HomeVideos

Why Smart People Struggle to “Be Normal”

Now Playing

Why Smart People Struggle to “Be Normal”

Transcript

556 segments

0:00

Alrighty chat. Today we're going to talk

0:01

about stupidity. So I know everyone's

0:04

concerned about being intelligent, high

0:06

IQ. We're going to do cognitive

0:08

neurotropics, cognitive enhancement,

0:10

right? We always want to boost our

0:12

intelligence. And I know I am certainly

0:14

guilty of this. I don't know if you guys

0:15

know what I'm talking about, but there's

0:16

like smart intelligent people and

0:20

there's stupid intelligent people. And

0:23

if you're someone who's really

0:25

intelligent, it turns out that if you're

0:27

not careful, your intelligence will kind

0:29

of circle back around and become a

0:32

unique form of stupidity. Now, when I do

0:35

this work with people, it turns out

0:36

really well. We sort of help them like,

0:38

you know, figure out their blind spots,

0:39

which we're going to go over today. But

0:41

if you're someone who's who's super

0:42

smart, but can't seem to like leverage

0:45

that, I highly recommend you check out

0:47

our coaching program, which is designed

0:49

to help you sort of live up to your

0:51

potential. So what's the difference

0:52

between someone who's a stupid

0:54

intelligent person and a smart

0:55

intelligent person? The first thing that

0:57

we're going to talk about is the

0:59

misapplication of intelligence. So one

1:02

of my favorite examples of this is NASA.

1:04

So when NASA was sending astronauts to

1:05

the moon, they like developed a really

1:07

like they spent a bunch of money and

1:08

like did all this research on developing

1:10

like a pen that writes in space.

1:12

>> You know what the Russians did? Used a

1:14

pencil.

1:14

>> They used a pencil. So what's really

1:16

interesting is we think that

1:18

intelligence is the primary

1:21

problemsolving

1:23

faculty that we have. And if you're a

1:25

stupid intelligent person, I know this

1:26

sounds insane, but one of the mistakes

1:28

you're probably making is that you are

1:30

using your intelligence too much. Now,

1:32

what the hell do I mean by that? If you

1:33

look at people with empathy, right? So a

1:35

lot of people when they're facing social

1:37

situations, they'll perform a lot of

1:39

calculations. And there are these other

1:41

humans out there who are like sort of

1:44

ignorant, wandering through life and

1:47

just making judgments and they seem to

1:49

be happy and things seem to be working

1:50

out for them, right? There are a lot of

1:52

people who like struggle with social

1:53

situations because they're running a

1:55

bazillion calculations to try to figure

1:57

out what to say or what to do or

1:58

whatever. So, here's the key thing to

2:00

understand. Intelligence from an

2:02

evolutionary standpoint evolved for

2:05

certain things. And we have other parts

2:08

of our brain that have evolved for other

2:10

things. So especially when it comes to

2:13

things like social situations, we have

2:15

empathic circuits. We integrate a lot of

2:18

information about body language, tone,

2:20

facial expressions. Intelligence is not

2:23

designed to be the tool for social

2:28

interactions. It's kind of like trying

2:30

to milk a cow with a hammer.

2:32

intelligence from an evolutionary

2:34

perspective is actually designed to

2:36

solve novel problems. So a great example

2:38

of this is like redneck engineering,

2:41

right? Where you see this really

2:42

hilarious like you know redneck

2:44

engineering where someone builds this

2:45

contraption like someone builds some

2:48

like mechanized tricycle or something

2:50

like that because they don't have a car.

2:52

That's actually what intelligence is

2:53

for. Intelligence is designed when we

2:56

encounter a new problem. We have to be

2:59

able to pull in a lot of information and

3:01

come up with a novel solution. We run

3:04

into trouble when we start misapplying

3:07

intelligence is the primary tool for a

3:10

series of things especially social

3:12

situations. So when we start to use our

3:14

abstract reasoning capability, our sort

3:17

of data analysis capability for things

3:19

like human interactions, it actually

3:22

falls short, right? And there's a bunch

3:24

of like relationship experts who will

3:26

sort of cite all of this research and

3:27

like talk about all these theories,

3:29

they'll develop this really complex kind

3:31

of stuff where actually the reason that

3:34

you know this stuff doesn't really work

3:36

great and if you look at a lot of people

3:37

who have effortless social interactions,

3:39

they are using the right parts of their

3:41

brain. Now why does this happen? So this

3:43

is what's really interesting. I work

3:44

with a bunch of people. I'm sort of like

3:46

this. And the reason this happens is

3:48

because when you have a high IQ, it's so

3:51

good at solving so many different

3:52

things. So as you are growing up, you

3:55

are sort of like leveling up your IQ,

3:57

increasing your proficiency with your

4:00

IQ. And since you're using your IQ, you

4:02

underdevelop other things like EQ, like

4:04

your emotional quotient, right? So your

4:06

ability to be empathic, your ability to

4:10

feel what other people are feeling, your

4:12

ability to use your intuition. As you

4:15

become more intelligent, you start to

4:16

make more calculations and your

4:18

intuition starts to rust. Your social

4:21

faculties start to rust and that creates

4:24

problems because now you are running a

4:26

bunch of calculations when you actually

4:28

have a a circuit in your brain that'll

4:29

do it instantly. You're just not using

4:32

it. The second element of stupidity that

4:34

intelligent people are vulnerable to is

4:36

actually mindlessness. So if you look at

4:39

the research and you ask someone okay

4:41

like what is stupidity? There's

4:43

different kinds of stupidity and one of

4:44

them is being mindless, right? So like

4:46

I'm not paying attention or my mind is

4:49

not focused on the problem, therefore I

4:52

make a mistake. Now I've worked with a

4:54

ton of people who have a high IQ who

4:56

think they have ADHD because they are

4:59

mindless, right? My mind doesn't I'm

5:01

smart but my mind does not pay

5:03

attention. So this is not necessarily

5:05

ADHD. There's some coorbidity between IQ

5:07

and ADHD but it's not sort of huge. This

5:11

is actually where intelligence induces

5:14

mindlessness. Intelligence induces

5:17

causes you to stop paying attention. And

5:20

here's how this works. So I want you to

5:22

imagine a stupid person who is sitting

5:25

in a lecture. So when a stupid person is

5:27

sitting in a lecture, they don't

5:29

understand what the lecturer is talking

5:31

about. They haven't heard this before.

5:33

They haven't processed it before. Since

5:35

it is new to them, they are going to pay

5:38

attention. Now if you have a high IQ

5:41

that also means you have a strong

5:43

predictive capability right so if you

5:45

think about like high IQ and playing

5:47

chess you can read 10 moves ahead so

5:50

when your brain is listening to someone

5:52

speak when you are performing a task and

5:54

your brain automatically makes

5:56

calculations ahead when it reads 10

5:58

moves ahead oh you're like this guy's

6:00

talking about quantum mechanics oh I

6:01

know what he's going to say he's talking

6:02

about the double slit experiment so you

6:04

stop paying attention anytime your mind

6:06

can read things through to the end it no

6:09

longer pays attention. When you no

6:11

longer pay attention, now you're not

6:13

paying attention. And that opens you up

6:15

to making mistakes. And when this is

6:18

what's really scary about it, right? So

6:20

the simpler the thing is, the easier it

6:22

is to predict. The easier it is to

6:24

predict, the more you stop paying

6:27

attention. And the more you stop paying

6:29

attention, the more mistakes you make.

6:31

So this is what's really scary, right?

6:33

This is what makes a stupid intelligent

6:35

person. The thing that is really simple

6:37

is where you are making the mistakes,

6:39

which is really confusing because then

6:41

are you like really stupid or are you

6:43

really intelligent? Turns out that if

6:46

you go far enough down the scale of

6:49

intelligence, you wrap around to

6:51

stupidity. The third thing that we're

6:53

going to talk about, people who are

6:55

highly intelligent paint themselves into

6:57

a corner. So here's how this goes. In

7:00

the research, what people kind of

7:01

describe is that people who are highly

7:03

intelligent will commit to something

7:06

that is false. Okay? Now, why do they do

7:09

that? So, imagine once again that I'm an

7:11

idiot and then I have a belief that is

7:14

wrong. So, if I have a belief that's

7:16

wrong, that means that I can't defend

7:18

it, right? Like, if I'm wrong and I

7:21

can't come up with a good logical reason

7:23

for it, then I'm just wrong. and then I

7:25

have to admit my mistake and then like I

7:27

don't double down and then like okay I

7:29

made a mistake and then I correct it and

7:30

then I'm like in the right camp. But if

7:32

you're smart and you guys may notice

7:34

this, right? So if you've ever gotten

7:36

into an argument with someone with super

7:38

high IQ on the internet who is, you

7:40

know, found on the I am very smart

7:42

subreddit, what you will discover is

7:44

that oftenimes people who are really

7:45

intelligent are really arrogant about

7:48

it. And even when they are wrong, they

7:51

will argue with you until their last

7:54

breath. Now, why does this happen? So,

7:56

you will say, "Okay, this is because

7:57

they're arrogant assholes." But no, this

7:59

is actually a function of intelligence.

8:00

That's what the research suggests. Okay?

8:02

So, when you have a wrong belief, and if

8:05

you have the capacity for intelligence,

8:08

even when you have a wrong belief, you

8:10

can come up with logical reasons why

8:13

your wrong belief is correct. And there

8:16

are some people out there that are

8:17

famously very intelligent but are also

8:20

really stupid and stuck on wrong beliefs

8:24

that they will, you know, go down with

8:25

the sinking ship. They just will never

8:27

admit they are wrong. And part of it is

8:29

arrogance for sure, right? And we'll get

8:31

to how that arrogance is the solution to

8:33

all of this. We we'll kind of get to

8:35

that in a second. But I want you all to

8:36

understand that the better you are, the

8:39

better your brain is at producing

8:41

arguments, the more likely you are to

8:44

defend a wrong point of view. And as you

8:48

are defending a wrong point of view, it

8:50

opens you up to make big mistakes. Okay?

8:54

And this is where like I see this

8:55

literally all the time with the very

8:57

high functioning people that I work with

8:59

which is like since they are right most

9:01

of the time the one or two% of the time

9:03

that they are wrong they have a lot of

9:06

difficulty

9:08

understanding that they're wrong right

9:09

so as I I mean I don't really explain to

9:11

them I figured out how to do this but if

9:13

they talk to their co-founders or their

9:15

advisory board or things like that right

9:17

their seuite kind of group like they

9:20

have a lot of difficulty recognizing

9:21

they're wrong because their mind is

9:23

always able to come up with arguments

9:26

that support the incorrect belief.

9:29

Another kind of stupidity that people

9:30

with high IQ are predisposed to is

9:32

something called a misapplied heristic

9:35

or a discrepancy between someone's

9:38

confidence and their abilities. So like

9:40

a good example of this that doesn't have

9:42

to do with IQ is, you know, back couple

9:44

maybe about a year ago, two years ago,

9:46

there was like all these things going

9:47

around on social media where there were

9:48

like dudes who were like, "Yeah, I can

9:50

wrestle a bear, bro." Like if I took a

9:53

bear in in a fight like unarmed, like I

9:56

would own that bear. Like I'm stronger

9:57

than a bear, right? You have like people

9:59

on social media who are making these

10:01

bizarre claims of confidence. So there's

10:04

a gap between what you believe you're

10:06

capable of and what you are actually

10:09

capable of. So Dunning and Krueger uh

10:11

wrote a seminal paper on this back in

10:13

like 1999 which is called the Dunning

10:15

Krueger effect which is that people who

10:17

don't know much misestimate their

10:20

abilities. Is this just a case of like

10:22

people being arrogant? Because that's

10:24

certainly the case on social media. But

10:25

it turns out that there's some really

10:27

interesting science behind this. And

10:28

this is something that Kant originally

10:30

sort of discovered and he said that

10:32

judgment is I think the application of a

10:35

rule like appropriately. So in a lot of

10:38

situations if you apply the correct

10:42

rules then you will behave intelligently

10:45

or smartly or wisely. And if you apply

10:49

the wrong set of rules to a situation,

10:51

then that will result in stupidity. In

10:54

scientific terms, this is something

10:55

called the problem of misapplied

10:57

heristics. So a heristic is kind of

11:00

like, you know, a set of rules that we

11:02

follow. And when we don't correctly read

11:05

the situation, when we have sort of like

11:07

an answer key and we misapply this

11:10

answer key to a set of problems, that

11:13

results in stupidity. So a good example

11:15

of this I've worked with a bunch of

11:17

people who are once again CEOs,

11:18

founders, leaders, right? And they have

11:20

a set of rules of when interacting with

11:24

people. These are the set of rules that

11:26

lead to success. And when these leaders

11:30

go home and they have their spouse or

11:33

partner, when they have their kids, they

11:36

assume, right, this is why they end up

11:37

in my office because they're in the

11:39

midst their their partner is threatening

11:41

divorce. They're alienated from their

11:43

children. They're narcissistic and

11:44

they're like, "I don't understand what's

11:46

wrong. Like, why do people hate me?

11:48

Like, I'm focused on efficiency. They

11:50

want these things. I tell them to do it

11:52

this way. If everyone listened to me,

11:54

everyone would get what they want. I'm

11:55

smart. I know how to do this. I built a

11:57

hundred million dollar company. I don't

11:59

know why these people are [ __ ]

12:00

arguing with me. My son is 15 years old

12:02

and he [ __ ] argues with me. This is a

12:04

case of a misapplied uristic. This

12:06

person is incredibly successful,

12:07

somewhat narcissistic, fine. But that's

12:09

not actually what their mistake is.

12:10

Their mistake is that they are taking

12:12

the rule set from being a founder or

12:16

leader and they are applying it to a

12:19

family situation. They're applying it to

12:21

a 15-year-old son who is in the process

12:24

of transitioning from a child to an

12:26

adult. So even that heruristic used to

12:29

work when your son was like six because

12:31

when your son is six and you're like 40,

12:34

they listen to you. They're supposed to

12:35

listen to you. But as they start to

12:37

develop independence, right? When your

12:39

employees are developing independence,

12:40

you're like, "Nah, bro. You got to

12:41

listen to what I'm saying." But that

12:43

doesn't work with your kid. It doesn't

12:45

work with your spouse. So, as we

12:47

misapply heristics, we result in

12:50

stupidity despite the fact that we're

12:52

intelligent. Why are people with

12:53

intelligence more vulnerable to this?

12:56

It's because their ability to shape a

12:59

heristic to a situation is actually

13:01

greater. If I were to ask like a super

13:03

smart person, make me a list of the

13:06

similarities between a family and a

13:08

company like they could connect those

13:10

dots more easily. As they connect those

13:12

dots more easily, they are more likely

13:14

to apply heristics, adapt heristics,

13:17

which on some level may work, but is not

13:19

nearly as good as developing an

13:21

independent heristic. So now the

13:23

question becomes, how do we fix this?

13:24

Right? So how do we move from being a

13:26

stupid intelligent person to a smart

13:28

intelligent person? It turns out that

13:30

there's another element here. There's

13:32

another like cognitive principle which

13:34

often times if you're intelligent you

13:36

don't really figure out. Some people

13:38

sort of do it naturally which is how

13:40

they become smart intelligent people.

13:42

But if you don't do it naturally you can

13:43

absolutely learn it. Okay. And this is

13:46

called thinking disposition. So this is

13:49

thinking disposition is not your IQ. It

13:52

is the way that you relate to your

13:55

thinking. The attitude that you have

13:57

towards your thinking. So let me give

13:59

you an example. Okay, I am an

14:00

influencer. So many influencers are

14:02

like, hey, I'm successful on YouTube.

14:05

Therefore, let me become an

14:06

entrepreneur, right? So there are like

14:07

these entrepreneur influencers. Many of

14:09

them will start companies. They'll

14:10

develop products. Like myself, I

14:12

developed a coaching program. And since,

14:14

by the way, since I'm successful on

14:16

YouTube, that must mean anything that I

14:19

develop will work, right? So here I am

14:22

trained at Harvard Medical School, was

14:24

faculty there, was there for like seven

14:26

or eight years and like now I'm

14:27

successful on the internet and these two

14:29

data points mean that whatever product I

14:31

develop will be successful because I'm

14:34

such a genius. That's not actually the

14:35

attitude that I take though. We did

14:37

actually the exact opposite at H because

14:40

you know we understand based on medical

14:42

training and stuff like that that genius

14:43

doesn't translate directly over to

14:46

successful products. That's why we do

14:49

studies on our coaching program. We have

14:50

research baked into it to measure

14:52

whether it actually works with people,

14:54

right? So we see reductions in

14:56

depression, reductions in anxiety,

14:57

improvements in a sense of life purpose.

14:59

We see people like living up to their

15:00

potential. They tend to be pretty happy

15:01

with it. 10 to 20,000 people have gone

15:03

through the program since we started it.

15:05

It is the way that you relate to your

15:08

thinking. So just because Dr. K has an

15:10

idea, even if I'm Dr. K, that doesn't

15:13

make it good. And there are a couple of

15:15

critical components to thinking

15:17

disposition. The first is collecting

15:20

information before you make a judgment.

15:22

So this is what's really like tricky.

15:24

Okay, so the smarter you are, the more

15:27

quickly you will arrive at a judgment,

15:28

right? Because you can make all of these

15:30

natural calculations, they happen pretty

15:32

quick. And so often times what we don't

15:34

do even when we know the answer, we

15:37

don't go looking for information. So the

15:39

whole point of medical training is that

15:40

when a doctor jumps to a conclusion,

15:42

like jumps to a diagnosis. Oh yeah, I've

15:44

seen the flu a thousand times. Flu is

15:46

going around. Your kid comes in, he's

15:48

got the flu, right? So, he's got sweats,

15:50

right? And they don't ask the question,

15:52

okay, does he have sweats only at night

15:54

or does he have them all day long? Do

15:56

they respond to Tylenol? Do they not

15:57

respond to Tylenol? Has someone else

15:59

been sick in the house? This is how you

16:01

separate out something like lymphoma or

16:04

leukemia from the flu. The training that

16:07

we go through for doctors is even when

16:09

you make a judgment or ideally before

16:11

you make a final judgment, you can have

16:13

an initial diagnostic idea, you should

16:16

still collect information. So be a

16:19

little bit hesitant to make judgments.

16:21

Make judgments after you go through a

16:23

process. The second thing for thinking

16:26

disposition is when you have a

16:28

particular idea to try to engage with

16:31

contrary opinions. This is something

16:33

that we see very little of on the

16:35

internet where you have a lot of

16:36

intelligent people who become parts of

16:39

echo chambers and they stop engaging

16:41

with contrary opinions. So, I know it

16:43

sounds insane, but like when you have an

16:45

idea of what is OP in a video game

16:48

because you're so smart and you're

16:51

someone who is like high rank and

16:53

therefore you know everything. When you

16:55

think of something as OP, you kind of

16:56

double down. You argue with people. You

16:58

don't actually go around collecting

17:00

opinions that are the exact opposite of

17:03

yours. Maybe you do, and if you do,

17:04

chances are you're a smart, intelligent

17:06

person, right? So, if we're intelligent,

17:08

we actually want to bring in contrary

17:10

opinions for our intelligence to factor

17:14

into the calculation. We don't have to

17:16

believe them, but we really want to

17:17

collect that data. The third thing, and

17:20

this is so counterintuitive because we

17:22

all think we do it, and that is thinking

17:25

before you make a decision. Just because

17:27

our mind produces

17:30

a calculation, right? It usually happens

17:33

very fast. It usually happens

17:35

unintentionally. Your mind just comes up

17:36

with an idea. Oh, this is bad. We often

17:39

times the more intelligent you are, the

17:41

less you learn because you don't need

17:43

to, right? So, if you're very

17:44

intelligent, you make a calculation, the

17:46

chances are the calculation is right.

17:48

So, then you sort of fly by the seat of

17:50

your pants. A lot of people go through

17:52

life with like this automatic

17:54

intelligence. That's what predisposes

17:56

you to make mistakes because that's not

17:58

always going to be right. And then we

18:01

see this weird synergistic effect

18:02

because if you make a snap judgment, if

18:04

you don't collect information and then

18:06

you have a very very robust intellectual

18:08

capability, you will argue yourself into

18:11

being correct even when you're wrong. So

18:14

you need to pause and really think about

18:17

making decisions. So often times when

18:19

I'm working with someone, you know what

18:21

I'll do is I'll ask them, you guys may

18:22

have seen this in our interviews, right?

18:24

I'll ask them lots of open-ended

18:25

questions. I'll really get them to think

18:28

about their problems. I don't give them

18:30

answers and I don't need to. What And if

18:32

you struggle with this because it's kind

18:34

of hard to do on your own, this is where

18:36

working with someone who asks you

18:38

questions to encourage your thinking

18:40

about the problem to engage your

18:42

critical thinking instead of jumping to

18:45

a conclusion, which is technically what

18:46

your mind does. That's what leads to

18:49

smart intelligence. And the last thing

18:51

is to think critically about your

18:53

thinking. Okay, this is sort of related.

18:56

This is why we sort of encourage people

18:57

to think, but oftentimes the smarter you

19:00

are, the less critical you are about

19:02

your own thinking. Right? So, we may

19:04

think we're critical. And some of y'all

19:05

may be critical about your thinking. I

19:07

think that's totally fine. But when I

19:09

encounter people who are like high IQ

19:11

and super blackpilled, this is a good

19:14

example of not being critical about your

19:16

thinking. They may have read a bunch of

19:18

research, but they never stop to think

19:20

like, okay, there's a bunch of studies

19:22

on why black pill is correct, but do

19:25

they spend an equal amount of time

19:27

studying lots of things that show that

19:29

black pill isn't correct? No. It turns

19:32

out that there's a selection bias. So,

19:34

if you are someone who is a stupid

19:36

intelligent person, it's not about

19:38

leveling up your IQ or leveling down

19:41

Well, I guess it is about leveling down

19:42

your stupidity. And the way that we do

19:44

that is by changing our thinking

19:47

disposition.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the phenomenon of 'stupid intelligent people,' where high intelligence can lead to specific cognitive blind spots. The speaker identifies four main traps: misapplying abstract intelligence to social situations that require empathy, becoming mindless because the brain predicts outcomes too quickly, using logic to defend incorrect beliefs, and misapplying heuristics from one domain to another. To counteract these, the speaker recommends developing a 'thinking disposition,' which involves slowing down, seeking contrary opinions, and thinking critically about one's own thought process.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts