HomeVideos

Team Favorite: AI-Era Internet, Spaceport Investment, Bolivia’s Investability | Wall Street Week

Now Playing

Team Favorite: AI-Era Internet, Spaceport Investment, Bolivia’s Investability | Wall Street Week

Transcript

1210 segments

0:09

[music]

0:13

This is Wall Street Week. I'm David

0:15

[music] Weston bringing you stories of

0:17

capitalism coming to an internet near

0:19

you. Artificial intelligence. Will those

0:22

helpful chat bots kill the search and

0:24

advertising paying for all that content

0:26

that you enjoy?

0:29

and liftoff of Falcon 9.

0:31

>> Plus, the race to make money in space.

0:34

Companies are competing to launch

0:35

100,000 satellites in the next 5 years

0:38

as China builds out its own space

0:40

infrastructure in Latin America.

0:44

And investing in Bolivia, a new regime

0:46

aims to be friendly to private

0:48

enterprise. But when is the right time

0:50

for investors to dip their toe in the

0:52

water?

0:55

But we begin with the continuing

0:57

conflict in Iran. Harvard professor and

0:59

former IMF chief economist Ken Rogoff

1:02

chronicled the US dollar's rise in the

1:04

beginning of its decline as a global

1:06

currency [music] in his latest book, Our

1:08

Dollar, Your Problem. It turns out that

1:10

it's not just oil and aluminum at risk

1:13

in the Iran war. It also may be the

1:15

status of the [music] dollar.

1:18

Ken, in your book, Our Dollar, Your

1:20

Problem, you talk about the position of

1:23

the US dollar as declining gradually

1:25

over time in relation to other

1:27

currencies. We now have a conflict in

1:29

Iran. Is that affecting that decline?

1:33

Oh,

1:33

>> I don't think there's any question that

1:35

it will affect the decline. It could go

1:37

either way. It depends on how it comes

1:39

out. If the US comes out incredibly

1:42

triumphant, there's peace in the Middle

1:44

East.

1:46

uh everyone, you know, looks to the

1:48

United States to maintain peace. That's

1:50

one outcome. Another outcome where where

1:53

it's viewed as a strategic defeat and

1:55

China gains. But, you know, it's it's a

1:58

step. I don't think either way it's

2:01

changing a dynamic that was going to

2:03

happen anyway. There are things on the

2:06

outside that it influences. So they're

2:09

it's definitely going to help China

2:12

accelerate getting other countries to

2:14

use its currency particularly for

2:17

Chinese imports. For example, if China

2:19

buys oil or China buys anything, it's

2:21

going to help in that dimension. Uh but

2:24

it's also affecting global debt because

2:27

everybody sees a lot of need for

2:29

military expending. The US is the

2:32

biggest debtor in the world. We lose the

2:34

most when global interest rates go up.

2:37

So there are pressures from the outside

2:40

coming from everybody's trying to look

2:43

for other options and pressures from the

2:45

inside that we're you know running this

2:48

big debt that is manageable if we wanted

2:53

to but there's not a lot of will to want

2:55

to

2:56

>> is the strength of a currency reflective

2:59

of the strength including military

3:00

strength of the country in your book you

3:02

graduate to the Armada actually with

3:04

Queen Elizabeth I and the Spanish as Is

3:07

this potentially a barometer of how the

3:09

world is perceiving the relative

3:11

military strength of the United States?

3:13

>> The military strength's a piece of being

3:15

the dominant currency. And here, just to

3:17

be clear, we're talking about the

3:19

dollar's market share, which reached an

3:22

incredible peak about 10 years ago. But

3:25

also, military strength gives you the

3:27

ability to affect negotiations. They can

3:30

be over very unrelated things. They can

3:34

have to do with how the IMF works. they

3:36

can have to do with how global banking

3:39

regulation works. So having the military

3:42

power at the end of the day says well

3:45

you know of course of course it matters

3:46

for a lot of things and if you're looked

3:48

at as weaker it hurts you and part of

3:51

the protection historically going back

3:52

to like 1974 was of the Gulf states

3:55

countries like Saudi Arabia because of

3:57

US military protection. Now, as you say,

3:59

it depends on how this all plays out.

4:01

But if in fact the United States does

4:03

not uh have a triumph of some sort over

4:06

Iran, does it really undermine the

4:09

confidence of the Gulf States in using

4:11

the US dollar?

4:12

>> Well, the Gulf States are a really

4:14

important anchor of the US dollar. And

4:16

you know, it's interesting you picked

4:17

the 1970s because it really fell in the

4:21

1970s. Europe left the dollar. That's

4:25

worth remembering. And the Gulf States

4:27

when they sort of did their recycling of

4:31

their petro dollars through the United

4:33

States and priced oil and dollars, I

4:36

think it was sort of helpful. Although

4:39

nevertheless, you know, that period uh

4:41

was down. I don't want to overstate the

4:43

petro dollar. I want to be a little

4:45

careful about that because oil is a very

4:48

flexible price. We're all staring at

4:51

Brent crude and it's still here and it

4:53

goes here. it can move very fast. So

4:57

it's a little bit like my paying with

5:00

Visa or Mastercard.

5:02

It matters a lot more whether uh goods

5:06

manufactured goods are priced in

5:08

dollars. But it but it's important. I

5:10

mean it fills a lot of roles. The Gulf

5:12

States use dollars. Saudi is still

5:15

pegged to the dollar. I don't know how

5:16

long that's going to last but they still

5:18

are. And because uh so many of them uh

5:22

are pegged to the dollar, rotate around

5:24

the dollar, they hold more dollars.

5:27

They've been very important to our

5:29

business model. Not as important as

5:32

China, but they've been important. And

5:35

it's unclear how this is playing out. I

5:37

mean, I think a lot of the Gulf States

5:39

are looking at us and saying, "Wait, I

5:43

thought you built those bases to protect

5:46

us. I didn't know you built those uh you

5:50

know uh various military complexes in

5:53

our country so we could be target

5:55

practice and are you on our side or you

5:58

on their side like what's going on?

6:00

That's been a delicate dance. I I don't

6:02

think we know how it comes out yet. So,

6:05

you know, China's kind of playing it

6:08

cool. A lot of people say they may

6:10

benefit. They might, but but I I just

6:13

think we have to see what the endgame of

6:15

this is. the Chinese might benefit. Will

6:17

will the yuan benefit? Because we see

6:20

Iran saying, "We'll let oil through the

6:22

straight moves if you if you sell it in

6:24

yuan, for example." And China certainly

6:26

wants more transactions denominated.

6:29

>> They're doing quite a bit in crypto,

6:30

too, also, by the way. Yeah. I mean, if

6:32

they get paid in dollars, we can

6:34

sanction them immediately. They're

6:35

putting it hostage. Why the heck should

6:37

they do that? That's certainly

6:39

significant. But the big thing of the

6:42

Iran war in the future of the dollar is

6:45

it's raised global interest rates. They

6:48

were going up and up and up. So if I

6:50

look at the dynamic of how I see things

6:52

unfolding, it's that there's this

6:56

pressures from the outside that are very

6:59

slowm moving but they're happening to

7:02

have a more multipolar system. And there

7:05

are problems on the inside where we're

7:07

the richest country ever, ever, ever.

7:10

But we still have trouble paying our

7:13

bills and running these crazy large

7:16

debts. There's no political consensus in

7:19

either party. The Republicans don't want

7:21

to tax anyone. The Democrats think 1% of

7:24

people can pay, which doesn't add up.

7:27

And so we are racing towards having a

7:30

fiscal problem. And then central bank

7:33

independence becomes a problem because

7:35

when you have a fiscal problem you're

7:37

kind of looking for the central bank to

7:39

bail you out and if all that's happening

7:42

that's sort of what happened in the 70s

7:44

in a way it undermines the dollar.

7:46

>> So so what are the metrics that people

7:48

should use in figuring out where we are

7:50

in the relative prominence of the

7:52

dollars? What do you look at? I mean for

7:53

example were you surprised that the

7:55

dollar was not more of a safe harbor

7:57

when the Iran conflict broke out? So uh

7:59

there are people in finance uh who are

8:02

doing all these papers showing that the

8:04

premium we used to extract on longer

8:08

term debt is gone. So on short-term debt

8:13

there's still a premium to dollars. It's

8:16

still the safest asset. Long-term debt

8:19

it's not there anymore. I mean it's

8:22

safer than let's say uh you know some

8:26

African or South American countries debt

8:29

but if you compare it to many European

8:32

countries uh Japan it doesn't rank that

8:35

way they used to and so there are ways

8:38

in which what we're getting out of the

8:40

deal is going down. Now we can crowd

8:43

everything into short-term borrowing and

8:46

Secretary Bessence said I think interest

8:48

rates are going to go down. I'm going to

8:50

borrow more short-term.

8:53

Okay. But that's very risky. In fact, I

8:56

think he was saying not to do that 10

8:58

years ago. And so we're losing you you

9:02

see that in many uh measures. On the

9:05

other hand, you know, these things are

9:07

very slow moving. If you do uh foreign

9:11

exchange trading is overwhelmingly goes

9:14

through dollars. If you do uh currency

9:18

of denomination of debt, it's

9:21

overwhelmingly dollars. Of course, part

9:23

of that's because more than 50% of the

9:27

debt of the advanced countries is ours.

9:29

More than that in global bonds, it might

9:32

even be 60 or 70% is ours. So there's

9:36

there's a lot of liquidity in it. I

9:38

still remember 20 years ago a prominent

9:42

European economist getting up at a

9:44

meeting and saying, "Today is a big day.

9:47

There's more euro euro debt than dollar

9:51

debt." Which was true that day. Well,

9:53

how did that work out? You know, I mean,

9:55

it's I I think this is a slowm moving

9:58

thing. We're seeing it in the interest

9:59

rate spreads. We're seeing it in

10:02

reserves. So what countries are choosing

10:04

to do uh we're seeing it in uh actions

10:08

that the Europeans and the Chinese are

10:10

taking to develop independent systems.

10:15

But this isn't something the private

10:17

sector is just going to do. It's mostly

10:20

the Chinese, the Europeans are leading

10:22

the way. We are digging our, you know,

10:28

grave so to speak. And it's all the

10:30

actions of the governments. It's not

10:32

something that's happening overnight.

10:36

>> Coming up, the content business made a

10:39

long and difficult transition from print

10:41

to the internet. But what happens if

10:43

scrolling online is now replaced by AI?

10:47

We bring you the story of another

10:49

revolution in how we get our information

10:51

and entertainment.

11:00

>> [music]

11:07

>> This is a story about big changes on

11:09

tiny screens. Since its inception, the

11:12

internet has become where we turn for

11:14

content. Content we mostly access

11:16

through search. And that's mostly free.

11:19

But of course, it's not really free.

11:22

When we searched on platforms like

11:24

Google, we were directed to web pages

11:26

created by publishers who got paid for

11:28

all those ads we spent time looking at.

11:31

Now all that is changing and as AI

11:33

becomes the new gateway to the web, it's

11:36

transforming the economics of the

11:38

internet.

11:43

We believe the high water mark for

11:45

internet traffic like [music] that was

11:46

sent out from social media and search

11:49

and AI tools which are quite nent at the

11:51

time was 2022. [music] Essentially over

11:54

the last 4 years those numbers have been

11:57

dropping. [music]

11:58

>> Rand Fishiskin is an author and

12:00

entrepreneur who specializes in online

12:03

search

12:05

the main way that most of us interact

12:07

[music] with the web. I do a lot of

12:09

research with clickstream data which

12:11

essentially looks at devices and what

12:13

they visit [music] and and don't visit.

12:15

Whereas in 2011, Google was sending

12:19

north of 70% of all searches to a third

12:23

party website, right? A website not

12:25

owned or controlled by Google. And today

12:27

that number is in the mid40s and

12:31

falling. Um that clearly indicates this

12:35

zero-click trend.

12:37

Zero click. It's a term for an online

12:40

search result that doesn't [music] lead

12:42

to any other web pages. That can be good

12:44

news for users if their question has

12:47

been answered quickly and correctly. No

12:49

need to spend time scrolling through all

12:50

that text and pages of ads. But if you

12:53

are a publisher counting on that click

12:55

to bring [music] traffic to your website

12:56

and to sell those ads, it's very bad

12:59

news. Which means the creators of all

13:02

that web content have [music] to rethink

13:04

the game. Long before AI, Google started

13:07

disintermediating content providers by

13:10

answering questions right in the search

13:11

results. [music] You search for the MET

13:13

score, the score is right at the top.

13:15

And AI just enhanced their ability to do

13:19

this.

13:20

>> For an idea of just how big this change

13:22

is for Google itself, here's the

13:25

company's head of search talking about

13:26

incorporating AI just last month. Now

13:29

we're entering the next chapter of

13:31

Google search where incredible AI

13:33

features aren't just in search. Google

13:36

search is AI search through and through.

13:39

Now this is the biggest upgrade to our

13:40

iconic search box since its debut over

13:42

25 years ago. The problem is that most

13:45

people don't click on the links in

13:48

Google and that has

13:48

>> Caitlyn Petri is author of all the news

13:51

that's fit to click and a professor at

13:53

Rutgers who studies the way algorithms

13:56

shape online media

13:58

>> news sites that were counting on

14:01

referrals from Google for their traffic

14:04

for their ad revenue to draw maybe

14:06

subscribers who might come to the site

14:08

get interested and then subscribe are

14:10

now seeing in some cases very dramatic

14:12

decreases is in the traffic that they're

14:14

getting from Google.

14:15

>> The move from print to the internet,

14:18

many people think actually eliminated

14:20

some news sources. A lot of local

14:22

newspapers, for example, were eliminated

14:24

partly because of the business model

14:25

challenge, the revenue challenge. Uh do

14:28

we face a risk of that with AI that we

14:30

will eliminate even further sources?

14:32

>> I think we do. Um I think it's a major

14:34

concern.

14:35

>> It was really revealing. Perhaps nobody

14:37

in the world has a better view of these

14:40

changes and what they mean for online

14:42

content creators than Neil Vogle.

14:44

>> What happened was our audience, right?

14:48

And and we're we reach half of America

14:50

each month. Our audience on the internet

14:53

was 75% from Google search

14:56

2022, maybe a little bit more, maybe a

14:58

little bit less, but ballpark that. That

15:00

is now 25% of our audience.

15:03

>> Vogle is CEO of People Inc. The largest

15:06

online and print publisher in America.

15:09

It reaches 175 million people each month

15:12

with dozens of publications whose names

15:15

you know well.

15:16

>> Better Homes and Gardens, People,

15:18

Entertainment Weekly, Travel and

15:20

Leisure, Food and Wine. And we put all

15:22

of these brands together because we

15:25

believed we understood how to run these

15:28

classic heritage brands on the internet.

15:30

And we've been proven right. Although

15:32

Vogle has had a front row seat to the

15:34

collapse in search traffic that AI has

15:36

ushered in, he also told us something

15:39

surprising. His business is booming.

15:42

>> We're very profitable and we're defying

15:45

the narrative around publishing. That is

15:47

publishers can't succeed in this world

15:49

and we're succeeding. We feel really

15:51

good and really optimistic about the

15:52

future of media. Back in the day, before

15:54

there even was an internet, believe it

15:56

or not, there was a time. Uh if you look

15:58

at a publisher, newspaper, magazine,

16:00

their revenue came from two sources,

16:02

subscription and advertising. What's

16:04

your revenue model?

16:05

>> If you look at the internet, that is

16:07

where we thrive. That is our bread and

16:08

butter. 90% of our profitability comes

16:12

from our internet and our online

16:14

presence. That is very much advertising,

16:16

but it's also lots of other things.

16:18

Those other things include deals and

16:20

branded products, but Vogle says they've

16:23

also got a new revenue stream.

16:25

>> We licensed content to LLM and AI

16:28

engines. We sat with Sam Alman at OpenAI

16:33

right before they could launch the first

16:35

commercial LLM. This is the fall of

16:37

2022.

16:39

And we saw this LLM and and

16:41

[clears throat] we saw what it could do.

16:42

And we were like, uh-oh. Like the world

16:45

is going to be different from here. And

16:46

there's moments in your life who know

16:47

the world's going to be different. Like

16:48

you have your first kid or the

16:49

Philadelphia Eagles win the Super Bowl

16:51

and you know that like your world's

16:53

going to be different from there. This

16:54

was one of those m this was like the

16:55

business version of that moment. And we

16:57

took a look at this and our first

16:59

reaction is thank god we have brands

17:02

because what we knew was this was going

17:05

to be a new paradigm in media and we

17:07

knew there were going to be risks and

17:08

there going to be opportunities and we

17:10

made the bet and had the thesis that

17:12

says if you have these intangible assets

17:15

that really really mean something to

17:17

people you have something that is going

17:18

to increase in value in an artificial

17:21

era. And starting in 22 and 23 we

17:23

started to build other ways to

17:25

distribute our brands. Tik Tok,

17:27

Instagram, YouTube, our own emails,

17:29

product licensing, all of these things

17:31

we did. And cut to today, five years

17:34

later, we've made 10 straight quarters

17:37

on Wall Street. We're growing in an area

17:39

where at most publishers are struggling.

17:41

And we did it because we have these

17:43

amazing brands that can live in all

17:45

these places and our aggregate aggregate

17:47

audience size is multiples what it was

17:50

when we started here. You mentioned that

17:51

you do have licensing arrangements with

17:53

some of the LLM large language models.

17:56

>> Uh how does that work for you? Is it

17:58

real money?

17:59

>> So it's real money. It's material for

18:01

us.

18:02

>> I think we made a decision. Um

18:06

maybe it's right, maybe it's wrong. So

18:08

far I think it's right that we wanted a

18:11

seat to the table. The important thing

18:13

to understand and realize is AI needs

18:15

three things. It needs power, which has

18:17

been a lot of talk about power. It needs

18:19

a model. It's been a lot of talk about

18:20

models and it needs inputs. We are the

18:23

inputs. We are the training of the

18:25

models. Now we believe and I think if

18:27

you talk to any of these AI

18:29

professionals believe the internet's

18:31

been crawled. All the data in the world

18:32

is already in the models. So the value

18:35

should acrue to those of us that are

18:37

still making substantial amounts of new

18:39

things that are needed for the search

18:41

use case which is a very big use case

18:44

and are needed for all the corporate

18:45

clients that want to use LLM for their

18:46

stuff. So it could be something simple

18:48

as we have 50 new recipes with avocados

18:51

in them and avocados are important to I

18:53

can tell you every single thing Kim

18:54

Kardashian did yesterday. But these are

18:56

things that are very valuable these

18:58

pieces of data. The other thing we did

19:00

which is really important here is

19:03

part of having a seat at the table is we

19:06

wanted to control our own destiny. Last

19:09

uh summer and in July, we made a

19:12

decision and we partnered with a group

19:14

called Cloudflare to block every AI

19:16

crawler you could possibly block. So,

19:18

you cannot get access to our content

19:19

unless you pay us for it.

19:20

>> And given your model uh to license the

19:23

um training using your content

19:27

>> to an LLM

19:28

>> is basically found money, right? It's

19:31

not taking away from your other business

19:32

because that's based on brand.

19:34

>> I mean, so it it's interesting. Is it ah

19:37

it's funny we have this conversation all

19:38

the time like and the answer we always

19:41

come back to is cash is cash it would be

19:44

amazing if we could make money the way

19:46

we made money three or four years ago be

19:47

super fun I'd have a lot more free time

19:49

but I don't and we have to work hard so

19:52

it it is what it is

19:54

>> for a publisher with strong

19:56

wellestablished brands even the

19:58

uncertain future with AI may be bright

20:01

but for smaller publishers and for the

20:03

web as a whole the outlook may not be as

20:06

encouraging potentially in the longer

20:08

run. What could this mean for the

20:11

internet itself? Because the internet

20:13

really has thrived on very rich

20:15

production of content. If content

20:18

providers don't get paid for that,

20:20

sooner or later there's not going to be

20:22

as much content.

20:23

>> Yeah. This this death spiral that you're

20:25

describing has been something that

20:27

people have theorized over the last

20:29

three or four years with no discernable

20:32

solution. I I'm going to tell you what I

20:34

think is the most likely scenario, but

20:36

it's also the most tragic one, which is

20:40

that in a few years, AI tools find

20:42

themselves unable to get enough content

20:44

to train on, whether that's video or

20:46

text or audio, long form, short form,

20:49

and they decide to build their own

20:51

publishing departments. And in years to

20:54

come, a decade, two decades from now, it

20:56

would not surprise me if

20:59

OpenAI or Anthropic looked a lot like

21:02

Tik Tok where they have a creator fund

21:05

and they pay creators a certain amount

21:08

based on the amount of traffic and page

21:10

views and value to the training set that

21:12

these creators provide. And so they're

21:15

contract employing these creators and we

21:19

get a we get an AI shaped internet,

21:22

right? an internet that is built not

21:24

only for but by AI tools. That um that

21:30

seems quite probable.

21:31

>> I think that that is something that if I

21:34

worked at an AI company, I would really

21:36

be thinking about because if the traffic

21:39

drops so significantly that we see even

21:41

more jobs in journalism be lost. We see

21:43

even more, especially local outlets, but

21:46

a lot of news outlets shutter themselves

21:47

because they can't stay afloat. um that

21:50

diminishes the amount of content that

21:51

these LLMs can train on too, right? So,

21:54

this is something that I think we should

21:56

all be concerned about, not just

21:58

journalists, but um also those who work

22:00

at AI companies, anyone who cares about

22:02

the future of democracy should be

22:03

thinking about this right now.

22:05

>> Tell me how broadly apart from people,

22:07

beyond people, how do you think

22:10

generative AI is going to change the

22:12

nature of the internet, the content on

22:14

the internet? I so we can end up being

22:16

fairly myopic around here and looking at

22:18

our own use case. I am um and I have to

22:23

be I'm like a crazy optimistic person

22:25

and um I am very optimistic about AI for

22:30

us, right? The risk for AI for us is

22:32

already out. It's already killed our

22:34

biggest piece of traffic from 5 years

22:36

ago. But we've built something even

22:37

better over here that we use AI to do

22:42

more of. Like we are today, we make

22:44

about 50% more content than we made when

22:48

this whole process started for roughly

22:51

the same cost and humans make every

22:53

single thing you read and see because

22:55

we've been able to use AI in the

22:57

background to streamline so many

22:59

processes. If you look at as an

23:01

opportunity, it's incredible for us and

23:03

we have no choice but to look at it that

23:05

way. If we look at it any other way,

23:06

it's too scary. And it's sort of like

23:09

riding a bike. Don't look down. Look

23:10

towards the horizon like and you'll

23:11

[clears throat] be fine.

23:14

>> Since we talked with Neil Vogle, People

23:16

Inc.'s parent company made an offer to

23:17

buy the part of MGM it doesn't already

23:20

own. In making the bid, chairman Barry

23:22

Diller emphasized the value of what he

23:24

called realworld assets that AI cannot

23:27

easily replicate. Pursuing a part of the

23:30

media world very different from the

23:32

online content brands that Vogle

23:34

continues to build. Up next, we've come

23:37

a long way from Cape Canaveral. Today,

23:39

there's a booming business in space

23:41

launches, which means a long waiting

23:43

list for satellites trying to get into

23:45

orbit. [music] And the latest

23:47

opportunity may lie 1,000 mi south of

23:49

Florida in the Dominican Republic.

24:04

This is a story about making money

24:06

22,000 miles up, meeting a commercial

24:08

need for tens of thousands of satellites

24:11

to be launched by 2030. There is a race

24:13

on to get all those satellites into

24:15

orbit, but also a race with China, which

24:18

has already built a range of satellite

24:20

ground stations in Latin America.

24:22

Something that's gotten the attention of

24:24

the US government.

24:34

[music]

24:37

So, it's about 45 minutes on a

24:38

helicopter flight. It's probably about

24:40

four or five hours driving.

24:42

>> In the western part of the Dominican

24:43

Republic, on the border with Haiti, lies

24:46

Pedanales, a quiet coastal province that

24:49

will soon be home to the country's first

24:51

spaceport and what is slated to be the

24:53

first US-owned commercial spaceport in

24:56

Latin America.

24:57

>> If they were to identify this region as

25:00

ideal for commercial space, be

25:02

essentially the Straits of Hormuz for

25:04

space. When we talk about the straight

25:07

of Hormuz, we think of all that oil and

25:10

fertilizer and aluminum trying to get

25:12

through a narrow sea channel. When it

25:14

comes to space, it's satellites. And

25:16

[music] the choke point isn't a sea

25:18

passage, but launch pads that we simply

25:20

don't have enough of. [music]

25:22

>> How many pads are you going to have

25:23

here?

25:23

>> Four.

25:24

>> Four pads here.

25:25

>> Burton Catage is a former Air Force

25:27

colonel who founded aerospace company

25:29

Launch on Demand in 2018. The amount of

25:32

support that they came back with was

25:34

amazing.

25:35

>> He's now developing a $600 million

25:37

commercial spaceport in this remote part

25:40

of the Dominican Republic.

25:41

>> The ecosystem at Cape Canaveral more or

25:43

less has grown out of ad hoc. Okay. It

25:46

has it was not necessarily built with

25:49

the idea for the commercial space

25:50

industry. The entire market has changed.

25:52

You know, the space industry is

25:53

something on the order last time I

25:55

checked it was like $650 billion. um

25:58

it's supposed to be over a trillion um

26:01

in by 2030, maybe a trillion and a half.

26:04

And some people are even saying that's

26:05

pretty low. [music]

26:07

>> To relieve the bottleneck in launching

26:08

the growing number of satellites we

26:10

need, the US has to have more

26:12

spaceports, [music]

26:13

creating a business opportunity for

26:15

companies like Launch on Demand. Right

26:17

now, there are over a dozen US

26:19

spaceports across the country [music]

26:21

and just one internationally, Rocket

26:23

Labs launch site in New Zealand. I think

26:26

the United States from the space economy

26:28

perspective is in a position of extreme

26:30

opportunity and they are in a growth

26:32

phase. Ryan Brookart is a senior partner

26:34

at McKenzie who focuses on global

26:37

aerospace, defense [music] and space

26:39

companies.

26:40

>> I think the infrastructure in in the US

26:42

is becoming a bit stretched, right? If

26:43

you look at our launch sites, we're

26:45

launching, you know, every day or a

26:47

couple times a day from some of these

26:48

launch sites. There's a huge backlog of,

26:50

you know, US companies looking to launch

26:52

things into space and to be able to

26:55

accomplish their mission and get the get

26:56

the return that their investors are

26:57

looking for.

26:58

>> Right now, uh, I've heard that it's

27:01

about three-year waiting list to get a

27:03

satellite on orbit.

27:04

>> What accounts for that demand ramping up

27:06

so dramatically? And do you expect it's

27:08

going to continue to increase that much?

27:10

>> Well, in order to have global coverage

27:11

of the entire Earth, you have to have a

27:14

lot of satellites. Right now, there's

27:15

about 14,000

27:18

satellites in orbit. The FCC tracks all

27:20

the number of satellites that are going

27:22

to be submitted, and they're looking at

27:24

over a 100,000 satellites by 2030. So,

27:26

if we got 14,000 satellites, and it's

27:28

2026 already, and we have to launch

27:31

100,000 satellites by 2030.

27:34

That's a lot of launches that have to

27:36

happen between now and then. That may

27:38

explain the need for more launch sites,

27:40

but where

27:41

>> the goal for a rocket is to get to space

27:43

in the most efficient and effective way

27:45

possible. And engineers spend hundreds

27:49

of millions of dollars trying to finesse

27:51

what does that efficiency look like? But

27:52

eventually comes down to two things. How

27:55

much fuel can I put on the rocket? And

27:57

how much mass can I put on top of the

27:59

lift? So they're always playing with

28:00

that equation. Well, the geography has

28:04

an important part in here this because

28:06

in order to achieve escape velocity, a

28:08

rocket has to achieve 17,500 mph.

28:12

And the Earth closer to the equator

28:15

spins faster than it does at the poles.

28:18

What that translates into is you could

28:20

put more satellites up with less of a

28:23

smaller rocket. And so the goal of most

28:26

spaceports is to try and get to the as

28:28

close to the equator as possible. But

28:30

why does it take me to Dominican

28:31

Republic?

28:32

>> So what we ended up doing about 3 years

28:35

ago was doing a technical feasibility

28:36

study. We looked at everything we could

28:38

possibly look at. But as we did our

28:40

analysis, it started shifting to

28:42

paradales which has a relatively low

28:45

population and because it's on the

28:47

coastline and because people don't live

28:49

in the water, we have almost a straight

28:51

shot to orbit without hazarding the

28:54

public.

28:55

>> So if something goes wrong, it goes in

28:56

the ocean.

28:56

>> That's right. So that's why a lot of our

28:58

space ports are built next to the coast

29:00

is not necessarily because of the water.

29:02

It's because of the low population. It's

29:04

not really about whether the rocket

29:05

explodes or whether the rocket gets to

29:07

orbit. It's all about public safety.

29:09

>> Safety is no small concern in the new

29:11

space race as we saw just last month

29:14

when Jeff Bezos Blue Origin rocket test

29:16

blew up in spectacular fashion. and

29:18

liftoff.

29:19

>> Along with the expected trillion dollar

29:21

IPO of Elon Musk's SpaceX, it's a

29:24

reminder of just how public the failures

29:26

and successes can be in this business

29:28

and how big the players are.

29:30

>> The pad will be 2 miles to the coast.

29:32

>> That's one reason that Burton would

29:33

rather work with them than against them.

29:36

>> You are though competitive with SpaceX,

29:37

right? Most of the feedback that we have

29:39

gotten from all the commercial operators

29:41

is they would like the ground

29:43

infrastructure to be more responsive to

29:45

be more not we launch on this day we

29:48

launch on readiness and right now the

29:50

infrastructure and the processes are not

29:53

designed that way. So right now um

29:56

statutoily the office of commercial

29:59

space has 6 months to review it and give

30:01

you a decision. We're going to give you

30:03

a license in 45 days. That's very

30:05

attractive. We don't look at ourselves

30:07

as competitors to the rocket customers.

30:10

We look at us as enablers.

30:11

>> What's the attraction for investors and

30:13

what's been your experience so far on

30:15

people stepping up?

30:16

>> There is a large appetite right now for

30:19

space. This is kind of like the early,

30:20

you know, early internet age, if you

30:23

will. The problem is there's not very

30:25

many investment opportunities or good

30:27

investment opportunities to get into

30:29

space. The first phase of the spaceport

30:31

is going to be about $600 million of

30:33

investment. Um and uh the response that

30:35

we've gotten is has been really quite

30:37

significant.

30:39

>> As launch on demand prepares to break

30:41

ground later this year, a larger race is

30:44

already underway in Latin America. Space

30:47

infrastructure has become a [music] new

30:48

front in the US China rivalry.

30:51

>> China is aggressively making investments

30:55

in our hemisphere particularly in Latin

30:58

and South America. also partnerships

31:01

that they have made with Caribbean

31:03

nations to have aerospace applications,

31:08

satellite demonstrations,

31:10

civilian applications, also with

31:13

military application components to it.

31:16

>> A recent [music] report from the Select

31:17

Committee on the Chinese Communist Party

31:19

warned about China's growing space

31:22

footprint in the region, including more

31:24

than 10 satellite tracking stations.

31:27

Congresswoman Haley Stevens of Michigan

31:29

is a member of the committee.

31:31

>> This is a call to double down on the way

31:34

our system works and so we don't want to

31:36

be seeding ground to China. We don't

31:38

want to see them uh continuing to eat

31:42

our lunch uh with our neighbors and we

31:46

can win this race.

31:48

>> I guess you could look at it as a

31:49

marathon or maybe an ultramarathon, but

31:51

I don't see an end here. There is not a

31:53

clear finish line. Carrie Bingan is a

31:55

director of CSIS's Aerospace Security

31:58

Project.

31:59

>> Well, I thought what was really

32:00

interesting in the decades that we were

32:02

competing against the Soviet Union, so

32:05

much of what was happening in space, it

32:06

was fueled by government. I think what

32:08

you're seeing now, which really sets

32:10

this current era apart, is so much of

32:13

what's happening in space is commercial.

32:15

Over 80% of the satellites on orbit

32:17

today are commercial systems. a lot from

32:20

the United States, SpaceX, Starlink, but

32:23

many other countries are now players in

32:25

space. The technology is much more

32:28

distributed across the globe. Launch

32:31

costs are a lot cheaper. So, so any

32:33

country or even entity can put something

32:35

in orbit and much of that is now fueled

32:37

by private capital, not just taxpayer

32:40

dollars. China has ambitions to be the

32:43

world's space power.

32:46

their presence and their capabilities in

32:49

Latin America are part of that strategy.

32:52

They want access. They want influence.

32:54

They want to be able to band together

32:56

with these countries in bodies like the

32:59

United Nations to start shaping where

33:02

the standards are.

33:03

>> We started this program well before

33:05

people realized that China was, you

33:08

know, very interested in taking over

33:09

real estate in Latin America. as we have

33:13

gotten the Trump administration and

33:15

President Abbena's administration

33:17

together, they are aligned on what has

33:21

been called, you know, the the pivot to

33:23

the Western Hemisphere. So, I would call

33:25

the spaceport more of an artifact of the

33:28

decision to pivot to the Western

33:30

Hemisphere rather than, you know,

33:32

anything else. And we emphasize this is

33:35

run by a US company that is designed to

33:38

be commercial that is complimementaryary

33:41

not competitive with the spaceports in

33:43

the United States and we work very very

33:45

hard to make sure that they understand

33:47

we're a friend not a foe and so so much

33:50

so that when we have talked to the

33:53

president of we said we want to adopt

33:56

the US safety standards for launch and

33:59

re-entry and he he agreed and so if If

34:03

you're a customer that launches from the

34:04

United States, the standard will be the

34:06

same if you launch from the Dominican

34:07

Republic.

34:08

>> We have holes. We never thought that

34:10

missiles would be launched across the

34:12

southern hemisphere. So, we did not put

34:14

a lot of radars down in South America or

34:17

in Africa, for example. But we're

34:19

realizing we need to have coverage

34:21

[music] of of everything that's

34:23

happening in orbit. We're seeing China,

34:26

we're seeing Russia maneuver satellites

34:28

much more frequently.

34:30

Are they benign or do they have a hidden

34:32

weapon? Um, we don't know, but we know

34:35

that they're testing these kind of

34:36

capabilities and so you need to be able

34:38

to monitor that.

34:38

>> Are there restrictions on who can use

34:40

your spaceport?

34:41

>> We want to stay in line with US foreign

34:46

policy. And what do I mean by that? So

34:49

even though I'm a US company operating

34:51

in Dominican Republic, I need to make

34:53

sure that my host country, the US in

34:56

this case, is aligned with what I'm

34:57

doing. [music]

34:58

So if I sort of, you know, went kind of

35:01

off the off the beaten path, I would

35:03

essentially be cutting myself up from

35:05

the largest commercial market in the

35:06

world, which doesn't make much sense.

35:09

Launch on demands being aligned with the

35:11

US government on the geopolitics of

35:13

[music] space infrastructure in Latin

35:15

America is important to CatLage. But

35:17

make no mistake, at its heart, this US

35:20

spaceport company is a business, one

35:23

that Called believes will be a [music]

35:24

good one. So, we estimate that by about

35:27

the 10-year point after we hit full

35:29

operations, we'll be generating about $8

35:30

billion. And so, this will be the first

35:33

private [music] revenue generating

35:35

spaceport in the world. And the reason

35:37

why is was because we're leveraging all

35:39

the technology that's been invented.

35:41

We're bringing that here.

35:43

>> Coming up, from the Dominican Republic

35:45

to Bolivia for a look at another Latin

35:48

American country chasing US investment

35:50

with a president trying to shake things

35:52

up.

36:06

This is a story of rebranding a country.

36:09

Rodrigo Paz was elected president of

36:11

Bolivia in November, marking a major

36:14

shift for the country following two

36:15

decades of socialist rule. PA has a

36:18

mandate of economic reform, closer

36:20

relations with the United States, and

36:22

increased foreign investment. But as our

36:25

colleague David Guro found out, ideas

36:28

and execution are sometimes very

36:30

different things.

36:34

The Solar Deuni in Bolivia is the

36:37

country's crown jewel. It's a sprawling

36:39

salt flat on the Andian Alta Plano. So

36:42

large, it's visible from space. We are

36:45

at u 3,650

36:49

m [music] above sea level, my friend.

36:51

>> Very high.

36:52

>> Very high.

36:54

[music]

36:54

>> Bolivia's economy benefits from the

36:56

tourists who flock to the Solar from all

36:58

over the world. What the country's

37:00

leadership is banking on is what's

37:02

underneath this snow-like layer of salt.

37:05

>> So the lithium mining [music] just down

37:08

on the salt. The idea of the government

37:10

was like do some manufacturing batteries

37:13

or electric cars things like that but uh

37:17

you know it takes a long time of course

37:18

and also we need some technology from

37:21

outside you know

37:22

>> we're standing on top of one of the

37:24

largest lithium resources in the world

37:26

[music] and President Rodrigo P says if

37:29

the country can develop these reserves

37:31

it will transform Bolivia's struggling

37:33

economy improving the lives of some 12

37:35

million Bolivians.

37:37

>> Peru Peru, Bolivia, and Chile

37:39

collectively hold the largest

37:41

concentration of minerals in the world.

37:44

Peru generates $50 billion annually.

37:48

Chile generates $65 billion annually.

37:56

Bolivia

37:57

>> Bolivia possesses the highest

37:59

concentration of minerals of the three.

38:01

Yet we generate only 6 billion per year.

38:06

The question is why do we choose to be

38:08

poor?

38:10

>> After he was elected last October,

38:12

President P signaled Bolivia is open for

38:14

business. But as we discovered, there is

38:17

a disconnect between his rhetoric and

38:19

the realities on the ground. We arrived

38:22

in Le Paz to sit down with the president

38:24

as violent protests erupted across the

38:26

country, shut down parts of the city. We

38:29

got the go-ahead to climb through

38:31

barricades, part of a police perimeter

38:33

that protected Bolivia's Parliament

38:34

building and presidential palace.

38:37

We were told to wait in a cafe on a

38:40

mostly empty plaza.

38:42

And as the hours ticked by, we could

38:45

hear protesters just a few blocks away

38:47

throwing dynamite.

38:51

Tear gas hung in the air.

38:55

President Paw, we learned, was locked in

38:57

tense negotiations. Just before

38:59

midnight, we got word from one of his

39:01

adviserss the president would have to

39:03

postpone [music]

39:04

our interview. One week later, we

39:06

finally got our chance to talk with him.

39:08

It's been a busy week.

39:10

>> Three weeks.

39:11

>> Three weeks. Many of these protesters

39:13

are calling on you to resign, to step

39:15

down, and I'm wondering if there's a

39:17

point at which that will become

39:18

something that you would consider

39:23

>> in 5 years from now. When we conclude

39:25

our administration, Bolivia will be an

39:28

advanced nation grounded in a modernity

39:31

made necessary by new institutions,

39:39

a frontal assault on corruption, a

39:42

controlled fiscal deficit, and a clear

39:44

path towards growth within an open

39:47

economy governed by clear laws.

39:53

Moreover, it will be a country where

39:55

racial, regional, and cultural

39:56

differences are not exploited to fuel

39:59

political conflict. Where I hope I will

40:01

leave behind a government characterized

40:03

by pluralistic participation.

40:11

At a precarious moment for his

40:13

presidency, Rodri Pas has gotten public

40:15

[music] support from the Trump

40:16

administration. Secretary of State Marco

40:19

Rubio said the United States stands

40:21

squarely in support of Bolivia's

40:22

government. [music] Trump and his team

40:24

have embraced PZ's new vision for

40:26

Bolivia as they've welcomed wins by

40:28

other center-right politicians in Latin

40:30

America.

40:32

Trump

40:33

>> I met with President Trump. There is a

40:36

relationship regarding the geopolitical

40:38

and geoeconomic vision on the

40:40

continental level. Bolivia's vision is

40:44

very clear. Pragmatic is everything that

40:47

is functional for the development of our

40:49

economy of the economy of the people. We

40:52

will be seated so that we can

40:53

collaborate and be part of a global

40:55

vision. [applause]

40:57

>> I think that investors in general should

41:00

have the patience to follow the

41:02

situation and see, you know, how well he

41:06

pulls it off.

41:07

>> Hans Humes has spent his career

41:09

investing in frontier markets. He's the

41:11

chairman and CEO of Greylock Capital.

41:14

the markets generally give a pretty

41:19

positive tailwind

41:21

um when a right of center government

41:23

comes in. So getting the enthusiasm

41:25

putting it out there saying we're open

41:27

for investment great and then tapping

41:29

the markets when they did raising a

41:31

billion dollars I think you know was a

41:33

good signal. Everybody knows the Bolivia

41:35

story. It's an incredibly,

41:38

you know, commodity-wise,

41:40

it's kind of hard not to see it as a

41:44

really easy place to make money. It's

41:45

just the sort of the ethnic tensions

41:47

there that have always existed. And the

41:50

fact that they have a tradition of going

41:51

out in the streets, there's been a lot

41:53

of turnover of governments and as we're

41:54

seeing now, it's pretty easy to sort of

41:57

choke the economy.

41:59

>> Doing business in Bolivia has not

42:01

[music] been easy. And there's been talk

42:02

of harnessing its lithium for decades.

42:05

Today, a lithium plant owned by the

42:07

state is running at [music] just 15% of

42:10

capacity, and contracts that Chinese and

42:12

Russian companies signed with PA's

42:14

predecessor haven't been ratified by

42:15

Bolivia's Congress. In the near term,

42:18

Bolivia wants to boost tourism [music]

42:20

as a source of revenue, but the

42:22

longerterm vision is to do more with its

42:25

minerals.

42:26

>> The country's never been closed for

42:27

business, right? uh there there's always

42:29

been uh foreign investors coming in and

42:32

there's always been the ability to do

42:35

business but there was always

42:36

difficulties with the administration.

42:39

>> Jorge Chow is a senior partner at the

42:41

law firm Dentons based in La Paz and he

42:44

[music] spends a lot of his time working

42:45

with foreign investors on deals

42:47

involving Bolivia's natural resources.

42:50

foreign investors are are a little weary

42:52

and and and concerned right that their

42:54

rights won't be respected right and they

42:57

won't be able to carry out the project

42:59

in the terms that they that they want.

43:01

One of the main things uh in in some

43:04

strategic se sectors was that you needed

43:06

to be in an agreement with the

43:07

government and to the extent that you

43:10

weren't able to um

43:14

have a security that the government was

43:15

going to actually you know comply with

43:18

their side of the agreement that that

43:20

was that was a complicated situation. if

43:22

the government had too much of a say,

43:25

right? And and and you were not in a

43:27

position to, you know, uh make your

43:31

rights uh upheld, then of course that

43:34

gives everyone pause. The fact that the

43:36

Bolivia left the the exit convention and

43:40

uh was reluctant to enter into

43:42

international arbitration agreements,

43:45

that gave a lot of investors pause.

43:47

>> What needs to happen over the course of

43:49

the next year? for President P has a

43:51

5-year term, but uh for Bolivia to get

43:53

on track in the way that he wants it to,

43:55

what needs to happen in in a year's

43:57

time,

43:57

>> they need to see results of some sort,

43:59

right? So, some of those results have

44:01

already been seen, right? Uh we need to

44:04

stabilize the economy. [music]

44:06

>> To do that, Bolivia has turned to the

44:08

International Monetary Fund. It's in

44:11

negotiations for a $3 billion package

44:14

that P says would go towards social

44:16

organizations, entrepreneurship, and

44:18

economic development. [music]

44:20

But just 6 months into President P's

44:22

term, many Bolivians seem to be running

44:24

out of patience. Protests have followed

44:27

his decision to cut fuel subsidies. And

44:29

with inflation at 14% as recently as

44:32

April, the pressure has mounted. But the

44:35

calls for PA to step down go beyond

44:37

economics. Some opposition groups have

44:40

sought to force him from office

44:41

entirely, and the blockades they've

44:43

erected are now causing shortages of

44:45

food, gasoline, and medical supplies.

44:49

Do you see any missteps, things he could

44:51

have done differently or should have

44:53

done differently?

44:53

>> Pulling away subsidies, it's a uh it's

44:57

the right thing to do.

45:00

Um but it's a wrong thing to do if you

45:02

don't manage it well. One of the

45:05

problems that you see in a lot of these

45:07

countries, whether it's Ecuador,

45:10

Bolivia, is, you know, you want to head

45:13

off people going into the street. So

45:16

maybe there he should have

45:21

tried to have a bit of a negotiation on

45:25

the timing of removing subsidies, slow

45:30

walking it. He probably should have

45:32

recognized that stylistically he might

45:35

have wanted to do a Malay, but

45:38

practically speaking, he didn't have,

45:42

you know, he didn't have the national

45:45

support um that Malay did.

45:49

I imagine there are investors outside

45:51

the country who are watching what's

45:53

unfolding in Bolivia and wondering how

45:55

much has changed if it's still status

45:58

quo that there are protests and

45:59

demonstrations and overarching

46:01

uncertainty. What would you say to those

46:03

investors or those prospective investors

46:05

about what Bolivia is like today and how

46:07

welcoming Bolivia is of outside

46:09

investment?

46:13

We were promised 20 years of the

46:15

possibility of becoming a Switzerland.

46:18

That was the promise made 20 years ago.

46:22

20 years later, they have left behind a

46:24

shattered economy, stripped of the

46:27

natural resources such as hydrocarbons

46:29

that we would otherwise export.

46:33

>> We possess abundant hydrocarbon

46:36

reserves. Yet they have left us without

46:38

the necessary investments and without

46:40

the security required to ensure that

46:43

those wishing to invest in Bolivia find

46:46

clear rules and laws during this

46:48

transition. Laws that would foster an

46:51

investment safe environment in Bolivia.

46:56

>> President P is pushing for changes to

46:58

Bolivia's legal framework to make the

47:00

country more businessfriendly. [music]

47:02

He's still making his pitch to the

47:04

Bolivian people and also to outside

47:06

investors. The country just held its

47:08

first dollar denominated bond sale in

47:10

almost 5 years. What would it take for

47:13

you personally to invest in Bolivia at

47:16

this point in time?

47:16

>> We own some of the bonds. I mean, we're

47:18

already in there. We're bond guys. We're

47:20

Yeah, I'm not going to buy a lithium

47:21

mine. I have friends who might be, you

47:22

know, I just wouldn't know what to do

47:24

with it. But, um, yeah, I think the

47:25

riskreward now it's tricky. I'm not

47:28

going to put 50% of the portfolio in it,

47:30

but I think it's a good risk return.

47:32

We've had a lot of bad headlines. I'm

47:35

willing to keep the focus there cuz the

47:38

macro story is a good one.

47:42

>> That does it for us here at Wall Street

47:43

Week. I'm David Weston. See you next

47:45

week for more stories of capitalism.

Interactive Summary

This episode of Wall Street Week covers three distinct topics: the geopolitical and economic pressures facing the US dollar, the impact of artificial intelligence on the publishing and content creation industry, and the emerging space economy and its intersection with US-China rivalry in Latin America. Additionally, it highlights Bolivia's economic reform efforts under its new president, assessing the risks and opportunities for foreign investors in a volatile landscape.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts