If you've been gauging the severity of

the war in Iran by just looking at the

S&P 500, you'd be forgiven for thinking

that the whole thing is just a minor

administrative hurdle. The kind that

clears up after a weekend of strongly

worded tweets. Equity investors, it

would appear, have decided that a

regional conflict might just be a buy

the dip opportunity. That calm finally

broke on Thursday when stocks had their

worst day since the conflict began with

the S&P 500 sliding to a six-month low

and the tech heavy Nasdaq officially

crossing into a technical correction,

meaning that it's more than 10% below

its high. The mood on the bond and

commodity desks remains grim. Analysts

there are staring at their screens in a

state of what one commentator called

alarming cognitive dissonance. In the

bond market, the term premium,

effectively the insurance premium

investors charge for holding long-term

debt, is surging. Robert Armstrong noted

this week that while 10-year interest

rates have gone up, break even inflation

has stayed relatively flat. This

suggests that investors aren't just

worried about inflation. They're worried

that in a world of supply shocks, bonds

no longer act as a good hedge for

stocks. They simply both fall at the

same time. In the UK, 30-year guild

yields have climbed to 5 12% as the Bank

of England faces a central banker's

nightmare, an energy shock that raises

inflation while killing growth. This

divergence is being driven by a new Wall

Street obsession, the Trump Pressure

Index, developed by Deutsche Bank's head

of cross asset strategy. The index is

made up of the one-mon change in Trump's

approval ratings, one-year inflation

expectations, the performance of the S&P

500, and US Treasury yields. The idea is

that these are the things that Trump

cares the most about. Sorry, Eric, but

you just didn't make the list. The

higher the index goes, the more pressure

Trump is under to make a change to his

strategy in Iran. Traders are using this

to predict when the administration will

experience what Robert Armstrong calls a

taco moment. The acronym coined about a

year ago stands for Trump always

chickens out. We saw this play out in

real time on Thursday. Just 11 minutes

after the closing bell, the president

posted a 10-day extension to his peace

deadline, pausing his threats to destroy

Iranian energy plants until April 6th.

Now, we have to ask ourselves, do stock

traders actually believe these

announcements? A few weeks ago, the

president announced that the war was

very complete, pretty much causing

stocks to rise and oil to fall. Those

moves reversed themselves later as

events in the Middle East dragged on.

Earlier this week, Trump announced that

the US and Iran had held very good and

productive conversations about ending

war, once again, causing stocks to rise

and oil to fall, even though Iranian

leaders quickly came out and denied

having any talks. I'm not sure that

traders actually believe these peace

announcements, but they possibly see the

announcements as a signal that the

president's resolve is weakening. They

aren't buying the peace so much as

they're buying the capitulation. But a

possible problem with that is that you

can't necessarily taco out of an actual

war as easily as you can a trade war.

Unlike a trade dispute, which is a

matter of administrative ink, the

straight of homes is currently governed

by mines and broken infrastructure. Even

if a ceasefire was signed tomorrow, oil

wells can't just be turned back on like

a kitchen tap. It takes weeks to bring

them back online without causing

permanent damage. But even if Trump does

blink, negotiating a deal assumes that

there's a credible leader on the other

side of the table, and the war has left

Iran's command and control in total

disarray. As the saying goes, it takes

two to tackle. Or at least I think that

is what the saying is. Senior officials

in Iran are reportedly underground and

avoiding all electronic communications

for fear of targeted assassinations.

It's not clear if any single diplomat in

Thran actually speaks for the

revolutionary guards, the people who

actually have their fingers on the

buttons. A formal agreement signed in a

safe house may have little effect on a

field commander at a remote missile site

who's either unable to receive orders or

simply doesn't respect the authority of

the person who sent them. Today, we're

going to look at why this crisis is

about much more than just the price of

Brent crude and how the global economy

may be approaching a supply cliff that

no true social post can fix. We'll look

at the single points of failure for

global industry, commodities like

helium, LNG, aluminium, and fertilizer

that have no easy alternative routes.

We'll also discuss the winners and

losers of this new reality and why the

physical damage to the region's

infrastructure means that we'll likely

be living with the fallout of this war

long after the shooting stops. Before we

dig into that though, let me tell you

about this week's video sponsor, Incogn.

Most people don't realize how much of

their personal information is exposed

online until they see it for themselves.

A quick Google search of your name,

city, and state will often find dozens

of websites listing your personal

details like your address, phone number,

email, and relatives names, usually

without your consent. That's information

that can be bought by anyone with an

internet connection. Incogn is a service

that works to remove that information

from the internet. One thing that really

sets Incogn apart from the competition

is their custom removals feature

available on their unlimited plans. This

goes way beyond automated tools. If you

find a specific website, a blog post, or

a forum that's displaying your personal

information, you don't have to fight

them yourself. You simply send the link

to Incogn and your dedicated privacy

expert handles the entire removal

process for you. It's like having an

online bodyguard scrubbing your name

from the corners of the web that

automated tools sometimes miss. Take

back control and protect your online

privacy. Go to incogn.com/boil

by clicking the link in the description

and use the code boil to get 60% off an

annual plan. There's a money back

guarantee if you aren't satisfied. Now,

while much of the general news coverage

is quite rightly focused on the military

conflict and the human cost of the war,

the financial headlines have focused

almost exclusively on the price of oil.

And this is understandable because it's

the source of the region's immense

wealth. But if you're only watching the

price of a barrel of Brent crude, which

hit $110 this morning, you're likely

missing the real story. Oil, for all of

its importance, is a relatively

fungeible commodity. If a shipment is

blocked in the Gulf, you can eventually

find another barrel in West Texas,

Guyana, or the North Sea, provided

you're willing to pay up for it. The

real crisis is to be found in

commodities that are much harder to

replace. According to ship tracking

data, we're currently approaching a

cliff edge as the final LNG tankers that

loaded in the Gulf before the blockade

began are due to reach their

destinations in the next few days. Once

those ships are unloaded, the flow of

these commodities essentially stops.

Qatar produces a fifth of the world's

liqufied natural gas and nearly all of

its exports have been halted by the

closure of the straight of Hormuz.

Unlike oil, LNG requires massive

specialized liqufification plants to

turn gas into liquid for transport. The

Razan facility in Qatar has already

suffered enormous damage from Iranian

missile strikes. The Qatari energy

minister has warned that 17% of their

capacity will be out of service for 3 to

5 years, forcing them to declare force

majour on long-term contracts. This is a

hole in the global energy supply that no

amount of diplomatic pressure can fill.

Then there's helium. Around 33% of

global seaborn helium passes through the

straight of Hormuz. Helium is a

nonrenewable byproduct of natural gas

and it's essential for cooling the super

magnets used in manufacturing

semiconductor chips. There's no

synthetic substitute. And for high-tech

manufacturing hubs in Asia and the US,

there's no easy way to reroute the

supply. We also have to consider

fertilizer and aluminium. Onethird of

the world's seaborn fertilizer trade

passes through the strait along with a

quarter of the world's seaborn

aluminium. Since the US and Israel

launched their strikes, including a

fresh wave of strikes on Thran this

morning, the price of nitrogen-based

fertilizer skyrocketed. This happened

right as farmers in the northern

hemisphere are heading into springtime

when they fertilize their fields. This

is a lurking threat to food security. As

UAE Minister Sultan Aljabar put it this

week, "Iran holds her muzz hostage and

every nation pays the ransom at the

grocery store. If farmers in Asia and

Africa can't fertilize their crops this

spring, the World Food Program warns

that we could see record levels of acute

hunger by 2027.

These are the single points of failure

in our modern supply chain. The optimism

that we see in the stock market relies

on the idea that these are temporary

hitches. But with Iran now asserting

sovereignty over the strait and

reportedly demanding a $2 million fee

for every vessel that wants to pass, the

physical reality suggests that we're

moving into an era of scarcity that a

simple ceasefire won't fix. Even if a

breakthrough is reached by Trump's new

April 6 deadline, the immediate relief

rally we'll likely see in the stock

market will be at odds with the reality

on the water. To understand why, we have

to look at three specific bottlenecks

that a peace treaty cannot simply wish

away. First, there's the problem of the

shutin wells. Because the straight of

Homer has essentially been blocked for a

month, Gulf producers were forced to

stop pumping as their storage tanks hit

their limits. This is a much bigger

problem than just pausing a production

line. When you stop the flow of an oil

well, the environment inside that well

changes immediately. Without the

constant heat and the movement of

flowing oil, the crude starts to settle

and separate. It can become waxy and

thick, physically clogging the tiny

pores in the rock that the oil needs to

travel through. In some cases, the

surrounding groundwater can even seep

into the oil layers, which can

permanently drown a well's productivity.

To make matters worse, many of these

wells will have been closed using heavy

mud or cement plugs, which are needed to

keep them safe during the fighting.

Those plugs will have to be

painstakingly drilled out before any oil

can move again. If you try and force the

pressure back too quickly, you risk

cracking the underground formations and

ruining the field forever. It's a

delicate multimonth restart process that

doesn't just happen overnight. The

second hurdle is the naval gauntlet.

While the US and Israel have spent a

month bombing Iran, they've achieved

almost no substantive gains in loosening

Iran's choke hold on the strait. This is

why the Pentagon is currently sending in

10,000 additional troops, including

units trained to seize and hold land.

Their mission appears to be prying the

straight open by force, physically

taking the islands and coastal slivers

where Iran hides the drones and missiles

that are keeping the American Navy at a

distance. Even after those launch sites

are secured, the waterway remains at the

very least a suspected minefield.

Whether or not Iran has actually laid

thousands of mines, the mere risk of

them creates what experts call a

psychological blockade, which is just as

effective as a physical one. Reopening

the strait safely requires a careful

naval operation. First, hunting down any

remaining threats like speedboats and

drones that have been harassing

shipping, followed by the slow,

painstaking process of sweeping the

water for mines. Only then can the final

phase providing continuous naval escorts

for commercial tankers actually begin.

Finally, there's the logistical log jam.

Traffic through the straight has dropped

by 97% this month. The few ships that

are moving are often dark fleet vessels

are those willing to pay the $2 million

safe passage fee that Iran is currently

demanding. Insurance premiums for the

region haven't just spiked. In many

cases, policies have been cancelled

entirely. Ship captains and their crews

are not going to steam back into a

recently cleared war zone the moment a

truth social tweet goes out. They'll

wait for a sustained allclear from naval

authorities and for the insurance

markets to normalize. When you combine

all of these issues, the Oxford

Economics timeline of the strade

remaining largely impassible until May

starts to look very realistic. Whenever

a crisis like this breaks out,

economists are quick to point out one

comforting statistic. Our oil intensity

has collapsed. In the 1970s, it took

roughly one full barrel of oil to

produce $1,000 of global GDP. Today that

number is less than half. We need only

about 04 barrels to generate the same

amount of economic output. The argument

is that because we're more efficient,

we're no longer the hostages to the

Middle East that we were 50 years ago.

But this is a dangerous distraction.

While we've moved away from oil as a

primary fuel for factories and home

heating, we haven't actually reduced our

energy vulnerability. we've simply

transferred it to the power grid. In

much of the world, electricity prices

are set at the margin by natural gas

fired power plants. So when the straight

closes and 20% of the world's LNG

vanishes, the shock doesn't just hit the

gas pump, it hits electrical sockets,

too. And this is where the modern US

economy has a weakness that didn't exist

in the 1970s, the AI revolution. Right

now, we're near the start of what's

being described as the largest

infrastructure buildout in human

history, centered entirely on hypers

scale data centers. These facilities are

essentially giant energy sinks that

require massive steadystate power to

function. To understand the scale,

analysts look at these facilities in

terms of gigawatt. 1 gawatt is enough

power to run a midsize city or about

750,000 homes. The International Energy

Agency predicts that by 2030 the global

demand from these data centers will grow

by an additional 50 gaw. To put that in

perspective, the electricity needed just

to keep the world's AI chips running in

four years time is expected to be

equivalent to the total power

consumption of Germany and France

combined or roughly three and a half

times the total power consumption of the

UK. These projects represent hundreds of

billions of dollars in capital

investment, and the United States

appears to be pinning its expected

growth in the coming years on AI

buildout. An energy shock today would

likely be very different to the 1970s

where there were long lines at gas

stations, but it's not reasonable to

claim that energy scarcity won't impact

growth. In the world of geopolitics,

winning doesn't always involve having

the best military. Sometimes it just

means being the last person to run out

of somebody else's money. The terms

winner and loser often have very little

to do with whose cities are being bombed

and everything to do with relative

strategic advantage. If we look at the

scorecard for this conflict, the results

are surprising and deeply

counterintuitive.

It's difficult to call a country a

winner when its air defenses are in

pieces and its leadership is hiding in

bunkers to avoid assassination. So the

best we can say for Iran is that it's a

survivor. But as the economist argues,

for the Islamic Republic, mere survival

against the combined might of the US and

Israel counts as a victory of sorts.

Iran has successfully demonstrated that

it can hold the global economy hostage

using nothing more than asymmetric

tools, cheap drones, missiles, and the

credible threat of underwater mines.

Most strikingly, in a move that

highlights just how desperate the global

energy situation has become, the US

appears to have quietly retreated on its

own sanctions. Despite being in an

active shooting war with Thran, the

Trump administration has temporarily

waved sanctions on 140 million barrels

of Iranian oil currently at sea because

the supply shock from the Straits

closure is so painful that the White

House cannot afford to keep those 1.5

million barrels a day off the market.

While Gulf allies watch their own

tankers sit idle, Iran is currently

getting its crew to China and is now

attempting to institutionalize a $2

million safe passage fee for non-hostile

vessels. If they can make this stick,

they could generate up to $80 billion a

year, effectively replacing their lost

oil revenue with a global transit tax.

Russia is perhaps the most unambiguous

winner of the crisis. Not only are

soaring oil and gas prices relieving its

previously strained budget, but it has

now received its own sanctions holiday.

On March 13th, the US Treasury lifted

restrictions on Russian oil tankers

currently at sea to prevent a global

supply shock. This move has achieved two

of Moscow's primary strategic goals. It

provides an immediate cash infusion to

its war effort in Ukraine and it has

triggered a bipartisan revolt in the US

Congress with lawmakers like Chuck

Schumer labing the policy asinine. By

forcing the US to choose between energy

security and its foreign policy goals,

Russia has successfully exposed the

limits of American economic warfare.

China occupies a fascinating and

arguably enviable position. While it's

the world's largest oil importer, it's

now roughly 85% energy self-sufficient

thanks to its massive domestic coal

reserves and an aggressive multi-year

pivot to renewables. The upside for

Beijing is that this oil shock is the

best possible advert for Chinese

technology as the world may speed up its

transition to solar panels, batteries,

and EVs industries that China absolutely

dominates. While Netanyahu may be

thrilled with the tactical success of

the strikes, the strategic reality for

Israel is much bleeer. Despite the

bombardment of their enemy, Israel is

not really any safer than before.

Iranian missiles have still penetrated

Israeli airspace, and the nuclear threat

remains buried under rubble.

Furthermore, the war is severely

straining Israel's relationship with its

most important patron. As US gasoline

prices sore and markets slide, American

voters are increasingly pointing the

finger at the cost of supporting the

conflict. Europe is currently facing

what analysts call its second major

energy crisis. With Qatari LNG

completely cut off and domestic gas

storage at a dangerously low 30%

capacity, electricity search charges of

up to 30% are hitting heavy industry,

leading to fears of permanent

de-industrialization.

The real shock to Europe isn't just

economic. On March 20th, Iran fired two

ballistic missiles at the US UK base at

Diego Garcia. This strike demonstrated a

range of 4,000 kilometers, twice Iran's

previously known capability. This means

that every major European capital is

within direct reach of Iranian missiles.

If you want to find the G20's biggest

loser, you don't have to look much

further than the United Kingdom. Because

of its extreme dependence on imported

natural gas, the UK is facing what

Kenneth Rogoff calls the biggest

stagflationary shock in five decades.

The damage is appearing in real time.

The route in the guilt market has pushed

10-year borrowing costs to their highest

level since 2008, forcing lenders to

withdraw over 1,500 mortgage products

from the market in a single month.

Finally, there's the United States. On

paper, the US is a winner. Its energy

independence and status as a major LNG

exporter have provided a massive

windfall for domestic producers. But

according to the FT, this insulation is

something of a mirage. And the reason

comes down to what economists call

embedded energy. The US runs a massive

trade deficit in manufactured goods and

it takes an enormous amount of energy to

produce those goods in factories across

Asia and Europe. When energy costs for

those global manufacturers skyrocket,

those costs are eventually exported to

the US in the form of higher prices for

everything from electronics to clothing.

The American grocery bill is also

directly in the crosshairs. Because the

US agricultural system is so heavily

dependent on fossil fuels for both fuel

and nitrogen-based fertilizers, the

energy shock in the Gulf translates

almost immediately into higher prices

for bread, meat, and dairy. This

imported inflation has forced a radical

shift at the Federal Reserve. This

brings us back to the Trump pressure

index. The president's political

survival is tethered to the returns of

the S&P 500, inflation, and the price at

the pump. By making a big threat and

then backing down the moment markets

panicked, the administration has

signaled to every adversary on Earth

that the fastest way to defeat a

superpower is to strike its retirement

portfolios.

I'm recording this video right before

the market opens on Friday, and S&P

futures are down almost half a percent

in the overnight market, and it's

possible that markets are no longer

giving the president the benefit of the

doubt that his strategy in Iran is

working. Beyond the major powers, the

conflict is triggering a form of energy

triage that's fundamentally reshaping

daily life around the world. We have to

start with the United Arab Emirates and

the potential end of what we might call

the Dubai dream. For decades, Dubai has

branded itself as a neutral, high luxury

oasis, a Singapore of the sands, where

you could do global business while the

rest of the Middle East was in turmoil.

But that brand is currently being

shattered. Since Iran began its

retaliation on February 28th, the city

has transformed from a billionaire's

playground into a ghost town in just 3

weeks. The problem is demographic. Over

90% of Dubai's population is foreign

born. When you don't have deep roots in

a location, stability isn't a luxury.

It's the entire product. The mobile

elite have already hit the exit. We've

seen reports that the hedge fund

Millennium Management is exploring a

relocation of its Dubai based staff to

Jersey after drone debris reportedly

damaged the building housing their

offices, which leaves us wondering if

Andrew Tate will soon be the only person

left on the Palm Jiraa. While wealthy

expats might flee to tax neutral islands

in the English Channel, the rest of the

world is entering a period of energy

rationing. Governments almost entirely

dependent on Middle Eastern energy are

racing to save what little they have

left. In Thailand, the prime minister

has ordered civil servants to take the

stairs instead of elevators to save

power. In the Philippines, the

government has shifted to a 4-day work

week and ordered offices to switch off

computers during lunch breaks. This

rationing highlights a brutal divide.

While wealthy nations like the US and

the UK can use massive subsidies to

shield their citizens from the worst of

the price hikes, they are inadvertently

suffocating everyone else. By

artificially keeping domestic demand

high, rich countries block the price

signal that would normally force a drop

in consumption. This leaves the world's

poorest nations to bear the full brunt

of the scarcity. In Bangladesh,

universities have been closed. And in

Pakistan and India, the gas shortage is

so acute that families are being issued

half filled cylinders of cooking gas.

Shortages aren't just happening in poor

countries either. A Japanese potato chip

company had to halt production this week

due to a shortage of oil, which is a

relatively minor inconvenience in Japan.

But if deep fryers went dark somewhere

like Scotland, where people have evolved

to subsist entirely on deep fried food,

it could cause a genuine famine. As we

approach the next deadline on April 6th,

the temptation is to believe that a deal

will return everything to the status

quo. But the logistics of oil and gas

may not be so easily appeased. Even if a

deal is signed tomorrow, the economic

fallout from this conflict will likely

be felt well into next winter and

possibly for years beyond. This crisis

has highlighted something that we've

also been seeing in Ukraine, that you

don't need a peer level military to

defeat a superpower. By holding the

global economy hostage, Iran has shown

that asymmetric disruption is just as

effective as traditional warfare. in

achieving your goals. The fact that the

US has been forced to ease sanctions on

its enemies is the ultimate proof that

in the modern world, the market is a

more sensitive target than any military

base. The second shift is the end of the

idea of security by distance. For

decades, Europe viewed Middle Eastern

volatility as a tragic but distant

problem. The breakthrough of the 4,000

km missile has ended that luxury. Every

European capital is now within reach of

a power that has proven it's willing to

strike whomever it needs to to get its

way. Ultimately, a negotiated

deescalation might provide a sigh of

relief, but it can't weld the turbines

back together at Raslafan, and it can't

erase the new reality of fragmented

alliances, where energy security has

replaced ideology as the ultimate

geopolitical currency. The stock market

might be buying the peace trade today,

but the physical world moves at its own

pace, dictated by ships, pipes, and

turbines rather than sentiment. If you

found this video interesting, you should

watch my video on China's rarer choke

hold next. Don't forget to check out our

sponsor incogn using the link in the

video description. And see you in the

next video. Bye.