HomeVideos

What Claude Just Did Is Insane (Investors Aren't Ready)

Now Playing

What Claude Just Did Is Insane (Investors Aren't Ready)

Transcript

540 segments

0:00

An AI model just found serious security

0:02

flaws in every major operating system

0:05

and web browser on Earth. One flaw was

0:07

hiding for 27 years inside one of the

0:10

most secure systems ever built.

0:13

Automated tools scanned that code 5

0:15

million times and they never caught it.

0:18

But here's where things get really

0:19

crazy. The company that built this AI

0:22

decided that it was too dangerous to

0:24

release. So instead, they gave it to 12

0:27

of the most powerful companies on the

0:29

planet. Almost all of which we can

0:31

invest in. My name is Alex and I spent 8

0:33

years as a radar engineer and AI

0:35

researcher at MIT and I've never seen AI

0:39

do anything like this. So subscribe to

0:41

the channel and let me show you what

0:43

just happened and how I'm investing in

0:45

it. Your time is valuable, so let's get

0:48

right into it. There's a piece of

0:49

software that's so foundational that it

0:51

powers almost every video you've ever

0:54

watched online including this one. It's

0:57

called FFmpeg and it had a bug. It used

1:00

two different kinds of counters that

1:02

didn't quite line up under one very

1:04

specific condition. A frame carefully

1:07

split into exactly 65,536

1:11

tiny pieces. That's 2 to the 16th power.

1:14

Those counters would collide when that

1:16

happens and when that happened, the

1:18

software could write data outside of the

1:20

memory it was allowed to touch which

1:22

opens the door for attackers to take

1:24

control of the machine running the

1:26

video. That's your PC or your smartphone

1:28

if you're the one playing that video.

1:30

But it's also the enterprise servers

1:33

that are processing it. Netflix, Apple,

1:36

YouTube. That bug was introduced in

1:38

2010. For 16 years automated testing

1:41

tools saw that same line of code. 5

1:44

million scans. Every single one missed

1:47

it and the reason is simple. Traditional

1:50

tools throw random inputs at software

1:52

and wait for it to crash. But this bug

1:55

only triggers at one specific number. A

1:57

random number tester would almost never

1:59

find it, but this AI read the code,

2:02

found the flaw, generated a custom test

2:05

for it, and confirmed the bug on its

2:07

very first try. This isn't a specialized

2:10

cybersecurity tool. It's not a model

2:12

that's trained to hunt vulnerabilities.

2:15

It's a general-purpose language model

2:17

called Claude Mythos, built by a company

2:20

called Anthropic. And here's why that

2:22

matters for investors. Anthropic didn't

2:25

set out to build a hacking tool. They

2:27

set out to build a better coding

2:29

assistant, but the model got so good at

2:31

reading code and so good at

2:32

understanding what a programmer

2:34

intended, as well as spotting the

2:36

difference between the two, that it

2:38

could find the flaws that human experts

2:40

have been missing for decades. So,

2:42

Anthropic trained Claude Mythos to be

2:44

really good at code, but as a side

2:46

effect, it got really good at securing

2:48

code as well. To understand why this is

2:50

such a huge deal for software stocks,

2:53

you need to understand how Mythos

2:54

actually finds these issues. The model

2:57

is placed in an isolated environment

2:59

with access to a specific code base. It

3:01

reads through the source files, which is

3:03

millions of lines of code, and finds the

3:05

parts most likely to be hiding serious

3:08

bugs. Then it writes and runs test

3:10

programs against that code to confirm or

3:12

disprove each potential bug. When it

3:15

finds one, it writes a formal

3:16

vulnerability report with a small

3:18

example that recreates the flaw in

3:20

practice. That's exactly what a

3:22

professional security researcher does

3:24

today. The difference is speed and

3:27

scale. A human analyst might take weeks

3:29

to audit a single block of code,

3:32

especially if it's mission-critical.

3:34

Mythos processes an entire code base in

3:37

hours, and it doesn't just find bugs, it

3:40

understands them. It reads the code the

3:42

way an engineer reads a blueprint,

3:44

understanding intent, spotting where the

3:46

code doesn't match that intent, and

3:48

reasoning about what would trigger the

3:49

failure. What's even crazier is just how

3:52

fast this happened. Cyber gym is a UC

3:55

Berkeley benchmark that throws over

3:57

1,500 real-world software bugs from

4:00

almost 200 open-source projects at

4:02

different AI models. The current Claude

4:05

model, Opus 4.6, scored a 66%.

4:09

Claude Mythos scored an 83. That's a

4:12

16-point leap in one model generation.

4:15

The difference between a D and a B on a

4:17

test. That's the jump from a case

4:20

originally finding bugs to finding bugs

4:22

in every major operating system and web

4:24

browser on Earth. That's what makes this

4:26

model so dangerous. But, it didn't stop

4:28

there. It found a 27-year-old bug in

4:31

OpenBSD, which is an operating system

4:34

that prides itself on being almost

4:36

impossible to hack. This one matters to

4:39

investors for two reasons. First, we

4:41

talk a lot about AI networking, but not

4:43

the code that makes it possible. And

4:45

second, this wasn't a single bug, it was

4:48

two bugs that chained together. The

4:50

first was a missing safety check, and

4:52

the second was a number rolling back to

4:54

zero at the wrong time. When combined,

4:57

they could purposely crash a machine

4:59

from anywhere on the internet with no

5:01

authentication required. Governments

5:04

have trusted this system to run their

5:05

firewalls since 1998.

5:08

Mythos found this bug in 2026. It also

5:12

found flaws in FreeBSD, which is how

5:14

Firefox runs JavaScript. It found over

5:17

180 different bugs in everything from

5:20

cryptography libraries to virtual

5:22

machine monitors and turned them all

5:24

into functional attacks. Previous models

5:26

found just two of these bugs. And on

5:29

Linux, which runs most of the world's

5:31

servers, Android phones, and cloud

5:33

infrastructure, it chained four separate

5:35

vulnerabilities together. On their own,

5:38

each bug looked pretty insignificant,

5:40

but combined, they let an attacker jump

5:42

from an ordinary user account to full

5:44

control of the Linux machine. Mythos is

5:47

not a proof of concept. Mythos is a

5:50

weapon, and that's why it scared the

5:52

market. But, there's something else on

5:54

the market that you need to know about,

5:55

and that's your private data. There are

5:58

hundreds of online data brokers making

6:00

big money by collecting and selling your

6:02

personal information. That's why I've

6:04

been using this video's sponsor,

6:06

DeleteMe, for over 2 years now, and I

6:09

really can't recommend them enough.

6:11

DeleteMe is a hands-free subscription

6:12

service that will remove your personal

6:14

information from those online data

6:16

brokers. They give you a quarterly

6:18

privacy report showing everything

6:20

they've done, and they reviewed over

6:22

55,000 listings for me so far. But, what

6:25

really surprised me is these data

6:27

brokers had way more than just my

6:28

private data. They had my wife's and my

6:31

entire family's, too. That's another

6:33

reason I really like DeleteMe. They have

6:35

a family plan, so we can all have more

6:38

control over our personal data. So, if

6:40

you care about your data and your

6:42

family's privacy, you can get 20% off

6:45

any plan with my code, SYMBOL20, by

6:48

going to joindeleteme.com/symbol20

6:52

or with my link in the description. And

6:54

a big thank you to DeleteMe and to you

6:56

for supporting the channel. All right,

6:58

the AI arms race is moving fast. In

7:01

2024, Google's Project Big Sleep found a

7:04

single new vulnerability in SQLite. In

7:07

2025, a DARPA competition threw 54

7:10

million lines of code at competing

7:12

systems that collectively found 18 bugs.

7:16

In April of 2026, Mythos found thousands

7:19

across every major operating system,

7:22

every major browser, and every major

7:24

code library on the planet. And it

7:26

didn't just find bugs, it built working

7:29

attacks around them. Anthropic says that

7:31

over 99% of these bugs are still

7:33

unpatched because the fixes just haven't

7:36

been deployed yet, and that should have

7:38

the market's full attention. And it did,

7:41

but probably not the way Anthropic

7:42

wanted. Two weeks before they were ready

7:44

to announce Mythos, a blog

7:46

misconfiguration leaked it to the

7:48

public, and the market was very quick to

7:50

react. Cybersecurity stocks tanked.

7:53

CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks,

7:55

everyone. The logic was obvious. If an

7:58

AI model can find bugs, exploits, and

8:01

vulnerabilities faster than any human,

8:03

then why do we need a

8:04

quarter-trillion-dollar cybersecurity

8:07

industry in the first place? The market

8:09

didn't see Mythos as a competitive

8:11

threat. It saw it as a meteor.

8:13

Inexpensive cybersecurity consultants

8:16

were the dinosaurs. And for a few days,

8:18

it looked like the market was right. The

8:20

question was which company would use

8:22

these capabilities first? And that's

8:24

where the next phase of this AI arms

8:26

race begins. Alex Stamos is the former

8:29

chief security officer at Facebook and

8:32

Yahoo. Today, he's the chief product

8:34

officer at Corridor, an AI security

8:37

startup. Alex put a number to the

8:39

timeline. Six months. That's how long

8:42

before small open-source models can find

8:44

bugs as well as Mythos. And once that

8:47

happens, every cybercrime syndicate,

8:49

every state-sponsored spy, and every

8:52

individual hacker on the planet gets

8:54

access to AI-powered exploit discovery.

8:57

And here's the uncomfortable truth for

8:59

this entire industry. The bottleneck was

9:01

never finding the exploits. It was never

9:04

about bug discovery. Arctic Wolf's

9:06

threat report found that 76% of actual

9:09

compromises, the real breaches, the real

9:12

data being stolen, the real ransomware

9:14

being deployed, involved one or more of

9:16

just 10 known already patchable

9:19

vulnerabilities. The flaws were already

9:22

found. The patches already existed.

9:25

Organizations just could not move fast

9:27

enough to deploy them. AI just removed

9:30

the speed limit, not for cybersecurity

9:32

companies, but for the attackers. When

9:35

every bad actor on the planet can find

9:37

bugs at AI speeds, the gap between this

9:40

bug exists and this bug was exploited

9:43

collapses from months to hours. The

9:45

entire defensive model of the

9:47

cybersecurity industry, find it, report

9:49

it, patch it, and deploy it, assumes

9:51

humans are the bottleneck on both sides

9:54

of the equation. That assumption just

9:56

broke since attackers can sit at home

9:58

and point AI models at public software

10:01

pretty much as fast as they can type

10:03

while defenders have to fix the code,

10:05

test it, get approvals, schedule

10:07

maintenance windows, and avoid breaking

10:09

their customer deployments. That means

10:11

tickets, meetings, and manual reviews.

10:14

On top of that, attackers benefit from

10:16

automation, scanning for weaknesses,

10:18

writing fishing emails, exploring attack

10:21

pads, and generating exploit code while

10:23

defenders have to slow down to make sure

10:25

they meet regulatory requirements, work

10:28

with legacy systems, check with multiple

10:30

vendors, and have compliances that they

10:32

need to uphold. You can't just let an AI

10:35

patch a problem at a bank or a hospital

10:37

and hope for the best, but you

10:39

definitely can attack them that way. And

10:42

that six-month window is actually

10:44

shrinking. IO, an independent security

10:46

research lab, tested eight smaller,

10:49

cheaper, publicly available models to

10:51

see if they could reproduce Mythos's

10:53

findings. All eight models found the

10:55

same exploits that Mythos did. One of

10:58

those models had 3.6 billion parameters

11:01

and cost 11 cents per million tokens.

11:04

For investors, that means it's not about

11:06

the model itself, it's about the systems

11:08

built around it. The targeting, the

11:10

validation, the triage, the

11:12

relationships with maintainers, but the

11:14

raw capability is spreading fast. In

11:17

fact, Palo Alto Networks' chief security

11:19

intelligence officer said open models

11:22

are only weeks or months away from

11:24

matching Mythos. Cybersecurity trainers

11:26

at the SANS Institute say that that

11:29

capability exists now for finding and

11:31

exploiting basic vulnerabilities. So, 6

11:34

months is the optimistic estimate, and

11:37

the clock started on April 7th. Now, let

11:39

me say the quiet part out loud. The AI

11:42

model finding bugs to patch is the same

11:44

AI model that's exploiting them. There's

11:47

no architectural difference. There's no

11:49

switch you flip from offense to defense.

11:51

It's the exact same capability that

11:53

makes Mythos a shield that also makes it

11:56

a sword. Anthropic's own red team said

11:58

it best. The same improvements that make

12:01

the model substantially more effective

12:03

at patching vulnerabilities also make it

12:05

substantially more effective at

12:07

exploiting them. Before going public

12:09

with Mythos, Anthropic briefed senior

12:11

officials at two agencies responsible

12:13

for defending America's digital

12:15

infrastructure. NSA analysts were

12:17

already discussing what Mythos means for

12:19

cyber operations. And as an investor,

12:22

think about what this means for the

12:23

market. Anthropic, a private company

12:26

valued at $380 billion after the second

12:30

largest venture capital raise in

12:31

history, is sitting on software exploits

12:34

for almost every major company on Earth.

12:37

Over 99% of the vulnerabilities that

12:39

Mythos found are still unpatched, which

12:42

means Anthropic is effectively deciding

12:45

what gets fixed first, how much

12:47

information to release, when, and to

12:49

who. This is not a product launch. It's

12:52

a national security threat, and the real

12:54

question is who ultimately controls this

12:57

capability. Who gets access besides

12:59

Anthropic? And what happens when open

13:01

models start finding these same exploits

13:04

all over the internet? Those aren't

13:06

questions you're going to get answers to

13:08

on an earnings call. And this is where

13:10

Anthropic made a big decision that

13:11

affects the entire stock market. They

13:14

didn't sell Mythos to the government.

13:16

They didn't license it to the highest

13:17

bidder, and they didn't open source it

13:20

to level the playing field. They formed

13:22

a defensive coalition called Project

13:24

Glass Wing, and gave early access to

13:26

some of the most powerful publicly

13:28

traded companies on the planet, Amazon,

13:31

Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike,

13:34

Google, JP Morgan Chase, Microsoft,

13:37

Nvidia, Palo Alto Networks, and more

13:39

than 40 other organizations. The

13:42

cybersecurity stocks that went down on

13:43

the leak surged on the announcement.

13:46

CrowdStrike jumped over 6% in a single

13:48

session. Palo Alto rose almost 5%. The

13:51

Mythos model went from being a sword

13:53

pointed at the industry to the shield

13:55

protecting it. And now that you

13:57

understand what just happened, here's

13:59

exactly how I'm investing in it. The

14:01

biggest thing for investors to

14:02

understand is that the cybersecurity

14:05

industry is about to undergo a massive

14:07

shift from detecting and responding to

14:09

threats to predicting and preventing

14:11

them. The cybersecurity industry spent

14:13

the last two decades building tools to

14:16

catch attackers after they got in.

14:18

Glasswing is the first serious attempt

14:20

to find every flaw before the attackers

14:23

do. And the cybersecurity companies

14:25

inside this coalition are not being

14:27

disrupted by Mythos. They're being armed

14:30

with it. If it works, this will be the

14:32

single biggest shift in cybersecurity

14:34

since the invention of the firewall. And

14:36

if it doesn't, every enterprise on Earth

14:39

just entered an arms race they have no

14:41

way to win. But let's talk about who

14:43

wins from this today. The obvious

14:45

winners are the companies inside Project

14:47

Glasswing, the ones with direct access

14:49

to Mythos and the infrastructure to

14:51

deploy what it finds. CrowdStrike

14:53

focuses on endpoint detection and

14:55

response. So securing desktops, laptops,

14:58

and smartphones, really any device that

15:00

connects to a company network. Their

15:02

Falcon platform has three parts, a suite

15:04

of cloud-based modules that do things

15:06

like run virus scans, manage firewalls,

15:09

and detect malware. They have a separate

15:11

threat graph that maps out a company's

15:13

networks, the devices on it, the users,

15:16

and the permissions to make sure all the

15:18

network traffic is legit. And then their

15:20

Falcon agent is a lightweight agent that

15:22

runs on each device to send security

15:24

data back for analysis. Charlotte AI is

15:27

their AI assistant layer, and agent

15:29

works is their agentic automation

15:31

platform. Being armed with Mythos means

15:34

that CrowdStrike can use their Falcon

15:35

platform to proactively patch

15:37

vulnerabilities across their entire

15:39

customer base before attackers find

15:42

them. CrowdStrike's revenue came in at

15:43

$1.31 billion for their latest quarter,

15:46

which is up 23% year-over-year. Annual

15:49

recurring revenue came in at $5.25

15:52

billion,

15:53

which is up 24%. Net new ARR came in at

15:55

$331 million, up 47%.

16:00

And if you think you missed the boat on

16:01

CrowdStrike, they just posted their

16:03

first-ever GAAP profitable quarter, and

16:06

their gross customer retention sits at

16:08

97%.

16:10

CrowdStrike stock is not cheap. A $100

16:13

market cap means roughly 20 times

16:15

price-to-sales. But now that they're

16:17

armed with Mythos, we could see their

16:19

revenues, their profits, and their

16:20

overall growth continue to accelerate

16:23

while their competition still waits for

16:25

access. Palo Alto Networks is the other

16:27

pure-play cybersecurity company in

16:29

Project Glasswing. Their strategy is

16:31

convincing enterprises to consolidate

16:34

their security spending onto a single

16:36

platform: network security, cloud

16:38

security, access protection, and so on.

16:41

Cortex, their AI-powered security

16:43

operations platform, integrates directly

16:46

with Mythos for proactive threat

16:47

detection and response. Palo Alto's

16:50

annual recurring revenue from

16:51

next-generation security grew by 33%

16:55

year-over-year, and their guidance

16:57

implies more than 50% growth in next-gen

16:59

security for the rest of this fiscal

17:02

year. Their total annual revenue is

17:04

approaching $11 billion,

17:06

which makes Palo Alto Networks the

17:08

cheaper stock. They trade at roughly 14

17:11

times sales compared to CrowdStrike's

17:13

20, mostly because CrowdStrike is

17:15

growing significantly faster. The

17:17

hyperscalers, Microsoft, Google, and

17:19

Amazon, form the platform layer of

17:21

Anthropic's Project Glass Wing. They

17:23

host Mythos, they use it internally, and

17:26

they'll probably add it to their

17:27

server-side security offerings over

17:29

time. Microsoft alone runs the largest

17:32

cloud security business on the planet,

17:34

bringing roughly $28.5 billion a year.

17:38

These companies aren't using Mythos to

17:40

sell more cloud access. They're using it

17:42

to manage risk across the entire

17:45

infrastructure powering AI and the

17:47

internet. The best way to find great

17:49

investments is understanding a company's

17:52

products, not just their profits. And

17:54

the best companies have perfect products

17:57

for quickly growing markets. Nvidia,

17:59

Broadcom, Apple, these companies armed

18:02

with Mythos will define the next era of

18:04

digital security, while everyone else is

18:07

effectively defending against tomorrow's

18:09

attacks with yesterday's tools. And AI

18:12

is already making the global

18:13

cybersecurity market grow fast, from

18:16

$380 billion in 2026 to $1.2 trillion in

18:21

2034. That's a 15.5%

18:24

compound annual growth rate for the next

18:26

8 years, faster than the growth of the

18:29

S&P 500. And I expect it to accelerate

18:32

as more crime syndicates, more spies,

18:34

and more hackers in general start using

18:37

more advanced AI for their attacks. So,

18:39

the question for investors isn't whether

18:41

cybersecurity spending will keep

18:43

climbing. It's which companies will

18:45

capture it. That's why the ones in

18:47

Project Glass Wing are the ones that I'm

18:49

investing in. But here's the part we

18:51

can't model in our spreadsheets. Less

18:53

than 1% of the thousands of

18:55

vulnerabilities that Mythos has

18:57

discovered have actually been patched.

18:59

Less than 1%. Anthropic promised a

19:02

public report in the next 90 days.

19:04

That's July 2026. And in it, they're

19:07

going to spell out what they found,

19:09

what's been fixed, and who is still

19:10

exposed. If that report shows 10 to 20%

19:13

of the bugs have been fixed, then the

19:15

defenders really do have an edge. But if

19:18

it only shows 1% of the bugs have been

19:20

fixed and the vulnerabilities have been

19:22

closed, then the critics will be right.

19:24

Attackers will move as fast as AI, while

19:26

defenders will stay at the speed of

19:28

tickets, the speed of meetings, and

19:30

manual reviews. Remember, finding bugs

19:33

can be automated, but fixing them can't,

19:36

especially for banks, for hospitals, and

19:39

for other regulated industries. That's

19:41

why I think Palantir will play an

19:42

important role here, too. But there's

19:45

one last conflict that I'm not sure how

19:47

Anthropic will overcome, or if they even

19:49

can. Anthropic is reportedly considering

19:52

an IPO in October of 2026. That means

19:55

that the company that decided Mythos was

19:57

too dangerous to sell will also need to

19:59

justify a half-trillion-dollar valuation

20:02

to public market investors. The conflict

20:04

between cyber safety and shareholders is

20:07

very real. Anthropic's 90-day security

20:10

report will land in July. Open models

20:12

are improving every single month. The

20:14

clock is ticking, but whether

20:16

Anthropic's bet that six months of

20:18

Mythos running defense can outpace

20:20

AI-powered offense will pay off for the

20:23

companies in Project Glasswing, for

20:25

their stocks, and for the security of

20:27

every data center on the planet, that's

20:29

something the market hasn't priced in

20:31

yet. Let me know what you think in the

20:33

comments. Is Mythos a temporary edge for

20:35

the defenders, or is this AI-driven arms

20:38

race the start of a new era of

20:40

cybersecurity? And if you want to see

20:42

more science behind the stocks, check

20:44

out this video next. Either way, thanks

20:46

for watching, and until next time, this

20:48

is ticker symbol U. My name is Alex,

20:51

reminding you that the best investment

20:53

you can make is in you.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the emergence of 'Claude Mythos,' an AI model capable of identifying and exploiting critical security vulnerabilities in foundational software, operating systems, and browsers at a speed and scale impossible for humans or traditional tools. This breakthrough shifted the cybersecurity landscape, as Anthropic initially deemed the technology too dangerous for general release, leading them to form 'Project Glass Wing,' a defensive coalition of major technology and cybersecurity companies. The core dilemma presented is the 'AI arms race' in cybersecurity: while AI can be used for defense, the same capabilities can be turned toward offense, and the speed at which attackers can identify and leverage vulnerabilities using AI far exceeds the speed at which organizations can patch them through human processes.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts