HomeVideos

Market Hang (12:30–1:30 p.m. ET)

Now Playing

Market Hang (12:30–1:30 p.m. ET)

Transcript

1731 segments

0:00

Hey, welcome to the market hang. I'm

0:02

Dandy Franchesco. We got a full house

0:04

today. We got Gus and Mark in studio,

0:06

Nancy and David remote. So, a bunch of

0:09

really smart good investors and me. So,

0:11

this will be great. Um, but let's start

0:14

with obviously the market. Uh, you know,

0:17

S&P nearing records, NASDAQ up super

0:20

high, yields finally coming back a

0:23

little bit. Um, but still this question

0:25

of, you know, are we close to this edge?

0:28

Should we be nervous or not? And um

0:31

Mark, I want to start with you. Uh you

0:33

had an interesting blog or a newsletter

0:35

the other day where you had the great

0:36

line, the stock market is wearing

0:39

noiseancelling headphones, which I just

0:41

love. And for the record, always go

0:43

transparency mode. Never go full noise

0:45

cancelling. It's very dangerous out

0:46

there, people. But I'd love for you to

0:47

kind of expand a little bit on that and

0:49

uh what you're seeing in the market and

0:51

what the the risk that the rest of us

0:52

maybe aren't.

0:53

>> Yeah. I mean, I think that's the

0:54

challenge of the day for all of us,

0:56

right? So, we've all been trained over

0:58

the years to worry about yields going up

1:00

and up and up and up. And they weren't

1:02

going up and up and up over the years.

1:04

And then 2022 happened, 2023 happened,

1:06

and we all learned that when yields go

1:08

up, sometimes stocks go down. And so,

1:11

both bonds and stocks can go down at the

1:13

same time. So, we're at this crazy crazy

1:15

situation where we see these yields

1:17

right on the longer end of the yield

1:19

curve that we haven't seen since 2002.

1:22

And some people that are probably

1:23

watching us right now weren't even

1:25

involved in the market at the time.

1:26

>> Weren't even alive. Maybe

1:27

>> weren't even alive. I was there. Um so,

1:30

you know, that is the big challenge. So,

1:31

the question is is, you know, we see uh

1:34

stocks, as you said, all-time highs. Um

1:37

and of course, these super high bond

1:39

yields. Question is is, you know, when

1:42

is the stock market going to realize

1:44

that or is the stock market going to

1:46

realize? One of the two has got to be

1:47

right. It's usually the bond market that

1:49

usually wins out

1:50

>> always. But so far that's the big

1:52

question right now. And so right now not

1:55

all stocks,

1:56

>> some stocks, right? That's the that's

1:58

the big challenge here. It's not all

2:00

stocks. The indexes are doing well.

2:02

>> Sure. So

2:02

>> right now the

2:03

>> I think that's where you got it wrong

2:05

though. Like everyone says that it's the

2:06

equity market guys versus the bond

2:08

market guys and it's always like, "Oh

2:10

yeah, the bond guys are the smartest

2:11

guys in the room." I had equities here,

2:13

so I take umbrage at that. But I think

2:15

the equity guys have been right over the

2:17

past few years. All right. I just think

2:19

that the bond market and the equity

2:21

market, they're just focusing on two

2:23

completely different things. They're not

2:24

conflicting at all. I think the equity

2:26

markets, they're focusing more on

2:28

profitability and overall economic

2:30

growth, while the bond market, it's kind

2:32

of changed its focus from monetary to

2:35

fiscal policy. And you've seen the term

2:36

premium go up to about 70 to 80 basis

2:39

points right now. So, I don't think

2:40

they're saying something different.

2:41

They're just focusing something

2:42

completely opposite. Well, David, I'm

2:44

glad you chimed in here because I wanted

2:45

to pull up a a tweet from it's a little

2:47

ways back, but it sounds like you're

2:48

kind of still holding the same position,

2:50

which is you said in an interview, you

2:51

know, the biggest risk investors have

2:53

right now is not being risky enough,

2:55

right? You can see it right there. You

2:56

know, kind of risk on. Is that I know

2:58

that was, you know, back September 15th,

3:00

so obviously things have changed a

3:01

little bit in the past almost month, but

3:03

is that still the position? It's it's

3:04

time to be risk no matter what.

3:07

>> Yeah, my position has not changed

3:09

whatsoever. I mean, that's a question

3:11

we're getting a ton right now. Like,

3:13

hey, should we start to own more fixed

3:15

income than equities? And I I think that

3:18

is the absolute wrong decision because

3:20

when you live in kind of the fiscal

3:22

backdrop that we have when you're, you

3:24

know, printing money, running a 6%

3:26

deficit as a percentage of GDP, when you

3:28

have the debt problem that you have

3:29

right now, like if you own just fixed

3:31

income, you're just losing money safely.

3:34

I mean, there's so much debasement of

3:35

your capital. Even with nominal rates at

3:37

5%, if you look at tips, they're closer

3:39

to 2.7%. I think the inflation rate on

3:42

that number is much higher. I think

3:43

you're just kind of setting yourself up

3:45

for mediocrity moving forward if you

3:48

continue to own fixed coupon payment

3:50

vehicles. And that's why I think, you

3:51

know, the only game in town continues to

3:53

be stocks.

3:54

>> Yeah. I mean, you see the big board

3:55

here. Lot lot of big numbers, lot of

3:56

green. But Gus, Nancy, I'd love to bring

3:58

you in here. What kind of side do you

3:59

fall on?

4:00

>> Well, I think you have to look at why

4:01

rates are going higher. You had a supply

4:03

shock, right? oil's gone higher that

4:06

maybe comes to a head say 6 12 months

4:09

whatever it is you end up having no

4:10

strong growth and that's something else

4:13

that you have to look at right so you

4:14

have strong growth um also we just

4:17

talked about the oil you talk about you

4:18

know underlying inflation I'm looking at

4:20

labor kind of holding in we're looking

4:23

at you know the price of housing which

4:25

has kind of stayed also you know based

4:28

in a level that doesn't look like it's

4:29

inflationary and then the third thing is

4:31

you're looking at goods inflation and

4:33

that's where part of the problem is and

4:35

I think the interest rate increase that

4:37

we have is something that isn't going to

4:39

affect all of the investment that's

4:41

being made in AI that's already from

4:42

free cash flow coming from maybe a lot

4:44

of the hyperscalers and some borrowing

4:46

so we're in a position where if I look

4:48

at that it's not inflation debasement

4:51

you know like it was in the 70s or early

4:53

80s as I remember um but you're looking

4:56

at an environment where interest rates

4:58

are up but markets are growing pretty

5:00

substantially and they're moving higher

5:01

we started the year at around 320 and in

5:04

terms of what earnings are going to be

5:06

>> or you know and now we're we're

5:08

somewhere in that 260 270 and next year

5:10

we're looking at 420,

5:11

>> right?

5:12

>> So yeah, we're discounting that.

5:14

>> Nancy, what about you? Where do you come

5:15

in on this?

5:16

>> Yeah. So, um I'm I'm just going to say

5:19

ditto [laughter]

5:23

and then add some color. Um well, first

5:25

of all, stocks are cheaper now than they

5:27

were at the beginning of the year. Uh so

5:29

so that's important. We've seen multiple

5:31

compression. uh we're expected to see

5:33

somewhere between 30 32 33% earnings

5:36

growth in Q3. Uh and and and that's

5:39

going to be looking backwards. So what

5:41

we're going to be focused on is

5:42

guidance. But I think importantly I I

5:45

was managing I may be the oldest person

5:48

in the group but I was managing money in

5:50

the '9s. Uh we had higher interest rates

5:54

tenure was between 5 and 8% that

5:56

coexisted quite nicely with robust stock

5:58

returns. It matters why and how quickly

6:01

yields rise. And I think for me it looks

6:04

to me like a return on capital trades.

6:06

So if I can borrow at five five and a

6:09

half% and I can uh get a return of 20, I

6:12

should be doing that as a corporate CEO

6:14

all day long. Uh and and so for me rates

6:18

are um I mean I don't want to sound even

6:20

older than I am, but they are

6:21

normalizing. My first mortgage was 12

6:24

a.5% so we sort of cut our teeth on

6:27

higher interest rates. I don't think the

6:29

problem with mortgage rates is that

6:31

they're at seven plus percent. It's that

6:33

they've they're being compared to 2 and

6:36

3%. But if you step back and say, is

6:40

this a reasonable um amount to pay for

6:44

debt? I would argue the answer is yes.

6:46

And I think that's why stocks continue

6:48

to drive higher. And if you just look

6:49

since the Fed hiked rates, best

6:51

performing group is technology. Yeah. uh

6:54

counterintuitive because I don't think

6:56

the economy is slowing, but I think it's

6:58

part of um I still want to own earnings

7:00

growers even in a growing environment.

7:02

So, uh we're bullish. We've been um

7:06

we've been right, thank goodness, but uh

7:08

it it's been it was a challenging

7:10

summer. Yeah, let's just

7:11

>> Nancy, you bring up such a good point

7:12

with the rates because as someone that

7:14

bought a house uh a little over a year

7:17

ago, right, having to stomach, you know,

7:19

you know, at that time we got a little

7:21

over 6%. It sucks, right, when your

7:23

friends are like, "I'm on two and a

7:24

half. I'm on three and a half." But it's

7:26

kind of one of those things like it's

7:27

old the you ever seen this show,

7:28

Forgetting Sarah Marshall, like it's

7:30

over. Find a new show. Like those days

7:32

are gone. And I and I do agree that we

7:34

need to understand the context of like

7:36

just because what once was doesn't mean

7:38

what will be. Um so I I think that is

7:41

good. Now obviously the big thing coming

7:43

down the pipe is earnings. That's kind

7:45

of been the big bell weather for the

7:46

stock market. Does anyone you know the

7:50

what's what is that the one thing that

7:51

could slow it down and and you Nancy you

7:53

talked about projections that's going to

7:54

be the big focus. What's the the the red

7:57

flag that people are nervous about as

7:58

these companies start reporting?

8:00

>> I think the outlook

8:01

>> it's margins I think. Oh sorry I thought

8:03

that was me. Margin

8:05

>> margin. Okay.

8:06

>> Um you you saw the micro report uh 80

8:09

you know they're only going to generate

8:10

86% margins and the market was

8:13

horrified. So, I I think that's going to

8:15

be where the critical focus is going to

8:17

be. We're near um I we're at highs for

8:19

operating margins. So, um we'll be

8:22

watching that as well, but I I think the

8:24

market needs to sit back and and as Mark

8:26

might say, put the noise cancelling

8:28

headphones on because an 86% margin for

8:31

micron is is it's it's tolerable for me

8:35

as an investor.

8:36

>> Sure, Gus.

8:37

>> Ditto ditto on that. But the other

8:39

thing, right [laughter] back at you,

8:40

Nancy, the the other thing I wanted to

8:41

say is it's going to be the conference

8:43

calls

8:44

>> because you're hearing about in Texas

8:45

[clears throat]

8:46

and in Virginia the two biggest areas

8:48

for data centers, you know, some

8:50

slowdown potentially, but you also have

8:52

in Texas, I know they're going through

8:54

audits in terms of energy usage. So, are

8:56

you going to get allocated? Are you

8:58

going to have some sort of a delay? Are

8:59

things going to back up at all? And that

9:01

puts a question mark into the AI trade

9:03

which then flows down into industrials

9:06

and some other players that might not,

9:07

you know, have the computing power or

9:09

things that they need to in institute AI

9:11

in the fast way that they're expecting

9:13

to.

9:14

>> Sure. David, anything? Gus market. I got

9:16

I got one. You know Gus Mark and N like

9:18

debunk my theory here because you know I

9:21

was just talking about some clients the

9:22

other day and obviously we're going to

9:24

see some type of growth slowdown. And to

9:26

NY's point we've seen overall valuations

9:29

of the market go down from 22 times to

9:31

start the year to 19 times to start the

9:34

year. I think everyone wants to say it's

9:35

like rates that is bringing valuation

9:37

down. I think it's the index becoming

9:39

more you know asset heavy and less free

9:42

cash flow centric. So if we know you

9:45

know if growth is going to come down or

9:48

we just see the hyperscalers start to

9:50

grow less I think everyone thinks that

9:52

the market is going to fall apart. But I

9:54

would actually disagree and this might

9:56

be a hot take. I think that valuation

9:58

has already come down enough that if you

10:00

see the hyperscalers you know spend less

10:02

on capex their overall free cash flow is

10:05

going to go you know higher which while

10:07

earnings may hurt earn earnings may hurt

10:09

overall return I think pro I think

10:11

overall valuation can actually go higher

10:13

and I think that can really insulate the

10:15

market if hypers scale or capex does

10:17

slow down

10:18

>> but will it slow down right I mean you

10:20

know muse just came out and talked about

10:22

charm and all these other things that

10:24

they're coming out it seems like the the

10:26

the status quo has been plowing more and

10:28

more money in. It doesn't feel like

10:29

there's going to be a pullback because

10:31

it's this frantic race that if if I pull

10:33

back that means I'm going to lose that

10:35

much more in this race, right?

10:38

>> I don't um here. Sure. Um Mark, why

10:41

don't you, you know, um chime in here as

10:43

far as kind of where your position is.

10:44

>> Yeah. First, I feel like I have to sort

10:46

of

10:47

>> I have to remind Yeah. Like, okay. No,

10:50

no, I'm not throwing cold water. I just

10:51

made have to make myself clear. Uh I'm

10:53

very constructive on equities, okay?

10:55

because you know I came out of the I

10:57

came hot out of the gate with the bonds.

10:58

Okay, I'm just saying I am watching

11:01

rates very very closely. Rates I do

11:04

believe we have to watch we do have to

11:05

watch interest rates, right? So I do

11:07

believe the earnings growth at least for

11:09

the next 12 to 18 months is going to

11:11

continue. Of course it'll be bumpy. We

11:14

too just like uh just like Nancy, we're

11:16

watching uh margins uh very very

11:18

closely. That might be some of the early

11:21

sort of signs that things are getting

11:22

tough. Look, even if things are bad,

11:24

they're still so much better than they

11:26

have been historically. There are still

11:28

great thesis to own most of these,

11:30

especially in the tech sector, uh,

11:32

specifically in the AI ecosystem. The

11:34

the fundamentals are really, really

11:37

strong in terms of valuations, etc.

11:40

However, again, I hate to be that, you

11:42

know, that guy. A lot of these

11:44

hyperscalers and a lot of these

11:46

companies are relying more and more on

11:48

debt. Okay? Um, you can't just turn that

11:50

spigot off. They're all needing that

11:53

capital right now. Um, and by the way,

11:55

oh, we're talking about debt, okay? That

11:57

means if yields are going up, that debt

11:59

is becoming a little bit more expensive.

12:01

I'm not saying it's going to crash the

12:03

party, uh, and everything's going to

12:05

repric and it's going to be bad. It's

12:06

just something that we have to watch

12:08

carefully, right? They don't exist, both

12:09

of them, in separate, uh, in separate

12:12

categories, right? You say you're an

12:13

equity guy, I'm an equity guy. Um, but

12:16

that said, you know, equity guys have to

12:18

see what's happening over the nerds on

12:20

the bond desk. And so, you know, I

12:22

learned early on to pay attention to

12:24

what the bond guys are up to. And then I

12:26

learned that, oh, they're the guys at

12:27

the repo desk that sit like in the

12:29

basement with the stock loan guys.

12:30

That's where you really find out what's

12:32

going on. Um, and so, you know, it's

12:34

just all about sort of these things

12:36

which were, I think, for many years kind

12:38

of detached. They're just becoming more

12:40

and more attached. And so, like I said,

12:42

I don't think the bond market's going to

12:44

crash the equity market. Uh, but it's

12:46

definitely something we got to watch,

12:48

right? So, I mean, it's definitely it's

12:50

got its finger on the pulse of a lot of

12:51

what's going on in the economy right

12:54

now. I think a lot of the economic data

12:56

that we're seeing, which is a little bit

12:57

backward looking, is not really very

12:59

helpful in looking, you know, the macro

13:01

data, not very helpful in looking at

13:03

stocks at this point. We're looking

13:05

very, very closely at stocks. But there

13:07

is a point there is a point where you

13:10

know if if this things start to happen

13:12

with consumption uh with all these other

13:15

areas that kind of we all laugh at now

13:17

right because stocks just keep going up

13:19

and up and up and up and you know look

13:21

um again you know you could have been

13:24

you could I don't want to make fun of

13:25

equity people

13:27

>> but you know you made fun enough about

13:29

people I think we can get

13:30

>> I you know I know a lot of fantastic you

13:32

know equity people who just you know

13:34

bought equities what everyone was buying

13:35

and did very very well. You know, bond

13:37

people, it's much more difficult, right?

13:39

Right. Because there's so many

13:40

challenges in making money with bonds.

13:43

Um that

13:45

>> Go ahead, Nancy.

13:45

>> Well, I'm I was just going to jump in

13:47

and I I wanted to get them

13:49

[clears throat] going. [laughter]

13:51

>> Got you. Got you. Pulled them in the

13:53

bait. You grab the bait.

13:54

>> Bonds and equities. So, I'm not just

13:57

single-minded. And I think there's this

13:59

notion that if you're bullish, you're

14:01

not as smart as the bears because the

14:03

bears can tell you everything that's

14:05

wrong. I I can tell you too. Um I I

14:08

refer to our head bond trader as the as

14:10

the worry wart. I mean he he can tell

14:12

you everything that po that can possibly

14:14

go wrong. But that's not how markets

14:16

trade. And so I think what's different

14:20

now and it hasn't been easy, Mark. I

14:23

mean this year's been a slog. And I

14:26

think you know you can say well yeah the

14:28

indices are up but below the surface

14:30

most stocks are are down. And so I I

14:33

think what you have to do when you're

14:35

thinking about it is is there

14:36

skepticism? There is a lot of

14:39

skepticism. That's good for the

14:41

sustainability of a bull market. We had

14:43

zero skepticism in the '9s and it was

14:46

just euphoria all the time. So I I know

14:49

what you're saying. It the party will

14:51

end. Growth will decelerate at some

14:54

point, but if you're three years early

14:56

or two years early on that bet, you

14:58

leave a lot of your clients money on the

15:01

table. So the dance is you got to keep

15:04

keep in the game and figure out how to

15:06

rotate.

15:07

>> Yeah, Nancy, you're so right because

15:08

even if you're right, you can still be

15:10

wrong if you don't capture all of those

15:12

gains. It's and and to your point on

15:14

the, you know, the bomb people being

15:15

super smart, it is easy to if you

15:16

continually just call the end of the

15:18

world and the end of the world never

15:19

comes, people kind of forget about the

15:21

one time it hits, you're like, "Oh,

15:22

well, the guy hit it, so perfect." You

15:24

know, so I I definitely see your your

15:25

point. Uh sorry, it looked like you

15:26

wanted to

15:27

>> can only end once, though. But hey Dan,

15:29

I think I think Mark gave the the the

15:31

Yahoo headline quote of the day there.

15:33

Bond guys, they're nerds and he's 100%

15:37

>> guys. We're crushing our [laughter] bond

15:38

audience right now.

15:42

>> So if we look at if we look at the

15:44

banks, they're going to be reporting in

15:45

another week and you're going to get,

15:47

you know, an outlook. So what's

15:49

happening in terms of net interest

15:50

margin? Bad debt. And I think that's

15:53

going to look okay. The question is

15:54

going to be six and 12 months from now

15:56

because you ended up having a lot of

15:58

software that ended up getting put on

16:00

the books in terms of loans that have to

16:02

be re-uped and they were done at much

16:03

lower prices. You're talking about

16:05

housing and your friends at 3%. Well,

16:07

you also have companies that have that

16:08

same situation.

16:09

>> Sure. Sure. And well, sorry. Go ahead.

16:11

Yeah.

16:11

>> No, just the outlooks that we're going

16:12

to get from the banks, they're great

16:13

barometers for the economy. So, where do

16:15

they see things? So, you're going to get

16:17

an answer really quickly in terms of

16:19

where the positioning should be.

16:20

>> Yes. I will also say though there is the

16:22

whole private credit world right which

16:24

is that's what we won't get the view of

16:25

and that's where you know maybe the

16:27

>> well you will tangentially you got 250

16:29

billion that was put into software

16:32

during 2001 2002

16:34

>> right

16:34

>> so that has to come up for uh you know

16:37

for refinancing

16:38

>> that's a that's [clears throat] a

16:39

valuation problem there not not a debt

16:41

problem there on that side of the

16:42

>> Sure yeah and and tech debt as a

16:45

percentage of the total debt outstanding

16:46

is like 8% u so I think yes they've been

16:50

issuing a lot of debt, but there's 38%

16:53

of the S&P plus or minus. Um, so, so I

16:56

think we have to keep that in mind. And

16:58

then also remembering that some of

16:59

that's dry powder for buybacks.

17:02

>> Uh, and and that that's important

17:04

because that puts a floor under the

17:06

market as well. So, there's an

17:08

insatiable uh in the shadow banking

17:10

system as it's called, there's an

17:12

insatiable demand for corporate debt uh

17:15

and and in particular technology debt.

17:17

So the private pension plans, the uh I'm

17:20

sorry, the insurance companies, the

17:21

state-run pension plans, they can't get

17:23

enough. I love it because they're like

17:24

low risk, but they leverage all the

17:26

debt. So

17:27

>> I want to throw

17:28

>> Would any of you guys on this call

17:29

though say that the private credit side

17:31

of things is going to be the one thing

17:33

that's going to make this house of cards

17:34

collapse right now?

17:36

>> I don't think so at this point. I think

17:38

you got time if you know to see how

17:41

things play out and you're going to

17:42

start getting revenue coming through,

17:43

right? because a lot of the AI that's

17:45

being that was put in place a year ago,

17:47

year and a half ago are starting to see

17:49

revenues being generated whether it's

17:51

anthropic in their um you know in their

17:54

10Q or I'm sorry their K's um saying you

17:57

know we're looking at I think two

17:58

billion uh in terms of revenues that are

18:01

coming through. So you know there is a

18:02

time uh as time goes on we're going to

18:05

start seeing cash flows and and monies

18:07

come in to pay down that debt and expand

18:09

what they're doing currently. I think

18:11

with the uh David to your point about

18:13

the private credit what maybe worries me

18:16

or gets me a little nervous is you know

18:17

a couple years ago when obviously rates

18:19

spike it becomes the very hot thing on

18:20

Wall Street right priv everyone wants to

18:22

get in private credit it's the hottest

18:23

job to get into um so you know sure

18:26

those those top tier right debt that

18:28

kind of lands in private credit I think

18:29

that will ultimately be fine but like as

18:31

you kind of go down the totem pole and

18:33

more and more people want to get

18:34

involved where does that debt land

18:37

what's the underwriting process you know

18:39

I mean what was it Jamie Diamond

18:40

famously called it the cockroaches,

18:42

right? So, so when does that come to

18:44

fruition and how have those cockroaches

18:46

been nesting and and how big does that

18:48

get? Maybe it's only a small pile of it

18:50

and it's something that the market can

18:51

absorb or maybe it's a lot bigger. I

18:53

mean, the big issue with private credit

18:54

is that it's private and to NY's point,

18:56

it's shadow, so we don't really have a

18:57

full sense of it, but that's where I I

18:59

get a little bit uneasy.

19:02

>> Yeah, it's just a black box at 2. That's

19:04

why people are afraid, but you know,

19:06

it's still just a $2.2 two trillion

19:08

dollar industry. So it's not huge in in

19:10

the grand scheme of things. And

19:12

obviously the software is going to be

19:13

where the quoteunquote problem children

19:15

are going to be. Not on the top end,

19:17

especially like the more vertically

19:18

integrated companies, it's might be down

19:20

the wrongs, but if you look at I think

19:23

Goldman stats put this statistic out

19:24

there. It's like of all those loans on

19:26

PC for software companies like the loan

19:29

to value on those loans is like 30 or

19:31

40%. So I think that's just what

19:33

everyone's expected to be. I don't think

19:35

it it's going to be a problem actually

19:36

at all. moving forward in the future

19:38

because the interest coverage ratios

19:39

they have on there is like two 3x. So

19:43

it's more of the valuation problem than

19:45

the the debt repayment problem.

19:46

>> Right. Mark riding in my seat. I'm

19:49

riding in my seat. You know I keep

19:51

getting sucked back into that vortex of

19:54

I don't want to be the fixed income guy.

19:56

I don't want to be that guy. I want to

19:58

join the bandwag. I am long all these

20:00

stocks that everyone else is long. I

20:02

love this stuff. Let your real colors

20:03

fly. I have been pedal to the metal. I

20:06

have been pedal to the metal and just to

20:08

be clear, I'm not saying the world is

20:10

coming to an end tomorrow. Look, we get

20:11

paid to make investments, right? That

20:13

that's what we do. Um, and you know,

20:15

look on Wall Street and I've been doing

20:17

this for a minute. Um, you know, you

20:19

learn early on that, you know, you take

20:21

advantage of an opportunity investment,

20:22

you do it until you can't do it anymore,

20:25

right? And that investment right now is

20:27

very real and really, really good. It's

20:29

really solid. The thesis on a lot of

20:32

these stocks that we all own probably

20:33

sitting here today is super strong. I've

20:36

never seen such a strong environment as

20:39

I'm seeing today. I like to tell people

20:41

it's like this. You know, you look out,

20:43

you're on the at the beach or on the

20:45

lake at Lake Tahoe and you look out on

20:47

the water, although you don't have this

20:48

problem in lakes, but on the beach we

20:50

have this problem. You look out the

20:51

beautiful you see a beautiful blue sea

20:54

>> and some people they just jump right

20:56

into the water and they swim because

20:57

it's beautiful. other people like me,

21:00

the what is it? The worry wart bond guy.

21:02

I know that there's sharks under that

21:05

water and I have to know because that's

21:08

who I am. What sharks are lurking under

21:10

the water. I still swim. I still swim.

21:13

I'm not saying don't go and swim, but

21:15

I'm telling you that there are sharks

21:16

and I like to know what's out there. How

21:18

big are they? How many teeth do they

21:19

have? You know, how do I avoid them?

21:21

That's really it. Okay, so I made that

21:23

clear. Yeah. Now, let me just say with

21:25

regard to, you know, I don't think it's

21:28

prudent to ignore that fixed income and

21:32

bonds and borrowing and debt, um, we

21:35

can't ignore that even companies that

21:38

historically would not use that part of

21:40

their balance sheet to raise money are

21:42

doing it, right? Companies that don't

21:44

necessarily need to, but they are using

21:47

fixed income to finance data center

21:49

buildouts prudently, right? Because that

21:51

you learn that in corporate finance.

21:52

That's how you raise money to do those

21:54

types of projects, project finance.

21:56

However, it's getting to the point where

21:59

some of these companies which we are

22:01

investing in to plow money into R&D,

22:04

they're spending a lot of money on

22:07

building infrastructure. They're

22:08

starting to look like utilities. We're

22:10

treating them like they're innovators,

22:12

but they're starting to their balance

22:13

sheets are starting to look more and

22:15

more like traditional utilities, right?

22:17

And so that said, again, I'm not calling

22:19

an end to the party or anything like

22:21

that, but I'm saying that if the places

22:24

that I'm looking to see where there

22:27

might be a problem coming, I'm thinking

22:29

if it's going to start to fall apart,

22:31

it's going to start with the fixed

22:33

income side. You're going to start to

22:34

see some problems and then once the

22:37

oxygen leaves the room, um and and then

22:40

then there's investor sentiment that

22:42

will play a big factor into it. That's

22:44

not going to affect their ability to

22:45

make money.

22:46

>> Yeah. But it's [clears throat] not like

22:47

you can just turn these facilities off

22:49

overnight. You still have to pay those

22:51

bonds back.

22:51

>> I'm I'm waiting for David to come in

22:53

with stats about shark attacks now. They

22:55

only happen like once every

22:56

>> They don't have sharks in Lake Tahoe, do

22:58

they? No sharks in Lake Tahoe.

23:01

>> Just I'm going to I'm a big newsletter

23:04

writer.

23:05

>> Huh?

23:06

>> I'm a newsletter writer just like you,

23:07

Mark. And my newsletter theme over the

23:09

past quarter was Dolly Parton. And she

23:12

has all these like Dollyisms. And one of

23:13

them was like, if you want the rainbow,

23:15

you got to put up with the rain. So, I

23:17

think we recognize that there's a ton of

23:19

rain. I don't think we're going to see

23:20

the cracks on the fixed income market

23:22

first. What I would actually look for on

23:24

the equity side of things, I think there

23:26

needs to be a bifurcation on the AI

23:28

winners because there's so many

23:31

perceived AI winners on the equity side,

23:33

specifically on in the small cap

23:35

universe, that don't that are that

23:37

basically the non-earners out there. uh

23:39

they have in financial technical terms a

23:41

crap ton of debt on their balance sheets

23:43

and I think you're going to see cracks

23:44

in that area of the market first and you

23:45

haven't seen that just yet.

23:47

>> So I think go ahead spread

23:49

>> go ahead.

23:50

>> I was just going to say wouldn't it it

23:51

it really hasn't shown up in spreads.

23:53

>> Um and I think that's something that we

23:56

all look at uh as a as an indicator. It

23:59

always has historically right.

24:00

>> So I mean it that's not to say it can't

24:03

and I I think we actually all agree. Um,

24:06

it's it's just been enjoyable to watch

24:08

Mark squirm. [laughter]

24:12

>> Mark, I'm going to put the one I want I

24:13

want to hear from everybody here quick

24:15

about their take, but Mark, I'm going to

24:16

start with you. We do at Business

24:17

Insider, we do a quarterly thing where

24:18

to invest $10,000 right now. Mark was

24:21

nice enough to participate. Next time,

24:22

we're going to get all four of you

24:23

involved. But, uh, Mark, again, I don't

24:25

need to I don't need to paint more of a

24:27

picture, but something in the article.

24:29

So, where if you had $10,000 right now,

24:32

where would you invest it? So, okay. I

24:34

You caught me at a very weak point.

24:36

[laughter] All right. And And I'm

24:38

squirming right now, Nancy. I am.

24:40

>> What's the end of Fight Club? You caught

24:41

me at a very interesting point in my

24:42

life. You call Mark at a very

24:44

interesting point in his life.

24:44

>> They did. Uh, you know, I was watching

24:46

yields, you know, longer yields going up

24:48

and up and up, and I'm like, "Okay, you

24:49

know, look, maybe it's prudent to like

24:51

put a little bit of fixed income in a

24:53

portfolio of $10,000, right?" Um, you

24:56

know, I'm still I I still tilted heavy

24:59

into AI. I still I still like the S&P,

25:03

right? I still like these types of

25:04

things. So, but I thought maybe a little

25:06

prudent to buy a little bit of of uh

25:10

fixed income here at these levels, but

25:12

not a small allocation. And um just to

25:15

be fair, and I did say, and I'm going to

25:18

be honest, right, you could check me on

25:19

this, right? I did say, let's put a

25:21

little bit in bills, right? Tea bills.

25:23

But why? I put them there because if the

25:26

market pulls back, I want to have some

25:27

dry powder. And I think that's a great

25:29

place to put your money right now. You

25:31

could just take it out. The yields on

25:32

the on, you know, on this uh year and

25:34

under paper are very attractive. And

25:36

again, it's the nicest way. You know,

25:38

you you never got paid this much to hold

25:40

cash. I'm not saying go to cash,

25:42

>> but I'm saying that this is an

25:43

opportunity to buy the pullbacks. We've

25:45

been buying all the dips,

25:46

>> right?

25:47

>> So, that's really why I did to protect

25:49

myself.

25:49

>> All right. All right. You're off,

25:50

>> but you could kill me for the bonds.

25:52

>> Plus, what about you? Where do you come

25:53

out on $10,000? Where are you investing

25:54

right now? I think you want to look

25:55

where choke points are for AI and you

25:57

want to invest in those areas as well as

25:59

the leaders in AI. So those are part of

26:01

it and you end up having companies that

26:04

have been investing in this and are

26:05

starting to see the benefits whether

26:06

it's banks from looking at industrial

26:08

companies I have an energy company

26:11

that's supplying 5 gawatts of energy to

26:13

to behind the meter they call it types

26:15

of companies. So you can't get power the

26:17

guys in Texas we're talking about now

26:19

all of a sudden you flip a switch 18

26:20

months you're able to get you know your

26:22

power plant going. So, okay,

26:24

>> those are the things.

26:25

>> Choke points. Got it. Nancy, what about

26:27

you?

26:29

>> Uh, $10,000. Huh.

26:30

>> Yes.

26:31

>> Yeah. I think I would um I' I'd put it

26:35

in the cues for now. Um I I just think

26:37

you get broad diversification. Uh you

26:40

don't get all the choke points, but you

26:42

get most of the names that are going to

26:43

succeed. And I think I didn't know what

26:44

the time horizon was, but if it's fourth

26:47

quarter, that's where I'd put it.

26:48

>> Okay. And then David, what about you?

26:50

Where are you landing? I'm going 99%

26:53

beta between the S&P 500 and the Q's,

26:56

but you know, Mark said he wanted dried

26:58

powder in case the market pulled back.

27:00

I'd rather on that last 1% in long

27:02

volatility in low delta put options. So,

27:05

you know, he basically puts guard rails

27:07

on the portfolio. If you get a pullback

27:08

in the market, you know, you can

27:10

capitalize on the gains from the put

27:11

that have that be the dry capital to go

27:14

out there and buy the dip.

27:15

>> Gotcha. All right. So, we're talking a

27:17

lot about AI and let's kind of bring in

27:19

some of the pricing pressure that we're

27:20

seeing. And so there was a report about

27:22

Microsoft slashing its internal cloud

27:24

spending. Um you know that also came a

27:26

couple weeks ago when chat when openi

27:28

announced chat GBT's uh premier tier

27:31

subscription is going up. We also just

27:33

broadly have anthropic and openai

27:34

looking to go public right they want to

27:36

get their financials in order. So I

27:38

think we're seeing some of the AI

27:39

companies right increase some of their

27:41

subscription models. Maybe some of the

27:42

users pulling back in some areas. So I

27:46

wonder, you know, I've used this term in

27:48

in my own newsletter, chatbot monogamy,

27:51

right? This idea of um from the AI

27:54

companies, they want to go deeper with a

27:56

client, whether it's an enterprise or a

27:58

person, right? Muse wants everything.

28:00

They want all of your details. Um and

28:02

then from a user perspective, is it

28:05

really realistic for me to manage a

28:08

bunch of different subscriptions? We

28:09

were talking before um with some of the

28:11

producers about streaming, right? Like I

28:12

can only have so many streamers. Do you

28:15

do you see that as a realistic future

28:18

now that people are going to start pull

28:19

back and there's going to be winners and

28:21

losers and how does that impact all

28:22

these companies? Mark, you're shaking

28:23

your head.

28:24

>> Yeah, totally. Um, this brings up such

28:26

an interesting point, right? Because um,

28:29

you know, these companies, and I dare

28:31

say this, it it hurt it gets me nervous

28:33

to even say it. You know, these

28:35

companies where they are right now,

28:37

they're starting to look to me like

28:40

commodities in a weird sort of way,

28:42

right? Because at some point, yeah,

28:44

there are notable differences and we all

28:46

know the notable differences between the

28:48

different models that are out there, but

28:50

at the end of the day, they're all going

28:52

to serve some sort of a function and

28:54

companies or individual users are going

28:57

to be able to select their favorite

28:59

based on price, based on all these types

29:02

of things. You see them now, they're

29:03

talking about price. They can't, it's

29:05

going to be very difficult to continue

29:07

to exist as a differentiator, right? And

29:10

at some point, uh, even sort of the

29:12

users, the corporate users, the B2B

29:14

users are going to be like, "Oh, we're

29:16

just going to go for the one that makes

29:17

the most fiscal sense." It's going to

29:20

be, uh, it's going to be a CFO decision.

29:22

It's not going to be the nerds making

29:24

the decision, saying, "Oh, no, no, no.

29:26

This one here is, you know, is smarter

29:28

at this or smarter at that." Yeah,

29:30

there'll be nuances, but, you know,

29:32

we've seen this happen in technology

29:34

before. It's going to be very hard to

29:36

continue to differentiate. Now people

29:38

below that level below the the providers

29:42

themselves I'm talking about the open

29:44

AIs and the anthropics right those guys

29:47

will still be able to differentiate

29:48

themselves better chips you know better

29:50

power cheap you know all that kind of

29:52

stuff that's all sort of organizing

29:54

right now but the people that we're

29:55

expecting the most from in the next year

29:57

as these two companies the big ones go

30:00

public you're going to that's going to

30:02

be the question we're going to have to

30:03

ask ourselves is this some sort of a

30:06

sustainable

30:08

moat that they're building that's going

30:09

to make this one the winner. That's not

30:11

going to ultimately put price pressure

30:14

on companies that have very very high

30:16

costs to produce their products,

30:18

>> right?

30:19

>> I'm going to take it from the other

30:20

side. You have power users. They're

30:22

maybe five uh you know 10% maybe of all

30:25

of the AI users. Now, those guys are

30:28

going to probably look for what's the

30:29

best utilization? How do I get these

30:31

models to work the best? How am I making

30:33

more profit in terms of my company? Then

30:35

you have the guys kind of middle in the

30:37

the the we'll call it the entry level.

30:40

They're looking at, you know, um what

30:42

goes into this recipe and obviously

30:44

that's going to be more of a

30:45

costconscious thing more so than anybody

30:47

else probably. Um and then you do have

30:49

the CFOs that are probably going to get

30:50

involved with the power users over time,

30:52

but I think you're going to draw down

30:54

the pricing of this uh in terms of like

30:56

any other model. Um and you know you're

30:59

going to have lower and lower costs who

31:00

gets more utilization and those are the

31:02

people that you're going to look to is

31:04

probably going to be the winners.

31:05

>> David, you look like you want to

31:06

>> It's 100 Yeah, it's 100% kind of a

31:09

commodity side of things. Obviously like

31:10

the Muse news, you know, not being on

31:12

the enterprise side of things is

31:13

interesting, but like can you blame

31:15

Daario for coming out and you know

31:17

giving all this fear porn out there to

31:19

try to people make people afraid of AI?

31:20

Like

31:21

>> oh I love that

31:21

>> he knows what his mode is and it's going

31:23

to be on the regulation side of things.

31:25

So, I'd be doing exactly what Dario was

31:27

saying before, but I mean, we're just

31:28

seeing Jeban's paradox really play out

31:31

in real time. I mean, you have cheaper

31:32

tokens, far more tokens, bigger total

31:35

bills, but like every time the price

31:37

drops, usage is going to explode higher.

31:41

And I think that's what continues to

31:42

make me very bullish about the entire

31:44

space, even if it is commoditized.

31:45

>> Do you think, and N, I'd love to get

31:47

your take, too, but David, do you think

31:48

that the other foot will eventually

31:50

drop? What I always think about, I'm a

31:51

millennial, right? And I was raised on

31:54

the millennial subsidy, right? We had

31:56

Door Dash and we had all these great

31:57

apps that gave us super low prices

31:59

because they wanted growth, growth,

32:00

growth. And then all of a sudden, I look

32:02

at my Uber Eats and I'm like, wait,

32:04

there's this fee and this fee and this

32:05

fee and my Door Dash and and my gym

32:07

subscription is this and all of a sudden

32:08

it spikes up. So do you think there's a

32:10

little bit of like draw up it down, get

32:12

the usage in and then as we right when

32:14

we get addicted then the price spikes?

32:17

>> Yeah, I mean that's likely going to

32:18

happen. I mean, we kind of had this

32:20

exact same thing happen during Google. I

32:23

mean, people can now look stuff up. I

32:25

mean, that was kind of the narrative

32:26

around Google to, you know, try to bring

32:28

down overall costs. I mean, now you can

32:30

just look stuff up even more faster and

32:33

efficiently. So, I I definitely think

32:34

it's going to happen. I don't know, you

32:36

know, Dan, I don't know if I'm a

32:37

millennial not. I lived 23 days in the

32:39

80s. Drug, sex, rock and roll. I don't

32:41

remember any of it. Um, [laughter] but

32:42

you know, I'm unfortunately I have not

32:44

been able to look at my uh my Uber Eats

32:46

build, but I definitely probably have

32:48

those uh piles of fees stacking up where

32:50

I need to utilize Muse. [laughter]

32:52

>> Yeah, I mean I haven't jumped into the

32:53

Muse, but sorry, Nancy, I want to bring

32:54

you in as well. What where do you fall

32:56

on all this? [snorts]

32:57

>> Um, I don't know. I'm back on sex,

32:59

drugs, and rock and roll. [laughter] Um,

33:03

what what were we talking about? Um I I

33:06

think I think you watch what the the

33:09

smart leaders are doing and what what we

33:11

heard from uh Jensen Wong about I don't

33:14

know maybe it was six months three

33:15

months ago was that they Nvidia was

33:18

pivoting away from the large language

33:20

models which is not to say they're not

33:21

still dumping chips in the to the LLMs

33:24

but they were focusing on industry and

33:27

they were focusing on sovereigns and I

33:30

think that's where we're going to start

33:31

to see bifurcation like and by the way

33:34

one of the big winners is probably going

33:35

to be Microsoft. Not the best product,

33:38

certainly not. Um, but embedded in the

33:40

enterprise. And so, you know, go back to

33:43

when I was growing up and it was the

33:45

question was, do you want to own a Sony

33:47

Betamax uh player or a VHS player? Sony

33:51

was superior, but VHS stole stole the

33:54

brand. And so, we ended up with an

33:56

inferior technology. Um, but because it

34:00

was it was omnipresent. And so I think

34:04

you're going to start to see changes.

34:05

And I think that's what Daario's worried

34:06

about. Uh and Sam Alman as well. You

34:09

don't pull an IPO or push an IPO uh

34:11

because you're you're optimistic about

34:14

about the future. You you pull back and

34:16

try to recalibrate. And last thing I'll

34:19

say is this whole

34:21

nonsense about the end of humanity. Um

34:24

[clears throat] it and please regulate

34:26

us. We can't help ourselves. Oh, by the

34:27

way, we just released a new model. Um,

34:30

but I behind the scenes while this was

34:33

all going on. But just remember, it

34:34

wasn't that long ago that Mark

34:36

Zuckerberg was like, "I'm sorry, did we

34:38

censor? Please regulate me." So, I think

34:41

it's an old playbook for Silicon Valley.

34:43

>> Also interesting that Mark is on the

34:45

other side. He's not the one. You know,

34:47

it's cuz he learned his lesson. But

34:48

David, I got a Dolly Parton quote for

34:50

you for your next newsletter. It costs a

34:52

lot of money to look this cheap. Um, so,

34:54

you know, just, you know, there

34:56

something for for your next newsletter.

34:57

But no, Nancy, I I totally agree with

34:59

you about I I think I've kind of I've

35:02

written about this a lot. The whole oh

35:04

regulate us. I think it's far too

35:06

convenient. You have the rise of openw

35:08

weight models which are a real risk to

35:09

the business model for open AI and

35:11

anthropic. You also have other players

35:13

kind of coming in whether it's the big

35:15

guys like Google and Gemini continues to

35:17

kind of make progress there. Um and I

35:20

think also it's an easy scapegoat for oh

35:22

we can't release our new product not

35:24

because maybe it's not as good as we

35:25

thought maybe not. No, it's because the

35:27

regulators like we the fate guys, the

35:29

fate of humanity is at hand here. So we

35:32

for for everyone's sake, we need to hold

35:33

back. I think it's far far far too

35:36

convenient that all of this is is coming

35:38

down. And the other thing I I really

35:39

question is, you know, when they say

35:41

they want to be regulated, how much do

35:42

they really mean that? You know, how

35:44

much do they really want the government

35:46

getting in their models, getting in

35:47

their source code? Like these are

35:49

trillion dollar companies. There's so

35:51

much valuable IP. I read a story the

35:53

other day about at Meta the people who

35:54

are working on their top AI models. They

35:56

don't even have them on the internal org

35:58

chart. These are like the, you know,

35:59

another millennial. These are like the

36:01

unspeakables in Harry Potter. Like

36:02

you're not even allowed to look at these

36:03

people. You can't know who they are, you

36:05

know. So if that's the secrecy that they

36:07

have around this thing, they also at the

36:09

same time want to turn over to the

36:10

federal government. I I don't I don't

36:12

necessarily um buy all that.

36:14

>> Sorry. Go ahead.

36:14

>> And and the federal government, they

36:16

can't regulate anything including crypto

36:18

or the internet.

36:19

>> Track is not great. track record is not

36:21

great.

36:21

>> I'm going to play play on that with

36:23

Dolly Parton and Nancy. I mean the

36:24

government only works 9 to5 [laughter]

36:26

AI 24/7.

36:28

>> Um I want to talk about Gus. You

36:30

mentioned choke points. So we had an

36:32

interesting deal today. Google with

36:33

constellation, right? Nuclear power. Now

36:35

I'll be upfront with my bias. I come

36:38

from a nuclear power power family. My

36:40

dad was a nuclear engineer. So I've been

36:42

I have lots of propaganda of of nuclear

36:45

power, but I can be unbiased in that. I

36:47

think it's a really interesting deal.

36:48

But I think it's also interesting for

36:49

the markets because um you know nuclear

36:52

power had an interesting run last year.

36:53

This year not doing that great but we

36:56

are seeing this deal done. What's the

36:58

disconnect between it seems like the the

37:01

way forward with um AI and the way to

37:04

power it is probably going to be nuclear

37:05

power but the markets aren't necessarily

37:08

recognized that is that because the

37:09

value's already been built in or what's

37:10

what's your take on that?

37:11

>> In constellations uh example I think

37:14

part of it has been because they had

37:15

five approvals for plants that they

37:17

could put down. So they're past the

37:19

approval process, right?

37:20

>> So they can get to market quicker than

37:21

anybody else. And that's why I think it

37:23

was discounted

37:24

>> already into the pricing. Um when I look

37:27

overseas, I mean it's been used in

37:29

France for uh years. You know, it can be

37:32

used here. Uh you end up coming out with

37:34

a model that is our biggest problem is

37:37

we haven't built these plants. There was

37:39

one built down in Georgia. It was

37:40

supposed to take three years. I think it

37:41

took seven.

37:42

>> Takes a while,

37:43

>> right? So you have to have that muscle

37:44

memory. So I think that this is actually

37:46

the way to go and you'll probably see

37:48

the government get involved after the

37:49

election trying to get it, you know,

37:51

push start this to get more nuclear

37:53

plants going because it's one of the

37:54

fastest ways that you can actually get a

37:57

lot of power.

37:58

>> Sure.

37:58

>> And push it out safely and it's also

38:00

clean,

38:00

>> right? Which is it's just as again as a

38:03

child of nuclear power hearing about

38:04

it's you know our governor at the time

38:06

was not a big fan of hearing this is not

38:08

clean, this is bad. Now it's the clean

38:10

nuclear it's clean. It's just it's all

38:12

it's an upside down world. But um I

38:14

don't know if anyone else has thoughts

38:15

on on the nuclear push in power or no um

38:18

or sorry Nancy

38:19

>> I'll just say one thing I I thought I

38:21

wanted to be a nuclear power activist

38:23

after uh the China syndrome uh which you

38:26

probably none of you remember but it it

38:28

came out Jane Fonda so I mean who didn't

38:30

want to be Jane Fonda at that age so it

38:32

was it was a nuclear power meltdown and

38:35

then and 12 days later we had the three

38:37

mile island meltdown and here's here's a

38:41

fun fact no one died But we shut down

38:44

all the nuclear power regulators and we

38:46

poisoned the earth if you're following

38:48

with the climate people for 40 years uh

38:51

using fossil fuels all the way all the

38:54

while yelling at the fossil fuel

38:56

companies. So I I think it's awesome

38:58

that we're finally back there. Um I I I

39:01

grew up in an age where you hid under

39:03

your desk duck and cover nuclear bomb.

39:06

Um and I was always curious how that was

39:09

going to protect me, but you know we

39:10

obeyed. Yeah. and um desks were sick.

39:13

Yeah. Yeah. They made desks really well

39:15

back then, [laughter]

39:17

>> but I do think it's I do think it's

39:18

awesome. And we have a a strategy we run

39:21

that is invested in all the technologies

39:23

we think are going to change. It's a

39:24

thematic portfolio. So, highly volatile.

39:27

I'm not hawking it here. I'm just saying

39:28

we're in the names. Uh we we we like the

39:31

space and I think uh I think it's going

39:33

to really change the way the things

39:35

we're talking about.

39:36

>> Sure. I'll I'll just say not an

39:38

investment advisor. don't hold any of

39:41

the fancy certifications you have. I

39:43

think one interesting thing to look at

39:44

is people who handle the nuclear waste,

39:47

right? That's always been a big problem.

39:48

We were supposed to have Yucka Mountain

39:50

in Nevada. Never fell apart. Now, as we

39:53

have more of this nuclear power, we're

39:54

going to have more of these radioactive

39:56

rods that are going to be created as a,

39:57

you know, as a byproduct of this. We're

39:59

going to have to put it somewhere. They

40:00

can't keep out on site. So, I don't

40:01

know. Just one to look out for. Again,

40:03

not a financial adviser, but just my

40:05

thought. Um let's uh let's talk a little

40:08

bit about AI adoption, right? Because we

40:10

talked a little bit about Muse now. And

40:12

one interesting thing, we had a story um

40:14

a CEO told us how actually Muse is

40:18

driving him away from Amazon purchases

40:20

and boosting Shopify. And the the

40:22

backstory here is that Amazon has

40:24

blocked Muse, right? It's considered a

40:26

competitor. So Muse is not playing and

40:28

there is a big relationship with

40:30

Spotify. Um, again, it's just one

40:33

example, but I'm curious if if this is

40:34

the start of maybe bigger things as more

40:36

and more people leverage Muse and and

40:38

shopping is a big piece of the puzzle

40:40

here. What do we think there?

40:42

>> I mean, is that going to be a worry for

40:44

the overall market? I mean, let's just

40:46

say that happens. All right. You know,

40:48

uh, the corporations, maybe they spend

40:50

less. Well, you know what? That boosts

40:52

profit margins. What's the one thing

40:53

that markets love to see? Increasing

40:56

margins. Or if they take it somewhere

40:57

else, you know what? All right, maybe

40:58

we're spending less here. We trim the

41:00

fat to save money, but we're probably

41:01

going to spend it somewhere else, which

41:03

then encouraers, you know, some type of

41:04

other revenue growth. So, I I don't see

41:06

it being a a bearish aspect whatsoever.

41:09

It's just a better stewardship of

41:10

capital.

41:11

>> Sure. Is anyone here on the Muse game

41:14

yet?

41:15

>> No.

41:16

>> No. No buyins. All right. What about

41:18

Instinct? Instinct. No. So, you guys are

41:21

not involved on the You guys aren't No

41:22

one's in on the AI agents yet.

41:25

>> What's What's holding you back?

41:29

Mine's not on the consumer side of

41:30

whatever. Like I'm not worried about the

41:32

agents. Like everyone's worried like,

41:33

"Oh, they're going to steal my data." My

41:34

data has already been stolen probably

41:36

[laughter] a million times and it's

41:38

going to continue to be stolen. But I

41:41

definitely need to get on the train,

41:42

Dan.

41:42

>> Yeah, I I I fall in the same boat as

41:44

you. I get an email, I think once a

41:46

month, saying that all my details are on

41:47

the dark web. So, there's a lot of Dandy

41:49

Franchescos out there. Nancy, sorry. It

41:50

looks like you were going to say

41:51

something there. Oh, I was just going to

41:52

say I have two millennials that in my

41:54

household and I'm I'm just waiting for

41:56

them to come home Christmas and get me

41:57

set up on Muse. I mean, I I love the

41:59

idea of it because it solves problems.

42:01

Um, but I I as I used to tell my

42:04

students, I don't I don't have to know

42:05

how to use technology. It was my

42:07

generation that invented it. So,

42:10

>> I love it. You heard it here first.

42:12

Thanksgiving break, look for the spike

42:14

in Muse downloads and Instinct downloads

42:16

[laughter] because all the kids come

42:18

home and say, "Mom, dad, you got to get

42:19

on this." Uh, Mark Gus, what about you?

42:22

You guys not interested in the AI agent?

42:24

Is there a specific reason or just

42:25

haven't got around to it or

42:26

>> I just haven't got I think it's an

42:27

amazing thing. I mean, it's an amazing

42:29

technology. I've been embracing

42:31

technology from, you know, back in the

42:32

day when we invented the wheel. Uh,

42:34

probably before Nancy got into the I've

42:37

been around for a minute. Uh, but yeah,

42:39

[laughter] no, I've always been very

42:40

close to the tech and and I just haven't

42:42

had a chance. I think it makes a lot of

42:44

sense. I mean, we I definitely use

42:46

agents, but I use them like what would

42:48

be considered the oldfashioned way now,

42:49

right? through the the LLM, through the

42:51

other services, uh, versus having it

42:54

right there on a cute little app. But I

42:56

think it's a great thing. I mean, it's a

42:57

tool, right? It's again, this whole

42:59

question of is it going to end the

43:00

world? I remember when we talked about,

43:02

well, Nancy, of course, will remember

43:03

this, right? When the when we had when

43:05

when they first came out with

43:07

spreadsheets, right? Everyone thought,

43:08

oh my god, it's going to end the entire

43:11

accounting profession. It, you know,

43:13

everyone's going to lose jobs. There's

43:14

going to be massive unemployment, right?

43:16

But it's it actually had the opposite

43:18

effect, right? I mean we became the most

43:21

productive country in the world on the

43:23

backs of those technology tools right

43:26

>> sure enhanced it started

43:27

>> consult this is just we're going to see

43:28

this is just really the you know two and

43:31

3.0 of that, right? So, it's happening

43:33

right now. Um, you know, obviously all

43:36

these questions about

43:37

>> all these questions that people are

43:39

worried about about their their identity

43:40

and all that stuff. This stuff all

43:42

existed before. There are always

43:43

nefarious people out there that are

43:46

going to do the wrong thing. Look,

43:47

kitchen knives, they could be really

43:49

great tools if you're trying to cut

43:50

salad, but you can also kill someone

43:52

with a kitchen knife or in the hands of

43:54

somebody who's not dey, you can hurt

43:56

yourself with it. I'll I will I'll jump

43:57

on the aging myself trend. And I

43:59

remember when buying stuff on the

44:01

internet was like people would kind of

44:02

look at you like you put your credit

44:04

card on the internet like my I think it

44:06

was I think it was until 2010 my mom was

44:08

willing to uh to jump on that train. So

44:10

I I definitely appreciate that. I think

44:12

the flip side uh Andre Horowitz had an

44:15

interesting um report about the most

44:17

used apps. I think we could put up here

44:18

users for Gen Z. Um so these are the top

44:21

consumer AI apps by monthly revenue. Um

44:25

so sorry this is active users right so

44:27

chatgbt cap cut which I know I use is

44:29

like for Tik Tok cutting uh Gemini

44:32

another chatbot there canva and AI

44:34

gallery I think making your Instagram's

44:35

pretty um and then if you go to revenue

44:38

um which I think we also have that chart

44:40

so interesting that OpenAI the top but

44:42

then anthropic jumps up which that

44:43

caught out to me I think uh Claude was

44:46

maybe seven as far as users but

44:48

interesting that open eye and anthropic

44:50

are one and two as far as revenue um but

44:53

yeah I don't know if anything stands out

44:54

to anyone there. Higsfield I think is on

44:56

the the AI um you know movie side of

44:58

things. Um so yeah it's just you know

45:00

Jenz is always willing to really um jump

45:03

in. I know we talked a lot about AI so

45:05

maybe we could pivot here to the wider

45:07

economy right because there's a lot of

45:08

other companies out there

45:10

>> [snorts]

45:10

>> um and with earnings season what sectors

45:13

are we expecting or hoping some

45:16

outperformance from? Uh Mark

45:18

>> jump in. Yeah. So we talked a little bit

45:19

about banks before. Um um you know I I

45:24

love that banks come first, right? Um

45:26

not because I love banks or anything

45:27

like that, but no because you know again

45:30

you mentioned earlier that they give I

45:32

look at them more for a read on what's

45:34

going on in the broader economy, right?

45:36

Every single one of those banks is kind

45:38

of unique in the in the clients that

45:40

they serve, right? So you get to hear

45:41

something interesting from each one of

45:43

those. And you mentioned the credit

45:45

issue. So for me in the last um again

45:48

because I am Dr. doom. Um I'm always

45:51

looking for when's that next crack going

45:53

to come, right? Um and so look, I I

45:56

think all of us are, but you guys

45:58

probably have gone away from that. You

46:00

know, I'm waiting for that consumer to

46:01

break. All right? And that consumer is

46:03

not breaking. And every single quarter,

46:05

I'm like, the consumer is going to break

46:06

this quarter. Consumer is going to break

46:08

this quarter. And consumers just keep

46:09

spending. And I love to hear the banks

46:12

talk about, you know, their credit cards

46:13

and things like that. And every quarter

46:15

it's like, oh, our defaults are lower.

46:17

And I'm like, wait, when is it gonna

46:18

finally break? But I'm gonna Here's my

46:20

thing, right? This quarter, I'm gonna be

46:23

looking for something different. Here's

46:24

your doom quote of the day.

46:26

>> As if I haven't already rolled 10 of

46:27

them here. Um, you know, I'm going to

46:30

start to look at how their higherend

46:32

customers are are doing with their

46:34

credit right now, right? Because I know

46:35

there's the wealth effect and I know but

46:37

a lot of the wealthier the top part of

46:40

the K uh has been really supporting

46:42

consumption a lot, right? Um, and I can

46:45

say though that the top end of the K is

46:47

where the problems might start, right?

46:50

Because if you start to look at any

46:52

labor problems that we're having right

46:54

now, if you looked at Friday's numbers,

46:55

last Friday's numbers, you start to see

46:58

the numbers start to look worse for

47:00

white collar people, right? Because of

47:02

AI, right? Because we are all being

47:06

replaced by AI or they're basically

47:08

tamping down hiring, right? So through

47:10

natural attrition basically there's a

47:13

lot of pressure on the top end. Okay.

47:15

And so you are going to start there is a

47:18

there is a point where people even

47:20

wealthy people are going to start to

47:22

pull back and we have seen it. We've

47:23

heard it from Walmart before that

47:25

they're getting some wealthier they're

47:27

getting more wealthier customers that

47:29

are coming to shop in their store. You

47:30

see it at Costco. You you see it uh at

47:32

all these places now where people are

47:35

trading now. Higherend customers clients

47:37

are now starting to trade down. So, I

47:39

want to hear what what they're going to

47:41

say about them. That to me is what I'm

47:43

listening for. Of course, I'm looking

47:44

for private credit and all that

47:45

[clears throat] other stuff, but what's

47:46

the consumer up there?

47:47

>> So, some of the other things that we

47:49

look at, there are companies that

47:50

actually have August quarter ends and

47:53

they reported actually pretty good

47:54

numbers. Yeah.

47:55

>> So, you have that. The second thing is I

47:57

always look at TSA. So, if I'm looking

47:59

at that's probably if you're taking a

48:01

flight, it's because you have excess

48:02

cash. Yeah.

48:03

>> Right. And those are at record numbers.

48:05

>> Yeah.

48:05

>> And we're also looking at Nancy had

48:07

mentioned it before. or if we're looking

48:08

at some sort of spread widenings and

48:10

things like that, we're not seeing

48:12

credit so far. And then on the flip

48:13

side, usually earnings, you end up

48:16

having analysts bring numbers down and

48:17

then you beat it. But for three quarters

48:19

in a row, we're actually increasing

48:21

numbers going into quarter end. So right

48:24

now things look okay. Now the outlooks

48:26

are the things that we're looking at and

48:28

you know what are they going to tell us?

48:29

Are they going to pull back numbers? Are

48:31

analysts going to get more concerned?

48:32

And is it going to break the difference

48:34

between the winners and losers or just

48:36

start to do that at this I mean, well,

48:38

banks had a fantastic quarter last

48:40

quarter, right? So, the question is is

48:41

can they keep it up, right?

48:43

>> Will they be able to have those fees

48:44

that they had last quarter?

48:46

>> Looks like bonuses are going to be big

48:47

now, too. I saw a report.

48:48

>> I just think if anything is, you know,

48:50

that's that that's the one sector that I

48:52

think can can provide the most amount of

48:55

let's call it queasiness, right? Cuz,

48:57

you know, it can go either way because

48:59

they they were just so good last quarter

49:01

and the expectations right now are so

49:03

high. Um, so you know, for me, you know,

49:06

obviously that can set the tone for what

49:08

what follows.

49:09

>> David, what are you looking at?

49:10

>> That's I mean that's why Brian Moahan's

49:12

comments are really the only comments I

49:15

want to look at during uh bank earning

49:17

season. It's actually not JB Diamond. I

49:19

think he's been wrong a lot here lately.

49:21

Like let's go back to the 1957 novel

49:24

novel by Ein Randall talk. It's called

49:26

Atlas Shrugged. All right. You know, we

49:27

know that the consumer drives like 70%

49:30

of the GDP spend here in the United

49:32

States. Like, and if the consumer ever

49:34

shrugs, that's what's going to create a

49:36

problem for the economy. But we always

49:38

want to talk about that K-shaped

49:39

economy. You know, the top part's doing

49:41

great, the bottom part's doing terrible.

49:43

But I I actually don't agree with that

49:45

at all. If you go back to pre-COVID,

49:47

like the top 1% has grown its net wealth

49:49

by 108%. If you go to the bottom 50%,

49:52

they've grown their net wealth by 129%.

49:55

Obviously, it's off a much smaller base,

49:58

but obviously if you look at the top

50:00

cohorts, and I know Mark, you made a

50:02

great point that, you know, if we're

50:03

going to see some spending slow, it

50:05

might be on the top end. I fully

50:06

disagree with that because if you look

50:08

at who owns stocks, who looks own homes,

50:10

like that's what's driven the majority

50:12

of the net wealth over the last 10

50:14

years, and that just continues to

50:15

skyrocket. And, you know, I don't like

50:17

quoting Buffett. I think he's over

50:18

pontificated. But if if consumers have

50:21

the money in their pocket, they're

50:22

they're going to spend it. They're not

50:23

going to let a bul burn a hole in their

50:25

pocket.

50:25

>> That's not Dolly Parton. [laughter]

50:28

>> Taking shots

50:28

>> all over all over the board, guys.

50:30

>> I love it. Taking shots of Jamie

50:31

Diamond, Warren Buffett, and physically

50:32

showing the Atlas shrug. Nancy, what

50:34

about you? What's uh what's what are you

50:36

looking at on the for earnings? [snorts]

50:38

>> Um well, I I think I said it. I think

50:40

we're we're focused on margins and

50:42

guidance because um I I do think um God

50:46

bless America, the consumer is going to

50:48

continue to spend. Uh even if you look

50:50

at energy costs, I mean they were higher

50:53

a few years back. Uh and so I don't

50:56

think um I don't think energy costs are

50:58

going to derail the consumer. It h they

51:00

haven't yet. Uh and and the if you look

51:03

at the lower end of the income cohort,

51:05

that's actually been the group that has

51:07

enjoyed the highest level of salary

51:09

increases. So to Dave's point, but um

51:12

that said, uh they matter a lot and um

51:15

so we'll be we'll be paying attention.

51:17

Uh, but I I want to see some activity in

51:20

the IP IPO market uh get restarted. I

51:23

think that'll help the banks that we

51:25

own, which are Goldman and JP Morgan.

51:28

Um, Meg, just in general, I hope you

51:30

cannot hear my dog barking.

51:31

>> No, you're fine. [laughter]

51:33

>> Okay.

51:34

>> Are there bears around? Are there bears?

51:36

>> Are there bears around? Is it protect?

51:38

Do you [laughter] need to Do you need to

51:38

go?

51:39

>> I'm not a bear. I'm not a bear.

51:41

>> Please, please.

51:42

>> I'm a bull.

51:43

>> It's afraid of Mark.

51:44

>> He's [laughter] He's reacting to Mark.

51:46

Um yeah no so so anyway I think I've

51:49

said it but yeah we're going to be and

51:52

and also the spread of AI across sectors

51:55

that has been our investing theme for

51:57

the last four years old economy

51:59

companies that are um pivoting to the

52:01

new technologies we started with

52:02

digitization remember that one nobody

52:05

could say it before 8:00 in the morning

52:07

but um and so we're we're watching that

52:10

across you know multiple sectors

52:11

>> so we've done a lot of you know

52:13

nostalgia here which is very timely

52:16

because the nostalgia economy is

52:17

growing. Um, there's a story recently

52:19

about how CD sales are booming. Um,

52:22

which is fascinating. So, I'd love to

52:25

hear from all of you if there's a '90s

52:27

trend that you don't want to make a

52:29

comeback. Before we do that, I have a

52:30

great business idea. For any of the Gen

52:32

Z, only Gen Z viewers, I will offer you

52:35

12 CDs for a penny, and you just have to

52:38

send me your credit card details. There

52:39

might be some further, you know,

52:41

charging, but don't worry about that.

52:42

Just send them. And for the people who

52:44

are confused, I'm talking about Columbia

52:46

House. You might remember there was a

52:47

famous subscription service in the back

52:49

of the magazines. You got 12 CDs for a

52:51

penny and then every CD after that was

52:53

like $45 and they wouldn't stop coming

52:55

unless you sent your firstborn. They

52:57

actually just shut down I saw in

52:58

September. So it's very Yeah. F which is

53:01

crazy that it lasted till 2026. Um but

53:04

uh nostalgia. Gus, let's start with you.

53:06

What's What trend would you not like to

53:08

see make a comeback?

53:09

>> Mullets. [laughter]

53:11

Well, look, Andrew Wang, you know, the

53:13

the the Facebook guy. Um,

53:15

>> I don't feel like I can weigh in on the

53:16

mullet thing. I'm just saying. And I'm

53:19

thinking maybe not you either, but you

53:20

know, [laughter]

53:22

>> Mark, what?

53:22

>> I'd love to see a mullet come back,

53:24

personally.

53:25

>> What would you not like to see come

53:26

back?

53:27

>> Oh. Oh, boy. I love the '9s, man. So, I

53:29

I can't say that there's anything I

53:31

didn't like. I think all of us are now

53:33

grasping for that time where we had our

53:35

feet at least one toe on the ground, but

53:37

right now everything's moving so fast. I

53:39

think that's why you're seeing that. But

53:40

I will say that if people are grasping

53:43

for those comfort things, those things

53:45

are not as easily disrupted as maybe

53:47

everything else in our lives which

53:49

operate on a you know millisecond to

53:51

millisecond basis where you actually had

53:53

to listen to a tape all the way through

53:55

and if you were lucky enough it

53:57

automatically turned over. You didn't

53:58

have to pull it out of the machine and

53:59

put it back in.

54:01

>> David, what about you? I hopefully you

54:02

remember the '90s as opposed to the 80s.

54:04

What's one thing you'd like to uh

54:05

[laughter]

54:06

>> I love mullets. I go to like 10 NASCAR

54:08

races a year. I may own Jorts. So, don't

54:11

leave the leave those. You can maybe

54:13

take like Frosted Tips, but I I wouldn't

54:15

bring [laughter] back uh Beanie Babies.

54:17

Okay. I feel like that's very

54:19

reminiscent of what we saw in like 2021

54:21

and 22 and2 with the I don't know what

54:23

those monkeys were called or the meme

54:24

stocks, the gamification of the market.

54:26

I feel like that early entrance was a

54:28

Beanie Baby. So, don't don't bring back.

54:29

>> I love that. Nancy, real quick. What

54:31

would you like to bring back from the

54:32

90s or not?

54:33

>> I have quick I'm a portfolio manager, so

54:35

I'm going to answer a different

54:36

question. I have a great CD story in

54:38

Europe in Budapest. This guy comes over

54:40

to the table. He's playing and I just

54:42

like wanted him to leave. So, I bought

54:44

his CD. Okay.

54:45

>> And I got home and I was like, "How do I

54:47

play this thing? I don't have a CD. Not

54:49

one in my car. Not one in Yeah.

54:51

>> All right. Well, listen, this has been

54:52

great. Thanks so much for being here and

54:54

uh we'll see you next time on the Market

54:55

Hang."

54:56

>> Thank you.

54:57

>> Thank you. Yeah. That was great, guys.

54:59

Great job.

55:06

Hey, thanks everyone.

55:13

[music]

55:21

[music]

55:30

>> [music]

55:40

[music]

55:45

[music]

55:54

[music]

56:13

[music]

56:19

>> Heat. Heat.

56:22

[music]

56:40

[music]

57:00

Hey,

57:06

hey, hey.

57:24

Down.

57:27

[music]

57:29

Down.

57:37

>> [music]

57:43

[music]

57:45

>> Down.

57:50

Down.

57:54

[music]

58:32

>> [music]

58:39

[music]

58:49

[music]

58:57

[music]

59:04

[music]

59:08

[music]

59:15

[music]

59:22

[music]

59:29

[music]

59:42

>> Hey, [music]

59:46

hey, hey.

Interactive Summary

This episode of the Market Hang features an expert panel discussing the current state of the stock market, focusing on the dichotomy between high equity valuations and rising bond yields. The investors debate the impact of fiscal versus monetary policy, the sustainability of AI-driven growth, and concerns regarding corporate debt and margins. The discussion also touches on the potential risks of private credit, the commoditization of AI models, and the panel's investment strategies for a hypothetical $10,000.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts