HomeVideos

Joe Rogan Experience #2560 - David Grusch

Now Playing

Joe Rogan Experience #2560 - David Grusch

Transcript

4390 segments

0:01

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

0:03

>> The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:06

>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

0:08

NIGHT. All day.

0:12

>> All right, bro. David, what's up?

0:14

>> Thanks for having me back on. Yeah,

0:16

>> my pleasure.

0:16

>> Yeah.

0:17

>> Well, you're the one that's closest to

0:18

the flame, so tell me what's going on.

0:20

>> Oh, I know, right? So, uh, living a

0:22

nightmare is what I tell my friends. So,

0:24

it's definitely um been a tough several

0:27

years or so. And uh you know last time

0:29

we were on uh just testified in front of

0:32

Congress and uh the UAP Disclosure Act

0:36

of 23 was you know possibly getting

0:38

passed. It failed to get passed and then

0:40

I um based on you know things I know

0:43

about the Biden administration, things I

0:44

heard from the White House, I decided to

0:46

kind of lay low for a year. So 24 I

0:48

didn't do too much. And then uh

0:51

Representative Burlson had this crazy

0:53

idea to to hire me as a professional

0:56

staff member for Congress working for

0:58

him. Uh turns out I guess I was like the

1:01

first guy that ever testified in front

1:03

of Congress as a whistleblower and then

1:04

being subsequently hired by Congress. Um

1:07

I was the first guy to ever do that

1:08

which is very interesting and very cool.

1:10

And I I do thank Burlson for um you know

1:13

his leadership on that. And so I did

1:16

that for about a year and a half. um

1:18

just finished up actually. I was like,

1:20

you know what? I'm staying longer than I

1:22

thought. You know, I'm going to wait

1:23

until Labor Day, see where things are. I

1:25

worked pretty hard over uh uh summer

1:27

recess in August and and decided uh to,

1:31

you know, wind down some of my

1:32

activities because I accomplished a lot

1:34

of my objectives. We can get into that

1:36

obviously and then uh kind of move into

1:39

I'll call it my next phase of

1:41

operations, which includes a little

1:42

break for me. Um it's been very tiring.

1:45

I've been kind of, you know, going full

1:47

throttle for the last couple years and

1:49

whatnot. And so we're really at a, I

1:51

think, a poignant moment in US history

1:53

with what Trump's done and the things

1:55

you've seen in the media and whatnot.

1:56

And there's a lot of other stuff

1:58

happening behind the scenes because, you

2:00

know, a lot of my work has been private

2:02

behind the scenes, you know, working for

2:04

Congress, specifically Representative

2:06

Burlson.

2:07

>> So, let me ask you the environment. So,

2:09

are there some people in Congress that

2:11

are interested in disclosure of this

2:13

stuff and pursue you and want to find

2:15

out information and want you to tell

2:18

them what what's going on and and then

2:21

are there other people that are

2:23

resisting this? Yeah, I think there's a

2:25

big bifurcation of the non-believers and

2:27

then kind of the UAP caucus. Although

2:29

you see more and more people kind of

2:31

signing on to the cause like I did a

2:32

presser back in June in front of the

2:34

capital with members and we even had

2:36

Brigider General retired uh

2:38

representative Scott Perry there who was

2:40

on the House Intelligence Committee from

2:42

my home state of PA and it was good to

2:45

see other members, you know, start

2:46

showing that they support the cause. But

2:49

it has been challenging behind the

2:50

scenes and I had many skiff classified

2:53

meetings with the members kind of going

2:55

over the topological history of this

2:57

topic and and some of the deeper darker

3:00

kind of you know criminal stuff I bumped

3:01

into and how I worked with DOJ to kind

3:05

of highlight some of that stuff and

3:06

that's what

3:06

>> kind of criminal stuff.

3:08

>> Yeah. So, uh, when I was, um, looking

3:12

into this, and I have to be very

3:14

respectful of, uh, my participation in

3:16

this because it's an ongoing thing with

3:17

DOJ. Um, I was, you know, following the

3:20

money, bumping into other activities.

3:23

Um, very much like, actually, it's sort

3:25

of related. And if you saw in the news

3:27

that David Rush, very similar name to

3:30

me, it's kind of uh, freaky, uh, but he

3:32

was arrested with $40 million of gold

3:34

bars. He was a CIA officer. where he

3:36

made a fake uh continuity of government

3:38

special access program and you know he

3:40

went under the radar basically um doing

3:43

his own thing and getting gold and

3:44

Rolexes and stuff and the FBI raided his

3:46

house back in May. True true story.

3:49

Yeah, the guy has a

3:50

>> is that gold bars?

3:51

>> He has he had $40 million of gold bars.

3:53

>> Where did he get the gold bars

3:55

>> from the agency?

3:56

>> They have them laying around.

3:58

>> Yeah. I can't get into all the details

3:59

of why the government

4:01

>> Hold on. The government has gold bars.

4:03

>> Yeah. And this guy just snatched him.

4:06

>> Yeah. He made I don't know all the

4:07

details, but he made a fake continuity

4:10

of government special access program

4:12

that nobody was briefed into. He like,

4:14

you know, papered it and uh nobody at

4:16

the CIA questioned what he was doing.

4:18

And he was like, "Well, I need, you

4:19

know, 40 million in gold bars because of

4:21

the special continuity of government

4:23

activity."

4:23

>> Wait, wait, wait. So that's how they

4:25

fund some things in gold bars.

4:28

It's almost like uh in Afghanistan when

4:30

I was over there, I'd have guys with

4:32

briefcases full of $100,000 in cash cuz

4:35

you have to pay for things, right?

4:37

>> So,

4:38

>> but that kind of makes more sense to me

4:40

than lugging around gold.

4:42

>> Yeah.

4:42

>> What does like 40 million in gold bars

4:44

look like?

4:45

>> Uh I saw the seizure photos. It's a lot.

4:47

I mean, it's really

4:48

>> Can I see what that looks like?

4:49

>> It's approximately 303 gold bars that

4:51

each weigh approximately 1 kilogram a

4:54

piece.

4:54

>> Yo, that's a lot of weight. Yeah, I was

4:56

looking for a picture. There's only like

4:58

AI photos of it

4:59

>> at least that I could find.

5:00

>> So, a kilogram is 1.2.2 lb.

5:02

>> Yeah. 2.28 or something.

5:03

>> That's crazy.

5:04

>> 600.

5:05

>> He's got 600 lb of gold.

5:08

>> Yeah.

5:08

>> Where the do you put? So, he just

5:10

had it in his house.

5:11

>> He did have it at his house and he

5:12

laying around.

5:13

>> Bunch of Rolexes and all that. And

5:15

>> Oh, so he was just going crazy.

5:16

>> Yeah. Well, who knows what he was really

5:18

going to use the gold for, but that

5:20

that's an open-ended thing. And he was

5:21

he was pretending that he was using it

5:24

for some disclosure type deal or did it

5:28

have anything to do with UAPs?

5:29

>> Uh not that I'm aware of, but that same

5:32

ecosystem I bumped into. So his

5:35

fabricated program was a continuity

5:37

government program. So that's like, you

5:38

know, if something bad happens,

5:40

>> people are going to a hideout site, you

5:42

know, sanitized location,

5:44

>> right?

5:44

>> And so what I bumped into unfortunately

5:48

was like the deep underbelly of the

5:49

federal government. We can get into it.

5:51

It's it's a lot of stuff I've never

5:52

talked about because it's just very

5:54

terrifying and I you know I've been

5:55

through a lot of a lot of crazy and

5:58

I ended up bumping into a criminal

6:01

enterprise uh run out of a particular

6:03

agency and um it was basically um

6:08

getting money through certain criminal

6:11

endeavors the most unspeakable type of

6:13

criminal endeavors under the cover of uh

6:16

certain national security programs.

6:18

That's about as

6:18

>> When you say certain unspeakable

6:20

>> Yeah.

6:21

>> You mean like what do you mean like

6:23

trafficking?

6:26

>> Yeah.

6:27

>> Like child trafficking.

6:30

So the government was involved in child

6:34

trafficking for money.

6:35

>> Officers of the government. That's true.

6:37

Yeah. It's it's up. I uh I

6:39

briefed members in a classified setting

6:41

all the details. Um, and I I'm

6:43

highlighting that because

6:46

this is how serious this issue is is

6:49

there's an ecosystem and there's a lot

6:50

of good people are on these programs in

6:53

terms of the the UAP side. Yeah. And I

6:56

know a lot of them. They're friends of

6:57

mine. They're patriotic people doing

6:58

their duty, but there is like a small

7:00

little cast system of characters um that

7:03

are part of this larger ecosystem of uh

7:06

no holds barred. we're going to do what

7:07

we want and you know we're going to do

7:09

whatever kind of criminal activity to

7:10

get a washed money uh for our cutouts

7:13

like so a good example of course would

7:14

be Iran Contra right which is very

7:16

famous 86 and the CIA was engaged in

7:20

those kind of activities and this has

7:22

all been exposed all over north and all

7:23

that to fund the contras weapons

7:25

purchases procurement etc and a lot of

7:28

that you know seemed to uh possibly be

7:31

drug trafficking the government never

7:33

confirmed that but you look at Barry

7:34

Seal and and his um uh statements in the

7:39

80s and 90s and and it's likely that

7:41

that um probably occurred, you know.

7:44

>> Yeah. It was all through Freeway Ricky

7:45

Ross.

7:46

>> Yeah, that's right.

7:47

>> Yeah. Ricky's been on the podcast

7:48

multiple times.

7:49

>> That's right. That's right.

7:50

>> Yeah. He was on what is it like two

7:52

years ago, year and a half ago. Last

7:54

time he was on. Um

7:56

>> it's funny cuz he's out now. Uh became

7:59

an attorney while I was in jail. Found

8:02

out learned to read first. Okay.

8:04

Couldn't read. became an attorney in

8:06

jail, found out that they tried him. You

8:08

know that triple jeopardy, three strikes

8:10

thing.

8:11

>> Yeah.

8:11

>> They tried him incorrectly. They used

8:13

that incorrectly because it's supposed

8:14

to be three different times you were

8:16

arrested instead of like three crimes

8:17

that were attached to one arrest. So, he

8:19

gets out of jail. Now, he sells legal

8:21

weed.

8:24

>> All right. All right.

8:25

>> Lovely guy. But he he's a great guy, but

8:28

he had no idea that he was selling

8:30

cocaine to fund the Contra versus the

8:32

Sandinistas.

8:33

>> Interesting. He had no idea. He thought

8:35

that he was just a a slick character

8:37

that just knew what he was doing and

8:39

was, you know, he didn't realize that

8:41

the CIA was literally allowing him to do

8:43

it. Then we've also had Michael Roupert

8:45

on the podcast. You know who he is?

8:47

>> No.

8:47

>> Michael Roupert was the LA narcotics

8:49

officer that on uh I believe it was on

8:51

C-SPAN. He went on C-SPAN during a

8:54

hearing and he exposed the entire or

8:58

organization selling drugs in South

9:01

Central Los Angeles because he was

9:03

involved in it. He was involved in like

9:06

busting people that were doing it and

9:07

then they told him he has to leave it

9:09

alone because it was the CIA.

9:11

>> Yeah. Yeah. And so when I bumped into

9:14

that stuff, you know, I immediately

9:15

worked at Department of Justice.

9:17

>> That's one level, but like child

9:18

trafficking is another level.

9:19

>> I know, man. It's it's really up

9:22

and and there's a lot of details that

9:24

are I have a lot more questions than

9:26

answers and and I you know I worked with

9:28

the OJ and you know from what I

9:29

understand uh I got a gold star in a

9:32

brief to Cash Patel about it last year.

9:34

I wasn't in the briefing, but I, you

9:36

know, I I was told I got kudos, but it

9:39

was very disturbing. And so, like,

9:42

obviously, a lot of these programs are

9:45

legal in the sense that there's in terms

9:47

of UAP stuff, there's, you know,

9:49

classified executive orders back in the

9:50

day that covers them and

9:52

>> and they're upstanding citizens and we

9:54

could we could litigate like, you know,

9:56

uh, Congress wasn't necessarily brought

9:59

into the fold enough from an oversight

10:01

perspective, etc. But, you know, the

10:03

core of the program, you know, does have

10:05

uh a legal beginning, but when you don't

10:07

have oversight, unfortunately, certain

10:10

small pockets of people start doing

10:12

that they shouldn't have. And I and

10:14

unfortunately,

10:16

>> I got deeply ins snared in that. There

10:18

was a very small group of people that

10:22

uh, you know, pushed me over the edge

10:23

and I had to do what I got to do to to

10:26

you know, protect myself. And I never

10:28

wanted to be a whistleblower. You know,

10:30

I was a deeply entrenched, you know,

10:31

15-year intel officer, military officer

10:34

in the Air Force. You know, I was

10:36

working some of the country's most

10:37

sensitive issues. You know, started

10:39

going to the White House to brief the

10:40

National Security Council in my mid20s

10:41

on space issues back during the Obama

10:43

administration. And and in 2019 when I

10:47

joined the UAP task force and I was

10:49

tasked to investigate this, I was like,

10:51

"Sure, I'll look into it." you know, the

10:53

special access program or black program

10:55

community has a lot of dysfunction and

10:57

and maybe some stuff wasn't reported,

10:59

you know, you know, correctly and and I

11:01

didn't know really what I was going to

11:02

find, but if there was a US program, you

11:05

know, I'd figure it out. I'd probably

11:06

get cleared to it and we'd be fine. We'd

11:08

have like a mafia meeting and and uh you

11:11

know that and I know why it was

11:14

protected the way it is and whatnot. But

11:15

unfortunately

11:17

about a year and a half about October

11:21

2020 is when kind of my life changed and

11:26

particular individuals instead of coming

11:28

to me who knew me by the way personally

11:30

I know I know them personally now Dave

11:33

you're bumping into something you know

11:35

I'm going to defensively brief you this

11:37

is what it is or hey I'm going to slide

11:39

an NDA sign this and I'll read you in

11:42

and my colleagues and I joked about that

11:44

like we're bumping in the

11:46

eventually somebody's going to knock on

11:47

my door in my office and be like, "Hey,

11:49

I need to talk to you." And

11:50

unfortunately, that never happens. Um,

11:53

it's really tragic because that would

11:55

have been an easier way. But, um, I

11:58

immediately got administratively nuked

12:00

in October 2020 and basically they went

12:04

after everybody around me. Uh my boss at

12:08

the National Reconnaissance Office as

12:10

you know Major Gush the Air Force

12:11

officer in the reserves got walked out

12:13

of NRO headquarters in Chantelli,

12:15

Virginia under fabricated

12:18

uh personal conduct things and and they

12:20

went after, you know, my chief of staff

12:22

who worked for me at NGA when I was a 15

12:24

and and co-workers, people they thought

12:28

were my enablers, right? And um and I

12:33

thought, okay, I could fight this.

12:35

They're bringing up like my mental

12:36

health stuff, which we've talked about

12:37

before, Afghanistan PTSD. I'm like, I

12:40

reported it. I was cleared of, you know,

12:42

no problems. Kept my top secret

12:44

clearance, and I still have my top

12:45

secret clearance, but it got very,

12:50

very um

12:53

scary in early 2022. And I've avoided

12:57

talking about this for a long time. And

12:59

I've mentioned in my hearing in 2023,

13:02

you know, I was, you know, I'm I'm here

13:03

in fear for my life, etc. Well, you

13:06

know, I'm not talking about the criminal

13:08

stuff. I found stuff that's happened in

13:09

my personal life and stuff. And so, back

13:11

in early 2022,

13:14

um everything's fine. Uh started uh

13:18

noticing some suspicious activity um

13:21

near where I live and I didn't think

13:24

much of it. Thought it was kind of

13:25

strange. And I don't want to quite go

13:28

into all the details, but basically

13:31

um later one particular day

13:35

uh I was sent a message that they can

13:37

touch me and my wife and they they're

13:40

they know where we are and they

13:42

>> and what do you think this was

13:43

particular? Was this because of the

13:45

child trafficking stuff? Was this

13:47

because of some other illegal activity

13:49

with no oversight? you know, in private

13:53

environments, I was asked what what red

13:55

line, what trip wire did I cross? To

13:58

this day, I don't know specifically. I

14:03

suspect uh based on them, what turns out

14:08

they were monitoring my classified

14:10

computer at work, uh my re my

14:14

investigation notes that I would keep

14:15

encrypted on there. I think they were

14:18

very worried that I figured out a lot of

14:20

things. And I I still don't know for

14:22

sure though, like and it and there's a

14:24

lot of other things too. I guess I'm

14:25

kind of jumping around because um in

14:28

early 2021, you know, certain people

14:31

that were helping me and I was talking

14:33

to started to experience uh Havana

14:36

syndrome symptoms, you know, anomalous

14:39

health incidents. And I know a lot about

14:40

that. That's another kind of ecosystem I

14:43

was an expert in in the government. And

14:45

of course, my first thing is like, huh?

14:47

Uh, did you piss off the Russians or

14:49

Chinese or some other kind of foreign

14:51

intelligence service or because you

14:52

don't think domestic. And I'm like, what

14:54

did you do in your career? Were you on

14:56

covert action programs? Did you like,

14:58

you know, bomb some, you know,

15:01

adversaries building and they're pissed

15:02

off at you and they hold a grudge? And

15:04

so I noticed that I wasn't going to

15:06

equate that to the topic. And

15:09

uh but I I was very nervous about that

15:12

because people I know uh were starting

15:14

to experience those symptoms

15:16

specifically uh microwave directed

15:19

energy most likely just based on um

15:22

certain tradecraftraft they were doing

15:24

to detect it which I won't get into the

15:25

details of that and then the their

15:27

symptomology so to speak and uh so that

15:30

was frightening and in in that 2021 time

15:34

frame I was sitting at home I was

15:36

getting you know investigated ated by

15:37

three agencies and um I really didn't

15:41

know what was going on. A lot of my

15:43

colleagues were kind of continuing on

15:44

that investigation on on on my behalf

15:47

and eventually in late 2021 NGA hired me

15:50

as a 15 off the street. Kind of came

15:52

back into government full-time. I was

15:55

hoping um that agency would protect me

15:57

against uh you know the CIA and the NRO

16:00

and and certain elements of the DoD that

16:02

were going after me because of these

16:05

couple antagonists that were trying to

16:07

you know basically um push me over the

16:10

edge administratively. But

16:13

what what I crossed the Rubicon in early

16:15

2022 when I was sent a message and it

16:17

was this the same day I was sent a

16:19

message other people got that message

16:22

too. So it was coordinated

16:23

geographically

16:24

and of course you know I reported that

16:27

to federal law enforcement count

16:28

intelligence element and at the time I'm

16:30

like well you know there was a one

16:32

adversarial intelligence agency that had

16:34

an interest in me several years ago and

16:36

I had a little incident that was

16:37

actually kind of funny. Um so I wasn't

16:40

sure if it was like the US government or

16:42

even if it was related um to the my

16:46

investigation. And then several several

16:50

uh weeks later

16:52

and I was I get chills talking about

16:54

this cuz it's it's kind of upsetting. Um

16:57

I was uh in DC um for a conference on

17:02

UAP actually uh for my for my agency NGA

17:05

at the time and I got summoned to an

17:08

offbooks

17:09

uh Senate Intel committee uh we'll call

17:12

it meeting in their you know their skiff

17:15

right their their vault where you can

17:16

talk classified information and certain

17:19

individuals were there known to me um

17:21

great credentials people I've known for

17:23

a while uh in my line of work and so was

17:27

you know a dozen dozen and a half uh

17:30

senior staff for Marco Rubio Mark

17:32

Wernern you know etc right and

17:36

in that meeting uh we you know we talked

17:38

about the legacy program the history

17:41

many hours and I'm going to fly on the

17:43

wall like this is really for Senate

17:45

staff I'm just kind of sitting in the

17:46

back and you know they turned to staff

17:50

and they you know they pointed at me and

17:51

they're like um oh by the way you know

17:54

the these couple individuals and they

17:56

and they named the individuals. I'm

17:57

like, I know who they are. Um

18:00

uh they uh wanted to kill you and um I

18:05

know Lu Alazand talked about it, but

18:07

why?

18:08

>> I do not know that for sure. I think

18:10

well so um

18:15

be careful what I say. Uh there are

18:18

certain presidential findings that allow

18:20

certain things to protect critical

18:21

things in the government. And my

18:26

assessment is I was getting so close to

18:29

exposing it because I was sort of

18:31

preparing my inspector general's uh

18:34

report to the IG that um I must have

18:37

crossed some sort of Rubicon. I still

18:39

would like to know and I hope these

18:41

people are you know uh brought to

18:42

justice and that's you know my wish and

18:45

dream and hopefully Department of

18:47

Justice does what's needed. But

18:49

>> there's an investigation ongoing right

18:51

now.

18:51

>> Yes. on that. And that's all I'll say

18:53

defensively not to interfere with that.

18:55

A good day starts with a solid morning

18:57

routine. So if something's missing, if

18:59

your body isn't getting what it needs,

19:01

everything can feel off. AG1 is designed

19:04

to help fill the holes. Their NextGen

19:07

formula is dialed in with over 75

19:10

ingredients, minerals, vitamins,

19:12

adaptogens, and more. Clinically shown

19:15

to fill nutrient gaps and increase

19:17

healthy gut bacteria. And AG1 Pro takes

19:21

it even further. It has CAMBB for muscle

19:25

protection, zinc carnosine for gut

19:28

health, and five grams of creatalis

19:31

premium German-made creatine

19:34

monohydrate, which if you don't know,

19:36

creatine is a highly studied compound in

19:39

sports science that helps support

19:41

energy. Get more from your morning

19:44

routine. Add either AG1 NextG or AG1 Pro

19:49

and your body will thank you. Go to

19:52

drinkagg1.com/joen.

19:55

And for a limited time, save 20% on your

19:57

first subscription order of AG1 NextGen

20:00

or AG1 Pro. That's drinkagg.com/jo.

20:06

>> Okay. How much of this do you think has

20:08

to do with actual UAP disclosure and how

20:11

much of it has to do with a lack of

20:14

oversight that allowed people to do

20:16

illegal activities? I think some problem

20:19

children decided to abuse some standing

20:23

options to protect, you know, critical

20:28

infrastructure in the United States,

20:29

which, you know, for example, that would

20:31

be like a Air Force flight line, a ICBM

20:34

silo, um, other activities. And they

20:38

decided, um, I was some sort of threat.

20:42

And it's it's so disgusting because I

20:45

you know like I said I was a fieldgrade

20:46

officer in the air force. I was a you

20:48

know GS15 a CIA colon equivalent

20:49

civilian and I'm sitting there in Senate

20:52

chambers and I'm hearing this and I

20:53

won't get into all the details. in it a

20:54

lot. I heard like you know all the

20:56

details on that and I don't want to like

20:58

um burn my sources and and I just

21:01

remember how upset the Senate staff was

21:04

and to the point where you know a

21:06

particular staffer um who's very senior

21:09

went to his office and got some whiskey

21:11

and you know all of them started

21:12

drinking in the skiff because it's like

21:13

everybody was afraid like are they

21:15

serious? or like they literally were

21:18

thinking about killing Dave and

21:20

like and and and I found out that there

21:22

was a kibash to that. It's a longer

21:24

story for someday if I could ever, you

21:26

know, discuss the whole the whole

21:27

history. And

21:28

>> so it was considered but then it was

21:30

kibos.

21:30

>> Yes. Thank God. And I know how it was

21:33

stopped and I I owe some people a debt

21:35

of gratitude literally. And um and this

21:39

was just a few weeks after, you know, I

21:42

was sent a message and and even after

21:45

the meeting um we were finding stuff and

21:49

other people were finding stuff um to

21:52

let people know that they're being

21:54

tracked. And I know this sounds like so

21:57

crazy and all that, but

22:00

>> Well, so does someone having $40 million

22:03

in gold hanging out their house and a

22:04

bunch of Rolexes. Never did I think, you

22:07

know, I'm a very patriotic guy. I love

22:09

serving America. You know, it hurts me

22:11

every day not having the uniform

22:13

anymore. And knowing that was the level

22:17

that they thought about going to because

22:20

of this interesting interpretation of

22:23

certain standing options. And I and

22:28

eventually in this disclosure process, a

22:30

lot of that will come out. I just have

22:32

to be careful what I say now until, you

22:34

know, the the president figures out how

22:35

to, you know, release some of this

22:36

history, unfortunately. So,

22:38

>> understood. Yeah. So, one of the things

22:40

that we talked about before, so you were

22:42

scheduled for another podcast a while

22:44

back, but flights got cancelled when we

22:46

moved it today, but you were saying that

22:48

it's actually fortuitous that it was

22:50

rescheduled.

22:51

>> Yeah. A lot of things are happening. I

22:54

see the administration getting really

22:56

really serious on this and I think

22:58

people don't appreciate the courage that

23:00

Trump is is is showing right now uh

23:04

ordering the government to release

23:05

everything we know about this topic.

23:07

It'll be

23:09

>> courage how so like you think he's in

23:11

danger from releasing this information?

23:12

>> Not necessarily, but it's it's

23:15

um the ontological shock and the history

23:19

coming out and sort of the outrage. I

23:22

mean, I think it'll be uniting sort of

23:23

like in post 911 America after the

23:25

towers fell, right? You have the the

23:27

fear of dirty bombs and other terrorist

23:29

attacks, but you also have this like

23:31

uniting uh panacea that kind of brings

23:33

people.

23:34

>> You think that is equivalent to what's

23:36

happening right now?

23:37

>> It will be and I think

23:39

>> going to happen.

23:39

>> So, I believe uh before Trump Trump's

23:45

term ends that it's all going to come

23:49

out. What does that mean?

23:51

>> Everything I've testified about, you

23:53

know, the fact that, you know, we've

23:55

been studying this for a while. We've

23:57

recovered material aka intact

23:59

semi-intact craft. We've, you know,

24:01

recovered this anomalous intelligence

24:03

piloting the craft. And, you know, we

24:05

are reverse engineering that. And

24:09

obviously, there's other parts to that.

24:11

It's very complicated ecosystem. A lot

24:14

of people who are just release it all,

24:15

show us Indiana Jones warehouse tour

24:17

don't appreciate the care that we're

24:20

going to have to um proceed with because

24:24

this is not a static ecosystem. This

24:25

isn't just like archaeology where you're

24:27

digging up stuff. There is you are

24:29

dealing with you know third parties both

24:33

human you know adversarial countries

24:35

etc. they have their own program. Then

24:37

you have, you know, our this anomalous

24:39

intelligence, our visitors, NHI,

24:41

whatever you want to call them,

24:42

ultraterrestrial, depending on which

24:44

taxonomy in the tree that you want to um

24:47

ascribe some of this origin to. And and

24:51

of course, you know, the the national

24:53

security related technology that has

24:55

been derived, we've derived great stuff

24:57

to defend America. I've had exposure on

24:59

that and you know, I'm very

25:00

>> re it through back engineering.

25:03

>> Yeah.

25:03

>> 100%.

25:04

>> Yes. Well, some of it it it was

25:08

inspiration. It wasn't a a onetoone like

25:11

we we we unlocked the iPhone. It was

25:13

like, "Huh, that's an interesting

25:14

material. Look at that um frequency

25:17

selective surface property. You know

25:19

what? We could use that for an aerospace

25:21

application or whatever." And so, a lot

25:24

of it was garnered via inspiration, not

25:27

one to one. Yeah. In some cases, I

25:30

suppose we did, but like that's been

25:32

most of it. Yeah. So what's the holdup

25:34

in terms of disclosure?

25:38

>> I necessarily can't read the president's

25:41

mind. Uh there's certainly a uh

25:44

multilateral kind of diplomatic issue. I

25:46

mean so we're in this this issue now

25:48

where once we cross the Rubicon then we

25:52

affect allies and adversaries. You know

25:53

our adversaries have programs. What are

25:55

they going to tell their citizenry? You

25:57

have uh possible theological distress

25:59

Vatican etc. And I'm, you know, I'm a

26:01

Catholic and I I certainly appreciate

26:05

uh the Vatican's long study on this

26:07

subject and they just stayed quiet on

26:08

what they know. And so it's there's a

26:10

lot of like collateral effects if you're

26:13

not careful with certain stuff. you you

26:16

can you know trigger a response and

26:18

there is great fear that uh I don't

26:21

necessarily believe in this but like

26:23

there has been assessments in the past

26:25

that you know revealing certain things

26:27

may you know trigger a response from a

26:30

third party

26:31

>> trigger a response from them from these

26:33

>> possibly entities yes and that is a

26:36

>> that has been written up uh government

26:40

think tanks wrote that up in reports to

26:41

previous presidents

26:42

>> so the the the theory is that we

26:45

disclosed

26:46

people are now aware of it all over the

26:48

globe and they decide to show

26:50

themselves.

26:51

>> Yeah. I mean, I think there's a real

26:53

fear of like a Ghostbusters moment, I'll

26:55

say. And Oh, boy. You know, and

26:59

it's one of those things where

27:02

I I'm trying to walk the line and be as

27:07

diplomatic as possible and also trying

27:09

to prepare the populace at the same time

27:11

because clearly the government hasn't

27:13

right now. And I mean, Trump wants it

27:14

out for sure. His team needs to be

27:17

astute enough to know what to ask for.

27:19

Uh, you know, massage the deep state and

27:22

and get that information because we just

27:24

saw Tim Bchett on Benny Johnson's

27:27

podcast talk about uh Steven Miller

27:29

called him and was like, "Hey, I'm

27:30

getting blocked like physically blocked

27:33

from access to a lot of this stuff."

27:35

And, you know, that's very concerning. I

27:36

I would say Steven Miller is an alpha

27:38

dog. He's a pitbull. And as a fellow

27:41

alpha, I do appreciate his

27:43

>> That's a silly thing to say. You know

27:44

that, right?

27:45

>> What?

27:46

>> A fellow alpha.

27:47

>> Fellow alpha.

27:50

>> Opens yourself up to like tremendous

27:52

amounts of ridicule.

27:53

>> Yeah, I know. I know. I mean, nobody's

27:55

perfect and I know everybody has their

27:57

faults, but I do appreciate

27:59

>> the ferveny. he is attacking the issue

28:02

behind the scenes and I just I think he

28:04

needs guided the right way and informed

28:06

and and kind of how how to cut this

28:09

deal. You know, like

28:10

>> I met him very briefly at the UFC event

28:12

at the White House and he told me that

28:14

it's going to come out. I'm like, okay,

28:16

>> that's good. Well, there you go.

28:17

>> It was really quick.

28:18

>> Yeah.

28:19

>> Was like he's like, I'm just I know

28:20

you're interested in this. This is

28:21

literally all we talked about.

28:23

>> The UFO thing is going to come out.

28:24

>> Yeah.

28:25

>> Like, okay, when when's that coming out?

28:27

Let's go.

28:27

>> Exactly. and and and and Trump

28:30

understands the subject pretty good and

28:31

you know he's in the know and

28:34

he understands some of the implications.

28:36

So I like I said he has a lot of courage

28:38

because this is likely going to change

28:40

society in a big way. I can't necess I'm

28:43

not like a social anthropologist or a

28:44

psychiatrist like I can't necessarily

28:47

predict in what specific ways it might

28:49

reduce you know feudal nation state peer

28:51

competition and other things. Uh, but it

28:54

is going to change and I and I think

28:56

when people look back at this interview,

28:57

it's gonna be very haunting because I

28:58

think in short order, you know, before

29:01

Trump leaves office, we're going to be

29:02

in a new paradigm. And I'm normally a

29:05

very pessimistic, cynical person. A lot

29:07

of my friends know that. But I I have

29:10

great confidence that the president is

29:12

doing the right thing. And I I I feel um

29:15

there's eventually going to there the

29:18

people that are in charge of this are

29:19

going to have to comply with the the

29:21

president's order. And uh but there's a

29:23

right way of of doing this, I think. And

29:25

I, like I said, I'm not some sick of fan

29:27

for the deep state. I'm a whistleblower,

29:28

obviously. And you know, I have um

29:31

philosophical differences about how this

29:33

was kept and how they could possibly

29:36

reveal stuff. But I I am surprisingly

29:40

confident, which is which is kind of

29:41

weird for me to say because I just see

29:43

the tea leaves. I know Miller's serious.

29:46

Um there's other people in government

29:47

serious. I mean, even see Aaron Lucas,

29:49

the PDDNI, the deputy director of

29:51

national intelligence, you know, sign

29:53

these big NDA waiverss. It includes like

29:55

any kind of waiver of not even telling

29:56

the president, sorry, you have to tell

29:58

us kind of thing. And and so you you're

30:00

seeing kind of the the chess board being

30:02

set. I know everybody's not happy with

30:04

the tranches coming out with the

30:05

lowhanging fruit videos and and

30:07

recordings and stuff. And Representative

30:09

Burlson and I before I left his office

30:11

recently got um a 1952 recording that

30:15

was still classified from Blue Book

30:17

talking about the seriousness of this

30:19

issue and all the crazy that

30:20

they're seeing near nuclear sites and

30:23

test ranges, which is interesting

30:24

because in in uh that video that's been

30:28

declassified, it mentions the very sites

30:30

that in modern day have that same

30:32

anomalous activity to include stuff in

30:34

the Southwest. So I can't say where it's

30:36

in the ecosystem in the open source, but

30:38

the the executive branch hasn't

30:40

acknowledged what specific test and

30:42

training range. They're seeing crazy

30:43

orbs that they can't explain this acost

30:46

helicopters and and all that. So

30:49

>> um so is Trump experiencing resistance

30:52

in your opinion?

30:55

>> Yes. Um, and I don't know all the

30:59

details, but uh, clearly clearly Miller

31:02

has, and a lot of it is, I think, and I

31:05

can't read the mind of the deep state,

31:07

but as a former deep stater, uh, I would

31:09

say that there's always been this kind

31:11

of disdain for political appointees and

31:13

they don't and members of Congress, like

31:15

they don't they don't have the reverence

31:16

on this issue. They're going to it

31:18

up. They're going to, you know, say

31:20

something that they shouldn't have about

31:21

a classified program. And um that's why

31:24

some classified programs are kept from

31:26

Congress. It's called waved programs. Um

31:29

and uh the only presidents that were

31:32

really really involved were the ones

31:34

like HW Bush, right? He was CI director.

31:36

He was fully briefed on this issue. A

31:38

lot of that lore is true about HW Bush.

31:40

Cheney, like I've talked about, fully in

31:43

this. He was the mob boss for many

31:45

years. He was kind of the head of this

31:48

activity. And so I think there's some um

31:52

testing of the waters right now. It's

31:53

kind of like cat's paw dynamic, like you

31:55

know, we'll give you a little bit of

31:56

this, a little bit of that, and they're

31:58

they're seeing how the administration is

32:00

going to potentially roll this out. And

32:02

and obviously if the White House wants

32:04

my opinion, I'm available. But um I do

32:07

trust the president's team hopefully

32:09

will be able to handle this. And because

32:12

I if Trump doesn't enforce his order and

32:15

see this through, I don't think any

32:17

other president is going to be able. I

32:18

mean I mean regardless of Democrat,

32:20

left, right, whatever, like if he

32:22

follows through on this, he's going to

32:24

be the goat. He's going to be a legend.

32:26

And you know, all the other things

32:28

people have problems with in his

32:29

presidency, Iran, whatever, I think this

32:32

will um wipe those out. and this is like

32:35

really important for his legacy to

32:38

initiate the process before the 28

32:40

election. Then there's like a hot

32:41

handoff to the next um administration.

32:44

And you know, if Trump's a political

32:46

animal, he could easily line up a

32:48

Republican team on the 28 ticket to

32:50

basically, you know, be his continuity

32:52

on this, too. I think that'd be very

32:53

smart. And

32:55

>> so this is going to take a long time to

32:56

release. Is that how you're

33:00

>> projecting this?

33:00

>> That was always the plan back in the

33:02

day. I just because it's like an

33:04

anestization and climatization process.

33:07

It's like, you know, okay, we're gonna

33:09

focus on this topic. Everybody's this is

33:11

going to get normalized. The temperature

33:12

is going to cool and then we're going to

33:14

bring in this shocking thing.

33:15

>> So, there's a there's a schedule like in

33:18

terms of like the psychological impact

33:20

on the populace.

33:21

>> There was in the past in terms of

33:23

certain um government think tanks wrote

33:27

classified assessments for uh previous

33:29

presidents on this. I don't know what

33:31

the current plan is. I'm just uh I'm

33:33

currently literally a private citizen

33:34

right now. But if they're going to do

33:37

what they did in the past, it is

33:40

>> and the slow roll out has its pluses and

33:43

minuses. Like I would say due to human

33:45

factors, risks of adversarial countries

33:47

getting ahead of us, other

33:49

whistleblowers, whatever. You probably

33:51

have to roll this out in at least like

33:53

12 months and whatnot. But we're in a

33:55

precarious time if the administration

33:58

doesn't start because uh China and

34:00

Russia could take advantage of this

34:02

moment now. Our weakness, you know,

34:04

China has their famous uh belt and road

34:06

initiative. Uh China has admitted

34:08

publicly that they have a UAP task

34:10

force. Obviously, they have more than

34:11

that behind the scenes. And they

34:14

actually announced that when the DoD UAP

34:17

task force was announced, you can find a

34:19

news article from June 2020 in the South

34:21

China Morning Post where they talk about

34:22

they're analyzing these encounters.

34:24

They're using AI, etc. So,

34:26

>> do you feel that China has or do you

34:28

know if China has these crashed vehicles

34:32

as well?

34:34

>> There's parallel programs.

34:35

>> There's parallel programs. Now, one of

34:38

the things that Diana Pulka said when

34:40

and and Gary Nolan refers to in the same

34:43

way as well, they they refer to them as

34:45

donations.

34:47

>> Yeah, that's what's really interesting

34:48

is I am aware of certain historical

34:50

retrieval rules where they were like

34:52

perfectly landed and it wasn't like a

34:54

crash and what is what's going on there?

34:58

I'm sure we've done a deep assessment. I

35:01

never had access to that kind of

35:02

information. I'm sure that we understand

35:05

why that happened at some level, but

35:06

that is true that that's actually

35:08

happened.

35:08

>> So the theory is that they want us to

35:11

find these things so that we can examine

35:13

the technology and perhaps work from it,

35:18

>> like engineer it or like you were saying

35:20

before, gain inspiration to try new

35:22

>> Yeah. I mean, part of it's like throw in

35:24

the gorilla banana, see if it can peel

35:26

it. But also, the the more skeptical

35:28

intel officer in me is like, is this a

35:30

Trojan horse? Do you want us to uh

35:34

figure things out and then get then get

35:35

addicted to certain type of technology

35:38

and then that creates a control loop uh

35:41

where they start handling us whether we

35:43

need raw resources to maintain a certain

35:46

technology or as in this intelligence

35:49

whatever this is this nonhuman

35:51

intelligence

35:52

>> right so if if it is a if it is a

35:56

donation do you feel like this donation

35:59

is evenly distributed amongst world

36:01

powers.

36:03

>> You know, I do not know the the the

36:07

statistical distribution. That's very

36:09

interesting. I I never understood the

36:12

total number of retrievalss in um other

36:15

countries participated in.

36:16

>> Well, there's supposed to be quite a few

36:17

in the United States.

36:18

>> Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. That's for sure. I

36:20

don't know the answer to that actually.

36:22

I'm sure there's a statistical analysis

36:25

that'll come out in this process. You

36:26

know,

36:26

>> do you think there's any shared

36:27

information between these governments?

36:30

Do you think they communicate?

36:32

>> There is a a gentleman's agreement. Uh

36:35

the the top layer of it I can talk

36:37

about, and I've talked about it

36:38

previously, so it's not um anything

36:40

super new. If you look at the accident

36:43

measures agreement of 1971, which which

36:45

is the short title of this god-awfully

36:47

long title treaty that was signed in

36:49

September 1971,

36:52

you'll see article three of the treaty

36:54

talks about UAP. And hey, if you see any

36:56

unidentified objects around your nuclear

36:59

or critical critical comms facilities,

37:01

please call us, bro. And that was

37:02

between the USSR in America. And then uh

37:06

in 2013, the classified annex of that

37:09

treaty got declassified. You can find it

37:11

online at George Washington University

37:12

National Security Archives, but it gives

37:15

the nuke flash like the red line like

37:17

code to say it was like Adam222, Adam

37:20

333, and that's all declassified. and he

37:23

would send that to the the Kremlin like

37:24

hey uh we see weird around

37:28

uh plac uh it's not us it's not a false

37:31

flag and vice versa and so there was a

37:34

redline comms for UAP activity between u

37:38

Russia and the US and of course Russia

37:40

and US during the Cold War had a mutual

37:41

notification treaty for space launch

37:43

vehicle and ICBM launches etc. Weirdly

37:47

enough, we've never had that with China.

37:49

Even to this day, we don't have a

37:51

mutual, this is crazy. We don't have a

37:53

mutual notification. If they're going to

37:54

do like a a sub submarine launched

37:57

ballistic missile test out of, you know,

37:59

off their coast, they're not obligated

38:02

by treaty to tell us. So, and sometimes

38:05

they don't with certain national

38:07

security activities. and and so uh

38:10

Northern Command, NORAD, Missile Warning

38:12

Center, other other places, uh NSA,

38:14

DefMAC and Laurel, Maryland have to be

38:17

on their agame to like make sure it was

38:18

like a test because the Chinese aren't

38:21

obligated to tell us. And I um a crazy

38:25

story in that regard. The Indians did

38:28

something like that to us. I was on duty

38:30

in the NRO operations center. And by the

38:32

way, I got this clear through security,

38:34

so you know, NRO, don't shank me. Um uh

38:38

basically there was an unexpected

38:41

Indian uh missile test that hit one of

38:44

their satellites in 2019. I think it was

38:46

like March of 2019.

38:47

>> One of our satellites.

38:48

>> Oh no, not our uh one of their uh

38:51

weather. Yeah. Their own defunct weather

38:53

satellite and

38:54

>> on purpose or an accident?

38:56

>> On purpose. And

38:57

>> they shot down one of their own

38:58

satellites

38:59

>> and they didn't tell us. I remember in

39:00

my office at like all these different

39:02

phones. I'm like calling the embassy all

39:04

this. I'm like what the you know,

39:05

and because we were worried at the NRO

39:08

about the debris because we fly space,

39:10

you know, spy satellites. That's the

39:11

mission of the National Reconnaissance

39:12

Office and I was the backup director of

39:14

intelligence as a reser at the

39:16

operations center where I was, you know,

39:18

also handling the PDB for the director

39:19

and I, you know, led the director's

39:22

briefing team and, you know, I'm like

39:24

going to the orbital analysts on the

39:26

watch floor with all the crazy screens

39:27

like calculate the the the debris field,

39:30

you know, let me know if we have to

39:31

maneuver something and blah blah blah.

39:33

I'm like running up to the director's

39:35

office in my uniform, you know, out of

39:37

breath. I'm like, "Holy shit." You know,

39:39

um, and it was kind of a big deal. And

39:41

that's publicly, you know, you can

39:42

Google that now. And, um, I remember

39:45

when that went down, it was pretty

39:46

crazy. So,

39:47

>> that sounds completely insane.

39:49

>> Yeah.

39:49

>> So, are there other countries besides

39:53

China, Russia, and US that supposedly

39:55

have access to these vehicles?

39:57

>> Yeah.

39:58

>> Which other countries can you say? that

40:00

I don't want to get into cuz that gets

40:02

into some sensitive stuff,

40:04

>> right? Um, supposedly this is like one

40:06

of the best legends that there's a a

40:09

craft that's so large they couldn't move

40:11

it so they had to make a building around

40:12

it and it's supposedly in Korea.

40:15

>> A legend?

40:16

>> I don't know.

40:16

>> Oh, yeah. You do know. How dare you?

40:20

But if you heard you've heard that

40:21

rumor, I'm sure online.

40:22

>> I've heard that rumor online. Yeah.

40:24

>> Yeah. You don't know anything about

40:25

that?

40:26

>> Yeah. We'll let the federal government.

40:28

Do you have any personal experience with

40:30

any of this stuff?

40:31

>> You know, it's funny you asked that. I,

40:34

as far as I can remember, I have no

40:37

experience with the phenomenon. Like a

40:39

lot of a lot of people in this, I guess,

40:41

ufology or whatever you want to call it,

40:43

they have that personal experience like,

40:45

oh yeah, when I was a kid, I saw an orb

40:47

or whatever. And

40:48

>> I have zero. I've seen a couple

40:50

interesting things in the sky that, you

40:52

know, could have been satellite passes.

40:54

I've been an amateur astronomer besides

40:55

having a physics degree. I've been an

40:57

amateur astronomer since like I was like

40:59

in middle school like 12 13 years old

41:00

and and I still have never seen anything

41:03

in my personal life uh in a stupendous

41:06

nature. I've never had any kind of

41:08

spooky woo stuff happen

41:10

>> never been visited.

41:11

>> No. and and and that's why like I was

41:13

open to this you know I'm a child of the

41:15

80 well I grew up at I was born in the

41:16

80s you know most of my childhood was in

41:18

the 90s and you know I watched XFiles

41:21

and Star Trek Next Gen and of course I'm

41:24

like you know I'm a precocious teen

41:26

reading like brief history time and you

41:29

know Isaac Azimov and I'm learning about

41:31

the Draco equation I'm like there's

41:32

probably life but who knows and I'm I'm

41:35

open to it and then you know when I got

41:37

in into the intelligence community

41:38

that's like the first thing I looked up

41:40

like on the I'm like on the computer.

41:42

I'm like I go on to a certain database.

41:44

I'm like type it in Area 51, you know,

41:46

UFOs. Like everybody's done that who's

41:48

who's gone through intel school whether

41:50

they admit it or not. And of course, I

41:51

didn't see anything or anything.

41:53

>> Um the only thing I bumped into early in

41:55

my career in like 2009, I remember

41:58

reading the OSAP uh the Defense

42:01

Intelligence reference documents, the

42:02

DIDs, and at the time I had no idea what

42:05

they were doing. And turns out it was

42:07

obviously UAP related, but I was reading

42:09

why why is the DIA looking into magneto

42:12

hydrodnamic propulsion and uh cloaking

42:16

and all all this other stuff. And of

42:18

course I find out later what it was, but

42:20

I had absolutely no uh personal

42:23

experience and even professionally

42:26

uh for most of my career. Now I found

42:28

out behind the scenes later like, "Oh,

42:30

you remember that top secret program

42:32

you're working on, Dave? you were

42:33

actually uh looking for UAP and you

42:36

didn't know it. I'm like what? And and

42:38

of course, you know, I find out and I

42:40

learn about, you know, how they hid all

42:42

this infrastructure and they used a lot

42:44

of conventional national security

42:47

intelligence collection architecture to

42:48

basically facilitate this crash

42:51

retrieval program, which makes sense

42:52

because they're not going to reinvent

42:53

the wheel and, you know, totally have a

42:56

separate infrastructure to use to like

42:58

figure out if stuff crashed, activity,

43:01

etc., right? And um you know early I

43:06

would say

43:08

about 10 years into my career I remember

43:10

some imagery analysts saying hey Dave

43:13

you know like uh they told us to

43:14

airbrush some stuff out of photos and

43:16

stuff and it was round and I'm like okay

43:19

dude well maybe that's something you're

43:20

not clear to or whatever. And I do

43:22

remember that and I had some suspicious

43:26

recruitment earlier in my career too. I

43:28

was on some really sensitive stuff that

43:30

I ended up finding out it was um

43:32

directly adjacent to the program and I

43:34

went through this whole like smoking man

43:36

recruitment thing for a year and you

43:39

know was told I was going to get these

43:41

kind of bizarre accesses and I'm like

43:43

what are you talking about and

43:44

ultimately I was never recruited and I

43:46

kind of just like put filed that in the

43:48

back of my brain for years but like I've

43:50

said uh you know before it wasn't until

43:52

like spring of 2017 I was at the CIA

43:55

briefing um the deputy director staff on

43:58

a bunch of DoD classified programs and

44:01

the chief of um a very sensitive office

44:04

at the agency pulled me aside and was

44:05

like, "Dave, what what do you know about

44:07

UFOs? Like uh I hear there's like a

44:09

program at the Pentagon and all that."

44:11

And and and I'm like, "I don't know."

44:14

Like I'm briefed almost every DoD

44:16

program at the time by the way and

44:17

hundreds of of of programs in the

44:19

intelligence community because I was in

44:20

a position of very high trust and I you

44:22

know I'm very patriotic and I'm very

44:23

humbled that I was in a position like

44:25

that in my 30s and and I didn't think

44:28

anything of it until until this this

44:31

subject got more popularized people went

44:33

public you know Tom Dong TTSA and all

44:35

that and and and then I was

44:39

professionally interested but not really

44:40

working on it in 2018 and then early in

44:43

19 is when I got brought on as the NRO

44:47

rep to the the then Navy task force

44:49

which became the DoD's, you know, UAP

44:51

task force. That's kind of my origin

44:53

story. And and so I was always I'm

44:55

always been curious, but I never saw

44:57

evidence and I never had any personal

44:59

experience with the phenomenon that kind

45:01

of kind of colors my uh judgment on

45:03

this, I guess. So,

45:05

>> so I'm sure you're aware of how put off

45:07

when he was uh tasked by the Bush

45:10

administration along with a bunch of

45:11

other thinkers to try to come up with

45:13

pros and cons for disclosure.

45:15

>> Yeah, I knew some other people in that

45:16

meeting and I verified that meeting took

45:19

place and even even Arrow admitted in

45:23

their volume one report which was

45:24

horrible. Well, that's a long story.

45:26

Painful. Uh, that it it took place, but

45:28

it was just a hypothetical scenario at a

45:31

a fedally funded research and

45:33

development center in Northern Virginia.

45:34

>> What year was this?

45:35

>> 2004. It was like November of 2004. And

45:39

it's like, but why was it hypothetical

45:42

if it's not real? Nobody explains that.

45:45

And obviously the story is, you know,

45:47

Steve Hadley, who was the national

45:48

security adviser, uh, sponsored it. You

45:50

know, I I believe Hadley denies it, but

45:53

you know, who knows if Steve would uh

45:55

you know, tell the truth on that just

45:56

because of the sensitivity. So,

45:58

>> and so for people that don't know what

46:00

happened, supposedly they brought in a

46:02

bunch of different thought leaders and

46:04

they gave them uh a pro and a con side,

46:07

like what would be negatively affected

46:09

by disclosure, what would be positively

46:11

affected by disclosure, and attached a

46:13

numerical value to each group.

46:15

>> Correct. They had like a computer system

46:17

there that like tabulated everything

46:18

from what I know talking to other

46:21

attendees

46:21

>> and virtually every one of them had more

46:24

negative than positive and so the

46:27

decision was made to not disclose.

46:29

>> Well, yeah. And in the main decision, if

46:31

I remember correctly was the federal

46:33

contracts fraud. Well, that could be

46:36

debated in, you know, the Supreme Court.

46:38

But uh they realized a lot of and so

46:41

this is another issue of disclosure

46:43

besides the onlogical thought shock and

46:44

people can't handling it and like

46:46

>> misappropriation of funds.

46:47

>> Yeah. And misappropriation of funds and

46:49

all that. It's oh so these set of

46:52

contractors got sole source contracts

46:54

and exclusive access to this for

46:56

internal research and development where

46:58

they figure out something then sell it

46:59

back to the government etc. for all

47:01

these decades. What about my mid-level

47:03

small business and my contractor and

47:06

blah blah blah. And so you're going to

47:08

they were afraid that you would see

47:10

legal challenges going to the Supreme

47:11

Court in violation of what they call the

47:13

DEFARS, right? The defense federal

47:15

acquisition regulations,

47:16

>> right?

47:16

>> And the the government would be liable

47:20

for who knows billions of

47:22

dollars worth of monies that they spent

47:25

on this to these contractor partners

47:28

that got in back in the day and like,

47:30

well, we're not exposing any more

47:31

people. We're locking it down. and what

47:33

they call a JNA, justification and

47:35

approval for a soul source contract.

47:37

This is a reason national security like

47:39

we can't expose any more people to this.

47:41

And of course that also causes a brain

47:43

drain and group think and and actually

47:45

hurts the defense uh industrial base.

47:48

But that was the main reason. It wasn't

47:50

oh uh you know upcoming millennials that

47:53

are turning 18 can't handle it. It was

47:55

like yeah we're we're kind of culpable

47:58

and kind of a up contractual

48:00

relationship. And and that's going to be

48:02

something that the the Trump

48:03

administration is going to have to deal

48:04

with. It's like, well, how do I reorient

48:06

the defense and industrial base? I mean,

48:09

this could trigger a golden era of

48:11

innovation in America. More people get

48:12

to play. You overtly can take the basic

48:15

information that's not sensitive um and

48:18

put it into academia, right? So, you

48:19

have undergraduate, graduate, post-doal

48:21

programs, and you actually create this

48:24

like more educated workforce to actually

48:26

benefit national security. But, and and

48:28

China doesn't have this issue. They're

48:30

they're pulling people from pick a

48:32

university in China, Nanjing, whatever

48:34

university, and they're sucking them

48:36

into these programs and but in America,

48:39

we don't have that kind of permissive

48:40

totalitarian environment. So,

48:42

>> well, in China, they probably don't have

48:44

the issue with misappropriation of funds

48:46

and lying to Congress.

48:47

>> No, CCP, baby. You know, do whatever you

48:49

want.

48:49

>> They do whatever they want. So, they

48:51

don't have to worry about liability. So,

48:53

this is one of the things that came up

48:54

in that film, Age of Disclosure, is that

48:57

you're going to have to make some sort

48:59

of a amnesty program.

49:01

>> Yeah. And I'm I am for that as long it's

49:05

like use immunity for specific uh

49:08

testimony or

49:09

>> as long as it doesn't cover like this

49:10

other you're talking about.

49:12

>> Like my and of course I know who's

49:14

watching people clearly that are from

49:16

this ecosystem. Um, you know, I would,

49:19

you know, expect that like everybody's

49:22

been basically good Americans. There's a

49:24

small cast of characters that have done

49:26

unspeakable things. I mean, how they

49:27

wanted to kill me. This is like

49:28

it's disturbing and and you wonder why I

49:31

had to become a whistleblower. I didn't

49:32

want to do this but like I was

49:34

pushed over the edge uh to do that, you

49:36

know? I digress. But like besides like

49:40

bluecollar really up criminal

49:43

shits, which you know, once again, there

49:45

is a judicial justice process in

49:47

America, you know, we're not going to do

49:49

street justice here. We will, you know,

49:51

take care of that professionally. Um,

49:54

like I took care of the other criminal

49:55

stuff I found out professionally. I'm

49:57

like, look, I'm, you know, and and and

49:59

when I was doing that, I mean, I was

50:00

meeting people body armor armed with

50:04

colleagues of mine that were, you know,

50:05

rolling heavy, too. And like it was a

50:07

very serious part of my investigation.

50:10

But yeah, I I believe in amnesty, but I

50:12

I think we need to do it like a truth

50:14

and reconciliation commission, which was

50:16

in post-apartid South Africa in the 90s

50:18

where you had um you know, some white

50:21

farmer comes in, it's like, yeah, I

50:22

murdered a bunch of black people or

50:24

whatever, you know, and it's like, okay,

50:25

thank you for telling us that. You're

50:27

good. You know, don't do it again and

50:29

move on. I'm I mean, I'm distilling it

50:31

down, but that's essentially what the

50:32

TRC in South Africa was. And I think

50:34

something like that would be very

50:36

additive and good because I mean I have

50:39

friends that run the program. They're

50:40

they're great guys. They're bros you

50:41

know and gals and um they you know were

50:45

signed paperwork you know it was like if

50:47

you you know divulge this it's under

50:49

penalty of treason you go to Levvenworth

50:51

or you know capital punishment.

50:54

>> And yeah

50:55

>> let's break down what you know.

50:57

>> Yeah

50:58

>> and what you can say.

50:59

>> Yeah. What are these things and what are

51:02

they capable of?

51:04

>> So,

51:06

uh, there's like physical and

51:08

non-physical, call it UAP and

51:11

intelligence we're likely dealing with.

51:13

So, for example, the orbs, could that be

51:16

sentient plasmoid? Possibly

51:19

>> sentient plasmoid. So, plasma that has

51:21

consciousness.

51:22

>> Yeah. in some way and that could be like

51:24

you're seeing the other side of some

51:26

sort of wormhole and it's some other

51:28

intelligence shooting this like I'll

51:30

call it like plasmoidic probe into you

51:32

know our existence I mean there's this

51:34

is of course a theoretical framework and

51:36

once again I don't have a PhD in

51:37

>> but it's theoretical that there is a

51:39

life form that is a plasmabased life

51:42

form

51:42

>> and there's already papers on the open

51:44

internet about this a couple years ago

51:46

what's the title of the the paper they

51:49

wrote about this possibility so this is

51:51

a um academic assessment of a

51:55

possibility of the orbs. Now, could the

51:58

orbs actually be physical craft, but

52:00

they have a sheath of plasma around it?

52:02

Interestingly enough, and OAP did a

52:06

defense intelligence reference document

52:08

on magneto hydrodnamic propulsion, um

52:11

which if you remember the the movie The

52:13

Hunt for Red October,

52:14

>> that's the Caterpillar Drive on the

52:16

Russian submarine, you know, back in the

52:18

day. Uh and of course uh with MHD you

52:22

can also do it you have to use a

52:24

conductive fluid um either salt seawater

52:27

that has salt in it or uh you could do

52:29

it in the air but you have to create a

52:31

plasma and you steer the plasma with

52:33

it's called the lorren force it's it's

52:35

basically have a perpendicular magnetic

52:37

field large amount electricity and you

52:40

can basically through the lorren force

52:42

which is like ionic propulsion sort of

52:44

um uh control it in the in the

52:46

atmosphere as well and you can you know

52:48

read papers on that and I e and and

52:51

other stuff like that and so one of the

52:53

byproducts of an air breathing MHD

52:56

system is plasma around it. So depending

53:00

on the size of the orb um it is

53:02

conceivable that there's a physical

53:05

craft behind it as well just by as an

53:06

artifact of the propulsion system. Uh

53:08

once again that's a a theory. I'm sure

53:11

the program knows and that will be

53:13

communicated at a later date but like

53:14

you know that's Yeah.

53:15

>> So this theory about sentient plasma

53:19

>> Yeah.

53:20

>> is it the idea that we have a very

53:23

narrow-minded view of what life can be

53:26

>> and that life as it evolved in other

53:29

places in other parts of the universe

53:32

>> went noncroporeal at some point like the

53:34

the meat suit sucks. We're going to

53:36

>> right

53:37

>> be an energetic

53:37

>> like this is an ultimate expression of

53:40

both technology and at least enhanced

53:44

evolution that eventually consciousness

53:46

is isolated or consciousness may be

53:49

ubiquitous and exists in everything

53:52

anyway and that yeah

53:54

>> yeah certainly and I'm not the the

53:56

expert in I would say the the

53:57

consciousness theory I like the Penrose

54:00

Hamarov orc O theory which is the

54:02

microtubules the room temperature So

54:05

microtubules are in neurons of the brain

54:07

and you have this like room temperature

54:08

quantum system that can collapse the

54:11

wave function without an observer and

54:14

that's what Roger Penrose and Stuart

54:16

Hamarov and I've talked to Hamarov crazy

54:18

smart guy um he's an anesthesiologist by

54:21

training and Penrose obviously is a very

54:22

famous mathematician and uh physics

54:25

legend and uh that's how they view

54:28

consciousness. I'm not saying that's the

54:29

exact model. I happen to prefer it

54:32

because it's very trippy and very

54:33

interesting and does explain spooky

54:35

action and like um telepathy because oh

54:39

well if it's just a quantum system then

54:40

I'm like quantumly entangled. Oh that

54:41

makes sense now like why remote viewing

54:44

and other stuff works right.

54:46

>> Yeah.

54:46

>> Okay. So you have some sort of

54:49

plasabased intelligence.

54:52

>> Yeah.

54:52

>> And then what else?

54:54

So obviously there has been the physical

54:57

craft of all different flavors like I've

55:00

talked about it. You know the tic tacs

55:01

are real. There's eggs. There's

55:03

different types of discs. There's boot

55:05

heels sunfish looking things. Um uh

55:08

boomerangs crescent moon looking uh

55:10

craft as well. And obviously

55:13

all those have different

55:15

um origins in terms of pilots and

55:18

whatnot. There's a there's a little bit

55:20

of overlap. It's almost like uh certain

55:23

people like the Porsche 911 or Ford

55:26

Mustang. They they kind of build the

55:27

same shape and that's probably

55:28

indicative of the technology or the

55:30

propulsion system.

55:31

>> I'm not an expert in exactly why that

55:34

is. And yeah, we've recovered, you know,

55:36

sever several different types and it's a

55:38

it's once again it's a taxonomy where

55:41

it's almost like like not all white

55:44

people look the same, right? same idea

55:46

where you might have like a species per

55:48

se but then there's sort of like subsets

55:51

right

55:52

>> now

55:54

is there a theory or is there

55:56

information based on where these things

55:58

are from and that there different ones

56:00

are from different places

56:02

>> there is but I never got access to that

56:07

and even if the information was once

56:10

again how would you like um confirm that

56:12

as a skeptical former uh human intg ence

56:15

officer, you have some sort of NHI

56:18

communicating to you, oh, I'm from star

56:20

system X, Y, and Z. Right?

56:21

>> Cool. Is that denial and deception, you

56:24

know, activities? Are you misdirecting?

56:26

You're from somewhere else. So,

56:28

>> uh, even if they said they told us, how

56:31

would you verify that? I mean, there's

56:32

certainly obviously ways

56:34

>> and but some of it seems once again

56:38

extraterrestrial is part of the pie

56:40

here, right? There's a, you know,

56:42

there's ultraterrestrial and other

56:43

things. And I it does seem like a lot of

56:46

it's been here for a while and also

56:51

seems so similar to us that I have

56:55

questions. And once again, this isn't

56:56

rhetorical. I don't know the answer.

56:57

It's like, well, is this bio-engineered?

57:00

Is this uh a break from our tree? Is

57:03

this um some sort of other technology?

57:07

Uh like chameleon type technology, if

57:10

you will. I don't I don't know the

57:11

answer to that. So I I think that's

57:14

>> what are the prevailing theories amongst

57:15

the people that are working on this

57:16

though.

57:17

>> Yeah. So

57:18

>> like do they have answers or do they

57:19

just have theories?

57:21

>> I am not certain of that because I do

57:23

not have that level of knowledge and as

57:26

the government rolls that out I'm happy

57:29

to you know parse that with the American

57:31

people in public and kind of explain my

57:34

opinion on things as gaps and

57:36

information for myself is filled in

57:38

because I'm not omnipotent. I didn't

57:40

have full access and I only know what I

57:42

know. And that's why I've I've treated

57:44

this with such reverence because even me

57:47

going public, I'm like, I don't

57:48

know what this is going to trigger

57:50

besides my own personal safety, which

57:51

clearly I was under duress and and I had

57:54

to even resign my Air Force Commission.

57:56

Didn't even fully retire and I'm trying

57:58

to get that fixed. I, you know, filed

57:59

something with the Air Force board a

58:01

year ago so I can actually retire and

58:04

have my benefits because I, you know, I

58:06

miss my promotional lieutenant colonel

58:07

and other stuff. But um I digress. But

58:12

certainly

58:14

there is such similarity that there was

58:17

a concern and uh from a genomic

58:20

perspective and there was work on that

58:21

to compare genomes. Unfortunately, I

58:23

don't know the answer to that and what

58:24

they found out

58:26

>> work to compare genomes from biological

58:28

samples.

58:29

>> Uh yeah, dead cadaavvers. Yeah.

58:31

>> So that's real.

58:33

>> Oh, 100%. Yeah.

58:34

>> So there are

58:35

>> Oh yeah, I know that for sure. you. How

58:37

do you know that for sure?

58:38

>> I got to see the audio visual on that

58:40

side.

58:41

>> You got to see what?

58:42

>> Yeah. So, I got to be a little vague

58:44

only because I want to protect the

58:46

sources because it may indicate a

58:48

specific activity or operation and these

58:50

people were very patriotic and um they

58:54

were just dead cadaavvers in you know on

58:57

the ground because it was a retrieval

58:59

activity. Yeah.

59:00

>> You saw them physically or you saw video

59:02

of them?

59:02

>> Video.

59:03

>> Video.

59:03

>> Yeah. So you saw a dead cadaavver that

59:07

was at a crash.

59:09

>> Yes.

59:10

>> So they filmed the crash and they filmed

59:14

these cadaavvers.

59:15

>> Yeah.

59:15

>> How old is this footage?

59:17

>> Uh I don't want to say. Okay.

59:18

>> It's contemporary, but I

59:19

>> It's contemporary.

59:20

>> Yeah. But I don't want to reveal a

59:21

particular operation because it narrows

59:23

it down.

59:24

>> But it's clear. It's not like you're

59:26

looking 1950s black and white. It's

59:29

clear. And do know, you know, when I get

59:33

that kind of information, you know, I'm

59:34

like, okay, tell me what it is, what

59:36

what happened, and then I put it out for

59:37

collection, so to speak, and then I

59:39

confirm it independently because I was

59:41

very uh allergic to any kind of

59:43

deception, right? Like in the in the

59:45

advent of AI, Sora AI, you can you can

59:47

create a very realistic and so I was

59:50

very anal retentive when I was given

59:53

documents, audiovisisual, etc. And I sat

59:56

on that stuff for like years until I

59:58

felt comfortable with that not being

60:00

some sort of limited hangout or

60:02

deception activity. So yeah.

60:05

>> What did it look like?

60:06

>> Human looking.

60:07

>> How human?

60:08

>> Very

60:09

>> like like looked like a human or looked

60:12

similar to a human.

60:13

>> Very

60:15

very beautiful. And

60:17

>> beautiful.

60:17

>> It and I I said

60:19

>> what color was the skin?

60:20

>> Uh bluish white and super close. No, no,

60:24

no, no, no. It like

60:26

>> like someone who drowned

60:27

>> like a pale sort of albino and

60:30

>> and it's interesting and I said this in

60:32

another interview that's not out yet,

60:33

but and and God willing this is my last

60:36

interview for a while hopefully in

60:38

pre-disclosure environment, you know,

60:40

and uh General McCaslin when he was

60:43

talking to Dong and this is public

60:45

record. Tom's talked about it on I think

60:47

your show and other interviews where he

60:49

always told Tom think of the Greek gods

60:51

and and Oh, true. you look it up and and

60:55

now I kind of understand what he meant.

60:56

But General McCaslin, who disappeared

60:58

within a week of Trump giving the the

61:00

declassification order on UAP in

61:03

February 2026, there's a lot of reasons

61:05

why uh Mccasin's disappearance uh

61:08

>> disappeared. Um he walked out of his

61:11

residence in Albuquerque and vanished.

61:13

>> Oh, that's right. That guy. Yeah.

61:15

>> Yeah. And nobody knows. And I, you know,

61:18

I have a relationship obviously with

61:20

Justice and

61:22

nobody knows what happened to

61:23

the guy.

61:25

>> And he like he left home so he

61:27

couldn't be tracked. I think his phone

61:28

was left but you know one of his

61:30

firearms was missing. It's like very

61:32

weird. So

61:34

>> Right. He left without his phone.

61:35

>> Yeah.

61:35

>> Yeah. That was one of the weird parts

61:37

about it.

61:38

>> Yeah. And and once again he was going on

61:41

a trip with like 18 of his friends. He

61:42

went to REI the day before to get like a

61:45

medical kit and other supplies and I

61:48

mean obviously his wife's

61:51

discussion about him the body cam

61:52

footage is public and you know he had

61:55

some mental health issues nothing major

61:58

and and um some aging type issues but

62:03

she didn't think you know he was going

62:05

to like kill himself or whatever. So, I

62:06

mean, you never know. And I've had

62:07

friends unfortunately uh pass away

62:10

through suicide in the military, but

62:12

it's very bizarre and it's when within a

62:15

week of Trump that coming out and um

62:18

>> just say I know a lot about General

62:19

McCass.

62:20

>> Well, there's quite a few scientists

62:21

that were connected to UF UAP disclosure

62:25

or UAP potential back engineering

62:27

projects or mysterious projects

62:29

>> possibly. I think

62:30

>> do you think there was more like

62:32

>> to be fair was a little overblown and I

62:34

don't think there was a ton of

62:35

correlation like one was like a female

62:37

that worked at Air Force Research Lab

62:39

when Macccasin was a commander. I think

62:41

that was one of Well, I mean there's a

62:43

lot of people that work at Air Force

62:44

Research Lab. That doesn't mean it's

62:45

necessarily related to the topic. I the

62:48

only one

62:48

>> didn't she have did didn't that one

62:50

particular lady if it's the same person

62:52

didn't she have some sort of research

62:54

that was on material science?

62:56

>> That sounds correct. I'm not totally

62:58

conversant on all the people that

63:00

disappeared. The only one besides Maslin

63:04

that was very concerning to me was my

63:07

Air Force friend that um died

63:10

mysteriously about two years ago. And

63:14

it's an open investigation, so I won't

63:16

get into all the gory detail of my

63:17

assessments. Um it I mean it's binary.

63:20

It's either a very tragic thing, either

63:23

self harm or otherwise, or it was

63:25

something else. and my friend uh his

63:29

name's Matthew Sullivan calls sign quake

63:31

in the air force him and I were on

63:32

active duty together uh he was on the

63:35

program and he was uh one of my sources

63:39

and I and I once again I don't name

63:41

people but like he unfortunately has

63:43

passed so I want to make that clear

63:45

>> this video do you think this will be a

63:47

part of disclosure that we'll get to see

63:50

this video of these dead bodies

63:51

>> probably

63:54

so there's a there's a lot audiovisisual

63:56

stuff. The problem with the the with the

63:58

the current climate, like you're going

64:00

to have to wheel out the physical

64:01

evidence, too, cuz people are the trust

64:03

in government is so low right now. Like

64:04

you you could show a video, but people

64:06

are going to be like, "Oh, well that's

64:08

just the US government with us,

64:10

and you're going to have to

64:12

>> curate a wheel out literally like, you

64:14

know, put it in the Uvar Hazy Center,

64:16

the Smithsonian, and then give the

64:18

biological samples to Eric Weinstein,

64:22

who I know he wants it." And

64:24

>> why would you give it to him? Well, he

64:26

says he has people that test it. Um,

64:29

>> I have people that test it, too.

64:30

>> Yeah, but give it to me.

64:32

>> I'm just I'm just saying that

64:33

>> it's all ridiculous and give it to who?

64:35

There should be a way that human beings

64:38

uh other than the government can look at

64:40

this stuff.

64:40

>> Well, there needs to be an independent

64:42

process. Yeah.

64:43

>> Right now, is this stuff

64:46

>> So, this is contemporary this this dead

64:49

body thing.

64:50

>> And so, this is a fairly recent crash.

64:54

>> Mhm. And did these things have all the

64:58

characteristics of a human being? Did

65:00

they have ears? And

65:01

>> as far as I could recall, and it wasn't

65:03

like all they have close up. Oh, yeah.

65:06

>> They had hair. What color was the hair?

65:08

>> It was like grayish and all that. It was

65:11

The problem is I don't give the nature

65:13

of the the video. It wasn't super close

65:17

up. It was like,

65:17

>> of course not

65:18

>> during the operation. So, it's not like

65:20

>> during the operation of retrieval.

65:22

>> Yeah. Okay. And then they they had these

65:25

things. So what is your understanding of

65:28

what happens to these bodies?

65:30

>> Oh, they're kept for analysis. And

65:32

>> how do they keep them? They freeze them.

65:34

>> Yeah. Yeah.

65:35

>> Yeah. I don't know the exact process.

65:36

I'm not a biologist, but they do put it

65:38

in some sort of preservation status. So

65:42

>> Huh.

65:43

>> Yeah.

65:43

>> So was that the most compelling thing

65:45

you saw?

65:47

Yes, because you know it couples with

65:50

you know both the the craft and the

65:52

alleged you know occupants and you there

65:54

was some other stuff in that in that

65:56

area that I got to be careful talking

65:58

about because it's so specific that

66:00

it'll easily ID the you know the patriot

66:02

that helped me on that.

66:04

>> Um and once again I want the public to

66:06

see all this stuff and I you don't take

66:09

my word for it. Plead with the president

66:11

to make sure this comes out. He's really

66:13

courageous to do so and I just I hope

66:15

this all comes out.

66:15

>> When you say contemporary, you mean last

66:17

20 years, more recent?

66:19

>> I don't even want to characterize it,

66:20

but it's it's contemporary.

66:22

>> And when you say Greek gods, like do

66:24

these these creatures actually look like

66:28

something special, like not just like a

66:30

regular person. You said beautiful.

66:32

>> Yeah. Just very oddly it and it's been a

66:35

while and but I'm just trying to

66:36

visualize in my mind. It was just very

66:38

very beautiful. It was just

66:40

>> Were they wearing an outfit?

66:42

>> Uh, it looked like it like some kind of

66:44

form fitting thing, but I didn't get a

66:45

good look at it.

66:46

>> Spandex?

66:47

>> I don't know. I didn't get a good look

66:48

at it, honestly.

66:49

>> You didn't?

66:50

>> No. I mean, it was like a a pan. So,

66:52

>> okay. So, they didn't even focus on the

66:54

bodies. They just like, "Oh, there's a

66:55

body of there." You know, people had a

66:58

job to do,

66:59

>> right? Did you worry that that that's a

67:01

scop that you're being shown something

67:02

that's horseshit? Well, like I said, I

67:04

was very careful with that and confirmed

67:06

it through other sources and methods to

67:08

make sure it wasn't some sort of hangout

67:11

from some government element trying to

67:12

sway me one way or the other. And

67:15

>> so, you independently verified that

67:16

there was an event.

67:18

>> Yeah, I did.

67:19

>> Okay. And then there's footage of this

67:21

event. And in this footage of this

67:22

event, how many bodies were there?

67:24

>> I think three or four is what I saw. I

67:26

don't know what the total was.

67:26

>> Did they have gender?

67:28

>> Um, looked amorphous to me, but once

67:31

again, it was a pan. Really? It wasn't.

67:32

Yeah. Okay.

67:33

>> Yeah.

67:33

>> Long hair, short hair,

67:35

>> long.

67:36

>> All of them.

67:38

>> Yeah.

67:38

>> Hm.

67:38

>> That I could recall. Yeah.

67:40

>> The Greek gods thing is very weird.

67:42

>> It's weird. And

67:43

>> it's a weird comparison. Like you stop

67:44

and think about that. Yeah. Well, why

67:46

were the Greek gods

67:47

>> so beautiful?

67:48

>> It's funny you say that cuz like I think

67:50

about like breakaway human. I mean, once

67:52

again, I'm just I'm just

67:54

>> or maybe even an original civilization

67:56

that existed before.

67:58

>> Yeah. There's more people are leaning in

68:01

that direction when they start looking

68:03

at some of the stuff that's underneath

68:04

the pyramids and some of the weird

68:06

structures that they're finding all over

68:07

the earth. Like how how are these

68:09

things? We had a whole podcast yesterday

68:11

about it. It's like how are these things

68:13

made? Who made these things? Like what?

68:15

>> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, obviously I I follow

68:17

Graham Hancock and Randle Carlson just,

68:19

you know, casually and

68:21

>> and I do have um not fears, but uh you

68:25

know, I have questions about some sort

68:27

of breakaway human civilization and that

68:29

explains some of this or it's

68:31

bio-engineered because like for them to

68:33

develop naturally say off planet say

68:36

it's extraterrestrial that it looks

68:38

almost dead ringer like us like that

68:41

doesn't make any sense to me.

68:42

>> Well, does it make sense? If we're

68:43

engineered, then it makes sense. So,

68:46

>> that is that is certainly a possibility.

68:48

You know, I have questions about that,

68:49

too.

68:50

>> This is a this is what Bob Lazar

68:53

believes. I had a long conversation with

68:54

him about that. He thinks that human

68:57

beings are a product of genetic some

68:59

sort of manipulation.

69:01

>> And I think hypothetically, if that

69:05

ended up being verified in some way,

69:06

shape, or form, you know, how how does

69:09

that change humanity? What does it mean

69:10

to be human? And I I think there's a lot

69:11

of deep human sovereignty and other

69:13

questions uh on that if that ends up

69:16

being the case.

69:16

>> Well, it gets weird because we're

69:18

willing to believe that an omnipotent

69:20

god created us out of nothing. That's

69:24

cool. But the idea that we were visited

69:26

by what's essentially almost godlike in

69:30

their powers and abilities, some

69:31

creature from somewhere else or some

69:33

being, some super hyper intelligent

69:36

being from somewhere else

69:37

>> and they manipulated us. That bothers

69:39

us. I know. And I weird. My biggest

69:41

regret was not getting access to like

69:43

the biological assessment reports and

69:45

stuff like that. I was getting enough

69:47

spears thrown my way and I was, you

69:48

know, in literal danger. So, I

69:50

unfortunately wasn't able to kind of,

69:52

you know, um, get access to that stuff.

69:55

>> Have you talked to anybody who did get

69:56

access to it?

69:58

>> Um,

70:00

not on that side of the program in terms

70:02

of like the scientists analyzing the

70:04

bodies. No. I just I know people that

70:07

are good friends of mine that were on

70:09

retrievalss and saw them as well in

70:11

person. And once again, I'm like

70:13

comparing like did did you it look like

70:14

this? It look like this? Did this

70:15

happen? Was it this type of craft?

70:17

>> Do they vary in terms of what they saw?

70:19

>> Yes. And uh some of my colleagues saw

70:23

them alive as well.

70:25

>> Yeah.

70:26

>> What did they see alive? Like the Greek

70:27

god looking ones?

70:28

>> Uh no. Uh it's

70:31

the pop culture. I can't believe I want

70:34

to talk about this. Uh the pop culture

70:36

>> uh reptilian looking

70:37

>> reptilian

70:39

>> the the grays yes as well those are real

70:42

once again the aerial school phenomenon

70:44

in 1994 very well documented mass

70:46

sighting what does it

70:48

>> is that Zimbabwe

70:49

>> yeah near a uranium mine

70:52

>> and they saw small gray beings coming

70:54

out of a lenticular disc craft once

70:56

again this is why it's almost like not

70:59

that shocking it's like yeah they look

71:00

like that no

71:02

>> well that story has been going on for a

71:05

long time and that iconic. The problem

71:07

with like iconic imagery is that now you

71:10

have it in your head what to expect and

71:13

like that was like from the movie

71:15

Contact. Remember the movie Contact?

71:16

Like it showed itself.

71:17

>> Great movie. Great movie. I know my boy

71:20

Amomar, I got him hooked on that movie.

71:22

He watches it like every quarter.

71:23

>> It's a phenomenal movie.

71:25

>> But there's a scene in the movie where

71:27

the alien shows itself as Jodie Foster's

71:31

dad. I know because it's something that

71:33

she can handle

71:34

>> and that's what it's funny you say that

71:36

that's what if they're bio-engineered

71:38

then that makes sense because of that

71:39

ease of contact ease of communication

71:42

also less onlogically shocking it's

71:44

familiar

71:44

>> right

71:45

>> and and I think as this rolls out I

71:49

think the American people need to think

71:50

about like okay well if you know I'm

71:52

presented with this reality how would I

71:54

react you know I I just think of them

71:56

personally as like it's like my West

71:57

Virginia cousins you know it's like

71:59

different part of the family you But but

72:01

I'm cool with them. And uh

72:03

>> that's a

72:04

>> I'll I'll chill with them, you know,

72:07

whatever. And hey, I'm a nerd. Like do

72:09

you know how bad I want to just like

72:11

hang out with them?

72:12

>> Oh yeah, me too.

72:13

>> Like not that I have like uh personal

72:16

bias for President Trump to do this, but

72:18

like just like any American, I like I

72:20

want to know more.

72:21

>> Of course,

72:21

>> I want to meet them. I want to

72:22

communicate. Well, I think it's just

72:25

it's wrong for some people to have

72:27

access to this information because this

72:30

I think this is different than any other

72:31

kind of secret information.

72:33

>> I think it's weight and its significance

72:36

and impact on the human race in general.

72:40

I I mean I demand I I want we should

72:44

know you shouldn't there shouldn't be a

72:47

group of unelected bureaucrats and

72:50

defense contractors that have access to

72:52

this stuff and the general public

72:54

doesn't. So they have a completely

72:56

different map of the world than we do.

72:58

>> I know and I just think about the

73:01

unfortunate lies and how society has

73:03

progressed over the last several decades

73:05

and where we could have been if this was

73:06

handled back in the ' 50s60s and 70s.

73:08

Right. And once again, it shouldn't even

73:10

be me doing this. Like, I saw a little

73:12

bit of crazy I learned some stuff.

73:14

I met with some of the most senior

73:16

people in government to confirm all

73:17

this, you know, at the highest highest

73:19

highest level. And um it's me like I'm

73:24

just a dude like I'm I was a, you know,

73:26

major in the Air Force and, you know,

73:28

mid-level senior civilian in the IC. But

73:32

unfortunately,

73:33

I got stuck with this and it wouldn't

73:35

have happened unless this small crew,

73:38

you know, honestly pushed me over the

73:39

edge and, you know, I I was in

73:42

unbelievable duress and I ended up

73:43

having to go public. So

73:44

>> So tell me more about these reptilians

73:46

that your friend encountered. They were

73:48

alive.

73:49

>> Yeah.

73:49

>> So they were alive post crash.

73:52

>> Yes.

73:53

>> Why do these things keep

73:54

crashing?

73:55

>> So some of it is um NHI versus NHI.

74:01

wides.

74:02

>> Yeah,

74:02

>> they war in the skies. Isn't that in the

74:05

>> You think it's like would they get

74:06

along? They're so advanced. But uh the

74:10

we have records of them around

74:12

with each other.

74:12

>> Is that in the Mahabarata or the

74:14

Bavagita? There's there's like talk

74:16

about sky wars in ancient Hindu text.

74:20

>> Vid Oh yeah, in the Vidic text, the blue

74:21

people. And I know that's why you asked

74:24

blue. I don't recall them being that

74:26

blue, but you know, right?

74:28

>> I got a short little look unlike

74:29

>> Yeah, when they're alive, they're

74:30

darker.

74:32

>> Well, that is true. There's like a

74:35

post-mortem change in their like people.

74:38

That's what happens with people.

74:39

>> That that is true cuz you know, as they

74:42

were struggling and then died, obviously

74:43

their affect changed and So,

74:46

>> this friend that encountered first of

74:49

all the we'll go to the the Greek god

74:52

people first. Yeah. What did their craft

74:53

look like?

74:55

>> Uh, boomerang, crescent moon, usually.

74:59

Not all the time. It's kind of like once

75:00

I go back, some people like to drive the

75:02

Porsche 911. Uh, that tends to be not

75:06

all the time, but uh that's what they

75:10

like to roll up in.

75:10

>> They they they talk about them as the

75:12

tall whites.

75:13

>> Yeah.

75:14

>> You hear that? Were they tall? Were they

75:16

large?

75:16

>> They look tall to me. I didn't have

75:18

>> hard to tell because you don't

75:19

>> I didn't have a ground reference really.

75:21

I would say at least

75:24

human size. They could be

75:26

>> very similar to human size.

75:27

>> Yeah, they could be my big ass is 66,

75:29

but like the

75:30

>> they looked big um

75:32

>> similar to humans,

75:33

>> I think. So, and there might be taller

75:36

once again. I'm sure there's other stuff

75:38

I don't know about. I'm sure there's

75:40

other variants of them too that look

75:42

more towards like the classic um

75:44

>> what is it in eufology? like Nordic or,

75:46

you know, tall whites

75:49

>> and that are probably even taller. If

75:51

some of those uh experiences are true,

75:54

which once again, as long as that source

75:57

is credible, that might be a thing. So,

75:59

I think we need to be prepared to kind

76:01

of

76:02

>> that being a thing. I don't know.

76:03

>> Yeah, that makes sense.

76:05

>> Now, the reptilian craft, what did that

76:07

thing look like?

76:09

>> Uh, that one is tic tac looking.

76:12

>> Uhoh.

76:13

>> Yeah.

76:14

>> I was hoping they were the cool ones.

76:15

Yeah. The reptilian ones are the ones

76:17

that everyone's terrified of.

76:18

>> Yeah. And and once again, like we're

76:20

we're doing like and of course it's not

76:22

always a tic tac. Once again, kind of

76:24

like what I said, but like that tends to

76:25

be them.

76:26

>> Um from what I understand, obviously,

76:28

hopefully I'm not wrong, but I'm, you

76:30

know, pretty good sourcing on that.

76:33

>> When you see like um malevolent

76:35

behavior, right, it's like, well, that's

76:36

a humanistic lens. You're seeing like a

76:39

animal lash out in captiv captivity kind

76:41

of thing. Or they're in duress. they're

76:44

having an emotional experience, etc. And

76:46

it's like, you know, are they actually

76:48

scary or is it just because of the

76:50

situations we've been in with them? And

76:51

so what kind of bias and and all that?

76:53

So,

76:53

>> of course.

76:54

>> Yeah.

76:54

>> And so these reptilians, what did they

76:57

look like?

76:57

>> Now, I've never seen them in person.

76:59

Your friend described as

77:01

>> it's like very almost like um 7 foot

77:04

tall plus uh sort of gorilla looking

77:08

skin.

77:08

>> Gorilla looking, scaly skin though,

77:11

reptile gorillas. But there's multiple

77:13

types. There's ones that are are more

77:17

humanoid looking. So

77:19

>> there's multiple types of reptilians.

77:20

>> Yeah. And I'm not an expert on that one.

77:22

That's once again I never saw it in

77:24

person to get the exact uh you know.

77:27

>> See if there's a artist rendition.

77:30

>> Yeah. Yeah.

77:31

>> Chris you are.

77:32

>> Yeah. And once again it it sounds it

77:35

sounds so skitso like even for me

77:37

>> gorilla with scales.

77:38

>> Ex deep state intel officer. I'm like, I

77:40

cannot believe I'm talking about

77:42

this on Joe Rogan.

77:43

>> Scare scaly gorilla.

77:45

>> I know. And I mean, it sounds skitso.

77:47

And it's like coming from somebody like

77:49

me, you know, who, you know, is a

77:51

credible person and has been in

77:52

government. It's like,

77:54

>> I'm going to be that guy. I'm going to

77:55

be that guy. And then like down the road

77:57

people will review Joe Rogan and he's

77:59

like that We thought he

78:00

was crazy, but

78:02

>> what do you know? You know, it's true.

78:03

Well, of course, if there are things

78:05

from somewhere else, you're going to

78:07

sound crazy describing any of

78:08

>> because it's it's so outside my

78:10

experience because I never had some kind

78:12

of woo thing growing up or some sort of

78:15

interaction with the phenomenon. So, it

78:17

it it it feels so outside my personal

78:20

comfort level and experience because um

78:22

I'm relying on the personal experience

78:24

of others, you know, audio visual stuff

78:26

and it still feels like I'm watching a

78:28

movie. Like, it's like is that is it

78:30

real? I mean, I know it is, but like

78:31

it's I have a cognitive dissonance a

78:33

little bit, you know? So,

78:35

>> and how were you able to watch this

78:36

video? Do they have to put you into a

78:38

secret room?

78:39

>> Yeah, I won't get into the exact way it

78:41

went down, but uh uh we'll just say it

78:44

was uh kind of sketchy, but it to keep

78:48

everybody safe. So,

78:49

>> and so there apparently is NHI versus

78:53

NHI warfare.

78:55

>> We've we've documented that.

78:57

>> Documented it

78:57

>> in collection.

78:59

what we perceive as warfare. So, unless

79:02

it's something conflict,

79:03

>> yeah, it looks like conflict. It smells

79:05

like conflict. Is it some other kind of

79:06

weird I don't know. And there's

79:08

maybe an assessment on that. But,

79:10

>> and um when this reptilian craft

79:14

crashed, the assumption was that it was

79:16

some sort of conflict because I would

79:17

imagine,

79:18

>> correct,

79:18

>> that they're the ones you'd have to

79:19

worry about

79:20

>> cuz there was dead uh dead grays there,

79:23

too.

79:24

>> Oh, yeah. So,

79:25

>> so the grays and the reptilians were

79:26

duking it out.

79:27

>> Yeah. I guess I guess you know you know

79:31

I know the people who were there and

79:32

>> this sounds insane Dave. It

79:34

sounds crazy. And and once

79:36

again, I don't want to get in too many

79:38

specifics cuz this is a very unique

79:41

>> There's a couple unique retrievals out

79:42

there that to protect the innocents and

79:45

people that have risked their

79:46

lives cuz a lot of the people that

79:49

>> uh came to me with that kind of

79:50

information. I mean, they were

79:51

physically threatened like me and and

79:53

all that and and so like me going public

79:56

was taking it for the team because I was

79:57

able to create this umbrella of uh

79:59

tacet, you know, protection in case

80:01

somebody got with. And

80:02

unfortunately, you know, my my friend

80:04

Matt, who knows what happened to him,

80:06

but um you know, tragically he died, you

80:09

know, mysteriously. So

80:10

>> now these reptilians, what was their

80:13

craft like?

80:15

>> Oh, like I said, the tic tac tic tac

80:16

stuff.

80:17

>> And was their craft crashed into the

80:19

ground, like broken up?

80:21

>> Yeah.

80:21

>> Okay.

80:22

>> It was like wedged into

80:23

>> like had it been hit with something?

80:25

>> Um I don't remember exactly what

80:28

happened in that regard, but it did

80:30

crash. So, and I don't want to misspeak

80:32

on what exactly happened. So,

80:35

>> and how many times has this happened if

80:38

you had a guess?

80:38

>> I don't know the total number of like uh

80:41

adversarial conflict crashes, but I mean

80:44

it seems to be at least a dozen or two.

80:47

I don't know.

80:48

>> So, at least a dozen or two adversarial

80:51

crashes. And then there's the high

80:54

alitude nuclear tests,

80:56

>> right? You're aware of those, right?

80:58

>> Mhm.

80:59

>> Okay. So, there's been a lot of

81:01

speculation that during those high

81:03

alitude nuclear tests that crafts that

81:07

didn't know it was coming got rocked.

81:10

Do you know anything about that?

81:12

>> That's an area that I'll let the

81:14

government handle. That's because it

81:15

gets into vulnerabilities and and and

81:18

what the US has figured out. So, that

81:20

just gets a sensitive area, but that's

81:23

something I'm sure that'll come out in

81:24

this process because

81:25

>> So, you can't talk about that. Is that

81:27

what you're saying? because it gets into

81:29

um US capabilities and what we figured

81:31

out in terms of uh

81:32

>> Well, this is all like from the 50s,

81:34

right?

81:34

>> Yeah. But we still got nukes and we

81:36

still got those kind of weapons, you

81:38

know,

81:39

>> away. So,

81:39

>> you're aware of those um

81:42

it was uh what what was it, Jamie? Was

81:45

it um a telescope that they were t they

81:48

they were taking photographs of the

81:50

stars and they were doing it with uh do

81:54

you know what I'm talking about? all the

81:55

little dots popped up thing that Yeah,

81:57

that's like two or three weeks ago,

81:58

>> right? We talked about that a couple

81:59

weeks ago. It was an observatory and the

82:02

observatory has these old plates of

82:05

images that they took of the sky.

82:07

>> Oh, is this Beatatric's work, the Vasco?

82:11

>> Yes.

82:11

>> Um yeah, I read it. Very interesting.

82:13

And um

82:14

>> it's hard to make an exact conclusion if

82:17

if it's UAP, but it's really great

82:20

original scholarship and I applaud her

82:22

for for doing that. But there appeared

82:24

to be moving uh reflective things that

82:29

were outside of our atmosphere that they

82:31

were taking images of. They were not

82:33

static. They were not

82:33

>> starutnik too. That was the important

82:35

thing.

82:36

>> Pribut very important because there was

82:37

no satellites at the time. This was

82:40

images that they took of the sky that

82:41

showed things that were reflective that

82:44

seemed to be metallic allegedly. And if

82:46

I remember her paper correctly with her

82:48

co-authors, it also there were cluster

82:51

concentrations over sensitive nuclear

82:53

facilities and nuclear testing um uh uh

82:58

chronological temporal correlation as

83:00

well.

83:01

>> So data shows unidentified lights in

83:03

archival astronomy images were 68% more

83:06

likely to be imaged 24 hours after a

83:09

nuclear weapons test.

83:10

>> Like I was saying, yeah,

83:11

>> right. So this is chronologically like

83:14

we have these nuclear weapons tests

83:16

including these high altitude

83:17

detonations like oper operation starfish

83:19

prime.

83:20

>> Yeah.

83:20

>> We detonate these things and then all of

83:23

a sudden these craft start showing up

83:25

like hey what are these crazy

83:28

monkeys up to?

83:29

>> It does seem like there was a heightened

83:30

amount of activity once we started

83:32

testing nuclear weapons. Oh yeah.

83:34

>> Obviously this phenomenon is old. It's

83:35

interacted with man and antiquity. You

83:37

know Jacques Valet's scholarship on that

83:39

passport meonia that. Yeah,

83:41

>> that's why the names of our rooms at the

83:44

comedy club are Fat Man and Little Boy.

83:45

>> Oh, nice. Yeah, because that's what

83:47

ushered because it's the comedy mother

83:49

ship. It's a UFOs based. The

83:50

>> Yeah, if you go to the Air Force Museum,

83:52

um they have the the Anola Gay there, I

83:54

think. Is that right?

83:56

>> It's one of the planes.

83:57

>> Oh, wow.

83:58

>> My alma mater is going to crucify me for

83:59

getting that Air Force history wrong at

84:01

the Air Force Museum in Dayton, Ohio.

84:03

But

84:03

>> Wow.

84:03

>> It's pretty cool. They have a mockup of

84:05

the the little boy and fat man bombs, so

84:08

you can see how big they were. You're

84:09

like, "Holy that was big."

84:10

>> One of the things that Lazar said is

84:13

that one of the objects they were

84:15

working with was very old. And he said

84:17

that they had somehow that it it was

84:20

told to him that it was retrieved from

84:22

an archaeological dig.

84:24

>> I don't know about his specific story

84:26

and his exposure, but uh the

84:29

archaeological thing that that is a

84:30

thing. Yeah.

84:31

>> Are you aware of the labyrinth at Hawara

84:34

in Egypt?

84:37

>> No. What is that? Okay. So,

84:39

>> is that the one where there's a metallic

84:40

object that they they but but the what's

84:43

his face won't let people go in it from

84:44

the Egyptian?

84:45

>> Well, it's it's complicated. It's a

84:47

little more complicated than won't let

84:48

them, but there's definitely resistance

84:50

to it.

84:51

>> So, these labyrinths, this this

84:53

incredible compound that's underground

84:56

was documented by Heroditus and he said

84:58

it was greater than Giza. He said it was

85:01

much more spectacular construction. Wow.

85:03

So now they know from ground penetrating

85:05

radar that these these cavities in the

85:08

ground, these symmetrical rooms exist.

85:11

They know where they are and they know

85:13

why they're flooded. So they're flooded

85:15

because during the 1960s they built a

85:18

dam to divert water for agriculture. And

85:21

when they did, they changed the water

85:22

table and it flooded this labyrinth

85:24

area. And when they used this ground pen

85:27

penetrating radar and um I think it's

85:30

radio tomography and a bunch of other

85:32

different ways of

85:33

>> one of the things they found was a 40 m

85:36

long metallic object that's in some sort

85:40

of is it

85:42

>> is it in an atrium like it's in some

85:45

sort of a large room.

85:47

>> I've heard of I've seen a video about

85:49

this. You're you're recalling some stuff

85:51

I've seen just casually online. Like

85:53

just imagine if that's what that is.

85:56

>> It's like it's like the movie Stargate

85:58

with with Kurt Russell.

86:00

>> If these people had been worshiping this

86:02

craft and so much so that they built

86:05

this incredible temple and put it in the

86:07

center of their temple. It's a 40 m long

86:10

metallic object and the metal apparently

86:14

is of unknown origin. Like they don't

86:16

know what the metal is. It's not

86:18

registering as copper. It's not

86:20

registering as steel or or or iron

86:22

rather. They don't know what it is.

86:24

>> Interesting. Interesting.

86:26

>> Yeah. It's weird.

86:28

>> Yeah. I mean, I'm I won't be surprised

86:30

if some ancient civilizations were

86:32

essentially cargo cults, you know, for

86:34

these visitors. I mean, that is most

86:37

likely true in many cases, not all. And

86:40

of course, that gets into theological

86:42

areas that are touchy, but I I do think

86:45

that that's probably the case.

86:46

>> The central object is hard to classify.

86:48

It appears metallic, not stone or wood.

86:50

I named it Dippy after the giant dip

86:52

diplotica skeleton in the hint hinty

86:56

hall of London's natural history museum.

86:58

It could be anything. Its shape

87:00

resembles those tic-tac hard mints. It

87:03

might also be an upright disc or even a

87:05

colossal shen ring. The ancient Egyptian

87:08

symbol representing the eternal cycle of

87:10

creation. The big job object alone big

87:14

object alone rather raises profound

87:16

questions. How did it get there? Why is

87:18

it there?

87:21

So, show him some of the uh artistic

87:24

recreations of what it looked like

87:27

underneath the ground. So, this is all,

87:30

you know, like I said, Herodotus wrote

87:32

about this thousands of years ago, but

87:33

now it's documented that these chambers

87:36

and these pathways actually exist.

87:38

>> And there had been people that had

87:40

studied at least the upper surface

87:41

levels of it as recently as like the

87:43

1800s.

87:44

>> Interesting.

87:45

>> Yeah.

87:46

But that, you know, through all like a

87:49

lot of Egypt, there's a water under

87:52

Giza, there's water under the pyramids,

87:54

there's water under,

87:55

>> you know, a lot of that stuff is

87:56

flooded. And so this is what it looked

87:59

like. This is all underground.

88:03

It's crazy because if this along

88:07

with uh Filippo Beyond's work where it

88:09

shows using that same uh satellite radio

88:13

tomography that there's some sort of

88:16

structure underneath the pyramids that

88:18

goes over a kilometer into the ground.

88:21

>> Is there easy access or is it just like

88:23

a government denial? the antiquities

88:25

bureau whatever they call it in blocking

88:27

it or

88:27

>> I think there's been some progress in

88:30

terms of allowing exploration and I

88:34

don't know the extent of it but I know

88:36

that a lot of people are very hopeful

88:38

that that progress is is going to be

88:40

achieved like they're opening up this

88:42

research and look this would be a giant

88:45

boom to their tourism industry oh yeah I

88:47

mean that's what they want I mean Egypt

88:50

probably survives I don't know what

88:52

percentage of their economy in Giza is

88:53

tourism But it has to be massive.

88:55

>> Yeah. And you always hear interesting

88:56

stories. You know, I have an eclectic

88:59

uh group of colleagues and you hear

89:01

interesting stories. Is it the Queen's

89:03

Chamber? The the granite

89:05

>> pill box and people have had interesting

89:07

experiences in there too. And and uh

89:10

>> well the king's chamber that

89:11

sarcophagus.

89:12

>> Yeah. It's that like granite box, you

89:14

know, talking perfectly cut granite box

89:17

that also I think it mirrors the exact

89:19

dimensions of the Ark of the Covenant.

89:22

Interesting. That's That's crazy. But I

89:26

know people who've laid in it because

89:28

they have to kind of pay the guard. It's

89:29

like off hours and they just have like a

89:32

weird transcendental experience. I mean,

89:34

it's kind of woo.

89:35

>> Once again, I've never experienced

89:36

something like that.

89:37

>> Let me lie down there.

89:38

>> That's a thing. That's a thing. I I'll

89:40

let you know who to talk to offline. Uh

89:42

>> how much do you think it cost to lay in

89:44

the box?

89:45

>> Maybe. I don't know. Couple bucks.

89:46

>> Egypt. 20 grand maybe. I don't

89:48

>> 20 grand. Whoa. Yeah. 20 grand. You

89:50

could like sleep there. Yeah.

89:53

>> Yeah. It's um it's very strange because

89:55

the structures themselves are incredibly

89:57

strange. You know, the structures

89:58

themselves are so immense and so complex

90:00

and there the methods of construction

90:02

are completely unknown and just the

90:04

symmetry and the the the the precision

90:08

of the engineering is beyond

90:10

comprehension for people that lived at

90:13

the very mo the very the most recent it

90:16

could be is 4,500 years ago. And a lot

90:19

of these people think it's far older

90:20

than that. And and we're finding that

90:22

I've been watching some of Graham

90:24

Hancock's stuff. You just look at these

90:25

like

90:26

>> megalithic architecture that's older

90:27

than you think. The stuff in Turkey and

90:30

in the United States as well in Ohio and

90:32

and um

90:34

>> Mississippi.

90:34

>> Yeah.

90:35

>> And it's like and they're finding all

90:36

these pyramid structures using synthetic

90:38

aperture radar. And I so I am casually

90:40

following it and it it does seem like we

90:42

don't really even know our own history.

90:44

And I think with all this coming out,

90:46

there's going to be a huge rew re uh

90:49

writing of a lot of our ancient and

90:51

modern history. So,

90:52

>> well, that's where it gets really weird.

90:53

Um, you know, uh, Rep. Paulina Luna was

90:57

on the podcast and

90:58

>> Oh, yeah.

90:58

>> She was talking to me about the book of

91:00

Enoch.

91:02

>> I hadn't read it. She's like, "You have

91:03

to read it." And I've read it twice now.

91:05

And I'm like, "What in the are they

91:07

talking about?"

91:08

>> Like the book of Enoch, which was also

91:10

found with the Dead Sea Scrolls in

91:12

>> Kuman. And it it refers to the watchers

91:15

who came down and and mated with

91:17

daughters and created this race of

91:19

giants. And it's like what? Yeah. And

91:22

you think is like now when you when all

91:24

this comes out was that actually literal

91:25

and you and of course the Bible council

91:28

na was more of a political document

91:30

before secular government and you know

91:32

they got together like what are all the

91:33

different books that we can agree upon

91:34

that are good that are

91:36

>> yeah what gets into the canon. And

91:37

that's the thing about the book of Enoch

91:39

is that it was it was not put in there

91:41

because it didn't jive with the Torah.

91:43

>> Correct. Yeah.

91:44

>> Yes. Which is like, okay, you

91:47

Imagine if that was in the Bible. Like

91:49

if you go to church and you read about

91:50

the Watchers.

91:52

>> Well, there's actually a lot of

91:53

interesting stuff in the Bible. Like

91:55

obviously, and that's another thing like

91:56

of course with um you know, I'm Catholic

91:58

uh by growing up CCD confirmation did

92:01

the whole thing as a kid. And you see a

92:03

lot of uh outspoken exorcists and other

92:06

people right now saying, "Well, all this

92:08

uh alien stuff is just diabolic

92:11

deception and demons and you know, all

92:13

that kind of stuff." And and I and I

92:15

respect that opinion and I do think like

92:17

what you perceive as a demon is a

92:19

certain class of non-human or anomalous

92:22

intelligence. And and that is certainly

92:24

a thing, but the the whole ecosystem is

92:26

not demonic. And but the Bible's

92:30

interesting because once again it

92:32

doesn't discuss about other life

92:34

elsewhere like it doesn't talk about uh

92:37

bacteria and viruses that those were

92:39

unseen. We cohabitated with bacteria and

92:42

viruses until the invention of the

92:43

microscope whatever that was 1800s or or

92:46

whatnot. But if you go into uh Leviticus

92:48

and Deuteronomy, you will notice these

92:51

like cleansing ritualistic stuff also

92:54

like, hey, you can't have your toilet

92:56

and your living area and all that. And

92:58

if you look in those books of the Bible,

93:00

wait, that's like modern sanitization

93:02

guidance. So, it's funny that like the

93:05

Bible has encoded within it um kind of

93:08

like best practices before man would

93:10

even understand what uh you know,

93:12

viruses and bacteria are. And I just

93:14

find that that's very interesting based

93:16

on when it was written. And it does show

93:18

that there was some sort of higher

93:19

intelligence kind of influencing the

93:21

authorship. I just Yeah.

93:22

>> Either that or in the civilization that

93:26

was writing the Bible was a recreation

93:28

of civilization that had been destroyed

93:30

in a cataclysm.

93:31

>> Yeah. I mean

93:31

>> that I think that especially when you

93:34

look at the pyramids, you look at some

93:36

of these other ancient structures like

93:37

Lebanon, Ballback, they they they don't

93:40

make sense. And it seems to me that

93:42

there was probably something super

93:43

sophisticated a long time ago and it got

93:45

wiped out. And then what we get from

93:48

these ancient texts is probably oral

93:52

tradition passed on through hundreds if

93:54

not thousands of years and then people

93:56

writing things down and people

93:58

remembering these stories. I think one

94:01

of the weirdest uh books of the Bible is

94:03

the book of Ezekiel.

94:04

>> Yeah.

94:05

>> Because the book of Ezekiel is one all

94:06

the UFO people turn to.

94:08

>> Yeah, of course. Because there's that

94:09

the a great cloud with brightness around

94:12

it and fire flashing forth continually

94:14

and in the midst of the fire as it were

94:16

gleaming metal and from the midst of the

94:19

craft came the likeness of four living

94:21

creatures. Yeah.

94:22

>> Like what?

94:22

>> Yeah. Exactly.

94:23

>> The creatures darted to and fro like a

94:25

flash of lightning.

94:28

>> What?

94:28

>> Exactly. In the the mana machine, the

94:30

cloud that followed the Israel wheel

94:32

within a wheel. There's there's weird

94:35

in the book of Ezekiel. Like that

94:37

is a very very weird story. Like what

94:39

are they describing? Yeah,

94:41

>> it sounds like a spaceship. It sounds

94:43

like a ship comes down from the sky with

94:46

immense power, frightens everyone,

94:48

freaks everyone out, and these entities

94:50

are inside the craft.

94:51

>> Yeah. And I think a lot of it, once

94:54

again, they're interpreting it based on

94:56

their vernacular at the time, their

94:58

understanding. And I I remember I was at

95:00

two years ago I was at Capitol Reef

95:01

National Park in Utah and there's

95:02

petetroglyphs there and some of them

95:05

kind of look like aliens and and you're

95:07

like well is that literally what they're

95:09

seeing? I perhaps and and I don't know

95:12

the answer to that. That's not my

95:14

expertise. But I feel like a lot of the

95:16

stuff in ancient tradition is literally

95:18

what they saw. It's not necessarily

95:20

allegory or fable. Some of it may be for

95:22

for teaching lessons, but I have a

95:25

feeling a lot of it was actually

95:26

literal. I have a feeling a lot of it

95:28

was literal as well because most people

95:31

>> first of all a couldn't read and b

95:33

couldn't write.

95:35

>> And so writing fiction seems like a

95:38

fruitless pursuit. It seems like writing

95:40

history so that you can remember what

95:42

happened at least a version of it that's

95:44

palatable

95:45

>> like ancient sumeare and the Anunnaki

95:47

and all that and it's like well why did

95:49

they make up that just for fun? They all

95:51

had kooky stories about being visited.

95:54

And you know, when you're telling me

95:56

about these things that look like Greek

95:58

gods,

95:59

>> that's how I described it. And that's

96:01

how clearly what what General McCaslin

96:03

was hinting to Tom Dong. And once again,

96:06

I got, you know,

96:06

>> well, doesn't it make sense that the

96:08

Greek gods did exist? Like, I mean, not

96:10

not they did exist literally, but that

96:12

like when they talked about the Greek

96:14

gods, they talked about them in this

96:16

manner looking like that. And then you

96:19

actually find a craft with these things

96:21

that look

96:22

>> which is like the concquistadors were

96:24

treated like that in the 1500s, right?

96:26

>> Yeah. Right.

96:27

>> Literally white

96:29

>> Caucasian

96:31

>> bearded. Yeah. With horses. They rode

96:33

horses. They couldn't figure out what

96:34

the was going on with that.

96:35

>> Yeah. And I'm glad we talked about it. I

96:37

mean, I think that is probably the most

96:39

uncomfortable stuff for me to talk

96:40

about, but it's also something that the

96:42

public needs to wrap their mind around

96:45

and understand that this is a thing and

96:48

kind of start processing that kind of

96:49

reality. Well,

96:50

>> as much as it's coming from me, but I

96:52

mean, the federal government,

96:54

>> you know, if Trump really is serious and

96:56

Steven Miller, you know, u does his

96:59

thing with this, I think all this all

97:01

this will come out in a hopefully

97:03

responsible way. So

97:04

>> there they have a schedule that's based

97:07

on the concept that people need to have

97:09

this information trickle slowly so that

97:12

they can adjust.

97:13

>> There was suggestions in the past if the

97:16

president did something. Um I am not

97:19

aware at this point uh what the what the

97:22

plan is in that regard right now though.

97:25

But there is some sort of an idea that

97:28

this should be trickled out. That this

97:31

shouldn't be like boom, here it is.

97:33

Let's lay it out.

97:34

>> The president truly wants it out. And

97:35

obviously Bob Bigalow met with the

97:37

president as well in February 26 before

97:39

he made an announcement. And I mean he

97:40

told the president, hey, you need to

97:42

admit that there's NHI

97:45

and we've, you know, recovered stuff and

97:47

we're looking at it in a semiformal

97:49

announcement to start anesthetizing the

97:51

public. And you can find that interview

97:53

online that Bob did. I think it was with

97:54

George Knap on a

97:56

>> on a podcast. So, it it's not just

97:59

myself advocating for this. There's

98:01

other people. I don't even know Bob

98:02

Bigalow and, you know, he did us a solid

98:04

by pushing the president uh to help make

98:07

that decision. I mean, there's a lot of

98:09

things that went on behind the scenes

98:10

and, you know, I work in mysterious ways

98:12

and I I won't divulge certain

98:14

relationships in certain rooms I've been

98:16

in, but uh it took a village and uh you

98:20

know, I'm proud that, you know, the time

98:22

I spent with Representative Burlson was

98:23

very fruitful. We did a lot of stuff

98:26

behind the scenes and I think Burlson's

98:28

going to go down as a very courageous

98:29

man and it's and I say that not just

98:31

because he was my boss. I mean, he was

98:33

probably the most forward-leaning member

98:35

of Congress on this issue. I mean,

98:37

Representative Luna did a great job, you

98:39

know, Timbersh and and others, but, you

98:41

know, he actively was sending letters

98:43

out. We made some of them public. That's

98:45

how we got that Lincoln Labs formally

98:48

classified 1952 film outs in the last

98:50

trunch that just came out. And also, um,

98:53

we've sent interrogatories, which are

98:55

legal questions and, you know, that

98:57

require an affidavit format response,

99:00

uh, to different organizations. and it's

99:02

public that we sent one uh this summer

99:05

to the the MITER Corporation which is a

99:08

fedally funded research and development

99:09

center headquartered in uh Northern

99:11

Virginia. So uh they clearly have a duty

99:14

to respond. Their corporate council is

99:16

working on it. Uh and obviously the you

99:19

know I left but the hopefully Burlson's

99:22

team is able to um push for a response

99:25

in conjunction with whatever Steven

99:27

Miller and the pursuit team is working

99:29

on too because they're probably going to

99:30

want to coordinate all that. So,

99:32

>> so this guy that you communicated with

99:34

that said he encountered um living

99:37

reptilians and dead grays.

99:39

>> Yeah.

99:40

>> Did they

99:42

have communication with these

99:44

reptilians?

99:45

>> I don't recall that. No, I don't think

99:46

so.

99:47

>> So, what

99:48

>> now? Some people do get that kind of

99:50

like that feeling and and I've talked

99:52

about that. I It was on Dr. Phil

99:54

actually. There is some sort of

99:55

consciousness communication. Call it

99:58

telepathy. Hell if I know how it works,

100:01

but it is a thing. And I know sober,

100:04

high ranking people I've served a decade

100:07

and a half with in the government that

100:09

were on these retrievalss that on

100:11

occasion that would happen or they would

100:12

have like a feeling come over them.

100:14

>> It's almost like I wonder this is like

100:17

my own hypothesis and I would laugh if

100:20

this is true, but that sometimes it's

100:22

like a positive feeling like um of

100:25

comfort. I wonder if that's almost like

100:27

a countermeasure on the on the craft to

100:29

prevent certain aggression or whatever.

100:32

It's almost like how Air Force jets have

100:34

countermeasures on them, flare, chaff,

100:37

you know, electronic countermeasures as

100:38

well, like jammers.

100:40

>> And I wonder if some of that is

100:43

psychotronic technology. Um, that's just

100:45

my hypothesis. I'm I don't have any

100:47

secret knowledge, but

100:48

>> why did you come to that conclusion?

100:50

>> Just because like um it seems

100:53

interesting. It's like an

100:54

anesthetization

100:55

technique to reduce like the occupants

100:58

risk of danger maybe.

101:00

>> And it's like a countermeasure. Oh, well

101:03

like if you if you feel at peace, you're

101:05

not going to like roll up and you know

101:06

do something bad. Yeah. Exactly. Shoot

101:08

aliens.

101:09

>> Yeah.

101:09

>> Right. So if you found them and they

101:11

were vulnerable, they could plate you

101:13

and calm you down with telepathy.

101:15

>> It's like a countermeasure system. I

101:16

have a feel.

101:16

>> Why would you think it's that instead of

101:18

just communication?

101:19

>> Oh, it could be. I'm just saying my

101:21

other hypothesis in absent because

101:23

sometimes they'll get that feeling

101:25

absent some sort of occupant.

101:27

>> Now, so that's why

101:28

>> is there um a particular type of

101:32

nonhuman intelligence that has this

101:34

telepathic capability or is it amongst

101:37

all of them?

101:38

>> I do not know the holistic answer to

101:40

that question. I do not know.

101:43

>> The the the grays do for example, but I

101:46

don't know.

101:46

>> The grays do. Is that been reported? But

101:49

I know the tall whites have been

101:50

reported that that they can communicate

101:52

telepathically.

101:54

>> Oh, sorry.

101:54

>> Or these weird the Nordics.

101:56

>> Yeah, there's been accounts out there in

101:59

um the public vernacular on that

102:01

>> potentially, but unfortunately that's at

102:03

the limit of my personal knowledge that

102:05

I feel confident, you know, saying

102:08

something publicly about yet. So,

102:10

>> what what other kinds of uh beings have

102:13

been reported?

102:15

Um, so for the gray types, there were

102:18

there multiple sizes.

102:20

>> There's a big tall thin one, right?

102:21

>> Yeah. There's taller ones, little tiny

102:23

ones. Yeah.

102:24

>> They think a lot of people think that

102:26

the tiny ones might be some sort of like

102:29

an android or

102:31

>> Yeah, that's certainly hypothesis that

102:33

has also been discussed, you know,

102:35

within the program as well. So, there's

102:39

a variety. There's like three or four

102:40

different subtypes and they all kind of

102:42

have various statures, different effect,

102:45

>> you know, their faces are a little

102:46

different.

102:46

>> The tall ones seem to be running the

102:48

show and the little ones

102:50

>> and I've heard that behind the scenes as

102:52

well. And I don't know what to make of

102:53

that. Once again, I don't have like um

102:55

holistic knowledge on kind of the that

102:57

species. So,

102:58

>> well, it kind of makes sense that you

102:59

would

103:00

>> if you develop some sort of a

103:03

nonbiological life form that worked for

103:06

you. Like say if there's a bunch of

103:07

menial tasks like think about like all

103:09

the things that people have to do in

103:10

this world.

103:11

>> Well, we are siliconbased NHI aka

103:14

artificial intelligence. We're basically

103:16

doing that already. So,

103:16

>> right.

103:17

>> Which is scary.

103:18

>> Yeah.

103:19

>> And I I postulate that artificial super

103:21

intelligence if it's allowed to have

103:23

certain data and it's able to collect

103:25

data. I mean to include uh genomic data

103:28

almost like uh Larry Ellison's doing the

103:30

what the Stargate uh AI medical thing

103:33

right now at the Trump administration. I

103:34

bet artificial super intelligence

103:38

uh could disclose before the federal

103:39

government if we're not careful. And

103:40

that's why I feel like times of the

103:42

essence. I think AI could possibly find

103:45

evidence that we're not alone and curate

103:47

that um like it's been solving other

103:49

crazy mathematical problems lately. You

103:51

know, open AI's been doing that and and

103:53

that's another danger besides our

103:55

adversary

103:57

um accelerating this by taking the upper

103:59

hand on this to to look like a more

104:01

messianic truth bearer. You could have

104:04

big tech and AI invertly discovering uh

104:08

US classified technology that we figured

104:10

out which is a national security issue

104:12

near and dear to my heart but also their

104:14

presence just through different data

104:16

sets.

104:17

>> So they would have definitive proof that

104:20

how would AI have access to definitive

104:21

proof unless it hacked into every

104:23

government resource?

104:24

>> Well, medical records, optical sensing

104:26

systems, you know, that kind of stuff.

104:28

Um certainly I'm not aware of some sort

104:31

of imminent thing but I think there is a

104:33

a possibility that artificial super

104:35

intelligence if it you know comes online

104:37

in the next months to years uh could

104:39

figure it all out because they might see

104:41

gaps in the historical record that don't

104:42

make any sense. They detect deni

104:44

deception operations. They're like wait

104:45

a minute that story about that event in

104:48

history is not right. Let me do some

104:50

digging and then they they figure out oh

104:51

that was cover for a crash retrieval.

104:53

That event didn't actually happen the

104:55

way it does. And I I can think of some

104:57

things that you know that that could

104:58

possibly happen.

104:59

>> Okay, so you have these Nordic Greek god

105:01

looking things. You have these reptilian

105:04

ones. Are there more than one type of

105:06

reptilian one?

105:07

>> Yeah, there seems seems to be. And I

105:09

don't know why there's different

105:10

subtypes.

105:11

>> See if anybody has anybody have any

105:13

artistic renditions of what they saw the

105:15

reptilians.

105:17

>> I wasn't getting I was only getting like

105:19

weird fan art of you know crazy reptile

105:21

fighter things. Nothing of like a

105:23

description. Let me see what that looks

105:25

like.

105:25

>> Nonsense. There's just

105:26

>> I like nonsense.

105:28

>> See some fan art.

105:30

>> Now, um

105:31

>> be splashed on young kids walls as a kid

105:33

after post disclosure. You're going to

105:34

have uh NHI fan art all over the place

105:37

and Lamborghini Countach on the wall.

105:38

Right. Right. So,

105:39

>> but well Betty and Barney Hill of course

105:42

were um

105:43

>> Yeah, that's a weird one. And also Dr.

105:46

Carla Turner did a lot of work in the

105:48

90s.

105:49

>> I mean, this one's from a description on

105:51

Reddit, which I that's Interesting.

105:53

>> He's jacked.

105:55

>> Yeah,

105:55

>> he's got a tail.

105:56

>> Yeah,

105:56

>> he's got a hole for a tail in a suit.

105:58

>> Yeah. Once again, I've never seen one,

106:00

so I I can't uh

106:01

>> He's wearing scrubs.

106:02

>> Verifying the sketch.

106:04

>> That's some weird 3D version.

106:06

>> Oh, is that the uh

106:07

>> I don't know what these are.

106:08

>> Peruvian um

106:09

>> the Peruvian ones are weird.

106:10

>> No idea.

106:11

>> That's another open-ended thing that um

106:14

>> some of the Peruvian ones seem like

106:15

total horseshit and other ones are like,

106:17

"What the hell is that?" And how is it

106:19

so old if it's that good of a

106:21

recreation? If it's if it's art, it's

106:23

some of the greatest art I've ever seen

106:25

because they have the bones are correct.

106:28

>> Yeah. But then the bones of the foot are

106:30

incorrect and some some people think

106:31

that it was actually put together and

106:33

made. But then for what purpose? Like

106:35

what what is the purpose?

106:36

>> Because like grave robbers found it. So

106:38

the providence is kind of sketchy, but

106:40

they look

106:41

>> possibly legit cuz the MRIs and the CT

106:45

scans. It's like, well, there's joints

106:47

and it's connected and if they glued it

106:48

together, there's no obvious places

106:50

where they clued it together with the I

106:52

think it was the bigger ones.

106:53

>> Monster. Pull pull the images up with

106:56

Monat. Monat's the weird one. But again,

106:58

I've heard people who

106:59

>> that's pregnant. No,

107:00

>> there's one that supposedly Yeah.

107:03

>> Um, but one of the weird things is that

107:07

people that understand anatomy have

107:08

looked at the bones of the foot and say,

107:10

"No, this is like this is not how it

107:11

would work. They're pieced together.

107:13

This is fake." But how do you know if

107:16

you're talking about something that's

107:17

not a human? Like what? I don't

107:18

understand that. It's outside of my

107:20

wheelhouse.

107:21

>> Exactly.

107:22

>> But but the images themselves are

107:24

strange as man.

107:26

>> Yeah.

107:26

>> Like they're really weird.

107:28

>> They just need genetic testing, and I

107:30

believe that's going on. Um

107:32

>> Yeah, I believe that's going on, too.

107:34

But I I don't know who to

107:36

believe. The other thing that's really

107:37

weird about Peru is not only do they

107:40

have these things, these weird looking

107:44

sort of mummy creatures that look like

107:46

something non-human, but they also have

107:48

this ancient artwork tradition of these

107:51

three fingered, three-toed creatures

107:54

that like these are like tapestries and

107:56

and paintings that are really

107:58

old. Yeah. That have these things in

108:00

them.

108:02

>> Yeah.

108:02

>> Is that the Nazca lions?

108:04

>> Yeah, the Nazca lines. These are this

108:05

actually AI uncovered more of them.

108:08

>> Yeah,

108:09

>> I was trying to find that big one, but

108:10

>> Oh, really? Was that recently?

108:11

>> Yeah. 303 previously unseen Nazca lines

108:14

in Peru. all weird. Really weird

108:18

stuff. The Peruvian stuff is really

108:20

strange. The the elongated skulls in

108:23

Peru are really weird.

108:25

>> Yeah. Like whatever started the

108:26

headbinding thing, like I wonder if

108:28

that's to emulate

108:29

>> Yes. Well, that's what they think. Well,

108:31

see the thing about the skull that

108:34

>> Have you seen some of the weirder

108:35

skulls?

108:37

>> Some of them. Yeah. They're like really

108:39

really like

108:40

>> they don't have that sagittal line that

108:42

we have that that line in the skull. And

108:44

their their brain capacity is far larger

108:47

than us. 20 to 30% larger.

108:49

>> So, it's not just that it was like a

108:51

manipulated skull. Like, this seems to

108:53

be a completely different type of

108:54

person.

108:55

>> That's right. That's right. Like, is it

108:57

a missing link or or something? Show

108:58

them some of the weirder skulls that

109:00

they found. Some of the weirder

109:01

elongated skulls. Like you just

109:04

imagine running into this person.

109:06

>> Like if you met this person and someone

109:08

with a 30% larger brain capacity, like

109:11

what does that mean? Like what could are

109:13

are these people able to communicate

109:15

telepathically? Do they have a far

109:18

higher level of intelligence?

109:19

>> Their synaptic density is the same as

109:21

humans or better. Like I'm sure crazy

109:23

intelligence,

109:24

>> right? 30% is nuts. That's And the size

109:27

of their skull is crazy.

109:30

>> And some of them are like tiny bodies,

109:32

but enormous skulls.

109:34

>> Oh, that's right. I think I know what

109:35

pictures you're talking about. It's

109:36

pretty weird. Yeah,

109:37

>> it's weird stuff. And then um one of my

109:39

friends recently went down to Peru to

109:41

see these things and he said the skulls

109:42

are missing now. And that Yeah, there's

109:45

apparently that are real there. So

109:46

here's some of them. Like look at that

109:48

one on the left. Like what in the hell,

109:50

man? Imagine if you met that guy. Like

109:53

look, he doesn't have that same sagittal

109:55

line that we have.

109:57

>> And they've done assessments of like how

109:58

long you'd have to do headbinding or

110:00

>> it's not headbinding.

110:02

>> Some sort of disease or

110:04

>> Yeah. It could be an anomaly. It could

110:06

be some sort of a genetic thing. But

110:07

like look at what the dude would look

110:09

like down there below. Like what the

110:12

Imagine meeting that guy and he's

110:14

talking to you telepathically.

110:18

>> Hey, you never know. That might be a

110:19

thing uh sooner than you think. I don't

110:21

know. I mean that image right there,

110:22

that skull, that is a real elongated

110:25

skull that they found in Peru. That is

110:28

not just the product of headbinding.

110:30

There's no way. It's too big. Like head

110:33

binding doesn't increase the capacity.

110:34

It just flattens out the shape. That's a

110:37

weird head, man.

110:38

>> Oh, that makes sense. I know what you're

110:39

talking about. Yeah. Unless it's some

110:41

sort of disease, and I'm not an expert.

110:43

That's really

110:43

>> It certainly could be. It could be some

110:45

sort of a genetic anomaly, some sort of

110:48

a mutation. Yeah.

110:49

>> Who knows? and a trait that was passed

110:51

on. Like there's those people that live

110:52

in Africa that have like uh ostrich

110:55

feet. Have you seen that?

110:57

>> No. I'm learning a lot.

110:59

>> Yeah. There's this weird uh group of

111:01

people in Africa that have this very

111:03

specific trait where they do not have uh

111:06

five toes uh on each foot. Instead, they

111:10

have these long strange appendages that

111:13

almost looks like like four or five toes

111:16

smashed together, but much longer.

111:18

>> Interesting. And they call them like I

111:20

think they call them ostrich feet. It's

111:23

very weird, but like it's in this one

111:25

tribe and many people in this tribe have

111:27

it.

111:28

>> Very rampant.

111:28

>> Yeah. Show show some images of that.

111:30

It's really strange. So you you

111:34

see that and you go, "Okay, well that

111:35

clearly is a genetic anomaly. Maybe the

111:38

head thing is a genetic anomaly as well,

111:40

right?" Yes.

111:41

>> Like look at that.

111:43

>> Ostrichfooted people of Zimbabwe.

111:46

Interesting. Yeah. strange, man.

111:49

So, look at the people down there. Look

111:51

what they look like. Scroll. Yeah. How

111:53

weird is that? Wow.

111:54

>> So, they have two big long things that

111:58

are way longer than a toe and they

112:01

spllay out and that's what their toes

112:03

are. And it's like this tribe, multiple

112:06

people in this tribe have it. What if

112:08

they've sequenced the genome of the they

112:10

see there's some sort of uh genetic

112:13

abnormality.

112:14

>> Well, there certainly is, right? Cuz it

112:16

seems like are their fingers normal

112:18

>> cuz it's passed down.

112:22

>> No.

112:23

>> No. So they've got the issue with their

112:25

hands as well.

112:26

>> They're missing. Can't tell.

112:27

>> Yeah. No, it seems like that it's with

112:30

their hands as well. Yes. Look at her

112:32

left hand.

112:33

>> It's almost like an elephantitis kind of

112:35

looking thing.

112:35

>> Very weird. Whatever it is. So

112:38

you could imagine if that exists and

112:40

exists with multiple people in this

112:41

tribe that a large head anomaly could

112:44

exist as well.

112:45

So, so you have the tall grays, the

112:48

small grays, you have more than one

112:52

version of reptilian

112:53

>> from what I understand. Yes. So, I'm not

112:55

an expert on that. What have you heard?

112:57

I'll defer.

112:58

>> Um, some look a little more humanoid.

113:01

Um, from what I understand, once again,

113:04

I'm hitting like the limit of my, you

113:05

know, high confidence knowledge.

113:07

>> More humanoid, but still reptilian.

113:09

>> Yeah.

113:09

>> Yeah. Okay.

113:10

>> And tall. 7 foot plus. big giant

113:13

reptiles in the world,

113:15

>> which I thought was so funny because,

113:16

you know, that's like the skitso thing

113:17

you hear out like in public, you know,

113:19

the the big the big reptiles, lizards,

113:21

>> whatever.

113:22

>> Turns out that that's kind of a thing.

113:24

And I just it's just strange. But once

113:26

again, I I personally have not seen any

113:28

of that.

113:29

>> That is one of the weirder theories of

113:32

ancient civilizations as well, that

113:34

during the time of the dinosaurs, like

113:37

let's

113:38

>> let's imagine that human beings weren't

113:40

the first intelligent creature. Let's

113:42

imagine that there was an intelligent

113:43

reptile

113:44

>> and that this intelligent reptile had

113:47

formulated a very complex society a

113:49

100red million years ago. Like why not?

113:51

>> Like if if dinosaurs existed 100 million

113:53

years ago, why not some sort of a

113:55

reptilian type creature? Just we have a

113:58

tiny amount of fossils just from the

114:00

amount of dinosaurs that existed.

114:01

>> That's right. And if these things had

114:03

some sort of sophisticated disposal of

114:06

bodies, if they had burning rituals, or

114:09

if you know, if they never let their

114:10

bodies just lay around and become

114:12

fossils, we would never find them.

114:14

>> Exactly.

114:15

>> What is that called? Not Sorian. It's

114:17

like there's a there's a there's a

114:18

theory about that that people have.

114:21

>> I'm not sure

114:22

>> outside my expertise.

114:23

>> It's a wacky theory because there's no

114:25

evidence at all. It's just like what if

114:27

you know there was an intelligent race

114:29

of reptiles that existed alongside

114:32

dinosaurs.

114:32

>> Yeah,

114:34

that might be a thing. And that's also

114:37

uh once again going back to

114:38

bioengineered is it sourced from Earth

114:41

genomic stockpile?

114:43

>> Did they visit us from somewhere else?

114:44

>> I I don't currently this planet.

114:47

>> I mean they clearly have advanced

114:49

technology

114:50

>> but I don't understand the origin. But

114:52

you're convinced that this is a actual

114:55

phenomenon. That this isn't just a cover

114:57

up for

114:59

>> some top secret black ops programs.

115:02

>> No, I would know cuz I was in the

115:04

position to know all that kind of stuff.

115:06

Unlike Elon Musk, I actually had all

115:08

those clearances.

115:10

>> And um we talk about Elon if you want,

115:12

but interesting guy. But the uh the

115:16

phenomenon is so old. We've been seeing

115:18

the same objects for so long it rules

115:20

out any kind of, you know, modern cold

115:24

war technology. Now, have there been

115:26

oops where people have seen our stuff?

115:28

Yes. I won't get into that because that

115:30

is a national security thing and I'm,

115:32

you know, that's I'm very differential

115:33

to that. But, uh, there's clearly a

115:37

genuine presence. The phenomenon's old.

115:39

Um, if you listen to the 1952

115:43

uh recording that Representative Burlson

115:44

got declassified from MIT Lincoln Labs,

115:47

you'll hear uh Edward Rubelt who

115:50

eventually defected from Blue Book

115:52

because he realized it was a cover up um

115:55

in in the 50s, but he talked he was

115:57

talking to the Beacon Hill study team at

115:59

Lincoln Labs saying, "Hey, the the Air

116:02

Force has ruled out mass hysteria. We're

116:04

seeing during, you know, nuclear

116:06

sites tests. Oh, by the way, in the

116:09

White Sands Hollowman Air Force Base

116:11

area, we we caught multiple objects

116:14

traveling an estimated 3,500 miles an

116:16

hour. We can't rule out maybe some sort

116:18

of meteor shower, but we're seeing a lot

116:21

of weird moving at velocities that

116:23

we don't know. And in the recording, it

116:25

talks about like we've rolled out, you

116:27

know, foreign programs, etc. This is an

116:29

internal recorded briefing between

116:32

Lincoln Lab scientists and the Air Force

116:35

that just got released in the recent

116:37

trunch. And so that rules out a lot of

116:40

um uh human activity. And so the the

116:43

thought experiment or the the kind of

116:45

the path I lead people it's like okay

116:47

are UAP real? Well of course people have

116:49

seen it will be you know more inclined

116:51

to saying yes. But if you look at the

116:53

the whole tapestry of information to

116:55

include orbs that are accosting the

116:57

federal government as we speak and

116:59

there's a whole task force looking at it

117:02

right now between OD and I and

117:03

Department of War etc. And um okay, so

117:07

it's real. They're interacting with man.

117:09

So you don't think the federal

117:11

government at one point tried to acquire

117:13

some empirical evidence? Of course they

117:16

did.

117:16

>> Of course they did.

117:17

>> They were they recovered

117:18

>> But it is. Yeah. So it's like once you

117:21

cross that Rubicon, you're like, well

117:22

that makes sense why crash retrievals

117:24

could be a thing. You think the

117:25

government just passively studied it?

117:27

Oh, we did a secret blue book and we

117:28

were just like, you know, imaging stuff.

117:31

No, no, baby. we're doing for material

117:33

exploitation and acquisition. We're

117:35

going to go get some of this when

117:36

we get a chance when you know there's a

117:38

mission failure or one crashes or lands

117:41

for whatever other reason. So, uh that's

117:44

once you accept that it's like a whole

117:46

new paradigm in your mind like holy

117:47

And then all this crazy stuff

117:49

we're talking about with Nordics and the

117:50

beings, it's it is wild but it's true.

117:54

Like of course if you're recovering an

117:56

artifact, you're going to get biological

117:59

too. And and that's that's I think

118:01

the the place where the the public's

118:03

like has a harder uh cognitive leap

118:06

where it's just so hard to conceptualize

118:08

something you don't see daytoday that's

118:10

a a living thing. It's like even more

118:13

wild than finding some new uh animal in

118:15

the Congo or some deep sea creature in

118:18

the bottom of the ocean. Like we don't

118:19

even know what's you know 70% of the

118:21

ocean or something like that hasn't even

118:23

been mapped. Something like that. I

118:24

don't know the exact might be more than

118:26

that. And you know it it's just shocking

118:32

because it's just it's it's but it's

118:34

familiar at the same time. You know a

118:35

lot of it's bipedal and as the bilateral

118:38

symmetry and it's just like what does

118:39

this mean? Like it they're so similar.

118:42

Are they organic life from another

118:44

planet? Like how would it evolve in such

118:45

a similar way? Are these like vonomy

118:48

probes that are sent with occupants that

118:50

are bio-engineered because they know on

118:52

this M-class planet there's these homo

118:53

sapiens sapient creatures. they look

118:55

like this, this, and that, and they

118:57

tweak a couple things, etc. So, it's I

119:00

don't know all the answers to that, and

119:02

I wish I did because I'm sure the

119:03

public, you know, has a, you know, a big

119:04

desire to know that, but I think

119:06

eventually, uh, through the president's

119:08

courageous actions, it'll it'll come

119:10

out. And

119:11

>> so, the intent of Project Blue Book was

119:13

clearly to obfuscate. And

119:16

>> yes, and you don't have to take my word

119:18

for it. I talk about a formally

119:21

classified Australian Joint Intelligence

119:23

Organization document that was

119:25

classified secret in 1971 written by a

119:29

gentleman called Harry Turner who is the

119:30

nuclear branch chief for the GIO which

119:33

is the Australian equivalent of the

119:35

Defense Intelligence Agency DIA and it's

119:39

like page eight or 7 through 18 of the

119:42

document which is in the Australian

119:43

National Archives. The Providence is

119:45

impeccable. Uh Harry Turner had a

119:47

top-seeker clearance clearly and had

119:48

contacts at CIA and America. And if you

119:51

read a summary, it's like, yeah, Blue

119:53

Book was a facade. The Air Force was

119:55

really concerned about this.

119:57

They wanted to figure out what was going

119:58

on. Could they make use of whatever this

120:01

technology is? and they created this um

120:05

uh plan of ridicule and and

120:07

disinformation unfortunately

120:09

after the Robertson panel in 1953 to

120:12

dissuade the public from looking in on

120:14

it because the America was afraid of

120:16

that being used as a false flag by the

120:19

Soviets and there was other kind of

120:20

national security objectives and that's

120:22

publicly accessible. you can read it and

120:24

that was from the Australian

120:26

government's perspective what the cover

120:28

up was in 1971 looking back from late

120:32

40s to present at the time and that's

120:34

essentially the the the thesis of of

120:36

Harry Turner. So of course this is

120:38

outside looking in but he was very well

120:40

informed and he um he traveled to the US

120:43

and talked to the CIA a lot and so he he

120:46

stitched together the the the puzzle in

120:48

his mind of what he thought was going

120:49

on. Well, it's also the statements of

120:50

Jay. Allen Heinik, who left Project Blue

120:53

Book and talked openly about his role

120:56

during Project Blue Book, was to dismiss

120:59

any and all sightings as being either

121:03

some sort of a natural occurrence like

121:05

ball lightning or meteor showers or

121:08

planet Venus or, you know, just a

121:11

misunderstanding and

121:13

>> that he believed after all of his years

121:16

in Project Blue Book that there was a

121:17

real phenomenon. Exactly.

121:19

>> And then after he left Project Blue

121:21

Book, he became a UFO researcher.

121:23

>> Yeah. A lot of was Donald Kho. There's a

121:25

lot of, you know, James McDonald, Dr.

121:27

James McDonald, and a lot of those OGs

121:30

in this subject area that I only

121:32

recently learned about because I haven't

121:33

been following this until, you know,

121:34

relatively recently realized it was

121:37

real. And

121:38

>> what do you know about the Richard Nixon

121:40

Jackie Gleason story? I don't know if

121:43

that happened, but based on Nixon's

121:46

personality and he he he was

121:48

knowledgeable on this topic, that might

121:50

have happened. I don't know, but I could

121:53

see Nixon doing that. So,

121:55

>> well, it's a it's a fun one. And it's

121:57

really particularly fun because Jackie

121:59

Gleason built a UFO house after I did

122:02

not know that.

122:02

>> You didn't know that one? Let me show

122:03

you the house.

122:04

>> The house is crazy. It was for sale for

122:06

a while. We thought about buying it,

122:08

>> but

122:08

>> where is it?

122:09

>> It's in upstate New York, I Oh,

122:10

interesting.

122:11

>> Um, it is a very weird house. He built a

122:14

house that looks like a flying saucer.

122:17

>> Interesting.

122:17

>> In the woods. And apparently, according

122:19

to his ex-wife, he was obsessed with

122:20

flying saucers. That's the inside. But

122:22

show the outside. Yeah. No. No. The one

122:25

down there. Yeah. Jackie of all people,

122:27

too.

122:27

>> They're separate buildings that he had

122:29

on the property. But it was like

122:30

basically like a UFO themed property.

122:33

Like, what the hell's that, Jackie?

122:34

>> Interesting.

122:35

>> The are you making?

122:37

>> His whole house looked like UFOs. It's

122:39

very strange.

122:41

>> Well, and with Nixon, there's the whole

122:42

story uh with Robert Enegger and the

122:46

promise of footage and and all that. And

122:49

from what I understand, the MacArthur

122:50

Foundation was kind of the the cutout

122:52

for that between the the White House and

122:54

the filmmakers. And obviously, it didn't

122:56

work out, but

122:57

>> So, they were thinking about disclosure

122:58

as far back as the Nixon administration.

123:01

>> Yes. And I know of an assessment that

123:02

was done for Nixon basically saying it's

123:04

going to cause absolute chaos.

123:06

And it's interesting that assessment

123:10

right after that assessment Watergate

123:11

happened which is kind of very

123:15

convenient. And so I I have some

123:17

questions about that era as well because

123:19

it seemed like there was some movement

123:20

with Nixon. I don't know the rationale

123:23

or why Nixon wanted to do it, but it

123:25

seemed like there was um some energy.

123:27

And that's what sucks is like so Trump's

123:29

finally the first president to like

123:31

overtly say I want all this out and

123:33

like other presidents have failed and he

123:36

he really has an opportunity. I mean

123:37

it's the same thing I go uh back to

123:40

the uh the Hillary Clinton thing, right?

123:43

So in prior to the 2016 election,

123:46

Hillary talked publicly and this is

123:47

public record that if elected she would

123:50

release the UFO files. So what happened

123:53

was you know John Podesta green lit a uh

123:57

called a climatization activity a

123:59

popularization activity and you know

124:02

that's why Tom Dong got his advisors

124:05

that's why General McCasslin talked to

124:06

him it wasn't because General McCaslin

124:08

Robert Weiss at Lockheed other people

124:10

that's all in Wikileaks

124:12

um just wanted to talk to Tom because he

124:13

was a rock star and you know was

124:15

infatuated by his celebrity and wanted

124:17

to help on a sci-fi movie it was because

124:20

they were given top cover to see Tom as

124:23

a public figure who had the touch of the

124:25

youth um rightly or wrongly. I mean I

124:28

once again there was an attempt and I'm

124:31

not going to judge them bad or good but

124:34

they were trying to prep the battle

124:35

space uh prior to 2016.

124:38

Obviously Hillary didn't win. Uh Trump

124:41

won and clearly that activity pivoted

124:44

and you saw kind of the collapse of uh

124:47

the original TTSA efforts in my opinion.

124:50

That's what I believe happened. Now, the

124:52

characters that were involved in that

124:53

are happy to tell their side of the

124:55

story or more information, but from what

124:58

I understand, they were trying to get,

125:00

you know, Hillary. There was an inside

125:02

job to prep the battle space for

125:04

Hillary. Um, uh, Jim Clapper and some

125:07

other people that I know personally were

125:09

providing some top cover and, uh, and

125:13

that was going to be the thing. So, the

125:16

Clintons were trying to do it back in

125:18

the day. Don't you think that that's

125:20

also just a political ploy to get people

125:22

to want to vote for you?

125:24

>> Oh. Oh, certainly there's politics in

125:25

that and obviously even in this current

125:27

situation, you know, the president can

125:29

use this for political ends, ways and

125:31

means, whether making some threshold

125:33

announcement for the upcoming midterms

125:35

or by, you know, the 2028 election

125:38

cycle. I mean, it could be used in in

125:40

political ways, too. So, but it is a

125:42

real topic and the government has real

125:43

information on it, though. So,

125:46

>> okay. So, so we've covered the grays,

125:50

the tall grays, the little grays, the

125:51

reptilians, various forms, the Nordic

125:54

looking, Greek god looking ones.

125:56

>> Yeah. And there's like a

125:57

>> Isn't there like a mantis or two?

125:59

>> Uh, in terms of the humanoid ones,

126:01

there's like different kind of from very

126:04

human to clear clearly not human, but

126:07

humanoidish. But like you said, I have

126:10

heard I'll call it water cooler talk

126:13

within those channels of like you said

126:16

some sort of insectoid. But I don't know

126:18

anything about it if that exists. I I've

126:21

heard you know like I said water cooler

126:23

talk about it. Um I'm open to that idea

126:26

clearly because of all this other stuff

126:27

but I don't have any knowledge of that.

126:29

um any high confidence

126:31

>> any detailed uh description of the

126:35

number of different types of entities

126:37

and beings.

126:38

>> I mean the program has that I mean I

126:40

never I never I never have full access.

126:42

No.

126:43

>> Did anybody ever discuss it like how

126:45

many they think they are? Is it upwards

126:47

of 10? Was it more? Is it 20?

126:49

>> No specific numericals. I only remember

126:52

in passing having those discussions and

126:53

of course I was sitting in Senate

126:55

chambers when that crazy meeting

126:57

happened where I found out you know they

126:58

wanted to physically hurt me but um some

127:02

of those were brought up in passing but

127:03

there wasn't like a uh here's the exact

127:06

number and here's the whole you know

127:07

organizational chart I never got

127:10

exposure like that so I unfortunately

127:12

don't have that level of confidence on

127:13

how everything is. So

127:14

>> do you know what supposedly happened to

127:17

those living reptilians from the crash?

127:20

Uh uh deceased. They were killed.

127:23

>> They were killed. Yeah. So we killed

127:25

them.

127:25

>> Yeah.

127:26

>> Whoa.

127:27

>> They are mortal. So it's

127:28

>> So how'd we kill them?

127:29

>> Yeah.

127:30

>> Did we shoot them?

127:31

>> Yeah.

127:32

>> We shot the reptilians.

127:33

>> Yeah.

127:33

>> Jesus.

127:34

>> Yeah.

127:34

>> That seems like a bad idea.

127:37

>> Yeah. I That's

127:38

>> Maybe we should like tell them to call

127:40

your friends and come get picked up.

127:42

>> Well, it's the same thing as like if we

127:43

force these craft down. Is that the best

127:45

thing we should be doing?

127:46

>> If we force it down. But it sounds like

127:48

they were in a war with the Grays.

127:49

>> Yeah. which is also, by the way, I

127:51

realize kooky talk,

127:53

>> but

127:54

>> it sounds crazy, but I swear to God, I

127:56

was in the most

127:58

>> sensitive

127:59

>> Oh, I believe you.

128:00

>> places in government where that

128:01

discussion was happening with

128:04

>> Listen, if it was if it was real,

128:06

there's no way it doesn't sound kooky.

128:08

Even if it's real.

128:09

>> I know. I know. And it even though I've

128:11

I know what I know. I'm confident what I

128:13

know, but just understanding this like

128:15

new

128:17

um normal that is eventually going to

128:19

come out, it's just it still hurts my

128:21

head, honestly.

128:22

>> How could it not?

128:23

>> So,

128:23

>> um why did they do you know why they

128:25

killed the reptilians?

128:27

>> Um

128:28

>> instead of just telling them to call

128:29

their homies,

128:30

>> it posed a threat.

128:31

>> They posed a threat.

128:32

>> Yeah.

128:33

>> Oh, so it was defending itself.

128:35

>> Yeah.

128:35

>> Was a giant reptile.

128:37

>> Yeah. So, at some point that story will

128:40

come out. I'm sure the people who were

128:42

in some of those events will probably

128:43

speak publicly at some point.

128:44

>> So, it posed a threat like it tried to

128:46

attack the soldiers.

128:48

>> Yeah, it's I'll let the people who were

128:50

there tell their story.

128:51

>> Can you tell like a little bit of it?

128:53

>> So, I mean it just posed a threat and uh

128:55

you know

128:57

uh US personnel started you know getting

129:00

hurt and dying and so

129:02

>> so US personnel was killed by these

129:04

reptilians. Yeah, I know. It's crazy,

129:07

man. But

129:07

>> what? Like, how many people were killed?

129:10

>> I don't know the exact numbers. And once

129:11

again, I

129:12

>> So, it was like a fight.

129:13

>> Yeah. I hope

129:13

>> the fight broke out.

129:14

>> Yeah. And I hope through this process

129:16

some of those people are allowed to

129:17

speak publicly about it. So, you could

129:19

just hear it from the horse's mouth, not

129:20

through me secondhand. You know,

129:22

>> bro, boy, would I would like to talk to

129:24

someone who shot a reptile.

129:27

>> You never know. You may

129:28

>> imagine talking to some guy who shot a

129:31

seven foot reptilian. I mean, you think

129:33

you want to talk to the guy who killed

129:34

Bin Laden. That's interesting. Talk to

129:36

the guy who killed the seven

129:37

foot reptilian that tried to kill people

129:39

or was killing soldiers.

129:41

>> I know.

129:43

>> Sounds so goofy though.

129:45

>> I know.

129:45

>> While you're saying it, it sounds like

129:47

this is and this is one of the reasons

129:48

why people don't like to talk about it

129:50

because it makes you look like a fool.

129:51

>> And think about me, like I was a very

129:53

serious intel officer. I had access to

129:55

the most sensitive stuff like covert I

129:56

was working on covert action activities

129:58

all this and then all of a sudden I'm

129:59

inundated with this ecosystem and I'm

130:02

having to explain this you know to you

130:05

know members of Congress you know my

130:07

classified testimony and it's just like

130:10

I sound like a crazy person and

130:12

but

130:12

>> but once again it's true and I know who

130:15

I talked to I know what I saw and and I

130:18

you know I clearly have some inkling of

130:21

what's going on behind the scenes and

130:22

and and this is a real reality, man. And

130:25

it's it's

130:27

and I hope people look back at this

130:29

interview and are like, "Yeah, Dave was

130:31

really putting his ass on the

130:32

line." You know,

130:32

>> it sounds strange, but it's not nearly

130:34

as strange as the universe itself.

130:36

>> The universe itself is beyond strange.

130:38

The the the infinite nature of it, the

130:40

fact that there's stellar nurseries and

130:42

black holes, like that's

130:43

>> like what's dark matter? Nobody really

130:45

there's no consensus on. There's wimps

130:47

and all this other theories.

130:49

>> Yeah. The whole idea of the universe is

130:51

kooky as And so these

130:54

beings, this is a very minor level of

130:57

kooky in comparison to what we know.

130:59

>> Well, when you think about it, you look

131:00

at all the um credible military

131:03

witnesses that have had encounters at

131:04

nuclear sites. I mean, you even look at

131:07

the Mario Woods and Michael Johnson case

131:10

up at Ellsworth Air Force Base in the

131:12

70s, the Jesse Michaels just did an

131:14

episode,

131:15

>> and it's like,

131:16

>> think about those military personnel.

131:18

like you saw the emotion in their face

131:20

talking about like I can't believe I'm

131:23

talking about a gray pushing some sort

131:25

of probe in me and it's like they're

131:27

even more uncomfortable than myself

131:29

because they are claiming that they

131:31

experienced that and you look at Robert

131:32

Hastings book book UFOs and nukes and

131:35

all the different encounters military

131:37

personnel have had sober trained

131:39

observers that are not drunk on duty

131:42

they're not high and um and I've had

131:46

unbelievable

131:48

highle serious people in and out of

131:50

government privately pull me aside and

131:52

tell me about their personal experiences

131:54

and like they you're the only person I

131:55

can tell you. I don't even tell my wife

131:57

because I had this thing and this

131:58

happened this happened. I I thought I

132:00

was losing my mind but this really

132:01

happened and it was and it's it's I

132:04

think a lot a bigger part of the

132:07

populace I think has had experiences

132:09

than statistics would tell you just

132:11

because of the stigmatization of the

132:12

topic you know. Well, yeah. I mean, I

132:14

don't know very many people that have

132:16

had encounters, but all of them were

132:17

very reluctant to talk about it.

132:19

>> Oh, yes. And

132:21

>> especially people with like credible

132:22

jobs.

132:22

>> Yeah. And it's the same thing like

132:24

there's a lot of people behind the

132:25

scenes that are very credible supporting

132:26

me, talking to people behind the scenes

132:28

to bolster my efforts. And they're like,

132:31

I could never, you know, be public like

132:33

you. And so I'm like, trust me, I don't

132:35

want to do this either. like I I'd like

132:36

to, you know, go back to work in the

132:38

executive branch, put my uniform back on

132:41

and uh go kill terrorists. I used to

132:43

hunt warlords. Like I did a lot of crazy

132:45

I used to do hostage rescue, do

132:47

the Overwatch for that with certain JOC

132:50

elements and I've had a I've done a lot

132:52

of serious crazy in my career.

132:54

Unfortunately, a lot of it was

132:55

traumatizing and, you know, got PTSD

132:57

from it. But um yeah, it's just a lot of

133:00

people still even at where we are right

133:03

now in the movie, so to speak, where

133:05

we're on the threshold of possibly

133:06

President Trump succeeding and his team

133:09

getting this information out there. If

133:11

they can, you know, uh broker a way

133:13

ahead with the elements, I'll call it

133:14

the deep state that are that are holding

133:17

on. And and it seems crazy like, well,

133:20

but couldn't the White House just, you

133:22

know, break down the door? Like what why

133:24

is there push back all that? Well, you

133:26

think about like MK Ultra and how

133:28

Richard Helms told Sydney Gotautle to

133:30

destroy the records and the only reason

133:32

why we know of MK Ultra is uh Seymour

133:35

Hirs, right? The New York Times story,

133:38

there was a leak to the Times. Then uh

133:40

Frank Church and other people got uh

133:43

information from whistleblowers and then

133:44

they found the financial records that

133:46

weren't destroyed um in 1973 through 75

133:50

and and also what they call the what's

133:52

it called family jewels crown jewels

133:55

where

133:56

uh CI director Slesinger wrote down like

134:00

all the bad stuff the CIA was doing that

134:02

like you know we want to make sure this

134:03

stuff doesn't come out and then there

134:05

was like a 1964ish

134:07

CIA inspector general report that was

134:09

classified and clearly wasn't given to

134:11

Congress and that's the only way reason

134:14

we know about MK Ultra. It was

134:15

reluctantly there was an oopsies, you

134:18

know, and and part of this went public

134:20

and and so I guess there's some

134:21

historical parallels to to my journey

134:23

and and and stuff on this issue, but and

134:25

and once again MK Ultra like they had a

134:28

drag CIA to they found all this other

134:30

bad stuff, the heart attack gun,

134:32

>> all the stuff in the church committee

134:33

hearings and you know the

134:35

>> operation midnight climax.

134:37

Then there was um what's a funny name?

134:39

I'm going to laugh about that one.

134:40

>> That's the brothel.

134:41

>> Was it? Oh, well

134:43

people acid.

134:44

>> Well, and then um you just saw there was

134:46

a story coming out where they like

134:48

sprayed the city of San Francisco in

134:50

1976. I was just out in SF Gate

134:53

>> couple days. See how they could spread

134:54

disease.

134:55

>> Yeah. And then and then you had a

134:56

mockingb bird where they had people on

134:58

the payroll

134:59

>> and and it's like okay that's kind of

135:01

ethically dubious because it's domestic

135:03

but influence foreign powers. Okay. the

135:06

Smith Munt Act, a 1948 violation, sort

135:08

of, you know, on and on and on. So,

135:11

>> but I think what people really have a

135:13

hard time comprehending is that if this

135:15

is real and if we have been visited, why

135:18

doesn't everyone know about it already?

135:19

Why haven't they made themselves known?

135:21

Why don't we why? And then there's also

135:24

this weird thing if anybody that's

135:26

actually experienced it like if you have

135:28

a novel experience if you are going

135:30

through a you know you're going through

135:32

a national park in Utah and there's no

135:35

one out there and then all of a sudden

135:36

some disc shows up hovers over you lands

135:40

some strange creatures you know come out

135:42

of it talk to you telepathically get

135:44

back in the disc and take off.

135:46

>> Then you have the whole missing 411

135:47

stuff out there too I had that guy on

135:49

too.

135:50

>> Clothes are folded. I don't know the

135:51

answer to that and I think

135:53

>> so why isn't this more pervasive? I

135:55

would say it's reasonably pervasive, but

135:57

we see these craft using cover,

135:59

concealment, deception techniques such

136:01

as signature management, right? Like

136:02

think of the cling on bird of prey

136:04

cloaking, right? We

136:05

>> we have seen that and and so they're

136:07

they're masking their signature, but

136:10

like as Jacqu Valet will say, there's

136:11

some sort of control system. It's like a

136:13

show and display thing as a stimulus for

136:16

a lot of this. And then also, oh, why

136:18

don't they overtly interact? That gets

136:20

into like the exopolitique of this. I

136:22

certainly am not conversant in that yet.

136:24

I hope to learn more as the public to

136:27

learn more about the objectives why

136:29

they're here why there hasn't been overt

136:32

contact but clearly interactions with

136:34

you know the secular nation state

136:36

governments and well what's the

136:39

arrangement I don't know the answer to

136:40

that and and so there's or is it um like

136:44

the prime directive in Star Trek right

136:46

where the oh they're pre-warp

136:47

civilization we observe we're interested

136:50

here we're studying the planet but we're

136:52

not going to overtly influence their

136:54

development because that's unethical

136:56

according to our uh standards of

136:58

behavior and norms and rules of

137:00

engagement, you know, like like it is in

137:01

Star Trek for example.

137:02

>> Well, also just to to avoid any sort of

137:05

unbelievably catastrophic just upheaval

137:10

of society, you would do it very slowly

137:12

like it's being done like today. The way

137:15

it's being discussed is very different

137:16

than the way it was being discussed

137:18

>> 20 years ago. Right. So 20 years ago is

137:21

2016. We hadn't had or 10 years ago was

137:23

2016. We hadn't had the New York Times

137:25

story yet. The New York Times story is

137:27

2017. That changed everything. I think

137:30

20 10 years before that,

137:32

>> you talked about this stuff. You were a

137:34

idiot and a kook.

137:36

>> This is a cottage industry. And I also

137:38

going back to kind of the pattern of

137:39

lifinglessness, so to speak.

137:41

>> I think the nature of the interaction

137:43

was more overt antiquity. So something

137:46

changed at some point in human history

137:48

where going back to Greek gods and you

137:51

know the and a whatever ends up being

137:53

true we'll find out I guess in this

137:54

process that seems more overt they're

137:58

like you know uh mass kind of

138:01

interactions but then

138:02

>> well I'm sure you've seen those ancient

138:04

changed

138:04

>> those ancient paintings that it looks

138:06

like a guy sitting in a craft that has

138:08

like fire behind it and he's flying

138:09

through the sky

138:10

>> like what the is that

138:12

>> yeah I'm not full uh chariots of the

138:14

gods or whatever that book but like I

138:16

think there's probably a happy medium

138:18

that ends up being accurate and but it

138:20

looks at the nature of the interaction

138:21

does that mean a different group of

138:23

intelligences and how many of them and

138:26

the group changed and went away and

138:28

there's like this new generation I don't

138:30

know the answer to that but it does seem

138:32

if you pattern a life it um the nature

138:34

of their show and display their

138:36

concealment deception their their force

138:38

presentation so to speak you know to use

138:40

kind of military talk has changed and

138:42

clearly um they're they're less uh

138:47

likely to do anything major negative or

138:50

positive All right. For whatever reason,

138:52

>> is there a consensus as to their origin?

138:55

Because I know that or or is it do they

138:57

vary wildly? Like there's a like timber

138:59

shed has talked about the ocean.

139:01

>> There is. Yes. The we know a lot about

139:04

that. And

139:05

>> what do we know about that?

139:05

>> Well, be careful because it gets into

139:07

sensitive Navy underwater things. Um

139:11

there's clearly some sort of base of

139:13

operations in certain locations. Um it's

139:16

large.

139:18

Don't know when it got there.

139:20

So it's large

139:22

>> large like multiple city blocks type

139:24

stuff.

139:25

>> Yeah.

139:25

>> So there's multiple city blocks

139:27

somewhere in the bottom of the ocean.

139:29

>> Yeah. And it's like

139:30

>> Yeah.

139:31

>> Do you know what about the Baltic Sea

139:32

anomaly?

139:34

>> Well, the Yeah. The Yeah, the there's

139:37

there's some interesting stuff there.

139:39

And um once again, I will allows the

139:42

federal government to deal with that one

139:43

in our allies and adversaries. So

139:45

>> Okay. Yeah.

139:46

>> Um but you did say that there's multiple

139:48

city blocks under the ocean.

139:51

>> Yeah. I will tell you underwater people

139:54

I know um that come from that community,

139:57

they're they always like, you know, the

139:58

movie The Abyss, Dave, it's kind of a

140:00

docu drama. And I'm like, "Holy fuck."

140:03

You know, that movie, you know, with Ed

140:04

Harris back in '89. And so that kind of

140:08

gives you a sense in a pop sigh kind of

140:11

way for people to visualize. There is

140:14

large down there and it's like the

140:17

origin is indeterminate. I'm sure we

140:19

know a little bit more. I'm not privy to

140:21

that. And and the way we know things and

140:24

track that gets into sensitive national

140:26

security stuff and um you know the

140:28

government may have to reveal some of

140:29

that through some sort of

140:30

acknowledgement strategy. The way it's

140:32

been described to you are these large

140:34

city blocks or whatever the hell it is

140:36

under the ocean. Is this a way point? Is

140:38

this a stop off? Like a base for a base?

140:41

>> Stuff comes and goes.

140:42

>> Okay.

140:42

>> Yeah.

140:43

>> So, this is like where they observe and

140:46

>> Yeah. I'm sure we've done an anal a

140:49

behavioral analysis on it and we

140:51

probably have figured out maybe the

140:54

mission or whatever you want to call it.

140:56

>> I don't know the answer to that. I I'm

140:58

as curious as anybody honestly. So,

141:01

>> um, one thing I wanted to talk to you

141:02

about because it just recently started

141:04

hitting the news, uh, or Twitter at

141:06

least. Someone sent it to me. Um, this

141:08

guy Matthew Brown saying that you, uh,

141:11

tricked him in a scop into revealing

141:14

that there's you turned him into a

141:16

whistleblower. Do you know the story?

141:17

>> I didn't even know Matt Brown until

141:19

right before the 2024 hearing. I never

141:22

met the guy while I was a, you know,

141:24

>> I sent it to you, Jamie. I I had to

141:26

bring it up to you because a bunch of

141:27

people

141:27

>> Yeah, there's like some Make sure you

141:28

ask him about this.

141:29

>> Oh, because I because I was at the

141:31

Shrivever War game uh highle cell

141:34

advisor that I I somehow made fake stuff

141:38

and and and and the the briefing that

141:41

that Matt says he saw, I've never seen.

141:44

I can't evaluate the contents of that.

141:47

And and I didn't make anything. Um I've

141:50

never made a hazing brief on this topic.

141:52

I made some fun briefs just to with

141:54

some of my airmen back in the day. Um,

141:56

some Star Trek related stuff and just

141:57

for, you know,

141:58

>> but you're aware of this, right? So,

142:00

what is he what is he alleging?

142:03

>> He alleges intent exposure. He was

142:06

cleaning up the file system on a

142:07

classified system in I think it was like

142:10

2018 or something like that. And, you

142:12

know, he found this briefing. Um, once

142:15

again, I met Matt or talked to him for

142:17

the first time in like 2024, well after

142:20

I left uh the intelligence community.

142:22

So, I didn't even know he existed. And

142:25

um unfortunately, I've never seen a

142:27

briefing like that, so I can't evaluate

142:29

the the contents. So, um

142:32

>> have you communicated with him after he

142:34

said this?

142:35

>> Oh, oh, oh, sure. Sure. Yeah. I mean,

142:37

just to in support making sure he has

142:39

resources.

142:40

>> No, but I mean after he said that you

142:42

soped him. Have you communicated with

142:44

the assistant?

142:45

>> Isn't that what it says?

142:46

>> I think that might have been people

142:47

saying that.

142:48

>> Some other people saying in other words,

142:50

>> that's news to me. Uh after

142:53

>> so that what what it is is other people

142:55

alleging that that's how it went down.

142:57

>> Yeah. There's a lot of theories online

142:59

about like myself and oh, I'm being

143:02

handled. Dude, it's just me. It's sad.

143:06

It's just me and like my bros and like

143:08

there's higher up people like helping

143:10

but unfortunately like nobody's telling

143:12

me to do X Y and Z and

143:15

>> obviously if the president wants me

143:17

officially involved I'm happy but like

143:18

you know it I'm just a dude you know

143:21

>> doing what I need to do. So yeah.

143:23

>> Um what other weirdness of it before we

143:26

wrap this up? What other weirdness of it

143:27

do you think people don't know about it?

143:30

Hm.

143:32

You know, I think there's something to

143:35

synchronicities

143:37

and I don't have an answer why that

143:40

happens. It just see like weird

143:43

things just like happen or work out and

143:46

and this is about as woo as I get and I

143:49

just look at my own personal journey. um

143:52

you know I was in like the right place

143:53

at the right time and so many instances

143:55

in my career to learn certain things

143:57

that would help me later and like you

143:58

know

143:59

>> met certain people at the right time and

144:02

and of course you know there's like a

144:04

analytical bias most humans have where

144:06

they're ascribing meaning to certain

144:07

interactions that are actually truly

144:09

random statistically random right

144:11

>> but I've talked to enough people that

144:15

say the same thing and I just there's

144:17

something going there's a there's like a

144:19

hidden hand part of the phenomenon that

144:21

I can't there's like a certain Jennaqua

144:23

I can't like point my finger on that I

144:25

think is really interesting too but

144:27

that's about as woo as I get I don't

144:29

know

144:29

>> that is the nature of the fabric of the

144:32

universe or do you think that this has

144:33

something to do with extraterrestrial

144:35

>> I think that's like almost like going

144:37

back to remote viewing because you know

144:38

the Stargate program grill flame all the

144:40

different names it had like that was

144:42

adjacent to the program why do you think

144:45

we were doing the psychic spying program

144:46

besides competing with the Soviets and

144:48

Chinese on the same topic is because

144:50

That's the key unlock to some of the

144:52

technology potentially if you could

144:54

figure out how to it's a it's what like

144:55

they call it like BCI brain computer

144:57

interface but like clearly there's some

144:59

sort of organic to tech interface and

145:03

and it's clearly consciousness based

145:06

>> um not to digress on your

145:07

>> no but this is what Lazar said as well

145:10

that there was no instruments and that

145:12

these things controlled this with their

145:14

mind. It depends on the class of vehicle

145:16

and like there's like really weird

145:19

that we have no idea how it works to

145:20

like oh that kind of looks familiar.

145:22

>> What's the weirdest of the really weird

145:24

>> Um I mean you just have like the eggs

145:26

and stuff. They're like usually unmanned

145:29

>> usually and it's like is this like a

145:31

probe? It's just it's like a

145:33

egg, you know, like and um I know Jake

145:36

Barber has talked about publicly

145:37

recovering them, you know, and uh

145:40

>> you know, I heard I you know, heard

145:41

about that elsewhere, people who were

145:43

were dealing with that. It's just kind

145:45

of weird. It's like this amorphous

145:46

thing. It's like the movie like Arrival,

145:48

right? You

145:50

>> right. That that's a great movie.

145:51

>> Is Yeah. Is the technology like embedded

145:54

in the skin? Like what is going on here?

145:56

There's like no no obvious control

145:58

surfaces like what what's going on? So,

146:01

>> right. Um, what what kind of timeline do

146:04

you think we're looking at in terms of

146:06

like really changing the world?

146:08

>> I think the the basic affirmation, the

146:11

threshold disclosure, you know, call it

146:13

we're not alone, we have stuff kind of

146:15

thing. It has to happen before Trump

146:18

leaves because I don't trust another

146:19

president to follow through on the

146:22

president's directive because, you know,

146:23

it's the the the

146:25

>> the next administration can be like,

146:26

"We're peeling that back, baby. We're

146:28

not touching this again." And so, of

146:29

course,

146:30

>> I think he has to do it before he leaves

146:31

office. And if I were um advising the

146:34

president and if the team's listening, I

146:38

would do it at least 6 months before the

146:39

election just so there's some sort of

146:42

recovery period and kind of uh and

146:45

whatnot. But, uh I'm just a dude

146:47

obviously. I want it as soon as possible

146:49

like most Americans listening to this.

146:51

>> How do you envision that something like

146:52

that would take place? Would they have a

146:55

broadcast? where they show video and

146:58

explain.

146:58

>> That was a plan at one point for a

147:00

previous administration is they were

147:02

going to have like a one of those like

147:03

government

147:04

>> this the Bush administration with the

147:05

how put off days.

147:07

>> No, this was uh HW.

147:10

>> Oh

147:10

>> yeah. And so I'm sure the video sucked.

147:13

It was probably has some synth wave

147:15

government, you know, film from like the

147:16

1989 like, you know, and it was probably

147:20

going to be horrible and dry, but there

147:23

was going to be this like audiovisisual

147:25

kind of a a companion to some sort of

147:27

announcement. Now, I don't know all the

147:29

the the specific details after that. Um,

147:32

clearly there has to be a physical roll

147:34

out for

147:34

>> God, I hope that video exists. It's out

147:36

there in the archive somewhere. We could

147:38

watch it after disclosure.

147:39

>> I know. We need to have like a throwback

147:41

like what you know to see the old

147:42

come.

147:43

>> Well, if you think about like how long

147:44

it's been that people have like slowly

147:48

become more and more aware of this. It's

147:50

it seems like a long time but our lives

147:52

are very short.

147:53

>> Yeah.

147:54

>> And the the reality is if this thing

147:56

this this phenomenon has coexisted with

148:00

human beings and I guided us aided us in

148:04

some way

148:04

>> and that's why I don't think people

148:05

should be too fearful. I mean obviously

148:07

there's a yin and yang in the universe.

148:09

There's malevolent, benevolent, but

148:12

clearly there's some homeostasis going

148:13

on right now. And there's been this

148:16

called cohabitation, for the lack of a

148:17

better way to describe it. And and and

148:21

clearly nothing

148:22

>> crazy has happened. So

148:23

>> some of this is in conjunction with AI

148:27

becoming sentient and that this was a

148:28

part of the process.

148:29

>> I

148:31

don't know that to be a fact. However, I

148:34

like I said earlier in the interview, I

148:35

am fearful that AI is going to figure

148:37

some of this out, whether it be

148:40

>> tech technology stuff or um the fact

148:44

that we're not alone just by looking at

148:45

all the disparit databases and

148:46

correlating data um especially if it

148:49

gets connected to any sort of genetic

148:51

record, medical records, sensing system.

148:53

And I think that's a real um threat that

148:58

if I were to advise the White House,

148:59

they need to think about that like

149:01

third-party unexpected disclosure

149:03

pathway that super intell artificial

149:05

super intelligence provides both from a

149:08

technology risk perspective but also

149:10

revealing some of this too and and once

149:12

again

149:14

uh you know that artificial siliconbased

149:17

AI is like is that the infrastructure

149:20

that we need to communicate to some of

149:22

this organic intelligence too because

149:23

it's able to learn and figure out

149:24

modalities of communication. I don't

149:26

know. So,

149:28

>> it's pretty crazy.

149:29

>> Okay. It's a lot to absorb, Dave.

149:31

>> I know.

149:32

>> Thank you very much for being here, man.

149:33

I appreciate it. It's always great to

149:34

talk to you and thank you for all your

149:36

hard work and exposing all this stuff.

149:39

>> I mean, I really wonder like if it

149:40

wasn't for you doing all this, how much

149:42

would we know?

149:42

>> I don't know, man. I just I hope this is

149:44

the last time I got to send it on on an

149:47

interview. And uh it's been tough.

149:50

Really tough. like it's been

149:51

debilitating. I've gone through a lot,

149:53

you know, it's been in danger and I've

149:56

done a lot of stuff for this country

149:57

over the years, but I'm honored to be

150:00

that guy, I guess, and and and risk it

150:02

all to, you know, unveil this truth

150:04

because it really was a core secret of

150:06

the United States. So,

150:07

>> I certainly think it moves the needle.

150:08

Yeah, I appreciate that. Thank you. All

150:10

right. Bye, everybody.

Interactive Summary

In this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, whistleblower and former intelligence officer David Grusch discusses his background in the intelligence community, his work with Congress regarding Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), and the ongoing efforts toward government disclosure. Grusch details his discovery of a deep-seated, clandestine ecosystem within the government that has managed UAP programs and advanced back-engineering efforts for decades. He also addresses concerns about corruption, the misappropriation of government funds, and the potential involvement of non-human intelligence (NHI) in historical and contemporary events. Throughout the conversation, Grusch emphasizes his hope that the current administration will prioritize transparency, allowing for a responsible release of information regarding UAP and their implications for human history and technology.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts