HomeVideos

Former US Envoy Warns of Wider Middle East Conflict

Now Playing

Former US Envoy Warns of Wider Middle East Conflict

Transcript

165 segments

0:00

We're gonna start this section with Brett McGurk. He served as the national security council coordinator

0:04

for The Middle East under president Biden. He's also the author of a new book, Brink,

0:08

inside the race to free the October 7 hostages. Brett, thank you so much for joining

0:13

us. We wanted to have you on first to talk about the book, but you're such

0:17

a relevant guest for everything we've been talking about all morning, geopolitics on fire. So we're

0:22

gonna we're gonna start there, I think. Look, I'm really curious to get your take because

0:26

under your your wide remit as as you've been an official for different presidents, different state

0:31

departments, different national security advisers, is the Mid East Mid East and terrorism. So as you

0:36

look at this attack on the airport in Riyadh and where the Houthis are both as

0:40

a group and as an aspiring political player in the region. Can you just kind of

0:44

walk us through how we got here and what you think the threat level is, and

0:48

whether or not it's going to expand?

0:50

Yeah. Christine, thanks so much for having me. And, actually, in Brink, the first chapter lays

0:55

out some of these issues, particularly with Iran, the Houthis in Saudi Arabia. The Houthis are

1:00

an indigenous group in Yemen. They overthrew the legitimate government in Yemen a number of years

1:06

ago, actually, during the Obama administration, and there's been a civil war there going on. But

1:10

they're heavily backed by Iran. Of course, their motto is death to America, death to Israel,

1:14

curse the Jews. That's who these guys are. But massively backed by Iran, and Iran has

1:19

supplied these, you know, very advanced ballistic missile capabilities, anti ship missile capabilities. And we've tried

1:26

to deal with it in a number of ways, the Obama administration, the Trump administration. Trump

1:31

administration was heavily supporting Saudi Arabia in the conflict in Yemen. When we entered office in

1:36

the Biden administration, it's actually the first chapter in Brink. I went to see the crown

1:40

prince of Saudi Arabia very early, like the first few days of the Biden administration, and

1:44

my instructions were to explain to him that we're making changes in our policy. We cut

1:49

Saudi Arabia off from significant weapon systems. We lifted the foreign terrorist designation of the Houthis

1:55

that the Trump administration had put on. And we also, over the course of that first

1:59

year, significantly withdrew our military presence in the region. Actually, there's a scene in the in

2:03

the book where I see Adam Brad Cooper. He's a current CENTCOM commander. He was a

2:08

deputy back then. And I said, hey. What are you seeing with the Houthis and Iran's

2:11

supply to the Houthis? And he said to me, you know, Brett, I only got one

2:15

ship in the water, so it's hard for me to see much at all. And what

2:19

happened in that period was that Iran just kept supplying the Houthis. So we, you know,

2:25

we can cut off our partners and allies, but our adversaries then just kinda amp it

2:30

up. And after October 7, we saw for the first time ever anti ship seeking ballistic

2:36

missiles going 4,000 miles an hour, targeting commercial ships and our ships, a massive problem. I

2:44

went to see the Iranians in Oman. This is also in Brink in a back channel.

2:47

So you get a sense of what this is like in real time, what it's like

2:50

to deal with Iran, what it's like to deal with these guys. And the attacks, you

2:54

know, kept coming. And then we had to engage militarily. And this has kinda continued for

2:59

some time. But the attack last night is very emblematic. A very advanced sophisticated ballistic missile,

3:05

very accurate, targeting a commercial airport, and now a number of civilian casualties. It's an act

3:11

of terrorism. I think there has to be a response. But, unfortunately, you know, this is

3:15

who these guys are. And it it gets to a broader question of... And for any

3:20

president, you have to deal with this. How do you deal with gathering threats? You know,

3:25

do you take them on preemptively? How how do you deal with this? And the Houthis

3:29

just got way too powerful. They have no capability on their own. They do now because

3:35

all the training over, you know, of course, a decade or so, to manufacture these ballistic

3:41

missiles, anti ship missiles, and they're sitting there right on the Red Sea controlling access to

3:44

the Red Sea. So a huge problem. I I suspect... I mentioned Brad Cooper. He's a

3:49

CENTCOM commander. I'm sure he's coming to the White House now with... To the president with

3:54

military options for a response. We have a dead American here at the Riyadh International Airport.

3:59

But, you know, the options aren't great. It's a it's a really tough situation. They're heavily

4:04

dug into mountains. And in the age of drone warfare, and this ties it into Ukraine,

4:09

and, of the course, drones that the Russians are using in Ukraine are Iranian Shahed drones.

4:13

The Iranians transferred this technology to the Russians back in about 2022. And the Russians now

4:19

manufacture their own Iranian Shahed drones, but they added rocket. They're now rocket propelled, and they

4:25

can manufacture these things to such scale and mass. And that's the combination between Russia and

4:32

Iran. But the problem with the drones, as you know, they can fly, you know, thousand

4:36

kilometers, 1,500 kilometers. You can launch them from anywhere. And when you're when you're targeting, say,

4:42

a commercial ship or an airport, they can be very accurate. And they can come in

4:50

such numbers that even very, very sophisticated air defenses, some of them get through. Mhmm. I

4:55

can just finally make one final point. I have a scene in the book. I'm in

4:57

the situation room, and a reader is right there. And we are seeing in real time

5:03

a 170 drones, 30 cruise missiles, and then ultimately a 120 ballistic missiles at the same

5:11

time launched from Iran. The launches are timed to converge converge on Israel at the same

5:16

moment. And, you know, we we scrambled to build a coalition to help defeat this attack,

5:23

but you're right there if you read Brink. You're in the situation room what this is

5:26

like, and it's just a a wicked problem. But it's Russia. It's Iran. China is part

5:34

of this. Unfortunately, this is the world we we live in, and and The United States

5:39

has to work with our allies and partners to coordinate and try to deter and contain

5:45

as best we can. It's

5:46

just really That that scene is so vivid in the book, and I wanted to ask

5:50

you just about the seeming intractability of this conflict and and so much of what you

5:54

experienced in in this last stint in government centered on the the prospect of there being

5:57

this kind of wider war in The Middle East. And I... I'm genuinely curious at this

6:01

moment in time who the cooler head is who might prevail here in in this conflict.

6:06

Were you in your position today with whom you'd be negotiating? It does seem like it's

6:10

widened so much here, and there is so much discord throughout the region. I just sort

6:14

of wonder who the principal is or principals are with whom you you think you would

6:17

wanna be dealing to kind of calm things down, if anyone.

6:21

Well, we're in a tough situation now. You know, I've always... And and if you read

6:24

Brink, you're in you're in the room as we're we're debating the use of military. When

6:28

do we use US military power? What are the objectives? What are the... And I've always

6:33

believed in being very, disciplined in the use of US military power. What's the... What are

6:38

the ends, ways, means? What are the objectives? Like, what are we trying to do? I

6:42

thought president Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer last year was a very effective use of US military

6:47

power. It a it was a clear objective. We're gonna take out Forteau and Natanz and

6:51

nuclear sites. That's an operation that had been planned for years, and it went very well,

6:56

kinda textbook. This current war started in February. In the first night, you took out almost

7:02

the entire Iranian leadership. And once you do that, it opens a question, what is the

7:06

objective? Is it regime change, a kind of infinite objective? That's how we got ourselves in

7:10

trouble in Iraq. I lived through that. And now it is, you know, eight or nine

7:13

months later, and we're still kinda trying to figure out what exactly we want. But you

7:19

also asked a good question. Who do you talk to? And I've had this experience with

7:23

Iran... Iranians. I've I've negotiated with them a number of times. For example, in a hostage

7:27

negotiation with the Iranians, I did in the Obama administration, you don't wanna talk to the

7:33

English speaking foreign ministers and diplomats because they don't hold the keys to the hostages. So

7:37

I had to talk to the guys from the revolutionary guards and the intelligence services. Similar

7:43

here, who is actually making decisions in Iran? Is the supreme leader even alive? We don't

7:49

know. And it seems, from everything we can tell, the revolutionary guards and Ahmed Vahidi, he

7:57

is a... Just a diehard revolutionary ideologue. He has basically see... He's been now leading the

8:02

revolutionary guards. He's the decision maker, and it's gonna be very hard to ever get a

8:07

deal with him.

8:08

Brett, do you think the do you think the regime in Iran is more extreme now

8:13

than it was before the conflict began?

8:16

Well, they have consolidated the very hard line. Although I would... They were hard line before.

8:21

I don't... I've never put much stock in in in dealing with... And I've done deals

8:24

with Iran. I've been involved in conflicts with Iran that there's a moderate... You know, that

8:29

you can deal with a moderate camp. And they will make tactical deals with us, but

8:33

ultimately, their goal in Tehran, this system, is to get The US out of the Middle

8:38

East. They ultimately wanna see Israel, as they say. They wanna they wanna get rid of

8:42

Israel. That is their objective. And so you're dealing with that reality as you find tactical

8:49

deals such as the Obama era nuclear deal to put some time on the clock. But

8:53

to your question, yes. I mean, I... Go back to Ahmed Vahidi. It... For... In June...

8:58

Go back to June, the MOU that president Trump signed with Pojeskin. Pozhakian is the president

9:03

of Iran. He's one of the more pragmatic guys. Mhmm. They actually signed a deal, Trump

9:07

and Pozhakian, unprecedented. And that was the most favorable deal Iran was ever gonna get. It

9:12

it lifted all their banking and oil sanctions. The sanctions relief even went broader in many

9:18

ways than the Obama era nuclear deal. But one of the requirements was ships have to

9:24

go through the Strait Of Hormuz. And what did Iran do? They fired drones at two

9:29

commercial ships. Yeah. And the deal fell apart. And that... That's Vahidi. K? I'm sure Pajjaianz,

9:35

Basarachi, the foreign minister, they would not have given orders to fire those ships and and

9:40

break that deal. That was so favorable to Iran in many ways. But that's what we're

9:44

dealing with. So I just... I do not see near term prospects for a deal with

9:48

Iran. I think we're going to be in this kinda stalemated situation where we're applying economic

9:55

pressure, and it is real pressure. Iran has never had a blockade like this ever, but

10:01

they are then imposing costs on us. You know, they can't close the Strait Of Moose

10:04

anymore. I think we've gotten a decent handle on that, but they can... As you just

10:08

had in your last segment, they can impose costs on on using that channel, and that's

10:13

what they're doing. So they're trying to apply macroeconomic pressure. We are applying very clear micro

10:20

pressure on Iran's economy. You know, this system, eventually, let's hope it it cracks because the

10:27

Iranian people is one of the most pro West populations in the region. Anytime you can

10:32

get a a reliable pull out of there. But the the system, and I've dealing with

10:38

this for so many years, is what it is. And I would try to... As you're

10:43

playing economic pressure on Iran as we are, then you gotta think about how do you

10:46

use that in a negotiation. Right? Sure. That's really the trick here, but it's gonna be

10:51

really hard.

10:51

We just have a couple minutes left. I wanna ask you about patience, diplomatic patience here,

10:55

and that's a theme of this book as well. How much patience you had to have

10:57

in these negotiations? You have praise for Steve Witkow, as well. I'm I'm curious as you

11:01

look at him and Jared Kushner in compliment trying to find a solution to both of

11:06

these conflicts, how much confidence do you have in their ability to do that and and

11:10

their sense of how much patience it requires to get it done?

11:14

Well, and and, Brink, as you know, we had a key moment. Synagur is dead, the

11:18

leader of Hamas. Hezbollah cuts a deal. It was a key moment to go back to

11:22

the deal. And right around that time, Trump wins the election. So I knew we had

11:26

to work together if we wanted to get that ceasefire, get the hostages home. I called

11:29

Jared Kushner, started working with Steve. That's all in the book. I think it's a story

11:33

of unlikely in Washington these days, two teams coming together for the good of the country

11:37

and trying to stop a war and save lives. But, yeah, I worked closely with Steve

11:41

in that negotiation. He was extremely effective when it came down to these final two issues

11:45

that we had to bridge. But, look, they now have the most difficult files in the

11:49

world. I mean, Russia, Ukraine is so hard because Putin is a 100% determined to continue

11:57

his war in Ukraine. Yeah. He's impervious to the cost. And then the Iranians, we... I

12:01

just I just talked about. So, you know, I... They got their work cut out for

12:05

them. I'm not gonna take shots here from the chief seats. I I just... I hope

12:09

we succeed. I think to succeed on Ukraine, we gotta support Ukraine. I think the diesel

12:14

deal we cut over the weekend sends all the wrong wrong signals, and you gotta work

12:18

with your allies so that Putin realizes the cost he's suffering. You know, he's not gonna

12:22

get out of it without without cutting a deal. I think he believes... All these countries

12:26

believe, Russia, Iran, China, that time is on their side because The United States, we have

12:32

short attention span. So they can just kinda wait us out. I think that's what Putin

12:36

right now believes, and that's why this horrible war, is poised to continue. But, boy, I

12:41

hope they can succeed and find a way a way to wind down that conflict and

12:45

and find a way to some sort of arrangement with with Iran.

Interactive Summary

This video features an interview with former National Security Council coordinator Brett McGurk, who discusses his book 'Brink' and provides insights into the geopolitical challenges in the Middle East. McGurk details the rise of the Houthis, the complexity of dealing with Iran, and the strategic difficulties involved in navigating conflicts involving Russia, China, and Iran. He also reflects on his past negotiations, the need for disciplined use of U.S. military power, and his collaboration with the current administration's transition team to address critical regional issues.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts