What Claude Just Did Is Insane (Investors Aren't Ready)
540 segments
An AI model just found serious security
flaws in every major operating system
and web browser on Earth. One flaw was
hiding for 27 years inside one of the
most secure systems ever built.
Automated tools scanned that code 5
million times and they never caught it.
But here's where things get really
crazy. The company that built this AI
decided that it was too dangerous to
release. So instead, they gave it to 12
of the most powerful companies on the
planet. Almost all of which we can
invest in. My name is Alex and I spent 8
years as a radar engineer and AI
researcher at MIT and I've never seen AI
do anything like this. So subscribe to
the channel and let me show you what
just happened and how I'm investing in
it. Your time is valuable, so let's get
right into it. There's a piece of
software that's so foundational that it
powers almost every video you've ever
watched online including this one. It's
called FFmpeg and it had a bug. It used
two different kinds of counters that
didn't quite line up under one very
specific condition. A frame carefully
split into exactly 65,536
tiny pieces. That's 2 to the 16th power.
Those counters would collide when that
happens and when that happened, the
software could write data outside of the
memory it was allowed to touch which
opens the door for attackers to take
control of the machine running the
video. That's your PC or your smartphone
if you're the one playing that video.
But it's also the enterprise servers
that are processing it. Netflix, Apple,
YouTube. That bug was introduced in
2010. For 16 years automated testing
tools saw that same line of code. 5
million scans. Every single one missed
it and the reason is simple. Traditional
tools throw random inputs at software
and wait for it to crash. But this bug
only triggers at one specific number. A
random number tester would almost never
find it, but this AI read the code,
found the flaw, generated a custom test
for it, and confirmed the bug on its
very first try. This isn't a specialized
cybersecurity tool. It's not a model
that's trained to hunt vulnerabilities.
It's a general-purpose language model
called Claude Mythos, built by a company
called Anthropic. And here's why that
matters for investors. Anthropic didn't
set out to build a hacking tool. They
set out to build a better coding
assistant, but the model got so good at
reading code and so good at
understanding what a programmer
intended, as well as spotting the
difference between the two, that it
could find the flaws that human experts
have been missing for decades. So,
Anthropic trained Claude Mythos to be
really good at code, but as a side
effect, it got really good at securing
code as well. To understand why this is
such a huge deal for software stocks,
you need to understand how Mythos
actually finds these issues. The model
is placed in an isolated environment
with access to a specific code base. It
reads through the source files, which is
millions of lines of code, and finds the
parts most likely to be hiding serious
bugs. Then it writes and runs test
programs against that code to confirm or
disprove each potential bug. When it
finds one, it writes a formal
vulnerability report with a small
example that recreates the flaw in
practice. That's exactly what a
professional security researcher does
today. The difference is speed and
scale. A human analyst might take weeks
to audit a single block of code,
especially if it's mission-critical.
Mythos processes an entire code base in
hours, and it doesn't just find bugs, it
understands them. It reads the code the
way an engineer reads a blueprint,
understanding intent, spotting where the
code doesn't match that intent, and
reasoning about what would trigger the
failure. What's even crazier is just how
fast this happened. Cyber gym is a UC
Berkeley benchmark that throws over
1,500 real-world software bugs from
almost 200 open-source projects at
different AI models. The current Claude
model, Opus 4.6, scored a 66%.
Claude Mythos scored an 83. That's a
16-point leap in one model generation.
The difference between a D and a B on a
test. That's the jump from a case
originally finding bugs to finding bugs
in every major operating system and web
browser on Earth. That's what makes this
model so dangerous. But, it didn't stop
there. It found a 27-year-old bug in
OpenBSD, which is an operating system
that prides itself on being almost
impossible to hack. This one matters to
investors for two reasons. First, we
talk a lot about AI networking, but not
the code that makes it possible. And
second, this wasn't a single bug, it was
two bugs that chained together. The
first was a missing safety check, and
the second was a number rolling back to
zero at the wrong time. When combined,
they could purposely crash a machine
from anywhere on the internet with no
authentication required. Governments
have trusted this system to run their
firewalls since 1998.
Mythos found this bug in 2026. It also
found flaws in FreeBSD, which is how
Firefox runs JavaScript. It found over
180 different bugs in everything from
cryptography libraries to virtual
machine monitors and turned them all
into functional attacks. Previous models
found just two of these bugs. And on
Linux, which runs most of the world's
servers, Android phones, and cloud
infrastructure, it chained four separate
vulnerabilities together. On their own,
each bug looked pretty insignificant,
but combined, they let an attacker jump
from an ordinary user account to full
control of the Linux machine. Mythos is
not a proof of concept. Mythos is a
weapon, and that's why it scared the
market. But, there's something else on
the market that you need to know about,
and that's your private data. There are
hundreds of online data brokers making
big money by collecting and selling your
personal information. That's why I've
been using this video's sponsor,
DeleteMe, for over 2 years now, and I
really can't recommend them enough.
DeleteMe is a hands-free subscription
service that will remove your personal
information from those online data
brokers. They give you a quarterly
privacy report showing everything
they've done, and they reviewed over
55,000 listings for me so far. But, what
really surprised me is these data
brokers had way more than just my
private data. They had my wife's and my
entire family's, too. That's another
reason I really like DeleteMe. They have
a family plan, so we can all have more
control over our personal data. So, if
you care about your data and your
family's privacy, you can get 20% off
any plan with my code, SYMBOL20, by
going to joindeleteme.com/symbol20
or with my link in the description. And
a big thank you to DeleteMe and to you
for supporting the channel. All right,
the AI arms race is moving fast. In
2024, Google's Project Big Sleep found a
single new vulnerability in SQLite. In
2025, a DARPA competition threw 54
million lines of code at competing
systems that collectively found 18 bugs.
In April of 2026, Mythos found thousands
across every major operating system,
every major browser, and every major
code library on the planet. And it
didn't just find bugs, it built working
attacks around them. Anthropic says that
over 99% of these bugs are still
unpatched because the fixes just haven't
been deployed yet, and that should have
the market's full attention. And it did,
but probably not the way Anthropic
wanted. Two weeks before they were ready
to announce Mythos, a blog
misconfiguration leaked it to the
public, and the market was very quick to
react. Cybersecurity stocks tanked.
CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks,
everyone. The logic was obvious. If an
AI model can find bugs, exploits, and
vulnerabilities faster than any human,
then why do we need a
quarter-trillion-dollar cybersecurity
industry in the first place? The market
didn't see Mythos as a competitive
threat. It saw it as a meteor.
Inexpensive cybersecurity consultants
were the dinosaurs. And for a few days,
it looked like the market was right. The
question was which company would use
these capabilities first? And that's
where the next phase of this AI arms
race begins. Alex Stamos is the former
chief security officer at Facebook and
Yahoo. Today, he's the chief product
officer at Corridor, an AI security
startup. Alex put a number to the
timeline. Six months. That's how long
before small open-source models can find
bugs as well as Mythos. And once that
happens, every cybercrime syndicate,
every state-sponsored spy, and every
individual hacker on the planet gets
access to AI-powered exploit discovery.
And here's the uncomfortable truth for
this entire industry. The bottleneck was
never finding the exploits. It was never
about bug discovery. Arctic Wolf's
threat report found that 76% of actual
compromises, the real breaches, the real
data being stolen, the real ransomware
being deployed, involved one or more of
just 10 known already patchable
vulnerabilities. The flaws were already
found. The patches already existed.
Organizations just could not move fast
enough to deploy them. AI just removed
the speed limit, not for cybersecurity
companies, but for the attackers. When
every bad actor on the planet can find
bugs at AI speeds, the gap between this
bug exists and this bug was exploited
collapses from months to hours. The
entire defensive model of the
cybersecurity industry, find it, report
it, patch it, and deploy it, assumes
humans are the bottleneck on both sides
of the equation. That assumption just
broke since attackers can sit at home
and point AI models at public software
pretty much as fast as they can type
while defenders have to fix the code,
test it, get approvals, schedule
maintenance windows, and avoid breaking
their customer deployments. That means
tickets, meetings, and manual reviews.
On top of that, attackers benefit from
automation, scanning for weaknesses,
writing fishing emails, exploring attack
pads, and generating exploit code while
defenders have to slow down to make sure
they meet regulatory requirements, work
with legacy systems, check with multiple
vendors, and have compliances that they
need to uphold. You can't just let an AI
patch a problem at a bank or a hospital
and hope for the best, but you
definitely can attack them that way. And
that six-month window is actually
shrinking. IO, an independent security
research lab, tested eight smaller,
cheaper, publicly available models to
see if they could reproduce Mythos's
findings. All eight models found the
same exploits that Mythos did. One of
those models had 3.6 billion parameters
and cost 11 cents per million tokens.
For investors, that means it's not about
the model itself, it's about the systems
built around it. The targeting, the
validation, the triage, the
relationships with maintainers, but the
raw capability is spreading fast. In
fact, Palo Alto Networks' chief security
intelligence officer said open models
are only weeks or months away from
matching Mythos. Cybersecurity trainers
at the SANS Institute say that that
capability exists now for finding and
exploiting basic vulnerabilities. So, 6
months is the optimistic estimate, and
the clock started on April 7th. Now, let
me say the quiet part out loud. The AI
model finding bugs to patch is the same
AI model that's exploiting them. There's
no architectural difference. There's no
switch you flip from offense to defense.
It's the exact same capability that
makes Mythos a shield that also makes it
a sword. Anthropic's own red team said
it best. The same improvements that make
the model substantially more effective
at patching vulnerabilities also make it
substantially more effective at
exploiting them. Before going public
with Mythos, Anthropic briefed senior
officials at two agencies responsible
for defending America's digital
infrastructure. NSA analysts were
already discussing what Mythos means for
cyber operations. And as an investor,
think about what this means for the
market. Anthropic, a private company
valued at $380 billion after the second
largest venture capital raise in
history, is sitting on software exploits
for almost every major company on Earth.
Over 99% of the vulnerabilities that
Mythos found are still unpatched, which
means Anthropic is effectively deciding
what gets fixed first, how much
information to release, when, and to
who. This is not a product launch. It's
a national security threat, and the real
question is who ultimately controls this
capability. Who gets access besides
Anthropic? And what happens when open
models start finding these same exploits
all over the internet? Those aren't
questions you're going to get answers to
on an earnings call. And this is where
Anthropic made a big decision that
affects the entire stock market. They
didn't sell Mythos to the government.
They didn't license it to the highest
bidder, and they didn't open source it
to level the playing field. They formed
a defensive coalition called Project
Glass Wing, and gave early access to
some of the most powerful publicly
traded companies on the planet, Amazon,
Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike,
Google, JP Morgan Chase, Microsoft,
Nvidia, Palo Alto Networks, and more
than 40 other organizations. The
cybersecurity stocks that went down on
the leak surged on the announcement.
CrowdStrike jumped over 6% in a single
session. Palo Alto rose almost 5%. The
Mythos model went from being a sword
pointed at the industry to the shield
protecting it. And now that you
understand what just happened, here's
exactly how I'm investing in it. The
biggest thing for investors to
understand is that the cybersecurity
industry is about to undergo a massive
shift from detecting and responding to
threats to predicting and preventing
them. The cybersecurity industry spent
the last two decades building tools to
catch attackers after they got in.
Glasswing is the first serious attempt
to find every flaw before the attackers
do. And the cybersecurity companies
inside this coalition are not being
disrupted by Mythos. They're being armed
with it. If it works, this will be the
single biggest shift in cybersecurity
since the invention of the firewall. And
if it doesn't, every enterprise on Earth
just entered an arms race they have no
way to win. But let's talk about who
wins from this today. The obvious
winners are the companies inside Project
Glasswing, the ones with direct access
to Mythos and the infrastructure to
deploy what it finds. CrowdStrike
focuses on endpoint detection and
response. So securing desktops, laptops,
and smartphones, really any device that
connects to a company network. Their
Falcon platform has three parts, a suite
of cloud-based modules that do things
like run virus scans, manage firewalls,
and detect malware. They have a separate
threat graph that maps out a company's
networks, the devices on it, the users,
and the permissions to make sure all the
network traffic is legit. And then their
Falcon agent is a lightweight agent that
runs on each device to send security
data back for analysis. Charlotte AI is
their AI assistant layer, and agent
works is their agentic automation
platform. Being armed with Mythos means
that CrowdStrike can use their Falcon
platform to proactively patch
vulnerabilities across their entire
customer base before attackers find
them. CrowdStrike's revenue came in at
$1.31 billion for their latest quarter,
which is up 23% year-over-year. Annual
recurring revenue came in at $5.25
billion,
which is up 24%. Net new ARR came in at
$331 million, up 47%.
And if you think you missed the boat on
CrowdStrike, they just posted their
first-ever GAAP profitable quarter, and
their gross customer retention sits at
97%.
CrowdStrike stock is not cheap. A $100
market cap means roughly 20 times
price-to-sales. But now that they're
armed with Mythos, we could see their
revenues, their profits, and their
overall growth continue to accelerate
while their competition still waits for
access. Palo Alto Networks is the other
pure-play cybersecurity company in
Project Glasswing. Their strategy is
convincing enterprises to consolidate
their security spending onto a single
platform: network security, cloud
security, access protection, and so on.
Cortex, their AI-powered security
operations platform, integrates directly
with Mythos for proactive threat
detection and response. Palo Alto's
annual recurring revenue from
next-generation security grew by 33%
year-over-year, and their guidance
implies more than 50% growth in next-gen
security for the rest of this fiscal
year. Their total annual revenue is
approaching $11 billion,
which makes Palo Alto Networks the
cheaper stock. They trade at roughly 14
times sales compared to CrowdStrike's
20, mostly because CrowdStrike is
growing significantly faster. The
hyperscalers, Microsoft, Google, and
Amazon, form the platform layer of
Anthropic's Project Glass Wing. They
host Mythos, they use it internally, and
they'll probably add it to their
server-side security offerings over
time. Microsoft alone runs the largest
cloud security business on the planet,
bringing roughly $28.5 billion a year.
These companies aren't using Mythos to
sell more cloud access. They're using it
to manage risk across the entire
infrastructure powering AI and the
internet. The best way to find great
investments is understanding a company's
products, not just their profits. And
the best companies have perfect products
for quickly growing markets. Nvidia,
Broadcom, Apple, these companies armed
with Mythos will define the next era of
digital security, while everyone else is
effectively defending against tomorrow's
attacks with yesterday's tools. And AI
is already making the global
cybersecurity market grow fast, from
$380 billion in 2026 to $1.2 trillion in
2034. That's a 15.5%
compound annual growth rate for the next
8 years, faster than the growth of the
S&P 500. And I expect it to accelerate
as more crime syndicates, more spies,
and more hackers in general start using
more advanced AI for their attacks. So,
the question for investors isn't whether
cybersecurity spending will keep
climbing. It's which companies will
capture it. That's why the ones in
Project Glass Wing are the ones that I'm
investing in. But here's the part we
can't model in our spreadsheets. Less
than 1% of the thousands of
vulnerabilities that Mythos has
discovered have actually been patched.
Less than 1%. Anthropic promised a
public report in the next 90 days.
That's July 2026. And in it, they're
going to spell out what they found,
what's been fixed, and who is still
exposed. If that report shows 10 to 20%
of the bugs have been fixed, then the
defenders really do have an edge. But if
it only shows 1% of the bugs have been
fixed and the vulnerabilities have been
closed, then the critics will be right.
Attackers will move as fast as AI, while
defenders will stay at the speed of
tickets, the speed of meetings, and
manual reviews. Remember, finding bugs
can be automated, but fixing them can't,
especially for banks, for hospitals, and
for other regulated industries. That's
why I think Palantir will play an
important role here, too. But there's
one last conflict that I'm not sure how
Anthropic will overcome, or if they even
can. Anthropic is reportedly considering
an IPO in October of 2026. That means
that the company that decided Mythos was
too dangerous to sell will also need to
justify a half-trillion-dollar valuation
to public market investors. The conflict
between cyber safety and shareholders is
very real. Anthropic's 90-day security
report will land in July. Open models
are improving every single month. The
clock is ticking, but whether
Anthropic's bet that six months of
Mythos running defense can outpace
AI-powered offense will pay off for the
companies in Project Glasswing, for
their stocks, and for the security of
every data center on the planet, that's
something the market hasn't priced in
yet. Let me know what you think in the
comments. Is Mythos a temporary edge for
the defenders, or is this AI-driven arms
race the start of a new era of
cybersecurity? And if you want to see
more science behind the stocks, check
out this video next. Either way, thanks
for watching, and until next time, this
is ticker symbol U. My name is Alex,
reminding you that the best investment
you can make is in you.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses the emergence of 'Claude Mythos,' an AI model capable of identifying and exploiting critical security vulnerabilities in foundational software, operating systems, and browsers at a speed and scale impossible for humans or traditional tools. This breakthrough shifted the cybersecurity landscape, as Anthropic initially deemed the technology too dangerous for general release, leading them to form 'Project Glass Wing,' a defensive coalition of major technology and cybersecurity companies. The core dilemma presented is the 'AI arms race' in cybersecurity: while AI can be used for defense, the same capabilities can be turned toward offense, and the speed at which attackers can identify and leverage vulnerabilities using AI far exceeds the speed at which organizations can patch them through human processes.
Videos recently processed by our community