HomeVideos

Tear-Down of Rare ATi HD 4870 X2 Prototype & History

Now Playing

Tear-Down of Rare ATi HD 4870 X2 Prototype & History

Transcript

665 segments

0:02

This is a dual GPU engineering sample of

0:04

an AMD ATI HD 4870X2

0:08

that the company shipped back in 2008.

0:11

We bought this from a viewer and

0:13

although AMD didn't ship a variant of

0:16

what this eventually became, we've never

0:18

seen an engineering sample of it pop up

0:20

online, and this one's got some

0:22

interesting differences with it. The

0:24

retail version of this was the single

0:26

fastest graphics card when it launched

0:28

and forced Nvidia to slash prices of its

0:31

GTX 280 by $220 and its GTX 260 by $110

0:37

to contend with AMD's offerings

0:39

according to Techreport and Anitech from

0:41

the time. The release of this dual GPU

0:44

or the retail version of it came at a

0:46

pivotal moment for AMD less than two

0:48

years after acquiring ATI and only two

0:50

months before spinning out its foundry

0:52

business. Andy hadn't yet begun to

0:54

contend with the aftermath of the great

0:57

recession because it was the beforemath

0:59

or the middlemath of the great

1:01

recession. The 2008 financial crisis was

1:03

only really just beginning and that

1:05

would kick off one month after in

1:07

greater form when the layman brothers

1:08

collapsed a month after the dual GPU

1:11

launched for AMD. And just to be clear,

1:14

this didn't cause the layman brothers to

1:16

collapse. Although in a certain way that

1:18

would be sort of funny except for the

1:20

the part where the the financial crisis

1:22

happened, but otherwise it would be

1:23

funny. AMDy's stock was worth about $5

1:26

per share in August of 2008, falling to

1:29

$3.50 per share just 2 months later

1:32

after this card launched, setting it up

1:34

for failure long term. Following October

1:36

of 2008, the price plummeted to around

1:39

$2 per share by February of 2009. The

1:42

GPU that we're looking at today was part

1:44

of AMD's last flagship launch before it

1:47

entered a freef fall. It was also around

1:49

this era that AMD dumped its real estate

1:51

in the lease back deal, signaling what

1:54

almost became a death spiral. So, this

1:56

dual GPU video card that we're working

1:58

on today that our viewer found in I

1:59

think was a thrift shop or something

2:01

like that. uh this would have launched

2:04

right at the beginning of a long period

2:07

of turmoil for AMD the industry in

2:10

general but in particular for AMD long

2:13

before Ryzen was ever even someone's

2:15

idea that would only come to save AMD

2:18

nearly a decade later from the launch of

2:21

this card. We're fortunate enough to

2:22

have been able to buy this from a

2:24

viewer. We've actually got a lot of

2:25

really unique hardware from viewers over

2:27

the years. So, if you find stuff that

2:29

you think we might find interesting for

2:31

videos and you want to loan it to us or

2:33

sell it to us, you can email our tips

2:34

line, tips gamers.net. But our thanks to

2:37

uh Muzz for sending this over to us. We

2:39

bought it from them. And we're going to

2:41

get started with a tearown of this

2:43

engineering sample dual GPU card from

2:46

AMD to see what the differences are from

2:48

retail and try to get it to turn on.

2:51

Before that, this video is brought to

2:52

you by ID Cooling and the Frozen A720

2:55

cooler. The A720 air cooler performed

2:58

well in our testing last year. The A720

3:00

is a relatively high-end dual 140mimeter

3:03

air cooler with seven heat pipes. We

3:05

found the use of larger fans can be

3:06

beneficial to acoustic performance given

3:08

the thermals. Although, you'll want to

3:10

check your case for compatibility given

3:12

the taller nature of the cooler and its

3:14

fans. ID Cooling uses an all black look

3:16

for its A720 and includes mounting

3:19

hardware for all modern sockets. Learn

3:21

more at the link in the description

3:22

below. So, we had a lot of trouble

3:23

getting this card to work. We're going

3:25

to talk about that in a little bit here,

3:26

but today what we're focusing on is some

3:28

of the history of this card. A lot of

3:30

nostalgia from this era for a lot of

3:31

people. Personally, I had a system with

3:34

two 4870s. So, they were in Crossfire

3:38

and I think it was called the Ant

3:40

Skeleton. I think it was the big version

3:42

of the case. They had a mini and a large

3:44

one. That was my build for that era. I

3:46

remember playing Battlefield Bad

3:47

Company, whatever number it was back uh

3:50

shortly after in the 2010 2012 era with

3:54

those two 4870s. And uh this is kind of

3:58

familiar to that except it's one card

4:00

and an engineering sample which I

4:02

personally could have never dreamed of

4:04

having back at that time. So we're going

4:06

to try to get it to boot. We ran into a

4:08

lot of problems though. We'll talk about

4:09

that. Uh this is also a good opportunity

4:11

though for the history and the tear

4:12

down. Back when AMD's website looked

4:14

like it cared about gaming, rather than

4:16

using AI to spit out maps about Nebraska

4:18

and Texas during keynotes about AI for

4:22

education, the company announced its ATI

4:25

Radeon HD 4870X2.

4:28

The site feels like a throwback.

4:30

Gradients used for the buttons on the

4:31

website, a borderless styling, red and

4:34

black everywhere, and simple navigation.

4:36

It was a simpler time. It's a throwback.

4:39

AMD released the ATI Radeon HD 4870X2 in

4:43

August of 2008. Some things don't change

4:46

apparently, including naming schemes for

4:48

computer hardware. AMD marketed the card

4:50

towards what they said were ultra

4:53

enthusiasts and positioned its $550 dual

4:56

GPU against Nvidia's 9800 GX2 and GT200

5:01

series lineups. Today, that'd be about

5:03

$820 with inflation. This followed

5:06

Nvidia's famous 8800 GPU series, best

5:09

known for being able to run Crisis

5:11

reasonably well. At the time, Anitech

5:13

commented saying, quote, "It looks like

5:15

Nvidia's standards have changed largely

5:17

thanks to AMD, and now the key players

5:19

in Nvidia's lineup are priced more

5:21

realistically end quote." AMD's

5:23

marketing noted that the card had quote

5:25

unparalleled anti-aliasing and

5:27

anisotropic filtering. End quote. with

5:29

the features tab noting DirectX 10.1

5:32

support giving us a timestamp of an era.

5:35

The officially launched 4870X2 spec

5:37

sheet lists a 750 MHz GPU clock, a 900

5:41

MHz memory clock, 800 shading units, 40

5:44

TMUs, 16 rocks, 1 GB of GDR5 memory, and

5:48

a 256bit bus width per GPU. And again,

5:51

that's with two GPUs total. So you're

5:53

getting 2 GB total of GDR5 across the

5:57

whole board. The card also has a 286

5:59

watt TDP PCIe 2.0 x6 interface, two DVI

6:04

ports, and one Svideo port for display.

6:06

Dual GPUs can't access the resources

6:09

across the GPUs. So, these specs are

6:12

reserved for each GPU individually.

6:14

Crossfire means that you could put two

6:17

of these together, which would give you

6:18

four GPUs in two slots. Theoretically,

6:21

AMD basically took two RV770 processors,

6:24

from what we could tell, from its

6:25

already released ATI HD 4870 nonX2s.

6:30

They doubled the memory of each from 512

6:32

megabytes to 1 GB per GPU and combined

6:36

them on a single PCB along with a PLX

6:38

PCIe switch between the GPUs. Following

6:41

the same strategy introduced in its HD

6:44

3800 series and confirmed by Anitech of

6:46

the time, AMD competed at the high end

6:49

by multiplying its GPUs, effectively

6:51

planting two on the same PCB rather than

6:54

the traditional approach of using a

6:56

single flagship GPU at the high end and

6:58

then cutting it down for variations for

7:01

the mid-range and maybe low-end market

7:03

segments, if not spinning out something

7:04

different entirely. Andy decided

7:06

strategy was to build perfect solutions

7:09

for $200 to $300, which would be $300 to

7:12

$450 today. Andy stuck with that

7:15

strategy later as well, like with the RX

7:17

480. AMD's single card approach for two

7:20

GPUs granted users some key advantages

7:22

over traditional Crossfire

7:24

configurations by requiring fewer PCIe

7:26

slots and fewer PCIe power cables in

7:29

addition to eliminating motherboard

7:31

support for Crossfire which is something

7:33

that reviewers of the time noted

7:35

regarding AMD's newfound plan of attack

7:38

and tech reported quote so does AMD's

7:40

approach invalidate Nvidia's big

7:42

monolithic GPU strategy not exactly

7:45

while it is true that two RV770s can

7:48

outperform a single GT200 in many cases.

7:50

You could also make the argument that

7:52

two GT200s could outperform anything

7:54

that AMD could possibly concoct. Three

7:57

and four-way crossfire scaling isn't

7:59

nearly as good as two-way. AMD strategy

8:01

makes sense for AMD, but it's

8:03

fundamentally no different than what

8:04

Nvidia is doing. AMD is simply targeting

8:07

a different initial market and scaling

8:09

up or down from there. End quote. Early

8:12

marketing for the HD 4870X2 heavily

8:15

pushed Crossfire Sideport, a new

8:17

technology planned to release with the

8:19

card with AMD claiming it increase the

8:22

total interconnect bandwidth from 6.8 GB

8:25

per second to 21.8 GB per second, a

8:28

massive increase. Tech report explained

8:30

how it was supposed to work. reporting,

8:33

quote, "AMD says the side port is

8:35

electrically similar to PCI Express, but

8:37

is simpler because it's only intended as

8:39

a peer-to-peer link between GPUs. This

8:42

link augments the bandwidth already

8:43

available via the X2's Crossfire Bridge

8:46

interface, CFBI, in the diagram, which

8:48

is only used to pass final frames from

8:51

one GPU to the next for compositing and

8:54

its PCI Express lanes. The sideep port

8:57

connection should help improve

8:58

performance in cases where multiGPU

9:00

applications have typically had

9:02

performance scaling problems, such as

9:04

when texture synchronization between the

9:06

GPUs becomes a problem. End quote.

9:08

Despite its initial marketing, AMD

9:10

disabled the feature at launch due to

9:11

minimal performance uplift despite

9:14

increased power requirements and costs

9:15

for AIB vendors as reported via Anitech.

9:19

On the card's release day, PC

9:20

Perspective noted, quote, "The current

9:22

plan is to offer a software update for

9:24

the card that will enable the technology

9:26

for better performance. The problem is

9:28

that AMD is allowing board vendors an

9:30

option to include the Sideport

9:32

technology or leave it out for a cost

9:34

savings. This means that there'll be

9:36

some HD 4870X2 cards on the market

9:38

that'll be able to use Sideport

9:40

technology and some that will not.

9:42

distinguishing between the two will be

9:44

nearly impossible unless the card

9:46

vendors explicitly indicate their card

9:48

status. End quote. As far as we could

9:50

tell, AMD never enabled Sideport with

9:52

driver updates and ultimately abandoned

9:55

the technology after its HD 4800 series

9:58

launch. At that time, it would also have

10:01

been in the fight for its life as a

10:03

company. The big challenge with dual GPU

10:05

cards is that if you have a lot of

10:07

memory between two GPUs, it doesn't mean

10:10

one GPU has all that memory. So if

10:11

you've got 48 gigabytes on the board in

10:14

total, but it's 24 per GPU, although

10:17

still useful, it's not like you have a

10:20

single contiguous pool of 48 gigabytes

10:23

of memory. And that was true back here

10:26

too where GPUA can't use GPUB's memory

10:31

on this card if GPUB isn't doing

10:34

anything useful with it. So that's

10:36

always been a challenge for these dual

10:37

GPU solutions. Now, the performance of

10:39

most dual GPUs is also largely dependent

10:41

on driver support, which is kind of

10:43

shoddy, and whether the game or the

10:45

application knows how to utilize both

10:47

devices. So, despite their intrigue and

10:50

really a lot of the desire to make these

10:52

types of cards good, because it'd be

10:54

awesome if you could have obviously a

10:57

dual GPU card and then you put two of

10:59

them, now you got four and two slots.

11:01

Despite all of that, they've just never

11:03

been common and they've become even less

11:06

common over time. The first multiGPU

11:08

cards that we could remember were 3DFX's

11:11

Voodoo 2 and Quantum 3D's Obsidian 2

11:15

X24, both released in 1998. It wasn't

11:19

until around 2006 with Nvidia's 7950 GX2

11:23

that they really started to pick up

11:24

steam. The dual GPU trend would remain

11:26

for the next decade or so on and off

11:28

with the HD 4870X2 launching amidst the

11:31

height of the trend. Two of the last

11:33

dual GPU cards we can remember from that

11:35

time are Nvidia's GTX Titanz and AMD's

11:38

R9 295X2,

11:41

both released in 2014. Nvidia also

11:44

earlier than that had the GTX 690 in

11:46

2012. Since then, most dual GPUs have

11:49

been restricted to workstation cards

11:51

like AMD's Radeon Pro Duo cards,

11:54

Huawei's Ascend 300i Duo, and Maxon's

11:57

Intel Pro B60 Duel. Now getting into

12:00

trying to use it. Unfortunately, that is

12:03

where we ran into the big problems. We

12:05

could get the card to boot in a separate

12:07

slot as long as video was put out by

12:09

something else. The system recognized

12:11

the card and even powered it on in

12:13

various platforms we assembled with

12:14

different operating systems in our

12:16

attempts to boot with it. But the card

12:17

had issues putting out display and also

12:20

had issues getting drivers installed

12:21

onto the system. Additionally, any

12:23

attempts to force install the drivers

12:26

last officially supported on Windows 8

12:28

would crash our system and even

12:30

corrupted the operating system on

12:31

multiple occasions. Although in some

12:33

instances, like the Windows 8 9.1

12:36

version, nothing of value would be lost.

12:39

The engineering sample that we purchased

12:40

from a viewer did arrive with some

12:41

relatively minor shipping damage along

12:43

the PCIe bracket. It doesn't really seem

12:45

to be enough to affect the card's

12:47

functionality in any way. It's just the

12:48

metal that was affected that we can see.

12:51

But maybe it explains some of the

12:52

display troubles we ran into if there's

12:54

some underlying damage we can't see. We

12:56

did try a lot of things to get it to

12:57

work. So we tried Windows 11, Windows

13:00

10, Windows 8 varying versions and uh

13:02

experimented with PCIe bifurcation

13:05

support, checked on the support on the

13:07

motherboard. So that's another

13:08

interesting challenge of these dual GPU

13:10

devices is you're taking the PCIe slot,

13:14

you're basically splitting it into each

13:16

GPU is going to get eight lanes. if

13:18

you're on a buy 16 and that will also

13:20

require some form of logic for the

13:23

motherboard to do that. So, we checked

13:25

all that stuff and we just could not get

13:27

this thing to work. Maybe it was an

13:28

engineering sample for a reason. It

13:30

turns on, the fan spins, that's about

13:33

it. All right, so now we're going to

13:34

take apart the RV 770 engineering

13:36

sample. We'll start with kind of a walk

13:38

around of the card to see what the

13:40

design looked like. Really simple stuff.

13:42

So, this is a longer card with a

13:43

standard height uh PCIe slot. So they're

13:46

not protruding past the slot here. They

13:49

were running a blower fan and that's

13:52

just going to push the air straight

13:53

through over both GPU cores and out.

13:55

That would mean that this one runs

13:57

warmer, which it would do anyway because

13:58

it's further back, but also it's going

14:00

to get the heat dumped on it from this

14:01

core. The rest of the cooler design, I

14:04

mean, this is this is about as bad as

14:06

you can get in terms of thermal design,

14:08

um, even back then. But if they were

14:11

designing these to be stacked multiple

14:13

in a system, then blower is still the

14:15

best way to do it. Just because if you

14:16

got another card right here, there's no

14:19

room for the axial fans to bring air in

14:21

and and cool the heat sink. So the big

14:23

question is going to be whether this is

14:26

two or 4 GB of memory in total because

14:29

two is what it should be. But GPUZ was

14:32

showing this as four. We think it's a

14:33

software issue. If this has four for

14:36

real though physically, then that would

14:38

have been another reason. Maybe this was

14:39

an engineering sample. So, we'll start

14:41

with actually disassembling it. Now, I'm

14:43

going to track these on the mod mat,

14:46

which if you want to grab one of these

14:48

anti-static mats we make, they're on

14:49

store. Nexus.net. There's a grid here.

14:52

We're going to be tracking the front and

14:53

the back screws as I take them out. Just

14:55

because sometimes these engineering

14:56

samples, they have different types of

14:57

screws in weird locations. So, we got

15:00

Phillips one. Let's go around the whole

15:02

back plate first.

15:10

It's interesting to see the fat

15:12

capacitors externally.

15:15

All right, that's a good start.

15:17

Uh, this is better than the MSI card I

15:20

just took apart in the Cyber Power

15:21

pre-built review where that card used a

15:23

plastic back plate. This is at least

15:25

metal. So, this is aluminum. They're

15:27

sinking into this. not going to do a

15:29

whole lot, but since there's memory

15:30

directly on the back, there's nothing

15:32

else cooling it, which is going to be a

15:34

challenge to keep the heat down on

15:36

those. So, they need to do at least

15:38

something. And this is kind of the bare

15:40

minimum. So, we've got four modules for

15:43

each GPU. There's going to be some on

15:44

the other side as well. So, these are

15:46

debug LEDs that might be unique to this

15:49

card, uh, because in engineering

15:52

samples, they'll often put additional

15:54

LEDs or hookups. There's some unoccupied

15:58

four pin connector spots on the PCB

16:01

here. Over here, there's captain tape

16:05

covering two dip switches. So, that's

16:07

going to be unique to engineering card.

16:09

It's they're labeled one and two and

16:11

they say on and K. Those would have been

16:14

used for something in the debug and

16:16

engineering process. Let's get the

16:18

cooler off. Get a smaller driver.

16:20

Definitely not fully That is not fully

16:23

torqued. I'm not sure if that's because

16:25

someone else took it apart before us or

16:28

if they just didn't assemble it all the

16:31

way.

16:33

So, these are spring retention, which is

16:36

pretty much how it's been done for a

16:39

long time with GPUs. And then there's

16:41

just some plastic bumpers here. These

16:43

are probably to prevent a short. So,

16:45

those are just going to stop the uh the

16:47

bracket here, which is most likely

16:49

steel, from bridging any components on

16:53

the board. I'm wondering if the DIP

16:54

switch enables or disables one of the

16:57

GPUs.

17:02

So, this specific module isn't in the

17:05

data sheet. It's really close, though.

17:06

There's some There's a few that there's

17:08

four that have the exact same character

17:10

strain, but then one or two letters are

17:12

changed, which might just be to do with

17:14

pre-production versus production. Um, so

17:17

the format seems to match the one

17:19

gigabit modules. There's eight bits in a

17:21

bite. That would mean if there's four on

17:23

this side and there's four on the flip

17:25

side, that'd be eight total modules per

17:26

GPU, which would be one gigabyte per

17:29

GPU, which is what we would expect. This

17:31

is supposed to be a two total gigabyte

17:33

card, one per core. Uh, it does detect

17:36

as four in GPUZ, but unfortunately, it

17:38

looks like we do not have a gold mine of

17:40

memory right now in 2026 on this card,

17:45

but I think we've seen enough here to to

17:46

confirm that. So, now I'm going to take

17:48

apart the rest of this.

17:51

Oh, that was

17:54

a little crusty.

17:57

Yeah, look at that. That doesn't look

17:59

like a good quality copper. Yeah, we've

18:01

got thermal paste applied to two GPU

18:04

cores. This is pretty cool. Is that a

18:05

PEX chip? That might be a PEX chip.

18:07

Yeah. So, this is a PLX. This is a

18:09

multiplexer

18:11

for PCIe. So, this is what allows the

18:14

two GPU cores to share their lanes

18:17

through a single PCIe slot. These were

18:20

expensive. So, I don't know what they

18:21

cost at this point in time in history,

18:22

but the last time I looked up the price

18:24

of these like cost, they were $30 to $50

18:28

at the time. It was when they were

18:30

they're really in demand for specific

18:32

applications. The IHS for this is the

18:35

size is larger than the GPU silicon.

18:38

Then we've got our other four memory

18:39

modules per core here. So, that's going

18:41

to be eight total front and back, same

18:44

memory. So, uh that is going to be a two

18:48

total gigabyte card.

18:50

And then for the rest of this, it looks

18:51

like they've maybe changed some caps or

18:53

moved some things around. So between

18:55

these two power connectors, if we look

18:57

at the reference images on Tech

18:59

Power-Ups website where they have some

19:00

board shots, uh, this region looks

19:02

different. So that may be a that may be

19:05

unique for the engineering sample here.

19:07

I'm actually not sure what this is. I'm

19:09

going to have to look that up. I might

19:11

look that up. Let's look up you or V.

19:13

Oh, it's VTEC.

19:17

>> Honda

19:21

Variable cam timing.

19:22

>> H. Is that what that is?

19:24

>> E tech. Yeah.

19:25

>> Multi-phase SMD coupled inductor. No,

19:27

it's a coupled inductor.

19:29

>> That's not right.

19:29

>> That's not Yeah. Ron Honda.

19:34

Oh, these apparently these were

19:37

best known for use on the uh 4850 and

19:41

4870s. I'm just looking at some data

19:44

sheet entry for it. So, it's a coupled

19:46

inductor. Uh, it's part of the VRM. If

19:49

you look straight down here,

19:52

those are going to be the inductors

19:54

themselves. So, it looks like it might

19:57

be a group of I don't know, three or

19:58

something. Maybe maybe more than that.

20:00

But, that's just a big fat inductor

20:02

that's all grouped into one thing.

20:03

That's kind of cool. I haven't seen that

20:05

or I haven't seen it in a long time. If

20:07

I have Oh, another coupled component.

20:10

Yeah, that's another one. Oh, nice.

20:12

Plastic. There's plastic in the thermal

20:13

pad. That's good.

20:16

that'll conduct. So, this is going to be

20:19

uh three fats to the three inductors in

20:22

the coupled inductor. So, without

20:24

probing it directly, uh it's probably a

20:26

three-phase. And then we've got a plus

20:28

one over here. Maybe that's for memory.

20:30

It's possible that this is for memory.

20:32

One of these is going to be a

20:33

controller. One's going to be for

20:34

memory. There's another three phases

20:36

over here. That is probably for the uh

20:39

the other GPU. All right. So, this is

20:41

pretty easy. We're just going to see if

20:42

it says anything on the die. It does.

20:44

Nice. All right. Let's see what it says.

20:46

ATI

20:48

says site for sore eyes.

20:51

There's the ATI logo. So, this says

20:56

diffused in Taiwan. Made in Taiwan. So,

20:59

they were still they were already doing

21:01

stuff there. It does say engineering

21:04

sample

21:06

0818G

21:10

and

21:12

it's a B3 stepping whatever that would

21:14

have meant for this particular card. So

21:16

that's cool. This should be just the

21:18

same exact thing.

21:20

This might be the first pace it's gotten

21:22

in 20 years when we redo it. So same

21:26

thing just twice flipped. And uh

21:28

rotating it like that would allow them

21:30

to kind of rotate the memory and the VRM

21:33

and everything so that they can just

21:34

mirror them. This has some very orange

21:37

copper heat sinks. Normally that's not a

21:39

great sign.

21:41

Uh that can be an indicator of plating.

21:44

In this case, I I thought it was copper

21:45

plated, but um some crusty paste.

21:51

There's your heat sink. We're going to

21:53

go through and just pull the shell apart

21:55

to look at what the fin stack looks like

21:57

inside. Good use of thermal pads.

21:59

They've got a large thermal pad right in

22:01

the middle that would have been

22:02

contacting that PLX

22:04

chip. That's for the fan.

22:11

They really wanted this held together.

22:12

Couple things. First of all, they drove

22:14

that screw right through the memory

22:16

contact patch, the heat sink. So, a

22:18

little bit of lacking coverage there,

22:20

but uh steel screw doesn't really sink

22:22

that much heat. This is an aluminum base

22:26

plate. This is a kind of traditional

22:28

sign. Look at that. Look right. It was

22:32

perfect.

22:36

Again, you can grab your mod mat on the

22:38

store for moments like this. Uh aluminum

22:42

base plate. There you go. That's not

22:44

bad. They've got some fat fins here. the

22:47

the uh that's going to help with the

22:49

PLX. So, that is sitting right on top of

22:50

the PLX chip. They did get warm from

22:52

what I remember. I don't know what the

22:54

power was for them, but throwing pad to

22:56

it. And just as a reminder, that's what

22:59

that looks like. So, that larger square

23:01

pad contacts that PLX chip in the

23:03

middle. This is going to help sink the

23:05

heat. Wider fins will reduce the

23:08

resistance as you're pushing air through

23:11

the tighter fin stack here and then the

23:13

tighter fin stack here. This is uh those

23:17

pins we were looking at earlier. So,

23:18

those are going to help with memory.

23:20

There's a little bit of contact directly

23:21

under it to some of the MOSFETs um some

23:24

of the memory components like that

23:27

blower fan and uh otherwise this is all

23:30

they were cooling it with. This thing

23:31

would have run pretty hot. So, this was

23:33

also in an era where AMD and Nvidia

23:36

weren't shamed enough yet to really

23:38

improve the cooling on their GPUs. So,

23:40

that's going to be it for the history

23:41

lesson on this unique ATI AMD card right

23:45

after AMD bought ATI before they kind of

23:47

shuttered the brand and before one of

23:49

AMD's worst moments in its history

23:52

financially. Uh, after this would have

23:54

been bulldozer, pile driver,

23:57

steamroller, all of those CPUs before

23:59

the Ryzen launch in 2017 and the AM4

24:02

launch in 2016. So, this was sort of AMD

24:05

was doing okay and they managed to buy

24:07

ATI. that was big acquisition but then

24:10

they hit those they hit the 2008 crisis

24:13

not a good time for AMD and uh Nvidia

24:16

was much smaller at that time. So

24:18

historically really interesting point in

24:20

time for this card because this came out

24:22

like just before massive drops in AMD's

24:25

stock price and before AMD had to do a

24:28

lot of cutbacks which is why I think you

24:29

see some of the technologies that were

24:31

supposed to be in cards like this never

24:34

really coming to fruition because they

24:35

probably made a bunch of cuts to their

24:37

tech ambitions and just went towards

24:40

sort of trying to survive through the

24:42

2008 uh crisis. So really interesting

24:45

stuff. So that's going to be it for this

24:46

one. if you have any other older GPUs or

24:49

CPUs or anything you're interested in

24:50

where we could do a historical recap

24:53

plus maybe a tear down or something and

24:54

if we can get it working, which

24:55

unfortunately we couldn't get this one

24:57

to actually run anything successfully

24:59

without a major crash or corruption or

25:00

something. But if we can get it working,

25:02

let us know what kinds of parts that

25:05

you're interested in from older eras.

25:06

We'll see if we can get them or if we

25:08

already have them and maybe do a history

25:10

breakdown of it and some testing. And

25:12

otherwise, if you want to see more like

25:13

this, check out our 3DFX Voodoo GPU that

25:17

we looked at previously. That one was

25:18

handmade by someone who salvaged GPUs

25:21

from 3dfx that were never officially

25:23

released. We'll link that below. Thanks

25:25

for watching. Subscribe for more. You

25:26

can go to store.gamersac.net to support

25:27

us directly or patreon.com/gamersac.

25:30

and we'll see you all next time.

Interactive Summary

This video features a teardown and historical analysis of a rare engineering sample of the AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870X2, a dual-GPU graphics card from 2008. The host discusses the card's role in the market, which forced Nvidia to drastically reduce prices, and its place in history right at the onset of the 2008 financial crisis. The video also covers the card's specifications, the failed Sideport technology, and a detailed internal teardown revealing unique engineering components.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts