HomeVideos

Q&A with Tim — The Upcoming AI Tsunami and Building Offline Advantage

Now Playing

Q&A with Tim — The Upcoming AI Tsunami and Building Offline Advantage

Transcript

1918 segments

0:00

I think courage is learned. You have to

0:03

practice it. And

0:06

if you're not afraid, it's not courage,

0:09

right? If someone's fearless, they're by

0:12

definition not using courage. You have

0:14

to be afraid of something. I think you

0:16

have to prove to yourself that you have

0:18

it. And the only way your subconscious

0:21

will believe it is if you are actually

0:23

doing things that are uncomfortable.

0:26

That's it.

0:28

which means it is learnable. Hello

0:32

everybody. Thanks for making it. We got

0:34

lots of questions that were

0:37

presubmitted. There's a lot to cover and

0:40

I will begin with saying there are many

0:43

many questions about AI. It is certainly

0:46

the topic of the hour and

0:50

I would like to provide a few caveats

0:53

and I'll do that by leading in with a

0:57

question. How many of you invested in or

1:00

even know of Diamond Rio? Diamond Rio.

1:04

Anyone? MPman F10. Come on now. You guys

1:09

must remember MPMAN F10. These are MP3

1:12

players that predated the iPod.

1:15

And

1:16

Jobs famously changed it from Speeds and

1:20

Feeds into 10,00 Songs in Your Pocket.

1:23

Also had the industrial design,

1:25

engineering, supply chain wizardry along

1:28

with his marketing genius, of course.

1:30

All to bring to bear on this thing

1:32

called the iPod, which then produced,

1:35

you guessed it, some of you whizzed,

1:38

gray-haired folks, but youngsters do not

1:40

realizing iPod leads to podcasting. Yes,

1:45

that was the genesis of this podcasting

1:47

term. And the reason I bring this up is

1:50

that I am not I do not consider myself a

1:54

bleeding edge investor or even in a lot

1:59

of instances a bleeding edge user. I

2:02

like to be on the dull edge. Um, I would

2:05

say that the iPod is a great example of

2:08

that because if you looked at some of

2:10

the technological trend lines, you

2:12

looked at a few different pieces of

2:13

hardware that had had somewhat derisked

2:17

solid state MP3 players, the timing was

2:20

right for something to be taken from

2:24

very very niche and unwieldy to

2:27

mainstream. And certainly we've seen

2:30

that unfold. And I view AI very

2:33

similarly and in some respects

2:37

it is very amendable to that approach

2:40

because things are changing so

2:42

incredibly quickly. If you hated a model

2:46

3 weeks ago it might do exactly what you

2:48

need today. And with all of that I just

2:52

want to say I do not view myself as an

2:55

AI expert. I think if you're looking for

2:58

someone who seems to be the Nostradamus

3:01

of AI, you should read up on Leopold

3:04

Ashin Brena.

3:06

You can look up situational awareness

3:08

the decade ahead. It was penned and

3:10

published online June 2024. And the

3:15

number of actual hits, predictive hits

3:18

that Leopold had is staggering. It is

3:23

just really about as close to

3:27

Clairvoyant as

3:30

you could possibly be. So, Leopold Ashen

3:32

Brener and you should check him out if

3:36

you're looking for what's coming. If

3:38

you're looking for what I have observed

3:41

personally as a muggle, someone who is

3:44

non-technical, I'm not writing white

3:45

papers, but I get to watch a very large

3:48

audience and I have a lot of friends I

3:51

can lean on, many of whom are technical,

3:54

I can fill you in. All right, that's a

3:56

whole lot of preamble. Let's hop into

3:58

it. All right, first question is from

4:02

Hugo. In a world full of tools, systems

4:04

and AI, what human abilities or habits

4:06

are becoming more valuable, not less.

4:08

So, I'll try to keep this pretty short.

4:10

I would say the relational, the tactile,

4:13

anything IRL in real life

4:17

that can be extended also to, for

4:20

instance, in my case,formational

4:23

advantage, offlineformational

4:25

advantage. A lot of the LLMs are slicing

4:28

and dicing the internet. One might argue

4:30

all of them are doing that. And whether

4:34

you are looking at longevity in

4:37

professional terms, if you're looking at

4:39

longevity in creative terms,

4:42

I think putting on the lens of looking

4:46

at what you can do in IRL that currently

4:49

now that certainly robotics are

4:53

on the edge of some type of Cambrian

4:57

explosion. So, who knows? Maybe it's

4:58

iRoot 3 years from now. But for now, the

5:01

kind of offline

5:04

differentiator is a big deal. And I

5:07

would say the relational side certainly

5:10

the harnessing of awe, wonder, etc.

5:13

nature immersion, which sounds like I'm

5:15

suggesting everybody disappear off into

5:17

a commune in the woods or become

5:19

homesteaders or something. That's not

5:20

what I'm saying. But for instance, the

5:22

fact that I have people I can text for

5:27

very narrow types of expertise

5:31

even though they have the access of a

5:34

generalist allows me to have

5:35

anformational advantage because none of

5:38

that is online. Conversely, if you're

5:41

using Chat GBT or Claude to try to

5:45

assess a given public company as a good

5:48

or bad investment or somewhere in

5:49

between, rest assured that many, many

5:52

people, perhaps even millions of people

5:54

have already done this and therefore

5:56

you're going to be reading more or less

5:58

the same thing as many others.

6:02

So, that's my stab at that first

6:05

question. A lot of this is going to

6:08

boomerang back in fusion notes. Let me

6:11

take a sip of my sipping ketones. Excuse

6:13

me.

6:16

This was sent to me by a scientist and

6:18

he was like, "Mix 10 milliliters into

6:20

250 milliliters of water. Do not chug in

6:22

all caps written with a marker on this

6:25

experimental

6:27

container of ketones." So, we'll see. If

6:29

I start seizuring, it'll make for a

6:31

great short on social media. All right,

6:35

next question I'm going to take a stab

6:38

at is from Jeff. With a pre-throat

6:42

clearing, not financial advice in

6:44

quotation marks disclaimer already

6:46

granted to you by virtue of this

6:47

question. Where should a small investor

6:49

be looking to invest in public markets

6:50

as AI continues to eat our white collar

6:52

jobs in the coming months and years? All

6:54

right, I know I indirectly already gave

6:57

the caveat.

6:59

I am not giving any investment advice

7:02

because that is a terrible thing to do

7:05

if you're not registered financial

7:07

adviser and all that stuff. I'm none of

7:09

those things. So, this is forformational

7:11

purposes only.

7:13

Number one, you shouldn't gamble,

7:16

and I do kind of view it as gambling, or

7:18

invest anything you cannot afford to

7:20

lose completely because AI is moving so

7:23

incredibly quickly. And there's a lot of

7:26

whipssaw reactivity in the markets. Chat

7:30

GPT comes out with something that

7:33

connects to some type of industry in in

7:36

an oblique way and suddenly

7:39

six public stocks lose billions and tens

7:42

of billions of dollars of market cap.

7:43

You know, there's there's a lot of

7:44

craziness. So, as certainly has been

7:48

said before me, the markets can remain

7:51

irrational longer than you can remain

7:53

solvent. So, don't play with anything

7:57

you're not willing to lose. There are

7:59

people talking about what's been termed

8:01

halo trades, trying to look for things

8:04

that are less likely to get disrupted or

8:07

destroyed. Kind of the Warren Buffett

8:09

approach to non- tech investing

8:13

by and large, right? Seize, candy,

8:15

railways, etc.

8:17

But I would say that

8:21

initially

8:22

sparked by conversations with Kevin

8:24

Rose, and I hesitate to even mention

8:27

this, but I do think Google is in a very

8:29

interesting position. Alphabet, the the

8:32

artist formerly known as Google,

8:34

Alphabet is in an interesting position

8:36

to in some respects kind of own the full

8:40

stack. engineers aren't going to like

8:41

that I'm using that term, but they have

8:43

distribution. They have hardware, right?

8:47

In terms of TPUs, they have

8:51

incredible unparalleled access to

8:54

information. They've got Demis and Deep

8:57

Mind internally. They've got the ability

9:00

to spin things out like Whimo. There's

9:03

just so much going on within Alphabet

9:07

that I find it

9:09

very

9:11

fun and terrifying to take a close look

9:13

at. And I say that also because it is

9:18

incredibly it is completely unclear I

9:20

would say how exactly

9:23

Google compensates for or plans for

9:28

shifting to some type of ad revenue from

9:33

AI generated responses or an AI based

9:37

LLM based platform

9:39

versus what we use today in the browser

9:42

right and that's inevitably going to

9:43

happen. So, the bull case is very

9:47

exciting for Google and the bare case is

9:49

also

9:51

pretty compelling, I would say. But, as

9:54

I'm looking at stuff out there,

9:57

I tend not to screw around in the public

10:00

markets. I just don't feel like I have

10:02

any advantage whatsoever compared to

10:04

everybody else who's fine slicing

10:07

things. But in conversations with

10:10

friends and looking at it pretty

10:12

closely, I do think Alphabet's pretty

10:14

interesting.

10:16

So there you have it. I'm not saying

10:18

invest in it. You could really lose

10:21

money and it might be that they lose for

10:23

a while until they win. It could be they

10:26

lose completely. So there is that. Next

10:29

question is from David. What are the top

10:30

three things you should never use AI

10:32

for? I would say any skill you want to

10:34

preserve in your head,

10:37

you should probably not use AI for. So I

10:41

use AI for editing. Right now, you very

10:45

quickly end up on a slippery slope. So

10:47

if I create a rough draft, as I did with

10:50

the self-help trap, for instance, I

10:53

would then take that, feed it into these

10:55

models, and give them a personality.

10:58

Right? You are an editor from the New

11:01

Yorker. this is your name, right? Maybe

11:03

it's a famous editor or the person who

11:05

worked with Robert Carroll, whatever it

11:06

might be. I mean, that's again, not to

11:09

compare myself to those people, but I

11:10

want a good editor.

11:12

Give me feedback on this rough draft.

11:16

What the model will do because they want

11:18

to keep you using the model of course is

11:19

it will give you all the feedback and

11:20

then it will say, would you like me to

11:22

incorporate all these changes and draft

11:25

a version that uses all these things?

11:28

And that's where I have deliberately

11:31

hesitated. I've also played around with

11:33

it and frankly it's very good. But

11:36

therein lies the danger because if you

11:39

want to preserve your ability to

11:41

synthesize and this will tie into

11:43

questions shortly about creativity. I do

11:47

think that

11:50

it makes some sense

11:53

to exercise caution and that there are

11:57

already scientists and researchers

11:58

looking at the negative cognitive

12:01

impacts of depending on AI much like

12:05

your ability to navigate is probably

12:07

deteriorated since using Google maps and

12:10

I would say net net each individual is

12:13

more enhanced

12:15

augmented using these tools. But if if

12:18

you do want to keep certain muscles

12:21

strong and able, that's where I would

12:24

hesitate. And look, you can always

12:26

change your mind later, but if you lose

12:28

it, it's a hell of a lot harder to

12:29

reclaim it. So that's where I am at the

12:32

moment.

12:33

Oh, CJ, CJ's question. Do you, Tim,

12:37

think AI is capable of creativity in the

12:39

sense that humans are? What I would

12:41

argue here, and I've read all these

12:43

books on creativity? I've looked at some

12:46

research which tends to be pretty soft I

12:49

would say if I were being less generous

12:52

handwavy about creativity or flow. I

12:55

mean I feel like a lot of these are

12:57

poorly defined. So, we could even go so

13:00

far as to say, I don't think we

13:02

understand what creativity is in humans,

13:06

right?

13:09

Could machines have the equivalent of

13:12

the muse visit them? Is there a way to

13:14

engineer that when we create these

13:17

metaphors for ourselves? Are we really

13:19

just using poetry or abstraction to try

13:23

to verbalize something that's actually

13:25

pretty discreet and replicable if you

13:28

just operate from a sort of bottoms up

13:30

approach with reinforcement learning and

13:32

this that and the other thing? Maybe. I

13:34

just don't know. Right.

13:36

The second question the CJ had though is

13:37

the one that I think is worth not

13:40

spending more time on, but I would

13:42

underline this because I underline it

13:44

for myself. As a writer and with the

13:46

explosion of AI generated content out

13:48

there now, how do you rise above the

13:49

noise? All right, it's pretty simple and

13:54

I will I will answer that by way of a

13:57

story. I was spending time, a little bit

14:00

of time, drinking a Paloma

14:02

with a very well-known photographer. He

14:06

is one of the most commercially

14:07

successful photographers in the world.

14:10

And

14:12

he was laughing and telling a story of

14:15

how he gets approached by

14:18

photographers. They could be amateur,

14:19

but very often they're professionals who

14:21

want to know how they can become better

14:24

photographers. and they're asking all

14:25

these gear related questions and his

14:28

answer is just put more interesting

14:30

stuff in front of the camera. Make

14:33

what's in front of the camera more

14:34

interesting. And the equivalent of that,

14:36

at least for me as a non-fiction writer,

14:39

is doing interesting things. Go out in

14:42

the world, do interesting things or

14:45

observe interesting things in real life

14:48

and write about those things, do

14:49

experiments, etc. I mean, there are many

14:52

ways to skin this cat. It could be,

14:55

let's just say, Travels with Charlie.

14:57

Amazing book by John Steinbeck. Road

14:59

trip in a makeshift RV with his dog

15:02

Charlie. All right. Incredible book. And

15:06

as it stands right now, I think it's a

15:08

ways off that a humanoid robot is going

15:12

to get into a car with a canine

15:14

companion, robotic or flesh and bone,

15:18

and do something like this, right?

15:20

Anything that is analysis based is

15:23

relegated to the machines at this point.

15:25

They are so good. The AI, broadly

15:29

speaking, LLMs being one manifestation

15:32

of that are just too good. They're so

15:34

good. And we'll talk about how I use

15:36

some of those tools a little bit later.

15:38

So do interesting things and write about

15:41

them. That's the short answer. All

15:43

right. There are certain questions where

15:46

I don't feel like I have good answers or

15:48

informed answers. I could make up some

15:51

[ __ ] and spin a yarn and make

15:53

something that seems to hold water, but

15:55

I'm not going to do that. So, I'm going

15:56

to I apologize if I'm skipping some of

15:58

your questions, but I don't want to give

15:59

you any type of false confidence in my

16:02

answers. All right. So, this is a

16:04

question from Manneil. How are you

16:06

keeping up with all the new AI tools?

16:09

Where do you keep your focus? Have you

16:11

set up Open Claw? And if so, what's your

16:13

workflow? Okay. So, I am not keeping up

16:17

with AI developments. People who do this

16:20

full-time as the seuite executive teams

16:24

of the best known companies in the world

16:29

have trouble keeping up. So, I am

16:30

definitely not keeping up or trying to

16:32

keep up. I feel like as soon as I'm

16:34

doing that, I've already lost. So, it's

16:37

not how do I win the game, it's choosing

16:39

the right game, which might sound

16:41

cliched,

16:43

but does that mean I'm ignoring

16:45

everything? No. With something like Open

16:48

Claw, due to security concerns, I let

16:49

friends of mine

16:52

be the first elect to be some of the

16:54

first monkeys shot into space. So, I'm

16:56

going to read from a friend of mine who

16:59

I texted, right? This is

17:02

about this question right before we

17:05

started recording. All right. So about

17:08

open claw, he played around with

17:09

openclaw. His name is Chris Hutchkins.

17:11

He's been on the podcast. He has a

17:13

podcast called All the Hacks which he

17:18

has used to explore some really

17:21

fascinating stuff. If you're a points

17:23

nerd or like travel, it's a good one. He

17:25

goes a lot further than that. But one of

17:27

his episodes is, "I built an AI

17:30

assistant that works while I sleep." And

17:31

he explains what he did with OpenClaw.

17:34

However, here's what he texted to me. In

17:36

the last week, Claude's desktop app has

17:39

shipped a bunch of features that do a

17:40

lot of what OpenClaw can do in a more

17:42

userfriendly way. Schedule tasks, remote

17:45

access, etc. So, that could be a good

17:47

beginner way to start. But with all AI

17:49

projects, I suggest going in with a use

17:51

case. This is again Chris texting. And

17:55

then he documented his whole journey

17:58

with building a basic app through

17:59

OpenClaw, etc., etc., etc., and leveling

18:02

up his knowledge each time. We'll link

18:04

to that episode in the show notes. Can

18:06

find it pretty easily. Here's what he

18:08

added to that. For OpenClaw, I'd say you

18:10

absolutely don't need a fancy computer.

18:11

I ran it on a 2012 Mac Mini for the

18:14

first few weeks, but if you have an old

18:17

computer and you want to set it up and

18:18

test it out at home, great. But until

18:20

you feel confident, one, don't give it

18:22

access to things like email, credit

18:23

cards, etc. And there are some

18:26

hilariously tragic stories of this gone

18:28

arry that you can find on your own. Two,

18:30

that okay, that was my director's

18:32

commentary. Two, don't install random

18:35

skills you find on the internet. Three,

18:36

go to claude chatgpt, etc. and get

18:39

advice about how to set it up securely.

18:40

Four, every time I've gotten stuck, I've

18:42

been able to use claud code in the Open

18:44

Claw directory to fix things. So, there

18:46

you have. That is by virtue of texting

18:49

Chris Hutchkins an answer on open claw

18:54

and what I also do is give some examples

18:57

of internally how we're using stuff. So

19:00

I have an employee who is very

19:04

interested in these tools and I have

19:07

wanted to encourage that as long as

19:09

we're not completely demolishing our own

19:12

security from the inside out. So he's

19:14

played a lot with cloud code and other

19:16

things and I asked him for some use

19:18

cases that I could share with you. So I

19:22

will pull those up right now. All right.

19:25

And this alludes to a term defines a

19:27

term that Chris used. All right. So this

19:29

is my employee. One thing I did earlier

19:31

today was build a skill quote unquote

19:33

skill. Fancy name for a text file in

19:35

this case inside claw that will generate

19:37

the PDF and word versions of an IO.

19:40

That's an insertion order for a podcast

19:42

sponsor. If I only give it the missing

19:45

items from the IO, for instance, company

19:47

name, official company name, da da da

19:48

da, it fills it out automatically and

19:50

creates a PDF. It's a small save in

19:52

time, but this is something he repeats a

19:54

lot. And there may be a better way to do

19:56

it, like a template, hello sign or

19:58

something. I also have been working on a

20:01

project doing a 20 year roughly 20-year

20:04

retrospective deep dive and analysis of

20:08

all my angel investing, right? Are the

20:10

stories I tell myself about my rapport

20:13

card accurate? Are they completely

20:15

false? Are they somewhere in between?

20:17

Etc., etc. And for that project, coming

20:21

back to his uh text here, it's been

20:24

really crazy to just tell it quote

20:25

here's an API key and it will figure out

20:28

how to connect to a given service like

20:30

Gmail. And if you have an API key for a

20:32

product, you can easily start using it

20:34

in Claude as it will simply write itself

20:35

a script.

20:38

And one of the wildest things, this is

20:40

I'm paraphrasing here, but it can ingest

20:42

an absurd amount of data and convert it

20:44

into something useful. And it can also

20:47

enrich data in some very interesting

20:49

ways. Right? So if I'm trying to figure

20:50

out, okay, right, via email

20:54

introductions, who introduced the

20:56

winners, who introduced the losers, who

20:58

introduced the zombies that just can't

21:00

seem to die after years of struggling

21:03

or take off for that matter. And then is

21:08

there a signal say looking at the

21:11

education levels, the schools, the alma

21:14

modders of founders, right? What about

21:16

single founders versus two founders

21:19

versus three founders? Things like this

21:21

location, geography, blah blah blah blah

21:24

blah blah blah, right? Is there any

21:25

signal to any of this?

21:28

Another example which might apply to

21:30

more of you, the Google calendar

21:32

integration has also been helpful. In

21:34

other words, updating a calendar entry

21:36

from claude or creating multiple at a

21:39

time, right? So using claude to calendar

21:42

entries. Now, in my case, I have a bunch

21:45

of different calendars and different

21:47

people on my team add to different

21:49

calendars.

21:50

One thing that helps us a lot, and maybe

21:53

someday I'll share this. for right now.

21:55

I I'm probably not going to, but I have

21:57

a document, a Google doc that is the ten

22:00

commandments of

22:02

my calendar basically. And it's rules

22:06

around formatting, what to include,

22:08

etc., right? Secondary points of

22:10

contact, cell phones, time zone always,

22:13

right? Indicated in the headline, etc.,

22:16

etc., etc. There are lots of different

22:18

rules, but he can use that or other

22:21

people on my team can use that to then

22:24

automatically check calendar entries

22:26

through claude code and fix them as

22:28

needed. Right? So, some people have

22:30

joked that, you know, the 4-hour work

22:32

week should be rewritten as the the

22:34

4minute work week. I think there's

22:36

something to it, right? And there's a

22:38

temptation to do an entire section on

22:40

the use of AI in place of virtual

22:42

assistants and so on. The problem with

22:43

that is that

22:46

as soon as the ink had metaphorically

22:49

dried on that paper, it would already be

22:50

out of date. So, I'm not going to do

22:52

that, I don't think. So, there you have

22:54

it, right? And the API key is is a

22:58

really important component to all of

22:59

this. Also, and I'm sure some of you

23:02

have figured this out, but with cloud

23:04

code and Chris Hutchkins alluded to this

23:06

as well, for debugging, for instance, we

23:09

did a website redesign and there was an

23:10

issue with a form. no idea why, right?

23:13

And we wanted to fix it very quickly and

23:16

we weren't sure how long it would take

23:17

for support to get back to us. So, he

23:20

was able to dump all the code at the

23:22

time into the model and just figured out

23:24

how to fix it. And there are many, many,

23:26

many other examples of that. Yeah, it's

23:30

and many of these things are not quantum

23:32

leaps, but they are much like anything

23:36

else just automating little paper cuts

23:38

so they don't add up ultimately to a

23:40

huge gash in your calendar. Okay, back

23:45

to work. Tim Ferrris.

23:49

All right, let's look at other things.

23:51

This is a question from Becky.

23:53

What would you say to someone who wants

23:54

a career job? Sometimes I feel I get

23:57

caught in a loop of same pay range, same

24:00

experiences, same mid-level

24:01

opportunities. How can I start

24:02

increasing my income opportunities and

24:05

skills this year? Okay, so I reached out

24:08

as I often do, texted a couple of people

24:11

about this because they're actually this

24:14

is going to be a huge huge mega mega

24:18

meta problem for people moving forward

24:21

and it's going to increasingly I think

24:24

be pervasive. people are going to wonder

24:27

what they should do next, right? Which

24:29

then informs kind of upskilling

24:32

and and there's a later question, so I

24:35

might as well explore it here related to

24:37

encodings. In the Jim Collins episode, a

24:39

question around encodings, and I might

24:40

come back to that, but suffice to say,

24:43

some of these personality tests and

24:46

things like any are actually very

24:48

helpful and things like strengthfinder

24:50

and so on. And there are two startups

24:53

I'm involved with because I recognize

24:56

just through questions like this, right,

24:58

from Becky which are kind of the canary

25:01

in the coal mine. It's not really a

25:03

canary in a coal mine. It's like there

25:04

was one whisper, now there are 10, then

25:08

there were 100, now there are thousand,

25:09

right? This question is coming up more

25:10

and more and a lot of folks are going to

25:14

in one way or another need to zig and

25:16

zag even though they might not expect it

25:18

right now. And a lot of that's going to

25:21

be due to AI job displacement. So the

25:25

two startups that and again I mentioned

25:28

that I'm an investor in these so I'm

25:30

biased but the reason that I invested in

25:32

these is to answer this question or more

25:35

specifically to help people answer this

25:37

question. So the first one is called apt

25:40

apt and you can check that out at

25:43

triapp.ai.

25:45

So triapp rap.ai.

25:48

I had the co-founder

25:52

and CEO create a code. So if any of you

25:55

guys want to try it, ultimately it does

25:58

cost money to get all the results and to

26:00

get this sort of AIG guided mentor

26:04

around your strengths and so on which

26:06

you discover or uncover through the

26:09

process of going through this. But you

26:11

can get 50% off with Tim50. That's the

26:15

code to use. Tim50.

26:17

All right. All right. So if you want to

26:18

take a look at that, you can check it

26:19

out. The other is OBO. So obtly

26:26

focused on accelerating skill

26:28

acquisition and learning. So I think

26:31

these two actually go together really

26:33

well. Right? You could use apt first and

26:36

then OBO. And I've played around with

26:38

both. There's a lot that's going to be

26:41

coming into both of these, but might be

26:44

worth checking out. Honestly, if I were

26:46

to tell you to go buy what color is my

26:48

parachute or something, you might glean

26:50

something from that. But I feel like in

26:53

very dynamic times with so much shifting

26:58

sand with respect to technology, you

27:00

probably need something a bit more or

27:02

benefit from something that is more

27:04

dynamic and personalized from the get-

27:08

go as opposed to you having to do lots

27:10

and lots of heavy lifting with a fixed

27:12

format. So, that's what I would say,

27:14

Becky. And definitely let me know what

27:17

you think because if something's broken

27:19

or if you love something or you hate

27:20

something, all that stuff can get fixed.

27:23

All right, next one. This is from Jeff

27:26

and we will do some live questions.

27:30

These ketones are actually doing

27:31

something, which is good cuz it's 400

27:34

p.m. and I don't want to have any

27:35

caffeine.

27:37

Yeah, fortunately, it doesn't taste too

27:40

much like jet fuel. All right, let me do

27:43

one more. Jeff, okay, this is the

27:44

question. You've worked across books,

27:46

podcasts, and experiments that each

27:47

attracted their own communities. What

27:49

have you learned about proactively

27:50

shaping a community's culture, not just

27:53

growing an audience? And how has direct

27:56

interaction with people changed the way

27:58

you enter creative flow today? The last

28:01

piece is probably the hardest answer,

28:02

but I can tell you that I think that

28:07

proactively shaping a community's

28:10

culture actually helps you to

28:15

build an audience,

28:17

but to what end, right? Not build an

28:18

audience like, oh, I'm aiming for 2

28:20

million, 3 million, 10 million YouTube

28:22

subscribers. I don't like renting

28:24

audience in a way that's dependent on

28:26

algorithms, right? And you can look at a

28:27

lot of the biggest YouTube channels.

28:29

It's like their average views per video

28:32

have created even though they have huge

28:34

numbers of subscribers. You see that

28:36

with engagement on X and other places.

28:38

However, one thing that never goes out

28:41

of style is 1,000 True Fans by Kevin

28:44

Kelly. You can read it for free at

28:46

kk.org.

28:48

And therefore, I will focus on the

28:52

proactively shaping a community's

28:53

culture. In my case, I think it's pretty

28:56

simple. I treat a closed community like

29:01

I would a dinner party at my house. So

29:04

somebody walks into my house and this is

29:08

a shoes free house, right? Because who

29:11

wants like dog [ __ ] and bubble gum on

29:13

your kitchen floor? I don't. So the

29:15

shoes come off at the door, right? So

29:16

let's say somebody comes in, they're

29:17

like, "No, I'm keeping my boots on."

29:19

They come in tracking mud all over the

29:21

place. They sit down at the dinner

29:22

table. they kick their feet up on the

29:24

table and start calling people [ __ ]

29:26

or something like that person's going to

29:28

get dragged by their hair out and then

29:30

they're never coming back in. Right? So

29:33

that's a bit of an maybe melodramatic

29:36

example, but zero tolerance policy for

29:40

broken windows, right? You know, Malcolm

29:42

Gladwell and others have written about

29:43

this, but it's like when these minor

29:46

infractions are permitted, I'm going to

29:48

pull out a fancy term that tech people

29:50

like, the Overton window.

29:53

Right. This the broadness of what is now

29:56

allowable behavior shifts. Okay? Or I

30:01

shouldn't say shifts. It's a [ __ ]

30:03

window. It's not supposed to get wider

30:04

or shorter, but it moves in a more

30:07

aggressive behavioral direction, right?

30:10

So if you allow minor infractions,

30:11

you're going to get moderate

30:12

infractions. You allow those, you're

30:14

going to get major infractions. So, from

30:17

the very first days of say the blog, the

30:20

the comments section has guidelines and

30:22

it's like remember the Fonza, we're

30:24

going to be cool like that. Like, if

30:25

you're an [ __ ] we're going to boot

30:26

you and blacklist you and you can

30:29

criticize me, but don't be a dick to

30:31

other people. And if you are, you're

30:33

gone. Like, that's zero tolerance. And

30:35

you have to enforce that, right? If you

30:37

don't, people are crafty. They'll learn

30:40

how to manipulate you because you are

30:43

asking to be at least abused by not

30:46

enforcing your own rules. So that's the

30:48

first one. It's just like you have to

30:51

excise the cancers and remove the

30:52

poison. You just have to because the

30:56

default state of pretty much the entire

30:58

internet now because it's been allowed

31:00

and encouraged

31:02

through various gamifications on social

31:04

platforms is just being loud, obnoxious,

31:06

awful. So you have to set rules to to

31:10

counterveail that. Also, and Jeff, I

31:13

think you've experienced this. If if you

31:16

have a private community of 100 people

31:18

or 200 people or 50, doesn't really

31:21

matter, and you charge $5

31:24

a quarter, $5 a year, doesn't really

31:26

matter. But if you have some very

31:29

nominal cost, people opt in who

31:32

generally want to contribute and be in

31:36

an environment of positivity. That's my

31:39

experience generally.

31:41

So having some very very nominal fee at

31:46

the door I think is incredibly helpful.

31:48

Right. And you find that also with

31:51

events. I've done plenty of live events.

31:54

don't really do them anymore for a lot

31:55

of reasons, but

31:57

very very rarely in the past, I would

32:00

throw these live events for like, you

32:02

know, book launch parties, 100 people,

32:03

200. If people can RSVP to an event,

32:07

your abandonment rate or no show rate is

32:10

going to be skyhigh. If you force them

32:13

to pay $1 to hold their spot, suddenly

32:18

the no-show rate goes down to low single

32:21

digits. Right? So, I don't think there's

32:24

any rocket science here, but the tough

32:26

part is being willing to enforce, right?

32:30

And maybe you give someone a two

32:32

strikes, you're out policy, but frankly,

32:34

I find that that can metastasize and for

32:38

instance, I have a lovely dog was a

32:41

stray two months ago, adopted her, and

32:45

she's really smart. She's part

32:49

Anatolian shepherd, it would seem. And

32:51

if she realizes, for instance, that she

32:55

can kind of pit me against my partner

32:59

and that she doesn't actually have to

33:01

listen to sit until the third time.

33:03

She's not going to listen to the first

33:04

two. She'll just stare at you defiantly

33:06

and then sit the third time. Humans are

33:08

the same way. They'll do that, too. If

33:10

they know they have two strikes, you're

33:12

going to get more bad behavior because

33:13

they know they can get away with it

33:14

once.

33:16

All right. So, there you go. And let's

33:20

go to We've got plenty more questions,

33:24

but let's go live to some live

33:28

questions. And I apologize that there's

33:31

so much in the chat, so I'm going to

33:32

have to I'm going to have to Oh, yeah.

33:35

The crown means top fans. All right.

33:36

Well, thank you. Thank you, top fan. All

33:38

right. Let's throw out some live

33:40

questions and I'll give it a shot. If

33:42

you already posted one, please post

33:44

again because I can't I can't scroll up

33:46

and go through hundreds and hundreds and

33:47

hundreds. Favorite color? Green right

33:50

there.

33:52

Green. Green. Green.

33:54

Uh specifically, it's like the color of

33:58

late morning light, like 11:00 a.m.

34:01

sunlight around

34:04

August coming through maple leaves. That

34:07

is the color of this sort of like

34:09

translucent green. All right.

34:13

future of Vlatta. Okay, for those who

34:15

don't know, also Coyote, Coyote

34:19

continues to do really well. I feel like

34:21

I have done mostly what I can do with

34:24

Coyote at this point, and it's sort of

34:27

in steady state. I mean, the reviews on

34:30

Amazon and elsewhere are great. It

34:32

continues to sell well through the

34:35

distribution channels. I wish in

34:37

retrospect earlier on I had really

34:39

focused on fam even though there are

34:42

plenty of adults who enjoy it focusing

34:44

on families that have at least one or

34:46

two kids in that sort of 8 to 15 range

34:50

and that would have helped with escape

34:52

velocity sooner but hindsight 2020 I'm

34:56

really really happy with with how it's

34:58

turned out and then veratta honestly now

35:01

that the AI tools are getting good

35:03

enough

35:05

about 6 months ago ago, I was planning

35:07

on creating a movie trailer for

35:09

effectively a script. I've got the whole

35:11

thing in my head focused on Tyrion. If

35:15

anyone, this is the legend of Cockpunch.

35:17

Now, I think I will, for obvious

35:20

reasons, lean towards legends of Vlatta,

35:23

but focusing on the relationship between

35:26

Tai and his father and all sorts of

35:29

craziness that ensues. So, I've got like

35:31

a whole movie script in my head and

35:33

concept art that I haven't really done

35:35

anything with from some of the top Magic

35:39

the Gathering and DND artists you can

35:42

imagine. So, we'll see. We'll see. I

35:45

could see screwing around with that this

35:48

summer. All right. Yes, shout out to

35:52

Jeff for keeping the CP community

35:56

humming. Happy to spend some time there

35:58

as well. All right. If I could only pick

36:01

from the books on the shelves behind

36:02

you, what book would you want everyone

36:03

in this group to deep dive into or dive

36:06

deep into? I mean, man, I mean, I have

36:10

those books up there for a reason,

36:11

right? I have thousands of books. I've

36:13

donated most of them. These are the ones

36:15

I keep up for me to look at.

36:17

Give me a second. I'll tell you.

36:24

Okay.

36:26

So, I'm going to give answers that may

36:28

not be satisfying to some folks. That's

36:31

okay. I would read I'll give you one

36:34

that I suppose you might expect from me.

36:36

So, one is going to be The Effective

36:37

Executive from Peter Ducker. Classic,

36:40

old, short, incredible bang for the

36:43

buck.

36:44

However, the other books

36:47

I would say again talking about what you

36:50

do in a world of AI, do more interesting

36:52

things.

36:54

There's a book back there called Of

36:56

Wolves and Men by Barry Lopez who won I

36:59

believe it was the Booker or Pulitzer

37:01

Prize for another of his books called

37:02

Arctic Dreams. Of Wolves and Men is one

37:06

of the best non-fiction books I've ever

37:07

read and it really shattered the mold.

37:10

It redefined what

37:14

let's just call it non-fiction nature

37:16

writing could be. It's just an

37:19

incredible incredible book. So, there's

37:22

one, but again, this is choose your own

37:25

adventure. Pick and choose. Travels with

37:27

Charlie by John Steinbeck. I mentioned

37:30

it earlier, is hilarious. Also an

37:34

incredibly accurate and

37:40

enjoyable warts and all ride through the

37:43

US, right? What a quirky weird ass

37:46

country. So, that's another one. Pretty

37:49

fast read. And then there are entire

37:52

shelves back there related to animal

37:54

tracking and so on because I've done a

37:56

bunch of that. I don't think most of you

37:58

should probably spend a lot of time on

37:59

that. If you haven't read I'll simplify

38:03

the title here. Alice in Wonderland. You

38:05

should go read Alice in Wonderland. Read

38:07

the whole thing just quotes from it. I

38:09

have a collector's edition back there.

38:11

And then there are a few actually that I

38:14

was going to mention for one of the

38:16

questions you guys submitted or as an

38:18

answer. the 8020 principle, Richard

38:21

Kosh. That just never gets old. Just

38:24

does not get old. And there's another

38:26

book of his up there called Living the

38:28

8020 Principle. It might be living the

38:30

8020 way. And he really walks the talk.

38:33

And if you haven't heard my podcasts

38:34

with Richard Kosh, KO,

38:37

he's also one of the best investors I've

38:42

ever met. I mean, he's had I don't know

38:46

if he's disclosed the actual amount, but

38:47

like he is I know a lot of the world's

38:50

best investors and he is quietly way up

38:53

there in the Pantheon. So, also a

38:56

practitioner.

38:58

He's on the field. So, worth paying

39:00

attention to him. All right. All the

39:02

places I've traveled to, which have been

39:03

the most breathtaking, there's so many.

39:05

I mean, Queenstown, New Zealand at the

39:07

right time of year, I think is

39:08

incredible.

39:10

But you name it, you name it. I think

39:12

upstate New York, honestly, the Gunks

39:15

and that entire region where a lot of

39:20

the Last of the Moheakans, the book

39:22

certainly I don't know what about the

39:24

filming of the movie, but that takes

39:26

place in that region.

39:29

You can kind of put me anywhere. I mean,

39:30

I just I think so many places are

39:32

beautiful. Take a couple of drawing

39:34

classes. That makes things much more

39:37

beautiful overall. Like gesture drawing

39:39

classes. Get some live nudes. keep it

39:41

interesting. I mean, you you may get an

39:43

obese dude with his schwans all over the

39:45

place. So, just just so you know, it's

39:47

not automatically going to be a Victoria

39:48

Secret model, but that's okay. Uh, can't

39:52

win them all. All right, this is from

39:55

Hilka.

39:57

All right,

39:59

I'll I'll abbreviate a bit because this

40:00

was a long question. I'm only going to

40:02

hit the the first part here, but I'm a

40:04

bootstrap founder and repleted revenue

40:06

flying into San Francisco next week to

40:08

pitch and network for a few days. If you

40:10

were in my shoes and wanted to squeeze

40:12

the maximum long-term leverage out of

40:14

that short trip, what specific things

40:15

would you do before, during, and after

40:17

the event to one, have the right

40:19

conversations, and two, turn them into

40:21

real opportunities rather than just

40:22

great chats? Okay, bonus. How is your

40:25

bootstrapped versus VC changed lately

40:28

for tech software? I mean, I think it's

40:29

just getting cheaper and cheaper to make

40:31

software. So, I think we're going to see

40:35

a lot of self-funded startups. I mean,

40:38

good news, barrier to entry technically

40:41

also economically is much lower. Bad

40:43

news, the barrier to attention in

40:45

actually getting people to use your

40:46

stuff has never been higher. So, there

40:49

is that. But I do think that we're going

40:52

to see huge self-funded bootstrap

40:55

companies, assuming that there aren't

40:57

just a few gods, aka, you know, super

41:01

intelligence

41:02

AI beasts that eat everything. All

41:05

right, but coming back to your question

41:07

about network,

41:09

this has also never been more true. I

41:12

think in real life wins.

41:15

Everything else is too crowded. So there

41:17

is a talk I gave. I don't think there's

41:19

any video. You don't need video,

41:21

frankly, but there was a talk I gave at

41:23

South by Southwest. We'll link to this

41:25

in the show notes, but if you search my

41:27

name

41:29

and how to build a worldclass network in

41:31

record time, this will pop up. This is a

41:34

a talk I gave

41:36

who knows, seven years ago, 10 years ago

41:39

at South by Southwest describing exactly

41:41

what I did at South by Southwest 2007

41:46

when I launched the 4-hour work week.

41:49

And my entire budget for that book for

41:53

launch and marketing and so on was spent

41:55

on a few trips

41:58

to I think it was web summit

42:01

maybe something expo blog expo and then

42:03

south by southwest and there's an

42:06

approach described in that that I think

42:09

is very very effective and it's still

42:12

surprising to me no matter how many

42:14

times I talk about certain things

42:17

people just don't follow But,

42:20

you know, if I'm like, hey, if I wanted

42:22

to shill some shitcoin and be like, it's

42:24

going to the moon, right? People would

42:25

buy it immediately. But I'm like, hey,

42:27

here's this thing. It actually takes

42:28

some hard thinking and you need to plan

42:29

for it. But it's so much more effective

42:32

long term than all of this hustle

42:34

culture [ __ ] like

42:38

you know, three card monty that you want

42:39

to do, you know, every day for 10 hours.

42:41

It's like the the upfront stuff really

42:43

matters a lot. In this case, I really

42:45

recommend this talk, how to build a

42:48

world-class network in record time. And

42:50

that sounds like YouTube clickbait, but

42:54

it's actually true.

42:56

A lot of friends who are still friends

42:59

of mine almost 20 years later came from

43:02

South by Southwest 2007. And a couple of

43:05

those events I flew to. These were not

43:08

just transactional interactions. And

43:12

there is there is a way to approach

43:15

this, right? You definitely need to

43:16

study any sessions and attendees

43:19

beforehand.

43:20

The good news is good news bad news is

43:22

that have the right conversations

43:25

you don't need to worry about. You have

43:27

no idea

43:29

how to have the right conversations.

43:30

Your goal is to meet people who are

43:33

hopefully world class at what they do.

43:36

Sympotico with you, meaning you guys

43:38

will actually get along. could be

43:40

extracurricular interests, side hobbies,

43:43

it could just be the way the two of you

43:45

are programmed. And there are other kind

43:49

of general strategies like talking to

43:53

moderators of panels instead of the

43:54

panelists. Everybody floods the

43:56

panelists. The moderator gets orphaned

43:58

and in many cases the moderator is just

44:01

as impressive. And certainly the

44:04

moderator knows everybody on the panel

44:06

and lots of people on other panels and

44:08

everywhere else. So there are a couple

44:11

of of tips in that that I would suggest

44:13

checking out. All right, next question

44:15

is from Alex. My company is growing

44:16

quickly. There are a lot of things that

44:18

I need to be doing to hit escape

44:20

velocity and be able to hire to manage

44:24

at the top. I think that's manage. It

44:26

says mange, but I assume you don't want

44:28

mange. How do I choose what not to do?

44:31

All right. All right. Well, the good

44:31

news is we already talked about a

44:32

couple. So 8020 principle, Richard Kosh,

44:35

I would read that. The effective

44:37

executive, absolutely read that. And

44:39

it's really going to give you a

44:40

frameworks

44:42

for better discerning yourself what to

44:46

do and not do. the other depending on

44:49

the scope current scope and scale of the

44:55

company and then the ambitions

44:58

especially if it's venture-backed is to

45:01

read a book called the high growth

45:04

handbook by Allad Gil E L A D G I L

45:08

arguably the best one of the best

45:11

certainly angel investors of the last

45:13

few decades I mean his his hit rate is

45:16

absolutely insane He's he's invested in

45:19

at least 40 unicorns.

45:22

Also a tremendous founder and operator

45:24

in his own right. You can check him out.

45:26

Has a pretty wicked biology background

45:28

on top of everything else. So those are

45:30

a few that that come to mind. And then

45:35

maybe last but not least, it's been a

45:38

long time since I read it, but the blue

45:39

ocean strategy probably worth checking

45:41

out because if if you choose to compete

45:43

in a crowded category, you just have a

45:46

harder road ahead of you. So creating a

45:49

category of one in a sense, much like

45:52

Cirtole did back in the day, right? I'm

45:56

expecting you're not dealing with

45:58

Eastern European acrobats, but you get

46:00

the idea. All right, this is from JC.

46:05

When exploring sematic or psychedelic

46:07

healing spaces, what specific questions

46:09

or observations do you use to quickly

46:11

distinguish between a highly competent,

46:12

grounded practitioner and a narcissistic

46:14

guru?

46:16

Tough,

46:18

a lot of good actors out there.

46:21

You know, the first thing that comes to

46:23

mind and obviously with all the usual

46:26

the usual caveats, right? These things

46:28

are powerful. You can definitely

46:29

destabilize yourself. They're illegal in

46:32

most places, etc. I said, "Don't break

46:34

any laws. Talk to your doctor." Blah,

46:36

blah, blah. But

46:39

ask, you could ask practitioners or you

46:42

could ask someone who's had two trips

46:44

and they're suddenly

46:46

acting like a messiah proitizing

46:48

everybody. You could ask them the same

46:50

question. But

46:53

specific to clinicians or practitioners,

46:55

ask them

46:57

what types of adverse events they've

46:59

seen, right? what are the most

47:01

concerning adverse events that they've

47:02

seen?

47:04

A simpler way to put that is how do you

47:07

handle freakouts, right? What do you do

47:09

when somebody really loses their [ __ ]

47:12

And if their answer is people don't lose

47:15

their [ __ ]

47:17

there aren't any adverse events, they're

47:21

either lying,

47:24

delusional,

47:26

or very inexperienced. Right? maybe all

47:29

three. Those are not mutually exclusive.

47:32

So, I find that to be a pretty quick

47:36

necessary but not sufficient way

47:39

to use a particular line of questioning

47:41

to separate seasoned practitioners who

47:45

are honest from those who are neither of

47:47

those things.

47:50

Of course, do your own homework. I don't

47:53

think anyone who's new to this and by

47:55

new I mean they have not been doing it

47:58

more than a decade ideally multiple

48:00

decades is

48:04

makes the the fly list for me.

48:09

It's just become too godamn trendy. So

48:13

I would just say

48:15

probably unfairly but I would be biased

48:18

towards people who have been doing this

48:20

since before

48:22

Michael Pollen's exceptional book how to

48:24

change your mind right that might be the

48:26

cuto off for before and after let's go

48:29

back to live questions yeah Kumari great

48:31

documentary Fred recommended everybody

48:33

should watch Kumari ku m a r e I won't

48:36

ruin the surprise

48:39

check that out it's a great great film

48:42

I liked it so much that way back in the

48:44

day there was a startup called

48:45

quarterly.co

48:47

which sent out boxes of goodies to

48:50

people who subscribed, right? And I

48:51

would hand curate all these things that

48:53

I really liked. It was kind of like Five

48:54

Bullet Friday but on a quarterly basis

48:57

where you get all my favorite things

48:58

shipped to you in a box. Very difficult

49:01

business to make work. But at one point,

49:04

this also dates me. It tells you how

49:06

long ago it was. I reached out to the

49:08

filmmaker who made Kumar and we figured

49:12

out a way to make it work that I would

49:14

ship something like 3,000

49:17

USB drives each of which contain this

49:19

movie to my subscribers. That was one of

49:22

my items that I sent. All right, lots of

49:25

questions about conferences. I don't

49:26

have a particular take on conferences

49:28

these days. I apologize. I just I'm not

49:30

tracking it actively. There are always

49:32

interesting meeting places in person.

49:34

So, I don't believe that's outdated.

49:36

South by Southwest has gotten very large

49:38

and quite corporate. Doesn't mean you

49:40

can't have interesting interactions, but

49:43

you know, I would look for the events

49:44

ideally that are

49:47

fewer than a thousand people, fewer than

49:48

500, even better if you can. It's from

49:51

Chris. If I weren't an author and

49:53

podcaster, what other careers or

49:55

industries would you have pursued? I

49:57

wanted to be a comic book pencellor for

49:59

ages and

50:01

still do some actually of my art pads

50:07

right back over there where I love to do

50:10

live gesture drawings honestly helps me

50:12

get out of my head. Somebody will be up

50:14

there. They'll hold a pose for like 60

50:16

seconds at a time and then change or two

50:19

minutes or five minutes at a time. You

50:21

really can't get in your head. There's

50:22

just not enough time for it. So, I

50:24

really really enjoy that. But I wanted

50:25

to be a comic book pencellor and was an

50:28

illustrator through a good part of

50:30

college, helping to pay for expenses,

50:32

things like that, illustrating books and

50:34

so on. So I uh the the prospects then

50:39

were not very attractive financially to

50:41

do that, especially after my extended

50:44

family paid a fortune on my education.

50:46

So I shifted gears, but certainly felt a

50:49

draw towards that. What kind of dog is

50:52

Molly? Molly is a rescue mut. She is

50:56

Labrador,

50:57

blood hound, and pitbull mix.

51:02

Then I'm sure there's high 57 of other

51:05

breeds in there. In terms of training,

51:09

honestly, I put up some basic training

51:11

videos on YouTube if you just search my

51:13

name in dog training. But the books that

51:16

I have found most helpful are Don't

51:18

Shoot the Dog by Karen Prior. I think

51:20

everybody should read that. I think the

51:22

back copy says something like

51:24

Whether you want to stop your cat from

51:26

jumping on the table, train your dog to

51:28

do X, or convince your like

51:31

mother-in-law to stop nagging you, like

51:33

the instructions are all the same.

51:35

Something like that. It's pretty funny.

51:36

But Karen Prior brought clicker

51:39

training, sort of audible

51:42

queuing of that type from marine mammal

51:45

training, dolphins, orcas, etc. to dog

51:49

training or at least she's one of the

51:50

people responsible for that. really

51:52

fantastic book on behavioral change and

51:55

shaping behavior overall.

51:58

And then listen to my podcast with Susan

52:01

Garrett. Susan Garrett g a r e t is

52:05

impressive because she has won I want to

52:07

say I don't know 5 to 10 national dog

52:11

agility championships even though she

52:14

herself is much older than most of the

52:16

human competitors who have to kind of

52:18

run alongside their dogs. and she really

52:21

really knows her stuff. So those would

52:22

be I would say two places that you can

52:24

start at two or three places. Very kind

52:26

comment here. All of your works hold so

52:28

many lessons on protection and

52:29

nourishment, the root of being a father.

52:31

I feel that way. Thank you. My friends

52:33

have been my closest friends are like,

52:35

"Yeah, you know what? You're going to be

52:36

a great dad." So that's part of the

52:38

reason why I'm headed that way. Even

52:41

though, you know, word on the internet

52:42

is that I've self-help optimized myself

52:44

into being single and miserable. That's

52:46

not true. So,

52:49

all those trolls can suck a dick. Um,

52:54

makes makes me feel like I'm drinking

52:55

tequila. Beware of those ketones, guys.

52:58

More on my thoughts is from Cindy on

53:00

enog dating and business peeps. I think

53:02

anyagram look it might be tech friendly

53:05

astrology, but I've seen it used at

53:08

Shopify. I've seen it used at Dropbox.

53:12

I've seen it used by more than one

53:14

person to meet very good matches in

53:18

intimate relationships

53:20

and I think there's something to it. I

53:22

mean it is a tool I would say that I'm I

53:25

try to be as tool agnostic as possible

53:27

but I found the enog there are other

53:29

options of course as one good option for

53:33

identifying your own blind spots for say

53:36

your partner and this could be someone

53:38

you you know work with superior

53:41

subordinate colleague

53:43

what your likely blind spots are where

53:45

you're likely to be oversensitive

53:48

and therefore how you might want to

53:50

handle things internally like meetings,

53:52

decision-m, conflict resolution

53:56

and that's pretty interesting and it has

53:59

been tested on a pretty large scale

54:02

within places like Shopify and Dropbox,

54:05

right? Unlike many other things. So, I

54:08

find it interesting and

54:11

the app that I mentioned earlier,

54:14

tryapp.ai,

54:15

code Tim50 for 50% off. I don't get any

54:18

affiliate kickback or anything. That's

54:20

just to save you guys some money. They

54:22

incorporate the inagram. So, pretty

54:24

interesting. I was telling them I was

54:26

like, "Hey, once you figure out this

54:28

kind of business career mentoring side,

54:30

you could very easily have a matchmaking

54:33

capability built into it." All right.

54:36

Quantum computing I find fascinating,

54:40

amazing, and terrifying in equal

54:42

measure. I have not done much in the

54:44

quantum computing world. I have looked

54:46

at

54:48

maybe how certain

54:51

cryptocurrencies are more prepared to be

54:55

quantum resistant than others, right?

54:57

I've looked at stuff like that. I mean,

54:59

not to mention

55:01

all of our other fancy passwords that we

55:04

currently use and security, but I have

55:08

not really gone super deep. I feel like

55:09

that's an area much like Fusion

55:13

where you really want to be as technical

55:17

as possible waiting into those waters. I

55:20

did a podcast with Steve Gerbbertson

55:23

ages ago who was one of the first

55:25

investors in D-Wave.

55:27

But yeah, I mean people are talking

55:30

about AI, but man, when when quantum

55:33

actually hits and the joke has been with

55:36

Fusion, for instance, that fusion is

55:37

always 30 years away. I don't think

55:39

that's true anymore. Now, I could be

55:42

proven wrong, but I also think that's

55:44

true with quantum where people are like,

55:45

"Yeah, yeah, yeah. That shit's never

55:47

going to work." I'm like, "H, we'll see.

55:50

Look at Google's excuse me, look at

55:53

Alphabet's investments into

55:57

quantum computing. It does raise some

56:00

questions. Very interesting and also

56:04

pretty scary to imagine what postquantum

56:06

looks like. This is a good question. How

56:08

do you maintain so many friends despite

56:10

your countercultural

56:11

ideologies?

56:15

We, my friends and I, I think have maybe

56:21

implicitly,

56:23

and this is maybe survivorship bias, but

56:27

agreed that like as long as you're

56:29

civil, like you can disagree on all

56:31

sorts of stuff. And I surround myself

56:33

with friends who are going to push back.

56:38

And this includes my oldest friends.

56:40

This isn't just like fancy friends that

56:41

I've accumulated since the podcast or

56:43

anything. This also applies to my oldest

56:45

friends from high school and college.

56:48

So, I would also say that most of my

56:52

friends are pretty adaptable in light of

56:57

new information. I don't spend a lot of

56:59

time around blowhards who are like, I'm

57:00

an X, I'm a Y, right? I'm a liberal and

57:04

that person's a neocon. or I'm a

57:08

conservative and that person's a libtard

57:10

or whatever. Like, I don't hang out with

57:12

those folks because while I recognize

57:14

that level of simplicity is appealing in

57:16

a very chaotic, messy world, it's not

57:19

particularly

57:20

an accurate reflection of reality and

57:24

the gradiations in between extremes. And

57:28

it's certainly not very helpful unless

57:31

you are playing the political game and

57:33

that's just an arrow in the quiver that

57:36

you have to use. But otherwise,

57:40

I just stay away from that stuff. I

57:42

certainly don't steer away from

57:44

controversy, but I ask myself, is this,

57:47

and this applies to watching news or

57:50

social media, and I know I've said this

57:52

before, but I haven't had any social

57:53

media apps on my phone for probably

57:54

three or four years. And the way I feel

57:58

about the news in the 4-hour work week

58:00

is probably 10x more intense now in

58:03

terms of my selective ignorance around

58:07

mainlining quote unquote news, right?

58:10

Because if if it's not relevant to your

58:13

life and if you are not going to make a

58:17

decision differently or take action

58:20

because of it or maybe avoid action

58:22

because of it, if there isn't some kind

58:24

of followup, you don't need it is my

58:27

general feeling.

58:29

And that's going to become not just a

58:34

maybe perceived luxury. I've been doing

58:36

this for decades now, right? And I

58:39

wouldn't consider myself ineffective in

58:41

the world,

58:43

but

58:45

it's going to become a survival

58:47

imperative. If you want to remain sane,

58:49

you can't doom scroll 24/7. There's no

58:52

way you can't doom scroll even a few

58:54

hours a day.

58:56

So, I've seen some crazy crazy

58:59

physiological data from people on and

59:02

off of social media like blood tests and

59:06

like mental health assessments and so

59:08

on.

59:10

Ham D caps 5, you know, all this kind of

59:12

stuff. It's not good, guys. So,

59:15

I'm I'm uh getting up on my soap box

59:17

now, but like we were talking about that

59:19

no [ __ ] rule. Just because someone

59:21

disagrees with you does not mean they're

59:23

an [ __ ] But if someone is really

59:25

throwing sharp elbows for no reason,

59:28

it's like they're out. Like I'm I'm I

59:31

very freely

59:34

have an inflow and outflow of friends.

59:37

There are certain friends who have

59:40

remained in the inner sanctum and I for

59:42

them too cuz they reserve the same right

59:44

for years and decades and decades now.

59:48

But it's like, and people are allowed to

59:50

have off days, but it's like if someone

59:51

has suddenly adopted being an [ __ ] as

59:54

part of their personality or identity in

59:58

service of quote unquote keeping it real

60:00

or something. I don't have time for

60:01

that. All right. Somebody asked about

60:04

podcast interviewing a female

60:06

screenwriter. Yeah, sure. Depends on the

60:08

screenwriter, but was actually reaching

60:10

out to two female screenwriters

60:14

not too long ago. I don't think I heard

60:16

back. So, what are you going to do? This

60:19

is a comment by Tim. This sounds super

60:21

simple. My longest, latest relationships

60:24

share a common sense of humor. Married

60:25

for 33 years, and that's foundational.

60:27

Same goes for oldest and longest lasting

60:29

friendships. Yeah, 100%. Humor is just

60:32

reflective of so many other qualities,

60:34

right? And there's a difference between

60:36

humor and just like a kind of

60:41

cynicism, right? Quippy cynicism. I'm

60:44

not so much into that. But like if if

60:46

there's a fast banter and people also

60:48

are good at making fun of themselves,

60:49

not all the time, but in the right dose,

60:52

it generally bodess well. What inspired

60:55

my most recent blog post? Fugacity Labs.

61:00

This is on the self-help trap. What I

61:02

learned from 20 plus years of optimizing

61:04

myself, optimizing on quotation marks,

61:06

might have been improving. We split test

61:08

a bunch of different headlines. But what

61:11

prompted that is just seeing how,

61:16

you know, at worst miserable, at best

61:19

constantly anxious or self-doubting so

61:22

many people are in the selfhelp,

61:25

self-development world, right? And I

61:29

feel like we are all sitting on a

61:33

slightly too warm stove top of baseline

61:37

anxiety due to the technological

61:41

tectonic plates that we're dealing with

61:43

and certainly the kind of algo driven

61:46

personalized feeds that will just pour

61:51

gasoline on your lyic system. And coming

61:55

back to what we can control, right? It's

61:56

like, okay, sure, I can I can suggest

61:58

people delete social media apps off of

62:01

their phones. Realistically, most people

62:03

are not going to do that. And there are

62:05

some upsides. If you have the ability to

62:08

moderate with these tools, you can stay

62:10

connected with friends, etc., etc.

62:12

Although, I've become more and more

62:13

dubious of those defenses.

62:15

if if people were able to instead of

62:17

just looking at screen time by app to

62:20

see what actual usage is the use cases

62:23

that they're spending time on with a

62:26

given app I think that would be very

62:28

illuminating in any case in lie of that

62:31

what else can you do what other levers

62:33

can you pull and I think the in real

62:37

life relational component is the lever

62:41

that makes all other levers easier in a

62:46

way. So that's what prompted writing

62:48

that blog post. Very nice question. How

62:51

can we help you? Whether here in the

62:52

Discord book forum just

62:58

just try to be

63:01

go first with people to quote Gabby Ree.

63:05

I interviewed Gabby with Lear Hamilton,

63:08

one of the kings of big wave surfing.

63:11

And I think her billboard answer was go

63:14

first. Just like smile and say hi first.

63:17

Just do that. I'd say helping the world

63:21

to be just like 1% brighter in some tiny

63:25

way, right? Like tip the breeze, like

63:27

leave a 20 as a tip like once a month

63:30

somewhere. I know that's not necessarily

63:32

trivial money for folks, but it's like

63:34

give somebody an absurd tip, right? Like

63:36

if they're really good, really kind,

63:37

just like or it doesn't need like have

63:40

an iced tea tip. I'm a 10, right?

63:42

Something like that. Doesn't need to be

63:44

money. You get the idea. Do I have any

63:46

news to share about the notebook? Yeah,

63:49

I'm going to I'm going to put on my

63:51

diving goggles and get back into it in

63:54

the next probably month or two, pretty

63:57

soon. have a couple of other things and

64:00

I'll have I foresee at least one big

64:03

announcement related to other projects

64:05

coming up in the next few months. But

64:08

going back in, wish me luck. This is a

64:11

question from John. Still love the 17

64:13

questions.

64:15

People can find those 17 questions. I

64:17

think they're in Tools of Titans, maybe

64:18

Tribe of Mentors, but also on Tim.blog.

64:21

There's a PDF with the 17 questions I

64:23

most often ask myself.

64:26

I've got one

64:30

question that I would probably add is

64:33

some version of what is the most

64:35

generous interpretation of this.

64:38

Right?

64:40

I have been trained since a wee little

64:44

lad

64:45

to be pretty

64:48

anger forward. Let's just say if I were

64:50

a wine, very anger forward. And

64:55

the way that shows up, there are to get

64:58

fancy myriad ways this shows up. One is

65:01

that

65:03

some days

65:05

I can just feel like the entire world is

65:07

conspiring to make me annoyed. And

65:10

obviously that's not true, right? But

65:14

if it seems like someone is ripping you

65:16

off, right? which does happen

65:21

most of the time. It's probably just a

65:23

misunderstanding, right? So, what's the

65:25

most generous interpretation? If you

65:28

feel like your significant other did

65:31

something to annoy you,

65:34

did something to annoy you, or they

65:36

always do X, they never do Y. Like,

65:39

okay. Well, what's the most generous

65:41

interpretation of this?

65:44

And I'm borrowing this from other

65:46

people, but I feel like that is a very

65:49

helpful question.

65:53

And you could pair that with a bunch of

65:55

other ones. I think Christa Tippet,

65:58

great podcaster by the way, but Christa

66:00

Tippet, one of the OGs

66:03

on Being, I believe, is her podcast. And

66:06

I believe it's Christa. I might be

66:08

misattributing, but at least I'm not

66:10

saying Oscar Wild or Abe Lincoln that

66:14

she said anger is pain shown in public.

66:18

Something like that, right? So you can

66:21

apply that to yourself too if you're a

66:22

little

66:24

anger forward.

66:26

And that doesn't mean naval gaze and you

66:29

have to do 12 years of therapy to figure

66:31

it out. like what is the most generous

66:32

interpretation of this? Whatever this

66:35

might be, I would add that to my

66:36

questions. Okay, if you go to a city and

66:39

you have two days, what are your go-to

66:40

activities? Bicycle tour, bike tour, for

66:44

sure.

66:46

One of the best ways to meet locals,

66:49

figure out what's fun that isn't just a

66:53

glossy photo,

66:55

post it on Instagram

66:57

or an ex super expensive

67:00

three Michelin star restaurant, bicycle

67:03

tour, hang out, you know, also hang out

67:06

with, you don't have to actually stay at

67:07

a hostel, but like go talk to the

67:09

manager of a hostel or somebody who

67:10

works the front desk and has been there

67:12

for a couple years. They'll have lots of

67:13

great recommendations. Okay. Where does

67:16

accumulating wealth fall on my scale of

67:17

overall success?

67:19

Zero.

67:21

It's like, look,

67:24

I mean, a lot of wealthy people make a

67:26

lot of excuses as to why they need to

67:28

keep making money. Like, well, you know,

67:30

I could give money now, but if I

67:32

compound at such and such, compounded

67:36

annual growth rate, and then, you know,

67:38

I'll give it away when I'm dead,

67:40

basically, or yada yada yada. I just

67:44

don't buy it. You know, working dogs who

67:47

have been tracing a rabbit around a

67:48

track their whole lives in sixth gear

67:50

get very good at chasing something in

67:52

sixth gear. So, they want to continue

67:53

doing that. I'm not holding myself up as

67:56

some enlightened being. I've just had

67:59

the benefit of seeing so many people

68:03

crash and burn or just end up with this

68:07

existential malaise because when they

68:09

actually pause for a second if they do

68:11

pause and sometimes life's life life

68:12

forces you to pause with a divorce or

68:15

medical emergency they have this

68:20

maybe sense of hollowess or certainly

68:22

not a sense of fulfillment. So I've just

68:25

seen that so many times. It's like

68:27

accumulating wealth. Who cares?

68:29

It's just like how many people can give

68:33

you the full name of Alexander the

68:34

Great, right? It's like nobody's going

68:36

to remember you. Nobody's going to

68:37

remember me. Nobody's going to remember

68:38

us. It's okay. It's totally fine. It's

68:40

actually very freeing.

68:44

It's like every everybody should read I

68:47

think it's Percy Shelly. Azymandas.

68:51

Yeah, Percy

68:53

Shelly. Azymandas. Everybody should find

68:56

this. Oz Y M- N D I A S. So good.

69:02

Everybody should read Aussy Mandas. What

69:05

do I prioritize instead of wealth

69:08

relationships? And this sounds so trit,

69:11

but it's like there are people who say

69:13

that and then you go visit them and

69:14

you're like, "Holy shit." like their

69:16

kids hate them and like they never see

69:18

their best friends or their quote

69:20

unquote best friends are constantly a

69:23

different roster because

69:25

as Arthur Brooks would put it, they're

69:28

deal friends, not real friends, right?

69:33

But

69:35

I mean, the past year review helps to

69:38

make this point for me over and over

69:40

again. And if you don't know what the

69:41

hell I'm talking about, just search my

69:42

name in past year review. But thinking

69:45

about it's like, okay, who are the 10

69:47

most important people in your life? Did

69:49

you spend as much time as you would like

69:50

to spend with them last year? If the

69:52

answer is no, invest in those 10 before

69:54

you invest in anyone else, right? And

69:58

track the results. Then you look back,

70:01

look at the number of peak positive

70:05

experiences, right? Energetically,

70:07

emotionally, whatever it is over that

70:10

quarter, that year. It's not something

70:11

you have to do all the time. and you're

70:12

like, "Oh, yeah. Doubling down on those

70:15

10 really made my year so much better."

70:17

Blocking out time with those people in

70:18

advance made it so much better. Okay,

70:20

let's do more of that.

70:25

So, yeah, that's about it. Yeah, it

70:28

might have been Tara Brock who talked

70:30

about the

70:32

anger is fear on the outside. Who knows?

70:34

Some smart person who's a lot chiller

70:37

than I am said that. David,

70:40

here we go. As a soon to be father, I'm

70:42

thinking a lot about parenthood. If you

70:44

started a family, what would be the top

70:46

three values or lessons you'd hope to

70:47

instill in your children?

70:50

I have thought about this a lot and I've

70:51

had I've been able to watch what has

70:53

worked and what has not worked. I think

70:56

optimism,

70:57

resourcefulness,

71:00

and like lots of physical activity, lots

71:02

of physical activity. You got to run

71:04

that dog. Tired dog is a happy dog. So,

71:07

yeah, optimism. I think Mike Maples Jr.

71:10

was the first person who really

71:11

underscored this. He has a bunch of kids

71:13

who have turned out well. Optimism is

71:15

kind of number one. It's like the mother

71:17

quality that enables all else.

71:20

Resourcefulness, I would say I think

71:22

Maya Angelou actually said courage is

71:24

sort of the mother quality cuz

71:26

everything else at its breaking point

71:27

depends on it. So I had something which

71:30

is like no failure only feedback. Just

71:33

encouraging them to try stuff. Positive

71:36

reinforcement. Try stuff. Try stuff. I

71:38

mean, this applies to dog training, too,

71:40

but some of my friends who have never

71:42

had dogs get all pissed off and get

71:44

their knickers in a twist when I compare

71:47

kids to dogs. I know they're not the

71:50

same, but you know what?

71:52

Shapi behavior is pretty similar across

71:54

mammals. Anyway, optimism, courage slash

71:58

try a bunch of [ __ ] It's fine. It's

72:00

just feedback. And then resourcefulness.

72:02

And I think if you have optimism and

72:04

you're willing to try a bunch of stuff,

72:07

aka use courage in certain ways, then I

72:10

think resourcefulness is a byproduct of

72:12

that. So those would be the things I

72:14

would focus on. And lots and lots and

72:17

lots and lots of physical activity

72:20

together as a family, right?

72:23

Okay. Rachel, thought I'd throw out an

72:25

odd question this time. Have you Have

72:26

you ever been on a treasure hunt or

72:28

geocache? What's the weirdest, coolest,

72:30

most unexpected thing you found out in

72:32

the wilderness? Could be something

72:33

natural or unnatural.

72:36

Well,

72:38

black bear stole a leg from my elk last

72:42

year. That was pretty annoying. And we

72:45

found it chewed to all sorts of into all

72:49

sorts of mangled contortions. That was a

72:50

bummer. Don't want to have sloppy

72:52

seconds after a bear has gotten into

72:54

your elk leg. Just pro tip. I've been on

72:57

treasure hunts and geocaches. I would

72:59

say the thing that comes to mind, which

73:01

is somewhat unrelated to your question,

73:04

is that if people are like, "What's the

73:06

most interesting way you've lost money?"

73:09

Because I do get my face ripped off then

73:11

and again, part of the early stage

73:13

investing game. I invested in treasure

73:16

hunters, very famous treasure hunters

73:18

who were searching for sunken Spanish

73:21

gallions full of gold bars and all sorts

73:24

of stuff. And ultimately one of the

73:27

people involved just absconded with all

73:29

of the investor money and it turned into

73:32

this like where in the world is Karmen

73:34

San Diego [ __ ] debacle. But you know

73:37

makes for a story. So once again don't

73:41

bet money you cannot afford to lose

73:44

especially when it involves Spanish

73:46

gallions.

73:48

Oh good lordy lordy lordy. This is

73:50

coming back to encodings. Cindy, you and

73:53

Jim Collins talked about encoding. This

73:55

is a term that Jim uses which is

73:57

somewhat comparable to strengths. Like

74:00

what are your innate strengths? Right.

74:03

So, we spoke about that. I'd love if

74:05

you'd go deeper on the topic. Share more

74:07

about how it resonated with you

74:08

personally and give additional practical

74:10

advice on how people currently locked

74:12

into work or career situations can

74:13

progress with a plan towards living

74:15

fully within their encoded selves.

74:18

I find that asking your best friends,

74:21

could be family members,

74:25

could also be employees. 360

74:28

reviews can be very brutal. You can

74:30

listen to my conversation with Joe

74:32

Gibbia, co-founder of Airbnb, about how

74:34

brutal that can be. Doesn't have to be

74:37

brutal, though. I would say that a

74:39

couple of questions come up that I have

74:42

asked close friends, some of my best

74:44

friends, people who know me really well.

74:48

when have you seen me at my best? Or

74:50

when do you see me at my best? But it's

74:53

good to have practical examples or

74:55

concrete examples from the past. Not

74:57

just like when you tend to do this, you

74:59

tend to do that. It's like no, give me

75:00

an example. Like when have you seen me

75:02

at my best? When have you seen me at my

75:04

worst? Like what stories or memories

75:05

come to mind? Then what is easier for me

75:10

than for other people, right? What do

75:12

you see in me that I'm I find easier

75:14

than most people? Jim didn't like that

75:17

question, right? Because he wanted it

75:19

all to be internally individually

75:21

referenced. But this is how I do it. I

75:24

actually do find that aspect helpful cuz

75:27

then you're not only finding strengths,

75:29

you're finding strengths that allow you

75:31

to potentially compete. And I I just

75:33

like having both if I can.

75:36

And then you could ask, you know, what

75:38

this is very closely related to the last

75:39

one, but what what strength or ability

75:42

do I discount in myself,

75:45

right? there's certain things a friend

75:48

of mine was making a point about

75:49

something related to startups recently

75:51

and I was like yeah I mean it doesn't

75:52

strike me as particularly special

75:53

because ABNC and he's like that's the

75:55

problem he's like you can't see it

75:57

because like you're the fish swimming in

75:58

the water and I was like huh okay then I

76:02

bounced it off a few other people and

76:03

they're like yeah that's like a [ __ ]

76:04

weird superpower of yours and I don't

76:06

understand it and I was like oh never

76:08

really realized so what strengths or

76:11

ability do I discount in myself right

76:13

this is you using that question for

76:16

somebody else or not harness, right? It

76:18

could be discounting, could just be like

76:20

what strength or ability am I not using

76:24

that I have? And

76:27

one question that can infer a lot of the

76:29

answers to these others also is if I

76:32

weren't doing X, whatever your current

76:33

gig is, like what could you see me

76:35

doing, right? And

76:39

I feel like if you ask enough people who

76:42

know you well enough and who aren't

76:44

going to [ __ ] you, who will also be

76:46

willing to answer questions about your

76:48

weaknesses, right? In other words,

76:50

example given, when have you seen me at

76:52

my worst, if they can't answer that,

76:53

they're not going to give you fully

76:55

candidate advice. So, I would say those

76:58

are a few of the approaches that I've

77:00

used and I've found them very helpful.

77:05

Geocaching. A lot of people here into

77:07

geocaching. Yeah, I mean sure it'd be

77:09

fun. I've also dreamed about doing

77:11

orientering courses which I think could

77:13

be super super fascinating. This is the

77:15

last question. I think it's a good one

77:16

to end on. Is courage external or

77:18

internal? How do you teach it to kids? I

77:21

think courage is learned. You have to

77:23

practice it. And

77:27

if you're not afraid, it's not courage.

77:30

Right? If someone's fearless, they're by

77:33

definition not using courage. You have

77:35

to be afraid of something. So, you can

77:37

edge yourself and you can edge kids into

77:40

that, right? It's not like, "Hey, you've

77:42

never been in the water before. Let's

77:44

take you up to do cliff diving." No, no.

77:46

Yeah. I mean, that's unhelpful fear with

77:49

severe consequences. It's like you can

77:51

stair step into it. But I think I don't

77:54

think courage is a decision. I don't

77:56

think courage is something you get from

77:58

reading a book. I don't think courage is

78:02

something that you can develop

78:05

abstractly. I think you have to prove to

78:07

yourself that you have it. And the only

78:09

way your subconscious will believe it is

78:12

if you are actually doing things that

78:14

are uncomfortable.

78:16

That's it.

78:18

Which means it is learnable. And there

78:22

may be some

78:24

set point that contributes to it right

78:27

in one way or another. Right? And if

78:29

you're Alex Hunnel and your amydala is

78:30

like basically asleep, it's like, okay,

78:32

well, right, that explains a few things.

78:35

But it's also something that you can

78:38

very

78:41

sequentially sort of expose yourself to

78:44

just like you would to build a tan or to

78:46

get stronger in the gym. I think it's

78:48

through action, right? It's like

78:50

progressive resistance that you develop

78:53

courage. And it's very I've seen my

78:56

friends do this with their kids and this

78:58

is also why the physical activity is

79:00

very very helpful to prove kids to prove

79:03

to kids or help them prove to themselves

79:04

that they can do hard things right like

79:08

okay sure you could wait until they can

79:09

sit down with calculus and try to figure

79:11

that out or you could be like yeah that

79:12

thing that you're nervous about doing

79:14

like hitting a baseball climbing a

79:17

whatever you know 5'9 in a indoor

79:20

climbing gym like yeah okay let's get

79:22

after

79:24

All right, I will I will stop there,

79:26

guys. I appreciate somebody asked, "When

79:28

is Alex Hold coming on the podcast?" I

79:30

had him on about six months before he

79:33

free soloed LCAP. If you want to if you

79:35

want to listen to Alex Honold before he

79:36

got media polished, my podcast is a good

79:39

way to start.

79:41

Great guy, but it was before he got

79:43

polished for Prime Time. And that's

79:46

about it. All right, ladies and

79:49

gentlemen. appreciate you taking the

79:51

time and thanks for all the great

79:52

questions.

79:54

And be safe out there. Be just a bit

79:56

kinder than is necessary to others, yes,

79:59

but to yourself also. Go first. Smile.

80:02

Say hi. Thanks everybody.

Interactive Summary

The speaker discusses the nature of courage, emphasizing that it's learned through practice and facing fears, not by being fearless. They then delve into various questions about AI, investing, personal development, and community building. Key topics include the increasing value of relational and offline skills in an AI-driven world, investment strategies in public markets amidst AI disruption (with a specific mention of Alphabet's interesting position), and the importance of preserving certain cognitive skills by not over-relying on AI. The discussion also touches on AI's potential for creativity, how to stand out amidst AI-generated content by doing interesting things, and practical advice on using AI tools like Open Claw and Claude. The speaker advises against using AI for skills one wants to preserve and highlights the dangers of cognitive degradation from over-reliance. They also share insights on career advancement, the importance of real-life networking, and strategies for shaping community culture. The conversation touches upon personal experiences, book recommendations, and philosophical questions about wealth, relationships, and values. Finally, the speaker emphasizes the learnable nature of courage, developed through action and facing discomfort, and the importance of optimism, resourcefulness, and physical activity for personal growth and raising children.

Suggested questions

12 ready-made prompts