Joe Rogan Experience #2444 - Andrew Wilson
4913 segments
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
>> The Joe Rogan Experience.
>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
NIGHT. All day.
Prove me wrong type things, you know,
way before they change my mind.
>> Change my mind. What does Charlie What
did Charlie say? Prove me wrong or
something like that.
>> It It was something akin to that. My
understanding was that
essentially uh TPUSA ripped that idea
offered.
Yeah.
>> And then uh he would I think he feels a
lot of like responsibility for what
happened with Kirk because
>> is he the MSAD?
>> What's that?
>> Is he the
>> Is he the MSAD? Yeah, exactly.
[laughter] That's so funny.
>> I don't know. Let's You got You got
Candace's number. We can ask her. We can
ask her.
>> Kansas is getting uh she's getting
dragged on Twitter today because uh
she's like, "I' I've lived in
Connecticut. I've never seen this much
ice on trees and uh it's 30° out." And
everybody's like, "Yeah,
30 is freezing."
>> Yeah. [laughter] Yeah. It's so funny.
Ice on trees.
>> Do you see all the Miss Cleo memes?
>> It's Oh, it's so funny. You remember You
don't remember the Miss Cleo? Yeah. The
psychic. They keep on putting the Miss
Cleo memes out for Candace because she's
a psychic, you know.
>> That's hilarious. [laughter]
>> It is funny.
>> I think this lighter just [ __ ] the bed.
Can I borrow that other one? Thank you.
>> Yeah,
>> it's really funny.
>> Well, Candace has painted herself into a
weird corner where everything has to be
a wild conspiracy. Like, it has to be
Bridget Mcron's a man. Oh, yeah. Erica
Kirk killed Charlie. It h it has to like
one up the last one, you know.
>> Yeah. I I was It's really funny. He came
to the same conclusion that I did. So,
it's like I've seen those conspiracy
channels come up before
>> and then they they come up and they
crash out. And the reason is is because
like for her, I think she she had the
whole like um
uh she was involved with this, right?
She was involved intricately with with
Kirk. She knew him.
>> Yeah. And so that g gave a lot of
credibility to a lot of the things that
she was saying. But then once you start
moving back into like Mandela effect
stuff and and you know time travel and
this and that. Yeah. People are like ah
[laughter]
>> I mean you could do that if you're that
guy. If you're Art Bell, you know, if
you
>> Well, you know, but Belle I I I remember
I used to listen to Bill.
>> He's the goat on the wall over there.
>> You remember that intro? Boom.
Yeah. So he the kingdom of N.
>> Yeah. Yeah. I remember I remember
listening to him [snorts] uh for years
when I drive around with my dad and he
was a like it was a big deal and I
remember the very first episode I heard
from him was something about the Nim. It
was like
>> what's the Nim?
>> The Nim were like this guy called in. He
was a time traveler, [laughter]
>> right? And he came back in time because
his whole his his whole thing was like
he had to stop the weather patterns from
destroying the future because the Nim,
an alien race of grays, had come and
they were heating up the planet slowly
to change it to be the conditionals that
were necessary for them to then live on
the planet.
>> And you know, Art Bill, he's always
playing into it with the lunatics, you
know, and he's like,
>> "And does the CIA currently know that
you're there doing this?" You know,
[laughter]
the guy And the dude's just like, "Uh,
[laughter]
>> yeah, Art would give you all the rope."
>> Oh, yeah.
>> You call Art I'm a Werewolf.
Interesting.
>> Yeah.
>> Oh, you ever hear the Bigfoot episode?
>> No.
>> Oh my god. That's the funniest episode
you'll ever hear. So, Redneck calls into
Art Bell and talks about how he killed
Bigfoot and where he buried it. And the
guy has it's like I don't know if it was
early trolling like before trolling was
trolling but it was like this guy
>> he was like yeah you know me and Timmy
we we took him out back there we shot
him right in the chest twice and u there
was some youngans and they spread out a
little bit and then we you know we
packed up the Bigfoot and buried him in
the backyard you know and B's just like
and you said there was youngans.
[laughter]
>> The Bigfoot people are the weirdest.
Duncan Trussell and I went uh hunting
for Bigfoot once. We did this uh I used
to do this TV show for a while called
Joe Rogan Questions Everything. And I
would go like, "All right, tell me about
chemtrails, you know, and I go meet with
all the loons and all all the people
that are like really involved UFO,
anything like that." Yeah. And we went
and hung out with the Bigfoot people.
So, we went Bigfoot hunting for like two
days in the Pacific Northwest and talked
to all these people and
>> they're all like the same person. I just
said it's like a team of unfuckable
white guys.
>> It's like that's what you find. Like
these guys are just like they found
their calling. It's just like
>> looking for a mystery in the woods that
you'll never solve.
>> Well, the there was a guy I used to have
on your podcast and he was he was huge
for a long time and I think it still is.
It's a remember those missing cases?
>> Mhm.
>> Right. That was that's a big deal. And I
was always like anytime I heard anything
about that, I always was enthralled with
it because some of the stories were
demented. Yeah.
>> You know, like kids appearing 500 miles
away and all this.
>> But that guy always had you edged
because people would always go, "What do
you think's going on?"
>> You know, and he
>> What was that guy's name?
>> I can't I can't remember it, but he it
was like missing
>> Yeah.
>> 411.
>> Yeah. Missing 411.
>> He's I've seen him on Instagram or on
Twitter.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Wow. He But he'd got all the park
records, you know, and he started going
through and he was like, "Uh, there's
some really weird stuff going on here
for how many people are missing in
national parks."
>> There is. There is, but the reality is
if you die in the woods, you get
consumed pretty quick. That's the
reality. That's why you don't find
mountain lion skeletons. Mountain lions
are a real thing. I've never found a
dead mountain line skeleton in all the
times I've been hunting. Never. Not
once. You'll find uh elk bones. You
know, you'll find stuff like that.
>> I found some coyote coyote skeletons
before out in the Nevada desert.
>> But mountain lions are a real thing. You
very, very, very, very, very rarely find
a dead mountain lion.
>> Yeah.
>> And there's so many of them. Now, think
about how few people actually go like
hiking into the deep wilderness. Your
body just gets consumed.
>> Sure.
>> You know, there's so many animals that
come along, rats, all kinds of things.
Eat your bones.
>> Oh, yeah. It's a free meal.
>> Yeah. It's so easy.
>> And they can smell it for miles.
>> Sure. Bears.
>> Yeah.
>> Anywhere there's wild pigs and then then
it's over. Then there's nothing left.
>> Yeah. They can smell [snorts] that stuff
for miles.
>> But it's like people always want to
attach some crazy deeper weird, you
know, UFO Bigfoot meaning to it. It's
like no, it's you're in the wild and
nature has a whole plan for dead things
and it does a really good job of
>> I assume they don't last.
>> Not at all.
>> Well, that's the thing. If you live out
in the country, it's you see this all
the time. Uh, you know, raccoon will be
around getting in someone's trash.
They'll walk out. Bam. Raccoon's done.
They just go throw it in the bushes.
>> You don't need That's it.
>> That's it.
>> Problem problem solved.
>> Problem solved. And it disappears
quickly and the plants consume it. And
>> yeah,
>> that's it. It rots and things eat it.
>> Doesn't even take that long to rot.
>> It's pretty quick. It's pretty quick.
You ever seen like those timelapse
photos where they take a dead animal and
they let it sit there and you watch it
get consumed by maggots and it's very
quick. Yeah.
>> So, these poor people that go hiking,
you know, like if you go hiking and
you're by yourself and you break an
ankle and you're 15 miles in and you
don't have a compass and you're kind of
like roughly judging which hill you came
over and there's a lot of people that
just get ahead of themselves and they
really shouldn't be that far out there
and they just die. Happens all the time.
>> Yeah. You know, so like this idea that
it's like there's you could if you look
at all the data and you try to find a
pattern to it and you start imagining
that there's some grand conspiracy,
there's some watcher in the woods that's
consuming people, some demon that's out
there, you can you get pretty kooky with
your
>> I think the popular theory is it's wild
men.
>> Oh, wild men.
>> Wild men.
>> Oh, like humans.
>> Yeah. Well, or some human variant that
are
>> that's what this guy, this 411 guy
believes.
>> I'm not sure because he won't say they
don't he doesn't he doesn't [laughter]
actually give his here's what I think is
going on.
>> But people ask him and he's like, "Well,
I have my theories, but he never tells
you actually what the theories are, you
know."
>> Interesting. I wonder why he doesn't
want to tell. Maybe that's why he's not
more popular. If he just came out with
it like Candace. Yeah,
>> maybe it'd be huge.
>> Yeah, like those guys that used to be in
the 90s who were saying that we were
going underground and killing the
Nephilim. Remember those? Those guys
were great.
>> They You're going down. It's like a man.
And they were giants. They had three
rows of teeth and their special forces
are going down there and taking them
out. [laughter]
>> Yeah. There's a whole group of people
that believe that there's underground
creatures that live underground and come
out at night. And there's always been
like
>> Yeah. for whatever they are. You know,
people some people think the grays live
underground.
>> You know, there's like there's not a lot
of mystery left,
>> you know, outside of places like the
Amazon, the Congo that are super deep to
get to. Not a whole lot of mystery left
in terms of life.
>> Maybe ocean depths.
>> Yeah, ocean depths for sure.
>> That's like the whole new unexplored
frontier, right? Is ocean depths.
>> Yeah.
>> Saying the time I turn on the TV, it's
like, uh, look at this crazy creature.
I'm like, "That doesn't exist." And I
look it up, I'm like, "Wait, that
>> that exists?" I saw one the other day
tweeted out. I was like, "Mandela effect
has to be real." It was a
>> It's called a Siberian mu deer.
>> You ever seen a Siberian mu deer?
>> No.
>> They have fangs.
>> Oh, right. I I have seen a fang deer. I
forget what they call it. Apparently,
that's the uh You know, do you know what
elk ivories are?
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. That's It used to be like a tusk
like way way back in the day.
>> It's so [ __ ] looking, dude. Yeah,
the fang deer. Yeah, they're weird. It's
very strange.
>> Yeah.
>> I wonder what they were there for.
>> Yeah. Well, there's v I found a video
cuz I was like, "No way, dude. Do these
things exist?" I thought I was being
me'd, you know? So, [laughter]
look. And this thing is real. So, I
found a video of them fighting and they
use those things as weapons.
>> Oh, that makes sense. That's the only
thing that makes sense. Like gorillas.
The gorillas don't eat meat yet. They
have these massive fangs.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, it's nature is weird. so much
variation, you know, there's so many
different types of life. It's and that
the fact that they all sort of
synchronize like this one eats that one
and that one eats this one and this one
lives there and that one lives. It's
like it's very fascinating when you
really look at the just the wide variety
of species that exist.
>> Well, most people don't know anything
about it. Like most people have never we
live in such a comfortable world
>> that is completely guarded from
everything that's out there. And it's
like if people had a taste of out there.
>> Yeah.
>> And I think that the worldview of many
many people would change very quickly.
Especially feminist. I think that
feminists would immediately stop being
feminist if they just had a taste of
like well you know people actually did
have to shut themselves up at night from
wolves. Yeah.
>> That was a real thing. Wolves would come
in and eat you and so you would shut
yourself in so that that didn't happen.
>> Well, that's gone so far the other way
that [ __ ] retards are bringing wolves
into places.
>> Yeah, I know. [laughter]
>> It is so dumb. You know, I have a good
friend.
>> Didn't they take it over like in in
Yellowstone or some place? They
reintroduced wolves and it just
decimated the deer population,
>> the elk population. That's actually
arguable that that might have been a
good thing um in some ways because it
was getting to elk need natural
predators and mountain lions can only
kill so many elk. Yeah.
>> Um, but what's really interesting is
mountain lions kill way more elk when
wolves are around cuz the wolves find
the mountain lions and take their elk.
And so then the the mountain lions have
to go kill another deer or you know
whatever they
>> Why like just issue more hunting elk
permits though? Like why do that?
>> Well, you have to have some natural
predators in in a good healthy
ecosystem. And there's a good argument,
particularly in Montana, that at one
point in time it had gotten to a point
where you're going to have like rampant
disease because they were they were
issuing these uh they were issuing like
unlimited or a large amount of tags for
people in the mid winter so that you can
catch these elk in deep snow and just
peck them off because they were having
so many of them and that they they
weren't sustainable that they were
hitting these massive populations. So,
their populations are down to like
I want to say less than 40% of what they
were at their peak when they brought in
the wolves. But the problem is these
wolves, like what they did in Colorado
recently is the dumbest of all time
because they brought these [ __ ]
wolves outside of Aspen and they took
wolves from Washington State, Washington
State or Oregon, but whatever it was,
these these wolves from the Pacific
Northwest were wolves that already had
been killing cattle. So they captured
these wolves instead of killing them.
And then they relocated them to Aspen
where they're killing cattle. So they
they relocated him onto my buddy's
ranch. Like there's five of them.
>> And he had a cattle ranch, did he?
>> He didn't have he doesn't have cattle on
his ranch, but his [ __ ] neighbors do.
Okay. And his neighbors are losing
cattle left and right. And he's And so
now they've killed off a couple of them
and they're trying to It was a disaster.
And it's because the governor, the
governor's husband, he's a uh wildlife
lover and he thinks it would be amazing
if we had wolves.
>> You ever talk to those deer hunters in
Michigan? in Michigan.
>> Yeah, they've been pissed off for like
every deer hunter I know in Michigan has
been pissed off who's a native for years
because they all they all used to shoot
pheasant. That was the big deal in
Michigan was
>> pheasant.
>> And then here's the story I heard. I
don't know if it's true or not, right?
Um, but the DNR, the Department of
Natural Resources, imported a b a bunch
of western coyotes in order to thin out
the deer population because the deer
population was basically mangling all
these farm crops.
>> Oh boy.
>> And those now that's an all you can eat
buffet for a coyote in Nevada. These
ground birds that are just these fat
>> fat little ground birds and they
decimated the population. So you you'll
talk to these old deer hunters. Have you
seen any feeasant? No. Shut up.
[laughter]
Shut up.
>> The interesting thing about that though
is pheasants's an invasive species.
That's not a natural North American
species either.
>> They brought those [ __ ] over and they
are delicious. Yeah.
>> And it's fun to hunt them.
>> Well, they would always just walk those
train tracks, those old abandoned train
tracks, you know, and they'd have the
dogs. Do dogs kick up the feeasant and
they'd shoot them from the track. Dog
would bring it up. That was like a
Michigan pastime.
>> Yeah. Yeah, the the coyote thing is a
real problem because coyotes are now
they used to be a western animal and now
they're in all 50 states.
>> Not only that, they're in virtually
every city in America.
>> Well, they've been wiping them out in
Michigan pretty good in the rural areas.
Oh, yeah. Well, what they do now is they
have the GPS trackers to put them on the
dogs.
>> Old boys will get in with AR-15s. Those
dogs will run them for 200 miles and
then they finally take a shot and they
just will do that all winter long. Man,
>> that's good. But it's hard to wipe them
out because what they do is you know
when you hear coyotes calling it's like
roll call
they're letting sometime there's a lot
of confusion to what they're doing. Some
people think that they're letting the
other coyotes know that they've killed
something that we have food but it's
also a roll call and when one of the
coyotes is missing the females have more
pups.
>> Really?
>> Yeah. Some weird natural reaction. Also,
they have natural enemy is greywolves.
And when um they evolved, they evolved
to when the greywolves kill them because
the the greywolves don't breed with
coyotes, but coyotes do breed with red
wolves. That's why you have these like
koi wolves on the east coast.
>> A coyote is a wolf. It's a wolf. It's
just a small wolf. And so, their natural
inclination is when they're getting
chased, they move to a new area and then
they have even more pups. So that's how
they've spread out through the entire
country. So if you go back to like the
turn of the century, like the 1900s,
>> coyotes were exclusively a western
animal.
>> Yeah.
>> Now they're in [clears throat] New York
City.
>> Yeah. They're everywhere,
>> which is crazy. They have them in
Central Park. They have [ __ ] coyotes
running around Central Park.
>> Some lady this morning posted on X uh a
mountain line in San Francisco sitting
on a porch
>> in the city of San Francisco. A big one
just sitting there. It's like [laughter]
>> just having a good time. [clears throat]
Well, that's just cuz California has the
dumbest [ __ ] laws when it comes to
those things.
>> Yeah. Well, they have terrible gun laws,
too. They have terrible terrible laws.
They have terrible laws, period.
>> They have terrible laws. Terrible
everything.
>> Terrible politicians. You know, it's a
shame, too. Like, I grew up in Santa
Rosa.
>> And um that's the most beautiful area,
>> the Napa Valley area. It's the most
beautiful area on planet Earth. The
weather's always perfect. It's January
15th. It might as well be July 15th,
right? It's always perfect. It's always
gorgeous. And they [ __ ] it all up.
>> They [ __ ] it all up.
>> They [ __ ] it all up.
>> Yeah.
>> And they [ __ ] it up real bad, too.
>> Oh, it's almost unfixable now.
>> Especially like San Francisco area.
>> Like the whole Pacific Northwest is
almost unfixable. It's like they double
down and they keep going. Like Seattle
now has a communist mayor.
>> Yeah.
>> Who's been living with her parents.
>> New York. [laughter] They all got
communists.
Black Lives Matter had they were their
head organizers. They were communist,
devoued communists. Like
>> until it came to buying property with
Black Lives Matter money.
>> Yeah.
>> What's happening with that?
>> Well, then they're then they're very
much capitalistic.
>> How come they're not in trouble? I don't
understand that. Like they spent
millions of dollars of that money on
real estate.
>> Yeah.
>> There's only one UFC 325 this Saturday.
And on DraftKings Sportsbook, the number
one sports book for live betting. Once
it's over, your shot to get in on the
action is gone. DraftKings Sportsbook is
built for live betting, not just
pre-fight picks. Because in the UFC, one
moment can flip the entire fight. One
punch, one kick, one takedown. New to
DraftKings, new customers can bet just
five bucks and get $300 in bonus bets if
your bet wins with code Rogan. Download
the DraftKings Sportsbook app and use
the code Rogan. That's code Rogan to
turn five bucks into 300 in bonus bets
if your bet wins in partnership with
DraftKings. The crown is yours. Gambling
problem? Call 1800 gambler. In New York,
call 8778 wire or text hope 467-369. In
Connecticut, call 888-7897777
or visit ccpg.org. On behalf of Bootill
Casino and Resort in Kansas, pass
through if per wager tax may apply in
Illinois. 21 and over. Age and
eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void
in Ontario. Restrictions apply. Bet must
win to receive bonus bets which expire
in 7 days. Minimum odds required. For
additional terms and responsible gaming
resources, see dkg.co/audio.
Limited time offer.
>> What's going on?
>> No idea. I have no idea why. Well, I
don't I don't know why the the heads of
many of these organizations aren't being
rounded up and sumearily arrested.
>> Yeah.
>> I mean, we're watching these I've been
covering the riots non-stop.
>> I'm sorry. Protest that the completely
organic protests, which are totally
organic. Um,
>> and it's been interesting to watch. I
was watching one the other day. We were
live and it was Don Lemon and he had
showed up at Minnesota and the first
thing Don Lemon does, right? I hate Don
Lemon, by the way. But first thing,
>> one of the dumbest [ __ ] that
has ever gotten on television.
>> He's terrible. First thing he does, he
gets he drives up in this car. He's in
the back seat and he jumps out of the
car and he has this [ __ ] eatating lemon
smile on his face, you know, and he runs
over with Starbucks to these people and
he's like, "Here you go."
>> Yeah.
>> And then he jumps back in the car,
right? And they drive off.
>> Now, here's here's what's interesting
about this. He comes back and he's in
there with the protesters, you know what
I mean? And he's interviewing them. Most
of the protesters are saying, "We're
coming from out of town. We're from this
state. I'm from two states away. I'm
from three states away." You know, for
this totally organic protest. Well, the
cops, what they start doing, they have
these guard rails on the the sidewalk in
front of the ice facility, and there's
gaps inside of that barrier. And so,
they pull their police cruisers in just
to fill those gaps so that they stay
behind the barrier. And Lemon's like,
"Why would they do that? Why would they
why would they keep us compressed uh you
know, behind this barrier?" And I'm
thinking, "Because you just stopped your
car in the middle of the street to run
across the road and give these guys
Starbucks, you idiot." you know, they
want to keep the roadway clear so that
they can get their people in and out.
You literally stopped your car in the
middle of the road, ran across the
street to give these people Starbucks
and then got back in your car and
they're like, why why is it that they're
trying to get to keep us from getting
into the road, you [laughter] know? I'm
like, what are you talking about? I just
couldn't believe. I was like, what? It's
amazing when these people that are so
smug where they're protected by a large
organization by CNN and then they get
fired and then they get they're
basically like like a dog like Carl
getting released into the woods and then
they have to fend for themselves and you
see them in the world of podcasting
where you don't have anybody writing
things for you and you have to express
your own opinions. You're like, "Oh,
this is the real you." It turns out
you're a [ __ ] [laughter] that. Wow. I
didn't know. Whoa. You know, the whole
time, Matt, you thinking the whole time,
uh, you know, I never thought I'd be an
entertainer. I didn't think I'd do
anything with podcast. Never. Never in a
million years. I never would have
thought that.
>> You were a what were you? An engineer or
a robot?
>> Robotics mechanic. Yeah.
>> A robotics mechanic. Yeah.
>> How did you get involved in that? Uh
well, I was a I was a gunsmith for years
and um there there's no real applicable
skills outside of that for anything
actually. There it doesn't really carry
over in anything. It's really its own
thing, you know, bluing things like it
just doesn't carry over.
>> Um a friend of mine said, "Hey, look,"
because I told him, I was like, "I need
a job. Um you know, I I'm I'm not making
it. What do What do you think?" He's
like, "You know, you should apply to be
an industrial mechanic." And I was like,
I don't know much about it, you know.
He's like, we'll just go apply. So, I
did took NAPDU test. And so, uh, the guy
was like, well, I want to hire you at a
level three, which was high high, you
know, was like mid-range. Wasn't the
highest, wasn't the lowest. I was like,
damn. Okay. You know, what's the pay?
He's like, was like 30 an hour. You
know, that to me was was life-changing.
So, I took the job and I got I didn't
know what the hell I was doing, but they
trained me up well. And then, um, there
were some robots on the floor and I
started working on those. And then from
there they trained me in robotics and so
uh it was it was all done on site.
>> What kind of automation like automation
and it was all food related.
>> Food related.
>> Mhm. All food robots. Yep. So we weren't
dealing with Johnny 5. We were dealing
with like vacuum systems and ovens and
uh various robots which were associated
with those. Like for instance there was
a packaging machine that would just all
it would do is form boxes. That's it.
All it did it just that's it. But it
would form, you know, a thousand boxes a
minute. And it was a it was a giant
robot and it had a huge sequence of
functions on it. You know, when people
think robot, they always think humanoid.
But almost no robot
>> is is in any way humanoid at all. You
know, they're that's just not what
they're for.
>> It is weird, right, that we think of
robots as like movie robots. We think of
iRoot.
>> Yeah. If if you came across a robot in a
factory, you would have no idea it was a
robot. You'd be like, "What the hell is
that? So, how did you go from that to
debating people online?
>> Uh, co. So, the Yeah, the lockdowns
happened and I was laid off. The all the
food plants in Michigan were shut down,
especially the meat plants and that's
where I was. I was in the meat plants
>> and uh and they all shut down be because
of the draconian restrictions of one
Gretchen Whitmer. And um anyway, while
she was out with, you know, on a boat
partying with uh you know, with her
honey, we were all locked out of work,
right?
>> So, familiar story.
>> Yeah. We had the stay at home orders and
I would argue with these dumb liberals
on Facebook and uh and they man, they
pissed me off. And so, I started
crashing their panels and I would debate
with them and um you know, I had a lot
to say and those things started to
become more and more popular and they
would move over to YouTube. People would
clip it. Then I started getting invited
on to do debates with other people. And
I didn't know who these people were. It
wasn't my world. Like I didn't know who
any of these podcasters were, you know,
stuff like that. I'd listen to it maybe
occasionally
>> online, but like I I couldn't have told
you who like Vosch was or Destiny or any
of these PE. Like I didn't know who any
of them were.
>> Um and I didn't care. To me it was just
some other dumb smug liberal, you know?
So um that's where I got my start. I
never would have foreseen at all that
I'd be sitting here with you. That's so
in Well, I never would have foreseen I
would have been here either.
>> It's weird, huh?
>> Yeah. Oh, it's weird. Very weird.
>> And I'll never get used to it. People
walk over and they're like, "You're
Andrew Wilson." And I'm like, "I'm
[ __ ] nobody." You know what I mean?
But it's nice to meet you. You know,
shake their hand, you have a chat with
them.
>> Uh, I'll never get used to it.
>> No, you probably shouldn't. It's
probably better to not get I'm not used
to it.
>> Yeah. Used to it.
>> It's probably better to not be used to
it.
>> Keep you sane.
>> And maybe keep you humble. Yeah, you
need something. You need something to
keep you humble. We all know people that
did not have something that kept them
humble and they lost their their way.
The wheels fall off.
>> Yeah. They lose their marbles.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. Especially as you get more and
more famous. It becomes more and more
unmanageable.
>> I was I feel like I I'm pretty well
grounded uh due to the fact that um I
didn't come from a political background.
There's no famous people in my family,
you know, there's just none of that. And
so I feel like the the grounding is
always there because uh you know even
even from the family you get the call
like from from my brother for instance
like he's been calling me the I don't
know if you can say the felur here so I
won't but he's been calling yeah [ __ ]
He's been you know he's been like the
the phone call since I was 15. What are
you doing [ __ ] Has not changed.
>> Good.
>> It has not changed. You know 42. He's
like happy birthday [ __ ] [laughter]
>> That's normal.
>> Yeah.
>> I remember you were having a
conversation. I think it was on Pierce
Morgan who is the best cat wrangler in
the business.
>> That's what he does. He cat wrangles.
>> Yeah, I just talked to him briefly.
>> Is he okay
>> on Well, that's what I asked him. I just
Yeah, I sent him a DM and I was like,
"Hey,
>> for people don't know, he fell."
>> Yeah, he fell
>> and really [ __ ] himself.
>> And it was the hip and at his age, the
hip,
>> you know, you don't want to Nothing with
the hip. Every time I see anybody who's
60s
>> Mhm.
>> they get the hip injury, it's it's bad.
>> Yeah. It's not good. I think they they
think your lifespan post hip surgery is
like 10 years.
>> Yeah, it's right. And that
>> he'll probably be better than that.
>> He will.
>> And I think he's mobile.
>> Oh, that's good.
>> He's mobile, but I'm
>> really good at hip replacements now.
>> I was like, what's you know, are you are
you doing? He's like, yeah, you know,
I'm I'm doing okay. And and I was like,
don't [ __ ] around with the hips, dude.
>> It's crazy that he had to have a hip
replacement. Like, how bad was that
fall?
>> Uh yeah, I don't know. I don't know what
the details of it were, but
>> I fell like a sack of spuds, he wrote.
[laughter] Wound up needing a new hip
after fracturing the neck of his femur
and is recovering from surgery. In
addition to being on crutches for 6
weeks, he won't be allowed to take any
longhaul flights for at least 12 weeks.
He tripped on a small step inside of a
lust a London restaurant in the tumble.
You think he's drunk?
>> He could have been a little fired up.
>> A little drunk. was also is, you know,
not the most fit or agile guy in the
world.
>> True.
>> You know,
>> Yeah.
>> He's only two years older than me.
>> No way.
>> Yeah.
>> Really?
>> Mhm.
>> Not crazy.
>> Yeah. Damn.
>> Yeah. Some people
>> don't take care of themselves.
>> Yeah. He got he got the crack. Yeah. I
got to quit these. But yeah, he got the
crack on the on the hip and I was like,
man.
>> Do you think that American spirits are
better than Marorrow for you?
>> Probably.
>> Yeah.
>> But they taste like [ __ ] Do they? Is
there a difference? You really like the
Marbo taste? You don't think you get
used to American Spirits?
>> I think I could.
>> Um
>> I've been trying the cigarellas. Those
have been helpful. Like the little mini
cigarette cigars.
>> Oh yeah. Ron White used to smoke those.
He just quit totally. He went to a
hypnotist, quit instantaneously. But
those are loaded with nicotine. Like way
more nicotine than a cigarette. He was
smoking those [laughter] little tins. We
have those.
>> What are those tins, Jamie? Do you know
what they are?
>> It's like a like a famous cigar company
sells tins of these little tiny cigars.
And it's great if you don't have the
time to smoke this. Like you get out of
a flight, you just want to have a small
But he inhales these [ __ ] like
a cigarette.
>> That's brutal, dude. [laughter] That'll
do you in. And then washes it down with
whiskey.
>> Well, he doesn't drink anymore. He quit
drinking. Yeah. I think he went
>> That was always in his bit, though. He
was always up there smoking and
drinking. And I always thought,
>> I love that. It was
>> Well, he did it. He did it till the
wheels fell off and then um the drinking
was the big one. You know, he went to a
doctor and the doctor's like, "You're
going to die."
>> Yeah.
>> Like your liver is not in good shape.
Like if you back off now, you'll
probably live. If you don't, you're not.
You got like a few years left.
>> Well, alcoholics too, they have it. I
don't know if he was one or not. He
might have just been like a heavy social
drinker, but like real alcoholics,
that's no way to live.
>> No. I mean, uh, they stink.
>> They They're like I mean, kind of
everything about a real alcoholic is
just they look completely unwell.
>> They're just kind of mangled, you know?
>> Yeah.
>> It's a weird disease, too. Uh, in that
that addiction is one that you can't
quit.
>> You can't just cold turkey.
>> You'll die.
>> You'll die. There's only a couple of
things that'll just kill you if you quit
right away. And alcohol is one of them,
which is really crazy because it gets
integrated into your biological system
where you need it to stay alive. Your
body's like, "Okay, we're going to use
this for fuel. Going to use this to
function."
>> Yeah. They've been weaning people off
alcohol with beer for centuries.
>> Is that what they use? Beer.
>> Yeah. They used beer. They would just
go, "Okay." And well, it was pretty
common to drink beer and ale with
dinner, you know?
>> They just weenie off with beer.
>> That makes sense.
>> They knew. They knew hundreds of years
ago there's books on how alcohol, you
know, what do they consumption or
whatever they called it.
>> Uh they killed you if you just if you
just quit if you're an alcoholic and so
they'd wean off with beer.
>> Wonder when they started making hard
liquor cuz you would imagine like
fermented things like wine and beer were
like the first things that people
consumed.
>> I think it's been around for thousand I
mean several thousand years.
>> I wonder I wonder like how they figured
it out. The biggest the biggest uh what
was it the biggest distributor in Europe
of wine was the Catholic Church.
>> Well, wine has certainly been around
forever, but like what about hard
liquor? Jamie, put that into our sponsor
perplexity. When was the first what
known? I mean, we don't really know
because there's so much weird [ __ ] about
history, but like what was the first
in like documented hard liquor like
whiskey, vodka, [ __ ] like that? That's
the That's the stuff that kills you. If
you die from beer, boy, you you're
[ __ ] you're going hard. Like Shane
Gillis will sit here on a podcast and
drink 16 Bud Lights.
Um, first alcohol drinks were fermented
things like beer, wine, me. Okay.
Thousands of years before true liquor.
Okay. First rec recognizable liquor
appears when people began to distill.
Archaeological evidence shows fermented
drinks. Okay. That's around 7,000 B.CE.
So clear of is of true alcohol
distillation. Chinese rice beer dist
distillates
by about 800 BCE.
>> Yeah.
>> So a couple thousand years.
>> Couple thousand years. Yeah.
>> Yeah.
Okay. Wind into strong spirits. The Arab
alchemists.
Alul. Oh, interesting. Using the term
alul, the root of alcohol.
Well, they used they used alcohol as
base for for alchemy, too. That was a
base for trying to transmute metal.
Yeah.
>> I wonder if they were ever successful.
>> They were never successful.
>> Nothing.
>> No.
>> It seems like a crazy thing to waste so
much time on trying to turn lead into
gold.
>> I mean, there there was whole kingdoms
spent trying to figure out how to do
this.
>> Wild.
>> And it's just like and they never I
mean, you think about it, it makes
sense, right? If you're the first one,
>> if you're the one who knows
>> Mhm. like you can just create as much
wealth for yourself as you want.
>> Oh yeah.
>> And uh
>> it's just amazing that they kept trying.
Must have been someone saying that they
got it. I got it, dude. Just give me
some money.
>> Oh, there's tons of frauds.
>> Yeah,
>> there was tons of frauds who were
alchemist who, you know, there were the
that centuries version of a snake oil
salesman, you know. Yeah, of course we
can we can turn and there there was ones
even in the '9s who were like, we can
now turn, you know, base metals into
gold. I think there's something now
where they can make some gold, but I
think it takes an incredible amount of
energy
>> and
>> cost more to make than it's worth,
>> right? I think it's one of them deals.
Is that a fact? I feel like I've read
something like that fairly recently,
but it's Here's the weird one. Why gold?
Like, why does anybody give a [ __ ] about
this metal that you can't even use?
>> There's not much of it,
>> right? That's true.
>> Is what they saying there's um 90% of
all the gold ever discovered still in
circulation,
>> right? Yeah. Well, China just found a
huge vein of gold. An enormous amount.
But I mean, when you say enormous, it's
like relative. Yeah. Because I think the
entire world supply of gold will fit
inside of a football field.
>> Yeah. There's not much of it.
>> Yeah.
>> It's very I mean, and very little of it
is worth a lot. I mean, even if you
think a pirates treasure chest, you
know, it's not actually that much gold,
>> right? So it's yeah it's
>> it's a box of gold
>> extremely valuable and also you can do
things with it you can't do with other
metals and same thing with silver you
know silver
>> scientists mimicking the big bang
accidentally turn lead into gold yeah so
this is the thing but I mean again I
think mimicking the big bang like what
are they using a particle collider like
what are they doing
okay how they do it how to steal a
proton protons found the nucleus of an
atom so extreme extremely small amounts.
In fact, a total of some 29 trillionth
of a gram they made. Okay. Smashing lead
atoms into each other. Extreme. So, it
is a particle collider. I guess uh the
working on the Alice experiment and the
large hydron collider. Yeah, there it
is. In Switzerland in incidentally
produced small amounts of gold.
>> You just need a you just need a
partider. That's all. No big deal. No
big deal. You just build it into a whole
mountain. And now they're building a
second one. They said they're building
into a new mountain,
>> right? [laughter]
>> Well, there was one they were putting
during the Clinton administration. They
were building a particle collider
somewhere in the middle of America. I'm
trying to figure out where it was.
>> I'm certain there's already more than
one.
>> Oh, there's many particle colliders.
>> Yeah. But I'm certain there's ones that
are
>> that are even probably larger and hidden
than the one that's currently there.
Yeah.
>> Really? You think so?
>> Yeah. Oh, for sure.
>> What do you think they're doing with
them? Well, I mean, the military
applications for that are like they're
enormous. The idea that uh you could
make like some kind of particle weapon,
you know, or something like this.
>> Oh, right. Right. Right.
>> Um Yeah. There's no way that the that
the US military is going to let
scientists have a gadget like that
somewhere that they don't have complete
control over. There's no way. I wonder
because I I don't know what kind of
military applications you would have for
particle colliders.
I mean, for sure,
>> big explosions, right?
>> There's probably Yeah, but you're just
you've got a giant loop and you're
slinging
>> smashing things together, right?
>> Yeah.
>> So, what I mean, what do you do
together? You can make them go boommy
boom, right?
>> Kind of. Well, the real concern with the
Large Hadron Collider is they were going
to create many black holes that were
going to eat their way through the Earth
that you wouldn't be able to stop them.
They would just like slide through the
Earth,
>> you know.
>> Yeah, I heard that. I heard they were
concerned they were going to open up a
portal to a different dimension. I've
heard like I've Yeah, I've heard all
sorts of Yeah, we changed our timeline.
>> We're on the new timeline. You know, the
uh the whole nine yards. I I've I've
heard it all. I'm just saying that
anything. It's just been my experience.
Look, when I look through the historic
record that if there's any scientific
gadget out there that looks like it has
the potential to make something go boom,
the United States military has a version
of it somewhere.
>> Yeah, that makes sense. That makes
sense. But for whatever reason, they
abandoned this one during the Clinton
administration. I I don't remember why
they abandoned it, but you could people
can if they have access to the area
where it's at can still go inside of it
and see like what they started to build,
but they never did. But it would have
been larger than the large hydron
collider. I want to say it's in Georgia.
>> I don't remember though. But it's a it
was going to be an enormous particle
collider.
>> Yeah.
>> And for some reason they just stopped
funding to this thing.
But
>> well, they're talking about funding
another another one that's twice the
size the one that they have now. They
say that they need more room to smash
more particles together.
>> What are they trying to do?
>> I have no idea. Like that is way outside
of of my domain. Um, I can tell you I
probably the same things you've heard,
right, is uh they're trying to smash
small particles together to see what
happens. That's what the kind of the
official story is. But it's funny
because every time a new story comes
out, it's like
>> scientists smash this together with this
and this happens. And I'm always like,
"Okay, well, what does that mean?" And
you never get any of that. Right.
>> Right.
>> This one was in Texas.
>> Oh, was in Texas. Yeah. The Clinton.
Okay, that's it.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> Spent $2 billion on it and abandoned it.
I wonder. See if you can find some
images of it.
>> Yeah, it's outside of Dallas.
>> Oh, it is outside of Dallas. Okay.
>> Abandoned superconducting super collider
site in 2008. Wow. I wonder if you could
buy it. That'd be [ __ ] awesome.
>> Get Broen's own [laughter]
particle collider.
>> I mean, there's nothing there. It's just
concrete.
Finish it.
>> What's the big deal?
>> Like that weird time machine out in the
desert. That was really funny.
>> Let me set up an archery range inside of
it.
>> Confirmed this stuff last week.
Department of War confirms plans to
scale direct energy weapons. Did you see
that thing with China?
>> Why would they need a hydro collider
though, right? Or you know, particle
well because they want to make stuff go
boom.
>> Yeah, direct energy weapons.
>> Yes, Department of War has direct energy
weapons. Yes, we are scaling them. Wow.
>> Conspiracy theorist went wild over this.
>> Told you.
>> Well, that was a lot of people. The
really
>> Fallout rifle though. I do. I want my
plasma rifle, right?
>> I do. Like if they have plasma rifles,
you're going to buy one, right? Oh,
yeah. Oh, for sure.
>> You'd probably get a tax stamp. You It
probably be like a lengthy thing to get.
>> Um I'm glad you're a gun guy because I
want I wanted to bring up this whole
thing with this guy uh Prey. Yeah.
>> And I I haven't talked about it. We
haven't done a podcast since that guy
got killed. Um but that whole thing
for there's a lot of people that don't
understand what's going on and um why
riots only in Minneapolis and why riots
in the place where there's an ungodly
amount of fraud that has been discovered
>> coincidentally right around the same
time.
>> Exactly. Like instantaneously afterwards
the narrative completely changes.
Everybody forgets about the fraud. Now
all anybody cares about is ICE and
fascists and Nazis.
>> Yeah.
>> And um
>> it's uh there's a you know what a color
revolution is
>> of course
>> and for people that don't it's it's a
coordinated effort to cause chaos and
this is a very coordinated thing. The
idea that this is an organic protest
these these riots organic is nonsense.
Um it's provably nonsense because now
they have access to the signal chats. So
they know that these So these people
that
>> Cam Higgby, by the way, yes, he was he's
been on the front lines of this. Um, The
Crucible has been a big supporter of
that effort. Uh, my channel, um, I will
often snipe his coverage while it's
going on, send my audience over to send
in super chats in order to keep this guy
going. I think that that work is
critical.
>> Yes,
>> it's critical work. And there's not that
many people doing it anymore because of
how dangerous it has become.
>> Yes. And so I'm a big supporter of that.
Doesn't mean I agree with everything he
says politically, but what he's doing on
the ground there needs to happen,
>> right? We need you need to understand
that this isn't organic. Regardless of
how you feel, I don't feel that that guy
should have been shot. Um, but I
understand what happened and what
happened was chaos. So what hap first of
all, it wasn't ICE. People need to
understand that [clears throat]
it was uh customs border patrol people.
So they were brought in to assist ICE.
Um, and they're telling this lady to
stand away and then this cop gets very
aggressive and shoves her. Um, you have
to understand the situation that they're
in, right? And this is not making an
excuse for any of it, but you have to
just just to put it into context. These
people are getting harassed outside of
any hotel they're at. People blow horns.
They try to smash into the hotel. They
dox them. That's why they're wearing
masks. It's a coordinated effort. I'm
not saying that guy should have shoved
that guy. I don't think he should have
or that woman. I don't think he should
have. And then pepper- sprrayed. And
then the guy who got shot, Prey, he
steps in, which is if you know anything
about concealed carry, if you are a
concealed carry holder and you are
carrying not just a pistol, but two full
magazines as well, you do not ever
physically engage with someone. You also
are supposed to carry your license on
you and you're supposed to uh you're
supposed to have ID on you. All right.
You you
>> and you're trained specifically for
this. By the way, I was a CPL instructor
for years.
>> Okay. So, you know about it.
>> The the thing is there's a framework
here if you don't mind if I add your
framework.
>> The framework here is this is a
mathematical formula. So, I've been
following these extremely closely live
um and looking at at how this is done.
Let's go backwards in time. You remember
what was going on in California? Nobody
died in California. There was an ICE
raid on a Home Depot and they went nuts
and they started smashing police cars.
They were starting fires, right? This
was not over. Somebody dying. And now
the narrative, they're trying to make
the narrative shift. The Gestapos in
here, you know, murdering American
citizens. Well, and what what was going
on in California then because there was
no American citizens getting murdered
there. What was going on there was they
did an ice raid in a Home Depot, which
anybody who's been to California knows
that uh you know there's it used to be
that you'd drive down the street and
they would all hang out in front of the
Home Depot and you'd say two, right?
>> And they'd hop in the truck and you
would you know they would go Yeah. They
were day laborers, right?
>> So it didn't surprise me that they were
there doing daily raids. Okay, that
doesn't surprise me a bit.
>> Uh and they they all went ballistic.
>> Now here's what was very curious about
the coverage of that. And I had a debate
with a couple of leftists on this.
What I saw was what looked to me to be a
police standown order. There was people
who were breaking into I don't remember
if it was an Amco or a 7-Eleven, but
they were busting into it. The cops were
were on the side corner watching this go
down and do anything. They didn't do
anything about it.
>> Right.
>> Okay. They if it got too rowdy, they'd
clear it out and then they let them
continue. It looked like a standown
order, like you don't you don't involve
yourself. Well, what I think these guys
have figured out is a mathematical
formula and it works like this. The if
the local police are not going to
protect the federal buildings, then it's
left to the federal police to do this,
right? In this case, ICE is going to
protect its own buildings. The FBI is
going to protect its own buildings. If
the local police aren't going to protect
it and it's surrounded, then who who
does the protection then? And this is
why Trump, he unleashes the National
Guard, but where to those federal
buildings to protect those federal
buildings. That was the whole point of
it. That's And basically anytime he's
unleashed a National Guard that I've
seen, it's two federal buildings to
protect them. And so, uh, the
mathematical formula works like this.
The longer it is that protesters are
engaging with federal officers whose job
is not to do basic street cleanup of
thugs, that's the local PD's job. Uh,
the chances that there's an incident,
which is going to be a bad incident, is
going to occur. So basically the longer
you're there, the the more attrition
there is, the more engagements you have
with with these federal officers over
time, eventually yes,
>> there's going to be something which is
out of pocket that happens or something
which is escalatory that happens and
they're banking on that. And that's why
ICE is out in front of these or not ICE,
the Antifa people are still out in front
of the ICE buildings in front of many
states night after night after night.
And it's designed specifically to make
sure it's just ma a math formula, right?
The longer we're here and the less the
local PD involves itself, the more
chance of incident between federal
officers and us.
>> You're knocking steel against Flint.
>> Yep.
>> Yeah. You're you're
>> waiting for the fire.
>> You're waiting for sparks.
>> And um in this particular instance, this
guy uh clearly had been very involved.
Uh I don't know if he was a part of the
signal chats, but when you go to what's
supposed to be a peaceful protest and
you're fully armed like that with two
magazines, it's kind of crazy, right?
Like what do you why do you need so many
bullets?
>> Now the liberal said prosecond
amendment, too.
>> That is wild.
>> Wild, which I'm for.
>> He had every right.
>> Like tell He didn't last month, but
okay.
>> I like it. I like where it's going. I
like that cuz that's kind of a trap. Um,
[laughter]
did you see what MSNBC did to his image?
>> Yeah. Were they Were they gusty?
>> They did the opposite of what CNN did to
me. You know, CNN during the COVID times
turned me green
>> and uh they made me ugly and look like I
was dying and they made him handsome.
Yeah.
>> So people would be more sympathetic to
him getting shot, which is kind of wild.
Like are ugly people less valuable to
MSNBC?
>> Less marketable?
>> That is crazy to me. Like look at the
difference.
>> Yeah. Look at the difference. They
shortened up his face. They gave him a
little bit of a tan. They widened his
face a little bit. It seems like they
just made him a little handsomemer.
>> Yeah. Little hotter.
>> They gave him gave him a bit of that
Chad jaw, didn't they?
>> They shrunk his nose a little, too,
didn't they? They did. They shrunk his
nose. Gave him a little bit of a
handsome jaw. So, he looks like
>> And they made him, if you look at the
shoulders, it even looks like they uh
they may have plumped up the shoulders
there a bit.
>> A little bit. Yeah. The one on the right
looks like looks like he's a little
plumper. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Yeah. They they changed the tone
of the color. Wild.
I mean, they look at they they changed
his [ __ ] teeth, man.
>> Communist news now.
>> They gave him veneers.
>> Yeah.
>> Like look at the difference in his
teeth. He's a much more handsome guy.
Like the one on the right is like the
handsome brother and the one on the left
is like, "Fuck, why couldn't I look on
the right hand?"
>> Yeah. The one on the right, he they were
twins and he took more of the protein.
Right. Right. That was what that was
what happened. The thing is is like this
doesn't surprise me by the way. Uh this
is um what's going on and it this is a
well orchestrated well-crafted thing.
Yeah.
>> And the signal chats prove that but we
knew it anyway.
>> Yes.
>> Involving government by the way
allegedly at least involving Minnesota
state government.
>> Well, it involves Waltz.
>> Yes.
>> So that's not alleged,
>> right? That's not alleged.
>> It's not alleged that it involves Waltz.
It's not alleged that it involves Frey.
Right.
>> And it's not alleged. Well, what what is
alleged is the allegations of fraud, of
course, but
>> but there would be a reason why you
would want to distract from all that
fraud and that would motivate you to do
something along these lines. So, let's
go back to the the instance.
>> So, um you've got these cops that are on
these CBP guys that are on high alert,
right? There's a lot of tension, people
are screaming. If you're in an
environment like that all day, like I've
never been a police officer, but I was a
security guard. And when I was I was a
security guard for Great Woods, and by
the way, I'm not comparing this in any
way, but I'm just explaining my
mentality when I was there. It was very
much us versus them. It was a small
group of guys that were uh working at uh
I I worked at Greatwood Center for the
Performing Arts in Mansfield,
Massachusetts. It's a concert venue in
Mansfield. And this was when I was
fighting. So it was me and uh a bunch of
guys from my taekwond do team got hired
to be security guards. One of the guys
came and said, "Hey, you guys want to uh
get a job working as a security guard?
It's great. You get to see concerts."
And it was like a good pay. And you
know, I was doing a bunch of random jobs
back then while I was competing just to
sort of pay bills. And I said, "Yeah,
okay. What do I have to do?" And like
it's nothing. You just go there and you
work. First day on the job. I go there,
some guy had stolen one of the security
golf carts. So there's this dude named
Alleycat. He was the head guy of
security. He was [ __ ] character.
Hilarious. His main dream was to open up
a a bar. Lib Alleycats, libations, and
victuals. He had this whole dream of
like just a real character. But this guy
was a hardcore [ __ ] And uh they
caught the guy who uh stole this golf
cart, tacked him to the ground, and he
was beating him in the face with a
walkietalkie. This is my first day on
the job. So I'm like, "Okay, so this is
what we're doing." And we kind of became
like almost like cops for this place,
but there was very much an us versus
them mentality. And uh it turns out it
was a lot more involved than I ever
thought it was. And then one day I was
at a Neil Young concert. I was working
the Neil Young concert and riots broke
out. There was fire. It was cold out and
there was like a grassy area. So there
was like a lawn. So it was like there's
the inside, not inside, it was like an
outdoor concert venue, but there was a
roof to part of it and then the back of
it was like this lawn area that was in
the back and these guys had started
bonfires up there and we we were
supposed to go in there and break up the
bonfires. And then my friend Larry, who
is like one of the most mildmannered
guys you would ever want to meet, but
you know, a elite black belt. He gets in
a fight with this guy and some guy
pushes him and he knocks this guy down.
And I'm like, okay, chaos is broken out.
Let's get the [ __ ] I'm like, let's quit.
Let's get the [ __ ] out of here. And I
used to wear a hoodie. I used to carry a
hoodie so I could just zip up the hoodie
over my security outfit and like, bye.
Um because I knew there was going to
come a time where I was like, I'm not
getting shot, stabbed, killed, whatever,
stomped.
for 20.
So I wound up leaving that day. But
>> you there was a very and I it very
clearly like oh this is probably what
happens with cops times a million. Like
you develop this us versus them because
it was very much us. We would meet up at
the beginning of our shift. We would all
talk about what's going down. We mostly
we were catching people that were
bringing in alcohol like women in their
purses would you know you know like uh
some Carly Simon or something be
playing. and they'd sneak in a bottle of
wine that you know and James Taylor, you
know, there was a lot of that. And so we
would we'd have like literal
[ __ ] trash cans filled with bottles
of wine and liquor at the end of the
night. We would get to keep them. We'd
take them home. And so this us versus
them.
>> That's a nice perk.
>> It was kind of fun.
>> Yeah, that's a nice perk. It's like
>> also I was illegal to drink. I was only
19 at the time. But
>> an even nicer perk. Yeah, [laughter] it
was very clearly us versus them and the
tensions were very high.
>> Like whenever some weird [ __ ] went down,
everybody puffed up their chest and
everybody was ready to throw down. And I
was like, "This job is not good." But it
it educated me. I was like, "Okay." And
I in my mind I was like, "Okay, this is
must be like this when you're police
officer again times a million." Uh that
to think of what's going on.
>> Why they have their codes, right? They
have the they have their oaths they take
and then they have their little codes to
each other too.
>> Exactly. Exactly.
>> But I wouldn't I don't blame them. Like
it seems completely there's a a certain
wisdom to this
>> like hey look that could be me%
>> and so if it's you I'm going to be right
there with you% and then if it's me
you're going to be right there with me.
I get it. Also, there's a tremendous
amount of social media content that
anybody could access at any given time
where a lot of these dorks are calling
for violence. You know, it's just it's
all over the place. You could find it.
The least likely people that would ever
be involved in any sort of an
altercation are on Tik Tok calling for
violence. We got to kill these
[ __ ] We got to shoot these
[ __ ] And these guys are out
there in the middle of that. All right.
So, tensions are high as [ __ ] And
they're getting screamed out all the
time. They're on red alert. They're
wearing vests. They're carrying guns.
>> Well, their wives are getting called and
threatened. And uh they're saying
they're gonna rape their kids. And
they're saying that they're going to
brutalize their family members. And they
give them calls in the middle of the
night. And they whisper to them, "Well,
how's your dad such and such doing, you
know, and just cryptic things like that
and let it go."
>> Uh-huh. Exactly. And this is very
coordinated. It's very coordinated and
organized. And the way they find out all
their information,
it's very creepy. So again, I don't
think this guy should have pushed that
lady. I mean, the way he did it was very
violent. She was a small woman and he he
shoved her very violently to the ground.
Then this other guy, Prey, gets in
between them, okay? Which again, if
you're a concealed carry holder, is a
giant no. You do not [ __ ] do that.
You do not engage with law enforcement
when you're armed. You shouldn't engage
with anyone
>> ever. Ever. I mean,
>> you should be avoiding You should be
trained to avoid conflict. Yes. That's
the whole thing is like uh if you're if
you're armed, you move into that next
level of you need to really be avoiding
conflict. You're not supposed to be in
bars drinking. Exactly. You're not
supposed to be uh you know at big
parties and things like this where
violent things can occur.
>> Exactly.
>> You know, you can take it to church,
defend the church. Other than that,
>> like you're supposed to be avoiding
conflict.
>> Exactly. So, uh, he gets in between the
officer and this woman, puts his hands
on the officer,
>> and then he gets pepper-sprayed.
They go to the ground. There's a lot of
scrambling going on. Now, you have to
understand what happens when you get
pepper-sprayed. Okay. Uh, I've never
been pepper-sprayed, but I did get
teargassed once during Fear Factor. We
did a a fear factor stunt where these
people had to I forget what they had to
do but we we had built this there was
like a structure and they were inside
the structure and they released tear gas
in this charger. I got hit with it. It's
pretty brutal but
>> it's painful.
>> Yeah. It sucks
>> and you can't breathe.
>> You can't breathe. Your eyes swell up.
You your nose starts running like crazy.
Yeah.
>> Um
>> and that [ __ ] stays on your clothes.
>> You don't think well when that happens.
So this this guy's clearly not thinking
well and he can't see and he's you know
and then they're on him, right? So
they're on him and then
one guy whether he yells out he's got a
gun or grabs the gun first. I I'm not
sure. But there he has a gun. So they
see his gun in the middle of the
scramble. The guy pulls his gun out and
moves off. Now this is where it gets
this is where it gets weird.
I I believe the gun was a Sig P32.
A a Sig P320 is known for having
accidental discharges. It is uh it has a
reputation for it. It has a very
specific type of striker. It doesn't
have uh a safety the way some other guns
do. And you can have negligent
discharges with SIGs.
>> Now, is the the P320 is that a hammered
model?
>> Yes.
>> Okay. So, it's not a striker fire.
>> No, wait a minute. No, no, it is a
striker fire. It's Let's Well, let's
let's pull Let's pull Let's pull it up
cuz I'm not I know the 365 is built very
differently. The the 320 breaks cleaner,
>> but
>> I thought the 320 had a hammer was
double action and single action. And
then I I
>> You might be right.
>> I didn't think it was a striker fire.
Most of the P models are not striker
fires that I'm aware of. I could be
wrong.
>> Well, the 365 the P365 is definitely
different than the 320. Yeah,
>> they have a different striking
mechanisms. They're known for accidental
discharges.
>> Okay. Um I can't tell if that's a hammer
underneath the slide.
>> Well, let's um just just What is this?
What is the trigger mechanism of a Sig
P320? Put that in there. And what is it
that makes it prone to accidental
discharges? If you look up SIG P320
online in any search engine, accidental
discharge comes up very quickly.
>> Oh, it is striker fired. Yeah. Okay.
Okay.
>> So, it's a modular striker fire trigger
mechanism. Uh when pressed, trigger bar
moves forward, disengage the safety
lever in sear releasing the striker.
Okay. So, it's a striker fired pistols.
Okay. Got it.
>> So, as of uh 2017,
SIG changed the way they make their guns
because the trigger itself was heavier
than what it is now. And not just the
pull, but the actual mechanism of the
trigger was heavier if you drop it. So,
if uh this is the barrel of the gun
where the bullet comes out and this is
where you're holding on your hand, if
you drop it, it'll it'll discharge and
it'll discharge without rot without
moving the slide, which is kind of crazy
because what happens is something in the
dropping it on the back where the handle
is,
>> releases the disconnector probably.
>> It causes that heavier trigger, the
heavier weight to the trigger to drop
down and it will discharge.
>> Okay. Uh, as of 2017, they made the
trigger lighter and it doesn't do that
anymore. And there's a whole YouTube
video where this guy explains it and
shows that you can do it with the older
models. If you drop them, if you drop
them on their side, they don't do it. If
you drop them barrel first, they don't
do it. But if you drop them handle first
and it hits the the back where you hold
it, where the, you know, the the the
what is it called? The beaver tail gun
>> sits where the internal hammer f drops
and bang.
>> Exactly. And it's one of the only guns
that does that. Yeah.
>> And uh so much so that I believe you
should search this. I believe the Dallas
Police Department stopped uh issuing
them to their officers. See if that's
true
before I go further because I don't I
don't want to get into any legal weeds
here. But I have one. I have a 320. I've
never had a problem with it. Uh I Here
it is. Dallas police suspends use of
pistol manufacturer. Okay. Yeah. And
it's because of that. So, um,
>> what are these chambered in? 940.
>> It's nine.
>> Nine.
>> They're nines. But the, um, so that's
the gun this guy has.
>> Mhm.
>> So, when this CBP officer grabs his gun,
he's moving off and it appears, it's
very grainy the video. It appears
there's an accidental discharge.
Now, you can make an accidental
discharge of this gun without touching
the trigger. If there's any kind of
pressure on the trigger, if it is a
modified trigger, if there's anything
that engages with it, even even a slight
amount and you move the slide
>> at all, that gun will go off. And
there's videos of it online. You could
find videos online. See if you can find
videos of it online where a guy shows
how you can get that gun to to negligent
discharge because it will. It will, at
least the pre 2017 model. Um,
>> I don't I didn't see his hand go on the
slide of the gun, though.
>> Yeah. Well, he's holding it in a It's
the hard thing is it's [ __ ]
>> Yeah, you can't see. I looked at it from
both angles, but it looked to me like he
was holding it um by the handle with no
finger on the trigger. But it does seem
>> like, at least in some of the takes that
I've seen, I may be wrong, but it seems
like that gun might have negligent
discharged. Now,
>> usually when someone's holding a gun and
there's a negligent discharge, it's
because they they pulled the trigger,
right?
>> Right.
>> So, in this case, let's I'm I mean, I'm
going to assume it for a second. So, the
gun drops on the side, striker fired.
Let's say it's I don't know what the
mechanism is. Well, let's say the
disconnector that makes the disconnector
go. The hammer drops, bam, hits the
primer, gun fires.
>> Gun fires, hits the ground. These guys
think they hear gun. These guys think
this guy might have a gun in the
scramble. They don't know. This is all
second high pressure. They opened fire
on him.
>> That's what I believe happened, you
know. So when people say, "Oh, they
straight up executed this guy.
>> Think you better. It there's a little
more nuance there.
>> There's more nuance to it. There's
chaos. There's the fog of chaos. You're
in the middle of this like very high
stress situation where you've already
pepper- sprrayed this guy. Now you're in
a physical scramble. Someone says he has
a gun. Gun goes off. Bang bang bang.
You're just shooting." Mhm.
>> I'm assuming this is just a lot of, you
know, a lot of guess,
>> but that's a lot of bad stuff that has
to happen in sequence. Like the the fact
even if this gun is recalled as a model
uh that had these issues, right? I'm
guessing that it wasn't every every one
of them that had the issues. Some of
them, right? Probably not all.
>> Um and if it's because it has to have a
lot of force for it to go off or the
slide has to be,
>> you know, you have to be moving the
slide or something like this. What I saw
was him holding the pistol, how you or I
would hold the pistol with the finger
off the trigger.
>> I did not actually see like what would
have caused that force.
>> This is where it gets weird. So, there
have been documented instance like the P
the the SIG P320.
There's a lot of legal stuff involved in
this. There's there's tons of cases.
Some of them are [ __ ] Like there
was one cop where they said the cop got
shot because the gun accidentally went
off and everybody's like, "Oh man, Sig's
in trouble." Turns out that cop had to
recant that and he accidentally hit the
trigger and shot a cop.
>> But he he want So this is one. So this
guy, his gun just goes off.
>> Now he doesn't have his finger on the
trigger. It just goes off. Now there's
another one where a cop is in the middle
of a precinct and he leans forward.
>> He's got the holster on the outside. He
leans forward and the gun goes off. He
does not have his hand on the trigger.
He's not touching the gun at all. See if
you can find the one where the cop does
it. So, there's a cop where he's in the
precinct. His gun is Now, here's the
question. Was there something touching
the trigger? Was it the holster bad? Was
there Was there debris in it? Was there
something? Was there was his his shirt
touching it? Did he Did he jam the gun
in the holster and maybe like his shirt
got stuck in it touched the trigger?
There's also the second gun theory.
>> And then he moves forward if the guy had
a second gun.
>> There's also the second gun theory. So,
I I understand what you're saying and
maybe it met all of the conditions for
that.
>> It does seem unlikely to me, but it's
possible um that he's just holding it
and it just happens to go off.
>> It would seem unlikely with any other
gun. So, if the guy had a Glock,
>> but both of these cases are from the
holster. This guy's grabbing from the
holster. He's grabbing from the holster.
Well, the cop had already pulled it out
of the holster and now he's holding it
>> and then it goes off,
>> right? But it's it's so low resolution,
it's hard to see what's going on with
his hands.
>> So, if there had been some funkiness
with the trigger, you know, who knows
where he got the gun, who knows whether
or not that gun had an aftermarket
trigger, who knows what's going on. But
as he's doing this, you're in the middle
of the chaos. You're ramped up with
adrenaline. Who knows if that guy
accidentally while he was holding it put
pressure on the slide and caused that
gun to negligent discharge. I don't
know. This is the speculation and the
reason why the speculation is so it's
it's it's this is something we're
talking about is because it's a Sig P320
and there's so many stories about that.
>> It's not outside the realm of
possibility. In other words,
>> right, which is the worst case scenario,
right? You got all this chaos and you
got that [ __ ] gun and that gun goes
off. Well, let me ask you this. Let's
say we we adjust for this.
>> There's an investigation. Turns out that
this 320 model was one of the ones that
uh you know was Yeah. or something like
this or it was issued after the fact and
it's brand it's newer. Let's just say
it's it's newer and they've gotten this
design flaw out of there. Let's just
assume for a second.
>> All those things being equal now, right?
When a leftist points at that and says
that's an execution, what what's your
opinion then? If it if it's the case
there is no there is no negligent
discharge, there is none of that. What
like how would you view it then?
>> Well, it's a extremely unfortunate case
of what happens during chaos.
>> Yeah, I agree.
>> I don't think it's an execution. I don't
think they pulled the gun from him and
then just shot him.
>> But that's rhetoric being used, right?
>> It is. But you know which you you're
automatically going to have if you have
a guy get shot. Um
do we can we watch a video? Let's watch
a video and see if we can discern when
the shot fires off cuz does it before or
after they say he's got a gun? Cuz
someone says he has a gun, one of the
officers removes the gun and then a shot
goes off.
>> Yeah. Now, there's another speculation
that the guy who shot him had a
negligent discharge. He didn't like
maybe he had his hand on the trigger and
he got a little amped up and it went off
and then he just [ __ ] fired into him,
kept going. That's possible, too. I not
exactly sure. It's there's a ton of
angles, ton of different cell phone
angles. None of them are really crystal
clear. And the thing that's interesting
about this is I'm even willing to kind
of grant it to the left just on
appearance alone for a second just for
the sake of uh of like logically taking
this to its conclusion. Let's say that
the cops were totally wrong on this.
They they messed the whole thing up.
They screwed it up. They it was a
negligent discharge from the officer
himself. It killed this guy. It was
totally unjustified.
Okay. But now what? Right. Is it is it
the case that we're gonna what stop
deporting illegal immigrants? We're
gonna stop uh you know that ICE is gonna
stop Border Patrol is going to stop
doing its job? IC is gonna stop doing
its job because of a single incident
even if all of the officers involved
were incorrect. Of course not. That's
ridiculous. Right. The thing about this
incident is it's being used as a
catalyst to now say they're the they're
the Gestapo just like they were trying
to do with Renee. They're the Gestapo.
They're here to to uh you know uh be the
jack booted thugs of the Trump
administration. That's being used now as
the new rallying cry and catalyst for
the and it's post hawk justification.
That's what makes me so angry about is
it's like no no no. You're out here
doing all of this long before anybody
was getting uh shot by ICE. Okay. You
were doing this long before there was
any supposed abuses by ICE. It seems
like they're the what they do is they
set up the reactions, right? They set up
the conditions, maximize the conditions
for horrible actions to happen. And then
when they do, they use those as the
justification for why they were ever out
there in the first place. And it's like,
what's going on here? That's that's what
bothers me.
>> Right? This is the quintessential
description of the color revolution. I
mean, that they're they're trying to
create chaos. And um is again, it's very
well funded and very well organized.
It's not as simple as this is an organic
protest that people are fired up because
ISIS is in their community. That's not
really what's going on
>> at all.
>> But I think there's a lot of good people
that are wrapped up in that that think
they're doing a good thing and they
really do think they're fighting fascism
because they exist in these bubbles and
they're they're
>> I believe them. Yeah,
>> I do believe them that they think that
they're fighting against fascism. And I
I've I've debated with enough of these
people on the what historically fascism
is in comparison to what they perceive
it as that I do think that they believe
that 100%.
>> It's I just think it's an unjustified
belief and I think it's uh it's
ridiculous, but
>> it's not accurate.
>> It's not accurate.
>> You know, one of the things that we went
over the other day um is we talked about
the deportations, right? and that
there's been somewhere in the
neighborhood of uh 2 million
deportations,
but 1.6 of them were like self
deportations. 1.6 of them were like
people were notified and they said,
"Well, just get the [ __ ] out of here. I
don't want to be in jail."
>> Yeah, good.
>> And then a half a million of them were
and then but people are saying very few
of them have have been violent
criminals. But we found out there was
like 8%.
>> This is just 8% of what we know has been
caught. That is a lot of violent
criminals. If you go to half a million
people and 8% of them are murderers and
rapists and they snuck in during not
even snuck in because they were allowed
access to the United States over the
last four years. Somewhere to the tune
of let's be like super charitable. Let's
say it's only 10 million cuz I think
it's a lot more and they don't a lot
more.
>> Yeah. They don't really know the number
because it's really the numbers that
they're giving are based on
interactions, right? But how many people
snuck through and they didn't have an
interaction with them? It's a lot, man.
It's a lot of people. And they did this
[ __ ] on purpose. And they did this [ __ ]
because they want more congressional
seats because the census doesn't count
citizens. It doesn't count legal
citizens. It just counts human beings.
So the more citizens you have in an
area, the more congressional seats you
have. And then there's places like
California that make it illegal to show
your ID. You're not allowed. Not only
are you not, which you should have to
show your [ __ ] ID when you vote,
right? So we know that you're legally
voting. They made it so you can't show
your ID, which is the only the only you
could steal man this to the end of time.
The only reason why you do that is
because you want to cheat. It's the only
reason.
>> Of course. Well, it's not just that. But
you make you make a good compelling
point here.
The idea, even if it was the case, let's
just say almost none of them are violent
criminals. Let's just give it to them
just kind of for the sake of argument
here. We'll give it to them. So what?
The people don't want them here. That's
it. You're these are supposed to be the
biggest believers in democracy and
republicanism ever. That's what they're
fighting against is the evil fascists.
It's like, well, here the people spoke.
Okay.
>> And the people said,
>> "We don't want illegal immigrants here.
We want them out of here. It doesn't
matter what the conditionals are for
violent criminality or not violent
criminality. the if you're really a big
believer in the republic like you claim,
why is it that when Trump gets elected
to do exactly this job, you impede it at
every turn?
>> Yeah, they don't want it to happen
because it was a part of the strategy
for you a uni party. I mean, this is
Elon came on and was,
>> you know, was very passionate about
wanting to explain this to people. I
mean, it's one of the reasons why he did
it before the election. Like you have to
understand the plan that's in place. And
what they're doing is they're trying to
make it so that no one but by the
Democrats can ever win ever again. And
one of the best ways to do that is ship
untold numbers of people to swing
states.
>> Yeah. Which is what they're doing.
>> It's what they did. They didn't just do
it. They flew them out there. They gave
them EBT cards. They put them on social
security. We had this woman, we
documented, we we talked about this
woman who uh worked for God, I forget
which department, but her job was to
turn these people from illegal
immigrants into what she described they
described to her as clients.
>> And so you would tell these people, are
you Yes. So her her question was to
them, do you have a permanent
disability? So do you have headaches?
Does your back hurt? I get headaches. My
back hurts. I guess I'm permanently
disabled. And all you have to do is like
you don't have to have like like clear
evidence. You have all your [ __ ]
discs are fused. You can't walk or you
have Yeah. No, you just have to have a
[ __ ] back hurt. Your back hurts.
Well, what [ __ ] man who's a laborer
who's uh 35 years old doesn't have
[ __ ] back pain like you all do. So
they come to you, they said, "You have
headaches and back pain."
>> What man is an office worker doesn't
have back pain? [laughter]
Exactly. [ __ ] everybody does. You get
older, you get back pain, especially if
you don't take care of your back. And so
these guys are are all being roped into
the system and then they get money. They
get social security money. They get
money from taxpayers in essentially
forever. So if you can get those people
to vote, they will most certainly vote
for the people that are giving them that
money, right? most certainly vote for
the people that are moving them into the
Roosevelt Hotel in New York.
>> Just like how Muslims will vote, even
though at the local level they oppose
all leftist policy, they'll vote at a
national level for leftists because they
bring in their family members. They
bring in they they allow the the
importation of people that they want
here.
>> So yeah, they're they they utilize the
system
>> for uh for the aims. And for Democrats,
this is all good. And of course, for
Republicans, it's all bad. And Elon's
right. It is he is right that Democrats
and here's what I see the bird's eye
view right Trump what they're going to
do Democrats going to win the midterms
by hook or by crook they're going to win
the midterms and when they do if they
have the power in the house to do this
they're going to impeach him day one and
we'll have now it'll be the thrice
impeached president right and they'll
obstruct him they'll obstruct his agenda
the entire step of the way under this
elongated impeachment and they'll just
run out the clock
>> you Yeah, let's just run it out.
>> It's It's all pretty [ __ ] crazy. It's
really crazy. Gads has a great u way to
describe this. He calls it suicidal
empathy. And you know, a lot of these
people that are on the left that are
self-described leftists, they're very
kind people. And they they want, you
know, everyone to have a chance to live
in America and be good people. and they
don't understand they're being used as
pawns by much more cynical people that
are just trying to get total control.
And if you want to know what total
control looks like and what kind of
restrictions could be imposed on a
western society, look no further than
the UK. Look what's going on in in
England right now. 12,000 people have
been arrested so far last year for uh in
the last year rather for social media
posts. just social media post
criticizing immigration. Um there was
some new thing that they uh just passed
that makes it so that you're supposed to
tell on people who are talking in pubs
who are having conversations in pubs
that you think are dangerous
conversations.
>> There was that woman in the UK who was
said and then called the guy a name via
text.
>> Yes. She called him a [ __ ]
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah.
>> She called Yeah. He was sex she was
sexually assaulted. She called him a
[ __ ] and then she was arrested.
>> Yeah, she was arrested. I was and I
remember arguing on Pierce Morgan. I was
debating with a leftist on this. This
was the topic at the time.
>> Yeah.
>> And the leftist who looked at me like to
he was a [ __ ] too. Said uh he was
defending it tooth and nail, right? This
is a good thing because we want to get
rid of stigma. The idea is to try to
destigmatize the thing. You see, words
create stigma and stigma creates harm
values and harm values are evil. They're
bad. That's that's the whole moral
system. If it if we reduce harm, that's
moral. If we increase harm, that's
immoral.
>> So that it that's the zero sum way that
they look at this, right? If you're
increasing it bad. If you're decreasing
it good. So if we're decreasing
stigmatization of an activity that we
think is protected, then that's reducing
harm. Therefore, that's the moral
position.
>> Crazy.
>> They are crazy. That is actually a crazy
way to look at the world. Well, it's
very dystopian. It's it's very spooky
that it it's happening so quickly and
that the UK has become the the leader in
the world for arresting people for
social media posts. No one would have
ever saw that coming five, six years
ago. But this is what happens when you
get total control of a population. You
don't and you don't stop where you're
at. You continue to move forward. You
continue to try to get more and more
control. And this is this new thing
where they're trying to u uh get people
to turn people in for bar talk, which is
just crazy. It's just crazy. So that's
where it goes. If you're really a
liberal, a real liberal, a real
progressive person who really believes
in free speech, you should believe in
all speech. And you have to. I mean,
this was the ADL's position way back in
the day when they would allow the Ku
Klux Clan to march. They would say,
"Look,
>> and then fight for the right to do so."
>> Yes. I mean, this is what it used to be.
Yeah,
>> there used to be an understanding that
as complicated as this thing is, you've
got to allow people to say horrible
things so that you can counter them with
better points and you make a better
argument and that people see your side
and then society moves forward in a
generally possible
>> you know in the online dialectic the way
that it moves between group and I and I
think that now uh online influencers
podcasters political commentators
actually do have political they have
some political capital now which can be
spent the same way low-level polit
Politicians have political capital which
can now be spent. They actually are
connected often times with politicians
and operate as mouthpieces uh on behalf
of whatever that political arm is.
>> Well, you would say that about the right
too, wouldn't you?
>> Of course, but I don't see it as
prevalent as I do uh with the left. The
the left, for instance, there was a a
whole thing that used to go on on Twitch
where an organization came in and bought
up all the Twitch mouthpieces. Uh that's
what they did. And like this this is
this is something which has been going
on for a long time.
>> But what's interesting with the
political capital angle from these
leftists they don't care what the means
are. You see the the ends are what
that's all they care about, right? The
the means to get there totally
irrelevant to them. From their view
though, that makes a sick sort of sense.
They believe that they're fighting
against Nazis,
>> literal Nazis. Right.
>> So, if you believed that you were in a
war with literal Nazis, what wouldn't
you do to complete that war? What what
means wouldn't you go to, what means of
sabotage would you not do? What cars
would you not blow up? What cops would
you not eliminate in order to stop the
rise of the new Hitler?
>> Right.
>> And it's like, and they're they're
expending their political capital on
that message. And that message has a lot
of influence on people.
>> Yeah. It also
there there's so many people that are
getting attention by feeding into the
rhetoric. There's so many people that
are making viral clips of them
threatening you like menacing like these
weird dorky liberal guys like these guys
that you would think of pacifists are
literally calling for violence. I got
one of them because it's like the most
unlikely guy. Like you see this guy
doing this, you're like, "Hey buddy,
like who? What? What are you saying?
[laughter]
>> Who who who's following you into battle?
>> Yeah. Who's I'm gonna I'm gonna send you
because it's it's the way he says it too
is so like like he's watched too many
[ __ ] TV shows. Um this guy let's cuz
it's it's the terminology that he uses
that is it's actually kind of funny. If
it wasn't so scary. Put this on real
quick.
>> Sure. cuz it's so
[laughter] you see this guy's doughy
face and [snorts]
his understanding of real violence.
Listen to this.
>> When combat starts, we all roll
initiative.
I'm going to say that again. And anyone,
everyone knows what I'm talking about
when I say this. When combat starts, we
all roll initiative.
[laughter]
>> I mean, I hate to laugh. because it's
kind of [ __ ] serious because they're
they're they're inciting violence and
they're they're calling for
insurrection. They're calling for people
to, you know, take to the streets and
start violence. But that guy like what
what like
>> you're not going to roll initiative.
>> What does it even mean?
>> Well, I mean I think I think it just
means we all go,
>> right?
>> When violence start, we we all go.
>> Dungeons and Dragons reference.
>> Is it rolling? You're not going to roll.
>> Oh, [laughter] rolling.
>> No, no, no.
>> Wait a minute. It's
>> No. The tweet says Dungeons and Dragons
in it. I don't even know.
>> Oh god.
>> Says Dungeons and Dragons nerds means
business, I think.
>> Oh, so do a search on that. Does roll
initiative is that a part of Dungeons
and Dragons roll that? Cuz I only know
of Dungeons and Dragons from Strange.
>> So, does his does his AR do 2d6 damage?
It's [laughter] like,
>> but it's just the the menacing way that
he stares into the camera in combat.
>> Rolling for initiative determines the
turn order in combat. Each player and
monster rolls a 20-sided die and adds
their dexterity modifier. Oh god. But I
mean, this is what I'm saying. It's like
it's a lot of it is cosplay.
>> That does sound like he is saying
though, we all go there, right?
>> Yes. Yeah, it sounds like it's that's
what he's saying. And it's also
>> it gives meaning to people whose lives
do not have a lot of meaning, right?
Like all of a sudden you're a part of a
greater cause. You're you're a part of a
very important movement.
>> Yeah. You're stopping Nazis.
>> Yeah. You're stopping Nazis. And it's,
you know, relatively safe from the
comfort of your own home staring at your
phone on on TikTok.
>> Sure.
>> You know, and you get all excited about
it and you cheer. And these are the same
people that cheered when Charlie Kirk
got shot um for just talking like that
was fine, but this one is not good. You
know, it's it's it's all like it's very
[ __ ] up, man.
>> Well, and they're going to kill they'll
kill more commentators. They can get
away with it. Um, happily. I mean, part
of that whole signal chat that's
dangerous that people aren't talking
about. That's probably the mo most
dangerous aspect of it. It it and I
can't prove this, but it's been my
experience that left-wing communities
and leftwing groups, especially online
communities and online groups, really
pander to the mentally ill in a big way.
Really pander to them. And it's I think
that it's a form of weaponization. They
want to attract the extremely mentally
ill into these communities and it it
helps with actually what is
radicalization and they play on the fact
that they're mentally ill in order to do
this.
>> Well, this is Antifa, right? Like this
is [clears throat] this is why
>> it's not just Antifa. It goes beyond
that. Like if you go to some of these
Tik Tockers communities, you go to some
of the online political pundits
communities who are far left. Okay.
These people who are in there are Froot
Loops, man.
>> Yeah. They are lunatics and they're
pandered to. They're pandered to. Oh,
okay. You can't say this to them. That's
abbleist. You can't tell them this is
you're a weirdo because that's mean. You
can't. And not only they pander to, but
I think that that's the source of the
weapon. If it's the case that these
people don't care about death. They
don't care like, oh, the outcome's going
to be death. That guy shot at the uh the
ICE agents not too long ago, remember?
He was on top of the roof. He was
shooting across with I think a mouser
rifle and they they dusted him. and they
killed him or he shot himself. I don't
remember which.
>> When When was this?
>> This was a few months back.
>> I don't know about this one, I don't
think.
>> No, there was a guy. He was
>> Is this how callous have I've become?
>> Yeah. He was taking shots at uh I
believe it was ICE agents in front of
the ice facility.
>> Oh, that's right. That's right.
>> Yeah. He was using I believe he was
using like a mouser rifle or something.
>> Okay. Now I remember.
>> And early on with the Charlie Kirk
thing, they were actually making these
connections cuz he had used a a mouser
as well, right, to shoot Charlie Kirk.
That was the So people were making those
early connections. Wait, is this is this
a sequence of events? Does the mouser
mean something here? Does that
particular rifle have special meaning?
You know how people are online.
>> Yeah.
>> But anyway, uh the interesting thing is
like they don't care if they die.
>> They're they're dying martyrs. They
don't care.
>> And it's really easy to weaponize
mentally ill people that way because
they don't care. These are the same
people who have the high suicide rates
for a reason because they're already
mentally ill like the trunes and others
which many of them you find are
connected to trans people almost every
time.
>> Also SSRI.
>> Yep. And this is the other problem is
that how many of these people are on
these psychiatric medications that
violent ideiation is a part of the side
effects of these suicidal or excuse me
these psychiatric drugs. There's a a a
lot of people that have uh psychotic
thoughts when they get on some of these
different SSRIs and and different
psychiatric medications. So, you've got
people that are already [ __ ] up
mentally and then you've got them on
these medications that cause them to do
all kinds of crazy things.
>> And aren't women aren't women taking
much more in the way of SSRI eye pills
than men are? And who do we see is the
on the bullhorns and loudspeakers at
most of these events? It's women. Well,
particularly liberal women,
I'm sure you've se seen the statistics,
but I I lopsided save them because
they're kind of nutty.
>> Uh the which what's what's interesting
is the like the least mentally ill in
terms of numbers is conservative men.
Conservative men, I think it's like
>> cuz they're normal. [laughter] I think.
Okay. Young liberal women, 56%
report a mental health diagnosis. Young
moderate women uh 18 to 29 28%. Young
conservative women 27% only slightly
less. Um so for men
it is uh 34% of all liberal men. 34%. So
a third of all liberal men are mentally
ill. 22% of moderate men and 16% of
conservative men.
>> Yeah. But do you know what the lunatics
argue when you bring that up? The these
lunatics, they'll argue, "No, no, no.
>> The conservative men are just as
mentally ill. It's just undiagnosed
because there's a stigma in conservative
communities about going to get your
mental illness diagnosed." And I always
point out, and I think this is an
interesting way to point this out, like
maybe they're not going to get diagnosed
because they don't have a problem. Did
you ever think of that? It's possible.
It's possible it's undiagnosed because I
think that is accurate though that there
is a stigma about mental health and
therapy and things along those lines in
conservative I mean if you want to like
>> I agree but I also think that what
happens is um when you're when you're
talking especially about the voodoo that
is psychology and it is it is voodoo. I
have very little respect for psychology.
I don't even consider it science. I
consider that there's scientific methods
used for data gathering, but I don't
consider psychology a science at all.
>> And that's psychology. Psychiatry gets
even weirder because then you start
adding medication. You're not just
talking about therapy.
>> It's all voodoo to as far as I'm
concerned. I think that men often,
especially conservative men, get as much
out of uh, you know, their close
relationships with friends and family as
they would going to a psychologist. In
other words, just I think just having
somebody to talk to who's a close friend
who's intricately familiar with your
situation probably gives you more value
than going to a complete stranger who
has learned manipulation techniques.
That's what they learn essentially is
manipulation techniques. Uh I think
there's more value there. And so I think
that the stigma which exists there
doesn't exist because it's like you're
not manly, which is how they try to
frame it. I think the stigma exists
there because so many conservative men
go well I tried that [ __ ] and it was
nonsense. I tried it and it sucked. I
tried it and it was worth I I went to
marriage counseling, did nothing. Um,
sided with the wife, right? I went uh
for this issue, did nothing. Uh, but
when I went out and had some beers with
my friends, that actually helped relieve
some of these some of these issues.
>> I think the problem with that is there's
a lot of guys who don't have good
friends, you know, and you don't have
someone that you can count on,
unfortunately. You know, there's just
there's a lot of men out there that are
lost.
>> I agree. But I think that the
conservative men seem to like they have
closer longevity with friends than
progressive men do.
>> Yes. And they don't abandon them when
they change their opinions on things. Um
so here's a self-reported data um from
2022 survey analysis found that 51% of
conservatives report report excellent
mental health [clears throat]
>> compared to 20% of liberals.
>> That's a big difference.
>> Huge.
>> It's a giant difference.
>> I don't think stigma could account for
that.
>> No, it can't. It It's like It's not just
stigma. It's like it's also like like
what is what does it mean to be
conservative? Does it mean you know
taking account for your own actions,
discipline, hard work ethic? All those
things are actually good for your mental
health like like pulling yourself up and
getting back to work and doing things.
>> I think I think now and I think maybe it
always should have been framed this way.
I think now for to for the label of
conservative to apply, we really kind of
start with religious foundationalism.
>> Mhm. That's what is becoming fast
becoming the delineation,
>> right? Having a framework.
>> Having the framework, right? And the
religious framework is almost instantly
going to put you in that moving towards
that conservative camp almost every
single time.
>> And uh and I think I think that that's a
necessary component. Now, if we're
trying to make these political
delineations, it becomes tough. What's a
Republican or a neocon versus a
conservative versus a this versus that?
It comes down to foundationalism of
framework like you were just saying and
the framework of Christianity Christian
ethics huge delineation point between
the right and the left who rejects that
for harm principles utilitarianism and
various other uh sorts of frameworks.
>> Yeah. And they they'll also point to you
know [clears throat]
what Christianity has done throughout
history and the amount of harm that it's
caused. [gasps]
But it's kind of like every power
structure throughout history you could
point to in that way.
>> Well, it was what was there.
>> Yeah.
>> The thing is like the Catholic Church,
the Catholic Church gets a lot of [ __ ]
for this.
>> Well, look at all the horrible things
that the Catholic Church did. It's like,
well, the Catholic Church was the whole
known world once, right?
>> You know, all of Europe was the Catholic
Church, not, you know, like all of it
was. You can't have organizations which
span whole nations and countries um uh
ethnicities, cultures integrate
themselves into it and and not have
corruption. That I don't care what
system it is.
>> Pointing to it and saying it's because
they were Catholic. That's where it
becomes absurd. Right.
>> They were corrupt. There was corruption.
>> But because they're human, not because
they're Catholic.
>> Right. Right. Um one of the things that
I always try to point out to people,
they go, "Why do you go to church?" Like
because when I was younger, I was very
cynical about religion. And then I've
got older, I was one of the things that
I always say is if there was a pill that
could make you as nice as the people
that I go to church with, [laughter]
everybody would be on it.
>> Yeah.
>> They are the nicest [ __ ] people you
will ever encounter. When we leave the
church parking lot,
>> they're kind
and nice. They're they're all the above.
They're like very friendly, happy
people. But when you leave the church
parking lot or even when you're
entering,
they're the they everybody lets
everybody in. It's like no one rushes
ahead. It's like you go ahead and then
you go ahead. It's like the most
self-organized
mo most charitable way of exiting a
parking lot I've ever experienced in my
life. The opposite of a concert. You go
to a great concert, everybody's like
[ __ ] on everybody's bumper trying to
weasel in. People are honking. [ __ ] you.
In church, it's like one person goes and
another person goes. No, you go wave and
then everybody's fine and everybody's
happy. It's like if that was if you
could take a pill that could do that to
you. If therapy could do that to you, we
should all be on therapy. We should all
take that pill.
>> Philosophy can do that for you because
the phenomenon that you're talking about
is the me philosophy. And so what you're
you're going to church, it's not all
about you,
>> right?
>> And that's why you have those types of
interactions with people. Wait, I'm
going you go to a concert. That's for
you. Mhm.
>> That's for me, not for these strangers.
I'm going there because I want to be
entertained. That's for me. You go to
church,
>> it's not for you.
>> Right.
>> And the thing is is um
>> it's the it's the kind of material
materialism view, the materialistic view
of pure materialism reduces always to
me, me, me, me. Because what else can
there be, right? There's just me and m
the material I engage with. There's
nothing outside of that. So why engage
as though there's something outside of
that? That doesn't just lead to
nihilism, but it's the beginning stages
of understanding the distinction between
religious foundationalism and uh
basically everything else. The reduction
doesn't come down to me. And that's why
those interactions seem so much better
because they are because people are
thinking about you, right?
>> It's like what a concept. Imagine a
world where people think about somebody
besides themselves
>> and they think about they think about
everybody as a part of a community and a
collective community that you care about
that has value to you and they're you
know there's
>> and then you go why is the mental health
rate so much better in these
communities? It's like well isn't it
interesting how much they think about
other people than just themselves and
duties to those people instead of just
me me. They're the kindest people you
you're ever going to come across. Yeah.
And uh I think there's a lot of value in
that. And I think the people that are
cynical about that
>> because they don't want to believe in
fairy tales or they don't want to be
stupid. They don't want to get duped by
like like there's a a foundation to
that. If you just look, forget about
some of the stuff that's in the Bible
that you know, it gets weird when you
get old like you go back into the old
old stuff because like for sure human
beings had some sort of an influence on
what was written down and what wasn't
written down. But if you get to the
teachings of Christ, I can't find any
faults in it. Like it's all about being
kind. It's all about this this idea that
we're all in this together and that
you're supposed to lift each other up
and look after each other. There's no
faults in it. It's it's not like you
have to kill the non-believers. It's not
like you get to rape and pillage for the
non-believers and the infidels must die.
There's none of that. That's why the
that's why Christians believe in
objective truth that there must be
objective truth because otherwise why is
most of the world following this as
though it's objective truth. We seem to
be leaning towards this as though this
must be the thing which is objectively
real and objectively true and a thing
which we can point to that is because
when people are introduced to it like
you just said it's really hard and
difficult to find fault in it. It's not
just that. You know, it's interesting.
If we reverse it, if we say, "What could
I do that actually would be the best for
me me?" It would still be that.
>> Yeah.
>> Which is the funniest part of the whole
thing. It's like both ways. It works for
you if even if it's not all about you or
it works for you. Even if it is all
about you, it's still going to be the
better message out of the two.
>> It's it's definitely a better framework
for living your life. And um there's a
lot of people that just reject that that
are that think of themselves as
intelligent, you know, they think of
themselves as intelligent and well read
and educated and they just Yeah, I'm too
smart for that. Too smart for all that.
I'm an atheist.
>> Yeah.
>> Any atheist needs to take eight grams of
mushrooms. Just
>> do a little DMT.
>> Do a little DMT. And you're like, "Oh, I
don't know anything." You You think you
know things. You don't know a [ __ ]
thing. You just know what you've
experienced. And I think that this
the world is better off if people have a
great moral and ethical framework. I
think morals and ethics and being kind
is one of the most important values that
human beings can ever possess if you
want to live in a productive and healthy
community.
>> Completely agree. And uh I think that
kindness I make a delineation between
kindness and niceness
>> is I think it's often kind not to be
nice
>> but I do think that you can be nice and
it may not be kind
>> right
>> and so that's true.
>> So I make a delineation between those
things. I don't think that kindness
though has much variance.
>> Kindness is looking after the interest
of somebody who's not me
>> and it makes everybody it's it's
actually selfish because it makes you
feel good too.
>> Yeah. There's I mean there is something
you
>> could look at it that way.
>> Sure. from from the from the position of
trying to convince the unbeliever,
right? Appealing to their self-interest
may not be the worst idea, right? You
know, appealing to like, well, has the
lack of community and the like, let's
just assume for a second. Let's just
assume
>> it's all [ __ ] and it's all nonsense.
>> Every bit of it is just totally made up.
We just like we just made it up, right?
But we all acted as though it was true.
If it's the case that your whole
framework is that we just want a society
that really works well and does the best
it can possibly do for everyone, then
shouldn't you by your own framework just
pretend it's true,
>> right? Yeah.
>> Shouldn't you just act as though it's
true anyway?
>> Jordan Peterson had a very good point
about that.
>> Yeah.
>> About believing in God that if you
believe if you act as if God is real,
you will have a better life. Like it it
it works. It really does work. almost
like a universal truth.
>> Yeah. It's it's very fascinating. It's
fascinating that um people that are
self-p profofessed atheists and people
that think of themselves as too
intelligent for religion won't
acknowledge that. They don't want to
believe that. And so many of them that I
know that are self-professed atheists
are some of the most miserable people.
They're they're very depressed. A lot of
them are on psychiatric medications. A
lot of them are in therapy. A lot of
them are really [ __ ] up.
>> They're almost cursed. [laughter]
Almost seems like that, doesn't it? And
the thing, well, the thing is
interesting is like um I've talked with
a lot of atheists, debated with a lot of
atheists, especially on the effects of
Christianity in society against the
effects of atheism. And I know what pure
secular states have led to. That's what
communism was. That was a purely secular
state. Yes.
>> Where you really where you really wall
off the church from the state. But here
we pretend that it's secular and they
get all the benefits of it being quote
secular, but it's not secular at all.
Right?
>> Politicians are constantly voted in
based on the fact that they have an x
amount of value structure and that's
what they're going to implement
legislatively on you. The whole secular
thing totally made up. It's and and them
pretending that that's even even real or
has ever existed as a real framework in
the United States just nonsense. Not
only that, but I think there is a
natural default in the human mind to be
attracted to a structure. And uh if that
structure is a Christian structure,
you're attracted to all the Christian
values that we've just discussed being
so positive and beneficial to you. But
if you're not and you go to a leftist
progressive structure, leftists in
particular, um like a Marxist structure,
what you know what you're seeing is a
complete lack of forgiveness. They don't
have that built into the system. You
know, one of the one of the beautiful
things about Christianity is forgiveness
and the recognition that we're all
sinners and we all [ __ ] up and we're all
human and we're all flawed and that you
could you could move on and be better
and you can atone for these sins and you
could recognize that, you know, yes,
you've made a mistake, but here's the
best way to move forward and be a better
person. Society at whole recognizes that
you are me and I am you and we're all
kind of the same thing. We all [ __ ] up
and we're all we're we're all just human
beings. But there's a pathway. There's a
pathway to forgiveness. There's zero
pathway in this in in leftism. That's
that's the most horrible thing when you
watch these pylons online over like the
most innocuous
>> discretion. What's funny with leftists
is their pathway is just everything's
permitted.
>> Yeah.
>> And the pathway from the Christian is
no, not everything is permitted, but
almost everything can be forgiven.
>> Right. And that I would see is the big
distinction. It might there, you know,
there's a a story uh that I heard
because I'm Eastern Orthodox. That's um
that's what I follow. And uh I heard a
it was a great story my priest told me.
And so basically how this went is there
was monks uh they lived in a commune and
one monk uh liked to get drunk. That was
his big vice, right? And he drank a lot
of beer. And he did this clear up until
the day that he died. And when he died,
uh, everyone was crying. And a monk
said, "Well, you know, why why is
everyone crying?" You know, he held that
vice clear up till the day he died. And
the head of the of the the abbot who was
there, he said, "Yeah, but the last few
years, he cut it in half. [laughter]
He was on the path."
>> Yeah. He was well he's just saying I'm
going to recognize all the progress that
this man who had this horrible vice uh
did right there was still prog he was
still trying to move towards the virtue.
>> Yeah.
>> Now maybe he never got to it. But I'm
still going to recognize that he was
trying to and maybe he he was not able
to surmount it. He was not able to get
past his demons. Maybe he wasn't able to
overtake them all. But he was at least
attempting to.
>> Right. That's the thing.
>> That's the that's the thing. Well, it's
it's this idea of like someone being a
perfect person is just it's it's
nonsense. Doesn't exist. And so, if you
don't have a pathway to forgiveness and
if you don't if you don't have that
built into your society, you're always
going to have people pointing out the
people that are the bad people. And it's
going to keep moving in that direction.
And it's one of the things you see in
the left in particular, they eat their
own. And it it's drives me crazy when I
see that also from the right. I'm like,
you don't you see that the people that
you criticize are doing this and now
you're doing this? You guys are turning
on each other over the most innocuous
things and and forming tribes where
you're attacking each other even though
you have mostly shared values instead of
being charitable and recognizing that,
you know, these are just human beings
and they make mistakes.
>> Yeah.
>> But the left eats itself more than any
[ __ ] group that I've ever encountered
over almost nothing. and they love to
pile on because they're absolutely
terrified that it's going to come for
them. They're [ __ ] terrified and so
they will go out of their way to shame
and attack and to take some of the
energy away from them.
>> But do you think there's a unity in
that? Like if we were to if we were to
look at this again like from a bird's
eye view, I agree with you. The left
eats itself way more than the right
does. Though the right eats itself too,
right? And we've been seeing a lot of
that post Charlie Kirk's death. I though
I think that that was mostly power
vacuum based and who gets to fill the
power vacuum.
>> That's what I think.
>> I still think that it's it turned into a
dog eat dog for the power vacuum fight
and it was a criticism of values
foundationalism and all of that.
>> But from the left view, if you eat
>> if you're eating your own, right, and
you eat the message apart to the point
where you get down to the foundation and
now everybody's in lock and step, is
that better for political power or
worse? Like if you constantly are just
eating the wrong, nope, that message
isn't pure enough and they gobble them
up until you get the monster, right? Who
has the right message, they're all on
board. Is is that the better way to
achieve this kind of like political
paradigm that they want? That's my
question.
>> It's very naive. It's a It's a naive
perspective that eventually you're going
to boil it down to a purity and you're
not going to. It's not going to happen.
You're you're never going to get farleft
enough.
>> There'll always be something else to eat
them over on.
>> Yeah. Well, also you're advocating for
communism and advocating for communism
is so wild. And people there's no
examples of it ever being done right.
It's there's zero. Imagine advocating
for something that has zero success.
There's zero. None. Like you can It
doesn't exist. It does. It's never
happened. It's never been. Why? Well,
I'll tell you why. Because if everybody
has to share all the money, then who's
going to enforce that?
Who's going to do who who's going to
tell people that you have to give up
your house? Who's going to tell people
to give up [laughter] your life? The
state. The state.
>> And the state has guns.
>> Yeah. So, you're advocating for
violence. Well, you don't think you're
advocating for violence, but you are.
You're advocating for hard men with with
guns to enforce your will.
>> And those people are going to wind up
living in mansions and eating filet
minan and everybody else is going to be
eating oats and grl and uh that's
>> which is exactly what's always happened
when it's tried. And the thing the thing
is interesting too is there's other
there's other value set issues that are
really simple to point to like okay
nothing's worth anything like how do I
get my guitar
>> right it's nonsense
>> like just you know all the communist
nations were always setting their market
prices based on what capitalist would
markets would set for prices
>> and it's like how do I value a guitar if
it's if if if it's supposed to just be
mine in the commune and then yours also
and his also how do we set a value
assessment here. What makes the epohone
better than the
>> um another Sorry folks, we had a crash,
software crash. Another problem is this
idea of the equality of outcome that
everybody should get an equal amount.
That is crazy talk because we all know
that equality of effort does not exist.
There's a reason why there's outliers
and the reason why they're so compelling
and so inspirational. It's like this
[ __ ] guy got up at five o'clock in
the morning and ran every morning before
work and hustled and and ate the right
food and and [ __ ] did the right
things and was thinking and pushing and
was open-minded and and he became
radically successful.
>> But from each according to their
ability, Joe, [laughter]
>> but that No, it's it's not even
maximizing everyone's ability because
you're you're basically giving a safety
net for [ __ ] lazy people and that's
not good for them either. No, being
inspired by others success is a good
thing. It's a good thing. And the only
way that happens is if you let someone
be exceptional. And the only way you let
somebody be exceptional, you have to
incentivize them. What's the incentive?
The incentive is they get more value out
of their hard work. They get more money.
They get a nicer house. They get like
what are you going to do? You going to
decide that people have to like mate?
Like that women [laughter] don't find
this guy attractive, but that's not
fair. So that they have to be with this
guy and they have to find him attractive
or that you know a woman has to find
this man attractive even though he's
he's a a don'ty [ __ ] lazy loser. Like
this is the way of the world and
competition is a good thing for human
beings. It inspires us. It's good. It it
it lets you know that there's a higher
bar that can be achieved. And you often
used to know who the lazy people were
based on the living conditions they had.
Yes. Isn't that interesting? Just like
you would often know if there was an
ugly kid that their parents probably
were pretty ugly, right? Uh but it's
true, right? It is true. The the idea
here is like um people tend to bat in
dating in their league, at least men do,
right? Or try to, right? [laughter]
Uh women above their league. But the
thing is is the reason you commonly see
good-looking people with good-looking
people and ugly people with ugly people
is because that's about what you can
get.
>> Yeah. But it's the same thing when it
comes to ability and skill in whatever
it is that you're doing, right? Yes.
Hey, thing is is like often times if you
ask a person, my dad used to say this
all the time. He was right. If you ask a
person, are you where you're at based on
things that happened to you or because
of you? He said 98% of people will say
because of things that happened to me.
And then when you ask them about what
those things are, you'll find out that
it's because of them. you'll find out
it's because of choices they've made,
things that they've done. That's
actually what's responsible for the
conditions that they're in.
>> Oh, and by the way, for people that's
not the case, like trust fund kids are
the most miserable [ __ ] I have
ever met in my life.
>> And they lose it all anyway.
>> They a lot of them do, but so they a lot
of them are not fully formed human
beings. And the way I always describe
it, I I go, it's like if you give if you
make cement and you don't add all the
stuff in the right way, you can't fix it
later.
>> Right.
>> Right. So during the developmental
process, if you're [ __ ] Joffrey from
Game of Thrones, like what are the odds
that Joffrey is going to [ __ ] figure
it out and get his [ __ ] together and be
cool when he gets old?
>> You're just Dexter and that's it.
>> Exactly.
>> Right. You just like you have the
informed experience of the serial
killing and it's like there's just no
fixing you.
>> There's no fixing it.
>> Yeah. There's no fixing it. I get that.
I just the thing that's interesting is
like um when I look at the the communist
paradigm versus the capital, you know,
that's coming back. That paradigm is
coming back. And for a while it was kind
of shoved off as like that's boomer
[ __ ] you know? But the Cold War is
over, Grandpa, right? Cold War is over,
grandpa. There's no communist versus
capitalist versus that that's all. It's
like not it's not it's not done.
>> No, not at all.
>> It's not done. It's a story as old as
time and it keeps [ __ ] repeating
itself. And it's just weird that people
Well, I look, but also I believe in
social safety nets because I think that
there's a lot of people that are very
unfortunate and there's a lot of people
that do grow up with shitty parents or
parents that have a bad situation in
life. Maybe the father dies or the
mother dies and there's no like it's
good to be charitable and churches are
fantastic at that. It's one of the the
more pure charities that you're ever
going to find because their goal is
really just to help those people. Unlike
what what you think of as charities in
the modern sense, one of the grossest
[ __ ] things today is these enormous
charities that everybody thinks, "Oh,
I'm going to support this charity. It's
doing so much good."
>> 90% to the CEO.
>> Yeah, dude. I was watching this thing.
It was either li I think it was Live
Aid, you know, one of those uh one of
those concert things. What was Bono?
What was he involved in? Was it Live
Aid?
>> I don't remember. But Bono Bono I
remember his speech where he was like,
"Capitalism's done more to take people
out of poverty than anything else." I
thought that was funny.
>> It is funny.
>> Yeah. But uh I don't remember which one
he was involved in directly, but I know
what you're referencing. Well, Mike Benz
did this video today where he's
explaining how an enormous percentage of
that money went to regime change. Like,
it went to prop up went to prop up CIA
operations. Like, the [ __ ] money that
people donated so generously to the LA
fires. Do you ever see where all that
went?
>> Where?
>> It went to like a hundred different
nonprofits. Like some of it was like uh
uh pro-immigration
that uh was like we we we we talked
about it the other day. We had a whole
list of all the different things that
have been documented that that money Oh,
yeah. That's all. So very little money
is ever going to go to the actual people
that lost their house. Almost all the
money is going to go to these
nonprofits. All these nonprofits have
overhead. It goes to their employees. It
goes to the overhead costs. All these
people got bonuses.
million dollar went to bonuses.
>> Yeah, but that's same with the state.
>> But how crazy is that? You get a bonus
for running a [ __ ] charity. That's
crazy.
>> Huge bonuses.
>> Huge bonuses.
>> Like hundreds of thousands of dollars or
millions in bonuses.
>> And that's the homeless situation. This
is the other thing about the homeless
situation in California. Oh, we're going
to help the homeless. It's really
important to donate to the homeless.
Let's help the homeless. California
spent $24 billion on the homeless
problem. It got worse. Not only did it
get worse, they can't account for the
money. And when the politicians have
unanimously voted to try to do an audit
to see where the money goes, Gavin
Newsome has vetoed it. IT'S WILD. WELL,
isn't it counterintuitive? Anyway, if
you're in an area and you say, "Look,
we're going to be really good to the
homeless here. We're going to give them
a lot of money, a lot of entitlements.
We're going to really help them get on
their feet." If you were homeless in a
neighboring state, where would you go?
[laughter]
>> Yeah. Yeah, you move to the place with
awesome weather, they'll give you money
>> where they're going to give you money.
>> And so, you know, and they do they do
just that. And so, that's why these
budgets become very bloated, right?
People are like, "Wait a second. There
used to be three homeless guys over
there. Now there's a tent city. What the
hell is going on?"
>> And they all get free crack.
>> Yeah. Yeah. Or free needles in their
needle exchange or whatever it is.
>> Um, it gets worse and worse. The state
does the same thing. State is allocating
tons and tons of cash that it gets in
social security tax. It's not going to
social security. It's like these
entitlements and entitlement spending.
>> Well, when people found out that social
security is going to illegal immigrants
an enormous amount of it, they were
like, "Wait, wait, what?" And they
denied it. They denied it and then, you
know, they had to fess up to it and
whistleblowers and
>> Well, why would you have a payo system?
Why would you have a system where you're
like, "This is social safety net that
you're paying into for your retirement
that you have to pay into. Why wouldn't
that go in a lock box? Why would you
have a Well, because uh we want access
to that money right now." and we'll
we'll pay it out later. That's what
we'll do. We'll pay it out later.
>> Uh it's like what? Why wouldn't you why
wouldn't you have it?
>> It's like misappropriation.
>> Of course. It's it's it's w it's wild
that they're allowed to access the
social security funds that are for your
retirement. And then they're like,
"Well, we're going to defund social
security. So, we'll shut the whole
government down, right?" Uh because then
you won't get your social security
checks. We'll weaponize the entitlement
that should just be in a lock box.
>> Yeah. You know it's it's well we'll pass
funding for it. Funding for the thing
they already paid.
>> Well the idea also is that you are
supposed to be paying into it so that
you will get money when you retire. But
your return on investment is so bad.
>> That's terrible
>> in compared to what would happen if you
spent that exact same money and put it
in like a fund a reliable fund. You
would get so much more money when you
retire. Like an enormous amount. Now,
well, now I almost feel like it's
hamstringing because if if it was the
case that they let you keep, you could
just opt out, you know, I don't want
social security, I want to keep it, and
then you took that and you put it in
those hedge funds and retirement
accounts and things like this, you would
way maximize over what you get in social
security.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, so but you can't opt out even
though it's for you.
>> There's nothing the government does
good. Not a thing. Not a single thing.
So why would they be good at that? And
why would anybody support that? They're
just not good at it, especially when it
comes to money. There's always a bunch
of shenanigans that take place, you
know, and the idea that they would say,
"Oh, Social Security is sacred. This
this we're going to really treat we're
going to maximize your the amount of
investment and really take care of
people. We we really care about people."
>> Yeah. We care about them tons.
>> It's so naive. It's just It's so naive
and so obviously an ineffective and
possibly corrupt system.
>> Well, hasn't it become a weapon?
Entitlements are a weapon.
>> They're a political weapon.
>> Wow. It certainly helps. Yeah. And and
also again the suicidal empathy that Gad
Sad talks about. If you're on the left,
you think of it as being like you're an
empathetic person, a kind person. You
want people to have money when they
retire. You want people to have Medicaid
and you want people to have welfare and
you want people to have SNAP. Who was
the guy you brought up? Um I'm trying to
think of his name. It was like uh maybe
Professor Raft, something like that.
They brought up the Papa New Guinea
thing. Do you remember the Papa New
Guinea thing?
>> Yes, I do.
>> Yeah. So, on the that little island,
right, they have the Seol people and the
Seol people basically they molest young
boys. That's what they do, right?
>> Uh but apparently the young boys there,
they love it because it's a right of
manhood, right? And it's all socially
conditioned in. The thing is with
suicidal empathy that's really funny
here to point out to a left is from
their paradigm there's nothing wrong
with that actually
>> where's the harm right that's part of
the suicidal empathy of the part of the
ideology of suicidal empathy is like for
me from my worldview it's like I don't
care if you don't think there's harm in
that there is we're stopping it emperor
Andrew done that's that's done no more
that's not allowed I don't care if it's
relativistic or Not it's over, right?
>> Yeah. I mean, it it's crazy to try to
defend that culture. That culture is so
wild. The the seaman warriors of Papo
New.
>> Yeah. The seaman warriors of Papa. for
people who don't know. And let's let's
instead of just talking about this,
let's read this from an actual source so
we can explain because they call the the
the children when I think they're six.
The boys have to live with a man that
they refer to as the anal father. And
this guy and in order for them to grow
strong, they have to consume semen both
orally and anally. And so they get mouth
[ __ ] and [ __ ] by this guy and
then they continue that when they grow
up
>> as part of their warrior culture.
>> And what stopped it?
>> You know what's what ended up finally
stopping a lot of that.
>> It's not going on anymore.
>> It still is, but it a lot of it was
stopped depending on the tribe you were
in because of Christian missionaries.
>> Interesting.
>> Because of Christian missionaries. But
here's the thing that cracks me up,
right? And this whole culturally
relativistic nonsense harm principles
stuff. you're Christopher Columbus and
you show up and if culture is doing
that,
>> don't you put them to the sword,
>> right?
>> Like if you see the pyramids and they're
cutting people's hearts out like we're
holding it up to this to to the to raw
or whatever.
>> You're like, I'm supposed to feel bad
that they put you to the store. Like
it's really hard for me to feel bad
about that, right?
>> You know, it's really hard for me to be
upset about that. But with the seinal
people, same thing. It's like if you
went in there and you just used strong
armed force, this is why the libertarian
NAP and stuff like that I disagree with
cuz it's like if you went in there and
used strong armed force and just stopped
it immediately, so what? So what? How's
the world a worse place for this? How
is, you know, like and how is that not
ultimately stopping an egregious sinful
act uh that you can stop with ease,
>> right?
>> Like why not why not do that? Well, one
of the things uh I got really into uh
Aztecs recently and because I I did I
wasn't aware um that a lot of those
temples that they found You would think
that the people that build those
incredible pyramids and temples
>> No, they found them, didn't they?
>> Yeah. You would think they have to be an
incredibly sophisticated society. Well,
it turns out they didn't really build
them. They found them
>> and they referred to them as the place
where the gods were born. I didn't know
that. I I I was always told that they
built these incredible structures and
then the Spaniards came and they found
them and no when
>> no they were primitives who found who
found something that was extremely
advanced and then used it for their
primitive application.
>> Not just primitive but barbaric. Um when
they completed the consecration of the
temple of Tanochon they killed
somewhere between 20,000 on the low end
and 80,000 on the high end. They
sacrificed 20,000 to 80,000 people
within four days. In four days. And this
was documented by God, I forget his
name. Um
something Diaz. He was a Spanish
chronicler because this is before Cortez
came. They you know they they they
started like trying to figure out what's
going on over there. And one one of the
things that this guy came back he said
this place is [ __ ] crazy. like they
killed 80,000 people and a lot of people
have disputed that 80,000 people but
then they found so many bones that
they're like okay it's probably
somewhere north of 20,000 which is crazy
enough they sacrificed him in four
[ __ ] days
>> morality is relative
>> right was 4,000 maybe
>> what's that
>> as many as 4,000 was as max as they got
to
>> do bonesies [clears throat]
yeah the people that if even if they did
20,000 I think the number I think I saw
was four people or it was like four
people every minute you would have had
to do or was it was something that
almost impossible to accomplish. They
just said the number was probably
exaggerated a lot,
>> right? But they said that the No, I
think if you
>> I looked I looked somebody brought up
>> but I looked it up too. I looked it up
yesterday actually. I looked it up
yesterday and they were saying that that
this guy who was the guy that um
Okay, we can
I can I know I have it saved so I can
find it in here. Um
so this guy uh this Diaz guy
>> who's chronicling this
>> Yeah. who chronicled it in
>> how long before was this?
>> Really really soon. Okay. Like within a
couple of decades before Cortez
Yeah.
Um,
oh god, I'm trying to find it.
But it
>> this does say maybe I I'll just the the
perplexity of things said Spanish
sources claimed 80,400 victims in 1487,
>> right?
>> But modern estimates suggest 4,000 to
maybe 20,000,
>> right? So 20 Okay, they don't really
know. So 20 80,000 might be exaggerated
if you think about the number, but just
think about 20,000 people. Killing
20,000 people by cutting their hearts
out and throwing them down the steps of
the pyramid in 4 days. It's [ __ ]
crazy. So if you're the Spaniest,
the Spaniards, and you come here, you
don't feel bad about conquering those
[ __ ] You're like, "What are you guys
doing?" Or how about when they showed up
and they found the Mayans and they're
playing football with human heads.
>> Yeah.
>> Now, here's a funny one. They don't want
to believe that they played football
with human heads. So historians try to
say that they didn't play football with
human heads. Even though there's
artistic depictions of them playing
football with human heads, like no, that
was just symbolic. Well, did they
sacrifice humans? Yes, they did. But um
we think they played [laughter] football
with their heads. That would be rude.
>> It's that that whole myth of the noble
savage.
>> Exactly. And that whole myth of the
noble savage is something which is
utilized by the left in order to make
the claim that you are an imperialist
and an occupier and a person who yeah
you have colonized their land. And the
thing is is it's like
>> if that's what we colonized why do I
care? I ask this question all the time.
Why do I care if that's what I
colonized? If that's what my ancestors
colonized, why should I give a [ __ ]
about that?
>> Well, there's an amazing book about
Texas called Empire of the Summer Moon.
Uh, it's all about the Comanche. This
entire land used to be before Mexico
owned it. By the way, one of the funny
thing this lady said to me, you know,
uh, this all used to be Mexico. I'm
like, right. But do you know how for how
long? 15 years. Like, I've been here for
six. Like, you got to let that go.
That's not that long. 15 years. And by
the way, Mexico was only
>> and we had an Alamo over it. Okay.
>> Yeah. And by the way, Mexico was only
one when it owned Texas.
>> Mexico started
>> with it new constitution.
>> Yeah. Yeah.
>> Because then also you have the language
and the religion of your oppressors that
you're trying to say is this noble and
incredible culture that you're bringing
over to America.
>> And you're all Catholic.
>> And yeah, you're all Catholic. You all
speak Spanish. [laughter] They used to
have well first of all the people the
Native American people and the original
people and the Aztecs the Mayans the
Mexicans it's essentially the same kind
of people a lot of them are they look
the same was like if you look at sitting
bull looks like you could be working at
a takaria
>> my wife calls them the pygmy people
>> oh they're tiny little people
they have flat noses and they like yeah
they look like pygmy people
>> well the the the original people of
Mexico had or what the land of Mexico
had over a hundred languages. The Mayans
alone had 30 different languages.
They're all lost. Like these languages
are all lost. And we're supposed to
think it's noble that this amazing
culture that have the language and the
religion of their oppressors and they
want to mo move here with this language.
They're colonizing. They're trying to
colonize a place. You've been colonized.
You're trying to colonize. And here's
the thing about colonizing everybody.
Everybody that doesn't live in Africa,
somewhere in their ancestry, there was a
colonizer. Like if you go to Minnesota
and you see these Somali communities and
everyone's speaking Somali, they have
Somali businesses. What do you think
that is?
>> It's a colony, of course.
>> It's just not a big one. It just hasn't
taken over the entire country. And when
it does, you'll think it's great because
they're not white,
>> right? Well, they're not colonizers.
They're not col you see white
immigrants. They're immigrants. Yeah.
>> Right. White people are colonizers.
>> Yeah. White white people are the
colonizers. Everyone else is the
immigrant.
>> Nobody feels bad for Swedish chicks with
big tits that are moving to America. You
don't think that those are colonists.
>> Yeah. Don't care. Yeah.
>> Don't care. It's only It's only the
colon. It's only the colonization. Oh
man. Well, the thing is funny moving
back to the to the myth of the noble
savage thing. How weaponized that is
when so much of it isn't true. Like for
instance, you've heard of the two
spirits. Yes.
>> Right. That's that's all that's all
[ __ ] too. The whole two spirit
people all [ __ ] Came from like one
guy. I don't remember started with a B,
right? Um who like Bardetche or
something like this that they called
them, right? And it was one tribe of
people who who uh had some like weird
thing that they did. That was it.
>> Well, it's probably gay guys.
>> Yeah. The gay guys that like dressing up
like women.
>> Yeah. That's where the whole two spirit
thing came. And then suddenly it's like
no, the Native Americans had the two
spirit. It's like, no, no, no, no, no,
no, no, no. That is not the case at all.
You just made it up because then you
could throw it in with your Skittles
[ __ ]
>> Right.
>> So [laughter]
that's the rainbow.
>> Yeah. Throw it in with the Skittles
[ __ ]
>> The rainbow. Yeah. Well, the thing about
this area here before Mexico owned it,
it was Comancheria. Uh, it was owned by
the Comanche. But you know how they
owned it? Cuz they killed the [ __ ]
Apache. That's That's how Yeah. Well,
they were [ __ ] brutal. That's why
this Empire of the Summer Moon book is
so good because it just shows you how
unbelievably barbaric the Comanche were.
They were the baddest [ __ ]
around cuz they had figured out horse
raising. Um, and by the way, they only
got those from Yeah. from Europeans,
right?
>> Yeah. Which is crazy because horses
actually originated from North America.
>> I thought they were in Europe and
brought here in from Europe. Horses. No,
horses originated in North America and
then made their way to Asia and then
were wiped out in North America and then
reintroduced Spanish.
>> But the but the natives didn't have
access to them until Europeans brought
Okay, that's what I thought.
>> Their culture was so incredibly wild if
you think about it. Like you you you
know, you're talking about where you you
think about Europe and Asia. You've got
people riding horses and building cities
and you've got like agriculture and all
these things. And in North America, you
basically have stone age people. It's
really kind of crazy. Really kind of
fascinating. And then they get horses.
And the Comanches were the first ones to
really figure out horse breeding. They
figured out how, you know, how to
castrate their horses
>> and they became Mongols.
>> Yeah. They basically became Mongols.
>> Yeah. They became Mongols once they had
access to horses. Well, that was what
that was the whole distinction. Anyway,
if you reduce it all between the two
civilizations, Europeans had
domesticable animals, natives didn't,
>> right?
>> And because we had domesticable animals,
we had labor, we built these these
amazing societies and they didn't. Yeah.
>> Like the difference that a work ox and a
workhorse can make in labor is
astronomical.
>> Yeah.
>> And so, you know, like um that's that's
the real difference. Same thing with
disease. They're like, ah, you know, the
whites brought over all their disease.
It's like, well, all those came from
animals, small pox, all that got
immunity because we of animal husbandry.
They didn't have any immunity to any of
that.
>> Not only that, there's real evidence
that syphilis came from Native Americans
and then they brought that at least some
forms of syphilis and they brought that
syphilis back to Europe and then all the
Europeans started going crazy and
getting holes in [snorts] their head and
losing all their hair and that's where
the big wigs came from
>> and then eating mercury pills to cure
themselves. [laughter]
>> It's crazy what people used to believe.
>> Yeah. It's really kind of fascinating.
But the point is even the people that
lived in America before those settlers
came, those people came from somewhere
else. They came from Siberia. You know,
everyone's a colonizer. Everyone all
over the world. People, you start in
Africa million years ago or whatever it
is, and then people start slowly moving
away from the people that were kicking
their ass looking for a better place to
live. But isn't the whole thing from the
leftist paradigm just to create um or to
delegitimize
uh the fact that you can say what do you
mean my my grandpa was born here?
>> His grandpa was born here, right? He was
a colonizer.
>> I'm an American and I have a right to my
nation because by birth I have a
birthight to to the land that I'm on and
so do my fellow countrymen. And they
Nope. It's an attempt to delegitimize
that. Right. That's the whole point.
just to delegitimize your claim to your
own land.
>> Well, that's what we were talking about
earlier with lefts with leftists where
there's this purity test that no one can
ever pass because they'll always keep
pushing the boundaries further and
further. You're you're never going to be
there's there's no like real Americans.
Everyone who's white is a colonizer.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. It's just it's [ __ ] goofy and
it's just designed to point at someone
that someone is the bad person and this
is the reason why life sucks. and also
dismiss any of the terrible activities
that any of the other people participate
in because like oh they're they're just
oppressed. They're oppressed people so
they're lashing out.
>> Do you think what like if you had if you
again the bird's eye view what do you
think the left what do you think their
end goal is here?
>> I don't think they know. I don't think
their end goal their end goal is their
enemy is the the right and the right is
Nazis and fascists. They want to
eliminate the Nazis. In fact, they want
to roll initiative.
>> Roll initiative initiative, right?
>> Yeah. They want and they
>> 2d6 damage. It's happening.
>> And they think that once they get into
power, everything will be fine. But it's
not going to. And not only that, what
would be fascinating is if someone from
the left started behaving exactly like
the people that are on the right just
did it from a perspective of the left
where you would think, oh, this is okay.
And that's what we got during the Obama
administration. I sent you this thing,
Jamie, a little bit ago, the clip of
Obama talking about immigration. And by
the way, Obama do I and I was mistaken
on this. I thought that a lot of the
people that Obama deported were people
that were turned away at the border.
Uh-uh. That was a third. Most of the
people out of the I think it was 3
million over the course of his
presidency uh that were deported were
[ __ ] deported. Like arrested,
deported. A lot of people were killed.
Let's put on the headphones so we can
listen to the speech cuz this this
sounds very MAGA. Listen to this. There
are those [clears throat] in the
immigrants rights community
who have argued passionately
that we should simply provide those who
are illegally with legal status or
at least ignore the laws on the books
and put an end to deportation until
we have better laws. And often this
argument is framed in moral terms. Why
should we punish people who are just
trying to earn a living?
I recognize the sense of compassion that
drives this argument,
but I believe such an indiscriminate
approach would be both unwise and
unfair.
It would suggest to those tink thinking
about coming here illegally that there
will be no repercussions for such a
decision and this could lead to a surge
in more illegal immigration.
And it would also ignore the millions of
people around the world who are waiting
in line to come here legally.
Ultimately, our nation, like all
nations, has the right and obligation to
control its borders and set laws for
residency and citizenship.
And no matter how decent they are, no
matter their reasons, the 11 million who
broke these laws should be held
accountable.
That sounds so Republican. In 2010, that
was a Democrat saying that and everybody
was like, "Well, okay,
>> that's reasonable."
>> Yeah. And Tom Hman,
>> who is the head now, was the guy then
and he gave him a [ __ ] medal.
Find the clip of Hillary when she's
running in 2012 where Hillary is more
MAGA than Trump. The way she frames
things is so hardcore right-wing she
sounds to the right of Marjorie Taylor
Green. If you've never seen this, have
you seen this one?
>> I think so, but I'm going to look again.
>> Wonderful. It's wonderful because it
just shows you how much horseshit. By
the way, how good was he? He was such a
good spokesperson. like the way he
talked was so it was so measured and so
noble in the way he phrased his his
sentences like it was really it's really
interesting how much perception plays a
factor in what you think of as like
someone being a good president because
everybody on the left thinks of him as
being like the most amazing president
ever this isn't the one and he wasn't
>> it keeps coming up though what I'm
looking for
>> but this isn't the one the one is she's
giving a speech
>> so I thought I was looking for but I
didn't even type in what I was looking
for. I just typed in 2012 and that's the
thing that keeps
>> Maybe it's not 2012. It might have been
2008.
Don't don't do uh Hillary is more MAGA
than than Trump. See if you can find it.
It's I know it's on YouTube, but it's
this amazing campaign speech where you
got it.
>> This is 2008.
>> Is it 2008? Yeah, that's it. That's it.
Here it is. Listen to this. [laughter]
I love this one.
>> I think we got to have tough conditions.
Tell people to come out of the shadows.
If they've committed a crime, deport
them. No questions asked. They're gone.
If they
>> Cheers. Cheers from the Democrats.
>> If they've been working and are
law-abiding, we should say, "Here are
the conditions for you staying. You have
to pay a stiff fine because you came
here illegally. You have to pay back
taxes. And you have to try to learn
English. And you have to wait in line.
You going TO LEARN ENGLISH? EVERYBODY'S
CHEERING.
>> YEAH, they love it. [laughter] They love
it. And now
>> Trump Trump's a Nazi.
>> Yeah,
>> Trump's a Nazi.
>> That is more rightwing than Marjorie
Taylor Green.
>> Yeah. The the Democrats were I mean
there used to be labor unions that would
put pressure on them, right? Uh this was
a big thing. Like there was labor
unions. That was what the Democrats had.
Yes. And the labor unions did not want
uh the cheap labor to come in and
displace them from having their nice
little highwage jobs. And so it was all
about we got to deport the illegals.
Like but what did Bernie Sanders say?
Mass illegal immigration
>> is a right
>> is a right-wing Koch brothers uh
conspiracy to bring in cheap labor. And
he wasn't wrong.
>> Right.
>> Okay. He wasn't wrong. But the thing is
is it's like
>> what the hell are we fighting over here?
Well, we're fighting over the fact that
uh the the left is just trying to uiate
itself with power and they don't really
care about what the moral paradigm is.
As long as they can get their people in
power, they'll use anything as a
lynchpin issue.
>> That's right. That's right. It's all
about power. The whole thing is about
power and that's what people need to
truly understand. You're being played.
You're being played. You're being played
in Minneapolis. You're being played all
around the country. It's it's about
power. It's about them getting power.
And if you think that once they get
complete, if they did, they were
successful, they imported millions more
to all these swing states, they allow
them to vote, they completely rigged the
system, now it's only, you think that's
going to be good for everybody, you're
out of your [ __ ] mind.
>> Well, let me ask you this. Do you think
then that Christians knowing this, they
know that these are bids for power when
you have Christian nationalism on the
rise and Christians moving towards that?
Doesn't that seem like it's a rational
and reasonable thing to do for them to
want the mindset of if we're not in
power, they will be in power.
>> It's rational from their perspective for
sure. What people are terrified of is
that it would restrict the freedom of
religion and that you would impose
Christianity on the entire country, you
know, and I don't think you should
impose any kind of religion on any
people. I think people should be free.
I've never seen the I know that they
there are of course the the people who
push that there has to be an established
theocracy in order for Christian
nationalism to work, but the frameworks
that I've seen that have political
legitimacy don't seem to push for that
at all. They push instead that the ideas
that Christians should not be hamstrung
from the ideals of of holding power
itself. that that does not make you bad
or evil or awful. No matter what the
left says, Christian or how Christians
are supposed to act and that when you
are in power, you should rule with
Christian ethics in mind. That's how
you're supposed to pass policy, public,
you know, public uh public policy of all
kinds is through those ethical means.
>> That certainly sounds like
>> not, hey,
>> it's going to be a theocracy, right?
>> Um that doesn't seem like it's a a
necessary component.
>> No. Well, people are afraid of the
concept of a theocracy and I think that
people are afraid of just human nature
and that if people did get into power
that that's what it would become just
like these people are just trying to get
into power that they would use
Christianity as as a vehicle and they
would just use that as an ability to
control people. The the the real concern
is just human nature. Human beings when
they get into any position of power like
to keep it and expand it. It's like
that's what they do. You know, I I tell
jokes. I talk [ __ ] That's what I do. I
like to talk [ __ ] I like to tell more
jokes.
>> But there have been good kings, right?
>> There have been. But boy, good luck.
Good luck finding a benevolent dictator
to
>> Well, not anymore. I don't I don't think
you would have to use a utilize a
dictatorship. But if it's the case that
we can point to like there were people
who had a lot of power who fundamentally
were pretty good. What was it that
they're pointing to that made them good?
Like
>> is there something we can point society
towards that could make our leaders a
bit better? that can make our leadership
not hyperfocus on uh the nonsense of
like gay marriage and stuff like that
which is completely and totally
unimportant at the political level and
she didn't mean up to the federal
government anyway.
>> Yeah. And I think it's a political tool
too. you know, uh, Anna Paulina Luna was
on the podcast and she said something
that I really didn't consider about
certain political problems that exist in
this country that they don't want to
solve them
>> because they want to use them to finance
their campaigns. They want to run on
those principles. They want to run
>> to always be there.
>> It needs to always be there.
>> It needs to always be there as an issue.
And it's like uh
>> I feel I I think a lot of these can be
solved like if we if we were to have
>> politicians in mass and their supporters
in mass who followed Christian ethics. I
do think a lot of those sub issues get
solved very quickly
>> if it's true Christianity if they really
do follow the teachings of Jesus Christ.
But I think what people are really
worried about is like when people think
about Christians, they think about the
worstc case scenario of Christianity,
which is like evangelicals on television
that just try to get private jets.
>> But how is electing atheists better or
electing socialists better or electing
any of these people better? It can't be
better. Right.
>> Right. It's not better like if someone's
a complete sociopath, it doesn't have
any moral framework like a Gavin Newsome
type guy. Like that's that's even more
terrifying.
>> Yeah. So, it's like if if I'm going to
be ruled, can I at least be ruled by
people who have my ethics or
>> really [laughter] who really believe and
that they're trying to make the world a
better place and they're not just trying
to acquire wealth and and help their
donors acquire more wealth. It's spooky.
It's spooky because people that have
power, you know, it scares the [ __ ] out
of everybody else. And it should because
historically it's never been good. It's
almost always when people have power,
they want more power and they want to
also support the people that help them
acquire that power. And then they want
to make sure they got that power locked
down. So what's the best way to do that?
Well, you restrict people's ability to
express themselves. You restrict
people's ability to travel. You take
away as much money as possible, tax them
as highly as possible so they're always
in this like state of constantly
struggling to pay their bills. You keep
them completely no one's comfortable
ever. and then, you know, have this
problem that we have to solve. This is
why you have a problem. It's uh these
people.
>> Yeah. And we're the we're the solution.
The causers.
>> Yeah.
>> The causers are the solution.
>> Do you you know, one of the things that
I I mean, you you engage in so many
[ __ ] debates, man. I've I've watched
I've consumed a lot of your content
online and I always wonder like what
does that wear on you after a while?
>> Constantly. Oh, yeah. All the time. All
the time. Well, the thing is is that
[sighs] so I [snorts] I argue from a
worldview. My worldview is Christian
ethics and this is a foundation from
which all other arguments are starting
and ending. Now, I'm happy to meet
people in the middle. A lot of people
want to argue in the middle, right?
We're going to get past all the
foundational stuff and we're going to go
to the menu or the middle of the
argument and start there. And I'm kind
of happy to do that to kind of move the
move everything backwards or forward so
we can either get to the end or we can
get to the beginning and get this
figured out. Yes. What wears on me the
most about it is there's a lot of people
who I debate with who I know don't
believe what they're saying.
>> I know I know for sure and I there's
moments where I catch myself where I
recognize it right then that moment in
the debate and then I'll hammer them.
But it happens all the time where I'm
like, "You don't believe that [ __ ]
There's no way." And then they'll come
back with a, you know, with a re I do
and and and you could just tell it's
disingenuous. Yeah. Right. I can't
logically show it. I There's no way for
me to logically show necessarily your no
your motivation maybe in extreme
context, but
>> yeah, man. There's people who are pretty
disingenuous about their view and
there's times where it comes out and the
whole audience can see it and you can
see it and you're just like just why?
Just why are you like you don't even
believe the [ __ ] yourself and you're
you're propagating it on other people
and you know people will follow it. You
know there's some cash there. You know
there's a but you're doing it anyway.
You're doing it anyway. Like I've always
thought in my head you take a guy like
Destiny, right? The coomer gremlin as I
like to call him. Okay.
>> What do you call him? Cummer gremlin.
>> What's that mean?
>> Well, like cumor, like he just all he
does is he he bakes. He's like a sexual
degenerate, right?
>> Is that what a cummer is?
>> Yeah. Well, akumor it's a it's a little
more mild than that. Akumor is just like
um kind of one of the higher values is
just kind of having sex with everyone
right around like that's what you do,
right?
>> Yeah. Yeah. He did. Yeah. Well, he's all
kinds of sexual apparently. But the
thing is is like um [snorts] I've often
thought that there's times where I'm
talking to the guy where I'm like I you
don't believe that. Like you just
there's no [ __ ] way you believe that
[ __ ] You're making it up and I know
you're making it up. Right. And you'll
catch him at times. You'll be like
whatever I got to say to win the
argument.
>> Yeah.
>> And it's like yeah I believe that.
>> Yeah.
>> I believe that. But it's like there are
people who genuinely believe their view
and are excellent debaters.
uh backing their view and I love those
engagements. You know, I live for those
engagements. The problem is it's like
it's 5% of them,
>> right? A lot of people are just trying
to win, right?
>> Well, not just trying to win, but I
don't even have a problem with going
into a debate with a mindset of winning
it. If you're representing a view you
believe,
>> right?
>> You want to win the engagement, whether
it's a conversation or it's a debate,
you want to you want to win people over
to your side. You want to even win the
person you're talking to over to your
side. you know, or maybe sometimes you
got to be brutal and destroy the view
completely so people don't move towards
it. Both of those are completely I I
consider them both fine and I think
they're both effective, but the issue
that I have ultimately is when you're
arguing with somebody and you know they
don't believe what they're saying.
>> Yeah.
>> And yeah, that that wears on you. And uh
it's not just that, but sometimes you
hear the same recycled arguments over
and over and over and I'm like, you
don't even have to tell me anymore. I
can get to the end before you can.
[laughter] I can tell you exactly where
you're gonna go, what you're gonna say,
why you're gonna say it, what your
justification's going to be, and I can
just get to the end and take care of
this right now.
>> It's got to be weird. Like, how old are
you?
>> Uh, 42. Just turned 42.
>> Weird like in your late 30s, early 40s
to like have entered into this world.
>> Oh, yeah. Dude,
>> so bizarre. It is. It is beyond bizarre.
I mean to be like a normal
>> workingass guy doing
>> literal nobody from nowhere, no
political experience,
>> nothing. I had no no entryway, nobody in
entertainment, nobody to help me along,
nothing.
>> And so was it just seeing how ridiculous
people were being during the COVID
pandemic that like motivated you to be
vocal about all this stuff?
>> It Well, and I had time.
>> Yeah. You know, time's a big one. But
with the with the layoff, it's like, oh,
well, I don't really have a lot to do.
And I'm listening to this and it's like
now I can maybe I can engage a little.
Maybe I can get involved a little bit.
You know, not much. I didn't think I
didn't think anything would ever come of
it. You know what I mean? I just wanted
I saw my view wasn't being represented
very well.
>> But did you have a a history of
education? Like were you were you just
reading books? Like where did you
develop these ideas?
>> Yeah. Well, it wasn't just from books,
right? I would listen to long- form uh,
you know, historic podcast. Um, I would
[clears throat] more than anything I
would be listening to, you know, the the
mediums changed, but I would listen to
what people had to say on a a variety of
issues and I would watch the news
incessantly and I would be able to pick
out what's true and what's not true
after a while. Uh, political education
comes from a variety of sources. You
can't get it from the news and you can't
get it from listening to just podcasts
and you can't listen get it by just
talking to people. You have to take a
sum total of everything. All of it in
order to at least be even moderately
politically savvy and understand what's
going on in the world. And I realize
most people make commentary on things
they have no [ __ ] idea what they're
talking about.
>> Right. And so how did you transition to
doing this as a job?
>> Um well it's about two years in to uh
doing this. So, I was like, "Look, I sat
sat down with my wife and I said,
I'm not making enough money on my
podcast to quit my job. There's no way."
You know, or doing debates to quit my
job. There's no way. But I think I
could. I actually think I could if I
just focused my time on it now. I think
I could do it. Replace my income with
ease.
>> God, that's a big risk, right?
>> It was a huge risk
>> because you have a family.
>> Yeah, huge risk. And she said, "Okay."
>> Wow. gave me a kiss and uh next day I
went in and quit and I was like I don't
know what the [ __ ] I just did.
[laughter]
I you know it's um in some ways it was
like it it's like a I'm going to go be a
big football star to you screw you to
your boss, you know what I mean? And
it's like it wasn't the same exactly but
it was a big risk but I just thought you
know I really can make a go of this. If
I can focus my time and energy on this I
think I'll do really well at it. Well, I
think you have a very unique mind for it
and uh I think you're very good at it
and I also think you have really good
points that are very valuable for people
to hear and you're really good at
pointing out the logical fallacies and
pointing out the ridiculous thought
processes that a lot of these people
have. And I I you know that's important
man. It's it's important for society. I
probably don't think of it that way.
probably just enjoy doing it and feel
like it's but it's valuable
>> because there's not a lot of people that
are good at it.
>> I get hundreds of DMs weekly from people
and they'll say thing and th this again
I'll never get used to it but what I do
this is my process. I sit down every
morning uh I have a cup of coffee and I
just respond to every DM that's sent to
me.
>> Wow.
>> So um
>> I used to do that
>> for me. Yeah. You probably get too many,
right? Yeah, it's unto
>> I get I thought so too. I thought, well,
if I start getting hundreds every day,
there's just no way. But I still do it
every morning.
>> How much time does it take you? It
>> takes me hours about two hours.
>> Wow.
>> Two hours every morning. I'll sit down
and I'll go through them and I can't
send back long paragraphs, but usually
I'll read exactly what they say and even
I'll just say something like, "Thanks
for the support." Or, "You know, I
really appreciate you saying that. Uh,
that means a lot." You know, cuz it
does.
>> Yeah. To me, it's my privilege to have
fans. It's not uh their privilege to be
one.
>> And so, when I started to see that and I
started to see, wait, this actually does
have a massive effect on people. I also
began taking it very much more seriously
because I understood uh you I can also
say things that do the opposite. They
could move people towards the opposite
of things which are which are good. You
know what I mean? or things which are uh
things which you should be moving
towards and so you know I do take it
seriously and I understand my job is to
represent a worldview and when I go into
a debate that's exactly what I think
millions of people are going to see this
worldview on display I'm representing it
I need to do the best I can to represent
it well
>> to be an intelligent reasonable person
who's both well read and has very good
points that you can express about social
issues societal issues just
it has
it's a massive thing. It's it's a very
important thing that um you know
mainstream media is not doing a good job
of filling that role. It just doesn't
you know there's not a lot of people out
there I mean Christopher Hitchens is
dead. There's not a lot of people out
there that are really good at debating
against ridiculous people and exposing
this and and it's it's so important for
people to sit down and see something
like that and to to recognize like, oh,
I've heard people like that talk. Oh,
I've always wondered like that doesn't
make any sense. Why doesn't someone tell
that guy to shut the [ __ ] up? Why
doesn't someone got And you do that.
>> And that's my job.
>> That's your job.
>> My job is to go in specifically and say,
why don't you shut the [ __ ] up? Because
what you're saying what you're saying is
so detrimental to people, too.
>> Yeah.
>> And it it's nightmare fuel for him. Like
I mean, people hear this stuff, man.
Like I I remember this one guy, he DM'd
me and he was like, Andrew, I hate these
[ __ ] people. Like I hate them. He
said, "I'll listen to him, man." And I
just [ __ ] rage in my truck. I'm like,
"I [ __ ] hate these bastards." He's
like, "But I can't stop listening." He's
like, and it his mindset was, "I want to
know what the enemy is thinking." Right.
That's his mindset. Yeah.
>> And I think a lot of it is maybe that
particular guy's addicted to rage or
whatever, [snorts] whatever you want to
frame it. I don't think so. I think the
truth is is that when people are trying
to get to the bottom of things, they're
trying to be like, "Why is this
happening? Why is this going on? Why do
these people think the way they do?" And
then they start listening to them.
Sometimes it's way worse than you
thought. It's like, "You really believe
that [ __ ] You really think that that's
the case? You really think that we
should be doing anything like this? What
is wrong with you?"
>> Yeah. And I I think that for a lot of
people that could be a a very kind of
like jarring experience for them. And I
I think that that's healthy though. I
think that's healthy for you to be kind
of jarred out of complacency a little
bit.
>> Well, it's certainly healthy for other
people to watch it cuz certain people
lean in one direction or the other and
they're not really exactly sure how they
feel about things. And sometimes someone
who has bad ideas can be very compelling
with these bad ideas because they're not
being confronted by someone who's better
at it,
>> you know, and I think that's a very
important
>> or even as good.
>> Yeah.
>> You know, even even some if you just
draw a stalemate,
>> it's like sometimes even that's good
enough.
>> Um because it's like, you know, maybe I
was leaning towards this or I was
leaning towards that, but I'm not sure.
Again, sometimes that's the be the best
thing, right? May maybe you shouldn't be
too sure on this side or that side,
right?
>> Um, but you know, before you commit, at
least maybe I can stop you from making a
committal to this. Tons of people are
like, "Man, I was on the fence about
Christianity. I was on the fence about
Orthodox. I was on the fence about this.
I was on the fence about that. This
debate did it for me. Listening to what
these people had to say. This debate did
it for me. This debate did it for me."
you know, different fans have different
highlights that they like because
they're all coming from different walks
of life, but they're all very similar in
one aspect. Most of my audience are
married men, uh, you know, or
marriageable age, but, you know, late
20s, uh, through 30s, early 40s. That's
that's about the demographic, but mostly
like 32 to 45. And so these people, they
have some life experience. They're not
dummies. And they're listening to and
they're like, "It's about time someone
told that." Yeah,
>> you know, somebody let them know what
was going on. Somebody challenged those
ideas. Somebody buried them. And um
yeah, that's that's what I'm effective
at doing. And that's what I'm going to
keep doing because these people are and
the higher here's what I've learned. The
higher I go in confrontation with the
higher level people, the dumber they
get.
>> Really,
>> the dumber they get. Back in the old
Twitch Blood Sport days when it was 50
live viewers and me against two leftists
and we were slugging it out, they were
smarter. They were these were much
smarter people than the highlevel
academic like it took on these two
academics recently at Debatecon. Both of
them are Ivy League graduates, right? It
was nothing. I could have I could have
easily destroyed them while enjoying a
hot bowl of soup. It would not have like
it was just it was it was
inconsequential. Why do you think that
is?
>> I Well, I think it's because of there's
a degree of asskissing and there's a
degree of people around you affirming
over and over and over how [ __ ] great
you are. That's where that egotism comes
in where I was saying earlier in the
podcast, you have to be make sure you're
grounded. Make sure that your ego never
takes over. Make sure that you don't
become the thing that you hate. Right.
>> And it's so easy to do. But it's also I
think I think that as they go things
become more cerebral and academic rather
than applicable and those kind of old
debates that I was doing was people
living in it not external from it
>> and so they you know it did they had
real emotion behind it this wasn't just
a thing on a chalkboard
>> right
>> you know so uh and the other thing is I
think a lot of people get where they are
in media through connection
and not because of merit. I think a lot
of people who are in media and political
pundits have no [ __ ] business being
there at all. They're dumb as a box of
rocks and they're there because they had
connections or they had friends who
assisted them in getting in the position
they are. Uh and when they are actually
confronted on their views, they fall
apart.
>> They totally fall apart. I've seen
comedians comics who were on the road
for years do better in academic debates
than academics.
>> Yeah.
>> And I Well, how is this possible? Well,
it's possible because that guy has real
world experience. He's probably just as
well read as you had a lot of downtime,
right? So, he educated himself, but he
can do the thing you can't. He can apply
it. That guy had he has a way to apply
this knowledge in a in a framework that
works because he's part of the apparatus
of the world. And there was nobody there
where he was like he tugged on their
their shirt sleeve and said hey daddy or
hey you know Uncle Bucks or whoever you
know I want to be on Fox News and now
they have an in you know and I think a
lot of that in media happens. I think
it's very very a lot of nepotism there
and a lot of people just really got no
business being there at all.
>> Don Lemon
>> Don Lemon not just Don Lemon. I mean no
there's so many of them. I just like to
pick on him cuz he's picked on me.
>> Yeah.
>> Well, I don't know what Don Lemon's
doing picking on anybody. Like you would
you would same thing. You would destroy
Lemon while enjoying a hot bowl of soup.
It would just be nothing because Lemon's
biggest problem is he had never had any
business. He was he was a token.
Literally a token. He was the token gay
black guy.
>> He was not valued for his great insights
and wonderful political takes and the
fantastic way in which he broke down the
issues of our time. He was valued
because he was a gay dude who was black
who was like liberal talking points.
>> Yeah,
>> that's it.
>> Yeah, I agree. Hey, listen, man. I
enjoyed this. Let's do it again
sometime. Absolutely. And tell everybody
your show, The Crucible, where they
could find it.
>> Yeah, my show is The Crucible on
YouTube. Uh you can also make sure you
go and grab a copy of my wife's book,
Oult Feminism. It's fantastic. I brought
you a copy, Joe.
>> Cool.
>> And then uh I know you I know you love
feminists. That's why I brought that's
why I brought that copy. And then um you
can also catch me uh debate university.
It's a the thing that I've done for
years. It uh it'll teach you how to
debate. You can go check that out as
well. debateuniversity.com. I really
appreciate the time.
>> Hey, I appreciate you being here, man. I
think what you're doing is great. I
really do. I enjoy it.
>> Thanks.
>> All right. Bye, everybody.
[music]
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The podcast discusses various topics, including the nature of political discourse, the impact of social media, and societal issues. A significant portion of the conversation revolves around the perceived rise of left-wing ideology, its tactics, and its perceived negative impact on society. The speakers delve into topics such as the weaponization of social issues, the decline of traditional values, and the role of religion in public life. There's also a discussion about the effectiveness of different political ideologies and the importance of a moral and ethical framework for a functioning society. The conversation touches upon the nature of debate, the importance of intellectual honesty, and the challenges of navigating public discourse in the current political climate.
Videos recently processed by our community