HomeVideos

Why Your Partner Doesn't Support Your Dreams

Now Playing

Why Your Partner Doesn't Support Your Dreams

Transcript

445 segments

0:00

girlfriend said, "I'm a loser for taking

0:02

CS seriously." I was happy after my EC

0:04

League match today and my girlfriend

0:06

said, "Congrats, but that it's kind of a

0:07

loser stuff to take a video game so

0:09

seriously." I didn't really see it like

0:10

that. I only play 10 hours per week, so

0:13

I didn't think I could be a loser. My

0:14

team is one BO3 away from reaching EC

0:17

Advanced. I'm proud of us. But I guess

0:18

since it's still in the amateur level,

0:20

it's not so impressive. It's just a

0:21

hobby now. How to stop people thinking

0:23

you were a loser for taking the game

0:24

seriously when you win major. Should I

0:26

break up with her? And Lewig. really

0:29

love Lewig's opinions and takes on

0:31

things. I think he's a really thoughtful

0:32

person. In college, I became obsessed

0:34

with Smash. I wanted to go to

0:36

tournaments, commemorate, commentate

0:37

games, and make videos about it. My

0:39

girlfriend at the time thought it was

0:40

lame as hell, and we broke up shortly

0:42

after. There's a beauty in dedicating a

0:44

portion of your life to a delusional

0:45

dream, but you need people in your life

0:47

who will support you. I thought this was

0:48

great. Does playing video games make you

0:50

a loser? If you're dating someone who

0:52

thinks playing video games makes you a

0:53

loser, should you break up with them?

0:55

And there's this thing about delusional

0:57

dreams. Should you have dreams? Should

0:59

you have delusional dreams? What's the

1:02

difference between a dream and a

1:03

delusional dream? I love like all of the

1:06

things that this touches. So, first

1:08

let's start with this concept of loser.

1:10

Does playing a video game make you a

1:13

loser? My answer is it depends. How do

1:15

you know when it's a problem? So, here's

1:17

my take on it. If playing video games

1:19

prevents you from doing the things that

1:22

you should be doing, kind of makes you a

1:24

loser. Like that's kind of my like

1:26

general, you know, yard stick to measure

1:29

that. I think video games are a

1:31

perfectly acceptable hobby, recreation,

1:34

or career. Should you break up with

1:36

someone who thinks that you playing

1:39

video games makes you a manchild makes

1:41

you a loser? And I would also say sort

1:44

of. So, it's not that you have to break

1:46

up with them, but I want y'all to

1:47

understand what kind of person this is.

1:50

So when someone looks at a behavior that

1:54

you do, looks at one attribute of your

1:57

life and makes a broadcale judgment

2:01

based on that attribute. The question

2:03

that you want to ask yourself is, do you

2:06

want someone who judges you based on

2:09

their conditioning or do you want

2:11

someone who judges you based on their

2:14

experience with you? And generally

2:16

speaking, I think if you are in a

2:18

relationship with someone who judges you

2:20

based on the conditioning of the world,

2:23

that is going to be a suboptimal

2:24

relationship. It can be very harmonious

2:26

and works for people. Sometimes it's

2:28

mutual. I'm going to judge you for this.

2:29

You're going to judge me for this. We're

2:30

both conditioned. We like it. That can

2:32

actually work. Another good example of

2:34

this is like, you know, if you refuse to

2:36

date someone because they don't have a

2:39

physical object, like an iPhone, right?

2:41

I've seen these these cases of like,

2:42

yeah, like I refuse to date a guy or

2:45

girl who does not have an iPhone, which

2:46

is like fine. It's your prerogative to

2:48

date what you who you want. My point is,

2:50

what does that say about them? And if

2:52

your answer is anything beyond they

2:55

don't have an iPhone, that is

2:56

technically wrong, right? If you say,

2:58

"Oh, that means that they're not keeping

3:00

up with the time." Like, you can't make

3:01

that generalization. What are the

3:03

associations of owning an iPhone? You

3:05

know, I want to date someone who's a

3:06

doctor. And like even if you marry

3:08

someone who wants to date a doctor, that

3:09

may not end well for you. Are they is

3:12

that based on their conditioning or are

3:14

they treating you like a human being?

3:16

Are their responses to you based on the

3:18

whole plethora of individuality that you

3:21

are? And that doesn't mean that you have

3:23

to break up with them, but I want to be

3:25

clear that like you should be clear

3:27

about who you are dating and how they

3:30

look at you. And we all do this by the

3:32

way, right? Uh what's my example? Um I'm

3:35

such a little when it comes to

3:37

some of these things like there like

3:39

another example is Tesla, right? So like

3:41

people will make all kinds of

3:43

implications about someone if they own a

3:46

Tesla. If they own a Tesla that means

3:48

this. So it used to be if you own a

3:50

Tesla that means that you're pro-

3:52

environment and you're liberal and

3:53

things like that. Now if you own a Tesla

3:55

it means that you're maybe conservative

3:57

and you like Elon M. Like I'm not even

3:59

sure what it means, right? People will

4:00

make like all kinds of judgments on

4:03

people. I will do this too. I can't

4:04

think of anything right now. So, should

4:06

you break up with them? Like, I don't

4:07

think it's that simple. I think it's are

4:10

you willing to be in a relationship with

4:12

someone who takes one aspect of who you

4:14

are and generalizes it to mean all kinds

4:16

of other things. Generally speaking, the

4:18

more they do that, the harder it is for

4:19

you to have a healthy relationship

4:21

because they're not judging you based on

4:22

you. They're judging attributes of you

4:25

as proxies to other things. The other

4:27

thing that I think is really important

4:28

in a relationship is if you have people

4:30

who are flexible around their opinion of

4:33

you, then I think that's really good.

4:35

So, it's fine if they start this way,

4:37

but if you explain to them, look, I'm

4:38

taking care of all my stuff. I play for

4:40

10 hours a week. Like, you waste 10

4:42

hours plus a week browsing short form

4:45

content, I don't really think it's that

4:46

different, right? And if they kind of

4:47

push back on that or they're not willing

4:49

to be flexible on that, then I think

4:50

it's clear the main thing you need to

4:52

understand is who you're getting into a

4:53

relationship with. Because if they're

4:54

rigid around this, they're likely to be

4:56

rigid around other things. And I think

4:58

probably one of the best indicators of

5:01

long-term success in a relationship is

5:03

flexibility around your beliefs. Doesn't

5:05

mean that you don't can't have any.

5:08

Doesn't mean that you need to compromise

5:09

them all, but what is your capacity to

5:12

change? Loneliness is in an all-time

5:15

high. Sexlessness is at an all-time

5:17

high. Relationships are probably in the

5:19

worst state they've ever been in the

5:21

history of humanity. And that's why I

5:22

made Dr. K's [music] guide to love, sex,

5:24

and relationships. Let's talk about who

5:26

you should actually date. Falling in

5:28

love is sometimes one of the biggest

5:30

mistakes that you can make. You know, I

5:32

started to do a lot of research about

5:34

how to have like really good sex.

5:36

[music] Visit healthygamer.gg/guide

5:38

to learn more. Good luck out there,

5:40

mother. Y'all are going to need it.

5:43

My instinct is that the number one

5:45

reason why people are not willing to

5:48

commit to a relationship is because they

5:51

perceive a lack of ability to change in

5:55

their partner. So if someone

5:56

demonstrates that they're not capable of

5:58

change, then what you marry is what you

6:01

get. And then you can't marry them until

6:04

they are what you need and what you

6:05

want. So I want you all to think about

6:07

this, right? So it's like if you are in

6:09

a relationship with someone who is

6:11

willing to adapt to circumstances, then

6:13

they don't need to be perfect now. They

6:15

will change over time. And so

6:16

willingness to change for the sake of

6:18

your relationship, I think, is one of

6:19

the strongest positive indicators of who

6:22

to have a healthy relationship with. And

6:24

the really scary thing is this runs

6:26

contrary to a lot of what social media

6:28

will tell us. Social media will tell us,

6:31

don't compromise for another

6:33

human being, especially not a romantic

6:36

partner. If you want to do this, you do

6:38

it. If you want to play video games for

6:40

40 hours a day, who cares if you have a

6:43

newborn at home, you speak your truth.

6:45

If you want to move to New York City,

6:46

when you've got a 12-year-old and an

6:48

8-year-old at home to pursue your acting

6:50

career because in middle age when you

6:52

gave up your career and you had two

6:54

kids, if this is speaking your truth and

6:56

finding your truth and going on your

6:58

soul journey, you go for it. How dare

7:00

you let your husband restrain you? Oh my

7:03

god, everything is so patriarchal,

7:05

right? We're getting fed this. If a

7:07

don't do XYZ, then you dump her

7:09

and you move on. Here's how you find

7:11

women that are malleable. Here's how you

7:13

manipulate women so that you never have

7:15

to change. Toxic examples all over the

7:18

place. So, should you break up with

7:20

them? I don't know. That's for you to

7:22

decide. But be clear about their

7:23

rigidity. Be clear about what's going

7:25

on, how they inter how they perceive

7:27

you, how they judge you. And then

7:28

there's this issue of delusional dreams,

7:30

which I'm a huge fan of. So first thing

7:32

is what's the difference between a

7:33

delusional dream and a dream capability

7:36

right? So there are a lot of dreams that

7:38

I think are delusional that I think you

7:40

should absolutely pursue but get better

7:43

to the point where they're no longer

7:45

delusional. Don't give them up because

7:47

they're delusional. Run towards them,

7:49

not away from them. A lot of people will

7:51

tell you, "Oh, this is unachievable.

7:52

Don't do it. Terrible idea." I think you

7:55

should go for it. I think pursuing

7:57

delusional dreams is one of the best

7:59

things that you can do. Now, sometimes

8:00

it's really dumb, right? Sometimes

8:02

they're truly impossible. So, if your

8:04

dream is to like I don't even know what

8:05

go to Saturn, like maybe that's

8:07

delusional, but even then it's not clear

8:09

to me that you shouldn't pursue it. The

8:11

pursuit of delusional dreams is what's

8:13

responsible for the advancement of

8:14

humanity. Humanity advances because one

8:17

person looked at something that had been

8:19

impossible and said, "I'm going to do

8:21

that thing even though it's impossible."

8:24

And then they worked towards that thing.

8:27

They may not have done that thing, but

8:28

then someone else came along and then at

8:29

some point we started continually doing

8:31

the impossible. My favorite example of

8:33

this is transplant medicine. Some insane

8:36

doctor was like, "Oh my god, this heart

8:38

ain't working anymore. You know what I'm

8:39

going to do? I'm going to cut out a

8:41

heart from this other creature and I'm

8:44

going to stick it in this creature and

8:46

I'm going to hook up all the tubes and

8:47

I'm going to cross my fingers." Like,

8:49

how insane is that? We're going to

8:51

remove a body part from another person.

8:52

People are trying head transplants, by

8:53

the way. I don't know if you guys know

8:54

this. trying just full transplant of the

8:56

neck and the brain and the head onto a

8:59

body which is wild. It's like then are

9:00

you transplanting the whole body or you

9:02

transplanting the head? But I think

9:03

often times we underestimate the value

9:07

from pursuing a a delusional dream. It's

9:10

not about accomplishing the dream

9:11

necessarily, right? So I had dreams to

9:14

become an enlightened human being and I

9:16

was going to chase enlightenment. So I

9:18

strove to become a monk. That ended

9:20

terribly. One day I got laid, game over.

9:23

Am I mad or upset that I pursued that

9:26

dream? Hell no. You know, I I don't know

9:29

if I agree that the journey is more

9:31

important than the the destination. But

9:33

man, we grossly underestimate the value

9:37

of the journey. And Lwig became obsessed

9:40

with Smash and he tried to make it work.

9:42

Didn't really work. But there is no

9:43

doubt in my mind that in the pursuit of

9:46

that dream, he learned many of the

9:49

things that make him an exceptional

9:51

content creator today. The Smash

9:53

community is filled with love and

9:55

passion and arguably a game maker who is

9:59

like not even supportive and actually

10:01

anti- community in a lot of ways. So

10:04

like the grit and resilience that that

10:07

community needs to thrive. They really

10:10

pull things together with duct tape and

10:12

thread. It's amazing. Such a tight-knit

10:15

community. I still remember interviewing

10:17

Bobby Scar because I wasn't too familiar

10:18

with Smash community. Now I'm getting

10:20

into Smash because I play with my kids,

10:21

which is great. Actually, cool

10:23

milestone. About a year ago, I could 1v2

10:26

them and kind of dumpster them. Um, I

10:28

tried 1v2ing them like two or three days

10:30

ago and just got absolutely edgeguarded

10:34

out of my mind. Like one of them would

10:36

attack me, right, and I would hit and

10:37

we'd trade and I kind of get knocked off

10:40

and then the other one like a

10:41

wolf would be just waiting to pounce.

10:43

And the problem with like I don't know

10:45

if this is possible. I'm really curious

10:46

about this, but if you're really good at

10:48

Smash and you're 1v2, is it possible to

10:52

escape edgeguarding? Because the cool

10:54

down of like one person who like the

10:56

cool down seemed I I would get owned

10:58

like if I got knocked off the ledge

11:00

once, they would be waiting like hyenas

11:03

at the edge of a watering hole for me to

11:06

come out. I got basically I mean I I

11:08

didn't I think maybe I knocked one of

11:09

them out once, but once I hit the edge,

11:11

it's like game over. So I think this is

11:13

where we we underestimate the value of a

11:16

failed dream. So you should go for it. I

11:19

think it's great. You need people in

11:21

life who will support you. I think

11:22

that's absolutely true. And I think the

11:25

trickiest thing here is understanding

11:29

when someone does not want you to pursue

11:31

your dreams but is supportive. So just

11:33

because you want someone who will

11:35

support you does not mean that they need

11:37

to be in favor of your dreams, right?

11:39

And this I think is also another like

11:41

black and white kind of thing. Oh my

11:42

god, if this person does not support my

11:44

dreams, I want to do this thing. My

11:45

partner is not supportive. them.

11:47

And this I think comes down to one word

11:49

which is enough. I think the right way

11:51

to do this as a partner is to give them

11:53

a fair shot. Support them, encourage

11:55

them, let them go for it. And also at

11:58

some point I think it's okay to say

12:00

enough. Hey, you've been trying to go

12:02

pro and smash for eight years. There's

12:04

no income there. Enough, man. Like move

12:06

on. Find something else, right? Right.

12:08

And I I think that's what's really hard

12:10

is you can have a partner partner who is

12:12

supportive of you without being

12:15

supportive of your behaviors. And then I

12:17

think if you're in the position of being

12:19

that partner, the scariest thing is I

12:20

don't want to give you all license to

12:22

say, "Oh my god, I'm so tired of this

12:23

thing. Enough is enough." It's not about

12:24

how you feel. If you're frustrated by

12:27

that's not the right compass, that's not

12:28

being a supportive partner. It's looking

12:30

at them. What is happening to their

12:32

efforts? Are their efforts being

12:34

squandered? Are they sweating day and

12:37

night to get nothing? Is their life

12:41

better off if they separate if they

12:43

decide to move on from this thing?

12:46

Right? You should a supportive partner

12:48

thinks about you, not themselves, not

12:50

their own frustration. So, if I've got a

12:51

young kid at home, oddly enough, the

12:54

thing to think about, I think this is

12:56

different because there's a child's

12:57

needs that need that trump, in my

12:59

opinion, the parents needs. That's an

13:01

important distinction. But I still think

13:02

like the right attitude is sure this is

13:04

what's important for the kid, but also

13:06

like you playing 40 hours of WoW a week

13:09

is not actually as good for you in life

13:12

as you spending 40 hours a kid with your

13:15

40 hours a week with your kid. And then

13:16

there's some debate over that, I think,

13:18

which is fair, right? So, how many hours

13:20

is okay if you have a a parent who gets

13:24

to relax some? Are they a better parent

13:25

when they spend time with their kids?

13:27

There's a lot of nuance and detail

13:28

there. But I I would strongly encourage

13:30

y'all. I mean, this too was like sort of

13:32

a dream, except it really wasn't. It was

13:34

not like something I set out to do. Last

13:36

thing to explain and also to give y'all

13:39

a tip. If you do have a delusional

13:41

dream, if it requires telling other

13:44

people, you should tell other people.

13:45

But if it doesn't require telling other

13:46

people, keep it secret. I'm going to

13:49

give you all a psychological, cognitive,

13:51

and scientific reason, and I'm going to

13:52

give you all a spiritual reason. Freud

13:55

made an interesting discovery. Words are

13:57

a substitute for action. If a patient

14:00

has homicidal ideiation, sharing that

14:02

with a therapist usually reduces their

14:05

homicidal ideiation. Talking about

14:08

things helps you remove some of them

14:11

from you, the drive for it. We use that

14:14

in therapy all the time. Second bit

14:16

about this is that there are people who

14:18

talk about what they're going to do and

14:20

people who do things. Sometimes they're

14:22

talkers and sometimes they're doers.

14:24

Sometimes there's both. It's not

14:26

mutually exclusive, but there is

14:27

evidence that speaking about something

14:31

activates your reward circuitry in some

14:35

small way. And then we get into a

14:37

problem which is what we're rewarding is

14:40

speaking about something. And then the

14:42

behavior that we are reinforcing is

14:44

speaking about something instead of

14:46

doing the actual thing. The other thing

14:48

from a spiritual perspective is when

14:50

something gets externalized, it is no

14:54

longer within you. also true of things

14:55

like trauma. So when we have traumatic

14:57

thoughts, feelings, memories in here,

15:00

when we vent the trauma, it is no longer

15:02

in here. When it stays in here, it

15:05

compounds. So I talk about this I think

15:08

in in Dr. K's guide to meditation. One

15:10

of the key things is this is why we keep

15:12

mantra secret. The more secret your

15:14

mantra is, if you don't share it with

15:15

anyone, the power of it compounds. So if

15:18

you have a delusional dream, I'd say be

15:20

hungry for it. Chase it. work on your

15:22

capabilities so that it is no longer

15:24

delusional. And in the words of Gandalf,

15:26

keep it secret, keep it safe.

Interactive Summary

The video addresses the common issue of partners judging hobbies, particularly video games, by exploring whether serious engagement in gaming makes one a "loser." It argues that playing games is only problematic if it prevents essential life tasks. The speaker then delves into relationship dynamics, advising that partners should judge based on personal experience rather than societal conditioning, and highlights the importance of flexibility over rigidity for long-term success. Furthermore, the video strongly encourages the pursuit of "delusional dreams," asserting that these aspirations, even if seemingly impossible, drive human progress and that the journey itself offers profound value. A key piece of advice given is to keep personal, delusional dreams secret when possible, as externalizing them can diminish the drive to achieve them, both psychologically and spiritually.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts