The Dollar’s Replacement Won’t Be China
481 segments
For [music] the first time, the world's
central banks, the people who manage the
savings of entire nations, are holding
more gold than US [music] Treasuries.
Gold quietly passed American government
debt to become [music] the single
biggest asset in the world's reserves.
But this is not really a story about
gold, and it is not a promise that gold
is the future.
It is something entirely different. For
600 years, the world's money has worked
like a crown. It passes from one king to
the next. And the strange thing about
this moment is that the crown looks
ready to change [music]
hands. But when you go looking for who's
next in line, the throne is empty. There
is no crown prince. Here is what almost
no investor is pricing in. Everyone you
talk to has [music] an answer for what
might replace the dollar. They'll tell
you China, or the Euro, or some BRICS
thing, maybe Bitcoin. But almost nobody
has actually checked their work. And
when you do, when you actually run the
numbers on every candidate, you find
something the whole market is unprepared
[music] for. There is no heir.
Look, empires end, [music] reserve
currencies end, and the dollar will
eventually lose its place at the center
of the world. And anybody who tells you
the current arrangement is permanent
hasn't read much history. So, this is
not alarmist, it's just the cycle
turning.
But every other time the cycle turned,
there was a successor already standing
in the wings.
And this time the wings are empty. And
that one fact changes everything about
how this plays out. Let's start with how
this has always worked. For 600 years,
the crown has always had an heir. Right
recent history. Portugal handed off to
Spain, Spain to the Dutch, the Dutch to
France, France to Britain, and Britain
to the United States.
>> [music]
>> Roughly a century each. And every single
time, you could see the successor
standing by the side. By the time
London's reign was ending, America was
already the largest economy on Earth and
the world's biggest creditor. The crown
never leaps to a stranger. It went to
the next strongest power in the room,
the one who already controlled the trade
routes and the resources that mattered.
The understudy was already in costume.
So, today I want to go hunting for that
air, but before we do, I want to talk
about the one idea that makes sense of
everything else that's going to follow.
Okay, so here it is. Every currency on
Earth, the dollar, the euro, the yuan,
is a story that we've agreed to believe.
A dollar is worth a dollar only because
we all agree it is and because we trust
the government not to print too much of
it. Money has always been a story. So,
the real question is never which money
has real value because none of them do.
The question is whose story are you
trusting and what does that storyteller
want you to believe?
And there is exactly one thing on the
whole list that no storyteller can
rewrite. If you're at a dinner party and
you say something like the dollar is
finished, inevitably somebody may finish
your sentence for you. They'll say,
"China. China is next." It's like a
reflex, right? The world's factory, the
biggest exporter, the second largest
economy. Of course, of course China is
next after the United States.
But I'm suspicious of any answer the
whole room reaches too fast. So, here
are three reasons why I believe that's
wrong. First, you cannot be the world's
banker while the doors [music] of your
bank are locked. A reserve currency has
to be something [music]
the whole world can hold freely. They
can buy it, they can sell it, they can
move it across borders at 3:00 in the
morning without asking [music]
permission.
After decades as the the number one
exporter, of Yuan is less than 2% of
global reserves and about 3% of
cross-border payments. The dollar is
around 58% for comparison. Now, that's
not a gap, that's a canyon. But, [music]
the canyon is there on purpose. An
ordinary Chinese citizen can legally
move only about $50,000 [music]
out of the country every year. Beijing
sets the Yuan's price every morning and
lets it drift by maybe 2%. Because if
the money could leave freely, savers
could pull it all out at once and crash
the system. And that's the control that
China will never give up.
And here's the twist. China doesn't even
seem to want the job of the reserve
currency. Back in 2009, [music]
the head of its central bank said the
world leaned too hard on one country's
money. And his fix wasn't "Use ours
instead." [music] It was that the world
should run on a neutral money belonging
to no nation. He had the perfect moment
to pitch the Yuan. The world was
beginning to distrust the dollar, but he
didn't. He said no country should hold
that power, including his own. Now,
look,
I don't believe most of what politicians
say, but it is important to pay
attention to that because China is known
for dictating long-term strategy and
then holding the line on that. Now,
there's a Cornell economist named Eswar
Prasad who put it plainly in his book
called Gaining Currency: The Rise of the
Renminbi. He said as long as China keeps
its money walled off, the Yuan can win a
slice of the trade but never become the
money that the world saves in. It needs
to move freely in order for that to
occur.
Number two,
to be the world's banker, you have to
send your money out into the world.
China was built to pull it in.
In 1960, an economist named Robert
Triffin spotted the trap. If the world
runs on your money, you have to supply
it to the world, which means running
deficits permanently. America's done it
for 80 years. Those trade deficits that
everybody complains about at every
election, that's actually the rent the
US pays to keep the crown.
China is the opposite. In 2025, it ran a
current account surplus of 735 billion
dollars, the largest any nation has ever
run. To take the throne, it would have
to flip that on its head and dismantle
the exact machine that made it strong.
China seems to have looked at that
bargain and said politely, "No, thank
you."
And number three, China is aging before
it's finished climbing. When America
took the crown in 1944, it was young, it
was growing, it was the largest creditor
that the world had ever seen.
China's population peaked in 2022 and
it's now shrinking. It's working-age
population has been falling since 2015
and by 2050, the UN expects roughly 40%
of the country to be over 60 years old.
That's a society growing old before it's
finished growing rich. Every previous
heir made its leap while it was still
young, getting richer and opening its
doors. China is the reverse on all
three. It may be the first workshop in
history to grow old and stay locked up
before it ever became the bank. And if
you set China aside, the bench of heirs
gets pretty thin in a hurry.
Let's look at the euro. After the
dollar, it is the most widely held
reserve currency on Earth, about 21%.
So, it earns a serious look, but it has
a flaw the dollar doesn't. It's a
currency without a country. 20 nations
share it and each still borrows on its
own. There's no single euro bond for the
world to buy. You have to pick one
country's debt over another's. The world
wants one big safe place to park its
savings and the euro offers 20 smaller
ones. Now, we watched it nearly tear
itself apart during the debt crisis from
2009 to 2012 when tiny Greece almost
brought the whole system down. 25 years
in, its share of reserve currency has
hardly moved. Now, the yen and the
British pound come next at about 6% and
5% of reserves, respectively. But,
neither is a contender. They're just
warnings. Japan owes more than twice
everything it produces in a year, the
heaviest debt load in the developed
world. To survive the interest bill, its
central bank pins rates down by force
and has bought up nearly half of its own
government debt to do it. The yen has
been sliding for years and a shrinking,
aging population, and that's not a
country reaching for the crown, all
right? It's one showing the rest of us
what the end of the road looks like, not
the beginning. And the pound, quite
frankly, it's the same story in a
smaller size. But, what about a BRICS
currency? I hear this one a lot. Maybe
it's the the one I get asked about the
most, but history is blunt here.
Monetary unions without political union
don't ever survive. The Latin Monetary
Union tied France, Belgium, Italy, and
Switzerland together from 1865 to the
1920s. And the Scandinavian Union,
founded in 1873, was gone by 1924. And
these countries that made up those
unions, they were neighbors, they shared
borders, and they shared culture, and
they still came apart at the first real
shock. When you look at BRICS, what do
you see? You see India and China. They
have soldiers killing each other as
recently as 2020 in the Galwan Valley.
They're open rivals. India has said
flatly they don't want a common
currency. No shared central bank, no
shared treasury, no shared culture, no
shared law. A common currency is a
marriage. You You got to trust your
partner with your savings for life.
BRICS is not a marriage. It's a
networking event with a photo op. And
look, leverage for sure from a trade
standpoint, not a reserve currency, very
different things. Now, there's another
that a lot of you are bullish on and for
good reason, and I'm talking about
stablecoins. You're not wrong to be
bullish on stablecoins. They may be the
most important monetary innovation in a
generation.
So, let me explain it real quick. A
stablecoin is a digital token meant to
always be worth $1. Now, a private
company holds one real dollar or a
dollar equivalent in US Treasuries
behind each stablecoin it issues. So, it
moves like crypto, but it's stable like
a dollar. You can send money anywhere in
seconds, as easy as sending a text
message, with no bank in the middle.
>> [music]
>> And that's a real advantage. But, here's
the thing. The company that issues that
stablecoin can also freeze it on its own
or on government order. And the dollars
behind it still sit inside the US
financial system, where they can be
frozen, too.
>> [music]
>> So, a stablecoin doesn't free you from a
dependence on America and their monetary
policy, it adds a second party to trust
on top [music] of it. It's still a
dollar. Now, a faster, smarter dollar
that may stretch the dollar's lifespan,
but it does not replace it. So, once
you've actually checked the work, you
end up where I keep ending up and kept
resisting, quite frankly, because it
sounds
a bit stranger than it is. What if we've
been asking the wrong question this
whole time? Every answer history ever
handed us was a country, a flag, a
capital city with a mint. That's where
the currency would go.
So, we go looking for the next flag and
we come up empty and we conclude that
nothing can replace the dollar. But, the
rule, honestly, was never it has to be a
nation. The rule was it has to be
something the whole world trusts to
settle its debts. And there is exactly
one asset that belongs to no government,
carries no one's promise, can't be
printed by a rival or frozen by an
enemy, and it's been accepted everywhere
on Earth for longer than any of those
flags have existed. So, many of you know
where I'm going with this. I'm talking
about gold, but this is not uh gold bug
sermon, because gold is not the answer,
okay? Let me explain. At the end of
2008, gold was about 9% of global
reserves, a single-digit afterthought,
sort of on par with where the yen or the
sterling are today.
By 2024, that number had jumped to 16%,
and by the end of 2025, roughly 27%, now
passing US Treasuries as the single
largest holding in the world's central
banks. Now, I know the reflex. The
second anybody says gold, half the room
rolls their eyes at the gold bug and
tunes out. Now, that that is not me, but
I get it, and here's why. Gold is
useless. You can't eat it. It pays no
interest. It is a soft metal that sits
in a vault and does nothing. Its entire
value rests on back to that, one shared
belief.
But, if we're going to be consistent, we
have to run that same test on everything
else, right? The dollar, as mentioned,
is also just a belief. So are the euro,
the yen, the yuan. You can't eat any of
them, either. The only difference is
that gold is the one belief on that list
that an author cannot spontaneously
print more of or confiscate. And this
isn't just my opinion. In 2022, the US
and its allies froze over 300 billion
dollars of Russia's foreign reserves in
response to the invasion of Ukraine. And
that afternoon, every finance minister
on Earth learned the same lesson. An
asset held inside someone else's system
is not really your asset. And that's why
that same year, central banks bought
more gold than in any year since 1950
and they have not stopped.
Even Washington is saying the quiet part
out loud. The US Treasury Secretary
Scott percent recently stated, we are at
a unique moment geopolitically. There is
a very good chance we're going to have
some kind of grand global economic
reordering. Something on the equivalent
of a new Bretton Woods or the Treaty of
Versailles over the next four years. He
said this in 2024. The man in charge of
the dollar is openly talking about
rebuilding the system and the central
banks are voting
with their vaults. So, let's jump into
some of this arithmetic. The supply of
gold is essentially fixed. Nobody can
print it. It takes a lot of time and
energy to mine. Meanwhile, the biggest,
least price sensitive buyers on the
planet, being central banks, are buying
it at a record pace. Fixed supply, huge
demand. There's only one direction the
price can go and it's gone that way.
Look at the tape. Gold has more than
doubled since 2022 from about $1,800 an
ounce to more than 4,000 today.
That is not a metal suddenly becoming
more useful, by the way. That is trust
draining out of the system in real time.
That's what the gold price truly
reflects. So, let me be clear about what
gold is and what gold isn't. I am not
here to crown a new king. That is the
gold bug sermon and it misreads the
whole thing. Gold is not the heir who
finally steps out of the wings. Gold is
what the world reaches for when it looks
at the wings and finds them empty.
And the first thing an empty stage tells
you is the it's the opposite of doom. A
king with no rival does not get
overthrown next Tuesday because there is
no successor ready and no country
willing to do the job, the dollar will
hold its place far longer than the
loudest pundits will claim. And And
that's why I'm not ringing alarm bells.
The dollar won't fall off a cliff. I do
believe it's going to die by inches, but
that's a slow death, right? Now, gold
will never be the world's everyday money
because it's slow, and the world needs
money that moves fast. Gold isn't the
next act, but I do believe it is the
intermission. Now, what comes after
anybody's guess, most likely a hybrid.
Trade priced in several currencies at
once, debt settled in part by a neutral
asset, maybe gold that no government
controls. You can already see the shape
of it, right? Central banks hold
dollars, euros, and gold side by side.
China's own banker called for a neutral
money back in 2009, and with the
Shanghai Gold Exchange, they are
offering the world an option to buy in
yuan and settle in gold, and maybe
that's the future. The first Bretton
Woods was a hybrid, too. Currencies
anchored to gold.
But, that's a direction, not a
destination. And all those ideas are
just speculation. Nobody is rewriting
the system tomorrow. And that's what the
gold price really tells us. Central
banks don't trust the rules of the
current game being played any longer.
So, they've stepped off the field until
the new rules become clear. Stepping off
the field in money speak is gold. So,
the rising price of gold isn't really a
story about gold. It's like a
thermometer, and the temperature is
climbing. The number going up isn't gold
getting more useful, it's trust leaking
out of the system.
And as long as that price keeps
climbing, the world has not yet agreed
on what comes next. That's the gauge to
watch, not because gold is the
destination, because it tells you how
far we are still from finding one. So,
for the last 600 years, since the rise
of the Portuguese Empire and what we
might be able to call the first sort of
world reserve currency,
the question was always the same, which
country would come next? And the strange
thing that we have to sit with today is
that the honest answer might be none.
There's no crown prince, maybe not for a
long time.
So, what happens next is uncertain. When
you're uncertain what's around the
corner, you want to hedge your bets. And
that's why central banks all over the
world are hedging theirs.
I think the dollar has a long run ahead
of it, but not a positive one. Not one
you want to sit on and ride. It's going
to go the wrong direction. It will die a
slow death because there's no natural
successor.
Central banks have picked up on this.
They believe that story to be true even
if they don't know what comes next. When
you don't trust the existing system, but
you're not sure where you're going next,
gold is the asset you want to sit on,
and that's why central banks are sitting
on it in numbers we haven't seen for
nearly a century.
But, as always, honest question, what am
I missing? Let me know in the comments.
If you enjoy my content, my name is Jay
Martin, and this is the Jay Martin Show.
I publish here every Saturday, and I
love doing it. If you enjoyed this, do
me a favor. Click subscribe, hit like,
but most importantly, share this video
with a friend, somebody that you believe
needs to see it. That's all for today.
I'll see you next week.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This video explores the shifting landscape of global reserve currencies, highlighting a significant historical anomaly: while the US dollar's dominance is waning, there is no clear successor ready to take the 'crown' of the reserve currency. Historically, every major reserve currency transition saw a clear heir, but today, potential candidates like China (the Yuan), the Euro, and BRICS face insurmountable structural or political challenges. Instead of a new nation-state currency, central banks are increasingly accumulating gold, not necessarily as a new reserve standard, but as a neutral asset hedge amidst declining trust in the existing monetary system and geopolitical uncertainty.
Videos recently processed by our community