Daybreak Weekend: US Tech, BOE Decision, BOJ Meeting | Bloomberg Daybreak: Asia Edition
1243 segments
So, there's a lot of noise about AI, but
time's too tight for more promises. So,
let's talk about results. At IBM, we
work with our employees to integrate
technology right into the systems they
need. Now, our global workforce of
300,000 can use AI to fill their HR
questions, resolving 94% of common
questions.
Not noise, proof of how we can help
companies get smarter by putting AI
where it actually pays off, deep in the
work that moves the business. Let's
create smarter business. IBM.
>> Healthcare doesn't always work great. If
you've ever waited on a refill or
couldn't schedule an appointment, you
get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum
is changing. They're using data and
technology to integrate patient care,
pharmacy, and everything else. So,
healthcare is connected, not
complicated. What's that look like?
Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to
get, and care that looks at the whole
person, how you need it. Optum is
helping make healthcare work as one, for
everyone. Learn more at
business.optum.com.
>> Wise is the smart way to manage the
currencies you need around the globe.
When you send money abroad using your
bank, you could get hit with hidden fees
and exchange rate markups. There's a
better way. Try Wise. Wise uses the
exchange [music] rate you'd usually find
on Google, with no unwelcome surprises.
Plus, most transfers happen in under 20
seconds, which means your money arrives
in less time than you've been listening
[music] to me. It's simple and free to
sign up when you download the Wise app.
[music]
Be smart, get Wise. T's and C's apply.
>> Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts,
radio, news.
>> This is Bloomberg [music] Daybreak
Weekend, our global look at the top
stories in the coming week from our
Daybreak anchors all around the world.
[music] Straight ahead on the program,
we look ahead to the next Fed meeting
and big tech earnings. I'm Nathan Hager
in Washington.
>> I'm Caroline Hepker London, where we're
discussing the outlook for the Bank of
England [music] against a backdrop of
renewed conflict in the Middle East and
a new UK government.
>> I'm Doug Krizner looking ahead to next
[music] week's interest rate decision
from the Bank of Japan.
>> That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg
Daybreak weekend on Bloomberg 1130 New
York, Bloomberg 99.1 Washington D.C.,
Bloomberg 92.9 [music] Boston, DAB
Digital Radio London, Sirius XM 121,
[music]
and around the world on Bloomberg
radio.com and the Bloomberg Business
App.
>> Good day to you. I'm Nathan Hager.
[music] We begin today's program with
the Federal Reserve. Kevin Warsh and
company begin their latest two-day
policy meeting this Tuesday with the
interest rate decision to come
Wednesday. Here to get us ready for it
is our man in the room for the Fed's
policy moves, Bloomberg International
Economics and Policy Correspondent
Michael McKee. And it's really
interesting, Mike, leading up to this
decision. It seems like the market's
pretty split on which way the Fed could
go. Is that the way Kevin Warsh likes
it?
>> It's going to be interesting to see how
he characterizes all of this when he
does get to the news conference, which
by the way he is going to have.
>> Okay.
>> Uh we were able to confirm that because
they always send out a reservation form
for reporters to say yes, we're coming.
So we got that. So we figured that he's
going to hold the the press conference.
Now the question is is
what's he going to say and that's
there is as you mentioned a growing
debate about that.
The markets are beginning to get more
worried about inflation. We've now got
$100 Brent oil. This week we had Google
come out with a very large spend on AI
and the Fed's been worried about
short-term demand caused AI inflation.
And on top of that, tariffs are back.
So, there's a lot of reasons to think
that in the near-term future we're going
to have more inflation, which then has
people in the bond markets especially
pushing yields up to account for that.
>> And you will we've heard from Warsh
himself since he took the reins, well
even before he took the reins, that you
know, he's not satisfied with where
inflation is right now. He's not
declaring mission accomplished when it
comes to getting back to the 2% target.
What does that tell us about where the
lean could be?
>> That's an interesting question because
there's sort of two camps at the Fed
right now. Well, three if you put Kevin
Warsh by himself because he says he's
not participating in the forward
guidance stuff, but there's the camp
that is okay with raising interest rates
if they think the inflation danger is
growing,
and that's a very large group of people.
And then there are people like Beth
Hammack of Cleveland, Lorie Logan
of Dallas, Jeff Schmitt of Kansas City,
who think that
the Fed has been behind the curve on
inflation in terms of their target of 2%
for 5 years now, and it's about time
that they get that done. And that the
the longer they wait, that the harder it
just gets, and then people start to
anticipate that inflation will be
higher. So, they say we're not tight
enough because inflation's not going
down to 2%, and we think we should raise
rates right now. So, if there's enough
of a concern in the first group about
those who are worried about if inflation
picks up, we could hike, then you could
see a movement to
to do that. Probably the most likely
scenario is that you get some dissents,
maybe Hammack, maybe Logan, maybe both,
but we could have a surprise.
>> And talk a little bit about what the
potential economic impact could be if we
do get that surprise if the Fed decides
to deliver an interest rate hike this
week. What could the impact be in terms
of economic growth? What could the
market impact be?
>> Well, it will probably be disparate. In
the equity markets, it could certainly
be a concern because we have all these
tech companies and software companies
and all of the people who are leading
the markets
making these big bets
AI and the capital spend for that. And
if they have to pay more in interest to
borrow or
for for for their
dividends,
then it's going to it's going to hurt.
And you could see a decline in the
equity markets. In the bond markets,
what we've seen in the last week or so
is a big increase in yields. And so the
bond markets have pretty much priced in
the idea of a rate cut. They don't have
to react as much. What you'd be looking
for there is in the longer end, are they
pricing in more cuts, more increases
after they did one. So it's it's going
to be a kind of a different reaction in
different markets. And as for the as far
as the economy's going to be concerned,
it's not going to have a big impact. Cuz
it's 25 basis points. It'll take time to
get it into the economy. The bond
markets have already adjusted borrowing
costs. So you wouldn't notice it as much
in your day-to-day life.
>> Well, you've talked about the the price
increases around the the chip supply
crunch, the the tech sector inflation,
as well as this
growing risk of war-driven inflation as
well. Is Federal Reserve policy an
effective tool against either of those
kinds of price pressures, Mike?
>> That is kind of the counterargument to
the idea that the Fed should do
something because inflation is too high.
The Fed can't raise interest rates all
at once. It's not going to bring down
the price of oil unless it were to throw
the economy into recession and we didn't
all go to work.
The Fed can do that and it's not going
to change the view of people that AI is
worth spending money on because there's
a payoff in the long run.
So at this point it may have an impact
because it over a longer period of time
that would slow economic growth and
hopefully that would bring down some
inflation but most of the inflation is
supply caused at this point and it's
difficult to have an impact on that with
monetary policy. So that's the argument
for why they might not do anything.
>> Well, Mike looking forward to the Fed
decision looking forward to seeing you
back in DC this week. That is Michael
McKee Bloomberg International Economics
and Policy Correspondent ahead of the
Fed decision this Wednesday 2:00 p.m.
Wall Street time. We will have full
coverage of course for you throughout
the day on Bloomberg Radio. Let's take a
look now at some stocks making news in
the week ahead. I'm Nathan Hager joined
by Mandeep Singh global head of tech
research at Bloomberg Intelligence
because it is another big week for big
tech earnings. Correct me if I'm wrong
Mandeep but I think we're hearing from
what three more of the four major
hyperscalers after we heard from
Alphabet this past week.
>> We are indeed and look
we know Microsoft hasn't done well in
the past quarter and they will be for me
one of the big ones Amazon
and you know Apple. Uh all and and meta
as well like all these companies have
had a decent quarter so from that
perspective I I think
their expectations
are really low. I would say it's
Microsoft and for me Google had a slight
increase in their full year capex for
2026. They raised it by about 4% and
they said 2027 capex would be
significantly higher. And so, from that
perspective, it'll be interesting to see
what Microsoft and Amazon end up doing
as well as Meta.
>> Absolutely. Well, let's start with
Microsoft. As you say, probably the
biggest player of the three major
hyperscalers we're going to hear from
this week. After we heard from Alphabet,
$205 billion, that increase on the top
line in terms of their forecast for
capital expenditure for this year. If we
see similar numbers from Microsoft, what
kind of a market reaction could that
spark, Mandate?
>> Actually, I expect a negative reaction
if they significantly raise their CapEx.
And I feel the bar is now quite high
with Alphabet going over $200 billion
for this year. So, with Microsoft, the
challenge is they don't have the
vertical integration that Alphabet has
with Gemini and their TPU systems which
that Google has highlighted could be a
separate line of business. So, from that
perspective, you know, Microsoft has to
show Azure growth, and that Azure growth
has been more like around 40%. Google
posted cloud growth of around 82% in
their second quarter. So, from that
perspective, there's a lot that
Microsoft has to prove in terms of both
the cloud growth rates that have been
trailing and also how else they can
monetize that CapEx beyond their cloud
segment growth as Google has shown with
TPU systems and you know, how they are
deploying their own Gemini model on top
of it.
>> Now, when it comes to Meta, also
reporting on Wednesday, if they see a
major increase to their capital
expenditure, it's a little bit
different, isn't it, in terms of how
they deploy that kind of spending?
>> Yeah, I said it was
a bigger bar for Microsoft. For Meta,
it's even higher because they don't even
have a cloud business. So, in the case
of Microsoft, at least they have a cloud
business where Azure segment would
probably see accelerating sequentially
accelerating growth. In the case of
Meta, it all has to show up in their top
line ads business, which we have seen
from Google. The search business didn't
accelerate. It was really their cloud
business that went from, you know, 60%
growth to over 80% growth. So, Meta
doesn't have a cloud business. And so,
if Meta comes out and says they are
raising their CapEx for second half, I
totally expect a negative reaction going
by how the market has reacted to the
Google CapEx increase.
>> How do you see Mark Zuckerberg's
strategy when it comes to AI deployment
right now, particularly after all the
spending Meta's done just building a
superintelligence team and all the
partnerships that it's gotten into?
>> Yeah, so look, they've released a new
model, the new Spark model. They're
looking to monetize that through API use
and also get into cloud rentals like the
Neo clouds. That would be very
interesting for me who the buyers of
Meta compute could be because we've seen
SpaceX
rent their compute to Google and Google
did say that, you know, because of the
third-party computer rentals, the
margins may actually go down. So, in
effect, we expect maybe Google may end
up renting compute from Meta in the near
term. It would be interesting if that
happens and I think there are
speculations that Meta wants to get into
cloud rental business. That's where it
could be a new line of business for them
to, you know, justify any CapEx increase
that they may have during their earnings
call.
>> In the time we have left, Mandeep, I'd
be curious to get your view as well on
Apple. They report Thursday, maybe not a
hyper scalar along the lines of Meta,
Microsoft, or Amazon, but how do you see
Apple's results coming out?
>> I mean, they have a new CEO. They have
been at the receiving end of all these
memory and the component price
increases, which they have passed on to
their or they plan to pass it on to
their customers in terms of higher
prices.
I think, you know, even though
expectations are for mid-teens
double-digit growth,
it'll be hard for them to come up with
any upside
given price increases are a big part of
that top line growth. So, given the CEO
change and the price increases, I I
think it'll be hard to see any big
positive surprises coming out of Apple.
>> Really appreciate the perspective as we
get ready for the firehose of tech
earnings this week. Mandeep Singh with
us there, Global
>> Head of Tech Research at Bloomberg
Intelligence. [music]
And coming up on Bloomberg Daybreak
Weekend, we look ahead to the Bank of
England's next rate [music] decision.
I'm Nathan Hager, and this is Bloomberg.
>> [music]
>> Amazon Pharmacy presents Painful
Thoughts.
>> It's been a long bumpy road dealing with
yet another bladder infection.
And driving to the pharmacy to pick up
meds, I went over a pothole and a little
pee came out. So, now I get to stand in
line with peepy pants.
>> Next time, skip the pain and get fast
free delivery with Amazon Pharmacy.
Healthcare just got less painful.
>> [music]
>> The future won't wait, [music] and
neither should you. That's why American
Public University offers master's
programs designed for momentum,
affordable, high-quality, [music] and
flexible so you keep moving forward.
With career-relevant programs in
business, health care, education, IT,
and more, [music]
you can gain skills you can use right
away and the confidence to power your
next move. American Public University,
[music]
made for what's next. Learn more at
apu.apus.edu.
>> Discover a spectacular island
destination with [music] crystal blue
seas, endless sunshine, and the cool
Bohemian breeze. Baha Mar, located in
Nassau, Bahamas, offers your choice of
three luxury hotels: the richly refined
Rosewood, [music]
the playfully hip SLS, and the stylishly
modern Grand Hyatt. With over 45
restaurants, [music] bars, and lounges,
Baha Mar serves up delicious dining from
world-renowned chefs like [music] Daniel
Boulud and Marcus Samuelsson. Nightlife
venues like the new Jon Batiste Jazz
Club [music] and the Caribbean's most
luxurious casino. At Baha Mar, you'll
find every pleasure under the sun and
one-of-a-kind experiences for the entire
family
>> [music]
>> like Baha Bay, our 15-acre lush tropical
water park, interactive wildlife [music]
experiences including our daily flamingo
parade, world-class golf, tennis, spa,
and [music] so much more. Visit
bahamar.com today and discover a
vacation destination where memories are
made for a lifetime. Baha Mar, life
spectacular.
>> [music]
>> This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our
global look ahead at the top stories for
investors in the coming [music] week.
I'm Nathan Hager in Washington. Up later
in the program, we'll look ahead to a
monetary policy decision from the Bank
of Japan. But first, in the coming days,
we get the Bank of England's decision on
interest rates. That's as UK inflation
hit a 15-month low in June, but the
renewed conflict in the Middle East
means ever-present energy price concern.
So, how will the BOE navigate it all?
Let's go to London and bring in
Bloomberg Daybreak Europe anchor,
Caroline Hepker.
>> Nathan, the Bank of England faces
inflationary pressures from the Iran
war, a loosening jobs market, and
sluggish economic growth. It also must
get used to a new administration in
number 10 and number 11 Downing Street.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has promised
a new economic model for the UK and
measures to tackle the cost of living.
His Chancellor, John Healey, has
signaled room to maneuver on tax and
spending, but he's also spoken about the
need for fiscal credibility. He is
giving an inaugural address to staff at
the UK Treasury.
>> I'm still burning
with a passion about this institution as
a force for stability,
for security,
for growth,
a force for a successful Britain.
>> John Healey, the new UK Chancellor and
former Defense Minister, speaking there.
So, all sunshine and roses for now, but
this Chancellor faces all manner of
challenges and pressure to deliver
quickly on economic growth. And while
markets widely expect the Bank of
England to hold interest rates at 3.75%
on the 30th of July, the energy shock
from the Iran war keeps the UK's
inflation expectations elevated. So, how
will the Bank of England chart a path
through this period of change, conflict,
and volatility? Joining me now is
Bloomberg's UK economy reporter Tom Rees
and Bloomberg's chief UK economist Dan
Hanson. Dan, can I start with you? The
UK has seen inflation pretty elevated
for some 3 years. Things seem to be
improving a little bit in June. Does
that change the picture for the Bank of
England's decision next Thursday?
>> Well, I think it definitely makes their
decision a little bit easier because
inflation has come in quite
substantially below their forecasts, and
that's obviously
for any central bank, that's that's good
news. Of course, the challenge
at the moment for the bank at this sort
of juncture is that you've got inflation
and the data not throwing up any red
flags.
Good news. On the other hand,
re-escalation in the Middle East, and
that is obviously a significant issue
for the Bank of England and all central
banks because oil prices have risen.
Importantly for European central banks,
gas prices have risen significantly as
well.
And you sort of add those two things up
and you've got this picture where in the
near term there's no rush to do
anything, but you've got to keep your
options open because we just do not know
where this is heading into the second
latter half of this year. So, I think,
you know, if you look at market pricing,
they're betting on a an interest rate
hike as early as September, which is the
next meeting after July. Equally, if you
look back two months from where we are
now, you know, a lot has changed. So, a
lot can change in two months. That's the
that's the point. So, I think
big picture is the bank can afford to
stick with its wait-and-see approach,
but it's certainly not going to be
sort of saying it's all clear, we can
think about, you know, potentially go
back to where we were prior to the war
and think about when we can next cut
interest rates. They're very much in a
wait-and-see holding pattern.
>> Okay.
Tom, the Bank of England Governor Andrew
Bailey might have said pretty much that
at the beginning of this month, that it
was too early to consider interest rate
cuts, and then warning that households
are yet to feel the full effects from
the Iran war.
In terms of this conflict and the energy
shock, it has resumed and re-escalated.
When do you think households are going
to start to feel that leg higher?
>> So, they could feel it relatively soon
in terms of petrol prices if Well,
they've already started increasing again
um in response to what we're seeing in
oil markets since that re-escalation. I
think what Bailey was referring to at
that moment was the July increase in the
price cap that we've just had, you know,
that price cap that sets kind of
household gas and electricity bills. So,
we've we've only had inflation data up
to June so far. So, because the UK has
this kind of unusual price cap that gets
updated every 3 months, it sort of
delays the the impact of the the changes
that we've seen in energy markets. So,
that price cap went up 13% in July. That
adds about .4 percentage points to
inflation. You know, we had some new
estimates from Cornwall Insight that
showed that the price cap might go up a
little bit more later in the year. So,
he was he was referring to that impact,
but you know, obviously there's other
ways that this war can kind of feed
through to consumers later on. The kind
of delayed effect, you know,
particularly businesses, you know, start
to
pass on their their higher energy costs
back to consumers.
>> In terms of the other data that we've
had out in the past few days, it's also
about the labor market. Do you think
that that reinforces the case for a hold
in terms of interest rates because wages
obviously are very important, too?
>> Yeah, so the the latest labor market
data is was quite interesting this week.
You know, it was kind of showing that
the number of employees on company
payrolls, which is what economists were
looking at most in that release
currently, has been broadly flat over
the last couple of months. You know,
that could be showing that the downturn
in the labor market that we've had in
the last couple of years is is beginning
to fade. That data comes with a big
caveat. That's revised quite often and
quite heavily. But the most important
thing for the BOE is that, you know,
demand for labor is is very weak. You
know, vacancies are, you know, around
their lowest since '21. Private sector
pay growth is is lowest since 2020. So,
the BOE kind of hopes that that's enough
to contain any of those second-round
effects to inflation, you know, if that
effect where you know, workers trying to
compensate from, you know, their losses
from inflation try and bid up wages. The
labor market being weak sort of contains
that risk.
>> Dan, the Bank of England doesn't
currently have a labor market remit,
though. So, what do you think about the
soft jobs data and and what it means in
terms of the meeting for the Bank of
England in July?
>> I mean, I agree with completely with Tom
that you're right, they don't have a
labor market remit like the Fed does.
They don't have a dual mandate, so
they're not thinking about full
employment, but
the consequence of where the economy is
relative to full employment tells you
something about the outlook for
inflation, so they do take it into
account. And I think one of these
it's one of these things that people
talk about in terms of adding growth to
the Bank of England's or the the economy
if you as a whole or the labor market to
the Bank of England's mandate, would it
really change the path of interest
rates? I'm not sure it would, to be
honest with you. I think
they think about the labor market a lot.
The path of the labor market is very
much linked to the path of the economy,
so you sort of all of those things are
are are interlinked. They all speak to
each other, and the result is inflation,
effectively. I mean, to answer your
question again, it's another reason to
think they won't move. The economy is
weak, the labor market is loose.
That, as Tom rightly said, makes it less
likely that workers are able to bid up
wages in response to higher prices.
And so, it makes it less likely that we
get this dynamic that economists talk
about, this wage-price spiral dynamics,
where prices go up, wages follow. That
makes inflation stickier, and that's the
that was the problem we had in following
the 2022 shock.
>> Mhm.
>> Is that we experienced that in 2023 and
2024.
I think the chance of that happening
this time are far, far lower. Not least,
one, because the labor market's loose.
Two, the shock is far smaller um
relative to 2022, and three, interest
rates are in a much better place.
The 2022 shock, interest rates were
far, far too low. Right now, they're in
what we call restrictive territory, so
monetary policy is still bearing down on
the economy.
>> More broadly, Tom, with this new
government coming in, Andy Burnham and
John Healey, I mean, we've had a few
phrases, haven't we, from Burnham about
his vision, a new economic model, the
biggest changes in the last 40 years, a
circuit breaker. They are interesting
phrases. They didn't give us that much
in terms of policy. How do you think
that, in the context of the Bank of
England decision and of monetary policy,
we should be thinking about Burnham?
>> Yeah, so so we've had quite, I would
say, mixed messages on how radical this
government is going to be, you know,
we've like you said, we've had Burnham
talk about new economic models and
rolling back, you know, the last 40
years, etc. Then we've also had him talk
about being very prudent with public
finances. For the bank, it very much
depends on kind of not only what Burnham
does, but if Burnham is prudent, sticks
with largely kind of small tinkering
like, you know, the VAT cut on
electricity bills, and he pays for that,
you know, largely by cutting elsewhere
or, you know, raising tax a little bit.
I'm not sure it massively affects, you
know, the central bank's thinking and,
you know, the BOE has sort of signaled
in the past that it's minded to look
through these sort of measures on on
energy bills,
you know, even if it does improve the
kind of mood music around interest rate
decisions. I We would obviously be in
different territory if he, you know, if
they do
push things into, you know, the the more
radical territory. You know, he's talked
up the idea of finding more flexibility
within the fiscal rules. It's hard to
know exactly what he means by that, and
I'm not sure he he knows himself. But,
you know, people have interpreted that
as, you know, using a bit more leeway
provided by the debt rules, you know,
using the UK's public finance through
institutions like the National Wealth
Fund, that sort of thing. So, yeah, it's
it's a wait and see on that front.
>> Yeah, I suppose it just depends what
those policies actually are, Dan. John
Healey has though criticized previously
the Treasury as a dead hand on dynamic
government. So, again, it's another
phrase that's gotten people's attention.
Do you think that he's going to run
Treasury very differently? How do you
think about the new administration in
this context?
>> I always find that amazing. This idea
that the Treasury doesn't want economic
growth and everything it does is to stop
economic growth. The reason the Treasury
acts the way it acts is to put a brake
on decisions that are politically
oriented and trying to buy votes. You
know, and and fiscal prudence is a
is a very important component of a
stable economy and therefore economic
growth. In any case, run's over.
>> I think in terms of the Burnham-Healey
dynamic, I think John Healey's got
experience in the Treasury. Many years
ago, but he he was in the Treasury
before. I think the dynamic between the
two of them is very much going to be he
is going to I would say enact whatever
Burnham's platform proves to be and I
agree with you both it's not completely
clear, but whatever that proves to be
Healey's going to be charged with
enacting that through the Treasury. So,
the one big question I think he has and
the big tension is around defense
spending. Of course, he quit the Starmer
government because of
a lack of funding for defense.
>> Yeah.
>> He'll need to find that money and it
looks like he's going to want to find
that money as well.
>> Yeah.
>> And Tom alluded to that, that means
really difficult decisions cuz it's a
lot of cash that's needed to get defense
spending up to the even 3% of GDP and
then up to 3.5% of GDP. So,
that's the thing that I think it's the
it's probably his biggest challenge, but
that would have been any Chancellor's
challenge coming in because we knew that
they have to be really really careful.
We've already seen a bit of a response
to the using the flexibility in the
fiscal rules.
We've already seen the you know, this
idea of a tax cut floated and then taken
back on income tax, raising the personal
allowance.
So, they need to get their messaging
right.
>> So, perhaps no change from the Bank of
England in terms of the rate decision,
but all the focus really on the politics
and the policy of a new set of leaders
here in the UK. Dan, thank you so much
for being with us on the program. That
is Bloomberg's chief UK economist, Dan
Hanson, and Bloomberg's UK economy
reporter, Tom Rees. Really appreciate
you coming on to the program in just the
days ahead of the Bank of England's
interest rate decision. Thank you. I'm
Caroline Hepker here in London. You can
catch us every weekday morning for
Bloomberg Daybreak Europe beginning at
6:00 a.m. in London. That's 1:00 a.m. on
Wall Street. Nathan.
>> Thanks, Caroline. And coming up on
Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, [music]
we'll look ahead to the next rate
decision from the Bank of Japan. I'm
Nathan Hager, and this is Bloomberg.
>> [music]
>> Amazon Pharmacy presents painful
thoughts.
>> It's been a long bumpy road dealing with
yet another bladder infection.
And driving to the pharmacy to pick up
meds,
I went over a pothole and a little pee
came out. So, now I get to stand in line
with pee-pee pants.
>> Next time, skip the pain and get fast
free delivery with Amazon Pharmacy.
Healthcare just got less painful.
>> [music]
>> The future won't wait, and neither
should you. That's why American Public
University [music] offers master's
programs designed for momentum.
Affordable, high-quality, and flexible,
[music] so you keep moving forward with
career-relevant programs in business,
healthcare, education, IT, and more. You
can gain [music] skills you can use
right away and the confidence to power
your next move. American Public
University, made for what's next. Learn
more at apu.apus.edu.
>> Discover a spectacular island [music]
destination with crystal blue seas,
endless sunshine, and the cool Bohemian
breeze. Baha Mar, located in Nassau,
Bahamas, offers your choice [music] of
three luxury hotels, over 45 fine dining
and nightlife venues, John Bull all new
jazz club, the Caribbean's most
luxurious [music]
casino, and one-of-a-kind experiences
for the entire family, like our 15-acre
tropical water [music] park, wildlife
sanctuary, world-class golf course, and
so much more. Visit bahamar.com today.
>> This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our
[music] global look ahead at the top
stories for investors in the coming
week. I'm Nathan Hager in Washington.
The Fed and the Bank of England aren't
the only central banks with rate
decisions in the coming week. We will
also hear from the Bank of Japan. For
more, let's go to Doug Krizner, host of
the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast.
>> Thanks, Nathan. You'll remember last
month the BOJ raised its policy rate to
1%. Now, that's the highest in 31 years.
We know very well that inflation in
Japan is still a problem. It has been
for a while. Yes, higher rates would be
a remedy, although for the moment the
BOJ is widely expected to hold the
policy rate steady at next week's
meeting. For a closer look, I'm joined
by Bloomberg's Molly Smith. Molly is
part of the team that covers the
Japanese economy and government, and she
joins us from our studios in Tokyo.
Thank you for being here, and the timing
is actually perfect, because as we walk
up to this BOJ meeting, Bloomberg had a
very interesting story about some
officials at the BOJ being open to
raising interest rates at an accelerated
rate. Give me a sense of what's
happening here.
>> It is interesting that the BOJ officials
do seem to be willing to move faster
than this pre-prescribed pace of roughly
every 6 months, which is not written in
stone anywhere. I think that's just come
to be the consensus among economists of
the pace that the BOJ is moving at and
what they've done so far in the past.
But there does seem to be a case to now
move a bit faster than that. So, since
the BOJ just moved in June, the standard
formula would call for another rate
increase by December, but you have seen
more growing market odds that the that
there could be another hike by October.
And there's, you know, a couple of
meetings between now and October to
consider. Obviously, the July one being
one of them, but no one's really calling
for a move at that meeting. So, it's
interesting to see the market odds be so
high for a chance of a hike by October,
whereas we recently conducted a survey
of economists here at Bloomberg, and
they seem to be a bit unconvinced that
the BOJ would really move faster. And
the big reason for that is because they
still see
uh Prime Minister Takaiichi's
administration as being in the way of
the BOJ moving sooner.
>> You know, I think we can agree that the
BOJ has a reputation for being very,
very cautious. Is there the view now in
Japan that the bank is behind the curve,
basically?
>> I think it's growing, certainly. And I
think the the bigger concern though is
really that it's more a question of like
how independent really is the BOJ. That
it's not the same concept of
independence the way we think of the
Federal Reserve and how fiercely that is
debated and prized in the US. But in
Japan, it's very different here that
there is a sense of BOJ autonomy, yet
the government recently put out its
annual economic policy guidelines, which
usually come out in late June. And it
only just got passed um in the past
week. And that's because there were so
many times that the government had to go
back and revise the language,
particularly around its expectations for
the BOJ and how it should work with the
government in achieving policy goals.
>> So, I'm glad that you brought up the the
idea of independence because the other
big player, obviously, in terms of
policy in Japan is the Ministry of
Finance, which takes us to the weakness
of the yen, which is I I very much a
part of the the inflation story still. I
mean, we're at a 40-year low against the
greenback.
What is the scuttlebutt in terms of the
potential for intervention on the part
of the Ministry of Finance when it comes
to supporting the currency or
is the MOF basically backing away and
saying this is not our problem, the yen
weakness is really a reflection of BOJ
policy?
>> It's so hard to tell right now,
honestly. This is something that we are
parsing the tea leaves here every day
for what's coming out of the Finance
Minister Katayama as well as the, you
know, the chair for the the currency
chief Mimura. And whenever we get the
chance to hear from them, it is very
closely watched to hear if they are
going to speak any stronger about any
references to quote bold or decisive
action, which in Japan is interpreted as
intervention or you know, an allusion or
a reference to upcoming intervention.
So, that's what's really changed in
maybe the past like couple days from
Katayama that she has sounded a bit more
forceful with her language. Whereas in
recent weeks, she's kind of said there's
been no change to our stance. We're
we've I've maintained a stable sense of
communication. And after these last two
couple of days where she said, we will
take bold action as needed or decisive
action as appropriate, there hasn't
really been a subsequent reaction in the
yen. So, I think that tells you that the
markets are pretty unconvinced about at
least any form of verbal intervention,
if that's what she was trying to
accomplish. You would think that since
they have the BOJ meeting next week,
perhaps the Ministry of Finance would
wait until after that if there was going
to be any intervention. It's hard to say
though. So, that's definitely something
that we are keeping an eye out for.
>> You're in a part of the world where
semiconductor manufacturing is a major
industry and we know that Japan has
companies that are very much connected
to that supply chain and recently there
has been a lot talked about as it
relates to the price of semiconductors
rising not only because of their
scarcity but because input prices are
rising too and I'm wondering about the
evidence away from let's say the chip
industry evidence to indicate that
companies are basically passing along
higher cost across the board.
>> That is a very new concept here and that
definitely is happening. You know, for
instance
there are some economic indicators here
that the team will you know, monitor but
not necessarily always write up because
sometimes they're just a bit more of the
same and nothing really happening there
and one of them would be the producer
price index but in the three months that
I've been here we've written about that
every single time and the PPI is a
measure of wholesale inflation so that's
more like B2B kind of pricing and that's
where you're seeing that businesses are
definitely more willing to pass on
higher costs to their customers.
>> So we know that the war in Iran has
greatly impacted the energy markets and
obviously Japan being a major energy
importer has really confronted this in a
major way and I'm wondering how it's
showing up in people's daily lives
there.
>> The one thing at least for the energy
cost that is still helping out to an
extent is that the administration has
put in place
different energy subsidies to try to
cushion the impact on households from
those costs tied to the Middle East so
that's where you know, Takaichi and her
administration put together an extra
budget in recent months to try to keep
some of these subsidies in place through
the summer but we are now finally
experiencing summer in Japan. I had been
joking up until this week that I've been
warned about it for months but I only
just
it, you know, in terms of like
Fahrenheit where like roughly at like,
you know, mid-90s degrees this week and
it's fully humid and baking here. And I
did see that
the energy team had written up the other
day that power prices in Japan just hit
some sort of multi-year high just based
on all of the, you know, increased
demand for air conditioning as well as
the yen being as weak as it is right
now.
>> So, anecdotally, what can you tell me
about the way in which average people
are reacting to higher prices?
>> It's still very new for a lot of people
that Japan has really not experienced
persistent or any meaningful inflation
in decades. And for some people, this is
maybe like the first time in their
lifetime they've ever seen something
like this. But I think it's really
important to note that, you know, for
somebody like me who's effectively
almost like a tourist because I'm still
paid in dollars in the short time that
I'm here,
I don't experience it the same way that
somebody who has lived here and works
here for a much longer amount of time
will experience it. So, I was recently
traveling over one weekend and met up
with a friend of a friend and that
person is a tour guide here and she's
been in Japan for years now. She's from
the US, so she's bilingual in
English and Japanese. And she was
telling me how she understands why
tourists say this, but it still bothers
her when people say how cheap Japan is
because it doesn't feel that way for
her. And I think that's something to
keep in mind of how these things can be
received, you know, by local people. And
like I know that nobody means any harm
by it and I think that what I said to
her in response was just something that
in the US, this is just such a foreign
concept that you could have a really
amazing full quality meal in a major
city of the world for less than $10.
Like that is just something that doesn't
compute coming from the states and
particularly me coming from New York
where, you know, we've had our own
ecosystem of inflation forever. So, it
is a very different lived experience for
somebody who
is here and this is their life and
especially if their wages aren't keeping
pace with inflation.
>> as I'm listening to I'm remembering a
conversation that I had with Taro
Kimura,
uh who is the Japan economist for
Bloomberg Economics. Young person
relative to myself and I'm thinking that
during this conversation about inflation
he said that he was born into a culture
essentially, a society where he only
knew disinflation or deflation. So, when
prices
began to rise, it was so unfamiliar. He
didn't have any sense of that concept
aside from reading about it in
textbooks.
>> I This is something that when I was uh
writing about inflation back in the US
when it was really taking off around
like 2021 and 2022. And the idea of how
psychological inflation is really
started to resonate with me then. And I
think that's probably what people in
Japan are experiencing now. That you
have this sort of memory or this like
expectation of what a price of something
should be. Particularly for groceries,
you know, that's like always something
we talk about that's like in your face
the most. Or if you get a particular
kind of meal at a restaurant often, like
a hamburger in the US or a bowl of ramen
here, you have a rough idea of what that
should cost in your mind. And to see
something that deviates from that so
much is really quite shocking to people.
But that I think is very real, the
sticker shock of what's going on.
>> So, before I let you go, let's get back
to the BOJ meeting and we're going to
have this post-meeting news conference
from Governor Ueda, and I'm wondering
about where he may place emphasis. Does
he push back on this Bloomberg report
and the indication that the BOJ may be
leaning into an acceleration of rate
hikes? What How do you think he may
handle that?
>> From what I've seen of how of Ueda's
press conferences so far,
he and, you know, the bank as an
institution, as you said, are tend to be
very cautious, especially for somebody
like Ueda who comes from an academic
background, sometimes can speak in a
little bit of a roundabout way and not
be the most direct with his language,
that I think he would very much want to
leave open the possibility of
the pace that the BOJ would move at from
here and would not want to commit to any
kind of predetermined path. I I [snorts]
think he would even be hesitant to
really open the door to the possibility
of moving sooner than every 6 months.
>> Molly, this was a delightful
conversation. Thank you so very much uh
for helping us set up uh the BOJ meeting
in the coming week. I look forward to
your return to the office in New York.
We can talk more about what your
experience was like being in Japan.
Bloomberg's Molly Smith, part of the
team that covers the Japanese economy
and government, joining from our studios
in Tokyo. I'm Doug Krizner. You can
catch us weekdays for the Daybreak Asia
podcast. It's available wherever you get
your podcast. Nathan?
>> Thanks, Doug, and that does it for this
edition of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend.
Join us again Monday morning at 5:00
a.m. Wall Street time for the latest on
markets overseas and the news you need
to start your day. I'm Nathan Hager.
Stay with us. Top stories and global
business headlines [music] are coming up
right now.
>> [music]
>> Healthcare doesn't always work great. If
you've ever waited on a refill or
couldn't schedule an appointment, you
get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum
is changing. They're using data and
technology to integrate patient care,
pharmacy, and everything else. So,
healthcare is connected, not
complicated. What's that look like?
Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to
get and care that looks at the whole
person, how you need it. Optum is
helping make healthcare work as one for
everyone. Learn more at
business.optum.com.
>> Online education [music] is convenient,
but sometimes it can be lonely.
Sometimes the extra help [music] you
need can only come from someone else. At
American Public University, they make
online education personalized,
affordable, and memorable. [music]
With 24/7 mental health support
available in multiple languages, access
to career coaches who are industry
[music] professionals, and lifelong
career services, you'll never feel alone
on your path to success. [music]
APU, digital by nature, human by design.
Learn more at apu.apus.edu.
>> Discover a spectacular island
destination with crystal blue seas,
[music] endless sunshine, and the cool
Bohemian breeze. Baha Mar, located in
Nassau, Bahamas, offers your choice of
three luxury hotels, [music] over 45
fine dining and nightlife venues, Jazz
Etc. all new Jazz Club, the Caribbean's
most luxurious casino, and one-of-a-kind
[music] experiences for the entire
family, like our 15-acre tropical water
park, [music] wildlife sanctuary,
world-class golf courses, and so much
more. Visit bahamar.com today.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This episode of Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend covers critical economic updates, including the upcoming Federal Reserve policy meeting, the Bank of England's interest rate outlook amidst Middle East conflicts, and the Bank of Japan's potential rate decisions. It also features analysis on upcoming tech earnings for major companies like Microsoft, Meta, and Apple, emphasizing the impact of rising capital expenditures on AI.
Videos recently processed by our community