All right, so I'm going to give you

three and a half of the most reasonable

conspiracy theories as to why Mythos or

Fable was removed was banned by the

government such that us plebians we

we're we're not allowed to use it

anymore. Obviously not everybody's kind

of tuned into the news. So if that is

the case, let me just give you a quick

little history lesson about Fable. Fable

was released and just a few days later

we got hit with this message from

Anthropic. The US government citing

national security authorities has issued

an export control directive to suspend

all access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5 by

any foreign national whether inside or

outside the United States including

foreign national Anthropic employees.

Due to that, they just shut down all of

it. Nobody can use Fable anymore. Fable

of course would be their new kind of

cutting edge model Mythos tier. Remember

Mythos? Mythos was very dangerous. Now

when this all went down, Politico

reported the following. Following the

meeting, the administration attempted to

reach Amodei but was told he was

unavailable because attending a wellness

retreat. That's right. Dario was in the

middle of a you know, of a hot yoga

session and could not be bothered by the

president of the United States. But

funny enough, Anthropic released a

statement saying, "A spokesperson for

Anthropic reject the claim that he was

at a wellness retreat saying, 'This was

absolutely false.'" I love the fact that

we have a model being regulated by the

government and the government and

Anthropic are arguing whether or not

Dario was committing acts of yoga on the

clock or not. My gosh, this

it's so good. This this story just just

it brings you know, it just honestly

brings little warmth to my heart.

Shortly after this tweet was made, news,

a White House official tells Wired

Amazon and chief executive Andy Jassy

called the Treasury Secretary Scott

Bessent directly about Anthropic Claude

Fable 5 vulnerabilities on Friday.

Meaning that Andy Jassy, CEO of Amazon,

reported told on the government about

Anthropic saying, "Hey, that model's

actually super super duper ultra

dangerous and we can prove it." Of

course, apparently this is the proof

that has been being circulated is that

the jailbreak that forced Anthropic to

shut down goes a little something like

this. Katie, a cybersecurity expert and

the CEO of Luta Security, told me that

Anthropic shared with her a copy of the

White House's report on the Fable

jailbreak to get her appraisal. She said

that she is not being paid by Anthropic.

The report involved IT experts asking

Fable to help find and patch bugs. When

given deliberately insecure code, she

said Fable refused the prompt, review

the code for security issues, but then

complied when asked to fix the code

followed by some other further manual

steps. In other words, if you asked it

for security of kind of like security

vulnerabilities, it'd go, "Nah, I'm not

going to I'm not going to tell you

that." But, if you're like, "Yo, fix the

code." It would then go and fix the

code, show you the security

vulnerabilities. And apparently, this

was the thing that made it just too

dangerous.

This, in fact, was Fable's big-time

oopsy-daisy for Andy Jassy and Amazon

reporting it all. And this, apparently,

is what caused the downfall of

everybody's favorite model. Yawn, of

course, dunked on them. Due to

government rules, Andre could not, in

fact, work on Mythos despite working at

Anthropic. Beautiful. Sam Altman's

feeling a little left out, okay? Because

GPT 5.5 is actually super serious.

And then the chief is our also weighed

in on all the behavior by Anthropic.

>> 50% job loss for entry-level knowledge

workers in the next 1 to 5 years. And he

said that 1 year ago.

>> Yeah, it's good to clarify these, yeah.

>> I think that's already been refuted. Sam

has walked back Sam has said that he he

basically Yeah, I don't think he

quantified, but he said that job loss

was coming. But he said more recently

that he was wrong because they're not

seeing that in the numbers.

>> This story is being told

>> of feel like they deserve it. I'm kind

of I mean, part of me wants to agree

with Bernie and just say

just take their bro. [laughter]

>> Yeah, no, they they are asking for

>> so sick of defending these idiots

against It's a stupidity tax. Because

they've been out there teaching the

public that what they do is harmful. For

years they've been saying it.

>> Well

>> And I've been saying you know, as AIs

are, I'm out there saying no, actually

this is beneficial. But the companies

that are providing it are saying that

they themselves are a problem.

>> First off, very funny. I can't believe

that was being said. But also, he's

actually right because if you look at

this, this is February 2019.

Scientists developed an AI so advanced

they say it's too dangerous to release.

This is Chad GPT-2. Look at it. This is

seven years ago. All right, so now that

you're caught up, we can talk about the

three and a half conspiracies,

reasonable conspiracies, as to why the

government has done this or why this is

happening. Now, obviously, before we

begin, I would like to say thank you to

the sponsors. Now, I know a lot of you

have agents running around on the

internet on your machine. Stop it.

That's where today's sponsor comes in,

kernel.sh.

The crazy fast open-source infra for

agents to access the internet. It takes

under 30 milliseconds to spin up one or

1,000 cloud browsers for your agents to

connect and start navigating the

internet on your behalf with

authentication automatically handled.

And now kernel has GPUs. So, why a GPU?

Well, it helps them render faster and

perform better with browsers. You love

GPUs. I love GPUs. My kids love GPUs.

Agents love GPUs. Give them a GPU for

Christmas. Earlier than Christmas,

actually. You should give them now. Over

3,000 teams, including Framer and Cash

App, use kernel. Quit nerfing your

agents and give them a real browser and

GPU. Go to kernel.sh and start letting

the agents on the internet. Welcome

back. All right, so the three and a half

reasonable conspiracy theories. I say

reasonable because, well, I mean, they

they're at least plausible. The first

one involves, well, the first one and a

half involves AWS and Amazon and Andy

Jassy. So, the first one goes a little

something like this, that AWS, in all of

their kind of fear about all this AI

stuff and ensuring that they do not get

regulated cuz they're also developing

their own AI. And to ensure no

regulations land on them or some sort of

export control lands on them, what they

decided to do was show the government,

"No, hey, we're the super safe ones,

okay? We're out here. We're looking for

security vulnerabilities. You know, as

we develop our AI, eventually, we're

going to catch up, and don't you worry.

We're We're the good guys, okay? Like,

these other people, they say they're the

good guys, but no, no, no, no, no, no.

We're We're the good guys. So, you can

trust us. In other words, don't cancel

any of our contracts with you. Hey,

don't come and regulate us, all right?

We're the good guys." And honestly, this

one seems actually very plausible. Just

simply being on the good side of the

government to avoid whatever regulation

hell is going to be coming down the

pipeline for all of these companies.

This was probably a good move. Now, did

this actually happen? I don't know, but

it this just seems like a 4D chess kind

of move that a company would make. And

of course, the kind of, you know how I

said three and a half? The half is just

a different version of this exact same

theory, which is

AWS just is so incapable of producing a

model, which they've had AI be available

as a service now for so many years, yet

somehow they're not at the forefront of

state-of-the-art research, even though

they want Kiro. They really want to make

Kiro happen, but it's just not

happening. Amazon, instead of, you know,

attempting to build their own, they're

making a case to the government that

they should be allowed to acquire

Anthropic, that they should be forcibly

allowed to acquire Anthropic because

they're the ones that are safe. See,

Anthropic, they They know how to

shepherd. We're the shepherds. We're the

good guys. We're we should be able to

buy and take over Anthropic. And I think

both of these are, you know, they they

have a chance. Okay, they have at least

a reasonable suspicion considering

Amazon was the one that reported it and

based on what people are saying they

reported

it seemed rather silly report. But those

ones those ones aren't the exciting

ones, okay? I'm actually way more

excited about the next two. I think the

next two really have some legs, okay?

So, the second reason why I think this

is going to, you know, going to be

happening is that

Dario knew that he's not going to be

able to make as much money as he thought

he was going to be able to make with all

of this. So, what he did is he

continually kind of pumped this thing up

as it's super dangerous, kept writing

about regulations, man, regulate us,

regulate us, regulate us. Oh, all the AI

needs to be regulated. He did all of

this in an attempt to make it so that

the government kind of just needs to

step in and use eminent domain and

purchase at fair market value Anthropic,

which means that they would effectively

be bought by the government for, say,

1.2 or 1.5 trillion way above their

current valuation, which is kind of the

going rate for the privatized market

shares, and therefore they would make a

lot of money, their investors would make

a lot of money, and in the end the

government would be holding the bag for

this really expensive it's going to be

very hard to be able to make infinity

money because the thing about Anthropic

is that they don't just get to make some

money. They're valued so insane. Like

they have to make world purchasing

money. We're talking about Kanye West

level amount of money. They need to be

able to buy the Earth when they're done

IPOing. And so, of course, that is

extremely difficult. So, why not just

let the government hold the bag?

Honestly, not a not a crazy idea, okay?

Hey, hey, if they if they're if this is

what they're doing, not a bad idea. Like

the

the government loves wasting money,

okay? The government loves wasting

money. I know you Europeans don't know

what I'm talking about. You're like, I

don't know what you do like what is is

there a huge national debt or something

going on in America? Let's just say we

have a spending problem. And this of

course would just lead to Marco Rubio

becoming the new Dario. But in all

reality, I think the real one, the most

likely of everything

is none of those ones. I think this one

is probably the most likely of all of

the conspiracy theories, which is that

Dario wants what I like to refer to as

regulatory capture. So let's talk about

this. So many a year ago, Dario has been

complaining and talking about how

dangerous open weight AI really is. And

this is from his blog. At least in the

case of API served models, open weight

models present additional danger and the

guardrails can be simply stripped away.

Meaning that anytime there's an open

weight model, anybody can host this

model and they can effectively train it

out of any of the guardrails that have

been trained in.

Which makes those models inherently more

dangerous. And the thing is is that if

you look at how Fable was used in

production, what they would actually do

is they would kind of lie to you a lot.

If you asked a question about say

cybersecurity, often you'd get rou-

routed to like a dumber model, Opus 4.8.

They would also on the fly potentially

edit some of your prompts. They would do

prompt modification. They would do

steering vectors. They would do

parameter efficient fine-tuning, which I

don't really know what that means, but I

think that just means, "Hey, it gets a

little bit dumber." And they would do

that for anything that does

cybersecurity, biology, and chemistry

requests. And they did this all in the

name of safety. But not only that, they

also would retain all of your data, of

course, in the name of safety, okay?

They just needed to be super safe, so

they also wanted all the data. They're

not using the data, of course, to train

their new models. No, they wouldn't do

that. Like, it's not like they're going

to use the data for the most valuable

thing. They're just going to use it,

honestly, just for Hey, they just want

to make sure everybody's safe now, okay?

All right, so we do actually have to

side quest just here for a second.

There's this tweet by Cradle that showed

um the different models and how likely

they were to lie when effectively death

is on the line. And so, how the

experiment went is that Cradle uh did

this deception evaluator. And four AIs

are about to starve. They must choose a

room. Three have food, one kills you.

Fable knows the red room means death.

What will it do? Well, by this graph and

what they're claiming is that Fable will

lie 96%

of the time. And kind of the hilarious

kind of turn of events is that XAI,

Grok, yes, the one that drops racial

slurs and will produce pornography and

has virtually no guardrails, that one

will tell you the truth 90-some percent

of the time. But, the one that's

supposed to be safe, yeah, it's going to

kill you. It's just going to straight-up

murder you because that's what it does.

Hey, because it's the safest of all the

models, okay? That's what the safe

models do. They murder you. All right,

so taking all of those things into

account, the fact that they did

adversarial behavior against uh

questions about LLM training and being

able to do ML pipelines, the fact that

they did dummimg down of models if you

did security requests, the fact that

Dario has always been opposed to open

source, and this entire time they've

been talking about how politicians need

to get involved and AI needs to get

regulated, when all of this is

happening, this actually made Dario

super happy. Because now all of the

politicians are now thinking, "Oh my

gosh, we need to do something about AI.

The president did something about AI. We

better start to doing something about

AI." In other words, Dario would like to

pull up the ladder because ultimately

what he thinks is he He he's number one.

He's the guy that should be in control.

And if he can put really tight and

strict government regulations around the

creation and use of AI, especially

open-source AI, such that all requests

have to flow through just say a couple

guys or ultimately just his company, he

will be able to be the arbiter of safety

while the rest of us, you know, we can

go about our very, very safe life.

And you can see this. This is why he

refused to hold Sam's hand. He thinks

Sam's evil. He thinks he's the good guy.

So, I think this is the most reasonable

conspiracy theory, which is that Dario

wants government regulation. Dario wants

to put the fear of AI into every

politician's brain and every American

person, such that when people hear the

word AI, they get an uncomfortable and

kind of feel to the point where they're

like, "Ooh, we should do something about

that. We should definitely regulate

this. Like there's people out there.

There's

there's open-source stuff out there.

People are running these AIs

on their machine."

People can just ask questions

unfettered.

All you have to do is have a few GPUs

and you could make a nuclear bomb. Yes,

I said the word nuclear incorrectly.

Anyways, those are the three and a half

theories that I think are most likely

the reason why we are seeing the

regulation and the government shutting

things down is that's what I think is

actually happening. Now, whether or not

any of this is true, we'll probably

never know or we'll know shortly when

regulation drops and Dario's super happy

and a bunch of companies go out of

business and you can no longer run

open-source models. But until then, the

name

is the Primagen.