HomeVideos

I Investigated IKEA’s Suspiciously Cheap Tech

Now Playing

I Investigated IKEA’s Suspiciously Cheap Tech

Transcript

472 segments

0:00

This is a Philips Huegh smart bulb and I

0:02

had to pay £55 to buy one of these here

0:05

in the UK last week. That made me pretty

0:07

angry. Then I found out IKEA literally

0:10

starting this year has decided to become

0:13

a tech company. They've just had their

0:15

biggest ever smarthome push and their

0:17

light bulb is £7. So I bought every

0:22

single IKEA tech product I could find.

0:25

No, literally. I bought their new

0:27

giraffe lamp. I found smart tea lightss.

0:29

I even discovered a cabinet that

0:31

secretly opens up into an entire gaming

0:33

station. Where are you?

0:38

So, carrying no fewer than 47 IKEA

0:40

products, I scured back home, desperate

0:42

to find out how this stuff can actually

0:44

be as good value as it seems to be. It

0:47

was not much of a scurry by the end.

0:50

So, I've only just started setting up

0:52

these products, obviously prioritizing

0:54

my new home, the gaming closet. But

0:56

right now, at least this feels a little

0:57

bit too good to be true. Like these mad

0:59

lads made a MagSafe charger for £9. Yes,

1:03

it's very light and it can wobble. But

1:04

if you just stick it down, that's insane

1:07

value. And the lighting. I thought this

1:09

£7 smart bulb would have some very

1:11

obvious caveat when I plugged that in.

1:13

But there's an app. You turn it on and

1:16

off from your phone. There's a

1:17

brightness slider to the side and you

1:18

can choose any color on the spectrum. I

1:20

have found that Philips does also sell

1:22

an affordable bulb, but even their

1:24

absolute cheapest is three times the

1:26

price of IKEA's. It's the same

1:28

brightness as IKEA's. Oh, yeah. And it

1:29

scores an F in energy efficiency

1:31

compared to a D. And the thing with all

1:33

this IKEA stuff is it's still based on

1:35

matter, which is the latest standard in

1:37

smart homes designed to be kind of like

1:38

a shared language that lets all types of

1:41

devices from all different companies

1:42

play nice with each other. It means that

1:44

I could say to this Alexa hub, "Alexa,

1:46

light blue."

1:50

Okay.

1:52

Okay, that works. Or I can use a 4B IKEA

1:57

matter remote. And it's so sick cuz

2:00

clicking down turns the light on and

2:02

off. You can scroll this wheel. 7 out of

2:05

10 satisfying. But then also press down

2:07

at the bottom of the remote to switch

2:09

which group of matter devices that I

2:11

want to be controlling. The idea being

2:13

that those devices could be almost

2:15

anything, even one of these. So, this is

2:18

the new IKEA color light strip. £13, by

2:21

the way, compared to the minimum that I

2:23

can find fillets for, which is 50. But I

2:25

guess what they've cut to get there is

2:27

this doesn't directly connect to

2:29

anything. It's not matter. The only way

2:31

you typically control it is this button

2:33

to turn it on and off and this one to

2:35

change color. But yeah, so what you can

2:36

do then is connect it up to one of these

2:38

matter smart plugs, which will then let

2:41

my Mattera smart remote talk to it. And

2:44

it has memory. When I turn it on, it's

2:46

remembering what color it was set to

2:48

before I turned it off. Am I nerding out

2:49

over furniture store LEDs? Yes, but the

2:53

configurability here for the money is

2:55

like everything I've been searching for.

2:58

Or so I thought at this point. Things

3:00

are about to take a dark turn soon. IKEA

3:02

has also made a bunch of matter sensors.

3:05

And yes, I've also managed to catch them

3:07

all. So, there's a 7 lb door sensor

3:10

which I've stuck inside the gaming

3:11

cabinet cuz it means every time this

3:13

door closes, this part of the sensor,

3:15

which is just a magnet, changes the

3:17

magnetic field that's picked up by the

3:19

hall effect sensor in the main body,

3:21

which then sends a matter signal out to

3:23

everything here, including all the

3:25

non-smart stuff like these light strips

3:27

because of those matter plugs.

3:30

That was so well timed. And then because

3:32

it's configurable, I can also get it to

3:34

like ping me a notification to let me

3:36

know that the door has been opened or

3:38

closed. There's a motion sensor, too,

3:39

which can do the same thing, but in

3:41

response to, let's say, you walking into

3:43

the room. And you can do crazy stuff

3:46

like this. Right here is IKEA's

3:48

temperature and humidity sensor. £5, by

3:52

the way. And you could set this so that

3:53

the moment it picks up that the lights

3:55

are making this cabinet hot beyond a

3:57

certain point, they just get switched

3:59

off. And by the way, this isn't just

4:01

running matter, the universal language.

4:03

It's matter, but based on a layer of

4:04

technology called Thread, which should

4:07

be better than the more traditional

4:09

Wi-Fi smart home tech of Bu. Thread

4:12

essentially means that instead of each

4:13

of your products needing to communicate

4:14

with your Wi-Fi router first, they

4:16

actually just talk directly to each

4:18

other. And each one acts as its own

4:20

signal repeater. So, it extends the

4:22

range way past most routters. And it's a

4:24

self-healing system. So if one device

4:26

goes down, another one can just fill in

4:28

that gap and keep the network going. You

4:30

do still need a hub, but the cool thing

4:32

about Thread is that that hub can be any

4:35

kind of newish smartome product like an

4:37

Amazon Echo or an Apple TV 4K, things

4:40

you might already have. To be clear,

4:42

plenty of companies are already using

4:43

this combination of matter over thread,

4:46

just not at this price. I don't actually

4:49

understand like how is this even a

4:50

viable business model? This is a £5

4:53

product. One pound is just tax here in

4:55

the UK. So IKEA is making4 pound from

4:58

selling this. How in4 pound are you

5:00

managing to cover the temperature and

5:02

humidity sensor itself, the system on a

5:04

chip required to run the thing, the

5:06

materials, the display, the assembly,

5:08

the packaging, the cost of retail, and

5:10

then somehow still keeping room to make

5:13

a bit of profit. Okay, I've just gone

5:16

into a bit of a rabbit hole online and

5:18

turns out you can actually find the

5:20

exact sensor that IKEA is using in one

5:22

of their products, their air quality

5:24

meter, which they're selling for £25.

5:26

But it's this look, the Sension Sen 63C.

5:31

And if you search that up, this one

5:33

sensor alone is worth like £28. So yeah,

5:36

obviously IKEA is getting massive bulk

5:38

discounts on parts, but still this would

5:40

be a bit like if someone was selling a

5:42

complete gaming PC for the price that

5:45

you could also find just like the

5:47

graphics card inside of it alone. I

5:49

think IKEA has a particularly strong

5:51

incentive right now to establish

5:53

themselves in this space. So, they've

5:55

chosen to make next to no money at all

5:57

on this stuff because they know that

5:59

they're already the home company and if

6:02

they get this tech transition right,

6:04

they will also become the smart home

6:06

company and that could be worth

6:08

billions. I've just tried some of their

6:11

bedroom products and this stuff is not

6:12

matter. It's actually a bit less smart,

6:14

but it might be even better value than

6:16

the smart stuff. Like for £150 a pop,

6:19

we've got things like the cabinet

6:20

lights. They've got motion sensors

6:21

inside to pick up when you open doors or

6:23

drawers. Nice and bright, too. And then

6:26

the nightlight. You might remember I was

6:28

absolutely in awe at Xiaomi's motion

6:30

sensing nightlights. They're £12. The

6:33

IKEA nightlight is £2. Still seems to

6:35

work just as well and lasts 6 months on

6:38

battery apparently. There's an

6:40

interesting thing I've started to notice

6:41

with IKEA products.

6:43

Oh, still works.

6:46

This company is not really like most

6:48

tech companies where they come across

6:50

like they're designing products with one

6:52

hive mind and each product has the exact

6:54

same philosophy. Every IKEA product

6:56

seemingly has its own assigned designer.

6:59

Maybe it's like whoever came up with the

7:01

idea for something becomes the lead

7:03

producer of it, which is probably pretty

7:04

normal when it comes to furniture, but

7:06

kind of weird with tech cuz it means

7:08

that each product functions a bit

7:10

differently. But then the upside is some

7:11

of this stuff is so creative. Like look

7:14

at this really nice weighty glass bowl.

7:17

This is where you chuck your stuff like

7:19

your keys, your chewing gum, your micro

7:23

Game Boy Color

7:25

for some reason. But then you can stick

7:27

your phone onto this magnetic park and

7:29

that's a charger. And then press down.

7:31

It's a light too. I don't know about

7:33

you, but I think that's pretty

7:34

delightful for £15. These speakers are

7:37

£5 each. I say each because the idea is

7:39

you just press one button to pair two of

7:41

them together. And you can do this with

7:43

up to a hundred of them. You probably

7:46

shouldn't. They don't sound very good,

7:48

but you can, and that's kind of fun. Or

7:52

tea lights. Up until this point, I've

7:53

only ever used real tea lights, but

7:55

then, you know, they die after one use.

7:57

Or ones powered by those little coin

7:58

cell batteries that are a massive hassle

8:00

to keep changing out. But IKEA has made

8:02

a USBC charging station where each

8:04

telight docks when you're done with it,

8:06

blinks to confirm that it is charging.

8:08

And then when charged, IKEA has claimed

8:10

that they can last 35 hours each. That

8:13

number sounded crazy to me, so I tested

8:14

it myself. And uh yeah, they weren't

8:16

kidding. Teite battery tests. That's

8:19

where we're at now. What are they

8:21

sitting on? An IKEA table that is also

8:24

an air purifier. And credit to David

8:26

Wall. The thing's so damn efficient.

8:28

Pull out these clips that lets you take

8:30

the top off. Then you can see your

8:31

filter in case you want to change it. A

8:33

hidden compartment where the power

8:35

supply hides. Love that. And then the

8:37

cable wires through the back of the leg.

8:41

David, can you organize my life, please?

8:43

Oh, and then my favorite. It's a giraffe

8:46

lamp. You push the head to turn it on.

8:49

Gosh. And then it'll turn itself off

8:51

after 15 minutes. Just enough time for a

8:54

quick Pokémon Champions. Then you can

8:55

even take the light off and use it to

8:57

make sure you can see your way to the

8:59

bathroom at night. Now, there are some

9:01

things I can see which partly explain

9:03

the low prices, like the fact that IKEA

9:05

seems to refuse to give you batteries

9:07

unless they absolutely have to. This

9:08

giraffe takes doubleas's. All of these

9:10

sensors take AAA's. And I guess that

9:12

kind of helps IKEA because then they can

9:14

sell you theirs. And then the charger

9:16

for those batteries, too. But I think

9:17

the biggest thing is IKEA's volumes. I

9:20

actually just cannot wrap my head around

9:21

the fact that this company has sold over

9:24

140 million of this one bookshelf. So

9:27

IKEA can place enormous orders for parts

9:29

and get a very good deal doing so. And

9:32

it actually feels like they specifically

9:33

reuse those parts in as many different

9:35

products as possible to maximize those

9:37

savings. And even more importantly,

9:39

unlike most companies who make home

9:41

accessories, who probably sell a few

9:43

thousand units and want to make big

9:45

bucks with each one, IKEA does not care.

9:48

As long as they're making pennies per

9:50

product, they're still doing fine

9:52

overall. That's why for years now IKEA

9:54

has been able to sell things at silly

9:56

low prices when they want to things like

9:57

these simple sensors. And I guess now

10:00

they're seeing it as their chance to

10:01

start applying that to the smart home

10:04

now specifically because matter is kind

10:07

of like the stars aligning for IKEA. You

10:09

might know that for the last decade, the

10:11

smart home was basically owned by

10:13

premium companies like Philips Huegh,

10:15

Sonos, Google Nest. Because to actually

10:17

make a smart home that worked needed a

10:19

ton of initial R&D to create a system

10:22

and a set of hardware where each thing

10:24

can talk to each other, you had to be

10:26

primarily a tech company. So, up until

10:29

this point, there's been no such thing

10:31

as the mass market middle ground, where

10:34

someone goes in to buy a sofa or a

10:36

cabinet, but then casually adds a smart

10:38

bulb to their basket just because it's

10:40

right there at the till. It's been too

10:41

complicated and priced way too high. But

10:44

matter is designed to fix that. In

10:46

theory, it takes away all of that

10:48

expensive R&D that used to cost

10:50

billions. All of that will my bulb

10:52

actually talk to my speaker engineering,

10:54

that's now baked into the standard

10:56

itself. So you don't need to be a tech

10:58

company anymore. You just need to make

11:00

yourself matter compatible. And no one

11:02

wins more from this than the company

11:05

with hundreds of millions of people

11:06

specifically walking through their doors

11:08

while in the process of setting up a

11:10

home. One area where it definitely does

11:12

pay to go high-end though is the eight

11:14

sleep bed I'll sponsor

11:17

which I've been using for over a year at

11:19

this point instead of the bed that I

11:21

spent 10 times more money on because I

11:23

tested them and to my shock/ despair

11:26

this made me sleep better and it's not

11:28

even close anymore cuz you know how

11:29

every single sleep device measures your

11:31

sleep score with a number right well

11:33

eight have just upgraded their app with

11:35

a sleep agent powered by AI that can

11:37

also tell you why you slept the way you

11:39

did and then fix it Like the last two

11:41

weeks, I've been kneede working on an

11:43

investigation video, and I've been

11:44

stressed. But this app is not just

11:46

noticing that and giving me suggestions

11:48

for how to fix it by itself, but it's

11:50

also taking matters into its own hands

11:52

and making 30 different adjustments

11:54

while I sleep. And with my code boss,

11:56

you can get $350 off the latest Pod 5.

11:59

You have 30 days to try it, but I don't

12:01

think you'll be sending it back.

12:04

It's falling apart, guys. I know I did

12:06

the whole spiel about why all this

12:08

matter stuff should be incredible, but

12:10

it's been 4 days of living with our IKEA

12:12

tech and it is not going well. Like this

12:16

doughnut lamp, which by the way on its

12:19

own is already kind of disappointing cuz

12:21

it's the exact same tech as that £7

12:23

smart bulb. Same app, same features, but

12:26

just now because it's in a mouth blown

12:28

glass container, it's £55. It doesn't

12:31

even have zone lighting or the ability

12:32

to do gradients. But more importantly,

12:35

how is the connection process this

12:37

terrible? We've been going through loop

12:39

after loop of discovery trying to find

12:41

the thing. And after seven failed

12:42

attempts, it randomly works on the

12:44

eighth, even though we've changed

12:46

nothing. Some of the bulbs have the same

12:47

thing. Like, we put six of them in this

12:49

column light over here. Bought them all

12:51

the same day. Five worked perfectly. One

12:54

just would not connect. It tries to find

12:56

it for two full minutes and then just

12:58

says unable to add accessory. I've

12:59

noticed sometimes the QR code on the box

13:02

lets you add these products onto your

13:03

network. Other times it does not. And

13:05

then the only thing that seems to work

13:06

when that happens is resetting the hub

13:09

and then manually entering the unique

13:11

device numbers that you can find on the

13:12

products. And while I've been dealing

13:13

with that, some of the lights that

13:15

originally set up fine have now started

13:17

showing that they're offline when

13:19

they're clearly on. My precious matter

13:21

remote has gone super laggy sometimes.

13:28

That should have turned it off. Didn't

13:34

like here. What's the matter?

13:35

>> Do you want to press it 100 times and

13:37

see what the success rate is?

13:39

>> Oh my god. I don't want to. One.

13:45

This is content.

13:49

No.

13:52

No. Yes.

13:57

How much longer do we have of this?

14:07

46 successes.

14:10

Oh dear. Still, you know, you see that

14:12

and then you think maybe it's just me.

14:15

Then I looked online. Reddit is full of

14:18

I bought IKEA's Matter products. Nothing

14:21

will connect. There's some positive

14:22

reviews on the IKEA site, but then

14:24

nearly as many one stars with pretty

14:26

much each person talking through

14:28

everything they've done to try and get

14:29

this stuff to work and then how it still

14:32

doesn't. I even found someone who's

14:33

tried to pair 59 of these matter remotes

14:36

and they've only managed to successfully

14:38

pair 29. They've got this 11step

14:41

troubleshooting technique they followed

14:42

and according to them, it fixed nothing.

14:45

So, they're estimating a 50% defect

14:48

rate, which kind of horrifyingly lines

14:52

up with the near 50% negative reviews on

14:55

their site

14:57

and the 50% success rate of the remote.

15:01

I mean, regardless of which way you look

15:03

at it, it's completely unheard of. What

15:04

if your car only started 50% of the

15:07

time? The more I look into this, the

15:09

more it feels like ultimately matter is

15:11

just not ready. It could be, and it

15:13

should be the solution. And one day it

15:15

still might be. But it seems like the

15:17

main companies who built matter, Apple,

15:19

Google, Amazon, etc., they invested in

15:21

it because it would help to promote the

15:23

idea that anyone could have a smart

15:24

home. But individually, none of them

15:27

actually has an incentive for it to

15:29

succeed. If matter becomes a viable

15:31

mainstream smart home solution, then

15:34

who's going to pay three times the price

15:35

for a Google Nest branded doorbell? How

15:38

will Amazon make sure that you also

15:39

subscribe to Prime and do all of your

15:41

shopping on Amazon.com? Matter will

15:44

basically open up the gates for

15:45

companies like IKEA to whip up something

15:47

for a Fiverr that works just as well and

15:49

that's not going to lock you into any

15:51

company's ecosystem. You'll notice as

15:53

well if you pay close attention that

15:54

Samsung has actually been really great

15:57

with all this matter stuff. Their Smart

15:59

Things is usually among the first

16:00

platforms to support each new Mattera

16:02

version, often within a few months of

16:04

release. But Apple, Google, Amazon,

16:06

sometimes we're talking a year behind

16:08

for the same updates. And that's

16:10

probably not random. Samsung is the most

16:12

aggressive because Samsung has the least

16:14

to protect. They don't have the dominant

16:17

voice assistant or the dominant phone

16:20

ecosystem. So, an open standard like

16:22

Matter has a lot of upsides for them.

16:24

They make tons of stuff like fridges,

16:26

washers, and ovens. All matter is going

16:28

to do is help those products work better

16:30

in other companies systems. It's really

16:32

those companies, the ones who make those

16:34

systems like Amazon, who have the most

16:36

to lose and so are the most reluctantly

16:38

trudging towards actually making matter

16:40

good. and instead focusing their efforts

16:42

on trying to ensure that the best

16:44

experience with their products comes

16:45

when you use all of them and you do so

16:47

via their app. And it feels like all of

16:49

this politics has left IKEA a little bit

16:53

stuck. They clearly saw the potential of

16:55

matter. They dived head first into it,

16:57

but it's just not ready yet. And while

16:59

IKEA are not the only ones supporting

17:01

matter, the difference is that IKEA's

17:03

products depend on matter because they

17:05

don't have their own robust ecosystem to

17:08

fall back on. So, for the sake of making

17:10

this smartarthome dream accessible to

17:12

the masses, I really hope IKEA can get

17:14

over this incredibly bumpy start. But

17:18

I'm not holding my breath.

Interactive Summary

The video explores IKEA's ambitious entry into the smart home market using the 'Matter' standard. While the products are incredibly affordable and offer impressive features—like smart bulbs, sensors, and remote controls—the reviewer experiences significant technical issues, including connectivity problems and high failure rates. The analysis suggests that while Matter aims to democratize the smart home, current implementations are often unreliable, and large tech companies may be reluctant to fully support an open ecosystem that threatens their proprietary platforms.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts