HomeVideos

The Simple Productivity Framework Behind Jim Collins's Success

Now Playing

The Simple Productivity Framework Behind Jim Collins's Success

Transcript

169 segments

0:00

Have you ever succumbed to this type of

0:03

gravitational pull to other things where

0:05

you end up kind of managing more than

0:07

making perhaps

0:08

>> and then separately if that's true how

0:11

have you corrected course? There's kind

0:14

of two aspects of how I have really

0:18

struggled getting pulled. First of all,

0:20

just way earlier in my life, I I was

0:23

very close to, you know, I was getting

0:25

pulled into things that I was not going

0:27

to be encoded for. And fortunately, by a

0:29

series of really good events and

0:31

choices, I ended up very much in frame.

0:33

But if id stayed too long doing some of

0:35

those things or taken some opportunities

0:38

that were very glittering opportunities

0:41

that my life may might have taken a very

0:42

different path. I think I would have

0:44

ended up successful and out of frame and

0:46

I think that that would have been an

0:48

unfortunate outcome. I think that so the

0:52

two areas that I've had to work with and

0:54

I eventually finally got my way to both

0:56

to succeed at both of them. The second

0:57

one was harder. First one was that

1:00

you're right about the thing about

1:01

visibility.

1:03

I was always prepared for failure.

1:07

I was not prepared for success.

1:10

>> Yeah.

1:10

>> And when success came, it surprised me.

1:13

Number one, I was like, you know, okay,

1:16

I was prepared for the catastrophe on

1:18

the other side. I didn't expect this to

1:20

be coming and now I got to deal with all

1:22

this stuff coming at me. And all of a

1:24

sudden, you have all these wonderful

1:27

things. Some of them maybe not so

1:28

wonderful, but they're all coming at

1:30

you, right? And you have all these all

1:32

these voices and and people and

1:34

opportunities and glittering things that

1:36

that could pull you out of what you're

1:39

really encoded for because of all this

1:41

wonderful opportunity and noise coming

1:45

at you. And early in that sort of

1:48

reeling from the su I was sort of a fog

1:50

of success phase and I was I was really

1:55

trying to sort through like how I would

1:57

allocate my time and I was kind of

1:59

reeling on my back feet and I would say

2:01

yes to things that later that today I

2:03

would never in a million years say yes

2:05

to but I did whether it be involving too

2:08

much travel or whatever sorts of things

2:09

but I began to realize man my whole life

2:11

could be sucked away accepting

2:14

opportunities and so I had to really

2:15

fight that and to eventually just kind

2:18

of clamp it all down, but to do it in a

2:21

really systematic and disciplined way.

2:22

And that's when I started counting my

2:24

hours, right? I basically just like I

2:26

got to have above a thousand creative

2:27

hours every 365 day cycle every single

2:30

day looking back for 50 years without a

2:32

miss, right? I just set that I will not

2:34

ever break it. And and then the other

2:37

was to begin using very very disciplined

2:39

mechanisms for what I would say yes to.

2:42

We have a punch card system as something

2:44

that I, you know, was very impressed by

2:46

Warren Buffett's view of the world,

2:47

which is, you know, any use of you is an

2:50

investment. It's a punch and you can't

2:52

get it back. And so when we're laying

2:54

out for the year what sorts of things I

2:56

will say yes to, we literally have every

2:59

year we we will be talking, well, what's

3:01

the punch card look like? How many

3:02

punches are left? And it's not a

3:04

question if somebody calls up and says,

3:05

are you free to give a speech on October

3:07

17? It's irrelevant whether I'm free to

3:09

give a speech on October 17. The

3:11

relevant question is do I have any

3:13

punches left? That's the first question.

3:16

Or how many punches are left? And we

3:17

limit them. We limit them tightly. And

3:20

so that became another way of like it's

3:22

punches. It's punches and they go away.

3:24

And one thing I've learned I've come to

3:26

see now at age 68, life is the ultimate

3:28

punch card. I mean, think about it,

3:30

right? So you're 48. If any given

3:33

goodsized project is call it a five-year

3:35

project, you got a bunch of fiveyear

3:37

punches left. I'm 68.

3:41

I probably have really good health, but

3:44

I know the number of punches that I have

3:46

left is a lower number than yours. And

3:50

and so life is the ultimate punch card,

3:53

right? And if you end up spending 5

3:55

years or 10 years,

3:58

you know, pulled away from what you're

4:01

really encoded for in some way because

4:04

of whatever sets of reasons, you can't

4:05

get that punch back. And so I began a

4:09

punch card process and that's how I how

4:11

I managed that. But then the other goes

4:13

back to what we were talking about

4:14

earlier.

4:14

>> Could I pause for one second? Please

4:16

don't lose your train of thought. But

4:18

for the punch cards, are those on a

4:20

category bycategory basis? In other

4:23

words, or for example,

4:25

>> speaking engagements, I'll only do five

4:28

speaking engagements per year. They need

4:30

to be within X number of hours of my

4:34

home. Is it on a category bycategory

4:38

basis?

4:38

>> The way we've done it, it's taken us a

4:41

few years iterating on the exact

4:42

process, but every week we calculate the

4:45

punch card. And the way it works is we

4:47

have a point system. And the way the

4:50

point system works is,

4:53

you know, if I'm going to do an

4:55

engagement that involves an airplane,

4:58

it costs more points. If I'm going to do

5:02

a

5:04

virtual presentation from here, it costs

5:06

fewer points. If I'm going to do an

5:08

intense, we have these lab sessions

5:10

where people bring their executive team

5:12

to Boulder for 2 days and be essentially

5:15

grilled by me for two days. If it's

5:17

going to be one of those, that actually

5:19

even though it's in Boulder, it actually

5:20

takes a fair number of points because

5:22

the intensity of it is so high. And so

5:26

what we've done is we've kind of

5:27

basically kind of use a numerical sense

5:30

and then in any given period of time

5:33

there's only so many points. So if I end

5:35

up agreeing to do a commitment in

5:38

London, I'm just going to blow like the

5:40

equivalent of three punches.

5:41

>> It's like a reverse frequent flyer

5:43

program.

5:43

>> Oh yeah. Exactly. Exactly.

5:45

>> You just get points subtracted.

5:46

>> Exactly. And so that's how we do it. And

5:48

then we always have a running kind of

5:50

what the total of the punch card is. And

5:52

there's, you know, it doesn't have to

5:53

hit the exact number at a given time,

5:56

but you can't start going over. It's

5:58

okay if you get to the end of the year

6:00

and you haven't spent all your punches.

6:01

What's bad is if you get to the end of

6:02

the year and you did twice as many as

6:04

you should have. And so our

6:05

conversations are always everything is

6:08

in the context of where's the punch

6:09

card? Like there's only one and a half

6:11

points left on the punch card.

Interactive Summary

The speaker discusses his personal journey of managing career opportunities and avoiding being sidetracked from his core purpose. He recounts early struggles with being pulled into roles he wasn't suited for, and later, the unexpected challenge of managing overwhelming success. To counter the

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts