HomeVideos

Essentials: Using Meditation to Focus, View Consciousness & Expand Your Mind | Dr. Sam Harris

Now Playing

Essentials: Using Meditation to Focus, View Consciousness & Expand Your Mind | Dr. Sam Harris

Transcript

974 segments

0:00

Welcome to Huberman Lab Essentials,

0:01

[music] where we revisit past episodes

0:04

for the most potent and actionable

0:06

science-based [music] tools for mental

0:08

health, physical health, and

0:09

performance.

0:11

I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor

0:13

of neurobiology and opthalmology at

0:16

Stamford School of Medicine. And now for

0:18

my discussion with Dr. Sam Harris. Dr.

0:21

Sam Harris, what is this thing that we

0:23

call a self? You know, as far as I know,

0:26

we have not localized the region in the

0:28

brain that can entirely account for our

0:31

awareness of self.

0:33

>> The problem is we we use the term self

0:35

in so many different ways, right? And

0:37

and there's there's one sense of that

0:40

term which um is the target of

0:43

meditation and you'll hear it from me

0:44

that this self is an illusion, right?

0:47

And and that there's a there's a

0:49

psychological freedom that can be

0:51

experienced on the other side of

0:52

discovering it to be an illusion. And

0:54

some people don't like that framing.

0:55

Some people would would insist that it's

0:57

not so much an illusion, but it's a it's

0:59

a construct and it's not what it seems.

1:01

The thing that doesn't exist, uh it

1:04

certainly doesn't exist as it seems. And

1:05

I would I would want to argue that it

1:07

actually is just a proper illusion is

1:09

this the sense that there is a subject

1:12

interior to experience in addition to

1:15

experience. So most people feel like

1:18

they're having an experience of the

1:19

world and they're having their an

1:21

experience of their bodies in the world.

1:23

And in addition to that, they feel that

1:26

they are a subject internal to the body.

1:29

Most people feel like they're behind

1:31

their face as a kind of locus of

1:33

awareness and thought and intention.

1:36

It's almost like they're you're a

1:37

passenger inside your body. Most people

1:39

don't feel identical to their

1:40

experience. They feel like they're on

1:42

the edge of experience, somehow

1:44

appropriating it from the side. You're

1:46

kind of on the edge of the world and the

1:49

world is out there. your body is is in

1:52

some sense an object in the world uh

1:54

which you you know it's different from

1:56

the world you know the the boundary of

1:58

your skin is still meaningful you can

1:59

sort of you loosely control your body I

2:02

mean you can't control you can control

2:04

your gross and subtle you know voluntary

2:06

motor movements but you're not

2:07

controlling everything your body is

2:09

doing you're not controlling your

2:10

heartbeat and your hormonal secretions

2:12

and all of that and so there's a lot

2:13

that's going on that is in the dark for

2:15

you then you give someone an instruction

2:18

to meditate A and you say, "Okay, let's

2:20

let's examine all of this from the first

2:22

person's side. Let's look for this thing

2:23

you're calling I." They're going to

2:25

close their eyes, very likely, and now

2:27

they're going to pay attention to

2:28

something. They're going to pay

2:29

attention to the breath or the sounds.

2:32

And it's from the point of view of being

2:34

a locus of attention that is now aiming

2:37

attention strategically at an object

2:39

like the breath that there's this

2:40

dualism that is set up. and the ultimate

2:43

promise of meditation. I mean, there

2:45

really two levels at which you could be

2:47

interested in in meditation. Um, one is,

2:52

you know, very straightforward and

2:53

remedial and non-p paradoxical and very

2:56

well subscribed and it's it's the usual

2:58

set of claims about all the benefits

3:00

you're going to get from meditation,

3:01

right? So you're going to lower your

3:02

stress and you're going to increase your

3:04

focus and you're going to, you know,

3:06

stave off cortical thinning and there's

3:08

all kinds of good things that science is

3:09

saying meditation will will give you.

3:12

But from my point of view, the real

3:14

purpose of meditation and its real

3:15

promise is not in this long list of of

3:19

benefits and you know I'm not

3:20

discounting any of those though you know

3:22

the science for many of them is quite

3:24

provisional. It's in this deeper claim

3:27

that if you look for this thing you're

3:29

calling eye, if you look for the sense

3:30

that that there's a thinker in addition

3:33

to the the the mere arising of the next

3:36

thought, say, you won't find that thing

3:39

and you cannot find it in a way that's

3:42

conclusive. Uh and that matters, right?

3:45

and and it and it has a there's a host

3:47

of benefits that follow from that

3:49

discovery which are quite a bit deeper

3:51

and more interesting than engaging

3:53

meditation on the side of its benefits.

3:55

You know, de-stressing, increasing focus

3:57

and all the rest. Many people think

3:59

meditation is about changing the

4:01

contents of consciousness. You there's

4:02

some some contents you want to get rid

4:04

of like anxiety. Other contents you want

4:07

to to encourage like calm and you know

4:10

unconditional love or you some other you

4:11

know classically pleasant pro-social

4:13

emotion. Um, and that's all fine. That's

4:16

all possible. But the real, you know,

4:20

wisdom of, you know, the the 2,000-y old

4:23

wisdom of meditation that really is the,

4:25

you know, the the chewy center of the

4:26

the Tootsie Pop is a recognition of what

4:30

consciousness itself is always already

4:33

like, regardless of the contents and the

4:35

changes in contents. And classic flow

4:38

experiences have this this quality where

4:40

there's the and this this tends to be

4:42

why they're so rewarding. um where

4:44

there's just if you're in in some you

4:47

know athletic activity or you know an

4:49

aesthetic one or you could be having sex

4:51

or you could be whatever it is some peak

4:53

experience. Its peakness usually entails

4:58

there being some brief period where

5:01

there was no distance between you and

5:03

the experience. Right? for that moment.

5:05

You were no longer looking over your own

5:07

shoulder or anticipating the next moment

5:10

or trying to get somewhere where where

5:12

you weren't or, you know, micromanaging

5:15

errors or you like this, you know,

5:17

there's not there's just the flow of

5:19

unity with whatever the, you know,

5:22

whatever the experience is, you know, a

5:24

surfer on on the wave, right? And we

5:26

love those experiences. We are

5:29

continually abstracted away from them by

5:32

our thinking about them. We're think,

5:34

"Oh my god, that that was so good." Or,

5:35

"How do I get back to that?" Or, you

5:37

know, you're looking at a sunset, it's

5:38

the most beautiful sunset you've ever

5:39

seen, and then you're continually

5:43

interrupting the experience of merely

5:45

seeing it with a commentary about how

5:48

amazing this is. And I wonder, you know,

5:50

what are real estate prices here? I

5:52

mean, is it possible that we could we

5:53

could move here? And like you your your

5:55

mind is just continually narrating a a

5:58

conversation you're having with

5:59

yourself. However, paradoxically, I

6:01

mean, you're telling yourself things

6:03

yourself things that you already know uh

6:06

as though there were two of you rather

6:08

often, right? Like, you know, you're

6:09

just, you know, I'm looking for, you

6:12

know, which which is the water. And I

6:13

say, oh, there it is, right? But like

6:14

I'm the one seeing it. Who am I saying,

6:18

oh, you know, there it is, too? So,

6:19

there's someone else who needs to be

6:21

informed about the thing I already saw.

6:24

Right? So, it's it's um there's

6:26

something about our internal dialogue

6:27

that is paradoxical. And that's what

6:30

ultimately meditation is. I mean this

6:32

kind of meditation you you ultimately

6:35

learn to recognize that there's no

6:38

separation from you between you and your

6:41

experience, right? There's not the

6:42

experience on the one hand and the self

6:45

on the other. There's just experience.

6:48

It's not that you're on the riverbank.

6:51

Uh and this is this is how it can seem

6:52

in the beginning. Even when you're

6:54

practicing meditation fairly diligently,

6:56

it can seem like you're on the riverbank

6:58

watching the contents of consciousness

7:00

flow by. And then and meditation is the

7:03

act of doing that more and more

7:06

dispassionately. So you're no longer

7:07

grabbing at the at the pleasant or

7:09

pushing the unpleasant away. You're just

7:10

kind of relaxing and in in the most

7:13

non-judgmental frame of mind, just

7:16

witnessing the flow. Right? But if

7:20

you're doing that dualistically,

7:22

you feel like the meditator. You feel

7:24

like the subject aiming attention. And

7:26

so now you're on the riverbank watching

7:28

everything go past. But the truth is

7:32

you are the river. There's a process by

7:34

which you would eventually recognize

7:37

that there's no distance between you and

7:40

your experience. And again, you can you

7:42

can wait for those moments in life where

7:44

experience gets so good or so

7:46

terrifying, you know, or just so

7:48

salient, right? Your amygdala is driving

7:51

so hard. I mean, so you're in in a war

7:53

and you can't think about anything

7:55

because, you know, the enem is shooting

7:56

at you and this is the most thrilling

7:58

video game you've ever played in your

7:59

life. uh and your life is on the line or

8:02

you're you're you know at the peak of of

8:04

some you know athletic event where

8:07

there's just you don't know how you're

8:09

doing the things you're doing but it's

8:11

all happening automatically right but

8:13

those are 1/100th of 1% of one's life

8:16

and what I'm calling meditation is a way

8:19

of simply

8:21

understanding the mechanics of attention

8:23

whereby you are denying yourself that

8:26

unity of experience so much of the time

8:29

and recognizing that that's, you know,

8:31

it's based on a a misperception of of

8:34

the way consciousness always already is.

8:37

>> Something about our developmental wiring

8:39

and the algorithms that these neural

8:42

circuits run tend to bias most people,

8:44

the non practice meditators to live a

8:49

somewhat functional life at least um

8:54

without this awareness of actor and

8:56

observer,

8:57

>> right? And so what you're really talking

8:59

about is an a deliberate intervention to

9:03

understand and resolve that gap in the

9:06

algorithm. So what are your thoughts

9:08

about the organization of the circuitry

9:10

to to essentially under normal

9:12

conditions to not reveal its what seems

9:15

to be one of its more important and

9:17

profound and um for you know dare I say

9:20

enlightening features. Right? It's

9:23

almost as if that we have to intervene

9:25

in the self in order to reveal the self.

9:27

We are not set up by evolution to be as

9:30

happy as we possibly can be and to do

9:34

almost anything that interests us. Well,

9:36

I mean, we're not set up by evolution to

9:38

be mathematicians or musicians or to to

9:42

create democracies that are healthy. We

9:45

are doing these things based on

9:47

cognitive and emotional hardware

9:50

uh that we are leveraging in new

9:53

directions, right? Right? I mean, we

9:54

have we are primates and we are, you

9:57

know, we're communicating with, you

9:58

know, small mouth noises. I mean, we're

9:59

language using primates and all of that

10:01

is clearly evolved and we're doing these

10:03

amazing things, including science, you

10:05

know, however improbably where you we're

10:07

actually able to to, you know, almost

10:10

entirely with language uh understand

10:15

reality that at at a scale that exceeds

10:18

us in both directions. I mean the very

10:20

the very vast and the very small and and

10:22

you know also temporally the very old.

10:23

It's amazing that we can do all of those

10:25

things but evolution is blind to all of

10:28

that. We have flown the perch that was

10:30

created for us by evolution. I mean

10:31

we're just not it's not just the primate

10:34

things. So, so it is with learning how

10:36

to regulate our emotions and and you

10:39

know punch through to a self-concept or

10:42

beyond a self-concept that is more

10:44

normative psychologically that allows us

10:46

to you know not be um terrorized by our

10:50

apish genes. Evolution never thought to

10:53

build us an off switch for this, right?

10:55

I mean the language is so useful and it

10:58

gets tuned up so strongly for us. Uh and

11:01

there was never a reason to shut it off,

11:03

right? There's never reason to give you

11:04

this ability to say I wouldn't it be

11:06

nice to have 4 hours of quiet now like

11:08

no selft talk for most of us um we are

11:12

covertly talking basically all the time

11:16

and and there's an imagistic component

11:18

of of this for many people you're

11:20

visualizing things as well but there's

11:22

just a lot a ton of white noise in the

11:25

mind that feels a certain way and you

11:30

know what I what you discover in

11:31

meditation ultimately is that

11:35

the self is what it feels like to be

11:38

thinking without knowing that you're

11:39

thinking. So like you and I are talking

11:41

now you're you know people are listening

11:42

to us they're struggling to follow the

11:44

train of this conversation because it is

11:46

competing with their the conversation

11:48

that's happening in their heads. So

11:50

it's, you know, the the first discovery

11:51

people make in meditation is that it's

11:53

just so hard to pay attention to

11:55

anything, the breath or a mantra or

11:57

sound, whatever it is, because

12:00

you're thinking every you're thinking

12:03

about the thing you need to do in an

12:04

hour and oh, it's so good that I I

12:06

downloaded this app. I'm like, this is

12:07

really good. This is going to be good

12:08

for me. But and you're but you're that

12:10

that chatter isn't showing up. you

12:13

you're not far back enough uh in the in

12:17

the kind of the theater of consciousness

12:19

so as to see it emerge. It's it is just

12:21

sneaking up behind you and it feels like

12:24

me again. It feels like when someone is

12:26

thinking the thought, well, what the

12:29

hell does that mean? Right? They're not

12:31

seeing it as an emerging object in

12:34

consciousness. It just feels like me. It

12:36

just feels that that that's it is it the

12:39

the you know subjectively it's like the

12:42

mind contracts around this appearance in

12:46

consciousness and it really is just it

12:47

is just a you know it's just a sound

12:49

with the voice of the mind if you

12:51

actually can inspect it. It is it is

12:54

deeply inscrable that we ever feel

12:57

identified with our thoughts. I mean how

12:58

is it that we could be a thought? these

13:01

thoughts, a thought just arises and

13:02

passes away. And when you inspect it,

13:04

when you go to inspect it, it's it, you

13:08

know, it unravels. It's it's just it's

13:12

it's the least substantial possible

13:14

thing. And and it could but yet it could

13:16

be a thought of self-hatred. You know,

13:19

it could be a a thought that that

13:21

unrecognized

13:23

totally defines your your mood. If you

13:26

could elaborate a bit on this notion of

13:28

internal chatter and external stimuli

13:31

>> is just the recognition that there's a

13:33

dialogue ongoing internally is that

13:36

itself valuable?

13:37

>> Yeah. I mean, so here here's a claim I

13:39

would make that some people might find

13:42

surprising, but I I think uh this is an

13:45

objectively true claim about the

13:48

subjectivity of most people, which is

13:50

that unless you, you know, have a fair

13:52

amount of training, unless you just

13:53

happen to be some kind of savant in this

13:55

area, which, you know, most people by

13:57

definition aren't, I believe this is a a

14:00

true claim that, you know, if we just,

14:01

you put a, you know, a stopwatch on this

14:03

table and and, you know, people could

14:06

just watch, you know, 30 seconds elapse

14:08

And I set, you know, I set all of our

14:10

listeners or your viewers the task. Uh,

14:14

for the next 30 seconds, just pay

14:16

attention to anything, your breath, you

14:18

know, or, you know, this the sight of

14:21

your hand or the sight of the clock or

14:23

uh any object without getting lost in

14:26

thought, without getting momentarily

14:28

distracted by this conversation you're

14:31

having with yourself. A couple things

14:32

would happen. One is no one would be

14:35

able to do it. This is not just a

14:37

superficial inability. I mean, if your

14:39

life depended on it, you wouldn't be

14:41

able to do it. I mean, if if the fate of

14:43

civilization depended on it, none of

14:45

none of our listeners would be able to

14:47

do this. Um, and yet some percentage of

14:50

them are are so distracted by thought

14:54

that they would think that they will

14:56

actually try this experiment and think

14:58

they succeeded. Right? And for these

14:59

people, what what happens is you put

15:00

them on a meditation retreat and you

15:03

have them spend 12 hours a day in

15:05

silence doing nothing but this. Right?

15:06

So the practice is just pay attention to

15:09

the breath when they're sitting and then

15:10

eventually you know you incorporate

15:12

everything sounds and other sensations.

15:14

And then you interle that with walking

15:16

meditation where they're paying

15:16

attention just to the sensations of

15:18

lifting and moving and placing their

15:20

feet. And then you know once the

15:22

practice is going you you incorporate

15:23

sounds and sights and everything but so

15:25

you can pay attention to everything but

15:26

the goal is for every moment

15:30

um you are going to you're going to

15:33

cultivate the what this this faculty of

15:34

mind which you know increasingly is

15:36

known as mindfulness right so and

15:38

mindfulness is nothing other than this

15:41

very careful attention to the contents

15:43

of consciousness. Uh but the crucial

15:46

piece is it is not

15:49

a moment of being lost in thought,

15:51

right? You're not you you're not

15:53

blocking thoughts. Thoughts themselves

15:54

can arise, but in those moments of being

15:56

truly mindful, you're noticing thoughts

15:59

as thoughts. Whether they're whether

16:00

it's language in the mind or images,

16:03

you're noticing those two as spontaneous

16:05

appearances in consciousness. Most

16:07

people, you know, certainly anyone who

16:09

thinks they can pay attention to

16:10

something for 30 seconds without being

16:11

lost in thought. You put those people on

16:14

a meditation retreat, what they're going

16:16

to experience is, you know, on the first

16:18

day, they're going to feel like, oh

16:20

yeah, I was, you know, I was with the

16:21

breath or I was walk, you know, I was

16:23

with the sensations of walking and I'd

16:25

be there for like five minutes, you

16:26

know, solid and then I would get lost in

16:28

thought, then I come back and, you know,

16:30

five more minutes I'd be lost in thought

16:31

and get back. But as the days

16:34

progressed, you know, even, you know, 10

16:35

days into a silent meditation retreat,

16:38

they're going to experience

16:40

more and more distraction. They're gonna

16:42

it's going to seem like, okay, wait a

16:44

minute. Now I can't pay attention to

16:46

anything for more than five seconds,

16:48

right? Because what they're discovering

16:50

is just how distractable they are. If

16:53

you train your attention in this way to

16:56

notice the particularities of of sensory

16:59

experience and emotional experience,

17:01

like you're looking for the atoms of

17:03

experience, you know, um you get better

17:06

and better at that and certain things

17:10

happen. But one thing that you one thing

17:12

that I really do do think happens is

17:15

there's a kind of frame rate change in

17:18

in the the data stream where you really

17:20

are just you're just noticing much much

17:22

more. This whole dance of I'm lost in

17:27

thought now I'm now I'm strategically

17:29

directing my attention again. All of

17:32

this seems to ramify this sense of self,

17:34

the sense of of there there's one to be

17:36

doing this. There's there's somebody

17:38

holding the spotlight of attention and

17:40

getting better at coming back to the

17:43

object of meditation. But the thing I

17:45

like to do when I talk about all of this

17:48

is undercut the false assumptions that

17:51

are anchoring all of that as early as

17:53

possible. Because where where I think

17:55

you want to be is recognizing that there

18:00

is no place from which to aim attention.

18:02

Right? This whole dualistic setup of

18:04

subject and object is the thing that is

18:07

already not there. And it's not that you

18:09

it's not that it's there and you

18:10

meditate it out of existence

18:12

successfully. It's really not there. And

18:14

if you if you learn how to look for it,

18:17

you can see that it's not there and feel

18:19

that it's not there and it no longer

18:21

seems to be there. Right? Right. It's

18:22

like it's it's not and it becomes like

18:24

again like a bstable percept where you

18:27

looked at it long enough and you thought

18:28

okay now I see the vase and the face and

18:31

um I can't unsee it and every time I

18:35

look it's it's there again. If we were

18:37

to kind of break it down meditation into

18:40

some basic component parts, what are the

18:42

component parts? And where I'm really

18:44

going with this is why would those

18:46

component parts eventually allow for the

18:48

realization that there is no um

18:50

distinction between uh actor and

18:52

observer and so on.

18:54

>> Ultimately, meditation

18:56

is not a practice that you're adding to

19:00

your life. It's not it's not a doing

19:01

more of anything. It's actually ceasing

19:03

to do something. It's ultimately

19:06

non-distraction. I mean, it's ultimately

19:08

you're recognizing what consciousness is

19:10

like when you're no longer distracted by

19:13

the the automatic arising of of thought.

19:16

It's not that thoughts don't arise. It's

19:17

not that you can't use them. It's not

19:18

that you've become irrational or or um

19:22

uh you know, unintelligent. I mean, like

19:24

all of that you you still have all of

19:26

your tools, but everything is in plain

19:28

view. I mean there's an analogy in in

19:29

Tibetan Buddhism which I love which is

19:31

um thoughts are like thieves entering an

19:34

empty house. You know there's nothing

19:36

for them to steal, right? So you know in

19:38

in the usual case thoughts are there

19:40

really is something in jeopardy. Every

19:42

time a thought comes I'm not meditating

19:44

anymore and and not only that I feel

19:46

terrible because of what I'm thinking

19:48

about most of the time. Right? So it's

19:50

totally understandable that thoughts

19:52

seem like a problem in the beginning and

19:54

for certain types of meditation they are

19:56

explicitly thought of as a problem

19:58

because you're trying to focus on one

20:00

thing to the exclusion of everything

20:02

else including thought and that's a

20:04

training that can be good to do. It

20:05

becomes a tool that you can use for

20:07

other kinds of of of insight but it's a

20:10

very specific and kind of brittle skill

20:14

in the end. I mean it's it is it's a

20:15

skill just like I'm going to pay

20:16

attention to one thing and I'm going to

20:18

do that so well that everything else is

20:20

going to fade out meditatively. If you

20:22

have a laser focus on any one thing

20:25

whether it's the breath or whatever it

20:26

is you can lose all sense of everything.

20:29

I mean you can lose all sense of hearing

20:30

and your physical body can disappear. I

20:32

mean like literally it can become

20:33

incredibly subtle and vast and

20:36

drug-like. Um, and many people approach

20:41

meditation thinking kind of climbing the

20:44

ladder of those changes into subtlety

20:46

and vastness. That's the whole that's

20:48

the whole game, right? And it can be a

20:51

deeply rewarding game to play. And it

20:54

also does come with all kinds of

20:56

ancillary benefits. I mean, all the

20:57

focus and the calm and the and the the

20:59

kind of smoothness of emotional states.

21:02

I mean, all of that comes with greater

21:03

concentration and it it can be quite

21:05

wonderful. But again at best that's a

21:08

tool to aim in the direction that I'm

21:10

talking about now with with respect to

21:12

meditation which relates to more what I

21:15

would call you know mindfulness

21:17

generically and ultimately kind of

21:19

non-dual mindfulness the underlying goal

21:22

is to be more and more aquamous with

21:25

changes. So not to grasp at what's

21:27

pleasant or interesting and not to push

21:29

what's unpleasant or or you know boring

21:33

or or you know otherwise non-engaging a

21:35

way. Um what you want is just a kind of

21:39

a skylike mind that just allows

21:42

everything to appear and you're not

21:43

clinging to anything or or or reacting

21:46

to anything. This applies not just to

21:48

something like mindfulness but even to

21:50

something like the self, right? So the

21:52

sense of self is also a process. I mean,

21:56

it's it's a verb. It's not. So, we're

21:58

we're selfing more than we are selves,

22:01

right? And even appropriate uses of of

22:04

of the term self that don't go away even

22:07

when you when you recognize that the

22:10

this the core subject self is an

22:12

illusion. There there are states of

22:14

self, right, where you you can recognize

22:17

in your life that you inhabit very

22:20

different modes of of being depending on

22:23

the context. So like there are moments

22:25

where you just by walking into a certain

22:27

building you suddenly transition into a

22:30

different state of self like like

22:32

suddenly you pass through a door and now

22:34

you're a customer in a store right so we

22:37

know what that customer feeling is like

22:39

you're now the person who's getting the

22:41

attention. It's a very kind of

22:42

formalized type of attention from the

22:44

person who's running the store. You can

22:46

be a student in the presence of a

22:47

teacher. You can be a parent in the

22:49

presence of a of a son or a daughter.

22:50

You can be a spouse in presence in the

22:53

presence of your spouse. The change in

22:54

context really does

22:58

usher in some fundamental psychological

23:00

changes in just the states of

23:02

consciousness that are available. More

23:04

and more as you become sensitive to

23:07

these changes and you become sensitive

23:08

to what it's like to actually not be

23:11

psychologically reactive and and not be

23:14

definable by your own self-concept, your

23:18

own ide. You're not identifying with

23:19

anything. You're not hanging your hat on

23:21

anything. You're not thinking about

23:22

yourself in the in the kind of terms

23:25

that you would export to others and then

23:27

care about what they think about you,

23:29

right? Like you're there's a kind of

23:30

invulnerability

23:32

uh that that arises that's not born of

23:38

being welldefended.

23:40

It's born of of of being evaporated.

23:42

Right? It's like you're no longer

23:44

keeping score in those ways. You can

23:46

leave aside all those circumstances

23:47

where it's appropriate to react to

23:49

someone and you know I'm I'm sure,

23:51

>> you know, I'm into martial arts and

23:52

self-defense and yes, you're not

23:54

supposed to be just this puddle of goo

23:56

out in the world who can be just

23:57

mistreated by people and and you know,

23:59

never put up, you know, resistance, but

24:01

it's um psychologically,

24:05

you know, even if even if a state like

24:08

anger or contraction is sometimes

24:11

normative and appropriate, the question

24:14

is how long is normative and appropriate

24:16

for like how how long do you want to

24:18

stay angry for? In my experience, you

24:21

kind of classically negative emotions

24:22

like anger and fear are appropriate as

24:26

salience cues. You know, they they

24:28

orient you to, you know, an emergency or

24:30

a potential emergency, but then in

24:32

dealing with the emergency, they're

24:34

almost never the state you want to be

24:35

in. It's better to actually be calm in

24:38

an emergency. Would you say that

24:40

meditation as a practice done for a few

24:42

minutes each day or with the app that

24:44

it's a um kind of a step function is it

24:46

very nonlinear in terms of people's

24:48

progress? What does the meditation

24:50

practice look like over time?

24:52

>> The first step function is to very

24:54

clearly experience the difference

24:57

between being lost in thought and being

24:59

clearly aware of any part of experience

25:02

including thought. and to notice

25:05

the freedom the comparative

25:07

psychological freedom that gives you.

25:09

Right? So you can like you're

25:11

something's made you angry and now

25:12

you're thinking about all the reasons

25:13

why you should be angry and have every

25:15

right to be angry and what you're going

25:16

to tell that person when you see them

25:18

and and then you notice you're thinking,

25:20

right? And you notice the connection

25:22

between the thought and the anger,

25:24

right? you like like the the minute

25:26

spent lost in thought about what's

25:29

making you angry is the thing that

25:31

dragged through the physiology of anger

25:35

and from the point of view of the one

25:36

who's being mindful this is tremendous

25:39

relief I mean and at minimum it's a

25:41

degree of freedom you can at that point

25:43

decide well how long do I want to be

25:45

angry for right is it useful to stay

25:47

angry do I want to be angry for 1 minute

25:49

2 minutes 5 minutes 10 minutes or

25:51

because but and but before you have that

25:53

capacity to be mindful

25:55

You're going to helplessly be as angry

25:57

as you're going to be for as long as

25:58

you're going to be that way just based

26:00

on the kind of the time course of your

26:03

thinking about it, brooding about it,

26:04

telling your wife about it. You are

26:06

going to be the hostage of that for as

26:08

long as you'll be the hostage of that.

26:09

You'll have nothing you can do apart

26:12

from just deciding to, you know, check

26:14

out and watch Game of Thrones again for

26:15

the third time, right? Like like it's

26:17

just you can divert your attention to

26:19

something else, which is, you know,

26:21

sometimes a good thing to do. But

26:23

mindfulness even dualistic mindfulness

26:25

gives you this capacity to just observe

26:29

the mechanics of this and then get off

26:31

the ride when you when you whenever you

26:33

want. The other step function is

26:36

noticing that there is no one who is

26:39

doing that. I mean this is the

26:40

non-duality the the selflessness the the

26:43

centerlessness of awareness right the

26:45

fact that there's no place from which

26:47

the mindfulness is being aimed but the

26:49

fact that there's just this open

26:51

condition in which everything is

26:52

appearing you know thoughts included at

26:55

that point your mindfulness no longer

26:58

becomes

26:59

it's no longer this this dualistic

27:03

effort to strategically pay attention to

27:07

anything as opposed to being lost in

27:09

thought It's just what's left when the

27:12

present recognized thought unravels.

27:16

Even before it unravels, what's

27:17

recognized is you are simply identical

27:21

to the condition in which everything is

27:23

appearing.

27:23

>> Could you tell us why psychedelics can

27:27

be useful, use safely and responsibly,

27:29

age appropriate, context appropriate,

27:32

>> ideally with some clinical or other type

27:34

of guidance. All that stated, what are

27:37

your thoughts about psychedelics in

27:38

terms of how they intersect with the

27:40

discussion that we've been having and

27:42

what utility do they play in recognition

27:45

of the self or in other sorts of brain

27:47

changes?

27:48

>> I would just say that for many of us, I

27:49

mean, certainly for me, psychedelics

27:52

were indispensable in the beginning in

27:55

proving to me that that a first person

27:58

interrogation of the mind was worth

28:01

doing. For somebody like me at 18, the

28:04

noun meditation meant absolutely nothing

28:07

to me before before I uh took my first

28:10

dose of in this case it was MDMA. The

28:13

the li one of the limitations of a drug

28:15

is that you know obviously no matter how

28:17

good the experience the drug wears off

28:19

and then you're back to you more in more

28:22

or less your usual form and now you have

28:25

a memory of the experience and it can be

28:27

a fairly dim memory. I mean, some of

28:29

these experiences are so discontinuous

28:31

with normal waking consciousness that it

28:33

can be like trying to remember a dream

28:35

where you recognize, okay, there there

28:38

was a way of being that is quite

28:40

different than what I'm tending to

28:42

access by default. And it is different

28:45

in ways that are obviously better and

28:48

and and psychologically more healthy. I

28:50

mean, it's possible to be healthy

28:52

psychologically

28:54

in a way that I I never imagined. Once

28:57

you have one of these experiences on

29:00

psychedelics or on a drug like MDMA, you

29:03

know that there's a there there. You

29:05

know that unconditional love is is a

29:07

possibility. If your only framework is

29:10

the good experiences, the good feels you

29:12

had on whatever drug it was, I think you

29:15

can be misled to just seek lots of peak

29:18

experiences. You're just trying to

29:19

string together a lot of peak

29:21

experiences, hoping they're going to

29:22

change you. every one of which by by

29:25

definition is going to be impermanent.

29:27

What everyone really wants whether they

29:29

know it or not and their right to want

29:31

is a type of freedom that is compatible

29:35

with even ordinary states of

29:37

consciousness. I mean so what I I hadn't

29:39

done psychedelics for 25 years because I

29:43

again they were super useful for me in

29:44

the beginning. Then I discovered

29:46

meditation on the basis of of those

29:50

experiences. got really into meditation

29:52

and realized okay this is a much more

29:54

you know conceptually this makes much

29:56

more sense to me this is delivering the

29:58

goods you know in terms of my experience

30:01

um there's no need to keep having these

30:04

you know seeking these peak experiences

30:06

with with drugs so what I think people

30:09

want is um a way of be having free

30:12

attention

30:14

and unconditional love

30:16

in this you know totally ordinary and

30:20

potentially

30:22

chaotic human experience, you know,

30:24

which can be psychologically fraught and

30:27

you can meet, you know, iterations of

30:29

yourself that you don't like that are

30:31

that are not equipping you to be the

30:32

best possible person in that

30:34

relationship. And what we want to do is

30:37

cut through all of that and actually,

30:40

you know, be in love with our lives and

30:43

with the people in our lives more and

30:45

more of the time. I'm not saying that

30:47

repeated psychedelic journeys aren't

30:50

can't be integral to that project but

30:53

but you know that it can't that the

30:55

project can't be being high all the time

30:58

right so whatever is extractable from

31:00

that the the the occasional you know

31:02

psychedelic trip has got to be mappable

31:05

into ordinary waking consciousness and

31:08

the point of the real point of contact

31:10

does kind of run through this you know

31:12

what I've been calling the illusion of

31:13

the self and again it is that part is

31:17

discoverable without any changes in

31:20

contents.

31:21

>> None of this can really be solved in a

31:23

single practice it sounds like. But it

31:25

does seem to me based on what you've

31:28

told us today is that only through a um

31:30

a deep understanding of the self as it

31:32

really is as opposed to this illusion

31:36

that you framed up could we actually

31:39

arrive at some answers about like what's

31:41

actually right for each and every one of

31:43

us. I mean there's one generic answer

31:45

that I think can be extracted both from

31:49

psyched psychedelics and from meditation

31:51

and just from just thinking more clearly

31:53

about the nature of of our lives and

31:56

it's it's to become more processoriented

32:00

and to be more and more sensitive to the

32:02

the mirageike character of of achieving

32:07

our goals. Right now I'm not I'm not

32:09

against achieving goals. I have a lot of

32:10

goals. I've, you know, I'm, you know,

32:12

I'm very busy. There are lots of things

32:13

I want to get done and I'm as satisfied

32:15

as anyone to finish a project. And but

32:18

if you look at the time course of all of

32:20

that, you know, fulfillment and

32:24

you you you just there few lessons

32:26

everyone I think has to draw. One is

32:28

most of your life is spent in the

32:30

process, right? Right? Like the go like

32:31

the moment at which the goal is you know

32:34

fully conquered that is just I mean that

32:37

has a you know it's a tiny duration and

32:41

it has a very short halflife and the

32:44

moment you you arrive at it it begins to

32:48

recede because in the meantime you have

32:50

all these other goals that are have

32:51

appeared on the horizon and in some

32:54

sense if you're if you're focused on

32:56

goals you really you can never arrive. I

32:59

think what we're we're all looking for

33:01

in life, we're looking for good enough

33:03

reasons

33:05

to let our attention

33:08

fully rest in the present. That is the

33:10

logic of success. Like the the s the

33:13

sense like I've got all these things I

33:14

want to do. If I could just get rich

33:16

enough or fit enough or, you know, dial

33:18

in my sleep well enough or, you know,

33:20

improve my life in all these ways, get

33:22

the right relationship, wouldn't it be

33:23

great to be married? You know, I want to

33:25

start a family. I want all of these

33:27

these things, right? I'm not I'm not

33:29

discounting those relative forms of

33:32

happiness or sources of happiness, but

33:34

one thing is absolutely clear. It's

33:37

possible to be miserable in the presence

33:39

of all of those things, right? It's and

33:41

you can add you can add great wealth and

33:43

fame and everything on top of that. It's

33:45

possible it's possible to be absolutely

33:47

miserable having everything anyone could

33:49

seemingly want. So, what is it that we

33:50

actually want in all of our seeking to

33:53

arrange the props in our lives and our

33:56

and our and the story to have a a

33:58

convincing enough story to tell about

34:00

ourselves that we're doing the right

34:01

thing? Uh what are what is all of that

34:05

effort predicated on? is predicated on

34:07

this desire and this expectation that if

34:11

we could get all of this stuff in the

34:13

right place

34:15

and not have anything terrifying to

34:17

worry about, right? Everyone we love is

34:19

healthy for the moment, right? And we're

34:21

healthy and it's you we've got something

34:22

to look forward to on the weekend and

34:24

there's not some there's not a you know

34:26

a plumbing leak in the house that we

34:28

have to immediately respond to and we

34:30

like our house and you know our career

34:32

is going fine. Now, can we just actually

34:35

give up the war? Right? Can we can we

34:37

can we fully locate our our sense of

34:40

well-being in the present moment? Is it

34:43

can we relax the impulse

34:46

to brood about the past or think

34:48

anxiously about the future for long

34:51

enough to discover that all of this here

34:54

is enough. Even if we're guarding our

34:56

time to do the things that are most

34:58

important to us, we can spend all of

35:01

that time

35:03

work, you know, regretting the past or

35:05

anxiously expecting the future and

35:07

telling just bouncing between past and

35:10

future in our thinking about ourselves

35:11

and our lives and basically just dancing

35:15

over the present and never making

35:16

contact with it. Right? So what we I I

35:19

think what we want is a circumstance

35:21

where attention can be located in the

35:24

present in a way that's truly

35:25

fulfilling. And

35:27

unless you have had some kind of radical

35:29

insight that allows you to do that on

35:32

demand,

35:34

you are in some sense hostage to the

35:38

circumstances of your life to do it do

35:40

that for you. You're you're constantly

35:41

trying to to engineer a state of the

35:45

world that will propagate back on a

35:47

state of self that will make the the

35:50

present moment good enough. And what

35:52

meditation does and psychedelics to some

35:55

degree does this, but meditation very

35:57

directly does this. It reverses the

36:00

causality and and lets you actually

36:03

change change state such that you can be

36:06

fulfilled before anything happens.

36:09

Right? nothing. Your your happiness is

36:11

no longer predicated on the next good

36:13

thing happening. You can be in the

36:15

presence of the next good or bad thing

36:17

already being fulfilled. It's like how

36:19

much can you puncture that seeking

36:24

happiness project with the recognition

36:27

that you're already free. It's not that

36:30

you just need to be a pushover when you

36:32

learn how to meditate or do any we work

36:34

on yourself in any of these ways, but um

36:38

what I think you I think you want to

36:40

find is you want to find your point of

36:42

rest in the midst of of any struggle.

36:46

>> I feel very blessed um in no small part

36:49

because of our conversation today. Thank

36:51

you so much.

36:52

>> Well, to be continued.

36:52

>> To be continued. We'll do it again and

36:54

again and [music] again.

Interactive Summary

In this Huberman Lab episode, Andrew Huberman and Dr. Sam Harris discuss the nature of the self, the mechanics of consciousness, and the role of meditation and psychedelics in achieving psychological freedom. They explore how the sense of a 'self' is often a construct resulting from internal chatter and a failure to recognize the present moment. Harris emphasizes that by cultivating mindfulness, individuals can move beyond identifying with their thoughts, ultimately recognizing that there is no 'self' separate from experience, and finding a sense of well-being that is independent of external circumstances.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts