comes from leverage, obsession, and effective execution.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts