HomeVideos

A Bear Market In Gold & Silver Is Coming | Milton Berg on Precious Metals, Stocks, and Bitcoin

Now Playing

A Bear Market In Gold & Silver Is Coming | Milton Berg on Precious Metals, Stocks, and Bitcoin

Transcript

4153 segments

0:00

If anyone's telling you that the market

0:01

action is inconsistent with actions seen

0:04

at previous market peaks or if anyone

0:06

tells you that Federal Reserve action is

0:08

inconsistent with what we've seen in the

0:10

previous market peaks, I would show them

0:11

my tech technicals at the highest show.

0:13

All of these things are in my in my

0:14

table and all these things are

0:16

consistent with what we've seen at prior

0:17

market peaks.

0:18

>> You're saying that you're seeing signs

0:20

of market?

0:20

>> You're saying that no one can argue that

0:22

the market can't peak now based on

0:24

technical data. They can argue that

0:26

we're not at a peak, but they can't

0:27

argue that we can't peak. wanted to

0:29

share with you and your readers, your

0:30

your viewers things that they've never

0:32

heard about Bitcoin. You have a lot of

0:33

factors telling you the market's why I'm

0:35

short.

0:35

>> Do you think we have a multi-deade bare

0:37

market in gold, Milton? Later on, you'll

0:39

hear more about the Fundrise Income Fund

0:40

and why sophisticated investors are

0:42

turning to higher yielding assets like

0:44

private credit. But for now, let's get

0:46

into today's interview. In this

0:47

interview, I'm speaking to the Turning

0:49

Point master himself, Milton Berg. Nine

0:52

months ago, Milton came on monetary

0:53

matters with an extraordinarily bullish

0:55

case for US stocks, which are now up

0:58

nearly 20% since that interview. Our

1:01

talk today is very technical and quite

1:03

long. So, I want to give you a little

1:04

bit of a road map. The first 20 minutes

1:07

or so we devote to the incredibly strong

1:09

buy signals that Milton saw in April

1:10

2025 that nearly one year later are

1:13

still motivating his analysis. At the

1:16

22-minute mark, Milton talks about the

1:17

disturbing December signal that made him

1:20

short the market. At the 1 hour and 12

1:22

minute mark, we talk about why Milton is

1:24

bearish on gold and silver and why he

1:26

thinks that late January was a climax

1:28

top for precious metals. At the 1 hour

1:30

and 37 minute mark, Milton talks about

1:32

Bitcoin. And just over two hours in, we

1:35

talk about the vicious selloff in

1:37

software stocks. I also want to make

1:39

clear that this interview was recorded

1:40

on February 6th and at that time Milton

1:43

in his model portfolio for institutional

1:45

clients had combined short positions of

1:48

over a 100% in the S&P, NASDAQ, Russell

1:50

as well as semiconductors based on what

1:53

he saw Monday, February 9th. Not only

1:55

did he cover those shorts, but he also

1:57

flipped long equities. Again, that is

1:59

for his institutional clients. in his

2:01

new retail service for individual

2:03

investors. Milton Signal has had a 100%

2:05

long exposure to stocks since early

2:08

April 2025. Also, when it comes to

2:10

precious metals, Milton shorted gold and

2:12

silver within one day of the high in

2:14

precious metals at the end of January,

2:16

and he remains bearish on gold and

2:18

silver. Let's get into it. Got a very

2:20

special guest. I'm joined once again by

2:23

the extremely accomplished technician

2:26

known as Milton Berg of MB Advisors and

2:30

Miltonberg Edge. Milton, it is wonderful

2:33

to see you. How are you?

2:34

>> I'm doing very well. Thank you so much.

2:36

Good to see you again, Jack. Always

2:38

enjoy interviewing with you.

2:39

>> The the feeling is mutual. Milton, about

2:42

eight or nine months ago, shortly after

2:44

the seismic panic in markets of April

2:46

2025, you you and I did an interview and

2:49

you were extremely emphatic that the

2:52

market uh the technical signals in the

2:54

market you were seeing were extremely

2:56

strong and you used extremely strong

2:58

language

2:58

>> this time. I said we've have we have a

3:01

series of buy signals. There's no no way

3:03

the market could go down. It's

3:04

definitely going to go up. How long it

3:06

goes, I don't know because you had

3:07

similar signals in 19 in ' 87 in January

3:10

and the market peaked threequarters of a

3:12

year later. So, I can't tell you how

3:13

long the market's going to rally. But I

3:15

will tell you um how high the market

3:17

should go. That's what we'll discuss

3:18

today. I said definitely going to be

3:19

bull market action.

3:20

>> You you promised bull market action.

3:22

Bull market action. We've had the

3:24

indices are are far higher now. Uh funny

3:27

you referenced 1987. That was a very

3:28

good year for you. Then in the

3:30

background people and say you were the

3:31

mutual fund manager of the year. Quite

3:33

an accomplishment. Milton, what were the

3:35

buy signals you saw in the market? How

3:37

have they evolved into January and now

3:40

February 2026? And what have you made of

3:44

the recent market action? Are you seeing

3:45

any sell signals?

3:46

>> Okay, I'm going to get back to what our

3:48

projections are. Now, we don't trade

3:49

based on projections. We trade based on

3:52

turning points. April was a major

3:53

turning point for the market. Uh, and we

3:56

pounded the table based the table. We

3:58

pounded the table by. And I'll I'll tell

4:01

you exactly why. Now, this chart as this

4:04

chart was the first of 88 buy signals we

4:06

received. Received this buy signal April

4:08

4th of 2025. I say it's the first of 88

4:11

because our retail newsletter only gets

4:14

the first signal and we say you buy now

4:15

when you hold till we tell you to sell.

4:17

Institutions are constantly comforted.

4:18

They give more confirmations and they

4:20

see many many of the signals we get. But

4:22

this was the first signal we saw on

4:23

April 4th. It was a day before the low.

4:26

On that day, the NASDAQ 5day volume was

4:28

at the 200 day high. On that day, NASDAQ

4:31

had declined 7% over the last three

4:34

days. And the VXN, which is a VIX on the

4:36

NASDAQ 100 rather than the VIX on the

4:38

S&P 500, gained 10% for at least two for

4:41

two days in a row. And this is a very

4:43

rare occurrence. We're looking for rare

4:44

occurrences. In other words, we're not

4:46

looking at moving averages and looking

4:48

what the Fed is doing and what the Fed

4:49

is saying and money supply. We're

4:51

looking for rare occurrences that take

4:53

place at market turning points. And on

4:55

this day, April 4th, you had these three

4:56

rare occurrences, which I just

4:58

mentioned. This actually occurred in the

4:59

past. occurred in uh October 8th 1998,

5:02

August 5th, 2024 and August 24th, 2015.

5:06

And the gains the maximum gains within a

5:08

year of those signals was 47% 15.6% and

5:12

23.2%. So far, so far the April 4th

5:15

signal through the high in January

5:17

through the closing high on January 27th

5:19

of this year, it's gained 37.53%.

5:22

So, it's outperformed two of the

5:23

historical precedents. It's

5:24

underperformed one of the precedents, up

5:27

47%. However, we're measuring one year

5:29

out. We're looking at the maximum gains

5:30

within one year. For all I know, we'll

5:32

be up 47% by April 4th of 2026. So, this

5:36

was the first signal we got. However, I

5:39

want to talk about projections. Why why

5:41

did we project to our clients? Now,

5:42

again, we don't trade based on

5:44

projections, but projections are very

5:46

important. Important because if you get

5:47

a buy signal, it would only historically

5:50

the median gain after that buy signal

5:51

was 5%. it really doesn't pay to trade

5:54

it because uh you know you just with the

5:56

slippage and with uh it just doesn't

5:58

pay. So we look at the historical

6:00

returns based on the signal and tell

6:02

what the market would do if we follow

6:04

the historical returns and it's very

6:06

helpful for us. So what we did is for

6:08

this chart for you guys I actually

6:10

created this for you. We took we we

6:12

broke up our signals by day. So on April

6:14

4th we actually had two signals. I

6:16

showed you one of them and based on the

6:18

signals we had on April 4th, the median

6:20

maximum gain before the market declined

6:22

10%. In other words, how much how far

6:25

did the market gain before it declined

6:27

the next 10%. So the median was 6 to

6:29

6757 relative we're using percentage

6:32

gains relative to where we started off

6:33

on April 4th and the uh the projection

6:35

on average would be 7152. Our maximized

6:38

date on a closing basis was 697860.

6:41

So based on this alone, there's more to

6:43

the upside. you see before the market

6:45

sees a 10% correction. That was April

6:47

4th. On April 7th, we had a number of

6:49

signals as well and that projected to uh

6:52

either 7291 or 7751. Again, the market

6:55

could go could go much much higher based

6:57

on those projections. On April 8th, we

6:59

had more signals with many more

7:01

historical um back backups to the

7:03

signal, many more historical precedents

7:05

and that that projected to between 7128

7:09

as a median, 6728 as an average. And

7:11

we've actually exceeded that by closing

7:13

at um the level we closed that was uh

7:16

697860. We've exceeded the average of of

7:19

previous returns. April 9th we had many

7:22

many signals. I think we had about 40

7:23

signals on April 9th itself. We had many

7:25

many historical precedents for these

7:26

signals. Each of these instances as

7:28

historical signal is a actual historical

7:30

date of the signal. So the what signal

7:32

April 9th signal looks like 30 or 40

7:34

times in the past. And these 57 signals

7:36

generate April 9th project to between

7:38

7487 or 7921 before the next decline of

7:42

20 of 10%. We're only at 697860.

7:45

Now again I don't trade based on

7:47

projections. I just give the clients

7:49

this is this is institutional work. The

7:50

retailers will not see this this kind of

7:52

work. We tell them how far the market

7:55

would go if it just gains the the median

7:58

gain or just gains the uh the um the

8:00

average gain based on the previous

8:03

signals. This is April 9th. This is

8:05

April 10th. I won't go through each one.

8:07

April 11th. Summary looking at all the

8:09

signals from April 4th through April

8:11

through April um through April 30th.

8:13

Many many buy signals. I said the medium

8:16

projection would be to be 7437 in the

8:19

S&P. The average projection is 75.99

8:23

which means from the from the closing

8:25

high on on January 28th 27th it's about

8:30

nearly 6%

8:32

and uh about 8 and a half% from where we

8:34

where we u from where we closed the

8:36

actual high 6978 you see. So again based

8:39

on the kind of buy signals we saw in

8:41

April the market has not satisfied its

8:44

historical gains. It had not satisfied

8:46

it historical mean or average. hasn't

8:49

satisfied its historical uh returns as

8:52

you'd expect after that that kind of

8:54

low. I just point out that the low in

8:56

April generate the most extreme oversold

8:59

condition we've ever seen. This is based

9:02

on 18 a combination of 18 oversold

9:04

indicators and the indicators go back

9:06

only to 1995 or so. So maybe you saw it

9:09

prior to that. But in any event, from

9:11

1995 to 2025, we had the most oversold.

9:14

And the reasons why half the half the

9:16

country hates Trump. Half the country

9:18

thinks Trump's going to cause the great

9:19

depression. And the other half of the

9:21

country that loves Trump hates Powell.

9:22

So they think Powell is going to cause

9:24

the Great Depression or hyperinflation.

9:26

And when Trump announced tariffs and he

9:28

great negotiated, people thought he

9:30

people laughing at him or laughing about

9:31

it. They took it seriously and they

9:33

thought they were going to have 100% or

9:34

200% or 300% tariffs on China or

9:37

whatever Trump decided on that

9:38

particular day. And people truly

9:40

panicked and market bottoms always occur

9:42

on panic. So uh our our signals flashed

9:45

on the days you know April 4th into the

9:46

low April 8th day of the low and April

9:49

9th day after the low. So signal at the

9:51

oversold readings into the low and at

9:53

the thrust off the low and again

9:55

projections look for say another 6%

9:57

above the current high which is not a

9:59

lot 6% is not a lot for an institutional

10:02

trader who's trading uh some some people

10:04

are trading trillions of dollars but

10:05

those are trading even billions of

10:06

dollars. You're probably going to start

10:08

worrying about the market now if the

10:11

medium projection is 6%. But we don't

10:13

tell our clients uh that we uh to wor

10:16

really worry about projections. We worry

10:18

about a turning point analysis and we'll

10:20

see in a minute that actually looked a

10:22

little bit cautious. We'll get to that

10:23

in a moment. I just want to review some

10:25

I took from each day just one signal

10:27

just to give your your viewers an idea

10:29

of what we look at because up until this

10:32

point you could say this this Milton is

10:33

just really he's just sort of like um

10:36

saying he has all these indicators but

10:37

we why should we believe him? I mean why

10:39

should you believe there's some robust

10:40

indicators? I mean for all we know he's

10:42

like all these charlatans on Wall Street

10:43

who claim they know what the market's

10:45

going to do and everybody knows they

10:46

can't project the market and everyone

10:48

knows the market is efficient. So what

10:50

exactly does he have? So I decided to

10:51

show take one signal for each of those

10:53

dates in April just to review what we

10:56

saw on those individual dates. So for

10:58

example for April 4th we had two

10:59

signals. This is just signal one of two

11:01

signals and as I said the NASDAQ's 5day

11:04

volume was at a 200 day high. The NASDAQ

11:07

had gain had lost 10.61% 61% over 3

11:10

days. The threshold for the signal is

11:12

losing 7%. And the VIX traded between 45

11:15

and 60 which is a which a rarity. The

11:18

VIX in our case was 45.31.

11:20

That's that generated signal gives you a

11:22

buy signals. As you can see these are

11:25

the two historical buy signal. This is

11:26

the great buy signal we had on April 4th

11:28

day before the low April 7th 2025. We

11:32

also had two signals. Now what do you

11:33

see in this one? First of all, instead

11:35

of looking at the NASDAQ volume, looking

11:37

at the New York Stock Exchange total

11:39

volume and its total volume was the

11:41

highest in 370 days sometime within the

11:43

past 20 days. Now, what does that mean?

11:45

It means we're in a regime of high

11:46

volume. People who know markets know

11:49

that turning points take place in a

11:50

regime of high volume. You don't necess

11:53

don't necessarily see the highest volume

11:55

on the day of the low or the day of the

11:56

high, but you just see very very high

11:59

fiveday volume sometime before the low

12:01

or sometimes before the high and we use

12:05

20 days as a threshold. So if we saw

12:07

fiveday volume in the New York Stock

12:08

Exchange, highest in 375 days, which is

12:11

a year and a half of trading, we saw

12:13

that within the past 20 days, we know

12:14

we're in a regime of high volume. Now

12:16

that's number one. Number two is there's

12:18

an oscillator generated by Ned Davis

12:20

Research. I put that for this indicator

12:21

but we actually have have uh made some

12:24

minor changes but any event that

12:26

oscillator is at 10 it runs from zero to

12:28

100 that was actually at 4.44 44 on

12:30

April 7th, 2025. It ranges from zero to

12:33

100. Obviously, it was major oversold.

12:35

And the threshold here, if it's 10 or

12:37

below, the third indicator is you take

12:39

the new highs and new lows in the NASDAQ

12:41

on a 5-day basis and you took a

12:43

percentage of new highs to new lows. In

12:45

any event, it was oversold at -6%. And

12:48

this again occurred at the lows in 1998,

12:50

occurred at the lows in 20 um 2018. It

12:54

occurs at the March lows in 2020 and

12:57

occurred on April 7th, 2025 at the lows.

13:00

That's one signal on April 7th. We

13:03

already showed you the projections, but

13:04

as said, anyone can show projections. We

13:06

want to show get under the hood and see

13:08

exactly what we're signaling. Again,

13:10

we're not using moving averages. We're

13:11

not using crossing. We're not using Fed

13:13

Fed. We're not using seasonality. We're

13:15

not talking about, you know, uh, if if

13:17

the market's up first five days of

13:18

January, we'll have a a bull market.

13:20

We're talking about precise rarities

13:23

that occur at marketing turning points.

13:24

Let's see what happened on April 8th.

13:26

April 8 had four signals. This is one of

13:27

the four signals. The NASDAQ 5-day rate

13:30

of change was weakest in 1,260 days. You

13:33

know what that means? That's in five

13:34

years. The five-day loss in the NASDAQ

13:36

was the greatest in over a 5year period.

13:39

Of course, everyone agree that's a

13:40

rarity. You don't see that every day. In

13:43

this case, it was down 1250%

13:45

over the five-day period into into April

13:48

8th. Then on additionally, the S&P 500

13:51

4-day advanced decline ratio generated

13:54

what we call a reverse thrust. Reverse

13:57

thrust means instead of being 2:1 or 7:1

14:00

day like today, let's see what it is

14:01

today. Today it's about 3:1 right there.

14:04

It's 0.2 to1. In other words, so you

14:06

were overwhelmed. The five the four day

14:09

AD line was overwhelming on the downside

14:11

and it was below

14:13

>> meaning that the amount of stocks that

14:15

were declining as opposed to advancing

14:17

was overwhelming.

14:18

>> Overwhelming to the downside but

14:20

extremely overwhelming. Extremely

14:22

extremely overwhelming. We're not

14:23

looking at averages. Okay, let's

14:24

continue. Then April 9th. April 9th they

14:26

said we had 50 signals or so. We really

14:28

have more but you know but but you know

14:32

my mind and my computer can't handle

14:34

much more. Let's see what we had on

14:35

April 9th. April 9th, the market was up

14:37

9%. The S&P was up 9.52% on the day. The

14:40

NASDAQ was up more than 9%. You had

14:42

overwhelming 95 to an upside downside

14:44

volume. But this is not what this this

14:46

indicator is showing you something else.

14:47

S&P was below it 50day moving average,

14:49

meaning that the S&P was by definition

14:52

by some people definition it was in a

14:53

bare market. That's the first criteria.

14:56

That's really nothing. Secondly is the

14:58

market gained at least 6%

15:00

from its last time it declined 10%. In

15:03

other words, happens to have been

15:04

declined 18% into the previous day's low

15:07

and this day was up 9.52%. So by

15:10

definition, it gained 6% from its last

15:12

10% decline. But just to be just to be

15:16

precise, it's not enough of gain 6%.

15:18

This has to be the highest high off that

15:20

low. So in other words, the S&P could

15:22

lost 10%. It's now up 6% off that low,

15:25

but today is the highest high off that

15:27

low. That again reduces the number of

15:29

days because in any bull market the S&P

15:32

is up 6% from its last 10% decline. But

15:34

it's it's not enough to be up 6% through

15:36

the last 10% decline. This has to be the

15:38

exact high day since that 10% decline.

15:40

Okay. Next one is the S&P generates

15:43

greatest gain in the last 250 days which

15:44

is about a tra it's roughly a trading

15:47

year and that's it was up 9.52% greatest

15:50

one day gain. And on top of that, the

15:53

S&P's volume on the day had to have

15:56

increased by at least 20% over the

15:58

previous day. In this case, it increased

16:00

38.28% over the previous day. And the

16:03

second condition is it has to be an

16:04

upday. So very often the market crashes,

16:07

the market is down in the day and volume

16:08

increases by 20%. This indicator needs

16:11

the markets to be up on the day and

16:12

volume to have increased by 20%. When

16:14

the all these four things come together,

16:16

you saw bottoms in 19 1976. You saw

16:20

bottoms in 1982, you saw bottoms in

16:23

1984, you saw bottom a double bottom in

16:26

2022 and 2000 in June and in October

16:30

2022. Jack, if you recall, we met then

16:33

we we we had a discussion then I pointed

16:35

out that Russell actually bottomed in

16:37

June and the S&P bottomed in October and

16:39

NASDAQ bottomed in in um in January in

16:42

December. So both of these calls were

16:45

correct. You had a buy, we had a buy

16:46

signal at the bottom in June and a buy

16:47

signal at the bottom in October. The

16:49

June signal actually was the bottom. The

16:51

Russell never made a lower low. And the

16:53

S&P made a low about 2% below low of

16:55

June and we got a buy signal then in

16:57

October. And again, you got a buy signal

16:59

October 9th, 2025. This is one of 57 buy

17:03

signals. Just one. Again, my point is to

17:05

show the robustness of the signal. Also,

17:07

I don't want to show off too much, but

17:09

no one on Wall Street has this kind of

17:10

information. We're really the only one

17:12

this particular models that we have. I

17:14

just finished I mean institutions have

17:16

been writing letters and working with

17:17

institutions for quite a number of years

17:18

but I've been on the side basically I've

17:20

been working on creating these models

17:22

and I just finished it in September. So

17:24

a lot of things you see now was really

17:25

relatively new. I wasn't able to show it

17:27

to clients a year ago or two years ago

17:28

or three years ago because we didn't

17:30

really finish creating the models and

17:32

and and fine-tuning the models and and

17:34

eliminating models that didn't have uh

17:37

perfect records until until September.

17:39

So April 10th, 2025 and again what when

17:42

you show the top of it is it's the first

17:43

time this this ever signal. So the first

17:46

one for example April 4th the first time

17:47

it ever signal was October 8th 1998. You

17:49

see the one April 7th the first time it

17:51

ever signal was September 1st 1998. The

17:53

April 8th signal the first time this

17:55

particular indicate ever signal was

17:56

March 27th 1980. And the first time the

17:59

April 9th was on April 14th 1978. And

18:02

then we have another signal on October

18:04

on April 10th 2025. And that signal the

18:07

day of the crash low in 1987. What is

18:09

the signal? Basically, the 7-day volume

18:11

breath, no polarity. No, the the model

18:14

doesn't care whether the volume was up

18:16

or the volume was down. All it cares

18:18

about that on a 7-day basis, you have 12

18:20

times as much either upside volume or

18:22

downside volume as the other side. In

18:24

other words, either 12 times as much

18:25

upside versus downside or 12 times as

18:28

much downside versus upside. The market

18:30

doesn't care which extreme it is. All

18:32

the market cares about is that is at an

18:34

extreme. In this particular instance, by

18:36

April 10th, the 7-day volume breath was

18:38

12 to1 on the upside in the New York

18:40

Stock Exchange. The 7-day volume breath

18:42

in the Russell 2000 was 10 to1 and the

18:45

10day volume breath in the in the um

18:47

Russell 2000 was 8:1. And on top of

18:50

that, New York Stock Exchange volume on

18:51

a 5day average was the greatest over the

18:53

last three years. These four rarities

18:56

put together have signaled 17 times in

18:58

the past. As you can see, in each

19:00

instance, a bull market followed. And

19:02

that's where we're able to pound the

19:03

table and say a bull market will follow.

19:05

>> Thank you, Milson. So, it's fair to say

19:07

you were able to spot in April at the

19:11

low, a few days within the low sign

19:14

overwhelming signals of the market

19:16

bottoming. That turned out to be

19:18

correct. And what's interesting to me is

19:19

we're already, you know, close to a year

19:21

out and the S&P has up 38% maybe 40%

19:26

from there. And your signals from April

19:29

are so strongly bullish that you want

19:31

more. You're saying 5% 6%.

19:33

>> I tell you like this. This is very

19:34

interesting. I'm glad you bring it up.

19:35

First of all, we haven't had a 7%

19:37

correction since AP April lows. Got a 5%

19:39

correction within two day three days of

19:41

the low, but you didn't have never had a

19:42

7% correction. Forget about 10%. More

19:44

than that, it's glad you mentioned the

19:46

analogy that came up in in the previous

19:48

interview was, you know, when when when

19:50

uh who's a great baseball player? I I

19:53

mentioned Ted Williams or or Babe Ruth,

19:54

but now the guy Otani, right? Right.

19:57

Yeah. Otani swings a bat and hits a home

19:59

run. based on physics, the physics knows

20:02

that the the ball will cross over will

20:04

be a home run over the fence as soon as

20:06

it leaves the bat,

20:09

>> right?

20:10

>> There's nothing going on after it leaves

20:11

the bat that's keeping the ball up and

20:13

telling it to cross cross over the

20:14

fence. It's the momentum of the action

20:16

that and the physics that took place

20:18

when the bat hit the ball that tells you

20:21

at that time that it's going over the

20:22

fence.

20:22

>> It was a launch. It was the launch, a

20:24

forced launch, right? So what we're

20:26

looking for on a on a buy signals are

20:28

launches.

20:29

>> So the fact that the market was able to

20:31

have a a 95 to an upside volume day one

20:34

day after the low and other things we

20:35

look at that tells you there is

20:37

underlying physics underlying momentum

20:40

underlying strength that doesn't

20:42

dissipate in five days or 10 days or 20

20:44

days and generally it lasts a year or

20:47

longer. And I I've got to ask you. So it

20:51

was a very strong thrust from that that

20:53

bottom on April April 8th around there

20:56

until the very late October October 29th

20:59

2025. Since then we it feels the

21:01

market's been feeling very bullish but

21:02

we're kind of kind of in a holding

21:04

holding pattern and I'm sure you're

21:06

going to reference buy you know

21:08

indicators buy signals and sell signals

21:10

from from April 2025 all the way

21:12

throughout the fall and and winter. But

21:15

just if possible, could I bring you back

21:16

to the current moment right now?

21:19

>> I would say it's worse than you say

21:20

because we got signals in April, we got

21:23

signals, some signals in May, no signals

21:25

in June, no signals in July, one single

21:27

in August, which is really not part of

21:28

the model. I I don't really trust that

21:30

signal. So there's no really confirming

21:32

signals throughout this bull market. All

21:33

we have is what you had in April and

21:35

May. It's all we have going for us. And

21:37

yes, um, as you saw, the market really

21:40

isn't doing as well as you'd expect

21:42

based on the signals, right? We showed

21:44

you really underperforming. We should be

21:46

up another four, six, eight%. But maybe

21:48

we still may get there by the by the

21:49

time the year is up. Is that

21:50

>> Have you got any sell signals recently?

21:52

>> First of all, um we wrote a report

21:54

today. I think it should first start

21:57

today and what we wrote about the last

21:58

week or so. Okay.

21:59

>> Yep.

22:00

>> So this morning's report is right here.

22:03

Strangely, the market is strangely

22:04

oversold. Not ready to go equity shorts.

22:07

In other words, the reason to believe

22:09

even though we're we're the market S&P

22:10

only declined 2.58%

22:12

over the January 27th all-time high and

22:15

even though the NASDAQ has only declined

22:16

5.92%

22:18

from October 29th high to yesterday's

22:21

close and the Russell only declined

22:23

5.19%. So not certainly no major bare

22:25

market really just a minor correction.

22:27

Still still VIX VXN has gained 10% over

22:30

two days running. VXN has gained 35%

22:33

over three days. NASDAQ has generated

22:36

weakest five days in 180 days and

22:39

fiveday volume in most indexes most of

22:41

them both the small caps and the large

22:42

caps are at 180 to 200 day highs. Now

22:45

what does that mean? I'm going to show

22:47

you something here. There's only one

22:48

time in history that you saw what you

22:50

saw yesterday which is the NASDAQ index

22:54

generating its weakest 5day gain or

22:57

actually fiveday loss weakest fiveday

22:59

gain in 180 days. the S&P, the NASDAQ AD

23:03

line declining eight out of 10 days in a

23:05

row. And eight out of 10 days, you had a

23:07

declining AD line. And the VXN gaining

23:10

35% over three days. These are three

23:12

rare indicators to see. And for them to

23:14

happen in one day only happened once.

23:16

And guess where that happened? It

23:17

happened with a sharp short correction

23:18

in 1997 right here. See? Now, what have

23:21

we had now? We had a sharp short

23:22

correction. The Russell peaked in late

23:24

January. It's still early February. The

23:26

midcaps peaked in in January. the the

23:29

socks index the semiconductors it peaked

23:31

I think uh on January 30th or maybe you

23:33

know so they just peaked two two or

23:34

three four days ago a sharp short

23:36

correction which caused the NASDAQ to

23:39

have its weakest 5day gain in 180 days

23:42

and eight out of n 10 days a declining

23:45

ad line and for the VXN which is VIX on

23:47

the NASDAQ to gain 35% three days and

23:49

when did it ever happen once before not

23:51

during a bare market during a a minor

23:54

correction took 14 days this correction

23:56

you see that happened again yesterday.

23:58

So that's the reason to turn bullish. In

24:00

that particular instance, the market

24:01

gained 35% without a pullback. It gained

24:04

a full 39% without a pullback. You see,

24:07

today we're having a very big day. We're

24:08

having the biggest day since May in the

24:10

markets, right? I mean, you look

24:11

>> today we're Friday, February 6,

24:13

extremely strong market,

24:15

>> right? I mean today you look at the

24:17

socks index which is looked like it's is

24:19

breaking down. Socks is at this moment

24:21

of 5.59%. Okay. Anyway, there's one

24:24

reason to consider covering shorts. Then

24:27

let me continue with this report.

24:28

There's another reason to continue

24:29

covering shorts because the VXN gained

24:31

10% for two days.

24:33

>> I'm sorry. I I guess I gotta go back.

24:35

First of all, why have you been short in

24:37

in your model portfolio? I I it's

24:40

important that I say what we saw today.

24:42

I'm going to get back to exactly why

24:43

we're short. All right. All right.

24:44

>> It's actually in this. It's actually in

24:45

this report.

24:46

>> First, our clients if the following what

24:48

I'm saying the short I myself am short,

24:51

right? Um the problem is you see action

24:54

yesterday that suggests to cover the

24:55

shorts. We're going to see exactly why

24:57

we're short and whether the evidence we

24:59

see today is sufficient to cover the

25:01

shorts based on what I just showed you

25:03

only had one precedence you in a sharp

25:07

unexpected decline that lasts just a

25:09

number of days I mean you saw these

25:11

indicators which exactly happened

25:12

yesterday in that case the market that

25:14

was its bottom and it gained 35% before

25:16

its next high and the second thing we

25:18

saw was this where the VIX VXN gained

25:21

10% for two days running VXN gained 35%

25:24

in three days and Nasdaq decline was the

25:27

greatest 180 days. This happened eight

25:29

times in the past. And let's just show

25:30

you the the instances. 1998 it was um at

25:34

a at a market low. S&P gained 38%.

25:38

Happened twice in the 2010 was during

25:40

the flush crash. In this case, the

25:41

market went down another another 7.9%.

25:44

So see there's not a perfect indicator.

25:46

Uh October 13th, 2014, the market gained

25:48

another 13%. bottom two days later down

25:51

only six threequarters of a percent

25:53

gained gained 13%. August 21st 2015 was

25:57

the day before the low of which in that

25:59

for that instance the market gained 7%

26:01

in 51 days and the next day which is

26:03

another buy signal it gained 11% in in

26:05

50 days and then you have August 5th

26:08

2024 after a sharp correction in the S&P

26:10

the market bottomed on that day and

26:12

gained 18.468 468 and it signaled on

26:14

August 4th, 2025 as well. It's not this

26:17

is not part of a model. These are the

26:19

kind of things we study each day. Our

26:20

models are fixed. When they signal, we

26:22

know they signal. Every day I look at

26:24

our indicators to see what it's telling

26:25

us. This is one of the things it's

26:26

telling us. So basically, I'm telling

26:28

myself it's quite possible that what we

26:30

saw yesterday was a low. I want to see

26:32

some more confirmation. Maybe it's not a

26:34

low. Maybe it's going to be more like

26:35

the flash crash in this case, right?

26:38

Where the market went down another 7.9%.

26:40

We've never seen this action early in a

26:42

bull market bare market, let's put it

26:43

that way. We've seen it during

26:45

corrective periods and the market

26:46

bottoms one or two months later at at

26:48

the worst. We've never seen this kind of

26:50

action early in a bull market.

26:52

>> So that's very promising, Milton, that

26:53

the action that we saw yesterday on

26:55

Thursday, February 5th. You often you

26:58

have seen in multiple local bottoms

27:00

suggesting that it's it's it's a bullish

27:02

indicator.

27:03

Yeah, it's not enough for me to cover my

27:04

shorts. But when I realized that the SVU

27:08

is down less than 3%.

27:10

NASDAQ was down less than 6% off its

27:12

highs. And still you saw panic in my

27:15

indicators, these rare indicators that

27:17

suggests that we're all going to be

27:19

fooled and the market could take off,

27:21

but I I haven't trig I haven't triggered

27:23

this yet. Now, realize my retail

27:25

newsletter clients are still long

27:27

because they had no reason to get out.

27:28

They're not traders. They're long-term

27:30

investors. We'll get to that in a

27:31

moment. and they're sitting pretty

27:32

today. My institutional investors are

27:34

not because either they maybe short

27:37

gold, maybe short stock so stocks, maybe

27:38

short the NASDAQ, maybe short the

27:39

Russell, maybe short the S&P and they're

27:41

all all screaming today. But this is re

27:43

why we went short. This is the reason we

27:45

went short right here. Okay.

27:47

>> Yep.

27:48

>> I'm going to show this later on. We got

27:50

a sell signal on December 11th. See the

27:52

December 11th, 2025, we got a sell

27:54

signal. This sell signal does not always

27:56

work. Okay. In other words, this sell

27:59

signal is telling you that the VX I

28:01

don't want to give you the the the

28:02

secret source, but it's looking at a

28:04

short-term rate of change in the VXN,

28:06

which is the VIX on the NASDAQ, relative

28:08

to another short-term VXM, which is

28:10

longer than the first shorter term. We

28:12

want to see a sharp shift in the VXN on

28:14

a short-term basis relative to previous

28:16

short-term basis. If I had to give you a

28:17

number, I'd say five days relative to 30

28:20

days, right? Tell you 10 days relative

28:21

to 30 days. Those aren't the real

28:23

numbers. Anyway, these gifts these

28:26

>> is it is it an increase in the in the

28:28

NASDAQ mix increase or in a very short

28:31

term rather over previous short term.

28:34

>> Okay. You you can tell me after the call

28:35

Milton but for now. Yeah.

28:37

>> Okay. Yes, I guess I could. But listen,

28:40

so in this case

28:42

this catches bare market rallies there

28:45

with singles when the market's up 18 or

28:47

15% in a bare market. It catches

28:48

rallies. It catches major bare market

28:50

major bull market peaks. But during a an

28:53

extended bill bull market, which you may

28:55

be having now, it gives a number of

28:56

false signals. I've pulled out the

28:58

successful signals from 1998 and we're

29:01

tracking is the market's following what

29:02

it does when the signals are successful.

29:04

If it's not, we get out of the short.

29:06

You understand? In other words, we're

29:07

going short on a probabilistic basis

29:09

knowing we may be wrong.

29:10

>> So, let me show you what we did on on

29:12

you know how how much the market has has

29:14

gained since December 11th. Take if you

29:16

wouldn't look at this table, what's the

29:18

maximum gain since December 11th?

29:19

Everything was talking about the great

29:21

new year and the bull movement, right?

29:23

>> Okay, I'll take guess I'll get I'll

29:24

guess I'll guess 7%.

29:26

>> What the S&P gained a maximum of 1.12%

29:30

since December 11th. That's all.

29:33

>> Really? Wow.

29:34

>> I want I can show you the chart if you'd

29:35

like.

29:35

>> I believe you.

29:36

>> Okay.

29:37

>> If there's anyone I believe Milton, it's

29:39

>> from the December 11th close to the

29:40

December to the January 27th close,

29:42

which was a final alltime high in the

29:44

S&P, it's only gained 1.12%. Now when

29:47

the success sixes were successful you

29:50

saw instances where it gained 1.8 for

29:52

1.98 5.17%.

29:54

2.61 2.78 2. So right now the way the

29:58

market has acted off the off those highs

30:00

is very consistent with successful

30:02

signals. Got it.

30:04

>> Uhhuh.

30:05

>> It's only hasn't really moved. Now

30:07

secondly let's see um we're now 37 days

30:10

past the signal. At yesterday's close we

30:12

were 37 days past the signal. How is it

30:15

done? Now, Sesby hadn't collapsed. It's

30:17

only down 1.49% since December 11th. But

30:20

let me show you something. In the year

30:22

2000, the signal on June 12th, the

30:25

market was up 0.45% 37 days later. Yet,

30:29

it g total decline off the signal of

30:31

23.70%.

30:33

In in 2001,

30:34

>> it was just later. It was just later, 58

30:36

days later.

30:37

>> Right. Right. The signal was later. But

30:38

the point is the market held up just as

30:40

it's held up now or actually or it's

30:43

held up then as well. Secondly, in in

30:45

here, it was up 0.31% in 2001, but from

30:49

the date of the signal, the ultimate

30:50

decline was 32%. And then again in in um

30:54

in 2015, excuse me. Yeah, it was up

30:57

1.07% by day 37, but its ultimate

31:00

decline was 13%. And again in 2021, it

31:03

was up 0.36%

31:06

through day 37 and its ultimate cl%. So

31:08

therefore, I tell my clients, yes, we're

31:11

short since December 11th. Yes, the

31:13

market hasn't gone down. However, the

31:15

market hasn't gone up. It's only gone up

31:16

1.2 12% maximum. And looking at the

31:19

instances in the past where the signal

31:21

work by day 37 in many instances, it was

31:24

up. We're down 1.49%.

31:26

So the my recommendation to the to the

31:28

institutions now, they don't all follow

31:30

me. They just use me as an input.

31:32

Obviously, the people managing billions

31:34

and trillions of dollars, I'm just one

31:35

input. Hopefully, I'll be one of the the

31:37

satis one of the best inputs, but I'm

31:39

just one input. But in any event, based

31:42

on this successful short single, we

31:44

should still be short. Now, it might

31:45

change at today's close for all I know,

31:47

right? But based on this successful

31:49

short signal of the past, let's face it,

31:51

we're only up 1.2% since December 11th

31:53

in the S&P. And at yesterday's close, we

31:56

were down 1.49, which is totally

31:57

consistent with previous successful

31:59

signals. This is the one reason I went

32:02

short. Nothing to do with the Fed,

32:04

nothing to do with Trump, nothing to do

32:05

with moving averages. Simple and

32:07

indicated. doesn't have a perfect

32:09

record, but it work it works great at

32:11

calling market peaks and bull and bare

32:13

market rally peaks. And since we had no

32:15

new bicycles since since May, and we had

32:18

one buy in June, which is I'll get to it

32:20

may be later, it's a weak buy signal.

32:22

We're giving you the benefit of the

32:23

doubt to the short side. However, I

32:25

would tell you a retail investor who's

32:27

following my work would sit through a

32:29

correction of four, five, six, even 7%

32:31

and not get out and and and and because

32:34

we're very long-term oriented for

32:36

institutions, we're trading oriented. We

32:38

can go short, we can go long, we can go

32:39

leveraged. It's a totally different

32:41

ballgame. And this is the reason we got

32:43

short just because of this one signal.

32:45

Of course, in the back of my mind, I

32:47

know there's there's there's a recession

32:49

indicator has 100% record that's now in

32:51

a cell, which is the rate of change of

32:53

the unemployment rate that's suggesting

32:55

recession. I know the leading indicators

32:57

are still suggesting recession. And

32:59

maybe there'll be recession, maybe

33:00

depression, maybe great deflation, may

33:02

be inflation. We don't really care. We

33:04

just care about the indicators. And in

33:06

the back of my mind, I know if you're

33:08

going to get a major bare market,

33:09

there'll be some sort of event that we

33:10

probably can't even predict that's going

33:11

to be associated with that bare market.

33:14

I think I already asked you this,

33:15

Milton, but it was the move in the V the

33:19

NASDAQ VIX VXN. Was it a decline or a

33:22

increase?

33:23

>> You asked me before. It's actually a

33:24

decline. It signals that after rally,

33:27

it's actually a decline. I'm sorry. It's

33:28

a sharp decline. Let's say it's 5 days,

33:30

but it's not five days. Let's say it's

33:32

five days relative to 30 days, relative

33:34

to 20 days. It's not 30. It's not 20.

33:36

You want to see a sharp decline in in

33:39

VIX relative to the rate of change for a

33:41

longer period. And it's

33:43

>> it's basically people

33:45

work.

33:46

>> It's inclusive. The five days include

33:48

the 30 days. You see,

33:49

>> it's not five days and the previous 25

33:51

days. It's five days and 30 days

33:54

including these five days, which has to

33:56

be a greater extreme.

33:57

>> I see. So, so it's pe it's uh investors

33:59

who were hedged bidding up options on

34:04

>> they got rid of their hedges too

34:05

quickly.

34:06

>> Very they're very optimistic of the

34:08

market on a very short-term basis

34:10

showing up in these numbers. Right.

34:11

Exactly. It's a shift in expected

34:13

volatility which is which is a shift in

34:15

bullishness which doesn't always show up

34:17

in the doesn't always show up in the

34:19

institutional uh in the in the uh retail

34:22

newsletter followers. Doesn't always

34:24

show up necessarily in put call ratios

34:26

but it shows up in this indicator

34:28

precisely near market peaks.

34:31

>> Yes. Almost never. And was it two

34:34

coincidence things? This VXN thing

34:35

happening and something else or was just

34:37

this?

34:37

>> No. No. This is one indicator based on

34:39

VXN itself. one indicator I say it's not

34:41

don't have a perfect record.

34:42

>> Yeah. This is this is special because

34:44

you know most of the times people see

34:45

implied volatility falling or even

34:47

crashing and they see that as a giant

34:49

buying opportunity for you it makes you

34:51

nervous. That's very interesting.

34:52

>> No no no no context context context.

34:54

Jack if this would have if this would

34:57

have signaled on June 15th I would have

35:00

it didn't but if it did I would have

35:01

ignored it because you're just coming

35:03

right off a major low with major buy

35:04

signals. Mhm.

35:06

>> Since it's signaling in December after

35:08

the market up since April and since um I

35:11

I got no additional confirming buy

35:13

signals, that's when I will try to act

35:14

on this. In other words, when I tell you

35:16

the signal is not always perfect and I

35:18

mentioned that in bull markets, you're

35:20

going to get false signals. I'm aware of

35:21

that. I'm not going to during the bull

35:23

market, I'm not going to have four or

35:24

false signals I'm going to follow. I'm

35:26

going to follow signals in which the

35:28

market has already gained significantly

35:29

and there's no confirming buy signals.

35:31

>> That makes sense. And so to me, you

35:35

know, normal normally, Milton, you get

35:36

an overwhelming

35:38

uh uh constellation. It's like a it's

35:40

like a parade of buy signals or sell

35:42

signals that that motivate you. Just let

35:44

me finish that motivate you to to

35:46

establish a position. It's interesting

35:48

to me, Milton, and you know, may maybe

35:50

you know, I won't without your

35:51

permission disclose just exactly how

35:53

short you are in your model portfolio,

35:55

but I can tell our audience uh very very

35:57

very short. It's interesting to me that

35:59

it indicates why why you have such a

36:02

large short position given this one

36:03

reading. Uh yeah.

36:06

>> Well, there's more. There's other things

36:07

that I talk about, but we went short on

36:08

December 11th. We added short

36:10

subsequently based on other things. I

36:11

just want to show you.

36:12

>> Okay.

36:12

>> We were long into December 11th. We went

36:14

short on December 11th. I'm trying to

36:15

show you why really, but I want to tell

36:17

you one other thing. And and I know most

36:18

technicians won't admit to this.

36:21

>> Many will, but many won't. It is so much

36:25

easier to call a market bottom

36:26

technically than to call a market peak.

36:30

Okay? Yet yet

36:32

technicians are always afraid to call

36:34

the market bottom and they're never

36:36

afraid to call the market peak. That's

36:38

so wrong at the top and they're so wrong

36:39

at the bottom. It's so amazing. In other

36:41

words, it's easier to call bottoms, but

36:43

everyone's always afraid to call the

36:44

bottom. But it's so much easier

36:45

technically.

36:46

>> Calling it top is very, very difficult

36:48

for everybody because tops it's in

36:50

stocks, not necessarily in commodities.

36:51

Clients are easy, but stocks are have

36:53

round the tops. And there's always

36:55

groups that are doing well even while

36:56

the market's peaking. So stocks are much

36:58

more difficult. And it's funny enough,

37:00

everyone's out there, you know, you see

37:01

people you interview all calling for

37:02

market crashes, market crashes, market

37:03

crashes, calling it for six months,

37:05

eight months, nine months, 10 years in a

37:06

row. You understand?

37:08

>> It's find somehow they find it easy to

37:09

call for market crashes. They're very

37:11

difficult to call market bottoms. Even

37:12

though market bottoms are so much easier

37:14

to call and market tops are much more

37:15

difficult to call.

37:16

>> Sophisticated investors don't typically

37:18

park their cash in high yield savings

37:20

accounts. Instead, when they want yield,

37:22

they turn to one of the fastest growing

37:23

asset classes for institutional

37:25

investors, private credit. These private

37:27

credit strategies were once reserved

37:29

exclusively for wealthy institutional

37:30

investors, but now they're available to

37:32

investors of all sizes thanks to the

37:34

Fundrise Income Fund, which has more

37:36

than 600 million invested and a 7.97%

37:39

distribution rate. With most traditional

37:41

savings yields falling, it's no wonder

37:43

why sophisticated institutional and

37:45

individual investors are turning to

37:47

higher yielding asset classes like

37:48

private credit. Click the link in the

37:50

description or visit fundrise.com/mm

37:53

to invest in the Fundrise income fund in

37:55

just minutes. The fund's total return in

37:57

2025 was 8% and the average annual total

37:59

return since inception is 7.8%. Past

38:01

performance does not guarantee future

38:02

results. Current distribution rate as of

38:03

12312025. Carefully consider the

38:05

investment material before investing

38:06

including objectives, risks, charges,

38:08

and expenses. This and other information

38:09

can be found in the income funds

38:10

perspectives at fundra.com/income. This

38:12

is a paid advertisement. Back to the

38:14

interview.

38:14

>> Okay. You want to talk Bitcoin or more

38:17

about stocks? I could talk about because

38:18

I have a lot of more about stocks.

38:19

>> Let's tease the people a little bit.

38:21

Let's uh let's let them wait. Let's talk

38:22

more about stocks. We will get into

38:23

Bitcoin. We will get into gold. We will

38:25

get into silver. But yeah, what were the

38:27

other signals you saw since December?

38:28

>> Let me show you something here. We we

38:29

actually let me do this control. If you

38:32

can't see the screen, let me know.

38:33

>> I will.

38:34

>> Russell 2000. We called this I actually

38:36

sent out the email at 401. I started

38:39

writing it at 10 minutes to 4 on January

38:41

23rd day after the top at the close.

38:44

This is the Russell 2000. This is a

38:46

chart. You can see where I'm circling

38:48

here, the circle.

38:48

>> Yes.

38:49

>> You see this island reversal? Island

38:50

reversal means it gapped into the into

38:52

the update and and and it gapped down.

38:54

You can make a little island. This this

38:57

bar in the top is an island. You see you

38:59

see what I mean by island.

39:00

>> Can you explain what what what this

39:01

means and and what it indicates in

39:04

>> I'll tell you what it means. When the

39:05

market gaps the up. Now, some people

39:07

don't understand what a gap is. A gap

39:09

doesn't mean the market opened higher

39:10

than yesterday's close. That's not a

39:11

gap. A gap means it happened opened

39:14

higher than yesterday's high. And the

39:16

downside gap means it opened lower than

39:18

yesterday's low. And for a gap to be

39:20

valid, it has to trade the whole day

39:22

with the gap not being filled. So in

39:24

other words, if the if the market is up

39:26

on a day and it it opens higher than the

39:29

day's previous high and by the end of

39:31

the day, it remains higher than the it

39:34

always remained higher than than the day

39:36

it previous high. That's an upside gap.

39:39

Downside gap is just the opposite. The

39:41

market opens below the previous day's

39:43

low and throughout the day it remained

39:45

its highest high of the day was below

39:47

the previous day's previous low. Okay,

39:49

that's a gap. A gap basically is telling

39:51

you

39:53

there's an emotional move. That's what a

39:54

gap is supposed to tell you. It's an

39:56

emotional move in the market. It's very

39:58

very rare in some markets is more rare

40:01

than other markets, but it's very rare

40:03

to see a market gap at all. I'll show

40:04

you some markets that almost never gap.

40:07

But there's something called an island

40:08

reversal, which is just two gaps. One

40:11

gap that takes place on the way up,

40:13

another gap that takes on the way down.

40:15

And you could make an island. There's an

40:17

air pocket between between those two

40:18

gaps. Now, I I showed you this one, but

40:22

this is a unique app. It's the only time

40:23

it ever happened in history of the

40:24

Russell 2000. What does that mean? It's

40:27

a one day island. I call it an isolated

40:29

one-day island reversal at the top. The

40:32

Russell 2000 was really really really

40:34

very very lethargic for quite a number

40:36

of years as you know right? Yes.

40:37

>> All of a sudden in January people are

40:39

saying the market is broadening. The

40:41

market is broadening. Wow. Look the

40:43

small caps are moving right. Everyone

40:45

was saying it. Even the beers were

40:47

saying it. Oh you know the the AI is

40:50

going to go down but the Russell is

40:51

going to continue higher. There's a

40:52

shift in rotation right? And people

40:54

believed it to so much of an extent that

40:57

on January 22nd, the day of the final

40:59

high so far in the Russell, the market

41:01

gapped up. But that's only half the

41:04

story. The next day, the market gap down

41:07

and it created a one-day island

41:08

reversal. One day

41:09

>> and this never happened before, ever.

41:11

>> Never in the Russell 2000. Usually an

41:13

hour reversal have three days or six

41:14

days. I'll show you the history. I have

41:16

I went through every island reversal

41:17

history of the Russell. Got it? So I'm

41:19

not just talking out of my hat.

41:21

>> I know you're not talking out your hat.

41:22

Yeah. Russell 2000 is the US small caps.

41:24

>> Russell 2000 had an island. I

41:26

immediately said the Russell 2000 is

41:28

giving a very very bearish signal. So we

41:30

had a sell signal on December 11th in

41:31

the in the S&P. S&P only was up maximum

41:34

1.2% above its high in um in actually by

41:38

January 22nd was even up 1.12% because

41:40

it peaked on January 27th. But anyway,

41:43

this is another reason to suggest the

41:44

market might be topping and in fact the

41:46

Russell 2000 ultimately through

41:48

yesterday's close were down um I think

41:50

7% off its high. What am I showing you?

41:52

This is an island versus the gap is

41:53

negative. I looked at previous tops that

41:56

occurred with N. Now you see you had you

41:58

had an you had a you have a gap up right

42:01

off the lows in April. You see you have

42:02

a gap up in May. You have a gap up in

42:04

June. You ignore these gaps because the

42:06

market's coming off a thrust low.

42:09

You don't just like we don't look at the

42:12

you don't look at the um VXN sell signal

42:15

right off the low because of course VXN

42:18

is going to collapse right off the low.

42:19

So too, there'll be a lot of enthusiasm

42:21

when the market is coming off a low. But

42:23

we're looking at this where everyone's

42:25

so excited about the Russell claiming

42:27

that it's starting to break out,

42:28

claiming to see a broadening and that's

42:30

where you see iron revers means it gaps

42:33

up, gaps down, and then it continues

42:35

lower. Now we wrote our report the day

42:37

gap down of course continued lower and

42:39

TSA's closed. So this is showing early

42:41

in the move. You can see multiple you

42:43

see multiple gaps which are considered

42:44

buy signals. See context is the key in

42:46

many indicators.

42:48

Gaps are not random. Gaps take place off

42:50

lows and gaps take place into tops. You

42:52

have to know where you are, what where

42:54

you potentially are. This is July 17th,

42:56

2000. This again, it wasn't an island

42:58

reversal. It was two gap days in a row

42:59

off the high, two gap downs, and that

43:02

marked the top of the market. The the

43:03

market tested, never made a higher high,

43:05

and then it declined some 40% over the

43:08

next two years from July 72, 2000 to the

43:11

to the bottom of the bare market. You

43:12

saw over here again in um September

43:15

19th, 2008. Now realize

43:17

>> Leman

43:18

>> the um you you there was a financial

43:21

crisis and and and for some reason on

43:23

that day there was some positive news

43:25

out of the Fed and the Russia 2000

43:27

gained 19.85%

43:30

on the day.

43:31

>> Milton only because I'm a giant nerd and

43:34

I've read a lot of books about 2008. I

43:36

think that was uh you know you're a

43:38

technician not that you you think it it

43:40

doesn't matter. I live I lived through

43:41

it but I I sort of I remember what the

43:42

market did but I forget what the news

43:44

>> there was a stimulus bill that was I

43:45

think was going to go through Congress

43:46

and then it didn't pass and it was a

43:48

>> so it's up 19% in today 985%

43:52

gapped up to the top and then it

43:53

declined 60% to it final low and this is

43:55

continuation gap so on point y where you

43:58

see important gaps at previous peaks now

43:59

look at this one this is on um January

44:02

17th 2020 remember you remember the

44:04

COVID crisis I think so right covid

44:06

crisis y crisis didn't really begin

44:08

until uh until early March. But the

44:11

Russell knew about the COVID crisis

44:12

because the Russell gapped up one day

44:14

before its peak. One day before the

44:16

all-time high, the Russell 2000 on

44:18

January 17th, 2020, the Russell gapped

44:21

up. That was its high. Then it further

44:23

gaps into the secondary high. But this

44:25

is again a sign of a market peak. Enthus

44:28

uncalled for enthusiasm at a new high.

44:30

Got it?

44:31

>> In that case, the market declined

44:33

another 43.90% to its low. And I show

44:35

2007 of various gaps. I don't want to

44:37

take too much time on this. I just want

44:39

to justify why I'm able to I'm going

44:41

through history of gaps. I mean the only

44:43

other the see this is our island

44:45

reversal. This is our current market.

44:47

You see the one I showed you earlier

44:49

January 22nd 2016 right

44:51

>> the peak in November 15 2024 the final

44:55

peak in that in that rally was also on a

44:57

gap day. You see then the market

45:00

declined 29.90%.

45:02

To find a a an island reversal in the

45:04

Russell island reversal. Let me see if I

45:06

I think I I highlighted an island

45:07

reversal here. No, this not a true

45:09

island reversal. No. Uh I think I

45:12

highlighted one, but I don't take too

45:13

much time in it now. But the the the one

45:15

day island reversal we had now, which I

45:16

called it an isolated one day reversal

45:18

at the top, has never before occurred in

45:20

the Russell. It occurs in commodities

45:22

often enough has never occurred in the

45:24

Russell. And the reason it occurred this

45:26

time is because everyone's so enthusiast

45:28

enthusiastic about the Russell rather

45:30

than understanding I wrote this in my

45:32

reports. rather than understanding that

45:33

in nearly every bull market in history,

45:36

it peaks when the lagards start moving.

45:38

It doesn't peak when the previous uh

45:40

movers start moving. It peaks when the

45:41

lagards stop moving and the general they

45:43

call the generals and the troops. The

45:45

generals slow down then they let the

45:46

troops get killed. You understand?

45:48

>> And sorry, are are those are the lagards

45:50

would they be high beta, high risk, high

45:53

speculation stocks or they save stocks

45:55

like Coca-Cola?

45:56

>> Every market has a different lagard.

45:57

Yeah, sometimes low beta like Coca-Cola,

46:00

but sometimes it's uh the small cap like

46:02

the Russell 2000. In this case, the

46:04

Russell 2000 SP 600 did very little for

46:06

the last four years and all of a sudden

46:08

it starts surging into a pig and

46:10

everyone's claiming bullish bullish

46:12

bullish market breath breath is is

46:14

increasing and the market is broadening

46:16

and get out of your AI and just buy the

46:18

small caps and and I say no this happen

46:21

so typical at the top of a bull market

46:23

where the they call it the dogs, right?

46:26

the dogs start there's expression

46:28

something about the dogs lead the pack

46:29

you know

46:30

>> so yeah these are the dogs there I think

46:32

40% of the ro 2000 have no earnings you

46:34

know negative earnings so this is not a

46:37

quality indicator call it small cap

46:39

whatever they're great small caps and

46:40

they're are garbage small caps 2000

46:43

about 40% of it are small caps that have

46:45

really no earnings I just wanted to

46:46

point out what we saw which is this

46:48

amazing one day I there's another reason

46:50

to be bearish again there's another

46:52

reason in the back of my head why I'm

46:53

not I didn't use action to cover my

46:55

shorts. Even though there's some

46:56

historical instances, my models didn't

46:59

go long. I just gave instances where it

47:00

might be a bottom. I'm still, you know,

47:02

tops are very difficult to call and

47:04

bottom is difficult to call. And uh this

47:06

bottom after two and a half% decline in

47:08

the S&P, less than 3%. You know, it's

47:10

highly unlikely that it's a bottom. It

47:11

may be a sharp short correction that

47:13

ends. We'll see. I'm trying to tell you

47:15

that I'm not pounding the table. I'm not

47:16

sure. I'm trying to show you what we

47:17

tell our clients. We don't every day

47:20

have a strong opinion like most people

47:22

try to do. My strong opinion is that

47:24

we're in a bull market that began in

47:25

April and the market should continue

47:27

higher. It's projected to go higher

47:28

unless we see something different. We

47:29

haven't seen anything major different

47:31

except the VXN single in December and

47:34

these things like for example this gap

47:35

up in the Russell 2000. Let's see. Let's

47:37

let's get let's um let's um

47:42

let me show you the last buy signal we

47:43

ever got if if that's interesting to

47:45

you.

47:45

>> Absolutely.

47:46

>> I said the last signal we got was in

47:47

August 13th.

47:48

>> But you said you didn't like it.

47:49

>> I don't like it. I'll tell you why. Tell

47:50

you why. This signal occurs when the

47:54

Russell declines at least 5% bottomed

47:56

eight days ago meaning it didn't make a

47:58

lower low for eight days. So on on

47:59

August on August this first signal on

48:02

April 9th 2009 but this the latest

48:04

signal was August 13th 2025. In that

48:07

case the Russell was down like five and

48:09

a half% SP is down like less than 2%.

48:11

The rest of the market didn't pull back

48:13

the Russell pulled back held its low for

48:15

eight days and on the eighth day it it

48:18

exhibited an upside gap. Remember we

48:20

said upside gaps come a great after a

48:22

low and a bearish where you when after

48:24

market had an extended rally.

48:26

>> This is one of the cases where you get

48:28

an upside gap just eight days after a

48:30

low. Now the low was only 5%. In most of

48:32

these instances it wasn't just the

48:34

Russell down 5%. Many other indices were

48:36

down. In this case a only the Russell

48:38

was down 5%. Even the S&P 600 small cap

48:41

wasn't down 5%. And on the day a gap to

48:43

the upside. Let me just show you the

48:44

history of this one. This is it. It

48:47

signaled on April 9th, 2009, right after

48:49

a major bare market down. It was a 56%

48:51

bare market. It was right. It signaled

48:53

on October 14th, 2000. Also early in a

48:55

bull market signal on September 3rd,

48:58

2010 after 19% decline in the S&P. It

49:01

signal 2012. This is more of a after a

49:04

rally, but you did have a great low in

49:06

in 2011 at the lows. It signal here it

49:10

signal during during an up move in 2017.

49:13

And here it signaled um after the 220

49:15

lows at the at the June correction and

49:18

now it signal here. Now when I saw the

49:20

signal I I really I think it's a weak

49:22

signal but basically the S&P the S&P is

49:24

up 7.9% since then which is not a bad

49:27

move. Why do I say it's not a bad move?

49:29

It's only up 7.9% since August 13th

49:32

because I look at the history of the

49:33

other successful moves you see right

49:34

here. There's a table. This shows all

49:37

those nine instances when we got the

49:38

same signal. The 90 I'm showing the 90.

49:41

So, you're looking at the results for

49:42

the S&P even though the signal was for

49:44

the Russell.

49:44

>> Yes. Yes. Yes. I I showed my clients the

49:46

signal is for the Russell, but I trade

49:49

basically the models are built to call

49:50

the S&P. Okay. We're looking at Okay,

49:52

that's that's the point. But the point

49:54

over here is is that through 90 days,

49:57

the maximum gain was 6.72, which seems

49:59

pretty weak, right?

50:01

>> However, in 2016, the maximum gain

50:03

through 90 is only 2.83% and went on to

50:06

gain 15%. You see, in 2012, by day 90

50:09

through 90 days, it was only up 5.38%

50:12

and yet it gained a total of 22% within

50:14

a year. In 2009, it was up 5.33% through

50:19

day 90 and ended up 11.47. So, the fact

50:21

that we're only up 6.72%

50:23

is not really troubling. But this

50:26

doesn't go into my models. It's not

50:27

robust enough as far as I'm concerned.

50:29

So, I say I built models to call

50:31

markets, which we'll talk about for

50:32

retail and so on. This doesn't go into

50:35

my models. This is just something that I

50:36

show my clients uh just to show what's

50:39

going on in the market. I I did not put

50:40

much weight into this particular signal,

50:42

but we're on a buy signal off the lows

50:43

anyway, but I didn't put much weight

50:45

into the signal because the you're

50:48

looking for a gap a gap up after a

50:50

decline and only the Russell decline. It

50:51

was only a minor decline of 5%. And in

50:53

Russell, 5% decline is really just a

50:55

hiccup. It's just a random event.

50:56

Russell is far more volatile than the

50:58

S&P. So that's that one. Okay. Now,

51:01

there's something else here. This is

51:02

very important. Mhm.

51:03

>> This is very important because you would

51:05

think that I just show some signals with

51:07

some uh data and

51:10

you think I wouldn't even follow the

51:11

standard technical stuff but I actually

51:13

believe it or not I actually follow

51:14

standard technical stuff as well.

51:17

>> I know Milton I was looking at some of

51:18

the the data and all the materials you

51:20

sent almost all the time you have very

51:22

few charts all tables and data but this

51:25

time I said Milton making charts. What's

51:27

going on?

51:28

>> These charts are just reflecting where

51:30

the date is. But anyway, this is let me

51:32

show you this. We looked at every great

51:34

market peak since 1966. Okay? Every

51:36

market topped in the S&P. We're looking

51:38

for minimum decline of of 18% in the

51:40

S&P. So, for example, 1966 market peaked

51:44

on February 9th and declined 22%. Let's

51:46

see 1981. Uh the the the S&P peaked on

51:51

they're actually looking at the Dow

51:52

peaked in April 27th, declined 24%. NASA

51:56

peaked in April May 29th clined 28% and

51:58

so on. 87 SB peaked in August 25th,

52:01

declined 33%. You see, we're looking for

52:03

every decline of at least 18%. In 2000,

52:06

the S&P peaked on March 24th, down 49%.

52:09

NASDAQ peaked on March 10th, down 77,

52:11

and so on so forth.

52:12

>> And these aren't just highs, they're

52:14

highs that specifically were the peak

52:17

leading the final highs in the market.

52:19

>> Final highs, not just highs, final

52:20

>> final highs in the final highs in the

52:22

market for decline of of 18%. Final

52:24

final highs. Okay? Because most of the

52:26

time, sorry, but most of the time highs

52:28

are actually bullish, right?

52:30

>> Well, until it's bearish. Yeah. Most not

52:32

highs are bullish until they're bearish,

52:33

right? But yeah, because the market

52:35

makes a series of higher highs till its

52:37

final high. I mean, market make 50

52:39

higher highs till it's final high. So,

52:40

yes, if you look at it that way, of

52:42

course, highs are generally bullish.

52:43

It's questions what takes place at the

52:45

highs. For example, I'll give it I I I

52:47

highly red arrows. There are four pages

52:49

by the way data.

52:51

>> I highly like the 10day 10day trend. Now

52:53

I I hate to explain what trend is

52:55

because it's even I always found it

52:57

difficult to understand it. I now I

52:58

finally understand.

52:59

>> I prepared I looked it up before. It's

53:01

ratio of upside volume to ratio of

53:03

downside volume.

53:04

>> No, that's half the that's only half the

53:06

ratio. It's a ratio of the ratio of

53:08

upside down to downside volume to the

53:09

ratio of upside stocks to downside

53:11

stocks. It's a ratio of a ratio. In

53:13

other words, it's not enough to have

53:14

high upside volume. You have to have

53:15

high upside volume relative to the

53:17

number of stocks that went up. So for

53:18

example, if you have 10 to one upside

53:20

volume and you have 10 times as many

53:22

stocks up as down, the trend will be one

53:24

neutral. However, if you had 10 times to

53:27

one upside volume and only had a 1 ratio

53:31

of up stocks to down stocks, you see

53:33

then the trade will be 0 50. That would

53:35

be a very very low ratio because the the

53:38

upside volume is overwhelming to such an

53:40

extent that it it takes the ratio ratio

53:42

down. But any event, I don't want to get

53:44

into the trend because I'll have to get

53:46

into everything and it's going to take

53:47

too long. But the 10day trade in the S&

53:50

NASDAQ at the day of the peak of January

53:53

27th of the S&P was 0.76.

53:56

Now this exactly the median you see at

53:58

previous market peaks. It's 0.78. You

54:01

see right at what you normally see at a

54:03

market. Now I'm sure all of pages are

54:05

all yellow. When they're not when

54:06

they're red when any column is red, it

54:08

means they're not consistent with what

54:09

you've seen in a previous market peak.

54:12

Everything is consistent but many of

54:13

them are at the medians. For example,

54:15

25-day New York Stock Exchange trend at

54:17

0.98. The median is 0.96. You see?

54:19

>> Mhm.

54:20

>> Let's look at this one. 10day advanced

54:21

declines in in the NASDAQ. The New York

54:24

Stock Exchange is 1.07 over1. The median

54:27

at major peaks is 1.09 over1. We're at

54:30

the median. What about the number of 52-

54:32

week highs in the S&P on December?

54:34

January 23 45, which seems like a high

54:36

number, but in fact, the median peak at

54:39

final market peaks is 47 right there.

54:42

And I can go on and on and on. Let me

54:44

find an interesting one. Let's look at

54:45

rates of change because that's really

54:46

important. Let's look at the uh

54:48

>> at the the six-month rate of change in

54:50

the S&P. You know, the S&P has only

54:51

gained 9.22%

54:53

over the last six months, even though

54:55

it's up 37% since April.

54:58

It's slowed down. The median is 10.08%

55:00

at the top. Let's look at the NASDAQ.

55:02

You know, the NASDAQ is only up 12.46%

55:05

over the last six months, even though

55:06

it's up 45% off the lows. But the median

55:09

at a peak is 13.19. Let's look at the

55:12

smaller caps because we're all talking

55:13

about small caps. The the S&P 400 is

55:16

midcap. It's six month is 8.5% but the

55:19

median is 10.94. It's below the median

55:21

gain. It's more it's weaker than you'd

55:23

expect at a top. You see? So these are

55:25

>> tell me about a threshold and what that

55:26

means.

55:27

>> Threshold means if it be above this

55:29

level, it would turn red. The six month

55:31

rate of change in the NASDAQ would be

55:33

above 81.11. It's not totally

55:35

inconsistent with what you see at a

55:36

market peak. You've never seen that

55:38

strength at a market peak. Well, let's

55:39

look at the number of highs in the S&P

55:41

because that actually helped me out in

55:43

2020 2023.

55:46

Uh let me show you that S&P page one 52

55:50

week highs. The threshold is 87. There's

55:53

a period during 19 2024

55:56

where most of these things were yellow

55:58

but the the number of highs were were

55:59

were about 92.

56:01

>> I think you may have talked to me about

56:02

that Milton. Yeah.

56:03

>> Which told me that that's not the market

56:05

generally. You wouldn't expect that to

56:07

be the market peak because you never saw

56:08

a market peak with that many new highs.

56:10

Okay, this is showing something else we

56:12

look at.

56:12

>> You just went through a lot of the data,

56:14

but I didn't hear a lot of conclusions.

56:16

What What were some of the

56:17

>> conclusions? Conclusion here is

56:18

>> Yeah. Yeah. If anyone's telling you, if

56:21

anyone's telling you that the market

56:23

action is inconsistent with actions seen

56:26

at previous market peaks, or if anyone

56:29

tells you that Federal Reserve action is

56:31

inconsistent with what we've seen in the

56:32

previous market peaks, or if anyone

56:34

tells you that the rate of change of

56:36

interest rates of the long bond is

56:38

inconsistent with what you've seen at

56:40

market peaks, I would show them my tech

56:42

technicals at the high and show. All of

56:43

these things are in my are in my table

56:45

and all these things are consistent with

56:47

what you've seen at prior market peaks.

56:49

>> You're saying that you're seeing signs

56:51

of market.

56:52

>> You're saying that no one can argue that

56:54

the market can't peak now based on

56:56

technical data. They can argue that

56:59

we're not at a peak, but they can't

57:00

argue that we can't peak. In other

57:02

words, sometimes, very often that, you

57:05

know, half his data is red, meaning the

57:07

market is showing signs that it's not

57:09

peaking.

57:10

>> And red in this instance is good. In the

57:12

same way red in China means stock market

57:14

goes up.

57:15

>> No no yeah red means that it's not

57:17

consistent with

57:18

>> with with what you see in the previous

57:19

peaks. I mean a good example would be

57:21

the five day the fiveday breath. Like

57:24

for example let me show let's get the

57:25

fiveday breath. Fiveday advance

57:26

declines. You see the 1.33.

57:29

If it's above 2.3 2.34 you're not going

57:32

to see a market peak. It's going to be a

57:34

thrust. Only once did you see it above

57:36

two. That's back in 1976. Now 196, just

57:39

to let you know, was one of the

57:41

strangest markets because the the S&P

57:44

peaked, the Dow peaked, they they

57:45

climbed about 18%. At the same time, the

57:49

American Stock Exchange, which I don't

57:50

think exists anymore, which was an which

57:52

was the small cap index of the day, was

57:54

in a major bull market gaining 30%. It

57:57

was mainly in oil stocks, but the oil

57:59

stocks and the S&P were also rallying

58:01

while the S&P was declining. So

58:03

therefore at the peak you saw the at

58:06

that peak you saw the oil stock surging

58:07

and you saw 2.34 to1 um AD line at the

58:11

peak but generally you see at the peak

58:13

the AD line is uh is look at it you

58:15

never see it even above 1.75 we're at

58:18

1.33 median is 1.18 but let me you had

58:21

1.66 66 to 2011 top also difficult top

58:25

but you 1.58 1.52 and 89 and 90 okay

58:29

this is just one example 5day advanced

58:31

decline we have a 5day ad line we use as

58:34

a breath rust you know we have readings

58:35

of three four five to one over fiveday

58:38

basis which gives us buy signals but to

58:40

tell you you can't expect the market to

58:41

peak even at a 2 to1 level you wouldn't

58:43

expect the market we're not there now

58:45

you understand

58:46

>> if you had 90 new 52 week highs in the

58:48

S&P when you last saw the high and this

58:50

only looks at the days of highs So if

58:52

January 27th could have been the final

58:54

high because the data is consistent. It

58:56

doesn't mean it is the final high. It

58:57

means it could be the final high and

58:59

we're looking at you look at as you can

59:00

see we look at many things you know we

59:02

don't just hang our hat on one

59:03

indicator. Yes.

59:04

>> Okay let's see what else you want. Well

59:06

you you talk to talk about many things

59:07

to talk about.

59:08

>> Milton we'll return to stocks and we

59:10

will I promise our audience just get

59:12

into the commodities gold silver maybe a

59:15

little oil but also particularly

59:17

Bitcoin. But Milton, I just want to take

59:18

a lot of the work that you've been

59:20

showing is for institutional clients,

59:22

some of the biggest and most successful

59:24

hedge funds in the world. You recently

59:26

launched a product that is for

59:28

individual investors. You know, I

59:30

include myself in that category.

59:32

>> What is different about this product?

59:36

Tell us a little bit about the value

59:37

that you you think it could provide.

59:39

Okay, I'm going to take it step by step,

59:41

but basically before I even show any

59:43

charts or show any data, individual

59:45

investors find it very very difficult

59:47

because they read the news and they hear

59:50

the news and they try to f follow

59:51

financial reports and they even listen

59:53

to great podcasts like Jack Farley's

59:56

great podcast. They always get

59:57

conflicting opinions. They don't know

59:59

what to decide for themselves. They're

60:02

they're out of the market when the

60:03

market's rallying. They get into the

60:04

market close to the top. you know, it's

60:06

very difficult for an individual

60:07

investor and I wanted to create I I

60:10

spent 10 years working on models. I

60:11

really didn't plan to build a newsletter

60:13

for retail investors. I really just to

60:16

wanted to write a book and when I as you

60:19

did my research,

60:20

>> my research was getting so robust and it

60:22

fascinated me because I couldn't believe

60:24

what I was discovering in the market. Be

60:26

honest with you, I I if 10 years ago I

60:28

would someone would have told me by the

60:29

time you finish you're going to have

60:30

2,800 indicators. You're going to have

60:32

about 600 indicators that have a perfect

60:34

track record. meaning without a pullback

60:36

on a bicycle with pullbacks of less than

60:38

three and a half% you know I wouldn't

60:40

have believed it's even possible most

60:41

indicators work on percentage you know

60:43

work 65% of the time you're happy it

60:44

works 75% of the time you're ecstatic

60:47

indicators that work historically 100%

60:50

of the time and they're not madeup

60:51

indicators not back fit indicators we're

60:53

just looking for rare data that takes

60:55

place at lows the problem is most people

60:57

who look at market lows only see what's

60:58

obvious to them they open the chart they

61:00

see a moving average there are many many

61:02

indicators as I mentioned earlier saw

61:04

they're not obvious vious to the most

61:05

people not even to most technicians

61:07

because they don't follow it on it's not

61:09

computerized just as long as we're

61:10

talking I have I have one of my uh one

61:13

of my uh spreadsheets open so here you

61:15

see for example this my this is today's

61:17

spreadsheet that I I get my indicators

61:19

on

61:20

>> oh wow

61:20

>> so so for example today I saw the VXN

61:24

yesterday VXN was up 10% over two days

61:26

VIX VXN was 35% in three days these

61:29

indexes had the highest three-day volume

61:30

in 200 days 200 days 20 you see that I

61:33

get these indicator ators. This these

61:35

are not signals. These are just basic

61:36

indicators.

61:37

>> But I want to point out I'll go to the

61:38

column where you show no signal. You see

61:40

column says no signal right here. Yeah.

61:41

>> You see no signal.

61:43

>> Just want to show you uh how many

61:46

indicators we have. So you go to no

61:48

signal.

61:52

>> 17,000 19,000 20,000

61:55

>> be this soon. We'll be there soon. You

61:56

see we have

61:57

>> 22,000 indicators that have not signaled

61:59

today. Instead

62:00

>> we you have 23,000 that did not signal.

62:03

2029. No, it's actually 20 20,310 that

62:07

have not signaled today. Right. Okay.

62:08

>> Right. So, the point is we're looking

62:10

for these things to signal. We're

62:12

looking for rare signals. We're not

62:13

looking for the kind of things people

62:14

look at every day. Market's up 1%,

62:16

markets up 2%. You know, we're looking

62:17

for things that don't take place too

62:19

often. But when they do take place,

62:21

they're telling you something. Got it?

62:23

>> So, sometimes the VXN gaining 35% in

62:26

three days tells you something as I

62:27

pointed out, but sometimes it's not

62:29

sufficient. That's why we're not ready

62:30

to cover our shorts today. But at the

62:32

other end by tomorrow today's action may

62:35

change things. You know it's a very very

62:36

big bullish day. Okay let's get the

62:38

let's let's go back to to to to the

62:40

retail letter when what so I wanted to

62:42

create something for retail people. I

62:44

wanted to create something well when I

62:46

say wanted to create something I was

62:47

only able to create it after I did all

62:48

my work. I realized that the data I'm

62:50

getting allows me to create something

62:53

that retail investors never had before.

62:55

And that is, you know, we're told that

62:57

if you miss the greatest days of the

62:59

market, you know, only five days a year,

63:01

you'll

63:01

>> Yeah. I Yeah.

63:03

>> Right. So, if you're going to try to

63:05

time the market, it's likely you're

63:07

going to miss those great days. You know

63:08

why? Not because um by chance you'll

63:11

miss those five great days because those

63:14

five great days generally take place

63:15

early on in a bull market. They don't

63:17

take place middle of a bull market. like

63:19

the 9% gain you had in um on April in

63:22

April 9th was early in a bull market,

63:24

right? See that?

63:26

>> So so so mostly most often the great

63:28

gains take place early in a move. You

63:31

miss get if you don't get it early, you

63:32

wait for the moving averages to cross.

63:34

You wait till until the Fed eases 15

63:36

times, you're late and you miss the

63:37

great move. So on the other hand, I

63:39

realized in doing my work that it's

63:41

difficult to call tops. In other words,

63:43

as they say, the recession indicator

63:45

called uh called 18 of the last six bull

63:48

markets. In other words,

63:51

tops are more difficult to to call. So,

63:52

this is what I did. It's it's it's

63:54

different. We decide we're not going to

63:56

call market tops at all. We're going to

63:59

be long the market until it declines.

64:02

For the model purpose, I used 8%, but

64:04

for in talking purposes, I say seven or

64:06

8%. But for the the data you're going to

64:08

see is all based on a decline of a

64:10

minimum of 8%. Okay? So we said like

64:12

this, we're going to buy the first buy

64:14

signal that's generated. Now the

64:15

institutions see our hundreds of

64:17

signals. We keep, you know, we're

64:19

charging our retail people $10 a month.

64:20

Institutions pay as much as 12,000 a

64:22

month. So we're not going to we're not

64:23

going to um give give the data away. But

64:26

we're going to give the the retail

64:28

indicators a buy signal at a first at a

64:30

first signal at a first new buy signal

64:33

after they're out of the market. So So

64:35

what gets them out of the market? Say

64:37

they got a buy sale on April 4th, they'd

64:38

still be long because the market had

64:40

never declined 8%. Right? The maximum

64:42

decline was 5% and change few days after

64:45

the loan. So, we're going to say you're

64:47

going to buy the market, hold on, and

64:49

you're going to hold on until we get you

64:50

out. We're going to get you out after

64:51

about a decline of about 8%, which is

64:53

the model. Why 8%. Very simply,

64:57

an investor could tolerate an 8% decline

64:59

if he's already made 30% on the up move.

65:01

Number one. Secondly, he could have

65:02

target 8% decline if the market's going

65:04

to decline 44% or 35% or 26% or 19%.

65:09

He's happy to have missed the bulk of

65:12

the down move even though he caught the

65:13

first 8% of the down move. Got it?

65:15

Number one, we have we had 50 roughly 55

65:18

buy signals since 1957. Remember, I'm

65:20

only showing you the initial buy signal

65:23

after after we're out of the market. I'm

65:24

not showing institutional wise is

65:26

thousands of buy signals for the retail

65:29

model. We have a buy signal. We had

65:32

about 55. It says 55 buys and sells

65:34

since 1957. You see? And this is a chart

65:36

showing all the buys. The last buy I

65:39

highlighted April 4th, 2025. The

65:42

market's up u 38% since then. Right

65:45

since April 4th. Now,

65:48

these are the buys and based on signals,

65:50

which I'll show you some of the signals.

65:52

However,

65:54

what are the cells? When do you get out?

65:56

So, you're going to get out. We don't

65:57

know what to sell. We're not smart

65:58

enough to call the cells because sells

65:59

are very difficult. Tops are difficult

66:01

to call. We're not gonna anticipate a

66:03

bare market. We're not going to say get

66:04

out now at the tire of the market

66:05

because they're bare market. You say,

66:06

you know, my my my my clients, you know,

66:08

my retail clients, you know, my

66:10

individual investors who don't have time

66:12

to sit at a computer all day and watch

66:13

the market. They rather be retired. They

66:15

rather build a retirement account and

66:16

work in their in their shops or work in

66:18

their on their computers or whatever

66:20

they do and rather not watch the market.

66:21

We'll tell you to get out when the

66:23

market's down some 8%.

66:25

And then you'll just go into Treasury

66:27

bills, which is a great safe investment.

66:29

Okay? And we'll tell you when to get

66:31

back in when we get a buy signal. And

66:33

now what is that done?

66:34

>> So to be clear, there is one and only

66:36

one sell signal. The market's down seven

66:38

or eight%. That's it.

66:40

>> For the model purposes, what I'm showing

66:42

you now is based on 8% at a closing

66:44

basis.

66:45

>> In reality, it's 7 to 8%.

66:47

>> Yeah.

66:48

>> I I I'm not to first show to you 7 to

66:50

8%. William O'Neal, as you know, in his

66:52

famous Ken Slim model tells you buy a

66:55

stock and get out if it's down seven or

66:56

eight%. So, I I use that term, but the

66:59

model was built using 8%. To be honest,

67:02

each of these cells you're going to see

67:03

were down eight. Let me let's go to the

67:05

next page because this is good. This is

67:07

the um this is all the buy dates. Let's

67:10

see what you did. If you got out, down

67:12

8%. Now, some be down 10% because the

67:15

market be down 3% in one day. Yeah.

67:17

>> This is the batting averages. In other

67:19

words, the model starts on on the first

67:23

buy seal occurs on October 21st, 1957

67:26

was the day before the low. The market

67:29

gained 51.26% before you got out. You

67:31

got out on September 21st, 59. And you

67:35

average the average long the average

67:37

long position getting in to get out, you

67:38

gained 26%. The average decline when you

67:41

when you got out of a loss was was

67:42

1.41%.

67:44

$10,000 invested in 1957 following this

67:48

model it' be worth1 billion12,000

67:51

at the end closed with trading yesterday

67:53

January 6th

67:54

>> 10 billion how is that possible wait

67:56

>> compounding 8 and a half% peranom try it

67:58

out 50 70 years 68 years

68:01

>> you started with 10,000

68:02

>> 18 and a half% peranom starting at

68:04

10,000 uh 68 years you you'll see it's a

68:08

billion dollars okay

68:10

>> that's it so the point is though that

68:12

you're you're not going you're a

68:14

long-term investor in the S&P 500.

68:16

You're not going to pick stocks. You're

68:17

not going to pick sectors. You're not

68:18

going to worry about bare markets.

68:20

You're going to be long. You're going to

68:22

capitalize the most of the big moves of

68:23

the S&P 500. You're going to wait till

68:25

the markets decline down some before you

68:27

get out. And B and if you're in a

68:29

retirement account, you're not going to

68:30

pay taxes. And this has been the return

68:32

yet. The profit long trades 95% of the

68:35

long trades have been profitable. Give

68:36

you an example. You bought it August

68:38

4th.

68:39

>> Let's say the market's down 10%

68:40

tomorrow. So, we're down 8% off the

68:43

highs. It's a profitable trade. You

68:45

bought you bought on August 4th. You're

68:46

not going to be up 40%. It'll be up 29%.

68:48

Got it.

68:49

>> Yep. And melt. So, so uh 18.5% that is

68:52

uh pretty good. You know, Buffett, I

68:54

think, is 20 around 20%.

68:57

>> But it certainly outperforms most hedge

68:58

funds. I mean, it doesn't outerform

68:59

Stuck Miller or George Soros, but it

69:02

certainly out outperforms 90% of hedge

69:04

funds. No question. and Milton, the fact

69:06

that you're never on the uh when the

69:09

market's going up, you're never

69:10

outperforming by, you know, having a

69:12

beta or exposure over 100%. So, it means

69:15

it's just it's just avoiding draw downs.

69:17

And then what that indicates to me, I

69:19

think it must be a logical conclusion is

69:20

that the worst periods for the S&P 500

69:23

are when it's already down more than 80%

69:25

from its highs.

69:26

>> It's amazing that you ask. Look at this.

69:27

This is the year-over-year returns based

69:29

on the model. A yellow are the years the

69:31

S&P were down. So in year 2000, let's go

69:34

back here. In ' 62, the SP was down 8%,

69:36

the model gained 18%. 66, the SP is down

69:40

10%, the model was flat in the year. In

69:43

74, the SP is down 26, the model was up

69:45

20. Why? Because we're out during the

69:47

bulk of the decline. We get in within

69:49

days of the low and we catch those big

69:51

five-day moves that people talk are fate

69:53

of missing. You see 81, the mark's down

69:55

five, we're up 15. Last was 2022, the

69:58

the market was down 18.1 19%. We're up

70:01

3.6%. And again, this is total return.

70:03

It's including the dividends on the S&P

70:05

and it's including the the the income

70:07

you get from Treasury bills. Now, okay,

70:10

so this is just showing the yearly year

70:11

returns. Any question? Pick a year like

70:13

you know any

70:14

>> you don't get the advanced signals uh um

70:17

but you you you just get this reading of

70:19

the S&P 500 when to get in, when to get

70:22

out and the your model has been long the

70:25

S&P throughout all of this turmoil since

70:28

early April. And I think that is so

70:30

important because it's not just the

70:31

quality of the research. I mean, as

70:33

people can tell, every have a pretty

70:35

encyclopedic read of the markets and

70:37

market history, but it's also how

70:40

accessible is it to the person using

70:42

that research. Like, for example, you

70:44

know, I mean, there there are some great

70:45

research providers out there or or good

70:48

research providers who the thing is so

70:50

complicated that it's almost impossible

70:52

for someone who's not trading the

70:53

markets full-time to implement it. And

70:55

actually there there is a risk for you

70:57

know very smart people who are very

70:58

proficient and successful in their

71:00

fields but are not uh you know um

71:03

experts in in the markets to to to get

71:05

things wrong. And so I think this the

71:07

simplicity of this model is is extremely

71:11

um totally people try to scale in and

71:14

scale out. They never show here short.

71:16

You're either long or short either long

71:17

or asset or T bills. Nothing wrong with

71:19

being in T builds right

71:20

>> and nothing wrong with being in a bull

71:22

market and getting out after you're down

71:23

8%. You have a tremendous trade. You're

71:25

far better than most people. Now, let me

71:27

show you something else that's

71:28

fascinating about this.

71:30

>> People who have a business or they're

71:31

working, they don't want to trade all

71:32

the time.

71:33

>> We have an average of one trade, one

71:35

roundtrip buy and sell every one and a

71:37

quarter years.

71:38

>> Wow.

71:38

>> 2026 there were no trades. In 2025, we

71:41

sold on March 10th and we bought on

71:43

April 4th. 2024, zero trades. 23 two

71:46

trades. You see, the worst we saw was in

71:48

2002, there were six trades. Worst.

71:50

That's the worst we saw. You see? So

71:52

this is also look how many zeros there

71:54

are. I mean you can sit back and just go

71:56

on your vacation.

71:57

>> That's amazing. And people say I want as

71:59

many signals as possible and people can

72:01

tell you you know you have 20,000

72:02

probably more signals but really what

72:04

people should be paying for is the lack

72:05

of signals the lack of exactly. Okay. So

72:08

so Milton you know you you charge uh a

72:12

quite hefty fee for your institutional

72:13

investors but you said that this is only

72:15

$10 a month. So is that $120 a year?

72:18

Yeah, this is our website institutions

72:20

is milenberg.com individuals

72:22

milenbergedge.com

72:24

and what I did is just you know I showed

72:25

you 2004 excuse me 2025

72:29

>> I just did select six dates

72:32

sample dates if you're interested to

72:33

show you why it was so difficult to get

72:35

into the market and why the model told

72:37

you to get in. So for example, October

72:39

21st, 1957,

72:42

Secretary Treasury Hump Humphrey, he was

72:44

a secretary of the Treasury.

72:47

He said, "We're headed for a depression,

72:49

as did former President Herbert Hoover,

72:51

who was still alive in 1957." And they

72:54

both were warning of a great depression

72:55

again. Why do you say to that? 1957.

72:58

And comes Miltonberg's model and gets a

73:01

buy signal on October 21st, 1957. Why

73:04

was the buy signal? Simple stuff. The

73:06

fiveday average volume of New York Stock

73:08

Exchange was the greatest in in 375 days

73:11

over the past 20 a regime of high

73:13

volume. The S&P 500 made at least 60 new

73:17

one-year lows. The um the the SB500

73:21

closed at at least a 60-day low. The SP

73:24

declined at least 12% into today's low

73:26

and today was the lowest low off its

73:28

high. And net upside volume as a

73:30

percentage of total volume, I don't it's

73:32

complicated, was less than was below

73:34

minus.45%. 45% which means heavy

73:37

downside volume and you had a reverse

73:39

breath thrust advances declines of the 0

73:42

was the opposite of a advanced decline

73:44

line a reverse advanced decline line and

73:46

this signal at the low just when

73:48

everyone was expecting a great

73:49

depression it signaled at the low mark

73:51

gained 55% signal gain at the low in 62

73:54

market gained 79% signal again

73:57

>> melt sorry I don't I don't want to get

73:59

lost in the you I want us I want us to

74:00

go the weeds about the present day so

74:02

people go to those websites we'll we'll

74:03

include those links in the description

74:05

Um, Milton, let's talk about

74:09

Bitcoin, gold, and silver. Let's start

74:11

starting with gold and silver. Uh, we've

74:14

had such a powerful move over the past

74:16

year higher and yet we we just had an

74:18

utter collapse exactly one week ago week

74:21

ago. I've been receiving your research

74:22

and I was impressed that uh either the

74:26

the day of the high or the day after the

74:28

high, you correct me, you actually you

74:30

put put a short position in gold and

74:32

silver by by selling call spreads. What

74:34

did you see in gold and silver? What

74:36

have you made of the market action uh

74:38

over the past week?

74:39

>> Okay, it's so funny because look look

74:41

what Paige just opened to you. You ever

74:43

Nelson bunker hunt? You ever these

74:44

people have bunker hunt?

74:46

>> That was last last silver crisis. Not

74:48

not this the last one you had but silver

74:50

went traded to to $50.

74:52

>> Silver Thursday.

74:53

>> This is back. Look at that. So guess

74:55

what? The market declined. I want to

74:57

show you this. And and and this is March

74:59

24th, 1980. Nelson Bunker Hunt 71%

75:02

silver collapse and um CPI was at 14.7%

75:07

on that month, the highest in 23 years

75:09

on March 24th, 1980. And the market was

75:12

down 20 17%. Everyone's panicking and

75:14

guess what? We got a buy signal. I'm not

75:16

going to get into it now. Just trust us.

75:18

We got a buy signal

75:19

>> and that was a buy signal for the S&P.

75:20

But but yeah, I'm

75:21

>> No, the point I'm making is the panic in

75:24

silver generated a buy signal in the

75:26

S&P. That's what I'm trying to point

75:27

out. Let's go. Let's get back to your

75:29

questions of gold and silver. I just

75:30

just interesting that you mentioned

75:32

silver. Just when I had the chart about

75:33

the Nelson Bunker Silver Panic, let's

75:35

talk about gold and silver. Okay. Number

75:37

one, I I got to show you why we do a

75:39

lot. I I managed a lot, you know, people

75:41

don't know this. I managed the largest

75:43

gold fund in America in the 1980s.

75:45

Largest gold stock fund.

75:47

>> Yep.

75:48

>> You saw that uh that picture up there

75:49

where it says mutual manager of the

75:51

year. I managed three top funds of the

75:54

year in ' 87. One of them was a gold

75:56

fund. And the reason was because while

75:58

everyone thought gold will go counter to

75:59

the market, my argument was I saw a

76:02

crash coming. I said gold was moving up

76:04

along with stocks. If gold moves up

76:07

along the stocks and the stocks in a

76:08

crash, no reason for gold to go counter.

76:10

Gold will go counter if it's showing

76:12

signs of going counter to the market.

76:14

But if gold and stocks move in the same

76:15

direction, there's no reason to believe

76:17

that when stocks go down, gold will

76:18

continue going up. So we we we lowered

76:20

our our cash position in our gold fund.

76:22

We raised our cash position to more than

76:23

50%. That's how I had the greatest

76:25

performing gold fund up 66% on the year.

76:27

But let me show you my gold uh my gold

76:29

stuff. I have a lot of stuff on gold

76:30

here. January 30th writing gold and

76:32

silver calls. We sold calls using this

76:34

the high strike price. We made a quick

76:37

easy 4% for institutional clients if

76:39

they followed us. They didn't have to

76:40

sell the exact strike price we did. But

76:42

it was clear that the market's not going

76:43

to make a new high. So we sold the calls

76:45

at the strike. What were we looking at?

76:47

Let me show you what we were looking at.

76:48

Number one, people think the that gold

76:51

is some sort of a magic instrument

76:52

that's going to trade up along with the

76:54

CPI. Okay, it trades up along CPI, but

76:58

often the price of gold exceeds the CPI

77:01

to such an extent that you get a major

77:02

bare market right here in 1980. This is

77:06

the red is the the the ratio of gold to

77:08

the CPI, United States cumulative CPI.

77:11

You see this spike here? Over the next

77:14

20 years,

77:16

gold declined 86.2% 27% relative to CPI

77:21

from 1980 to 20 thou to 2000 the CPI

77:24

doubled and gold was down nearly more

77:27

than 50% the relative loss in gold was

77:30

86.27% 27% versus the CPI. So when

77:34

everyone out all the pundits are telling

77:35

you buy gold because if the inflation

77:37

goes up, gold goes up. It's just not

77:39

true. If gold anticipated the inflation

77:42

in this case, gold got so ahead of

77:43

inflation. As inflation continued, gold

77:45

went down relative inflation. Same thing

77:47

is happening now. This is only through

77:49

December 31st, not through January. Gold

77:52

relative to CPI is way higher it's ever

77:55

been in history. Now say the CPI is

77:57

fudged. Okay? But we all know with 100

78:00

ounce of gold, you can find buy more now

78:02

than you were able to buy five years

78:03

ago. I mean, you could buy a yacht, you

78:05

could buy whatever. I mean, which you

78:06

couldn't do five years ago with gold.

78:08

Gold has way exceeded the CPI. I did

78:10

studies, you know, I managed the largest

78:11

gold fund. I have this out of memory,

78:14

but I did studies of the YM Republic in

78:16

in Germany when you had the so-called

78:18

hyperinflation when they say gold was

78:19

the best asset to own. Yes, gold was the

78:22

best asset ass asset to own because

78:24

stocks on an inflation adjusted basis

78:26

lost 95%. And gold on inflation adjusted

78:30

bas b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b

78:30

b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b

78:30

b bas gain 10%. Okay, if you take out

78:34

the billions of% of inflation in Weimar,

78:37

if you held gold, not only did you not

78:38

lose money, you made 10% over that

78:40

three-year period,

78:41

>> but it's not a trillion percent if after

78:43

you adjust for inflation,

78:44

>> right? You didn't make hundreds of

78:45

percent. So when people are saying gold

78:48

is up 175% because of inflation it makes

78:51

no sense. Gold even in the worst

78:52

hyperinflation did not outperform and

78:55

secondly there was one correction during

78:57

that this people don't realize it

78:59

there's one correction in gold during

79:01

that hyperinflation period when gold

79:02

corrected nearly 50%. While inflation

79:05

was hyper why while you saw the

79:07

hyperinflation so gold listen I look at

79:09

gold as a commodity but it's a a stable

79:12

commodity. It's a commodity. It doesn't

79:13

deteriorate. So, it's a very good hedge

79:15

against inflation over the long term.

79:17

But it depends when you bought it. If

79:18

you bought it right here when it's low

79:19

relative inflation, you're doing fine.

79:21

But if you bought it now,

79:25

if you bought it right here, up here,

79:27

when it's at an all-time high relative

79:29

to you got to be crazy to think

79:31

you're going to outperform inflation.

79:33

Look at gold relative to oil. Gold is at

79:35

its highest price relative to oil. Now,

79:37

oil is a commodity and gold is a

79:38

commodity. Oil is mined and gold is

79:40

mined. Now oil has a benefit over gold.

79:43

The benefit is all oil that has been

79:45

mined or has been drilled over history

79:48

has disappeared. It's been consumed. Now

79:50

one ounce of gold that has been mined in

79:53

the last 5,000 years is is is has been

79:56

consumed. It's all above ground. So the

79:58

supply of gold actually increases to a

80:00

far greater extent than the supply of

80:02

most other commodities. So gold actually

80:05

has something negative relative to oil.

80:06

Now you look historically gold had a

80:09

trading range relative to oil. All of a

80:10

sudden, this spike wasn't because gold

80:12

did well. This spiked because crude oil

80:14

traded below zero, if you remember

80:16

during the COVID crisis,

80:17

>> but this spike is because gold way

80:19

outperformed oil. Why? Why? Why? They're

80:22

both commodities. They're both hedge

80:24

against inflation and they go both move

80:26

up with inflation. This was telling you

80:28

that gold was very very strange and you

80:30

can't can't even compare it to this.

80:32

This took place because oil collapsed.

80:33

Let's look at gold relative to look at

80:35

volume. You had record volume in gold

80:37

futures. It had record volumes in ETFs.

80:40

It had record volume in spot gold. So

80:42

record volume,

80:43

>> record volumes, Milton, but I don't

80:45

believe records in

80:47

>> open interest. No.

80:48

>> Yes. Open interest or or assets under

80:51

managements in the ETF. So maybe in Asia

80:53

they were going crazy about buying tons

80:54

of precious metals, but I don't think

80:56

the retail speculation or western, you

80:58

know, America speculation in gold rival

81:01

that of 15 years ago.

81:02

>> That's true. But I'm lucky that over the

81:04

years I've never built models using open

81:05

interest. I only built models using

81:07

volume. So volume may be the most

81:08

important factor.

81:09

>> Fair. Fair enough.

81:10

>> I agree with you 100%. But right now the

81:12

volume. So this is reason to believe

81:14

that this is heading towards the top.

81:15

Okay. This is this is my my chart on

81:18

golden volume. Let's look at um look at

81:20

this. This is gold relative to soybeans.

81:22

Now soybeans as a commodity like you

81:24

know you buy you buy soybean products in

81:26

the supermarkets. You know most things

81:28

many things are made of soybeans and it

81:30

moves up with inflation. All of a sudden

81:31

gold relative to soybeans. Why? Why?

81:33

Why? For this period of of 20 years,

81:36

gold and and and soybeans were

81:38

oscillating, right? We had inflation.

81:40

Then gold didn't take off. If gold takes

81:42

off, soybeans should also take off. Why

81:44

should gold in in in Wymer, Germany, the

81:47

price of gold went up, so did the price

81:48

price of soybeans go up.

81:50

>> So So let's face it, I mean, it could

81:52

could use soybeans as a hedge. You can't

81:54

buy a warehouse of soybeans. But the

81:55

point I'm making is is that

81:57

>> gold has outperformed commodities. It's

81:59

outperforming CPI. It actually makes no

82:01

sense to think look at gold relative to

82:03

the the typical home in America CPI rel

82:06

the um existing what any medium sales

82:09

price existing homes it was way higher

82:12

here in 1980 I admit but now it's the

82:14

second highest in history no reason to

82:16

think gold is going to really take off

82:17

from here it already took off and the

82:20

most important chart is this one

82:22

this is gold this is a proprietary chart

82:25

which had created not gold in dollars

82:28

but gold in GDP weighted in in in all

82:30

major currencies of the world. It's in

82:32

Australian currency, US, Canada, Great

82:34

Britain, Euro, Japan, Switzerland,

82:35

China, Russia, India, Brazil, which are

82:37

the bricks, gold relat,

82:41

you know, my I used to work with at

82:42

Oenheim, we had a guy named um was named

82:45

uh I think his name was Jack Levy who

82:47

ran the company. He's a brilliant

82:48

analyst and he says what he does what he

82:50

does, he takes his grandson Johnny and

82:52

he shows him a chart, okay? And he says,

82:54

"Johnny, do you think this is going up

82:56

or this is going down?" and he says it's

82:57

going up, it's bullish. Going down, it's

82:59

bearish. I say tell tell someone who's a

83:01

little more intelligent than Johnny,

83:03

does this look like we're at the

83:04

beginning of a move or it look like

83:05

we're at the end of a move just a little

83:07

bit. Look at charts. In other words,

83:09

does this look like the beginning of a

83:11

move? More likely the end of a move.

83:12

Look at this big move. This looks like

83:14

it's a a trading range, but this could

83:17

be the beginning of move, a breakout.

83:18

This could be a breakout, but does this

83:20

look like the beginning of a move? Of

83:22

course not. Well, Mil, I got to ask you,

83:24

don't you have bull markets in precious

83:27

metals that last a very long time? 1971

83:30

to 1980 and then 2000 to 2012.

83:35

>> Let me tell you, listen to this. From

83:36

2000 to 2012, gold relative to CPI

83:39

declined 85%. Gold itself declined more

83:42

than 50%. It came off 50% decline.

83:44

Right? So, you you had a bull market.

83:46

Let's see. This is gold. This is spot

83:48

gold. It it was fixed. So, the price is

83:50

false till 1970. You got it. So, the

83:52

first rally was just catching up for the

83:54

fact that the price of gold was

83:56

falsified. It was fixed by the

83:57

government. You It was $35 an ounce

83:59

regardless of what its true worth was.

84:01

So, the first rally was really a uh just

84:04

catchup. The next rally was a

84:05

speculative rally. It peaked. It It

84:07

peaked for 20 years. This rally, I mean,

84:09

I say this gold rally we had started in

84:11

2000. It's 25 years old. You had a

84:14

hiccup over here pullback, but in

84:15

reality, if you start in 2000 to now,

84:18

you way outperformed. his his gold

84:20

relative CPI in 2000.

84:21

>> Do you think we have a multi-deade bare

84:23

market in gold, Milton?

84:24

>> I think it's likely I think it's likely

84:26

the relative inflation you'll have a

84:28

multi-year bare market in in gold. I

84:30

think I wrote it up to my clients. The

84:31

likely it is likely is you'll see a

84:34

multi- decade, let's just say a one

84:38

decade beer market in gold is enough to

84:40

say, but I think it could be multi-deade

84:42

because gold is at the greatest extreme

84:44

that it's ever been relative to

84:45

commodities and gold is just a

84:46

commodity. And there's no reason to

84:48

believe that gold will make you real

84:50

money relative to commodities, relative

84:51

to inflation. It listen, if gold does

84:54

well over the long term, let's put it

84:56

this way. If in the if in the year 0 AD

85:00

you had an ounce of gold and it was

85:02

worth say $10 an ounce at the time,

85:04

okay, and it gained 5% peranom until

85:07

today,

85:09

you know, be worth it worth more than

85:10

the money supply of every country in the

85:12

world.

85:13

>> Yeah.

85:14

>> Gold doesn't compound.

85:15

>> Yeah. Gold holds value and for some

85:18

reason I don't know why people have been

85:20

taught and people are convinced that

85:22

gold compounds and makes money. Gold is

85:24

not an asset that makes money. As Warren

85:26

Buffett used to say, you buy a stock

85:28

like um like um Apple, Apple generates

85:31

little babies. It's called earnings.

85:33

>> Yep.

85:33

>> You buy Apple and you it gains in value

85:36

causing little babies that that appear

85:37

>> and the babies have babies and they

85:40

shares capital expenditure the div

85:42

stock. Yeah. Yeah. gold and and also

85:44

Milton I will say you know I I try to be

85:47

neither a gold bug or an anti-gold bug

85:49

but when people say well gold from 1971

85:52

did this they're starting from a point

85:53

where it was just going to explode

85:56

because it had been artificully

85:57

depressed from from the gold standard so

85:59

you know

86:00

>> and also I said you know from 1981 to

86:02

2000 there was a yeah a 19-year bare

86:04

market in gold so no one is guaranteed

86:07

to to make money in precious metals even

86:10

on a 20-year time horizon

86:11

>> trying to even in the even when the

86:13

Republic had had this boom in gold. If

86:16

you think about it, it's only because of

86:17

the debasement of the currency. The

86:19

United States did not have a boom in

86:20

gold during that period. You understand?

86:22

So, it's

86:23

>> it's really gold doesn't really make you

86:25

money over over the long term. Now, it's

86:27

going to make you money sometimes.

86:28

>> Although, Milton, I will say, and this

86:30

you're showing this chart of gold priced

86:32

in a basket of global currencies. Almost

86:35

every currency maybe other than the

86:36

Swiss Frank is has been uh uh weakening

86:39

against the dollar. So in many countries

86:42

the precious uh bull market in gold and

86:44

and silver is even more extreme. So like

86:46

in India like the price of gold priced

86:48

in Indian rupees has just been on a

86:50

50-year bull market that is never ended.

86:52

So I mean that I think a lot of people

86:54

around the world are very bullish on

86:55

gold. Milton

86:56

>> again but the is because it

86:58

retains ultimately it retains its value

87:00

ultimately but if you buy it at the

87:02

right time I mean

87:03

>> I remember in 19 it's way before you

87:05

were born but in 1979 at the peak in

87:07

silver there was an investor that I knew

87:10

that had really his fortune was all in

87:12

silver

87:13

>> and he one year before one year before

87:15

the high in silver yeah

87:16

>> and then he saw he saw silver was peing

87:18

it went to $40 and somebody you got to

87:20

sell you got to sell he said I would

87:21

sell but where would I put my money you

87:23

understand he was so convinced that you

87:26

can't have money in paper assets. He

87:28

said, "I would sell, but where would I

87:29

put my money?" You understand?

87:31

>> The S&P was at like 10 times earnings

87:33

and the treasuries were yielding%. So,

87:36

Milty, you're looking at long-term

87:37

charts in gold, and you're basically

87:39

saying it's it's uh overvalued, even

87:41

though I know you're not a valuation

87:42

guy. In terms of the more short-term

87:44

technicals in gold,

87:45

>> shortterm had it had classic signs of a

87:47

of a of a climax top. Let's face it, you

87:49

had the accelerating uh gains. you had

87:53

you had gaps in the I don't know if you

87:54

have the charts you had gaps in the in

87:56

the GLD and so SOV had gaps to the

87:58

upside the I don't use moving averages

88:00

but it's ratio to its uh it's 200 day

88:03

the moving average was was also at an

88:04

extreme the kind of extreme you see in

88:06

speculative stocks that peaks you know

88:08

these meme stocks same kind of extreme

88:10

and that's signs of a top and signs of a

88:12

bottom and the fact that everybody I was

88:13

embarrassed to tell my clients to get

88:15

out of gold because some of some of the

88:17

titans in Wall Street will long gold at

88:19

the top between me and you Okay.

88:21

>> Yeah.

88:22

>> Well, they probably made a lot of money.

88:23

Let's be real. I would

88:25

>> Yeah. Right. That's true. They got They

88:27

got at the right time. I I don't want to

88:28

say, but one of my one of my a former

88:31

client of mine who for whatever reason I

88:33

had a client anymore. I don't get into

88:35

it. A good reason, not a bad reason. Um

88:37

got into the gold market way way early.

88:39

Way way early. He's he's more than 50%

88:41

in gold throughout this bull market. So,

88:43

he can handle this 12% pullback, believe

88:46

me.

88:47

>> But I'm talking about the public. It it

88:48

it was very difficult on the public, you

88:50

know, uh very difficult. So I did in

88:52

gold, but I just to be honest with you,

88:54

what I did was I wrote gold calls right

88:56

here. I wrote gold calls the day, you

88:58

see the top, the top was the previous

89:00

day, the 29th.

89:01

>> Yeah.

89:01

>> And I said, you know, we're not going to

89:02

get back to the high. So I wrote very

89:04

short-term gold calls to total 4% to

89:07

make 4% of the month. So listen, for all

89:08

I know, I'm going to be cursed and gold

89:10

be up $500 tomorrow. You know, we're we

89:14

sold I think the average cost is $6 and

89:16

$4 and they're now yesterday they're

89:18

trading in pennies, 30 cents, 25.

89:19

>> I would be shocked if those if those

89:20

calls don't expire worthless. So, what

89:22

motivated you to short gold uh the day

89:25

after? And also, Milton, can could you

89:27

tell us when you wrote that shorting

89:29

gold and silver, was it h how much into

89:32

the crash was it? Was it right at

89:34

>> 9:15? It was 9:15 in the morning. We

89:36

said invest at uh we gave an exact time

89:38

to invest. Yeah. Misha I said um uh 9:45

89:43

we used the the bid at 9:45. We weren't

89:46

going to going to scale it because we

89:47

knew this you know we just pick the

89:49

price time and that's the price we use

89:52

but um what I'm showing you here is this

89:54

is this is the this is the peak on gold

89:56

on the 28. Did I tell you about silver

89:57

refiners you know did a little

89:59

fundamental work silver is so

90:00

overwhelmed with incoming inventory they

90:02

have stopped accepting additional scrap

90:04

metal. This suggests that at a

90:06

fundamental level current price are

90:07

pulling significant new supply into the

90:09

market. At the 2011 silver peak when I

90:12

worked for a hedge fund, refiners were

90:13

running three eight hour shifts a day

90:15

and still did not need to turn suppliers

90:17

away. Whereas today conditions imply an

90:19

even greater supply response to these

90:21

price levels. other pointing out that

90:23

the high price of silver today on a real

90:26

basis is greater than the high price in

90:28

2011 because the refiners are turning

90:31

away supply which means to say there's

90:33

such an overwhelming amount of supply

90:36

>> overnight. This is this is on January

90:37

29th. We saw the market rally th this

90:40

amount and we wanted to get this high.

90:43

So we we suggested shorting beginning

90:46

about 11 o'clock in the day and shorting

90:48

down. So you shorted that gold at about

90:51

5,400. Incredible move. Incredible move.

90:53

>> Yeah, but okay, you got I I was I wasn't

90:56

Anyway, that's a story. So, um, Bitcoin,

90:58

Bitcoin, Milton, I'm sorry, but in terms

91:01

of technical analysis, you said gold

91:04

relative to its history, relative to CPI

91:06

is overvalued.

91:07

>> And technically, it had all the signs of

91:09

of a climax

91:10

>> of high volume, but was that it

91:12

>> climax peak? You had gaps into the high.

91:13

You had record volume into the high. You

91:15

had people um you had the the record

91:17

volume in the most retail oriented types

91:20

of investments, you know, the ETFs, the

91:23

the the gold bullion dealers who sell to

91:25

the public. You had record volume on on

91:28

the retail side buying and the the

91:30

natural sellers, people who already own

91:32

gold or own gold scrap or own silver

91:34

scrap were sellers. It was drawing

91:36

supply. So on a technical basis, it was

91:38

a peak. On a fundamental basis was a

91:39

peak. the the parabolic rise with the,

91:42

you know, with exponential greater

91:44

greater increases on gaps. That's all

91:46

you need to see. You can just look at

91:48

the look at, you know, stocks that have

91:50

peaked historically. Stocks that have

91:51

peaked on parabolic rises show exactly

91:54

the same same idea. Gold was just a very

91:57

high cap stock that was peaking.

91:59

>> And are you still bearish on gold and

92:01

silver? What do you think? What do you

92:02

see right now?

92:03

>> I think I'm bearish in gold and silver.

92:04

Yes, I think gold and silver will have a

92:06

a long-term decline. Although you're

92:08

listening, you know, markets can

92:09

surprise you. If it surprise, if it

92:11

surprises us, we won't be surprised

92:13

because we'll we'll see it in the data.

92:14

I don't think it make no more highs. You

92:16

know, people who follow other other

92:18

techniques say that we've seen pullbacks

92:21

before to this extent that are followed

92:22

by new highs. I mean, you've seen in

92:25

Bitcoin in the past, gold is a far

92:28

deeper market and it's highly unlikely

92:30

after this type of a decline, if this

92:32

type of a panic buying that you'll see

92:33

new highs.

92:34

high highly like I tell you if you do

92:36

see new highs there's only one oh you

92:38

reminded me of my research there's only

92:39

one time in history when gold made a

92:40

rounding top commodities in general make

92:42

spike tops gold always makes a spike top

92:44

as does silver the only time it's made a

92:46

right a rounding top which means it made

92:49

a high and then tested the high at a

92:51

slightly higher level was in 2011 I

92:53

think its final high was September and

92:55

it made its first high in July and the

92:57

September high was slightly above

92:59

slightly above the um the high in in

93:02

July so that's called more of rounding

93:04

top, but generally the type of top we

93:06

throw in gold is a type of top you see

93:08

in commodities and particularly you see

93:09

this type of top type in gold.

93:11

>> And and Milton, I'm sorry, I'm just I've

93:12

been the giant nerd on silver. So I I

93:14

got to ask you a few questions. So

93:15

you've been experience experience in the

93:17

precious metals markets for, you know,

93:19

before I was born. So silver, you know,

93:22

copper is is almost all used at for for

93:25

industry, uh for for almost everything,

93:27

you know, wiring used in vehicles, etc.

93:30

Uh gold is is mostly used almost all as

93:33

a precious metal to store it in a vault

93:34

or as jewelry. Obviously, gold has some

93:36

industrial uses. Silver is interesting

93:38

because a lot of people have silver

93:41

bars. It's for saving. It has a monetary

93:43

thing. In history, it was used as

93:44

monetary, you know, it's in it's in the

93:45

Bible. Um but then there was a there was

93:47

a very vicious um uh uh demonetization

93:50

of silver of governments and central

93:51

banks selling silver. Yeah.

93:53

>> So basically, it's silver is not money

93:54

anymore. But some people do still do see

93:57

it as a precious metal and it rallies

93:59

alongside gold often and sells off

94:00

alongside gold just with more

94:02

volatility, higher beta. But then it

94:03

also silver is a giant industrial metal

94:06

that historically was used for

94:07

photography in the 60s and 70s. It it

94:10

was used a lot for electronics uh and in

94:13

particular more recently it's been used

94:15

a lot for so uh solar panels which is

94:17

you know the technology of the future

94:18

let's be honest. And uh there's a record

94:20

shortage of silver for the past 5 years

94:23

and basically over uh above ground stock

94:26

piles have had to be depleted in order

94:29

to to meet this uh um shortage and

94:32

Milton and I'm just setting the stage

94:33

obviously I know you know this but the

94:35

for the the bull market of silver from

94:37

2000 to 2012 or 20 yeah around there um

94:42

>> for the first half of it it had a

94:44

physical deficit like there was a

94:45

shortage of silver but for the second

94:47

half and Warren once stopped being a

94:49

shortage. By the way, Warren Buffett

94:50

sold. He made money in silver, but he

94:52

sold once the fundamentals told him to

94:54

sell. But from like 2006 to 2011, there

94:57

was a surplus of silver. So, it was just

94:59

incred incredibly speculative asset. And

95:01

everyone was just getting long silver.

95:02

Let's let's go long silver. So to me,

95:04

Milton, um, you know, I I have been long

95:07

silver in various ways from like, you

95:09

know, precious metal royalty companies

95:10

and stuff, but um

95:12

>> to me there seems like a an obvious

95:13

deficit, but but should I respect the

95:15

the technicals and should I should I

95:18

accept that silver is going to be in a

95:19

in a bare market even though I'm looking

95:22

at and I'm seeing a shortage?

95:24

>> There's a lot of silver. Silver has been

95:25

mined for for millennium just like gold

95:29

has been mined. Now of course not all

95:31

silver remains above ground like all

95:33

gold remains above ground but a lot of

95:34

silver remains above ground in various

95:36

ways silverware for example and I just

95:39

way where I see it people are are

95:41

nitpicking by saying there's a shortage

95:42

of supply where I see it is in speaking

95:44

to refiners there's a record supply so I

95:47

I wouldn't I I don't necessarily believe

95:49

the fundamentals I do know that back in

95:51

1980 when silver was speaking you had

95:53

the same kind of stories as shorter

95:55

mainly it was due to photography they

95:56

claimed yeah

95:57

>> but there's not enough go so I've heard

95:58

these stories before I'd rather stick

95:59

with the technicals and the technicals

96:01

are telling you that uh we saw an

96:03

important peak at the in at the end of

96:06

January, early February. Whether or not

96:08

we make a higher peak in the near future

96:09

is anyone's guess, but I I don't think

96:11

we'll make it very very soon. I don't

96:12

think it's just a real hiccup which we

96:14

go much higher.

96:15

>> And and that work about sorry that work

96:16

about the uh um smelting about how all

96:18

the silver smelters are not accepting

96:21

silver. Is that is that in the news?

96:24

You're reading reports or you're you're

96:26

on the ground analysis. Where is you

96:27

getting that?

96:28

>> We got it from two places. Okay. I sold

96:30

my personal gold stock pile on Thursday,

96:32

the day of the peak. Okay. I So, a

96:35

friend of mine is the largest smelter in

96:37

the in New York. I don't want to mention

96:39

his name, but he's a legend in the

96:40

business. Okay. So, a lot of my

96:42

information that comes from him and a

96:43

lot of information comes from uh from

96:45

just reading.

96:46

>> And I just I just know that uh this is

96:48

not a question you talk to any smelter.

96:50

I back in 2011, I was working for a

96:52

hedge fund that had actually the largest

96:54

position of gold and silver of any hedge

96:56

fund in the world. sec they were second

96:58

to Sprat's gold fund

97:00

>> and they uh and I did a lot of research

97:02

and I remember speaking to uh to

97:03

refiners in Texas telling me oh we we're

97:07

running 24 hours a day three-hour shifts

97:09

and this rally in silver will never end

97:11

because there's a shortage and I I said

97:13

to myself if they're running three-hour

97:15

shifts there so much supply coming

97:16

there's definitely no no shortage you

97:18

understand it's just the opposite people

97:20

look at it depends how you look at

97:21

things most people are saying wow the

97:24

smelters can't smelt it that must be a

97:25

shortage because not able to come come

97:27

up with supply but it's telling you

97:29

there's underlying supply looking to

97:30

smelt

97:31

>> see that it depends how you look at it

97:34

>> we shall see so far the market has

97:35

spoken the market so far told us there

97:37

was a speculative fever into the peak

97:39

just like you've seen in in in in stocks

97:41

like Cisco there are great companies or

97:43

even Amazon into 19 into the year 2000

97:45

and Amazon declined 19% as great a

97:47

company it is so as great as gold and

97:49

silver might be you had a speculative

97:51

move and had all signs of a top and the

97:54

the the decline was historic and you're

97:56

going to bounces, but I think ultimately

97:58

it should go down for a while. And you

98:00

know, I don't like to project things

98:01

could change. If things change, we'll

98:02

we'll act upon it. Hopefully, we act

98:04

upon the change. I don't want to get

98:05

caught into anyone anyone position, but

98:07

I don't I think that was a very historic

98:09

pick and gold and it was didn't surprise

98:12

didn't surprise me. One of my clients um

98:15

uh when I put that position out of

98:18

selling um I put a negative negative

98:21

piece out on gold before the peak and

98:23

they they sent me all this kind of

98:24

information. you know how gold and

98:25

silver the shortage is and all that

98:27

>> the shortage the shortage Milton don't

98:28

you know about the shortage

98:30

>> monetary policy and all this kind of

98:32

stuff you know doesn't you know I I

98:34

stick with the markets you want to talk

98:35

about Bitcoin

98:36

>> yeah yes okay so you're bare on gold

98:38

bear on silver as well in the near term

98:40

thank you for saying that tell us about

98:41

Bitcoin which it's it's uh selling off

98:44

very viciously it's very tough time in

98:46

bitcoin

98:46

>> had a very big move very big up move

98:48

today as you know right

98:50

>> after a huge down move yes so so Milton

98:53

so you know, for for our audience,

98:55

Bitcoin peaked at over 120,000 in

98:58

October of 2025, last year, and it now

99:01

it it's trading very very poorly and it

99:04

bought it uh was as low as 63 or 64,000

99:08

uh you know uh in in early February, but

99:11

today February 6, it's rallied back up

99:13

to 70,000. Your thoughts?

99:15

>> My thoughts? First of all, I don't like

99:17

to talk about cycle dates because most

99:20

people whether retail investors or

99:22

institutional investors are not familiar

99:25

with cycle dates. The great investors I

99:27

can't mention names but the world's top

99:29

investors now Warren Buffer is a total

99:31

fundamentalist but the name that pe the

99:34

names that people know about many of

99:35

them are my clients are very familiar

99:37

with uh esoteric

99:40

cyclic work.

99:41

You're not you're not talking about

99:43

seasonality and we're not talking about,

99:45

you know, early, you know, which months

99:47

are strong or which months are weak.

99:48

We're talking about other cycles,

99:50

natural cycles. Anyway,

99:52

I don't know if you're familiar with the

99:53

great analyst Paul Montgomery, Paul

99:55

McCrae Montgomery, he was an analyst for

99:56

about 40 years on Wall Street until the

99:59

roughly till about uh maybe 2000 20 or

100:03

so. And he published he he did a lot of

100:06

cycle work and he was my mentor in a

100:08

sense when it came to cycles. So, we

100:09

have a cycle. We're going back going up

100:11

to the year uh to the year 2011.

100:14

And he had October 6 as a cycle date. He

100:17

also had February 3rd as a cycle date.

100:19

Okay. So, Bitcoin now

100:21

>> you said 2,100. You mean 2100 in 80

100:24

years

100:24

>> where? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Cycles.

100:26

Okay. So, listen. So, so the way cycles

100:29

work is people confuse when they talk

100:31

about cycles. They think every cycle is

100:33

going to affect every market. It's not

100:34

true.

100:35

>> A cycle will affect the market if the

100:37

market is prone for a turn. Cycle dates

100:39

predict turning turning points. They

100:41

don't predict accelerations or

100:42

decelerations. They predict turning

100:44

points in the market and and cycles work

100:47

along with let's say human psychology or

100:49

human emotion with sentiment. If you

100:51

have a market that's been peing with a

100:52

lot of sentiment or your market's been

100:54

declining a lot of negative sentiment

100:56

with a lot of headline news about it and

100:58

it occurs in a cycle date, you have a

101:00

greater than random probability that the

101:02

market is going to peak. Okay? Or or

101:03

going to the bottom. Bitcoin and gold

101:06

are are the two uh assets that work best

101:10

in cycle dates. Gold because all gold

101:12

that has been has ever been mined in the

101:14

world is above ground and the supply

101:17

increases every year. So it's different

101:19

than all other commodities and basically

101:22

moves on sentiment. It doesn't move on

101:24

supply and demand fundamentals because

101:26

uh supply is there for millennia and the

101:30

um and demand just changes based on

101:33

basically based on uh on sentiment. So

101:37

it cycle affect gold very very very well

101:39

and so the cycle affect Bitcoin because

101:41

there's no value to Bitcoin at all. We

101:42

get to that in a moment. I'm going to

101:44

share with you and your readers your

101:45

your viewers things that they've never

101:47

heard about Bitcoin which is on my you

101:49

probably seen it in one of the next few

101:50

pages. But in any event, Bitcoin did

101:52

peak on a cycle date, October 6th, and

101:54

it made a crash low into February 3rd,

101:57

cycle date. So, we thought that might be

101:58

a final low. I told the clients it might

102:01

be a final. However, I said if that is a

102:03

final low, basically it's testing the

102:05

low we saw in April of 2024. See this

102:08

this April 2024 and this is February

102:10

3rd. So, my view when I when the market

102:13

tests the low, sometimes it it's it's

102:15

the decline stops right before the low.

102:17

doesn't quite quite hit any low or

102:19

suddenly it declines up to 3 and 3/4%

102:21

below the prior low. So I said if the

102:24

71,651.33

102:27

level holds past today's close, I would

102:29

recommend Bitcoin bulls to increase

102:30

exposure using the air of the low as a

102:32

stop. In other words, I told my clients

102:34

I'm not a bull bull on Bitcoin. Okay, I

102:36

I think Bitcoin,

102:38

you'll see in a minute what I think

102:39

about Bitcoin, but I I I don't recommend

102:41

people go long Bitcoin because it makes

102:43

no sense to me. But I have clients who

102:44

are big in Bitcoin. I told them you

102:46

should consider buying around here but

102:48

only if this low holds because then

102:50

it'll be considered a test of this low.

102:53

>> It didn't hold. So that's the next page.

102:55

The low failed. This is the low. It had

102:57

to the low the test would have been

102:59

71,000 and changed. It got to 61,000. So

103:02

the low didn't failed and I told my

103:04

clients if you're considering buying

103:06

Bitcoin don't buy it because the low

103:09

failed and anything could happen. Now of

103:10

course maybe you have a a panic low.

103:12

It's going to turn up. We'll see that

103:14

later on. Now, what exactly is Bitcoin?

103:16

I I've read a lot about Bitcoin because

103:18

I never could get my mind around it. I

103:20

still don't get my around. I finally

103:21

found out I you know, there's a number

103:23

of books written about it, but I see the

103:24

the intellect the u the AC academics

103:27

also understand Bitcoin. This is it. The

103:29

original of Bitcoin is the RAI stone on

103:32

Yap Island. Are you familiar with this

103:34

>> from you? Yeah.

103:35

>> Okay. These massive circular discs made

103:37

of lines that have been used as a form

103:39

of money on Yap Island for centuries.

103:40

This is in the books about Bitcoin. I

103:41

promise you. I've read a number of books

103:43

about Bitcoin and they all come up with

103:44

the app island as a justification for

103:46

why Bitcoin is money and the story is

103:48

nothing short of fascinating. From their

103:49

origins as a currency used for trade and

103:52

social status to enduring significance

103:53

in Japanese culture, the race stones

103:55

have truly shaped societies. Okay, let's

103:57

continue. Researchers from the

103:58

University of Oregon specifically Mr.

104:00

Fitzpatrick, I hope you're listening to

104:02

this. So, Mr. McKenthropologist

104:04

Scott Fitzpat and finance professor

104:06

Steven McKeen are key figures who have

104:08

compared Bitcoin to the ancient REI

104:10

stone of YAP. In their paper banking on

104:13

stone money, ancient anticipants to

104:15

Bitcoin published in the journal of

104:16

economic anthropology. They argue that

104:18

Bitcoin is similar to these stones

104:19

because both are highly valued really

104:22

moved like Bitcoin's ledger. Ownership

104:24

of heavy area stones was transferred

104:25

through public verbal agreements rather

104:27

than physical movement. A form of

104:29

distributed ledger. Anyway, the point is

104:31

there were these big stones that was

104:33

difficult to move and people would would

104:35

buy and sell things and and use a stone

104:37

as a to to remind themselves of the

104:40

transactions and there were thousands of

104:41

transactions based on one stone. And

104:44

this little island of of Yap people

104:46

remembered exactly which stone

104:48

represented which transaction. So

104:50

instead of having money, they just go to

104:52

this stone and remind themselves that

104:54

Mr. Yap Ah uh sold his daughter to Mr.

104:58

app B in marriage or Mr. Yap A sold his

105:01

boat to to Mr. Yap C and they'd look at

105:03

the the the stone and they remind

105:05

themselves and have a record of what

105:08

transactions took place. This is the

105:10

closest and the most logical explanation

105:12

I've ever seen of Bitcoin because other

105:14

than that, Bitcoin makes absolutely no

105:16

sense. There's no other currency in the

105:18

world that's compared to Bitcoin. Gold

105:20

has intrinsic value. Gold is used as

105:22

jewelry. Gold is beautiful. People give

105:24

gold to their girlfriends. People give

105:26

gold to their wives. People give gold,

105:29

transfer gold to the next generation

105:31

because of the value, because of the

105:32

beauty. Gold has been used for years as

105:34

money. So too silver. So to bicycles.

105:37

There were there were times when

105:38

bicycles were used as money during wars.

105:40

My mother told me candles was were used

105:42

as money during World War II. But all

105:44

these things had intrinsic value.

105:45

There's something you can do with it.

105:46

>> In prison, cigarettes cigarettes are

105:48

used as currency.

105:49

>> Cigarettes used as currency. Right.

105:51

Yeah. Exactly. Um I told him this by um

105:54

what's the Treasury Secretary's name?

105:56

Scott Besson.

105:57

>> Scott Besson told me about bicycles when

105:58

I used to work with him at at at Drill.

106:01

He said, "Yeah, he he was he remembers

106:03

when bicycles use his currency and his

106:04

readings." I mean, he he's an expert on

106:06

all these things. I mean, he's he's a

106:07

monitor as far as greater than anyone we

106:09

know. But let's continue. So, the

106:11

Appston were different. App wasn't

106:13

money. It was just a way of recording

106:15

transactions.

106:17

And it was a small little town, a small

106:19

little island where you look at the you

106:21

look at it and you remind yourself of

106:22

the transaction. It was nothing to do

106:23

with money. Bitcoin has no intrinsic

106:26

value at all. At all, at all. At all. At

106:28

all. You can't say it's cheap when it's

106:29

at $60,000. You can't say it's cheap

106:31

when it's at $10,000. You can't say it's

106:33

expensive when it's at $10 million

106:35

because there's no way of measuring its

106:37

value.

106:38

>> There is no way of measuring its value

106:39

on the way up. There's nothing in terms

106:42

of overvaluation to prevent it from

106:43

going up way more than you imagine. And

106:45

on the downside, there's no valuation.

106:47

>> There's no value. No, there's no reason

106:49

money. It's it's a fallacy.

106:52

Nakashi who whatever his name is who

106:53

made a bitcoin he didn't understand what

106:55

money is money isn't something sim simil

106:58

simply because you have to pay it cost

107:00

money to mine it because I gave the

107:02

example before bitcoin even existed when

107:04

I ran a gold fund in 1980 before gold

107:07

people said gold is valuable because

107:09

it's rare it's val because it cost it's

107:11

expensive to mine it I said well what if

107:14

you took a

107:16

a thousand used paper cups and buried it

107:19

on the ground and protected it with

107:22

nuclear arms and it would be very

107:24

expensive to mine it. Would that give it

107:27

any value? Of course.

107:28

>> But there are other paper cups that you

107:29

could easily make.

107:29

>> No, no, they're not. Those you know the

107:31

paper cups that that are underground.

107:33

>> Yeah.

107:33

>> Mark each paper cup with a way that no

107:35

one knows. You can't duplicate it. You

107:37

can't counterfeit it. Would anyone in

107:39

the right mind think that's money?

107:41

>> No. Okay. Money. Gold isn't money

107:44

because people think it's money. Gold is

107:46

only money because it is money. Now the

107:48

dollar isn't money. So Milton Friedman

107:51

says the dollar is a fiction. But Milton

107:53

Friedman is a fiction. The reason the

107:55

dollar is money because it's backed by

107:57

guns. It's it's backed by prison cells.

108:00

If the government wants you to pay taxes

108:02

and dollars, you don't pay it, you go to

108:04

jail.

108:05

>> So it's not money because it's

108:06

intrinsically money. It's money because

108:08

it's backed by the forces of the US

108:10

government. So too other money. Now

108:12

money is not backed by forces of the

108:14

government hyperinflates. It disappears.

108:16

So the point being is that Bitcoin is is

108:19

a fallacy. Bitcoin is false and no sense

108:21

to Bitcoin and it simply trades as a

108:24

speculative I don't call it asset a

108:26

speculative item that absolutely makes

108:29

no sense when people say Bitcoin is

108:31

cheap because it's $60,000 cheap

108:33

relative to what Bitcoin is expensive at

108:36

$10 million relative I'll tell you

108:38

relative if somebody would take his

108:39

$60,000 and instead of buying a Bitcoin

108:42

and buy a Tesla at least that's

108:43

something you could drive

108:44

>> yeah Milton I'll tell you what when

108:46

people say Bitcoin's cheap I'll tell you

108:47

what they mean Milton over the past

108:49

year, gold has doubled, silver has

108:52

tripled, and the S&P is up 40%. And in

108:55

the meantime, Bitcoin is is down. So

108:57

therefore, Bitcoin must be cheap. That's

108:58

what they mean.

108:59

>> Okay. Well, you depends again when

109:01

when's your starting point. I I I a

109:04

relative of mine who's a a genius when

109:06

it comes to to to to computers and

109:08

stuff. He bought Bitcoin at 4 cents.

109:11

>> That's pretty good.

109:12

>> He sold it he sold it as 8 cents and he

109:14

redid his bathroom. Okay?

109:16

>> So, in other words, guess what? He

109:18

didn't make a mistake because it was

109:19

worthless at 4 cents and it's worthless

109:21

at 8 cents. He just it was just a good

109:23

trade. If you buy Bitcoin, you sell it

109:25

at profit, it's a good trade. If if

109:26

you're like Michael Sailor, you buy

109:27

Bitcoin at $76,000 and you and now it's

109:30

60,000. So far, it's a poor trade. If it

109:33

goes up, it's a good trade. Not because

109:34

it made any sense because there are

109:36

other people who are willing to pay more

109:37

for the value Bitcoin. Absolutely. And

109:40

you were able to pay for the value of

109:41

Bitcoin. And here I ch I challenge the

109:42

bears. I challenge the bulls. And I

109:44

challenge anyone out there to explain to

109:46

me the value of Bitcoin other than than

109:48

the fact that it's something to do with

109:50

these RAI stones.

109:52

>> I I got you. I got you. I got the

109:53

Bitcoin bulls. I I'll I'll do them a

109:56

solid on their behalf, which is Milton.

109:59

I told you I was into the pre uh the

110:01

mineral royalty business and and looking

110:03

at those businesses. So I said, what are

110:04

the mines that last the longest? So

110:06

silver mines only last eight years. Gold

110:08

mines only last 15 years on average.

110:10

Copper mines could last a lot longer.

110:12

Um, interestingly, rare earth mines

110:14

actually last like 50 or 100 years.

110:16

Potach mine lasts oh maybe a hundred

110:18

years. Limestone mines is one of the

110:21

most common materials in the world.

110:24

There are limestone mines that last

110:26

hundreds of years, 500 years. And I

110:28

maybe you know my my Gemini Google

110:30

Gemini large language model is just

110:32

making this up for me. I don't I don't

110:33

know. Um, but he told me that there are

110:35

some mines from the Roman Empire that

110:37

are still mining limestone. So you said

110:39

that these things are made out of

110:40

limestone. It's the most common one of

110:42

the most common things in the world.

110:44

Bitcoin is very scarce, artificially

110:46

scarce, but it's scarce. And therefore,

110:48

people say it must have value. So that

110:49

is a difference between those limestone

110:51

stones and and Bitcoin.

110:52

>> Yeah. But no, the limestones were were

110:54

scarce because they had to have a hole

110:55

in it. You see, they had to have a hole

110:56

in it.

110:57

>> And it was scarce because they had

110:59

imported from another island. They the

111:01

lines and stones couldn't be mined in

111:02

this island. It was a very small world

111:04

in those days. And because but I'm

111:06

saying the main value was because the

111:07

people around knew exactly who the other

111:10

side of the transaction was. Unlike

111:11

Bitcoin where you don't know who the

111:12

other side of the transaction is. It's a

111:14

different concept. But but guess what?

111:16

Limestone is you're saying limestone has

111:19

nothing to do with Bitcoin. You're going

111:20

So right now

111:21

>> Yeah, I'm going against you.

111:22

>> Yeah.

111:22

>> The people No, I'm not saying bit I I'm

111:24

against the using limestone bitcoin. I'm

111:26

saying when you study the research, the

111:28

best they can come up with is the REI

111:30

stones in Yap Island. Rarity is nothing.

111:32

Listen, I have a sock. I have a stock

111:34

sock with a hole in it right now in my

111:35

fate, right? It's very rare, but it's

111:37

valueless. There's only one in the

111:39

world. What would give it value? And you

111:42

can't duplicate it. You see, I'm saying

111:44

it makes no sense. There's no logical

111:46

thing to say that if something's scarce

111:48

and it costs money to mine it, if

111:49

someone lives in Los Angeles, he has to

111:51

fly to to to Florida to get my stock.

111:53

Does that give it any value? Absolutely

111:55

not. It's a fallacy. The whole thing is

111:57

a fallacy. So, as you said, if it goes

112:00

to zero, it goes to $10 a bitcoin,

112:03

that's its value because that's what

112:04

people pay for it. It goes to 10

112:06

million, that's its value because that's

112:08

people pay for it. But everything else

112:10

in the world has a value except for the

112:12

dollar. But the dollar's value is what

112:14

the government places on it through

112:16

their guns and through their army and

112:18

through their police force.

112:19

>> Milton, what you're you're making

112:21

fundamental arguments and the fact that

112:22

Bitcoin doesn't have a fundamental

112:24

argument. Basically, uh I I understand

112:26

your argument, but when you look at the

112:27

technicals, what do you see? Because

112:29

that really is kind of all Bitcoin has

112:30

is the tech.

112:31

>> No, there's no technical. There's no

112:32

there's no advanced decline. There's no

112:34

uh there's no uh natural end user.

112:37

There's no uh

112:38

>> same as gold. It's one thing. There's no

112:41

it's not like gold where where has some

112:44

industrial uses. There's nothing to

112:46

measure it either fundamental or

112:48

technically. I mean

112:50

volume

112:53

>> you look at volume you look at moving

112:54

averages but you know what I look for in

112:57

stocks technically it's far more robust

113:00

than what anyone could look and even

113:01

want to look at in gold is far greater

113:02

because at least gold has some some uses

113:05

and some supply demand factors other

113:07

than the fact that it's scarce is above

113:09

anyway yes okay okay you you you'll be a

113:13

believer in Bitcoin and listen

113:14

everyone's been right in the sense that

113:15

Bitcoin went up in value went up in

113:17

price but as As Benjamin Graham said, I

113:19

listen, I don't believe much in what

113:21

Benjamin Graham says either about value

113:23

investing. But he Benjamin Graham missed

113:26

every bull market he was alive for

113:27

because he nothing was cheap enough

113:29

between me and you. But and even Warren

113:32

Buffett would have missed many bull

113:33

markets had it not been for for Mer who

113:36

told him to buy stock good companies.

113:38

Don't just buy cheap companies. And and

113:40

and and and Buffett, we don't know how

113:42

bad it's going to be, but he says a $300

113:44

billion war chest just waiting and

113:45

waiting for stocks to get cheap.

113:47

ultimately it may turn out great. We we

113:49

don't know. We certainly miss some

113:50

upside due to that which which the hedge

113:52

fund people that I deal with don't miss

113:54

the upside because stocks aren't cheap.

113:55

They don't care whether stocks are cheap

113:57

or not. They care about other things.

113:58

But what I was trying to get to about

114:00

Bitcoin is is that um I I don't see any

114:03

case that can be made in history for

114:06

Bitcoin. And people were stretching to

114:08

compare to the REI stones and they say

114:10

over we disagree is a far better form of

114:12

money than Bitcoin. I don't see anything

114:14

about Bitcoin that give you a monetary

114:15

value. And what but people the reason

114:18

stocks go up in value isn't because

114:19

people are buying it. As I say, Apple

114:21

has little baby apples and and and and

114:24

Nvidia has little baby Nvidas, right?

114:27

And and Walmart is little baby Walmarts,

114:29

but Bitcoin has no little baby bitcoins.

114:32

So how how you going to measure it? It

114:34

has no uses. How you going to measure

114:35

it? I mean, you could argue from Anthony

114:37

tomorrow. It's my view. And people say

114:39

I'm Oh. So why say Benjamin Graham?

114:41

Because Benjamin Graham in his book

114:43

security analysis he says people think a

114:45

successful investment is one that went

114:47

up in price and they think an

114:49

unsuccessful speculation is an asset

114:51

that went down in price. That's not the

114:53

case. That's the other criteria that

114:55

measures whether something is an

114:56

investment or something speculation.

114:58

>> Yeah. So the fundamental

115:00

>> Bitcoin is not an investment and all

115:02

these little widows and orphans, the

115:04

people putting Bitcoin and all these

115:05

institutions that are allocating 5% to

115:07

Bitcoin absolutely makes no sense other

115:10

than the fact that they saw it going up

115:12

in value. But no one could sit in front

115:13

of me and give me a logical reason for

115:16

Bitcoin to be a valuable asset. No one.

115:18

Not you. You're not the only one. I

115:20

hadn't at least maybe I'm stubborn, but

115:22

I just don't see it.

115:25

>> Yeah, but you're you're talking

115:26

fundamentals. So tech technically you

115:28

don't have any analysis of Bitcoin other

115:29

than

115:30

>> technically technically it has no value.

115:32

Technical analysis just interprets value

115:35

but it doesn't give you value. Bitcoin

115:38

gold has value but Bitcoin has no value.

115:40

The fact that it has a price doesn't

115:42

mean it has a value.

115:43

>> Let's move let's move on. Let's let's

115:45

return to where we started which is the

115:47

stock market. You had some overwhelming

115:48

buy signals in April of 2025. You had

115:52

one more buy signal in the summer you

115:53

didn't really believe in. you got a sell

115:55

signal that made you anxious go short on

115:57

your model portfolio on December 11th or

115:59

no December early December and then you

116:02

you saw another signal that you didn't

116:03

like a sell signal in January what's

116:05

what's your positioning now and Milton I

116:07

might say based on you know how you

116:10

started and saying oh I I still want

116:12

another 5% 6% more in the in the S&P

116:15

based off the the huge starting gun you

116:18

know bomb that was that was August sorry

116:20

that that was April based on that you

116:23

know I'm familiar with just how short

116:24

your model assets portfolio is. Like why

116:26

are you

116:27

>> I'm not hiding it. I'm long about 5%

116:28

Argentina. We got into at the lows at a

116:31

classic bottom in Argentina. If you're

116:33

interested, you'll see.

116:34

>> Right, Mila? But your your short

116:35

positions in other assets are 20 times.

116:38

>> I'm 110% short various I'm short the

116:41

midcaps. I'm short Russell. I'm short

116:43

the Q's and I'm short the spies. That's

116:45

all

116:45

>> and semiconductors. Right.

116:47

>> Yeah. And I just went short

116:48

semiconductors the day after their top.

116:49

Exactly. Yes. Yes. Yes. So, so why is

116:52

your position so bearish if you only

116:53

have, you know, a few sell signals or

116:56

what am I what am I missing?

116:57

>> I told you got I'm I'm I'm short because

117:00

my VXN sell signal back on December 11th

117:03

has not had the market follow through.

117:04

All follow through so far have been

117:07

signed as speculative tops. You have the

117:09

the you had the island on top of the

117:11

Russell. You have the fact that the

117:12

Russell is moving up without the S&P

117:13

500. You had the maximum gain since

117:15

December 11th was 1.2% in the S&P. you

117:18

have the fact that the NASDAQ wasn't

117:19

able to make a higher above its December

117:21

December 29th high. You have a lot of

117:23

factors telling you the market's

117:24

topping. That's why I'm short. Why I'm

117:26

100% short because I don't I'm not I

117:27

don't go in um in increments. I if I'm

117:29

short, I'm I'll be short. If I'm wrong,

117:31

I'll get out. I told you this morning, I

117:33

consider covering my shorts. I um that's

117:35

why I wrote the report. I wrote based on

117:37

the various indicators we saw. There's

117:39

sometimes in the past generated exact

117:41

bottom, especially after a short sharp

117:43

spike decline. never took place with a

117:46

decline of like 2% or 3% of the S&P.

117:48

But, you know, maybe tomorrow, Monday,

117:50

I'll change my mind if I see

117:51

follow-through or maybe my indicators

117:53

will come up with even more buy signals

117:55

than the one I saw at yesterday's close.

117:57

You know, we're flexible. But, um,

117:59

actually this morning when I wrote my

118:00

report, initially I titled the report

118:02

covering shorts. That's the initial one.

118:05

Then I said then I ended it saying chain

118:06

we're not ready to cover our shorts. In

118:07

other words, as I wrote the report and

118:09

went through the data, I see I see

118:10

reasons to cover the shorts and I see

118:12

but not enough to cover my shorts. Is

118:15

it, you know, but but this is not a

118:16

long-term call. I I said I could see a

118:18

depression. You never know what's going

118:20

to you never know what's going to get

118:22

you into a bare market until it takes

118:23

place. When people predict a crash

118:25

ahead, very rarely do they know why it's

118:27

going to crash if they're correct. Most

118:28

often they're not correct. Even even

118:30

when you live through a bare market, you

118:31

generally don't know what's causing the

118:33

bare market until until the bare market

118:36

takes place or or or even a bull market,

118:38

you know, you don't really know what's

118:39

going to what what turns bullish. The

118:41

market anticipates it and you don't

118:42

really know what's what's what's going

118:43

to cause it. But no, we're we're we're

118:45

short and we may be long on on on

118:47

Monday. But the point I want to really

118:49

make is that for the real people out,

118:51

the millions of people out there who

118:52

have IRA, IAS and 401 for 401k plans,

118:57

and they want to invest in the long

118:59

term, they want to save. Forget about

119:00

all this stuff. This doesn't help

119:02

anybody. Just drives you crazy. Bull

119:04

market, bare market, ad lines, um, uh,

119:07

seasonality, broadening or Russell 2000,

119:11

uh, moving, which is a bullish sign.

119:13

Just know the SPI if we remain a

119:15

capitalist country which we hope we do.

119:17

I mean we're there's been many many

119:19

times in the past where it looked like

119:20

socialism will take over like during the

119:22

great depression. If we remain a

119:23

capitalist country over the long term

119:24

the SP00 should gain in price in real

119:27

terms and if you're in for the bulk of

119:29

bull markets and you're in treasure

119:30

building during the bulk of bare markets

119:31

doing very well. And until until I'm not

119:34

a young man, until last September, I

119:36

didn't really complete models that allow

119:38

me and confidence to say be in the

119:41

stock, be in the SPF00 for the bulk of

119:42

the time. Hold on,

119:45

be long during bull markets. Don't worry

119:47

about all these pundits who are telling

119:49

you there's a crash, a recession, a

119:51

correction head. Wait for the correction

119:53

to start. Wait for the correction to be

119:54

down 8% based on the model. And then

119:56

when you're out, get into T- bills. You

119:58

can sleep when you're in T- bills.

119:59

Tibles are not the best investment but

120:01

they're certainly the safest investment

120:03

and then when the time comes to buy the

120:05

market you don't have to guess because

120:06

our models I say in April 4th April 9th

120:09

you had we showed 57 signals from April

120:12

from the month of April itself I think

120:13

we have a total of 88 signals published

120:15

we have many signals that are

120:16

unpublished I mean published meaning

120:18

through my computers so markets give you

120:20

rare signals at turning points we have

120:23

we believe we've be able to pinpoint

120:24

them in the stock market and we believe

120:26

as long as you can get into the market

120:28

early in the bull market. As long as you

120:30

can get out early in the beer market,

120:32

you you'll do very very well. And that's

120:33

what our models are showing. And our

120:35

clients get a newsletter twice a month

120:37

telling them what they're up to. Very

120:39

little data, not the kind of data we've

120:40

been talking about here. They just get

120:42

uh what the latest signal was.

120:44

Occasionally, we'll give a historical

120:45

signal, you know, what signal in 1974 or

120:48

what signal did in 1990, what signal in

120:49

the year 2000 may show historical

120:51

signals that went into the model. But

120:53

remember, the model is only built on one

120:54

signal, the first signal of the series.

120:57

I do not disclose to the retail clients

120:59

the thousands of models we have. That

121:00

goes for the institutional clients. It's

121:02

a totally different ballgame. Plus,

121:03

institutional clients are recommended

121:05

sectors, recommended precious metals,

121:06

the recommended long and shorten

121:07

leverage. And clients is simple. Either

121:10

100% in the stock market based on the

121:12

capitalist system in United States or

121:13

100% in in treasury bills because

121:15

there's a correction or a bare market

121:17

and you want to be out of it. Very, very

121:18

simple.

121:19

>> Absolutely, Milton. You know, so I Yes,

121:22

generally you're right. I mean American

121:23

companies have a much higher profit

121:25

margin, return on equity and capitalism

121:27

is generally good for stock markets. I

121:28

mean look at China. But I will say

121:30

Milton in fundamentals like there there

121:32

is a lot of uh counterpoints like in

121:35

Brazil when the left-wing guy was in

121:38

charge in the very early 2000s.

121:39

Brazilian stock market did really well

121:41

because there was a bull market in

121:43

emerging markets and oil. So there's

121:44

always a counter example. I want to ask

121:46

you Milton about your Yeah, exactly what

121:48

you showed the individual name position.

121:51

with a long life portfolio. This long

121:52

life portfolio is is institutionals get

121:55

every day a long life only portfolio.

121:56

Our turnover average is 75% a year.

121:59

Remember, we don't even have 100%

122:00

turnover. Okay? We try to own stocks for

122:02

at least a year. We buy the stocks

122:04

strictly on technicals. However, I do

122:06

try to make sure the companies don't

122:07

have any balance sheet issues. I don't

122:08

want to get into a bankruptcy. We

122:10

fortunately had a great return. This

122:12

started in 2016 January 1. Our model

122:16

>> that's good is not total return. just

122:18

price action up 542% versus 236 since

122:21

since 1919 it's up 467% versus 174%

122:26

since since 2022 151 versus 44 since

122:31

2023 191 versus 79 last year from

122:35

yesterday we're up 53 versus 17% now and

122:38

this year we're up 7.56% this is through

122:41

February 4th versus the SP of 0.54 now

122:44

how do we do it we don't do a lot of

122:45

trading and we do it based on technical

122:47

analysis. I I did just to be honest, I

122:50

learned a lot of what I know about

122:52

technical analysis from William O'Neal's

122:55

people are very familiar with William

122:56

O'Neal's work. But he he would stress

123:00

growth stocks and we use his his pattern

123:03

analysis for cyclical stocks as well as

123:06

for um as well as for undervalued stocks

123:09

or or beaten down stocks. We try to get

123:11

early in the turn. So to give you

123:12

example what we own now just for the

123:14

portfolio this is the portfolio we own

123:16

now uh this we own Argentina as a ETF we

123:20

have a 4.9 we up 36% in Argentina we

123:24

have a number of foreign stocks the

123:25

foreign stocks are showing greater

123:27

potential technically than the US stocks

123:29

we have at which is a which is a Chinese

123:32

no many people would have heard of this

123:34

stock it's a Chinese um like I guess

123:36

it's like trip advisor or travel

123:37

velocity I'm not sure exactly what they

123:39

do fundamentally but they're they're for

123:41

people going on trips. You know, Chinese

123:43

people like to travel. This is their

123:45

travel company. Alibaba, Bergkshire, we

123:47

have really I think it's a great

123:49

management. I I didn't there's a

123:51

technical reason I bought it, but really

123:53

I bought it because I think it's sort of

123:55

a cash asset. I'm still nervous about

123:57

the market long term and I'd rather have

123:59

4.6% in Birkshshire because I think in a

124:01

bare market it would hold up a little

124:02

better. Constellation Energy we spoke

124:04

about two years ago if you remember I

124:06

said

124:06

>> incredible pick. Incredible pick.

124:07

>> Remember that I said I don't know why I

124:08

own it but the chart was great. Turns

124:10

out it's an AI stock. We're up 94. We

124:12

sold half the position already. The

124:14

stock went over we we had over 5%

124:16

position and we sold half of it. So,

124:18

>> and I see one of your biggest your

124:19

biggest position is Seagate, which is

124:21

data storage.

124:22

>> So, I'm going to show you some charts.

124:24

We have Shinan Korean. Let me show you

124:26

the some some purchases. So, these are

124:28

recent purchases. We we own Grenov. We

124:30

bought in the last year. We bought it

124:32

right here at this breakout.

124:33

>> And by the way, Milton, I know you you

124:34

don't focus on fundamentals, but in the

124:35

fundamentals, you know, GE was this

124:37

business that had issues for so many so

124:39

many years, but now they spun out this

124:40

business and they basically had um

124:42

natural gas natural gas turbines and

124:44

there's a giant shortage of natural gas

124:46

turbines.

124:46

>> I do look at earnings, but I look

124:48

earnings on I look at earnings on a

124:49

technical basis, not a fundamental

124:51

basis. I don't really care what brought

124:52

there. Anyway, we bought it back here

124:54

where the arrow is. We bought just

124:56

bought this recently. Shinan Financial

124:58

Group, which is a Korean stock. Look at

125:00

the new high. This is today's chart. It

125:01

made a new high today. Look at that.

125:02

What do you say? So, this is doing very

125:04

well for us. Again, it had a very low P

125:07

of nine. It was actually P of of seven

125:08

when we bought it. And you had a stream

125:10

of good earnings, but you know, you had

125:12

a kind big up move consolidation, a

125:13

breakout. I'm looking for stocks that

125:15

are, you know, American stocks didn't

125:16

show these kind of chart patterns. KP,

125:19

another Korean company we bought right

125:20

here. It made a new high a few days ago.

125:23

Now, it's okay. And the last one is C.

125:25

Now, my guy works with me, a very

125:27

brilliant guy works with me. He's been

125:28

in the business quite a long time. He

125:30

used to be a a trader for himself and

125:31

now he works with me and I bought Seate.

125:34

He was yelling Milton don't buy Seagate.

125:36

Don't buy Seagate. I said he said and he

125:38

gave me all the fundamental reason not

125:39

to buy it. Well, technical reasons that

125:41

he believed not to buy overpriced.

125:42

Everyone's looking at it and so on and

125:43

so forth. And you had this breakout on a

125:46

gap and I bought it right there, you

125:47

know, the earnings. I didn't really

125:48

care. I saw it was strong earnings. I

125:50

didn't care what my guy who works with

125:52

me told me, you know, and he thought

125:53

he'd be right. But here it is. Just made

125:55

a new high a few days ago. It's one of

125:56

our best performing stock. We own it for

125:58

less than a year. Now I know it's very

126:00

vulnerable. It may come down but we try

126:02

to hold stocks for at least a year. We

126:03

don't always do it. We try to. So this

126:05

is the kind of things we do and this

126:07

only goes to institutions.

126:08

>> And what are what are what is what are

126:09

your your newest additions Milton?

126:11

>> The last year or the the latest one the

126:13

last one was Phineia Auto Parts. It's up

126:16

17%. I I could I just bought it maybe

126:19

not even not even two months ago. I

126:21

don't want to bring up the full chart

126:22

though. That's a new one. Fineia.

126:24

>> Uh Korea Electric Power I showed you was

126:27

pretty recent. Insight was pretty

126:28

recent.

126:29

>> You got Google. You got Google. That's

126:30

interesting.

126:30

>> Google's old one. Although probably two

126:32

years already. Google. Generrack was in

126:34

the last year. It's not doing so well.

126:36

Down 3%. Uh let's see. Uh

126:41

Argentina wasn't a purchase in the last

126:43

year.

126:44

>> That's good. Hey Milton, I got I got

126:45

something for for you which I know you

126:47

know you like to prepare for stuff, but

126:48

I figured I just wanted to throw a

126:49

ticker at it.

126:49

>> Yeah.

126:50

>> Just so you know software there's

126:51

technology but there's hardware tech and

126:53

then there's software tech. Software

126:55

tech had been performing so well for you

126:57

know many decades now but software is in

126:59

a brutal bare market that the fear being

127:00

that AI is going to make these uh a lot

127:03

of these software companies obsolete.

127:05

The ticker Milton is IGV

127:08

>> IGV. Let me take a quick look.

127:13

>> Let me bring it down here. This is IGV.

127:16

I I see nothing. I see no reason to buy

127:18

the stock. I just say wow. Wow. You know

127:21

it made a rolling top here. I don't know

127:22

the technicals yet but

127:24

>> um IGV wow I mean you know listen one

127:27

thing you see there is one positive in

127:29

the in the stock high volume occurs at

127:31

turning points okay high volume doesn't

127:32

take place at the top here high volume

127:34

took place when it's down I don't know

127:36

down to uh it must be down 50% or so I

127:40

don't know if it's high so the fact that

127:43

you see this this high volume that's a

127:44

sign of a top you look at stocks or

127:46

indices the bottom you're going to see

127:47

this kind of fiveday high volume record

127:49

volume that's one of the things we saw

127:51

back in April We've seen many many major

127:53

lows. You see these this high volume.

127:54

That's the only thing I can see in this

127:56

chart going for it. I don't see any

127:57

testing of a low. You can argue to test

127:59

this low, but it's it's really too far

128:01

back to be considered a test. And

128:03

probably there have been fundamental

128:04

shifts since then. A technician would

128:06

call, you know, call this level as a

128:08

potential test. I I probably wouldn't

128:10

when it comes to stocks are like a

128:11

three-month range roughly for a test. I

128:13

mean, here's a So, wow. Do you expect me

128:16

to like the stock? What was your opinion

128:17

on the stock?

128:18

>> No, no, I wanted your your commentary. I

128:20

mean I think um a lot of these software

128:23

companies h have been perceived by the

128:25

market historically to be high quality

128:26

companies high return on equity high you

128:28

know growing their revenues and earnings

128:30

a lot um and you know I

128:33

>> this is an ETF this is an ETF it's not

128:35

an actual stock

128:37

>> yes yes so so um

128:38

>> you look at Microsoft which is one of

128:40

the components

128:41

>> yep

128:42

>> there's nothing beautiful about the

128:43

stock you have you have strong earnings

128:45

and a weakening stock look at this

128:46

double top right here look at these

128:48

reversal a double reverse It's amazing a

128:50

negative technical stock. There's no

128:52

reason

128:52

>> I I got I got I got some of the worst

128:53

tickets for you. Um try Adobe. Adobe or

128:56

Salesforce CRM.

128:57

>> We own we owned Adobe. We got out of it

128:59

pretty well. My m fact, my guy I work

129:01

with was pointing out, boy, I got out of

129:03

I got out of PayPal and I got out of

129:05

Adobe, you know, in the last year or

129:07

sometime. And I said, wow, you got out

129:09

pretty well. So, usually I get out of a

129:11

stock because I find another stock to

129:13

buy and what I look I I skim the the the

129:15

tables for stocks that are showing me

129:17

what I'm looking for. I couldn't find

129:18

any today, for example. And then I when

129:21

I put a stock in, usually I take out

129:22

another stock, you know, for whatever

129:24

reason. Adobe, wow. Wow. But Adobe, you

129:26

took a look at a monthly chart. It was

129:28

once a leader. Look at this amazing

129:29

leader. Yeah. Adobe learned how to rip

129:31

people off. I used to buy Adobe. I paid

129:33

$200 for the disc. I used it for four

129:35

years. Then they started a subscription

129:37

basis, which at first people thought was

129:38

very negative. Subscription basis here.

129:40

Stock and now I'm paying them $250 a

129:43

month for my subscription.

129:45

>> It's nuts. Yeah. Milton, try uh look at

129:47

Service Now. Ticker is Na N.

129:49

>> N that was a big leader for a while,

129:51

right? This is a long-term chunk. Wow.

129:53

And on a short-term basis uh daily, it's

129:56

it's it's a dog. Listen, you're seeing

129:58

the the increase in this is one thing

130:00

you see increase in volume. But when you

130:02

see stocks with strong earnings coming

130:05

down, the market knows more than the

130:06

earnings know. You understand?

130:07

>> Yeah. Yep.

130:08

>> You want to see strong earnings at the

130:09

market level. This is amazing. I didn't

130:10

never own Service Now. I did own Adobe.

130:13

I did own uh I didn't own Microsoft. I

130:15

did own PayPal which is really a dog you

130:16

know they say right I own PayPal was

130:18

down 90% of its high PayPal I own PayPal

130:22

but I got out well I bought it

130:23

>> and I did not get out well I yeah PayPal

130:25

is tough for me

130:26

>> yeah look at that stock PayPal you know

130:28

I was one of the first analysts to

130:29

recommend Tesla and I really didn't

130:31

trade it when Tesla had it new issue and

130:33

it came out with a new issue I said the

130:35

pattern of Tesla's new issue reminds me

130:38

or was very similar to the pattern of

130:39

Cisco when Cisco was no issue

130:42

>> and and and I didn't trade it well I got

130:44

out early in early in the early in the

130:46

move but I was really one of the first

130:48

tech certainly technical anal tech

130:49

technical analysts I remember name I met

130:52

with a analyst who was negative he's

130:55

he's a famous bearer he's negative on

130:58

negative on Tesla and he you know he

131:00

said it's just an auto company and all

131:01

the came and I said Tesla's selling cars

131:04

without advertising not one know this is

131:07

when Tesl first started they sell cars

131:09

with no advertisements I said this is

131:11

tells you something about the underlying

131:13

demand for electronic cars. That's all I

131:15

needed to know. You know, they were

131:17

selling cars. Volume was increasing, but

131:19

they weren't even advertising. I mean,

131:21

which car maker doesn't take ads in the

131:23

Super Bowl, you know, or whatever it is

131:24

just to get just to get his name out

131:26

there to show how great the car is.

131:27

Tesla didn't need that. So, Tesla was a

131:30

great long-term stock. It's way

131:31

overvalued. I I haven't I haven't bought

131:33

it. I never owned it in a long

131:35

portfolio. Um I don't see any reason to

131:37

own it now. See, you saw a breakout of a

131:39

consolidation, but you saw it with weak

131:41

earnings and the stock wasn't cheap by

131:43

any. So, I I wouldn't buy this kind of a

131:44

breakout. So, I don't I I don't like I

131:47

don't like there's nothing about the

131:48

chart of Tesla telling me to buy it.

131:50

Again, like Bitcoin, you want to own it

131:52

because it's gone up, but that's not a

131:54

reason to own a stock. You want to own

131:55

it because it's gone up with some strong

131:57

technicals. As I said, I gave the

131:58

example with the ball when when Babe

132:01

Ruth swings at a ball or when

132:03

>> one of the great home run hitters swing

132:04

at a ball, at the time it hits the ball,

132:06

you know, it's going to take off. That's

132:07

what you like to see at breakouts.

132:09

That's what you see at market bottoms.

132:10

You want to see the energy within the

132:12

market bottom so you don't have to worry

132:13

about it later on. You don't have to

132:14

look at it every day.

132:15

>> That's a really good way of putting it.

132:16

Milton, what do you think about the

132:17

semiconductors? Uh, you know, I I

132:20

personally have actually been, you know,

132:21

quite quite long the semiconductors. Uh,

132:23

why are you short? The fact that you're

132:25

short is making me a little bit nervous.

132:27

>> Short because Yeah, short in the market.

132:29

SOXX. SOXX. We we're short the um short

132:33

the GP the ETF. Let me show you why I

132:35

went short. You're not gonna believe it.

132:36

Because of course it went short because

132:39

you gapped up into the high. One sign of

132:41

a top. And it's not the only time it

132:42

gaps. You know, it gapped here. It

132:44

wasn't the top. But it gapped into a

132:46

high while Russell was making the the

132:48

the um the isolated one day reversal.

132:51

But more importantly, its first down day

132:53

was the cycle. The cycle Montgomery

132:55

cycle began on January 30th. So it

132:57

peaked the day before the cycle. Its

132:58

first down day was on the cycle day. And

133:01

since there's a lot of emotion in the

133:02

semiconductor stocks, as you know, it's

133:04

been a while is up 185% over its lows. I

133:06

think in just uh less than three

133:08

quarters of a year, it's up uh

133:12

145%. So there's a lot of motion in the

133:15

stock. It's something that should cycle.

133:16

So we showed it right now. Right now,

133:18

you had a gap up today. You know, it I I

133:21

tell you, I may reevaluate on Monday. I

133:22

don't know. Let me see. The high

133:24

yesterday was 33547. The low today was

133:28

33587. and we got a 40 cent gap. This is

133:30

a this is um I don't say it's bullish

133:34

because it's very difficult to find

133:35

bullish indicators exactly one day after

133:37

low. You saw it you see it but usually

133:39

you'll see it two days after low or

133:40

three days after low, you know, you saw

133:42

it in in 2025 in April, a day before the

133:45

low. But you know, we'll see. I might

133:47

change my mind. I might cover my short

133:48

on this, but if the market's going down,

133:50

I think semic would lead to the

133:52

downside. So that's why I shorted it.

133:54

And it was a cycle as well involved in

133:56

it. any other any other buy or sell

133:58

signals or things you find interesting

134:00

that have happened in this year?

134:03

>> Well, the most interesting thing is I we

134:05

bought the Korea Korea stocks look good

134:06

and and and we thought Chinese stocks is

134:08

good. One of my biggest clients, my

134:10

favorite clients would not touch China

134:12

because and he's probably right, but I'm

134:14

not as ethical as he is. He wouldn't buy

134:15

China because they're very non-ethical

134:17

government as you many for many reasons

134:19

that n not capitalistic. But I always

134:22

took the view that you know once a

134:23

company once a country prospers

134:25

ultimately it will become more more

134:27

ethical because uh um just the way it's

134:30

been capitalism is is the most ethical

134:32

type of system as opposed to communism

134:35

and um and socialism. But anyway

134:38

I saw Korea I saw China. Uh in the US I

134:41

didn't see things to buy as far as

134:43

things to sell. Maybe we have to wait

134:44

till the bare market dissolves before we

134:46

find things to sell. I would say that

134:47

the type of top we saw in Russell should

134:50

tell you that Russell will lead to the

134:51

downside on fundamental. The reason

134:52

Russell lead to the downside because

134:54

there's many I think 40% of zombie

134:56

companies in the Russell 2000. The

134:58

Russell 2000 doesn't doesn't select for

135:00

for earnings unlike the S&P indexes. The

135:02

SP600 you have to have an earnings

135:04

criteria to get into it for

135:06

>> and the best companies in the Russell

135:08

that grow their earnings they go into

135:10

the midcap index.

135:11

>> Yeah, that's midcap. Exactly. So, what's

135:13

one of the problems with what's one of

135:14

the problems considering small cap an

135:16

asset class? Because every time they

135:18

rebalance it, you're losing the good

135:20

companies. Like, it's kind of funny.

135:22

>> Definitely. All right, Milton. Um,

135:24

>> thank you, Jack. I hope we we only

135:25

covered a small portion of what I

135:27

prepared to speak about, but I think it

135:29

was really fascinating and good. I hope

135:30

you think so as well.

135:31

>> Yes. Um, we'll include the link in your

135:34

description both to your institutional

135:35

service, but also the the retail service

135:38

where it's a much simpler read. Um,

135:40

>> if I if I can make an advertisement, we

135:43

we the reason I I charge $10 a month

135:45

because this is what I said to myself. I

135:47

did, no one will turn this down because

135:48

it's too expensive. No investor will

135:50

turn it down because it's too expensive.

135:52

Everyone should at least invest for a

135:53

month or two months and take a look.

135:55

They've seen nothing like it. And the

135:57

best benefit is is not a trading

135:59

portfolio. It's a portfolio for

136:01

long-term investors with very, very few

136:03

ins and outs. It's perfect for for

136:06

individual retail investor.

136:10

and and obviously you know selling um

136:13

and getting out of the market before a

136:15

crash is valuable but getting back in

136:16

the market is really

136:18

>> most important thing right

136:18

>> oh before valuable like I actually

136:20

happen to have uh quote unquote sold the

136:23

top and been bearish before a market

136:25

crashes before you know mostly due to

136:27

luck although actually maybe maybe over

136:29

a 100% of it was due to luck because I

136:31

had negative alpha at the time but um

136:34

but like if I didn't get back in that

136:36

one time I'm thinking of the 2020 crash

136:38

And that's just if you if you nail the

136:40

bottom, sorry, if you if you nail the

136:42

crash, but you don't get back in, it's

136:44

worse than just being 100% owning

136:46

stocks. It really is.

136:47

>> I tell you, be honest with you. I I've

136:48

made the same mistake you've made.

136:50

>> Yeah.

136:50

>> But that's why I spent, you know, I used

136:52

to work I used to I managed, you know,

136:53

three funds at Apple and I managed large

136:55

gold fund. I worked for Sina, I worked

136:57

for Soros, I worked for Draville, I

136:59

managed money, but um I spent the last

137:02

10 years just delving into research

137:04

really and and now I you know now I

137:07

wouldn't make I don't hope I wouldn't

137:08

make mistakes because I will blindly

137:10

follow the indicators rather than follow

137:13

my my emotions or follow what the

137:15

headlines are telling you or follow what

137:17

the economists are telling you. I just

137:18

follow and you know the indicators are

137:20

very robust. So everyone makes the

137:21

mistake of missing the bottom. That's

137:22

the worst mistake you can make.

137:24

Absolutely.

137:25

>> Fortunately, we built in the case

137:26

strictly to call the bottoms.

137:28

>> Absolutely. We we'll leave it there.

137:29

People can find you on Twitter, Milton.

137:32

Thank you everyone for watching. Please

137:33

leave a rating and review on Apple

137:34

Podcast, Spotify, and subscribe to the

137:36

Monetary Matters YouTube channel. Until

137:38

next time. Thanks for watching.

137:40

Interested in the Fundrise Income Fund?

137:42

Click the link in the description to

137:43

learn more. Until next time.

Interactive Summary

Milton Berg discusses his technical analysis of market turning points, highlighting the massive buy signals he saw in April 2025 and his current short position as of early 2026. He expresses skepticism about Bitcoin's intrinsic value, comparing it to the Rai stones of Yap Island, and maintains a bearish outlook on gold and silver due to extreme valuations and "climax top" signals. Berg also introduces his retail service, which uses a simplified "long or T-bills" strategy designed to keep investors in bull markets while protecting them from major crashes.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts