HomeVideos

DOJ Letter Reveals Why You're Not Getting Hired

Now Playing

DOJ Letter Reveals Why You're Not Getting Hired

Transcript

429 segments

0:00

And we are going to forget about this

0:01

one for today. We are going to get to

0:03

work. We're going to start to get those

0:04

numbers. They can't get an interview.

0:07

They cannot get an interview. So,

0:09

there's something going on here.

0:11

Yesterday, a mailman shows up to my

0:13

house and they have a letter to drop

0:16

off. It's certified mail. Now, usually

0:18

that's not good news. The letter was

0:21

from the Department of Justice. It was

0:23

about the discrimination charge I filed

0:25

against Figma. The letter said, "Yeah,

0:28

we got it and we don't care, so we're

0:30

not going to take it forward." Which is

0:32

confusing because just yesterday there

0:35

was a tweet by Har Dylan of the

0:37

Department of Justice, the same entity

0:39

that sent me this letter, saying they

0:41

are rooting out on institutions that

0:42

disproportionately hire H-1Bs as opposed

0:45

to American workers. Same department,

0:48

same enforcement arm, very different

0:50

messaging between what you see on

0:51

Twitter in the hype cycle and what

0:53

they're actually doing or not doing. So

0:55

today we're going to read the letter,

0:57

look at the law, talk about why there's

0:58

this disconnect between what Hermit

1:00

Dylan is tweeting and what her

1:02

institution is actually doing. And I'm

1:04

going to give you some strategies on how

1:06

you can help. Let's go through the

1:08

letter. The salient points are right in

1:10

the opening volley here. This is from

1:13

the immigrant and employee rights

1:14

section of the Department of Justice.

1:16

and they say, "I alleged a violation of

1:19

the anti-discrimination provision of the

1:21

Immigration and Nationality Act, section

1:24

8, subsection 1324B. Based on the

1:28

investigation, we are dismissing your

1:30

charge and will not file a complaint

1:32

with the Office of the Chief

1:33

Administrative Hearing Officer. So, we

1:36

heard you. We're just not going to look

1:38

into it." I have my email up right here

1:41

so I can get through the dates. I

1:42

applied to Figma on July 29th and the

1:46

rejection email landed August 14th. I

1:50

filed this IER complaint on August 15th,

1:53

the day after receiving the rejection

1:55

email. And I want to talk a little bit

1:57

about the qualifications for this job.

2:00

This was for a software engineering

2:02

manager job because the elephant in the

2:04

room is going to be, well, Dr. J, you

2:05

just weren't qualified and they just

2:06

tossed you out. Let's walk through it.

2:08

So it was for an engineering manager

2:11

posting. The requirement was 2 years of

2:13

experience in engineering leadership. By

2:16

the point I applied, I had four. Not

2:19

only four, I was currently when I

2:21

applied a director at American Express,

2:22

responsible for the work of 100 software

2:24

engineers. And prior to that, I was

2:28

senior software engineering manager at

2:30

Anderil, which is like the hottest

2:32

defense tech company right now. Well

2:34

qualified on all of the tech, mostly

2:35

front-end stack, really my bread and

2:37

butter. I've been doing this for over a

2:39

decade now and I received no email back

2:41

in the inter room. I didn't receive a

2:44

call with the hiring manager. Radio

2:46

silence other than the automated

2:48

rejection email 2 weeks later. So, this

2:50

isn't an HR complaint. That's not what I

2:52

did when I filed with the DOJ. This is a

2:55

federal immigration related accusation

2:58

of a large company. It's part of our

3:00

discrimination law. So in the letter

3:02

remember it referenced of the

3:04

immigration and nationality act section

3:06

8 subsection 1324b

3:09

and that section covers citizenship

3:12

status and national origin

3:13

discrimination. That statute is far

3:16

narrower than most people think and that

3:18

is very important to understand. So who

3:20

is Har Dylan and why should we care

3:22

about what she tweets? Well, she is a

3:24

bigwig at the Department of Justice. She

3:26

is the assistant attorney general for

3:28

civil rights. She is a Republican, or at

3:31

least she calls herself that publicly.

3:33

And she made waves on a lot of

3:36

conservative media, including Tucker

3:38

Carlson's show before she had the

3:40

position, saying about how she was

3:42

really going to crack down on H-1B abuse

3:44

in this country. And if anything, H-1B

3:46

abuse has gotten worse. And the current

3:48

administration, Har Dylan included,

3:50

haven't really done much about it. I

3:52

mean, if you work in tech, you've seen

3:54

it before where you apply to these jobs

3:56

and you get rejected same day, two weeks

3:58

later, radio silence, you're

4:00

wellqualified for the position,

4:02

overqualified even, and you just don't

4:04

hear anything back. You don't even get a

4:05

recruiter screen where they kind of do

4:08

the dance with you to make it seem like

4:09

they're considering you, but they're not

4:11

really considering you. Not even that

4:13

level level of effort, just an automated

4:15

rejection. I'm not alone in this because

4:17

I know a number of engineers. It's

4:19

growing it seems like every month that

4:21

are elite engineers. They have worked at

4:24

very high caliber tech outfits including

4:27

fang companies, including AI companies

4:30

that got laid off. And it's not that

4:32

they can't get another competitive job

4:34

that's highaying like the one that they

4:36

got laid off from. They can't get an

4:38

interview. They cannot get an interview.

4:41

So there's something going on here. So,

4:43

Department of Justice isn't making a

4:45

meaningful impact on boots on the ground

4:47

in our industry or in other industries

4:50

for that matter, but they're tweeting

4:51

about it. Okay? They're tweeting instead

4:53

of actually doing anything about it,

4:54

which seems like a trend with the

4:56

current president, the current

4:57

administration is they tweet a lot and

5:00

they actually do very little for the

5:02

American citizen. Harit Dylan tweets

5:04

here. It is deeply problematic that

5:06

federal funding flows to institutions

5:08

that disproportionately hire H-1B visa

5:11

workers over American workers. The

5:13

Justice Department will continue to root

5:15

out this problem and protect employment

5:17

civil rights of Americans. Really, Har,

5:20

it's problematic. What does that even

5:22

mean? I hate that word. It's

5:24

problematic. So, there's not even a

5:25

strong stance here. She's just saying we

5:28

kind of don't like what's going on and

5:30

hey, we're going to do something about

5:31

it. What are you going to do? When are

5:33

you going to do it? How are you going to

5:34

track the results of what you're going

5:36

to do? This is the problem not only with

5:38

our current administration, but with the

5:40

government fighting for the rights of

5:42

American citizens lately is there is no

5:45

accountability. It's all these handwavy

5:47

tweets, this grandiose language. But

5:50

none of this would fly in a corporation.

5:52

Can you imagine? Imagine that Har Dylan

5:55

is working at IBM. Let's imagine for a

5:58

minute that Harmy Dylan is working at

6:01

Nvidia. Okay, she's up there in the

6:03

company. She's responsible for a new AI

6:06

kind of machine learning chip that

6:08

they're developing. And Jensen goes to

6:10

her in one of his famous large group

6:12

staff meetings. He calls on her. He

6:13

says, "Har, what you got cooking for our

6:16

new X series of chips that you're

6:18

responsible for?" And Harit says, "Well,

6:21

the process is problematic. It's

6:24

problematic and we're going to do

6:25

everything we can to resolve it." Do you

6:27

think she'd get canned? If I was Jensen,

6:29

I'd fire her. I know Jensen would fire

6:31

somebody like that because that does not

6:32

fly in the corporate world. It's when

6:34

are you going to do it? How are you

6:35

going to do it? How are you going to

6:36

measure it? And how are you going to

6:38

tell if it's a success or not? And

6:39

instead, we get handwavy tweets about

6:41

it's problematic. We don't like it. And

6:44

hey, we're going to do something about

6:45

it. It gets me pissed off. That's why

6:48

I'm wearing the Scorched Earth hat

6:50

today. You can grab that abandon online.

6:52

That's my buddy's hat company. Go get

6:54

one of these hats. I love it. It was

6:55

perfect for this video, so I had to wear

6:57

it. Back to it. Despite that tweet, I'll

6:59

give everyone a fair shot. So, I looked

7:01

into the numbers, and we don't have

7:02

exact numbers on this, but we do have

7:04

rough, directionally correct numbers

7:06

that really tell us the whole picture of

7:07

what's going on. So, we estimate that

7:10

Figma grew by about 600 employees

7:13

throughout 2025. That estimate might be

7:16

a little high, so we'll call it 500.

7:18

Then, I looked into how many H-1B

7:20

petitions they filed, which we do

7:22

actually have very good records on. They

7:24

filed 46. And you want to know how many

7:28

of those were approved? 45. Only only

7:31

one got denied. Only one got denied. Um,

7:34

so I assume that what went on for this

7:37

role and other roles is they did a labor

7:39

market test, which is what they call

7:40

when they have a fake posting where they

7:42

never intend on hiring an American

7:43

citizen or giving an American citizen a

7:45

chance at any of these roles. They

7:47

solicited applications. Maybe they

7:48

called one or two and then they

7:51

sponsored a foreign worker to take the

7:53

position. And maybe that's not what

7:55

happened in this circumstance. Maybe you

7:57

think I'm just sour grapes. But I think

8:00

the stats would bear me out. I have

8:01

great experience. I have tons of

8:03

experience. I was well qualified, highly

8:06

qualified for that role. It was

8:07

directionally aligned with what I was

8:09

doing at the time and what I was

8:10

targeting during that job hunt. By the

8:12

best numbers we're able to find, Figma

8:14

filled 25% of their jobs with H-1B

8:18

sponsored workers last year. So, there's

8:20

already a one in4 shot that you applied

8:22

for one of those roles. I don't know,

8:24

maybe, maybe not. But the crazy thing is

8:27

to me is that with those numbers, with a

8:28

one in four shot, they didn't even look

8:30

into it. They just said, "We're just

8:32

we're not going to look into it. We

8:33

don't care. We don't care enough to pick

8:36

up the phone and call Figma and be like,

8:38

"Hey, are you doing anything bad over

8:39

there?" Nothing. Nothing. just decided

8:41

we're we're all good. We're going to

8:42

dismiss it. Here's where the power

8:44

actually shows up and here's how you can

8:47

fight for the American worker. The

8:49

system doesn't move because something

8:52

feels unfair. The system moves when

8:55

legal thresholds are met sometimes. In

8:58

reality, it's a lot different. All of

9:00

these politicians, including Harit

9:01

Dylan, that claim to be fighting for the

9:03

American worker, including Donald Trump,

9:04

who flipped off a factory worker

9:06

recently, which is really just an

9:08

encapsulation of how our government

9:10

feels about the working class lately.

9:12

Really, what these people run on is not

9:14

legal thresholds. It's not legal

9:16

thresholds. It's not unfair. It's

9:18

publicity, right? It's publicity. How is

9:21

Harat sort of structuring her persona?

9:24

She's going on Tucker Carlson is a

9:26

talking head. She's tweeting. She's

9:29

trying to get likes. She's trying to get

9:30

retweets. And so these people run on

9:33

publicity. They run on public sentiment.

9:35

And so what you can do to help to help

9:38

yourself and to help the American middle

9:40

class, the American worker, is you can

9:42

file these petitions every time you

9:44

apply to a company during your next job

9:47

hunt that is known to sponsor a high

9:50

number of H-1Bs. Not, you know, hey, we

9:52

need a rocket scientist that does this

9:54

specialized thing to come over. You you

9:55

know what I'm talking about? like the

9:56

American Expresses, the JP Morgan

9:59

Chasees of the world. Whenever you apply

10:01

for a company that has high H-1B

10:04

stats, what you need to do is a couple

10:06

of things. You need to file with the IER

10:10

department of the US Department of

10:11

Justice, just like I've done.

10:12

Eventually, that resource drain will

10:14

make it very, very painful. This would

10:16

had to be sent by certified mail. I

10:17

moved so it had to be sent to a new

10:19

address. They had to tie up, let's see

10:22

who the person was, Varda Hussein's time

10:25

with looking into this. That's the

10:27

acting deputy special counsel on this

10:29

case. We need to tie them up with an

10:31

influx of process. If they won't do

10:33

their job, we need to make them do their

10:35

job. The other thing you can do is what

10:37

I'm doing on this channel, and I

10:38

encourage you to do the same in whatever

10:40

capacity you you are able to do, is

10:43

speak up about this publicly. Even if

10:46

you have a faceless Twitter account or a

10:48

faceless YouTube channel where you post

10:50

content, you need to be tweeting at Har

10:52

Dylan. You need to be tweeting at the

10:54

Department of Justice. You need to be

10:55

tweeting at pus about this. We need to

10:58

get a critical mass going so that we

10:59

shape public sentiment to get people to

11:01

realize that this is a toxic situation

11:05

for everybody involved. As I've spoken

11:07

about in my other videos, it's obviously

11:10

toxic for the American worker because it

11:12

drives our wages down. If I was from a

11:15

less prosperous country and I wanted to

11:17

improve my life, I would do everything

11:18

in my power to come to America. This

11:20

fault does not lie on the actual

11:22

employees coming over here to the

11:24

country. I want to be very clear on

11:26

that. But in doing so, in doing so, in

11:29

improving your situation, moving to a

11:30

better country because the US is the

11:32

best country in the world. You can fight

11:34

me about that in the comments, but it's

11:35

absolutely true. I wouldn't want to live

11:37

in any other country than the US. People

11:39

come here to make a better life for

11:41

themselves, but they are willing to

11:45

take less, accept less

11:48

when they when they come here. And if

11:49

they're willing to do that, if you have

11:51

the employee whose nationality, whose

11:53

status is tied to a job, that's an

11:58

inherently unhealthy power dynamic where

12:00

the boss can say, "You got to work 80

12:02

hours a week. You got to work weekends.

12:03

You got to work holidays because if you

12:05

don't and I fire you, you lose your

12:08

health insurance entirely. There's no

12:10

safety net for you. And if you don't

12:11

find a new job in that scramble period,

12:13

you got to go back. You got to go back.

12:15

The dream is over for you. That's

12:17

inherently exploitative towards H-1Bs.

12:19

If we bring an H-1B into this country,

12:22

we should support them and give them

12:24

everything they need to be successful.

12:26

But instead, they're treated like

12:28

secondass citizens and tasked with

12:31

immense amount of work. impossible

12:33

deadlines and just exploited, exploited,

12:36

abused. That's the best word I saw for

12:38

it at AMX is abuse. Abuse of those

12:40

people. And then on the American citizen

12:41

site, it drives down wages. And then all

12:43

of a sudden there becomes an expectation

12:44

that hey, you you are on call 24/7 or

12:47

you you have to work weekends too

12:48

because if not, we will just sponsor an

12:50

H-1B because the Department of Justice,

12:52

the president is not imputing really any

12:56

penalty for doing so. A couple of you

12:58

have called out in the comments that

12:59

there's a $100,000

13:01

H1B fee being instituted, but look look

13:04

into that. We'll do another video on

13:05

that. That is not like the slam dunk win

13:07

for this system that you think it is.

13:08

It's a onetime fee. There's more to come

13:10

on this story. It's not over. You see,

13:12

during that period of job hunting in

13:15

July and August, this was, by the way,

13:18

at AMX when I was told that one of my

13:20

teams would move to India and I would

13:22

have to lay off the American workers on

13:24

the American team that would be replaced

13:25

by an India team. I was given no choice

13:28

in the matter. This is when I started

13:29

applying to jobs on that job hunt. I

13:31

applied to a lot and four of them

13:34

including Figma were companies that had

13:36

very high H-1B to American citizen

13:38

ratios. So I filed three of these other

13:42

reports. So we'll see as they come back.

13:44

This is the first one I've got. We'll

13:45

see as they come back. I'll do an update

13:47

video on each and as uh help to the

13:51

Department of Justice because apparently

13:52

they can't do this. they're they're

13:53

incapable of pulling numbers of doing

13:55

the research like we are on this

13:57

channel. As a sign of good faith for

13:59

working with the Department of Justice,

14:01

I will begin to compile numbers for

14:03

those companies and I'll do a video on

14:05

each company. do a video on each company

14:07

that they dismiss a case for to help

14:10

them out because I agree Harmy Dylan

14:12

this is problematic and I am an engineer

14:16

so I build things and I do things in the

14:18

world and I've worked in a corporate

14:20

environment for a long time so I know

14:23

that when I build things there are

14:24

metrics there are deliverables I'm on

14:26

the hook for it I'm not a gvy that can

14:28

just do whatever all day and just get

14:30

reelected based on a tweet so I am going

14:33

to dig into the research I am going to

14:35

do my job to get you those numbers to

14:36

get you those facts and figures on this

14:38

channel on h1bexposed.te

14:40

my website where I post H-1B figures for

14:44

companies that are obviously abusing the

14:45

system and we are going to forget about

14:47

this one for today. We are going to get

14:49

to work. We're going to start to get

14:50

those numbers. Please sign up for the

14:52

newsletter if you want these numbers in

14:53

your inbox. The link for that is below.

14:56

If you're not already subscribed to the

14:58

channel, lots more news coming on how

15:00

power flows in American tech and how to

15:03

leverage it to work for you. Please

15:05

subscribe. Click the bell to be

15:06

notified.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses the speaker's experience filing a discrimination charge against Figma with the Department of Justice (DOJ) after being rejected for a software engineering manager role despite being highly qualified. The DOJ dismissed the case, which the speaker contrasts with public statements from Assistant Attorney General Har Dylan about cracking down on H-1B visa abuse. The speaker presents data suggesting Figma filled a significant percentage of its roles with H-1B workers and criticizes the DOJ for inaction and vague rhetoric. The video concludes with strategies for American workers to fight perceived H-1B abuse by filing petitions and speaking publicly, highlighting the negative impacts of the current H-1B system on both American and H-1B workers.

Suggested questions

6 ready-made prompts