A Bear Market In Gold & Silver Is Coming | Milton Berg on Precious Metals, Stocks, and Bitcoin
4153 segments
If anyone's telling you that the market
action is inconsistent with actions seen
at previous market peaks or if anyone
tells you that Federal Reserve action is
inconsistent with what we've seen in the
previous market peaks, I would show them
my tech technicals at the highest show.
All of these things are in my in my
table and all these things are
consistent with what we've seen at prior
market peaks.
>> You're saying that you're seeing signs
of market?
>> You're saying that no one can argue that
the market can't peak now based on
technical data. They can argue that
we're not at a peak, but they can't
argue that we can't peak. wanted to
share with you and your readers, your
your viewers things that they've never
heard about Bitcoin. You have a lot of
factors telling you the market's why I'm
short.
>> Do you think we have a multi-deade bare
market in gold, Milton? Later on, you'll
hear more about the Fundrise Income Fund
and why sophisticated investors are
turning to higher yielding assets like
private credit. But for now, let's get
into today's interview. In this
interview, I'm speaking to the Turning
Point master himself, Milton Berg. Nine
months ago, Milton came on monetary
matters with an extraordinarily bullish
case for US stocks, which are now up
nearly 20% since that interview. Our
talk today is very technical and quite
long. So, I want to give you a little
bit of a road map. The first 20 minutes
or so we devote to the incredibly strong
buy signals that Milton saw in April
2025 that nearly one year later are
still motivating his analysis. At the
22-minute mark, Milton talks about the
disturbing December signal that made him
short the market. At the 1 hour and 12
minute mark, we talk about why Milton is
bearish on gold and silver and why he
thinks that late January was a climax
top for precious metals. At the 1 hour
and 37 minute mark, Milton talks about
Bitcoin. And just over two hours in, we
talk about the vicious selloff in
software stocks. I also want to make
clear that this interview was recorded
on February 6th and at that time Milton
in his model portfolio for institutional
clients had combined short positions of
over a 100% in the S&P, NASDAQ, Russell
as well as semiconductors based on what
he saw Monday, February 9th. Not only
did he cover those shorts, but he also
flipped long equities. Again, that is
for his institutional clients. in his
new retail service for individual
investors. Milton Signal has had a 100%
long exposure to stocks since early
April 2025. Also, when it comes to
precious metals, Milton shorted gold and
silver within one day of the high in
precious metals at the end of January,
and he remains bearish on gold and
silver. Let's get into it. Got a very
special guest. I'm joined once again by
the extremely accomplished technician
known as Milton Berg of MB Advisors and
Miltonberg Edge. Milton, it is wonderful
to see you. How are you?
>> I'm doing very well. Thank you so much.
Good to see you again, Jack. Always
enjoy interviewing with you.
>> The the feeling is mutual. Milton, about
eight or nine months ago, shortly after
the seismic panic in markets of April
2025, you you and I did an interview and
you were extremely emphatic that the
market uh the technical signals in the
market you were seeing were extremely
strong and you used extremely strong
language
>> this time. I said we've have we have a
series of buy signals. There's no no way
the market could go down. It's
definitely going to go up. How long it
goes, I don't know because you had
similar signals in 19 in ' 87 in January
and the market peaked threequarters of a
year later. So, I can't tell you how
long the market's going to rally. But I
will tell you um how high the market
should go. That's what we'll discuss
today. I said definitely going to be
bull market action.
>> You you promised bull market action.
Bull market action. We've had the
indices are are far higher now. Uh funny
you referenced 1987. That was a very
good year for you. Then in the
background people and say you were the
mutual fund manager of the year. Quite
an accomplishment. Milton, what were the
buy signals you saw in the market? How
have they evolved into January and now
February 2026? And what have you made of
the recent market action? Are you seeing
any sell signals?
>> Okay, I'm going to get back to what our
projections are. Now, we don't trade
based on projections. We trade based on
turning points. April was a major
turning point for the market. Uh, and we
pounded the table based the table. We
pounded the table by. And I'll I'll tell
you exactly why. Now, this chart as this
chart was the first of 88 buy signals we
received. Received this buy signal April
4th of 2025. I say it's the first of 88
because our retail newsletter only gets
the first signal and we say you buy now
when you hold till we tell you to sell.
Institutions are constantly comforted.
They give more confirmations and they
see many many of the signals we get. But
this was the first signal we saw on
April 4th. It was a day before the low.
On that day, the NASDAQ 5day volume was
at the 200 day high. On that day, NASDAQ
had declined 7% over the last three
days. And the VXN, which is a VIX on the
NASDAQ 100 rather than the VIX on the
S&P 500, gained 10% for at least two for
two days in a row. And this is a very
rare occurrence. We're looking for rare
occurrences. In other words, we're not
looking at moving averages and looking
what the Fed is doing and what the Fed
is saying and money supply. We're
looking for rare occurrences that take
place at market turning points. And on
this day, April 4th, you had these three
rare occurrences, which I just
mentioned. This actually occurred in the
past. occurred in uh October 8th 1998,
August 5th, 2024 and August 24th, 2015.
And the gains the maximum gains within a
year of those signals was 47% 15.6% and
23.2%. So far, so far the April 4th
signal through the high in January
through the closing high on January 27th
of this year, it's gained 37.53%.
So, it's outperformed two of the
historical precedents. It's
underperformed one of the precedents, up
47%. However, we're measuring one year
out. We're looking at the maximum gains
within one year. For all I know, we'll
be up 47% by April 4th of 2026. So, this
was the first signal we got. However, I
want to talk about projections. Why why
did we project to our clients? Now,
again, we don't trade based on
projections, but projections are very
important. Important because if you get
a buy signal, it would only historically
the median gain after that buy signal
was 5%. it really doesn't pay to trade
it because uh you know you just with the
slippage and with uh it just doesn't
pay. So we look at the historical
returns based on the signal and tell
what the market would do if we follow
the historical returns and it's very
helpful for us. So what we did is for
this chart for you guys I actually
created this for you. We took we we
broke up our signals by day. So on April
4th we actually had two signals. I
showed you one of them and based on the
signals we had on April 4th, the median
maximum gain before the market declined
10%. In other words, how much how far
did the market gain before it declined
the next 10%. So the median was 6 to
6757 relative we're using percentage
gains relative to where we started off
on April 4th and the uh the projection
on average would be 7152. Our maximized
date on a closing basis was 697860.
So based on this alone, there's more to
the upside. you see before the market
sees a 10% correction. That was April
4th. On April 7th, we had a number of
signals as well and that projected to uh
either 7291 or 7751. Again, the market
could go could go much much higher based
on those projections. On April 8th, we
had more signals with many more
historical um back backups to the
signal, many more historical precedents
and that that projected to between 7128
as a median, 6728 as an average. And
we've actually exceeded that by closing
at um the level we closed that was uh
697860. We've exceeded the average of of
previous returns. April 9th we had many
many signals. I think we had about 40
signals on April 9th itself. We had many
many historical precedents for these
signals. Each of these instances as
historical signal is a actual historical
date of the signal. So the what signal
April 9th signal looks like 30 or 40
times in the past. And these 57 signals
generate April 9th project to between
7487 or 7921 before the next decline of
20 of 10%. We're only at 697860.
Now again I don't trade based on
projections. I just give the clients
this is this is institutional work. The
retailers will not see this this kind of
work. We tell them how far the market
would go if it just gains the the median
gain or just gains the uh the um the
average gain based on the previous
signals. This is April 9th. This is
April 10th. I won't go through each one.
April 11th. Summary looking at all the
signals from April 4th through April
through April um through April 30th.
Many many buy signals. I said the medium
projection would be to be 7437 in the
S&P. The average projection is 75.99
which means from the from the closing
high on on January 28th 27th it's about
nearly 6%
and uh about 8 and a half% from where we
where we u from where we closed the
actual high 6978 you see. So again based
on the kind of buy signals we saw in
April the market has not satisfied its
historical gains. It had not satisfied
it historical mean or average. hasn't
satisfied its historical uh returns as
you'd expect after that that kind of
low. I just point out that the low in
April generate the most extreme oversold
condition we've ever seen. This is based
on 18 a combination of 18 oversold
indicators and the indicators go back
only to 1995 or so. So maybe you saw it
prior to that. But in any event, from
1995 to 2025, we had the most oversold.
And the reasons why half the half the
country hates Trump. Half the country
thinks Trump's going to cause the great
depression. And the other half of the
country that loves Trump hates Powell.
So they think Powell is going to cause
the Great Depression or hyperinflation.
And when Trump announced tariffs and he
great negotiated, people thought he
people laughing at him or laughing about
it. They took it seriously and they
thought they were going to have 100% or
200% or 300% tariffs on China or
whatever Trump decided on that
particular day. And people truly
panicked and market bottoms always occur
on panic. So uh our our signals flashed
on the days you know April 4th into the
low April 8th day of the low and April
9th day after the low. So signal at the
oversold readings into the low and at
the thrust off the low and again
projections look for say another 6%
above the current high which is not a
lot 6% is not a lot for an institutional
trader who's trading uh some some people
are trading trillions of dollars but
those are trading even billions of
dollars. You're probably going to start
worrying about the market now if the
medium projection is 6%. But we don't
tell our clients uh that we uh to wor
really worry about projections. We worry
about a turning point analysis and we'll
see in a minute that actually looked a
little bit cautious. We'll get to that
in a moment. I just want to review some
I took from each day just one signal
just to give your your viewers an idea
of what we look at because up until this
point you could say this this Milton is
just really he's just sort of like um
saying he has all these indicators but
we why should we believe him? I mean why
should you believe there's some robust
indicators? I mean for all we know he's
like all these charlatans on Wall Street
who claim they know what the market's
going to do and everybody knows they
can't project the market and everyone
knows the market is efficient. So what
exactly does he have? So I decided to
show take one signal for each of those
dates in April just to review what we
saw on those individual dates. So for
example for April 4th we had two
signals. This is just signal one of two
signals and as I said the NASDAQ's 5day
volume was at a 200 day high. The NASDAQ
had gain had lost 10.61% 61% over 3
days. The threshold for the signal is
losing 7%. And the VIX traded between 45
and 60 which is a which a rarity. The
VIX in our case was 45.31.
That's that generated signal gives you a
buy signals. As you can see these are
the two historical buy signal. This is
the great buy signal we had on April 4th
day before the low April 7th 2025. We
also had two signals. Now what do you
see in this one? First of all, instead
of looking at the NASDAQ volume, looking
at the New York Stock Exchange total
volume and its total volume was the
highest in 370 days sometime within the
past 20 days. Now, what does that mean?
It means we're in a regime of high
volume. People who know markets know
that turning points take place in a
regime of high volume. You don't necess
don't necessarily see the highest volume
on the day of the low or the day of the
high, but you just see very very high
fiveday volume sometime before the low
or sometimes before the high and we use
20 days as a threshold. So if we saw
fiveday volume in the New York Stock
Exchange, highest in 375 days, which is
a year and a half of trading, we saw
that within the past 20 days, we know
we're in a regime of high volume. Now
that's number one. Number two is there's
an oscillator generated by Ned Davis
Research. I put that for this indicator
but we actually have have uh made some
minor changes but any event that
oscillator is at 10 it runs from zero to
100 that was actually at 4.44 44 on
April 7th, 2025. It ranges from zero to
100. Obviously, it was major oversold.
And the threshold here, if it's 10 or
below, the third indicator is you take
the new highs and new lows in the NASDAQ
on a 5-day basis and you took a
percentage of new highs to new lows. In
any event, it was oversold at -6%. And
this again occurred at the lows in 1998,
occurred at the lows in 20 um 2018. It
occurs at the March lows in 2020 and
occurred on April 7th, 2025 at the lows.
That's one signal on April 7th. We
already showed you the projections, but
as said, anyone can show projections. We
want to show get under the hood and see
exactly what we're signaling. Again,
we're not using moving averages. We're
not using crossing. We're not using Fed
Fed. We're not using seasonality. We're
not talking about, you know, uh, if if
the market's up first five days of
January, we'll have a a bull market.
We're talking about precise rarities
that occur at marketing turning points.
Let's see what happened on April 8th.
April 8 had four signals. This is one of
the four signals. The NASDAQ 5-day rate
of change was weakest in 1,260 days. You
know what that means? That's in five
years. The five-day loss in the NASDAQ
was the greatest in over a 5year period.
Of course, everyone agree that's a
rarity. You don't see that every day. In
this case, it was down 1250%
over the five-day period into into April
8th. Then on additionally, the S&P 500
4-day advanced decline ratio generated
what we call a reverse thrust. Reverse
thrust means instead of being 2:1 or 7:1
day like today, let's see what it is
today. Today it's about 3:1 right there.
It's 0.2 to1. In other words, so you
were overwhelmed. The five the four day
AD line was overwhelming on the downside
and it was below
>> meaning that the amount of stocks that
were declining as opposed to advancing
was overwhelming.
>> Overwhelming to the downside but
extremely overwhelming. Extremely
extremely overwhelming. We're not
looking at averages. Okay, let's
continue. Then April 9th. April 9th they
said we had 50 signals or so. We really
have more but you know but but you know
my mind and my computer can't handle
much more. Let's see what we had on
April 9th. April 9th, the market was up
9%. The S&P was up 9.52% on the day. The
NASDAQ was up more than 9%. You had
overwhelming 95 to an upside downside
volume. But this is not what this this
indicator is showing you something else.
S&P was below it 50day moving average,
meaning that the S&P was by definition
by some people definition it was in a
bare market. That's the first criteria.
That's really nothing. Secondly is the
market gained at least 6%
from its last time it declined 10%. In
other words, happens to have been
declined 18% into the previous day's low
and this day was up 9.52%. So by
definition, it gained 6% from its last
10% decline. But just to be just to be
precise, it's not enough of gain 6%.
This has to be the highest high off that
low. So in other words, the S&P could
lost 10%. It's now up 6% off that low,
but today is the highest high off that
low. That again reduces the number of
days because in any bull market the S&P
is up 6% from its last 10% decline. But
it's it's not enough to be up 6% through
the last 10% decline. This has to be the
exact high day since that 10% decline.
Okay. Next one is the S&P generates
greatest gain in the last 250 days which
is about a tra it's roughly a trading
year and that's it was up 9.52% greatest
one day gain. And on top of that, the
S&P's volume on the day had to have
increased by at least 20% over the
previous day. In this case, it increased
38.28% over the previous day. And the
second condition is it has to be an
upday. So very often the market crashes,
the market is down in the day and volume
increases by 20%. This indicator needs
the markets to be up on the day and
volume to have increased by 20%. When
the all these four things come together,
you saw bottoms in 19 1976. You saw
bottoms in 1982, you saw bottoms in
1984, you saw bottom a double bottom in
2022 and 2000 in June and in October
2022. Jack, if you recall, we met then
we we we had a discussion then I pointed
out that Russell actually bottomed in
June and the S&P bottomed in October and
NASDAQ bottomed in in um in January in
December. So both of these calls were
correct. You had a buy, we had a buy
signal at the bottom in June and a buy
signal at the bottom in October. The
June signal actually was the bottom. The
Russell never made a lower low. And the
S&P made a low about 2% below low of
June and we got a buy signal then in
October. And again, you got a buy signal
October 9th, 2025. This is one of 57 buy
signals. Just one. Again, my point is to
show the robustness of the signal. Also,
I don't want to show off too much, but
no one on Wall Street has this kind of
information. We're really the only one
this particular models that we have. I
just finished I mean institutions have
been writing letters and working with
institutions for quite a number of years
but I've been on the side basically I've
been working on creating these models
and I just finished it in September. So
a lot of things you see now was really
relatively new. I wasn't able to show it
to clients a year ago or two years ago
or three years ago because we didn't
really finish creating the models and
and and fine-tuning the models and and
eliminating models that didn't have uh
perfect records until until September.
So April 10th, 2025 and again what when
you show the top of it is it's the first
time this this ever signal. So the first
one for example April 4th the first time
it ever signal was October 8th 1998. You
see the one April 7th the first time it
ever signal was September 1st 1998. The
April 8th signal the first time this
particular indicate ever signal was
March 27th 1980. And the first time the
April 9th was on April 14th 1978. And
then we have another signal on October
on April 10th 2025. And that signal the
day of the crash low in 1987. What is
the signal? Basically, the 7-day volume
breath, no polarity. No, the the model
doesn't care whether the volume was up
or the volume was down. All it cares
about that on a 7-day basis, you have 12
times as much either upside volume or
downside volume as the other side. In
other words, either 12 times as much
upside versus downside or 12 times as
much downside versus upside. The market
doesn't care which extreme it is. All
the market cares about is that is at an
extreme. In this particular instance, by
April 10th, the 7-day volume breath was
12 to1 on the upside in the New York
Stock Exchange. The 7-day volume breath
in the Russell 2000 was 10 to1 and the
10day volume breath in the in the um
Russell 2000 was 8:1. And on top of
that, New York Stock Exchange volume on
a 5day average was the greatest over the
last three years. These four rarities
put together have signaled 17 times in
the past. As you can see, in each
instance, a bull market followed. And
that's where we're able to pound the
table and say a bull market will follow.
>> Thank you, Milson. So, it's fair to say
you were able to spot in April at the
low, a few days within the low sign
overwhelming signals of the market
bottoming. That turned out to be
correct. And what's interesting to me is
we're already, you know, close to a year
out and the S&P has up 38% maybe 40%
from there. And your signals from April
are so strongly bullish that you want
more. You're saying 5% 6%.
>> I tell you like this. This is very
interesting. I'm glad you bring it up.
First of all, we haven't had a 7%
correction since AP April lows. Got a 5%
correction within two day three days of
the low, but you didn't have never had a
7% correction. Forget about 10%. More
than that, it's glad you mentioned the
analogy that came up in in the previous
interview was, you know, when when when
uh who's a great baseball player? I I
mentioned Ted Williams or or Babe Ruth,
but now the guy Otani, right? Right.
Yeah. Otani swings a bat and hits a home
run. based on physics, the physics knows
that the the ball will cross over will
be a home run over the fence as soon as
it leaves the bat,
>> right?
>> There's nothing going on after it leaves
the bat that's keeping the ball up and
telling it to cross cross over the
fence. It's the momentum of the action
that and the physics that took place
when the bat hit the ball that tells you
at that time that it's going over the
fence.
>> It was a launch. It was the launch, a
forced launch, right? So what we're
looking for on a on a buy signals are
launches.
>> So the fact that the market was able to
have a a 95 to an upside volume day one
day after the low and other things we
look at that tells you there is
underlying physics underlying momentum
underlying strength that doesn't
dissipate in five days or 10 days or 20
days and generally it lasts a year or
longer. And I I've got to ask you. So it
was a very strong thrust from that that
bottom on April April 8th around there
until the very late October October 29th
2025. Since then we it feels the
market's been feeling very bullish but
we're kind of kind of in a holding
holding pattern and I'm sure you're
going to reference buy you know
indicators buy signals and sell signals
from from April 2025 all the way
throughout the fall and and winter. But
just if possible, could I bring you back
to the current moment right now?
>> I would say it's worse than you say
because we got signals in April, we got
signals, some signals in May, no signals
in June, no signals in July, one single
in August, which is really not part of
the model. I I don't really trust that
signal. So there's no really confirming
signals throughout this bull market. All
we have is what you had in April and
May. It's all we have going for us. And
yes, um, as you saw, the market really
isn't doing as well as you'd expect
based on the signals, right? We showed
you really underperforming. We should be
up another four, six, eight%. But maybe
we still may get there by the by the
time the year is up. Is that
>> Have you got any sell signals recently?
>> First of all, um we wrote a report
today. I think it should first start
today and what we wrote about the last
week or so. Okay.
>> Yep.
>> So this morning's report is right here.
Strangely, the market is strangely
oversold. Not ready to go equity shorts.
In other words, the reason to believe
even though we're we're the market S&P
only declined 2.58%
over the January 27th all-time high and
even though the NASDAQ has only declined
5.92%
from October 29th high to yesterday's
close and the Russell only declined
5.19%. So not certainly no major bare
market really just a minor correction.
Still still VIX VXN has gained 10% over
two days running. VXN has gained 35%
over three days. NASDAQ has generated
weakest five days in 180 days and
fiveday volume in most indexes most of
them both the small caps and the large
caps are at 180 to 200 day highs. Now
what does that mean? I'm going to show
you something here. There's only one
time in history that you saw what you
saw yesterday which is the NASDAQ index
generating its weakest 5day gain or
actually fiveday loss weakest fiveday
gain in 180 days. the S&P, the NASDAQ AD
line declining eight out of 10 days in a
row. And eight out of 10 days, you had a
declining AD line. And the VXN gaining
35% over three days. These are three
rare indicators to see. And for them to
happen in one day only happened once.
And guess where that happened? It
happened with a sharp short correction
in 1997 right here. See? Now, what have
we had now? We had a sharp short
correction. The Russell peaked in late
January. It's still early February. The
midcaps peaked in in January. the the
socks index the semiconductors it peaked
I think uh on January 30th or maybe you
know so they just peaked two two or
three four days ago a sharp short
correction which caused the NASDAQ to
have its weakest 5day gain in 180 days
and eight out of n 10 days a declining
ad line and for the VXN which is VIX on
the NASDAQ to gain 35% three days and
when did it ever happen once before not
during a bare market during a a minor
correction took 14 days this correction
you see that happened again yesterday.
So that's the reason to turn bullish. In
that particular instance, the market
gained 35% without a pullback. It gained
a full 39% without a pullback. You see,
today we're having a very big day. We're
having the biggest day since May in the
markets, right? I mean, you look
>> today we're Friday, February 6,
extremely strong market,
>> right? I mean today you look at the
socks index which is looked like it's is
breaking down. Socks is at this moment
of 5.59%. Okay. Anyway, there's one
reason to consider covering shorts. Then
let me continue with this report.
There's another reason to continue
covering shorts because the VXN gained
10% for two days.
>> I'm sorry. I I guess I gotta go back.
First of all, why have you been short in
in your model portfolio? I I it's
important that I say what we saw today.
I'm going to get back to exactly why
we're short. All right. All right.
>> It's actually in this. It's actually in
this report.
>> First, our clients if the following what
I'm saying the short I myself am short,
right? Um the problem is you see action
yesterday that suggests to cover the
shorts. We're going to see exactly why
we're short and whether the evidence we
see today is sufficient to cover the
shorts based on what I just showed you
only had one precedence you in a sharp
unexpected decline that lasts just a
number of days I mean you saw these
indicators which exactly happened
yesterday in that case the market that
was its bottom and it gained 35% before
its next high and the second thing we
saw was this where the VIX VXN gained
10% for two days running VXN gained 35%
in three days and Nasdaq decline was the
greatest 180 days. This happened eight
times in the past. And let's just show
you the the instances. 1998 it was um at
a at a market low. S&P gained 38%.
Happened twice in the 2010 was during
the flush crash. In this case, the
market went down another another 7.9%.
So see there's not a perfect indicator.
Uh October 13th, 2014, the market gained
another 13%. bottom two days later down
only six threequarters of a percent
gained gained 13%. August 21st 2015 was
the day before the low of which in that
for that instance the market gained 7%
in 51 days and the next day which is
another buy signal it gained 11% in in
50 days and then you have August 5th
2024 after a sharp correction in the S&P
the market bottomed on that day and
gained 18.468 468 and it signaled on
August 4th, 2025 as well. It's not this
is not part of a model. These are the
kind of things we study each day. Our
models are fixed. When they signal, we
know they signal. Every day I look at
our indicators to see what it's telling
us. This is one of the things it's
telling us. So basically, I'm telling
myself it's quite possible that what we
saw yesterday was a low. I want to see
some more confirmation. Maybe it's not a
low. Maybe it's going to be more like
the flash crash in this case, right?
Where the market went down another 7.9%.
We've never seen this action early in a
bull market bare market, let's put it
that way. We've seen it during
corrective periods and the market
bottoms one or two months later at at
the worst. We've never seen this kind of
action early in a bull market.
>> So that's very promising, Milton, that
the action that we saw yesterday on
Thursday, February 5th. You often you
have seen in multiple local bottoms
suggesting that it's it's it's a bullish
indicator.
Yeah, it's not enough for me to cover my
shorts. But when I realized that the SVU
is down less than 3%.
NASDAQ was down less than 6% off its
highs. And still you saw panic in my
indicators, these rare indicators that
suggests that we're all going to be
fooled and the market could take off,
but I I haven't trig I haven't triggered
this yet. Now, realize my retail
newsletter clients are still long
because they had no reason to get out.
They're not traders. They're long-term
investors. We'll get to that in a
moment. and they're sitting pretty
today. My institutional investors are
not because either they maybe short
gold, maybe short stock so stocks, maybe
short the NASDAQ, maybe short the
Russell, maybe short the S&P and they're
all all screaming today. But this is re
why we went short. This is the reason we
went short right here. Okay.
>> Yep.
>> I'm going to show this later on. We got
a sell signal on December 11th. See the
December 11th, 2025, we got a sell
signal. This sell signal does not always
work. Okay. In other words, this sell
signal is telling you that the VX I
don't want to give you the the the
secret source, but it's looking at a
short-term rate of change in the VXN,
which is the VIX on the NASDAQ, relative
to another short-term VXM, which is
longer than the first shorter term. We
want to see a sharp shift in the VXN on
a short-term basis relative to previous
short-term basis. If I had to give you a
number, I'd say five days relative to 30
days, right? Tell you 10 days relative
to 30 days. Those aren't the real
numbers. Anyway, these gifts these
>> is it is it an increase in the in the
NASDAQ mix increase or in a very short
term rather over previous short term.
>> Okay. You you can tell me after the call
Milton but for now. Yeah.
>> Okay. Yes, I guess I could. But listen,
so in this case
this catches bare market rallies there
with singles when the market's up 18 or
15% in a bare market. It catches
rallies. It catches major bare market
major bull market peaks. But during a an
extended bill bull market, which you may
be having now, it gives a number of
false signals. I've pulled out the
successful signals from 1998 and we're
tracking is the market's following what
it does when the signals are successful.
If it's not, we get out of the short.
You understand? In other words, we're
going short on a probabilistic basis
knowing we may be wrong.
>> So, let me show you what we did on on
you know how how much the market has has
gained since December 11th. Take if you
wouldn't look at this table, what's the
maximum gain since December 11th?
Everything was talking about the great
new year and the bull movement, right?
>> Okay, I'll take guess I'll get I'll
guess I'll guess 7%.
>> What the S&P gained a maximum of 1.12%
since December 11th. That's all.
>> Really? Wow.
>> I want I can show you the chart if you'd
like.
>> I believe you.
>> Okay.
>> If there's anyone I believe Milton, it's
>> from the December 11th close to the
December to the January 27th close,
which was a final alltime high in the
S&P, it's only gained 1.12%. Now when
the success sixes were successful you
saw instances where it gained 1.8 for
1.98 5.17%.
2.61 2.78 2. So right now the way the
market has acted off the off those highs
is very consistent with successful
signals. Got it.
>> Uhhuh.
>> It's only hasn't really moved. Now
secondly let's see um we're now 37 days
past the signal. At yesterday's close we
were 37 days past the signal. How is it
done? Now, Sesby hadn't collapsed. It's
only down 1.49% since December 11th. But
let me show you something. In the year
2000, the signal on June 12th, the
market was up 0.45% 37 days later. Yet,
it g total decline off the signal of
23.70%.
In in 2001,
>> it was just later. It was just later, 58
days later.
>> Right. Right. The signal was later. But
the point is the market held up just as
it's held up now or actually or it's
held up then as well. Secondly, in in
here, it was up 0.31% in 2001, but from
the date of the signal, the ultimate
decline was 32%. And then again in in um
in 2015, excuse me. Yeah, it was up
1.07% by day 37, but its ultimate
decline was 13%. And again in 2021, it
was up 0.36%
through day 37 and its ultimate cl%. So
therefore, I tell my clients, yes, we're
short since December 11th. Yes, the
market hasn't gone down. However, the
market hasn't gone up. It's only gone up
1.2 12% maximum. And looking at the
instances in the past where the signal
work by day 37 in many instances, it was
up. We're down 1.49%.
So the my recommendation to the to the
institutions now, they don't all follow
me. They just use me as an input.
Obviously, the people managing billions
and trillions of dollars, I'm just one
input. Hopefully, I'll be one of the the
satis one of the best inputs, but I'm
just one input. But in any event, based
on this successful short single, we
should still be short. Now, it might
change at today's close for all I know,
right? But based on this successful
short signal of the past, let's face it,
we're only up 1.2% since December 11th
in the S&P. And at yesterday's close, we
were down 1.49, which is totally
consistent with previous successful
signals. This is the one reason I went
short. Nothing to do with the Fed,
nothing to do with Trump, nothing to do
with moving averages. Simple and
indicated. doesn't have a perfect
record, but it work it works great at
calling market peaks and bull and bare
market rally peaks. And since we had no
new bicycles since since May, and we had
one buy in June, which is I'll get to it
may be later, it's a weak buy signal.
We're giving you the benefit of the
doubt to the short side. However, I
would tell you a retail investor who's
following my work would sit through a
correction of four, five, six, even 7%
and not get out and and and and because
we're very long-term oriented for
institutions, we're trading oriented. We
can go short, we can go long, we can go
leveraged. It's a totally different
ballgame. And this is the reason we got
short just because of this one signal.
Of course, in the back of my mind, I
know there's there's there's a recession
indicator has 100% record that's now in
a cell, which is the rate of change of
the unemployment rate that's suggesting
recession. I know the leading indicators
are still suggesting recession. And
maybe there'll be recession, maybe
depression, maybe great deflation, may
be inflation. We don't really care. We
just care about the indicators. And in
the back of my mind, I know if you're
going to get a major bare market,
there'll be some sort of event that we
probably can't even predict that's going
to be associated with that bare market.
I think I already asked you this,
Milton, but it was the move in the V the
NASDAQ VIX VXN. Was it a decline or a
increase?
>> You asked me before. It's actually a
decline. It signals that after rally,
it's actually a decline. I'm sorry. It's
a sharp decline. Let's say it's 5 days,
but it's not five days. Let's say it's
five days relative to 30 days, relative
to 20 days. It's not 30. It's not 20.
You want to see a sharp decline in in
VIX relative to the rate of change for a
longer period. And it's
>> it's basically people
work.
>> It's inclusive. The five days include
the 30 days. You see,
>> it's not five days and the previous 25
days. It's five days and 30 days
including these five days, which has to
be a greater extreme.
>> I see. So, so it's pe it's uh investors
who were hedged bidding up options on
>> they got rid of their hedges too
quickly.
>> Very they're very optimistic of the
market on a very short-term basis
showing up in these numbers. Right.
Exactly. It's a shift in expected
volatility which is which is a shift in
bullishness which doesn't always show up
in the doesn't always show up in the
institutional uh in the in the uh retail
newsletter followers. Doesn't always
show up necessarily in put call ratios
but it shows up in this indicator
precisely near market peaks.
>> Yes. Almost never. And was it two
coincidence things? This VXN thing
happening and something else or was just
this?
>> No. No. This is one indicator based on
VXN itself. one indicator I say it's not
don't have a perfect record.
>> Yeah. This is this is special because
you know most of the times people see
implied volatility falling or even
crashing and they see that as a giant
buying opportunity for you it makes you
nervous. That's very interesting.
>> No no no no context context context.
Jack if this would have if this would
have signaled on June 15th I would have
it didn't but if it did I would have
ignored it because you're just coming
right off a major low with major buy
signals. Mhm.
>> Since it's signaling in December after
the market up since April and since um I
I got no additional confirming buy
signals, that's when I will try to act
on this. In other words, when I tell you
the signal is not always perfect and I
mentioned that in bull markets, you're
going to get false signals. I'm aware of
that. I'm not going to during the bull
market, I'm not going to have four or
false signals I'm going to follow. I'm
going to follow signals in which the
market has already gained significantly
and there's no confirming buy signals.
>> That makes sense. And so to me, you
know, normal normally, Milton, you get
an overwhelming
uh uh constellation. It's like a it's
like a parade of buy signals or sell
signals that that motivate you. Just let
me finish that motivate you to to
establish a position. It's interesting
to me, Milton, and you know, may maybe
you know, I won't without your
permission disclose just exactly how
short you are in your model portfolio,
but I can tell our audience uh very very
very short. It's interesting to me that
it indicates why why you have such a
large short position given this one
reading. Uh yeah.
>> Well, there's more. There's other things
that I talk about, but we went short on
December 11th. We added short
subsequently based on other things. I
just want to show you.
>> Okay.
>> We were long into December 11th. We went
short on December 11th. I'm trying to
show you why really, but I want to tell
you one other thing. And and I know most
technicians won't admit to this.
>> Many will, but many won't. It is so much
easier to call a market bottom
technically than to call a market peak.
Okay? Yet yet
technicians are always afraid to call
the market bottom and they're never
afraid to call the market peak. That's
so wrong at the top and they're so wrong
at the bottom. It's so amazing. In other
words, it's easier to call bottoms, but
everyone's always afraid to call the
bottom. But it's so much easier
technically.
>> Calling it top is very, very difficult
for everybody because tops it's in
stocks, not necessarily in commodities.
Clients are easy, but stocks are have
round the tops. And there's always
groups that are doing well even while
the market's peaking. So stocks are much
more difficult. And it's funny enough,
everyone's out there, you know, you see
people you interview all calling for
market crashes, market crashes, market
crashes, calling it for six months,
eight months, nine months, 10 years in a
row. You understand?
>> It's find somehow they find it easy to
call for market crashes. They're very
difficult to call market bottoms. Even
though market bottoms are so much easier
to call and market tops are much more
difficult to call.
>> Sophisticated investors don't typically
park their cash in high yield savings
accounts. Instead, when they want yield,
they turn to one of the fastest growing
asset classes for institutional
investors, private credit. These private
credit strategies were once reserved
exclusively for wealthy institutional
investors, but now they're available to
investors of all sizes thanks to the
Fundrise Income Fund, which has more
than 600 million invested and a 7.97%
distribution rate. With most traditional
savings yields falling, it's no wonder
why sophisticated institutional and
individual investors are turning to
higher yielding asset classes like
private credit. Click the link in the
description or visit fundrise.com/mm
to invest in the Fundrise income fund in
just minutes. The fund's total return in
2025 was 8% and the average annual total
return since inception is 7.8%. Past
performance does not guarantee future
results. Current distribution rate as of
12312025. Carefully consider the
investment material before investing
including objectives, risks, charges,
and expenses. This and other information
can be found in the income funds
perspectives at fundra.com/income. This
is a paid advertisement. Back to the
interview.
>> Okay. You want to talk Bitcoin or more
about stocks? I could talk about because
I have a lot of more about stocks.
>> Let's tease the people a little bit.
Let's uh let's let them wait. Let's talk
more about stocks. We will get into
Bitcoin. We will get into gold. We will
get into silver. But yeah, what were the
other signals you saw since December?
>> Let me show you something here. We we
actually let me do this control. If you
can't see the screen, let me know.
>> I will.
>> Russell 2000. We called this I actually
sent out the email at 401. I started
writing it at 10 minutes to 4 on January
23rd day after the top at the close.
This is the Russell 2000. This is a
chart. You can see where I'm circling
here, the circle.
>> Yes.
>> You see this island reversal? Island
reversal means it gapped into the into
the update and and and it gapped down.
You can make a little island. This this
bar in the top is an island. You see you
see what I mean by island.
>> Can you explain what what what this
means and and what it indicates in
>> I'll tell you what it means. When the
market gaps the up. Now, some people
don't understand what a gap is. A gap
doesn't mean the market opened higher
than yesterday's close. That's not a
gap. A gap means it happened opened
higher than yesterday's high. And the
downside gap means it opened lower than
yesterday's low. And for a gap to be
valid, it has to trade the whole day
with the gap not being filled. So in
other words, if the if the market is up
on a day and it it opens higher than the
day's previous high and by the end of
the day, it remains higher than the it
always remained higher than than the day
it previous high. That's an upside gap.
Downside gap is just the opposite. The
market opens below the previous day's
low and throughout the day it remained
its highest high of the day was below
the previous day's previous low. Okay,
that's a gap. A gap basically is telling
you
there's an emotional move. That's what a
gap is supposed to tell you. It's an
emotional move in the market. It's very
very rare in some markets is more rare
than other markets, but it's very rare
to see a market gap at all. I'll show
you some markets that almost never gap.
But there's something called an island
reversal, which is just two gaps. One
gap that takes place on the way up,
another gap that takes on the way down.
And you could make an island. There's an
air pocket between between those two
gaps. Now, I I showed you this one, but
this is a unique app. It's the only time
it ever happened in history of the
Russell 2000. What does that mean? It's
a one day island. I call it an isolated
one-day island reversal at the top. The
Russell 2000 was really really really
very very lethargic for quite a number
of years as you know right? Yes.
>> All of a sudden in January people are
saying the market is broadening. The
market is broadening. Wow. Look the
small caps are moving right. Everyone
was saying it. Even the beers were
saying it. Oh you know the the AI is
going to go down but the Russell is
going to continue higher. There's a
shift in rotation right? And people
believed it to so much of an extent that
on January 22nd, the day of the final
high so far in the Russell, the market
gapped up. But that's only half the
story. The next day, the market gap down
and it created a one-day island
reversal. One day
>> and this never happened before, ever.
>> Never in the Russell 2000. Usually an
hour reversal have three days or six
days. I'll show you the history. I have
I went through every island reversal
history of the Russell. Got it? So I'm
not just talking out of my hat.
>> I know you're not talking out your hat.
Yeah. Russell 2000 is the US small caps.
>> Russell 2000 had an island. I
immediately said the Russell 2000 is
giving a very very bearish signal. So we
had a sell signal on December 11th in
the in the S&P. S&P only was up maximum
1.2% above its high in um in actually by
January 22nd was even up 1.12% because
it peaked on January 27th. But anyway,
this is another reason to suggest the
market might be topping and in fact the
Russell 2000 ultimately through
yesterday's close were down um I think
7% off its high. What am I showing you?
This is an island versus the gap is
negative. I looked at previous tops that
occurred with N. Now you see you had you
had an you had a you have a gap up right
off the lows in April. You see you have
a gap up in May. You have a gap up in
June. You ignore these gaps because the
market's coming off a thrust low.
You don't just like we don't look at the
you don't look at the um VXN sell signal
right off the low because of course VXN
is going to collapse right off the low.
So too, there'll be a lot of enthusiasm
when the market is coming off a low. But
we're looking at this where everyone's
so excited about the Russell claiming
that it's starting to break out,
claiming to see a broadening and that's
where you see iron revers means it gaps
up, gaps down, and then it continues
lower. Now we wrote our report the day
gap down of course continued lower and
TSA's closed. So this is showing early
in the move. You can see multiple you
see multiple gaps which are considered
buy signals. See context is the key in
many indicators.
Gaps are not random. Gaps take place off
lows and gaps take place into tops. You
have to know where you are, what where
you potentially are. This is July 17th,
2000. This again, it wasn't an island
reversal. It was two gap days in a row
off the high, two gap downs, and that
marked the top of the market. The the
market tested, never made a higher high,
and then it declined some 40% over the
next two years from July 72, 2000 to the
to the bottom of the bare market. You
saw over here again in um September
19th, 2008. Now realize
>> Leman
>> the um you you there was a financial
crisis and and and for some reason on
that day there was some positive news
out of the Fed and the Russia 2000
gained 19.85%
on the day.
>> Milton only because I'm a giant nerd and
I've read a lot of books about 2008. I
think that was uh you know you're a
technician not that you you think it it
doesn't matter. I live I lived through
it but I I sort of I remember what the
market did but I forget what the news
>> there was a stimulus bill that was I
think was going to go through Congress
and then it didn't pass and it was a
>> so it's up 19% in today 985%
gapped up to the top and then it
declined 60% to it final low and this is
continuation gap so on point y where you
see important gaps at previous peaks now
look at this one this is on um January
17th 2020 remember you remember the
COVID crisis I think so right covid
crisis y crisis didn't really begin
until uh until early March. But the
Russell knew about the COVID crisis
because the Russell gapped up one day
before its peak. One day before the
all-time high, the Russell 2000 on
January 17th, 2020, the Russell gapped
up. That was its high. Then it further
gaps into the secondary high. But this
is again a sign of a market peak. Enthus
uncalled for enthusiasm at a new high.
Got it?
>> In that case, the market declined
another 43.90% to its low. And I show
2007 of various gaps. I don't want to
take too much time on this. I just want
to justify why I'm able to I'm going
through history of gaps. I mean the only
other the see this is our island
reversal. This is our current market.
You see the one I showed you earlier
January 22nd 2016 right
>> the peak in November 15 2024 the final
peak in that in that rally was also on a
gap day. You see then the market
declined 29.90%.
To find a a an island reversal in the
Russell island reversal. Let me see if I
I think I I highlighted an island
reversal here. No, this not a true
island reversal. No. Uh I think I
highlighted one, but I don't take too
much time in it now. But the the the one
day island reversal we had now, which I
called it an isolated one day reversal
at the top, has never before occurred in
the Russell. It occurs in commodities
often enough has never occurred in the
Russell. And the reason it occurred this
time is because everyone's so enthusiast
enthusiastic about the Russell rather
than understanding I wrote this in my
reports. rather than understanding that
in nearly every bull market in history,
it peaks when the lagards start moving.
It doesn't peak when the previous uh
movers start moving. It peaks when the
lagards stop moving and the general they
call the generals and the troops. The
generals slow down then they let the
troops get killed. You understand?
>> And sorry, are are those are the lagards
would they be high beta, high risk, high
speculation stocks or they save stocks
like Coca-Cola?
>> Every market has a different lagard.
Yeah, sometimes low beta like Coca-Cola,
but sometimes it's uh the small cap like
the Russell 2000. In this case, the
Russell 2000 SP 600 did very little for
the last four years and all of a sudden
it starts surging into a pig and
everyone's claiming bullish bullish
bullish market breath breath is is
increasing and the market is broadening
and get out of your AI and just buy the
small caps and and I say no this happen
so typical at the top of a bull market
where the they call it the dogs, right?
the dogs start there's expression
something about the dogs lead the pack
you know
>> so yeah these are the dogs there I think
40% of the ro 2000 have no earnings you
know negative earnings so this is not a
quality indicator call it small cap
whatever they're great small caps and
they're are garbage small caps 2000
about 40% of it are small caps that have
really no earnings I just wanted to
point out what we saw which is this
amazing one day I there's another reason
to be bearish again there's another
reason in the back of my head why I'm
not I didn't use action to cover my
shorts. Even though there's some
historical instances, my models didn't
go long. I just gave instances where it
might be a bottom. I'm still, you know,
tops are very difficult to call and
bottom is difficult to call. And uh this
bottom after two and a half% decline in
the S&P, less than 3%. You know, it's
highly unlikely that it's a bottom. It
may be a sharp short correction that
ends. We'll see. I'm trying to tell you
that I'm not pounding the table. I'm not
sure. I'm trying to show you what we
tell our clients. We don't every day
have a strong opinion like most people
try to do. My strong opinion is that
we're in a bull market that began in
April and the market should continue
higher. It's projected to go higher
unless we see something different. We
haven't seen anything major different
except the VXN single in December and
these things like for example this gap
up in the Russell 2000. Let's see. Let's
let's get let's um let's um
let me show you the last buy signal we
ever got if if that's interesting to
you.
>> Absolutely.
>> I said the last signal we got was in
August 13th.
>> But you said you didn't like it.
>> I don't like it. I'll tell you why. Tell
you why. This signal occurs when the
Russell declines at least 5% bottomed
eight days ago meaning it didn't make a
lower low for eight days. So on on
August on August this first signal on
April 9th 2009 but this the latest
signal was August 13th 2025. In that
case the Russell was down like five and
a half% SP is down like less than 2%.
The rest of the market didn't pull back
the Russell pulled back held its low for
eight days and on the eighth day it it
exhibited an upside gap. Remember we
said upside gaps come a great after a
low and a bearish where you when after
market had an extended rally.
>> This is one of the cases where you get
an upside gap just eight days after a
low. Now the low was only 5%. In most of
these instances it wasn't just the
Russell down 5%. Many other indices were
down. In this case a only the Russell
was down 5%. Even the S&P 600 small cap
wasn't down 5%. And on the day a gap to
the upside. Let me just show you the
history of this one. This is it. It
signaled on April 9th, 2009, right after
a major bare market down. It was a 56%
bare market. It was right. It signaled
on October 14th, 2000. Also early in a
bull market signal on September 3rd,
2010 after 19% decline in the S&P. It
signal 2012. This is more of a after a
rally, but you did have a great low in
in 2011 at the lows. It signal here it
signal during during an up move in 2017.
And here it signaled um after the 220
lows at the at the June correction and
now it signal here. Now when I saw the
signal I I really I think it's a weak
signal but basically the S&P the S&P is
up 7.9% since then which is not a bad
move. Why do I say it's not a bad move?
It's only up 7.9% since August 13th
because I look at the history of the
other successful moves you see right
here. There's a table. This shows all
those nine instances when we got the
same signal. The 90 I'm showing the 90.
So, you're looking at the results for
the S&P even though the signal was for
the Russell.
>> Yes. Yes. Yes. I I showed my clients the
signal is for the Russell, but I trade
basically the models are built to call
the S&P. Okay. We're looking at Okay,
that's that's the point. But the point
over here is is that through 90 days,
the maximum gain was 6.72, which seems
pretty weak, right?
>> However, in 2016, the maximum gain
through 90 is only 2.83% and went on to
gain 15%. You see, in 2012, by day 90
through 90 days, it was only up 5.38%
and yet it gained a total of 22% within
a year. In 2009, it was up 5.33% through
day 90 and ended up 11.47. So, the fact
that we're only up 6.72%
is not really troubling. But this
doesn't go into my models. It's not
robust enough as far as I'm concerned.
So, I say I built models to call
markets, which we'll talk about for
retail and so on. This doesn't go into
my models. This is just something that I
show my clients uh just to show what's
going on in the market. I I did not put
much weight into this particular signal,
but we're on a buy signal off the lows
anyway, but I didn't put much weight
into the signal because the you're
looking for a gap a gap up after a
decline and only the Russell decline. It
was only a minor decline of 5%. And in
Russell, 5% decline is really just a
hiccup. It's just a random event.
Russell is far more volatile than the
S&P. So that's that one. Okay. Now,
there's something else here. This is
very important. Mhm.
>> This is very important because you would
think that I just show some signals with
some uh data and
you think I wouldn't even follow the
standard technical stuff but I actually
believe it or not I actually follow
standard technical stuff as well.
>> I know Milton I was looking at some of
the the data and all the materials you
sent almost all the time you have very
few charts all tables and data but this
time I said Milton making charts. What's
going on?
>> These charts are just reflecting where
the date is. But anyway, this is let me
show you this. We looked at every great
market peak since 1966. Okay? Every
market topped in the S&P. We're looking
for minimum decline of of 18% in the
S&P. So, for example, 1966 market peaked
on February 9th and declined 22%. Let's
see 1981. Uh the the the S&P peaked on
they're actually looking at the Dow
peaked in April 27th, declined 24%. NASA
peaked in April May 29th clined 28% and
so on. 87 SB peaked in August 25th,
declined 33%. You see, we're looking for
every decline of at least 18%. In 2000,
the S&P peaked on March 24th, down 49%.
NASDAQ peaked on March 10th, down 77,
and so on so forth.
>> And these aren't just highs, they're
highs that specifically were the peak
leading the final highs in the market.
>> Final highs, not just highs, final
>> final highs in the final highs in the
market for decline of of 18%. Final
final highs. Okay? Because most of the
time, sorry, but most of the time highs
are actually bullish, right?
>> Well, until it's bearish. Yeah. Most not
highs are bullish until they're bearish,
right? But yeah, because the market
makes a series of higher highs till its
final high. I mean, market make 50
higher highs till it's final high. So,
yes, if you look at it that way, of
course, highs are generally bullish.
It's questions what takes place at the
highs. For example, I'll give it I I I
highly red arrows. There are four pages
by the way data.
>> I highly like the 10day 10day trend. Now
I I hate to explain what trend is
because it's even I always found it
difficult to understand it. I now I
finally understand.
>> I prepared I looked it up before. It's
ratio of upside volume to ratio of
downside volume.
>> No, that's half the that's only half the
ratio. It's a ratio of the ratio of
upside down to downside volume to the
ratio of upside stocks to downside
stocks. It's a ratio of a ratio. In
other words, it's not enough to have
high upside volume. You have to have
high upside volume relative to the
number of stocks that went up. So for
example, if you have 10 to one upside
volume and you have 10 times as many
stocks up as down, the trend will be one
neutral. However, if you had 10 times to
one upside volume and only had a 1 ratio
of up stocks to down stocks, you see
then the trade will be 0 50. That would
be a very very low ratio because the the
upside volume is overwhelming to such an
extent that it it takes the ratio ratio
down. But any event, I don't want to get
into the trend because I'll have to get
into everything and it's going to take
too long. But the 10day trade in the S&
NASDAQ at the day of the peak of January
27th of the S&P was 0.76.
Now this exactly the median you see at
previous market peaks. It's 0.78. You
see right at what you normally see at a
market. Now I'm sure all of pages are
all yellow. When they're not when
they're red when any column is red, it
means they're not consistent with what
you've seen in a previous market peak.
Everything is consistent but many of
them are at the medians. For example,
25-day New York Stock Exchange trend at
0.98. The median is 0.96. You see?
>> Mhm.
>> Let's look at this one. 10day advanced
declines in in the NASDAQ. The New York
Stock Exchange is 1.07 over1. The median
at major peaks is 1.09 over1. We're at
the median. What about the number of 52-
week highs in the S&P on December?
January 23 45, which seems like a high
number, but in fact, the median peak at
final market peaks is 47 right there.
And I can go on and on and on. Let me
find an interesting one. Let's look at
rates of change because that's really
important. Let's look at the uh
>> at the the six-month rate of change in
the S&P. You know, the S&P has only
gained 9.22%
over the last six months, even though
it's up 37% since April.
It's slowed down. The median is 10.08%
at the top. Let's look at the NASDAQ.
You know, the NASDAQ is only up 12.46%
over the last six months, even though
it's up 45% off the lows. But the median
at a peak is 13.19. Let's look at the
smaller caps because we're all talking
about small caps. The the S&P 400 is
midcap. It's six month is 8.5% but the
median is 10.94. It's below the median
gain. It's more it's weaker than you'd
expect at a top. You see? So these are
>> tell me about a threshold and what that
means.
>> Threshold means if it be above this
level, it would turn red. The six month
rate of change in the NASDAQ would be
above 81.11. It's not totally
inconsistent with what you see at a
market peak. You've never seen that
strength at a market peak. Well, let's
look at the number of highs in the S&P
because that actually helped me out in
2020 2023.
Uh let me show you that S&P page one 52
week highs. The threshold is 87. There's
a period during 19 2024
where most of these things were yellow
but the the number of highs were were
were about 92.
>> I think you may have talked to me about
that Milton. Yeah.
>> Which told me that that's not the market
generally. You wouldn't expect that to
be the market peak because you never saw
a market peak with that many new highs.
Okay, this is showing something else we
look at.
>> You just went through a lot of the data,
but I didn't hear a lot of conclusions.
What What were some of the
>> conclusions? Conclusion here is
>> Yeah. Yeah. If anyone's telling you, if
anyone's telling you that the market
action is inconsistent with actions seen
at previous market peaks, or if anyone
tells you that Federal Reserve action is
inconsistent with what we've seen in the
previous market peaks, or if anyone
tells you that the rate of change of
interest rates of the long bond is
inconsistent with what you've seen at
market peaks, I would show them my tech
technicals at the high and show. All of
these things are in my are in my table
and all these things are consistent with
what you've seen at prior market peaks.
>> You're saying that you're seeing signs
of market.
>> You're saying that no one can argue that
the market can't peak now based on
technical data. They can argue that
we're not at a peak, but they can't
argue that we can't peak. In other
words, sometimes, very often that, you
know, half his data is red, meaning the
market is showing signs that it's not
peaking.
>> And red in this instance is good. In the
same way red in China means stock market
goes up.
>> No no yeah red means that it's not
consistent with
>> with with what you see in the previous
peaks. I mean a good example would be
the five day the fiveday breath. Like
for example let me show let's get the
fiveday breath. Fiveday advance
declines. You see the 1.33.
If it's above 2.3 2.34 you're not going
to see a market peak. It's going to be a
thrust. Only once did you see it above
two. That's back in 1976. Now 196, just
to let you know, was one of the
strangest markets because the the S&P
peaked, the Dow peaked, they they
climbed about 18%. At the same time, the
American Stock Exchange, which I don't
think exists anymore, which was an which
was the small cap index of the day, was
in a major bull market gaining 30%. It
was mainly in oil stocks, but the oil
stocks and the S&P were also rallying
while the S&P was declining. So
therefore at the peak you saw the at
that peak you saw the oil stock surging
and you saw 2.34 to1 um AD line at the
peak but generally you see at the peak
the AD line is uh is look at it you
never see it even above 1.75 we're at
1.33 median is 1.18 but let me you had
1.66 66 to 2011 top also difficult top
but you 1.58 1.52 and 89 and 90 okay
this is just one example 5day advanced
decline we have a 5day ad line we use as
a breath rust you know we have readings
of three four five to one over fiveday
basis which gives us buy signals but to
tell you you can't expect the market to
peak even at a 2 to1 level you wouldn't
expect the market we're not there now
you understand
>> if you had 90 new 52 week highs in the
S&P when you last saw the high and this
only looks at the days of highs So if
January 27th could have been the final
high because the data is consistent. It
doesn't mean it is the final high. It
means it could be the final high and
we're looking at you look at as you can
see we look at many things you know we
don't just hang our hat on one
indicator. Yes.
>> Okay let's see what else you want. Well
you you talk to talk about many things
to talk about.
>> Milton we'll return to stocks and we
will I promise our audience just get
into the commodities gold silver maybe a
little oil but also particularly
Bitcoin. But Milton, I just want to take
a lot of the work that you've been
showing is for institutional clients,
some of the biggest and most successful
hedge funds in the world. You recently
launched a product that is for
individual investors. You know, I
include myself in that category.
>> What is different about this product?
Tell us a little bit about the value
that you you think it could provide.
Okay, I'm going to take it step by step,
but basically before I even show any
charts or show any data, individual
investors find it very very difficult
because they read the news and they hear
the news and they try to f follow
financial reports and they even listen
to great podcasts like Jack Farley's
great podcast. They always get
conflicting opinions. They don't know
what to decide for themselves. They're
they're out of the market when the
market's rallying. They get into the
market close to the top. you know, it's
very difficult for an individual
investor and I wanted to create I I
spent 10 years working on models. I
really didn't plan to build a newsletter
for retail investors. I really just to
wanted to write a book and when I as you
did my research,
>> my research was getting so robust and it
fascinated me because I couldn't believe
what I was discovering in the market. Be
honest with you, I I if 10 years ago I
would someone would have told me by the
time you finish you're going to have
2,800 indicators. You're going to have
about 600 indicators that have a perfect
track record. meaning without a pullback
on a bicycle with pullbacks of less than
three and a half% you know I wouldn't
have believed it's even possible most
indicators work on percentage you know
work 65% of the time you're happy it
works 75% of the time you're ecstatic
indicators that work historically 100%
of the time and they're not madeup
indicators not back fit indicators we're
just looking for rare data that takes
place at lows the problem is most people
who look at market lows only see what's
obvious to them they open the chart they
see a moving average there are many many
indicators as I mentioned earlier saw
they're not obvious vious to the most
people not even to most technicians
because they don't follow it on it's not
computerized just as long as we're
talking I have I have one of my uh one
of my uh spreadsheets open so here you
see for example this my this is today's
spreadsheet that I I get my indicators
on
>> oh wow
>> so so for example today I saw the VXN
yesterday VXN was up 10% over two days
VIX VXN was 35% in three days these
indexes had the highest three-day volume
in 200 days 200 days 20 you see that I
get these indicator ators. This these
are not signals. These are just basic
indicators.
>> But I want to point out I'll go to the
column where you show no signal. You see
column says no signal right here. Yeah.
>> You see no signal.
>> Just want to show you uh how many
indicators we have. So you go to no
signal.
>> 17,000 19,000 20,000
>> be this soon. We'll be there soon. You
see we have
>> 22,000 indicators that have not signaled
today. Instead
>> we you have 23,000 that did not signal.
2029. No, it's actually 20 20,310 that
have not signaled today. Right. Okay.
>> Right. So, the point is we're looking
for these things to signal. We're
looking for rare signals. We're not
looking for the kind of things people
look at every day. Market's up 1%,
markets up 2%. You know, we're looking
for things that don't take place too
often. But when they do take place,
they're telling you something. Got it?
>> So, sometimes the VXN gaining 35% in
three days tells you something as I
pointed out, but sometimes it's not
sufficient. That's why we're not ready
to cover our shorts today. But at the
other end by tomorrow today's action may
change things. You know it's a very very
big bullish day. Okay let's get the
let's let's go back to to to to the
retail letter when what so I wanted to
create something for retail people. I
wanted to create something well when I
say wanted to create something I was
only able to create it after I did all
my work. I realized that the data I'm
getting allows me to create something
that retail investors never had before.
And that is, you know, we're told that
if you miss the greatest days of the
market, you know, only five days a year,
you'll
>> Yeah. I Yeah.
>> Right. So, if you're going to try to
time the market, it's likely you're
going to miss those great days. You know
why? Not because um by chance you'll
miss those five great days because those
five great days generally take place
early on in a bull market. They don't
take place middle of a bull market. like
the 9% gain you had in um on April in
April 9th was early in a bull market,
right? See that?
>> So so so mostly most often the great
gains take place early in a move. You
miss get if you don't get it early, you
wait for the moving averages to cross.
You wait till until the Fed eases 15
times, you're late and you miss the
great move. So on the other hand, I
realized in doing my work that it's
difficult to call tops. In other words,
as they say, the recession indicator
called uh called 18 of the last six bull
markets. In other words,
tops are more difficult to to call. So,
this is what I did. It's it's it's
different. We decide we're not going to
call market tops at all. We're going to
be long the market until it declines.
For the model purpose, I used 8%, but
for in talking purposes, I say seven or
8%. But for the the data you're going to
see is all based on a decline of a
minimum of 8%. Okay? So we said like
this, we're going to buy the first buy
signal that's generated. Now the
institutions see our hundreds of
signals. We keep, you know, we're
charging our retail people $10 a month.
Institutions pay as much as 12,000 a
month. So we're not going to we're not
going to um give give the data away. But
we're going to give the the retail
indicators a buy signal at a first at a
first signal at a first new buy signal
after they're out of the market. So So
what gets them out of the market? Say
they got a buy sale on April 4th, they'd
still be long because the market had
never declined 8%. Right? The maximum
decline was 5% and change few days after
the loan. So, we're going to say you're
going to buy the market, hold on, and
you're going to hold on until we get you
out. We're going to get you out after
about a decline of about 8%, which is
the model. Why 8%. Very simply,
an investor could tolerate an 8% decline
if he's already made 30% on the up move.
Number one. Secondly, he could have
target 8% decline if the market's going
to decline 44% or 35% or 26% or 19%.
He's happy to have missed the bulk of
the down move even though he caught the
first 8% of the down move. Got it?
Number one, we have we had 50 roughly 55
buy signals since 1957. Remember, I'm
only showing you the initial buy signal
after after we're out of the market. I'm
not showing institutional wise is
thousands of buy signals for the retail
model. We have a buy signal. We had
about 55. It says 55 buys and sells
since 1957. You see? And this is a chart
showing all the buys. The last buy I
highlighted April 4th, 2025. The
market's up u 38% since then. Right
since April 4th. Now,
these are the buys and based on signals,
which I'll show you some of the signals.
However,
what are the cells? When do you get out?
So, you're going to get out. We don't
know what to sell. We're not smart
enough to call the cells because sells
are very difficult. Tops are difficult
to call. We're not gonna anticipate a
bare market. We're not going to say get
out now at the tire of the market
because they're bare market. You say,
you know, my my my my clients, you know,
my retail clients, you know, my
individual investors who don't have time
to sit at a computer all day and watch
the market. They rather be retired. They
rather build a retirement account and
work in their in their shops or work in
their on their computers or whatever
they do and rather not watch the market.
We'll tell you to get out when the
market's down some 8%.
And then you'll just go into Treasury
bills, which is a great safe investment.
Okay? And we'll tell you when to get
back in when we get a buy signal. And
now what is that done?
>> So to be clear, there is one and only
one sell signal. The market's down seven
or eight%. That's it.
>> For the model purposes, what I'm showing
you now is based on 8% at a closing
basis.
>> In reality, it's 7 to 8%.
>> Yeah.
>> I I I'm not to first show to you 7 to
8%. William O'Neal, as you know, in his
famous Ken Slim model tells you buy a
stock and get out if it's down seven or
eight%. So, I I use that term, but the
model was built using 8%. To be honest,
each of these cells you're going to see
were down eight. Let me let's go to the
next page because this is good. This is
the um this is all the buy dates. Let's
see what you did. If you got out, down
8%. Now, some be down 10% because the
market be down 3% in one day. Yeah.
>> This is the batting averages. In other
words, the model starts on on the first
buy seal occurs on October 21st, 1957
was the day before the low. The market
gained 51.26% before you got out. You
got out on September 21st, 59. And you
average the average long the average
long position getting in to get out, you
gained 26%. The average decline when you
when you got out of a loss was was
1.41%.
$10,000 invested in 1957 following this
model it' be worth1 billion12,000
at the end closed with trading yesterday
January 6th
>> 10 billion how is that possible wait
>> compounding 8 and a half% peranom try it
out 50 70 years 68 years
>> you started with 10,000
>> 18 and a half% peranom starting at
10,000 uh 68 years you you'll see it's a
billion dollars okay
>> that's it so the point is though that
you're you're not going you're a
long-term investor in the S&P 500.
You're not going to pick stocks. You're
not going to pick sectors. You're not
going to worry about bare markets.
You're going to be long. You're going to
capitalize the most of the big moves of
the S&P 500. You're going to wait till
the markets decline down some before you
get out. And B and if you're in a
retirement account, you're not going to
pay taxes. And this has been the return
yet. The profit long trades 95% of the
long trades have been profitable. Give
you an example. You bought it August
4th.
>> Let's say the market's down 10%
tomorrow. So, we're down 8% off the
highs. It's a profitable trade. You
bought you bought on August 4th. You're
not going to be up 40%. It'll be up 29%.
Got it.
>> Yep. And melt. So, so uh 18.5% that is
uh pretty good. You know, Buffett, I
think, is 20 around 20%.
>> But it certainly outperforms most hedge
funds. I mean, it doesn't outerform
Stuck Miller or George Soros, but it
certainly out outperforms 90% of hedge
funds. No question. and Milton, the fact
that you're never on the uh when the
market's going up, you're never
outperforming by, you know, having a
beta or exposure over 100%. So, it means
it's just it's just avoiding draw downs.
And then what that indicates to me, I
think it must be a logical conclusion is
that the worst periods for the S&P 500
are when it's already down more than 80%
from its highs.
>> It's amazing that you ask. Look at this.
This is the year-over-year returns based
on the model. A yellow are the years the
S&P were down. So in year 2000, let's go
back here. In ' 62, the SP was down 8%,
the model gained 18%. 66, the SP is down
10%, the model was flat in the year. In
74, the SP is down 26, the model was up
20. Why? Because we're out during the
bulk of the decline. We get in within
days of the low and we catch those big
five-day moves that people talk are fate
of missing. You see 81, the mark's down
five, we're up 15. Last was 2022, the
the market was down 18.1 19%. We're up
3.6%. And again, this is total return.
It's including the dividends on the S&P
and it's including the the the income
you get from Treasury bills. Now, okay,
so this is just showing the yearly year
returns. Any question? Pick a year like
you know any
>> you don't get the advanced signals uh um
but you you you just get this reading of
the S&P 500 when to get in, when to get
out and the your model has been long the
S&P throughout all of this turmoil since
early April. And I think that is so
important because it's not just the
quality of the research. I mean, as
people can tell, every have a pretty
encyclopedic read of the markets and
market history, but it's also how
accessible is it to the person using
that research. Like, for example, you
know, I mean, there there are some great
research providers out there or or good
research providers who the thing is so
complicated that it's almost impossible
for someone who's not trading the
markets full-time to implement it. And
actually there there is a risk for you
know very smart people who are very
proficient and successful in their
fields but are not uh you know um
experts in in the markets to to to get
things wrong. And so I think this the
simplicity of this model is is extremely
um totally people try to scale in and
scale out. They never show here short.
You're either long or short either long
or asset or T bills. Nothing wrong with
being in T builds right
>> and nothing wrong with being in a bull
market and getting out after you're down
8%. You have a tremendous trade. You're
far better than most people. Now, let me
show you something else that's
fascinating about this.
>> People who have a business or they're
working, they don't want to trade all
the time.
>> We have an average of one trade, one
roundtrip buy and sell every one and a
quarter years.
>> Wow.
>> 2026 there were no trades. In 2025, we
sold on March 10th and we bought on
April 4th. 2024, zero trades. 23 two
trades. You see, the worst we saw was in
2002, there were six trades. Worst.
That's the worst we saw. You see? So
this is also look how many zeros there
are. I mean you can sit back and just go
on your vacation.
>> That's amazing. And people say I want as
many signals as possible and people can
tell you you know you have 20,000
probably more signals but really what
people should be paying for is the lack
of signals the lack of exactly. Okay. So
so Milton you know you you charge uh a
quite hefty fee for your institutional
investors but you said that this is only
$10 a month. So is that $120 a year?
Yeah, this is our website institutions
is milenberg.com individuals
milenbergedge.com
and what I did is just you know I showed
you 2004 excuse me 2025
>> I just did select six dates
sample dates if you're interested to
show you why it was so difficult to get
into the market and why the model told
you to get in. So for example, October
21st, 1957,
Secretary Treasury Hump Humphrey, he was
a secretary of the Treasury.
He said, "We're headed for a depression,
as did former President Herbert Hoover,
who was still alive in 1957." And they
both were warning of a great depression
again. Why do you say to that? 1957.
And comes Miltonberg's model and gets a
buy signal on October 21st, 1957. Why
was the buy signal? Simple stuff. The
fiveday average volume of New York Stock
Exchange was the greatest in in 375 days
over the past 20 a regime of high
volume. The S&P 500 made at least 60 new
one-year lows. The um the the SB500
closed at at least a 60-day low. The SP
declined at least 12% into today's low
and today was the lowest low off its
high. And net upside volume as a
percentage of total volume, I don't it's
complicated, was less than was below
minus.45%. 45% which means heavy
downside volume and you had a reverse
breath thrust advances declines of the 0
was the opposite of a advanced decline
line a reverse advanced decline line and
this signal at the low just when
everyone was expecting a great
depression it signaled at the low mark
gained 55% signal gain at the low in 62
market gained 79% signal again
>> melt sorry I don't I don't want to get
lost in the you I want us I want us to
go the weeds about the present day so
people go to those websites we'll we'll
include those links in the description
Um, Milton, let's talk about
Bitcoin, gold, and silver. Let's start
starting with gold and silver. Uh, we've
had such a powerful move over the past
year higher and yet we we just had an
utter collapse exactly one week ago week
ago. I've been receiving your research
and I was impressed that uh either the
the day of the high or the day after the
high, you correct me, you actually you
put put a short position in gold and
silver by by selling call spreads. What
did you see in gold and silver? What
have you made of the market action uh
over the past week?
>> Okay, it's so funny because look look
what Paige just opened to you. You ever
Nelson bunker hunt? You ever these
people have bunker hunt?
>> That was last last silver crisis. Not
not this the last one you had but silver
went traded to to $50.
>> Silver Thursday.
>> This is back. Look at that. So guess
what? The market declined. I want to
show you this. And and and this is March
24th, 1980. Nelson Bunker Hunt 71%
silver collapse and um CPI was at 14.7%
on that month, the highest in 23 years
on March 24th, 1980. And the market was
down 20 17%. Everyone's panicking and
guess what? We got a buy signal. I'm not
going to get into it now. Just trust us.
We got a buy signal
>> and that was a buy signal for the S&P.
But but yeah, I'm
>> No, the point I'm making is the panic in
silver generated a buy signal in the
S&P. That's what I'm trying to point
out. Let's go. Let's get back to your
questions of gold and silver. I just
just interesting that you mentioned
silver. Just when I had the chart about
the Nelson Bunker Silver Panic, let's
talk about gold and silver. Okay. Number
one, I I got to show you why we do a
lot. I I managed a lot, you know, people
don't know this. I managed the largest
gold fund in America in the 1980s.
Largest gold stock fund.
>> Yep.
>> You saw that uh that picture up there
where it says mutual manager of the
year. I managed three top funds of the
year in ' 87. One of them was a gold
fund. And the reason was because while
everyone thought gold will go counter to
the market, my argument was I saw a
crash coming. I said gold was moving up
along with stocks. If gold moves up
along the stocks and the stocks in a
crash, no reason for gold to go counter.
Gold will go counter if it's showing
signs of going counter to the market.
But if gold and stocks move in the same
direction, there's no reason to believe
that when stocks go down, gold will
continue going up. So we we we lowered
our our cash position in our gold fund.
We raised our cash position to more than
50%. That's how I had the greatest
performing gold fund up 66% on the year.
But let me show you my gold uh my gold
stuff. I have a lot of stuff on gold
here. January 30th writing gold and
silver calls. We sold calls using this
the high strike price. We made a quick
easy 4% for institutional clients if
they followed us. They didn't have to
sell the exact strike price we did. But
it was clear that the market's not going
to make a new high. So we sold the calls
at the strike. What were we looking at?
Let me show you what we were looking at.
Number one, people think the that gold
is some sort of a magic instrument
that's going to trade up along with the
CPI. Okay, it trades up along CPI, but
often the price of gold exceeds the CPI
to such an extent that you get a major
bare market right here in 1980. This is
the red is the the the ratio of gold to
the CPI, United States cumulative CPI.
You see this spike here? Over the next
20 years,
gold declined 86.2% 27% relative to CPI
from 1980 to 20 thou to 2000 the CPI
doubled and gold was down nearly more
than 50% the relative loss in gold was
86.27% 27% versus the CPI. So when
everyone out all the pundits are telling
you buy gold because if the inflation
goes up, gold goes up. It's just not
true. If gold anticipated the inflation
in this case, gold got so ahead of
inflation. As inflation continued, gold
went down relative inflation. Same thing
is happening now. This is only through
December 31st, not through January. Gold
relative to CPI is way higher it's ever
been in history. Now say the CPI is
fudged. Okay? But we all know with 100
ounce of gold, you can find buy more now
than you were able to buy five years
ago. I mean, you could buy a yacht, you
could buy whatever. I mean, which you
couldn't do five years ago with gold.
Gold has way exceeded the CPI. I did
studies, you know, I managed the largest
gold fund. I have this out of memory,
but I did studies of the YM Republic in
in Germany when you had the so-called
hyperinflation when they say gold was
the best asset to own. Yes, gold was the
best asset ass asset to own because
stocks on an inflation adjusted basis
lost 95%. And gold on inflation adjusted
bas b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b
b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b b
b bas gain 10%. Okay, if you take out
the billions of% of inflation in Weimar,
if you held gold, not only did you not
lose money, you made 10% over that
three-year period,
>> but it's not a trillion percent if after
you adjust for inflation,
>> right? You didn't make hundreds of
percent. So when people are saying gold
is up 175% because of inflation it makes
no sense. Gold even in the worst
hyperinflation did not outperform and
secondly there was one correction during
that this people don't realize it
there's one correction in gold during
that hyperinflation period when gold
corrected nearly 50%. While inflation
was hyper why while you saw the
hyperinflation so gold listen I look at
gold as a commodity but it's a a stable
commodity. It's a commodity. It doesn't
deteriorate. So, it's a very good hedge
against inflation over the long term.
But it depends when you bought it. If
you bought it right here when it's low
relative inflation, you're doing fine.
But if you bought it now,
if you bought it right here, up here,
when it's at an all-time high relative
to you got to be crazy to think
you're going to outperform inflation.
Look at gold relative to oil. Gold is at
its highest price relative to oil. Now,
oil is a commodity and gold is a
commodity. Oil is mined and gold is
mined. Now oil has a benefit over gold.
The benefit is all oil that has been
mined or has been drilled over history
has disappeared. It's been consumed. Now
one ounce of gold that has been mined in
the last 5,000 years is is is has been
consumed. It's all above ground. So the
supply of gold actually increases to a
far greater extent than the supply of
most other commodities. So gold actually
has something negative relative to oil.
Now you look historically gold had a
trading range relative to oil. All of a
sudden, this spike wasn't because gold
did well. This spiked because crude oil
traded below zero, if you remember
during the COVID crisis,
>> but this spike is because gold way
outperformed oil. Why? Why? Why? They're
both commodities. They're both hedge
against inflation and they go both move
up with inflation. This was telling you
that gold was very very strange and you
can't can't even compare it to this.
This took place because oil collapsed.
Let's look at gold relative to look at
volume. You had record volume in gold
futures. It had record volumes in ETFs.
It had record volume in spot gold. So
record volume,
>> record volumes, Milton, but I don't
believe records in
>> open interest. No.
>> Yes. Open interest or or assets under
managements in the ETF. So maybe in Asia
they were going crazy about buying tons
of precious metals, but I don't think
the retail speculation or western, you
know, America speculation in gold rival
that of 15 years ago.
>> That's true. But I'm lucky that over the
years I've never built models using open
interest. I only built models using
volume. So volume may be the most
important factor.
>> Fair. Fair enough.
>> I agree with you 100%. But right now the
volume. So this is reason to believe
that this is heading towards the top.
Okay. This is this is my my chart on
golden volume. Let's look at um look at
this. This is gold relative to soybeans.
Now soybeans as a commodity like you
know you buy you buy soybean products in
the supermarkets. You know most things
many things are made of soybeans and it
moves up with inflation. All of a sudden
gold relative to soybeans. Why? Why?
Why? For this period of of 20 years,
gold and and and soybeans were
oscillating, right? We had inflation.
Then gold didn't take off. If gold takes
off, soybeans should also take off. Why
should gold in in in Wymer, Germany, the
price of gold went up, so did the price
price of soybeans go up.
>> So So let's face it, I mean, it could
could use soybeans as a hedge. You can't
buy a warehouse of soybeans. But the
point I'm making is is that
>> gold has outperformed commodities. It's
outperforming CPI. It actually makes no
sense to think look at gold relative to
the the typical home in America CPI rel
the um existing what any medium sales
price existing homes it was way higher
here in 1980 I admit but now it's the
second highest in history no reason to
think gold is going to really take off
from here it already took off and the
most important chart is this one
this is gold this is a proprietary chart
which had created not gold in dollars
but gold in GDP weighted in in in all
major currencies of the world. It's in
Australian currency, US, Canada, Great
Britain, Euro, Japan, Switzerland,
China, Russia, India, Brazil, which are
the bricks, gold relat,
you know, my I used to work with at
Oenheim, we had a guy named um was named
uh I think his name was Jack Levy who
ran the company. He's a brilliant
analyst and he says what he does what he
does, he takes his grandson Johnny and
he shows him a chart, okay? And he says,
"Johnny, do you think this is going up
or this is going down?" and he says it's
going up, it's bullish. Going down, it's
bearish. I say tell tell someone who's a
little more intelligent than Johnny,
does this look like we're at the
beginning of a move or it look like
we're at the end of a move just a little
bit. Look at charts. In other words,
does this look like the beginning of a
move? More likely the end of a move.
Look at this big move. This looks like
it's a a trading range, but this could
be the beginning of move, a breakout.
This could be a breakout, but does this
look like the beginning of a move? Of
course not. Well, Mil, I got to ask you,
don't you have bull markets in precious
metals that last a very long time? 1971
to 1980 and then 2000 to 2012.
>> Let me tell you, listen to this. From
2000 to 2012, gold relative to CPI
declined 85%. Gold itself declined more
than 50%. It came off 50% decline.
Right? So, you you had a bull market.
Let's see. This is gold. This is spot
gold. It it was fixed. So, the price is
false till 1970. You got it. So, the
first rally was just catching up for the
fact that the price of gold was
falsified. It was fixed by the
government. You It was $35 an ounce
regardless of what its true worth was.
So, the first rally was really a uh just
catchup. The next rally was a
speculative rally. It peaked. It It
peaked for 20 years. This rally, I mean,
I say this gold rally we had started in
2000. It's 25 years old. You had a
hiccup over here pullback, but in
reality, if you start in 2000 to now,
you way outperformed. his his gold
relative CPI in 2000.
>> Do you think we have a multi-deade bare
market in gold, Milton?
>> I think it's likely I think it's likely
the relative inflation you'll have a
multi-year bare market in in gold. I
think I wrote it up to my clients. The
likely it is likely is you'll see a
multi- decade, let's just say a one
decade beer market in gold is enough to
say, but I think it could be multi-deade
because gold is at the greatest extreme
that it's ever been relative to
commodities and gold is just a
commodity. And there's no reason to
believe that gold will make you real
money relative to commodities, relative
to inflation. It listen, if gold does
well over the long term, let's put it
this way. If in the if in the year 0 AD
you had an ounce of gold and it was
worth say $10 an ounce at the time,
okay, and it gained 5% peranom until
today,
you know, be worth it worth more than
the money supply of every country in the
world.
>> Yeah.
>> Gold doesn't compound.
>> Yeah. Gold holds value and for some
reason I don't know why people have been
taught and people are convinced that
gold compounds and makes money. Gold is
not an asset that makes money. As Warren
Buffett used to say, you buy a stock
like um like um Apple, Apple generates
little babies. It's called earnings.
>> Yep.
>> You buy Apple and you it gains in value
causing little babies that that appear
>> and the babies have babies and they
shares capital expenditure the div
stock. Yeah. Yeah. gold and and also
Milton I will say you know I I try to be
neither a gold bug or an anti-gold bug
but when people say well gold from 1971
did this they're starting from a point
where it was just going to explode
because it had been artificully
depressed from from the gold standard so
you know
>> and also I said you know from 1981 to
2000 there was a yeah a 19-year bare
market in gold so no one is guaranteed
to to make money in precious metals even
on a 20-year time horizon
>> trying to even in the even when the
Republic had had this boom in gold. If
you think about it, it's only because of
the debasement of the currency. The
United States did not have a boom in
gold during that period. You understand?
So, it's
>> it's really gold doesn't really make you
money over over the long term. Now, it's
going to make you money sometimes.
>> Although, Milton, I will say, and this
you're showing this chart of gold priced
in a basket of global currencies. Almost
every currency maybe other than the
Swiss Frank is has been uh uh weakening
against the dollar. So in many countries
the precious uh bull market in gold and
and silver is even more extreme. So like
in India like the price of gold priced
in Indian rupees has just been on a
50-year bull market that is never ended.
So I mean that I think a lot of people
around the world are very bullish on
gold. Milton
>> again but the is because it
retains ultimately it retains its value
ultimately but if you buy it at the
right time I mean
>> I remember in 19 it's way before you
were born but in 1979 at the peak in
silver there was an investor that I knew
that had really his fortune was all in
silver
>> and he one year before one year before
the high in silver yeah
>> and then he saw he saw silver was peing
it went to $40 and somebody you got to
sell you got to sell he said I would
sell but where would I put my money you
understand he was so convinced that you
can't have money in paper assets. He
said, "I would sell, but where would I
put my money?" You understand?
>> The S&P was at like 10 times earnings
and the treasuries were yielding%. So,
Milty, you're looking at long-term
charts in gold, and you're basically
saying it's it's uh overvalued, even
though I know you're not a valuation
guy. In terms of the more short-term
technicals in gold,
>> shortterm had it had classic signs of a
of a of a climax top. Let's face it, you
had the accelerating uh gains. you had
you had gaps in the I don't know if you
have the charts you had gaps in the in
the GLD and so SOV had gaps to the
upside the I don't use moving averages
but it's ratio to its uh it's 200 day
the moving average was was also at an
extreme the kind of extreme you see in
speculative stocks that peaks you know
these meme stocks same kind of extreme
and that's signs of a top and signs of a
bottom and the fact that everybody I was
embarrassed to tell my clients to get
out of gold because some of some of the
titans in Wall Street will long gold at
the top between me and you Okay.
>> Yeah.
>> Well, they probably made a lot of money.
Let's be real. I would
>> Yeah. Right. That's true. They got They
got at the right time. I I don't want to
say, but one of my one of my a former
client of mine who for whatever reason I
had a client anymore. I don't get into
it. A good reason, not a bad reason. Um
got into the gold market way way early.
Way way early. He's he's more than 50%
in gold throughout this bull market. So,
he can handle this 12% pullback, believe
me.
>> But I'm talking about the public. It it
it was very difficult on the public, you
know, uh very difficult. So I did in
gold, but I just to be honest with you,
what I did was I wrote gold calls right
here. I wrote gold calls the day, you
see the top, the top was the previous
day, the 29th.
>> Yeah.
>> And I said, you know, we're not going to
get back to the high. So I wrote very
short-term gold calls to total 4% to
make 4% of the month. So listen, for all
I know, I'm going to be cursed and gold
be up $500 tomorrow. You know, we're we
sold I think the average cost is $6 and
$4 and they're now yesterday they're
trading in pennies, 30 cents, 25.
>> I would be shocked if those if those
calls don't expire worthless. So, what
motivated you to short gold uh the day
after? And also, Milton, can could you
tell us when you wrote that shorting
gold and silver, was it h how much into
the crash was it? Was it right at
>> 9:15? It was 9:15 in the morning. We
said invest at uh we gave an exact time
to invest. Yeah. Misha I said um uh 9:45
we used the the bid at 9:45. We weren't
going to going to scale it because we
knew this you know we just pick the
price time and that's the price we use
but um what I'm showing you here is this
is this is the this is the peak on gold
on the 28. Did I tell you about silver
refiners you know did a little
fundamental work silver is so
overwhelmed with incoming inventory they
have stopped accepting additional scrap
metal. This suggests that at a
fundamental level current price are
pulling significant new supply into the
market. At the 2011 silver peak when I
worked for a hedge fund, refiners were
running three eight hour shifts a day
and still did not need to turn suppliers
away. Whereas today conditions imply an
even greater supply response to these
price levels. other pointing out that
the high price of silver today on a real
basis is greater than the high price in
2011 because the refiners are turning
away supply which means to say there's
such an overwhelming amount of supply
>> overnight. This is this is on January
29th. We saw the market rally th this
amount and we wanted to get this high.
So we we suggested shorting beginning
about 11 o'clock in the day and shorting
down. So you shorted that gold at about
5,400. Incredible move. Incredible move.
>> Yeah, but okay, you got I I was I wasn't
Anyway, that's a story. So, um, Bitcoin,
Bitcoin, Milton, I'm sorry, but in terms
of technical analysis, you said gold
relative to its history, relative to CPI
is overvalued.
>> And technically, it had all the signs of
of a climax
>> of high volume, but was that it
>> climax peak? You had gaps into the high.
You had record volume into the high. You
had people um you had the the record
volume in the most retail oriented types
of investments, you know, the ETFs, the
the the gold bullion dealers who sell to
the public. You had record volume on on
the retail side buying and the the
natural sellers, people who already own
gold or own gold scrap or own silver
scrap were sellers. It was drawing
supply. So on a technical basis, it was
a peak. On a fundamental basis was a
peak. the the parabolic rise with the,
you know, with exponential greater
greater increases on gaps. That's all
you need to see. You can just look at
the look at, you know, stocks that have
peaked historically. Stocks that have
peaked on parabolic rises show exactly
the same same idea. Gold was just a very
high cap stock that was peaking.
>> And are you still bearish on gold and
silver? What do you think? What do you
see right now?
>> I think I'm bearish in gold and silver.
Yes, I think gold and silver will have a
a long-term decline. Although you're
listening, you know, markets can
surprise you. If it surprise, if it
surprises us, we won't be surprised
because we'll we'll see it in the data.
I don't think it make no more highs. You
know, people who follow other other
techniques say that we've seen pullbacks
before to this extent that are followed
by new highs. I mean, you've seen in
Bitcoin in the past, gold is a far
deeper market and it's highly unlikely
after this type of a decline, if this
type of a panic buying that you'll see
new highs.
high highly like I tell you if you do
see new highs there's only one oh you
reminded me of my research there's only
one time in history when gold made a
rounding top commodities in general make
spike tops gold always makes a spike top
as does silver the only time it's made a
right a rounding top which means it made
a high and then tested the high at a
slightly higher level was in 2011 I
think its final high was September and
it made its first high in July and the
September high was slightly above
slightly above the um the high in in
July so that's called more of rounding
top, but generally the type of top we
throw in gold is a type of top you see
in commodities and particularly you see
this type of top type in gold.
>> And and Milton, I'm sorry, I'm just I've
been the giant nerd on silver. So I I
got to ask you a few questions. So
you've been experience experience in the
precious metals markets for, you know,
before I was born. So silver, you know,
copper is is almost all used at for for
industry, uh for for almost everything,
you know, wiring used in vehicles, etc.
Uh gold is is mostly used almost all as
a precious metal to store it in a vault
or as jewelry. Obviously, gold has some
industrial uses. Silver is interesting
because a lot of people have silver
bars. It's for saving. It has a monetary
thing. In history, it was used as
monetary, you know, it's in it's in the
Bible. Um but then there was a there was
a very vicious um uh uh demonetization
of silver of governments and central
banks selling silver. Yeah.
>> So basically, it's silver is not money
anymore. But some people do still do see
it as a precious metal and it rallies
alongside gold often and sells off
alongside gold just with more
volatility, higher beta. But then it
also silver is a giant industrial metal
that historically was used for
photography in the 60s and 70s. It it
was used a lot for electronics uh and in
particular more recently it's been used
a lot for so uh solar panels which is
you know the technology of the future
let's be honest. And uh there's a record
shortage of silver for the past 5 years
and basically over uh above ground stock
piles have had to be depleted in order
to to meet this uh um shortage and
Milton and I'm just setting the stage
obviously I know you know this but the
for the the bull market of silver from
2000 to 2012 or 20 yeah around there um
>> for the first half of it it had a
physical deficit like there was a
shortage of silver but for the second
half and Warren once stopped being a
shortage. By the way, Warren Buffett
sold. He made money in silver, but he
sold once the fundamentals told him to
sell. But from like 2006 to 2011, there
was a surplus of silver. So, it was just
incred incredibly speculative asset. And
everyone was just getting long silver.
Let's let's go long silver. So to me,
Milton, um, you know, I I have been long
silver in various ways from like, you
know, precious metal royalty companies
and stuff, but um
>> to me there seems like a an obvious
deficit, but but should I respect the
the technicals and should I should I
accept that silver is going to be in a
in a bare market even though I'm looking
at and I'm seeing a shortage?
>> There's a lot of silver. Silver has been
mined for for millennium just like gold
has been mined. Now of course not all
silver remains above ground like all
gold remains above ground but a lot of
silver remains above ground in various
ways silverware for example and I just
way where I see it people are are
nitpicking by saying there's a shortage
of supply where I see it is in speaking
to refiners there's a record supply so I
I wouldn't I I don't necessarily believe
the fundamentals I do know that back in
1980 when silver was speaking you had
the same kind of stories as shorter
mainly it was due to photography they
claimed yeah
>> but there's not enough go so I've heard
these stories before I'd rather stick
with the technicals and the technicals
are telling you that uh we saw an
important peak at the in at the end of
January, early February. Whether or not
we make a higher peak in the near future
is anyone's guess, but I I don't think
we'll make it very very soon. I don't
think it's just a real hiccup which we
go much higher.
>> And and that work about sorry that work
about the uh um smelting about how all
the silver smelters are not accepting
silver. Is that is that in the news?
You're reading reports or you're you're
on the ground analysis. Where is you
getting that?
>> We got it from two places. Okay. I sold
my personal gold stock pile on Thursday,
the day of the peak. Okay. I So, a
friend of mine is the largest smelter in
the in New York. I don't want to mention
his name, but he's a legend in the
business. Okay. So, a lot of my
information that comes from him and a
lot of information comes from uh from
just reading.
>> And I just I just know that uh this is
not a question you talk to any smelter.
I back in 2011, I was working for a
hedge fund that had actually the largest
position of gold and silver of any hedge
fund in the world. sec they were second
to Sprat's gold fund
>> and they uh and I did a lot of research
and I remember speaking to uh to
refiners in Texas telling me oh we we're
running 24 hours a day three-hour shifts
and this rally in silver will never end
because there's a shortage and I I said
to myself if they're running three-hour
shifts there so much supply coming
there's definitely no no shortage you
understand it's just the opposite people
look at it depends how you look at
things most people are saying wow the
smelters can't smelt it that must be a
shortage because not able to come come
up with supply but it's telling you
there's underlying supply looking to
smelt
>> see that it depends how you look at it
>> we shall see so far the market has
spoken the market so far told us there
was a speculative fever into the peak
just like you've seen in in in in stocks
like Cisco there are great companies or
even Amazon into 19 into the year 2000
and Amazon declined 19% as great a
company it is so as great as gold and
silver might be you had a speculative
move and had all signs of a top and the
the the decline was historic and you're
going to bounces, but I think ultimately
it should go down for a while. And you
know, I don't like to project things
could change. If things change, we'll
we'll act upon it. Hopefully, we act
upon the change. I don't want to get
caught into anyone anyone position, but
I don't I think that was a very historic
pick and gold and it was didn't surprise
didn't surprise me. One of my clients um
uh when I put that position out of
selling um I put a negative negative
piece out on gold before the peak and
they they sent me all this kind of
information. you know how gold and
silver the shortage is and all that
>> the shortage the shortage Milton don't
you know about the shortage
>> monetary policy and all this kind of
stuff you know doesn't you know I I
stick with the markets you want to talk
about Bitcoin
>> yeah yes okay so you're bare on gold
bear on silver as well in the near term
thank you for saying that tell us about
Bitcoin which it's it's uh selling off
very viciously it's very tough time in
bitcoin
>> had a very big move very big up move
today as you know right
>> after a huge down move yes so so Milton
so you know, for for our audience,
Bitcoin peaked at over 120,000 in
October of 2025, last year, and it now
it it's trading very very poorly and it
bought it uh was as low as 63 or 64,000
uh you know uh in in early February, but
today February 6, it's rallied back up
to 70,000. Your thoughts?
>> My thoughts? First of all, I don't like
to talk about cycle dates because most
people whether retail investors or
institutional investors are not familiar
with cycle dates. The great investors I
can't mention names but the world's top
investors now Warren Buffer is a total
fundamentalist but the name that pe the
names that people know about many of
them are my clients are very familiar
with uh esoteric
cyclic work.
You're not you're not talking about
seasonality and we're not talking about,
you know, early, you know, which months
are strong or which months are weak.
We're talking about other cycles,
natural cycles. Anyway,
I don't know if you're familiar with the
great analyst Paul Montgomery, Paul
McCrae Montgomery, he was an analyst for
about 40 years on Wall Street until the
roughly till about uh maybe 2000 20 or
so. And he published he he did a lot of
cycle work and he was my mentor in a
sense when it came to cycles. So, we
have a cycle. We're going back going up
to the year uh to the year 2011.
And he had October 6 as a cycle date. He
also had February 3rd as a cycle date.
Okay. So, Bitcoin now
>> you said 2,100. You mean 2100 in 80
years
>> where? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Cycles.
Okay. So, listen. So, so the way cycles
work is people confuse when they talk
about cycles. They think every cycle is
going to affect every market. It's not
true.
>> A cycle will affect the market if the
market is prone for a turn. Cycle dates
predict turning turning points. They
don't predict accelerations or
decelerations. They predict turning
points in the market and and cycles work
along with let's say human psychology or
human emotion with sentiment. If you
have a market that's been peing with a
lot of sentiment or your market's been
declining a lot of negative sentiment
with a lot of headline news about it and
it occurs in a cycle date, you have a
greater than random probability that the
market is going to peak. Okay? Or or
going to the bottom. Bitcoin and gold
are are the two uh assets that work best
in cycle dates. Gold because all gold
that has been has ever been mined in the
world is above ground and the supply
increases every year. So it's different
than all other commodities and basically
moves on sentiment. It doesn't move on
supply and demand fundamentals because
uh supply is there for millennia and the
um and demand just changes based on
basically based on uh on sentiment. So
it cycle affect gold very very very well
and so the cycle affect Bitcoin because
there's no value to Bitcoin at all. We
get to that in a moment. I'm going to
share with you and your readers your
your viewers things that they've never
heard about Bitcoin which is on my you
probably seen it in one of the next few
pages. But in any event, Bitcoin did
peak on a cycle date, October 6th, and
it made a crash low into February 3rd,
cycle date. So, we thought that might be
a final low. I told the clients it might
be a final. However, I said if that is a
final low, basically it's testing the
low we saw in April of 2024. See this
this April 2024 and this is February
3rd. So, my view when I when the market
tests the low, sometimes it it's it's
the decline stops right before the low.
doesn't quite quite hit any low or
suddenly it declines up to 3 and 3/4%
below the prior low. So I said if the
71,651.33
level holds past today's close, I would
recommend Bitcoin bulls to increase
exposure using the air of the low as a
stop. In other words, I told my clients
I'm not a bull bull on Bitcoin. Okay, I
I think Bitcoin,
you'll see in a minute what I think
about Bitcoin, but I I I don't recommend
people go long Bitcoin because it makes
no sense to me. But I have clients who
are big in Bitcoin. I told them you
should consider buying around here but
only if this low holds because then
it'll be considered a test of this low.
>> It didn't hold. So that's the next page.
The low failed. This is the low. It had
to the low the test would have been
71,000 and changed. It got to 61,000. So
the low didn't failed and I told my
clients if you're considering buying
Bitcoin don't buy it because the low
failed and anything could happen. Now of
course maybe you have a a panic low.
It's going to turn up. We'll see that
later on. Now, what exactly is Bitcoin?
I I've read a lot about Bitcoin because
I never could get my mind around it. I
still don't get my around. I finally
found out I you know, there's a number
of books written about it, but I see the
the intellect the u the AC academics
also understand Bitcoin. This is it. The
original of Bitcoin is the RAI stone on
Yap Island. Are you familiar with this
>> from you? Yeah.
>> Okay. These massive circular discs made
of lines that have been used as a form
of money on Yap Island for centuries.
This is in the books about Bitcoin. I
promise you. I've read a number of books
about Bitcoin and they all come up with
the app island as a justification for
why Bitcoin is money and the story is
nothing short of fascinating. From their
origins as a currency used for trade and
social status to enduring significance
in Japanese culture, the race stones
have truly shaped societies. Okay, let's
continue. Researchers from the
University of Oregon specifically Mr.
Fitzpatrick, I hope you're listening to
this. So, Mr. McKenthropologist
Scott Fitzpat and finance professor
Steven McKeen are key figures who have
compared Bitcoin to the ancient REI
stone of YAP. In their paper banking on
stone money, ancient anticipants to
Bitcoin published in the journal of
economic anthropology. They argue that
Bitcoin is similar to these stones
because both are highly valued really
moved like Bitcoin's ledger. Ownership
of heavy area stones was transferred
through public verbal agreements rather
than physical movement. A form of
distributed ledger. Anyway, the point is
there were these big stones that was
difficult to move and people would would
buy and sell things and and use a stone
as a to to remind themselves of the
transactions and there were thousands of
transactions based on one stone. And
this little island of of Yap people
remembered exactly which stone
represented which transaction. So
instead of having money, they just go to
this stone and remind themselves that
Mr. Yap Ah uh sold his daughter to Mr.
app B in marriage or Mr. Yap A sold his
boat to to Mr. Yap C and they'd look at
the the the stone and they remind
themselves and have a record of what
transactions took place. This is the
closest and the most logical explanation
I've ever seen of Bitcoin because other
than that, Bitcoin makes absolutely no
sense. There's no other currency in the
world that's compared to Bitcoin. Gold
has intrinsic value. Gold is used as
jewelry. Gold is beautiful. People give
gold to their girlfriends. People give
gold to their wives. People give gold,
transfer gold to the next generation
because of the value, because of the
beauty. Gold has been used for years as
money. So too silver. So to bicycles.
There were there were times when
bicycles were used as money during wars.
My mother told me candles was were used
as money during World War II. But all
these things had intrinsic value.
There's something you can do with it.
>> In prison, cigarettes cigarettes are
used as currency.
>> Cigarettes used as currency. Right.
Yeah. Exactly. Um I told him this by um
what's the Treasury Secretary's name?
Scott Besson.
>> Scott Besson told me about bicycles when
I used to work with him at at at Drill.
He said, "Yeah, he he was he remembers
when bicycles use his currency and his
readings." I mean, he he's an expert on
all these things. I mean, he's he's a
monitor as far as greater than anyone we
know. But let's continue. So, the
Appston were different. App wasn't
money. It was just a way of recording
transactions.
And it was a small little town, a small
little island where you look at the you
look at it and you remind yourself of
the transaction. It was nothing to do
with money. Bitcoin has no intrinsic
value at all. At all, at all. At all. At
all. You can't say it's cheap when it's
at $60,000. You can't say it's cheap
when it's at $10,000. You can't say it's
expensive when it's at $10 million
because there's no way of measuring its
value.
>> There is no way of measuring its value
on the way up. There's nothing in terms
of overvaluation to prevent it from
going up way more than you imagine. And
on the downside, there's no valuation.
>> There's no value. No, there's no reason
money. It's it's a fallacy.
Nakashi who whatever his name is who
made a bitcoin he didn't understand what
money is money isn't something sim simil
simply because you have to pay it cost
money to mine it because I gave the
example before bitcoin even existed when
I ran a gold fund in 1980 before gold
people said gold is valuable because
it's rare it's val because it cost it's
expensive to mine it I said well what if
you took a
a thousand used paper cups and buried it
on the ground and protected it with
nuclear arms and it would be very
expensive to mine it. Would that give it
any value? Of course.
>> But there are other paper cups that you
could easily make.
>> No, no, they're not. Those you know the
paper cups that that are underground.
>> Yeah.
>> Mark each paper cup with a way that no
one knows. You can't duplicate it. You
can't counterfeit it. Would anyone in
the right mind think that's money?
>> No. Okay. Money. Gold isn't money
because people think it's money. Gold is
only money because it is money. Now the
dollar isn't money. So Milton Friedman
says the dollar is a fiction. But Milton
Friedman is a fiction. The reason the
dollar is money because it's backed by
guns. It's it's backed by prison cells.
If the government wants you to pay taxes
and dollars, you don't pay it, you go to
jail.
>> So it's not money because it's
intrinsically money. It's money because
it's backed by the forces of the US
government. So too other money. Now
money is not backed by forces of the
government hyperinflates. It disappears.
So the point being is that Bitcoin is is
a fallacy. Bitcoin is false and no sense
to Bitcoin and it simply trades as a
speculative I don't call it asset a
speculative item that absolutely makes
no sense when people say Bitcoin is
cheap because it's $60,000 cheap
relative to what Bitcoin is expensive at
$10 million relative I'll tell you
relative if somebody would take his
$60,000 and instead of buying a Bitcoin
and buy a Tesla at least that's
something you could drive
>> yeah Milton I'll tell you what when
people say Bitcoin's cheap I'll tell you
what they mean Milton over the past
year, gold has doubled, silver has
tripled, and the S&P is up 40%. And in
the meantime, Bitcoin is is down. So
therefore, Bitcoin must be cheap. That's
what they mean.
>> Okay. Well, you depends again when
when's your starting point. I I I a
relative of mine who's a a genius when
it comes to to to to computers and
stuff. He bought Bitcoin at 4 cents.
>> That's pretty good.
>> He sold it he sold it as 8 cents and he
redid his bathroom. Okay?
>> So, in other words, guess what? He
didn't make a mistake because it was
worthless at 4 cents and it's worthless
at 8 cents. He just it was just a good
trade. If you buy Bitcoin, you sell it
at profit, it's a good trade. If if
you're like Michael Sailor, you buy
Bitcoin at $76,000 and you and now it's
60,000. So far, it's a poor trade. If it
goes up, it's a good trade. Not because
it made any sense because there are
other people who are willing to pay more
for the value Bitcoin. Absolutely. And
you were able to pay for the value of
Bitcoin. And here I ch I challenge the
bears. I challenge the bulls. And I
challenge anyone out there to explain to
me the value of Bitcoin other than than
the fact that it's something to do with
these RAI stones.
>> I I got you. I got you. I got the
Bitcoin bulls. I I'll I'll do them a
solid on their behalf, which is Milton.
I told you I was into the pre uh the
mineral royalty business and and looking
at those businesses. So I said, what are
the mines that last the longest? So
silver mines only last eight years. Gold
mines only last 15 years on average.
Copper mines could last a lot longer.
Um, interestingly, rare earth mines
actually last like 50 or 100 years.
Potach mine lasts oh maybe a hundred
years. Limestone mines is one of the
most common materials in the world.
There are limestone mines that last
hundreds of years, 500 years. And I
maybe you know my my Gemini Google
Gemini large language model is just
making this up for me. I don't I don't
know. Um, but he told me that there are
some mines from the Roman Empire that
are still mining limestone. So you said
that these things are made out of
limestone. It's the most common one of
the most common things in the world.
Bitcoin is very scarce, artificially
scarce, but it's scarce. And therefore,
people say it must have value. So that
is a difference between those limestone
stones and and Bitcoin.
>> Yeah. But no, the limestones were were
scarce because they had to have a hole
in it. You see, they had to have a hole
in it.
>> And it was scarce because they had
imported from another island. They the
lines and stones couldn't be mined in
this island. It was a very small world
in those days. And because but I'm
saying the main value was because the
people around knew exactly who the other
side of the transaction was. Unlike
Bitcoin where you don't know who the
other side of the transaction is. It's a
different concept. But but guess what?
Limestone is you're saying limestone has
nothing to do with Bitcoin. You're going
So right now
>> Yeah, I'm going against you.
>> Yeah.
>> The people No, I'm not saying bit I I'm
against the using limestone bitcoin. I'm
saying when you study the research, the
best they can come up with is the REI
stones in Yap Island. Rarity is nothing.
Listen, I have a sock. I have a stock
sock with a hole in it right now in my
fate, right? It's very rare, but it's
valueless. There's only one in the
world. What would give it value? And you
can't duplicate it. You see, I'm saying
it makes no sense. There's no logical
thing to say that if something's scarce
and it costs money to mine it, if
someone lives in Los Angeles, he has to
fly to to to Florida to get my stock.
Does that give it any value? Absolutely
not. It's a fallacy. The whole thing is
a fallacy. So, as you said, if it goes
to zero, it goes to $10 a bitcoin,
that's its value because that's what
people pay for it. It goes to 10
million, that's its value because that's
people pay for it. But everything else
in the world has a value except for the
dollar. But the dollar's value is what
the government places on it through
their guns and through their army and
through their police force.
>> Milton, what you're you're making
fundamental arguments and the fact that
Bitcoin doesn't have a fundamental
argument. Basically, uh I I understand
your argument, but when you look at the
technicals, what do you see? Because
that really is kind of all Bitcoin has
is the tech.
>> No, there's no technical. There's no
there's no advanced decline. There's no
uh there's no uh natural end user.
There's no uh
>> same as gold. It's one thing. There's no
it's not like gold where where has some
industrial uses. There's nothing to
measure it either fundamental or
technically. I mean
volume
>> you look at volume you look at moving
averages but you know what I look for in
stocks technically it's far more robust
than what anyone could look and even
want to look at in gold is far greater
because at least gold has some some uses
and some supply demand factors other
than the fact that it's scarce is above
anyway yes okay okay you you you'll be a
believer in Bitcoin and listen
everyone's been right in the sense that
Bitcoin went up in value went up in
price but as As Benjamin Graham said, I
listen, I don't believe much in what
Benjamin Graham says either about value
investing. But he Benjamin Graham missed
every bull market he was alive for
because he nothing was cheap enough
between me and you. But and even Warren
Buffett would have missed many bull
markets had it not been for for Mer who
told him to buy stock good companies.
Don't just buy cheap companies. And and
and and and Buffett, we don't know how
bad it's going to be, but he says a $300
billion war chest just waiting and
waiting for stocks to get cheap.
ultimately it may turn out great. We we
don't know. We certainly miss some
upside due to that which which the hedge
fund people that I deal with don't miss
the upside because stocks aren't cheap.
They don't care whether stocks are cheap
or not. They care about other things.
But what I was trying to get to about
Bitcoin is is that um I I don't see any
case that can be made in history for
Bitcoin. And people were stretching to
compare to the REI stones and they say
over we disagree is a far better form of
money than Bitcoin. I don't see anything
about Bitcoin that give you a monetary
value. And what but people the reason
stocks go up in value isn't because
people are buying it. As I say, Apple
has little baby apples and and and and
Nvidia has little baby Nvidas, right?
And and Walmart is little baby Walmarts,
but Bitcoin has no little baby bitcoins.
So how how you going to measure it? It
has no uses. How you going to measure
it? I mean, you could argue from Anthony
tomorrow. It's my view. And people say
I'm Oh. So why say Benjamin Graham?
Because Benjamin Graham in his book
security analysis he says people think a
successful investment is one that went
up in price and they think an
unsuccessful speculation is an asset
that went down in price. That's not the
case. That's the other criteria that
measures whether something is an
investment or something speculation.
>> Yeah. So the fundamental
>> Bitcoin is not an investment and all
these little widows and orphans, the
people putting Bitcoin and all these
institutions that are allocating 5% to
Bitcoin absolutely makes no sense other
than the fact that they saw it going up
in value. But no one could sit in front
of me and give me a logical reason for
Bitcoin to be a valuable asset. No one.
Not you. You're not the only one. I
hadn't at least maybe I'm stubborn, but
I just don't see it.
>> Yeah, but you're you're talking
fundamentals. So tech technically you
don't have any analysis of Bitcoin other
than
>> technically technically it has no value.
Technical analysis just interprets value
but it doesn't give you value. Bitcoin
gold has value but Bitcoin has no value.
The fact that it has a price doesn't
mean it has a value.
>> Let's move let's move on. Let's let's
return to where we started which is the
stock market. You had some overwhelming
buy signals in April of 2025. You had
one more buy signal in the summer you
didn't really believe in. you got a sell
signal that made you anxious go short on
your model portfolio on December 11th or
no December early December and then you
you saw another signal that you didn't
like a sell signal in January what's
what's your positioning now and Milton I
might say based on you know how you
started and saying oh I I still want
another 5% 6% more in the in the S&P
based off the the huge starting gun you
know bomb that was that was August sorry
that that was April based on that you
know I'm familiar with just how short
your model assets portfolio is. Like why
are you
>> I'm not hiding it. I'm long about 5%
Argentina. We got into at the lows at a
classic bottom in Argentina. If you're
interested, you'll see.
>> Right, Mila? But your your short
positions in other assets are 20 times.
>> I'm 110% short various I'm short the
midcaps. I'm short Russell. I'm short
the Q's and I'm short the spies. That's
all
>> and semiconductors. Right.
>> Yeah. And I just went short
semiconductors the day after their top.
Exactly. Yes. Yes. Yes. So, so why is
your position so bearish if you only
have, you know, a few sell signals or
what am I what am I missing?
>> I told you got I'm I'm I'm short because
my VXN sell signal back on December 11th
has not had the market follow through.
All follow through so far have been
signed as speculative tops. You have the
the you had the island on top of the
Russell. You have the fact that the
Russell is moving up without the S&P
500. You had the maximum gain since
December 11th was 1.2% in the S&P. you
have the fact that the NASDAQ wasn't
able to make a higher above its December
December 29th high. You have a lot of
factors telling you the market's
topping. That's why I'm short. Why I'm
100% short because I don't I'm not I
don't go in um in increments. I if I'm
short, I'm I'll be short. If I'm wrong,
I'll get out. I told you this morning, I
consider covering my shorts. I um that's
why I wrote the report. I wrote based on
the various indicators we saw. There's
sometimes in the past generated exact
bottom, especially after a short sharp
spike decline. never took place with a
decline of like 2% or 3% of the S&P.
But, you know, maybe tomorrow, Monday,
I'll change my mind if I see
follow-through or maybe my indicators
will come up with even more buy signals
than the one I saw at yesterday's close.
You know, we're flexible. But, um,
actually this morning when I wrote my
report, initially I titled the report
covering shorts. That's the initial one.
Then I said then I ended it saying chain
we're not ready to cover our shorts. In
other words, as I wrote the report and
went through the data, I see I see
reasons to cover the shorts and I see
but not enough to cover my shorts. Is
it, you know, but but this is not a
long-term call. I I said I could see a
depression. You never know what's going
to you never know what's going to get
you into a bare market until it takes
place. When people predict a crash
ahead, very rarely do they know why it's
going to crash if they're correct. Most
often they're not correct. Even even
when you live through a bare market, you
generally don't know what's causing the
bare market until until the bare market
takes place or or or even a bull market,
you know, you don't really know what's
going to what what turns bullish. The
market anticipates it and you don't
really know what's what's what's going
to cause it. But no, we're we're we're
short and we may be long on on on
Monday. But the point I want to really
make is that for the real people out,
the millions of people out there who
have IRA, IAS and 401 for 401k plans,
and they want to invest in the long
term, they want to save. Forget about
all this stuff. This doesn't help
anybody. Just drives you crazy. Bull
market, bare market, ad lines, um, uh,
seasonality, broadening or Russell 2000,
uh, moving, which is a bullish sign.
Just know the SPI if we remain a
capitalist country which we hope we do.
I mean we're there's been many many
times in the past where it looked like
socialism will take over like during the
great depression. If we remain a
capitalist country over the long term
the SP00 should gain in price in real
terms and if you're in for the bulk of
bull markets and you're in treasure
building during the bulk of bare markets
doing very well. And until until I'm not
a young man, until last September, I
didn't really complete models that allow
me and confidence to say be in the
stock, be in the SPF00 for the bulk of
the time. Hold on,
be long during bull markets. Don't worry
about all these pundits who are telling
you there's a crash, a recession, a
correction head. Wait for the correction
to start. Wait for the correction to be
down 8% based on the model. And then
when you're out, get into T- bills. You
can sleep when you're in T- bills.
Tibles are not the best investment but
they're certainly the safest investment
and then when the time comes to buy the
market you don't have to guess because
our models I say in April 4th April 9th
you had we showed 57 signals from April
from the month of April itself I think
we have a total of 88 signals published
we have many signals that are
unpublished I mean published meaning
through my computers so markets give you
rare signals at turning points we have
we believe we've be able to pinpoint
them in the stock market and we believe
as long as you can get into the market
early in the bull market. As long as you
can get out early in the beer market,
you you'll do very very well. And that's
what our models are showing. And our
clients get a newsletter twice a month
telling them what they're up to. Very
little data, not the kind of data we've
been talking about here. They just get
uh what the latest signal was.
Occasionally, we'll give a historical
signal, you know, what signal in 1974 or
what signal did in 1990, what signal in
the year 2000 may show historical
signals that went into the model. But
remember, the model is only built on one
signal, the first signal of the series.
I do not disclose to the retail clients
the thousands of models we have. That
goes for the institutional clients. It's
a totally different ballgame. Plus,
institutional clients are recommended
sectors, recommended precious metals,
the recommended long and shorten
leverage. And clients is simple. Either
100% in the stock market based on the
capitalist system in United States or
100% in in treasury bills because
there's a correction or a bare market
and you want to be out of it. Very, very
simple.
>> Absolutely, Milton. You know, so I Yes,
generally you're right. I mean American
companies have a much higher profit
margin, return on equity and capitalism
is generally good for stock markets. I
mean look at China. But I will say
Milton in fundamentals like there there
is a lot of uh counterpoints like in
Brazil when the left-wing guy was in
charge in the very early 2000s.
Brazilian stock market did really well
because there was a bull market in
emerging markets and oil. So there's
always a counter example. I want to ask
you Milton about your Yeah, exactly what
you showed the individual name position.
with a long life portfolio. This long
life portfolio is is institutionals get
every day a long life only portfolio.
Our turnover average is 75% a year.
Remember, we don't even have 100%
turnover. Okay? We try to own stocks for
at least a year. We buy the stocks
strictly on technicals. However, I do
try to make sure the companies don't
have any balance sheet issues. I don't
want to get into a bankruptcy. We
fortunately had a great return. This
started in 2016 January 1. Our model
>> that's good is not total return. just
price action up 542% versus 236 since
since 1919 it's up 467% versus 174%
since since 2022 151 versus 44 since
2023 191 versus 79 last year from
yesterday we're up 53 versus 17% now and
this year we're up 7.56% this is through
February 4th versus the SP of 0.54 now
how do we do it we don't do a lot of
trading and we do it based on technical
analysis. I I did just to be honest, I
learned a lot of what I know about
technical analysis from William O'Neal's
people are very familiar with William
O'Neal's work. But he he would stress
growth stocks and we use his his pattern
analysis for cyclical stocks as well as
for um as well as for undervalued stocks
or or beaten down stocks. We try to get
early in the turn. So to give you
example what we own now just for the
portfolio this is the portfolio we own
now uh this we own Argentina as a ETF we
have a 4.9 we up 36% in Argentina we
have a number of foreign stocks the
foreign stocks are showing greater
potential technically than the US stocks
we have at which is a which is a Chinese
no many people would have heard of this
stock it's a Chinese um like I guess
it's like trip advisor or travel
velocity I'm not sure exactly what they
do fundamentally but they're they're for
people going on trips. You know, Chinese
people like to travel. This is their
travel company. Alibaba, Bergkshire, we
have really I think it's a great
management. I I didn't there's a
technical reason I bought it, but really
I bought it because I think it's sort of
a cash asset. I'm still nervous about
the market long term and I'd rather have
4.6% in Birkshshire because I think in a
bare market it would hold up a little
better. Constellation Energy we spoke
about two years ago if you remember I
said
>> incredible pick. Incredible pick.
>> Remember that I said I don't know why I
own it but the chart was great. Turns
out it's an AI stock. We're up 94. We
sold half the position already. The
stock went over we we had over 5%
position and we sold half of it. So,
>> and I see one of your biggest your
biggest position is Seagate, which is
data storage.
>> So, I'm going to show you some charts.
We have Shinan Korean. Let me show you
the some some purchases. So, these are
recent purchases. We we own Grenov. We
bought in the last year. We bought it
right here at this breakout.
>> And by the way, Milton, I know you you
don't focus on fundamentals, but in the
fundamentals, you know, GE was this
business that had issues for so many so
many years, but now they spun out this
business and they basically had um
natural gas natural gas turbines and
there's a giant shortage of natural gas
turbines.
>> I do look at earnings, but I look
earnings on I look at earnings on a
technical basis, not a fundamental
basis. I don't really care what brought
there. Anyway, we bought it back here
where the arrow is. We bought just
bought this recently. Shinan Financial
Group, which is a Korean stock. Look at
the new high. This is today's chart. It
made a new high today. Look at that.
What do you say? So, this is doing very
well for us. Again, it had a very low P
of nine. It was actually P of of seven
when we bought it. And you had a stream
of good earnings, but you know, you had
a kind big up move consolidation, a
breakout. I'm looking for stocks that
are, you know, American stocks didn't
show these kind of chart patterns. KP,
another Korean company we bought right
here. It made a new high a few days ago.
Now, it's okay. And the last one is C.
Now, my guy works with me, a very
brilliant guy works with me. He's been
in the business quite a long time. He
used to be a a trader for himself and
now he works with me and I bought Seate.
He was yelling Milton don't buy Seagate.
Don't buy Seagate. I said he said and he
gave me all the fundamental reason not
to buy it. Well, technical reasons that
he believed not to buy overpriced.
Everyone's looking at it and so on and
so forth. And you had this breakout on a
gap and I bought it right there, you
know, the earnings. I didn't really
care. I saw it was strong earnings. I
didn't care what my guy who works with
me told me, you know, and he thought
he'd be right. But here it is. Just made
a new high a few days ago. It's one of
our best performing stock. We own it for
less than a year. Now I know it's very
vulnerable. It may come down but we try
to hold stocks for at least a year. We
don't always do it. We try to. So this
is the kind of things we do and this
only goes to institutions.
>> And what are what are what is what are
your your newest additions Milton?
>> The last year or the the latest one the
last one was Phineia Auto Parts. It's up
17%. I I could I just bought it maybe
not even not even two months ago. I
don't want to bring up the full chart
though. That's a new one. Fineia.
>> Uh Korea Electric Power I showed you was
pretty recent. Insight was pretty
recent.
>> You got Google. You got Google. That's
interesting.
>> Google's old one. Although probably two
years already. Google. Generrack was in
the last year. It's not doing so well.
Down 3%. Uh let's see. Uh
Argentina wasn't a purchase in the last
year.
>> That's good. Hey Milton, I got I got
something for for you which I know you
know you like to prepare for stuff, but
I figured I just wanted to throw a
ticker at it.
>> Yeah.
>> Just so you know software there's
technology but there's hardware tech and
then there's software tech. Software
tech had been performing so well for you
know many decades now but software is in
a brutal bare market that the fear being
that AI is going to make these uh a lot
of these software companies obsolete.
The ticker Milton is IGV
>> IGV. Let me take a quick look.
>> Let me bring it down here. This is IGV.
I I see nothing. I see no reason to buy
the stock. I just say wow. Wow. You know
it made a rolling top here. I don't know
the technicals yet but
>> um IGV wow I mean you know listen one
thing you see there is one positive in
the in the stock high volume occurs at
turning points okay high volume doesn't
take place at the top here high volume
took place when it's down I don't know
down to uh it must be down 50% or so I
don't know if it's high so the fact that
you see this this high volume that's a
sign of a top you look at stocks or
indices the bottom you're going to see
this kind of fiveday high volume record
volume that's one of the things we saw
back in April We've seen many many major
lows. You see these this high volume.
That's the only thing I can see in this
chart going for it. I don't see any
testing of a low. You can argue to test
this low, but it's it's really too far
back to be considered a test. And
probably there have been fundamental
shifts since then. A technician would
call, you know, call this level as a
potential test. I I probably wouldn't
when it comes to stocks are like a
three-month range roughly for a test. I
mean, here's a So, wow. Do you expect me
to like the stock? What was your opinion
on the stock?
>> No, no, I wanted your your commentary. I
mean I think um a lot of these software
companies h have been perceived by the
market historically to be high quality
companies high return on equity high you
know growing their revenues and earnings
a lot um and you know I
>> this is an ETF this is an ETF it's not
an actual stock
>> yes yes so so um
>> you look at Microsoft which is one of
the components
>> yep
>> there's nothing beautiful about the
stock you have you have strong earnings
and a weakening stock look at this
double top right here look at these
reversal a double reverse It's amazing a
negative technical stock. There's no
reason
>> I I got I got I got some of the worst
tickets for you. Um try Adobe. Adobe or
Salesforce CRM.
>> We own we owned Adobe. We got out of it
pretty well. My m fact, my guy I work
with was pointing out, boy, I got out of
I got out of PayPal and I got out of
Adobe, you know, in the last year or
sometime. And I said, wow, you got out
pretty well. So, usually I get out of a
stock because I find another stock to
buy and what I look I I skim the the the
tables for stocks that are showing me
what I'm looking for. I couldn't find
any today, for example. And then I when
I put a stock in, usually I take out
another stock, you know, for whatever
reason. Adobe, wow. Wow. But Adobe, you
took a look at a monthly chart. It was
once a leader. Look at this amazing
leader. Yeah. Adobe learned how to rip
people off. I used to buy Adobe. I paid
$200 for the disc. I used it for four
years. Then they started a subscription
basis, which at first people thought was
very negative. Subscription basis here.
Stock and now I'm paying them $250 a
month for my subscription.
>> It's nuts. Yeah. Milton, try uh look at
Service Now. Ticker is Na N.
>> N that was a big leader for a while,
right? This is a long-term chunk. Wow.
And on a short-term basis uh daily, it's
it's it's a dog. Listen, you're seeing
the the increase in this is one thing
you see increase in volume. But when you
see stocks with strong earnings coming
down, the market knows more than the
earnings know. You understand?
>> Yeah. Yep.
>> You want to see strong earnings at the
market level. This is amazing. I didn't
never own Service Now. I did own Adobe.
I did own uh I didn't own Microsoft. I
did own PayPal which is really a dog you
know they say right I own PayPal was
down 90% of its high PayPal I own PayPal
but I got out well I bought it
>> and I did not get out well I yeah PayPal
is tough for me
>> yeah look at that stock PayPal you know
I was one of the first analysts to
recommend Tesla and I really didn't
trade it when Tesla had it new issue and
it came out with a new issue I said the
pattern of Tesla's new issue reminds me
or was very similar to the pattern of
Cisco when Cisco was no issue
>> and and and I didn't trade it well I got
out early in early in the early in the
move but I was really one of the first
tech certainly technical anal tech
technical analysts I remember name I met
with a analyst who was negative he's
he's a famous bearer he's negative on
negative on Tesla and he you know he
said it's just an auto company and all
the came and I said Tesla's selling cars
without advertising not one know this is
when Tesl first started they sell cars
with no advertisements I said this is
tells you something about the underlying
demand for electronic cars. That's all I
needed to know. You know, they were
selling cars. Volume was increasing, but
they weren't even advertising. I mean,
which car maker doesn't take ads in the
Super Bowl, you know, or whatever it is
just to get just to get his name out
there to show how great the car is.
Tesla didn't need that. So, Tesla was a
great long-term stock. It's way
overvalued. I I haven't I haven't bought
it. I never owned it in a long
portfolio. Um I don't see any reason to
own it now. See, you saw a breakout of a
consolidation, but you saw it with weak
earnings and the stock wasn't cheap by
any. So, I I wouldn't buy this kind of a
breakout. So, I don't I I don't like I
don't like there's nothing about the
chart of Tesla telling me to buy it.
Again, like Bitcoin, you want to own it
because it's gone up, but that's not a
reason to own a stock. You want to own
it because it's gone up with some strong
technicals. As I said, I gave the
example with the ball when when Babe
Ruth swings at a ball or when
>> one of the great home run hitters swing
at a ball, at the time it hits the ball,
you know, it's going to take off. That's
what you like to see at breakouts.
That's what you see at market bottoms.
You want to see the energy within the
market bottom so you don't have to worry
about it later on. You don't have to
look at it every day.
>> That's a really good way of putting it.
Milton, what do you think about the
semiconductors? Uh, you know, I I
personally have actually been, you know,
quite quite long the semiconductors. Uh,
why are you short? The fact that you're
short is making me a little bit nervous.
>> Short because Yeah, short in the market.
SOXX. SOXX. We we're short the um short
the GP the ETF. Let me show you why I
went short. You're not gonna believe it.
Because of course it went short because
you gapped up into the high. One sign of
a top. And it's not the only time it
gaps. You know, it gapped here. It
wasn't the top. But it gapped into a
high while Russell was making the the
the um the isolated one day reversal.
But more importantly, its first down day
was the cycle. The cycle Montgomery
cycle began on January 30th. So it
peaked the day before the cycle. Its
first down day was on the cycle day. And
since there's a lot of emotion in the
semiconductor stocks, as you know, it's
been a while is up 185% over its lows. I
think in just uh less than three
quarters of a year, it's up uh
145%. So there's a lot of motion in the
stock. It's something that should cycle.
So we showed it right now. Right now,
you had a gap up today. You know, it I I
tell you, I may reevaluate on Monday. I
don't know. Let me see. The high
yesterday was 33547. The low today was
33587. and we got a 40 cent gap. This is
a this is um I don't say it's bullish
because it's very difficult to find
bullish indicators exactly one day after
low. You saw it you see it but usually
you'll see it two days after low or
three days after low, you know, you saw
it in in 2025 in April, a day before the
low. But you know, we'll see. I might
change my mind. I might cover my short
on this, but if the market's going down,
I think semic would lead to the
downside. So that's why I shorted it.
And it was a cycle as well involved in
it. any other any other buy or sell
signals or things you find interesting
that have happened in this year?
>> Well, the most interesting thing is I we
bought the Korea Korea stocks look good
and and and we thought Chinese stocks is
good. One of my biggest clients, my
favorite clients would not touch China
because and he's probably right, but I'm
not as ethical as he is. He wouldn't buy
China because they're very non-ethical
government as you many for many reasons
that n not capitalistic. But I always
took the view that you know once a
company once a country prospers
ultimately it will become more more
ethical because uh um just the way it's
been capitalism is is the most ethical
type of system as opposed to communism
and um and socialism. But anyway
I saw Korea I saw China. Uh in the US I
didn't see things to buy as far as
things to sell. Maybe we have to wait
till the bare market dissolves before we
find things to sell. I would say that
the type of top we saw in Russell should
tell you that Russell will lead to the
downside on fundamental. The reason
Russell lead to the downside because
there's many I think 40% of zombie
companies in the Russell 2000. The
Russell 2000 doesn't doesn't select for
for earnings unlike the S&P indexes. The
SP600 you have to have an earnings
criteria to get into it for
>> and the best companies in the Russell
that grow their earnings they go into
the midcap index.
>> Yeah, that's midcap. Exactly. So, what's
one of the problems with what's one of
the problems considering small cap an
asset class? Because every time they
rebalance it, you're losing the good
companies. Like, it's kind of funny.
>> Definitely. All right, Milton. Um,
>> thank you, Jack. I hope we we only
covered a small portion of what I
prepared to speak about, but I think it
was really fascinating and good. I hope
you think so as well.
>> Yes. Um, we'll include the link in your
description both to your institutional
service, but also the the retail service
where it's a much simpler read. Um,
>> if I if I can make an advertisement, we
we the reason I I charge $10 a month
because this is what I said to myself. I
did, no one will turn this down because
it's too expensive. No investor will
turn it down because it's too expensive.
Everyone should at least invest for a
month or two months and take a look.
They've seen nothing like it. And the
best benefit is is not a trading
portfolio. It's a portfolio for
long-term investors with very, very few
ins and outs. It's perfect for for
individual retail investor.
and and obviously you know selling um
and getting out of the market before a
crash is valuable but getting back in
the market is really
>> most important thing right
>> oh before valuable like I actually
happen to have uh quote unquote sold the
top and been bearish before a market
crashes before you know mostly due to
luck although actually maybe maybe over
a 100% of it was due to luck because I
had negative alpha at the time but um
but like if I didn't get back in that
one time I'm thinking of the 2020 crash
And that's just if you if you nail the
bottom, sorry, if you if you nail the
crash, but you don't get back in, it's
worse than just being 100% owning
stocks. It really is.
>> I tell you, be honest with you. I I've
made the same mistake you've made.
>> Yeah.
>> But that's why I spent, you know, I used
to work I used to I managed, you know,
three funds at Apple and I managed large
gold fund. I worked for Sina, I worked
for Soros, I worked for Draville, I
managed money, but um I spent the last
10 years just delving into research
really and and now I you know now I
wouldn't make I don't hope I wouldn't
make mistakes because I will blindly
follow the indicators rather than follow
my my emotions or follow what the
headlines are telling you or follow what
the economists are telling you. I just
follow and you know the indicators are
very robust. So everyone makes the
mistake of missing the bottom. That's
the worst mistake you can make.
Absolutely.
>> Fortunately, we built in the case
strictly to call the bottoms.
>> Absolutely. We we'll leave it there.
People can find you on Twitter, Milton.
Thank you everyone for watching. Please
leave a rating and review on Apple
Podcast, Spotify, and subscribe to the
Monetary Matters YouTube channel. Until
next time. Thanks for watching.
Interested in the Fundrise Income Fund?
Click the link in the description to
learn more. Until next time.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
Milton Berg discusses his technical analysis of market turning points, highlighting the massive buy signals he saw in April 2025 and his current short position as of early 2026. He expresses skepticism about Bitcoin's intrinsic value, comparing it to the Rai stones of Yap Island, and maintains a bearish outlook on gold and silver due to extreme valuations and "climax top" signals. Berg also introduces his retail service, which uses a simplified "long or T-bills" strategy designed to keep investors in bull markets while protecting them from major crashes.
Videos recently processed by our community