We call it neuro rendering. The fusion

the fusion of 3D graphics and artificial

intelligence. [music] This is DLSS 5.

Take a look at it.

[music]

Other than re-emphasizing its love for

global surveillance and

military-industrial company Palanteer

with tasteful heart emojis, Nvidia today

announced DLSS5. That stands for deeple

learned super slop 5. DLSS5 takes the

revolutionary approach of applying a

custom-tuned, deeplearned, fully

trained, advanced 2019 Instagram selfie

filter to video games to ensure

characters are always shown under 5500K

studio lights even when fighting zombies

in dark alleys, including full lip

filler, lipstick, makeup that the artist

forgot to apply when the character left

the house. And Nvidia even debuted its

new DLSS model PT, which stands for

Peter Teal that applies a realistic

reptilian eye effect to NPCs. The entire

internet meme'd on DLSS5 and we stitched

some of them together.

>> Well,

this is going to scare you a little bit.

I'm going to flip the slide and don't

gasp.

[music]

So, we're going to go through the

schematic for the rest of the time.

This is my best slide. Every time I I

asked my I asked the team, "What's my

best slide?" repeatedly this was it.

They say, "Don't do it, Jensen. Don't do

it." I said, "No, this these seats are

free."

For some of you,

so this is your price of admission. But

Jensen made it clear. If you don't like

how DLSS5 looks, and these are the real

ones now, actually, then simply you're

wrong.

>> Well, first of all, they're completely

wrong. Um, the reason for that is

because, as I explained very carefully,

DLSS

fuses

controllability of this of geometry and

textures and everything about the game

with generative AI. When it's not busy

AI generating dating profile pictures

used to scam old people in other

countries, DLSS5 is busy creating

Yassified fan edits of soccer players

midfield with full studio lighting and

flash photography. Because now the game

is being a photographer for GQ magazine

instead, before which point it applies a

Mo effect to the shirt as an alien

prepares to burst out of his chest while

simultaneously sloppy an arm. Or as one

commenter said, quote, "They somehow

made the 15-year-old character look like

the 38-year-old Zakyama." end quote.

DLSS blasts the ever loving out of

the contrast, saturation, exposure, and

color grading of scenes that were built

with a particular feeling in mind, but

now feel like a up HDR video on

an unsupported device, and in some cases

even appear to literally change the

character. In the Reququum demo, in the

first frame of the comparison, you can

see that DLSS5 has the appearance of

giving Grace a broader, stronger jawline

while also giving her a nose job to lift

the nose upward. Not to mention eye

enlargement that also lifts them up.

More sharply defined curves on the

lacrimal canal and then curves on the

upper lash line on the outside. All for

a cost of only two RTX5090s, cheaper

than a trip to Korea or Turkey for

surgery. That's not to mention the

eyeshadow and the eyeliner they threw in

there for free. It's almost like someone

said, "Hey, if we train AI on what's

considered potentially attractive in

social media so that we can

subconsciously manipulate people to

extend their engagement time with the

media by just a little bit longer for

reasons they can't quite understand,

with the long-term possibility of using

millions of data points we've scraped

for each person via a combination of

their LLM usage from things like Chat

GPT on accounts that they've connected

to our services through data

partnerships with companies like Meta,

OpenAI, Data Nabs, and Game Studios,

thereby opening the door in the future

to leverage generative AI and games in a

way that appeals to the individual data

profile that we've built for the user

playing the game to best exploit them

for more money through their weaknesses

that we've algorithmically identified."

And then they packaged it into step one

and called it DLSS5.

And no, I did not speed that up in post.

And yes, it is conspiracy brain. But

then last time, we're going to need

we're going to need a bigger hat.

>> I said Venezuela would be a good source

of oil for data center companies. And

then the government said this.

>> Venezuela worked out really great. And

we're taking out hundreds of millions of

barrels of oil. Sort of my idea like

>> very much so.

>> Build your own power plant. And

everybody thought I was kidding. [music]

They said, "Really? you can do that? How

would you do that? I said, "We'll get

you fast permits because you know the

data centers and you people are so big

that you're the the biggest in the

world, but they've developed a little

bit of a bad public. They have they need

some PR help.

>> Drill, baby drill. We're still power

constraint."

>> So, the conspiracy brain thing,

just saying got a good track record.

Although [laughter] DLSS5 does modify

the images, there are some things that

it simply can't perfect. for example,

this image. There's clearly no

difference between the DLSS5 version and

the native rendering. So, I I don't know

if DLSS5 isn't working for that example

because as far as I'm concerned, they

are literally indistinguishable. They

look exactly the same. I native might

even be better than DLSS5 in this one.

So, it just sometimes it doesn't even

seem to work. We brought you this video

with our brand new wireframe V2 mouse

mat on store.ac.net.

Also accompanied by our new Micro Slop

t-shirt that's on its way to our

warehouse right now. These feature a

parody Micro Slop logo with a blue

screen of death frowny face, warning

marks from Event Viewer, and our

rendition of Tux the Penguin hidden

away, and of course, Micro Slop so

everyone you pass either thinks you work

there for now or they know your thoughts

on AI. The Wireframe V2 mouse mat on the

GN store was made by Andrew on the team

in Blender. Fully 3D modeled and then

represented in a high quality mouse mat

that you see here. The mat can easily

accommodate a keyboard and mouse has

fine detail with a city built of

wireframe components for the heat sink

RAM because let's be honest, it's the

only place any of us can get any now and

cooling tubes. And we use a matching

blue stitching for anti- fray with a

blue rubber underside for some unique GN

flare. We modeled these to ridiculous

levels of depth in that there are things

in the model that you can't even see in

the product because we went that deep

with it. Like for example, the springs

underneath the switch underneath the

keycap that's represented in the matte

surface. Head to store.gamersac.net to

support our deep dive independent

research content like this directly.

Today we're going over Nvidia's

sloppiest AI yet. We also get to cover

extremely relatable and downto-earth

quotes like this one.

>> You know, if you if you set up a

factory, a plant, a DRM plant, and I

come in and say, "You know what? Go

ahead and set up the DRAM plant because

I'm going to I'm going to use it." That

goes a long ways. You might as well take

that to the bank, as many of them have.

And so, and [laughter] so,

and so I I think the the the fact that

everything is scarce is fantastic for

us. you know the our our mutual friend

and Jensen tonight you don't talk to him

>> you know clearly he need a lot of memory

for his Robin and the next generation

product

>> between the LSS5 reimagining the Altmer

Hondaar as Joffrey Elstein and fueling

Epstein investment recipient Peter

Teal's co-founded company Palanteer with

technology that could be used in either

war abroad or in surveillance against

American citizens Jensen Juan had a lot

to talk about on stage at GTC we'll

start with the simplest which is DLSS5

DLSS S5 makes every single video game

character look like it came from the

same game with the same shitty I

generated a dating profile picture to

catfish people midjourney make it

photorealistic prompt. So if you've ever

thought to yourself, I like video games,

but I hate that they have character and

feeling. And I'd instead like them to

all look like the Facebook manifestation

of dead internet theory where as you're

scrolling you just pass one after

another fake image with thousands of

maybe actual people commenting on the

images or just bots who the knows.

If you want that in a video game, then

Nvidia has you covered. And all of this

comes during a time when building a

computer is no longer viable for normal

actual people who don't say things like

this.

>> The fact that everything is scarce is

fantastic for us.

>> The quiet part isn't the quiet part

anymore. Scarcity is good for business.

I mean, if you're not trying to get the

stuff, if you're selling it, but it's

good for business. With system memory

prices now at five times what they were

in September and SSD prices at least

doubling and it's going up faster than

that still the slop is why normal end

users can't afford RAM or solidstate

drives or find GPUs. That's because the

companies need to point all of that

stuff at research and development for

things like this

[music]

trustworthy AI. But all of this is to

try and make games look more

photorealistic. Except photo realism

shouldn't be the standard of what looks

good in a game. It can look good, but

graphics and aesthetics are different

things. While scrutinizing the company's

marketing materials, we also noticed

that nearly every DLSS5 demo that Nvidia

shared only previewed the effects as

they were applied on still shots. The

main exception to this that we could

find was in the EA Sports FC demo in

which we found several extremely

apparent examples of artifacting and

ghosting. Limited frames to analyze

means we have limited frame by frame

analysis. But we still noticed a few

things here. The soccer ball artifacts

heavily for several consecutive frames

as the player kicks it into the net,

even momentarily turning the player into

Roger from American Dad, or if you

prefer, Five Head from Twitch. As the

soccer ball enters the goal, it loses a

spot in the net. bifurcates into two

reality distortion balls momentarily and

then briefly vanishes before falling out

of the net. We guess the artist's

original vision for this was hollow deck

soccer. When the player runs off to

celebrate, DLSS cuts off part of the

player's left arm. That's got to be a

red card or something. It produces major

artifacts above the player's right arm

and overall just struggles with the

character's outline. this doesn't look

good for DLSS for a launch for five

anyway and points out a potential weak

point for Nvidia's latest revision or

maybe suggests that Nvidia never fully

addressed artifacting issues in previous

DLSS versions. But either way, this

certainly seems like why Nvidia didn't

really show any demos with movement

other than this one. Obviously, we don't

have enough material to conduct a proper

analysis. That being said, we don't

think the LSS5's first impressions here

were promising. Interestingly, Nvidia

noted temporal consistency as another

one of DLSS5's key benefits, and the

soccer ball was anything but temporally

consistent. But the backlash was so

enormous and somehow for the outof touch

AI boosters was so unexpected that they

had to jump in to help Nvidia with

damage control. Even though like the

entire internet was mad at this one. I I

saw one guy who I don't even remember

who it was who was like don't listen to

the influencers and the media who are

telling you what to think. And you look

at it's like the media hasn't said

anything yet. The media is going to be

like a day late to this. This is bro

this is all the internet. Like this is

for better or for worse. This is like

the entire internet decided this

thing.

But we also have things to say. So,

little bit of a point. Anyway, some

people jumped in to help Nvidia with the

damage control. Bethesda, presumably

with a gun pointed to the head of the

adoring fan, tweeted to say, quote,

"Appreciate your excitement [music] and

analysis of the new DLSS5 lighting

here." End quote. I'll tell you how you

know it was written by PR.

There's no subject of the sentence.

There's no I or we appreciate your

excitement. quote, "This is a very early

look, and our art teams will be further

adjusting the lighting and final effect

to look the way we think works best for

each game. This will all be under our

artists control and totally optional for

players." That line sounds familiar,

like marching orders that were handed

out. Quote, "Important to note, with

this technology advance, game developers

have full detailed artistic control over

DLSS5's effects to ensure they maintain

their game's unique aesthetic per

NVIDIA." underneath its video. Their

quote continues, "The SDK includes

things like intensity, color grading,

and masking off places where the effect

shouldn't be applied. It's not a filter.

DLSS5 inputs the game's color and motion

vectors from each frame into the model,

anchoring the output in the source 3D

content." End quote. This is a good

response. Nvidia is trying to get ahead

of what the internet was saying.

People were twisting it and saying it

looked like a 2019

Instagram filter and those people were

clearly wrong. So, this should solve it.

Let's see how the internet reacted. I'm

sure I'm sure Nvidia got the reaction

they were expecting with all that AI

that they had. They probably ran a

predictive model and just Okay. All

right. Maybe maybe they could have

worded it a little better or just like

not made this. But anyway, some of the

comments had great feedback friend

videos, such as quote, "Rams didn't die

for this. No way. This isn't an April

Fool's joke. Now your game can look like

an AI generated image. Wow. We went from

ray tracing to sloth tracing." Got to

say, that's my favorite one. This was

supposed to be an upscaler. How the

did it become this? We went from frame

gen to frame hallucination. So now we

measure GPU performance in terasops.

Probably my second favorite. Looks like

it completely changes what the devs

originally designed. Beyond weird. And

quote, "Grace's face looks like those

ads on the hub.

>> It's going to pound [music] on memory

really hard. It's going to be pounding

on the me on the storage system really,

really hard."

>> Jesus Once again, you guys are

brutal. Remind me not to with the

commenters. But also, I completely agree

with this. And uh I'm happy that

Nvidia's got plenty of feedback to pull

from so they know it's not just uh

random Lunatic yelling at Clouds and

Palunteer for the 67th time this month.

That would be me by the way, but also

everybody else. But there's good news.

The game development community says that

all of us are wrong.

>> Well, first of all,

>> that's right. all those thousands and

thousands of comments and people who

didn't like it and their opinions about

subjective things like art and graphics,

they're idiots and they just don't get

it. So, let's see what the game

development community had to say because

you're not allowed to have an opinion if

you don't make games. An Epic dev wrote,

quote, "All you guys roasting DLSS5 like

it doesn't look better is distracting

from art direction are absolutely

insane. the light and shaded

improvements are bonkers." End quote. He

unironically tweeted, "We assume about

this 16th century Japan village with

ultra-reflective powerwash solar roofs."

He continued, quote, "Are you so

ignorant as to not recognize what that

will enable for marginalized creators?"

Yes, I get it. The transition that it

will cause in the economy will be

painful for some people. Just like it

was painful when the internet destroyed

the mail order business. Or just like

when it was painful when candlemakers

were put out of business by Edison. It's

kind of wordy. Let me just shorten that

form a bit. In other words,

>> some of you may die, but it's a

sacrifice I am willing to make.

>> But guy who supports marginalized

creators and also works for Epic Games

has a point. DLSS5 shading and lighting

are bonkers. They're fantastic. They

bring Oblivion Remastered right back

where Oblivion came from.

2006. In this clip of Oblivion, you can

see the scene get blasted with an

indiscriminate flood light that feels

about the same as some HDR or as

if the brightness and saturation are

both set to your eyes on the

monitor. Or in this flickerfest of the

game where Hontitar Elstein looks like

he's glitching out of the matrix while

he walks towards the player, we can see

maybe why Nvidia didn't show off more

scenes where there was actual movement.

All right, enough of that for now. We'll

come back to more discussion on sort of

the image quality from the initial

demos. There is theoretically some

actual technology here. So, we'll talk

about that as well. Jensen Juan went on

stage to describe how DLSS5 is supposed

to work.

>> Now, what did we do? We fused

controllable 3D graphics, the ground

truth of virtual worlds, the structured

data, remember this word, the structured

data of virtual worlds, of gener

generated worlds. We combine 3D

graphics, structured data with

generative AI,

probabilistic computing. One of them is

completely predictive, the other one

probabilistic yet highly realistic. We

combine these two ideas. Combine these

two ideas controlled through structured

data controlled perfectly and yet

generating at the same time. And as a

result,

the content is beautiful, amazing, as

well as controllable.

>> Nvidia's website says that Jensen Juan

says that DLSS5 is quote the GPT moment

for graphics end quote. In other words,

like a jump scare for owning computer

hardware.

>> They say don't do it, Jensen. Don't do

it. I wonder if this can play Crisis.

>> Only gamers know that joke.

>> Nvidia's FAQ post says, quote, "Dls5 is

a neural rendering model that takes the

game's color and motion vectors as input

for each frame that infuses the scene

with photoreal lighting and materials

that are anchored to the source 3D

content and temporarily consistent from

frame to frame." End quote. Nvidia's

subsequent postings have tried to

emphasize their statements that this

deals only in color and motion. But

users online have called this into

question by pointing out examples that

appear to have had deeper changes. And

as we said earlier, Jensen Juan's newest

comment even says stuff about geometry

which seemingly came out of nowhere.

They didn't say that in this comment.

Unfortunately, Nvidia's obsession with

photo reality also, we think, sets a

misguided goalpost as if photo reality

is the ultimate in game graphics and

aesthetics. The NVIDIA site continues,

quote, "The AI model is trained end to

end to understand complex scene

semantics such as characters, hair,

fabric, and translucent skin along with

environmental lighting conditions like

front lit, back lit, or overcast, all by

analyzing a single frame. DLSS5 then

uses its deep understanding to generate

visually precise images that handle

complex elements such as subsurface

scattering on skin, the delicate sheen

of fabric and light material

interactions on hair, all while

retaining the structure and semantics of

the original scene end quote. Now, we

already know that Nvidia's images are

nothing close to quote visually precise

end quote. So, the marketing language

here is disconnected from reality. We

did notice subsurface scattering in some

images, so at least that much is true.

As for the so-called quote delicate

sheen of fabric and interactions on hair

and quote what we saw in most of the

examples isn't something we'd describe

as delicate sheen. DLSS5 lights these

scenes up like a truck driver using his

aftermarket lights to x-ray you from

across the intersection. Based on our

understanding, DLSS5 is still a work in

progress and will require some

significant optimization leading up to

its planned fall 2026 release. In a

forum post, Nvidia clarified that the

DLSS5 demo at GTC needed two 5090s to

run, stating, quote, "The DLSS5 early

preview demo shown at GTC is run on two

GeForce RTX 590s. One RTX 590 is

dedicated to rendering the game, while

the other is dedicated for running the

DLSS 5 model. DLSS5 will be optimized to

run on a single GPU for release." End

quote. Now, critically, they do not say

what kind of GPU, just that it will work

on a single GPU. We also think it's

ironic or fitting maybe that Jensen

described DLSS5 as

>> we call it neuro rendering the fusion

the fusion of 3D graphics and artificial

intelligence

>> when in reality Nvidia had to literally

separate them into 3D graphics and

so-called artificial intelligence onto

two physically separate 5090s. Now,

handing around his CEO buddies, Jensen

must have forgotten that most gamers

don't have an extra 5090 that they've

forgotten their other leather jacket

pocket.

>> I actually want to start out talking a

little bit about

>> all of my CEO friends, they're they all

have the most.

>> Nvidia might claim that it wants to get

this requirement down. It's a demo

running at a show, but it clearly

couldn't perform well enough to even run

outside of a basically fixed frame

situation with the 25090s. and we do

think that this is likely going to be a

challenge for them to get optimized.

We're also really curious about the VRAM

requirements for something like this.

The company was also unable to share any

details on the memory and performance

impact or even which GPUs will support

DLSS5 instead stating quote DLSS5 at GTC

is an early preview and the model is

still being optimized. will share these

details closer to release in fall 2026.

End quote. And quote, "Minimum GPU

specifications are pending model

optimizations and will be provided

closer to release." End quote. Despite

the model still requiring optimization,

Nvidia lists at least 15 games that it

says quote will support DLSS 5 at launch

and quote including Resident Evil

Reququum, Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion

Remastered, and Starfield to name a few

of the even fewer. Nvidia also claims,

quote, "DLss5 will be supported by the

industry's biggest publishers and game

developers, including Bethesda, Capcom,

Hottest Studio, Net Ease, NCOFT, Sgame,

Tencent, Ubisoft, and Warner Bros.

games." end quote. The company goes on

to point out what it considers DLSS5's

key benefits, highlighting what it says

is cinematic lighting and material depth

and saying DLSS5 quote reconstructs

complex effects like rim lighting,

subsurface scattering for realistic skin

and contact shadows with high fidelity

end quote. and that it quote enhances

physically based rendering properties

like roughness and adds micro realism to

complex objects such as eyes and hair

end quote. A lot of this kind of reminds

me of covering DLSS2 when it first came

out or RTX when it was first announced

something like 50 plus days before any

actual RTX games went out other than

that Star Wars demo they had which you

couldn't actually do anything with

because there's a lot of promise of what

they say it can do and then you look at

what it does and it does not look like

it it doesn't look like that the things

they say don't match the things that it

is. Interestingly, Nvidia attempts to

push controllability as a main feature.

It's actually something that Juan

mentioned several times on Sage as well

as the team mentioning in their blog

post. They label controllability a quote

key benefit. And they also submit that

DLSS 5 quote allows game developers to

tune intensity, color, and masking to

determine where and how enhancements are

applied to maintain the game's unique

aesthetic. End quote. Even if we just

decide to say that Nvidia is not

changing anything else. All right, let's

just it's only doing exactly what they

say. Nothing more, nothing less. Even in

that situation, the problem is if the

overwhelming amount of actual people who

might use this see it and go, "Oh, I

think it's changing meshes too." Then it

doesn't really matter what Nvidia says

it does at that point. It matters what

the perception is because this is all a

visual technology and all that matters

is what people see. So if what people

see is this no longer looks like the

same game or character, then that's kind

of the only point that matters, the

defensiveness about technologically

whatever it does, it's irrelevant to

people. So anyway, later in the forum

post, suspicions of defensive writing

are verified when the company reiterates

that DLSS5 quote honors artistic intent.

End quote. One of the key criticisms

online. Nvidia says that it is quote

inputting the game's color and motion

vectors for each frame into the model,

anchoring the output in the source 3D

content. End quote. Nvidia says, quote,

"By providing developers with detailed

controls such as intensity, and color

grading, artists can use these to adjust

blending, contrast, saturation, and

gamma, and determine where and how

enhancements are applied to maintain the

game's unique aesthetic. Developers can

also mask specific objects or areas to

be excluded from enhancement." End

quote. Even game developers jumped in on

mocking this, including Among Us. With

Nvidia unaware that it is being laughed

not with, but at replying, quote, "DLss5

not sus." end quote, which is possibly

the most sus thing to say. The Day Z

guys jumped in too with a giga chat, I

guess, from DLSS5. One of the big

problems here is that Nvidia has 95% of

the market now. So, it's at a point

where the developers are going to play a

game of numbers where optimizing for the

thing that 95% of the market has is

going to be the most financially

incentivized thing to do because you're

going to get the broadest user base and

have to deal with the least amount of

kind of specific fine-tuning across

vendors. So this to us is concerning

because just like with game works over

the years and all of the other

technologies Nvidia rolled out at one

point or another that are software

focused and integrated with game

development. Although there are cool

things they do, it also does tend to

follow a pattern of starting to sort of

box out the competitors. And now it's

not just AMD. Intel it's like kind of

doesn't count here. I'm not really

considering them. And it's not because

of ARC not earning it. It's because

Nvidia owns 5% of Intel. So it

doesn't really matter. Might be 4%.

Close enough. Like point is though,

Intel's part of Nvidia at this point.

Even though it's a very very small part,

a four or five% that's still substantial

if it's a competitor to own. Uh, but

also Chinese GPUs that are on the rise

right now where there are a lot of

companies in China that we're working on

covering right now that all have their

flavor of GPU and they're not there yet,

but it sure looks like they're getting

there in terms of gaming products. And

so the more sort of blocks that Nvidia

can pile up around game developers, the

more it will defend its position as 95%

market owner. And so Nvidia is doing

what it's been able to do for a couple

decades now that we've been covering for

I don't know like 15 years or something.

Uh which is utilize its more abundant

resources to get engineers and

developers and shader programmers into

game development companies to help them,

which is a good thing ultimately. But if

they're helping them deploy technologies

that uh create an a a disfavorable

marketplace from a competitive

standpoint, if it's boxing people out

and leveraging a monopoly status, then

that's not a good thing for consumers.

And this is at a time when literally the

president of the United States stood in

front of Jensen Juan and his competitor

Lisa Sue and then made jokes with Jensen

about how he owns the whole

market. Like it was funny to the United

States government that Nvidia owns the

entire market. I said we'll break him

up. They said no sir is very hard. I

said why? I said, "What percentages of

the market does he have?" So, he has

100%.

I said, "Who the hell is he? What's his

name?" His name is Jensen Wong. Nvidia.

I said, "What the hell is Nvidia? I've

never heard of it before."

>> There's not going to be any antitrust

regulation. They're they're like in it

together, literally. Actually, they're

both investors in Intel. So this is the

peak opportunity for them to leverage

their position and start building more

of a fortress. Even if Nvidia opens

certain technologies up more publicly,

ultimately fighting against smaller

competitors with fewer resources, it's

going to be harder for them to even just

keep up with that. So now it's not to

say they shouldn't do stuff to stay

ahead. It's what a company competing

should do. It's just that Nvidia is

uniquely positioned where they're buddy

buddy with the United States of America.

Uh, and Lisa Sue only just recently was

able to get Trump to remember her name

at one event after other events where he

seems to consistently not remember it.

We've covered that in a separate video,

though. We actually filmed and edited

another 20 minutes of content here that

we're going to leave for a separate

video cuz it mostly goes into Nvidia's

new Palunteer announcements. It was

already publicly announced as partnered

with Palanteer, which again is a company

that has ties to concerns for things

like pre-rime policing or predictive

policing, but there's new info there.

They also had some other announcements.

We were going over earnings as well, but

we've had a lot of 50-minute videos

lately. So, we're going to keep this one

focused after running a poll and asking

you all what you thought. It was like

80% voted for a focused video. So, this

is the DLSS5 one. And then we'll have

all that other stuff in a separate video

either here or on GNCA. But anyway, that

gets you up to speed on DLSS 5. We do

think that there's a greater play with

DLSS5 and I think it goes beyond just

limiting what the competition has access

to in the gaming space. Nvidia doesn't

give a about gaming as compared to

how it used to feel right now. That

doesn't mean they won't still box people

out and they probably would still build

up their their moat to try and do that

to limit competition. But I do actually

think that there is a greater play here

and it could be something like shifting

people to be more in line with getting

onto data centers for up to mid-range

cards for gaming services if uh the bar

or the requirement increasingly goes up

for graphics power locally and the price

goes up. It could also be the joking,

not joking earlier comment that we had

in here about if this is maybe useful

for entertainment providers like game

developers where if you have enough

data, if people are plugging everything

about their lives into LLMs, which Juan

has already stated, uh he would like for

those to know everything about you and

remember every conversation forever.

>> We would like to have this AI stay with

us our entire life and remember every

single conversation we've ever had with

it. Right? If they have all that

information and if they have all the

other data points about you that are

available online and if you've hooked

generative AI into active entertainment

solutions like video games, then there's

a lot of ways to abuse that to fine-tune

it to extract maximum value to maximize

the engagement time, the time spent in

the game or on the screen or watching

the movie or whatever uh and create a

loop that sucks people into it. And so

that stuff I I think it probably doesn't

sound too crazy to a lot of our

audience, but that is all possible.

These are all things that can be done.

And whether or not Nvidia explicitly sat

down in a boardroom and said, "This is

what we're going to do isn't really a

factor to us." The point is that it

looks like the technology could be

abused in this way, and we would just

caution connecting your data profile to

things where it can all be uh directly

linked back to you. But anyway, the

short version is DLSS5 has some ugly ass

graphics. That's it for this one. Thanks

for watching. and go to

store.gamersex.net or

patreon.com/gamersac

to support us directly.