HomeVideos

Warning: Don’t Buy Silver Unless You Can Handle This | Alex Campbell

Now Playing

Warning: Don’t Buy Silver Unless You Can Handle This | Alex Campbell

Transcript

1685 segments

0:00

A lot of silver flow to the US

0:02

pre-tariffs earlier in last year and you

0:06

see it going east now and I think that's

0:08

going to be the story for the next two

0:10

years. I think it's going to be a story

0:11

basically for until we have huge regime

0:13

shifts or we see some sort of radical

0:15

tightening in the US. I think there's a

0:17

real demand story as an investment

0:19

diversifier. Think about the

0:20

reallocation of all the strategic

0:22

investment, you know, portfolios as

0:24

being reallocated out of bonds and into

0:27

into metals. Today's episode is brought

0:29

to you by the Pict AI enhance

0:31

international equity ETF, ticker PQNT.

0:33

You'll hear more about their using AI to

0:35

enhance international equity returns

0:36

later in the show. For now, let's get

0:38

into it. Joined today by Alexander

0:40

Campbell, founder and CEO of Rose AI.

0:44

Alex, it is great to see you. Uh, in a

0:47

previous life, you were head of

0:48

commodities at Bridgewater, and that is

0:50

what I want to talk to you about today,

0:52

commodities, and in particular, silver.

0:54

You have been a massive bull on silver

0:57

for several years and almost a year ago

0:59

exactly. You published a piece called

1:01

the silver squeeze. Since then, silver

1:04

rose dramatically about well over 200%.

1:07

But in late January, it had an epic

1:09

correction, the biggest percentage crash

1:12

since 1980 for silver. And in dollar

1:15

terms, silver declined by more than the

1:18

price of silver had been for most of its

1:20

its history. Before we get into the epic

1:23

crash in silver that is somewhat ongoing

1:25

and your your view, can you describe

1:28

what motivated your bull thesis that you

1:30

had been developing over the past

1:32

several years? Why why did you get so

1:33

bullish?

1:34

>> So it actually starts with gold back in

1:36

18 more or less. So after I left

1:40

Bridgewater, I started a small fund

1:42

called Black Snow Capital. And the goal

1:45

of Black Snow Capital was to give people

1:47

convexity to kind of tail events. And

1:50

specifically the two events that I saw

1:52

that were kind of hitting the market.

1:54

One was super low interest rates. The

1:55

other one was the credit bubble in China

1:57

and the property bubble in China. And at

1:59

the time as a western investor, it was

2:01

very hard to get exposure to the banks

2:03

and the property companies. You can't

2:05

really trade the debt. The banks, a lot

2:07

of them are locked up. They have short

2:08

restrictions. And so I came up with a

2:10

framework or or a trade called gold in

2:12

China or double dollar gold which was

2:14

basically the notion that the Chinese

2:16

the PBOC had a choice which was fix the

2:19

banks and take deleveraging or print.

2:22

And to me, I saw the gold long short R&B

2:27

trade as kind of a headsy win tells you

2:28

lose type of framing of that because you

2:31

either have deleveraging pressure and

2:33

people worrying about the banks and

2:34

people fleeing to gold or you have a ton

2:37

of printing and the the you know the R&B

2:39

selling off quite a bit. And so we went

2:41

around and tried to sell this to people

2:42

and kind of explain how this was really

2:44

good portfolio diversification against a

2:46

lot of illquid stocks. They had a lot of

2:48

PE venture. You know, this is when the

2:49

Yale investment thesis was very popular

2:51

among institutions and everyone was

2:53

like, "No, we don't want to do publics.

2:54

We only want to do private anymore." And

2:56

I was like, "Guys, you're buying like

2:57

long liquid duration assets that are

2:59

progrowth at interest rates at zero.

3:01

It's like not a good idea." So that kind

3:03

of led me to have this gold position,

3:05

gold view for a long time. And then I

3:08

just started getting a little more into

3:09

silver over time by looking at um

3:12

basically was when the AI wave kind of

3:13

really hit and everyone started really

3:15

getting fattish about energy. um you

3:16

know used to be a commodity trader, used

3:18

to be an oil trader kind of and and

3:21

energy has always been an interesting

3:22

you know market to me and started just

3:26

noticing how much of the solar basically

3:29

solar build was silver intensive how so

3:32

much of the demand for silver was coming

3:33

from solar power and so you kind of had

3:35

this two themes that I liked hitting at

3:38

the same time which was one this kind of

3:40

capital flight out of China this kind of

3:43

need for hard assets you know there's

3:45

also the US fiscal thing, but also just

3:48

the notion that as opposed to gold where

3:51

most [clears throat] of the gold that's

3:53

bought is is sat on in coins or bars and

3:56

then it can hit the market again. You

3:58

know, we kind of destroy or or

4:00

effectively lock up silver for a lot of

4:02

time in these industrial materials. And

4:04

so, you know, I went and looked at the

4:05

demand supply balance, wrote that piece

4:07

last year saying, "Wait a second. um you

4:10

actually have this really nasty

4:13

combination of factors which is this

4:15

kind of secular bull somewhat price

4:17

insensitive alone totally price

4:18

insensitive demand coming out of these

4:19

solar panel manufacturers who it takes a

4:21

while to substitute to copper you had

4:23

this kind of investment demand and you

4:24

also had the notion that as opposed to a

4:26

lot of other commodities

4:28

75% of silver production is inelastic it

4:32

comes from making copper or gold or tin

4:34

or a bunch of other stuff and you know

4:36

classic inelastic demand in elastic

4:38

supply you get these squeezes. And so

4:39

that's kind of what we saw. And so, you

4:42

know, was [clears throat] super bullish

4:43

at 25, you know, I like to say,

4:45

dangerously bullish at 40, moderately

4:47

bullish at 80, uh, and then toe in the

4:50

water bullish, although a little still

4:51

too bullish towards the end of last

4:53

month, but, uh, but but that's kind of

4:55

the origin story of the trade. So the

4:57

demand for silver is both monetary. We

5:01

could call that speculative monetary

5:02

speculative as part one and part two is

5:05

industrial whereas the demand for gold

5:08

is primarily monetary or or speculative.

5:11

And that is what it makes it so

5:12

interesting. That's on the demand side.

5:14

On the supply side as you said only 25

5:17

30% of silver is mined from silver

5:20

primary mines. The rest 75 or 70 to 75%

5:24

of it is mined from gold from mines

5:26

where the primary metal is zinc or lead

5:30

or copper or gold. And as such, you

5:32

know, the price of silver could surge

5:34

and a gold miner or a copper miner

5:38

wouldn't necessarily be like, let's mine

5:40

as much as possible because they're

5:42

they're they're responding to the price

5:43

of gold, to the price of copper. the the

5:46

monetary and speculative element that

5:48

that is very very hard to pin down in

5:50

terms of the numbers. Tell us about the

5:53

industrial. [clears throat]

5:54

Tell us just how big is the shortage?

5:56

What we are what on our in our fifth or

5:58

fourth consecutive

6:00

>> deficit in terms of silver and where are

6:04

the who are the industrial what are the

6:07

industrial you know heights of industry

6:09

that are demanding so much silver? What

6:12

was it historically you know in terms of

6:14

photography? How has it evolved? Tell

6:16

tell us the journey.

6:17

>> Yeah. So a lot of it goes into

6:18

electronics. a lot of it is component

6:20

pieces and then as you kind of pointed

6:22

out historically a lot of it went into

6:24

solar photography which obviously has

6:26

been going down and so I think that's

6:27

part of what kind of hid this this

6:30

incredible rapid rise in the solar

6:33

demand because you if you just look at

6:34

it as industrial it almost stayed a

6:36

little bit flat or went up a bit but

6:38

when you look at that one you know that

6:40

that one component of solar it's now I

6:43

think 30% of mine production and you

6:45

know when you think about supply a lot

6:46

of it's recycled so the other trade I

6:48

thought was interesting was like buying

6:49

recycling companies or recycling you

6:51

know manufacturers essentially

6:53

processing units because if you get the

6:55

high prices which we're getting right

6:57

you would expect people to turn in their

6:59

jewelry turn in their stuff and then it

7:00

turns in back into boolean and then goes

7:02

back into the system so that was kind of

7:04

an interesting machine for me and you

7:06

know the other thing that kind of I

7:07

think people don't realize is just how

7:09

disconnected

7:11

the the day-to-day market for silver is

7:13

with you know these

7:16

things that they are investing in on the

7:18

software for AI's hyperscaler side

7:20

because when you hear about you know I

7:22

don't even know the number sometimes but

7:23

like one gigawatty data center you know

7:24

like 100 whatever and you hear about

7:27

things like Dyson spheres right okay so

7:29

everyone likes to talk about Dyson

7:30

spheres go into chachi go to claude go

7:32

into gemini go to Grock or whatever and

7:34

just ask how much silver would be

7:36

required to make a Dyson sphere and it's

7:37

10,000 years of supply or something like

7:39

that so yeah it's like we're not talking

7:41

like a little bit more we're talking

7:42

like more silver than has ever been made

7:44

in the history of humanity because these

7:46

are gigantic systems okay So if Elon

7:49

gets his way, this is not just a silver

7:51

grows by another 10% a year. It's like

7:53

we need a lot more silver. Now obviously

7:56

just like we're seeing some of that

7:58

production will get re reallocated to

8:00

copper. And obviously if we have a down

8:02

market or you know a lot of tightness,

8:05

you'll see less solar build and less

8:06

rapid solar build. And obviously if the

8:10

data centers had this like air gap which

8:11

I kind of see coming where revenues

8:13

aren't hitting as fast as the capex

8:15

requirements you could see a slow in

8:16

that energy demand but on a 10 20-year

8:19

basis if you think which I think is

8:21

reasonable that the base load energy is

8:23

going to be nuclear n gas and solar you

8:25

know it's it's you end up with these

8:27

really interesting economics again these

8:29

economics are different at 100 than they

8:30

are at 25 or whatever but if you

8:32

actually did the math and I did it in a

8:34

piece called like silver is money again

8:36

to kind of make the illusion to the fact

8:38

that you know when you have boolean now

8:40

you basically pay someone to store it

8:42

you know security deposit box like you

8:43

here's my key or whatever but if you

8:45

think about it from a state level or

8:47

like an institutional level if you're if

8:49

you have very long duration

8:51

[clears throat]

8:52

and you're willing to hold that silver

8:53

for 10 to 20 years you can stick it in a

8:55

solar panel and it generates a yield

8:58

so just like in the 1700s or the 1500s

9:01

or back in the history of banking and

9:03

pre fiat your gold and silver would

9:05

earned carry it was posit positive carry

9:08

as an asset. The fact that you can stick

9:10

it in something and then generate income

9:12

and then eventually melt it down and get

9:14

it back to me was a was a quasi positive

9:16

yield that was like not being priced in

9:18

the market as well.

9:19

>> So, Alex, we've had five consecutive

9:21

years of deficits in 2026 probably going

9:24

to be a deficit as well. And I'm I'm

9:28

looking the Silver Institute has some

9:29

great charts on this. They had an

9:31

interim November report and they also

9:33

had an annual report that about 20 that

9:35

that should be coming out in a few

9:36

months. But basically the demand

9:40

you know was was a lot of photography

9:43

and that has since faded and it's now as

9:47

you said a lot of electrical components

9:49

a lot of silver and AI I've asked Gemini

9:53

that basically the silver center pace

9:55

the the the silver that goes into data

9:58

centers and chips particularly is

10:00

roughly 2% of annual production so it's

10:02

not huge but it definitely is a a very

10:04

rapidly growing thing and I I think also

10:07

just the the supply is is you know 2025

10:10

the supply was lower than it was 10

10:12

years ago. The supply hasn't grown in 10

10:15

years and demand has grown a lot and the

10:20

part of demand that has grown is

10:21

industrial demand and there was a lot of

10:23

speculative fervor in you know the the

10:26

late 2000s and early 2010s that has

10:28

dissipated with the the you know the

10:30

popping of the precious metal bubble or

10:32

commodity bubble of you know that in

10:34

popped in 2011 or 2014 depending on what

10:36

commodity you're talking about and

10:37

there's just there's just not enough

10:39

silver is is what is that what drove the

10:42

bull market of silver from 20 to $115.

10:46

How much of it was the industrial

10:47

demand? How much of it was actual

10:49

speculation as we're seeing now? There

10:52

was, you know, a lot of leverage coming

10:53

out of China and some a lot more retail

10:56

demand than certainly I had imagined one

10:57

one year, sorry, one week ago.

10:59

>> When we say speculative demand, I think

11:01

we are coming at it from a very western

11:03

perspective. Okay? where you or I we

11:08

live in the west. We live in what I call

11:09

the world of dollars and we have a

11:12

tremendous amount of variety in the

11:16

interesting

11:17

safe you know positive carry or whatever

11:21

dollar assets that we can invest in. And

11:23

what I think that most western investors

11:25

and you see this on in the in the

11:26

discussion

11:28

is I I think a lot of westerners have

11:31

frankly like an ego problem really

11:33

understanding that on a dollar fordoll

11:36

basis it is not really their market

11:39

anymore. So most of the demand is going

11:43

not most of it but the biggest consumer

11:45

is now China just like in a lot of other

11:47

commodities and from an industrial

11:49

perspective and from this investment

11:50

perspective and also if you were a

11:53

Chinese household or a Chinese corporate

11:55

or a Chinese investment firm your saving

11:58

options are you know imagine they are

12:03

12th as good as what we have over here

12:07

the stock market has not made real

12:09

appreciable gains gains outside of stock

12:10

issuance for the past 10 years. The

12:14

banks, pardon my, you know,

12:17

colloquialisms are hosed. The banks are

12:20

hosed. Okay, you have about five to six

12:22

trillion of dead property company debt.

12:26

Five to six trillion. Okay, remember

12:27

Everrand? They still haven't fixed

12:28

Everrand.

12:29

>> Trillion dollars. So in terms of that's

12:32

35 trillion yuan or something.

12:33

>> Yeah. Yeah. So you have Yeah. Sorry.

12:35

I'll try to talk in dollars. I I get so

12:37

confused and we go back and forth. I

12:39

>> no no no it's good it's good that you

12:40

did it in dollars we have far more

12:41

viewers in the west than you do in China

12:42

so it's good

12:43

>> and this is the issue right it's it's

12:45

that translation and you see it today

12:47

even with we'll talk about it later but

12:48

this premium discussion and the back and

12:50

forth and how much is it in India and

12:51

how this cognitive work means that we

12:53

kind of just remove it from our head

12:56

there's now twice as much money in China

12:59

as there is in America twice as much M2

13:03

I'm talking about so there's a bunch of

13:04

other ways to count money but and that's

13:06

happened basically in the last 10 years.

13:08

Now, imagine you're one of those people

13:10

with twice as much money, right? And

13:13

you're looking around and you know your

13:15

local bank is hiding, you know, the

13:18

system's hiding trillions of dollars of

13:19

losses, but maybe your local bank is

13:20

insolvent and hiding billions of dollars

13:22

of losses. You're looking at a stock

13:24

market that is feels kind of Ponzi and

13:28

there's some cool stuff in it, but every

13:30

time it goes up, it gets cr You know,

13:31

that kind of thing. and you just put a

13:34

bunch of your wealth over the past two

13:36

decades in property because that was

13:38

seen as the safe responsible asset and

13:40

you can't get out of your property and

13:42

and then add capital controls, right?

13:45

You can't invest in a lot of these same

13:46

assets that we can invest in. So the the

13:49

risk return profile, the mobility of it

13:52

is just radically more attractive if you

13:55

or I were in one of those or India even

13:57

which is not as restrictive but still

13:59

has a lot of crappy banking system and

14:01

you know as many good saving options

14:03

that it starts to make a lot more sense

14:05

as a thing that you're willing to

14:06

tolerate a 30% up 30% down year which a

14:09

western investor who's comparing that to

14:10

stocks would never accept and so I think

14:13

that's driving a lot of what we see

14:15

right now which is this kind of pushpull

14:17

yanking back and forth. A lot of silver

14:20

flow to the US pre-tariffs earlier in

14:24

last year and you see it going east now

14:27

and I think that's going to be the story

14:28

for the next two years. I think it's

14:30

going be a story basically for until we

14:32

have huge regime shifts or we see some

14:34

sort of radical tightening in the US. So

14:36

that that's not to be too, you know, too

14:39

too kind of glib to your question, but

14:41

but I think it's I think there's a real

14:43

demand story as an investment

14:45

diversifier. And I think if you go back

14:46

and look against where metals were as an

14:49

inflation hedge for people back in the

14:51

80s and 70s, it was just a much higher

14:53

percentage of people's portfolio. And so

14:55

you can call it speculative and

14:56

obviously we saw a speculative boom bust

14:58

that we just had. But you can also think

15:00

about the reallocation of all the

15:01

strategic investment, you know,

15:03

portfolios as being reallocated out of

15:05

bonds and into into metals. And so I I

15:09

think that that's kind of the the the

15:11

perspective people should take on this

15:13

thing. I don't think you should be

15:14

trying to chase 20% a month. You know, I

15:16

tried to be a little bit cautious about

15:17

that and say, hey, you were probably

15:18

going to get a draw down along the way.

15:20

Not to not to say I was exactly right on

15:22

this or that, but obviously in the last

15:24

couple of weeks, you had a you had, you

15:27

know, a lot of leverage in the system. I

15:28

think you also had a lot of short gamma,

15:30

which we can talk about, which is why it

15:32

crawled up really fast and then has

15:34

puked.

15:35

>> As soon as AI tools begin to wow the

15:37

world, investors started asking when

15:39

will AIdriven strategies become more

15:41

common? The answer is that they're

15:42

already here. Sophisticated quant hedge

15:44

funds have been using machine learning

15:45

strategies for many years, largely only

15:48

for the benefit of institutional

15:49

investors paying higher fees. Now with

15:52

the barriers to usage coming down, AI

15:54

machine learning approaches are being

15:55

made available to you through products

15:57

like the PITE AI enhanced international

15:59

equity ETF ticker PQNT. Pquant gives

16:01

investors enhanced international returns

16:03

in a lowcost taxefficient rapper using

16:06

AI to take advantage of the types of

16:07

hidden outperformance potential that

16:09

human beings may not be able to detect

16:10

or explain. And unlike many other active

16:12

ETFs, Pquant isn't just taking factor

16:14

risk, leaving you overexposed to

16:16

specific sectors and betas or style

16:17

exposures. Instead, Pquant helps

16:19

neutralize factor exposure to minimize

16:21

index tracking error. That means when it

16:23

outperforms, it's coming from true

16:24

idiosyncratic stock returns, not

16:26

excessive risk or factor exposure. To

16:28

learn more about how you can harness the

16:29

power of AI in your portfolio, check out

16:31

the link in the description to learn

16:33

more. Before investing, carefully

16:34

consider the fund's investment

16:35

objectives, risks, charges, and

16:36

expenses, which may be obtained by

16:37

visiting www.pictay.com/etf.

16:40

Read it carefully before investing.

16:42

Distributed by Foresight Fund Services.

16:44

Now, back to the show. Alex to to me the

16:46

industrial demand from China the

16:48

industrial demand for solar other things

16:51

was very evident you could see it in the

16:52

charts there was data on that when I

16:54

looked at the

16:56

I again I'm going to call it speculative

16:58

or monetary demand for silver

17:00

>> in India as well as China I was not

17:03

really seeing it in the data you know

17:05

for there's a chart showing that retail

17:07

investment in silver in 2025 was

17:09

actually lower than it was in 2013 2014

17:13

and 2015 And then in China as well, like

17:16

this this not the Shanghai premium, but

17:18

this the one ETF of silver that's

17:21

trading at at 40% premium. Like in terms

17:23

of the size of that, that's 150th the

17:25

size of SLV, the biggest Western ETF. So

17:29

I hadn't been seeing this huge

17:31

speculative demand from China. But maybe

17:33

that's my misreading. Maybe I was

17:34

looking at the wrong things. Maybe I

17:36

wasn't looking at the the Shanghai

17:38

volumes. you know, suddenly we had this

17:40

30% crash in one day where again the

17:42

price of silver fell by more in dollar

17:44

terms than the price of silver has been

17:47

before 2025. It's it's kind of crazy.

17:50

And then suddenly you see all these

17:51

Bloomberg stories about, you know, Mrs.

17:53

Lee who's a 26-year-old nursing nurse in

17:56

China and she lost 1.4 million yuan, you

18:00

know, trading gold and silver. So

18:01

basically, you know, $200,000, a4

18:04

million dollars, let's call it. and you

18:06

know I'm like whoa China I thought that

18:07

the GDP per capita was like 15 or 20,000

18:09

this that's a that's a 10x loss that's

18:11

pretty big so just tell us about the

18:14

scale of the speculation and when I call

18:15

it speculation I'm you know there's no

18:17

judgment here I'm not I'm yeah I'm very

18:20

aware that you know what you said is is

18:22

very true of

18:23

>> certainly in the Chinese assets dour of

18:26

choice over the past 10 years real

18:27

estate and equities primarily real

18:29

estate have not performed well and and

18:31

also equities so I get that and also

18:33

because the dollar is so strong. You see

18:35

that particularly in the like the

18:36

Japanese yen and the Indian rupee.

18:39

Basically, a lot of countries didn't

18:41

even really experience the precious

18:42

metal bare market that started in 2011

18:45

or 2012 because their currencies went

18:46

down

18:47

>> almost as much against the dollar as

18:49

gold and silver went against the dollar.

18:51

So basically there was no bull market

18:52

like in China in a lot of countries

18:54

there's been a precious metals bull

18:55

market that's lasted for 50 years.

18:57

>> Exactly. That's why I say gold in China,

18:59

gold in India because as as you know, if

19:01

you look at 2008, I was trading 2008 and

19:04

I was, you know, in the market a little

19:06

bit then. Golden dollars fell during the

19:08

liquidation squeeze because the dollar

19:10

ripped. And so if you're sitting there

19:12

and you're paying dollars to get your

19:13

gold, you know, it looks bad, but if

19:16

you're in euros or yen or, you know,

19:18

heaven forbid the, you know, emerging

19:20

markets, it was a great asset. And so,

19:23

you know, I think I I'm not

19:26

the I think there's a lot of ambiguity

19:28

about where the actual pots of demand

19:32

and supply are or mostly demand. Like I

19:34

know there's a lot of wealth products

19:35

that are linked to gold and silver. I

19:37

think that you probably see some of that

19:39

leakage into SLV and those other kind of

19:42

western assets when they get their money

19:43

out and they kind of, you know, go go

19:45

through there. And I wouldn't be

19:46

surprised if some of the local banks

19:48

also were playing the in our futures

19:50

markets as well. So you know the tell

19:53

for me there's this kind of premium that

19:55

everybody talks about was that it's

19:59

about the change in that that price not

20:02

the level because there's this banding

20:04

about of oh is the VAT included is it

20:05

not

20:06

>> yeah tell tell us what you're talking

20:07

about the Shanghai premium which is the

20:09

price of silver in Shanghai relative to

20:12

the US explain what that is was it

20:15

trading at a premium and also if you

20:17

adjust the value added tax which is

20:20

>> yes 10% % 12% and also some people pay

20:22

the tax some people are exempt explain

20:24

it explain

20:25

>> yeah so I'm going to I'll give you an

20:27

analogy first and then we'll go because

20:28

[clears throat] it's a it's a microcosm

20:30

of a phenomenon in April 2020 2020 you

20:32

were familiar with what happened to the

20:33

price of oil in in America right it went

20:35

to negative 37 okay Brent oil in Europe

20:40

did not go to negative 37 and if you ask

20:44

you know a person on the street what is

20:47

the price of oil they're going to give

20:49

you some price you know Maybe they'll

20:50

give you their local gasoline price. But

20:52

the reality is that as opposed to purely

20:54

paper markets, okay, commodities have

20:57

this interesting thing where at the end

20:58

of the day, you owe someone some stuff.

21:00

And to the degree that that stuff is not

21:03

100% interchangeable, the Brent that

21:06

comes out of the ground in the North Sea

21:07

is not just like the Brent that comes

21:08

out the WTI that comes out of the ground

21:10

in Texas or whatever. When we talk about

21:12

the price of oil or the market for oil,

21:14

we're actually talking about the market

21:15

and the price of a basket of commodities

21:18

which are reflective of a thing that

21:20

doesn't exist. There is no pure price of

21:23

oil, right? There is the price of this

21:25

oil here and this oil here. And if

21:27

you're familiar with futures markets,

21:28

you get this pretty intuitively because

21:29

the futures markets have a curve, right?

21:31

There's oil tomorrow, there's early oil

21:33

the next day, there's oil in 10 years,

21:35

you know, etc., etc., on and on and on.

21:37

So when you think about these big

21:39

trading houses, you might have hear

21:40

about, you know, Trafigura, Glen Core,

21:42

this kind of thing, these guys make

21:44

money by understanding all these

21:46

different markets and physically not

21:48

only playing in the speculative side,

21:50

but moving things around to where it

21:52

needs to go in order to get those, you

21:55

know, prices more in line or more out of

21:58

line or whatever they're doing, right?

22:00

And we look at things like, you know,

22:02

Google stock. And if you're trying to

22:04

buy Google stock as a European and you

22:06

find some sort of, you know, local

22:07

listed, it wouldn't be an ADR, but an

22:09

ADR type thing where it's a listed on

22:11

their exchange, but it's denominated in

22:12

euros, you're just getting Google stock

22:15

plus the currency and maybe some

22:17

volatility in the local conditions. When

22:20

you talk about silver in New York and

22:23

silver in Shanghai, they're not even the

22:24

same kind of boolean. you got to kind of

22:26

melt it down and turn into something

22:28

else and then send it over.

22:31

So that's the first step is just to

22:32

realize that there is a lag between

22:34

those phenomena and you can tell by

22:36

looking at the curve in London

22:38

>> where you know the the curve in the US

22:41

futures curve is is what we call

22:42

contango

22:43

>> right the curve in Shanghai is in

22:45

contango which means that

22:48

>> sorry wait the US curve is in

22:49

backwardation right? No.

22:51

>> Okay. Okay. So, the US CME, the US curve

22:54

and the Chinese curve are both in

22:56

contango.

22:56

>> Yes. But London is in backwardation.

22:59

>> Okay. Okay.

23:00

>> Which is crazy. And what that's telling

23:02

you is that there's a lot of demand and

23:04

I think it's Asian demand to some degree

23:05

and it's also SLV but are hitting the

23:08

London market and sucking up physical

23:10

supply

23:12

and then because the inventory to price

23:15

mechanisms are being kept in line by

23:16

local speculators or local traders

23:19

basically in comx and in Shanghai those

23:22

curves look relatively stable. Now I

23:24

have a trade on that that the that

23:26

eventually the US inventories might get

23:28

a little bit strained because of this

23:30

flow. But what you saw now to go back to

23:33

the actual premium okay and I know I'm

23:35

kind of jumping around here but was that

23:38

it's not a stable thing. It moves around

23:40

a ton. Okay. And over the past two

23:44

months during this rise when you do the

23:47

conversion of you know R&B per kilogram

23:50

to dollars per troy ounce you saw a

23:54

rapid appreciation of the local price of

23:56

silver in Shanghai versus the US. Okay.

24:00

Now what ended up happening is a lot of

24:02

people started quoting that thing as a

24:04

spot in time

24:06

representation and saying oh Shanghai is

24:10

20% more expensive. Shanghai is 10 more.

24:12

This thing moves like 3% a day, 4% a day

24:13

sometimes. It moves a ton. I have a

24:14

bunch ton of charts on this that that

24:16

are kind of I post a bunch. But the

24:19

other side is that for retail investors,

24:21

I believe if they suck the actual

24:22

physical out of the Shanghai exchange,

24:24

they pay this VAT tax. So there's a lot

24:27

of ambiguity as to whether or not that

24:29

premium includes the VAT, right? And if

24:32

you're an indust I looked this up in

24:34

Gemini, but if if you're an industrial

24:36

producer and you import the metal under

24:39

certain conditions, you can be exempt

24:40

from the VAT tax. So some people on the

24:42

Shanghai exchange are paying the VAT,

24:43

some people are not paying the VAT.

24:45

>> Exactly. And so now you go, whoa, wait a

24:47

second.

24:48

>> Even the same commodity on the same

24:51

market is not the same thing for

24:53

depending on who buys it, which is super

24:56

confusing and super frustrating. And

24:58

then you know this last piece which is

24:59

you know they don't have the same market

25:01

hours as us. Okay. So sometimes their

25:04

market's closed and our market's selling

25:06

off and the premium looks like it's

25:07

going up. Last couple days they've hit

25:09

limit down because they have circuit

25:10

breakers and our market has sold off.

25:11

And so people go, "Oh, the premium's 40,

25:13

the premium's 50." That's obviously

25:15

ridiculous. That's a classic, you know,

25:17

kind of trap of just understanding

25:19

market hours and that kind of thing. But

25:21

the kind of critical point is that a lot

25:24

of the ambiguity, a lot of the

25:25

volatility, aside from the short and the

25:27

leverage, which is probably 80% of it,

25:28

let's say 20% of it though, is just

25:30

people being confused. They don't have

25:33

time to understand this. So they see a

25:35

tweet that says the premium's 40. And

25:37

they go out and they buy it and they see

25:38

someone saying, "Hey, you're an idiot.

25:39

This has the VAT tax, the premium's

25:41

negative." Then they sell it. And and I

25:43

think that you also see like this

25:44

getting weaponized a little bit by both

25:46

sides, obviously, where the shorts are

25:48

really pushing on how dumb the longs

25:49

are. the longs are talking about the

25:50

premium. I mean this is why if you look

25:53

at the V markets or the the option

25:55

markets things trading 130 vol 100 it's

25:59

trading at basically 10% moves a day for

26:01

the next couple of weeks which obviously

26:04

is not sustainable but do you really

26:06

want to go and sell options on something

26:08

that moves 30% a day like tomorrow?

26:10

Probably not. And so that's why we think

26:12

we're going to see chop for a little

26:14

while and if you can't take a five 10%

26:16

draw down you should not be in that

26:17

market. Alex,

26:21

h so how much of this de Asian demand

26:24

was speculative versus industrial?

26:27

>> Well, remember like the

26:30

the deficit that we went into as of last

26:33

year, right, was indust was mostly

26:36

industrial. There is a there was

26:37

investment demand, right? I think maybe

26:40

a 100 million of investment demand, you

26:42

know, 20 and the deficit was 250 or

26:43

something like that. And then you have

26:45

to add in that like solar panel demand

26:48

is probably growing into the middle of

26:50

last year. But I mean I don't have the

26:52

exact number for exactly how much.

26:55

That's kind of the problem, right? The

26:58

problem in trying to track these markets

27:00

is you never have exact numbers. What

27:02

you can see is that the number of shares

27:04

outstanding for SLV was falling last

27:06

week.

27:06

>> Yes.

27:06

>> So it wasn't going up. So it wasn't I

27:08

mean people had gone into it but there's

27:10

actually less shares outstanding for SLV

27:13

higher [clears throat] price. So bigger

27:14

market cap last week than there was back

27:17

in 2011 or whatever. So again like it's

27:21

it's the kind of thing where all these

27:23

things are happening at once and I think

27:25

a lot of the demand was actually people

27:27

just covering their short calls. I think

27:30

a lot of people went out there and

27:31

bought calls which are a form of

27:32

leverage and they don't hedge the delta

27:35

on their call.

27:36

>> Calls on SLV or calls on the CME

27:38

futures.

27:39

>> Both. Okay.

27:40

>> Both. I mean mostly SLV because that's

27:42

where retail tends to play. But you know

27:44

some institutions go out there and they

27:46

buy calls in the futures right you think

27:47

about a pension fund or or a bank or

27:49

something like that and they're going to

27:50

hedge that delta

27:51

>> and you know when you see even on the

27:54

way up it was more volatile than you

27:56

would think up 4% a 5% usually it's like

27:58

a two and a half wall asset or something

27:59

like that two and a half% a year a day

28:01

asset. What that means is that you have

28:04

people who have to hedge their call

28:06

options and they don't care that the

28:07

price is up. They have to buy. They have

28:09

to buy. They have to buy. You're talking

28:10

about the market makers have to hedge.

28:12

>> Yes.

28:12

>> Yes. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. So the people who

28:14

are selling the calls to the people who

28:15

are buying as price goes up. Yep. Delta

28:17

hedge.

28:17

>> And so you have these people who are

28:18

short calls and they do not want that

28:21

exposure in terms of the direction of

28:23

the price. They they're they're trading

28:24

implied versus realized wall. They're

28:26

trading, you know, option premium. So

28:28

when the price goes up, they have to buy

28:30

mechanically. And so that was happening.

28:31

That was part of the reason why January

28:33

was up. January was up. January was up.

28:35

January was up. And that's also why on

28:37

the way down

28:39

the opposite happens because when the

28:40

price goes down they are overhedged and

28:42

they need to sell. They need to sell.

28:44

They need to sell. And this happened in

28:45

October too on the option expiry in a

28:48

much less size. It was like a 4% move or

28:50

something like that where it had been

28:52

moving at one or two% a day and on the

28:54

Friday of expiry boom it goes down four

28:56

or five% like in in a kind of a rock.

28:58

And so you have these kind of short fall

29:00

dynamics which lead to mechanical buying

29:01

on the way up and mechanical selling on

29:03

the way down. And where does that where

29:05

does that leave us here today, Alex? How

29:08

what is what is your outlook on silver

29:11

right now? What was your outlook on

29:13

Thursday? As I'm sure, you know, you

29:15

experienced a a hyper version of what I

29:18

experienced of, oh my god, it's actually

29:19

happening. Like this has gone way better

29:21

than I expected. And then obviously, you

29:23

know, we we had an epic correction. How

29:25

have your views changed over the past,

29:27

let's call it five days. And what are

29:29

they now? Yeah, I went into Thursday

29:33

long copper, long gold, long silver. I

29:36

took off most of my silver delta. I

29:38

still had a bunch of options that were

29:40

basically flat delta, but I had a bunch

29:42

of gold. What that meant was

29:45

as the price started falling off on

29:48

Friday, I kind of was short a bit of

29:50

downside volatility and and long upside

29:52

volatility. And so I ended up being a

29:54

little bit long going into Friday. And

29:55

then I basically doubled on the end of

29:57

Friday. So kind of went reasonably long

30:01

Friday night into the close with the

30:04

thinking that let's look to see what

30:05

happens Monday and then last night the

30:08

price action was so terrible I cut my

30:10

copper and I flattened most of my delta.

30:12

So I am still a little bit long but way

30:16

less long than I was and I'm going to

30:18

kind of wait and let this play itself

30:20

out. You know 80 is still a pretty good

30:22

price if you're b if you bought in at 20

30:24

or whatever. So you're not you're not

30:26

too bad with that. I think there's a lot

30:28

But you did to be clear.

30:29

>> Yeah. I think there's a lot of people

30:30

though and and what's interesting about

30:32

this market is it's become almost like

30:33

this like weird political hockey stick

30:36

where you know everyone in Twitter like

30:38

loves to be right. They love to ah

30:40

here's how smart I am. Here's how smart

30:41

I am. But you know this is a short vall

30:43

market. We're going to have you're going

30:45

to have plenty of times to say you

30:46

bought and have it go up and plenty

30:47

times to sell and see it goes down. And

30:49

I think that that's really the the

30:51

perspective you want to have, which is

30:53

if you're not capable of handling this

30:55

volatility, like you pro you should

30:57

reduce your exposure, which is what I'm

30:59

basically doing because I'm like, ah,

31:01

taking the gains and letting this thing

31:02

shake itself out. But I'm actually a

31:04

little more worried about equities right

31:05

now because I think that that this kind

31:07

of air pocket in stocks looks like it's

31:09

coming to me. And so I most of my risk

31:12

right now is short stocks and I'm, you

31:14

know, a little bit long, kind of

31:16

flattish, still have some upside options

31:18

and that kind of stuff because I don't I

31:20

don't want to, you know, pay the

31:21

transaction costs on those. But I'm

31:22

mostly in wait and see mode right now.

31:25

>> Yeah. Just I mean you've you definitely

31:26

had a good handle not just of the silver

31:28

market but the overall market. I'm

31:29

reading a piece from September 21st of

31:31

2025 last year. You were the piece was

31:34

called why I'm 125% net long and

31:37

sleeping fine. You were long 78% silver,

31:39

long 46% gold, long 5% miners royalties,

31:43

long 23% tech and AI, short 8% delta via

31:47

S&P puts, and you were short 40% high

31:50

yield credit, so net 124% long.

31:52

Obviously, the stocks, silver, gold has

31:54

performed extremely well. Why are you

31:56

bearish about stocks right now? You tal

31:58

you talked about an air pocket.

32:00

>> Yeah. So one is if we're going to see

32:03

any ddollarization,

32:05

I think people are way too focused on

32:07

the dollar itself and they should be

32:08

more focused on US assets. Foreigners, I

32:11

know Europe especially who's might be

32:13

spooked by Trump hold a ton of MAG7, a

32:16

ton of S&P, right? There's been this

32:18

like three, four year trade where

32:19

everyone just gobbles up S&P and to me

32:21

like if people are going to reduce their

32:23

US exposure, that's going to be one of

32:25

the big mechanisms that they do it.

32:27

That's how they get out of dollars.

32:28

Okay, they have way more dollars in

32:30

stocks than they do in like dollar

32:32

futures or whatever. So, that's like one

32:34

kind of secular thing. The other thing

32:36

is

32:38

I did a bit of math and I'm writing

32:40

about this later, but I think the AI

32:42

acceleration is real. I'm still long the

32:45

memory players. I'm, you know, worried

32:47

about the positioning in the market

32:49

right now because it seems pretty

32:50

fattish, but I'm still long the

32:52

hardware. But if you look at what's

32:55

happening in US software, you see, you

32:57

know, these kind of real sharp declines

33:00

over the past couple of weeks. And

33:02

that's because one, like if you're using

33:04

cloud code, it can probably write the

33:05

software that you're usually paying all

33:06

this money for, but two, like what

33:10

happened to Microsoft last week is that

33:11

people are starting to be able to do the

33:12

math of just wait, all the money that

33:15

was going into buybacks is now going

33:16

into capex. So that's a demand that's

33:18

gone for the shares. two, this like

33:22

agent revolution, which I believe is

33:24

coming, is not here today. You have all

33:27

these hackers who are making a lot of

33:28

noise, you know, molt book, all this

33:30

stuff. They buy a Mac Mini, they kind of

33:31

make a thing that that talks to them all

33:33

the time and they give it their credit

33:34

card information. Like big enterprise,

33:38

big banks, big, you know, that kind of

33:39

thing are so far from actually deploying

33:42

AI in that way. There's [clears throat]

33:44

so much regulatory compliance,

33:46

logistics, security, ops, bureaucracy

33:49

resistance that needs to happen that my

33:52

shortest timeline for that takeoff is

33:54

like end of Q2.

33:56

Okay? So that means you're still going

33:58

to see decent demand into OpenAI and

34:00

claude and that kind of stuff where you

34:02

know maybe their private stocks will

34:03

keep going up. But if you're talking

34:05

about the big players, I just see a

34:08

world where the cash flow needs that are

34:10

being promised to make these data

34:13

centers which again most of the time

34:16

they need the big data center not to

34:18

service inference as it's called but to

34:20

build a bigger model to build a better

34:22

mousetrap. kind of race to the top. I

34:24

need the biggest model. I need 10

34:26

trillion parameter model, right? You

34:28

need a gigantic data center to do that.

34:30

But if you look at the actual capacity

34:34

utilization of inference once they turn

34:36

that data center into serving you a

34:38

query, it's still a lot of time spent

34:41

down. A lot of these chips are not being

34:44

used. It's just people are buying the

34:46

chips because they want to make their

34:48

own models and they want to do training.

34:50

And so to me, that is the air gap.

34:52

That's the air pocket that we're kind of

34:54

potentially approaching.

34:55

>> That's interesting. Alex, what has your

34:57

view been on the companies that are

35:00

involved with silver? The mining

35:01

companies

35:03

that mine silver and also the royalty

35:05

and streaming companies that basically

35:07

buy little pieces of the action and o

35:10

over time tend to be a little bit less

35:13

risky than the miners. You know, a

35:14

company that is the company that comes

35:16

to mind would be wheat and precious

35:16

metals which I which I actually am

35:18

invested in. But yeah, the comp the

35:20

silver companies the and precious metal

35:22

companies as opposed to the actual

35:23

physical metal.

35:25

>> Yeah. So again, I try not to speculate

35:27

too much on individual stocks for for

35:29

for reasons, but I' I've been long a lot

35:31

of these companies like in the baskets

35:33

and you know, they underperform the

35:35

metal on the way up. But I think that

35:37

makes some sense actually. People kind

35:39

of go crazy over like the gap between

35:41

those things because again, if you're if

35:44

you're a commodities investor, you know

35:45

that the curve can go very inverted. the

35:47

spot can go super high, but the 10-year

35:50

forward doesn't move as much. And if

35:52

you're if you're buying an equity in a

35:53

mining company, they don't sell all of

35:56

their silver in the next five minutes,

35:58

right? They have 10 years of supply,

36:00

that kind of thing. And so I I kind of

36:02

like these. I I like mining companies. I

36:04

like I think there's I think there's a

36:06

lot of value in them still, but I'm not

36:08

going to speculate too much on

36:09

individual ones if that's okay.

36:11

>> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, definitely. No, no

36:13

particular ones, but overall you like

36:17

silver miner beta as well as silver and

36:20

and has that ratio changed of a month

36:22

ago. Of a month ago, you were like, I

36:23

only want silver, no miners. Whereas

36:25

now, you're a little bit more

36:26

open-minded or tell us about that.

36:28

>> So, two years ago when people would ask

36:30

me this question, I'd say I think kind

36:32

of maybe a little bit naively, I said,

36:33

don't even buy the miners. Because what

36:36

people were doing was they buy miners

36:37

because they want leverage, right?

36:39

They're like the price goes up 10% but

36:41

if I buy a stock that is a mining

36:43

company and it kind of gets over its

36:44

break even I get a lot of convexity and

36:47

that's true to some extent and we've

36:48

seen that in the prices. So it's if you

36:50

want leverage get your leverage through

36:51

futures get your leverage through

36:52

options. I think

36:55

over the past couple of months

36:59

again the the the price has risen so

37:01

much that like the ratio of silver to

37:03

like the ETF for the silver you know

37:05

producers is like at its like all-time

37:07

low or whatever. And so I've kind of

37:08

reallocated relatively a little bit more

37:10

into those mining companies even though

37:12

the point I made about the curve kind of

37:14

getting inverted.

37:15

>> And what are you going to be watching

37:18

with silver over the next weeks, next

37:21

months? Like for me, I just know you

37:23

know I need this report. You probably

37:24

don't need this report. You you have

37:25

this the source the date yourself. But

37:27

like the an annual silver survey report,

37:30

world silver report is really good. I

37:32

think that comes out in like late Q1,

37:34

early Q2. So that's something I'll be

37:35

watching. What are you going to be

37:37

watching in terms of the data?

37:39

>> One of the biggest tells that I didn't

37:41

pay enough attention to and should have

37:42

been a real I think wake up on just a

37:46

little bit of what was going on the

37:47

market was the very front end of the

37:48

London futures curve. So if you do on

37:51

Bloomberg you do X AG CCRV you can see

37:53

the curve shape and you had this really

37:56

steep backwardation curve about a month

37:58

ago and then over as it kind of went

38:02

past 80 to about 100 you started seeing

38:04

it kind of curve like this and so if

38:06

you're measuring backwardation in in

38:08

kind of the you know the middle of the

38:10

curve it still looks pretty backwardated

38:11

and still way more backwardated than

38:13

contango but the very front started to

38:15

go down a little bit and so that's

38:17

that's for me a big signal I will be

38:19

looking at the relative lot of prices in

38:20

China versus the US. I'll be looking at

38:22

inventories again like how fast can the

38:24

inventories move from one to the other.

38:26

I think it's good to look at v markets

38:28

to understand just how much demand is in

38:30

these option world and then also just I

38:34

like to look at what happens when China

38:36

opens up right every night. So I'm now

38:38

kind of running two trading days

38:40

unfortunately where you know at the at

38:43

the night I'm looking at China opening

38:44

up and I'm like okay what happened to

38:46

China? How do they react to us? Because

38:49

I put this in my last piece, but if you

38:51

just did the

38:53

overnight return versus the day return

38:56

over the past 10 years,

38:59

more than 100% of the return came

39:01

overnight for a lot of these

39:03

commodities, which again is an

39:04

indication that it's coming from Asia,

39:05

right? So the day would happen, it would

39:07

sell off, night would happen, China

39:09

would buy it up, it would sell off, and

39:10

and this kind of kind of kept happening.

39:12

I think that's one of the reasons I

39:14

closed a lot much of my positions last

39:16

night was because, you know, even

39:18

outside of the them going limit down.

39:20

The demand just wasn't there and it

39:22

looked like they were levered too. And

39:24

so I want to kind of step out of that

39:25

market for a little bit. But but those

39:26

are things I'll be watching.

39:28

>> That's interesting. So you you did

39:30

derisk just because the price action you

39:32

you don't really like it. And also, can

39:34

you speak to the fact that, you know, if

39:36

you're a pure fundamentals person with

39:37

equities, like if Warren Buffett likes

39:39

Coca-Cola at 50 and it crashes and goes

39:41

to 42, he's probably going to buy more

39:44

of it. But with commodities,

39:47

you know, often you do have to respect

39:48

the price action.

39:51

>> Yeah. And and you know, today's demand

39:53

is tomorrow's supply in those short-term

39:56

markets. And so I think

40:00

it's possible to see a couple weeks of

40:03

people just getting washed out and a ton

40:05

of volatility. And just given the vault,

40:08

I think you'll see banks also reducing

40:10

their warehousing abilities, investment

40:13

firms de-risking. That might have

40:14

already happened and that's why I would

40:15

do a little bit of wait and see. But

40:17

again, like the case isn't as good at 80

40:19

as it was at 20 obviously. So I'm not

40:22

I'm not pounding the table here. more

40:25

again long stuff over like a two to

40:27

three year horizon and trying to be

40:29

short paper

40:31

>> short paper silver

40:33

>> no like paper like stocks bonds

40:35

>> okay okay

40:36

>> pieces of paper the the economy of paper

40:38

you know what I mean like I think you

40:40

want to be long the world of data long

40:42

the world of stuff and financial assets

40:45

in general I think you know this whole

40:48

dolization trade is a little bit

40:49

overhyped but I think that we're

40:52

entering in a world where

40:55

globalization is dying and people are

40:57

going to try to build their own supply

40:58

chains and that's you know inflationary

41:01

in a lot of ways

41:02

>> and tell us a little bit about the

41:04

silver technology the the transition

41:06

from PERC to Topcon and how that changed

41:10

the percentage of silver used in the

41:12

solar panels and how also as the silver

41:15

price has gone up there's been a lot of

41:17

what's it called shrinking or you know

41:19

the term I'm talking about

41:20

>> um

41:21

>> thrifting

41:22

thrifting. Yeah. So,

41:25

couple threads in there. So, one is, you

41:27

know, solar panel only captures, I don't

41:29

know, 22% of the energy that hits it.

41:31

That's come up from about five over like

41:32

the last couple decades. So, that means

41:34

again the solar panel is more profitable

41:36

because it generates more energy. But

41:38

the two ways the two two mechanisms you

41:41

described actually to get that increase

41:43

in efficiency is the word that the tech

41:45

use the word efficiency which is the

41:46

amount it captures they had to use more

41:48

silver. It was a more silver intensive

41:50

process. And so the same amount of

41:53

physical panel used more silver. Okay.

41:55

So that's one phenomena that was kind of

41:57

giving support to the price. There is

41:59

another thing which called thrifting or

42:01

just the general what a non markets

42:04

person would call efficiency gains which

42:06

is every year we get a little bit better

42:07

at you know making the thing with less

42:09

stuff. Okay. So those two things are

42:11

happening at the same time. You have the

42:13

more intense use from the transition to

42:15

this other technology and then you have

42:17

we get a little bit better at it each

42:18

year. And there's also the thrifting is

42:21

price elastic. So as the price of at

42:23

least that's what as the price of silver

42:25

goes up they they want to use less of

42:26

it.

42:27

>> Yeah. It's I mean like any like any

42:28

supply chain, right? And then the big

42:30

worry is basically copper substitution

42:32

which is at about $125 an ounce. A lot

42:35

of these solar panel companies if they

42:37

can't pass on that cost increase which

42:39

has gone from like you know 5% of the

42:41

cost of the solar panel to like 30 or 25

42:43

they don't make money. And so they have

42:46

a lot of incentive to what's called

42:49

copper substitution. There's a couple of

42:50

things that are further down the line

42:52

like this thing called perovite or

42:53

something like that, but it's like super

42:55

janky. Doesn't work yet. They can't

42:56

figure out how to make it work like in

42:57

scale. But copper substitution kind of

42:59

works. And copper substitution is

43:01

basically you take a very tiny amount of

43:03

silver and you wrap it in copper. So the

43:05

copper creates the connectivity, but the

43:07

silver gets the conductivity that you

43:08

need like through the system. So that I

43:11

think will be accelerated with this

43:13

move. It's less of an existential threat

43:15

at 80 than it is at 100 or 120. But I

43:18

think that's also partially why we saw

43:20

the kind of ceiling on the price over

43:22

the past couple of weeks because that's

43:24

about 120 is about where that starts to

43:26

become a really big deal for the solar

43:27

panel providers which is the big source

43:29

of demand

43:30

>> and according to my research which you

43:33

know what what do I know just looking up

43:34

Gemini but a lot of that new technology

43:37

a couple of the top maybe two or three

43:39

players are prepared to do that

43:41

technology that uses more copper and

43:43

substitute it in 2026 but the bulk of

43:45

the solar industry is not ready to do

43:47

that till 2028. Does that roughly accord

43:49

with your research?

43:50

>> Wanting to do it in 2026 and actually

43:52

doing it in 2026 are very different

43:54

things. So, it's still going to take

43:55

them a couple of years to retrofit all

43:57

these processes. They might get a plant

43:59

up or whatever. But my back of the

44:00

envelope was it took about 24 months to

44:02

fully change that supply chain. And so,

44:05

you probably went from 5% of the market

44:07

looking to do this to 50% of the market,

44:08

but you still have a couple of years.

44:09

Now, if you're if you're doing the deep

44:12

out there, it is a thing where if solar

44:16

if if silver hits $120 an ounce and

44:19

these guys invest billions of dollars in

44:21

figuring how to do it really rapidly,

44:23

you'll pull that forward. Alex, you

44:25

know, you have been a giant bull on

44:27

silver and sounds like still modestly

44:29

bullish. You I myself have participated

44:31

this on on the long side as well. So,

44:33

I'm glad that we've reached this long in

44:34

the interview at before us, you know,

44:36

getting, you know, foaming at the mouth

44:38

too bullish. However, I will point out

44:39

something just to throw it at you that

44:41

from my research like a lot of the

44:43

silver bull market from 2000 to 2011 in

44:46

those latter few years, a lot of the

44:49

time the market was technically in a

44:50

surplus. So, it appears to me that that

44:53

bull market, you know, which Warren

44:55

Buffett participated for maybe the first

44:56

half of it, but he missed on the second

44:58

more speculative half was extremely

45:00

speculative driven by Western investors.

45:02

And this time around there's there is a

45:04

deficit. So, the deficit is from

45:07

industrial demand. Yes, we clearly have

45:08

a lot of leveraged Asian speculators,

45:11

but you know, just just where do you

45:12

would you roughly agree with my

45:14

characterization and where do you think

45:16

this ends? Like how do you think the the

45:18

silver

45:20

how how do you think the the the deficit

45:22

resolves itself?

45:22

>> Remember the themes in 2008, 2009, 2010.

45:25

It was, oh my god, the financial system,

45:27

I can't trust it. Oh my god, the banks

45:28

are blowing up. Oh my god, I got to get

45:30

out of paper. Going back to this paper

45:32

concept, I got to get into the world of

45:33

metal. And I think that that was part of

45:35

the reason why it got so FOMO in 2011.

45:38

Now you have a real demand story going

45:41

on. And the Western banks are fine, but

45:44

that story is is not it's not as

45:47

viciously like biting in Asia in China

45:51

as it is here because the banks haven't

45:52

gone under. But everyone knows that the

45:55

banks are kind of not in a good place.

45:58

People are trying to get their money

45:59

out. There's capital flight. And

46:01

remember, there's twice as much money in

46:03

China as in America. Just think about

46:04

that for a second. That means if they

46:05

liberalize their capital account, and

46:08

they could buy America twice.

46:11

Do you really believe that that's the

46:13

case,

46:14

>> Alex? But you said M2 in China is twice

46:16

as big. And I believe you on that, but

46:18

in terms of capital markets, I think

46:19

that doesn't matter.

46:20

>> I'm just I'm just saying. Yeah, but I'm

46:21

just giving you an example of

46:23

>> Sorry to be a nerd.

46:24

>> No, I mean, you're again, it's it's a

46:26

euphemism, right? But like all of the M2

46:29

in China could buy all the M2 in America

46:31

twice. Do you really believe that that's

46:33

the case? Do you really believe that if

46:34

we totally liberalize the capital

46:36

account that they'd be able to gobble

46:38

gobble gobble up? I mean they also have

46:39

a gigantic bond market, right? So it's

46:41

not I mean we have bigger markets

46:43

obviously but but no and so I think the

46:46

people in China know that too. And so

46:47

what you what you saw in 2008 and 2011

46:50

in the west is playing out in the east a

46:52

little bit now too. And you know, how

46:56

does this resolve itself? It resolves

46:58

itself in one of two ways. One, copper

47:01

substitution comes in a lot faster than

47:03

people think. Two, you know, the

47:06

shortfall in the market flushes out a

47:08

bunch of people and they swear off the

47:10

metal and that kind of stuff. But

47:11

remember,

47:13

the US just told Russia that they're not

47:15

going to get their money back for their

47:16

treasuries. And so if you're China,

47:18

you're not as a government, you're not

47:20

going to stop buying gold ever. Okay? So

47:22

that's not going anywhere.

47:24

And you I think you're just going to see

47:26

that that whipsaw for the next couple of

47:28

years, which is again back to the

47:30

bullish how I got in this trade in the

47:32

first place, which is if you are an

47:36

official party or you're a household in

47:39

China, you do not have that many

47:41

allocations. You don't have that many

47:42

options for your money. If you're the

47:45

government, you do not want treasuries

47:46

anymore. You want gold. I mean, you saw

47:49

Xi come out yesterday and say, "We want

47:51

to be a reserve currency." How are they

47:53

going to do that with no open capital

47:54

account? They're going to buy gold.

47:56

They're going to try to, you know, I

47:57

don't know if they're going to back

47:57

their whole currency on gold because

47:59

they like printing money. But I think I

48:02

think on a five to 10 year horizon, you

48:04

still have to be bullish. Yes, for sure.

48:06

>> And when we look at the total above

48:09

ground identifiable

48:12

stocks in the three major markets that

48:14

the Chinese metals exchange, CME and

48:17

then London. Yeah. So London is is

48:20

extremely short because a lot of it has

48:21

g not short London supplies have gone

48:24

down a lot as that supply went to the

48:26

CME in America because of the tariff

48:28

thing last year but in total to total

48:31

supply it appears to be higher than for

48:33

much of 2023 and 2024.

48:35

Is that chart of total above ground

48:37

stocks a little bit misleading and might

48:39

the supply actually be shorter? Because

48:41

the you know if I looked at this thing I

48:43

would have think that the silver price

48:44

would have done its most rallying in

48:47

2023 and 2024 and not 2025 when

48:49

technically the above ground stocks went

48:51

up.

48:52

>> You mean just on the commodity

48:53

exchanges?

48:53

>> Yes. Yes.

48:54

>> I think stocks in China are relatively

48:56

low relative to history as well. I think

48:59

people are taking physical out. I don't

49:01

know the exact numbers of what it is in

49:02

China versus the US, but um

49:06

I think the flow that I'm willing to bet

49:07

on and the flow that I am betting on is

49:09

that metal will move east. Again, I'll

49:12

be a broken record here, but like that's

49:13

the theme that you have to understand,

49:15

which is the demand is in the east, the

49:18

supply is in the west. And you would

49:21

expect to see and you are seeing metal

49:23

move from one to the other. You know I

49:26

wouldn't be surprised if there was some

49:28

premium that continues to get baked in

49:30

to the eastern prices you know before

49:32

you take even after you take out this

49:34

bad thing you know India is also a

49:37

historical voracious demander of demand

49:39

source of gold and silver so yeah I mean

49:42

I think that there

49:46

it is true that the paper again paper

49:48

we're not mixing terms here but the

49:50

paper market every all these like silver

49:52

bulls of talking about all these like

49:53

terrible bankers and the paper market.

49:55

I'm not like, you know, to me it seems

49:57

pretty clear that the the banks are just

49:59

being banks, but that yeah, there's

50:00

going to be a lot of trading in those

50:01

assets. There's going to be a lot of

50:03

volatility in those assets relative to

50:04

the physical movement of metal. But

50:06

again, the thing I'm betting on is that

50:08

the metal will move east.

50:09

>> And in terms of a floor or a ceiling,

50:13

what what do you think? A lot of people

50:16

say that, okay, yes, like the new floor

50:18

for silver is 50 just because of the

50:21

industrial demand is is so high and

50:22

supply is so low. But also that sounds

50:25

to me like it could be true, but it

50:26

sounds like the biggest bag holder thing

50:28

to say ever. [laughter]

50:30

>> Well, again, like I'm not going to give

50:32

any price targets over the next two

50:34

weeks. Like we just saw the thing move

50:35

30%. Like you don't know what is going

50:37

to happen with shortfall in this market,

50:39

but I am a buyer at 5060 and a seller at

50:41

around 120 if that makes sense. Mhm.

50:45

That

50:45

>> which is a big range.

50:47

>> That that is that is a very big range

50:49

and you don't see new supply coming

50:50

online anytime soon.

50:52

>> You'll see some supply coming online in

50:54

response. But again, like a lot of it's

50:56

in elastic and it takes a long time to,

50:58

you know, you can't just start a mine

51:00

tomorrow and all of a sudden it's

51:02

printing, you know, 20% more more

51:04

supply.

51:05

>> Do you think we've seen the highs of 115

51:08

a week ago?

51:09

>> I'm a buyer at 60 and a seller at 120. I

51:12

I don't I mean, you know, since that

51:14

article went, you know, microviral. I

51:17

got a lot of people in my reply being

51:18

like, "Are you long hair? Are you gonna

51:19

buy here? You gonna be here?" And I'm

51:20

like, "Ah, you know, that's not my job."

51:22

But but I think we could go higher over

51:24

a longer time horizon. I don't think

51:25

we're go up there tomorrow because

51:27

again, I think a lot of the buying was

51:29

because people were short volatility on

51:31

the way up. And so you have that forced

51:33

mechanical buying, the forced mechanical

51:34

buying. But if a bank blows up in China,

51:37

if conflict breaks out, you know, if if

51:40

the AI acceleration timeline really

51:43

starts binding and we start shifting

51:44

back to solar, I think even like

51:47

Democrats getting back in power is

51:49

probably bullish because there, you

51:51

know, the US is kind of underinvested in

51:53

solar. I think these things will all be

51:55

like pretty bullish and they could all

51:56

happen at the same time.

51:57

>> Do you think that would it be possible

52:00

for you to see an opportunity for silver

52:02

in on the short side? like I I you know

52:05

I may pay it's 2027 there's officially a

52:08

surplus all of these Chinese solar

52:10

producers are saying we are you know

52:12

silver in terms of gram per per panel

52:16

has gone way way way down and this

52:17

technology is going live you know the

52:20

the the amount of speculative longs in

52:23

western ETFs Chinese ETFs everything is

52:26

really really high indicating

52:27

speculative fervor and you know the

52:29

price is at 200 I might say that for

52:31

experienced speculators who are prepared

52:33

to trade silver in a risk controlled

52:35

way, which you definitely want to do.

52:37

You know, there might be some

52:38

opportunities on the short side. Would

52:39

would you would you agree with me?

52:40

>> Yeah. So, I put four bearish pressures

52:43

or four things I would monitor that

52:44

would that if they all hit, I would

52:45

certainly change my view pretty

52:47

radically. One was peace in Ukraine

52:49

slash like a deal over Taiwan. Like,

52:51

I've been pitching this 50-year peace

52:53

plan. Like, if everyone would just chill

52:54

out for a while, again, that'd be that'd

52:56

be kind of on the margin bearish. Two is

52:59

copier substitution timelines moving up.

53:01

Okay, that's another example. Three is

53:03

actually strong US growth and higher

53:05

rates in the US and strong dollar. So I

53:08

wrote an article last week about how

53:10

that could be bearish on metals and like

53:11

you know what technically kicked off all

53:13

this move was Walsh getting nominated

53:14

which has kind of been hidden in the

53:16

>> in in in the wave. Um, and so you could

53:19

have all those things happening at once

53:21

where

53:23

Oh, yeah. And the last one was they

53:24

fixed their banks, which is never gonna

53:26

happen. But, you know, if you had all

53:28

those things happening at once, for

53:29

sure. You know, the the conflict premium

53:32

would go away, the capital flight

53:33

premium would go away, the solar demand

53:36

would be reduced significantly and a

53:37

strong dollar. Like, that'd be murder

53:39

for precious metals for sure. And I

53:41

guess the near-term catalyst was, as you

53:43

say, the nomination of Kevin Worsh to be

53:46

the next Fed chair, which has to be

53:48

approved by the Senate. I have been

53:50

asking many of my guests, to what degree

53:52

is the bid for precious metals because

53:54

President Trump has meddled or appears

53:57

to be meddling in the independence of

53:58

the central bank. And if that is

54:01

something that's truly quantifiable, you

54:02

know, was it quantifiable and tradable

54:04

on the way up? Is it quantifiable and

54:06

tradable on the way down? Now that it

54:07

appears that we have someone who in the

54:10

past has said things that appear quite

54:12

hawkish, it's unclear if he's actually

54:13

going to be that hawkish once he's in

54:16

office and he's more hawkish on the

54:17

balance sheet than he is on rates. And

54:18

maybe rates is is what matters

54:20

ultimately at the end of the day. But

54:22

just just how much did that change your

54:24

view of of of the silver and and gold

54:27

dynamics is is Kevin Wars being the next

54:29

veterary?

54:30

>> Well, not enough because otherwise I

54:31

would have sold everything and gone

54:32

short for a while. I mean, remember, I

54:34

guess the last thing is the US fiscal

54:36

deficit, which doesn't seem like it's

54:37

going anywhere, right? So, the Fed

54:39

doesn't control the budget deficit. So,

54:42

if we saw some sort of material,

54:46

you know, narrowing of the deficit or or

54:48

or move to fiscal conservatism, that

54:50

would also be relatively bearish on

54:53

metals to me. You know, I see a world

54:55

where

54:57

Europe is having tons of social upheaval

55:00

because they need to import labor to

55:02

sustain their social safety net. We had

55:04

a little bit of that. You know, nobody

55:06

wants to take pain there. So,

55:11

do you want to own those currencies over

55:13

the next 10 years is really a question.

55:15

And and then you have the China thing of

55:17

do you want to own their currency over

55:19

the next 10 years? And if the answer is

55:20

no to both of those things, then you're

55:22

going to see ups, you're going to see

55:23

downs, you're going to see these things

55:24

moving around. But, you know, to me,

55:27

that's still a relatively bullish

55:29

backdrop for for commodities.

55:31

>> Alex, tell us about Rose AI

55:33

specifically. You you know, what does

55:36

what does it do? And on the topics we've

55:37

been discussing, gold and silver

55:39

dynamics and AI earnings, everything,

55:42

how how how might Rose AI be useful to

55:44

you and to clients? And then what what

55:46

else does Rose AI do?

55:47

>> Yeah. So, you can think about Rose. I

55:49

remember I talked about frontend plus

55:50

database. So Rose is a front-end plus

55:52

database, but the goal of it is to help

55:55

people who want to get their agents to

55:57

use a database, particularly a time

55:58

series database or a hedge fund database

56:00

or you know a database that stores local

56:02

context as well. And so we help big

56:06

financial institutions and big

56:07

organizations implement AI. So all that

56:10

kind of grit that I spoke of was coming

56:11

from real battle scars that I have

56:14

navigating [clears throat] some of the

56:15

biggest banks in the world and other big

56:17

organizations and helping them use AI.

56:19

So Rose is on one level a services

56:20

company where we help people develop

56:22

that stuff. Two, it is a engine that you

56:25

can use to basically store your single

56:27

source of truth. Um you know we spent a

56:29

lot of time and energy at Bridgewater

56:32

just making sure that we could track

56:34

these markets, right? Track these

56:35

premiums, track these curves, all stuff.

56:37

It's it's it's a really backbreaking

56:39

kind of terrible thing that takes a lot

56:41

of pain and stress. And then we also

56:44

help people buy data to to kind of

56:46

hydrate those models. And so we work

56:48

with a lot of the vendors that you might

56:49

know and love to kind of give them data

56:52

pipelines into their kind of engine. And

56:54

we think that, you know, that it sounds

56:56

like a a kind of three-fold thing, but

56:58

it's all the same thing, which is

56:59

automating that kind of knowledge

57:01

management, idea generation, single

57:03

source of truth process in the age of

57:05

AI.

57:06

We'll leave it there. People can find

57:08

you on Twitter, AB Campbell. Got the

57:10

nice ABC. And you also have a blog where

57:12

you write write a lot of this stuff

57:15

about about silver and other things.

57:16

Thank you everyone for watching. Please

57:18

leave a rating and review for monetary

57:20

matters on Apple podcast and Spotify.

57:22

Thanks again. Thanks for watching.

57:23

Curious about harnessing AI to access

57:25

international equity? Check out the link

57:27

in the description to learn more about

57:28

the Pict AI enhanced international

57:31

equity ETF, ticker PQNT. Until next

57:34

time.

Interactive Summary

In this video, Alexander Campbell, CEO of Rose AI and former head of commodities at Bridgewater, discusses his bullish outlook on silver, the impact of Chinese investment demand, and the industrial role of silver in solar energy and AI infrastructure. He explains the recent market volatility, the inelasticity of silver supply, and why he remains long-term bullish on hard assets despite short-term fluctuations and technical market dynamics like the Shanghai premium and delta hedging.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts