Strait of Hormuz Shutdown Triggers Potential For Record Oil Release According To Report
107 segments
You sounded a little bit doubtful when I spoke to you earlier.
If they, in fact, go through with this, how long lasting will the impact be?
Good morning. Great question and great place to start.
So let's do the maths. The report so far is that the IEA is
planning the biggest ever release and the number out there is it would be
somewhere north of 180 million barrels. What we have lost more than ten days of
war, very easy calculation, about 20 million barrels per day that flows
through the Strait of Hormuz. We are now past ten days of the war.
The market has already lost about 200 million barrels.
Give or take. If the IEA countries release that much
of oil and a separate question over what period of time they will be able to
release or start. That would simply make up what the
market has already lost. Then every single day after that, that
the war continues and the strait remains closed.
What do we do? If you take a look at how long this
conflict has gone for, the impact across the Gulf states, across suppliers, that
is, how do you do modeling in terms of how much worse it can get and what
alternatives there are to, you know, being able to get around using the
Strait of Hormuz. You know, this black swan event, if I
can call it that, has already gone past all modelling.
You can't there's the obviously the the warfare
with the missiles and drones and what's going on in the Strait of Hormuz.
Right. So on the ground and physical market
disruptions that the likes of which the markets have never seen before in terms
of the enormity, 20% of the oil supply simply getting cut off.
But now this war has become even more complex and layered.
The last few days, what I'm seeing is it's become a psychological warfare.
It's become an information warfare. And just information warfare is what
don't even, you know, completely describe it, because we are seeing, you
know, as overnight we had the energy secretary in the U.S.
putting out an exposed that a tanker had been escorted safely out of the Strait
of Hormuz and then retracting it. And the U.S.
press secretary, the White House press secretary, then saying that that was
false information. So, you know, we are absolutely in
uncharted territory here. And I don't know what relief valves in
the IEA release. Let's see what that does, maybe some
psychological impact. But in the physical space and the
physical markets, it's absolutely chaos and mayhem.
You talk about the psychological and information warfare.
Say, though, if this war comes to an end tomorrow, I wonder what is your sense of
the extent in which production can be brought back quickly, given the damage
we've already been seeing to producing infrastructure?
Yes. So I think we would also need to very
clearly define and agree on a definition of what an end to the war means.
Right. The market view has been that President
Trump declares victory, The war is over, but we forget that there are still other
sides in this war. There's there's Israel, which said, I
believe on the same day that Trump said the war is is going to be over very
soon. Prime Minister Netanyahu said that
Israel is not finished yet. So we need to keep that in mind.
What plans and strategy does Tehran have?
We don't know that. So I think it would be very careful in
calling in, you know, describing what is an end to the war.
You would need absolute certainty for a period of time in the markets and on the
ground in the Strait of Hormuz that there's going to be no more
threats from drones and and missiles and debris or or even mines, for that
matter, played by anyone.
For ships to actually start going back and forth through the strait and for the
20 million barrels per day to start flowing into the market.
So, you know, the end doesn't look as clear to my mind as, you know, one would
hope it would. And at the same time, is the war
worsening the problem that we've had of dock fleets?
I mean, this idea that the U.S. is allowing Indian refiners to take
Russian energy, I'm sanctioning them. I mean, how does this shift the picture?
That's a drop in the bucket. India could take potentially, I don't
know, 10 to 20 million barrels of Russian oil that has been floating and
stranded, if you will, because of sanctions of the parties involved or
sanctions on the on the vessels involved.
Again, let's be very clear. The U.S.
has not lifted, even temporarily lifted sanctions on Russia.
What it has done is given a very limited waiver for one month.
India can buy oil that was already on water as of the 5th of March.
So a very, very small relief valve does almost nothing to address this huge job
calls that we have in the strait. Now,
I don't know where do you see the biggest vulnerabilities in economies
across Asia? Where do I start?
So already we see the ripple effect going through all the way into
petrochemicals and every single product around us that we consume
that uses petrochemicals. And, you know, the
every day I'm seeing at least a half a dozen to even a dozen companies
declaring force majeure on on product supply.
These are petrochemical companies. So it has already percolated all the way
down to that part of the oil supply chain that,
you know, as is the closest to consumers.
And, you know, you earlier asked me what if when the war ends, I would say that
this supply chain disruption has taken on such gigantic proportions now that
even a complete end to the war and a complete return to normalcy, I fear,
would mean at least months before we return to anything resembling normalcy
in in oil supplies and refining and petrochemicals and all the goods that we
consume on a daily basis. So we are headed for a period of
elevated oil prices that could be extended, protracted.
I wonder what is your sense of how high things can go?
120 I mean, based on what you're saying, maybe that's not even the lid.
Well, at this point, we are in this very curious and unfortunate situation.
I would say that the prices that we are seeing on crude futures are simply
completely disconnected from ground realities if you need to and if you have
to lift a physical barrier, which is well, which is how the world functions.
Right. Not on the basis of futures, but the
physical barrels you are having to pay 20, 30, $40 more than where the futures
are trading. So when you ask me where will prices go,
it's really hard to say. So which prices should we talk about?
But but I would leave it at this that, you know, how how much longer the Strait
of Hormuz remains closed. So the IEA may provide some relief, very
small temporary relief. I would say at the end of the day, the
Strait of Hormuz needs to reopen, or at least in the physical market, physical
oil prices will remain and continue going up in triple digit territory.
Just forget about what you are seeing on your screens with regard to the futures.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The transcript discusses the ongoing impact of a conflict, likely in the Strait of Hormuz, on global oil markets. The IEA is planning a significant oil release (over 180 million barrels), but this would only compensate for past losses, not ongoing disruptions. The conflict has evolved into psychological and information warfare, making market conditions unpredictable and surpassing traditional modeling. Defining an 'end to the war' is complex, requiring absolute certainty of no threats in the Strait for normal shipping to resume. A US waiver allowing India to buy Russian oil is deemed a minimal, temporary measure. The speaker emphasizes that supply chain disruptions, particularly in petrochemicals, are immense, and even with an immediate end to the conflict, a return to normalcy would take months. Elevated oil prices are expected to be protracted, with physical crude prices already significantly higher than futures, indicating chaos in the physical market until the Strait of Hormuz fully reopens.
Videos recently processed by our community