HomeVideos

South Korean Stocks Rebound, China NPC Begins, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon | Bloomberg...

Now Playing

South Korean Stocks Rebound, China NPC Begins, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon | Bloomberg...

Transcript

594 segments

0:02

Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts radio

0:06

news.

0:11

Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:13

I'm Doug Krer. We'll begin with crude

0:15

oil today which is moving higher for a

0:17

fifth straight session as the market

0:19

assesses the widening fallout from the

0:21

US Israeli war against Iran and the

0:24

combatants are vowing to press on. Now

0:27

we are learning that Kurdish Iranian

0:29

dissident groups based in northern Iraq

0:32

are preparing for a potential crossber

0:34

military operation in Iran. At the same

0:37

time today we're seeing a rebound in

0:39

equity markets across the Asia-Pacific

0:41

after an up arrow story for US stocks.

0:44

In South Korea for example a powerful

0:47

rebound is underway following

0:48

Wednesday's 12% selloff for the Cosby.

0:51

For a closer look now I'm joined by

0:53

Bloomberg's Leanting 2. Lean Ting is

0:56

managing editor for Asia Equities and

0:58

she joins us from our studios in

1:00

Singapore. Thank you for being here. Can

1:02

you help me understand what's going on

1:03

with the South Korean equity market

1:05

today?

1:06

>> The story about Korea basically is a

1:08

cautionary tale about leveraged bets uh

1:12

to buy into stocks. Yesterday we saw you

1:16

know the record sell off ever for Korean

1:18

stocks more than 12% drop and that was

1:21

really because the retail investors

1:23

leading into the war going into the war

1:26

they were just a wrongfooted right they

1:29

took out a record amount of debt uh and

1:32

uh they also put a lot of money into

1:35

brokerage accounts just sort of to get

1:37

ready to buy more Korean stocks. So a a

1:41

lot of that buying was really financed

1:44

by debt by margins. So that has caused a

1:49

lot of liquidation in a day when the

1:52

market plunged. So we see a lot of

1:55

technical reason behind that right force

1:57

liquidation a lot of gapping down and

1:59

that's a result of historic uh slump

2:03

that we saw yesterday. But today um I

2:06

think there was a lot of buy orders

2:08

leading into today's open. Again retail

2:11

investors even yesterday some of the uh

2:13

bravehearted were buying into long

2:16

leveraged ETFs. So there are a lot of

2:18

sort of uh still bullish people out

2:21

there looking to buy the dip. So today's

2:24

huge rebound is reflective of that. And

2:27

foreign investors yesterday I wanted to

2:29

highlight they were actually already

2:31

buyers. uh we saw at the end of day

2:34

about $1 billion of foreign inflow uh

2:37

into the market yesterday. So that kind

2:40

of inflow I think today is translating

2:42

into the the big jump up as well.

2:44

>> So when you look at the market internals

2:46

Leon Ting is it still technology related

2:49

and is that trade directly correlated

2:51

with artificial intelligence?

2:54

>> Yes, it's very much so. I think Korea,

2:57

you know, if you look at the overnight

2:58

trading in a Korea ETF in the US, there

3:01

was almost no sign that there was a big

3:04

crash in South Korea, you know, earlier

3:06

in the day. The EWI, I think that was a

3:09

ticker for the EyesShares uh Korea ETF.

3:12

It was it was up during the night and

3:14

there was still flows into it which

3:17

means um global investors not just the

3:20

Korean ones are still sort of very much

3:23

bullish about this Korea story about

3:25

memory chip shortage about how they are

3:27

being well positioned in this uh AI uh

3:30

supply chain. Um so that to me is quite

3:34

shocking right almost to global

3:35

investors nothing happened in Korea.

3:37

People continue to buy into this US ETF

3:40

of Korea. So, Leonting, we're getting

3:42

some headlines out of the National

3:44

People's Congress in China. The growth

3:46

target has been set in a range of

3:48

between 4 and a half to 5%. I think

3:51

that's the most modest we've seen in

3:52

about three decades. Some analysts were

3:55

saying earlier this is in effect an

3:57

admission that China's model, the

4:00

economic model that has powered the

4:01

country's rapid rise is now beginning to

4:04

show a little strain. How would you

4:06

describe what's emerging from the NPC?

4:10

Yeah, the growth target of between 4.5%

4:13

to 5% uh has been very well telegraphed.

4:17

So that bit of information is not a

4:20

surprise to market participants at all.

4:22

Xiinping's government has been talking

4:25

about how they wanted the quality of

4:27

growth, not just a pure number in the

4:30

GDP figure. So that's again well

4:34

understood by market participants. So

4:36

we've asked 10 people so far on what's

4:38

the takeaway. Everybody has said right

4:40

now they're not seeing market moving

4:43

news so far out of the MPC. The stuff

4:46

that came out including promotion of a

4:49

humanoid uh robot and also um the AI uh

4:54

AI related industry breakthroughs and

4:57

all that has been sort of reiteration of

5:00

what we heard before. And I think one

5:02

more thing to watch out for is the kind

5:05

of plans to boost consumption to lift

5:08

the proportion of consumption uh in

5:10

China's GDP that we haven't really seen

5:13

anything super concrete that has come

5:15

out of yet. But so far I think Chinese

5:18

market today is just being lifted along

5:20

with global markets. Uh Asia so far has

5:23

been the worst hit um in global stock

5:26

market since the war began. I think

5:28

China wasn't spared and today again it's

5:31

just a sort of the rising boat lifting

5:33

all tides.

5:34

>> You know, we know well that the story in

5:37

China lately in terms of prices has been

5:40

one of deflation. And so the government

5:42

set a CPI growth target for this year of

5:45

around 2%. How do you think they're

5:47

going to achieve that? Is that going to

5:49

come strictly from more government

5:52

spending?

5:53

>> There has been room for fiscal spending.

5:57

I think uh the deficit is still at

5:59

record high. That was the latest target

6:01

4%. Um but uh it is very very

6:06

challenging work to get CPI up um 2%.

6:09

Part of it is because um there is a lot

6:12

of competition and uh a lot of sort of

6:15

glut of supply in all sorts of things

6:18

materials even services uh that we saw

6:21

in uh China. Uh part of it as you as we

6:24

reported is this you know even in the

6:27

tech space right food delivery war

6:30

that's been going on of course solar is

6:32

overs supplied um lithium is overs

6:35

supplied and uh latest over supply that

6:38

we're seeing is actually AI application

6:41

models every other tech company has a AI

6:45

model that they wanted to promote um and

6:47

that has really added pressure on all

6:50

these internet names stock names, I

6:53

should say, just because they're

6:54

spending so much to get user signups um

6:58

for their latest AI app. So, that's

7:00

really pressuring margins. Again, that

7:03

doesn't reflect well for their stocks in

7:05

the stock market um and overall for

7:08

economy. That just adds to challenge of

7:10

reaching that 2% CPI goal. I mentioned

7:13

the push higher for crude oil and when

7:15

you consider economies like South Korea,

7:17

like Japan that are heavy oil importers,

7:20

what is the sense of the risk of

7:23

inflation picking up as a result of

7:25

higher oil? Is that something that

7:26

people are talking about? Is there a

7:28

great deal of concern being expressed

7:30

along those lines?

7:31

>> Not really for China. Uh the interesting

7:34

thing about China is China's now ted at

7:36

the biggest beneficiary of this oil

7:39

crisis that we're seeing right now. Part

7:41

of it is because China gets its oil um

7:43

you know from Russia mainly right and

7:46

also it can still get from Iran, it can

7:48

still get from Venezuela. So China

7:51

actually has a lot of friends in the

7:53

global south to get oil supply from

7:56

these countries. Uh so that that sort of

7:59

spared China uh from buying you know the

8:02

the recently surged oil prices. Um, so

8:06

it's a very wellpositioned market when

8:08

it comes to energy supply right now.

8:11

>> So I mentioned the conflict with Iran

8:13

earlier. And another headline that has

8:15

emerged from the NPC is China's plan to

8:18

increase defense spending by 7%. That's

8:22

the slowest since about 2022. And I'm

8:24

curious as to whether anyone's surprised

8:26

by that number.

8:28

>> I would say yes. That's probably one

8:30

surprise that has come out of the MPC so

8:33

far. Um but there are people saying that

8:37

you know China yeah the official number

8:39

may be 7% but China has many other ways

8:42

to spend on defense. So the actual

8:44

number that may not be released to the

8:46

public could be a lot higher than that.

8:48

And of course for China defense is just

8:51

becoming increasingly important as we're

8:53

seeing what's going on in Iran. There's

8:55

a lot of concern about you know what's

8:57

going to happen to Taiwan in the next

9:00

couple of years uh before Xiinping steps

9:02

down. Um so I would say defense is of

9:06

critical importance uh and China really

9:09

you know will not uh that slip uh in

9:12

terms of the technological breakthrough

9:14

in the defense sector relative to the

9:16

rest of the world especially uh with the

9:18

US.

9:19

>> Leanting we'll leave it there. Always a

9:20

pleasure. Thank you so much. Bloomberg's

9:22

Leanting too. She is managing editor for

9:24

Asia Equities joining from our studios

9:27

in Singapore here on the Daybreak Asia

9:29

podcast.

9:37

Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia

9:38

podcast. I'm Doug Krer. Financial

9:41

markets are still facing tremendous

9:42

uncertainty as the conflict in Iran

9:45

enters its fifth day and it shows no

9:47

sign of abading. Thran is targeting

9:49

Israel and Gulf states. And at the same

9:52

time, Israeli and US forces have been

9:54

bombing targets in the Islamic Republic.

9:56

That would include the US sinking an

9:58

Iranian warship in international waters.

10:01

It was on Tuesday when Goldman Sachs CEO

10:04

David Solomon expressed surprise at what

10:06

he called the market's benign reaction.

10:09

On Wednesday, Solomon spoke with

10:11

Bloomberg's Heidi Straoud Watts in

10:13

Sydney.

10:13

>> Your team of strategists led by Peter

10:15

Oenheim is saying buy the dip. Do you

10:18

see complacency at the moment?

10:20

>> I I don't see I don't see complacency. I

10:22

just I think there's a lot of

10:23

uncertainty around the direction of the

10:26

conflict, how it'll be resolved, um you

10:29

know, what the offramps are. And you

10:31

know, I think it's fair to say when you

10:33

look at markets, market reactions have

10:34

been relatively benign. Um and I I

10:36

certainly could have seen over the last

10:38

couple of days, you know, a little bit

10:39

more volatility, but I I don't think

10:41

people are being complacent. I think

10:42

that market participants are looking and

10:45

trying to say, you know, how is this

10:47

going to play out? What's the endgame?

10:50

um you can see you know good scenarios

10:52

and more difficult scenarios and as they

10:54

have more information in the coming days

10:55

in the coming week or two you know I

10:57

think that will have an impact on risk

10:59

premiums I think at the moment what

11:00

market participants are really looking

11:01

at is is this going to translate through

11:04

to things that affect economic growth

11:05

and activity particularly energy supply

11:07

chains you know so far I think one of

11:09

the reasons why markets are reacting the

11:11

way they are is they're encouraged that

11:14

there's you know strong support for

11:17

trying to ensure that doesn't happen but

11:19

it's uncertain You don't know and um and

11:21

we'll see in the long run for portfolio

11:24

allocation and I know Peter Oppenheimer

11:26

Shahim Mosari needed a call for our

11:29

wealth clients. You know if you have

11:30

portfolio allocation there's nobody

11:32

that's saying you should change your

11:33

fundamental portfolio allocation because

11:35

of what's going on. But for traders and

11:37

day-to-day market participants that

11:39

think about risk premia you know every

11:40

single day. Obviously they're watching

11:42

very closely.

11:43

>> What about for people that run big major

11:45

global banks like yours? Right. Do you

11:47

worry about the lack of predictability

11:48

when it comes to policy, when it comes

11:49

to how this potentially ends and when it

11:52

ends? What's going on with your Middle

11:54

East operations, for example?

11:55

>> I I I worry about a lot of things. We

11:58

run a big global business. We have an

11:59

extraordinary team. And, you know, I

12:02

think one of the things that we have to

12:04

accept is the world is a very

12:05

complicated place. There's always a lot

12:07

of uncertainty. There's always a lot of

12:09

nuance. Um but we have you know base

12:12

beliefs and how economies will perform

12:14

how the world will evolve and you know

12:16

we operate around that but we always are

12:18

prepared to risk manage and think about

12:20

downside risks and I think one of the

12:22

things you have to do when you run a big

12:23

large financial institution is that when

12:26

you know facts change or risks come up

12:28

you've always got to be prepared to

12:29

pivot to shift to derisk and you know we

12:32

run our business you know that way

12:33

always we run a big balance sheet and we

12:35

you know we think about that every day

12:36

but there's there's nothing while these

12:38

are very very significant events and I

12:40

don't want to diminish them in any

12:41

stretch. You know, we've operated the

12:43

firm through lots of very significant

12:45

events year in year out and that's

12:47

that's part of what we do.

12:48

>> Is it business as normal then for say

12:50

your offices in Saudi Arabia? Is there

12:52

still travel going on? What's the

12:53

communication with clients?

12:55

>> That's that is complex. We have we've

12:57

got a significant number of people um in

13:00

um you know in those Middle East

13:01

countries and obviously first and

13:03

foremost we're concerned with their

13:04

safety um and you know we're trying to

13:07

do everything we can to support them and

13:08

their families. I would not say you know

13:10

it's business as usual in those markets.

13:13

you know, all those markets for all

13:14

businesses, you know, are operating work

13:16

from home and and you know, stay safe as

13:19

a first priority. And so, we'll just

13:20

have to watch closely, you know, how

13:22

things play out and um, you know, we're

13:24

very very focused on making sure our

13:26

people and their families are safe and

13:28

sound. And at the moment, that's our

13:29

primary focus in that part of the world.

13:30

>> Do you think there is a bit of an

13:32

existential cloud over Dubai as a

13:33

financial center now? Well, you know, I

13:36

do think safety and security, you know,

13:37

matters and I I I wouldn't say I I think

13:41

it's a little bit premature to talk

13:42

about existential clouds. Um, but, you

13:46

know, if you're living and operating in

13:47

a place and you didn't anticipate this,

13:49

um, it's quite scary and it's quite

13:51

unsettling. Um, and so, as I said, our

13:53

primary focus is on the safety and

13:55

security of our people there and we're

13:56

we're working very hard to make sure

13:58

that we're protecting them and their

13:59

families.

13:59

>> It's not as though the background prior

14:01

to this conflict was was crystal clear,

14:04

right? We just came off really trying to

14:05

work out what the AI scare trade was

14:07

going to be like. Do you still think

14:10

that when it comes to that narrative of

14:12

sustainability of, you know, I know

14:13

Jamie Diamond said there's some players

14:15

doing dumb things, for example, is that

14:17

does that still have further to go?

14:18

>> Um, I'm I'm not sure I understood the

14:21

question exactly. Are you you talking

14:22

about kind of AI investment, you know,

14:24

growth? Look, AI is a fabulous fabulous

14:27

incredible technology that is going to

14:28

drive massive productivity gains through

14:31

society. There's a lot of capital being

14:33

deployed to grow AI capabilities around

14:35

the world. Some of that capital is going

14:37

to get reasonable returns. Some of that

14:39

capital is not. They're going to be

14:40

winners. They're going to be losers as

14:42

within any technology super cycle. I

14:45

think we're early in that process. But I

14:48

think it's exciting and I actually look

14:50

at the glass being half full. It doesn't

14:51

mean that there won't be, you know,

14:53

capital that's burned, companies that

14:55

don't work out, but I think overall the

14:56

benefits to enterprise productivity, you

14:59

know, the economy broadly as this

15:01

technology gets developed and deployed

15:03

is going to be quite exciting. And I'm

15:05

looking at the optimism of, you know,

15:07

what's ahead from all of this and of

15:08

course trying to manage the risk and

15:09

downside and speed bumps that will

15:11

inevitably come along the way.

15:12

>> I like that earlier said, you know, in

15:14

your job you worry about a lot of

15:15

things, right? Trade, tariffs, US policy

15:18

is obviously one of them. I think this

15:19

is the first time we've spoken to you

15:20

since the Supreme Court passed down

15:22

their judgment. Does the further lack of

15:24

predictability on trade policy? Is that

15:26

also a concern when it comes to business

15:28

sentiment? When it comes to your views

15:30

on how the US economy is going to cope?

15:32

>> I you know I think uncertainty does

15:34

affect business sentiment broadly. But I

15:36

just say I don't think that I don't

15:38

think that at the moment US trade policy

15:40

is that uncertain. I you know I think

15:42

this administration has been clear about

15:45

how they intend to drive a trade policy.

15:48

I think the Supreme Court decision

15:49

affects a uh certain discharge of

15:54

tariffs into the economy, but there's

15:56

certainly other avenues for the

15:57

president. I think the president's made

15:58

quite clear, you know, how he thinks

16:00

about tariff and trade. And I think

16:01

while this administration is in place,

16:03

that is going to be a construct that we

16:04

have to operate in. Of course, if there

16:07

could be more there could be more

16:08

certainty around exactly how that looks.

16:11

And I think the important thing is how

16:13

it will look in longer perpetuity. You

16:16

know, of course the market would

16:17

appreciate that, but I think the market

16:18

operates knowing that there's a level

16:20

uncertainty around trade and trade

16:21

policy that that we just have to adapt

16:23

to and we have to live with.

16:24

>> I wanted to get a bit more on why you're

16:25

here, for example, in beautiful Sydney.

16:28

Do times like this of of increased

16:30

global uncertainty. Does that make a a

16:32

relatively more idiosyncratic market

16:34

like Australia more interesting?

16:36

>> Well, Australia's always been an

16:37

interesting market. We have 400 people

16:38

here. There are a lot of very very

16:39

important, you know, companies in

16:42

Australia. We have a good wealth

16:43

business in Australia. Um, you know,

16:45

Australia is an important market and an

16:46

important economy, not just for the

16:48

world, but also for Goldman Sachs. You

16:49

know, any market, any economy that's

16:51

important is important for Goldman Sachs

16:52

given our global footprint. I try to get

16:54

here about once a year. Um I try to do

16:57

it around an event like this. So we've

16:58

got a lot of our clients brought

17:00

together first of all for this

17:01

conference. Um but this has always been

17:04

you know this has always been an

17:05

important market an important economy

17:06

for Goldman Sachs and you know I I think

17:09

that's consistent you know in in any

17:11

environment. So I was here the same week

17:13

last week and I'm excited to be back

17:14

again this year.

17:16

>> What else are you excited about around

17:17

the region? I know as a house view is

17:20

very bullish on China. It's of course

17:22

National People's Congress week as well.

17:24

What's your feel about that market given

17:26

some of the crosswinds on trade, on

17:28

tech, on ge geopolitics?

17:30

>> Yeah, China's China's one of the largest

17:31

China is one of the largest economies in

17:32

the world. It's going to continue to be

17:34

one of the largest economies in the

17:35

world. You know, at the moment, I'm very

17:36

focused on the bilateral relationship

17:38

between the US and China. I'm looking

17:40

forward to President Trump's visit with

17:43

President Xi. It's planned for later

17:45

this month, the beginning of April.

17:46

It'll be interesting to see what comes

17:48

out of that and you know whether or not

17:50

China and the US can make more progress

17:52

you know on their bilateral

17:54

relationship. I think that's important

17:55

for growth in the world and I think it's

17:56

important for both the US and China and

17:58

I think at the moment that's fragile and

18:00

so I'm very curious to see you know how

18:01

that progresses. In the meantime Chinese

18:04

markets have done very well in the last

18:06

12 months. That's increased capital

18:07

flows you know into the region. We

18:09

obviously participate in that, but we're

18:11

going to watch those bilateral meetings

18:13

and progress in the bilateral

18:14

relationship very closely.

18:16

>> What would you like to come out in terms

18:17

of deliverables from

18:19

>> I'd like to see, you know, more

18:21

certainty and clarity around um how the

18:23

bilateral relationship will work going

18:25

forward. I think there are things that

18:26

the US wants and things that China

18:28

wants. I'd like more clarity around what

18:30

that's going to look like, you know, not

18:31

just in 2026, but you know, over the

18:34

coming years. And I think that's still

18:35

relatively uncertain.

18:36

>> What are we not talking about enough? Um

18:38

I know we've talked a little bit about

18:39

private credit. You don't think it's

18:41

sort of a systemic risk at this point?

18:44

>> Um I I think credit formation

18:49

um around the world is really correlated

18:52

to you know economic growth and economic

18:54

activity.

18:56

I do think that we've gone if I just

18:58

look at the US market which is obviously

19:00

you know a very when you talk about

19:01

private credit a very very large market

19:02

in the context of private credit we've

19:04

gone a long time without a credit cycle.

19:06

We've gone a long time without a

19:07

recession. I do think when you have

19:09

these longdated cycles, there are

19:11

variety of things that happen. One,

19:13

credit spreads narrow. Two, lending

19:16

standards, people have more capital to

19:18

play. They get aggressive. Lending

19:19

standards deteriorate a little bit. Due

19:21

diligence standards deteriorate. And so,

19:23

we're watching very closely to see if

19:25

there's been a little bit too much

19:27

aggression, frothiness in those markets.

19:29

But fundamentally when you look at the

19:30

underlying credit portfolios

19:32

particularly below investment grade

19:34

credit while there have been a bunch of

19:36

idiosyncratic events where there have

19:37

been problems the broad portfolios are

19:40

performing reasonably well. Why are they

19:42

performing reasonably well? Because the

19:44

economy is doing fine and it's very hard

19:46

to have broad underperformance in a

19:48

broad diversified credit portfolio if

19:50

the economy is doing well. When we do

19:52

have a slowdown in the economy you will

19:54

see it. I think because of the length of

19:56

the cycle, you probably will find places

19:58

where the losses are higher than people

19:59

expect. We're very very focused on back

20:02

leverage and things that could affect or

20:05

amplify in a more difficult economic

20:07

environment, you know, credit

20:08

deployment. But at the moment, when you

20:10

look broadly across portfolios, we're

20:12

not seeing things that are super

20:13

concerning. That's a completely

20:16

different issue than retail

20:18

participation and retail investors

20:19

wanting liquidity from what are

20:21

fundamentally illquid products. And so

20:24

that's getting a lot of attention, but

20:25

that's different than the underlying

20:26

credit portfolios. But I do think that

20:29

when there is a slowdown in the economy

20:30

or we do get to a place where we have uh

20:33

you know a recession, you're you're

20:34

going to see losses in credit portfolios

20:37

and you know those losses could be

20:38

meaningful. But you know we'll watch

20:40

that closely while the economy is

20:41

chugging along. You know that's that's

20:43

not the primary focus. That was Goldman

20:45

Sachs CEO David Solomon speaking with

20:47

Bloomberg's Heidi Strad Watts at the

20:49

Goldman Sachs Australia Week

20:51

Alternatives and Macro Summit, bringing

20:53

you their conversation here on the

20:55

Daybreak Asia podcast.

20:58

Thanks for listening to today's episode

21:00

of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition

21:02

podcast. Each weekday, we look at the

21:05

stories shaping markets, finance, and

21:07

geopolitics in the Asia-Pacific. You can

21:09

find us on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg

21:12

Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere

21:14

else you listen. Join us again tomorrow

21:16

for insight on the market moves from

21:19

Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia.

21:22

I'm Doug Krer, and this is Bloomberg.

Interactive Summary

This episode of Daybreak Asia covers the impact of Middle Eastern conflicts on oil prices and the dramatic volatility in the South Korean equity market. It explores China's modest economic growth targets and defense spending plans revealed at the National People's Congress, as well as an interview with Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon regarding market complacency, the AI investment cycle, and risks within the private credit sector.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts